CN115269402B - Test data matching method, device, computer equipment and storage medium - Google Patents
Test data matching method, device, computer equipment and storage medium Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN115269402B CN115269402B CN202210872363.9A CN202210872363A CN115269402B CN 115269402 B CN115269402 B CN 115269402B CN 202210872363 A CN202210872363 A CN 202210872363A CN 115269402 B CN115269402 B CN 115269402B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- test
- data
- test data
- response level
- constraint
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/3684—Test management for test design, e.g. generating new test cases
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/368—Test management for test version control, e.g. updating test cases to a new software version
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
Abstract
The application discloses a test data matching method, a device, computer equipment and a storage medium, which relate to the field of software testing, wherein the method comprises the following steps: extracting an interaction control of the test page and attribute items of the interaction control; acquiring constraint conditions associated with the attribute items; searching test data matched with the interactive control in a test database based on the attribute items and constraint conditions; obtaining the response level of the test data; and generating a use case data set of the test page according to the test data and the response level. The application can simultaneously improve the efficiency and quality of software testing.
Description
Technical Field
The present application relates to the field of software testing, and in particular, to a method and apparatus for matching test data, a computer device, and a storage medium.
Background
With the high speed of the software industry, the iteration speed of the system version is increased, and the rapid software test is particularly important. The important precondition of software testing is the design of test cases, and the design of test cases is the design of case data. The use case design response is slow, the design is incomplete or the test data is not considered fully, and the quality hidden trouble is brought to the test delivery. In the actual test execution, the design ability of the testers is good, and the testers are easy to become bottlenecks of quick test implementation and test delivery quality.
Disclosure of Invention
Based on the foregoing, it is necessary to provide a test data matching method, device, computer equipment and storage medium, so as to improve the efficiency and quality of software testing.
A test data matching method, comprising:
extracting an interaction control of a test page and an attribute item of the interaction control;
acquiring constraint conditions associated with the attribute items;
searching test data matched with the interaction control in a test database based on the attribute items and the constraint conditions; obtaining the response level of the test data;
and generating a use case data set of the test page according to the test data and the response level.
A test data matching device, comprising:
the extraction module is used for extracting the interaction control of the test page and attribute items of the interaction control;
the constraint condition acquisition module is used for acquiring constraint conditions associated with the attribute items;
the matching data module is used for searching test data matched with the interaction control in a test database based on the attribute items and the constraint conditions; obtaining the response level of the test data;
and the case data generating module is used for generating a case data set of the test page according to the test data and the response level.
A computer device comprising a memory, a processor and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, the processor implementing the above test data matching method when executing the computer program.
A computer readable storage medium storing a computer program which when executed by a processor implements the test data matching method described above.
According to the test data matching method, the device, the computer equipment and the storage medium, through accurate matching of the test database, the comprehensive and effective use case data set can be quickly generated, which is equivalent to the fact that each development team is provided with an advanced test analyst and a high-level test experience value, the development staff can be helped to quickly complete comprehensive unit test verification, the unit test cost is reduced, and the unit test quality is helped to be improved.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application, the drawings that are needed in the description of the embodiments of the present application will be briefly described below, it being obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present application, and that other drawings may be obtained according to these drawings without inventive effort for a person skilled in the art.
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an application environment of a test data matching method according to an embodiment of the application;
FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a test data matching method according to an embodiment of the application;
FIG. 3 is a tabular representation of test data in an embodiment of the application;
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a test data matching device according to an embodiment of the application;
FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a computer device in accordance with an embodiment of the application.
Detailed Description
The following description of the embodiments of the present application will be made clearly and fully with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which it is evident that the embodiments described are some, but not all embodiments of the application. All other embodiments, which can be made by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments of the application without making any inventive effort, are intended to be within the scope of the application.
The account method provided in this embodiment may be applied in an application environment as shown in fig. 1, where a user terminal communicates with a server through a network. User terminals include, but are not limited to, various personal computers, notebook computers, smart phones, tablet computers, and portable wearable devices. The server may be implemented by a stand-alone server or a server cluster formed by a plurality of servers.
In an embodiment, as shown in fig. 2, a test data matching method is provided, and the method is applied to the server in fig. 1 for illustration, and includes the following steps S10-S40.
And S10, extracting an interaction control of the test page and attribute items of the interaction control.
Test pages are understandably referred to as pages that need to be tested after development has completed the corresponding page code development and compiled through. The interactive control refers to a control having an interactive function, such as an input box (TextBox), a list box (ListBox), a selection box (CheckBox), and the like. Each interactive control has several attribute items such as Name, identification number (ID), type (Type), style (Style), value (Value), etc.
In some examples, control elements of the test page may be analyzed to generate a control list, and then interaction controls may be extracted from the control list.
S20, obtaining constraint conditions associated with the attribute items.
Understandably, the constraint refers to a boundary range of the inputtable data of the interactive control (i.e., a boundary range of the demand end). Here, constraints include, but are not limited to, length, data type, and range of values. For example, the attribute term "identification card" must be 18 bits in length and the first 17 bits must be a number. The constraint condition can be pre-stored in a test database, or can be set manually according to the requirement of a user.
S30, searching test data matched with the interaction control in a test database based on the attribute items and the constraint conditions; and obtaining the response level of the test data.
The test database may be understandably a database built based on the experience of the test expert. The test database stores test data (case data) of a plurality of types of controls. Test data matching the interactive controls refers to test data of controls that are the same or similar in terms of properties and constraint. Each test data has a corresponding response level, such as high frequency, intermediate frequency, and low frequency.
In one example, as shown in FIG. 3, FIG. 3 is test data (represented by a list) generated for one example. In the example of FIG. 3, the test data includes case numbers, categories, points of interest, case levels (i.e., response levels), case data, and assigned characteristics.
Among the above test data, the test data relates to classification of category and use case level. Normal forward and reverse directions, as can be appreciated by a typical tester. However, the test cases of the abnormal class need a certain test experience accumulation to be considered. If the abnormal use cases are to be considered more discreet, expert test experience support is required.
In the test database, the abnormal cases are evaluated according to historical probability experience values of scene errors, and corresponding high-frequency, medium-frequency and low-frequency labels are marked.
As shown in fig. 3, normal valid equivalent, invalid equivalent cases, open section boundaries, carry algorithm (rounding), etc. are all high frequency cases, while closed section point boundaries, carry algorithm (cut-off method, carry method), trans-digit and trans-type reverse cases, etc. are used as intermediate frequency cases. The low frequency use case is basically only considered in a special outlier.
The high-frequency use cases comprise two types, namely a common normal use case, including a normal effective use case and a normal reverse use case; secondly, the common abnormal use cases, namely abnormal scenes with low rarely used degree, especially the scenes which are easy to ignore abnormal processing after carelessness are developed.
Intermediate frequency use cases are unusual use cases of moderate degree and reverse use cases (usually refinement of boundary class) considered more finely, and may not be considered by ordinary test design.
The low-frequency use case is an abnormal use case with high remote degree, is a scene which is not experienced by general testers, is not triggered in normal conditions, and is basically not considered by common test design.
S40, generating a use case data set of the test page according to the test data and the response level.
Understandably, the set of case data can be generated based on the respective test data and the corresponding response level. Different response levels may set different use case numbers.
According to the embodiment, through accurate matching of the test database, a comprehensive and effective use case data set can be generated quickly, which is equivalent to the fact that each development team is provided with an advanced test analyst and a high-level test experience value, so that developers can be helped to complete comprehensive unit test verification quickly, unit test cost is reduced, and unit test quality is helped to be improved.
Optionally, step S20, that is, the obtaining the constraint condition associated with the attribute item includes:
s201, inquiring constraint information corresponding to the attribute items in the test database;
s202, setting the constraint conditions according to the constraint information.
Understandably, constraint information for various attribute items can be configured in the test database based on expert experience. Corresponding constraint information can be obtained through inquiring the attribute items, and then constraint conditions are set according to the constraint information.
In some examples, each attribute item may contain constraint information for a plurality of different scenarios. Thus, the associated constraints can be accurately obtained by identifying the scene in which the test page is located.
The embodiment can improve the configuration efficiency of the constraint condition.
Optionally, step S20, that is, the obtaining the constraint condition associated with the attribute item includes:
s203, receiving a control constraint instruction generated based on user input operation;
s204, generating the constraint condition according to the control constraint instruction.
It will be appreciated that in general, the test requirements are different for different test pages. At this time, a configuration page of constraint conditions can be provided, a user performs input operation through the configuration page, a corresponding control constraint instruction is generated, and then the constraint conditions are generated by the control constraint instruction.
The embodiment can improve the flexibility of constraint condition configuration.
Optionally, in step S30, the obtaining the response level of the test data includes:
s301, inquiring test frequency of the test data in the test database;
s302, generating the response level according to the test frequency.
It is understood that in the test database, the test frequency of each test data is also recorded. In some examples, a "high frequency" tag may be added to test data having a test frequency greater than a first threshold (e.g., 100); an "intermediate frequency" tag may be added to test data having a test frequency greater than a second threshold (e.g., 100) and less than or equal to a first threshold (e.g., 50); a "low frequency" tag may be added to test data having a test frequency less than or equal to a first threshold (e.g., 100). The label is the response level.
In other examples, different comparison thresholds (including the first threshold and the second threshold described above) may be set for different application scenarios to meet the actual application requirements.
According to the embodiment, by setting different response levels, the test requirements can be precisely matched, and a better test result is obtained.
Optionally, in step S30, the obtaining the response level of the test data includes:
s303, receiving a response level setting instruction generated based on user input operation;
s304, generating the response level according to the response level setting instruction.
It will be appreciated that in some special cases the response level of the test data may be adjusted manually based on the actual. At this time, a setting page of the response level may be provided, through which the user performs an input operation, generates a corresponding response level setting instruction, and then generates a response level from the response level setting instruction.
The embodiment can improve the flexibility of response level setting.
Optionally, before step S30, that is, before the searching the test database for the test data matching the interaction control based on the attribute item and the constraint condition, the method further includes:
s31, acquiring test experience data, and constructing an initial test database based on the test experience data;
s32, acquiring test update data, updating the initial test database based on the test update data, and generating the test database.
It is understood that, herein, test experience data may refer to data formed from a summary of the first line experience of a senior full-time tester. An initial test database may be constructed based on these test experience data. The initial test database is constructed to contain a plurality of types of test data.
Test update data refers to new test data obtained based on actual production experience and technological changes during test practice. And updating the initial test database by using the test update data to generate a test database. Because new test update data are continuously obtained, the test database can better match the actual test requirement, and the test efficiency is improved.
Optionally, step S40, that is, the generating the use case data set of the test page according to the test data and the response level includes:
s401, acquiring a data selection rule corresponding to the response level; the data selection rule comprises a data expansion rule or a data deletion rule;
s42, processing the test data based on the data selection rule to generate the use case data set.
Optionally, the number of test data matched from the test database may be greater than the actual test requirement or may be greater than the actual test requirement. If the number of the test data is larger than the actual test requirement, selecting a data deleting rule to screen the test data, so that the number of the test data is reduced. If the number of the test data is smaller than the actual test requirement, the data expansion rule is selected to expand the test data, so that the number of the test data is increased.
Typically, the response level is "high frequency", and the number of actual test requirements is a large value; the response level is "low frequency", then the number of actual test requirements is a small value.
It should be understood that the sequence number of each step in the foregoing embodiment does not mean that the execution sequence of each process should be determined by the function and the internal logic, and should not limit the implementation process of the embodiment of the present application.
In an embodiment, a test data matching device is provided, where the test data matching device corresponds to the test data matching method in the above embodiment one by one. As shown in fig. 4, the test data matching apparatus includes an extraction module 10, an acquisition constraint module 20, a matching data module 30, and a generation case data module 40. The functional modules are described in detail as follows:
the extraction module 10 is used for extracting the interaction control of the test page and attribute items of the interaction control;
an acquisition constraint condition module 20, configured to acquire a constraint condition associated with the attribute item;
a matching data module 30, configured to find out test data matching the interaction control in a test database based on the attribute item and the constraint condition; obtaining the response level of the test data;
and a case data generating module 40, configured to generate a case data set of the test page according to the test data and the response level.
Optionally, the acquisition constraint module 20 includes:
the query constraint unit is used for querying constraint information corresponding to the attribute items in the test database;
and the first constraint condition unit is used for setting the constraint condition according to the constraint information.
Optionally, the acquisition constraint module 20 includes:
the constraint instruction unit is used for receiving a control constraint instruction generated based on user input operation;
and the second constraint condition unit is used for generating the constraint condition according to the control constraint instruction.
Optionally, the matching data module 30 includes:
the query frequency unit is used for querying the test frequency of the test data in the test database;
and the first response level generation unit is used for generating the response level according to the test frequency.
Optionally, the matching data module 30 includes:
a level setting instruction unit for receiving a response level setting instruction generated based on a user input operation;
and the second response level generating unit is used for generating the response level according to the response level setting instruction.
Optionally, the method further comprises generating a test database module, wherein the test database module comprises:
the method comprises the steps of constructing an initial database unit, wherein the initial database unit is used for acquiring test experience data and constructing an initial test database based on the test experience data;
and the updating database unit is used for acquiring test updating data, updating the initial test database based on the test updating data and generating the test database.
Optionally, the generating use case data module 40 includes:
the acquiring and selecting rule unit is used for acquiring a data selecting rule corresponding to the response level; the data selection rule comprises a data expansion rule or a data deletion rule;
and generating a use case data unit, which is used for processing the test data based on the data selection rule to generate the use case data set.
For specific limitations of the test data matching device, reference may be made to the above limitations of the test data matching method, and no further description is given here. The respective modules in the above-described test data matching device may be implemented in whole or in part by software, hardware, and a combination thereof. The above modules may be embedded in hardware or may be independent of a processor in the computer device, or may be stored in software in a memory in the computer device, so that the processor may call and execute operations corresponding to the above modules.
In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, which may be a server, the internal structure of which may be as shown in fig. 5. The computer device includes a processor, a memory, a network interface, and a database connected by a system bus. Wherein the processor of the computer device is configured to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device includes a non-volatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system, computer programs, and a database. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of the operating system and computer programs in the non-volatile storage media. The database of the computer device is used for storing the method related to the test data matching method. The network interface of the computer device is used for communicating with an external terminal through a network connection. The computer program is executed by a processor to implement a test data matching method.
In one embodiment, a computer device is provided comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, the processor implementing the steps of when executing the computer program:
extracting an interaction control of a test page and an attribute item of the interaction control;
acquiring constraint conditions associated with the attribute items;
searching test data matched with the interaction control in a test database based on the attribute items and the constraint conditions; obtaining the response level of the test data;
and generating a use case data set of the test page according to the test data and the response level.
In one embodiment, a computer readable storage medium is provided having a computer program stored thereon, which when executed by a processor, performs the steps of:
extracting an interaction control of a test page and an attribute item of the interaction control;
acquiring constraint conditions associated with the attribute items;
searching test data matched with the interaction control in a test database based on the attribute items and the constraint conditions; obtaining the response level of the test data;
and generating a use case data set of the test page according to the test data and the response level.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that implementing all or part of the above described methods may be accomplished by way of a computer program stored on a non-transitory computer readable storage medium, which when executed, may comprise the steps of the embodiments of the methods described above. Any reference to memory, storage, database, or other medium used in embodiments provided herein may include non-volatile and/or volatile memory. The nonvolatile memory can include Read Only Memory (ROM), programmable ROM (PROM), electrically Programmable ROM (EPROM), electrically Erasable Programmable ROM (EEPROM), or flash memory. Volatile memory can include Random Access Memory (RAM) or external cache memory. By way of illustration and not limitation, RAM is available in a variety of forms such as Static RAM (SRAM), dynamic RAM (DRAM), synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), double Data Rate SDRAM (DDRSDRAM), enhanced SDRAM (ESDRAM), synchronous Link DRAM (SLDRAM), memory bus direct RAM (RDRAM), direct memory bus dynamic RAM (DRDRAM), and memory bus dynamic RAM (RDRAM), among others.
The above embodiments are only for illustrating the technical solution of the present application, and not for limiting the same; although the application has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that: the technical scheme described in the foregoing embodiments can be modified or some technical features thereof can be replaced by equivalents; such modifications and substitutions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application, and are intended to be included in the scope of the present application.
Claims (10)
1. A method of matching test data, comprising:
extracting an interaction control of a test page and an attribute item of the interaction control;
acquiring constraint conditions associated with the attribute items;
searching test data matched with the interaction control in a test database based on the attribute items and the constraint conditions; the test data refers to the test data of the control with the same or similar attribute items and constraint conditions; obtaining the response level of the test data; the test database stores test data of a plurality of types of controls; the test data comprises case serial numbers, categories, attention points, response levels, case data and assignment characteristics;
and generating a use case data set of the test page according to the test data and the response level.
2. The test data matching method of claim 1, wherein said obtaining constraints associated with said attribute items comprises:
inquiring constraint information corresponding to the attribute items in the test database;
and setting the constraint conditions according to the constraint information.
3. The test data matching method of claim 1, wherein said obtaining constraints associated with said attribute items comprises:
receiving a control constraint instruction generated based on user input operation;
and generating the constraint condition according to the control constraint instruction.
4. The test data matching method of claim 1, wherein said obtaining a response level of said test data comprises:
inquiring the test frequency of the test data in the test database;
and generating the response level according to the test frequency.
5. The test data matching method of claim 1, wherein said obtaining a response level of said test data comprises:
receiving a response level setting instruction generated based on user input operation;
and generating the response level according to the response level setting instruction.
6. The method for matching test data according to claim 1, wherein before the test data matching the interactive control is found in a test database based on the attribute item and the constraint condition, further comprising:
acquiring test experience data, and constructing an initial test database based on the test experience data;
and acquiring test update data, updating the initial test database based on the test update data, and generating the test database.
7. The test data matching method of claim 1, wherein the generating the set of case data for the test page from the test data and the response level comprises:
acquiring a data selection rule corresponding to the response level; the data selection rule comprises a data expansion rule or a data deletion rule;
and processing the test data based on the data selection rule to generate the use case data set.
8. A test data matching apparatus, comprising:
the extraction module is used for extracting the interaction control of the test page and attribute items of the interaction control;
the constraint condition acquisition module is used for acquiring constraint conditions associated with the attribute items;
the matching data module is used for searching test data matched with the interaction control in a test database based on the attribute items and the constraint conditions; the test data refers to the test data of the control with the same or similar attribute items and constraint conditions; obtaining the response level of the test data; the test database stores test data of a plurality of types of controls; the test data comprises case serial numbers, categories, attention points, response levels, case data and assignment characteristics;
and the case data generating module is used for generating a case data set of the test page according to the test data and the response level.
9. A computer device comprising a memory, a processor and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that the processor implements the test data matching method according to any of claims 1 to 7 when executing the computer program.
10. A computer readable storage medium storing a computer program, wherein the computer program when executed by a processor implements the test data matching method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210872363.9A CN115269402B (en) | 2022-07-20 | 2022-07-20 | Test data matching method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210872363.9A CN115269402B (en) | 2022-07-20 | 2022-07-20 | Test data matching method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN115269402A CN115269402A (en) | 2022-11-01 |
| CN115269402B true CN115269402B (en) | 2023-09-15 |
Family
ID=83770792
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210872363.9A Active CN115269402B (en) | 2022-07-20 | 2022-07-20 | Test data matching method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN115269402B (en) |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US9424171B1 (en) * | 2015-04-23 | 2016-08-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Resource-constrained test automation |
| CN111240976A (en) * | 2020-01-07 | 2020-06-05 | 上海复深蓝软件股份有限公司 | Software testing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN111797026A (en) * | 2020-07-17 | 2020-10-20 | 上海复深蓝软件股份有限公司 | Test case generation method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN114048130A (en) * | 2021-11-11 | 2022-02-15 | 上海复深蓝软件股份有限公司 | Unit testing method, unit testing device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105930261B (en) * | 2016-01-16 | 2018-06-22 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | test method and test terminal |
-
2022
- 2022-07-20 CN CN202210872363.9A patent/CN115269402B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US9424171B1 (en) * | 2015-04-23 | 2016-08-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Resource-constrained test automation |
| CN111240976A (en) * | 2020-01-07 | 2020-06-05 | 上海复深蓝软件股份有限公司 | Software testing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN111797026A (en) * | 2020-07-17 | 2020-10-20 | 上海复深蓝软件股份有限公司 | Test case generation method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN114048130A (en) * | 2021-11-11 | 2022-02-15 | 上海复深蓝软件股份有限公司 | Unit testing method, unit testing device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| 宫云战.《软件测试》.国防工业出版社,2006,(第7-118-04176-9版),161页-167页. * |
| 陈进等.《电子商务中的知识产权》.对外经济贸易大学出版社,2008,(第978-7-81134-208-6版),第64-66页. * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN115269402A (en) | 2022-11-01 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN110489321B (en) | Test case screening method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN111382070B (en) | Compatibility testing method and device, storage medium and computer equipment | |
| CN111752571B (en) | Program upgrading method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN112651238A (en) | Training corpus expansion method and device and intention recognition model training method and device | |
| CN111176996A (en) | Test case generation method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| US10581845B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for assigning device fingerprints to internet devices | |
| CN110019566A (en) | Data checking, device, computer equipment and storage medium based on data warehouse | |
| CN108595338A (en) | Test case write method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110321284B (en) | Test data entry method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN111984659B (en) | Data updating method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN109361628B (en) | Message assembling method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110032505B (en) | Software quality determination apparatus and method, and non-transitory computer readable medium | |
| CN109542962B (en) | Data processing method, data processing device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN111324716A (en) | Index data acquisition method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN108874661A (en) | Test mapping relations library generating method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN108399125B (en) | Automatic testing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN109359176A (en) | Data extraction method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN112783866B (en) | Data reading method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110362478A (en) | Application upgrade test method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN115269402B (en) | Test data matching method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110647452B (en) | Test method, test device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN116894434A (en) | Grammar error correction method and electronic equipment | |
| CN112463164B (en) | SoC program execution display positioning method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN115705297A (en) | Code call detection method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN111538651A (en) | Interface testing method, device, server and storage medium |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |