CN115063032A - Public space performance evaluation system for urban updating - Google Patents
Public space performance evaluation system for urban updating Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN115063032A CN115063032A CN202210835239.5A CN202210835239A CN115063032A CN 115063032 A CN115063032 A CN 115063032A CN 202210835239 A CN202210835239 A CN 202210835239A CN 115063032 A CN115063032 A CN 115063032A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation
- public space
- city
- urban
- performance
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 67
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 37
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 238000013210 evaluation model Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 claims description 16
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000003912 environmental pollution Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000013468 resource allocation Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000001502 supplementing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000011234 economic evaluation Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 13
- 238000013439 planning Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000004069 differentiation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007261 regionalization Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005067 remediation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/067—Enterprise or organisation modelling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/26—Government or public services
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention belongs to the technical field of urban space performance evaluation, and discloses an urban updating public space performance evaluation system, which comprises the following steps of; s1, obtaining an evaluation index system of urban public space and urban development based on an ahp fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model, and obtaining corresponding evaluation indexes; s2, collecting scores corresponding to the evaluation indexes from urban residents; s3, combining the current situation of the urban public space, generating an FCE survey grading table, and grading the individual objects according to the standard; s4, evaluating the indexes of individual evaluation according to the rnsypAHP-FCE comprehensive evaluation model to obtain a comprehensive evaluation result of each test object; s5, screening the comprehensive evaluation results of all the test objects through a truncation average method to obtain urban public space performance.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of urban space performance evaluation, and particularly relates to a public space performance evaluation system for urban updating.
Background
As cities develop and progress, urban land is increasingly tense, so land utilization rate is an important factor influencing urban development, and planning work of urban space performance is one of key steps and links in the urban planning process, and the importance of the planning work is self-evident. The city planner must take into account all aspects of the city, and "city space performance" is an abstract concept, but in the actual city planning process, the space planning becomes concrete. For example, in the process of buying and selling urban housing, the house price is an important factor influencing the supply and demand relationship of housing market, which is also a factor most concerned by house buyers, however, the real estate industry itself has diversity and complexity in space, if the protection of urban ecological environment is not considered, the environmental pollution is caused, and the performance of urban land is neglected.
The existing evaluation system cannot evaluate urban space performance visually, cannot enable urban planning personnel to effectively know urban development conditions, cannot improve and develop space in a targeted manner according to spatial attributes of different regions, cannot implement a comprehensive development mode of differentiation, diversification, hierarchy and regionalization, and causes the abnormal disorder of land development management work, low land development utilization rate, disordered development order and lack of land supply for construction.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a performance evaluation system for a city updating public space, which aims to solve the problems in the background technology.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention provides the following technical scheme: a city updates the public space performance evaluation system, including the following step;
s1, obtaining an evaluation index system of urban public space and urban development based on an ahp fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model, and obtaining corresponding evaluation indexes;
s2, collecting scores corresponding to the evaluation indexes from urban residents;
s3, combining the current situation of the urban public space, generating an FCE survey grading table, and grading the individual objects according to the standard;
s4, evaluating the indexes of individual evaluation according to the rn syp AHP-FCE comprehensive evaluation model to obtain a comprehensive evaluation result of each test object;
and S5, screening the comprehensive evaluation result of each test object by a truncation average method to obtain the urban public space performance.
Preferably, the urban public space performance includes, but is not limited to, geospatial performance, socio-spatial performance, economic-spatial performance, and ecospatial performance.
Preferably, the score collecting method corresponding to the evaluation index includes, but is not limited to, a questionnaire survey method, a network survey method, a field survey method, a social survey method, a sampling survey method, and a statistical survey method.
Preferably, the evaluation index includes an evaluation index of a spatial form, an evaluation index of a social economy, and an evaluation index of an ecological environment.
Preferably, the evaluation index of the spatial form includes a construction site of a city, a spatial structure of the city, and an operation state of the city.
Preferably, the socioeconomic assessment indicators include, but are not limited to, demographics, capital allocation, employment status, educational level, medical level, and cultural characteristics.
Preferably, the evaluation indexes of the ecological environment include, but are not limited to, resource allocation, environmental pollution, environmental remediation and environmental suitability.
Preferably, the combined weight vector of each element of the rule layer and the scheme layer is calculated according to the relative weight vector, the consistency of the result is verified, YAAHP software judges the consistency of the matrix, and the existing matrix is automatically supplemented by using automatic adjustment and incomplete judgment, according to a formula AI: and calculating the index of consistency by using AI (lambda max-n)/(n-1), wherein lambda max refers to the maximum positive value in a matrix, n is the number of the criteria in a criterion layer, and the consistency ratio AR is expressed by using AR (AI/BI), wherein the index of random consistency is expressed by BI, and when AR is less than 0.1, the index of consistency is judged to be satisfactory.
Preferably, in the generated FCE survey scoring table, the urban public space performance reflected by the listed indexes is selected according to the scale of 1-100; the grades are 10-29 for A, 30-49 for B, 50-69 for C, 70-89 for D, and 90-100 for E, wherein A < B < C < D < E.
Preferably, the city space is divided into four parts of a street, a parcel, a city and a plot.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the beneficial effects that:
the invention can improve the evaluation, can intuitively evaluate the urban space performance, can lead urban planning personnel to effectively know the urban development situation, can pertinently improve and develop the space according to the space attributes of different regions, can implement a comprehensive development mode of differentiation, diversification, hierarchy and regionalization, leads the land development management work to be orderly, improves the land development utilization rate, has stable development order and has stable construction land supply.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the present invention;
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
Referring to fig. 1, the present invention provides the following technical solutions:
the first embodiment is as follows:
a performance evaluation system for city updating public space comprises the following steps;
s1, obtaining an evaluation index system of urban public space and urban development based on an ahp fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model, and obtaining corresponding evaluation indexes;
s2, collecting scores corresponding to the evaluation indexes from urban residents;
s3, combining the current situation of the urban public space, generating an FCE survey grading table, and grading the individual objects according to the standard;
s4, evaluating the indexes of individual evaluation according to the rn syp AHP-FCE comprehensive evaluation model to obtain a comprehensive evaluation result of each test object;
and S5, screening the comprehensive evaluation result of each test object by a truncation average method to obtain the urban public space performance.
Further, urban public space performance includes, but is not limited to, geospatial performance, socio-spatial performance, economic space performance, and ecospatial performance.
Further, the score collecting method corresponding to the evaluation index includes, but is not limited to, a questionnaire survey method, a network survey method, a field survey method, a social survey method, a sampling survey method, and a statistical survey method.
Further, the evaluation index includes an evaluation index of a spatial form, an evaluation index of social economy and an evaluation index of ecological environment.
Further, the evaluation index of the spatial form includes a construction site of a city, a spatial structure of the city, and an operation state of the city.
Further, socioeconomic evaluation metrics include, but are not limited to, population distribution, capital allocation, employment status, educational level, medical level, and cultural characteristics.
Further, evaluation indexes of the ecological environment include, but are not limited to, resource allocation, environmental pollution, environmental remediation, and environmental suitability.
Further, calculating a combined weight vector of each element of the rule layer and the scheme layer according to the relative weight vector and verifying the consistency of the result, judging the consistency of the matrix by YAAHP software, automatically supplementing the existing matrix by using automatic adjustment and incomplete judgment, and according to a formula AI: and calculating the index of consistency by using AI (lambda max-n)/(n-1), wherein lambda max refers to the maximum positive value in a matrix, n is the number of the criteria in a criterion layer, and the consistency ratio AR is expressed by using AR (AI/BI), wherein the index of random consistency is expressed by BI, and when AR is less than 0.1, the index of consistency is judged to be satisfactory.
Further, in the FCE survey scoring table, the urban public space performance reflected by the listed indexes is selected according to the scale of 1-100; the grades are 10-29 for A, 30-49 for B, 50-69 for C, 70-89 for D, and 90-100 for E, wherein A < B < C < D < E.
Furthermore, the city space is divided into four parts of a street, a parcel, a city and a plot.
Example two:
collecting scores of construction areas, spatial structures of cities, operation states of the cities, population distribution, capital allocation, employment status, education level, medical level, cultural characteristics, resource allocation, environmental pollution, environmental improvement and environmental suitability from urban residents through questionnaire survey, network survey, field survey, social survey, sampling survey and statistical survey, wherein each average score is (35, 55, 75, 65, 86, 92, 69, 45, 67, 83, 39, 59 and 80);
and (4) calculating urban public space performance which is approximately equal to 65.73 by a truncation average method and belongs to C-level urban public space performance.
Example three:
collecting scores of construction areas, spatial structures of cities, operation states of the cities, population distribution, capital allocation, employment status, education level, medical level, cultural characteristics, resource allocation, environmental pollution, environmental improvement and environmental suitability from urban residents through questionnaire survey, network survey, field survey, social survey, sampling survey and statistical survey, wherein each average score is (25, 46, 78, 75, 66, 82, 89, 64, 77, 73, 49, 59 and 91);
and (4) calculating the urban public space performance which is approximately equal to 68.91 by a truncation average method and belongs to the C-level urban public space performance.
Example four:
collecting scores of construction areas, spatial structures of cities, operation states of the cities, population distribution, capital allocation, employment status, education level, medical level, cultural characteristics, resource allocation, environmental pollution, environmental improvement and environmental suitability from urban residents through questionnaire survey, network survey, field survey, social survey, sampling survey and statistical survey, wherein each average score is (45, 75, 65, 75, 86, 82, 93, 65, 88, 95, 86, 85 and 90);
and calculating the urban public space performance by a truncation average method, wherein the urban public space performance is approximately equal to 80.91, and the urban public space performance belongs to the D-level urban public space performance.
Example five:
collecting scores of construction areas, spatial structures of cities, operation states of the cities, population distribution, capital allocation, employment status, education level, medical level, cultural characteristics, resource allocation, environmental pollution, environmental improvement and environmental suitability from urban residents through questionnaire survey, network survey, field survey, social survey, sampling survey and statistical survey, wherein each average score is (75, 85, 55, 74, 76, 92, 89, 69, 91, 86, 32, 51 and 94);
and calculating the urban public space performance which is approximately equal to 76.64 by a truncation average method and belongs to the D-level urban public space performance.
Example six:
collecting scores of construction areas, spatial structures of cities, operation states of the cities, population distribution, capital allocation, employment status, education level, medical level, cultural characteristics, resource allocation, environmental pollution, environmental improvement and environmental suitability from urban residents through questionnaire survey, network survey, field survey, social survey, sampling survey and statistical survey, wherein each average score is (83, 49, 78, 81, 85, 96, 91, 74, 86, 91, 41, 72 and 90);
and calculating the urban public space performance by a truncation average method, wherein the urban public space performance is approximately equal to 80, and the urban public space performance belongs to the D-level urban public space performance.
It is noted that, herein, relational terms such as first and second, and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. Also, the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.
Although embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes, modifications, substitutions and alterations can be made in these embodiments without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined in the appended claims and their equivalents.
Claims (10)
1. A performance evaluation system for a city updating public space is characterized by comprising the following steps;
s1, obtaining an evaluation index system of urban public space and urban development based on an ahp fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model, and obtaining corresponding evaluation indexes;
s2, collecting scores corresponding to the evaluation indexes from urban residents;
s3, combining the current situation of the urban public space, generating an FCE survey grading table, and grading the individual objects according to the standard;
s4, evaluating the indexes of individual evaluation according to the rnsypAHP-FCE comprehensive evaluation model to obtain a comprehensive evaluation result of each test object;
and S5, screening the comprehensive evaluation result of each test object by a truncation average method to obtain the urban public space performance.
2. The city updated public space performance evaluation system of claim 1, wherein: the urban public space performance includes, but is not limited to, geospatial performance, socio-spatial performance, economic-spatial performance, and ecospatial performance.
3. The city updated public space performance evaluation system of claim 1, wherein: the score collection method corresponding to the evaluation index includes, but is not limited to, a questionnaire survey method, a network survey method, a field survey method, a social survey method, a sampling survey method, and a statistical survey method.
4. The city update public space performance evaluation system of claim 1, characterized in that: the evaluation indexes comprise evaluation indexes of space forms, social and economic evaluation indexes and evaluation indexes of ecological environments.
5. The city updated public space performance evaluation system of claim 4, wherein: the evaluation indexes of the space form comprise the construction land of the city, the space structure of the city and the running state of the city.
6. The city updated public space performance evaluation system of claim 4, wherein: the socioeconomic evaluation metrics include, but are not limited to, demographics, capital allocation, employment status, educational levels, medical levels, and cultural characteristics.
7. The city update public space performance evaluation system of claim 4, characterized in that: the evaluation indexes of the ecological environment include but are not limited to resource allocation, environmental pollution, environmental management and environmental suitability.
8. The city update public space performance evaluation system of claim 1, characterized in that: calculating the combined weight vector of each element of the rule layer and the scheme layer according to the relative weight vector and verifying the consistency of the result, judging the consistency of the matrix by YAAHP software, automatically supplementing the existing matrix by using automatic adjustment and incomplete judgment, and according to a formula AI: and calculating the index of consistency by using AI (lambda max-n)/(n-1), wherein lambda max refers to the maximum positive value in a matrix, n is the number of the criteria in a criterion layer, and the consistency ratio AR is expressed by using AR (AI/BI), wherein the index of random consistency is expressed by BI, and when AR is less than 0.1, the index of consistency is judged to be satisfactory.
9. The city updated public space performance evaluation system of claim 1, wherein: in the generated FCE survey scoring table, the urban public space performance reflected by the listed indexes is selected according to the scale of 1-100; the grades are 10-29 for A, 30-49 for B, 50-69 for C, 70-89 for D, and 90-100 for E, wherein A < B < C < D < E.
10. The city updated public space performance evaluation system of claim 1, wherein: the city space is divided into four parts of a street, a parcel, a city and a plot.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210835239.5A CN115063032A (en) | 2022-07-15 | 2022-07-15 | Public space performance evaluation system for urban updating |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210835239.5A CN115063032A (en) | 2022-07-15 | 2022-07-15 | Public space performance evaluation system for urban updating |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN115063032A true CN115063032A (en) | 2022-09-16 |
Family
ID=83206265
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210835239.5A Withdrawn CN115063032A (en) | 2022-07-15 | 2022-07-15 | Public space performance evaluation system for urban updating |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN115063032A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN116011887A (en) * | 2023-02-21 | 2023-04-25 | 北京市城市规划设计研究院 | Running space evaluation method and device based on running track |
-
2022
- 2022-07-15 CN CN202210835239.5A patent/CN115063032A/en not_active Withdrawn
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN116011887A (en) * | 2023-02-21 | 2023-04-25 | 北京市城市规划设计研究院 | Running space evaluation method and device based on running track |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Javadian et al. | Application of sustainable urban development in environmental suitability analysis of educational land use by using AHP and GIS in Tehran | |
| Yang et al. | Agent-based modeling for scale evolution of plug-in electric vehicles and charging demand | |
| Koomen et al. | Modelling land-use change: theories and methods | |
| CN112348404A (en) | Village planning implementation evaluation system | |
| Nguyen et al. | A comprehensive risk assessment model based on a fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for green building projects: the case of Vietnam | |
| Zha et al. | Sources of tourism growth in Mainland China: An extended data envelopment analysis‐based decomposition analysis | |
| Ginevičius et al. | Quantitative evaluation of economic and social development of Lithuanian regions | |
| CN115063032A (en) | Public space performance evaluation system for urban updating | |
| Wegener | Transport network equilibrium and regional deconcentration | |
| Gauglitz et al. | Nature conservation as a driver in wind energy scenarios | |
| Ghodousi et al. | Air Quality Management in Tehran Using a Multi-Dimensional Decision Support System. | |
| Daş et al. | A set partitioning based goal programming model for the team formation problem | |
| Panteleeva et al. | Model development of expert estimation of quality of transport interchange functioning | |
| Chen et al. | Evaluating the impact of next generation broadband on local business creation | |
| Snickars | The Sustainable Network Society—A Scenario Study of Transport and Communications | |
| CN115619227A (en) | Visual city updating action evaluation method | |
| CN110532327A (en) | A kind of artificial intelligence power network line planing method | |
| Meyer de Freitas et al. | Road pricing: An analysis of equity effects with MATSim | |
| Nakamura et al. | Land-use transportation analysis system for a metropolitan area | |
| Moreira-Matias et al. | An online learning framework for predicting the taxi stand's profitability | |
| Cui et al. | Optimization of urban logistics terminal distribution based on cellular automaton model | |
| Zhang | Intercity relationships within urban agglomeration and their impacts on urban economic development in the case of GuangdongHong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area | |
| Kulkarni et al. | Decision analysis of alternative highway alignments | |
| Johanning et al. | The Influence of Financial Benefits and Peer Effects on the Adoption of Residential Rooftop Photovoltaic Systems | |
| Lee et al. | A Conceptual Framework for a Sustainable Building Rating System |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| WW01 | Invention patent application withdrawn after publication | ||
| WW01 | Invention patent application withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20220916 |