CN114997702A - Method and system for evaluating production equipment condition of waste incineration plant - Google Patents
Method and system for evaluating production equipment condition of waste incineration plant Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN114997702A CN114997702A CN202210720217.4A CN202210720217A CN114997702A CN 114997702 A CN114997702 A CN 114997702A CN 202210720217 A CN202210720217 A CN 202210720217A CN 114997702 A CN114997702 A CN 114997702A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- equipment
- evaluation
- waste incineration
- incineration plant
- condition
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000004056 waste incineration Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 90
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 24
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 24
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 96
- 238000013210 evaluation model Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 32
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 238000010248 power generation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 239000002918 waste heat Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000011234 economic evaluation Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- UGFAIRIUMAVXCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon monoxide Chemical compound [O+]#[C-] UGFAIRIUMAVXCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000003546 flue gas Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000002351 wastewater Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000003344 environmental pollutant Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 231100000719 pollutant Toxicity 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000009423 ventilation Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000003466 welding Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000002706 hydrostatic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000178 monomer Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000007257 malfunction Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 239000002956 ash Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000002893 slag Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000779 smoke Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002028 Biomass Substances 0.000 description 1
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010791 domestic waste Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000428 dust Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002708 enhancing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010881 fly ash Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002920 hazardous waste Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010865 sewage Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0631—Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
- G06Q10/06311—Scheduling, planning or task assignment for a person or group
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/30—Administration of product recycling or disposal
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/26—Government or public services
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y04—INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
- Y04S—SYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
- Y04S10/00—Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
- Y04S10/50—Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Sustainable Development (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Incineration Of Waste (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a method and a system for evaluating the condition of production equipment of a waste incineration plant, and belongs to the technical field of waste incineration power generation. Firstly, establishing a database of normal operation conditions of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant, then grading according to the importance of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant, establishing different evaluation models according to the importance levels, setting the weight of each evaluation factor in each evaluation model, and then inputting the actual operation conditions of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant into the evaluation model corresponding to the importance levels to obtain the evaluation result of the single equipment; and in addition, the safety state of the boiler pressure container with higher safety requirement is evaluated, and the evaluation result of the whole system is combined to finally finish the evaluation of the condition of the production equipment of the waste incineration plant. The method is simple and easy to implement, can guide the equipment maintenance of the waste incineration power plant, ensures the safety and the economy of the equipment, and accurately masters the equipment condition of the waste incineration power plant.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of waste incineration power generation, and particularly relates to a method and a system for evaluating the condition of production equipment of a waste incineration plant.
Background
The waste incineration power generation is one of the main ways for treating increasingly more urban waste, and has the advantages of reduction, harmlessness, resource utilization and the like. With the increase of service time, some waste incineration power plants which are put into operation at early stage are limited by the current technical level and are affected by damage and degradation of the equipment after long-term operation, and the equipment has the problems of frequent failure, low efficiency and the like, so that the equipment and the operation condition and the level of the equipment are urgently needed to be accurately and reliably grasped, but no effective method for evaluating the equipment condition of the waste incineration power plants exists so far.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to solve the defects in the prior art, the invention aims to provide a method and a system for evaluating the condition of production equipment of a waste incineration plant, which can guide the equipment maintenance of the waste incineration power plant, ensure the safety and the economy of the equipment and enable the waste incineration power plant to accurately master the condition of the equipment.
The invention is realized by the following technical scheme:
a method for evaluating the condition of production equipment of a waste incineration plant comprises the following steps:
s1: establishing a database of normal operation conditions of single equipment of a waste incineration plant;
s2: carrying out importance classification on the monomer equipment of the waste incineration plant;
s3: respectively establishing evaluation models corresponding to the individual equipment of the waste incineration plant with different importance levels according to the database established in the step S1, and setting the weight of each evaluation factor in each evaluation model;
s4: acquiring the actual operation condition of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant, inputting an evaluation model corresponding to the importance level, and outputting the evaluation result of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant;
s5: and respectively evaluating the safety state of the boiler pressure container and the whole system, and finishing the evaluation of the production equipment condition of the waste incineration plant by combining the evaluation results of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant.
Preferably, the waste incineration plant equipment comprises waste incineration system equipment, waste heat steam boiler system equipment, steam turbine power generation system equipment and auxiliary systems.
Further preferably, the auxiliary systems comprise a garbage receiving system, a garbage storage and transportation system, a garbage incineration system, a main water supply system, an ash and slag transportation system, a ventilation system, a flue gas treatment system, a waste liquid treatment system, a steam system, a power generation and distribution system, a security power supply system, a computer system, an automatic control system and a waste heat utilization system.
Preferably, in S2, the importance of the system is ranked according to the degree of influence on the system after the equipment of the waste incineration plant is out of order and the cost for maintenance or replacement.
Further preferably, the waste incineration plant equipment is divided into critical equipment, important equipment, general equipment and other equipment, wherein:
the key equipment is as follows: faults are easy to occur in service, the system is greatly influenced after the faults occur, and the system can be stopped for a long time; or the time for maintenance or replacement is more than 30 days, or the capital for maintenance or replacement is more than 20 ten thousand yuan;
important equipment: faults are easy to occur in service, and the influence on the system is large after the faults occur, so that the system can be shut down for a long time; or the time for maintenance or replacement is 3-30 days, or the capital required for maintenance or replacement is 10-20 ten thousand yuan;
general equipment: faults are easy to occur in service, the influence on the system after the faults is small, the system can continue to operate by changing operation parameters or working conditions, switching standby equipment and the like, or the system is only stopped for a short time; or the time for maintenance or replacement is less than 3 days, or the capital required for maintenance or replacement is 1-10 ten thousand yuan;
other devices: the fault is not easy to occur in service, or the influence on the system after the fault is small, and the normal operation of the system cannot be obviously interfered; or the capital required for repair or replacement is < 1 ten thousand yuan.
Further preferably, in S3, the evaluation factors in the key equipment and important equipment evaluation model include: whether the structure of the current equipment is complete, whether the function of the current equipment is normal, the type and severity of the fault of the equipment, the influence of the fault of the equipment, the time and cost of the fault of the equipment, the development trend of the fault of the equipment and the influence and cost of the fault of the equipment, and the prediction of the possible fault and cost of the equipment in the future; evaluation factors in the general equipment evaluation model include: whether the structure of the current equipment is complete, whether the function of the current equipment is normal and the type and severity of the fault of the equipment; evaluation factors in other equipment evaluation models include: whether the structure of the current equipment is complete and whether the function of the current equipment is normal.
Preferably, in S5, the evaluating the safety status of the boiler pressure vessel includes: the safety condition of technical data, the leakage safety condition of a heated surface pipe, the safety condition of an unreasonable structure, the safety condition that materials do not meet requirements, the safety condition that a welding seam has internal defects, the safety condition of part damage, the safety condition of safety accessories, the safety condition of a bearing structure, the safety condition of a protection device, the safety condition of a chemical inspection project and the hydrostatic test grade.
Preferably, in S5, the overall system evaluation includes environmental protection evaluation, reliability evaluation and economic evaluation; the environmental protection evaluation comprises whether the domestic garbage incineration plant site meets the requirements, whether the technical indexes of the incinerator meet the requirements, whether the pollutant emission meets the requirements, whether the waste water emission meets the requirements, whether the disposal of the incineration residues meets the requirements, and the social complaints and administrative penalties; the reliability assessment includes the following indicators: unplanned outage times, operating factors, and average continuous operating hours; the economic evaluation comprises annual garbage treatment capacity and generating capacity, ton garbage operation and maintenance cost and ton garbage generating capacity.
Further preferably, the operating coefficient SF in the reliability assessment is:
the average continuous run hour CSH is:
the invention discloses a system for evaluating the condition of production equipment of a waste incineration plant, which comprises:
the database establishing module is used for establishing a database of the normal operation condition of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant;
the importance grading module is used for grading the importance of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant;
the evaluation model establishing module is used for respectively establishing evaluation models corresponding to the individual equipment of the waste incineration plant with different importance levels according to the established database, and setting the weight of each evaluation factor in each evaluation model;
the actual operation state acquisition module is used for acquiring the actual operation state of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant;
the single equipment evaluation module of the waste incineration plant inputs the actual operation condition of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant into the corresponding evaluation model and outputs the evaluation result of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant;
the safety state evaluation module of the boiler pressure vessel evaluates the safety state of the boiler pressure vessel;
the integral system evaluation module is used for evaluating the integral system;
and the state evaluation module of the production equipment of the waste incineration plant combines the safety state evaluation result of the boiler pressure container, the overall system evaluation result and the evaluation result of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant to complete the state evaluation of the production equipment of the waste incineration plant.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the following beneficial technical effects:
the invention discloses a method for evaluating the condition of production equipment of a waste incineration plant, which comprises the steps of firstly establishing a database of the normal operation condition of single equipment of the waste incineration plant, then grading according to the importance of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant, establishing different evaluation models according to the importance grades, setting the weight of each evaluation factor in each evaluation model, and then inputting the actual operation condition of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant into the evaluation model corresponding to the importance grade to obtain the evaluation result of the single equipment; in addition, the safety state of the boiler pressure container with higher safety requirement is evaluated, the evaluation result of the whole system is combined, the evaluation of the condition of the production equipment of the waste incineration plant is finally completed, and measures such as supervision operation, modification, shutdown and the like can be made according to the evaluation result of the condition of the equipment of the waste incineration plant subsequently. The method is simple and easy to implement, can guide the equipment maintenance of the waste incineration power plant, ensures the safety and the economy of the equipment, and accurately masters the equipment condition of the waste incineration power plant.
The condition evaluation system of the production equipment of the waste incineration plant disclosed by the invention is simple to construct, high in automation degree, compatible with the existing system hardware and wide in application range.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow diagram of the process of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a graph showing the variation trend of the number of unplanned shutdowns (UOT) per year in a refuse incineration plant according to an embodiment;
FIG. 3 shows the annual operating factor (SF) variation trend of a refuse incineration plant in the example;
FIG. 4 shows the variation trend of the average continuous operating hours (CSH) per year of a certain waste incineration plant in the example.
Detailed Description
The present invention will now be described in further detail with reference to the following figures and specific examples, which are intended to be illustrative, but not limiting, of the invention.
Referring to fig. 1, the method for evaluating the condition of the production equipment of the waste incineration plant of the present invention includes:
s1: establishing a database of normal operation conditions of single equipment of a waste incineration plant; the waste incineration plant equipment comprises waste incineration system equipment, waste heat steam boiler system equipment, turbine power generation system equipment and an auxiliary system. The auxiliary systems comprise a garbage receiving system, a garbage storage and transportation system, a garbage incineration system, a main water supply system, an ash and slag transportation system, a ventilation system, a flue gas treatment system, a waste liquid treatment system, a steam system, a power generation and distribution system, a security power supply system, a computer system, an automatic control system and a waste heat utilization system.
S2: and (4) grading the importance of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant according to the influence degree of the equipment of the waste incineration plant on the system after the equipment is in fault and the cost for maintenance or replacement. Waste incineration plant equipment is divided into key equipment, important equipment, general equipment and other equipment, wherein:
the key equipment is as follows: faults are easy to occur in service, the system is greatly affected after the faults occur, and the system can be shut down for a long time; or the time for maintenance or replacement is more than 30 days, or the capital for maintenance or replacement is more than 20 ten thousand yuan;
important equipment: faults are easy to occur in service, and the influence on the system is large after the faults occur, so that the system can be shut down for a long time; or the time for maintenance or replacement is 3-30 days, or the capital required for maintenance or replacement is 10-20 ten thousand yuan;
general equipment: faults are easy to occur in service, the influence on the system after the faults is small, the system can continue to operate by changing operation parameters or working conditions, switching standby equipment and the like, or the system is only stopped for a short time; or the time for maintenance or replacement is less than 3 days, or the capital required for maintenance or replacement is 1-10 ten thousand yuan;
other devices: the system is not easy to have faults in service, or has little influence on the system after the faults, and can not bring obvious interference to the normal operation of the system; or the capital required for repair or replacement is < 1 ten thousand yuan.
S3: respectively establishing evaluation models corresponding to the individual equipment of the waste incineration plant with different importance levels according to the database established in the step S1, and setting the weight of each evaluation factor in each evaluation model; evaluation factors in the key and critical equipment evaluation models include: the method comprises the following steps of predicting whether the structure of the current equipment is complete, whether the function of the current equipment is normal, the type and the severity of the fault of the equipment, the influence of the fault of the equipment, the time and the cost of the fault of the equipment, the development trend of the fault of the equipment and the influence and the cost of the fault of the equipment, and the possible fault and the cost of the equipment in the future; the evaluation factors in the general equipment evaluation model include: whether the structure of the current equipment is complete, whether the function of the current equipment is normal and the type and severity of the fault of the equipment; evaluation factors in other equipment evaluation models include: whether the structure of the current equipment is complete and whether the function of the current equipment is normal.
S4: acquiring the actual operation condition of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant, inputting an evaluation model corresponding to the importance level, and outputting the evaluation result of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant;
s5: and respectively evaluating the safety state of the boiler pressure container and the whole system, and finishing the evaluation of the production equipment condition of the waste incineration plant by combining the evaluation results of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant. The safety state evaluation of the boiler pressure container comprises the following steps: the safety condition of technical data, the safety condition of leakage of a heated surface pipe, the safety condition of an unreasonable structure, the safety condition that the material does not meet the requirements, the safety condition that a welding line has internal defects, the safety condition of part damage, the safety condition of safety accessories, the safety condition of a bearing structure, the safety condition of protection device inspection, the safety condition of a chemical inspection project and the hydrostatic test grade. The overall system evaluation comprises environmental protection evaluation, reliability evaluation and economy evaluation; the environmental protection evaluation comprises whether the domestic garbage incineration plant site meets the requirements, whether the technical indexes of the incinerator meet the requirements, whether the pollutant emission meets the requirements, whether the waste water emission meets the requirements, whether the disposal of the incineration residues meets the requirements, and the social complaints and administrative penalties; the reliability assessment includes the following indicators: unplanned outage times, operating coefficients and average continuous operating hours; the economic evaluation comprises annual garbage treatment capacity and generating capacity, ton garbage operation and maintenance cost and ton garbage generating capacity.
The reliability evaluation includes the following indexes: three indexes, such as the number of unplanned shutdowns (UOT), an operation coefficient (SF) calculated according to equation (1), and an average continuous operation hour (CSH) calculated according to equation (2):
the invention is further illustrated below in a specific embodiment:
the method comprises the following steps of evaluating the running condition of a certain domestic waste incineration plant, firstly determining an evaluation thought, and comprising the following steps: analyzing and determining an evaluation object and range, determining an evaluation basis, determining an evaluation technical route, evaluating the state of monomer equipment, evaluating the safety state of a boiler pressure container, evaluating the state of the whole system, and comprehensively analyzing and evaluating the whole system.
The evaluation objects and ranges in the step I comprise: three sets of waste incineration system equipment, three sets of waste heat steam boiler system equipment and one set of steam turbine power generation system equipment, as well as a waste receiving system, a waste storage and transportation system, a waste incineration system, a main water supply system, an ash and slag transportation system, a ventilation system, a flue gas treatment system, a waste liquid treatment system, a steam system, a power generation and distribution system, a security power supply system, a computer system, an automatic control system equipment and other equipment directly related to waste incineration and waste heat utilization which are matched with the equipment.
And step two, the clear evaluation basis comprises three aspects of basic regulation, ministerial and local regulation, national and industrial standards and the like. Wherein the basic regulations include: safety supervision regulations for special equipment (68 th routine meeting of State Council of 19-D-2.2003, TSG 11-2020 boiler safety technology supervision regulation, TSG 21-2016 fixed pressure vessel safety technology supervision regulation, TSG D0001-2018 pressure pipeline safety technology supervision regulation-industrial pipeline, Commission and local regulation including notification (circulation [2008] 82) about further enhancing environmental impact evaluation management work of biomass power generation project, Guangdong province domestic garbage management regulations (nine times of the general Commission announcement No. 116 in Guangdong province), national and industry standards including GB 8978 + 1996 integrated sewage discharge standard, GB 14554 + 1993 stink pollutant discharge standard, GB 16889 + 2008 + domestic garbage landfill pollution control standard, GB 18485 + 2001 + incinerated domestic garbage control standard, GB/T + 2008 + waste heat boiler, GB 50337-2003 urban environmental sanitation facility planning specification and CJJ 90-2009 domestic garbage incineration treatment engineering technical specification.
And step three, determining an evaluation technical route, wherein the evaluation technical route comprises single equipment or part state evaluation, boiler pressure container safety state evaluation and overall system state evaluation (environmental protection, reliability and economy of the system), and the evaluation results are synthesized to carry out overall evaluation on the system and the equipment.
And step four, evaluating the states of the single equipment, wherein the evaluation comprises three aspects of data research, equipment classification, evaluation methods and contents of different types of equipment and the like.
In the fourth step, the classification principle of the equipment is that the equipment is divided according to the role and importance of the equipment in the system and the whole operation link, the requirements corresponding to relevant national and industrial regulations and the value of the equipment, and the factors such as the working conditions, the working environment, the possibility and degree of faults of each equipment, the degree of influence on the system after the faults, the cost for maintenance or replacement and the like are considered: the classification principle of the key equipment, the important equipment, the general equipment and other equipment is shown in the table 1.
TABLE 1 device Classification principles
The invention is further improved in that the evaluation method and the content of the four types of equipment in the step (iv) are shown in the table 2.
TABLE 2 evaluation method and contents of four kinds of devices
In the fifth step, the safety state of the boiler pressure container is evaluated to include technical data safety condition, heated surface pipe leakage safety condition, unreasonable structure safety condition, safety condition that the material is not qualified, safety condition that the welding seam has internal defects, safety condition that the parts are damaged, safety accessory safety condition, safety condition of the bearing structure, safety condition of protection device inspection, safety condition of chemical inspection project, hydraulic test grade and other items, the boiler pressure condition is divided into 5 grades, and the higher the grade is, the worse the safety condition is.
Evaluating the state of the whole system in the step sixth, wherein the evaluation of the environmental protection comprises three items of environmental protection evaluation, reliability evaluation, economy evaluation and the like, wherein the evaluation of the environmental protection comprises the contents of whether a domestic garbage incineration plant site meets requirements, whether an incinerator technical index meets requirements, whether pollution emission meets requirements, whether waste water (refuse leachate) emission meets requirements, whether treatment of incineration residues (hazardous waste fly ash) meets requirements, social complaints, administrative penalties and the like, and the evaluation result shows that the temperature of the boiler flue gas outlet does not reach 850 ℃, and the evaluation result does not meet the national environmental protection standard requirements; the indexes of the smoke emission part exceed the requirements (such as the concentrations of smoke dust and CO exceed the standards), the CODcr (chemical oxygen demand) in the wastewater exceeds the standards seriously, the odor concentration sometimes exceeds the standards, the pollution conditions such as odor, noise and the like are reflected strongly in recent years, and the like.
The reliability evaluation includes the following indexes: the operation coefficient (SF) is calculated according to the formula (1), the average continuous operation hour (CSH) is calculated according to the formula (2), and the result is shown in the figures 2-4.
The economic evaluation comprises the contents of annual garbage treatment capacity, generating capacity, ton garbage operation and maintenance cost, ton garbage generating capacity and the like. The evaluation result shows that the capacities of the equipment and the system are small, the parameters are low, and the economic differences are large; and the frequent failure of the equipment causes the system utilization rate to be continuously reduced, the equipment operation and maintenance cost to be continuously increased and the economical efficiency to be increasingly poor in recent years.
And making measures such as supervision operation, modification, shutdown and the like according to the evaluation result of the equipment condition of the waste incineration plant.
It should be noted that the above description is only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and equivalent changes made to the system described in the present invention are included in the protection scope of the present invention. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Claims (10)
1. A method for evaluating the condition of production equipment of a waste incineration plant is characterized by comprising the following steps:
s1: establishing a database of normal operation conditions of single equipment of a waste incineration plant;
s2: carrying out importance classification on the monomer equipment of the waste incineration plant;
s3: respectively establishing evaluation models corresponding to the individual equipment of the waste incineration plant with different importance levels according to the database established in the step S1, and setting the weight of each evaluation factor in each evaluation model;
s4: acquiring the actual operation condition of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant, inputting an evaluation model corresponding to the importance level, and outputting the evaluation result of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant;
s5: and respectively evaluating the safety state of the boiler pressure container and the whole system, and finishing the evaluation of the production equipment condition of the waste incineration plant by combining the evaluation results of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the waste incineration plant equipment includes waste incineration system equipment, waste heat steam boiler system equipment, steam turbine power generation system equipment, and auxiliary systems.
3. The method of evaluating the condition of a manufacturing facility of a refuse incineration plant according to claim 2, wherein the subsidiary systems include a refuse receiving system, a refuse storage and transportation system, a refuse incineration system, a main water supply system, an ash transportation system, a ventilation system, a flue gas treatment system, a waste liquid treatment system, a steam system, a power distribution system, a security power supply system, a computer system, an autonomous system, and a waste heat utilization system.
4. The method for evaluating conditions of manufacturing facilities of a refuse incineration plant according to claim 1, wherein in S2, importance ranking is performed according to the degree of influence on the system and the cost for maintenance or replacement after the malfunction of the refuse incineration plant facilities.
5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the facilities of the waste incineration plant are classified into key facilities, important facilities, general facilities, and other facilities, wherein:
the key equipment is as follows: faults are easy to occur in service, the system is greatly affected after the faults occur, and the system can be shut down for a long time; or the time for maintenance or replacement is more than 30 days, or the capital for maintenance or replacement is more than 20 ten thousand yuan;
important equipment: faults are easy to occur in service, and the influence on the system is large after the faults occur, so that the system can be shut down for a long time; or the time for maintenance or replacement is 3-30 days, or the capital required for maintenance or replacement is 10-20 ten thousand yuan;
general equipment: faults are easy to occur in service, the influence on the system after the faults is small, the system can continue to operate by changing operation parameters or working conditions, switching standby equipment and the like, or the system is only stopped for a short time; or the time for maintenance or replacement is less than 3 days, or the capital required for maintenance or replacement is 1-10 ten thousand yuan;
other devices: the fault is not easy to occur in service, or the influence on the system after the fault is small, and the normal operation of the system cannot be obviously interfered; or the capital required for repair or replacement is < 1 ten thousand yuan.
6. The method according to claim 5, wherein in S3, the evaluation factors in the key equipment and important equipment evaluation models include: the method comprises the following steps of predicting whether the structure of the current equipment is complete, whether the function of the current equipment is normal, the type and the severity of the fault of the equipment, the influence of the fault of the equipment, the time and the cost of the fault of the equipment, the development trend of the fault of the equipment and the influence and the cost of the fault of the equipment, and the possible fault and the cost of the equipment in the future; evaluation factors in the general equipment evaluation model include: whether the structure of the current equipment is complete, whether the function of the current equipment is normal and the type and severity of the fault of the equipment; evaluation factors in other equipment evaluation models include: whether the structure of the current equipment is complete and whether the function of the current equipment is normal.
7. The method for evaluating the condition of a manufacturing facility of a refuse incineration plant according to claim 1, wherein in S5, the evaluation of the safety state of the boiler pressure vessel includes: the safety condition of technical data, the safety condition of leakage of a heated surface pipe, the safety condition of an unreasonable structure, the safety condition that the material does not meet the requirements, the safety condition that a welding line has internal defects, the safety condition of part damage, the safety condition of safety accessories, the safety condition of a bearing structure, the safety condition of protection device inspection, the safety condition of a chemical inspection project and the hydrostatic test grade.
8. The method according to claim 1, wherein in S5, the overall system evaluation includes environmental protection evaluation, reliability evaluation, and economic evaluation; the environmental protection evaluation comprises whether the domestic garbage incineration plant site meets the requirements, whether the technical indexes of the incinerator meet the requirements, whether the pollutant emission meets the requirements, whether the waste water emission meets the requirements, whether the disposal of the incineration residues meets the requirements, and the social complaints and administrative penalties; the reliability assessment includes the following indicators: unplanned outage times, operating coefficients and average continuous operating hours; the economic evaluation comprises annual garbage treatment capacity and generating capacity, ton garbage operation and maintenance cost and ton garbage generating capacity.
9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the operation coefficient SF in the reliability evaluation is:
average continuous run hour CSH is:
10. a system for evaluating the condition of production equipment of a waste incineration plant is characterized by comprising:
the database establishing module is used for establishing a database of the normal operation condition of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant;
the importance grading module is used for grading the importance of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant;
the evaluation model establishing module is used for respectively establishing evaluation models corresponding to the individual equipment of the waste incineration plant with different importance levels according to the established database and setting the weight of each evaluation factor in each evaluation model;
the actual operation state acquisition module is used for acquiring the actual operation state of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant;
the single equipment evaluation module of the waste incineration plant inputs the actual operation condition of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant into the corresponding evaluation model and outputs the evaluation result of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant;
the safety state evaluation module of the boiler pressure vessel evaluates the safety state of the boiler pressure vessel;
the integral system evaluation module is used for evaluating an integral system;
and the state evaluation module of the production equipment of the waste incineration plant combines the safety state evaluation result of the boiler pressure container, the overall system evaluation result and the evaluation result of the single equipment of the waste incineration plant to finish the state evaluation of the production equipment of the waste incineration plant.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210720217.4A CN114997702A (en) | 2022-06-23 | 2022-06-23 | Method and system for evaluating production equipment condition of waste incineration plant |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210720217.4A CN114997702A (en) | 2022-06-23 | 2022-06-23 | Method and system for evaluating production equipment condition of waste incineration plant |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN114997702A true CN114997702A (en) | 2022-09-02 |
Family
ID=83036739
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210720217.4A Pending CN114997702A (en) | 2022-06-23 | 2022-06-23 | Method and system for evaluating production equipment condition of waste incineration plant |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN114997702A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN116797104A (en) * | 2023-08-21 | 2023-09-22 | 深圳市洛丁光电有限公司 | Smart city distributed data acquisition processing method and system based on AIOT |
-
2022
- 2022-06-23 CN CN202210720217.4A patent/CN114997702A/en active Pending
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN116797104A (en) * | 2023-08-21 | 2023-09-22 | 深圳市洛丁光电有限公司 | Smart city distributed data acquisition processing method and system based on AIOT |
| CN116797104B (en) * | 2023-08-21 | 2023-11-10 | 深圳市洛丁光电有限公司 | Smart city distributed data acquisition processing method and system based on AIOT |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Ma et al. | Low-carbon development of China's thermal power industry based on an international comparison: review, analysis and forecast | |
| Bai | The process and mechanism of urban environmental change: an evolutionary view | |
| CN114997702A (en) | Method and system for evaluating production equipment condition of waste incineration plant | |
| CN101082415A (en) | Method for real time centralized controlling electric generating set based on SO2 discharging | |
| Chen et al. | Environmental impact assessment of multi-source solid waste based on a life cycle assessment, principal component analysis, and random forest algorithm | |
| Kristjanpoller et al. | Biomethanation plant assessment based on reliability impact on operational effectiveness | |
| Saedi et al. | Life cycle assessment of Iran energy portfolio: Renewable energy replacement approach | |
| May et al. | Life cycle assessment of Australian fossil energy options | |
| CN205134483U (en) | A water pipe accuse system for coal industry sewage treatment | |
| CN101113817B (en) | Biomass cracking conversion processing equipment | |
| CN113516416B (en) | Evaluation method, device, equipment and medium for cement kiln waste treatment complete cycle | |
| Krumbeck et al. | First European fuel cell installation with anaerobic digester gas in a molten carbonate fuel cell | |
| Abderezzak et al. | The smart use of biogas: Decision support tool | |
| Vivchar et al. | Innovative activity of PJSC Mosenergo | |
| Alaw et al. | Development of risk assessment model for biomass plant boiler using bayesian network | |
| Yoesgiantoro et al. | Cost-Benefit Analysis of Palm Mill Oil Effluent Becomes Bio-CNG as HSD Fuel Substitution in West Kalimantan Province | |
| EL BOUZAIDI et al. | Modeling and optimization of controlled landfill gas performance using LandGEM | |
| Liu et al. | Benefit modeling and analysis of wind power generation under social energy economy and public health | |
| Fimbres Weihs et al. | Feasibility assessment of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) deployment with Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) co-combustion at New South Wales (NSW) coal power plants | |
| Liu et al. | Hydrogen production from municipal solid waste: Potential prediction and environmental impact analysis | |
| Sultanov et al. | Analysis of assessment of the technical condition of equipment of generating systems | |
| Yasukawa et al. | Integration of indirect CO 2 emissions from the full energy chain | |
| Nashrulloh et al. | Analysis of potential and feasibility of riogas energy from palm oil mill effluent in penajam paser utara regency | |
| Sardarova et al. | CONTROL SYSTEM FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESS | |
| Evans et al. | Renewable Energy Production from DoD Installation Solid Wastes by Anaerobic Digestion |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |