CN114934770A - Method for evaluating reservoir deployment feasibility of tight gas reservoir horizontal well - Google Patents

Method for evaluating reservoir deployment feasibility of tight gas reservoir horizontal well Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN114934770A
CN114934770A CN202210752701.5A CN202210752701A CN114934770A CN 114934770 A CN114934770 A CN 114934770A CN 202210752701 A CN202210752701 A CN 202210752701A CN 114934770 A CN114934770 A CN 114934770A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
reservoir
matrix
significance
maximum
fuzzy
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202210752701.5A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
王香增
张磊
乔向阳
倪军
谢小飞
辛翠平
刘鹏
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shaanxi Yanchang Petroleum Group Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Shaanxi Yanchang Petroleum Group Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shaanxi Yanchang Petroleum Group Co Ltd filed Critical Shaanxi Yanchang Petroleum Group Co Ltd
Priority to CN202210752701.5A priority Critical patent/CN114934770A/en
Publication of CN114934770A publication Critical patent/CN114934770A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B49/00Testing the nature of borehole walls; Formation testing; Methods or apparatus for obtaining samples of soil or well fluids, specially adapted to earth drilling or wells
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02ATECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A10/00TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE at coastal zones; at river basins
    • Y02A10/40Controlling or monitoring, e.g. of flood or hurricane; Forecasting, e.g. risk assessment or mapping

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for evaluating the feasibility of a compact gas reservoir horizontal well for deploying a reservoir, which comprises the following steps: sequentially establishing a reservoir parameter matrix and a fuzzy equivalent matrix; establishing a significance vector, forming a maximum significance class by using the elements with the maximum significance in the significance vector, and solving the unique maximum significance element in the maximum significance class; if the only element with the maximum significance degree is 0, the reservoir feasibility that horizontal well deployment cannot be achieved in each reservoir in the reservoir parameter matrix is shown; conversely, the existence of a unique maximum saliency element is represented, and the unique maximum saliency element corresponds to a unique maximum saliency reservoir; judging whether the development condition of the reservoir with the unique maximum significance is superior to that of other reservoirs; and if the development condition of the unique reservoir with the maximum significance degree is superior to that of other reservoirs, the unique reservoir with the maximum significance degree in the reservoir parameter matrix has reservoir feasibility of horizontal well deployment. The method has important value for effective development of the dense gas reservoir.

Description

Method for evaluating reservoir deployment feasibility of tight gas reservoir horizontal well
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of oil and gas field development, in particular to a method for evaluating reservoir deployment feasibility of a compact gas reservoir horizontal well.
Background
Horizontal wells are very important development modes in oil and gas field development, and compared with vertical wells and directional wells, the horizontal wells can generally adopt fewer wells to obtain higher yield, but the investment cost is generally higher. The reservoir feasibility of horizontal well deployment is reasonably demonstrated, the deployment risk can be effectively reduced, and the foundation for realizing successful development of the horizontal well is provided.
The reservoir of the tight gas reservoir is generally represented by multilayer superposition, and the main principle of horizontal well deployment is as follows: when the development condition of a certain reservoir is obviously superior to that of other reservoirs, a horizontal well can be deployed at the layer for development. The research on the feasibility of deploying the reservoir in the multilayer overlapped compact gas reservoir horizontal well is equivalent to evaluating the relative development conditions of different reservoirs, and the development conditions of the reservoirs are mainly evaluated by a main control parameter method at present, wherein the main control parameters comprise thickness, reserve abundance, gas saturation, permeability and the like. The parameters influencing the development condition of the reservoir layer comprise a plurality of non-main control parameters besides the main control parameters, wherein in the non-main control parameters, the influence of a single parameter on the development condition of the reservoir layer is not large, and when a plurality of non-main control parameters act simultaneously, the influence of the non-main control parameters on the development condition of the reservoir layer cannot be ignored. The more the parameters are considered, the more accurate evaluation is performed on the development condition of the reservoir, but the evaluation difficulty is increased greatly, the method for evaluating the feasibility of deploying the reservoir in the compact gas reservoir horizontal well is established by considering the parameters, and the method has important significance on the development of the compact gas reservoir.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a method for evaluating the reservoir deployment feasibility of a compact gas reservoir horizontal well aiming at the problems.
The technical scheme of the invention is as follows:
a method for evaluating reservoir deployment feasibility of a tight gas reservoir horizontal well comprises the following steps:
step 1: establishing a reservoir parameter matrix X, and establishing a fuzzy equivalent matrix R according to the reservoir parameter matrix X *
The specific process is as follows:
1) establishing a reservoir parameter matrix X of nxm;
Figure BDA0003718846470000011
in the formula: each 1 row of the reservoir parameter matrix X represents 1 reservoir, n rows are counted, and n is more than or equal to 2;
each 1 column of the reservoir parameter matrix X represents 1 parameter, m columns are counted, and m is more than or equal to 2;
2) calculating the elements in the formula (1) by using a translation and range conversion formula (2)
Figure BDA0003718846470000021
Wherein:
Figure BDA0003718846470000022
Figure BDA0003718846470000023
in the formula: x is the number of ik The element of the ith row and the kth column in the reservoir parameter matrix X is i-1, 2 … n, k-1, 2 … m;
Figure BDA0003718846470000024
the arithmetic mean value of the kth column element in the reservoir parameter matrix X is obtained;
s k the standard deviation of the kth column element in the reservoir parameter matrix X is shown;
x" ik for the elements in row i and column k in the fuzzy matrix X', 0 ≦ X " ik Less than or equal to 1, and no dimension;
obtaining a fuzzy matrix X' of n × m:
Figure BDA0003718846470000025
3) the elements in equation (3) are calculated using the following equation
Figure BDA0003718846470000026
In the formula: r is ij In order to blur the elements in the ith row and the jth column in the similarity matrix R, i is 1,2 … n, j is 1,2 … n;
x" ik to blur the elements, X, of row i, column k in matrix X ″. lk In order to blur the elements in the ith row and kth column of the matrix X ", there is no dimension, i is 1,2 … n, k is 1,2 … m, and l is j; 0 is less than or equal to x " ik ≤1,0≤x" lk ≤1;
Obtaining an n × n fuzzy similarity matrix R:
Figure BDA0003718846470000027
4) the elements in equation (5) are calculated using the following equation
Figure BDA0003718846470000031
In the formula: r 2 The matrix is an n multiplied by n matrix and represents the synthesis of the fuzzy similar matrix R and the fuzzy similar matrix R;
r ip ∧r qj represents taking r ip And r qj 1,2 … n, q ═ p;
Figure BDA0003718846470000032
represented in the set r i1 ∧r 1j ,r i2 ∧r 2j ,…,r in ∧r nj Taking the maximum value;
sequentially calculating by formula (6)
Figure BDA0003718846470000033
Up to
Figure BDA0003718846470000034
Wherein s is meterNumber of calculations, s is less than or equal to log 2 n+1;
Obtaining an n multiplied by n fuzzy equivalent matrix R *
Figure BDA0003718846470000035
And 2, step: based on fuzzy equivalence matrix R * Establishing a significance vector; forming a maximum significance class by using the elements with the maximum significance in the significance vector, and solving a unique maximum significance element in the maximum significance class;
if the only element with the maximum significance degree is 0, the fact that the only element with the maximum significance degree does not exist is shown, namely the reservoir with the maximum significance degree is not unique, and all reservoirs in the reservoir parameter matrix X do not have reservoir feasibility of horizontal well deployment; otherwise, the unique maximum significance element is represented to exist, the unique maximum significance element corresponds to the unique maximum significance reservoir and is further judged by combining a development condition classification decision function;
the specific process is as follows:
fuzzy equivalence matrix R of n x n * Saliency vector r converted to n × 1:
r=(r 1 ,…,r i ,…,r n ) T (9)
in the formula: r is a saliency vector;
t is transposition operation of the vector;
r i the development significance of the ith reservoir is r is more than or equal to 0 i 1, i is equal to or less than 1,2 … n and is dimensionless;
wherein:
Figure BDA0003718846470000036
in the formula: r is ij * Is a fuzzy equivalence matrix R * The element in the ith row and the jth column, i is 1,2 … n, j is 1,2 … n, and is dimensionless;
Figure BDA0003718846470000037
is represented in a fuzzy equivalence matrix R * Row i of (1) takes the maximum value excluding the major diagonal element;
establishing a calculation formula of the maximum degree of significance class:
Figure BDA0003718846470000041
in the formula: g The reservoir is the type with the maximum significance degree and is formed by the reservoir with the maximum significance degree in the reservoir parameter matrix X;
r t is the element with the maximum significance in the significance vector r, and r is more than or equal to 0 t 1, t is 1,2 … n, and is dimensionless;
finding class G with the greatest significance The only most significant element in (1):
Figure BDA0003718846470000042
in the formula: r is a radical of hydrogen The unique maximum significance element corresponds to the unique maximum significance reservoir in the reservoir parameter matrix X;
Figure BDA0003718846470000043
is class G with the greatest degree of significance The number of the elements in the Chinese character,
Figure BDA0003718846470000044
sgn (x) is a mathematical function; sgn (x) -1 when x < 0; sgn (x) 0 when x is 0; sgn (x) 1 when x > 0;
if the only element of maximum significance r When the number of the elements is 0, the maximum significance element does not exist, namely the maximum significance reservoir is not unique, and each reservoir in the reservoir parameter matrix X does not have reservoir feasibility of horizontal well deployment; if the only element of maximum significance r Class G with maximum significance Indicates that there is a unique maximum element of significance r in the reservoir parameter matrix X Correspond toThe reservoir is the only most significant reservoir.
And step 3: judging whether the development condition of the unique reservoir with the maximum significance degree is superior to other reservoirs according to a development condition classification decision function;
if the development condition of the unique maximum-significance reservoir is superior to that of other reservoirs, the unique maximum-significance reservoir in the reservoir parameter matrix X has reservoir feasibility of horizontal well deployment; and otherwise, each reservoir in the reservoir parameter matrix X does not have reservoir feasibility of horizontal well deployment.
The specific process is as follows:
the only maximum element r of significance is calculated by adopting the formula (11) Then, the only maximum significant element r needs to be further judged Whether the development condition of the corresponding reservoir is better than that of other reservoirs or not; establishing a unique maximum element r of significance And (3) classifying decision functions corresponding to the development conditions of the reservoirs:
Figure BDA0003718846470000045
in the formula: c Classifying decision functions for developmental conditions, C =-1,1;
Ω (i) Reserve abundance for the ith reservoir, 10 8 m 3 /Km 2
Ω (∨) The reserve abundance of the only most significant reservoir is proportional to the reservoir development, 10 8 m 3 /Km 2
R sg(i) Is the sand-land ratio of the ith reservoir without dimension;
R sg(∨) the sand-to-ground ratio of the reservoir with the only maximum significance degree is in direct proportion to the development condition of the reservoir and is dimensionless;
V k(∨) the reservoir variation coefficient is the only maximum reservoir variation coefficient with significance, is inversely proportional to the reservoir development condition and is dimensionless;
V k(i) coefficient of variation for the ith reservoir, dimensionless;
sign (x) is a mathematical function; sign (x) is-1 when x is less than 0; sign (x) is 1 when x is more than or equal to 0;
calculating to obtain a development condition classification decision function C
If C The development condition of the unique reservoir with the maximum significance degree is not superior to that of other reservoirs, and each reservoir in the reservoir parameter matrix X does not have reservoir feasibility of horizontal well deployment; if C The development condition of the unique reservoir with the maximum significance degree is superior to that of other reservoirs when being 1, and the unique reservoir with the maximum significance degree in the reservoir parameter matrix X has reservoir feasibility of horizontal well deployment.
The invention has the technical effects that:
according to the reservoir feasibility evaluation method for the deployment of the compact gas reservoir horizontal well, a reservoir parameter matrix, a fuzzy equivalent matrix, a development condition significance, a development condition classification decision function, the reservoir deployment feasibility of the horizontal well and the like are constructed, and the reservoir feasibility evaluation method for the deployment of the compact gas reservoir horizontal well can consider multiple parameters when evaluating the reservoir feasibility of the horizontal well deployment, and has important value for the effective development of the compact gas reservoir.
Detailed Description
Specific Experimental example 1
The Ordos basin southeast develops a plurality of layers of superposed compact gas reservoirs, but the development conditions of different reservoirs in different areas have certain difference, reservoir parameters of 3 adjacent areas are collected, and the reservoir feasibility of deploying horizontal wells in the 3 adjacent areas and different reservoirs is calculated by adopting the method provided by the invention.
Step 1: establishing a reservoir parameter matrix X, and establishing a fuzzy equivalent matrix R according to the reservoir parameter matrix X *
1) Establishing a reservoir parameter matrix X;
selecting the porosity phi, the permeability K and the gas saturation S of 4 reservoirs gi Reservoir thickness h, reservoir pressure p i Reservoir temperature T i Relative density of gamma g Critical pressure p pc Critical temperature T pc Storage abundance omega and variation coefficient V k Coefficient of surging T k Grade difference J k Coefficient of homogeneity K p Sandstone layer number n sl Sand to ground ratio R sg Number n of interlayer layers il Thick interlayerDegree h il And (3) waiting 18 parameters, and establishing a reservoir parameter matrix X when n is more than or equal to 4 and more than or equal to 2 and m is more than or equal to 18 and more than or equal to 2:
Figure BDA0003718846470000051
2) calculating elements of a reservoir parameter matrix X by using a translation and range transformation formula (2) to obtain a fuzzy matrix X':
Figure BDA0003718846470000052
3) calculating elements in the fuzzy matrix X' by using a formula (4) to obtain a fuzzy similarity matrix R:
Figure BDA0003718846470000061
4) calculating the elements in the fuzzy similar matrix R by using a formula (6) to obtain a fuzzy equivalent matrix R *
Figure BDA0003718846470000062
Step 2: fuzzy equivalence matrix R by using formula (8) * Calculating the elements in the sequence to obtain a significance vector r:
r=(0.646,0.646,0.654,0.654) T
calculating elements in the significance vector r to obtain the class G with the maximum significance
G ={0.654,0.654}
Class G with the greatest significance Number of elements in
Figure BDA0003718846470000063
Calculating by adopting a formula (11) to obtain a unique maximum element r of significance =0;
Unique maximum element of significance r When 0, it means that there is no only element with the greatest significance, i.e., the reservoir with the greatest significanceThe reservoir parameter matrix X is not unique, a reservoir suitable for horizontal well deployment does not exist in the reservoir parameter matrix X, and each reservoir in the reservoir parameter matrix X does not have reservoir feasibility of horizontal well deployment.
Specific Experimental example 2
Step 1: establishing a reservoir parameter matrix X, and establishing a fuzzy equivalent matrix R according to the reservoir parameter matrix X *
Selecting the porosity phi, the permeability K and the gas saturation S of 4 reservoirs gi Reservoir thickness h, reservoir pressure p i Reservoir temperature T i Relative density of gamma g Critical pressure p pc Critical temperature T pc Abundance omega, coefficient of variation V k Coefficient of surging T k Grade difference J k Coefficient of homogeneity K p Sandstone layer number n sl Sand to ground ratio R sg Number of interlayer layers n il Thickness h of the interlayer il And (3) waiting 18 parameters, and establishing a reservoir parameter matrix X when n is more than or equal to 4 and more than or equal to 2 and m is more than or equal to 18 and more than or equal to 2:
Figure BDA0003718846470000064
2) calculating elements of a reservoir parameter matrix X by using a translation and range transformation formula (2) to obtain a fuzzy matrix X':
Figure BDA0003718846470000065
3) calculating elements in the fuzzy matrix X' by using a formula (4) to obtain a fuzzy similarity matrix R:
Figure BDA0003718846470000071
4) calculating the elements in the fuzzy similar matrix R by using a formula (6) to obtain a fuzzy equivalent matrix R *
Figure BDA0003718846470000072
And 2, step: fuzzy equivalence matrix R by using formula (8) * Calculating the elements in the sequence to obtain a significance vector r:
r=(0.67,0.76,0.67,0.71) T
calculating elements in the saliency vector r to obtain the maximum saliency class G
G ={0.76}
Class G with the greatest significance Number of middle element
Figure BDA0003718846470000073
Calculating by adopting a formula (11) to obtain a unique maximum element r of significance =G
Indicates that there is a unique maximum element of saliency r The corresponding reservoir is the layer 2 in the reservoir parameter matrix X, and the development significance of the corresponding reservoir is 0.76; the decision function of the development condition classification is combined for further judgment.
And step 3: calculating the elements in the reservoir parameter matrix X by using a formula (12) to obtain a development condition classification decision function C =-1。
Unique maximum element of significance r The corresponding reservoir (the 2 nd reservoir in the reservoir parameter matrix X) is the only reservoir with the largest significance, but the development condition of the corresponding reservoir (the 2 nd reservoir in the reservoir parameter matrix X) is not better than that of other reservoirs according to the decision result of the development condition, so that the reservoir suitable for deploying the horizontal well does not exist in the reservoir parameter matrix X, the calculation is finished, and the calculation result is that the reservoir in the reservoir parameter matrix X does not have the reservoir feasibility of horizontal well deployment.
Specific Experimental example 3
Step 1: establishing a reservoir parameter matrix X, and establishing a fuzzy equivalent matrix R according to the reservoir parameter matrix X *
Selecting the porosity phi, the permeability K and the gas saturation S of 4 reservoirs gi Reservoir thickness h, reservoir pressure p i Reservoir temperature T i Relative density of gamma g Critical pressure p pc Critical temperature T pc Abundance omega, coefficient of variation V k Coefficient of surging T k Grade difference J k Coefficient of homogeneity K p Sandstone layer number n sl Sand to ground ratio R sg Number n of interlayer layers il Thickness h of the interlayer il And (3) waiting 18 parameters, and establishing a reservoir parameter matrix X when n is more than or equal to 4 and more than or equal to 2 and m is more than or equal to 18 and more than or equal to 2:
Figure BDA0003718846470000081
2) calculating elements of a reservoir parameter matrix X by using a translation and range transformation formula (2) to obtain a fuzzy matrix X':
Figure BDA0003718846470000082
3) calculating elements in the fuzzy matrix X' by using a formula (4) to obtain a fuzzy similarity matrix R:
Figure BDA0003718846470000083
4) calculating the elements in the fuzzy similar matrix R by using a formula (6) to obtain a fuzzy equivalent matrix R *
Figure BDA0003718846470000084
Step 2: fuzzy equivalence matrix R by formula (8) * Calculating the elements in the sequence to obtain a significance vector r:
r=(0.59,0.59,0.78,0.73) T
calculating elements in the saliency vector r to obtain the maximum saliency class G
G ={0.78}
Class G with the greatest significance Number of middle element
Figure BDA0003718846470000085
Calculating by adopting a formula (11) to obtain a unique maximum element r of significance =G
Indicating that there is a unique maximum element of saliency, r The corresponding reservoir is the 3 rd layer in the reservoir parameter matrix X, and the development significance of the reservoir is 0.78; the decision function of the development condition classification is combined for further judgment.
And step 3: calculating elements in the reservoir parameter matrix X by using a formula (12) to obtain a development condition classification decision function C =1。
Unique maximum element of significance r The corresponding reservoir (the 3 rd reservoir in the reservoir parameter matrix X) is the only reservoir with the largest significance, the development condition is superior to other reservoirs according to the decision result of the development condition, the 3 rd reservoir in the reservoir parameter matrix X is the reservoir suitable for horizontal well deployment, the calculation is finished, and the 3 rd reservoir in the reservoir parameter matrix X has reservoir feasibility of horizontal well deployment according to the calculation result.

Claims (7)

1. A method for evaluating the reservoir deployment feasibility of a compact gas reservoir horizontal well comprises the following steps:
step 1: establishing a reservoir parameter matrix X, and establishing a fuzzy equivalent matrix R according to the reservoir parameter matrix X *
The reservoir parameter matrix X is an n multiplied by m matrix and consists of n reservoirs containing m parameters;
fuzzy equivalence matrix R * A symmetric matrix of n × n;
the method is characterized in that:
step 2: based on fuzzy equivalence matrix R * Establishing a significance vector; forming a maximum significance class by using the elements with the maximum significance in the significance vector, and solving a unique maximum significance element in the maximum significance class;
if the only element with the maximum significance degree is 0, the fact that the only element with the maximum significance degree does not exist is shown, namely the reservoir with the maximum significance degree is not unique, and all reservoirs in the reservoir parameter matrix X do not have reservoir feasibility of horizontal well deployment; otherwise, the unique maximum significance element is represented to exist, the unique maximum significance element corresponds to the unique maximum significance reservoir and is further judged by combining a development condition classification decision function;
and step 3: judging whether the development condition of the only reservoir with the maximum significance is superior to other reservoirs according to a development condition classification decision function;
if the development condition of the unique maximum-significance reservoir is superior to that of other reservoirs, the unique maximum-significance reservoir in the reservoir parameter matrix X has reservoir feasibility of horizontal well deployment; and on the contrary, the reservoir feasibility that each reservoir in the reservoir parameter matrix X does not have horizontal well deployment is shown.
2. The method for evaluating the feasibility of deploying the reservoir in the tight gas reservoir horizontal well according to claim 1, which is characterized by comprising the following steps of: the specific process of the step 1 is as follows:
1) establishing a reservoir parameter matrix X of nxm;
Figure FDA0003718846460000011
in the formula: each 1 row of the reservoir parameter matrix X represents 1 reservoir, n rows are counted, and n is more than or equal to 2;
each 1 column of the reservoir parameter matrix X represents 1 parameter, m columns are counted, and m is more than or equal to 2;
2) converting the n × m reservoir parameter matrix X into an n × m fuzzy matrix X ":
Figure FDA0003718846460000012
3) converting the fuzzy matrix X' of n multiplied by m into a fuzzy similar matrix R of n multiplied by n;
Figure FDA0003718846460000021
4) converting the fuzzy similarity matrix R of n x n into the fuzzy equivalent matrix R of n x n *
Figure FDA0003718846460000022
3. The method for evaluating the feasibility of deploying the reservoir in the tight gas reservoir horizontal well according to claim 2, which is characterized by comprising the following steps of: the specific process of the step 2 is as follows:
fuzzy equivalence matrix R of n x n * Saliency vector r converted to n × 1:
r=(r 1 ,…,r i ,…,r n ) T (9)
in the formula: r is a saliency vector;
t is the transposition operation of the vector;
r i the development significance of the ith reservoir is r is more than or equal to 0 i 1, i is equal to or less than 1,2 … n and is dimensionless;
wherein:
Figure FDA0003718846460000023
in the formula: r is ij * Is a fuzzy equivalence matrix R * The element in the ith row and the jth column, i is 1,2 … n, j is 1,2 … n, and is dimensionless;
Figure FDA0003718846460000024
expressed in the fuzzy equivalence matrix R * Row i of (2) takes the maximum value excluding the main diagonal element;
establishing a calculation formula of the maximum class of the significance degree:
Figure FDA0003718846460000025
in the formula: g The reservoir is the type with the maximum significance degree and is formed by the reservoir with the maximum significance degree in the reservoir parameter matrix X;
r t is made apparent byThe element with the largest significance in the degree vector r, r is more than or equal to 0 t 1, t is 1,2 … n, and is dimensionless;
finding class G with the greatest significance The only most significant element in (1):
Figure FDA0003718846460000026
in the formula: r is The single maximum significance element corresponds to the single maximum significance reservoir in the reservoir parameter matrix X;
Figure FDA0003718846460000027
is class G with the greatest degree of significance The number of the elements in the Chinese character,
Figure FDA0003718846460000028
if the only element of maximum significance r When the number of the elements is 0, the maximum significance element does not exist, namely the maximum significance reservoir is not unique, and each reservoir in the reservoir parameter matrix X does not have reservoir feasibility of horizontal well deployment; if the only element of maximum significance r Class G with maximum significance Indicates that there is a unique maximum element of significance r in the reservoir parameter matrix X The corresponding reservoir is the only most significant reservoir.
4. The method for evaluating the feasibility of deploying the reservoir in the tight gas reservoir horizontal well according to claim 3, which is characterized by comprising the following steps of: the specific process of the step 3 is as follows:
establishing a development condition classification decision function:
Figure FDA0003718846460000031
in the formula: c Classifying decision functions for developmental conditions, C =-1,1;
Ω (i) Reserve abundance for the ith reservoir, 10 8 m 3 /Km 2
Ω (∨) The reserve abundance of the only most significant reservoir is proportional to the reservoir development, 10 8 m 3 /Km 2
R sg(i) The sand-to-ground ratio of the ith reservoir is dimensionless;
R sg(∨) the sand-to-ground ratio of the reservoir with the maximum significance is only in direct proportion to the development condition of the reservoir and is dimensionless;
V k(∨) the reservoir variation coefficient is the only maximum reservoir variation coefficient with significance, is inversely proportional to the reservoir development condition and is dimensionless;
V k(i) coefficient of variation for the ith reservoir, dimensionless;
calculating to obtain a development condition classification decision function C
If C The development condition of the unique reservoir with the maximum significance degree is not superior to that of other reservoirs, and each reservoir in the reservoir parameter matrix X does not have reservoir feasibility of horizontal well deployment; if C And (2) 1, the development condition of the unique reservoir with the maximum significance degree is superior to that of other reservoirs, and the unique reservoir with the maximum significance degree in the reservoir parameter matrix X has reservoir feasibility of horizontal well deployment.
5. The method for evaluating the feasibility of deploying the reservoir in the tight gas reservoir horizontal well according to claim 4, which is characterized by comprising the following steps of: the specific process of converting the n × m reservoir parameter matrix X into the n × m fuzzy matrix X ″ is as follows:
the elements in equation (1) are calculated using the following formula:
Figure FDA0003718846460000032
wherein:
Figure FDA0003718846460000033
Figure FDA0003718846460000034
in the formula: x is the number of ik The element of the ith row and the kth column in the reservoir parameter matrix X is i-1, 2 … n, k-1, 2 … m;
Figure FDA0003718846460000041
the arithmetic mean value of the kth column element in the reservoir parameter matrix X is obtained;
s k the standard deviation of the kth column element in the reservoir parameter matrix X is shown;
x″ ik 0 ≦ X ″, which is the element in the ith row and the kth column in the blur matrix X ″ ik Less than or equal to 1, and no dimension;
a blur matrix X "is obtained.
6. The method for evaluating the feasibility of deploying the reservoir in the tight gas reservoir horizontal well according to claim 5, wherein the method comprises the following steps: the specific process of converting the n × m fuzzy matrix X ″ into the n × n fuzzy similar matrix R is as follows:
the elements in equation (3) are calculated using the following equation
Figure FDA0003718846460000042
In the formula: r is ij In order to blur the elements in the ith row and jth column of the similarity matrix R, i is 1,2 … n, j is 1,2 … n;
x″ ik to obscure the element in row i and column k in matrix X', X ″ lk In order to blur the elements in the ith row and kth column of the matrix X ″, there is no dimension, i is 1,2 … n, k is 1,2 … m, and l is j; x is more than or equal to 0 ≦ x ″) ik ≤1,0≤x″ lk ≤1;
An nxn fuzzy similarity matrix R is obtained.
7. The method for evaluating the feasibility of deploying the reservoir in the tight gas reservoir horizontal well according to claim 6, wherein the method comprises the following steps: the conversion of the n × n fuzzy similar matrix R into the n × n fuzzy equivalent matrix R * The specific process comprises the following steps:
the elements in equation (5) are calculated using the following equation
Figure FDA0003718846460000043
In the formula: r 2 The matrix is an n multiplied by n matrix and represents the synthesis of the fuzzy similar matrix R and the fuzzy similar matrix R;
r ip ∧r qj represents taking r ip And r qj 1,2 … n, q ═ p;
Figure FDA0003718846460000044
represented in the set r i1 ∧r 1j ,r i2 ∧r 2j ,…,r in ∧r nj Taking the maximum value;
sequentially calculating by formula (6)
Figure FDA0003718846460000045
Up to
Figure FDA0003718846460000046
Wherein s is the number of calculation times, and s is less than or equal to log 2 n+1;
Obtaining an n multiplied by n fuzzy equivalent matrix R *
CN202210752701.5A 2022-06-28 2022-06-28 Method for evaluating reservoir deployment feasibility of tight gas reservoir horizontal well Pending CN114934770A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210752701.5A CN114934770A (en) 2022-06-28 2022-06-28 Method for evaluating reservoir deployment feasibility of tight gas reservoir horizontal well

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210752701.5A CN114934770A (en) 2022-06-28 2022-06-28 Method for evaluating reservoir deployment feasibility of tight gas reservoir horizontal well

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN114934770A true CN114934770A (en) 2022-08-23

Family

ID=82868525

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202210752701.5A Pending CN114934770A (en) 2022-06-28 2022-06-28 Method for evaluating reservoir deployment feasibility of tight gas reservoir horizontal well

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN114934770A (en)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20150060054A1 (en) * 2013-08-29 2015-03-05 Baker Hughes Incorporated Modeling and Production of Tight Hydrocarbon Reservoirs
CN108345719A (en) * 2018-01-17 2018-07-31 中国石油大学(华东) A kind of high angle hole/horizontal well is with boring inversion method after electromagnetic wave logging data is bored
CN109538197A (en) * 2018-11-01 2019-03-29 中国石油大学(北京) Oil and gas reservoir well drilling rail determines method, apparatus and storage medium
CN110334431A (en) * 2019-07-02 2019-10-15 西南石油大学 A kind of low permeability tight gas reservoir single well controlled reserves calculating and remaining gas analysis method

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20150060054A1 (en) * 2013-08-29 2015-03-05 Baker Hughes Incorporated Modeling and Production of Tight Hydrocarbon Reservoirs
CN108345719A (en) * 2018-01-17 2018-07-31 中国石油大学(华东) A kind of high angle hole/horizontal well is with boring inversion method after electromagnetic wave logging data is bored
CN109538197A (en) * 2018-11-01 2019-03-29 中国石油大学(北京) Oil and gas reservoir well drilling rail determines method, apparatus and storage medium
CN110334431A (en) * 2019-07-02 2019-10-15 西南石油大学 A kind of low permeability tight gas reservoir single well controlled reserves calculating and remaining gas analysis method

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
付锁堂;费世祥;叶珍;何磊;崔越华;: "致密砂岩气藏水平井参数优化", 天然气工业, no. 04, 20 April 2018 (2018-04-20) *
周海菲;: "复杂断块油藏区块分类优选方法", 大庆石油地质与开发, no. 04, 1 August 2016 (2016-08-01) *
马春晓;邢云;乔红军;周伟勤;张磊;: "致密油气储层体积压裂可行性研究", 内蒙古石油化工, no. 04, 30 April 2017 (2017-04-30) *

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN106777651B (en) Oil-water well yield splitting method based on injection-production balance principle
WO2019149147A1 (en) Method for dividing ecological and geological environment types based on coal resource development
CN104948163B (en) A kind of shale gas well deliverability assay method
Dalongeville et al. Geographic isolation and larval dispersal shape seascape genetic patterns differently according to spatial scale
CN111161201B (en) Infrared and visible light image fusion method based on detail enhancement channel attention
CN111191741A (en) Rock classification constraint inheritance loss method of rock recognition deep learning model
CN106056459A (en) Compacted oil source rock classification evaluation standard division method based on hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency
CN110807544A (en) Oil field residual oil saturation distribution prediction method based on machine learning
CN107679539A (en) A kind of single convolutional neural networks local message wild based on local sensing and global information integration method
CN114934770A (en) Method for evaluating reservoir deployment feasibility of tight gas reservoir horizontal well
WO2017179818A1 (en) Ensemble-based reservoir characterization method using multiple kalman gains and dynamic data selection
CN109992690B (en) Image retrieval method and system
CN107658029A (en) A kind of brand-new distribution and privatization miRNA diseases contact Forecasting Methodology
CN112883646B (en) Building settlement amount extraction method, system and device combining machine learning and soil mechanics model
Czembor et al. Study of Genetic Variability Among Monopycnidial and Monopycnidiospore Isolates Derived from Single Pycnidia of Stagonospora ssp. and Septoria tritici with the use of RAPD‐PCR, MP‐PCR and rep‐PCR Techniques
CN107133879A (en) A kind of method for screening similar oil field
Kolařík et al. Nucleotide composition bias of rDNA sequences as a source of phylogenetic artifacts in Basidiomycota—a case of a new lineage of a uredinicolous Ramularia-like anamorph with affinities to Ustilaginomycotina
Deshuraud et al. From genome wide SNPs to genomic islands of differentiation: the quest for species diagnostic markers in two scleractinian corals, Pocillopora and Porites
CN114923650A (en) Rapid structural damage identification method based on vibration mode difference ratio matrix and mode matching
CN113989528A (en) Hyperspectral image feature representation method based on depth joint sparse-collaborative representation
CN113673629A (en) Open set domain adaptive remote sensing image small sample classification method based on multi-graph convolution network
CN113434812B (en) Hydrate pilot mining target optimization method based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
CN111695229B (en) Novel distributed non-Gaussian process monitoring method based on GA-ICA
CN113358538B (en) Method and device for determining rock mode
Tanada Algorithm theoretical basis document of gcom-c/sgli ver. 3 cloud flag product (clfg)

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination