CN114897193A - A decision-making method and decision-making system for aircraft structure maintenance based on human-in-the-loop - Google Patents

A decision-making method and decision-making system for aircraft structure maintenance based on human-in-the-loop Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN114897193A
CN114897193A CN202210450388.XA CN202210450388A CN114897193A CN 114897193 A CN114897193 A CN 114897193A CN 202210450388 A CN202210450388 A CN 202210450388A CN 114897193 A CN114897193 A CN 114897193A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
case
decision
maintenance
maintenance decision
target
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202210450388.XA
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
李鑫
柏宇星
李伟男
徐翊竣
陈茹雯
吴金国
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nanjing Institute of Technology
Original Assignee
Nanjing Institute of Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nanjing Institute of Technology filed Critical Nanjing Institute of Technology
Priority to CN202210450388.XA priority Critical patent/CN114897193A/en
Publication of CN114897193A publication Critical patent/CN114897193A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/20Administration of product repair or maintenance
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F18/00Pattern recognition
    • G06F18/20Analysing
    • G06F18/21Design or setup of recognition systems or techniques; Extraction of features in feature space; Blind source separation
    • G06F18/213Feature extraction, e.g. by transforming the feature space; Summarisation; Mappings, e.g. subspace methods
    • G06F18/2135Feature extraction, e.g. by transforming the feature space; Summarisation; Mappings, e.g. subspace methods based on approximation criteria, e.g. principal component analysis
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F18/00Pattern recognition
    • G06F18/20Analysing
    • G06F18/22Matching criteria, e.g. proximity measures
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06NCOMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N20/00Machine learning

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Biology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Feedback Control In General (AREA)

Abstract

本发明公开了一种基于人在回路的飞机结构维修决策方法及决策系统,包括如下步骤,获取目标案例的飞机结构的损伤检查数据;基于维修决策模型算法库和维修案例库,提取目标案例的案例特征并分析案例特征属性权重;根据所述案例特征属性权重,得到与目标案例相似的源案例,输出目标案例的最优维修决策;根据所述最优维修决策,通过人机交互,输出决策结论。本发明针对目标案例的飞机结构的损伤检查数据,能够快递准确地生成维修决策结果。

Figure 202210450388

The invention discloses a human-in-the-loop-based aircraft structure maintenance decision-making method and decision-making system, comprising the following steps: obtaining damage inspection data of the aircraft structure of a target case; Case features and analyze the case feature attribute weights; according to the case feature attribute weights, obtain a source case similar to the target case, and output the optimal maintenance decision of the target case; according to the optimal maintenance decision, through human-computer interaction, output decision-making in conclusion. According to the damage inspection data of the aircraft structure of the target case, the invention can expressly and accurately generate the maintenance decision result.

Figure 202210450388

Description

一种基于人在回路的飞机结构维修决策方法及决策系统A decision-making method and decision-making system for aircraft structure maintenance based on human-in-the-loop

技术领域technical field

本发明涉及一种基于人在回路的飞机结构维修决策方法及决策系统,属于飞机结构维修技术领域。The invention relates to a human-in-the-loop-based aircraft structure maintenance decision-making method and decision-making system, belonging to the technical field of aircraft structure maintenance.

背景技术Background technique

及时准确的损伤测量与评估、高效的修理方案制定是解决民机结构修理问题的核心内容。以波音和空客为代表的国外民机为高效的制定修理方案,建立了涵盖“损伤监测、评估、报告和修理方案管理”的支援平台。国内已开始了结构修理评估和验证方面的研究,但研究成果大多处于理论分析和仿真验证层面,没有从结构设计和使用特点、以及维修资源和技术能力约束等具体因素出发,形成可靠可行的超手册结构修理方案制定技术。在民机结构案例研究中,需要针对不同类型的民机根据其结构和功能的特征、制造商以及型号方面的信息来尽可能全面的选择一些属性,来充分体现民机案例的特点。对于高度复杂化和专业化的飞机而言,会不可避免的出现属性的冗余、相关等问题。因此需要选择合适的方法从众多的属性中提取出有效特征。Timely and accurate damage measurement and assessment, and efficient repair plan formulation are the core contents of solving civil aircraft structural repair problems. Foreign civil aircraft represented by Boeing and Airbus have established a support platform covering "damage monitoring, assessment, reporting and repair program management" for the efficient formulation of repair plans. Domestic research on structural repair evaluation and verification has been started, but most of the research results are at the level of theoretical analysis and simulation verification. Manual Structural Repair Program Development Techniques. In the case study of civil aircraft structure, it is necessary to select some attributes as comprehensively as possible for different types of civil aircraft according to their structural and functional characteristics, manufacturers and models to fully reflect the characteristics of civil aircraft cases. For highly complex and specialized aircraft, there will inevitably be problems such as redundancy and correlation of attributes. Therefore, it is necessary to choose an appropriate method to extract effective features from numerous attributes.

传统的维修决策与人的能力和经验直接相关,所选取的维修属性特征和决策算法在实际中较为固定,制约了飞机结构维修决策能力的快速提升。同时,飞机结构的维修决策需要综合考虑全局的合理维修时机,兼顾资源和能力的维修方式,权衡损伤情况和维修能力的快速恢复措施,建立复杂损伤条件下的最优维修资源保障和技术状态恢复体系,因此迫切需要开发一套适用于飞机结构维修的智能决策方法,快速准确的针对飞机结构的损伤检查数据,给出损伤结构的维修决策,从而实现飞机实际运营的完整性、任务可靠性与整机可用性的有效提升。Traditional maintenance decision-making is directly related to human ability and experience. The selected maintenance attributes and decision-making algorithms are relatively fixed in practice, which restricts the rapid improvement of aircraft structure maintenance decision-making ability. At the same time, the maintenance decision of aircraft structure needs to comprehensively consider the overall reasonable maintenance timing, take into account the maintenance method of resources and capabilities, weigh the damage situation and the rapid recovery measures of maintenance capabilities, and establish the optimal maintenance resource guarantee and technical state recovery under complex damage conditions. Therefore, it is urgent to develop a set of intelligent decision-making methods suitable for aircraft structure maintenance, which can quickly and accurately target the damage inspection data of the aircraft structure, and give the maintenance decision of the damaged structure, so as to realize the integrity of the actual operation of the aircraft, the reliability of the mission and the reliability of the aircraft. Effectively improve the usability of the whole machine.

公开于该背景技术部分的信息仅仅旨在增加对本发明的总体背景的理解,而不应当被视为承认或以任何形式暗示该信息构成已为本领域普通技术人员所公知的现有技术。The information disclosed in this Background section is only for enhancement of understanding of the general background of the invention and should not be taken as an acknowledgement or any form of suggestion that this information forms the prior art already known to a person of ordinary skill in the art.

发明内容SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

本发明的目的在于克服现有技术中的不足,提供一种基于人在回路的飞机结构维修决策方法及决策系统,针对目标案例的飞机结构的损伤检查数据,能够快递准确地生成维修决策结果。The purpose of the present invention is to overcome the deficiencies in the prior art, and to provide a human-in-the-loop-based aircraft structure maintenance decision-making method and decision-making system, which can expressly and accurately generate maintenance decision-making results according to the damage inspection data of the aircraft structure of the target case.

为达到上述目的,本发明是采用下述技术方案实现的:To achieve the above object, the present invention adopts the following technical solutions to realize:

一方面,本发明公开了一种基于人在回路的飞机结构维修决策方法,包括如下步骤,In one aspect, the present invention discloses a human-in-the-loop-based aircraft structure maintenance decision-making method, comprising the following steps:

获取目标案例的飞机结构的损伤检查数据;Obtain the damage inspection data of the aircraft structure of the target case;

根据所述目标案例的飞机结构的损伤检查数据,基于维修决策模型算法库和维修案例库,提取目标案例的案例特征并分析案例特征属性权重;According to the damage inspection data of the aircraft structure of the target case, based on the maintenance decision model algorithm library and the maintenance case library, extract the case features of the target case and analyze the case feature attribute weights;

根据所述案例特征属性权重,得到与目标案例相似的源案例;According to the weight of the feature attribute of the case, a source case similar to the target case is obtained;

根据所述源案例,输出目标案例的最优维修决策;According to the source case, output the optimal maintenance decision for the target case;

根据所述最优维修决策,通过人机交互,输出决策结论;其中,若所述最优维修决策正确,则直接输出决策结论;若所述最优维修决策错误,则人工核实所述目标案例的决策结论并更新优化维修决策模型算法库和维修案例库。According to the optimal maintenance decision, a decision conclusion is output through human-computer interaction; wherein, if the optimal maintenance decision is correct, the decision conclusion is directly output; if the optimal maintenance decision is wrong, the target case is manually verified The decision conclusion and update the optimization maintenance decision model algorithm library and maintenance case library.

进一步的,所述目标案例的案例特征包括但不限于ATA部位编号、损伤部位结构类型、损伤成因、损伤类型、损伤尺寸、检查方式、修理类型。Further, the case characteristics of the target case include, but are not limited to, the ATA part number, the structure type of the damage part, the cause of the damage, the damage type, the damage size, the inspection method, and the repair type.

进一步的,所述案例特征采用层次分析法或主成分分析法等降维算法进行选取。Further, the case features are selected by a dimensionality reduction algorithm such as AHP or PCA.

进一步的,基于维修决策模型算法库和维修案例库,通过熵权值法确定案例特征属性权重。Further, based on the maintenance decision model algorithm library and the maintenance case library, the weight of the case feature attribute is determined by the entropy weight method.

进一步的,根据所述案例特征属性权重,采用基于欧式距离的加权K-近邻检索算法计算案例相似度,得到与目标案例相似的源案例。Further, according to the weight of the feature attribute of the case, the weighted K-nearest neighbor retrieval algorithm based on Euclidean distance is used to calculate the similarity of the case, and the source case similar to the target case is obtained.

进一步的,根据所述源案例,基于相似案例迁移学习,输出目标案例的最优维修决策。Further, according to the source case, based on the transfer learning of similar cases, the optimal maintenance decision of the target case is output.

进一步的,响应于所述人机交互模块输出的最优维修决策错误时,Further, in response to an error in the optimal maintenance decision output by the human-computer interaction module,

若所述目标案例为新案例,则人工输入所述目标案例的决策结论,形成新的维修决策,并作为新增维修案例进入维修案例库;同时触发案例自学习算法进行案例自学习,更新案例特征及案例特征属性权重,优化维修决策模型算法库;If the target case is a new case, manually input the decision conclusion of the target case, form a new maintenance decision, and enter the maintenance case database as a new maintenance case; at the same time, trigger the case self-learning algorithm to perform case self-learning and update the case Feature and case feature attribute weight, optimize maintenance decision model algorithm library;

若所述目标案例不为新案例,则人工修订所述目标案例的决策结论,并更新维修案例库;同时触发案例自学习算法进行案例自学习,优化维修决策模型算法库。If the target case is not a new case, manually revise the decision conclusion of the target case, and update the maintenance case database; at the same time, trigger the case self-learning algorithm to perform case self-learning, and optimize the maintenance decision model algorithm library.

另一方面,本发明公开了一个基于人在回路的飞机结构维修决策方法的决策系统,包括数据获取模块、分析数据模块、维修决策模型算法库、维修案例库、源案例模块、最优维修决策模型及人机交互模块,On the other hand, the present invention discloses a decision-making system based on a human-in-the-loop aircraft structure maintenance decision-making method, including a data acquisition module, an analysis data module, a maintenance decision model algorithm library, a maintenance case library, a source case module, and an optimal maintenance decision. models and human-computer interaction modules,

其中,所述数据获取模块,用于获取目标案例的飞机结构的损伤检查数据;Wherein, the data acquisition module is used to acquire the damage inspection data of the aircraft structure of the target case;

所述数据分析模块,用于根据所述目标案例的飞机结构的损伤检查数据,基于维修决策模型算法库和维修案例库,提取目标案例的案例特征并分析案例特征属性权重;The data analysis module is configured to extract the case features of the target case and analyze the case feature attribute weights based on the maintenance decision model algorithm library and the maintenance case library according to the damage inspection data of the aircraft structure of the target case;

所述维修案例库,用于存储飞机结构的维修案例;the maintenance case database for storing maintenance cases of the aircraft structure;

所述维修决策模型算法库,用于存储飞机结构的维修决策模型算法;The maintenance decision model algorithm library is used to store the maintenance decision model algorithm of the aircraft structure;

所述源案例模块,用于根据所述案例特征属性权重,得到与目标案例相似的源案例;The source case module is used to obtain a source case similar to the target case according to the weight of the feature attribute of the case;

所述最优维修决策模型,用于根据所述源案例,输出目标案例的最优维修决策;The optimal maintenance decision model is used for outputting the optimal maintenance decision of the target case according to the source case;

所述人机交互模块,用于根据所述最优维修决策,输出决策结论;若所述最优维修决策正确时,则直接输出决策结论;若所述最优维修决策错误时,则人工核实所述目标案例的决策结论并更新优化维修决策模型算法库和维修案例库。The human-computer interaction module is used to output a decision conclusion according to the optimal maintenance decision; if the optimal maintenance decision is correct, directly output the decision conclusion; if the optimal maintenance decision is wrong, manually verify The decision conclusion of the target case is updated to optimize the maintenance decision model algorithm library and maintenance case library.

与现有技术相比,本发明所达到的有益效果:Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects achieved by the present invention:

本发明基于维修案例库和维修决策模型算法库,提取与目标案例的案例特征,通过案例之间的共性特征,深入挖掘多维度的案例信息,确定与目标案例相似的源案例,从而获取目标案例的最优维修决策。Based on the maintenance case library and the maintenance decision model algorithm library, the invention extracts the case features of the target case, and deeply digs the multi-dimensional case information through the common features between the cases, determines the source case similar to the target case, and obtains the target case. optimal maintenance decision.

本发明还采用了人机交互模块,基于人在回路的方法对最优维修决策进行反馈,进而更为准确的得到维修决策结论;同时更新优化了维修案例库和维修决策模型算法库,使得输入新的目标案例后,能够更为快速的得到维修决策结论。The invention also adopts a human-computer interaction module, and feedbacks the optimal maintenance decision based on the human-in-the-loop method, so as to obtain the maintenance decision conclusion more accurately; meanwhile, the maintenance case database and the maintenance decision model algorithm database are updated and optimized, so that the input After a new target case, the maintenance decision conclusion can be obtained more quickly.

附图说明Description of drawings

图1是一种基于人在回路的飞机结构维修决策方法的流程图。Figure 1 is a flow chart of a man-in-the-loop based aircraft structure maintenance decision-making method.

具体实施方式Detailed ways

下面结合附图对本发明作进一步描述。以下实施例仅用于更加清楚地说明本发明的技术方案,而不能以此来限制本发明的保护范围。The present invention will be further described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. The following examples are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention more clearly, and cannot be used to limit the protection scope of the present invention.

实施例1Example 1

本实施例1提供了一种基于人在回路的飞机结构维修决策方法,包括如下步骤,This embodiment 1 provides a human-in-the-loop-based aircraft structure maintenance decision-making method, including the following steps:

步骤一:获取目标案例的飞机结构的损伤检查数据。Step 1: Obtain the damage inspection data of the aircraft structure of the target case.

步骤二:根据目标案例的飞机结构的损伤检查数据,基于维修决策模型算法库和维修案例库,提取目标案例的案例特征并分析案例特征属性权重。Step 2: According to the damage inspection data of the aircraft structure of the target case, based on the maintenance decision model algorithm library and the maintenance case library, extract the case features of the target case and analyze the weight of the case feature attributes.

具体的,影响维修决策的目标案例的案例特征的类型,一方面可以根据工程经验从飞机结构历史修理案例中选取,如ATA部位编号、损伤部位结构类型、损伤成因、损伤类型、损伤尺寸、检查方式、修理类型等,另一方面也可以对修理案例中的特征采用层次分析法、主成分分析法等降维算法选取影响飞机结构维修决策的主要案例特征。Specifically, the type of case characteristics of the target case that affects the maintenance decision can be selected from historical aircraft structural repair cases according to engineering experience, such as ATA part number, damage part structure type, damage cause, damage type, damage size, inspection On the other hand, dimensionality reduction algorithms such as AHP and PCA can also be used for the features in the repair cases to select the main case features that affect the decision-making of aircraft structural maintenance.

基于维修案例库,提取目标案例的案例特征后,确定案例特征属性权重。为避免人为主观性对案例特征属性权重的影响,采用熵权值法确定案例特征属性权重。Based on the maintenance case database, after extracting the case features of the target case, the attribute weights of the case features are determined. In order to avoid the influence of human subjectivity on the weight of case feature attributes, the entropy weight method is used to determine the weight of case feature attributes.

首先,将案例特征属性矩阵进行标准化处理,具体表达式如下:First, normalize the case feature attribute matrix, the specific expression is as follows:

Figure BDA0003618348450000051
Figure BDA0003618348450000051

其中,yij表示标准化处理后的案例特征属性矩阵,xij表示案例特征属性矩阵,yij和xij均为m行n列矩阵,m表示案例特征属性矩阵的行数,n表示案例特征属性矩阵的列数,i表示案例特征属性矩阵的行坐标,j表示案例特征属性矩阵的列坐标,xi表示源案例x的第i个特征属性值。Among them, y ij represents the standardized case feature attribute matrix, x ij represents the case feature attribute matrix, both y ij and x ij are matrices with m rows and n columns, m represents the row number of the case feature attribute matrix, and n represents the case feature attributes The number of columns of the matrix, i represents the row coordinate of the case feature attribute matrix, j represents the column coordinate of the case feature attribute matrix, and x i represents the ith feature attribute value of the source case x.

其次,求得各个案例特征属性的信息熵值Ej,具体表达式如下,Secondly, the information entropy value E j of each case feature attribute is obtained, and the specific expression is as follows:

Figure BDA0003618348450000061
Figure BDA0003618348450000061

Figure BDA0003618348450000062
Figure BDA0003618348450000062

Figure BDA0003618348450000063
Figure BDA0003618348450000063

其中,Ej表示第j个案例特征属性的信息熵值,k为中间参数,pij表示对yij进行归一化处理后的矩阵。Among them, E j represents the information entropy value of the feature attribute of the jth case, k is an intermediate parameter, and p ij represents the matrix after normalizing y ij .

最后,确定各个案例特征属性权重:Finally, determine the weight of each case feature attribute:

Figure BDA0003618348450000064
Figure BDA0003618348450000064

0≤ωj≤1 0≤ωj ≤1

Figure BDA0003618348450000065
Figure BDA0003618348450000065

其中,ωj表示第j个案例特征属性的权重。Among them, ω j represents the weight of the feature attribute of the jth case.

步骤三:根据案例特征属性权重,采用基于欧式距离的加权K-近邻检索算法计算案例相似度,得到与目标案例相似的源案例。Step 3: According to the weight of the feature attributes of the case, the weighted K-nearest neighbor retrieval algorithm based on Euclidean distance is used to calculate the similarity of the case, and the source case similar to the target case is obtained.

具体如下:details as follows:

加权的欧氏距离D(X,Y)为The weighted Euclidean distance D(X,Y) is

Figure BDA0003618348450000066
Figure BDA0003618348450000066

Figure BDA0003618348450000067
Figure BDA0003618348450000067

其中,xi表示源案例x的第i个特征属性值,i=1,2,3,...,n;yi表示目标案例y的第i个特征属性值;n表示案例特征属性的数量;ωj表示第j个案例特征属性的权重;d(xi,yi)2表示目标案例与源案例之间的欧氏距离,si表示n维案例特征空间上的第i个特征。Among them, x i represents the ith feature attribute value of the source case x, i=1,2,3,...,n; y i represents the ith feature attribute value of the target case y; n represents the case feature attribute value number; ω j represents the weight of the jth case feature attribute; d(x i , y i ) 2 represents the Euclidean distance between the target case and the source case, s i represents the ith feature on the n-dimensional case feature space .

目标案例与源案例之间的相似度S(X,Y)为:The similarity S(X,Y) between the target case and the source case is:

S(X,Y)=1/(1+D(X,Y))S(X,Y)=1/(1+D(X,Y))

步骤四:根据源案例,输出目标案例的最优维修决策。Step 4: According to the source case, output the optimal maintenance decision of the target case.

具体的,源案例按照类型的不同,可以分为同类机型案例和类似机型案例,通过源案例的信息迁移学习,在考虑相似度和匹配度的情况下,得到目标案例的最优维修决策。Specifically, the source cases can be divided into similar model cases and similar model cases according to different types. Through the information transfer learning of the source cases, considering the similarity and matching degree, the optimal maintenance decision of the target case is obtained. .

步骤五:根据最优维修决策,通过人机交互,输出决策结论。Step 5: According to the optimal maintenance decision, through human-computer interaction, output the decision conclusion.

具体的,通过迁移学习得到的最优维修决策,以人在回路的维修决策信息反馈为触发条件,采用人工输入核实维修决策结论。如果最优维修决策正确,则直接输出损伤结构的维修决策结论。Specifically, the optimal maintenance decision obtained through transfer learning takes the maintenance decision information feedback of the human-in-the-loop as the triggering condition, and uses manual input to verify the maintenance decision conclusion. If the optimal maintenance decision is correct, the maintenance decision conclusion of the damaged structure is directly output.

步骤六:响应于人机交互模块输出的最优维修决策错误时:Step 6: In response to the error of the optimal maintenance decision output by the human-computer interaction module:

若目标案例为新案例,则人工输入目标案例的决策结论,形成新的维修决策,并作为新增维修案例进入维修案例库;同时触发案例自学习算法进行案例自学习,更新案例特征及案例特征属性权重,优化维修决策模型算法库;If the target case is a new case, manually input the decision conclusion of the target case to form a new maintenance decision, and enter the maintenance case database as a new maintenance case; at the same time, trigger the case self-learning algorithm to conduct case self-learning, and update the case characteristics and case characteristics Attribute weight, optimization maintenance decision model algorithm library;

若目标案例不为新案例,则人工修订目标案例的决策结论,并更新维修案例库;同时触发案例自学习算法进行案例自学习,优化维修决策模型算法库。If the target case is not a new case, manually revise the decision conclusion of the target case and update the maintenance case database; at the same time, trigger the case self-learning algorithm to conduct case self-learning and optimize the maintenance decision model algorithm library.

步骤七,更新优化完成后,输入目标案例,重复上述步骤。Step 7: After the update and optimization is completed, enter the target case and repeat the above steps.

实施例2Example 2

本实施例2公开了一个基于实施例1的飞机结构维修决策方法的决策系统,包括数据获取模块、分析数据模块、维修决策模型算法库、维修案例库、源案例模块、最优维修决策模型及人机交互模块,The second embodiment discloses a decision-making system based on the aircraft structure maintenance decision-making method of the first embodiment, including a data acquisition module, an analysis data module, a maintenance decision-making model algorithm library, a maintenance case library, a source case module, an optimal maintenance decision-making model and Human-computer interaction module,

其中,数据获取模块,用于获取目标案例的飞机结构的损伤检查数据;Among them, the data acquisition module is used to acquire the damage inspection data of the aircraft structure of the target case;

数据分析模块,用于根据目标案例的飞机结构的损伤检查数据,基于维修决策模型算法库和维修案例库,提取目标案例的案例特征并分析案例特征属性权重;The data analysis module is used to extract the case features of the target case and analyze the weight of the case feature attributes based on the maintenance decision model algorithm library and maintenance case library based on the damage inspection data of the aircraft structure of the target case;

维修案例库,用于存储飞机结构的维修案例;Maintenance case library for storing maintenance cases for aircraft structures;

维修决策模型算法库,用于存储飞机结构的维修决策模型算法;Maintenance decision model algorithm library, which is used to store the maintenance decision model algorithm of aircraft structure;

源案例模块,用于根据案例特征属性权重,得到与目标案例相似的源案例;The source case module is used to obtain the source case similar to the target case according to the weight of the feature attribute of the case;

最优维修决策模型,用于根据源案例,输出目标案例的最优维修决策;The optimal maintenance decision model is used to output the optimal maintenance decision of the target case according to the source case;

人机交互模块,用于根据最优维修决策,输出决策结论;若最优维修决策正确时,则直接输出决策结论;若最优维修决策错误时,则人工核实目标案例的决策结论并更新优化维修决策模型算法库和维修案例库。The human-computer interaction module is used to output the decision conclusion according to the optimal maintenance decision; if the optimal maintenance decision is correct, it will directly output the decision conclusion; if the optimal maintenance decision is wrong, manually verify the decision conclusion of the target case and update the optimization Maintenance decision model algorithm library and maintenance case library.

本发明的技术构思为,针对输入的飞机结构的损伤检查数据,快速生成最优维修决策,采用人机交互模块核实最优维修决策,并反馈更新优化整个决策系统,迭代使用以使得系统能够更快速准确的给出决策结论。The technical idea of the present invention is to quickly generate an optimal maintenance decision based on the input damage inspection data of the aircraft structure, use a human-computer interaction module to verify the optimal maintenance decision, and feed back, update and optimize the entire decision-making system, and use iteratively to make the system more efficient. Make decisions quickly and accurately.

以上所述仅是本发明的优选实施方式,应当指出,对于本技术领域的普通技术人员来说,在不脱离本发明技术原理的前提下,还可以做出若干改进和变形,这些改进和变形也应视为本发明的保护范围。The above are only the preferred embodiments of the present invention. It should be pointed out that for those skilled in the art, without departing from the technical principle of the present invention, several improvements and modifications can also be made. These improvements and modifications It should also be regarded as the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims (8)

1. A method for deciding the maintenance of airplane structure based on man-in-the-loop includes such steps as providing a decision-making unit,
acquiring damage inspection data of an airplane structure of a target case;
extracting case characteristics of the target case and analyzing case characteristic attribute weights based on a maintenance decision model algorithm library and a maintenance case library according to damage inspection data of the airplane structure of the target case;
obtaining a source case similar to the target case according to the case characteristic attribute weight;
outputting an optimal maintenance decision of the target case according to the source case;
outputting a decision conclusion through man-machine interaction according to the optimal maintenance decision; if the optimal maintenance decision is correct, a decision conclusion is directly output; and if the optimal maintenance decision is wrong, manually verifying the decision conclusion of the target case and updating an optimal maintenance decision model algorithm library and a maintenance case library.
2. The human-in-loop based aircraft structure repair decision method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the case characteristics of the target case include, but are not limited to, ATA site number, damage site structure type, damage cause, damage type, damage size, inspection mode, repair type.
3. The human-in-loop-based aircraft structure maintenance decision method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the case characteristics are selected using a dimensionality reduction algorithm such as an analytic hierarchy process or a principal component analysis process.
4. The human-in-loop-based aircraft structure maintenance decision method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the case characteristic attribute weight is determined by an entropy weight method based on a maintenance decision model algorithm library and a maintenance case library.
5. The human-in-loop-based aircraft structure maintenance decision method as claimed in claim 1, wherein case similarity is calculated by using a weighted K-nearest neighbor search algorithm based on Euclidean distance according to the case characteristic attribute weight to obtain a source case similar to a target case.
6. The human-in-loop-based aircraft structure maintenance decision method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the optimal maintenance decision of the target case is output based on similar case transfer learning according to the source case.
7. The human-in-loop based aircraft structure maintenance decision method as claimed in claim 1, wherein in response to an error in the optimal maintenance decision output by the human-machine interaction module,
if the target case is a new case, manually inputting a decision conclusion of the target case to form a new maintenance decision, and entering a maintenance case library as a newly added maintenance case; simultaneously triggering a case self-learning algorithm to perform case self-learning, updating case characteristics and case characteristic attribute weights, and optimizing a maintenance decision model algorithm library;
if the target case is not a new case, manually revising the decision conclusion of the target case and updating a maintenance case base; and simultaneously triggering a case self-learning algorithm to perform case self-learning and optimizing a maintenance decision model algorithm library.
8. The decision-making system for the human-in-loop-based aircraft structure maintenance decision-making method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, comprising a data acquisition module, an analysis data module, a maintenance decision model algorithm library, a maintenance case library, a source case module, an optimal maintenance decision model and a human-computer interaction module,
the data acquisition module is used for acquiring damage inspection data of the airplane structure of the target case;
the data analysis module is used for extracting case characteristics of the target case and analyzing case characteristic attribute weights according to damage inspection data of the airplane structure of the target case and based on a maintenance decision model algorithm library and a maintenance case library;
the maintenance case library is used for storing maintenance cases of the aircraft structure;
the maintenance decision model algorithm library is used for storing maintenance decision model algorithms of the aircraft structure;
the source case module is used for obtaining a source case similar to the target case according to the case characteristic attribute weight;
the optimal maintenance decision model is used for outputting an optimal maintenance decision of a target case according to the source case;
the human-computer interaction module is used for outputting a decision conclusion according to the optimal maintenance decision; if the optimal maintenance decision is correct, directly outputting a decision conclusion; and if the optimal maintenance decision is wrong, manually verifying the decision conclusion of the target case and updating the optimal maintenance decision model algorithm library and the maintenance case library.
CN202210450388.XA 2022-04-24 2022-04-24 A decision-making method and decision-making system for aircraft structure maintenance based on human-in-the-loop Pending CN114897193A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210450388.XA CN114897193A (en) 2022-04-24 2022-04-24 A decision-making method and decision-making system for aircraft structure maintenance based on human-in-the-loop

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210450388.XA CN114897193A (en) 2022-04-24 2022-04-24 A decision-making method and decision-making system for aircraft structure maintenance based on human-in-the-loop

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN114897193A true CN114897193A (en) 2022-08-12

Family

ID=82718632

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202210450388.XA Pending CN114897193A (en) 2022-04-24 2022-04-24 A decision-making method and decision-making system for aircraft structure maintenance based on human-in-the-loop

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN114897193A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115730803A (en) * 2022-11-29 2023-03-03 保银信科信息技术(湖北)有限公司 Building maintenance progress intelligent monitoring management method based on artificial intelligence

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103500423A (en) * 2013-09-26 2014-01-08 国家电网公司 Case adaptation and decision method for power emergency events
CN112446572A (en) * 2019-08-30 2021-03-05 山西汾西矿业(集团)有限责任公司 Mine power supply scheduling emergency aid decision support method considering gas power plant
CN113011788A (en) * 2021-04-23 2021-06-22 集美大学 Emergency decision-making method for marine traffic accident, terminal equipment and storage medium

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103500423A (en) * 2013-09-26 2014-01-08 国家电网公司 Case adaptation and decision method for power emergency events
CN112446572A (en) * 2019-08-30 2021-03-05 山西汾西矿业(集团)有限责任公司 Mine power supply scheduling emergency aid decision support method considering gas power plant
CN113011788A (en) * 2021-04-23 2021-06-22 集美大学 Emergency decision-making method for marine traffic accident, terminal equipment and storage medium

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115730803A (en) * 2022-11-29 2023-03-03 保银信科信息技术(湖北)有限公司 Building maintenance progress intelligent monitoring management method based on artificial intelligence
CN115730803B (en) * 2022-11-29 2024-03-22 陈杰 Intelligent monitoring and management method for maintenance progress of building house based on artificial intelligence

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN111639815B (en) Method and system for predicting power grid defect materials through multi-model fusion
CN112756759B (en) Spot welding robot workstation fault judgment method
CN107886168A (en) One kind carries out elevator faults using multilayer perceptron neutral net and knows method for distinguishing
US20140324520A1 (en) Method for deterministic safety analysis in non-stationary high risk system, control method and control system using thereof
CN114021483B (en) Ultra-short-term wind power forecasting method based on time domain characteristics and XGBoost
CN113449072A (en) Construction method of excavator fault knowledge map based on deep learning
CN114168740B (en) Transformer concurrency fault diagnosis method based on graph convolution neural network and knowledge graph
CN117290462B (en) An intelligent decision-making system and method for large data models
US20250094677A1 (en) Self-service artificial intelligence platform leveraging data-based and physics-based models for providing real-time controls and recommendations
CN112559741A (en) Nuclear power equipment defect recording text classification method, system, medium and electronic equipment
CN104281525A (en) Defect data analytical method and method for shortening software testing programs by using same
CN119229939A (en) A storage chip performance testing method and device based on sparse matrix decomposition
CN114897193A (en) A decision-making method and decision-making system for aircraft structure maintenance based on human-in-the-loop
CN113033898A (en) Electrical load prediction method and system based on K-means clustering and BI-LSTM neural network
CN118566699B (en) Combined logic multi-fault diagnosis method and system based on graph convolution neural network
Yan et al. Simplified Markov model for reliability analysis of phased-mission system using states merging method
CN118033729A (en) Method and system for selecting least adverse earthquake motion based on big data and random forest
CN113435080B (en) Method and system for predicting nuclear power equipment connection pipe stress
CN114492740B (en) A neural network model testing method based on weighted neuron coverage
CN116302647A (en) A KPIs Abnormal Root Cause Location Method Based on LSTM-CNN Causality Discovery Model
Pan et al. Sequential design command prediction using BIM event logs
Li et al. On Testing and Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Models
CN112016240A (en) Prediction method for residual stable service life of incomplete degradation equipment with similar evidence
CN119783550B (en) Independent power grid power supply system reliability-based correction method and system
CN112380041B (en) Xgboost-based failure prediction method for command communication equipment

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination