CN114861404A - Electric heating comprehensive energy system real-time scheduling method for guaranteeing feasibility - Google Patents

Electric heating comprehensive energy system real-time scheduling method for guaranteeing feasibility Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN114861404A
CN114861404A CN202210377586.8A CN202210377586A CN114861404A CN 114861404 A CN114861404 A CN 114861404A CN 202210377586 A CN202210377586 A CN 202210377586A CN 114861404 A CN114861404 A CN 114861404A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
power
heat
supply network
electric heating
energy system
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202210377586.8A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
郑伟业
鲁浩
朱继忠
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
South China University of Technology SCUT
Original Assignee
South China University of Technology SCUT
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by South China University of Technology SCUT filed Critical South China University of Technology SCUT
Priority to CN202210377586.8A priority Critical patent/CN114861404A/en
Publication of CN114861404A publication Critical patent/CN114861404A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0631Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/06Energy or water supply
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2111/00Details relating to CAD techniques
    • G06F2111/06Multi-objective optimisation, e.g. Pareto optimisation using simulated annealing [SA], ant colony algorithms or genetic algorithms [GA]
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E10/00Energy generation through renewable energy sources
    • Y02E10/70Wind energy
    • Y02E10/76Power conversion electric or electronic aspects

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a real-time scheduling method for an electric heating comprehensive energy system for guaranteeing feasibility, which comprises the following steps of: 1) acquiring system parameters of an electric heating comprehensive energy system; 2) establishing a real-time electric heating combined scheduling model; 3) a modified Benders decomposition algorithm strictly guaranteeing feasibility is designed and applied to solving of a distributed real-time scheduling problem of the electric heating comprehensive energy system; 4) and outputting a distributed real-time scheduling result of the electric heating comprehensive energy system with feasibility guarantee. The invention strictly ensures the safety of the electric heating comprehensive energy system through novel feasible cutting before the circular iteration, greatly reduces the iteration times required by the algorithm convergence, and can safely apply the temporary scheduling scheme in the iteration process to the actual system in real time, so the real-time scheduling method can meet the requirements of real-time scheduling on efficiency and safety.

Description

Electric heating comprehensive energy system real-time scheduling method for guaranteeing feasibility
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of scheduling and optimizing of an electric heating integrated energy system, in particular to a real-time scheduling method for the electric heating integrated energy system, which guarantees feasibility.
Background
The traditional distributed scheduling method cannot effectively ensure the safety of real-time operation of the actual electric heating integrated energy system. Due to a relaxation mechanism of the dual decomposition algorithm, relaxed regional coupling constraint cannot be strictly met even after the algorithm is converged, and an error exists; while the original score resolving rule needs to continuously superimpose feasible segmentations on the power grid dispatching subproblems, and a feasible solution can be obtained through a large number of iterations. Whether the scheduling scheme can strictly meet all the constraints of the scheduling model in real time is a problem which cannot be effectively solved by a distributed optimization theory for a long time. Therefore, aiming at the daily scheduling problem of the electric heating integrated energy system, in order to solve the problems that the traditional distributed scheduling algorithm is low in efficiency and difficult to ensure the safety of the system, a novel feasible segmentation generation method is urgently needed to be provided, a modified Bends decomposition algorithm which strictly ensures the feasibility is designed, and the method is applied to solving the distributed real-time scheduling problem of the electric heating integrated energy system.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to solve the defects in the prior art and provide a real-time scheduling method for an electric heating integrated energy system, which guarantees feasibility, strictly ensures the safety of the electric heating integrated energy system through a novel feasible cut before cyclic iteration, greatly reduces the iteration times required by algorithm convergence, and can meet the requirements of real-time scheduling on efficiency and safety because a temporary scheduling scheme in an iteration process can be safely applied to an actual electric heating integrated energy system in real time.
The purpose of the invention can be achieved by adopting the following technical scheme:
a real-time scheduling method for an electric heating comprehensive energy system guaranteeing feasibility comprises the following steps:
s1, inputting system parameters of the electric heating comprehensive energy system;
s2, establishing a real-time electric-heat combined scheduling model;
s3, applying the modified Bender decomposition algorithm to the electric heating comprehensive energy system distributed real-time scheduling problem to solve;
and S4, outputting a distributed real-time scheduling result of the electric heating comprehensive energy system with feasibility guarantee.
Furthermore, the system parameters of the electric heating integrated energy system comprise the compound power of an injection node, the line power flow, the node voltage and the wind abandon penalty cost, the specific heat capacity of the side water of the heat supply network, the pipeline water supply flow rate, the node temperature of the water supply network and the water return network, the inlet and outlet temperature of the water supply network and the water return network, the power of the heat load and the pipeline length. The input of system parameters provides a data base for modeling, and other data can be calculated through the existing parameters.
Further, a mathematical model is established for the real-time electric-heating combined dispatching model through the obtained system parameters of the electric-heating integrated energy system, and the formula of the real-time electric-heating combined dispatching model established in the step S2 is expressed as follows:
Figure BDA0003591351710000021
s.t.D E x E +B E h E ≤b E (A)
D H x H +F E h E +F H h H =f H (B)
Figure BDA0003591351710000022
Figure BDA0003591351710000023
wherein x is E Representing internal variables of the grid, including vectors, x, consisting of the power generation, the up/down rotation reserve capacity of the generator unit, the phase angle of the bus and the power generation of the wind farm H Representing internal variables of the heat supply network, including vector composed of node temperature of supply/return side of pipeline node, temperature of supply/return side of heat source, inlet temperature of supply/return pipeline, outlet temperature of supply/return pipeline, and temperature of heat load supply/return side, B E And D E Coefficient matrices of boundary variables and state variables, respectively, b E Right hand term vector, D, being a constraint of the grid inequality H Is a heat supply network internal variable front coefficient matrix, F E Is a coefficient matrix before the electric output of the heat source, F H Is a coefficient matrix before heat source heat output, f H For equality constraint of the right-hand term, D H 、F E 、F H 、f H Both in relation to parameters of the heat supply network and the electricity network,x H and
Figure BDA0003591351710000031
lower and upper bounds, h, of state variables inside the heat supply network E For the electric power of the heat source, h H The heat source is used for generating heat,h H and
Figure BDA0003591351710000032
c in the formula (1) of an objective function is the lower bound and the upper bound of the heat output of the heat source H (h H ) The cost for the heat source inside the heat supply network is expressed as:
C H (h H )=c H T h H (2)
wherein, c H T C in the formula (1) of an objective function as a heat source heat cost coefficient vector E (x E ,h E ) The wind curtailment cost, the coupling heat source (such as a cogeneration device) and the generating cost of the heat unit are combined to form a quadratic function, and the quadratic function is expressed as:
C E (x E ,h E )=h E T Gh E +c E T h E (3)
wherein G is a coefficient matrix, c E T Is a heat source electricity cost coefficient vector.
Furthermore, in order to protect the privacy problem of the power grid and the heat supply network, the distributed method is adopted to solve the optimal scheduling problem of the electric heating integrated energy system, so that the power grid control center and the heat supply network control center can achieve almost the same result as centralized solution only by exchanging a small amount of boundary information, and different subject privacy can be protected while the solution precision is not lost. The process of step S3 is as follows:
s31, solving the optimal scheduling problem of the electric heating integrated energy system by adopting a distributed method, and solving the problem by decomposing. Decomposing the original electric heating comprehensive energy system optimization scheduling problem into a power grid main problem and a heat supply network sub-problem by a feasible cutting generation method; the economic dispatching problem of the power grid is used as the main problem of the power grid, and the modeling is as follows:
Figure BDA0003591351710000033
s.t.D H x H +F E h E +F H h H =f H (B)
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0003591351710000034
representing the thermal output of the stationary cogeneration unit, is a boundary variable, h ', determined by the grid control centre' E Is heat source electric power h E Virtual copy of (2), heat source power output h E Serving as a decision variable in the operation of the heat supply network, inf represents the lower bound of the solving function;
fixing
Figure BDA0003591351710000041
The heat supply network operation problem is optimized as a heat supply network sub-problem:
Figure BDA0003591351710000042
Figure BDA0003591351710000043
D H x H +F E h' E +F H h H =f H (F)
Figure BDA0003591351710000044
Figure BDA0003591351710000045
therefore, the feasible cuts to be generated by the heat supply network control center will be added to the main problem of the power network:
Figure BDA0003591351710000046
wherein h' H Is heat source heat output h H Virtual copy of (2), heat source heat output h H As a decision-making variable in the operation of the power grid,
Figure BDA0003591351710000047
is a divisible first and second coefficient matrix, g FC For a sectionable coefficient vector, the expression is as follows:
Figure BDA0003591351710000048
wherein I is an identity matrix, e H Is a unit vector;
the modified main grid problems are as follows:
Figure BDA0003591351710000049
Figure BDA00035913517100000410
Figure BDA00035913517100000411
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0003591351710000051
is the optimal solution of the internal variables of the power grid,
Figure BDA0003591351710000052
the argmin represents the minimum value of the solving function and provides a target function for a constant determined by a heat supply network control center;
s32, solving the optimization problem of the electric heating comprehensive energy system through Benders decomposition;
the Benders decomposition has excellent performance in solving a mathematical programming problem structure with complex variables, so the Benders decomposition is adopted for iterative solution. In each iteration of the Benders decomposition, the power grid control center solves the main problem of the power grid and sends the boundary state to the heat supply network control center; then, the heat supply network control center judges whether the heat supply network subproblems determined by the constraint condition formulas (E), (F), (C) and (D) are feasible or not, and if feasible, an optimal cut is generated; otherwise, a feasible cut will be generated; applying additional constraint to the boundary variable and adding to the main problem of the power grid;
correspond to different
Figure BDA0003591351710000053
The optimal cutting is a cutting plane of a boundary variable, the optimal cutting provides a lower boundary of an optimal value of the operation cost of the heat network, and the constraint condition formula (E) uses a Lagrange multiplier vector lambda * Expressed, the heat net subproblem is expressed in the form:
Figure BDA0003591351710000054
Figure BDA0003591351710000055
Figure BDA0003591351710000056
D H x H +F E h' E +F H h H =f H (F)
therefore, for any heat source that satisfies the constraint formula (F) E To obtain:
Figure BDA0003591351710000057
η H +G OC h E ≥g OC (10)
equation (17) is the optimal cut obtained from equation (16), where G OC Coefficient matrix for optimum cutting, g OC Coefficient vectors, G, for optimum segmentation OC =-(λ * ) T
Figure BDA0003591351710000058
Figure BDA0003591351710000059
Is the optimal solution, η, to the heat net subproblem H The estimated value of the optimal cost for the operation of the heat supply network on the power grid side is obtained;
s33, implementing a modified Benders decomposition strategy for guaranteeing feasibility of solving problems of the electric heating comprehensive energy system:
determining feasible cutting by a heat supply network control center, and sending constraint conditions to a power grid control center; secondly, the power grid control center sets an iteration index k as 1 and a target value f (0) Solving the modified main problem by using the current objective function and constraint, and obtaining the optimal solution
Figure BDA0003591351710000061
And
Figure BDA0003591351710000062
and will be
Figure BDA0003591351710000063
Sending to the heat supply network, and solving the following heat supply network sub-problems by the heat supply network control center:
Figure BDA0003591351710000064
Figure BDA0003591351710000065
D H x H +F E h' E +F H h H =f H (F)
Figure BDA0003591351710000066
Figure BDA0003591351710000067
to obtain
Figure BDA0003591351710000068
Optimal Lagrange multiplier vector λ corresponding to constraint (M) k And sending the corresponding parameters of the optimal cutting to the power grid, then carrying out convergence judgment, and calculating the kth iteration objective function by the power grid control center
Figure BDA0003591351710000069
If the absolute value of the difference between two adjacent objective function values in the iteration process is smaller than a preset judgment threshold constant epsilon, the iteration process is ended, otherwise, the power grid control center solves the following enhanced main problem of correcting the power grid:
Figure BDA00035913517100000610
s.t.D E x E +B E h E ≤b E (A)
Figure BDA00035913517100000611
Figure BDA00035913517100000612
wherein, the first and the second end of the pipe are connected with each other,
Figure BDA00035913517100000613
respectively, after iteration for the (k + 1) th time, the power grid internal variable, the power grid boundary variable, the heat supply network boundary variable and the estimated value of the optimal cost of the power grid side for the heat supply network operation are obtained, then, the iteration index is updated, k is enabled to be equal to k +1, and the new value is obtained
Figure BDA0003591351710000071
Sending the data to a heat supply network, solving the formula (12) again by a heat supply network control center, circularly processing until a convergence condition is met, and ending an iteration process;
s34, applying the corrected Benders decomposition for guaranteeing feasibility to the electric heating comprehensive energy system:
the provided modified Bender algorithm with feasibility guarantee is applied to the electric heating comprehensive energy system scheduling problem with robustness, uncertainty caused by renewable energy (such as a wind power plant) is well considered, and the output power of the wind power plant should meet the following relation:
Figure BDA0003591351710000072
Figure BDA0003591351710000073
wherein, the first and the second end of the pipe are connected with each other,
Figure BDA0003591351710000074
uploading the predicted available wind power interval to a power grid control center for each wind farm,
Figure BDA0003591351710000075
representing the lower bound of the predicted available wind power of the g-th wind farm at the t-th moment,
Figure BDA0003591351710000076
representing the upper bound of the predicted available wind power of the g wind farm at the t moment. The power grid control center determines and informs each wind power plant of the interval of wind power allowed to be output
Figure BDA0003591351710000077
Figure BDA0003591351710000078
Represents the lower bound of the wind power output allowed by the g wind power plant at the t moment by the power grid,
Figure BDA0003591351710000079
representing the upper bound of the wind power that the grid allows the g-th wind farm to output wind power at the t-th moment,
Figure BDA00035913517100000710
wind power is output for the g wind power plant at the t moment reference,
Figure BDA00035913517100000711
for the actual output wind power of the g wind power plant at the t moment, formula (13) indicates that the output power interval allowed by the wind power plant is a subset of the predicted power interval;
p as a deterministic variable since the deviation of the output wind power from the reference point is proportionally balanced by the thermal unit g,t And
Figure BDA00035913517100000712
using both uncertainty variables in constraints
Figure BDA00035913517100000713
And
Figure BDA00035913517100000714
alternatively, equation (22) is obtained:
Figure BDA00035913517100000715
where Kg is the coefficient for the sum of all thermal units to be 1, p g,t Outputting thermal power for the g wind power plant at the t moment based on the reference,
Figure BDA00035913517100000716
outputting actual thermal power for the ith thermal power generating unit at the tth moment,
Figure BDA00035913517100000717
the g' th wind power plant outputs the actual wind power at the t-th moment,
Figure BDA00035913517100000718
is a thermal power generator assembly,
Figure BDA0003591351710000081
Is a set of wind farms,
Figure BDA0003591351710000082
is a set of times;
further obtaining the cost of the waste wind:
Figure BDA0003591351710000083
thus, the uncertainty introduced by the wind farm can be characterized with a robust model:
Figure BDA0003591351710000084
Figure BDA0003591351710000085
Figure BDA0003591351710000086
Figure BDA0003591351710000087
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0003591351710000088
in order to be an indeterminate set,
Figure BDA0003591351710000089
in order to define the lower bound of the uncertainty set,
Figure BDA00035913517100000810
upper bound of uncertainty set, definition
Figure BDA00035913517100000811
Figure BDA00035913517100000812
For the cost function of the wind curtailment, σ g A wind abandon penalty factor, wherein W is a matrix determined by considering the parameters of an electric heating comprehensive energy system of renewable energy;
the robust model is equivalently expressed as follows:
Figure BDA00035913517100000813
Figure BDA00035913517100000814
Figure BDA00035913517100000815
Figure BDA00035913517100000816
D H x H +F E h' E +F H h H =f H (F)
in the above formula
Figure BDA00035913517100000817
And
Figure BDA00035913517100000818
is specifically expressed as follows:
Figure BDA00035913517100000819
wherein the matrix W + And W - Consisting of positive and negative elements of W, i.e. W + =max(W,0),W - Min (W,0), max (W,0) representing elements greater than 0 in the fetch matrix W, min (W,0) representing elements less than 0 in the fetch matrix W;
this problem can be solved directly in a distributed way by using the proposed modified pentes decomposition of the guaranteed feasibility. Therefore, the modified Benders decomposition that guarantees feasibility is fully compatible with the robust model.
Further, the step S4 process is as follows:
and solving a distributed scheduling result of the electric heating integrated energy system, and outputting output of each device in the power grid and the heat supply network, operation cost, electricity purchasing cost and air abandoning amount of the electric heating integrated energy system. And providing a scheduling reference scheme for the power grid control center and the heat supply network control center through the solved result.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the following advantages and effects:
(1) reliability: all feasible constraints are generated before iteration and are sent to the power grid control center by the heat grid control center, so that the feasibility of the heat grid control center and the power grid control center is ensured from the beginning.
(2) High efficiency: an improved distributed solution scheme is provided, namely the correction of feasibility is guaranteed, and the solution scheme is applied to distributed scheduling of electric heating comprehensive energy sources, so that the solving speed and the iteration times are obviously reduced.
(3) Expansibility: in the method, problem modeling adopts a matrix form, and the scheduling problem of the electric heating comprehensive energy system with different scales can be solved.
(4) Real-time performance: the safety of the electric heating comprehensive energy system is strictly ensured through the novel feasible cutting before the cyclic iteration, so all scheduling schemes in the iteration process can be applied.
Drawings
The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this application, illustrate embodiment(s) of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the invention without limiting the invention. In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a real-time scheduling method of an electric heating comprehensive energy system for guaranteeing feasibility, which is disclosed by the invention;
FIG. 2 is a diagram of an electric heat integrated energy system according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a diagram of a simulation system in an embodiment of the invention.
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention clearer, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are some, but not all, embodiments of the present invention. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
Examples
The embodiment discloses a real-time scheduling method for an electric heating comprehensive energy system, which guarantees feasibility, and comprises the following steps:
s1, inputting system parameters of the electric heating comprehensive energy system;
in this embodiment, the system parameters of the electric heat comprehensive energy system include the compound power of the injection node, the line tide, the node voltage, the wind abandon punishment cost, the specific heat capacity of the heat supply network side water, the pipeline water supply flow rate, the node temperature of the water supply network and the return water network, the inlet and outlet temperature of the water supply network and the return water network, the power of the heat load, and the pipeline length. The input of system parameters provides a data base for modeling, and other data can be calculated through the existing parameters.
S2, establishing a real-time electric-heat combined scheduling model;
in this embodiment, the formula of the real-time electric-thermal combination scheduling model established in step S2 is expressed as follows:
Figure BDA0003591351710000101
s.t.D E x E +B E h E ≤b E (A)
D H x H +F E h E +F H h H =f H (B)
Figure BDA0003591351710000111
Figure BDA0003591351710000112
wherein x is E Representing internal variables of the grid, including vectors, x, consisting of the power generation, the up/down rotation reserve capacity of the generator unit, the phase angle of the bus and the power generation of the wind farm H Representing internal variables of the heat supply network, including vector composed of node temperature of supply/return side of pipeline node, temperature of supply/return side of heat source, inlet temperature of supply/return pipeline, outlet temperature of supply/return pipeline, and temperature of heat load supply/return side, B E And D E Coefficient matrices for boundary variables and state variables, respectively, b E Right hand term vector, D, being a constraint of the grid inequality H Is a heat supply network internal variable front coefficient matrix, F E Is a coefficient matrix before the electric output of the heat source, F H Is a coefficient matrix before heat source thermal output, f H For equality constraint of the right-hand term, D H 、F E 、F H 、f H Heat supply network and electricityThe parameters of the network are related to each other,x H and
Figure BDA0003591351710000113
lower and upper bounds, h, of state variables inside the heat supply network E For the electric power of the heat source, h H The heat source is used for generating heat,h H and
Figure BDA0003591351710000114
c in the formula (1) of an objective function is the lower bound and the upper bound of the heat output of the heat source H (h H ) The cost for the heat source inside the heat supply network is expressed as:
C H (h H )=c H T h H (2)
wherein, c H T C in the formula (1) of an objective function as a heat source heat cost coefficient vector E (x E ,h E ) The wind curtailment cost, the coupling heat source (such as a cogeneration device) and the generating cost of the heat unit are combined to form a quadratic function, and the quadratic function is expressed as:
C E (x E ,h E )=h E T Gh E +c E T h E (3)
wherein G is a coefficient matrix heat source electricity cost coefficient matrix, c E T Is a heat source electricity cost coefficient vector.
S3, applying the modified Bender decomposition algorithm to the electric heating comprehensive energy system distributed real-time scheduling problem to solve;
in this embodiment, the process of step S3 is as follows:
s31, decomposing the original electric heating comprehensive energy system optimization scheduling problem into a power grid main problem and a heat supply network sub-problem by a feasible cutting generation method; the economic dispatching problem of the power grid is used as the main problem of the power grid, and the modeling is as follows:
Figure BDA0003591351710000121
s.t.D H x H +F E h E +F H h H =f H (B)
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0003591351710000122
representing the thermal output of the stationary cogeneration unit, is a boundary variable, h ', determined by the grid control centre' E Is heat source electric output h E Virtual copy of (2), heat source power h E Serving as a decision variable in the operation of the heat supply network, inf represents the lower bound of the solving function;
fixing
Figure BDA0003591351710000123
The heat supply network operation problem is optimized as a heat supply network sub-problem:
Figure BDA0003591351710000124
Figure BDA0003591351710000125
D H x H +F E h' E +F H h H =f H (F)
Figure BDA0003591351710000126
Figure BDA0003591351710000127
therefore, the feasible cuts to be generated by the heat supply network control center will be added to the main problem of the power network:
Figure BDA0003591351710000128
wherein, h' H Heat source heat output h H Virtual copy of (2), heat source heat output h H As a decision-making variable in the operation of the power grid,
Figure BDA0003591351710000129
is a divisible first and second coefficient matrix, g FC For a sectionable coefficient vector, the expression is as follows:
Figure BDA00035913517100001210
wherein I is an identity matrix, e H Is a unit vector;
the modified main grid problems are as follows:
Figure BDA0003591351710000131
Figure BDA0003591351710000132
Figure BDA0003591351710000133
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0003591351710000134
is the optimal solution of the internal variables of the power grid,
Figure BDA0003591351710000135
the argmin represents the minimum value of the solving function and provides a target function for a constant determined by a heat supply network control center;
s32, solving the optimization problem of the electric heating comprehensive energy system through Benders decomposition;
in each iteration of the Benders decomposition, the power grid control center solves the main problem of the power grid and sends the boundary state to the heat supply network control center; then, the heat supply network control center judges whether the heat supply network subproblems determined by the constraint condition formulas (E), (F), (C) and (D) are feasible or not, and if feasible, an optimal cut is generated; otherwise, a feasible cut will be generated; applying additional constraint to the boundary variable and adding to the main problem of the power grid;
correspond to different
Figure BDA0003591351710000136
The optimal cut is a cut plane of a boundary variable, the optimal cut provides a lower boundary of an optimal value of the operation cost of the heat network, and the Lagrange multiplier vector lambda is used for a constraint condition formula (E) * Expressed, the heat net subproblem is expressed in the form:
Figure BDA0003591351710000137
Figure BDA0003591351710000138
Figure BDA0003591351710000139
D H x H +F E h' E +F H h H =f H (F)
therefore, for any heat source that satisfies the constraint formula (F) E To obtain:
Figure BDA00035913517100001310
η H +G OC h E ≥g OC (10)
equation (17) is the optimal cut obtained from equation (16), where G OC Coefficient matrix for optimum cutting, g OC Coefficient vectors, G, for optimum segmentation OC =-(λ * ) T
Figure BDA0003591351710000141
Figure BDA0003591351710000142
Is the optimal solution, η, to the heat net subproblem H The estimated value of the optimal cost for the operation of the heat supply network on the power grid side is obtained;
s33, implementing a modified Benders decomposition strategy for guaranteeing feasibility of solving problems of the electric heating comprehensive energy system:
firstly, determining feasible cutting by a heat supply network control center, and sending constraint conditions to a power grid control center; secondly, the power grid control center sets an iteration index k as 1 and a target value f (0) Solving the modified main problem by using the current objective function and constraint, and obtaining the optimal solution
Figure BDA0003591351710000143
And
Figure BDA0003591351710000144
and will be
Figure BDA0003591351710000145
Sending to the heat supply network, and solving the following heat supply network sub-problems by the heat supply network control center:
Figure BDA0003591351710000146
Figure BDA0003591351710000147
D H x H +F E h' E +F H h H =f H (F)
Figure BDA0003591351710000148
Figure BDA0003591351710000149
to obtain
Figure BDA00035913517100001410
Optimal Lagrange multiplier vector λ corresponding to constraint (M) k And sending the corresponding parameters of the optimal cutting to the power grid, then carrying out convergence judgment, and calculating the kth iteration objective function by the power grid control center
Figure BDA00035913517100001411
If the absolute value of the difference between two adjacent objective function values in the iteration process is smaller than a preset judgment threshold constant epsilon, the iteration process is ended, otherwise, the power grid control center solves the following enhanced main problem of correcting the power grid:
Figure BDA00035913517100001412
s.t.D E x E +B E h E ≤b E (A)
Figure BDA0003591351710000151
Figure BDA0003591351710000152
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0003591351710000153
respectively, after iteration for the (k + 1) th time, the power grid internal variable, the power grid boundary variable, the heat supply network boundary variable and the estimated value of the optimal cost of the power grid side for the heat supply network operation are obtained, then, the iteration index is updated, k is enabled to be equal to k +1, and the new value is obtained
Figure BDA0003591351710000154
Sending the data to a heat supply network, solving the formula (12) again by a heat supply network control center, circularly processing until a convergence condition is met, and ending an iteration process;
s34, applying the corrected Benders decomposition for guaranteeing feasibility to the electric heating comprehensive energy system;
the provided modified Pends algorithm with feasibility guarantee is applied to the electric heating comprehensive energy system scheduling with robustness, wherein uncertainty caused by renewable energy (such as a wind power plant) is well considered, and the output power of the wind power plant satisfies the following relation:
Figure BDA0003591351710000155
Figure BDA0003591351710000156
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0003591351710000157
uploading the predicted available wind power interval to a power grid control center for each wind farm,
Figure BDA0003591351710000158
representing the lower bound of the predicted available wind power of the g-th wind farm at the t-th moment,
Figure BDA0003591351710000159
and the upper bound of the predicted available wind power of the g wind power plant at the t moment is represented. The power grid control center determines and informs each wind power plant of the interval of wind power allowed to be output
Figure BDA00035913517100001510
Figure BDA00035913517100001511
Represents the lower bound of the wind power output allowed by the g wind power plant at the t moment by the power grid,
Figure BDA00035913517100001512
representing the upper bound of the wind power that the grid allows the g-th wind farm to output wind power at the t-th moment,
Figure BDA00035913517100001513
wind power is output for the g wind power plant at the t moment reference,
Figure BDA00035913517100001514
for the actual output wind power of the g wind power plant at the t moment, formula (13) indicates that the output power interval allowed by the wind power plant is a subset of the predicted power interval;
p as a deterministic variable since the deviation of the output wind power from the reference point is proportionally balanced by the thermal unit g,t And
Figure BDA00035913517100001515
using both uncertainty variables in constraints
Figure BDA00035913517100001516
And
Figure BDA00035913517100001517
alternatively, equation (22) is obtained:
Figure BDA0003591351710000161
where Kg is the coefficient for the sum of all thermal units to be 1, p g,t Outputting thermal power for the g wind power plant at the t moment based on the reference,
Figure BDA0003591351710000162
outputting actual thermal power for the ith thermal power generating unit at the tth moment,
Figure BDA0003591351710000163
the g' th wind power plant outputs the actual wind power at the t-th moment,
Figure BDA0003591351710000164
is a thermal power generator assembly,
Figure BDA0003591351710000165
Is a set of wind farms,
Figure BDA0003591351710000166
is a set of times;
further obtaining the cost of the waste wind:
Figure BDA0003591351710000167
the robust model is:
Figure BDA0003591351710000168
Figure BDA0003591351710000169
Figure BDA00035913517100001610
Figure BDA00035913517100001611
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA00035913517100001612
in order to be an indeterminate set,
Figure BDA00035913517100001613
in order to define the lower bound of the uncertainty set,
Figure BDA00035913517100001614
upper bound of uncertainty set, definition
Figure BDA00035913517100001615
Figure BDA00035913517100001616
For the cost function of the wind curtailment, σ g A wind curtailment penalty factor, wherein W is a matrix determined by system parameters;
the robust model is equivalently expressed as follows:
Figure BDA00035913517100001617
Figure BDA00035913517100001618
Figure BDA00035913517100001619
Figure BDA00035913517100001620
D H x H +F E h' E +F H h H =f H (F)
in the above formula
Figure BDA0003591351710000171
And
Figure BDA0003591351710000172
the specific expression of (A) is as follows:
Figure BDA0003591351710000173
wherein the matrix W + And W - Consisting of positive and negative elements of W, i.e. W + =max(W,0),W - Min (W,0), max (W,0) representing elements greater than 0 in the fetch matrix W, min (W,0) representing elements less than 0 in the fetch matrix W;
this problem can be solved directly in a distributed way by using the proposed modified pentes decomposition of the guaranteed feasibility. Therefore, the modified Benders decomposition that guarantees feasibility is fully compatible with the robust model.
And S4, outputting a distributed real-time scheduling result of the electric heating comprehensive energy system with feasibility guarantee.
And solving a distributed scheduling result of the electric heating integrated energy system, and outputting output of each device in the power grid and the heat supply network, operation cost, electricity purchasing cost and air abandoning amount of the electric heating integrated energy system.
The simulation system is a small-sized electric heating comprehensive energy system consisting of a 6-node power grid and a 6-node heat supply network, wherein a thermoelectric coupling device electric pump and a CHP are arranged at the No. 6 node of the power grid, and a wind power plant is also arranged at the No. 6 node of the power grid, as shown in figure 3.
Table 1 is the simulation result. With table 1, centralized scheduling reduces the air volume by 74.5% compared to individual scheduling, thereby reducing the overall cost by 15.7%. The comprehensive dispatching efficiency of the wind power plant reaches 90.45 percent.
TABLE 1 economic performance of different scheduling strategies
Isolated scheduling Centralized scheduling The method mentioned
Wind abandon penalty cost (10) 4 $) 1.5870 0.3875 0.3875
Total scheduling cost (10) 4 $) 1.4225 6.1875 6.1875
The centralized scheduling and the real-time scheduling method for guaranteeing the feasibility of the electric heating integrated energy system disclosed in the embodiment 1 finally obtain the accurate optimal solution of the integrated scheduling model, but the distributed solution of the method can protect the privacy of the power grid and the heat supply network to a great extent.
The above embodiments are preferred embodiments of the present invention, but the present invention is not limited to the above embodiments, and any other changes, modifications, substitutions, combinations, and simplifications which do not depart from the spirit and principle of the present invention should be construed as equivalents thereof, and all such changes, modifications, substitutions, combinations, and simplifications are intended to be included in the scope of the present invention.

Claims (5)

1. A real-time scheduling method for an electric heating integrated energy system guaranteeing feasibility is characterized by comprising the following steps:
s1, inputting system parameters of the electric heating comprehensive energy system;
s2, establishing a real-time electric heating combined scheduling model;
s3, applying the modified Bender decomposition algorithm to the electric heating comprehensive energy system distributed real-time scheduling problem to solve;
and S4, outputting a distributed real-time scheduling result of the electric heating comprehensive energy system with feasibility guarantee.
2. The method for real-time scheduling of an electric heating comprehensive energy system guaranteeing feasibility according to claim 1, wherein the system parameters of the electric heating comprehensive energy system comprise a compound power of an injection node, a line power flow, a node voltage, a wind curtailment penalty cost, a specific heat capacity of side water of a heat supply network, a pipeline water supply flow rate, a node temperature of a water supply network and a water return network, inlet and outlet temperatures of the water supply network and the water return network, a power of a heat load, and a pipeline length.
3. The feasibility-guaranteeing real-time scheduling method for the electric-thermal integrated energy system according to claim 1, wherein the formula of the real-time electric-thermal combined scheduling model established in the step S2 is expressed as follows:
Figure FDA0003591351700000011
s.t.D E x E +B E h E ≤b E (A)
D H x H +F E h E +F H h H =f H (B)
Figure FDA0003591351700000012
Figure FDA0003591351700000013
wherein x is E Representing internal variables of the grid, including vectors, x, consisting of the power generation, the up/down rotation reserve capacity of the generator unit, the phase angle of the bus and the power generation of the wind farm H Representing internal variables of the heat supply network, including vector composed of node temperature of supply/return side of pipeline node, temperature of supply/return side of heat source, inlet temperature of supply/return pipeline, outlet temperature of supply/return pipeline, and temperature of heat load supply/return side, B E And D E Coefficient matrices for boundary variables and state variables, respectively, b E Right hand term vector, D, being a constraint of the grid inequality H Is a heat supply network internal variable front coefficient matrix, F E Is a coefficient matrix before the electric output of the heat source, F H Is a coefficient matrix before heat source heat output, f H For equality constraint of the right-hand term, D H 、F E 、F H 、f H Heat supply network and power networkIs related to the parameters of (a) a,x H and
Figure FDA0003591351700000021
lower and upper bounds, h, of state variables inside the heat supply network E For the electric power of the heat source, h H The heat source is used for generating heat,h H and
Figure FDA0003591351700000022
c in the formula (1) of an objective function is the lower bound and the upper bound of the heat output of the heat source H (h H ) The cost for the heat source inside the heat supply network is expressed as:
C H (h H )=c H T h H (2)
wherein, c H T C in the formula (1) of an objective function as a heat source heat cost coefficient vector E (x E ,h E ) The wind curtailment cost is combined with a quadratic function of the power generation cost of the coupling heat source and the heat unit, and the wind curtailment cost is expressed as follows:
C E (x E ,h E )=h E T Gh E +c E T h E (3)
wherein G is a coefficient matrix heat source electricity cost coefficient matrix, c E T Is a heat source electricity cost coefficient vector.
4. The method for guaranteeing the feasibility of real-time scheduling of the electric heating comprehensive energy system according to claim 3, wherein the process of the step S3 is as follows:
s31, decomposing the original electric heating comprehensive energy system optimization scheduling problem into a power grid main problem and a heat supply network sub-problem by a feasible cutting generation method; taking the economic dispatching problem of the power grid as the main problem of the power grid, and modeling as follows:
Figure FDA0003591351700000023
s.t.D H x H +F E h E +F H h H =f H (B)
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA0003591351700000024
representing the thermal output of the stationary cogeneration unit, is a boundary variable, h ', determined by the grid control centre' E Is heat source electric power h E Virtual copy of (2), heat source power h E Serving as a decision variable in the operation of the heat supply network, inf represents the lower bound of the solving function;
fixing
Figure FDA0003591351700000025
The heat supply network operation problem is optimized as a heat supply network sub-problem:
Figure FDA0003591351700000026
Figure FDA0003591351700000031
D H x H +F E h' E +F H h H =f H (F)
Figure FDA0003591351700000032
Figure FDA0003591351700000033
therefore, the feasible cuts to be generated by the heat supply network control center will be added to the main problem of the power network:
Figure FDA0003591351700000034
wherein, h' H Is heat source heat output h H Virtual copy of (2), heat source heat output h H As a decision-making variable in the operation of the power grid,
Figure FDA0003591351700000035
is a divisible first and second coefficient matrix, g FC For a sectionable coefficient vector, the expression is as follows:
Figure FDA0003591351700000036
wherein I is an identity matrix, e H Is a unit vector;
the modified main grid problems are as follows:
Figure FDA0003591351700000037
Figure FDA0003591351700000038
Figure FDA0003591351700000039
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA00035913517000000310
is the optimal solution of the internal variables of the power grid,
Figure FDA00035913517000000311
the argmin represents the minimum value of the solving function and provides a target function for a constant determined by a heat supply network control center;
s32, solving the optimization problem of the electric heating comprehensive energy system through Benders decomposition;
in each iteration of the Benders decomposition, the power grid control center solves the main problem of the power grid and sends the boundary state to the heat supply network control center; then, the heat supply network control center judges whether the heat supply network subproblems determined by the constraint condition formulas (E), (F), (C) and (D) are feasible or not, and if feasible, an optimal cut is generated; otherwise, a feasible cut will be generated; applying additional constraint to the boundary variable and adding to the main problem of the power grid;
correspond to different
Figure FDA0003591351700000041
The optimal cutting is a cutting plane of a boundary variable, the optimal cutting provides a lower boundary of an optimal value of the operation cost of the heat network, and the constraint condition formula (E) uses a Lagrange multiplier vector lambda * By way of illustration, the heat net subproblem is represented in the form:
Figure FDA0003591351700000042
Figure FDA0003591351700000043
Figure FDA0003591351700000044
D H x H +F E h' E +F H h H =f H (F)
therefore, for any heat source that satisfies the constraint formula (F) E To obtain:
Figure FDA0003591351700000045
η H +G OC h E ≥g OC (10)
the formula (10) is obtained from the formula (9)Wherein G is OC Coefficient matrix for optimum cutting, g OC Coefficient vectors, G, for optimum segmentation OC =-(λ * ) T
Figure FDA0003591351700000046
Figure FDA0003591351700000047
Is the optimal solution, η, to the heat net subproblem H The estimated value of the optimal cost for the operation of the heat supply network on the power grid side is obtained;
s33, implementing a modified Benders decomposition strategy for guaranteeing feasibility of solving problems of the electric heating comprehensive energy system:
firstly, determining feasible cutting by a heat supply network control center, and sending constraint conditions to a power grid control center; secondly, the power grid control center sets an iteration index k as 1 and a target value f (0) Solving the modified main problem by using the current objective function and constraint, and obtaining the optimal solution
Figure FDA0003591351700000048
And
Figure FDA0003591351700000049
and will be
Figure FDA00035913517000000410
Sending to the heat supply network, and solving the following heat supply network sub-problems by the heat supply network control center:
Figure FDA0003591351700000051
Figure FDA0003591351700000052
D H x H +F E h' E +F H h H =f H (F)
Figure FDA0003591351700000053
Figure FDA0003591351700000054
to obtain
Figure FDA0003591351700000055
Optimal Lagrange multiplier vector λ corresponding to constraint (M) k And sending the corresponding parameters of the optimal cutting to the power grid, then carrying out convergence judgment, and calculating the kth iteration objective function by the power grid control center
Figure FDA0003591351700000056
If the absolute value of the difference between two adjacent objective function values in the iteration process is smaller than a preset judgment threshold constant epsilon, the iteration process is ended, otherwise, the power grid control center solves the following enhanced main problem of correcting the power grid:
Figure FDA0003591351700000057
s.t.D E x E +B E h E ≤b E (A)
Figure FDA0003591351700000058
Figure FDA0003591351700000059
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA00035913517000000510
respectively, after iteration for the (k + 1) th time, the power grid internal variable, the power grid boundary variable, the heat supply network boundary variable and the estimated value of the optimal cost of the power grid side for the heat supply network operation are obtained, then, the iteration index is updated, k is enabled to be equal to k +1, and the new value is obtained
Figure FDA00035913517000000511
Sending the data to a heat supply network, solving the formula (12) again by a heat supply network control center, circularly processing until a convergence condition is met, and ending an iteration process;
s34, applying the corrected Benders decomposition for guaranteeing feasibility to the electric heating comprehensive energy system;
the provided modified Benders algorithm with feasibility guarantee is applied to the electric heating comprehensive energy system scheduling with robustness, wherein the output power of the wind power plant should meet the following relation:
Figure FDA0003591351700000061
Figure FDA0003591351700000062
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA0003591351700000063
uploading the predicted available wind power interval to a power grid control center for each wind farm,
Figure FDA0003591351700000064
representing the lower bound of the predicted available wind power of the g-th wind farm at the t-th moment,
Figure FDA0003591351700000065
representing the upper bound of the predicted available wind power of the g wind farm at the t moment. The power grid control center determines and informs each wind power plant of the interval of wind power allowed to be output
Figure FDA0003591351700000066
Figure FDA0003591351700000067
Represents the lower bound of the wind power output allowed by the g wind power plant at the t moment by the power grid,
Figure FDA0003591351700000068
representing the upper bound of the wind power that the grid allows the g-th wind farm to output wind power at the t-th moment,
Figure FDA0003591351700000069
wind power is output for the g wind power plant at the t moment reference,
Figure FDA00035913517000000610
for the actual output wind power of the g wind power plant at the t moment, formula (13) indicates that the output power interval allowed by the wind power plant is a subset of the predicted power interval;
p as a deterministic variable since the deviation of the output wind power from the reference point is proportionally balanced by the thermal unit g,t And
Figure FDA00035913517000000611
using both uncertainty variables in constraints
Figure FDA00035913517000000612
And
Figure FDA00035913517000000613
alternatively, equation (22) is obtained:
Figure FDA00035913517000000614
where Kg is the coefficient for the sum of all thermal units to be 1, p g,t For the g wind farmThe thermal power is output at the reference time t,
Figure FDA00035913517000000615
outputting actual thermal power for the ith thermal power generating unit at the tth moment,
Figure FDA00035913517000000616
the g' th wind power plant outputs the actual wind power at the t-th moment,
Figure FDA00035913517000000617
is a thermal power generator assembly,
Figure FDA00035913517000000618
Is a set of wind farms,
Figure FDA00035913517000000620
is a set of times;
further obtaining the cost of the waste wind:
Figure FDA00035913517000000619
the robust model is:
Figure FDA0003591351700000071
Figure FDA0003591351700000072
Figure FDA0003591351700000073
Figure FDA0003591351700000074
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA0003591351700000075
in order to be an indeterminate set,
Figure FDA0003591351700000076
in order to define the lower bound of the uncertainty set,
Figure FDA0003591351700000077
upper bound of uncertainty set, definition
Figure FDA0003591351700000078
Figure FDA0003591351700000079
For the cost function of the wind curtailment, σ g A wind abandon penalty factor, wherein W is a matrix determined by considering the parameters of an electric heating comprehensive energy system of renewable energy;
the robust model is equivalently expressed as follows:
Figure FDA00035913517000000710
Figure FDA00035913517000000711
Figure FDA00035913517000000712
Figure FDA00035913517000000713
D H x H +F E h' E +F H h H =f H (F)
in the above formula
Figure FDA00035913517000000714
And
Figure FDA00035913517000000715
the specific expression of (A) is as follows:
Figure FDA00035913517000000716
wherein the matrix W + And W - Consisting of positive and negative elements of W, i.e. W + =max(W,0),W - Min (W,0), max (W,0) denotes an element greater than 0 in the fetch matrix W, and min (W,0) denotes an element smaller than 0 in the fetch matrix W.
5. The feasibility-guaranteeing real-time scheduling method for the electric-thermal integrated energy system according to claim 1, wherein the step S4 is as follows:
and solving a distributed scheduling result of the electric heating integrated energy system, and outputting output of each device in the power grid and the heat supply network, operation cost, electricity purchasing cost and air abandoning amount of the electric heating integrated energy system.
CN202210377586.8A 2022-04-12 2022-04-12 Electric heating comprehensive energy system real-time scheduling method for guaranteeing feasibility Pending CN114861404A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210377586.8A CN114861404A (en) 2022-04-12 2022-04-12 Electric heating comprehensive energy system real-time scheduling method for guaranteeing feasibility

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210377586.8A CN114861404A (en) 2022-04-12 2022-04-12 Electric heating comprehensive energy system real-time scheduling method for guaranteeing feasibility

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN114861404A true CN114861404A (en) 2022-08-05

Family

ID=82629784

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202210377586.8A Pending CN114861404A (en) 2022-04-12 2022-04-12 Electric heating comprehensive energy system real-time scheduling method for guaranteeing feasibility

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN114861404A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN117151426A (en) * 2023-10-25 2023-12-01 广东电网有限责任公司中山供电局 Electrothermal energy system scheduling method and related device based on asymmetry of electrothermal information

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN117151426A (en) * 2023-10-25 2023-12-01 广东电网有限责任公司中山供电局 Electrothermal energy system scheduling method and related device based on asymmetry of electrothermal information
CN117151426B (en) * 2023-10-25 2024-02-09 广东电网有限责任公司中山供电局 Electrothermal energy system scheduling method and related device based on asymmetry of electrothermal information

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Li et al. Multi-stage real-time operation of a multi-energy microgrid with electrical and thermal energy storage assets: A data-driven MPC-ADP approach
Zhang et al. Optimal operation of integrated electricity and heat system: A review of modeling and solution methods
Santos et al. New multistage and stochastic mathematical model for maximizing RES hosting capacity—Part I: Problem formulation
Chen et al. Multi-linear probabilistic energy flow analysis of integrated electrical and natural-gas systems
US9954362B2 (en) Systems and methods for optimal power flow on a radial network
CN109980636B (en) Wind, water and fire coordinated optimization scheduling method based on improved Benders decomposition method
Kazemi et al. Participation of energy storage-based flexible hubs in day-ahead reserve regulation and energy markets based on a coordinated energy management strategy
CN111222257B (en) Electric heating water multipotency flow cooperative scheduling method based on convex optimization
Li et al. A two-stage distributionally robust optimization model for wind farms and storage units jointly operated power systems
CN113890023A (en) Distributed economic dispatching optimization method and system for comprehensive energy microgrid
CN113036819A (en) Electric heating comprehensive energy system robust scheduling method considering source-load bilateral uncertainty
CN115169916A (en) Electric heating comprehensive energy control method based on safety economy
CN112018756A (en) Day-ahead robust coordinated optimization scheduling method for gas-electricity combined system
CN116681171A (en) Multi-scene comprehensive energy system distribution robust optimization scheduling method and system
CN114861404A (en) Electric heating comprehensive energy system real-time scheduling method for guaranteeing feasibility
CN116341881B (en) Robust advanced scheduling method and system for electric-thermal system considering flexibility of heat supply network
CN113128750B (en) Water-fire-electricity generator set maintenance plan optimization decomposition method considering clean energy consumption
Zhang et al. Multiple stage stochastic planning of integrated electricity and gas system based on distributed approximate dynamic programming
CN113177185A (en) Comprehensive thermoelectric system scheduling method based on shrinking McCormick method
Hazazi et al. Optimal planning of distributed generators for loss reduction and voltage profile enhancement considering the integration of electric vehicles
CN115841006A (en) IEGS distributed low-carbon optimization control method based on gas network division
Liu et al. Influence Evaluation of Integrated Energy System on the Unit Commitment in Power System
CN114629125B (en) Flexible soft switch optimal configuration method, system, electronic equipment and storage medium
Tan et al. Optimal planning of integrated electricity and heat system considering seasonal and short-term thermal energy storage
CN110688725B (en) Robust unit combination method considering operation risk and demand response

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination