CN114818445B - Static force loading point determining method in static force superposition vibration test of airplane structure - Google Patents

Static force loading point determining method in static force superposition vibration test of airplane structure Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN114818445B
CN114818445B CN202210754561.5A CN202210754561A CN114818445B CN 114818445 B CN114818445 B CN 114818445B CN 202210754561 A CN202210754561 A CN 202210754561A CN 114818445 B CN114818445 B CN 114818445B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
node
test piece
order
mode
static force
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN202210754561.5A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN114818445A (en
Inventor
李凯翔
王彬文
张飞
马君峰
王纯
白春玉
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
AVIC Aircraft Strength Research Institute
Original Assignee
AVIC Aircraft Strength Research Institute
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by AVIC Aircraft Strength Research Institute filed Critical AVIC Aircraft Strength Research Institute
Priority to CN202210754561.5A priority Critical patent/CN114818445B/en
Publication of CN114818445A publication Critical patent/CN114818445A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN114818445B publication Critical patent/CN114818445B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • G06F30/23Design optimisation, verification or simulation using finite element methods [FEM] or finite difference methods [FDM]
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/10Geometric CAD
    • G06F30/15Vehicle, aircraft or watercraft design
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2119/00Details relating to the type or aim of the analysis or the optimisation
    • G06F2119/14Force analysis or force optimisation, e.g. static or dynamic forces
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02TCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T90/00Enabling technologies or technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
  • Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
  • Computational Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for determining a static force loading point in an aircraft structure static force superposition vibration test, which comprises the following steps: firstly, determining the number N of vibration modes considered by the design of an airplane structure test piece; secondly, carrying out finite element modeling on the airplane structure test piece and carrying out modal analysis; thirdly, acquiring a scale factor pre-estimated initial value corresponding to each order of mode; fourthly, calculating initial values of displacement thresholds of all the nodes in the ith order mode; fifthly, acquiring N groups of node sets and solving intersection to obtain node intersection D under the former N-order mode; sixthly, judging whether the node intersection D is an empty set; seventhly, calculating the j-th adjusting value of the corresponding scale factor of each order of mode; eighthly, calculating j adjustment values of displacement thresholds of all nodes in the ith order mode; ninthly, repeating the steps from five to eight until the node intersection D is not an empty set; and ten, selecting the node with the largest distance from the reference point of the test piece in the node intersection D as a static loading point. According to the invention, the position of the static force loading point is obtained through analysis, so that the influence on the dynamic characteristics of the structure is reduced.

Description

Static force loading point determining method in static force superposition vibration test of airplane structure
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of static force loading point determination in an airplane structure vibration test, and particularly relates to a method for determining a static force loading point in an airplane structure static force superposition vibration test.
Background
The loads borne by the aircraft in the flying process are very complex, and if the structural strength in the design of the aircraft is insufficient, structural damage can be caused, and a flying accident can be caused in serious cases. Therefore, the aircraft needs to pass ground tests to verify the structural strength before formal sizing. The typical structure of an airplane such as a wing, a vertical fin and the like is subjected to not only steady aerodynamic force, namely static load, but also unsteady aerodynamic force, namely vibration load, so that the steady aerodynamic force, namely the vibration load and the unsteady aerodynamic force need to be considered simultaneously in experimental verification. The loading modes of static force and vibration are different. Static loading is generally carried out by adopting a hydraulic actuator cylinder, vibration loading is usually carried out by adopting a vibration exciter, and two loading modes need to be integrated into one loading system in actual operation to carry out a combined loading test of static superposition vibration. However, the loading mode of the hydraulic actuator cylinder adopted for static loading actually changes the real boundary conditions of the structure, and influences the dynamic characteristics of the structure, namely changes the natural frequency and the vibration mode of the structure, so that the reliability of the test result is reduced, and therefore, the determination of the position of a static loading point in a proper static superposition vibration test of the aircraft structure is very important.
Disclosure of Invention
The technical problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a method for determining a static force loading point in an aircraft structure static force superposition vibration test, which aims at the defects in the prior art, and comprises the steps of performing finite element modeling on a vibration test structure of an aircraft structure test piece, performing modal analysis on the aircraft structure test piece in a finite element model to obtain a vibration mode of a first N-order mode of the aircraft structure test piece, estimating a corresponding scale factor of each order mode and adjusting a corresponding scale factor of each order mode in an iterative manner, calculating a displacement threshold of each node in an ith-order mode, taking an absolute value of the modal displacement of each order mode and comparing the absolute value with each modal threshold, selecting nodes smaller than each modal threshold to form an ith-order modal node set, performing intersection on the obtained N groups of node sets to obtain a node intersection under the first N-order mode, and enabling the nodes to exist in the intersection, and selecting the node with the largest distance from the reference point of the test piece in the node intersection D as a static loading point, loading the static load in a relatively immobile area of the aircraft structure test piece, and reducing the influence of the static loading on the structure dynamic characteristics, thereby improving the reliability of the test result and being convenient for popularization and use.
In order to solve the technical problems, the invention adopts the technical scheme that: a method for determining a static force loading point in an aircraft structure static force superposition vibration test is characterized by comprising the following steps:
determining the number of vibration modes of an airplane structure test piece design consideration in a static force superposition vibration test as the first N order, wherein N is a positive integer;
carrying out finite element modeling on a vibration test structure of the airplane structure test piece, wherein the vibration test structure comprises the airplane structure test piece, one end of the airplane structure test piece is fixed through a test piece fixer, grid division is carried out on the surface of the airplane structure test piece in a finite element model, the cross point of each grid is a node, and the midpoint of the connection between the airplane structure test piece and the test piece fixer is a test piece reference point;
modal analysis is carried out on the aircraft structure test piece in the finite element model, and the vibration mode of the front N-order mode of the aircraft structure test piece, namely the front N-order modal displacement of all nodes is obtained
Figure 520671DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure 736888DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
is the numbering of the nodes and
Figure 212869DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
Figure 565353DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
is the total number of the nodes and,
Figure 507901DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
is numbered for modal order and
Figure 945836DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
thirdly, the corresponding scale factor of each order of mode is estimated, and the estimated initial value of the corresponding scale factor of each order of mode is obtained
Figure 366453DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure 307864DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
step fourAccording to the formula
Figure 155734DEST_PATH_IMAGE009
Calculating the initial value of the displacement threshold of each node in the ith order mode
Figure 80965DEST_PATH_IMAGE010
Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure 305273DEST_PATH_IMAGE011
is the maximum of the absolute value of the displacement in the i-th mode and
Figure 632349DEST_PATH_IMAGE012
Figure 916700DEST_PATH_IMAGE013
is a maximum function;
fifthly, taking absolute values of modal displacement in each order of modes, comparing the absolute values with respective modal threshold values, and selecting nodes smaller than the respective modal threshold values to form ith order modal node set
Figure 922702DEST_PATH_IMAGE014
Performing intersection solving on the obtained N groups of node sets to obtain a node intersection D under the former N-order mode;
step six, judging whether the node intersection D is an empty set, and if the node intersection D is the empty set, executing the step seven; if the node intersection D is not an empty set, executing the step ten;
step seven, according to the formula
Figure 685122DEST_PATH_IMAGE015
Calculating the j adjustment value of the corresponding scale factor of each order mode
Figure 866704DEST_PATH_IMAGE016
Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure 321957DEST_PATH_IMAGE017
Figure 221779DEST_PATH_IMAGE018
numbers the corresponding scale factor adjusting times of each order mode and
Figure 787890DEST_PATH_IMAGE018
is a positive integer and is a non-zero integer,
Figure 292821DEST_PATH_IMAGE019
adjusting the step size for the scale factor;
step eight, according to the formula
Figure 918974DEST_PATH_IMAGE020
Calculating the j adjustment value of the displacement threshold value of each node in the ith order mode
Figure 306093DEST_PATH_IMAGE021
Step nine, repeating the step five to the step eight until the node intersection D is not an empty set;
step ten, if one node exists in the node intersection D, the node is used as a static loading point;
and if the number of the nodes in the node intersection D is larger than 1, selecting the node with the largest distance from the test piece reference point in the node intersection D as the static loading point.
The method for determining the static force loading point in the static force superposition vibration test of the aircraft structure is characterized by comprising the following steps of: the pre-estimated initial value of the corresponding scale factor of each order mode
Figure 410315DEST_PATH_IMAGE022
Taking 0.05-0.1.
The method for determining the static force loading point in the static force superposition vibration test of the aircraft structure is characterized by comprising the following steps of: the scale factor adjustment step size
Figure 566490DEST_PATH_IMAGE023
Taking 0.05-0.1.
The method has the advantages that the method carries out finite element modeling on the vibration test structure of the aircraft structure test piece, carries out modal analysis on the aircraft structure test piece in a finite element model, obtains the vibration mode of the front N-order mode of the aircraft structure test piece, calculates the displacement threshold value of each node in the ith-order mode by predicting the corresponding scale factor of each-order mode and adjusting the corresponding scale factor of each-order mode in an iterative mode, obtains the absolute value of the modal displacement of each-order mode and compares the absolute value with the respective modal threshold value, selects the nodes smaller than the respective modal threshold value to form the ith-order node set, carries out intersection calculation on the obtained N groups of node sets to obtain the node intersection under the front N-order mode, enables the nodes to exist in the intersection, selects the node with the maximum distance from the reference point of the test piece in the node intersection D as the static force loading point, and loads the static force in the relatively motionless area of the aircraft structure test piece, the influence of static loading on the structure dynamics is reduced, so that the reliability of the test result is improved, and the method is convenient to popularize and use.
The technical solution of the present invention is further described in detail by the accompanying drawings and embodiments.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic view of an installation of a test piece of an aircraft structure and a finite element model diagram.
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a node set of the first N-th order mode according to the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating intersection results of the previous N-th order modal node set according to the present invention.
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a method flow of the present invention.
Description of reference numerals:
1-an aircraft structure test piece; 2-a test piece holder; 3-test piece reference point;
4-node.
Detailed Description
As shown in fig. 1 to 4, the method for determining the static loading point in the static superposition vibration test of the aircraft structure of the invention comprises the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps of firstly, determining the number of vibration modes considered by the design of an aircraft structure test piece 1 in a static force superposition vibration test as the first N order, wherein N is a positive integer;
step two, carrying out finite element modeling on a vibration test structure of the aircraft structure test piece 1, wherein the vibration test structure comprises the aircraft structure test piece 1, one end of the aircraft structure test piece 1 is fixed through a test piece fixer 2, the surface of the aircraft structure test piece 1 is divided into grids in a finite element model, a cross point of each grid is a node 4, and a midpoint of the connection between the aircraft structure test piece 1 and the test piece fixer 2 is a test piece reference point 3;
modal analysis is carried out on the aircraft structure test piece 1 in the finite element model, and the vibration mode of the front N-order mode of the aircraft structure test piece 1, namely the front N-order modal displacement of all the nodes 4 is obtained
Figure 363545DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure 565856DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
is the number of node 4 and
Figure 739348DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
Figure 750030DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
is the total number of the nodes 4,
Figure 717986DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
is numbered for modal order and
Figure 814118DEST_PATH_IMAGE024
thirdly, the corresponding scale factor of each order of mode is estimated, and the estimated initial value of the corresponding scale factor of each order of mode is obtained
Figure 260143DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
Wherein, in the process,
Figure 859751DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
step four, according to the formula
Figure 998608DEST_PATH_IMAGE009
Calculating the initial value of the displacement threshold of each node 4 in the ith order mode
Figure 582037DEST_PATH_IMAGE010
Wherein, in the process,
Figure 831752DEST_PATH_IMAGE011
is the maximum of the absolute value of the displacement in the i-th mode and
Figure 817026DEST_PATH_IMAGE012
Figure 126784DEST_PATH_IMAGE013
is a maximum function;
fifthly, absolute values of modal displacement in each order of modes are obtained and compared with respective modal threshold values, and nodes smaller than the respective modal threshold values are selected to form an ith order modal node set
Figure 197509DEST_PATH_IMAGE014
Performing intersection solving on the obtained N groups of node sets to obtain a node intersection D under the former N-order mode;
step six, judging whether the node intersection D is an empty set, and if the node intersection D is the empty set, executing the step seven; if the node intersection D is not an empty set, executing the step ten;
step seven, according to the formula
Figure 844391DEST_PATH_IMAGE015
Calculating the j-th adjustment value of the corresponding scale factor of each order of mode
Figure 684171DEST_PATH_IMAGE016
Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure 164831DEST_PATH_IMAGE017
Figure 457272DEST_PATH_IMAGE018
numbers the corresponding scale factor adjusting times of each order mode and
Figure 314369DEST_PATH_IMAGE018
is a positive integer and is a non-zero integer,
Figure 8656DEST_PATH_IMAGE019
adjusting the step size for the scale factor;
step eight, according to the formula
Figure 129058DEST_PATH_IMAGE020
Calculating the j adjustment value of the displacement threshold value of each node 4 in the ith order mode
Figure 174375DEST_PATH_IMAGE021
Step nine, repeating the step five to the step eight until the node intersection D is not an empty set;
step ten, if one node 4 exists in the node intersection D, the node 4 is used as a static force loading point;
and if the number of the nodes 4 in the node intersection D is larger than 1, selecting the node 4 with the largest distance from the reference point 3 of the test piece in the node intersection D as a static force loading point.
In this embodiment, the pre-estimated initial value of the corresponding scale factor of each order mode
Figure 569584DEST_PATH_IMAGE022
Taking 0.05-0.1.
In this embodiment, the scale factor adjusting step size
Figure 118377DEST_PATH_IMAGE023
Taking 0.05-0.1.
When the method is used, the method comprises the steps of carrying out finite element modeling on a vibration test structure of the aircraft structure test piece, carrying out modal analysis on the aircraft structure test piece in a finite element model, obtaining the vibration mode of the front N-order mode of the aircraft structure test piece, calculating the displacement threshold value of each node in the ith-order mode by predicting the corresponding scale factor of each-order mode and adjusting the corresponding scale factor of each-order mode in an iterative mode, taking the absolute value of the modal displacement in each-order mode and comparing the absolute value with the respective mode threshold value, selecting the nodes smaller than the respective mode threshold values to form an ith-order modal node set, solving the intersection of the N groups of node sets to obtain the node intersection under the front N-order mode, enabling the nodes to exist in the intersection, selecting the node with the largest distance from a test piece reference point in the node intersection D as a static force loading point, and enabling a static force load to be loaded in a relatively motionless region of the aircraft structure test piece, the influence of static loading on the structure dynamics is reduced, and the reliability of the test result is improved.
The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, and is not intended to limit the present invention, and all simple modifications, changes and equivalent structural changes made to the above embodiment according to the technical spirit of the present invention still fall within the protection scope of the technical solution of the present invention.

Claims (3)

1. A method for determining a static force loading point in an aircraft structure static force superposition vibration test is characterized by comprising the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps of firstly, determining the number of vibration modes considered by the design of an aircraft structure test piece (1) in a static force superposition vibration test as the first N order, wherein N is a positive integer;
step two, carrying out finite element modeling on a vibration test structure of the aircraft structure test piece (1), wherein the vibration test structure comprises the aircraft structure test piece (1), one end of the aircraft structure test piece (1) is fixed through a test piece fixer (2), the surface of the aircraft structure test piece (1) is subjected to grid division in a finite element model, a cross point of each grid is a node (4), and a midpoint of the connection between the aircraft structure test piece (1) and the test piece fixer (2) is a test piece reference point (3);
modal analysis is carried out on the aircraft structure test piece (1) in the finite element model, and the mode shape of the front N-order mode of the aircraft structure test piece (1), namely the front N-order modal displacement of all the nodes (4), is obtained
Figure 541520DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure 427437DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
is the number of the node (4) and
Figure 284534DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
Figure 978821DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
is the total number of the nodes (4),
Figure 630382DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
is numbered for modal order and
Figure 675699DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
thirdly, the corresponding scale factor of each order of mode is estimated, and the estimated initial value of the corresponding scale factor of each order of mode is obtained
Figure 539749DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure 88542DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
step four, according to the formula
Figure 176584DEST_PATH_IMAGE009
Calculating the initial value of the displacement threshold of each node (4) in the ith order mode
Figure 443617DEST_PATH_IMAGE010
Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure 642518DEST_PATH_IMAGE011
is the maximum of the absolute value of the displacement in the i-th mode and
Figure 45817DEST_PATH_IMAGE012
Figure 898235DEST_PATH_IMAGE013
is a maximum function;
fifthly, taking absolute values of modal displacement in each order of modes, comparing the absolute values with respective modal threshold values, and selecting nodes smaller than the respective modal threshold values to form ith order modal node set
Figure 652565DEST_PATH_IMAGE014
Performing intersection solving on the obtained N groups of node sets to obtain a node intersection D under the former N-order mode;
step six, judging whether the node intersection D is an empty set, and if the node intersection D is the empty set, executing the step seven; if the node intersection D is not an empty set, executing the step ten;
step seven, according to the formula
Figure 389577DEST_PATH_IMAGE015
Calculating the j-th adjustment value of the corresponding scale factor of each order of mode
Figure 912962DEST_PATH_IMAGE016
Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure 342806DEST_PATH_IMAGE017
Figure 318852DEST_PATH_IMAGE018
numbers the corresponding scale factor adjusting times of each order mode and
Figure 328397DEST_PATH_IMAGE018
is a positive integer and is a non-zero integer,
Figure 971868DEST_PATH_IMAGE019
adjusting the step size for the scale factor;
step eight, according to the formula
Figure 307034DEST_PATH_IMAGE020
Calculating the j adjustment value of the displacement threshold value of each node (4) in the ith order mode
Figure 35956DEST_PATH_IMAGE021
Step nine, repeating the step five to the step eight until the node intersection D is not an empty set;
step ten, if one node (4) exists in the node intersection D, taking the node (4) as a static force loading point;
and if the number of the nodes (4) in the node intersection D is larger than 1, selecting the node (4) with the largest distance from the test piece reference point (3) in the node intersection D as a static loading point.
2. The method for determining the static force loading point in the aircraft structure static force superposition vibration test according to claim 1, is characterized in that: the pre-estimated initial value of the corresponding scale factor of each order mode
Figure 114770DEST_PATH_IMAGE022
Taking 0.05-0.1.
3. The method for determining the static force loading point in the aircraft structure static force superposition vibration test according to claim 1, is characterized in that: the scale factor adjustment step size
Figure 612748DEST_PATH_IMAGE023
Taking 0.05-0.1.
CN202210754561.5A 2022-06-30 2022-06-30 Static force loading point determining method in static force superposition vibration test of airplane structure Active CN114818445B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210754561.5A CN114818445B (en) 2022-06-30 2022-06-30 Static force loading point determining method in static force superposition vibration test of airplane structure

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210754561.5A CN114818445B (en) 2022-06-30 2022-06-30 Static force loading point determining method in static force superposition vibration test of airplane structure

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN114818445A CN114818445A (en) 2022-07-29
CN114818445B true CN114818445B (en) 2022-09-02

Family

ID=82522586

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202210754561.5A Active CN114818445B (en) 2022-06-30 2022-06-30 Static force loading point determining method in static force superposition vibration test of airplane structure

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN114818445B (en)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2018117971A1 (en) * 2016-12-22 2018-06-28 Agency For Science, Technology And Research Method and system of manufacturing a load-bearing structure and a load-bearing structure manufactured thereof
CN112733258A (en) * 2020-12-29 2021-04-30 中国航空工业集团公司西安飞机设计研究所 Analysis method for predicting lug bearing capacity based on nanostran nonlinear technology
CN113602525A (en) * 2021-08-25 2021-11-05 成都飞机工业(集团)有限责任公司 Flexible support method for catapult-assisted take-off unmanned aerial vehicle full-aircraft static test
CN113720707A (en) * 2021-08-23 2021-11-30 中国飞机强度研究所 Design method for large-deformation loading point of structural fatigue test

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2018117971A1 (en) * 2016-12-22 2018-06-28 Agency For Science, Technology And Research Method and system of manufacturing a load-bearing structure and a load-bearing structure manufactured thereof
CN112733258A (en) * 2020-12-29 2021-04-30 中国航空工业集团公司西安飞机设计研究所 Analysis method for predicting lug bearing capacity based on nanostran nonlinear technology
CN113720707A (en) * 2021-08-23 2021-11-30 中国飞机强度研究所 Design method for large-deformation loading point of structural fatigue test
CN113602525A (en) * 2021-08-25 2021-11-05 成都飞机工业(集团)有限责任公司 Flexible support method for catapult-assisted take-off unmanned aerial vehicle full-aircraft static test

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
某型民用运输机主起落架连接区结构静力试验;陈博等;《民用飞机设计与研究》;20130930(第03期);全文 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN114818445A (en) 2022-07-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Baysal et al. Aerodynamic sensitivity analysis methods for the compressible Euler equations
Ito et al. Unstructured Mesh Generation for Viscous Flow Computations.
CN114117968B (en) Water-gas two-phase flow fully-coupled aircraft water takeoff and landing load analysis method
CN105183996A (en) Surface element correction and grid beforehand self-adaption calculation method
US5926399A (en) Method of predicting change in shape of a solid structure
CN111274648B (en) Distributed flight load design method for civil aircraft leading edge flap
Kenway et al. Aerodynamic shape optimization of the CRM configuration including buffet-onset conditions
CN115329689A (en) High-efficiency calculation method for complex turbulent flow based on pseudo-unsteady time propulsion
CN111159817A (en) Design method of mixed scaling wing airfoil for icing wind tunnel test
Leifsson et al. Variable-fidelity aerodynamic shape optimization
CN115495965A (en) Method for analyzing time-varying reliability of complex aviation structure under mixed uncertainty
Kirz DLR TAU simulations for the third AIAA sonic boom prediction workshop near-field cases
CN110096798B (en) Multi-state finite element model correction method
CN114818445B (en) Static force loading point determining method in static force superposition vibration test of airplane structure
CN115345064A (en) Integrated deep neural network aerodynamic modeling method integrated with physical constraints
LIJEWSKI et al. Chimera-eagle store separation
Madson et al. F-16/generic store carriage load predictions at transonic Mach numbers using TranAir
Love et al. Computational aeroelasticity in high performance aircraft flight loads
Tinoco Analysis of the transonic NASA Common Research Model at high angle of attack
Murayama et al. Summary of JAXA studies for the fifth AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop using UPACS and FaSTAR
Laiche et al. Modeling and simulation analysis of aircraft wing loads
Sahu et al. 3-D parachute descent analysis using coupled CFD and structural codes
CN111177855B (en) Pneumatic structure solving method and system in global aeroelasticity optimization
CN110119560B (en) Method for checking communication satellite soft waveguide strength based on curvature radius
CN115017802B (en) Pneumatic thermal global quick prediction sequence sampling method based on influence domain-security domain

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant