CN114757051A - Method and device for verifying confrontation function level simulation of air-defense missile weapon system - Google Patents

Method and device for verifying confrontation function level simulation of air-defense missile weapon system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN114757051A
CN114757051A CN202210481878.6A CN202210481878A CN114757051A CN 114757051 A CN114757051 A CN 114757051A CN 202210481878 A CN202210481878 A CN 202210481878A CN 114757051 A CN114757051 A CN 114757051A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
simulation
calculation
weapon system
setting
parameters
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202210481878.6A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
揭力
李超
张君鹏
杨登泰
李继忠
王天
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Xi'an Hengfu Defense Technology Co ltd
Original Assignee
Xi'an Hengfu Defense Technology Co ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Xi'an Hengfu Defense Technology Co ltd filed Critical Xi'an Hengfu Defense Technology Co ltd
Priority to CN202210481878.6A priority Critical patent/CN114757051A/en
Publication of CN114757051A publication Critical patent/CN114757051A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T17/00Three dimensional [3D] modelling, e.g. data description of 3D objects
    • G06T17/05Geographic models

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Computer Graphics (AREA)
  • Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a method and a device for simulating and verifying the confrontation function level of an air-defense missile weapon system, wherein the method comprises the following steps: constructing a battle situation environment and setting simulation parameters; according to the simulation parameters, executing simulation and calculating simulation data to obtain data information; displaying the data information and collecting the data information; judging whether the simulation is finished; if the simulation is finished, uploading the acquired data information to a simulation result database; and the simulation result database outputs a simulation verification report. The invention simulates a real operation environment by utilizing a computer modeling and simulation technology, develops test design planning, deduction and evaluation against the background of the anti-interference capability test evaluation of the air-defense missile weapon system in a complex electromagnetic environment, provides a tool platform for the performance and efficiency evaluation of the air-defense missile weapon system, has high fault tolerance rate, can carry out repeated tests, and has short test period and high efficiency.

Description

Method and device for verifying confrontation function level simulation of air-defense missile weapon system
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of anti-aircraft weapon system anti-function level simulation, in particular to an anti-aircraft missile weapon system anti-function level simulation verification method and device.
Background
The air-defense missile weapon system comprises an air-defense missile, a target indication system, a guidance system, a command control system, a launching system and technical support equipment, and is used for intercepting and hitting an air-borne flight target. In a modern battlefield, an air defense missile weapon system faces a complex electromagnetic environment including active interference and passive interference, and the anti-interference capability of the air defense missile weapon system in the complex electromagnetic environment is an important factor for the success of interception. The air-defense missile weapon system is complex in composition, high in cost of an external field test, difficult in environment building, low in fault tolerance rate, difficult in repeated test, huge in cost, long in test period and low in efficiency, and a battlefield environment needs to be built again if parameters or attributes need to be changed.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to overcome the defects of the prior art and provides a method and a device for verifying the confrontation function level simulation of an air-defense missile weapon system.
In order to solve the technical problems, the invention adopts the following technical scheme:
in a first aspect, the embodiment provides an anti-aircraft missile weapon system countermeasure function level simulation verification method, which includes the following steps:
constructing a battle situation environment and setting simulation parameters;
according to the simulation parameters, executing simulation and calculating simulation data to obtain data information;
Displaying the data information and collecting the data information;
judging whether the simulation is finished;
if the simulation is finished, uploading the acquired data information to a simulation result database;
and the simulation result database outputs a simulation verification report.
The further technical scheme is as follows: the step of constructing the battle situation environment and setting the simulation parameters comprises the following steps: formulating a fighting situation planning design, constructing a fighting situation of an air defense missile weapon system according to a planned scene, then completing the loading of a three-dimensional image map and a digital elevation map, setting initial position parameters, initial posture parameters and initial speed parameters of a radar, an interference equipment platform and a target platform, and displaying the deployment situation of each fighting equipment platform on an electronic map by using a three-dimensional model; setting a motion track of the mobile platform in a mode of loading a track file, selecting points of a map and setting a geometric form air route; setting RCS attributes of a target platform; and setting the working mode and the working parameters of the electronic information equipment.
The further technical scheme is as follows: the step of executing simulation and calculating simulation data according to the simulation parameters to obtain data information includes: the method comprises the steps of platform position and attitude calculation, relative distance and included angle calculation of each platform, echo signal power calculation/receiver internal noise calculation/interference signal power calculation, signal-to-noise ratio calculation/signal-to-interference ratio calculation/drying ratio calculation, angle measurement precision calculation/distance measurement precision calculation/speed measurement precision calculation, and finding distance calculation/tracking distance calculation to obtain data information.
The further technical scheme is as follows: in the step of outputting the simulation verification report by the simulation result database, the output simulation verification report comprises battle situation scene data, detection performance of the air-defense missile weapon system and anti-interference performance test data.
In a second aspect, the present embodiment provides an anti-aircraft missile weapon system confrontation function level simulation verification apparatus, including: the device comprises a construction setting unit, an execution calculating unit, a display collecting unit, a judging unit, an uploading unit and an output unit;
the construction setting unit is used for constructing a battle situation environment and setting simulation parameters;
the execution calculation unit is used for executing simulation and calculating simulation data according to the simulation parameters to obtain data information;
the display acquisition unit is used for displaying the data information and acquiring the data information;
the judging unit is used for judging whether the simulation is finished;
the uploading unit is used for uploading the acquired data information to a simulation result database if the simulation is finished;
and the output unit is used for outputting a simulation verification report by the simulation result database.
The further technical scheme is as follows: the construction setting unit comprises: formulating a fighting situation planning design, constructing a fighting situation of an air defense missile weapon system according to a planned scene, then completing the loading of a three-dimensional image map and a digital elevation map, setting initial position parameters, initial posture parameters and initial speed parameters of a radar, an interference equipment platform and a target platform, and displaying the deployment situation of each fighting equipment platform on an electronic map by using a three-dimensional model; setting a motion track of the mobile platform in a mode of loading a track file, selecting points of a map and setting a geometric form air route; setting RCS attributes of a target platform; and setting the working mode and the working parameters of the electronic information equipment.
The further technical scheme is as follows: the execution computing unit comprises: the method comprises the steps of platform position and attitude calculation, relative distance and included angle calculation of each platform, echo signal power calculation/receiver internal noise calculation/interference signal power calculation, signal-to-noise ratio calculation/signal-to-interference ratio calculation/drying ratio calculation, angle measurement accuracy calculation/distance measurement accuracy calculation/speed measurement accuracy calculation, and finding distance calculation/tracking distance calculation to obtain data information.
The further technical scheme is as follows: in the output unit, the output simulation verification report comprises battle situation scene data, detection performance of the air defense missile weapon system and anti-interference performance test data.
In a third aspect, the present embodiment provides a computer device, which includes a memory and a processor, where the memory stores a computer program, and the processor, when executing the computer program, implements the method for verifying the anti-missile weapon system countermeasure function level simulation as described above.
In a fourth aspect, the present embodiment provides a storage medium storing a computer program comprising program instructions that, when executed by a processor, implement the method for validation of an anti-air missile weapon system at a countermeasure function level as described above.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the beneficial effects that: the method is characterized in that a real operation environment is simulated by utilizing a computer modeling and simulation technology, an anti-interference capability test evaluation of the air-defense missile weapon system in a complex electromagnetic environment is taken as a background, a functional level simulation model comprising a search/guidance radar, a seeker, an instruction line, a radio fuze, a finger control communication, an interference machine and the like is established, test design planning, deduction and evaluation are carried out, a tool platform is provided for the performance and efficiency evaluation of the air-defense missile weapon system, the fault tolerance rate is high, repeated tests can be carried out, the test period is short, the efficiency is high, and the requirements can be better met.
The invention is further described below with reference to the figures and the specific embodiments.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention, the drawings required to be used in the embodiments or the prior art description will be briefly described below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and for those skilled in the art, other drawings may be obtained according to these drawings without inventive labor.
Fig. 1 is a schematic flow chart of a method for simulating and verifying an anti-aircraft missile weapon system anti-function level according to an embodiment of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is a schematic view of an application framework of a method for verifying simulation of an anti-aircraft missile weapon system in an anti-functional level according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a radar parameter editing interface according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of an active radar seeker parameter editing interface provided in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 5 is a schematic diagram of a parameter editing interface of a semi-active radar seeker provided in an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of an instruction line parameter editing interface according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 7 is a schematic diagram of a radio fuze parameter editing interface provided in an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an example of an instructional communication parameter editing interface;
fig. 9 is a schematic diagram of a parameter editing interface of an jammer according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 10 is a schematic diagram of an antenna configuration interface according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating a simulation result of signal-to-noise ratio of a target echo according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 12 is a schematic diagram of a simulation result of angle measurement accuracy under a non-interference condition according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 13 is a schematic diagram of a simulation result of ranging accuracy under a non-interference condition according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating a simulation result of a target echo signal-to-interference ratio according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 15 is a schematic diagram of a simulation result of radar received dry-to-noise ratio according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 16 is a schematic diagram of an angular precision simulation result of a passive radar tracking interference source according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 17 is a schematic diagram of a three-dimensional scene and situation presentation provided by an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 18 is a schematic block diagram of an anti-flight missile weapon system countermeasure function level simulation verification device provided by an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 19 is a schematic block diagram of a computer apparatus provided by an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are some, not all, embodiments of the present invention. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
It will be understood that the terms "comprises" and/or "comprising," when used in this specification and the appended claims, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
It is also to be understood that the terminology used in the description of the invention herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used in the specification of the present invention and the appended claims, the singular forms "a," "an," and "the" are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
It should be further understood that the term "and/or" as used in this specification and the appended claims refers to and includes any and all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.
Referring to the specific embodiment shown in fig. 1, the invention discloses a method for simulating and verifying the confrontation function level of an air-defense missile weapon system, which comprises the following steps:
s1, constructing a battlefield environment and setting simulation parameters;
wherein, in step S1, the method includes: formulating a fighting situation planning design, constructing a fighting situation of an air defense missile weapon system according to a planned scene, then completing the loading of a three-dimensional image map and a digital elevation map, setting initial position parameters, initial posture parameters and initial speed parameters of a radar, an interference equipment platform and a target platform, and displaying the deployment situation of each fighting equipment platform on an electronic map by using a three-dimensional model; setting a motion track of the mobile platform in a mode of loading a track file, selecting points of a map and setting a geometric form air route; setting RCS attributes of a target platform; and setting the working mode and the working parameters of the electronic information equipment.
Specifically, as shown in fig. 2, the anti-aircraft missile weapon system confrontation function level simulation system mainly comprises systems such as battle situation scenario determination, simulation deduction, model and calculation, comprehensive display, and database.
The war scenario grading system is used for completing construction and arrangement of a battle platform, weaponry, targets and a battle environment of both parties of a battle or a confrontation on an electronic map, and mainly comprises war scenario management, platform attribute editing, platform track editing, equipment parameter editing and environment editing. The battle situation management comprises operations of creating, opening, modifying, copying, closing, deleting, storing, outputting and the like of the battle situation.
The platform attribute/track editing, equipment parameter editing and environment editing are the operations of carrying out the track setting of a combat platform, the RCS setting of a target platform, the deletion and addition of the air defense missile, the radar, the seeker, the instruction line, the finger control communication, the radio fuze, the interference detection and other electronic equipment in an open battle situation, and the platform parameter, the equipment parameter and the atmospheric attenuation parameter can be edited and revised.
When the battle conditions are constructed or edited, the configuration of platform parameters, equipment parameters and environment parameters can be realized by calling the database, and the data can also be stored in the database.
The simulation deduction subsystem takes a simulation time axis as a reference, completes dynamic deduction and calculation of a battle scene according to a planned scene, an equipment working mode and working parameters, and provides simulation setting, simulation control, simulation driving and middle-layer services.
The simulation setting refers to setting of deduction parameters such as simulation duration, stepping, speed multiplication and the like.
The simulation control is a control center of a simulation system and completes services of loading of a battle situation, management of a simulation process, synchronous management, information interaction between simulation subsystems or modules, starting, pausing, continuing, ending and the like of simulation deduction.
The simulation drive supports time trigger, event (such as signal-to-noise ratio, signal-to-interference ratio, interference-to-noise ratio and measurement precision) trigger, human-in-loop drive, scheduling implementation according to a set strategy and the like.
The middle tier service is a middle tier component that services all views for M (data model) V (view) separation.
The model and calculation subsystem provides a space relation and an electromagnetic model of dynamic interaction of a combat platform, equipment, a target and an environment, and specifically comprises data models of a battle situation, a platform, a track, equipment, an equipment network and the like, the space relation of the equipment of the combat platform in each simulation beat is resolved, and performance parameters of electronic information equipment such as a radar, an active/semi-active seeker, an instruction line, finger control communication, radio fuze and the like, such as signal-to-noise ratio, signal-to-interference ratio, interference-to-noise ratio, action distance, measurement accuracy and the like, are calculated. The calculation model can exist in the model and the calculation library in the form of algorithm, data or file, and corresponding data or calculation is called from the model and the calculation library when simulation deduction is carried out.
The comprehensive display subsystem is based on a two-dimensional/three-dimensional digital map, realizes three-dimensional situation display of battle situation scenario estimation and simulation deduction and chart display of simulation data, and comprises a map control and display module, a three-dimensional situation display module and a performance curve display module.
The map control and display module comprises loading and displaying of satellite images, vector maps and digital elevation data, and control of map amplification, reduction, roaming, rotation, positioning, view resetting, profile analysis, model pickup, geographic information extraction, layer setting and the like.
The three-dimensional situation display is based on a digital map and a three-dimensional model, displays operation situation information such as geographic environment, force deployment, motion trail and the like, electromagnetic situation information such as antenna beam scanning, radar power map, reconnaissance area of a reconnaissance interference machine, interference area and the like, and can also display the countermeasure effect and the attack effect, and specifically comprises display of motion postures and motion trails of airplanes, ships, missiles and the like, display of communication links, display of radar power, display of explosion special effects and the like. The three-dimensional situation display supports viewpoint selection, a free viewpoint is adopted by default, binding of the viewpoint and an object can be completed according to a selected three-dimensional model object, selection of fields of view such as global view, radar and the like is achieved, and changes of the fields of view are displayed in real time through a target observation field of view.
The performance curve display is that various performance parameters (such as signal-to-noise ratio, signal-to-interference ratio and the like) of radar, a seeker, a command line, a radio fuse and finger control communication are displayed in a graph and curve mode along with the change rule of time and distance.
The database subsystem is a public resource library and provides basic models and data for development and system operation of simulation software, and mainly comprises a battle situation library, a parameter library, a model library, a geographic information library, a simulation result library and the like.
Specifically, in the simulation preparation stage, a war situation planning design is completed by a war situation planning and classifying system, and the combat situation of the air defense missile weapon system is established according to a planned scene. Firstly, loading, displaying and controlling a three-dimensional image map and a digital elevation map. Secondly, setting parameters such as initial positions (longitude, latitude, altitude and relative ground height), initial postures (course angle, yaw angle, pitch angle and roll angle), initial speeds and the like of the radar, the interference equipment platform and the target platform, and displaying the deployment situation of each combat equipment platform on an electronic map by using a three-dimensional model; the air defense missile is used as a sub-platform and is additionally arranged on a guidance radar vehicle. And thirdly, electronic information equipment such as radars, guidance heads, command communication, reconnaissance jammers and the like are additionally arranged on respective loading platforms, wherein the on-missile equipment such as an active/semi-active guidance head, an instruction line (on-missile part), a radio fuse and the like is additionally arranged on the air defense missile. Then, setting the motion trail of the mobile platform such as an airplane and the like by loading a flight path file, selecting points on a map, setting a geometric form air route and the like; for the platform routes generated by the map point selection mode, the longitude, latitude, altitude, speed and other parameters of the passing points of each route can be manually modified, and the platform is set to fly according to constant speed/variable speed and equal height/variable height; circular, arc, oval, runway-shaped and 8-shaped air routes can be generated by setting geometric shape parameters; the ballistic missile trajectory can be set by selecting the missile landing point (longitude, latitude, altitude). And then, setting the RCS mean value, the fluctuation type (Swerling0-Swerling4) and the swing amplitude of each target platform, or setting the RCS attributes (frequency, polarization, azimuth angle, pitch angle, RCS values and the like) of the target platforms in a manner of loading RCS data files. Finally, the working mode, the working parameters and the transmission attenuation of the electromagnetic wave of the electronic information equipment such as the radar, the active radar seeker, the semi-active radar seeker, the instruction line, the radio fuse, the finger control communication, the jammer and the like are set, and are respectively shown in fig. 3-fig. 10.
S2, according to the simulation parameters, executing simulation and calculating simulation data to obtain data information;
wherein, in step S2, the method includes: the method comprises the steps of platform position and attitude calculation, relative distance and included angle calculation of each platform, echo signal power calculation/receiver internal noise calculation/interference signal power calculation, signal-to-noise ratio calculation/signal-to-interference ratio calculation/drying ratio calculation, angle measurement accuracy calculation/distance measurement accuracy calculation/speed measurement accuracy calculation, and finding distance calculation/tracking distance calculation to obtain data information.
Specifically, in a simulation deduction stage, the system loads the battle information and issues the battle information to the corresponding simulation node; each simulation node receives the battle situation information, analyzes and binds parameters, completes corresponding initialization work and reports back a simulation deduction unit; the system carries out simulation calculation according to the situation of the battle: resolving the positions and postures of platforms such as a radar, an interference machine, a target and the like, switching the working modes and working parameters of the radar and the interference machine as required, calculating the signal-to-noise ratio, the signal-to-interference ratio, the interference-to-noise ratio, the detection distance, the tracking performance and the like of the radar, and calculating and displaying the battlefield situation and the electromagnetic situation; when an enemy target enters a combat airspace of an air defense missile weapon system and meets missile launching conditions, missile launching is automatically or manually set, and electronic equipment such as an on-missile instruction line, an active/semi-active seeker, a radio fuze and the like are started to work in sequence according to set triggering conditions; calculating the signal-to-noise ratio, the signal-to-interference ratio and the like of each electronic device on the missile; when the system end condition is reached, stopping model calculation, sending a simulation stop command to each simulation node, and stopping the simulation test; in the simulation process, when abnormal conditions occur and simulation interruption is needed, the system sends a simulation interruption instruction, and each node forcibly interrupts the simulation.
S3, displaying the data information and collecting the data information;
the data information display comprises three-dimensional situation display and two-dimensional data display; the three-dimensional situation display comprises: the method comprises the steps of geographic environment display, platform posture display, platform track display, antenna beam scanning display, radar map display, communication link display, interference range reconnaissance display and attack effect display. The two-dimensional data display includes: radar performance display, active seeker performance display, semi-active seeker performance display, instruction linear performance display, radio fuze performance display, command communication performance display, reconnaissance interference performance display and field intensity monitoring display.
S4, judging whether the simulation is finished; if the simulation is not finished, returning to the step of S2;
s5, if the simulation is finished, uploading the collected data information to a simulation result database;
and S6, the simulation result database outputs a simulation verification report.
In the step S6, the output simulation verification report includes battle situation scene data, air defense missile weapon system detection performance and anti-interference performance test data.
The invention provides a technical scheme which is demonstrated by taking radar detection performance simulation calculation under the self-defense interference condition as an example:
Radar parameter setting
Emission peak power: p ist70 kW; signal bandwidth: bs3 MHz; emission loss: l ist2.6 dB; pulse repetition frequency: PRF ═ 1 kHz; reception loss: l isr3.7 dB; one-way atmospheric attenuation factor: gamma is 0.001 dB/km; receiver bandwidth: b isr3 MHz; receiver noise figure: fn3 dB; receiver noise temperature: t is0298K; transmission/reception antenna gain: gt=Gr36.37 dB; radar scattering cross-sectional area of target: sigma 5m2(ii) a Radar-target distance: rtApproximately 385-60 km; a target interception threshold: SNR013 dB; thermal noise coefficient: kr0.47; loop discriminator precision slope: kd1.2; azimuth beam width: thetaa0.52 °; elevation beam width: theta p0.53 °; radar sidelobe cancellation improvement factor: ggs17 dB; SJR threshold: SJR 03 constant ═ 3
Light speed: c is 299792458 m/s; boltzmann constant: k is 1.38 × 10-23
Jammer parameter setting
Transmission power of jammer: p J1 kW; jammer transmit antenna gain: gJ30.55 dB; interference bandwidth: b isJ100 MHz; interference emission loss: l isJ2 dB; polarization loss: l isJp3 dB; the direction included angle of the jammer deviating from the radar beam: alpha is alphaJ0 (self-defense interference); radar reception antenna gain in the interference direction: g rJ=Gr(self-defense interference); jammer-to-radar distance: r isJ=Rt(self-defense interference).
Calculation model
(1) Calculating the power of the received target echo signal:
Figure BDA0003627832780000091
(2) calculating the internal noise power of the receiver: pn=k·T0·Br·Fn
(3) Calculating the signal-to-noise ratio of the target echo at the output end of the receiver: SNR is Ps/PnThe calculation results are expressed in decibels: SNRdB=10log10(SNR)
(4) Calculating the interference signal power received by the radar:
Figure BDA0003627832780000092
(5) calculating the signal-to-interference ratio of a target echo at the output end of the receiver: SJR ═ Ps/(Pj+Pn) The calculation results are expressed in decibels: SJRdB=10log10(SJR)
(6) Calculating azimuth angle precision and pitch angle precision of radar
Figure BDA0003627832780000093
Or
Figure BDA0003627832780000094
(7) Calculating range accuracy sigma of radarTR
Figure BDA0003627832780000095
Or
Figure BDA0003627832780000096
(8) Calculating speed measurement accuracy sigma of radarvn
Figure BDA0003627832780000101
Or
Figure BDA0003627832780000102
(9) Calculating the dry-to-noise ratio at the output of a receiver
JNR=Pj/Pn
(10) Calculating passive tracking angle accuracy sigma of radar
Figure BDA0003627832780000103
Simulation result
Please refer to fig. 11-16, which includes: the variation curve of performance parameters such as target echo signal-to-noise ratio, angle measurement precision, distance measurement precision, target echo signal-to-interference ratio, radar receiving interference-to-noise ratio, passive tracking interference source angle precision and the like along with distance or time.
Three-dimensional scene and situation display
Referring to fig. 17, in a three-dimensional scene, according to the calculation result of each simulation beat, the platform attitude, the platform track, the antenna beam scanning, the radar map, the communication link, and the like can be dynamically displayed in three dimensions.
The technical scheme of the invention has the capability of designing, editing and managing the complex electromagnetic environment battle situation scenario; the system has the deployment and editing capabilities of a combat platform; the electronic equipment such as radar, active/semi-active seeker, instruction line, finger control communication, radio fuze, reconnaissance jammer and the like can be deployed on the battle platform; providing typical interference scenes such as self-defense interference, on-line interference, remote support interference and the like; the simulation deduction function of the complex electromagnetic environment is provided; the electronic countermeasure data processing and evaluation capability is provided; cross-platform, operable on a variety of operating systems; the interface is separated from the service, and the model and the algorithm are designed in a modularized manner, so that the expansion and the upgrade are facilitated; the primary electronic countermeasure model is validated; and battlefield situation display, electronic countermeasure effect display, striking effect display and the like are supported. By utilizing computer modeling and simulation technology to simulate a real combat environment, an anti-interference capability test evaluation of the air-defense missile weapon system in a complex electromagnetic environment is taken as a background, a functional level simulation model including a search/guidance radar, a seeker, an instruction line, a radio fuze, a finger control communication, an interference machine and the like is established, test design planning, deduction and evaluation are carried out, a tool platform is provided for performance and efficiency evaluation of the air-defense missile weapon system, the fault tolerance rate is high, repeated tests can be carried out, the test period is short, the efficiency is high, and the requirements can be better met.
Referring to fig. 18, the invention further discloses a device for simulating and verifying the confrontation function level of an air defense missile weapon system, which comprises: the system comprises a construction setting unit 10, an execution calculation unit 20, a display acquisition unit 30, a judgment unit 40, an uploading unit 50 and an output unit 60;
the construction setting unit 10 is used for constructing a battle situation environment and setting simulation parameters;
the execution calculating unit 20 is configured to execute simulation and calculate simulation data according to the simulation parameters to obtain data information;
the display acquisition unit 30 is used for displaying data information and acquiring the data information;
the judging unit 40 is configured to judge whether the simulation is completed;
the uploading unit 50 is configured to upload the acquired data information to the simulation result database if the simulation is completed;
the output unit 60 is configured to output a simulation verification report from the simulation result database.
Wherein, in the construction setting unit 10, include: formulating a fighting situation planning design, constructing a fighting situation of an air defense missile weapon system according to a planned scene, then completing the loading of a three-dimensional image map and a digital elevation map, setting initial position parameters, initial posture parameters and initial speed parameters of a radar, an interference equipment platform and a target platform, and displaying the deployment situation of each fighting equipment platform on an electronic map by using a three-dimensional model; setting a motion track of the mobile platform in a mode of loading a track file, selecting points of a map and setting a geometric form air route; setting RCS attributes of a target platform; and setting the working mode and the working parameters of the electronic information equipment.
Wherein, the execution computing unit 20 includes: the method comprises the steps of platform position and attitude calculation, relative distance and included angle calculation of each platform, echo signal power calculation/receiver internal noise calculation/interference signal power calculation, signal-to-noise ratio calculation/signal-to-interference ratio calculation/drying ratio calculation, angle measurement accuracy calculation/distance measurement accuracy calculation/speed measurement accuracy calculation, and finding distance calculation/tracking distance calculation to obtain data information.
In the output unit 60, the output simulation verification report includes battle situation scene data, detection performance of the air defense missile weapon system, and anti-interference performance test data.
It should be noted that, as will be clearly understood by those skilled in the art, the specific implementation processes of the countermeasure function level simulation verification apparatus and each unit of the air defense missile weapon system may refer to the corresponding descriptions in the foregoing method embodiments, and for convenience and brevity of description, no further description is provided herein.
The above-mentioned anti-aircraft missile weapon system confrontation function level simulation verification device can be realized in the form of a computer program which can be run on a computer device as shown in fig. 19.
Referring to fig. 19, fig. 19 is a schematic block diagram of a computer device according to an embodiment of the present application; the computer device 500 may be a terminal or a server, where the terminal may be an electronic device with a communication function, such as a smart phone, a tablet computer, a notebook computer, a desktop computer, a personal digital assistant, and a wearable device. The server may be an independent server or a server cluster composed of a plurality of servers.
Referring to fig. 19, the computer device 500 includes a processor 502, memory, and a network interface 505 connected by a system bus 501, where the memory may include a non-volatile storage medium 503 and an internal memory 504.
The non-volatile storage medium 503 may store an operating system 5031 and computer programs 5032. The computer programs 5032 include program instructions that, when executed, cause the processor 502 to perform a method for validation of flight defense weapon system challenge function level simulation.
The processor 502 is used to provide computing and control capabilities to support the operation of the overall computer device 500.
The internal memory 504 provides an environment for the operation of the computer program 5032 in the non-volatile storage medium 503, and when the computer program 5032 is executed by the processor 502, the processor 502 can be caused to execute a method for verifying the anti-missile weapon system anti-functional level simulation.
The network interface 505 is used for network communication with other devices. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the configuration shown in fig. 19 is a block diagram of only a portion of the configuration associated with the present application, and is not intended to limit the scope of the computer device 500 to which the present application may be applied, and that a particular computer device 500 may include more or less components than those shown, or may combine certain components, or have a different arrangement of components.
Wherein the processor 502 is configured to run the computer program 5032 stored in the memory to perform the steps of:
step S1, constructing a battle situation environment and setting simulation parameters;
step S2, according to the simulation parameters, executing simulation and calculating simulation data to obtain data information;
step S3, displaying and collecting data information;
step S4, judging whether the simulation is finished;
step S5, if the simulation is finished, the collected data information is uploaded to a simulation result database;
and step S6, the simulation result database outputs a simulation verification report.
It should be understood that, in the embodiment of the present Application, the Processor 502 may be a Central Processing Unit (CPU), and the Processor 502 may also be other general-purpose processors, Digital Signal Processors (DSPs), Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), Field-Programmable Gate arrays (FPGAs) or other Programmable logic devices, discrete Gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, and the like. Wherein a general purpose processor may be a microprocessor or the processor may be any conventional processor or the like.
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that all or part of the flow of the method implementing the above embodiments may be implemented by a computer program instructing relevant hardware. The computer program includes program instructions, and the computer program may be stored in a storage medium, which is a computer-readable storage medium. The program instructions are executed by at least one processor in the computer system to implement the flow steps of the embodiments of the method described above.
Accordingly, the present invention also provides a storage medium. The storage medium may be a computer-readable storage medium. The storage medium stores a computer program, wherein the computer program comprises program instructions that, when executed by a processor, implement the method for flight defense missile weapon system confrontation function level simulation verification described above. The storage medium stores a computer program comprising program instructions which, when executed by a processor, implement the method described above. The program instructions include the steps of:
step S1, constructing a battle situation environment and setting simulation parameters;
step S2, according to the simulation parameters, executing simulation and calculating simulation data to obtain data information;
Step S3, displaying and collecting data information;
step S4, judging whether the simulation is finished;
step S5, if the simulation is finished, the collected data information is uploaded to a simulation result database;
and step S6, the simulation result database outputs a simulation verification report.
The storage medium may be a usb disk, a removable hard disk, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a magnetic disk, or an optical disk, which can store various computer readable storage media of program codes.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the elements and algorithm steps of the examples described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be embodied in electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both, and that the components and steps of the examples have been described in a functional general in the foregoing description for the purpose of illustrating clearly the interchangeability of hardware and software. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the technical solution. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present invention.
In the several embodiments provided in the present invention, it should be understood that the disclosed apparatus and method may be implemented in other manners. For example, the above-described apparatus embodiments are merely illustrative. For example, the division of each unit is only one logic function division, and there may be another division manner in actual implementation. For example, various elements or components may be combined or may be integrated in another system or some features may be omitted, or not implemented.
The steps in the method of the embodiment of the invention can be sequentially adjusted, combined and deleted according to actual needs. The units in the device of the embodiment of the invention can be combined, divided and deleted according to actual needs. In addition, functional units in the embodiments of the present invention may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist alone physically, or two or more units are integrated into one unit.
The integrated unit, if implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as a separate product, may be stored in a storage medium. Based on such understanding, the technical solution of the present invention essentially or partly contributes to the prior art, or all or part of the technical solution can be embodied in the form of a software product, which is stored in a storage medium and includes several instructions for causing a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a terminal, or a network device) to execute all or part of the steps of the method according to the embodiments of the present invention.
The above embodiments are preferred implementations of the present invention, and the present invention can be implemented in other ways without departing from the spirit of the present invention.

Claims (10)

1. The method for simulating and verifying the confrontation function level of the air-defense missile weapon system is characterized by comprising the following steps of:
constructing a battle situation environment and setting simulation parameters;
according to the simulation parameters, executing simulation and calculating simulation data to obtain data information;
displaying the data information and collecting the data information;
judging whether the simulation is finished;
if the simulation is finished, uploading the acquired data information to a simulation result database;
and the simulation result database outputs a simulation verification report.
2. The method for simulating and verifying the confrontation function level of the air-defense missile weapon system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the step of constructing a battlefield environment and setting simulation parameters comprises the following steps: formulating a fighting situation planning design, constructing a fighting situation of an air defense missile weapon system according to a planned scene, then completing the loading of a three-dimensional image map and a digital elevation map, setting initial position parameters, initial posture parameters and initial speed parameters of a radar, an interference equipment platform and a target platform, and displaying the deployment situation of each fighting equipment platform on an electronic map by using a three-dimensional model; setting a motion track of the mobile platform in a mode of loading a track file, selecting points of a map and setting a geometric form air route; setting RCS attributes of a target platform; and setting the working mode and the working parameters of the electronic information equipment.
3. The method for verifying the anti-aircraft missile weapon system to simulate the functional level according to the claim 1, wherein the step of performing simulation and calculating simulation data according to the simulation parameters to obtain data information comprises: the method comprises the steps of platform position and attitude calculation, relative distance and included angle calculation of each platform, echo signal power calculation/receiver internal noise calculation/interference signal power calculation, signal-to-noise ratio calculation/signal-to-interference ratio calculation/drying ratio calculation, angle measurement accuracy calculation/distance measurement accuracy calculation/speed measurement accuracy calculation, and finding distance calculation/tracking distance calculation to obtain data information.
4. The method for performing the simulated verification on the confrontation function level of the air-defense missile weapon system according to claim 1, wherein in the step of outputting the simulated verification report by the simulation result database, the output simulated verification report comprises battle situation scene data, detection performance and anti-interference performance test data of the air-defense missile weapon system.
5. Air defense missile weapon system is confronted with functional level simulation verification device, its characterized in that includes: the system comprises a construction setting unit, an execution computing unit, a display acquisition unit, a judgment unit, an uploading unit and an output unit;
The construction setting unit is used for constructing a battle situation environment and setting simulation parameters;
the execution calculation unit is used for executing simulation and calculating simulation data according to the simulation parameters to obtain data information;
the display acquisition unit is used for displaying the data information and acquiring the data information;
the judging unit is used for judging whether the simulation is finished;
the uploading unit is used for uploading the acquired data information to a simulation result database if the simulation is finished;
and the output unit is used for outputting a simulation verification report by the simulation result database.
6. The air defense missile weapon system confrontation function level simulation verification device of claim 5, wherein the construction setting unit comprises: formulating a fighting situation planning design, constructing a fighting situation of an air defense missile weapon system according to a planned scene, then completing the loading of a three-dimensional image map and a digital elevation map, setting initial position parameters, initial posture parameters and initial speed parameters of a radar, an interference equipment platform and a target platform, and displaying the deployment situation of each fighting equipment platform on an electronic map by using a three-dimensional model; setting a motion track of the mobile platform in a mode of loading a track file, selecting points of a map and setting a geometric form air route; setting RCS attributes of a target platform; and setting the working mode and the working parameters of the electronic information equipment.
7. The air defense missile weapon system confrontation function level simulation verification device of claim 5, wherein the execution computing unit comprises: the method comprises the steps of platform position and attitude calculation, relative distance and included angle calculation of each platform, echo signal power calculation/receiver internal noise calculation/interference signal power calculation, signal-to-noise ratio calculation/signal-to-interference ratio calculation/drying ratio calculation, angle measurement accuracy calculation/distance measurement accuracy calculation/speed measurement accuracy calculation, and finding distance calculation/tracking distance calculation to obtain data information.
8. The anti-aircraft missile weapon system confrontation function level simulation verification device of claim 5, wherein in the output unit, the output simulation verification report comprises battlefield scene data, detection performance of the anti-aircraft missile weapon system and anti-interference performance test data.
9. A computer device, characterized in that the computer device comprises a memory and a processor, the memory having stored thereon a computer program which, when executed by the processor, implements the air defense missile weapon system confrontation function level simulation verification method of any one of claims 1 to 4.
10. A storage medium storing a computer program comprising program instructions that, when executed by a processor, implement the air defense missile weapon system confrontation function level simulation verification method of any one of claims 1 to 4.
CN202210481878.6A 2022-05-05 2022-05-05 Method and device for verifying confrontation function level simulation of air-defense missile weapon system Pending CN114757051A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210481878.6A CN114757051A (en) 2022-05-05 2022-05-05 Method and device for verifying confrontation function level simulation of air-defense missile weapon system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210481878.6A CN114757051A (en) 2022-05-05 2022-05-05 Method and device for verifying confrontation function level simulation of air-defense missile weapon system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN114757051A true CN114757051A (en) 2022-07-15

Family

ID=82333435

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202210481878.6A Pending CN114757051A (en) 2022-05-05 2022-05-05 Method and device for verifying confrontation function level simulation of air-defense missile weapon system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN114757051A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115130332A (en) * 2022-08-30 2022-09-30 中电太极(集团)有限公司 Simulation method and device for efficiency evaluation system
CN117648830A (en) * 2024-01-29 2024-03-05 北京蓝天航空科技股份有限公司 VOR navigation simulation method, device and system, electronic equipment and storage medium

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115130332A (en) * 2022-08-30 2022-09-30 中电太极(集团)有限公司 Simulation method and device for efficiency evaluation system
CN117648830A (en) * 2024-01-29 2024-03-05 北京蓝天航空科技股份有限公司 VOR navigation simulation method, device and system, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN117648830B (en) * 2024-01-29 2024-04-26 北京蓝天航空科技股份有限公司 VOR navigation simulation method, device and system, electronic equipment and storage medium

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN112489524B (en) Radar investigation and countermeasure simulation system
CN114757051A (en) Method and device for verifying confrontation function level simulation of air-defense missile weapon system
CN112668175B (en) Military simulation method and system based on dynamic situation driving
CN109658770B (en) Air condition simulation system for civil air defense training
CN112580221B (en) Attack and defense confrontation simulation system
CN115796042A (en) Electronic reconnaissance-oriented intelligent game counter deduction system and method
CN112308422A (en) Task planning and solving simulation system and method for remote aerial support carrier
US8986011B1 (en) Occlusion server for an integrated live and simulation environment for an aircraft
KR101620404B1 (en) System of embedded training of pod for lvc distributed simulation environment
CN105069197A (en) Simulation method for dynamic process of aerial platform radar detection
KR102557361B1 (en) Apparatus and method for performing electronic warfare simulation
You et al. Air combat command and guidance situation assessment based on attack area
RU2315940C2 (en) Method for fire of multiple target by rocket projectiles from sheltered fire positions and system for its realization
US11821996B1 (en) Outdoor entity and weapon tracking and orientation
Grant CEC: Sensor netting with integrated fire control
Fedaravicius et al. Design and research of the image processing unit and telemetric equipment for the laser-guided very short range air defence systems field simulator
CN114859757A (en) Airborne anti-stealth early warning radar and digital simulation test method and device for combat environment thereof
Haoyu et al. Simulation and effectiveness analysis on one versus one beyond visual range air combat
CN116242204A (en) Simulation method and device for simulating interception of aircraft based on ground-to-air missile weapon system
CN117688774A (en) Space launching simulation method for soldiers chess
KR20210060834A (en) A multi-access multiple cooperation military education training system
Cheng et al. Design of UAV distributed aided navigation simulation system based on scene/terrain matching
Tang et al. Evaluation of Radar Jamming Effect
Reali et al. Tracking a ballistic target by multiple model approach
Snarski et al. Autonomous UAV-based mapping of large-scale urban firefights

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination