CN114662846A - Method, system, equipment and medium for evaluating quality of railway train inspection operation - Google Patents
Method, system, equipment and medium for evaluating quality of railway train inspection operation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN114662846A CN114662846A CN202210121027.0A CN202210121027A CN114662846A CN 114662846 A CN114662846 A CN 114662846A CN 202210121027 A CN202210121027 A CN 202210121027A CN 114662846 A CN114662846 A CN 114662846A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- train
- inspection
- fault
- evaluated
- column
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 228
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 45
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 43
- 238000013441 quality evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 42
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 claims description 31
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000013024 troubleshooting Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000007405 data analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007418 data mining Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 206010063385 Intellectualisation Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012854 evaluation process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003203 everyday effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004927 fusion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010365 information processing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003137 locomotive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000275 quality assurance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003908 quality control method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004575 stone Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010409 thin film Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06395—Quality analysis or management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/20—Administration of product repair or maintenance
-
- G06Q50/40—
Abstract
The application discloses a railway train inspection operation quality evaluation method, which comprises the following steps: a collection generation step: selecting any one of the mutual control column examination records from the column examination information base of the mutual control operation field, screening the records of any one of the mutual control column examinations corresponding to a plurality of evaluated column examination records in the evaluated operation field based on a preset selection condition, and outputting a collection comprising the records of any one of the mutual control column examinations and the plurality of evaluated column examination records; train inspection number comparison step: based on a train number marshalling information matching rule, selecting any one of the records of the interactive train inspection and the record of the evaluated train inspection from the collection to carry out train number matching, and when the coincidence rate of the train numbers is greater than a preset value, if the matching is successful, determining that any one of the interactive train inspection and the evaluated train inspection is the same train; and (3) fault missing detection evaluation step: and based on a fault dictionary database and fault matching rules, carrying out various types of fault code matching on the evaluated column inspection, confirming that the evaluated column inspection has fault omission in a column inspection operation field if the matching is successful, and deducting the faults which are omitted to be inspected according to an evaluation standard to realize the operation quality evaluation of the evaluated column inspection.
Description
Technical Field
The present invention relates to quality management of train inspection, and more particularly, to a method, system, device, and medium for evaluating quality of train inspection work.
Background
At present, the running safety of railway vehicles is an important foundation stone for railway transportation safety, parts of the railway vehicles are gradually abraded, corroded and damaged in the application process, and various inspection and repair operations must be carried out on the railway vehicles in order to ensure good quality of the vehicles, ensure driving safety and prolong the service life of the vehicles.
Therefore, the quality of the vehicle train inspection work is an important guarantee for the running safety of the vehicle. On the basis of quality assurance of a construction and repair source, a truck application safety implementation section is responsible for control, quality tracing is implemented, all workshops and all processes are operated and repaired by vehicles, mutual supervision in the vehicle application and repair process is strengthened, good quality is closed, and the method is one of effective means for realizing mutual quality control and improving the vehicle application and repair quality.
In the actual application and the maintenance operation of vehicles, except for implementing the traditional three-level inspection degree, the control of the vehicle quality lacks mutual control links among different production operation units. Easy to miss detection and repair and bury major hidden troubles for the safe operation of vehicles.
Therefore, in order to solve the above problems in the prior art, adapt to the requirements of the railway vehicle operation and maintenance quality management, effectively prevent missed detection and missed maintenance, realize early detection and early handling of vehicle operation faults, and eliminate hidden danger of vehicle safe operation, promote data sharing and comprehensive application with the existing vehicle system, provide information service support for related management and operating personnel, urgently need to introduce advanced information processing technology, and urgently need to establish a set of more perfect standardized freight train quality evaluation model of a train inspection operation field, and realize intelligent evaluation of freight train inspection operation quality.
The invention provides a method and a system for evaluating the quality of railway train inspection operation, which can improve the evaluation quality of railway train inspection operation, improve the train inspection evaluation efficiency, perfect a control system for leak detection and repair, improve the analysis capability of train inspection operation and promote the long-term development of railway transportation safety.
Disclosure of Invention
The embodiment of the application provides a method for evaluating the quality of railway train inspection operation, provides a standard freight train quality evaluation model of a train inspection operation field, and realizes intelligent evaluation on the quality of freight train inspection operation.
In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a method for evaluating quality of a railway train inspection operation, including:
a collection generation step: selecting any one of the mutual control column examination records from the column examination information base of the mutual control operation field, screening the records of any one of the mutual control column examinations corresponding to a plurality of evaluated column examination records in the evaluated operation field based on a preset selection condition, and outputting a collection comprising the records of any one of the mutual control column examinations and the plurality of evaluated column examination records;
train inspection number comparison step: based on a train number grouping information matching rule, selecting any one of the records of the interactive train inspection and the records of the evaluated train inspection from the collection to perform train number matching, and when the coincidence rate of the train numbers is greater than a preset value, if the matching is successful, determining that any one of the interactive train inspection and the evaluated train inspection is the same train;
and (3) fault missing detection evaluation step: and based on a fault dictionary library and fault matching rules, carrying out various types of fault code matching on the evaluated column tests, confirming that the evaluated column tests have fault missing tests in a column test operation field if the matching is successful, and deducting the faults missing tests according to evaluation criteria to realize the operation quality evaluation of the evaluated column tests.
In the embodiment of the present invention, the preset selection condition in the collection generating step includes:
and inquiring the record of the evaluated train inspection with the property of the operation as the starting or the transit in a period of time based on the ending time of the record of any one interactive train inspection.
In the embodiment of the present invention, the train inspection number comparing step includes:
the evaluated column check selecting step: selecting one of the records of the evaluated column tests, which is closest to the interval time of the records of any one of the mutual control column tests, as a record for hitting the evaluated column test;
and a coincidence rate calculation step: and comparing the number of the overlapped vehicles with the number of the grouped vehicles in the record of the evaluated train test to complete the calculation of the coincidence rate of the vehicle numbers.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the failure and omission evaluation step includes:
a fault information acquisition step: based on the number information of the train hit to be evaluated and inspected, the repair fault information, the typical fault information and the TFDS confirmation fault information are searched;
and (3) fault matching: and confirming fault information aiming at the repair fault information, the typical fault information and the TFDS, if at least one fault information is successfully matched with the fault codes of the fault dictionary library or at least one fault is the same as the fault part of any mutual control column inspection, summarizing and outputting the deduction condition of hit to the evaluated column inspection according to the evaluation standard.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the step of acquiring the fault information includes:
and (3) temporary repair fault finding step: according to the train number information, the temporary repair fault record in a period of time after the technical inspection end time of the mutual control train inspection operation field is searched, and the temporary repair fault information of the evaluated train inspection is obtained;
typical troubleshooting steps: according to the train number information, searching a technical inspection end time matching typical fault table of the mutual control train inspection operation field, and obtaining typical faults which hit the evaluated train inspection;
TFDS fault finding step: and searching for the TFDS confirmation fault of the evaluated train inspection hit within a period of time before the technical inspection ending time of the mutual control train inspection operation field according to the train number information.
In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a quality evaluation system for a railway train inspection operation, which employs any one of the above methods for evaluating the quality of the railway train inspection operation, including:
a collection generation module: selecting any one of the mutual control column examination records from the column examination information base of the mutual control operation field, screening the records of any one of the mutual control column examinations corresponding to a plurality of evaluated column examination records in the evaluated operation field based on a preset selection condition, and outputting a collection comprising any one of the mutual control column examination records and a plurality of evaluated column examinations;
train inspection vehicle number comparison module: based on train number marshalling information matching rules, selecting any one of the records of the interactive train inspection and the record of the evaluated train inspection from the collection to perform train number matching, and when the coincidence rate of the train numbers is greater than a preset value, if the matching is successful, determining that any one of the interactive train inspection and the evaluated train inspection is the same train;
and a fault missing detection evaluation module: and based on the fault dictionary database and the fault matching rules, carrying out various types of fault code matching on the evaluated column tests, confirming that the evaluated column tests have fault missing tests in a column test operation field if the matching is successful, and deducting the faults missing tests according to the evaluation criteria to realize the operation quality evaluation of the evaluated column tests.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the train inspection number comparing module includes:
the evaluated column check selection module: selecting one record which is closest to the record interval time of any one mutual control train inspection from the records of the plurality of evaluated train inspections as a record hitting the evaluated train inspections;
a coincidence rate calculation module: the marshalling information matching rule is used for comparing the marshalling train number information in the records of any one of the mutual control train inspections and the evaluated train inspections, and comparing the number of the overlapped vehicles with the number of the marshalling vehicles in the records of the evaluated train inspections.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the failure missing detection evaluation module includes:
a fault information acquisition module: searching the repair fault information, the typical fault information and the TFDS confirmation fault information based on the number information of the hit evaluated train;
a fault matching module: and confirming fault information aiming at the repair fault information, the typical fault information and the TFDS, if at least one fault information is successfully matched with the fault codes of the fault dictionary library or at least one fault is the same as the fault part of any mutual control column inspection, summarizing and outputting the score deduction condition of the hit evaluated column inspection according to the evaluation standard.
In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a server device, which includes a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, where the processor, when executing the computer program, implements the method for evaluating quality of railway train inspection work according to any one of the above methods.
In a fourth aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, where the computer program is executed by a processor to implement the method for evaluating quality of railway train inspection work according to any one of the above aspects.
Compared with the related prior art, the method has the following outstanding advantages:
1. the method and the system for evaluating the quality of the railway train inspection operation can prevent the omission of inspection and repair and improve the evaluation capability of the quality of the mutual control operation;
2. the train inspection operation quality evaluation function of the train management information system provided by the invention comprehensively utilizes the train inspection technology to manually inspect the found faults and the TFDS system to find the faults and the repair faults according to the standard and the requirement of standardized train quality evaluation, evaluates the operation quality of the previous operation field, promotes the improvement of the train inspection operation quality and ensures the train operation quality. The current quality evaluation function of the standardized freight train for train inspection realizes the mutual control of the quality of the train inspection operation and the quality evaluation of the application management of a railway bureau and a vehicle section;
3. the invention supports automatic screening of the operation data of the mutual control operation field and the evaluated operation field, and the repeated vehicle numbers are quickly matched according to the vehicle number coding rule, thereby improving the efficiency of automatic data screening;
4. the method supports automatic matching of the fault dictionary, automatically matches according to the found fault information of the evaluated column inspection, automatically identifies the failure of missed inspection, greatly saves labor and improves the efficiency of fault matching and searching;
5. the method and the device support automatic matching of the deduction evaluation standard based on the searched missed inspection information, quickly and accurately output the comprehensive missed inspection evaluation report of the evaluated train inspection, realize all automatic intellectualization, realize the advance prediction and discovery of faults and improve the safety of locomotive operation.
Drawings
The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the application and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this application, illustrate embodiment(s) of the application and together with the description serve to explain the application and not to limit the application. In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the method for evaluating the quality of railway train inspection work according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic flow chart of an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a diagram of the railway train inspection operation quality evaluation architecture of the present invention;
fig. 4 is a hardware configuration diagram of an apparatus according to an embodiment of the present application.
In the above figures:
100 railway train inspection operation quality evaluation system
10 collection generation module 20 train inspection number comparison module
30 failure missing detection evaluation module
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present application more clearly understood, the present application is described and illustrated below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the present application and are not intended to limit the present application. All other embodiments obtained by a person of ordinary skill in the art based on the embodiments provided in the present application without any inventive step are within the scope of protection of the present application.
It is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only examples or embodiments of the present application, and that it is also possible for a person skilled in the art to apply the present application to other similar contexts on the basis of these drawings without inventive effort. Moreover, it should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another.
The details of one or more embodiments of the application are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below to provide a more thorough understanding of the application.
Reference in the specification to "an embodiment" means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment can be included in at least one embodiment of the specification. The appearances of the phrase in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments mutually exclusive of other embodiments. It is to be expressly and implicitly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the embodiments described herein may be combined with other embodiments without conflict.
Unless otherwise defined, technical or scientific terms referred to herein should have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this application belongs. Reference to "a," "an," "the," and similar words throughout this application are not to be construed as limiting in number, and may refer to the singular or the plural. The present application is directed to the use of the terms "including," "comprising," "having," and any variations thereof, which are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusions; for example, a process, method, system, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of steps or modules (elements) is not limited to the listed steps or elements, but may include other steps or elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Reference to "connected," "coupled," and the like in this application is not intended to be limited to physical or mechanical connections, but may include electrical connections, whether direct or indirect. The term "plurality" as used herein means two or more. "and/or" describes an association relationship of associated objects, meaning that three relationships may exist, for example, "A and/or B" may mean: a exists alone, A and B exist simultaneously, and B exists alone. The character "/" generally indicates that the former and latter associated objects are in an "or" relationship. Reference herein to the terms "first," "second," "third," and the like, are merely to distinguish similar objects and do not denote a particular ordering for the objects.
In order to solve the problems of the prior art, the invention aims to establish a technical index for standardizing the quality of the train in a train inspection work field, fuse and analyze the information of the technical inspection work of the freight train, typical faults, impending faults, fault forecast by a TFDS (freight train operation fault dynamic image detection system) and the like under the guidance of the technical index, establish an interpield mutual control and train fault backtracking mechanism by utilizing the related data of the two adjacent train inspection technical work of the same train, scientifically evaluate the quality of the train inspection work in the train inspection work field, and provide an important technical means for the management department of the freight train to evaluate the quality and gradually realize the fine management.
Fig. 1 is a flowchart of a method for evaluating quality of a railway train inspection operation according to the present invention, and as shown in fig. 1, an embodiment of the present application provides a first aspect, and an embodiment of the present application provides a method for evaluating quality of a railway train inspection operation, including:
collection generation step S10: selecting any one of the records of the mutual control train inspection from a train inspection information base of the mutual control operation field, screening the records of any one of the mutual control train inspections corresponding to a plurality of records of the evaluated train inspection in the evaluated operation field based on a preset selection condition, and outputting a collection containing the records of any one of the mutual control train inspections and the records of the plurality of the evaluated train inspections;
train inspection car number comparison step S20: based on a train number grouping information matching rule, selecting any one of the records of the interactive train inspection and the records of the evaluated train inspection from the collection to perform train number matching, and when the coincidence rate of the train numbers is greater than a preset value, if the matching is successful, determining that any one of the interactive train inspection and the evaluated train inspection is the same train;
failure omission evaluation step S30: and based on a fault dictionary library and fault matching rules, carrying out various types of fault code matching on the evaluated column tests, confirming that the evaluated column tests have fault missing tests in a column test operation field if the matching is successful, and deducting the faults missing tests according to evaluation criteria to realize the operation quality evaluation of the evaluated column tests.
In the embodiment of the present invention, the preset selection condition in the collection generating step S10 includes:
and inquiring the record of the evaluated train inspection with the property of the operation as the starting or the transit in a period of time based on the ending time of the record of any one interactive train inspection.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the train inspection number comparing step S20 includes:
the evaluated column check selecting step: selecting one of the records of the evaluated column tests, which is closest to the interval time of the records of any one of the mutual control column tests, as a record for hitting the evaluated column test;
and a coincidence rate calculation step: and comparing the information of the marshalling train numbers in the records of any one of the mutual control train inspections and the records of hitting the evaluated train inspections, and comparing the number of the coincident vehicles with the number of the marshalling vehicles in the records of the evaluated train inspections to complete the calculation of the coincidence rate of the train numbers.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the step S30 of evaluating the missing fault detection includes:
a fault information acquisition step: based on the number information of the train hit to be evaluated and inspected, the repair fault information, the typical fault information and the TFDS confirmation fault information are searched;
and (3) fault matching: and confirming fault information aiming at the repair fault information, the typical fault information and the TFDS, if at least one fault information is successfully matched with the fault codes of the fault dictionary library or at least one fault is the same as the fault part of any mutual control column inspection, summarizing and outputting the deduction condition of hit to the evaluated column inspection according to the evaluation standard.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the step of acquiring the fault information includes:
and (3) temporary repair fault finding step: according to the train number information, the temporary repair fault record in a period of time after the technical inspection end time of the mutual control train inspection operation field is searched, and the temporary repair fault information of the evaluated train inspection is obtained;
typical troubleshooting step: according to the train number information, searching a technical inspection end time matching typical fault table of the mutual control train inspection operation field, and obtaining typical faults which hit the evaluated train inspection;
TFDS fault finding step: and searching for the TFDS confirmation fault of the evaluated train inspection hit within a period of time before the technical inspection ending time of the mutual control train inspection operation field according to the train number information.
The following detailed description of specific embodiments of the invention refers to the accompanying drawings in which:
the invention provides that after a train inspection operation site A operates a train of trucks (the operation property is starting or transferring), the train of trucks arrives at the next train inspection operation site B to carry out arrival or transferring operation, and the train inspection operation site B can grade each train of trucks operated by the train inspection A according to a standard truck evaluation standard according to an inspection result. A is the evaluated row inspection operation field, and B is the mutual control row inspection operation field. And the mutual control train inspection operation field B scores the evaluated train inspection operation field A according to the standardized freight train evaluation standard, and the full score is 1000. The "acceptable" means a vehicle having an evaluation score of 900 points or more (inclusive), and the "unacceptable" means a vehicle having an evaluation score of less than 900 points. Non-evaluation refers to a vehicle not participating in evaluation. In the present invention, the above evaluation criteria are used in the specific examples, but the present invention is not limited thereto, and other evaluation criteria and evaluation scores may be used.
Fig. 2 is a flowchart of an embodiment of the present invention, and as shown in fig. 2, the overall evaluation process is as follows:
(1) selecting an arrival and transfer operation property record L2 from operation records of a train-14 (namely, vehicle comprehensive information of train inspection, including train inspection train number, train inspection starting time, train inspection ending time and the like) of an inter-control train inspection operation field (train inspection 2), searching an operation record L1 closest to the L2 technical inspection starting time, and taking an L1 operation train inspection as an evaluated train inspection operation field (train inspection 1);
(2) matching the marshalling information of the trains of L1 and L2, identifying the trains as the same train when the overlapping rate of the train numbers is more than 95 percent, and beginning to evaluate the operation quality of the evaluated train inspection 1; the predetermined value of the number overlap ratio is 95%, but the present invention is not limited thereto, and other ranges of the number overlap ratio may be adopted.
(3) And reporting typical faults and repairing vehicles to find vehicle fault codes by matching the mutual control train inspection operation field, or manually confirming the fault codes by a TFDS (thin film digital system) in front of the corresponding mutual control train inspection operation field, wherein two types of fault code information are successfully matched, namely, the evaluated train inspection operation field is determined to have fault missing inspection. The invention is not limited in this regard and may also include the use of other fault types.
(4) And (4) according to the standard freight car evaluation standard, deducting the missed inspection faults, and realizing the operation quality evaluation of the train inspection 1.
And judging that the two operation sites work in the same train standard:
(1) train comparison analysis is carried out by regularly utilizing the train number-14 coincidence rate every day
In the train-14, the arrival and transfer trains at the train inspection operation place are selected, for any train inspection record n, the train-14 record with the operation property of the start or transfer within 3 days before the technical inspection end time in n is inquired, and a plurality of train inspection records may be selected, wherein the train inspection record m of which the 'technical inspection completion time' is the nearest to the 'technical inspection start time' of n is taken. The job information of m and n form a collection, which is the basis of our data, n is the mutual control job site information, and m is the evaluated job site information.
(2) Train number information comparison
Comparing the formation train number information in the m and n train inspection records, wherein the train number coincidence rate is more than 95% (algorithm: the number of coincident trains/the number of formation trains in m), for example, the number of coincident trains m and n is 55, and the number of formation trains in the m train inspection record is 56, the coincidence rate is 55/56 and is approximately equal to 98%, namely, the trains are considered to be the same train.
The train number in the train inspection record m and the train number in the train inspection record n may not be completely the same, the train numbers of the two are compared, and the unmatched train numbers in n do not participate in quality evaluation.
(3) Basis for marking standardized truck quality for inter-control train inspection operation field
Based on the data base, for the car numbers which have operated in the two operation fields, three types of faults can be found according to the following modes:
according to the car number, searching for the repair fault record within 7 days after the technical inspection end time of the inter-control train inspection operation site, and obtaining the repair fault information of the car number;
according to the train number, matching the technical inspection end time of the inter-control train inspection operation field with the train number, the operation field and the date in the typical fault table to obtain the typical fault of the train number;
and searching TFDS of the train number within 2 hours before the technical inspection end time of the inter-control train inspection operation field according to the train number to confirm the fault.
After the faults are obtained, if any two of the three types of faults can correspond to the same fault, matching the standardized freight car evaluation standard according to the fault codes of the faults to obtain the deduction condition of the car number.
In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a system 100 for evaluating quality of railway train inspection work, which employs any one of the above methods for evaluating quality of railway train inspection work, as shown in fig. 3, and includes:
the collection generation module 10: selecting any one of the mutual control column examination records from the column examination information base of the mutual control operation field, screening the records of any one of the mutual control column examinations corresponding to a plurality of evaluated column examination records in the evaluated operation field based on a preset selection condition, and outputting a collection comprising any one of the mutual control column examination records and a plurality of evaluated column examinations;
train inspection vehicle number comparison module 20: based on train number marshalling information matching rules, selecting any one of the records of the interactive train inspection and the record of the evaluated train inspection from the collection to perform train number matching, and when the coincidence rate of the train numbers is greater than a preset value, if the matching is successful, determining that any one of the interactive train inspection and the evaluated train inspection is the same train;
the failure missing detection evaluation module 30: and based on the fault dictionary base and the fault matching rules, carrying out various types of fault code matching on the evaluated column inspection, confirming that the evaluated column inspection has fault omission in a column inspection operation field if the matching is successful, and deducting the faults which are omitted to be inspected according to the evaluation criteria to realize the operation quality evaluation of the evaluated column inspection.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the train inspection number comparing module 20 includes:
the evaluated column check selection module: selecting one of the records of the evaluated column tests, which is closest to the interval time of the records of any one of the mutual control column tests, as a record for hitting the evaluated column test;
a coincidence rate calculation module: the marshalling information matching rule is used for comparing the marshalling train number information in the records of any one of the mutual control train inspections and the evaluated train inspections, and comparing the number of the overlapped vehicles with the number of the marshalling vehicles in the records of the evaluated train inspections.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the failure missing detection evaluation module 30 includes:
a fault information acquisition module: based on the number information of the train hit to be evaluated and inspected, the repair fault information, the typical fault information and the TFDS confirmation fault information are searched;
a fault matching module: and confirming fault information aiming at the repair fault information, the typical fault information and the TFDS, if at least one fault information is successfully matched with the fault codes of the fault dictionary library or at least one fault is the same as the fault part of any mutual control column inspection, summarizing and outputting the deduction condition of hit to the evaluated column inspection according to the evaluation standard.
In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a server device, which includes a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, where the processor implements the method for evaluating quality of railway train inspection work according to any one of the above methods when executing the computer program.
In addition, the high-speed rail fusion media playing and controlling method described in the embodiment of the present application with reference to fig. 1 may be implemented by a server device. Fig. 4 is a schematic hardware structure diagram of a server device according to an embodiment of the present application.
The computer device may include a processor 81 and a memory 82 in which computer program instructions are stored.
Specifically, the processor 81 may include a Central Processing Unit (CPU), or A Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), or may be configured to implement one or more Integrated circuits of the embodiments of the present Application.
The memory 82 may be used to store or cache various data files for processing and/or communication use, as well as possible computer program instructions executed by the processor 81.
The processor 81 reads and executes the computer program instructions stored in the memory 82 to implement any one of the above-described methods for evaluating the quality of railway train inspection work.
In some of these embodiments, the computer device may also include a communication interface 83 and a bus 80. As shown in fig. 4, the processor 81, the memory 82, and the communication interface 83 are connected via the bus 80 to complete communication therebetween.
The communication interface 83 is used for implementing communication between modules, devices, units and/or equipment in the embodiment of the present application. The communication port 83 may also be implemented with other components such as: the data communication is carried out among external equipment, image/data acquisition equipment, a database, external storage, an image/data processing workstation and the like.
In a fourth aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, where the computer program is executed by a processor to implement the method for evaluating quality of railway train inspection work according to any one of the above aspects.
Compared with the prior art, the method can accurately acquire relevant data of the whole process of the crew operation, equipment operation and emergency disposal in real time, form a closed data loop of the whole process of the crew operation, and mine and analyze the data by combining the relevant data. The method and the system for remotely guiding the crew operation in real time can acquire relevant information of the crew operation in real time and acquire equipment state data; the system can contact ground management and emergency personnel when meeting emergency, and the ground management and emergency personnel guide a driver to carry out troubleshooting and treatment according to the emergency plan suggested by the system; the data transmission network adopts a network architecture for synchronous transmission of the mobile internet and the railway information private network, the two networks synchronously transmit data and mutually back up, and the reliability of data transmission is greatly improved; the data transmission network adopts the network gate equipment, so that the network isolation of an internal network and an external network is realized for the transmission network, the network security of a crew management system is greatly improved, the data security of the internal network is improved, and the network attack of the external network is prevented; the method adopts a method based on big data analysis and data mining to establish an emergency disposal model, supports automatic analysis and judgment of the emergency scene and provides an emergency disposal suggestion; the invention is based on big data analysis and data mining, automatically analyzes the links which are easy to cause problems in the crew operation, and supports the decision suggestion of advance prejudgment for safety management.
The technical features of the embodiments described above may be arbitrarily combined, and for the sake of brevity, all possible combinations of the technical features in the embodiments described above are not described, but should be considered as being within the scope of the present specification as long as there is no contradiction between the combinations of the technical features.
The above-mentioned embodiments only express several embodiments of the present application, and the description thereof is more specific and detailed, but not construed as limiting the scope of the invention. It should be noted that, for a person skilled in the art, several variations and modifications can be made without departing from the concept of the present application, which falls within the scope of protection of the present application. Therefore, the protection scope of the present patent shall be subject to the appended claims.
Claims (10)
1. A method for evaluating the quality of railway train inspection operation is characterized by comprising the following steps:
a collection generation step: selecting any one mutual control column check record from a column check information base of a mutual control operation field, screening a plurality of evaluated column check records corresponding to the mutual control column check record in the evaluated operation field based on a preset selection condition, and outputting a collection comprising the mutual control column check record and the evaluated column check records;
train inspection number comparison step: selecting any one of the inter-control train tests and the evaluated train test from the collection to perform train number matching based on a train number grouping information matching rule, and if the coincidence rate of the train numbers is greater than a preset value, determining that the any one of the inter-control train tests and the evaluated train test are the same train if the matching is successful;
and (3) fault missing detection evaluation step: and based on a fault dictionary database and fault matching rules, carrying out various types of fault code matching on the evaluated column inspection, confirming that the evaluated column inspection has fault omission in the column inspection operation field if the matching is successful, and deducting the faults which are omitted to be inspected according to evaluation criteria to realize the operation quality evaluation of the evaluated column inspection.
2. The method for evaluating the quality of the railway train inspection operation according to claim 1, wherein the preset selection conditions in the collection generating step comprise:
and inquiring the record of the evaluated train inspection with the operation property of originating or transferring in a period of time based on the end time of the record of any one of the interactive train inspection.
3. The method for evaluating the quality of railway train inspection work according to claim 1, wherein the train inspection number comparing step comprises:
the evaluated column inspection selecting step: selecting one of the records of the multiple evaluated column tests, which is closest to the interval time of the records of any one of the mutual control column tests, as a record for hitting the evaluated column test;
and a coincidence rate calculation step: and comparing the number of the coincident vehicles with the number of the grouped vehicles in the record of the evaluated train inspection to complete the calculation of the coincidence rate of the vehicle numbers.
4. The method for evaluating the quality of railway train inspection work according to claim 3, wherein the step of evaluating the missing fault inspection comprises the steps of:
a fault information acquisition step: searching the repair fault information, the typical fault information and the TFDS confirmation fault information based on the number information of the hit evaluated train;
and (3) fault matching: and confirming fault information aiming at the repair fault information, the typical fault information and the TFDS, if at least one fault information is successfully matched with the fault codes of the fault dictionary library or at least one fault is the same as the fault part of any mutual control column inspection, summarizing and outputting the score deduction condition of the hit evaluated column inspection according to the evaluation standard.
5. The method for evaluating the quality of railway train inspection work according to claim 4, wherein the step of acquiring the fault information comprises the steps of:
and (3) temporary repair fault finding step: according to the train number information, searching for the temporary repair fault record in a period of time after the technical inspection end time of the mutual control train inspection operation field, and obtaining the temporary repair fault information of the hit evaluated train inspection;
typical troubleshooting steps: according to the train number information, searching a technical inspection end time matching typical fault table of the mutual control train inspection operation field to obtain typical faults occurring when the evaluated train inspection is hit;
TFDS fault finding step: and searching the TFDS confirmation fault of the hit evaluated train inspection within a period of time before the technical inspection end time of the mutual control train inspection operation field according to the train number information.
6. A railway train inspection work quality evaluation system adopting the railway train inspection work quality evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, characterized by comprising:
a collection generation module: selecting any one of the mutual control column inspection records from the column inspection information base of the mutual control operation field, screening the records of any one of the mutual control column inspections corresponding to a plurality of evaluated column inspections in the evaluated operation field based on a preset selection condition, and outputting a collection comprising the records of any one of the mutual control column inspections and the plurality of evaluated column inspections;
train inspection vehicle number comparison module: selecting any one of the inter-control train tests and the evaluated train test from the collection to perform train number matching based on train number grouping information matching rules, and if the coincidence rate of the train numbers is greater than a preset value, determining that the any one of the inter-control train tests and the evaluated train test are the same train if the matching is successful;
and a fault missing detection evaluation module: and performing various types of fault code matching on the evaluated column inspection based on a fault dictionary library and a fault matching rule, confirming that the evaluated column inspection has fault missing inspection in the column inspection operation field if the matching is successful, and deducting the faults of the missing inspection according to an evaluation standard to realize the operation quality evaluation of the evaluated column inspection.
7. The system for evaluating the quality of railway train inspection work according to claim 6, wherein the train inspection number comparison module comprises:
the evaluated column check selection module: selecting one of the records of the multiple evaluated column tests, which is closest to the interval time of the records of any one of the cross-control column tests, as a record for hitting the evaluated column test;
a coincidence rate calculation module: and the marshalling information matching rule is used for comparing the marshalling train number information in the records of any one of the interactive control train exams and the hit evaluated train exam, and comparing the number of the overlapped vehicles with the number of the marshalling vehicles in the records of the evaluated train exam.
8. The railway train inspection work quality evaluation system of claim 6, wherein the failure and omission evaluation module comprises:
a fault information acquisition module: searching the repair fault information, the typical fault information and the TFDS confirmation fault information based on the number information of the hit evaluated train;
a fault matching module: and confirming fault information aiming at the repair fault information, the typical fault information and the TFDS, if at least one fault information is successfully matched with the fault codes of the fault dictionary library or at least one fault is the same as the fault part of any mutual control column inspection, summarizing and outputting the score deduction condition of the hit evaluated column inspection according to the evaluation standard.
9. A server apparatus comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor implements the method for evaluating quality of railway train inspection work according to any one of claims 1 to 5 when executing the computer program.
10. A computer-readable storage medium on which a computer program is stored, the program being characterized by implementing, when executed by a processor, the method for evaluating quality of a railroad train inspection work according to any one of claims 1 to 5.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210121027.0A CN114662846A (en) | 2022-02-09 | 2022-02-09 | Method, system, equipment and medium for evaluating quality of railway train inspection operation |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210121027.0A CN114662846A (en) | 2022-02-09 | 2022-02-09 | Method, system, equipment and medium for evaluating quality of railway train inspection operation |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN114662846A true CN114662846A (en) | 2022-06-24 |
Family
ID=82026354
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210121027.0A Pending CN114662846A (en) | 2022-02-09 | 2022-02-09 | Method, system, equipment and medium for evaluating quality of railway train inspection operation |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN114662846A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN116228207A (en) * | 2023-05-08 | 2023-06-06 | 北京京天威科技发展有限公司 | Method for dynamically obtaining vehicle maintenance quality, storage medium and computer equipment |
-
2022
- 2022-02-09 CN CN202210121027.0A patent/CN114662846A/en active Pending
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN116228207A (en) * | 2023-05-08 | 2023-06-06 | 北京京天威科技发展有限公司 | Method for dynamically obtaining vehicle maintenance quality, storage medium and computer equipment |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN106954042B (en) | Unmanned aerial vehicle railway line inspection device, system and method | |
| CN108475362A (en) | Vehicle appraisal procedure, device and equipment | |
| CN108335377B (en) | GIS technology-based automatic check method for road inspection vehicle service | |
| Szaciłło et al. | Risk assessment for rail freight transport operations | |
| CN106548436A (en) | Dangerous matter sources risk management and control method and control device | |
| CN114662846A (en) | Method, system, equipment and medium for evaluating quality of railway train inspection operation | |
| Marais et al. | Rail integrity management by means of ultrasonic testing | |
| CN112000558A (en) | Method for generating automatic test case of rail transit signal system | |
| CN111401712A (en) | Urban rail transit risk assessment system and method | |
| CN114565845A (en) | Intelligent inspection system for underground tunnel | |
| CN105923020A (en) | Automatic hump disintegration forecasting and alarming system for railway marshalling station | |
| CN110171450A (en) | Determine that fixed marshaling is owed to compile the method and device of shuffling | |
| RU2579981C1 (en) | Automated systems for integrated management of resources, risk, reliability of railway transport | |
| CN115171236B (en) | Inspection management method, inspection management platform and inspection management client | |
| CN115479949B (en) | Bridge safety monitoring and early warning method and system based on big data | |
| CN116402371A (en) | Informationized management system for tunnel lining detection | |
| Ming-yan et al. | Reach on fault tree analysis of train derailment in urban rail transit | |
| Si et al. | A method of generating engineering test sequence for urban rail transit CBTC system based on formalization | |
| Shkolina et al. | Resource Optimisation of Distributed Manufacturing Processes Using Simulation | |
| CN112183983A (en) | Enterprise dual prevention mechanism management system | |
| Liu et al. | Optimizing ultrasonic rail defect inspection to improve transportation safety and efficiency | |
| CN110228508A (en) | Train crosses vehicle message method for detecting abnormality and detection device | |
| CN117238190A (en) | Automatic verification system, method, equipment and medium for standardized operation of ATS system | |
| Szubartowski | Efficiency of repairs performed within the emergency repair subsystem of municipal bus transportation system | |
| CN111949008B (en) | Method and device for testing zone controller, electronic equipment and storage medium |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |