CN114662341A - Rock mass critical sliding surface limit analysis method - Google Patents

Rock mass critical sliding surface limit analysis method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN114662341A
CN114662341A CN202210529029.3A CN202210529029A CN114662341A CN 114662341 A CN114662341 A CN 114662341A CN 202210529029 A CN202210529029 A CN 202210529029A CN 114662341 A CN114662341 A CN 114662341A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
node
stress
rock mass
sliding surface
constraint equation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202210529029.3A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
张金良
尹德文
吴昊
苏凯
徐世濠
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co Ltd filed Critical Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co Ltd
Priority to CN202210529029.3A priority Critical patent/CN114662341A/en
Publication of CN114662341A publication Critical patent/CN114662341A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/10—Complex mathematical operations
    • G06F17/11—Complex mathematical operations for solving equations, e.g. nonlinear equations, general mathematical optimization problems
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2119/00—Details relating to the type or aim of the analysis or the optimisation
    • G06F2119/14—Force analysis or force optimisation, e.g. static or dynamic forces

Abstract

The invention discloses a rock mass critical sliding surface limit analysis method, which collects the distribution ranges of rock masses, structural surfaces and weak layers with different properties in a target area through geological survey; measuring physical and mechanical parameters of rock masses, structural surfaces and weak layers with different properties; dividing the cells; taking the stress components of all nodes as independent variables, constructing a unit static balance constraint equation, a node stress known boundary condition constraint equation, a node stress yield criterion constraint equation and an objective function, and forming a mathematical model for rock mass critical sliding surface limit analysis; and solving the optimal solution of the mathematical model and the node where the tight constraint of the mathematical model is located through a computer program, and determining the rock mass critical sliding surface. The method has the advantages that the method for quantitatively determining the critical sliding surface of the rock mass is provided, the defect that the stability of the rock mass can only be qualitatively judged in the prior art is overcome, the theoretical basis is tight, the applicability is strong, the calculation conclusion is more consistent with the engineering practice, and the method has better engineering practical value.

Description

Rock mass critical sliding surface limit analysis method
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of stability analysis of geotechnical engineering, in particular to a limit analysis method for a rock critical sliding surface.
Background
The stability analysis of rock engineering widely exists in projects such as water conservancy and hydropower, highway and rail traffic, industrial and civil buildings, geological mineral development, ecological environment management and the like. Rock mass stability analysis mainly comprises three problems: analyzing the stability of a rock slope, analyzing the stability of surrounding rocks of an underground cavern and analyzing the bearing capacity of a rock foundation; the method mainly relates to two aspects: and (4) judging the stability of the rock mass and calculating the critical sliding surface of the rock mass. The method mainly solves the problem that whether the rock slopes, the underground caverns and the rock foundations can be kept stable under certain external force conditions. If the rock slopes, the underground caverns and the rock foundations cannot be kept stable under certain external force conditions, the rock mass is usually required to be reinforced in order to meet the requirements of engineering construction. In order to reinforce unstable rock masses, it is necessary to further know where the rock mass is unstable, i.e. the location of the critical sliding surface of the rock mass.
In the prior art, in the rock stability analysis, the commonly used limit balance method can only analyze the rock stability, and in the stability judgment, the critical sliding surface is supposed to be known, so that the calculation of the rock critical sliding surface cannot be carried out. Although other rock stability analysis methods such as a slip line method, a finite element method and a limit analysis method can calculate the rock critical sliding surface, the slip line method has poor applicability and is not suitable for actual engineering calculation; the finite element method needs to be used for the constitutive relation which is most difficult to be clarified in the rock mass, and the extreme analysis method needs to introduce the assumption of stress discontinuity or velocity discontinuity, so that the theoretical tightness is insufficient.
The patent of rock mass stability limit analysis method, which is filed by the inventor in 2021, 12 and 29, has the application numbers: 202111610587.4, it has no need of introducing constitutive relation which is most difficult to be clarified in rock mass, and no need of introducing stress discontinuity or velocity discontinuity assumption, and its applicability is strong, but it can only judge whether rock mass is stable, and can not give rock mass critical sliding surface.
Therefore, the method for analyzing the rock mass critical sliding surface is designed without introducing a stress-strain relation, without introducing stress discontinuity or speed discontinuity hypothesis, and has strict theoretical basis and strong applicability, and has important significance for reinforcing rock slopes, underground caverns, rock foundations and the like.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a rock mass critical sliding surface limit analysis method.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention adopts the following technical scheme:
the invention relates to a rock mass critical sliding surface limit analysis method, which comprises the following steps:
s1, collecting distribution ranges of rock masses, structural surfaces and weak layers with different properties in the target area through geological survey;
s2, measuring physical and mechanical parameters of the rock mass, the structural surface and the weak layer with different properties;
s3, dividing units according to the distribution ranges of rock masses, structural surfaces and weak layers with different properties;
s4, constructing a unit static balance constraint equation, a node stress known boundary condition constraint equation, a node stress yield criterion constraint equation and an objective function by taking the stress components of all nodes as independent variables to form a mathematical model for rock mass critical sliding surface limit analysis;
s5, solving the optimal solution of the mathematical model;
and S6, solving the node where the mathematical model is tightly constrained according to the optimal solution, wherein the region formed by the node is the rock mass critical sliding surface. The rock mass critical sliding surface can have different expression forms for different problems, can be expressed as a two-dimensional curve, and can also be expressed as a two-dimensional area.
Further, in step S2, the rock physical and mechanical parameters include natural volume weight, dry volume weight, saturated volume weight, water content, tensile strength, compressive strength, internal friction angle, and viscosity coefficient;
the physical and mechanical parameters of the structural surface comprise an internal friction angle and a viscosity coefficient;
the physical and mechanical parameters of the soft layer comprise natural volume weight, dry volume weight, saturated volume weight, water content, internal friction angle and viscosity coefficient.
Further, in step S3, the cells in the cell division are quadrilateral cells.
Further, the unit static balance constraint equation is as follows:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
wherein, i represents the ith unit, and the value range is all units;
Figure 126019DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
the resultant force of the positive stress component representing the peripheral node of the ith unit on the unit in the X direction;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
representing the resultant force of the shear stress component of the peripheral node of the ith unit on the unit in the X direction;
Figure 498619DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
representing the physical strength of the ith cell in the X direction;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
the resultant force of the positive stress component representing the peripheral node of the ith cell on the cell in the Y direction;
Figure 448995DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
representing the resultant force of the shear stress component of the peripheral node of the ith unit on the unit in the Y direction;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
representing the physical strength of the ith cell in the Y direction.
Further, the constraint equation of the known boundary condition of the node stress is as follows:
Figure 299664DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
wherein j represents the jth node, and the value range is the node within the known stress boundary range;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE009
represents the positive stress of the jth node in the X direction;
Figure 317298DEST_PATH_IMAGE010
represents the positive stress of the jth node in the Y direction;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE011
represents the shear stress of the j-th node;
Figure 599813DEST_PATH_IMAGE012
represents the positive stress of the jth node in the boundary direction;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE013
representing the shear stress of the jth node in the boundary direction;
Figure 53797DEST_PATH_IMAGE014
、
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE015
、
Figure 737851DEST_PATH_IMAGE016
and is a calculation parameter.
Further, the node stress yield criterion constraint equation is:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE017
wherein k represents the kth node, and the value range is all the nodes;
Figure 485358DEST_PATH_IMAGE018
represents the positive stress of the k node in the X direction;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE019
represents the positive stress of the k node in the Y direction;
Figure 262077DEST_PATH_IMAGE020
represents the shear stress of the kth node;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE021
，
Figure 468937DEST_PATH_IMAGE022
represents an internal friction angle;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE023
representing the viscous force;
Figure 786042DEST_PATH_IMAGE024
and is a calculation parameter.
Further, the objective function is:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE025
Figure 512690DEST_PATH_IMAGE026
wherein k represents the kth node, and N represents the total number of nodes;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE027
represents the positive stress of the k node in the X direction;
Figure 660643DEST_PATH_IMAGE028
represents the positive stress of the k node in the Y direction;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE029
represents the shear stress of the kth node;
Figure 494081DEST_PATH_IMAGE030
representing positive stress in the X direction of the kth node
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE031
An effect coefficient to the objective function;
Figure 972466DEST_PATH_IMAGE032
represents the positive stress in the Y direction of the kth node
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE033
An effect coefficient on the objective function;
Figure 334047DEST_PATH_IMAGE034
representing shear stress at the k-th node
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE035
The coefficient of effect on the objective function.
Further, the optimal solution refers to the independent variable which satisfies the unit static balance constraint equation, the node stress known boundary condition constraint equation and the node stress yield criterion constraint equation at the same time and enables the objective function to obtain a maximum value.
Further, the tight constraint refers to a constraint that the node stress yield criterion constraint equation takes an equal sign for any optimal solution.
Further, in the three-dimensional rock mass stability analysis, the units are divided by adopting hexahedral units, and according to the unit static balance constraint equation, the node stress known boundary condition constraint equation, the node stress yield criterion constraint equation and the establishment thought of the objective function, a three-dimensional unit static balance constraint equation, the node stress known boundary condition constraint equation, the node stress yield criterion constraint equation and the objective function are established to form a mathematical model of rock mass critical sliding plane limit analysis; solving the optimal solution of the mathematical model; and under the optimal solution, tightly constraining the node where the mathematical model is located, wherein the region formed by the node is the rock mass critical sliding surface. In the three-dimensional analysis, the rock mass critical sliding surface can have different expression forms for different problems, can be expressed as a three-dimensional curve, and can also be expressed as a three-dimensional area.
The method has the advantages that the method for quantitatively determining the critical sliding surface of the rock mass is provided, the defect that whether the rock mass is stable can be judged only qualitatively in the prior art is overcome, the theoretical basis is tight, the applicability is strong, the calculation conclusion is more consistent with the engineering practice, and the method has better engineering practical value.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a rock mass critical sliding surface under the action of strip-shaped uniform load in embodiment 1 of the invention.
Fig. 2 is a flow chart of the method of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be described clearly and completely below, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
Example 1: as shown in fig. 1, the present embodiment takes the problem of the bearing capacity of the foundation under the action of the strip-shaped uniform load as an example, and describes the method for calculating the rock mass critical sliding surface according to the present invention, and the flow is shown in fig. 2.
As shown in figure 1, a strip-shaped uniform load 2 acts within 16m of the top of a foundation 1, the viscous force c of the foundation 1 is 200kPa, and the internal friction angle is
Figure 514886DEST_PATH_IMAGE036
Zero, physical strength. The method according to the invention is used below to solve the critical sliding surface of the foundation 1.
S1, collecting the distribution ranges of rock masses, structural surfaces and weak layers with different properties in the target area; for the embodiment, the foundation 1 is a homogeneous rock mass, and rock masses with different properties, structural surfaces and weak layers do not exist in the foundation range;
s2, obtaining physical and mechanical parameters of rock masses, structural surfaces and weak layers with different properties; the viscous force c of the rock mass of the foundation 1 is 200kPa, the internal friction angle phi is zero, and the volume weight of the rock mass is zero;
s3, dividing the unit; the total horizontal length of the foundation 1 is 40m, wherein the left and right strip-shaped uniform loads 2 are 12m respectively, the vertical thickness of the foundation 1 is 8m, and the unit division is carried out by adopting a quadrilateral unit. The horizontal length range is divided into 40 units and 41 nodes, and the horizontal length dx =1m of the units; 8 units and 9 nodes are divided in the vertical thickness range, and the vertical height of the unit is dy =1 m. The model is divided into a total of 320 units, 369 nodes. The nodes are numbered sequentially from top to bottom and from left to right.
And S4, constructing a constraint equation and an objective function by taking the stress components of all the nodes as independent variables.
For this embodiment, the arguments are:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE037
formula (1)
Wherein, the first and the second end of the pipe are connected with each other,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE039
represents the first
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE041
Individual nodes, whose value range is all nodes, i.e.
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE043
，
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE045
；
Figure 165179DEST_PATH_IMAGE046
Respectively representing the positive stress of the ith node in the X direction, the positive stress of the ith node in the Y direction and the shear stress of the ith node; there were 369 × 3=1107 independent variables.
The constraint equations comprise a unit static balance constraint equation, a node stress known boundary condition constraint equation and a node stress yield criterion constraint equation.
The unit static balance constraint equation is constructed as follows: for this embodiment, the unit horizontal length
Figure 417562DEST_PATH_IMAGE048
Vertical height of unit
Figure 463009DEST_PATH_IMAGE050
The physical strength of the unit in the X direction and the Y direction is zero. By adopting the method, the unit static balance constraint equation is obtained as follows:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE051
formula (2);
wherein, the first and the second end of the pipe are connected with each other,
Figure 77399DEST_PATH_IMAGE052
is taken to be all units, i.e.
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE053
。
The node stress known boundary condition constraint equation is constructed as follows: in the present embodiment, the known boundary conditions of the node stress include the normal stress and the shear stress of the upper surface of the foundation 1 on the left side of the load 2, the normal stress and the shear stress of the upper surface of the foundation 1 on the bottom of the load 2, and the normal stress and the shear stress of the upper surface of the foundation 1 on the right side of the load 2.
The node of the upper surface of the left-side foundation 1 of the load 2 has the known boundary condition of node stress
Figure 496879DEST_PATH_IMAGE054
Formula (3)
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE055
the jth node of the table is a node of the upper surface of the foundation 1 on the left side of the load 2; according to the number of the node in this embodiment, the specific value of j is:
Figure 225057DEST_PATH_IMAGE056
。
the node of the upper surface of the bottom foundation 1 of the load 2 has the known boundary condition of node stress
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE057
Formula (4)
Wherein, the first and the second end of the pipe are connected with each other,
Figure 561229DEST_PATH_IMAGE058
the jth node of the table is a node of the upper surface of the bottom foundation 1 of the load 2 in a value range; according to the number of the node in this embodiment, the specific value of j is:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE059
。
the node of the upper surface of the foundation 1 on the right side of the load 2 has the known boundary condition of the node stress
Figure 213098DEST_PATH_IMAGE060
Formula (5)
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure 713349DEST_PATH_IMAGE062
the jth node of the table is a node of the upper surface of the foundation 1 on the right side of the load 2 in a value range; according to the present embodiment, the specific value of j to the node number is:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE063
。
the above equations (3), (4) and (5) are the constraint equations of the known boundary conditions of the base point stress in this embodiment.
The node stress yield criterion constraint equation is constructed as follows: for this embodiment, the viscous force c of the rock mass of foundation 1 is 200kPa, the internal friction angle phi is zero,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE065
the physical force is zero, and the node stress yield criterion constraint equation is
Figure 648813DEST_PATH_IMAGE066
Formula (6)
The value range of k is as follows:
Figure 668853DEST_PATH_IMAGE068
。
the above formula (2), formula (3), formula (4), formula (5) and formula (6) are the constraint equations of the present embodiment, and thus the construction of the constraint equations of the present embodiment is completed.
And taking the stress components of all the nodes as independent variables, and constructing an objective function as follows:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE069
Figure 893554DEST_PATH_IMAGE070
wherein k represents the kth node, the value range is all the nodes, and N represents the total number of the nodes;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE071
represents the positive stress of the k node in the X direction;
Figure 599211DEST_PATH_IMAGE072
represents the positive stress of the k node in the Y direction;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE073
represents the shear stress of the kth node;
Figure 138033DEST_PATH_IMAGE074
representing positive stress in the X direction of the kth node
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE075
An effect coefficient on the objective function;
Figure 386481DEST_PATH_IMAGE076
represents the positive stress of the k-th node in the Y direction
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE077
An effect coefficient to the objective function;
Figure 15039DEST_PATH_IMAGE078
representing shear stress at the k-th node
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE079
The coefficient of effect on the objective function.
In this embodiment, the objective function is:
Figure 397872DEST_PATH_IMAGE080
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE081
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure 770079DEST_PATH_IMAGE082
respectively representing the positive stress of the 1 st, 13 th and Nth nodes in the X direction;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE083
respectively representing the positive stress of the 1 st, 13 th and Nth nodes in the Y direction;
Figure 935350DEST_PATH_IMAGE084
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE085
the distribution represents the shear stress of the 1 st, 13 th and Nth nodes;
according to the determination method of the effect coefficients, the effect coefficients of the positive stress in the X direction, the positive stress in the Y direction and the shear stress of the 1 st to 12 th nodes to the target function are all 0; the effect coefficients of the positive stress in the X direction, the positive stress in the Y direction and the shear stress of the 14 th to 369 th nodes on the objective function are all 0; the effect coefficients of the positive stress and the shear stress of the 13 th node in the X direction on the objective function are both 0, and the effect coefficient of the positive stress in the Y direction on the objective function is-1.
The constraint equation and the objective function jointly form a mathematical model of the rock mass sliding surface limit analysis of the embodiment;
s5, solving the optimal solution of the mathematical model through a computer program;
and meanwhile, a unit static balance constraint equation, a node stress known boundary condition constraint equation and a node stress yield criterion constraint equation are satisfied, and the objective function obtains the independent variable of the maximum value, which is the optimal solution of the mathematical model. And the independent variables simultaneously satisfying the unit static balance constraint equation, the node stress known boundary condition constraint equation and the node stress yield criterion constraint equation exist, and the stability of the rock mass is explained. And if the independent variables which simultaneously satisfy the unit static balance constraint equation, the node stress known boundary condition constraint equation and the node stress yield criterion constraint equation do not exist, the rock mass is proved to be unstable. The critical sliding surface of the rock mass can be analyzed only in a state where the rock mass is stable, and if the rock mass itself is unstable, the critical sliding surface does not exist.
S6, according to the optimal solution solved in the step S5, the node where the tight constraint of the embodiment is located is continuously solved through a computer program; the region where the node is located is the critical sliding surface of the rock mass. As shown in fig. 1, the gray node 3 in the figure is the node 3 where the tight constraint of the embodiment is located; the area where the node 3 is located is the gray shaded portion in the figure, which is the critical sliding surface in this embodiment. Aiming at different problems, the critical sliding surface can have different expression forms, can be expressed as a two-dimensional curve, and can also be expressed as a two-dimensional area.
In fig. 1, the number 4 is the rock mass theoretical critical sliding surface 4 of the present embodiment calculated according to the plastic mechanics theory. Compared with the distribution of the nodes 3 where the tight constraint is located, the rock mass critical sliding surface obtained by the method is consistent with the rock mass theoretical critical sliding surface, and the method can well meet the engineering practice requirements.
Example 2
In the calculation of the critical sliding surface of the three-dimensional rock mass, the units are divided by adopting hexahedral units, and a mathematical model for calculating the critical sliding surface of the rock mass is established according to the establishment thinking of the static balance constraint equation of the units, the known boundary condition constraint equation of the node stress and the stress yield criterion constraint equation of the nodes; and solving all tight constraints through a computer program, and further solving all tight nodes to obtain the critical sliding surface of the rock mass.
In summary, the rock mass critical sliding surface limit analysis method provided by the application provides a rock mass critical sliding surface numerical calculation method which does not need to introduce a stress-strain relation, does not need to introduce stress discontinuity or speed discontinuity hypothesis, has tight theoretical basis and strong applicability, and has better engineering practical value, and the calculation conclusion is in accordance with engineering practice.

Claims (10)

1. A rock mass critical sliding surface limit analysis method is characterized by comprising the following steps: the method comprises the following steps:
s1, collecting the distribution ranges of rock masses, structural surfaces and weak layers with different properties in the target area through geological survey;
s2, measuring physical and mechanical parameters of the rock mass, the structural surface and the weak layer with different properties;
s3, dividing units according to the distribution ranges of rock masses, structural surfaces and weak layers with different properties;
s4, constructing a unit static balance constraint equation, a node stress known boundary condition constraint equation, a node stress yield criterion constraint equation and an objective function by taking the stress components of all nodes as independent variables to form a mathematical model for rock mass critical sliding surface limit analysis;
s5, solving the optimal solution of the mathematical model through a computer program;
and S6, solving a node where tight constraint of the mathematical model is located through a computer program according to the optimal solution, wherein a region formed by the node is a rock mass critical sliding surface.
2. The critical sliding surface limit analysis method of rock mass according to claim 1, characterized in that: s2, the physical and mechanical parameters of the rock mass comprise natural volume weight, dry volume weight, saturated volume weight, water content, tensile strength, compressive strength, internal friction angle and viscosity coefficient;
the physical and mechanical parameters of the structural surface comprise an internal friction angle and a viscosity coefficient;
the physical and mechanical parameters of the soft layer comprise natural volume weight, dry volume weight, saturated volume weight, water content, internal friction angle and viscosity coefficient.
3. The critical sliding surface limit analysis method of rock mass according to claim 1, characterized in that: in step S3, the cells in the cell division are quadrilateral cells.
4. The critical sliding surface limit analysis method of rock mass according to claim 1, characterized in that: the unit static balance constraint equation is as follows:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
wherein, i represents the ith unit, and the value range is all units;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
the resultant force of the positive stress component representing the peripheral node of the ith unit on the unit in the X direction;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
representing the resultant force of the shear stress component of the peripheral node of the ith unit on the unit in the X direction;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
representing the physical strength of the ith cell in the X direction;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE010
the resultant force of the positive stress component representing the peripheral node of the ith cell on the cell in the Y direction;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE012
representing the resultant force of the shear stress component of the peripheral node of the ith unit on the unit in the Y direction;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE014
representing the physical strength of the ith cell in the Y direction.
5. The critical sliding surface limit analysis method of rock mass according to claim 1, characterized in that: the constraint equation of the known boundary condition of the node stress is as follows:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE016
wherein j represents the jth node, and the value range is the node within the known stress boundary range;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE018
represents the positive stress of the j node in the X direction;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE020
represents the positive stress of the jth node in the Y direction;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE022
represents the shear stress of the j node;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE024
represents the positive stress of the jth node in the boundary direction;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE026
representing the shear stress of the jth node in the boundary direction;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE028
、
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE030
、
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE032
and is a calculation parameter.
6. The critical sliding surface limit analysis method of rock mass according to claim 1, characterized in that: the node stress yield criterion constraint equation is as follows:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE034
wherein k represents the kth node, and the value range is all the nodes;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE036
represents the positive stress of the k node in the X direction;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE038
represents the positive stress of the k node in the Y direction;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE040
represents the shear stress of the kth node;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE042
，
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE044
represents an internal friction angle;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE046
representing viscosityForce;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE048
and is a calculation parameter.
7. The critical sliding surface limit analysis method of rock mass according to claim 1, characterized in that: the objective function is:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE050
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE052
wherein k represents the kth node, and N represents the total number of nodes;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE054
represents the positive stress of the k node in the X direction;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE056
represents the positive stress of the k node in the Y direction;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE058
represents the shear stress of the kth node;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE060
representing positive stress in the X direction of the kth node
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE062
An effect coefficient on the objective function;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE064
represents the positive stress of the k-th node in the Y direction
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE066
An effect coefficient on the objective function;
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE068
representing shear stress at the k-th node
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE070
The coefficient of effect on the objective function.
8. The critical sliding surface limit analysis method of rock mass according to claim 1, characterized in that: the optimal solution refers to the independent variable which simultaneously satisfies the unit static balance constraint equation, the node stress known boundary condition constraint equation and the node stress yield criterion constraint equation and enables the objective function to obtain the maximum value.
9. The critical sliding surface limit analysis method of rock mass according to claim 1, characterized in that: the tight constraint refers to the constraint that the node stress yield criterion constraint equation takes equal sign for any optimal solution.
10. The method for analyzing the limit of a critical sliding surface of a rock mass according to claims 1 to 8, wherein: in the three-dimensional rock mass stability analysis, the units are divided by adopting hexahedral units, and a three-dimensional unit static balance constraint equation, a node stress known boundary condition constraint equation, a node stress yield criterion constraint equation and a target function are established according to the establishment thinking of the unit static balance constraint equation, the node stress known boundary condition constraint equation, the node stress yield criterion constraint equation and the target function, so that a mathematical model for rock mass critical sliding surface limit analysis is formed; solving the optimal solution of the mathematical model; and under the optimal solution, tightly constraining the node where the mathematical model is located, wherein the region formed by the node is the rock mass critical sliding surface.
CN202210529029.3A 2022-05-16 2022-05-16 Rock mass critical sliding surface limit analysis method Pending CN114662341A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210529029.3A CN114662341A (en) 2022-05-16 2022-05-16 Rock mass critical sliding surface limit analysis method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210529029.3A CN114662341A (en) 2022-05-16 2022-05-16 Rock mass critical sliding surface limit analysis method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN114662341A true CN114662341A (en) 2022-06-24

Family

ID=82038242

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202210529029.3A Pending CN114662341A (en) 2022-05-16 2022-05-16 Rock mass critical sliding surface limit analysis method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN114662341A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2023124664A1 (en) * 2021-12-27 2023-07-06 黄河勘测规划设计研究院有限公司 Rock mass stability limit analysis method

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2023124664A1 (en) * 2021-12-27 2023-07-06 黄河勘测规划设计研究院有限公司 Rock mass stability limit analysis method

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN107038524B (en) Comprehensive evaluation method for construction quality of roller compacted concrete dam considering parameter uncertainty
Lan et al. Compressive strength of earth block masonry: Estimation based on neural networks and adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system
EP2866019A1 (en) Air-water-soil skeleton coupled calculation device, coupled calculation method, and coupled calculation program
Akhaveissy et al. Unreinforced masonry walls: Nonlinear finite element analysis with a unified constitutive model
CN115470550A (en) Method for calculating uplift displacement of lower horizontal tunnel caused by excavation of layered foundation pit
CN114662341A (en) Rock mass critical sliding surface limit analysis method
CN111062154B (en) Fluid-solid coupling calculation method for buildings in canal system of south-to-north water diversion
Liu et al. Multipoint hybrid model for RCC arch dam displacement health monitoring considering construction interface and its seepage
Fu et al. Evaluation of cracking potential for concrete arch dam based on simulation feedback analysis
Wang et al. Mechanical parameter inversion in sandstone diversion tunnel and stability analysis during operation period
Sha et al. Modeling of hydraulic fracture of concrete gravity dams by stress-seepage-damage coupling model
WO2023124664A1 (en) Rock mass stability limit analysis method
CN103882849B (en) A kind of argument and analysis and method for processing foundation containing vertical weak foundation for nuclear power plant
Qin et al. Safety evaluation with observational data and numerical analysis of Langyashan reinforced concrete face rockfill dam
CN105005667B (en) The compound soil body equivalent elastic modulus of fracture grouting and Poisson's ratio computational methods
Chen et al. Parameter sensitivity and inversion analysis for a concrete face rockfill dam based on CS-BPNN
Su et al. Particle flow code method-based meso-scale identification for seepage failure of soil levee
CN113221399B (en) Decision method for dividing scheme of railway tunnel fabricated lining components
CN107066744A (en) The Aseismic Analytical Method of subway station in water rich strata
CN113821952A (en) Digital twin ballastless track optimization method based on Kalman filtering algorithm
CN106709199A (en) Robustness method based on storey drift
Zhao Three-dimensional collapse simulation on the spatial structure of concrete assembly building based on BIM
Su et al. Cellular automata model-based numerical analysis for breaching process of embankment dam
Chen et al. The analysis on the deformation predition of pile-anchor retaining structure in deep foundation pit in Kunming
Qin et al. An Evaluation Method of Crack Variation on Structural Performance of Concrete Dams with Fusion Entropy Based on Observation and Simulation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination