CN114548908A - Method for checking and defining use permission of complex battlefield information in cooperative combat - Google Patents

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for checking and defining use permission of complex battlefield information of cooperative operation, and particularly relates to a command and control rule of multi-domain cooperative operation and a corresponding method for checking and designing use permission of the complex battlefield information. The method provides a layered scheme of the command authority of the operators in the process of operation, how the operators in different levels divide responsibility and right, and a set of scheme for commanding and controlling command issuing and processing of the operators in different levels in the process of cooperative operation. Compared with the prior art, the scheme has the advantages that on the basis of the existing aircraft carrier formation command scheme, the conventional air management command information is stripped, the command control information related to air combat is reserved, the scheme for managing the cooperative combat interaction information among fighters and between ships and fighters is added, the provided cooperative combat information interaction rule can guarantee the combat use requirements of different users in air combat of aircraft carrier formation, the information safety can be guaranteed, the network load can be reduced, and the application prospect is wide.

Description

Method for checking and defining use permission of complex battlefield information in cooperative combat

Technical Field

The invention relates to a complex battlefield information viewing and use authority definition method for cooperative operation, in particular to a command and control rule for multi-domain cooperative operation and a corresponding battlefield information viewing and use authority design method thereof.

Background

In the future, when multiple weapons and multiple platforms (including aircrafts such as fighters, early warning machines and helicopters, ships such as aircraft carriers and expelling ships, and other battle platforms on the ground, under sea and in space) are in cross-region cooperative battle, under the support of a battle net, the fighters need to acquire and process massive battlefield situations and command and control information, but at present, no information interaction rule and command and control instruction set relevant design exists in China.

In the complex battlefield cooperative combat, the form of command and control is greatly different from the traditional centralized command control, and the requirements on information viewing and use of the authority management are increased as follows:

1) the number and the types of the platforms participating in the cooperative operation are large, and if all the information processed and stored by the nodes participating in the operation is processed and stored, the network is not burdened;

2) in order to realize the combined operation, the types and the quantity of command and control information are increased, and the sharing expansion range of the command and control information is required to be distinguished;

3) the operator groups with different decision authorities in the cooperative combat are huge, and the requirements of different users on the viewing information range are different: the high-grade commander attaches importance to the overall situation comprehensiveness of a battlefield, and front-line fighters attach importance to the precision and the real-time performance of fighting friend and foe information; and information privacy requirements limit the use of partial information by users of low command level.

In order to effectively assist operators in decision making, how to meet the new requirements is the current technical problem of providing targeted battlefield information sharing and command and control instruction issuing authorities according to the acquisition demand conditions of battlefield situation information by operators with different command and control authorities.

Disclosure of Invention

In view of the technical background, the invention provides a method for checking information and defining use permission in a complex battlefield of cooperative combat, which can not only ensure the combat use requirements of different users in air defense combat of aircraft carrier formation, but also ensure information safety and reduce network load, and has wide application prospect.

In order to achieve the above purpose, the embodiment of the invention adopts the following technical scheme:

a method for viewing information and defining use authority of a complex battlefield in cooperative combat is characterized in that three layers of combat management and command control layers are defined aiming at a command layer, wherein the three layers of combat management and command control layers comprise an OMC1 command layer, an OMC2 command layer and an OMC3 command layer, and the method comprises the following steps: the OMC1 command level comprises a joint combat commander, and the OMC1 command level is used for sending a combat intention to the OMC2 command level; the OMC2 command level comprises a sea defense commander, a sea attack commander and a sea guarantee commander, and the OMC2 sends a combat task to the OMC3 command level based on a combat intention; the OMC3 command hierarchy comprises a fighter marshalling commander, a destroyer commander, an electronic warfare aircraft commander and an early warning aircraft commander, and the OMC3 command hierarchy sends a fighting action to a bureaucratic on the basis of a fighting mission.

Preferably, for the command control authority in the cooperative combat, the following rules are determined:

1) the command control commands issued by the command hierarchy of the OMC1 include: battlefield management: issuing an air alert level, dividing different platform combat areas and combat-dealing areas, and giving a hot spot area, a no-fly area and the like; user management: releasing the fighting preparation states of all the participating platforms, the user roles and the command relation with other platforms; and (5) commanding the battle: issuing a fighting intention and a fighting scheme plan; network management: the battle net use authority of all platforms is managed, the platform access permission is unknown in identity, and network problems are handled; electromagnetic management: setting the electromagnetic spectrum control level; and important command and control commands of the OMC2 are approved, and all command and control authorities of the OMC2 can be handed over if necessary.

2) The command control commands issued by the command hierarchy of the OMC2 comprise: user management: the combat readiness state of the subordinate platform, the role of the subordinate user and the command relationship with other users; and (5) commanding the battle: issuing the operation targets and operation action plans of subordinate aviation formation and ship formation, and giving out the matching relation of cooperative operation among the formations; network management: the battle net use authority management of subordinate platforms, the platform access permission with unknown identity, the network problem disposal and the like; all command control authority of the OMC3 may be taken over if necessary.

3) The command control commands issued by the command hierarchy of the OMC3 include: user management: the combat readiness state of the subordinate platform, the role of the subordinate user and the command relationship with other users; and (5) commanding the battle: issuing the operation targets and operation action plans of subordinate aviation formation and ship formation, and giving out the matching relation of cooperative operation among the formations; network management: the battle net use authority management of subordinate platforms, the platform access permission with unknown identity, the network problem disposal and the like; all command control authority of the OMC3 may be taken over if necessary.

Preferably, for the authority of uploading and downloading network information, the following rules are determined:

1) all nodes accessed to the network can share the enemy target track information, namely all the nodes have the authority of uploading and downloading the target track information for detection and tracking;

2) all nodes accessing the network can share the position and track information of the local machine, namely all the nodes have the authority of uploading the position and track of the local machine and downloading the position and track of the friend machine;

3) under the cooperative operation mode, the units participating in the cooperative operation share fire control data;

4) all nodes upload the health, state, configuration and capability information of the local computer; the OMC1 command hierarchy allows for viewing health, status, configuration, capability information of all nodes; the OMC2 command level allows the health, status, configuration, capability information of all participating collaborative air combat nodes to be viewed; the OMC3 command hierarchy allows viewing of health, status, configuration, and capability information of its hosting platforms, weapons, sensors;

preferably, the method for viewing and defining the usage right of the information of the complex battlefield of the cooperative combat comprises the following steps:

1) presetting and changing a platform command level: and (4) establishing an empty alert detection system by the entity before entering the empty war. In the air combat process, the presetting, command relationship and authority of the command level of the participatory combat platform can be changed in real time according to the design requirements of distributed command control of cooperative combat and front-end command control of combat;

2) user command control authority definition: the numerical range of the parameter of the level of the command control authority is [0, 1, 2, 3], and the command control authority is defined as 0 level, 1 level, 2 level and 3 level from low to high;

3) user information viewing and usage rights definition: the numerical range of the shared information viewing permission level parameter is [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5], and the shared information viewing permission level is defined as 0 level, 1 level, 2 level, 3 level, 4 level and 5 level from low to high;

4) and defining an information sharing scope.

Preferably, the step of presetting and changing the platform command hierarchy comprises the following operations:

1) the combined operation commander presets/confirms the command relations of all the participated operation platforms before the beginning of the operation, and the participated operation platforms automatically compare the preset results after networking to obtain the corresponding command, control, information use and network use permission;

2) the joint combat commanding official has the authority to dynamically distribute the commanding authority to different node platforms which are accessed to the network and endowed with the commanding authority;

3) after the appointed command authority is obtained, all the nodes have the functions of serving as commanders of any level, viewing corresponding information and receiving and sending corresponding command control instructions;

4) nodes in the same command level have priority sequencing, and when command authority adjustment or node off-network/damage occurs to cause the position of a commander to be vacant, the node can be automatically prompted to replace the node;

5) the OMC2 command level and the OMC3 command level can switch the command authority and priority sequence of the subordinate nodes, but require the approval of a superior command officer.

Preferably, the command control information that the user allows to upload the network share corresponds to the command control authority thereof, and the defining step includes a defining method as follows:

1) level 0: an unidentified airplane and a wing plane operator which do not enter a command architecture after corresponding network access; no command control right;

2) level 1: corresponding to the command hierarchy of the OMC3, command information allowed to be issued is defined by the OMC 3;

3) and 2, stage: corresponding to the command hierarchy of the OMC2, command information allowed to be issued is defined by the OMC 2;

4) and 3, level: the command information allowed to be issued corresponding to the command hierarchy of the OMC1 is defined in OMC 1.

Preferably, the step of defining the user information viewing and changing right includes the following operations:

1) level 0: checking relevant information of a local plane corresponding to an unknown airplane which does not enter a command architecture after the local plane is accessed to the network;

2) level 1: corresponding to a low-authority bureaucratic operator, the system allows to view battlefield environment information, battlefield command information, enemy detection information, and task information and HSCC information (health, state, capability and configuration) of a cooperative combat relation platform with the system;

3) and 2, stage: corresponding to a high-authority bureaucratic operator, the system allows to view battlefield environment information, battlefield command information, enemy detection information, task information and HSCC information of all platforms in a formation and a platform with cooperative combat relationship with the platform;

4) and 3, level: corresponding to a fighter team commander and a destroyer commander, allowing battlefield environment information, battlefield command information, subordinate platform role information and enemy detection information to be checked, and task information and HSCC information of all platforms in the team and platforms having cooperative combat relationship with the team;

5)4, level: corresponding to the defense commander on the sea, battlefield environment information, battlefield command information, subordinate platform role information, enemy detection information, task information of all subordinate platforms and HSCC information are allowed to be checked;

6) and 5, stage: and checking all node information of the whole battlefield corresponding to the joint combat commander.

The method for checking the information of the complex battlefield and defining the use permission in the cooperative combat has the following beneficial effects:

the method provides a multi-domain cooperative combat command and control rule and corresponding battlefield information viewing and use authority design thereof, and provides a layering scheme of command authority of operators in the combat process, how the operators in different levels divide responsibility and right, and a set of scheme for commanding and processing control instructions of the operators in different levels in the cooperative combat process. The cooperative combat information interaction rule provided by the scheme not only ensures the combat use requirements of different users in aircraft carrier formation air defense combat, but also ensures information safety and reduces network load.

Drawings

FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a collaborative combat command hierarchy according to the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating a preset and modified flow of a command hierarchy of a platform according to the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating a process for setting the level of authority controlled by a finger in the present invention;

fig. 4 is a schematic view of a shared information viewing permission level setting process in the present invention.

Detailed Description

In the description of the present invention, it is to be understood that the terms "center", "upper", "lower", "front", "rear", "left", "right", "vertical", "horizontal", "top", "bottom", "inner", "outer", and the like indicate orientations or positional relationships based on those shown in the drawings, and are only for convenience of description and simplicity of description, and do not indicate or imply that the referenced devices or elements must have a particular orientation, be constructed and operated in a particular orientation, and thus, are not to be construed as limiting the present invention. The terms "first", "second" and "first" are used for descriptive purposes only and are not to be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly indicating the number of technical features indicated. Thus, a feature defined as "first" or "second" may explicitly or implicitly include one or more of that feature. In the description of the present invention, "a plurality" means two or more unless otherwise specified.

The invention will be further illustrated with reference to the accompanying figures 1 to 4:

the method provides a multi-domain cooperative combat command and control rule and corresponding battlefield information viewing and use authority design thereof, and provides a layering scheme of command authority of operators in the combat process, how the operators in different levels divide responsibility and right, and a set of scheme for commanding and processing control instructions of the operators in different levels in the cooperative combat process.

In this embodiment, the command level design includes the following technical details:

the command level is the bottom rule of cooperative combat, and is the basis of ordered action decision and information safety in a battlefield. Mainly based on the design requirements of cooperative combat. Compared with the current aircraft carrier control design, the hierarchy of a commander of a fighter formation is increased, a maritime defense operation plan is carried, and operation tactical planning, cooperative operation task allocation and operation resource (weapon and sensor) optimized utilization in formation are carried out; and moreover, according to actual combat tasks and situations, command authorities can be dynamically allocated to different platforms, and distributed command control and combat front-end command control are realized. And the command instruction sets and the control instruction sets of all levels are designed according to actual requirements under a command level design framework.

In the complex battlefield cooperative combat, the form of command and control is very different from the traditional centralized command control, and the main aspects are as follows: the number and the types of platforms participating in the operation tasks in the cooperative operation are greatly increased, and correspondingly, the groups of operators with different decision authorities are greatly increased; in order to realize the combined operation, the types and the quantity of command information are increased; in order to realize cooperative fire control, part of operators need to give control requirements to the use plans of weapons and sensors of other platforms; in order to effectively assist operators in decision making, the requirements of operators with different command and control authorities for acquiring battlefield situation information are fully considered during design, and a targeted battlefield information sharing and command and control instruction issuing authority design scheme is provided.

Based on the conditions, distribution schemes of command authorities of different operators in the process of battle are given, and how the operators in different levels divide responsibility and right, and interaction rules of situation information of the bottom battlefield and command control instructions are given. The design idea comprises the following steps: the overall framework adopts the prior military combat command control form, namely, the prior aircraft carrier command relation and combat flow design are referred, and command and decentralized control are centralized; by dividing the command levels, the number of subordinate levels which need to be directly controlled by a single commander is reduced, and information and communication overload is prevented; the design of the command control hierarchy takes a platform provided with an operator as a node, and command control of the platform without the operator, a weapon or a sensor is not considered for the moment, and the considered node comprises the following nodes: aircraft carrier, early warning aircraft, electronic warplane, fighter plane, destroyer.

Taking an aircraft carrier combat system as an example, three layers of combat management and command control levels of a typical complex battlefield collaborative combat command and control system are defined, and are specifically shown in fig. 1: a) the OMC1 directs hierarchy: the combined combat commander is generally arranged on an aircraft carrier; b) the OMC2 directs hierarchy: the system comprises a marine defense commander, a marine attack commander and a marine guarantee commander, wherein the marine guarantee commander is generally arranged on an aircraft carrier, a destroyer or an early warning machine; c) the OMC3 directs hierarchy: the command officer of the battle aircraft formation, the command officer of the destroyer aircraft, the command officer of the electronic warfare aircraft and the command officer of the early warning aircraft, and the command officer of the early warning aircraft is generally on the pilot aircraft of the battle aircraft formation or on the ship carrying the pilot aircraft with higher command authority.

It should be noted that the joint combat commander divides the work of air defense combat, sea attack combat, anti-submarine combat, offensive combat, marine guarantee, etc. for all the combat units of the cooperative combat troops, and divides the space range and the combat rules in charge of each. After receiving a combat mission of marine defense combat, the marine defense commander analyzes the combat intentions of the enemy and the my, determines the center of gravity of the combat, combat objects of various combat formations and a combat action plan COA. After receiving the combat action plan, the fighter team commander, the destroyer commander, the electronic warfare aircraft commander and the early warning aircraft commander analyze the states, capabilities and configurations of all platforms, weapons and sensors in the team and issue the dispatching and use plans of all warplanes, warships and sensors and weapons on the warplanes in the team. After receiving the platform, weapon and sensor dispatch and use plan, each operational node executes the engagement according to the plan.

In this embodiment, the command and control authority design in the cooperative combat includes the following technical details:

the control authority of each platform corresponds to the command hierarchy thereof, and the command control commands allowed to be issued by the command hierarchy of the OMC1 comprise: battlefield management: issuing an air alert level, dividing different platform combat areas and combat-dealing areas, and giving a hot spot area, a no-fly area and the like; user management: releasing the fighting preparation states of all the participating platforms, the user roles and the command relation with other platforms; and (5) commanding the battle: issuing a fighting intention and a fighting scheme plan; network management: the battle net use authority of all platforms is managed, the platform access permission is unknown in identity, and network problems are handled; electromagnetic management: setting the electromagnetic spectrum control level; the important command and control commands of the OMC2 can be approved and all command and control rights of the OMC2 can be taken over if necessary.

The command control commands given by the OMC2 command level maritime defense command officer, maritime attack command officer and maritime safeguard command officer comprise: user management: the combat readiness state of the subordinate platform, the role of the subordinate user and the command relationship with other users; and (5) commanding the battle: issuing the operation targets and operation action plans of subordinate aviation formation and ship formation, and giving out the matching relation of cooperative operation among the formations; network management: the battle net use authority management of subordinate platforms, the platform access permission with unknown identity, the network problem disposal and the like; all command control authority of the OMC3 may be taken over if necessary.

The command control commands given by the command level fighter team commander, the destroyer commander, the electronic warfare aircraft commander and the early warning aircraft commander allowed by the OMC3 command level comprise: user management: the combat readiness state of the subordinate platform, the role of the subordinate user and the command relationship with other users; and (5) commanding the battle: issuing the operation targets and operation action plans of subordinate aviation formation and ship formation, and giving out the matching relation of cooperative operation among the formations; network management: the battle net use authority management of subordinate platforms, the platform access permission with unknown identity, the network problem disposal and the like; all command control authority of the OMC3 may be taken over if necessary.

In this embodiment, the permission design allowing uploading and downloading of network information includes the following technical details:

the authority of uploading and downloading network information is allowed by the nodes, and the authority of viewing battlefield situation information by a user through a single comprehensive air situation graph is designed according to the following principle: all nodes accessed to the network can share the enemy target track information, namely all the nodes have the authority of uploading and downloading the target track information for detecting and tracking; all nodes accessing the network can share the position and track information of the local machine, namely all the nodes have the authority of uploading the position and track of the local machine and downloading the position and track of the friend machine; under a cooperative operation mode (accurate indication, remote transmission, remote operation, forward operation, remote firing and optimal shooter), the units participating in the cooperative operation share fire control data; all nodes upload the health, state, configuration and capability information of the local computer; the OMC1 command level can view health, state, configuration, capability information of all nodes; the OMC2 command level can check the health, state, configuration and capability information of all the nodes participating in the collaborative air combat (all the OMC3 command levels, the platforms, weapons and sensors) and the corresponding functions; the OMC3 command level can check the health, state, configuration and capability information of the branch management platform, the weapon and the sensor; other information obtained or processed by the node is not shared with other nodes.

In this embodiment, the permission design allowing uploading and downloading of network information includes the following technical details:

step 1) presetting and changing a platform command level. As shown in fig. 2, according to the design requirements of distributed command control for cooperative operations and front-end command control for operations, the preset and modified design requirements of the command levels of each participating platform are as follows: the combined operation commander presets/confirms the command relations of all the participated operation platforms before the beginning of the operation, and the participated operation platforms automatically compare the preset results after networking to obtain the corresponding command, control, information use and network use permission; the joint combat commanding official has the authority to dynamically distribute the commanding authority to different node platforms which are accessed to the network and endowed with the commanding authority; after the appointed command authority is obtained, all the nodes have the functions of serving as commanders of any level, viewing corresponding information and receiving and sending corresponding command control instructions; nodes in the same command level have priority sequencing, and when command authority adjustment or node off-network/damage occurs to cause the position of a commander to be vacant, the node can be automatically prompted to replace the node; the command hierarchy of the OMC2 and the command hierarchy of the OMC3 can switch the command authority and priority sequence of the subordinate nodes, but require the approval of a superior command officer.

It should be noted that when a node accesses the network and the combined combat commander or the air defense combat commander changes the command hierarchy by using the human-computer interaction interface, the corresponding node command hierarchy relationship is established and maintained. Under different command control authorities, the permission of each node for issuing instructions and the authority for uploading and downloading network information are different. For example, the upper layer command center has the authority to issue commands and view detailed information to the lower layer command center, and the command control authority and the information viewing authority between the command centers in the same hierarchy and between nodes not belonging to the same command center are limited.

Step 2) definition of user command control authority: as shown in fig. 3, the range of the local control authority level parameter is [0, 1, 2, 3], and the corresponding control authority definition includes: a) level 0: an unidentified airplane and a wing plane operator which do not enter a command architecture after corresponding network access; non-command control b) level 1: corresponding to OMC3 command level fighter team commander and destroyer commander; the command information allowed to be issued is defined by OMC 3; c) and 2, stage: corresponding to OMC2 command level maritime defense commanders; the command information allowed to be issued is defined by OMC 2; d) and 3, level: corresponding to OMC1 command level joint combat commander; the command information that is allowed to be issued is defined in OMC 1.

Specifically, each combat node is added into the command architecture according to the matching condition with the preloaded command architecture, and simultaneously, the command control authority of the corresponding level is obtained.

Step 3) checking and changing authority definition of various user information: as shown in fig. 4, the range of the value of the shared information viewing permission level parameter is [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5], and the definition of the corresponding shared information viewing permission includes: a) level 0: only checking relevant information of a local airplane corresponding to an unidentified airplane which does not enter a command architecture after being accessed to the network; b) level 1: corresponding to a low-authority bureaucratic operator, the system allows to view battlefield environment information, battlefield command information, enemy detection information, and task information and HSCC information (health, state, capability and configuration) of a cooperative combat relation platform with the system; c) and 2, stage: corresponding to a high-authority bureaucratic operator, the system allows to view battlefield environment information, battlefield command information, enemy detection information, task information and HSCC information of all platforms in a formation and a platform with cooperative combat relationship with the platform; d) and 3, level: corresponding to a fighter team commander and a destroyer commander, allowing battlefield environment information, battlefield command information, subordinate platform role information and enemy detection information to be checked, and task information and HSCC information of all platforms in the team and platforms having cooperative combat relationship with the team; e)4, level: corresponding to the defense commander on the sea, battlefield environment information, battlefield command information, subordinate platform role information, enemy detection information, task information of all subordinate platforms and HSCC information are allowed to be checked; f) and 5, stage: all node information of the whole battlefield can be checked corresponding to the joint combat commander.

It should be noted that, when the platform interaction information viewing range is designed completely according to the command authority, the teammates of fighters and wing aircraft can only see the positions of nodes in the teams, and analysis shows that the design is not beneficial to making judgment on the battlefield environment. Therefore, the method for changing the identity, state and position information viewing range of the platform of the client comprises the following steps: all nodes share the identity, state and position of the aircraft carrier; all the fighter nodes participating in the maritime defense combat can share the identity, the state and the track information of all the air platforms of all the parties in the fighter battle area; all ship nodes participating in offshore defense combat can share the identity, state and track information of all local aerial platforms in a fighter flight area and a missile flight area.

In future multi-domain cooperative combat, a combat platform needs to transmit and receive and use massive battlefield situations and command control information by using a combat network, and the capacity of the combat platform for processing battlefield information by using the existing fighters and ships is far exceeded. The information interaction rule in the cooperative combat guarantees the combat use requirements of different users in the aircraft carrier formation air defense combat, guarantees the information safety and reduces the network load.

Finally, it should be noted that: the above examples are only intended to illustrate the technical solution of the present invention, but not to limit it; although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that: the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments may still be modified, or some technical features may be equivalently replaced; and such modifications or substitutions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the corresponding technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention.

Claims (7)

1. A method for viewing information and defining use authority of a complex battlefield in cooperative combat is characterized in that three layers of combat management and command control layers are defined aiming at a command layer, wherein the three layers of combat management and command control layers comprise an OMC1 command layer, an OMC2 command layer and an OMC3 command layer, and the method comprises the following steps:

the OMC1 command level comprises a joint combat commander, and the OMC1 command level is used for sending a combat intention to the OMC2 command level;

the OMC2 command level comprises a sea defense commander, a sea attack commander and a sea guarantee commander, and the OMC2 sends a combat task to the OMC3 command level based on a combat intention;

the OMC3 command hierarchy comprises a fighter marshalling commander, a destroyer commander, an electronic warfare aircraft commander and an early warning aircraft commander, and the OMC3 command hierarchy sends a fighting action to a bureaucratic on the basis of a fighting mission.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the following rules are determined for command control authority in cooperative combat:

1) the command control commands issued by the command hierarchy of the OMC1 include: battlefield management, user management, combat command, network management and electromagnetic management, wherein the battlefield management is used for issuing an air alert level, dividing different types of platform areas to be combated and areas for communication and warfare and providing a hot area and a no-fly area; the user management is used for issuing the combat readiness state of all the participating platforms, the user role and the command relationship with other platforms; the combat commander is used for issuing a combat intention and a combat scheme plan; the network management is used for managing the use authority of the battle net of all platforms, the platform access permission is unknown in identity, and network problems are handled; the electromagnetic management is used for setting the electromagnetic spectrum control level; the OMC1 commands a hierarchy to approve important command and control instructions of the OMC2 and can take over all command and control rights of the OMC2 if necessary;

2) the command control commands issued by the command hierarchy of the OMC2 comprise: user management, combat command and network management, wherein: the user management is used for managing the combat readiness state of the subordinate platform, the roles of the subordinate users and the command relationship with other users; the combat command is used for issuing combat targets and combat action plans of subordinate aviation formation and ship formation and giving a matching relation of cooperative combat among the formations; the network management is used for managing the use authority of the battle net of the subordinate platform, and the platform access permission and the network problem are unknown in identity; the OMC2 commands a hierarchy to approve important command and control instructions of the OMC3 and can take over all command and control rights of the OMC3 if necessary;

3) the command control commands issued by the command hierarchy of the OMC3 include: the system comprises user management, intelligent combat and network management, wherein the user management is used for managing the combat readiness state of subordinate platforms, the roles of subordinate users and the command relations with other users; the combat command is used for issuing combat targets and combat action plans of subordinate aviation formation and ship formation and giving a matching relation of cooperative combat among the formations; the network management is used for managing the use authority of the battle net of the subordinate platform, the platform access permission is unknown in identity, and the network problem is handled.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the following rules are determined for uploading and downloading network information rights:

1) all nodes accessed to the network can share the enemy target track information, namely all the nodes have the authority of uploading and downloading the target track information for detection and tracking;

2) all nodes accessing the network can share the position and track information of the local machine, namely all the nodes have the authority of uploading the position and track of the local machine and downloading the position and track of the friend machine;

3) under the cooperative operation mode, the units participating in the cooperative operation share fire control data;

4) all nodes upload the health, state, configuration and capability information of the local computer; the OMC1 command hierarchy allows for viewing health, status, configuration, capability information of all nodes; the OMC2 command level allows the health, status, configuration, capability information of all participating collaborative air combat nodes to be viewed; the OMC3 command hierarchy allows for viewing of health, status, configuration, and capability information of its hosting platforms, weapons, sensors.

4. The method for viewing and defining rights to use information in a complex battlefield for cooperative combat according to claim 1, comprising the steps of:

1) presetting and changing a platform command level: considering that the empty guard detection system is established completely before the air combat, and in the air combat process, according to the design requirements of distributed control of cooperative combat and control of the front end of the combat, the presetting, command relationship and authority of the command level of the platform for participating in the combat can be changed in real time;

2) user command control authority definition: the numerical range of the parameter of the level of the command control authority is [0, 1, 2, 3], and the command control authority is defined as 0 level, 1 level, 2 level and 3 level from low to high;

3) user information viewing and usage rights definition: the numerical range of the shared information viewing permission level parameter is [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5], and the shared information viewing permission level is defined as 0 level, 1 level, 2 level, 3 level, 4 level and 5 level from low to high;

4) and defining an information sharing scope.

5. The method for viewing information and defining usage rights in a complex battlefield for cooperative combat according to claim 4, wherein the step of presetting and modifying the command hierarchy of the platform comprises the following operations:

1) the combined operation commander presets/confirms the command relations of all the participated operation platforms before the beginning of the operation, and the participated operation platforms automatically compare the preset results after networking to obtain the corresponding command, control, information use and network use permission;

2) the joint combat commanding official has the authority to dynamically distribute the commanding authority to different node platforms which are accessed to the network and endowed with the commanding authority;

3) after the appointed command authority is obtained, all the nodes have the functions of serving as commanders of any level, viewing corresponding information and receiving and sending corresponding command control instructions;

4) nodes in the same command level have priority sequencing, and when command authority adjustment or node off-network/damage causes the position of a commander to be vacant, the node can be automatically prompted to replace the node;

5) the OMC2 command level and the OMC3 command level can switch the command authority and priority sequence of the subordinate nodes, but require the approval of a superior command officer.

6. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the command control information that the user allows to upload the network share corresponds to the command control authority thereof, and the defining step includes the following defining method:

1) level 0: an unidentified airplane and a wing plane operator which do not enter a command architecture after corresponding network access; no command control right;

2) stage 1: corresponding to the OMC3 command hierarchy;

3) and 2, stage: corresponding to the OMC2 command hierarchy;

4) and 3, level: corresponding to the OMC1 command hierarchy.

7. The method for viewing and defining rights to use information in a complex battlefield for cooperative combat according to claim 4, wherein the step of defining rights to view and modify the user information comprises the operations of:

1) level 0: checking relevant information of a local machine corresponding to an unknown platform of the party which does not enter a command framework after the network is accessed;

2) level 1: corresponding to a low-authority bureau plane operator, the system allows to view battlefield environment information, battlefield command information, enemy detection information, and task information and HSCC information of a cooperative combat relation platform with the system, wherein the HSCC information comprises health, state, capability and configuration information;

3) and 2, stage: corresponding to a high-authority bureaucratic operator, the system allows to view battlefield environment information, battlefield command information, enemy detection information, task information and HSCC information of all platforms in a formation and a platform with cooperative combat relationship with the platform;

4) and 3, level: corresponding to a fighter team commander and a destroyer commander, allowing battlefield environment information, battlefield command information, subordinate platform role information and enemy detection information to be checked, and task information and HSCC information of all platforms in the team and platforms having cooperative combat relationship with the team;

5) and 4, stage 4: corresponding to the defense commander on the sea, battlefield environment information, battlefield command information, subordinate platform role information, enemy detection information, task information of all subordinate platforms and HSCC information are allowed to be checked;

6) and 5, stage: and checking all node information of the whole battlefield corresponding to the joint combat commander.

Images