CN114459477A - Improved PSO-ANFIS-assisted SINS/DVL tightly combined navigation method - Google Patents

Improved PSO-ANFIS-assisted SINS/DVL tightly combined navigation method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN114459477A
CN114459477A CN202210234293.4A CN202210234293A CN114459477A CN 114459477 A CN114459477 A CN 114459477A CN 202210234293 A CN202210234293 A CN 202210234293A CN 114459477 A CN114459477 A CN 114459477A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
dvl
measurement
anfis
sins
error
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN202210234293.4A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN114459477B (en
Inventor
姚逸卿
潘绍华
徐晓苏
张涛
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Southeast University
Original Assignee
Southeast University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Southeast University filed Critical Southeast University
Priority to CN202210234293.4A priority Critical patent/CN114459477B/en
Publication of CN114459477A publication Critical patent/CN114459477A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN114459477B publication Critical patent/CN114459477B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01CMEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
    • G01C21/00Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00
    • G01C21/10Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00 by using measurements of speed or acceleration
    • G01C21/12Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00 by using measurements of speed or acceleration executed aboard the object being navigated; Dead reckoning
    • G01C21/16Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00 by using measurements of speed or acceleration executed aboard the object being navigated; Dead reckoning by integrating acceleration or speed, i.e. inertial navigation
    • G01C21/165Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00 by using measurements of speed or acceleration executed aboard the object being navigated; Dead reckoning by integrating acceleration or speed, i.e. inertial navigation combined with non-inertial navigation instruments
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01CMEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
    • G01C21/00Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00
    • G01C21/20Instruments for performing navigational calculations
    • G01C21/203Specially adapted for sailing ships
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S19/00Satellite radio beacon positioning systems; Determining position, velocity or attitude using signals transmitted by such systems
    • G01S19/38Determining a navigation solution using signals transmitted by a satellite radio beacon positioning system
    • G01S19/39Determining a navigation solution using signals transmitted by a satellite radio beacon positioning system the satellite radio beacon positioning system transmitting time-stamped messages, e.g. GPS [Global Positioning System], GLONASS [Global Orbiting Navigation Satellite System] or GALILEO
    • G01S19/42Determining position
    • G01S19/45Determining position by combining measurements of signals from the satellite radio beacon positioning system with a supplementary measurement
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S19/00Satellite radio beacon positioning systems; Determining position, velocity or attitude using signals transmitted by such systems
    • G01S19/38Determining a navigation solution using signals transmitted by a satellite radio beacon positioning system
    • G01S19/39Determining a navigation solution using signals transmitted by a satellite radio beacon positioning system the satellite radio beacon positioning system transmitting time-stamped messages, e.g. GPS [Global Positioning System], GLONASS [Global Orbiting Navigation Satellite System] or GALILEO
    • G01S19/42Determining position
    • G01S19/45Determining position by combining measurements of signals from the satellite radio beacon positioning system with a supplementary measurement
    • G01S19/47Determining position by combining measurements of signals from the satellite radio beacon positioning system with a supplementary measurement the supplementary measurement being an inertial measurement, e.g. tightly coupled inertial

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Navigation (AREA)

Abstract

The invention provides an SINS/DVL tightly combined navigation technology based on improved PSO-ANFIS assistance, which comprises the following steps: establishing a state equation and a measurement equation of an SINS/DVL tight combination navigation system in the underwater diving process; collecting sample data on the water surface by means of GNSS and a variational Bayesian Kalman filtering algorithm, acquiring innovation containing various abnormal measurement types, Mahalanobis distance and a measured noise covariance matrix as input information of ANFIS, and acquiring DVL absolute error as expected output; optimizing ANFIS model parameters through a particle swarm optimization algorithm, and training to obtain a better ANFIS model; when navigating underwater, online prediction is carried out on the four-beam absolute error of the DVL by adopting an ANFIS model obtained by training; furthermore, based on the ANFIS prediction result, the characteristic change of the error is monitored through an anomaly discrimination mechanism, and the DVL measurement value is selectively compensated and used for the measurement updating process of the integrated navigation system. The method can improve the positioning accuracy and robustness of the SINS/DVL tightly-combined navigation system in the complex underwater environment.

Description

Improved PSO-ANFIS-assisted SINS/DVL tightly combined navigation method
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the field of integrated navigation, and relates to an SINS/DVL tightly integrated navigation method based on improved PSO-ANFIS assistance.
Background
More and more countries take the exploration development of the ocean as a strategic target, and the realization of the exploration breadth and depth is always a global common pursuit. An accurate and stable underwater navigation system is very important for people to explore the ocean. Commonly used underwater navigation systems and sensors mainly include SINS, DVL, underwater acoustic positioning technology, geophysical navigation system, depth gauge, magnetometer and the like. Among them, SINS is the most central navigation system in underwater navigation because it has autonomy and concealment, but its independent use is limited by the problem of accumulation of errors over time. Unlike the ground and the air, the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) cannot be used underwater due to the serious attenuation of electromagnetic waves underwater. The geophysical navigation technology needs to establish a matching database of a task area in advance, and the underwater sound positioning also needs to arrange a sound head in advance. Therefore, the combined navigation of the SINS and the DVL is a mainstream navigation mode of An Underwater Vehicle (AUV) to realize long-endurance and high-precision Underwater navigation.
For an SINS/DVL integrated system, factors influencing navigation accuracy of the system are many, such as installation angle errors, lever arm errors and speed measurement errors. After the SINS and the DVL are fixed, the error of the installation angle and the lever arm is relatively stable, and the calibration can be carried out before sailing. The DVL is an active sonar, and needs to receive external reflected sound waves, and the received acoustic signals have a great relationship with the surrounding acoustic environment. Therefore, the actual speed measurement accuracy of the DVL is very affected by the complex environment, which is the most significant part of the combined navigation accuracy. When bubbles are generated around the AUV due to marine organism blockage or rapid acceleration during the navigation process, DVL measurement data can be misaligned, and outliers and large interference noise can be generated. In order to solve the problem of outliers, a series of robust estimation methods are proposed. The most easily realized is classical chi-square detection, and whether the detection is a wild value or not is judged by setting a certain threshold value. The scholars propose a Huber-M estimation-based Kalman filter, solve a Huber kernel function through innovation, further solve a weight matrix, reconstruct observed quantities to perform filtering updating, but certain experience is needed for parameter selection of the kernel function. Kalman filters based on the maximum correlation entropy criterion are also similar principles. The students propose a Student's-t distribution-based Kalman filter, which considers that measurement outliers in a complex underwater environment can cause measurement noise to have thick tail characteristics, models the measurement noise into Student's-t distribution, and iteratively solves state estimation through variational Bayes learning. The learners solve the problem of unknown interference noise through the adaptive filter, and the model parameters are adjusted in the iterative process to obtain a model which is more suitable for the actual situation, including a Sage-Husa adaptive filter, a variational Bayesian adaptive filter and the like, but the accuracy of the methods is very dependent on the initial values of a system process noise variance matrix and a system measurement noise covariance matrix, and the methods have no universality. In fact, when a deep groove or seabed sludge is encountered during the AUV navigation, part of the DVL beams cannot obtain effective reflected sound waves, which may cause irregular data updating and even short-term failure of part of the DVL beams. These errors are relatively small at the initial stage of occurrence, which leads to a reduction in the accuracy of the combined navigation. The current research on these factors is still in the initial stage and there is no effective enough solution. And high-precision navigation is realized in a complex marine environment, and the errors of the types need to be compensated, which is also the task of the invention.
In addition, considering that the occurrence of errors can cause the change of some associated variables, the correlation relationship can be obtained by an artificial intelligence method. In recent years, artificial intelligence is rapidly developed in various fields, wherein ANFIS integrates a learning mechanism of a neural network and a language reasoning capability of a fuzzy system, has a convenient and efficient learning capability, and is widely applied to various fields: medical condition discrimination, bridge deformation estimation, power system parameter estimation, and the like.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to solve the above problems, the present invention discloses a Strapdown Inertial Navigation System (SINS)/Doppler Velocity Log (DVL) tightly-combined Navigation method based on improved Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) -Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) assistance; an SINS/DVL tightly-combined navigation system is taken as a research object, the improved PSO-ANFIS algorithm is adopted to solve the speed error of the four beams of the DVL, and the actual DVL measurement value is compensated. And then the compensated measurement data and corresponding data calculated by inertial navigation are subjected to integrated navigation, so that high-precision navigation information is obtained.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention provides the following technical scheme:
an improved PSO-ANFIS assisted SINS/DVL tightly combined navigation method specifically comprises the following steps:
step 1: establishing a state equation of the SINS/DVL integrated navigation system according to a system error equation, and establishing a measurement equation of the SINS/DVL integrated navigation system by taking the difference between pseudo measurement information calculated according to navigation information solved by the SINS and four-beam velocity information measured by the DVL and depth information measured by the depth meter as measurement;
step 2: controlling the depth of the underwater vehicle of the AUV to reach the position near the water surface, after the initial alignment of a Navigation positioning System is completed, assisting in collecting sample data containing various abnormal measurement types by means of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) information and a Variational Bayesian Kalman Filter (VBKF) and training ANFIS;
and step 3: standardizing the sample data collected in the step 2, and processing the sample data through a particle swarm optimization algorithm to realize parameter optimization of the ANFIS model so as to complete the training process of the ANFIS model;
and 4, step 4: controlling the AUV to submerge underwater, and predicting the four-beam absolute error of the DVL by adopting an improved PSO-ANFIS algorithm, wherein characteristic information needs to be acquired online;
and 5: based on the ANFIS prediction result, the characteristic change of the error is monitored, the actual measurement of the DVL is compensated through an anomaly discrimination mechanism, and the compensated DVL measurement and the pseudo observed quantity calculated by the SINS are subjected to Kalman filtering.
Further, the state equation and the measurement equation of the SINS/DVL tightly-integrated navigation system are established in step 1, and the specific process is as follows:
step 1.1 defines the coordinate system to be used:
e-terrestrial coordinate system: is fixedly connected with the earth, with the origin at the center of the earth, xeAxis passing through the intersection of the meridian and equator, zeAxis directed north, yeAxis xe、zeForming a right-hand coordinate system;
n-a navigational coordinate system coinciding with the east-north-sky geographic coordinate system;
b-carrier coordinate system: the origin being at the center of the vehicle, zbAxis perpendicular to carrier up, xbDirected forward of the vehicle, ybAnd xb、zbForming a right-hand coordinate system;
d-an orthogonal coordinate system aligned with the beam center of the DVL, here denoted the beam system;
step 1.2, establishing a state equation of the SINS/DVL tightly-combined navigation system, which comprises the following specific steps:
taking the attitude error angle phi as [ phi ]x φy φz]Speed error δ V ═ δ VE δVN δVU]Position error δ P ═ δLδλ δh]Gyro constant drift epsilon and accelerometer random constant error
Figure BDA0003539528290000051
As state quantities of the SINS system, they are:
Figure BDA0003539528290000052
wherein phi isxIs the east misalignment angle, phiyIs the north misalignment angle, phizIs the angle of the vertical misalignment; delta VEIs east velocity error, δ VNIs the north velocity error, δ VUIs the speed error in the sky direction; δ L is the latitude error, δ λ is the longitude error, δ h is the altitude error; epsilonxIs the x-direction gyro drift, εyIs a y-direction gyro drift, epsilonzIs a z-direction gyroscopeHelical drift;
Figure BDA0003539528290000053
is the random constant error of the x-direction accelerometer,
Figure BDA0003539528290000054
is a random constant error of the y-direction accelerometer,
Figure BDA0003539528290000055
is the random constant error of the z-direction accelerometer;
noise of SINS system:
WSINS=[ωgx ωgy ωgz ωax ωay ωaz]T
wherein, ω isgIs the process noise vector, omega, of the gyroaIs the process noise vector of the accelerometer.
Taking DVL four-beam velocity zero offset delta b as [ delta b [ ]1 δb2 δb3 δb4]And taking the scale coefficient error delta k as a DVL system state variable, and recording as:
XDVL=[δb1 δb2 δb3 δb4 δk]T
wherein, δ b1Is beam1 velocity zero offset, δ b2Is beam2 velocity zero offset, δ b3Is beam3 velocity zero offset, δ b4Is beam4 velocity zero offset;
noise of DVL system is ωd
Offset deltab of depth gaugepsAs state variables of the depth gauge:
XPS=δbps
the noise of the depth gauge system is omegaps
The state quantity of the integrated navigation system can be expressed as:
X=[XSINS XDVL XPS]T
the state equation can be derived from an error model of the navigation system:
Figure BDA0003539528290000061
where F is the state transition matrix and W is the system noise;
Figure BDA0003539528290000062
specific formula FSINSDerivation is not discussed in detail, and derivation processes exist in many documents,
Figure BDA0003539528290000063
step 1.3, establishing a measurement equation of the SINS/DVL tightly-combined navigation system, and specifically comprising the following steps:
in the case of neglecting sensor errors, the speed is defined as follows:
Figure BDA0003539528290000064
wherein,
Figure BDA0003539528290000065
is the speed of the SINS under n,
Figure BDA0003539528290000066
is the velocity of the SINS under b,
Figure BDA0003539528290000067
is the SINS speed under the beam system,
Figure BDA0003539528290000068
is the velocity of the DVL measurement. There is a relationship between them:
Figure BDA0003539528290000069
wherein,
Figure BDA00035395282900000610
represents a transformation matrix from n system to b system,
Figure BDA00035395282900000611
represents a transformation matrix from b system to beam system, which is expressed as follows:
Figure BDA0003539528290000071
wherein b isiIs based on the geometric relationship between DVL beam and AUV from VbTo VdThe direction vector of (a) can be expressed as:
Figure BDA0003539528290000072
where α is the beam tilt angle of the DVL, a fixed characteristic of the DVL.
Figure BDA0003539528290000073
Can be expressed as
Figure BDA0003539528290000074
Wherein
Figure BDA0003539528290000075
For a "+" configuration of the DVL, and
Figure BDA0003539528290000076
DVL for "x" configuration;
measurements made by SINS, DVL and depth gauge:
Figure BDA0003539528290000077
wherein,
Figure BDA0003539528290000078
is the depth information calculated by the SINS,
Figure BDA0003539528290000079
is the depth information measured by the depth gauge. Defining a measurement error model of the depth gauge as follows:
Figure BDA00035395282900000710
wherein HPSIs the true depth value. Solved by the above analysis, SINS
Figure BDA00035395282900000711
The calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA00035395282900000712
the measurement error model for DVL is defined as:
Figure BDA00035395282900000713
obtained by converting the SINS calculation speed into beam system according to the analysis
Figure BDA00035395282900000714
The calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0003539528290000081
wherein [. x ] represents a cross product operation. The measurement equation of the integrated navigation system can be obtained as follows:
Z=HX+V
wherein,
Figure BDA0003539528290000082
V=[ωd ωps]T
further, in the step 2, sample data containing various abnormal measurement types is collected with the aid of GNSS information and VBKF algorithm for training ANFIS, and the specific process is as follows:
to predict data via the ANFIS model, the ANFIS parameters need to be trained beforehand via sample data. To obtain an accurate ANFIS model, navigation data needs to be collected by the VBKF to identify the variables most relevant to the anomalies occurring in the DVL measurements and use these variables as inputs. At the same time, we wish to find variables that can represent measured anomalies directly as outputs;
step 2.1, collecting variables most relevant to the abnormal DVL measurement information, and taking the variables as characteristic information, wherein the specific steps are as follows:
innovation refers to the difference between the predicted value and the measured value of the model. Innovation v in Kalman filtering in SINS/DVL integrated navigation systemskThe difference between the estimated value of the system model and the actual measured value of DVL can be mapped. The calculation expression is as follows:
Figure BDA0003539528290000091
wherein,
Figure BDA0003539528290000092
the DVL actually measures information for time k.
Figure BDA0003539528290000093
Is a one-step predicted value at time k. We consider the system model to be accurately modeled, so when the innovation suddenly becomes large, the DVL measurement is not accurate enough and the measurement error increases. Therefore, innovation is taken as one of the variables reflecting the DVL measurement error as input to the ANFIS system;
the mahalanobis distance describes the distance of a sampling point to a distributed standard deviation, and the similarity of two groups of random variables can be effectively calculated. The invention constructs a second input based on mahalanobis distance:
Figure BDA0003539528290000094
wherein λ iskIs the measured abnormal characteristic information defined according to the mahalanobis distance.
Figure BDA0003539528290000095
Pk/k-1Is a one-step prediction variance matrix. For convenience, λ will be used hereinkReferred to as mahalanobis distance;
when the DVL measurement information is abnormal, measurement noise may change. The specific method by which the measurement noise covariance matrix can be made to show this variation will be described in step 2.3. Measuring a noise covariance matrix
Figure BDA0003539528290000096
Is characteristic information that may represent a measurement anomaly, and therefore serves as a third input;
step 2.2, collecting the absolute error of the DVL measurement information as the output of the training data, and specifically comprising the following steps:
the learning process of the model requires accurate ideal output values. During the testing and verification process, the accurate measurement error is selected as the output of the training data in consideration of the sensors loaded on the AUV. This precise measurement error can be obtained from the AUV loaded PHINS:
Figure BDA0003539528290000097
in the formula,
Figure BDA0003539528290000101
the absolute error measured for the DVL at the k-th instant. The PHINS is a fiber optic inertial navigation sensor that integrates GPS information to provide the most accurate attitude, velocity and position information. ZGPS,kAccurate pseudo-measurement information obtained at the kth moment according to the attitude and speed information provided by the PHINS, and
Figure BDA0003539528290000102
the solving mode is the same;
in summary, to make the training of the target model more accurate, we select three feature information that best react to the measured outliers. They are new messages vkLambda constructed based on mahalanobis distancekAnd obtained based on VBKF
Figure BDA0003539528290000103
In addition, the absolute error of the DVL measurement information is selected as output, so that the data quality of the DVL can be visually displayed, and the subsequent compensation and utilization are facilitated.
Step 2.3, a noise uncertainty processing method based on VBKF is developed, and the specific steps are as follows:
constant filter parameters cannot describe the statistical characteristics of the observed quantity variation. The classic kalman filter algorithm treats all observations as the same feature, and cannot adapt to changes in the system when the system observations are abnormal or noise changes. To accurately respond to anomalies that may occur, the system must respond specifically to unknown anomalies. Corresponding mahalanobis distance and R are obtained when the abnormal measurement information is consideredkAnd introducing VBKF to characterize the change of the VBKF. Unknown can be estimated based on VBKF
Figure BDA0003539528290000104
To improve the effectiveness of the ANFIS input information;
when the system noise is known and the measurement noise is unknown, the optimal bayesian filtering including the measurement noise can be summarized as prediction and update:
p(xk,Rk|z1:k-1)
=∫p(xk|xk-1)p(Rk|Rk-1)p(xk-1,Rk-1|z1:k-1)dxk-1dRk-1
p(xk,Rk|z1:k)∝p(zk|xi,zk)p(xk,Rk|z1:k-1)
due to the above-mentioned Bayesian filteringDifficult to solve, so a uniform density q (x) of a plurality of known distributions is usedk,Rk) To approximate the true posterior probability distribution function p (x)k,Rk|z1:k) I.e. variational bayes algorithm:
p(xk,Rk|z1:k)≈q(xk)q(Rk)
where q (-) is an approximate posterior probability density function of p (-). The optimal solution of the expression can be obtained by minimizing the Probability Density Function (PDF) p (x)k,Rk|z1:k) And approximate posterior PDFq (x)k)q(Rk) With a Kullback-Leibler divergence in between. q (x)k)q(Rk) Updating to a Gaussian distribution and an inverse Wishart distribution:
Figure BDA0003539528290000111
the above equation requires fixed-point iterative solution, q(i+1)(Rk) Can be updated as:
Figure BDA0003539528290000112
in the formula, the factor of freedom
Figure BDA0003539528290000113
And inverse scale matrix
Figure BDA0003539528290000114
Can be expressed as:
Figure BDA0003539528290000115
Figure BDA0003539528290000116
wherein,
Figure BDA0003539528290000117
can be expressed as:
Figure BDA0003539528290000118
expectation of
Figure BDA0003539528290000119
Expressed as:
Figure BDA00035395282900001110
q(i+1)(xk) The updating is as follows:
Figure BDA00035395282900001111
wherein the mean value is obtainable by standard Kalman filtering
Figure BDA00035395282900001112
Sum covariance matrix
Figure BDA00035395282900001113
Figure BDA00035395282900001114
Figure BDA0003539528290000121
Figure BDA0003539528290000122
The VBKF is simply deduced, and more obvious characteristic information is obtained through the VBKF;
step 2.4 shows the application situation when part of DVL beam is missing, the specific steps are as follows:
based on the assumption that DVL beams have the following characteristics:
Figure BDA0003539528290000123
at the moment, it needs to be satisfied that the AUV has no vertical speed, and when the AUV fluctuates with the ocean current in an up-and-down mode, the formula does not work. The present invention has the following constraints for the application when a portion of the DVL beam is missing:
1) three beams are active: at the moment, complete pseudo-beam information can still be obtained through the formula, and error prediction compensation can be performed through the method;
2) two orthogonal beams are active: at the moment, complete pseudo-beam information can still be obtained through the formula, and error prediction compensation can be performed through the method;
in addition, under three conditions of effectiveness of two parallel beams or effectiveness of only one beam and total failure, the DVL information has a lot of defects, and the failed DVL beam can be predicted by selecting different characteristic information (such as information related to SINS calculation), so that the method is not applicable;
further, the sample data collected in step 3 is standardized, and processed by PSO algorithm to realize ANFIS model parameter optimization, completing the training process of ANFIS model, and specifically comprising the following steps:
step 3.1 standardizing the sample data:
z-score normalization of the innovation;
performing min-max standardization on the Mahalanobis distance and the measured noise covariance matrix to enable the result to fall into a [0,1] interval;
step 3.2 the specific ANFIS algorithm process is as follows:
for a simple TSK fuzzy system model: the way functions combine or interact is called a rule, which includes a pre-parameter and a post-parameter. In order to realize the learning process of the TSK fuzzy model, the TSK fuzzy model is generally converted into an adaptive neural network, and a membership function of the neural network, namely ANFIS, is obtained by training sample data. Given the pre-parameters, the output of ANFIS can be expressed as a linear combination of post-parameters;
the ANFIS has five layers in total,
step 3.2.1 first layer, input variable membership function layer:
each node i has an output function:
Figure BDA0003539528290000131
where in is an input, including x, y, z; miIs a fuzzy set comprising Ai,Bi,Ci
Figure BDA0003539528290000132
Is a membership function of the fuzzy set M, which represents the degree to which a given input in satisfies M;
there are many types of membership functions including bell, gaussian, triangular, etc. In general, we choose μMAs generalized bell membership functions:
Figure BDA0003539528290000133
wherein, ai,bi,ciIs a set of parameters whose changes in value change the shape of the bell-shaped function and thus result in different membership functions. The parameters are called as front-part parameters and can be adaptively adjusted in the learning process of the algorithm;
step 3.2.2 second layer, regular strength release layer:
each node i is responsible for multiplying the input signals:
Figure BDA0003539528290000141
wherein, ω isiIs each timeThe output of each node represents the credibility of the rule;
step 3.2.3 layer three, normalization process of all regular intensities:
the ith node calculates the ratio of the release strength of rule i to the sum of all the release strengths of the rules:
Figure BDA0003539528290000142
step 3.2.4, fourth layer, calculating fuzzy rule output:
each node i of this layer is an adaptive node whose output is:
Figure BDA0003539528290000143
wherein,
Figure BDA0003539528290000144
is the output of the third layer, according to the backward parameter mi,pi,qi,riComputing the output of the fuzzy rule by the membership function;
step 3.2.5 fifth layer, calculate the total output of the input signals:
Figure BDA0003539528290000145
as previously mentioned, the output of ANFIS can be expressed as a linear combination of backward parameters, the forward parameters having been given:
Figure BDA0003539528290000146
the training process of the ANFIS firstly extracts an initial fuzzy model through the collected sample data, and then optimizes the model parameters from Layer 1 to Layer 5. The node parameters of the first layer and the fourth layer are self-adaptive, and the node parameters of the second layer and the third layer are fixed.
The invention adopts a PSO algorithm to optimize the front-part and back-part parameters of the ANFIS model. From the first layer to the fourth layer, the back-piece parameters are calculated by least squares estimation, the error between the iteration value and the expected value of the training data is calculated, in the reverse transmission process, the error signal is propagated from the output layer back to the input layer, and the front-piece parameters are adjusted by the PSO. In the process of changing the parameters, the shape of the membership function is continuously modified so as to achieve the purpose of minimizing the output error in a set period.
Step 3.3 the specific PSO parameter optimization algorithm process is as follows:
PSO is a random optimization algorithm, the solution of the problem is called particles, and the optimization result can be checked by simulating the individual cooperation and competition modes in the particle swarm;
for a population of N particles, there is an N-dimensional search space. In PSO, each particle is assigned a position vector xiAnd a velocity vector viThe corresponding objective function allows the particle to obtain fitness and from the previous position and the current position (x)i) Selecting the best position (p)best) (ii) a In addition, in a cluster, all particles have their global optimal position (g)best);
The updating mode of the velocity vector and the position vector of the ith particle is expressed as follows:
Figure BDA0003539528290000151
Figure BDA0003539528290000152
in the above-mentioned formula,
Figure BDA0003539528290000153
representing the velocity vector of the particle i at the kth time in d dimension;
Figure BDA0003539528290000154
indicating that the particle i is in d dimensionA position vector at time k; omega represents an inertia weight; r is1And r2Represents a random number from 0 to 1; c. C1And c2As acceleration factor, i.e. cognition factor (c)1) And social coefficient (c)2);
The velocity vector equation is mainly composed of three parts of cognition, society and inertia. Wherein the inertial component is a memory of the previous direction of motion that caused the particle to fly through its path at time k; the cognitive component is a velocity component generated by moving the particles to a previous optimal position; the social component is an assessment of the performance of a particle relative to its neighbors and the entire population of particles. These three components define the trajectory of the particle throughout the search space;
optimizing parameters of the ANFIS model by adopting a PSO algorithm according to the training data which is acquired in the step 2 and comprises input data and target output to obtain a trained ANFIS model;
further, the step 4 of controlling the AUV to submerge underwater and predicting the four-beam absolute error of the DVL by adopting an improved PSO-ANFIS algorithm comprises the following specific steps:
step 4.1, inertial navigation resolving is carried out through initial information and IMU information;
step 4.2, calculating pseudo measurement information corresponding to the four-beam velocity of the DVL through inertial navigation resolving information according to the DVL updating frequency;
step 4.3, filtering the difference value of the solved pseudo measurement information and the DVL four-beam measurement value as an observed quantity through VBKF so as to obtain three kinds of characteristic information v consistent with the step 2kk,
Figure BDA0003539528290000161
As input to the ANFIS model;
step 4.4, performing a standardization process consistent with the step 3 on the collected characteristic information, and performing DVL measurement information error prediction through the ANFIS model subjected to PSO assisted training in the step 3;
further, in the step 5, based on the ANFIS prediction result, the characteristic change of the error is monitored, the actual measurement of the DVL is compensated by an anomaly discrimination mechanism, and the compensated DVL measurement and the pseudo-observed quantity calculated by the SINS are subjected to kalman filtering, which specifically includes the following steps:
step 5.1, analyzing a training sample by belonging to Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE) of prediction data, selecting 3 belonging to the group as a measurement abnormal threshold T of model prediction according to experience, and using the value as a state discrimination standard of model prediction output;
step 5.2, modeling the predicted value according to Bernoulli distribution:
Figure BDA0003539528290000171
and 5.3, compensating the DVL measured value according to the state discrimination standard:
Figure BDA0003539528290000172
wherein, γk0 indicates DVL measurement is normal; gamma rayk1 indicates abnormal DVL measurement, predicted by ANFIS
Figure BDA0003539528290000173
Performing compensation;
step 5.4 selecting compensated DVL measurement value ZDVL,kAnd the difference between the corresponding pseudo-observation information calculated by the SINS is used as an observation value, and the SINS/DVL tight combination navigation under the complex environment is realized by the VBKF.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the following advantages and beneficial effects:
1. and (3) acquiring high-quality ANFIS input information by using a variational Bayes-based adaptive filtering method. The innovation, the mahalanobis distance and the measurement noise covariance matrix are originally related to the measured value, the mahalanobis distance and the measurement noise covariance matrix in the ANFIS input information can be more remarkable when encountering abnormal values by the self-adaptive filtering method, and the training quality of the ANFIS is improved.
2. And introducing a particle swarm optimization algorithm to perform parameter optimization on the ANFIS. In consideration of the facts that the number of samples is not necessarily sufficient and the ANFIS initial parameter setting is random, in order to obtain a more accurate and stable ANFIS model, the PSO is adopted to assist in training the ANFIS model.
3. Instead of rejecting error points, a hierarchical approach to ANFIS prediction data is selected. Therefore, when the DVL measurement value encounters continuous errors such as irregular measurement information updating, short-time failure of partial beams and the like, the information of the DVL can be utilized to the maximum extent, and the reduction of navigation accuracy caused by continuous data point elimination is avoided.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a SINS/DVL tightly integrated navigation system provided by the present invention;
FIG. 2 is an ANFIS model structure with 3-inputs and 3-rules provided by the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a technical route of the SINS/DVL integrated navigation system under a complex environment provided by the present invention.
Detailed Description
The present invention will be further illustrated with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments, which are to be understood as merely illustrative of the invention and not as limiting the scope of the invention. It should be noted that the terms "front," "back," "left," "right," "upper" and "lower" used in the following description refer to directions in the drawings, and the terms "inner" and "outer" refer to directions toward and away from, respectively, the geometric center of a particular component.
The invention relates to an application method of an improved PSO-ANFIS assisted SINS/DVL tightly combined navigation method in AUV navigation, the flow of which is shown in figure 3, and the application method comprises the following steps:
step 1: establishing a state equation of the SINS/DVL integrated navigation system according to a system error equation, and establishing a measurement equation of the SINS/DVL integrated navigation system by taking the difference between pseudo measurement information calculated according to navigation information solved by the SINS and four-beam velocity information measured by the DVL and depth information measured by a depth meter as measurement quantity, as shown in FIG. 1;
step 1.1 defines the coordinate system to be used:
e-terrestrial coordinate system: is fixedly connected with the earthThe point is located at the geocentric, xeAxis passing through the intersection of the meridian and equator, zeAxis directed north, yeAxis xe、zeForming a right-hand coordinate system;
n-a navigational coordinate system coinciding with the east-north-sky geographic coordinate system;
b-carrier coordinate system: the origin being at the center of the vehicle, zbAxis perpendicular to carrier up, xbDirected forward of the vehicle, ybAnd xb、zbForming a right-hand coordinate system;
d-an orthogonal coordinate system aligned with the beam center of the DVL, here denoted the beam system;
step 1.2, establishing a state equation of the SINS/DVL tightly-combined navigation system, which comprises the following specific steps:
taking the attitude error angle phi as [ phi ]x φy φz]Speed error δ V ═ δ VE δVN δVU]Position error δ P ═ δLδλ δh]Gyro constant drift epsilon and accelerometer random constant error
Figure BDA0003539528290000191
As state quantities of the SINS system, they are:
Figure BDA0003539528290000192
wherein phixIs the east misalignment angle, phiyIs the north misalignment angle, phizIs the angle of the vertical misalignment; delta VEIs east velocity error, δ VNIs the north velocity error, δ VUIs the speed error in the sky direction; δ L is the latitude error, δ λ is the longitude error, δ h is the altitude error; epsilonxIs the x-direction gyro drift, εyIs a y-direction gyro drift, epsilonzIs z-direction gyro drift;
Figure BDA0003539528290000193
is the random constant error of the x-direction accelerometer,
Figure BDA0003539528290000194
is a random constant error of the y-direction accelerometer,
Figure BDA0003539528290000195
is the random constant error of the z-direction accelerometer;
noise of SINS system:
WSINS=[ωgx ωgy ωgz ωax ωay ωaz]T
wherein, ω isgIs the process noise vector, omega, of the gyroaIs the process noise vector of the accelerometer.
Taking DVL four-beam velocity zero offset delta b as [ delta b [ ]1 δb2 δb3 δb4]And taking the scale coefficient error delta k as a DVL system state variable, and recording as:
XDVL=[δb1 δb2 δb3 δb4 δk]T
wherein, δ b1Is beam1 velocity zero offset, δ b2Is beam2 velocity zero offset, δ b3Is beam3 velocity zero offset, δ b4Is beam4 velocity zero offset;
noise of DVL system is ωd
Offset deltab of depth gaugepsAs state variables of the depth gauge:
XPS=δbps
the noise of the depth gauge system is omegaps
The state quantity of the integrated navigation system can be expressed as:
X=[XSINS XDVL XPS]T
the state equation can be derived from an error model of the navigation system:
Figure BDA0003539528290000201
wherein, FIs the state transition matrix, W is the system noise;
Figure BDA0003539528290000202
specific formula FSINSDerivation is not discussed in detail, and derivation processes exist in many documents,
Figure BDA0003539528290000203
step 1.3, establishing a measurement equation of the SINS/DVL tightly-combined navigation system, and specifically comprising the following steps:
in the case of neglecting sensor errors, the speed is defined as follows:
Figure BDA0003539528290000211
wherein,
Figure BDA0003539528290000212
is the speed of the SINS under n,
Figure BDA0003539528290000213
is the velocity of the SINS under b,
Figure BDA0003539528290000214
is the SINS speed under the beam system,
Figure BDA0003539528290000215
is the velocity of the DVL measurement. There is a relationship between them:
Figure BDA0003539528290000216
wherein,
Figure BDA0003539528290000217
represents a transformation matrix from n system to b system,
Figure BDA0003539528290000218
represents a transformation matrix from b system to beam system, which is expressed as follows:
Figure BDA0003539528290000219
wherein b isiIs based on the geometric relationship between DVL beam and AUV from VbTo VdThe direction vector of (a) can be expressed as:
Figure BDA00035395282900002110
where α is the beam tilt angle of the DVL, a fixed characteristic of the DVL.
Figure BDA00035395282900002111
Can be expressed as
Figure BDA00035395282900002112
Wherein
Figure BDA00035395282900002113
For a "+" configuration of the DVL, and
Figure BDA00035395282900002114
DVL for "x" configuration;
measurements made by SINS, DVL and depth gauge:
Figure BDA00035395282900002115
wherein,
Figure BDA00035395282900002116
is the depth information calculated by the SINS,
Figure BDA00035395282900002117
is the depth information measured by the depth gauge. Defining a measurement error model of the depth gauge as follows:
Figure BDA0003539528290000221
wherein HPSIs the true depth value. Solved by the above analysis, SINS
Figure BDA0003539528290000222
The calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0003539528290000223
the measurement error model for DVL is defined as:
Figure BDA0003539528290000224
obtained by converting the SINS calculation speed into beam system according to the analysis
Figure BDA0003539528290000225
The calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0003539528290000226
wherein [. x ] represents a cross product operation. The measurement equation of the integrated navigation system can be obtained as follows:
Z=HX+V
wherein,
Figure BDA0003539528290000227
V=[ωd ωps]T
step 2: controlling the depth of the underwater vehicle of the AUV to reach the position near the water surface, and after the initial alignment of a navigation positioning system is completed, assisting in collecting sample data containing various abnormal measurement types by means of GNSS information and a variational Bayesian Kalman filtering algorithm for training ANFIS;
step 2.1, collecting variables most relevant to the abnormal DVL measurement information, and taking the variables as characteristic information, wherein the specific steps are as follows:
innovation refers to the difference between the predicted value and the measured value of the model. Innovation v in Kalman filtering in SINS/DVL integrated navigation systemskThe difference between the estimated value of the system model and the actual measured value of DVL can be mapped. The calculation expression is as follows:
Figure BDA0003539528290000231
wherein,
Figure BDA0003539528290000232
the DVL actually measures information for time k.
Figure BDA0003539528290000233
Is a one-step predicted value at time k. We consider the system model to be accurately modeled, so when the innovation suddenly becomes large, the DVL measurement is not accurate enough and the measurement error increases. Therefore, innovation is taken as one of the variables reflecting the DVL measurement error as input to the ANFIS system;
the mahalanobis distance describes the distance of a sampling point to a distributed standard deviation, and the similarity of two groups of random variables can be effectively calculated. The invention constructs a second input based on mahalanobis distance:
Figure BDA0003539528290000234
wherein λ iskIs the measured abnormal characteristic information defined according to the mahalanobis distance.
Figure BDA0003539528290000235
Pk/k-1Is a one-step prediction variance matrix. For convenience, λ will be used hereinkReferred to as mahalanobis distance;
when DVL measurement informationIn the event of an anomaly, the measurement noise will change. The specific method by which the measurement noise covariance matrix can be made to show this variation will be described in step 2.3. Measuring a noise covariance matrix
Figure BDA0003539528290000236
Is characteristic information that may represent a measurement anomaly, and therefore serves as a third input;
step 2.2, collecting the absolute error of the DVL measurement information as the output of the training data, and specifically comprising the following steps:
the learning process of the model requires accurate ideal output values. During the testing and verification process, the accurate measurement error is selected as the output of the training data in consideration of the sensors loaded on the AUV. This precise measurement error can be obtained from the AUV loaded PHINS:
Figure BDA0003539528290000241
in the formula,
Figure BDA0003539528290000242
the absolute error measured for the DVL at the k-th instant. The PHINS is a fiber optic inertial navigation sensor that integrates GPS information to provide the most accurate attitude, velocity and position information. ZGPS,kAccurate pseudo-measurement information obtained at the kth moment according to the attitude and speed information provided by the PHINS, and
Figure BDA0003539528290000243
the solving mode is the same;
in summary, to make the training of the target model more accurate, we select three feature information that best react to the measured outliers. They are new messages vkLambda constructed based on mahalanobis distancekAnd obtained based on VBKF
Figure BDA0003539528290000244
In addition, the absolute error of the DVL measurement information is selected as the output, so that the DVL number can be displayed intuitivelyAnd according to the quality, the subsequent compensation and utilization are convenient.
Step 2.3, expanding a noise uncertainty processing method based on VBKF, which comprises the following specific steps:
constant filter parameters cannot describe the statistical characteristics of the observed quantity variation. The classic kalman filter algorithm treats all observations as the same feature, and cannot adapt to changes in the system when the system observations are abnormal or noise changes. To accurately respond to anomalies that may occur, the system must respond specifically to unknown anomalies. Corresponding mahalanobis distance and R are obtained when the abnormal measurement information is consideredkVBKF is introduced to characterize its variations. Unknown can be estimated based on VBKF
Figure BDA0003539528290000245
To improve the effectiveness of the ANFIS input information;
when the system noise is known and the measurement noise is unknown, the optimal bayesian filtering including the measurement noise can be summarized as prediction and update:
p(xk,Rk|z1:k-1)
=∫p(xk|xk-1)p(Rk|Rk-1)p(xk-1,Rk-1|z1:k-1)dxk-1dRk-1
p(xk,Rk|z1:k)∝p(zk|xk,zk)p(xk,Rk|z1:k-1)
since the Bayesian filtering described above is difficult to solve, a uniform density q (x) of multiple known distributions is employedk,Rk) To approximate the true posterior probability distribution function p (x)k,Rk|z1:k) I.e. variational bayes algorithm:
p(xk,Rk|z1:k)≈q(xk)q(Rk)
where q (-) is an approximate posterior probability density function of p (-). The optimal solution of the expression can be obtained by minimizing the Probability Density Function (PDF) p (x)k,Rk|z1:k) And approximate posterior PDFq (x)k)q(Rk) With a Kullback-Leibler divergence in between. q (x)k)q(Rk) Updating to a Gaussian distribution and an inverse Wishart distribution:
Figure BDA0003539528290000251
the above equation requires fixed-point iterative solution, q(i+1)(Rk) Can be updated as:
Figure BDA0003539528290000252
in the formula, the factor of freedom
Figure BDA0003539528290000253
And inverse scale matrix
Figure BDA0003539528290000254
Can be expressed as:
Figure BDA0003539528290000255
Figure BDA0003539528290000256
wherein,
Figure BDA0003539528290000257
can be expressed as:
Figure BDA0003539528290000258
desire to
Figure BDA0003539528290000259
Expressed as:
Figure BDA0003539528290000261
q(i+1)(xk) The updating is as follows:
Figure BDA0003539528290000262
wherein the mean value is obtainable by standard Kalman filtering
Figure BDA0003539528290000263
Sum covariance matrix
Figure BDA0003539528290000264
Figure BDA0003539528290000265
Figure BDA0003539528290000266
Figure BDA0003539528290000267
The VBKF is simply deduced, and more obvious characteristic information is obtained through the VBKF;
step 2.4 shows the application situation when part of DVL beam is missing, the specific steps are as follows:
based on the assumption that DVL beams have the following characteristics:
Figure BDA0003539528290000268
at the moment, it needs to be satisfied that the AUV has no vertical speed, and when the AUV fluctuates with the ocean current in an up-and-down mode, the formula does not work. The present invention has the following constraints for the application when a portion of the DVL beam is missing:
1) three beams are active: at the moment, complete pseudo-beam information can still be obtained through the formula, and error prediction compensation can be performed through the method;
2) two orthogonal beams are active: at the moment, complete pseudo-beam information can still be obtained through the formula, and error prediction compensation can be performed through the method;
in addition, under three conditions of effectiveness of two parallel beams or effectiveness of only one beam and total failure, the DVL information has a lot of defects, and the failed DVL beam can be predicted by selecting different characteristic information (such as information related to SINS calculation), so that the method is not applicable;
and step 3: standardizing the sample data collected in the step 2, and processing the sample data through a particle swarm optimization algorithm to realize parameter optimization of the ANFIS model so as to complete the training process of the ANFIS model;
step 3.1 standardizing the sample data:
z-score normalization of the innovation;
performing min-max standardization on the Mahalanobis distance and the measured noise covariance matrix to enable the result to fall into a [0,1] interval;
step 3.2 the specific ANFIS algorithm process is as follows:
for a simple TSK fuzzy system model: the way functions combine or interact is called a rule, which includes a pre-parameter and a post-parameter. In order to realize the learning process of the TSK fuzzy model, the TSK fuzzy model is generally converted into an adaptive neural network, and a membership function of the neural network, namely ANFIS, is obtained by training sample data. Given the pre-parameters, the output of ANFIS can be expressed as a linear combination of post-parameters;
ANFIS has five layers;
step 3.2.1 first layer, input membership function layer of variable:
each node i has an output function:
Figure BDA0003539528290000271
where in is an input, including x, y, z; miIs a fuzzy set comprising Ai,Bi,Ci
Figure BDA0003539528290000272
Is a membership function of the fuzzy set M, which represents the degree to which a given input in satisfies M;
there are many types of membership functions including bell, gaussian, triangular, etc. In general, we choose μMAs generalized bell membership functions:
Figure BDA0003539528290000281
wherein, ai,bi,ciIs a set of parameters whose changes in value change the shape of the bell-shaped function and thus result in different membership functions. The parameters are called as front-part parameters and can be adaptively adjusted in the learning process of the algorithm;
step 3.2.2 second layer, regular strength release layer:
each node i is responsible for multiplying the input signals:
Figure BDA0003539528290000282
wherein, ω isiIs the output of each node, representing the trustworthiness of the rule;
step 3.2.3 layer three, normalization process of all regular intensities:
the ith node calculates the ratio of the release strength of rule i to the sum of all the release strengths of the rules:
Figure BDA0003539528290000283
step 3.2.4, fourth layer, calculating fuzzy rule output:
each node i of this layer is an adaptive node whose output is:
Figure BDA0003539528290000284
wherein,
Figure BDA0003539528290000285
is the output of the third layer, according to the backward parameter mi,pi,qi,riComputing the output of the fuzzy rule by the membership function;
step 3.2.5 fifth layer, calculate the total output of the input signals:
Figure BDA0003539528290000286
as previously mentioned, the output of ANFIS can be expressed as a linear combination of backward parameters, the forward parameters having been given:
Figure BDA0003539528290000291
the training process of the ANFIS firstly extracts an initial fuzzy model through the collected sample data, and then optimizes the model parameters from Layer 1 to Layer 5. The node parameters of the first layer and the fourth layer are self-adaptive, and the node parameters of the second layer and the third layer are fixed;
the invention adopts a PSO algorithm to optimize the front-part and back-part parameters of the ANFIS model. From the first layer to the fourth layer, the back-piece parameters are calculated by least squares estimation, the error between the iteration value and the expected value of the training data is calculated, in the reverse transmission process, the error signal is propagated from the output layer back to the input layer, and the front-piece parameters are adjusted by the PSO. In the process of changing the parameters, the shape of the membership function is continuously modified so as to achieve the purpose of minimum output error in a set period;
step 3.3 the specific PSO parameter optimization algorithm process is as follows:
PSO is a random optimization algorithm, the solution of the problem is called particles, and the optimization result can be checked by simulating the individual cooperation and competition modes in the particle swarm;
for a population of N particles, there is an N-dimensional search space. In PSO, each particle is assigned a position vector xiAnd a velocity vector viThe corresponding objective function allows the particle to obtain fitness and from the previous position and the current position (x)i) Selecting the best position (p)best) (ii) a In addition, in a cluster, all particles have their global optimal position (g)best);
The updating mode of the velocity vector and the position vector of the ith particle is expressed as follows:
Figure BDA0003539528290000292
Figure BDA0003539528290000293
in the above-mentioned formula,
Figure BDA0003539528290000301
representing the velocity vector of the particle i at the kth time in d dimension;
Figure BDA0003539528290000302
a position vector representing a particle i at a kth time in d-dimension; omega represents an inertia weight; r is1And r2Represents a random number from 0 to 1; c. C1And c2As acceleration factor, i.e. cognition factor (c)1) And social coefficient (c)2);
The velocity vector equation is mainly composed of three parts of cognition, society and inertia. Wherein the inertial component is a memory of the previous direction of motion that caused the particle to fly through its path at time k; the cognitive component is a velocity component generated by moving the particles to a previous optimal position; the social component is an assessment of the performance of a particle relative to its neighbors and the entire population of particles. These three components define the trajectory of the particle throughout the search space;
optimizing parameters of the ANFIS model by adopting a PSO algorithm according to the training data which is acquired in the step 2 and comprises input data and target output to obtain a trained ANFIS model;
and 4, step 4: controlling the AUV to submerge, and performing online prediction on the four-beam absolute error of the DVL by adopting an improved PSO-ANFIS algorithm;
step 4.1, inertial navigation resolving is carried out through initial information and IMU information;
step 4.2, calculating pseudo measurement information corresponding to the four-beam velocity of the DVL through inertial navigation resolving information according to the DVL updating frequency;
step 4.3, filtering the difference value of the solved pseudo measurement information and the DVL four-beam measurement value as an observed quantity through VBKF so as to obtain three kinds of characteristic information v consistent with the step 2kk,
Figure BDA0003539528290000303
As input to the ANFIS model;
step 4.4, performing a standardization process consistent with the step 3 on the collected characteristic information, and performing DVL measurement information error prediction through the ANFIS model subjected to PSO assisted training in the step 3;
and 5: monitoring characteristic change of errors based on an ANFIS prediction result, compensating actual measurement of the DVL through an anomaly discrimination mechanism, and performing Kalman filtering on the compensated DVL measurement and a pseudo observed quantity calculated by the SINS;
step 5.1, analyzing a training sample by belonging to Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE) of prediction data, selecting 3 belonging to the group as a measurement abnormal threshold T of model prediction according to experience, and using the value as a state discrimination standard of model prediction output;
step 5.2, modeling the predicted value according to Bernoulli distribution:
Figure BDA0003539528290000311
and 5.3, compensating the DVL measured value according to the state discrimination standard:
Figure BDA0003539528290000312
wherein, γk0 indicates DVL measurement is normal; gamma rayk1 indicates abnormal DVL measurement, predicted by ANFIS
Figure BDA0003539528290000313
Compensation is carried out;
step 5.4 selecting compensated DVL measurement value ZDVL,kAnd the difference between the corresponding pseudo-observation information calculated by the SINS is used as an observation value, and the SINS/DVL tight combination navigation under the complex environment is realized by the VBKF.
The technical means disclosed in the invention scheme are not limited to the technical means disclosed in the above embodiments, but also include the technical scheme formed by any combination of the above technical features.

Claims (6)

1. An improved PSO-ANFIS assisted SINS/DVL tightly combined navigation method, which is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step 1: establishing a state equation of the SINS/DVL integrated navigation system according to a system error equation, and establishing a measurement equation of the SINS/DVL integrated navigation system by taking the difference between pseudo measurement information calculated according to navigation information solved by the SINS and four-beam velocity information measured by the DVL and depth information measured by the depth meter as measurement;
step 2: controlling the depth of the underwater vehicle of the AUV to reach the position near the water surface, and after the initial alignment of a navigation positioning system is completed, assisting in collecting sample data containing various abnormal measurement types by means of GNSS information and a variational Bayesian Kalman filtering algorithm for training ANFIS;
and step 3: standardizing the sample data collected in the step 2, and processing the sample data through a particle swarm optimization algorithm to realize parameter optimization of the ANFIS model so as to complete the training process of the ANFIS model;
and 4, step 4: controlling the AUV to submerge, and predicting the four-beam absolute error of the DVL by adopting an improved PSO-ANFIS algorithm, wherein characteristic information needs to be acquired on line;
and 5: based on the ANFIS prediction result, the characteristic change of the error is monitored, the actual measurement of the DVL is compensated through an anomaly discrimination mechanism, and the compensated DVL measurement and the pseudo observed quantity calculated by the SINS are subjected to Kalman filtering.
2. The improved PSO-ANFIS-assisted SINS/DVL tightly-integrated navigation method according to claim 1, wherein the state equation and the measurement equation of the SINS/DVL tightly-integrated navigation system are established in step 1 by the following steps:
step 1.1 defines the coordinate system to be used:
e-terrestrial coordinate system: is fixedly connected with the earth, with the origin at the center of the earth, xeAxis passing through the intersection of the meridian and equator, zeAxis directed north, yeAxis xe、zeForming a right-hand coordinate system; n-a navigational coordinate system coinciding with the east-north-sky geographic coordinate system; b-carrier coordinate system: the origin being at the center of the vehicle, zbAxis perpendicular to carrier up, xbDirected forward of the vehicle, ybAnd xb、zbForming a right-hand coordinate system; d-an orthogonal coordinate system aligned with the beam center of the DVL, here denoted the beam system;
step 1.2, establishing a state equation of the SINS/DVL tightly-combined navigation system, which comprises the following specific steps:
taking the attitude error angle phi as [ phi ]x φy φz]Speed error δ V ═ δ VE δVN δVU]Position error δ P ═ δ L δ λ δ h]Gyro constant drift epsilon and accelerometer random constant error
Figure FDA0003539528280000026
As state quantities of the SINS system, they are:
Figure FDA0003539528280000021
wherein phi isxIs the east misalignment angle phiyIs the north misalignment angle, phizIs the angle of the vertical misalignment; delta VEIs east velocity error, δ VNIs the north velocity error, δ VUIs the speed error in the sky direction; δ L is the latitude error, δ λ is the longitude error, δ h is the altitude error; epsilonxIs the x-direction gyro drift, εyIs y-direction gyro drift, εzIs z-direction gyro drift;
Figure FDA0003539528280000025
is the random constant error of the x-direction accelerometer,
Figure FDA0003539528280000023
is a random constant error of the y-direction accelerometer,
Figure FDA0003539528280000024
is the random constant error of the z-direction accelerometer; noise of SINS system:
WSINS=[ωgx ωgy ωgz ωax ωay ωaz]T
wherein, ω isgIs the process noise vector, omega, of the gyroaIs the process noise vector of the accelerometer; taking DVL four-beam velocity zero offset delta b as [ delta b [ ]1 δb2 δb3 δb4]And taking the scale coefficient error delta k as a DVL system state variable, and recording as:
XDVL=[δb1 δb2 δb3 δb4 δk]T
wherein, δ b1Is the beam velocity zero offset, δ b2Is beam2 velocity zero offset, δ b3Is beam3 velocity zero offset, δ b4Is beam4 velocity zero offset;
noise of DVL system is ωd(ii) a Offset deltab of depth gaugepsAs state variables of the depth gauge:
XPS=δbps
the noise of the depth gauge system is omegaps
The state quantity of the integrated navigation system can be expressed as:
X=[XSINS XDVL XPS]T
from the error model of the navigation system, the state equation can be derived:
Figure FDA0003539528280000031
where F is the state transition matrix and W is the system noise;
Figure FDA0003539528280000032
specific formula FSINSDerivation is not discussed in detail, and derivation processes exist in many documents,
Figure FDA0003539528280000033
step 1.3, establishing a measurement equation of the SINS/DVL tightly-combined navigation system, and specifically comprising the following steps:
in the case of neglecting sensor errors, the speed is defined as follows:
Figure FDA0003539528280000034
wherein,
Figure FDA0003539528280000035
is the speed of the SINS under n,
Figure FDA0003539528280000036
is the velocity of the SINS under b,
Figure FDA0003539528280000037
is the SINS speed under the beam system,
Figure FDA0003539528280000038
is the velocity of the DVL measurement; there is a relationship between them:
Figure FDA0003539528280000041
wherein,
Figure FDA0003539528280000042
represents a transformation matrix from n system to b system,
Figure FDA0003539528280000043
represents a transformation matrix from b system to beam system, which is expressed as follows:
Figure FDA0003539528280000044
wherein b isiIs based on the geometric relationship between DVL beam and AUV from VbTo VdThe direction vector of (c) can be expressed as:
Figure FDA0003539528280000045
where α is the beam tilt angle of the DVL, a fixed characteristic of the DVL;
Figure FDA0003539528280000046
can be expressed as
Figure FDA0003539528280000047
Wherein
Figure FDA0003539528280000048
For "+" fittingDVL placed in, and
Figure FDA0003539528280000049
DVL for "x" configuration;
measurements made by SINS, DVL and depth gauge:
Figure FDA00035395282800000410
wherein,
Figure FDA00035395282800000411
is the depth information calculated by the SINS,
Figure FDA00035395282800000412
is depth information measured by a depth gauge; defining a measurement error model of the depth gauge as follows:
Figure FDA00035395282800000413
wherein HPSIs a true depth value; solved by the above analysis, SINS
Figure FDA00035395282800000414
The calculation formula is as follows:
Figure FDA00035395282800000415
the measurement error model for DVL is defined as:
Figure FDA0003539528280000051
obtained by converting the SINS calculation speed into beam system according to the analysis
Figure FDA0003539528280000052
The calculation formula is as follows:
Figure FDA0003539528280000053
wherein [. x ] represents a cross product operation; the measurement equation of the integrated navigation system can be obtained as follows:
Z=HX+V
wherein,
Figure FDA0003539528280000054
V=[ωd ωps]T
3. the improved PSO-ANFIS-assisted-based SINS/DVL tightly-combined navigation method according to claim 1, wherein the step 2 of collecting sample data containing various abnormal measurement types with the aid of GNSS information and VBKF algorithm for training ANFIS comprises the following steps:
step 2.1, collecting variables most relevant to the abnormal DVL measurement information, and taking the variables as characteristic information, wherein the specific steps are as follows:
innovation v in Kalman filtering in SINS/DVL integrated navigation systemskThe difference between the estimated value of the system model and the actual measured value of DVL can be mapped; the calculation expression is as follows:
Figure FDA0003539528280000055
wherein,
Figure FDA0003539528280000056
actual measurement information for the DVL at time k;
Figure FDA0003539528280000057
is a one-step predicted value at time k; we consider the system model to be accurately modeled, so when the innovation suddenly becomes large, the DVL measurement is not accurate enough and the measurement error increases; therefore, innovation is taken as one of the variables reflecting the DVL measurement error as input to the ANFIS system;
constructing a second input based on mahalanobis distance:
Figure FDA0003539528280000061
wherein λ iskThe measured abnormal characteristic information is defined according to the Mahalanobis distance;
Figure FDA0003539528280000062
Figure FDA0003539528280000063
Pk/k-1is a one-step prediction variance matrix; for convenience, λ will be used hereinkReferred to as mahalanobis distance;
when the DVL measurement information is abnormal, the measurement noise changes; a specific method that can make the measurement noise covariance matrix show such variations; measuring a noise covariance matrix
Figure FDA0003539528280000064
Is characteristic information that may represent a measurement anomaly, and therefore serves as a third input;
step 2.2, collecting the absolute error of the DVL measurement information as the output of the training data, and specifically comprising the following steps:
the learning process of the model requires accurate ideal output values; in the testing and verifying process, considering a sensor loaded on the AUV, and selecting an accurate measurement error as the output of training data; this precise measurement error can be obtained from the AUV loaded PHINS:
Figure FDA0003539528280000065
in the formula,
Figure FDA0003539528280000066
absolute error measured for the DVL at time k; the PHINS is an optical fiber inertial navigation sensor, can integrate GPS information and provides the most accurate attitude, speed and position information; zGPS,kAccurate pseudo-measurement information obtained at the kth moment according to the attitude and speed information provided by the PHINS, and
Figure FDA0003539528280000067
the solving mode is the same;
step 2.3, a noise uncertainty processing method based on VBKF is developed, and the specific steps are as follows:
in order to accurately respond to anomalies that may occur, the system must respond specifically to unknown anomalies; corresponding mahalanobis distance and R are obtained when the abnormal measurement information is consideredkIntroducing VBKF to characterize the change; unknown can be estimated based on VBKF
Figure FDA0003539528280000077
To improve the effectiveness of the ANFIS input information;
when the system noise is known and the measurement noise is unknown, the optimal bayesian filtering including the measurement noise can be summarized as prediction and update:
Figure FDA0003539528280000071
since the Bayesian filtering described above is difficult to solve, a uniform density q (x) of multiple known distributions is employedk,Rk) To approximate the true posterior probability distribution function p (x)k,Rk|z1:k) I.e. variational bayes algorithm:
p(xk,Rk|z1:k)≈q(xk)q(Rk)
wherein q (-) is an approximate posterior probability density function of p (-); the optimal solution of the expression can be obtained by minimizing the Probability Density Function (PDF) p (x)k,Rk|z1:k) And approximate posterior PDF q (x)k)q(Rk) The Kullback-Leibler divergence between the two parts; q (x)k)q(Rk) Updating to a Gaussian distribution and an inverse Wishart distribution:
Figure FDA0003539528280000072
the above equation requires fixed point iterative solution, q(i+1)(Rk) Can be updated as:
Figure FDA0003539528280000073
in the formula, the factor of freedom
Figure FDA0003539528280000074
And inverse scale matrix
Figure FDA0003539528280000075
Can be expressed as:
Figure FDA0003539528280000076
Figure FDA0003539528280000081
wherein,
Figure FDA0003539528280000082
can be expressed as:
Figure FDA0003539528280000083
expectation of
Figure FDA0003539528280000084
Expressed as:
Figure FDA0003539528280000085
q(i+1)(xk) The updating is as follows:
Figure FDA0003539528280000086
wherein the mean value is obtainable by standard Kalman filtering
Figure FDA0003539528280000087
Sum covariance matrix
Figure FDA0003539528280000088
Figure FDA0003539528280000089
Figure FDA00035395282800000810
Figure FDA00035395282800000811
The VBKF is simply deduced, and more obvious characteristic information is obtained through the VBKF;
step 2.4 shows the application situation when part of DVL beam is missing, the specific steps are as follows:
based on the assumption that DVL beams have the following characteristics:
Figure FDA00035395282800000812
at the moment, it is required to meet the condition that the AUV has no vertical speed, and when the fluctuation amplitude of the AUV along with the ocean current is too large, the formula does not hold; the present invention has the following constraints for the application when a portion of the DVL beam is missing:
1) three beams are active: at the moment, complete pseudo-beam information can still be obtained through the formula, and error prediction compensation can be performed through the method;
2) two orthogonal beams are active: at the moment, complete pseudo-beam information can still be obtained through the formula, and error prediction compensation can be performed through the method;
in addition, under three conditions of effectiveness of two parallel beams or effectiveness of only one beam and total failure, DVL information has a lot of defects, and different characteristic information can be selected at the moment; predicting failed DVL beams, the present invention is not applicable.
4. The improved PSO-ANFIS-assisted SINS/DVL tightly-combined navigation method according to claim 1, wherein in step 3, the sample data collected in step 2 is normalized, and the particle swarm optimization algorithm is used to process the sample data to realize parameter optimization of ANFIS model, thereby completing the training process of ANFIS model, specifically comprising the following steps:
step 3.1 standardizing the sample data: z-score normalization of the innovation; performing min-max standardization on the Mahalanobis distance and the measured noise covariance matrix to enable the result to fall into a [0,1] interval;
step 3.2 the specific ANFIS algorithm process is as follows:
for a simple TSK fuzzy system model: the mode of function combination or interaction is called a rule, and the rule comprises a pre-parameter and a post-parameter; in order to realize the learning process of the TSK fuzzy model, the TSK fuzzy model is generally converted into an adaptive neural network, and a membership function of the neural network, namely ANFIS, is obtained by training sample data; given the pre-parameters, the output of ANFIS can be expressed as a linear combination of post-parameters;
the ANFIS has five layers, which are as follows;
step 3.2.1 first layer, input membership function layer of variable:
each node i has an output function:
Figure FDA0003539528280000091
where in is an input, including x, y, z; miIs a fuzzy set comprising Ai,Bi,Ci
Figure FDA0003539528280000092
Is a membership function of the fuzzy set M, which represents the degree to which a given input in satisfies M;
there are many common membership functions including bell shape, gaussian shape, and triangle; in general, we choose μMAs generalized bell membership functions:
Figure FDA0003539528280000101
wherein, ai,bi,ciIs a parameter set, and the change of the parameter values can change the shape of a bell-shaped function, thereby obtaining different membership functions; the parameters are called as front-part parameters and can be adaptively adjusted in the learning process of the algorithm;
step 3.2.2 second layer, regular strength release layer:
each node i is responsible for multiplying the input signals:
Figure FDA0003539528280000102
wherein, ω isiIs the output of each node, representing the trustworthiness of the rule;
step 3.2.3 layer three, normalization process of all regular intensities:
the ith node calculates the ratio of the release strength of rule i to the sum of all the release strengths of the rules:
Figure FDA0003539528280000103
step 3.2.4, fourth layer, calculating fuzzy rule output:
each node i of this layer is an adaptive node whose output is:
Figure FDA0003539528280000104
wherein,
Figure FDA0003539528280000105
is the output of the third layer, according to the backward parameter mi,pi,qi,riComputing the output of the fuzzy rule by the membership function;
step 3.2.5 fifth layer, calculate the total output of the input signals:
Figure FDA0003539528280000111
as previously mentioned, the output of ANFIS can be expressed as a linear combination of backward parameters, the forward parameters having been given:
Figure FDA0003539528280000112
in the training process of the ANFIS, firstly, an initial fuzzy model is extracted through collected sample data, and then model parameters are optimized from Layer 1 to Layer 5; the node parameters of the first layer and the fourth layer are self-adaptive, and the node parameters of the second layer and the third layer are fixed;
the invention adopts PSO algorithm to optimize the front-part and back-part parameters of ANFIS model; from the first layer to the fourth layer, the back-piece parameters are calculated by least square estimation, the error between an iteration value and an expected value of training data is calculated, in the reverse transmission process, an error signal is transmitted back to the input layer from the output layer, and the front-piece parameters are adjusted through PSO; in the process of changing the parameters, the shape of the membership function is continuously modified so as to achieve the purpose of minimum output error in a set period;
step 3.3 the specific PSO parameter optimization algorithm process is as follows:
PSO is a random optimization algorithm, the solution of the problem is called particles, and the optimization result can be checked by simulating the individual cooperation and competition modes in the particle swarm;
for a population of N particles, there is an N-dimensional search space; in PSO, each particle is assigned a position vector xiAnd a velocity vector viThe corresponding objective function allows the particle to obtain fitness and from the previous position and the current position (x)i) Selecting the best position (p)best) (ii) a In addition, in a cluster, all particles have their global optimal position (g)best);
The updating mode of the velocity vector and the position vector of the ith particle is expressed as follows:
Figure FDA0003539528280000121
Figure FDA0003539528280000122
in the above-mentioned formula,
Figure FDA0003539528280000123
representing the velocity vector of particle i at the kth time in d-dimension;
Figure FDA0003539528280000124
A position vector representing a particle i at a kth time in d-dimension; omega represents an inertia weight; r is1And r2Represents a random number from 0 to 1; c. C1And c2As acceleration factor, i.e. cognition factor (c)1) And social coefficient (c)2) (ii) a The velocity vector equation mainly comprises three parts of cognition, society and inertia; wherein the inertial component is a memory of the previous direction of motion that caused the particle to fly through its path at time k; the cognitive component is a velocity component generated by moving the particles to a previous optimal position; the social component is an assessment of the performance of the particle relative to its neighbors and the entire population of particles; these three components define the trajectory of the particle throughout the search space;
and (3) optimizing the parameters of the ANFIS model by adopting a PSO algorithm according to the training data which is acquired in the step (2) and comprises the input data and the target output to obtain the trained ANFIS model.
5. The improved PSO-ANFIS-assisted SINS/DVL tight-coupled navigation method according to claim 1, wherein the step 4 of controlling the AUV to submerge comprises the following steps of predicting the absolute error of four beams of DVL by using the improved PSO-ANFIS algorithm:
step 4.1, inertial navigation resolving is carried out through initial information and IMU information;
step 4.2, calculating pseudo measurement information corresponding to the four-beam velocity of the DVL through inertial navigation resolving information according to the DVL updating frequency;
step 4.3, filtering the difference value of the solved pseudo measurement information and the DVL four-beam measurement value as an observed quantity through VBKF so as to obtain three kinds of characteristic information v consistent with the step 2k,λk
Figure FDA0003539528280000131
As input to the ANFIS model;
and 4.4, performing a standardization process consistent with the step 3 on the collected characteristic information, and performing error prediction on the DVL measurement information through the ANFIS model trained by the PSO in the step 3.
6. The improved PSO-ANFIS-assisted SINS/DVL tightly-integrated navigation method according to claim 1, wherein the step 5 of monitoring the characteristic variation of the error based on the ANFIS prediction result, compensating the actual measurement of DVL by the anomaly determination mechanism, and performing kalman filtering on the compensated DVL measurement and the pseudo-observation amount calculated by the SINS comprises the following steps:
step 5.1, analyzing a training sample by belonging to Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE) of prediction data, selecting 3 belonging to the group as a measurement abnormal threshold T of model prediction according to experience, and using the value as a state discrimination standard of model prediction output;
step 5.2, modeling the predicted value according to Bernoulli distribution:
Figure FDA0003539528280000132
and 5.3, compensating the DVL measured value according to the state discrimination standard:
Figure FDA0003539528280000133
wherein, γk0 indicates DVL measurement is normal; gamma rayk1 indicates abnormal DVL measurement, predicted by ANFIS
Figure FDA0003539528280000134
Compensation is carried out;
step 5.4 selecting the compensated DVL measurement value ZDVL,kAnd the difference between the corresponding pseudo-observation information calculated by the SINS is used as an observation value, and the SINS/DVL tight combination navigation under the complex environment is realized by the VBKF.
CN202210234293.4A 2022-03-09 2022-03-09 SINS/DVL (strapdown inertial navigation system/dynamic virtual local area network) tightly-combined navigation method based on improved PSO-ANFIS (PSO-ANFIS) assistance Active CN114459477B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210234293.4A CN114459477B (en) 2022-03-09 2022-03-09 SINS/DVL (strapdown inertial navigation system/dynamic virtual local area network) tightly-combined navigation method based on improved PSO-ANFIS (PSO-ANFIS) assistance

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210234293.4A CN114459477B (en) 2022-03-09 2022-03-09 SINS/DVL (strapdown inertial navigation system/dynamic virtual local area network) tightly-combined navigation method based on improved PSO-ANFIS (PSO-ANFIS) assistance

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN114459477A true CN114459477A (en) 2022-05-10
CN114459477B CN114459477B (en) 2024-03-19

Family

ID=81417022

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202210234293.4A Active CN114459477B (en) 2022-03-09 2022-03-09 SINS/DVL (strapdown inertial navigation system/dynamic virtual local area network) tightly-combined navigation method based on improved PSO-ANFIS (PSO-ANFIS) assistance

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN114459477B (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115855049A (en) * 2023-02-07 2023-03-28 河海大学 SINS/DVL navigation method based on particle swarm optimization robust filtering
CN116222582A (en) * 2023-05-10 2023-06-06 北京航空航天大学 Multi-physical-field self-adaptive combined navigation method based on variable decibel leaf-based inference

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20140018497A (en) * 2012-08-01 2014-02-13 한국전력공사 Prediction method of short-term wind speed and wind power and power supply line voltage prediction method therefore
CN109255726A (en) * 2018-09-07 2019-01-22 中国电建集团华东勘测设计研究院有限公司 A kind of ultra-short term wind power prediction method of Hybrid Intelligent Technology
CN109724599A (en) * 2019-03-12 2019-05-07 哈尔滨工程大学 A kind of Robust Kalman Filter SINS/DVL Combinated navigation method of anti-outlier

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20140018497A (en) * 2012-08-01 2014-02-13 한국전력공사 Prediction method of short-term wind speed and wind power and power supply line voltage prediction method therefore
CN109255726A (en) * 2018-09-07 2019-01-22 中国电建集团华东勘测设计研究院有限公司 A kind of ultra-short term wind power prediction method of Hybrid Intelligent Technology
CN109724599A (en) * 2019-03-12 2019-05-07 哈尔滨工程大学 A kind of Robust Kalman Filter SINS/DVL Combinated navigation method of anti-outlier

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
YIQING YAO: "DVL Aided SINS Coarse Alignment Solution With High Dynamics", ACCESS 2020, pages 169922 - 169929 *
徐健: "基于变分贝叶斯的DR/UTP组合导航滤波方法", 仪器仪表学报, no. 12, pages 2743 - 2748 *
赵俊波: "基于改进变分贝叶斯滤波的SINS/DVL/LBL 组合导航技术", 水下无人系统学报, vol. 29, no. 1, pages 54 - 59 *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115855049A (en) * 2023-02-07 2023-03-28 河海大学 SINS/DVL navigation method based on particle swarm optimization robust filtering
CN116222582A (en) * 2023-05-10 2023-06-06 北京航空航天大学 Multi-physical-field self-adaptive combined navigation method based on variable decibel leaf-based inference

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN114459477B (en) 2024-03-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN109781099B (en) Navigation method and system of self-adaptive UKF algorithm
CN114459477B (en) SINS/DVL (strapdown inertial navigation system/dynamic virtual local area network) tightly-combined navigation method based on improved PSO-ANFIS (PSO-ANFIS) assistance
Liu et al. A new coupled method of SINS/DVL integrated navigation based on improved dual adaptive factors
Loebis et al. Adaptive tuning of a Kalman filter via fuzzy logic for an intelligent AUV navigation system
CN111221018B (en) GNSS multi-source information fusion navigation method for inhibiting marine multipath
CN109724599A (en) A kind of Robust Kalman Filter SINS/DVL Combinated navigation method of anti-outlier
CN110954132B (en) GRNN-assisted self-adaptive Kalman filtering navigation fault identification method
Pan et al. A novel SINS/USBL tightly integrated navigation strategy based on improved ANFIS
CN106772524B (en) A kind of agricultural robot integrated navigation information fusion method based on order filtering
CN105180935A (en) Integrated navigation data fusion method suitable for weak signals of GNSS
CN108444481A (en) A kind of underwater hiding-machine paths planning method based on aid decision-making system
EP3333546A1 (en) Apparatus and method for data-based referenced navigation
Zhang et al. A novel and robust calibration method for the underwater transponder position
Peng et al. Marginalized Point Mass Filter with Estimating Tidal Depth Bias for Underwater Terrain‐Aided Navigation
Xu et al. A novel ANFIS-AQPSO-GA-Based online correction measurement method for cooperative localization
Ma et al. A robust fusion terrain-aided navigation method with a single Beam Echo Sounder
Cohen et al. A-KIT: Adaptive Kalman-informed transformer
Zhang et al. An outlier-robust Rao–Blackwellized particle filter for underwater terrain-aided navigation
Liu et al. Navigation algorithm based on PSO-BP UKF of autonomous underwater vehicle
Konakoğlu et al. A Study on 2D similarity transformation using multilayer perceptron neural networks and a performance comparison with conventional and robust outlier detection methods.
Zhou et al. Neural Network-Based Method for Orbit Uncertainty Propagation and Estimation
CN113703025B (en) GNSS (Global navigation satellite System) multiple failure state-oriented intelligent vehicle positioning error prediction method
Song et al. Cooperative mid-depth navigation aided by ocean current prediction
Chai et al. Terrain-aided navigation of long-range AUV based on cubature particle filter
Zhao et al. Gravity matching algorithm based on correlation filter

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant