CN114434450A - Flexible joint jitter suppression method and system based on track optimization control - Google Patents

Flexible joint jitter suppression method and system based on track optimization control Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN114434450A
CN114434450A CN202210364782.1A CN202210364782A CN114434450A CN 114434450 A CN114434450 A CN 114434450A CN 202210364782 A CN202210364782 A CN 202210364782A CN 114434450 A CN114434450 A CN 114434450A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
track
flexible joint
boundary condition
robot
transformation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN202210364782.1A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN114434450B (en
Inventor
甘中学
黄尧
谢云斌
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Zhichang Technology Group Co ltd
Original Assignee
Zhichang Technology Group Co ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Zhichang Technology Group Co ltd filed Critical Zhichang Technology Group Co ltd
Priority to CN202210364782.1A priority Critical patent/CN114434450B/en
Publication of CN114434450A publication Critical patent/CN114434450A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN114434450B publication Critical patent/CN114434450B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B25HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
    • B25JMANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
    • B25J9/00Programme-controlled manipulators
    • B25J9/16Programme controls
    • B25J9/1656Programme controls characterised by programming, planning systems for manipulators
    • B25J9/1664Programme controls characterised by programming, planning systems for manipulators characterised by motion, path, trajectory planning
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B25HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
    • B25JMANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
    • B25J9/00Programme-controlled manipulators
    • B25J9/16Programme controls
    • B25J9/1612Programme controls characterised by the hand, wrist, grip control
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B25HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
    • B25JMANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
    • B25J9/00Programme-controlled manipulators
    • B25J9/16Programme controls
    • B25J9/1628Programme controls characterised by the control loop
    • B25J9/163Programme controls characterised by the control loop learning, adaptive, model based, rule based expert control
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B25HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
    • B25JMANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
    • B25J9/00Programme-controlled manipulators
    • B25J9/16Programme controls
    • B25J9/1656Programme controls characterised by programming, planning systems for manipulators
    • B25J9/1661Programme controls characterised by programming, planning systems for manipulators characterised by task planning, object-oriented languages

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Robotics (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Orthopedic Medicine & Surgery (AREA)
  • Manipulator (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of flexible joint jitter suppression, and discloses a flexible joint jitter suppression method and system based on track optimization control, wherein the track optimization-based jitter suppression method provided by the invention belongs to the field of active control; the method is a limited Laplace track optimization method for carrying out track design based on key track information and a flexible joint model, wherein the key track information is the starting position, the target position and the running time from the starting position to the target position, and compared with the traditional input shaping, the method has no problem of running delay; the method carries out the limited Laplace track optimization method based on the initial position, the target position and the running time required by reaching the target position, can realize the optimization of acceleration, improves the residual shake of the flexible joint of the robot, and improves the running stability.

Description

Flexible joint jitter suppression method and system based on track optimization control
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of flexible joint jitter suppression, in particular to a method and a system for suppressing flexible joint jitter based on track optimization control.
Background
The flexibility of the robot is mainly divided into connecting rod flexibility and joint flexibility, and due to the existence of the flexibility, the robot can generate process jitter and residual jitter after stopping in the operation process, and for improving the control performance, the two flexible jitter suppression methods are mainly divided into an active suppression method and a passive suppression method. Because passive restraint optimizes the structure of design flexible robot through selecting various power consumption or energy storage materials for use to reach the purpose that reduces the shake, passive restraint is not considered at this application for the moment.
Currently, most commonly used input shaping methods of ZV and ZVD are adopted. The conventional trajectory shaping method causes a problem of running lag due to lag of the zv (zvd) shaper after processing the trajectory, the lag time depends on the number of pulses for convolution and the pulse application time, the lag is more serious when the number is larger, and the lag is more serious when the pulse application time interval is larger. However, in practical engineering applications, efficient production efficiency is essential, and therefore the plant operation lag caused by conventional input shapers is unacceptable.
The problem of serious tail end shaking is often caused by flexible joints of the serial robot, if each joint is flexible, serious tail end shaking and residual shaking after stopping can be caused by flexible accumulation, and the shaking problem is a method which needs to be solved urgently;
the traditional trajectory shaping method is easy to cause the phenomenon of delay of running time, and especially for point-to-point running, if delay exists in each section of trajectory, efficient operation cannot be realized finally.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention mainly provides a flexible joint jitter suppression method and system based on track optimization control.
In order to solve the technical problems, the invention adopts the following technical scheme:
the flexible joint shake suppression method based on the track optimization control comprises the following steps:
acquiring an original track and motion data of the robot flexible joint motion, extracting key track information based on the original track on a track motion coordinate system, and establishing a flexible joint model based on the motion data;
and obtaining the optimized track of the flexible joint of the robot by utilizing limited Laplace transformation based on the key track information and the flexible joint model.
Further, the obtaining of the optimized track of the flexible joint of the robot by using the limited Laplace transform based on the key track information and the flexible joint model includes:
calculating transformation constraint boundary conditions by combining limited Laplace transformation based on the key track information and the flexible joint model;
and optimizing the track of the flexible joint of the robot based on the transformation constraint boundary conditions.
Further, the acquiring an original track and motion data of the robot flexible joint motion, extracting key track information based on the original track on a track motion coordinate system, and establishing a flexible joint model based on the motion data includes:
acquiring an original track and motion data of the motion of a flexible joint of the robot;
constructing a track motion coordinate system, extracting the initial position, the target position and the running time of the flexible joint of the robot based on the spatial position of the original track distributed on the track motion coordinate system, and acquiring track boundary conditions based on the initial position, the target position and the running time;
and equivalently establishing the flexible joint model for the effect generated by the flexible joint based on the motion data.
Further, calculating transformation constraint boundary conditions based on the key track information and the flexible joint model by combining with finite Laplace transformation, wherein the method comprises the following steps:
decoupling the track boundary condition and the flexible joint model in a simultaneous mode to obtain a state equation under a modal coordinate system;
acquiring a Jordan standard form of the state equation and calculating an initial solution of the Jordan standard form;
and carrying out limited Laplace transformation on the initial solution to obtain a transformation constraint boundary condition.
Further, the trajectory optimization of the flexible joint of the robot based on the transformation constraint boundary conditions comprises:
determining a linear expression of an optimized track based on the transformation constraint boundary condition;
substituting the linear expression into the transformation constraint boundary condition to determine a linear state formula input by a system input curve;
acquiring a final track expression based on the linear state expression and the track boundary condition;
and acquiring an optimized track of the flexible joint of the robot based on the final track expression.
A flexible joint vibration suppression system based on track optimization control comprises:
the data acquisition module is used for acquiring an original track and motion data of the robot flexible joint motion, extracting key track information based on the original track on a track motion coordinate system, and establishing a flexible joint model based on the motion data;
and the track optimization module is used for acquiring the optimized track of the flexible joint of the robot by utilizing limited Laplace transformation based on the key track information and the flexible joint model.
Further, the trajectory optimization module includes:
the transformation constraint boundary condition calculation submodule is used for calculating a transformation constraint boundary condition by combining limited Laplace transformation based on the key track information and the flexible joint model;
and the track optimization submodule is used for optimizing the track of the flexible joint of the robot based on the transformation constraint boundary condition.
Further, the data acquisition module includes:
the data acquisition submodule is used for acquiring the original track and the motion data of the motion of the flexible joint of the robot;
the track boundary condition acquisition submodule is used for constructing a track motion coordinate system, extracting the initial position, the target position and the running time of the flexible joint of the robot based on the spatial position of the original track distributed on the track motion coordinate system, and acquiring a track boundary condition based on the initial position, the target position and the running time;
and the flexible joint model establishing submodule is used for equivalently establishing the flexible joint model for the effect generated by the flexible joint based on the motion data.
Further, the transformation constraint boundary condition calculation submodule includes:
the state equation calculation unit is used for decoupling the track boundary condition and the flexible joint model in a simultaneous mode to obtain a state equation under a modal coordinate system;
the initial solution calculation unit is used for acquiring a Jordan standard form of the state equation and calculating an initial solution of the Jordan standard form;
and the limited Laplace transformation unit is used for carrying out limited Laplace transformation on the initial solution to acquire a transformation constraint boundary condition.
Further, the trajectory optimization submodule includes:
the linear expression computing unit is used for determining a linear expression of the optimized track based on the transformation constraint boundary condition;
the linear state formula computing unit is used for substituting the linear expression into the linear state formula input by the transformation constraint boundary condition determination system input curve;
the final expression computing unit is used for acquiring a final track expression based on the linear state expression and the track boundary condition;
and the track optimization unit is used for acquiring the optimized track of the flexible joint of the robot based on the final track expression.
Has the beneficial effects that: the invention provides a track optimization-based jitter suppression method, which belongs to the field of active control; the method is a limited Laplace track optimization method for carrying out track design based on key track information and by combining a flexible joint model, wherein the key track information is the starting position, the target position and the running time from the starting position to the target position, and compared with the traditional input shaping, the method has no problem of running delay; the method carries out the limited Laplace track optimization method based on the initial position, the target position and the running time required by reaching the target position, can realize the optimization of acceleration, improves the residual shake of the flexible joint of the robot, and improves the running stability.
The invention redesigns the track on the basis of the original track, optimizes the acceleration based on the energy minimum theory, and breaks the problem of operation time delay caused by the traditional track shaping method by the re-optimized track, so that residual vibration and jitter are not generated when the device is operated to a target point and the same jitter is inhibited, and the operation efficiency of the device is improved.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for suppressing flexible joint jitter based on trajectory optimization control;
FIG. 2 is a flowchart of step S2;
FIG. 3 is a flowchart of step S1;
FIG. 4 is a flowchart of step S21;
FIG. 5 is a flowchart of step S22;
FIG. 6 is a block diagram of a flexible joint jitter suppression system based on trajectory optimization control;
FIG. 7 is a simplified model diagram of a flexible joint;
FIG. 8 is a comparison of four different traces;
FIG. 9 is a graphical representation of the actual position of the flexible joint tip;
fig. 10 is a current waveform diagram at the motor end for four different traces.
Detailed Description
The following describes the technical solutions of the method and system for suppressing flexible joint jitter based on trajectory optimization control according to the present invention in further detail with reference to the embodiments.
As shown in fig. 1, the method for suppressing flexible joint shake based on trajectory optimization control of this embodiment includes: S1-S2
S1, acquiring an original track and motion data of the robot flexible joint motion, extracting key track information based on the original track on a track motion coordinate system, and establishing a flexible joint model based on the motion data;
and S2, acquiring the optimized track of the flexible joint of the robot by using limited Laplace transformation based on the key track information and the flexible joint model.
Further, as shown in fig. 2, the step S2 of obtaining an optimized trajectory of a flexible joint of a robot by using a limited Laplace transformation based on the key trajectory information and the flexible joint model includes:
s21, calculating transformation constraint boundary conditions by combining limited Laplace transformation based on the key track information and the flexible joint model;
and S22, optimizing the track of the flexible joint of the robot based on the transformation constraint boundary conditions.
Further, as shown in fig. 3, the acquiring of the original trajectory and the motion data of the robot flexible joint motion in step S1, extracting key trajectory information based on the original trajectory on the trajectory motion coordinate system, and establishing a flexible joint model based on the motion data includes:
s11, acquiring the original track and motion data of the robot flexible joint motion;
s12, constructing a track motion coordinate system, extracting the initial position, the target position and the running time of the flexible joint of the robot based on the spatial position of the original track distributed on the track motion coordinate system, and acquiring track boundary conditions based on the initial position, the target position and the running time;
acquiring an original track, and extracting key track information from the original track; the final control is also reverted to controlling the motor, and thus equals to extracting the trajectory information from the motor side, such as the motor side start position
Figure 792834DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
Motor end target position
Figure 109546DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
Length of operation
Figure 972460DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
Wherein it is assumed that the initial position is 0, i.e.
Figure 164145DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
Upon acquisition of the target position
Figure 960062DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
And expected operation time length
Figure 713255DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
Later, if it is desired that the flexible joint not undergo residual wobble at the end of its movement
Figure 594623DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
The position of the motor end can be determined at any time
Figure 825884DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
Position of end of output end
Figure 476308DEST_PATH_IMAGE009
Are considered equal; i.e. assuming no reduction ratio
Figure 134823DEST_PATH_IMAGE010
And the speed of the starting time and the speed of the ending time of the two are both 0; t is a time variable. Namely, obtaining a trajectory boundary condition in the following formula (1):
Figure 503487DEST_PATH_IMAGE011
(1)
in the formula (1), the reaction mixture is,
Figure 771395DEST_PATH_IMAGE012
Figure 276326DEST_PATH_IMAGE013
is the position and speed of the motor terminal motor,
Figure 371321DEST_PATH_IMAGE014
Figure 227281DEST_PATH_IMAGE015
is the position and velocity of the output end.
And S13, equivalently establishing the flexible joint model according to the motion data and the effect generated by the flexible joint.
In order to derive the flexible joint dynamics model, the following assumptions are further made:
1) in a dynamic model, the effect generated by the flexibility of the flexible joint is equivalent to a linear spring, and the elastic coefficient of the linear spring represents the stiffness coefficient of the flexible joint;
2) the motor rotor is regarded as a whole integrated on the rotating shaft, and the motor rotor cannot bring additional influence on the rotation of the motor when rotating;
3) the electrical dynamics of the flexible joint are faster than the mechanical dynamics, so that the influence of the motor dynamics can be neglected in the flexible joint modeling.
This is a typical spring-mass system with a flexural mode, and the flexural joint model can be described as shown in equation (2):
Figure 800345DEST_PATH_IMAGE016
(2)
wherein, the first and the second end of the pipe are connected with each other,
Figure 425362DEST_PATH_IMAGE017
and
Figure 691258DEST_PATH_IMAGE018
respectively a motor driving moment and a motor rotation angle,
Figure 267470DEST_PATH_IMAGE018
i.e. the position of the motor end, the two are identical.
Figure 644225DEST_PATH_IMAGE019
Is the equivalent moment of the flexible element,
Figure 858169DEST_PATH_IMAGE020
and
Figure 294966DEST_PATH_IMAGE021
the turning angles of the moment applied to the load end of the flexible connecting rod and the actual load end are respectively;
Figure 859940DEST_PATH_IMAGE022
and
Figure 774806DEST_PATH_IMAGE023
respectively the equivalent stiffness coefficient and the equal damping coefficient of the flexible connecting rod;
Figure 374415DEST_PATH_IMAGE024
is the inertia of the motor and is,
Figure 247693DEST_PATH_IMAGE025
is the output end equivalent inertia;
Figure 798498DEST_PATH_IMAGE026
defined as the motor end speed
Figure 782634DEST_PATH_IMAGE027
Figure 971170DEST_PATH_IMAGE028
Is defined as the output rotation speed
Figure 749770DEST_PATH_IMAGE029
Figure 289336DEST_PATH_IMAGE030
Is an angular acceleration at the motor end,
Figure 811584DEST_PATH_IMAGE031
is the angular acceleration of the output.
Further, as shown in fig. 4, in step S21, the calculating a transformation constraint boundary condition based on the key trajectory information and the flexible joint model and combined with a finite Laplace transformation includes:
s211, decoupling the track boundary condition and the flexible joint model in a simultaneous mode to obtain a state equation under a modal coordinate system;
the track boundary condition formula (1) and the flexible joint model formula (2) are combined to obtain the relation between the input and state variables of the flexible joint and the boundary condition; further decoupling and carrying out equivalent transformation to obtain a state equation under a modal coordinate system:
Figure 854627DEST_PATH_IMAGE032
(3)
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure 302663DEST_PATH_IMAGE033
state variables in the modal coordinate system
Figure 63946DEST_PATH_IMAGE034
Represents the position of the rigid body and represents the position of the rigid body,
Figure 389885DEST_PATH_IMAGE035
which represents the amount of elastic deformation,
Figure 553013DEST_PATH_IMAGE036
is the equivalent mass of the motor end,
Figure 673416DEST_PATH_IMAGE037
is the equivalent mass at the output end of the mass,
Figure 187574DEST_PATH_IMAGE038
is the equivalent mass of the flexible body mode of the system.
Wherein the boundary condition change after decoupling is as shown in equation (4):
Figure 51625DEST_PATH_IMAGE039
(4)
from the formula (4), it is shown that at the end of the operation, the position of the flexible joint is operated to
Figure 69259DEST_PATH_IMAGE040
However, the elastic deformation of the flexibility is 0, and the kinetic energy and the potential energy of the flexibility and the elastic deformation are both 0, namely the kinetic energy and the elastic potential energy are 0.
S212, acquiring a Jordan standard form of the state equation, and calculating an initial solution of the Jordan standard form;
wherein, the Jordan standard type of the state equation is shown as the formula (5):
Figure 124678DEST_PATH_IMAGE041
(5)
is recorded as:
Figure 594973DEST_PATH_IMAGE042
input of
Figure 997136DEST_PATH_IMAGE043
In the above formula (5)
Figure 134856DEST_PATH_IMAGE044
And
Figure 128220DEST_PATH_IMAGE045
is the root of the characteristic equation of the flexible joint model, i.e. a pair of conjugate poles of the system. Variable of state
Figure 820232DEST_PATH_IMAGE046
Figure 557244DEST_PATH_IMAGE047
Figure 549471DEST_PATH_IMAGE048
Figure 681113DEST_PATH_IMAGE049
Redefined separately
Figure 126000DEST_PATH_IMAGE050
. And the initial solution of equation (5) when the system initial condition is 0 can be obtained as equation (6), that is, the solution of the Jordan standard equation:
Figure 135545DEST_PATH_IMAGE051
(6)
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure 982278DEST_PATH_IMAGE052
in order to have a long time period of operation,
Figure 51865DEST_PATH_IMAGE053
and S213, performing limited Laplace transformation on the initial solution to obtain a transformation constraint boundary condition.
Wherein, considering the integration time variable t as s, that is, s is a complex frequency domain, the part in parentheses of the initial solution formula (6) can be defined as Laplace transform formula (7) of the finite time variable:
Figure 984049DEST_PATH_IMAGE054
(7)
wherein, define
Figure 797284DEST_PATH_IMAGE055
Is to input
Figure 764103DEST_PATH_IMAGE056
In that
Figure 249267DEST_PATH_IMAGE057
A limited Laplace transform between the two,
Figure 934326DEST_PATH_IMAGE058
is the term that results after the solution.
Further, solving to obtain a transformation constraint boundary condition of the system flexible joint input limited Laplace transformation as shown in the formula (8): the solving method is to carry out mathematical derivation by the left and right side equivalence principle of the formula (6).
Figure 285673DEST_PATH_IMAGE059
(8)
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure 106998DEST_PATH_IMAGE060
Figure 518388DEST_PATH_IMAGE061
Figure 425164DEST_PATH_IMAGE062
Figure 845781DEST_PATH_IMAGE063
further, as shown in fig. 5, the performing of the trajectory optimization of the flexible joint of the robot based on the transformation constraint boundary conditions in step S22 includes:
s221, determining a linear expression of the optimized track based on the transformation constraint boundary condition;
the method comprises the following steps of (1) determining flexible joint input, namely a linear expression of an optimized track, based on a transformation constraint boundary condition of an equation (8), and adopting an independent basic linear function to form the flexible joint input, wherein the equation (9) is as follows:
Figure 521613DEST_PATH_IMAGE064
(9)
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure 369483DEST_PATH_IMAGE065
in order to constitute a substantially linear function,
Figure 262091DEST_PATH_IMAGE066
in order to be a function coefficient of the image,
Figure 955240DEST_PATH_IMAGE067
the number of basic linear functions forming the input of the system is related to the number of flexible body modes of the system.
S222, substituting the linear expression into the transformation constraint boundary condition to determine a linear state formula input by a system input curve;
wherein, substituting formula (9) into (8) yields:
Figure 16737DEST_PATH_IMAGE069
(10)
wherein, the characteristic equation root
Figure 769930DEST_PATH_IMAGE070
And
Figure 651298DEST_PATH_IMAGE045
consistent with the foregoing;
Figure 148138DEST_PATH_IMAGE071
Figure 64142DEST_PATH_IMAGE072
etc. are linear basis functions.
The result obtained after the final linearization is shown in formula (11):
Figure 988235DEST_PATH_IMAGE074
(11)
wherein coefficients corresponding thereto are determined by means of a substantially linear function
Figure 622479DEST_PATH_IMAGE075
Form an input function
Figure 657431DEST_PATH_IMAGE076
S223, acquiring a final track expression based on the linear state expression and the track boundary condition;
after the basic linear functions forming the input curve of the system are determined in the linear state mode, the coefficient of each basic linear function can be uniquely determined through the formula (1), and therefore the goal position can be achieved
Figure 427941DEST_PATH_IMAGE077
The target movement time is
Figure 21471DEST_PATH_IMAGE078
The final trajectory expression of the optimized trajectory of the zero residual vibration motion is shown as the formula (12):
Figure 877432DEST_PATH_IMAGE079
(12)
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure 716075DEST_PATH_IMAGE080
Figure 341091DEST_PATH_IMAGE081
the first and last two items in (1) are not modifiable, intermediate
Figure 872567DEST_PATH_IMAGE082
Can follow the coefficient
Figure 215823DEST_PATH_IMAGE083
Is increased correspondingly.
Figure 592578DEST_PATH_IMAGE084
Is a function of time t and is also a function of the trajectory after final optimization.
And S224, acquiring an optimized track of the flexible joint of the robot based on the final track expression.
And (3) experimental verification:
four different trajectories are given below, namely a ramp trajectory, a cubic polynomial trajectory, an S-shaped trajectory, and a Laplace optimization trajectory, as shown in fig. 8. As can be seen from the figure, the Laplace optimized track is relatively gentle at the starting time and the stopping time, and indirectly proves that the Laplace carries out re-optimization on the acceleration of the track.
And respectively comparing the position response waveforms of the tail end of the mechanical arm under the four tracks. The obtained result is shown in fig. 9, and it can be seen from the figure that the jitter amplitude of the output end of the flexible joint of the motor under the Laplace track is minimum, and the problem of running time lag does not exist.
The size of the residual jitter after the motor terminal is operated to the target position can also be represented by the current waveform of the motor terminal, as shown in fig. 10, at the starting time, although the jitter of the cubic polynomial locus is minimum, at the time of reaching the target position, the current fluctuation under the Laplace locus is minimum, and the Laplace locus has an obvious suppression effect on the residual jitter.
As an embodiment to which the present application is applied, a home position
Figure 337680DEST_PATH_IMAGE085
Is 0, target position
Figure 774478DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
1050 degrees, run length
Figure 605030DEST_PATH_IMAGE086
Is 0.6ms, and the track boundary condition has the formula (1) of
Figure 284011DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
Time =0.6 ms:
Figure 149199DEST_PATH_IMAGE087
and is
Figure 756898DEST_PATH_IMAGE088
And the flexible joint model is established in a SIMULINK simulation environment by means of an SIMMECHANICS tool box, and the motor driving torque, the flexible element equivalent torque, the flexible connecting rod load torque, the flexible connecting rod equivalent stiffness coefficient, the equal damping coefficient and the motor inertia are all obtained by means of SIMMECHANICS tool kit simulation. Using run time
Figure 543588DEST_PATH_IMAGE089
And position
Figure 527725DEST_PATH_IMAGE090
The final optimized trajectory represented is expressed as:
Figure 981840DEST_PATH_IMAGE091
after the track optimization is carried out by the flexible joint jitter suppression method, after the operation time length is 0.6ms along the optimized track, the jitter amplitude value of the track relative to the target position does not exceed +/-0.5 degrees, is reduced by 87.5 percent relative to the jitter amplitude value (+/-4 degrees) of the original slope track, is reduced by 83.3 percent relative to the jitter amplitude value (+/-3 degrees) of the existing cubic polynomial track, and is reduced by 68.2 percent relative to the jitter amplitude value (+/-1 degree) of the existing S-shaped track.
As shown in fig. 6, the flexible joint shake suppression system based on trajectory optimization control according to the present embodiment includes:
the data acquisition module 61 is used for acquiring an original track and motion data of the robot flexible joint motion, extracting key track information based on the original track on a track motion coordinate system, and establishing a flexible joint model based on the motion data;
and a track optimization module 62, configured to obtain an optimized track of the flexible joint of the robot by using a limited Laplace transform based on the key track information and the flexible joint model.
Further, the trajectory optimization module 62 includes:
the transformation constraint boundary condition calculation submodule 621 is used for calculating a transformation constraint boundary condition by combining limited Laplace transformation based on the key track information and the flexible joint model;
and the track optimization submodule 622 is used for optimizing the track of the flexible joint of the robot based on the transformation constraint boundary conditions.
Further, the data acquisition module 61 includes:
the data acquisition sub-module 611 is used for acquiring the original track and the motion data of the motion of the flexible joint of the robot;
the trajectory boundary condition obtaining submodule 612 is configured to construct a trajectory motion coordinate system, extract an initial position, a target position, and an operation time of a flexible joint of the robot based on a spatial position of the original trajectory distributed on the trajectory motion coordinate system, and obtain a trajectory boundary condition based on the initial position, the target position, and the operation time;
and a flexible joint model establishing submodule 613, configured to equivalently establish the flexible joint model according to the motion data and an effect generated by the flexible joint.
Further, the transformation constraint boundary condition calculation sub-module 621 includes:
the state equation calculation unit 6211 is configured to combine the trajectory boundary condition and the flexible joint model for decoupling, and obtain a state equation in a modal coordinate system;
an initial solution calculation unit 6212 configured to obtain a Jordan standard form of the state equation and calculate an initial solution of the Jordan standard form;
and a limited Laplace transformation unit 6213, configured to perform limited Laplace transformation on the initial solution to obtain a transformation constraint boundary condition.
Further, the trajectory optimization submodule 622 includes:
a linear expression calculation unit 6221, configured to determine a linear expression of the optimized trajectory based on the transformation constraint boundary condition;
a linear state formula calculating unit 6222, configured to bring the linear expression into the linear state formula input by the transformation constraint boundary condition determination system;
a final expression calculation unit 6223, configured to obtain a final trajectory expression based on the linear state expression and the trajectory boundary condition;
a trajectory optimization unit 6224, configured to obtain an optimized trajectory of the flexible joint of the robot based on the final trajectory expression.
Although embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes, modifications, substitutions and alterations can be made in these embodiments without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined in the appended claims and their equivalents.

Claims (10)

1. The flexible joint shake suppression method based on track optimization control is characterized by comprising the following steps:
acquiring an original track and motion data of the robot flexible joint motion, extracting key track information based on the original track on a track motion coordinate system, and establishing a flexible joint model based on the motion data;
and obtaining the optimized track of the flexible joint of the robot by utilizing limited Laplace transformation based on the key track information and the flexible joint model.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the obtaining an optimized trajectory of a flexible joint of a robot based on the key trajectory information and a flexible joint model using a limited Laplace transform comprises:
calculating transformation constraint boundary conditions by combining limited Laplace transformation based on the key track information and the flexible joint model;
and optimizing the track of the flexible joint of the robot based on the transformation constraint boundary conditions.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the obtaining of the original track and the motion data of the robot flexible joint motion, extracting key track information based on the original track on a track motion coordinate system, and establishing a flexible joint model based on the motion data comprises:
acquiring an original track and motion data of the motion of a flexible joint of the robot;
constructing a track motion coordinate system, extracting the initial position, the target position and the running time of the flexible joint of the robot based on the spatial position of the original track distributed on the track motion coordinate system, and acquiring track boundary conditions based on the initial position, the target position and the running time;
and equivalently establishing the flexible joint model for the effect generated by the flexible joint based on the motion data.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein computing transformation constraint boundary conditions in combination with a finite Laplace transform based on the key trajectory information and a flexible joint model comprises:
decoupling the track boundary condition and the flexible joint model in a simultaneous mode to obtain a state equation under a modal coordinate system;
acquiring a Jordan standard form of the state equation and calculating an initial solution of the Jordan standard form;
and carrying out limited Laplace transformation on the initial solution to obtain a transformation constraint boundary condition.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the trajectory optimization of the flexible joints of the robot based on the transformation constraint boundary conditions comprises:
determining a linear expression of an optimized track based on the transformation constraint boundary condition;
substituting the linear expression into the transformation constraint boundary condition to determine a linear state formula input by a system input curve;
acquiring a final track expression based on the linear state expression and the track boundary condition;
and acquiring the optimized track of the flexible joint of the robot based on the final track expression.
6. A flexible joint vibration suppression system based on track optimization control is characterized by comprising:
the data acquisition module is used for acquiring an original track and motion data of the robot flexible joint motion, extracting key track information based on the original track on a track motion coordinate system, and establishing a flexible joint model based on the motion data;
and the track optimization module is used for acquiring the optimized track of the flexible joint of the robot by utilizing limited Laplace transformation based on the key track information and the flexible joint model.
7. The system of claim 6, wherein the trajectory optimization module comprises:
the transformation constraint boundary condition calculation submodule is used for calculating a transformation constraint boundary condition by combining limited Laplace transformation based on the key track information and the flexible joint model;
and the track optimization submodule is used for optimizing the track of the flexible joint of the robot based on the transformation constraint boundary condition.
8. The system of claim 7, wherein the data acquisition module comprises:
the data acquisition submodule is used for acquiring the original track and the motion data of the motion of the flexible joint of the robot;
the track boundary condition acquisition submodule is used for constructing a track motion coordinate system, extracting the initial position, the target position and the running time of the flexible joint of the robot based on the spatial position of the original track distributed on the track motion coordinate system, and acquiring a track boundary condition based on the initial position, the target position and the running time;
and the flexible joint model establishing submodule is used for equivalently establishing the flexible joint model for the effect generated by the flexible joint based on the motion data.
9. The system of claim 8, wherein the transformation constraint boundary condition computation submodule comprises:
the state equation calculation unit is used for decoupling the track boundary condition and the flexible joint model in a simultaneous mode to obtain a state equation under a modal coordinate system;
the initial solution calculation unit is used for acquiring a Jordan standard form of the state equation and calculating an initial solution of the Jordan standard form;
and the limited Laplace transformation unit is used for carrying out limited Laplace transformation on the initial solution to obtain a transformation constraint boundary condition.
10. The system of claim 9, wherein the trajectory optimization submodule comprises:
the linear expression computing unit is used for determining a linear expression of the optimized track based on the transformation constraint boundary condition;
the linear state formula computing unit is used for substituting the linear expression into the linear state formula input by the transformation constraint boundary condition determination system input curve;
the final expression computing unit is used for acquiring a final track expression based on the linear state expression and the track boundary condition;
and the track optimization unit is used for acquiring the optimized track of the flexible joint of the robot based on the final track expression.
CN202210364782.1A 2022-04-08 2022-04-08 Flexible joint jitter suppression method and system based on track optimization control Active CN114434450B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210364782.1A CN114434450B (en) 2022-04-08 2022-04-08 Flexible joint jitter suppression method and system based on track optimization control

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210364782.1A CN114434450B (en) 2022-04-08 2022-04-08 Flexible joint jitter suppression method and system based on track optimization control

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN114434450A true CN114434450A (en) 2022-05-06
CN114434450B CN114434450B (en) 2022-07-26

Family

ID=81360304

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202210364782.1A Active CN114434450B (en) 2022-04-08 2022-04-08 Flexible joint jitter suppression method and system based on track optimization control

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN114434450B (en)

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101943912A (en) * 2010-09-02 2011-01-12 北京理工大学 Control method for eliminating upper body posture shaking of double-foot humanoid robot
CN104589359A (en) * 2014-12-25 2015-05-06 中国矿业大学 Method for controlling vibration of flexible manipulator based on vibration observer
US20160144508A1 (en) * 2014-11-21 2016-05-26 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Control device for motor drive device, control device for multi-axial motor, and control method for motor drive device
CN108638056A (en) * 2018-04-13 2018-10-12 华南理工大学 Joint of robot vibration analysis based on kinetics of deformable bodies model and suppressing method
CN110103220A (en) * 2019-05-20 2019-08-09 华南理工大学 Robot high-speed, high precision motion trail planning method, device, equipment and medium
CN111531548A (en) * 2020-06-12 2020-08-14 安徽工程大学 Active-disturbance-rejection control method of multi-shaft series mechanical arm
CN112405536A (en) * 2020-11-10 2021-02-26 东南大学 High-precision constant force control method combining offline compensation and online tracking hybrid strategy
WO2021136566A1 (en) * 2019-12-29 2021-07-08 Universal Robots A/S Method of suppressing vibrations of a robot arm with external objects
CN113282115A (en) * 2021-05-31 2021-08-20 华中科技大学 Phase-shift generalized integral extended state observer, vibration suppression method and system

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101943912A (en) * 2010-09-02 2011-01-12 北京理工大学 Control method for eliminating upper body posture shaking of double-foot humanoid robot
US20160144508A1 (en) * 2014-11-21 2016-05-26 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Control device for motor drive device, control device for multi-axial motor, and control method for motor drive device
CN104589359A (en) * 2014-12-25 2015-05-06 中国矿业大学 Method for controlling vibration of flexible manipulator based on vibration observer
CN108638056A (en) * 2018-04-13 2018-10-12 华南理工大学 Joint of robot vibration analysis based on kinetics of deformable bodies model and suppressing method
CN110103220A (en) * 2019-05-20 2019-08-09 华南理工大学 Robot high-speed, high precision motion trail planning method, device, equipment and medium
WO2021136566A1 (en) * 2019-12-29 2021-07-08 Universal Robots A/S Method of suppressing vibrations of a robot arm with external objects
CN111531548A (en) * 2020-06-12 2020-08-14 安徽工程大学 Active-disturbance-rejection control method of multi-shaft series mechanical arm
CN112405536A (en) * 2020-11-10 2021-02-26 东南大学 High-precision constant force control method combining offline compensation and online tracking hybrid strategy
CN113282115A (en) * 2021-05-31 2021-08-20 华中科技大学 Phase-shift generalized integral extended state observer, vibration suppression method and system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN114434450B (en) 2022-07-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN109623810B (en) Method for planning smooth time optimal trajectory of robot
CN110799309B (en) Vibration control of a system with configuration dependent dynamics
CN109799701B (en) Industrial robot vibration suppression method
KR930005775B1 (en) Shaping command input to minimize unwanted dynamics
CN113681543B (en) Mechanical arm zero-force control method based on model prediction
CN112338912B (en) Finite time stability control method and system for flexible single-chain mechanical arm
CN106873383B (en) Online control method for reducing vibration of industrial robot
CN102301582A (en) Valve control device
CN113043251B (en) Robot teaching reproduction track learning method
CN110977969B (en) Resonance suppression method of flexible load servo drive system based on pose change of mechanical arm
CN115202216A (en) Anti-interference finite time control method of mechanical arm considering input constraint
CN114434450B (en) Flexible joint jitter suppression method and system based on track optimization control
Van Oosterwyck et al. CAD based trajectory optimization of PTP motions using chebyshev polynomials
US11474484B2 (en) Method for training virtual animal to move based on control parameter
CN107544247B (en) Method and system for inhibiting vibration of mechanical motion structure
Ma et al. Backlash vibration suppression control of torsional system by novel fractional order PIDk controller
CN110774286B (en) Control method of five-degree-of-freedom manipulator based on rigid-flexible coupling dynamics
CN108809181A (en) The vibration suppressing method of flexible load is driven based on the anti-permasyn morot for pushing away control
JP2016032326A (en) Motor controller, robot device, motor control method, program, and recording medium
Kim et al. A learning approach to precision speed control of servomotors and its application to a VCR
JP6960112B1 (en) Command generator, command generation method
Fung et al. Dynamic analysis and vibration control of a flexible slider–crank mechanism using PM synchronous servo motor drive
Arolovich et al. Control improvement of under-damped systems and structures by input shaping
CN113021334B (en) Robot control method with optimal energy
JPH08328627A (en) Servo controller, servo controlling method, robot controller using these and robot controlling method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant