CN114330896A - Teaching characteristic optimization method - Google Patents

Teaching characteristic optimization method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN114330896A
CN114330896A CN202111658968.XA CN202111658968A CN114330896A CN 114330896 A CN114330896 A CN 114330896A CN 202111658968 A CN202111658968 A CN 202111658968A CN 114330896 A CN114330896 A CN 114330896A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
information
data
teaching
optimization
determining
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202111658968.XA
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
田雪松
陈天
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Beijing Biyun Shuchuang Technology Co ltd
Original Assignee
Beijing Biyun Shuchuang Technology Co ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Beijing Biyun Shuchuang Technology Co ltd filed Critical Beijing Biyun Shuchuang Technology Co ltd
Priority to CN202111658968.XA priority Critical patent/CN114330896A/en
Publication of CN114330896A publication Critical patent/CN114330896A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a teaching characteristic optimization method, which comprises the following steps: obtaining an optimization request; acquiring evaluation information and actual record information according to the optimization request; acquiring standard interval information according to the real recording item ID, and determining real recording interval information corresponding to the real recording data according to the standard interval information and the real recording data; acquiring corresponding characteristic information according to the real record item ID, and determining real record grading data corresponding to the characteristic information according to the real record interval information; comparing the scoring data with the actual record scoring data, and determining first teaching characteristic information according to a comparison result; and analyzing and processing according to the grading data, the actual record grading data and the first teaching characteristic information to determine first optimization information. The teaching characteristic optimization method of the invention contrasts and analyzes the teaching characteristics obtained from different angle evaluations to obtain the teaching optimization scheme aiming at different objects, thereby improving the teaching mode and improving the teaching quality.

Description

Teaching characteristic optimization method
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of information, in particular to a teaching characteristic optimization method.
Background
The efficient and scientific teaching evaluation is beneficial to smoothly realizing the classroom teaching target, feeds back the most real teaching information to the teacher, and timely makes corresponding adjustment on the teaching mode, thereby improving the overall classroom teaching level.
The current teaching evaluation mainly comes from education departments and school leader, and the two most important roles in teaching are neglected, so that teachers and students are difficult to truly and comprehensively measure the teaching effect under the influence of the single classroom teaching evaluation and the teaching effect is improved.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a teaching characteristic optimization method aiming at the defects of the prior art, which is used for carrying out comparative analysis on teaching characteristics obtained from different angle evaluations to obtain teaching optimization schemes aiming at different objects, thereby improving the teaching mode and improving the teaching quality.
In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides a teaching feature optimization method, including:
obtaining an optimization request; the optimization request includes: a class ID;
acquiring evaluation information and actual record information according to the optimization request; the evaluation information comprises: class ID, feature information and rating data; the record information includes: the class ID, the real recording item ID and the real recording data;
acquiring standard interval information according to the real recording item ID, and determining real recording interval information corresponding to real recording data according to the standard interval information and the real recording data;
acquiring corresponding characteristic information according to the recording project ID, and determining recording grading data corresponding to the characteristic information according to the recording interval information;
comparing the scoring data with the actual record scoring data, and determining first teaching characteristic information according to a comparison result;
and analyzing and processing according to the grading data, the actual record grading data and the first teaching characteristic information to determine first optimization information.
Preferably, questionnaire information is acquired according to the optimization request; the questionnaire information includes: class ID, user ID, questionnaire item ID and option ID;
acquiring corresponding characteristic information according to the questionnaire item ID, and determining questionnaire grading data corresponding to the characteristic information according to the option information;
comparing the questionnaire rating data with the record rating data, and determining second teaching characteristic information according to the comparison result;
and analyzing and processing according to the questionnaire rating data, the record rating data and the second teaching characteristic information, and determining second optimization information.
Further preferably, the scoring data and the questionnaire scoring data are compared, and third teaching characteristic information is determined according to a comparison result;
and analyzing and processing according to the grading data, the questionnaire grading data and the third teaching characteristic information to determine third optimization information.
Further preferably, the optimization report information is generated according to the first optimization information, the second optimization information and the third optimization information.
Preferably, the grading data of each class are compared according to the characteristic information, and the whole teaching condition information is determined according to the comparison result.
Preferably, after the obtaining of the evaluation information and the bibliographic information according to the optimization request, the teaching characteristic optimization method further includes:
determining an interval value according to the highest evaluation data and the lowest evaluation data, and generating chart information according to the interval value and the evaluation information.
The teaching characteristic optimization method provided by the embodiment of the invention carries out comparative analysis on the teaching characteristics obtained from different angle evaluations to obtain the teaching optimization scheme aiming at different objects, thereby improving the teaching mode and improving the teaching quality.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a teaching feature optimization method provided by an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of feature information provided in an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solution of the present invention is further described in detail by the accompanying drawings and embodiments.
The teaching characteristic optimization method provided by the invention carries out comparative analysis on the teaching characteristics obtained from different angle evaluations to obtain a teaching optimization scheme aiming at different objects, thereby improving the teaching mode and improving the teaching quality.
Example one
Fig. 1 is a flowchart of a teaching characteristic optimization method provided in an embodiment of the present invention, and the following detailed description is provided on a technical solution of the present invention with reference to fig. 1.
Step 101, obtaining an optimization request;
specifically, the optimization request includes: the class ID. In the embodiment of the present invention, the optimization request may include one class ID or may include a plurality of class IDs at the same time.
In a preferred embodiment, the optimization request further comprises: the user ID. It is determined whether the user has the right according to the user ID. Only if the user has the right, the next step can be taken. And when the user does not have the authority, generating the no-authority prompt information and outputting and displaying the no-authority prompt information.
Step 102, acquiring evaluation information and actual record information according to the optimization request;
specifically, the evaluation information includes: class ID, feature information, and rating data. The actual recording information comprises: a class ID, a real-record item ID, and real-record data. The evaluation information can be understood as evaluation comprehensive information according to evaluation objects in each class, and is used for indicating the teaching condition of the class. The feature information refers to information representing teaching effects of various angles, fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of the feature information provided in the embodiment of the present invention, and as shown in fig. 2, the feature information refers to understanding ability, experimental ability, knowledge application ability, and reasoning ability. Each feature information has a unique corresponding score data. The scoring data may be an average or median of the scoring data according to each object within the class. The actual recorded information refers to teaching data records actually in classroom teaching, such as: the teacher adopts a mode of concentrating the attention of the students, and the teacher adopts a mode of authority, pause, teaching strategy, individual reminding mode and the like.
In a preferred scheme, after the evaluation information and the actual record information are acquired according to the optimization request, an interval value is determined according to the highest evaluation data and the lowest evaluation data, and chart information is generated according to the interval value and the evaluation information. As shown in fig. 2, the highest score was 68.24, the lowest score was 49.78, and the interval was 5. The purpose of determining the interval value is mainly to make the generated chart more convenient to view, and the effect of presenting the chart information is influenced by too large or too small interval value.
Step 103, acquiring standard interval information according to the real recording item ID, and determining real recording interval information corresponding to the real recording data according to the standard interval information and the real recording data;
specifically, the standard section information includes a plurality of pieces of real recording section information, and the real recording section information is determined based on the standard section information in which the real recording data is located.
Step 104, acquiring corresponding characteristic information according to the real recording item ID, and determining real recording grading data corresponding to the characteristic information according to the real recording interval information;
specifically, each record item ID has corresponding characteristic information, and each record interval information has corresponding record score data.
In a preferred embodiment, each of the real recording item IDs corresponds to a plurality of pieces of feature information, but the ratio of different pieces of feature information corresponding to the same real recording item ID is different. And determining the record grading data of each characteristic information according to the score data and the proportion corresponding to the record interval information. And classifying, summarizing and summing the record grading data of the record project information according to the characteristic information to obtain the record grading data of the characteristic information.
Step 105, comparing the scoring data with the actual record scoring data, and determining first teaching characteristic information according to the comparison result;
specifically, when the score data is greater than or equal to the actual record score data, the actual teaching effect is superior to the actual teaching mode.
And when the score data is smaller than the actual record score data, the actual teaching effect is inferior to the actual teaching mode, and the corresponding characteristic information is determined to be the first teaching characteristic information.
And 106, analyzing and processing according to the grading data, the actual record grading data and the first teaching characteristic information, and determining first optimization information.
Specifically, a deviation value is calculated according to the scoring data and the actual record scoring data, corresponding reason information is determined according to the first teaching characteristic information, an analysis report is generated according to the deviation value and the reason information, all factors and influence degrees influencing the teaching effect are determined, and the improvement method is determined based on the factors and the influence degrees.
Example two
Step 201, obtaining questionnaire information according to an optimization request;
specifically, the questionnaire information includes: class ID, user ID, questionnaire item ID, and option ID. The user here refers to a teacher who performs the filling out of the questionnaire.
Step 202, acquiring corresponding characteristic information according to the questionnaire item ID, and determining questionnaire grading data corresponding to the characteristic information according to the option information;
specifically, each questionnaire item ID has a corresponding piece of characteristic information, and each item information has a corresponding piece of questionnaire rating data.
In a preferred embodiment, each questionnaire item ID corresponds to a plurality of pieces of feature information, but the proportion of different pieces of feature information corresponding to the same item information is different. And determining the questionnaire grading data of each characteristic information according to the score data and the percentage corresponding to the option information. And classifying, summarizing and summing the questionnaire rating data of each option information according to the characteristic information to obtain the questionnaire rating data of each characteristic information.
Step 203, comparing the questionnaire rating data with the record rating data, and determining second teaching characteristic information according to the comparison result;
specifically, when the questionnaire score data is greater than or equal to the actual record score data, it is indicated that the teacher has an ideal teaching mode and actually has access, the actual teaching mode does not conform to the plan, and the corresponding feature information is determined to be the second teaching feature information.
And when the questionnaire scoring data is smaller than the actual record scoring data, the ideal teaching mode of the teacher is consistent with the actual teaching mode.
And 204, analyzing and processing according to the questionnaire rating data, the record rating data and the second teaching characteristic information, and determining second optimization information.
Specifically, a deviation value is calculated according to questionnaire grading data and actual record grading data, corresponding reason information is determined according to the second teaching characteristic information, an analysis report is generated according to the deviation value and the reason information, a teacher mode and an influence degree influencing the teaching effect are determined, and an improvement method is determined based on the analysis report.
In a preferred scheme, the second optimization information is sent to the user terminal according to the user ID.
EXAMPLE III
Step 301, comparing the scoring data with the questionnaire scoring data, and determining third teaching characteristic information according to the comparison result;
specifically, when the score data is greater than or equal to the questionnaire score data, the actual teaching effect is superior to the effect of the ideal teaching mode of the teacher.
And when the grading data is smaller than the questionnaire grading data, the practical teaching effect is inferior to the ideal teaching effect of the teacher, and the corresponding characteristic information is determined to be second teaching characteristic information.
And step 302, analyzing and processing according to the scoring data, the questionnaire scoring data and the third teaching characteristic information, and determining third optimization information.
Specifically, a deviation value is calculated according to questionnaire grading data and grading data, corresponding reason information is determined according to the third teaching characteristic information, an analysis report is generated according to the deviation value and the reason information, a teacher mode and an influence degree influencing a teaching effect are determined, and an improvement method is determined based on the teacher mode and the influence degree.
In the preferred scheme, the reason is not accurately found only according to the ideal teaching effect and the actual teaching effect of the teacher, and on the basis of the second time, the scoring data and the actual scoring data are compared and analyzed again so as to stand for the reason influencing the teaching effect and optimize the reason.
In a preferred embodiment, the optimization report information is generated according to the first optimization information, the second optimization information and the third optimization information.
In another preferred scheme, the grading data of all classes are compared according to the characteristic information, and the overall teaching condition information is determined according to the comparison result. And summarizing comparison results of all characteristics of all classes, and judging the conditions of the classes and the differences among the classes according to the number of the comparison results.
The teaching characteristic optimization method of the invention contrasts and analyzes the teaching characteristics obtained from different angle evaluations to obtain the teaching optimization scheme aiming at different objects, thereby improving the teaching mode and improving the teaching quality.
Those of skill would further appreciate that the various illustrative components and algorithm steps described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both, and that the various illustrative components and steps have been described above generally in terms of their functionality in order to clearly illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the implementation. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present invention.
The steps of a method or algorithm described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be embodied in hardware, a software module executed by a processor, or a combination of the two. A software module may reside in Random Access Memory (RAM), memory, Read Only Memory (ROM), electrically programmable ROM, electrically erasable programmable ROM, registers, hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of storage medium known in the art.
The above-mentioned embodiments are intended to illustrate the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention in further detail, and it should be understood that the above-mentioned embodiments are merely exemplary embodiments of the present invention, and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention, and any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements and the like made within the spirit and principle of the present invention should be included in the scope of the present invention.

Claims (6)

1. A teaching feature optimization method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
obtaining an optimization request; the optimization request includes: a class ID;
acquiring evaluation information and actual record information according to the optimization request; the evaluation information comprises: class ID, feature information and rating data; the record information includes: the class ID, the real recording item ID and the real recording data;
acquiring standard interval information according to the real recording item ID, and determining real recording interval information corresponding to real recording data according to the standard interval information and the real recording data;
acquiring corresponding characteristic information according to the recording project ID, and determining recording grading data corresponding to the characteristic information according to the recording interval information;
comparing the scoring data with the actual record scoring data, and determining first teaching characteristic information according to a comparison result;
and analyzing and processing according to the grading data, the actual record grading data and the first teaching characteristic information to determine first optimization information.
2. The teach feature optimization method of claim 1 further comprising:
obtaining questionnaire information according to the optimization request; the questionnaire information includes: class ID, user ID, questionnaire item ID and option ID;
acquiring corresponding characteristic information according to the questionnaire item ID, and determining questionnaire grading data corresponding to the characteristic information according to the option information;
comparing the questionnaire rating data with the record rating data, and determining second teaching characteristic information according to the comparison result;
and analyzing and processing according to the questionnaire rating data, the record rating data and the second teaching characteristic information, and determining second optimization information.
3. The teach feature optimization method of claim 2, further comprising:
comparing the scoring data with the questionnaire scoring data, and determining third teaching characteristic information according to a comparison result;
and analyzing and processing according to the grading data, the questionnaire grading data and the third teaching characteristic information to determine third optimization information.
4. The teach feature optimization method of claim 3, further comprising:
and generating optimized report information according to the first optimized information, the second optimized information and the third optimized information.
5. The teach feature optimization method of claim 1 further comprising:
and comparing the grading data of each class according to the characteristic information, and determining the whole teaching condition information according to the comparison result.
6. The pedagogical feature optimization method of claim 1, wherein after the obtaining of the evaluation information and the bibliographic information according to the optimization request, the pedagogical feature optimization method further comprises:
determining an interval value according to the highest evaluation data and the lowest evaluation data, and generating chart information according to the interval value and the evaluation information.
CN202111658968.XA 2021-12-30 2021-12-30 Teaching characteristic optimization method Pending CN114330896A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202111658968.XA CN114330896A (en) 2021-12-30 2021-12-30 Teaching characteristic optimization method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202111658968.XA CN114330896A (en) 2021-12-30 2021-12-30 Teaching characteristic optimization method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN114330896A true CN114330896A (en) 2022-04-12

Family

ID=81019504

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202111658968.XA Pending CN114330896A (en) 2021-12-30 2021-12-30 Teaching characteristic optimization method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN114330896A (en)

Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106296503A (en) * 2015-06-29 2017-01-04 科大讯飞股份有限公司 Evaluation of teacher's method and system
CN107274727A (en) * 2017-07-25 2017-10-20 深圳市鹰硕技术有限公司 A kind of data processing equipment for teleeducation system
CN108648123A (en) * 2018-07-13 2018-10-12 江苏开放大学(江苏城市职业学院) A method of its management network teaching process of the network teaching platform and utilization based on big data
CN108805405A (en) * 2018-05-02 2018-11-13 浙江建设职业技术学院 A kind of teaching assessment system and its construction method
CN109801194A (en) * 2017-11-17 2019-05-24 深圳市鹰硕技术有限公司 It is a kind of to follow teaching method with remote evaluation function
CN110675676A (en) * 2019-10-14 2020-01-10 江苏食品药品职业技术学院 WeChat applet-based classroom teaching timely scoring method
CN111192169A (en) * 2019-12-23 2020-05-22 章明 Teaching effect evaluation system based on block chain technology
CN112132717A (en) * 2020-09-29 2020-12-25 上海松鼠课堂人工智能科技有限公司 Intelligent shift distributing method and system based on big data
CN112785192A (en) * 2021-02-03 2021-05-11 北京译泰教育科技有限公司 Method for evaluating regional education quality
CN112862257A (en) * 2021-01-13 2021-05-28 张辉 Student portrait generation method, system, equipment and readable storage medium
CN113096688A (en) * 2021-03-30 2021-07-09 江苏电子信息职业学院 Intelligent teaching method and system
CN113763212A (en) * 2021-06-22 2021-12-07 吉林建筑科技学院 College teaching quality assessment method based on CDBN

Patent Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106296503A (en) * 2015-06-29 2017-01-04 科大讯飞股份有限公司 Evaluation of teacher's method and system
CN107274727A (en) * 2017-07-25 2017-10-20 深圳市鹰硕技术有限公司 A kind of data processing equipment for teleeducation system
CN109801194A (en) * 2017-11-17 2019-05-24 深圳市鹰硕技术有限公司 It is a kind of to follow teaching method with remote evaluation function
CN108805405A (en) * 2018-05-02 2018-11-13 浙江建设职业技术学院 A kind of teaching assessment system and its construction method
CN108648123A (en) * 2018-07-13 2018-10-12 江苏开放大学(江苏城市职业学院) A method of its management network teaching process of the network teaching platform and utilization based on big data
CN110675676A (en) * 2019-10-14 2020-01-10 江苏食品药品职业技术学院 WeChat applet-based classroom teaching timely scoring method
CN111192169A (en) * 2019-12-23 2020-05-22 章明 Teaching effect evaluation system based on block chain technology
CN112132717A (en) * 2020-09-29 2020-12-25 上海松鼠课堂人工智能科技有限公司 Intelligent shift distributing method and system based on big data
CN112862257A (en) * 2021-01-13 2021-05-28 张辉 Student portrait generation method, system, equipment and readable storage medium
CN112785192A (en) * 2021-02-03 2021-05-11 北京译泰教育科技有限公司 Method for evaluating regional education quality
CN113096688A (en) * 2021-03-30 2021-07-09 江苏电子信息职业学院 Intelligent teaching method and system
CN113763212A (en) * 2021-06-22 2021-12-07 吉林建筑科技学院 College teaching quality assessment method based on CDBN

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Jones et al. Peer assessment using comparative and absolute judgement
KR100978091B1 (en) Management system for online test assessment and method thereof
Jensen et al. Midterm and first-exam grades predict final grades in biology courses
Butakor et al. Ghanaian students in TIMSS 2011: Relationship between contextual factors and mathematics performance
CN111598750A (en) Student online learning state evaluation method and system based on rumination ratio algorithm
Huang et al. High School Graduation Rates across English Learner Student Subgroups in Arizona. REL 2017-205.
Pazzaglia et al. An Analysis of Student Engagement Patterns and Online Course Outcomes in Wisconsin. REL 2016-147.
Khaliqi How common is the common core? A global analysis of math teaching and learning
Hallinan et al. School sector, school poverty, and the Catholic school advantage
Trendtel et al. Modeling item position effects with a Bayesian item response model applied to PISA 2009–2015 data
McGrane et al. Applying a thurstonian, two-stage method in the standardized assessment of writing
CN113393095A (en) Teacher teaching quality assessment method
CN114330896A (en) Teaching characteristic optimization method
CN114399213A (en) Teacher evaluation method
Stubbe Replacing translation tests with Yes/No tests
Noordzij et al. Attrition of certified teachers in secondary education during the induction phase
Zvoch et al. Successive student cohorts and longitudinal growth models: An investigation of elementary school mathematics performance
Schwerdt et al. Do teaching practices influence student achievement
MacDougall et al. Fortune-tellers or content specialists: Challenging the standard setting paradigm in medical education programmes
Cimentada Do Educational Institutions Explain SES Gaps? An International Comparison of the SES Achievement Gap from 2000–2015
Frans A captivating snapshot of standardized testing in early childhood: on the stability and utility of the Cito preschool/kindergarten tests
Danaher et al. Reliability and validity of the computing professional skills assessment
CN114358576A (en) Information processing system
Jakobsen et al. Comparison of item performance in a Norwegian study using US developed mathematical knowledge for teaching measures
Riel et al. Completion, time-in-intervention, and movement: Relationships between dimensions of participation in oTPD and knowledge growth

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination