CN114325107A - A method for judging the accuracy of harmonic impedance calculation results - Google Patents
A method for judging the accuracy of harmonic impedance calculation results Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN114325107A CN114325107A CN202111506290.3A CN202111506290A CN114325107A CN 114325107 A CN114325107 A CN 114325107A CN 202111506290 A CN202111506290 A CN 202111506290A CN 114325107 A CN114325107 A CN 114325107A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- harmonic
- user
- nonlinear
- impedance
- class
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 74
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 15
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000010891 electric arc Methods 0.000 abstract description 8
- 238000012880 independent component analysis Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003339 best practice Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E40/00—Technologies for an efficient electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
- Y02E40/40—Arrangements for reducing harmonics
Landscapes
- Measurement Of Resistance Or Impedance (AREA)
Abstract
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明涉及电能质量分享技术领域,具体为一种谐波阻抗计算结果准确性判断方法。The invention relates to the technical field of power quality sharing, in particular to a method for judging the accuracy of a harmonic impedance calculation result.
背景技术Background technique
随着电力电子设备的发展和非线性负荷的增加,电力系统中的谐波污染越来越严重。准确计算谐波阻抗是研究谐波问题的关键之一。基于公共连接点(Point of CommonCoupling PCC)处的谐波测量数据,现有学者提出了若干非侵入式谐波阻抗估计方法。在计算谐波阻抗后,需要验证计算结果的正确性。准确估计谐波阻抗对于量化谐波责任、滤波器设计、谐波控制以及系统谐振预测等方面具有重要意义。然而,目前仍没有统一的方法来验证求得谐波阻抗的正确性。With the development of power electronic equipment and the increase of nonlinear loads, the harmonic pollution in the power system is becoming more and more serious. Accurate calculation of harmonic impedance is one of the keys to study harmonic problems. Based on the harmonic measurement data at the point of common coupling (Point of Common Coupling PCC), existing scholars have proposed several non-intrusive harmonic impedance estimation methods. After calculating the harmonic impedance, it is necessary to verify the correctness of the calculation result. Accurate estimation of harmonic impedance is important for quantifying harmonic liability, filter design, harmonic control, and system resonance prediction. However, there is still no unified method to verify the correctness of the harmonic impedance.
现有方法的主要思路为,将计算所得背景谐波电压与用户退出运行后PCC点的实测电压相对比,若求得背景谐波电压与PCC点实测电压相差不大,说明谐波阻抗已计算准确;反之,说明求得谐波阻抗存在较大误差。背景谐波可根据IEC61000-3-6(称为IEC法)或叠加原理法计算。然而现有研究在验证求得谐波阻抗准确性时,忽略了一点,即IEC法与叠加原理法因基础原理不同,使用时需要根据实际工况来选择,而不能任意选择,否则可能会出现谐波阻抗准确性误判的风险。The main idea of the existing method is to compare the calculated background harmonic voltage with the measured voltage of the PCC point after the user quits operation. If the obtained background harmonic voltage is not much different from the measured voltage of the PCC point, it means that the harmonic impedance has been calculated. Accurate; on the contrary, it shows that there is a large error in the obtained harmonic impedance. Background harmonics can be calculated according to IEC61000-3-6 (called IEC method) or superposition principle method. However, the existing research ignores one point when verifying the accuracy of the harmonic impedance, that is, the IEC method and the superposition principle method have different basic principles, so they need to be selected according to the actual working conditions, and cannot be selected arbitrarily, otherwise there may be Risk of misjudgment of harmonic impedance accuracy.
发明内容SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
针对上述问题,本发明的目的在于通过IEC方法和叠加原理,将非线性用户分为两类模型,并详细分析了两类模型差异性及适用范围,进而提出一种谐波阻抗计算结果准确性判断方法。技术方案如下:In view of the above problems, the purpose of the present invention is to divide the nonlinear users into two types of models through the IEC method and the superposition principle, and analyze the differences and application scopes of the two types of models in detail, and then propose an accuracy of harmonic impedance calculation results. Judgment method. The technical solution is as follows:
一种谐波阻抗计算结果准确性判断方法,包括以下步骤:A method for judging the accuracy of a harmonic impedance calculation result, comprising the following steps:
步骤1:将非线性用户分为A类非线性用户和B类非线性用户,分别计算各类非线性用户退出运行时,在PCC处测得的谐波电压,即背景谐波的参考电压;Step 1: Divide the nonlinear users into Class A nonlinear users and Class B nonlinear users, and calculate the harmonic voltage measured at the PCC when each type of nonlinear user exits operation, that is, the reference voltage of the background harmonics;
1)所述A类非线性用户为当其停止运行时,谐波源和谐波阻抗均断开的用户,该类用户根据IEC方法的电路模型计算背景谐波电压;定义背景谐波的A类参考电压为由下式求得:1) The Class A nonlinear user is the user whose harmonic source and harmonic impedance are disconnected when it stops running. This class of users calculates the background harmonic voltage according to the circuit model of the IEC method; defines the A of the background harmonic. The class reference voltage is It is obtained by the following formula:
其中,Zu和分别为系统侧的谐波阻抗与谐波电流;Among them, Zu and are the harmonic impedance and harmonic current on the system side, respectively;
当准确求得系统侧谐波阻抗Zu之后,根据IEC方法计算的背景谐波电压将与A类参考电压相等;When the harmonic impedance Zu on the system side is accurately obtained, the background harmonic voltage calculated according to the IEC method will be with the class A reference voltage equal;
2)所述B类非线性用户为当其停止运行时,谐波源被切断,而谐波阻抗仍连接到电网的用户,该类用户根据叠加原理模型计算背景谐波电压;定义背景谐波的B类参考电压为由下式求得:2) The class B nonlinear user is the user whose harmonic source is cut off and the harmonic impedance is still connected to the power grid when it stops running. This type of user calculates the background harmonic voltage according to the superposition principle model; defines the background harmonic The class B reference voltage is It is obtained by the following formula:
其中,Zc为用户侧谐波阻抗;Among them, Z c is the harmonic impedance of the user side;
当准确求得用户侧谐波阻抗Zc与系统侧谐波阻抗Zu后,根据叠加原理计算的背景谐波电压与B类参考电压相等;When the user-side harmonic impedance Zc and the system-side harmonic impedance Zu are accurately obtained, the background harmonic voltage calculated according to the superposition principle with class B reference voltage equal;
步骤2:根据用户侧谐波阻抗Zc与系统侧谐波阻抗Zu之间的大小关系验证求得谐波阻抗的准确性,详细过程如下:Step 2: Verify the accuracy of the obtained harmonic impedance according to the magnitude relationship between the user-side harmonic impedance Zc and the system-side harmonic impedance Zu. The detailed process is as follows:
A)|Zc|并非远大于|Zu|的工况A) Cases where |Zc| is not much larger than |Zu|
对A类非线性用户采用IEC方法计算对B类非线性用户采用叠加原理计算据此验证求得系统侧谐波阻抗Zu和用户侧谐波阻抗Zc的准确性;Calculated by IEC method for Class A nonlinear users Superposition principle calculation for class B nonlinear users Based on this, the accuracy of obtaining the harmonic impedance Zu on the system side and the harmonic impedance Zc on the user side is verified;
B)|Zc|远大于|Zu|的工况B) Cases where |Zc| is much larger than |Zu|
由于|Zc|>>|Zu|,从而有Zu/Zc≈0,将根据叠加原理计算背景谐波电压的算式转化为下式:Since |Z c |>>|Z u |, there is Z u /Z c ≈0, and the formula for calculating the background harmonic voltage according to the superposition principle is transformed into the following formula:
则与彼此近似相等,无论是A类非线性用户还是B类非线性用户,均能够基于IEC方法或叠加原理验证求得系统侧谐波阻抗Zu的准确性。but and They are approximately equal to each other. Whether it is a Class A nonlinear user or a Class B nonlinear user, the accuracy of the harmonic impedance Zu on the system side can be obtained based on the IEC method or the superposition principle verification.
进一步的,|Zc|与|Zu|之间大小关系的判断方法为:Further, the method for judging the magnitude relationship between |Zc| and |Zu| is:
当|Zc|>>|Zu|时,有Zu/Zc≈0,从而有When |Zc|>>|Zu|, there is Z u /Z c ≈0, so there is
其中,为公共线路上测得的谐波电流,为用户侧的谐波电流;in, is the harmonic current measured on the public line, is the harmonic current on the user side;
通过量化与之间的相似性,间接地评估|Zc|>>|Zu|是否成立。by quantifying and The similarity between , indirectly evaluates whether |Z c |>>|Z u | holds.
更进一步的,所述评估|Zc|>>|Zu|是否成立的过程中,通过独立分量法重构源信号用户侧的谐波电流 Further, in the process of evaluating whether |Z c |>>|Z u | is true, the harmonic current on the user side of the source signal is reconstructed by the independent component method
根据诺顿等效电路,当非线性用户与系统相连时,有According to the Norton equivalent circuit, when the nonlinear user is connected to the system, there is
其中,矩阵X由观测信号PCC点测得的谐波电压与公共线路上测得的谐波电流构成;矩阵I由谐波源信号系统侧谐波电流与用户侧谐波电流构成;矩阵Z由PCC点两侧谐波阻抗构成;Among them, the matrix X is the harmonic voltage measured by the observation signal PCC point and harmonic currents measured on the public line The matrix I is composed of harmonic currents on the system side of the harmonic source signal system. and user side harmonic current composition; matrix Z is composed of harmonic impedances on both sides of the PCC point;
首先通过中值滤波技术提取信号的快变分量和再通过ICA算法重构谐波源信号 Firstly, the fast-varying component of the signal is extracted by median filtering technique and Then reconstruct the harmonic source signal through the ICA algorithm
而信号与之间的相似性则通过相关系数量化;while the signal and The similarity between them is quantified by the correlation coefficient;
相关系数大于设定值,则|Zc|>>|Zu|,否则|Zc|并非远大于|Zu|。If the correlation coefficient is greater than the set value, then |Zc|>>|Zu|, otherwise |Zc| is not much larger than |Zu|.
本发明的有益效果是:本发明本将非线性用户根据其停止运行的情况分为两类:1)仅切断谐波源而保留其用户侧阻抗与电网相连(如光伏场站等),2)切断谐波源和用户侧阻抗(如电弧炉等)。然后,本发明研究了在验证求得谐波阻抗准确性过程中,IEC方法和叠加原理方法的差异及其各自的适用范围。最后,基于这两种方法的特点以及非线性用户的类别,提出了可精确验证求得谐波阻抗正确性的方法。The beneficial effects of the present invention are as follows: the present invention divides nonlinear users into two categories according to the situation that they stop running: 1) only cut off the harmonic source and keep its user-side impedance connected to the power grid (such as photovoltaic stations, etc.), 2) ) cut off the harmonic source and user side impedance (such as electric arc furnace, etc.). Then, the present invention studies the difference between the IEC method and the superposition principle method and their respective applicable ranges in the process of verifying the accuracy of obtaining the harmonic impedance. Finally, based on the characteristics of these two methods and the types of nonlinear users, a method that can accurately verify the correctness of harmonic impedance is proposed.
附图说明Description of drawings
图1为IEC方法对应等值电路。Figure 1 shows the equivalent circuit corresponding to the IEC method.
图2为叠加原理方法对应等值电路。Figure 2 shows the equivalent circuit corresponding to the superposition principle method.
图3为谐波阻抗计算结果准确性判断方法流程图。Figure 3 is a flowchart of a method for judging the accuracy of harmonic impedance calculation results.
图4为光伏场9次谐波数据;(a)谐波电流(b)谐波电压。Figure 4 is the 9th harmonic data of photovoltaic field; (a) harmonic current (b) harmonic voltage.
图5为电弧炉5次谐波实测数据;(a)PCC点实测谐波电压(b)公共线路实测谐波电流。Figure 5 is the measured data of the 5th harmonic of the electric arc furnace; (a) the measured harmonic voltage at the PCC point (b) the measured harmonic current of the public line.
图6为电弧炉5次谐波数据;(a)谐波电流分析(b)谐波电压分析。Figure 6 is the 5th harmonic data of the electric arc furnace; (a) harmonic current analysis (b) harmonic voltage analysis.
具体实施方式Detailed ways
下面结合附图和具体实施例对本发明做进一步详细说明。在实际工程中,通过将求得的背景谐波电压与用户不工作时PCC点测得的电压进行对比,可以间接验证求得谐波阻抗的准确性。一般而言,背景谐波计算方法有两种方法:IEC法和叠加原理法。这两种方法具体原理如下。The present invention will be further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments. In practical engineering, by comparing the obtained background harmonic voltage with the voltage measured at the PCC point when the user is not working, the accuracy of the obtained harmonic impedance can be indirectly verified. Generally speaking, there are two methods for calculating background harmonics: IEC method and superposition principle method. The specific principles of these two methods are as follows.
(1)根据IEC方法计算背景谐波电压(1) Calculate the background harmonic voltage according to the IEC method
在图1所示IEC方法对应的诺顿等值电路中,Zu、Zc、分别是系统侧与用户侧的谐波阻抗与谐波电流源。与分别为PCC点测得的谐波电压以及公共线路上测得的谐波电流。In the Norton equivalent circuit corresponding to the IEC method shown in Figure 1, Zu, Zc, They are the harmonic impedance and harmonic current source on the system side and the user side, respectively. and are the harmonic voltage measured at the PCC point and the harmonic current measured on the public line, respectively.
当开关闭合时,用户连接到电网,PCC处的谐波电压为When the switch is closed and the user is connected to the grid, the harmonic voltage at the PCC is
当开关断开时,用户侧停止运行,PCC处的谐波电压为When the switch is turned off, the user side stops running, and the harmonic voltage at the PCC is
根据IEC61000-3-6标准对谐波发射水平的定义,非线性用户的谐波电压发射水平是用户侧连接到网络之前和用户退出运行之后,PCC点谐波电压的差值。参考该标准,用户侧和系统侧的谐波发射水平可分别表示为According to the definition of harmonic emission level in the IEC61000-3-6 standard, the harmonic voltage emission level of a nonlinear user is the difference between the harmonic voltage at the PCC point before the user side is connected to the network and after the user is out of operation. Referring to this standard, the harmonic emission levels on the user side and the system side can be expressed as
(2)根据叠加原理计算背景谐波电压(2) Calculate the background harmonic voltage according to the superposition principle
图2是叠加原理方法所对应的诺顿电路。系统侧谐波源以及非线性用户谐波源单独工作时PCC点的谐波电压为系统侧与用户侧各自的谐波电压发射水平,分别表示为Figure 2 is the Norton circuit corresponding to the superposition principle method. When the system side harmonic source and the nonlinear user harmonic source work alone, the harmonic voltage at the PCC point is the respective harmonic voltage emission levels of the system side and the user side, which are expressed as
(3)验证求得谐波阻抗准确性的方法(3) Verify the method for obtaining the accuracy of harmonic impedance
当非线性用户接入电网时,如果能准确估计Zu和Zc,则求得的背景谐波电压也是准确的。利用这一原理可以间接地验证求得谐波阻抗的准确性。当非线性用户退出运行时,在PCC处测得的谐波电压可视为背景谐波的参考电压。因此,通过将求得的背景谐波电压与参考电压进行对比,即可验证求得Zu和Zc的正确性。When the nonlinear user is connected to the power grid, if Zu and Zc can be accurately estimated, the obtained background harmonic voltage is also accurate. Using this principle can indirectly verify the accuracy of the obtained harmonic impedance. When the nonlinear user is out of operation, the harmonic voltages measured at the PCC can be considered as reference voltages for the background harmonics. Therefore, the correctness of the obtained Zu and Zc can be verified by comparing the obtained background harmonic voltage with the reference voltage.
在实践中,非线性用户是多样且复杂的。本发明根据其退出运行的方式,将非线性用户分为以下两类。In practice, nonlinear users are diverse and complex. The present invention divides nonlinear users into the following two categories according to the way they exit from operation.
1)模型A:1) Model A:
对于电弧炉等非线性用户,当用户不工作时,谐波源和谐波阻抗均断开。对于此类用户,应根据IEC方法的电路模型计算背景谐波电压。参考电压定义为通过将式(4)中的替换为即可计算因此,当准确求得Zu之后,将与相等。值得注意的是,由于式(4)中不含有Zc,因此该方法不能验证求得Zc的正确性。For nonlinear users such as electric arc furnaces, when the user is not working, both the harmonic source and the harmonic impedance are disconnected. For such users, the background harmonic voltage should be calculated according to the circuit model of the IEC method. The reference voltage is defined as By putting in formula (4) replace with can be calculated Therefore, when Zu is accurately obtained, Will equal. It is worth noting that since formula (4) does not contain Zc, this method cannot verify the correctness of Zc.
2)模型B:2) Model B:
对于风电场、光伏发电场等非线性用户,当用户停止运行时,谐波源被切断,而谐波阻抗仍连接到电网。对于这类用户,应根据叠加原理模型计算背景谐波电压。参考电压定义为通过将式(5)中的替换为即可计算当准确求得Zc与Zu后,则有与相等。值得注意的是,由于式(5)中同时含有Zc与Zu,因此该方法可同时验证求得Zc与Zu的正确性。For nonlinear users such as wind farms and photovoltaic power plants, when the user stops running, the harmonic source is cut off, while the harmonic impedance is still connected to the grid. For such users, the background harmonic voltage should be calculated according to the superposition principle model. The reference voltage is defined as By putting in formula (5) replace with can be calculated When Zc and Zu are accurately obtained, then we have and equal. It is worth noting that since formula (5) contains both Zc and Zu, this method can verify the correctness of Zc and Zu at the same time.
确定用户类别后,可以根据Zc和Zu之间的大小关系验证求得谐波阻抗的准确性。详细过程如下。After the user category is determined, the accuracy of the harmonic impedance can be verified based on the magnitude relationship between Zc and Zu. The detailed process is as follows.
A)|Zc|并非远大于|Zu|的工况A) Cases where |Zc| is not much larger than |Zu|
当|Zc|并非远大于|Zu|时,根据式(4)与式(5),求得的背景谐波电压与彼此不相等。因此,将不等于并且也不等于理论上,对于模型A,由叠加原理计算出的背景谐波电压与用户切断后测得的谐波电压不匹配。同样,对于模型B,IEC方法计算的背景谐波电压与测得电压不匹配。因此,如果计算背景谐波电压的方法(即IEC方法或叠加原理)选择错误,即使计算结果准确,也会误认为求得谐波阻抗是错误的。When |Zc| is not much larger than |Zu|, according to equations (4) and (5), the obtained background harmonic voltage and are not equal to each other. therefore, will not be equal to and does not mean Theoretically, for model A, the background harmonic voltage calculated by the superposition principle does not match the harmonic voltage measured after the user cuts it off. Likewise, for Model B, the background harmonic voltages calculated by the IEC method do not match the measured voltages. Therefore, if the method for calculating the background harmonic voltage (ie the IEC method or the superposition principle) is selected incorrectly, even if the calculation result is accurate, it will be mistaken for the obtained harmonic impedance to be wrong.
为了避免上述误判,需要使用正确的方法(IEC方法或叠加原理方法)匹配用户模型。In order to avoid the above misjudgments, it is necessary to use the correct method (IEC method or superposition principle method) to match the user model.
B)|Zc|远大于|Zu|的工况B) Cases where |Zc| is much larger than |Zu|
该工况下,求得Zc的误差通常较大,因此只需要验证求得Zu的精度。由于|Zc|>>|Zu|,从而有Zu/Zc≈0,式(5)可转化为式(7)。因此,背景谐波电压可在Zc未知情况下由叠加原理计算。Under this working condition, the error of obtaining Zc is usually large, so it is only necessary to verify the accuracy of obtaining Zu. Since |Z c |>>|Z u |, there is Z u /Z c ≈0, equation (5) can be transformed into equation (7). Therefore, the background harmonic voltage can be calculated by the superposition principle with Zc unknown.
值得注意的是,此时式(7)与式(5)等价,并且求得的与彼此近似相等。因此,无论是A类还是B类非线性用户,都可以基于IEC方法或叠加原理验证求得Zu的准确性。It is worth noting that at this time, equation (7) is equivalent to equation (5), and the obtained and are approximately equal to each other. Therefore, whether it is a class A or class B nonlinear user, the accuracy of Zu can be obtained based on the IEC method or the superposition principle verification.
C)|Zc|与|Zu|之间大小关系的判断方法C) The method of judging the relationship between |Zc| and |Zu|
当|Zc|>>|Zu|时,有Zu/Zc≈0,从而有When |Zc|>>|Zu|, there is Z u /Z c ≈0, so there is
因此,通过量化与之间的相似性,可间接地评估|Zc|>>|Zu|是否成立。在该评估过程中,可通过独立分量法(ICA Independent Component Analysis)重构源信号ICA是一种盲源分离技术,它可从观测信号中提取潜在变量和原始信号。Therefore, by quantifying and The similarity between , can indirectly evaluate whether |Z c |>>|Z u | holds. During this evaluation, the source signal can be reconstructed by ICA Independent Component Analysis ICA is a blind source separation technique that extracts latent variables and raw signals from observed signals.
根据诺顿等效电路(图1或图2),当非线性用户与系统相连时,有According to the Norton equivalent circuit (Figure 1 or Figure 2), when a nonlinear user is connected to the system, there is
式中:矩阵X由观测信号与构成,矩阵I由谐波源信号与构成,矩阵Z由PCC点两侧谐波阻抗构成。在使用ICA算法之前,需要通过中值滤波技术提取信号的快变分量,以保证各源信号之间的独立性。通过ICA算法可重构谐波源信号。而信号与之间的相似性则通过相关系数量化。相关系数越大,说明两信号越相似。In the formula: the matrix X is determined by the observed signal and constituted, matrix I consists of harmonic source signals and The matrix Z consists of harmonic impedances on both sides of the PCC point. Before using the ICA algorithm, it is necessary to extract the fast-changing components of the signal through median filtering technology to ensure the independence of each source signal. Harmonic source signal can be reconstructed by ICA algorithm . while the signal and The similarity between them is quantified by the correlation coefficient. The larger the correlation coefficient, the more similar the two signals are.
上述对求得谐波阻抗准确性判断方法的流程图如图3所示。The flow chart of the above-mentioned method for judging the accuracy of the obtained harmonic impedance is shown in FIG. 3 .
实例验证:Example verification:
当光伏发电场在夜间停止运行时,相关电气元件(如变压器、线路和滤波器等)仍与电网相连,因此,仅谐波源与电路断开连接,而光伏场站的谐波阻抗仍与系统侧相连。以我国某光伏发电场作为模型B的典型非线性用户来论证本发明所提方法的正确性。When the photovoltaic power plant stops running at night, the related electrical components (such as transformers, lines and filters, etc.) are still connected to the grid, therefore, only the harmonic source is disconnected from the circuit, and the harmonic impedance of the photovoltaic plant is still related to connected to the system side. The correctness of the method proposed in the present invention is demonstrated by taking a photovoltaic power plant in my country as a typical nonlinear user of model B.
对于9次谐波,满足|Zc|>>|Zu|,如图4(a)所示,由于通过ICA求得的谐波电流与测得的几乎吻合,且与之间的相关系数较大,为0.998,从而有|Zc|>>|Zu|。此时,理论上可通过对比与(或)之间的相关性来判断求得Zu的准确性。而图4(b)表明,和均能与相匹配,从而说明求得Zu具有很高精度。进而论证了所提方法的正确性。For the 9th harmonic, |Zc|>>|Zu| is satisfied, as shown in Fig. 4(a), due to the harmonic current obtained by ICA with the measured almost coincident, and and The correlation coefficient between is large, 0.998, so there is |Z c |>>|Z u |. At this point, theoretically, by comparing and (or ) to judge the accuracy of Zu. While Figure 4(b) shows that, and can be combined with match, which shows that the obtained Zu has very high accuracy. Furthermore, the correctness of the proposed method is demonstrated.
具体应用的最佳实施例:Best Practices for Specific Applications:
电弧炉作为模型A中的典型非线性用户,可用其验证所提方法的正确性。从100MW直流电弧炉的150kV母线上测量谐波数据,采样频率为6400Hz。利用快速傅里叶变换分析每分钟的电压和电流样本数据,得到各次谐波的谐波。The electric arc furnace, as a typical nonlinear user in Model A, can be used to verify the correctness of the proposed method. Harmonic data was measured from the 150kV bus of a 100MW DC electric arc furnace with a sampling frequency of 6400Hz. The minute-by-minute voltage and current sample data are analyzed using the Fast Fourier Transform to obtain the harmonics of each harmonic.
本案例中,用户侧安装了两个单调谐滤波器,以缓解5、7次谐波。滤波器的安装将导致|Zc|并非远大于|Zu|。5次谐波电压和电流如图5所示。1000分钟后,电弧炉短期停止运行(对应于停机时间)。In this case, two single-tuned filters are installed on the user side to mitigate the 5th and 7th harmonics. The installation of the filter will result in |Zc| not much larger than |Zu|. The 5th harmonic voltage and current are shown in Figure 5. After 1000 minutes, the electric arc furnace was stopped for a short period of time (corresponding to the downtime).
选采用ICA算法计算PCC点两侧谐波阻抗,求得的背景谐波电流以及分离所得的用户侧谐波电流如图6(a)所示。可见,在测得的与求得之间存在较大差异。此外,与之间的相关系数比较小,仅0.33。从而说明|Zc|并非远大于|Zu|。基于本发明所得方法,应与匹配,而与不匹配。图6(b)表明,实测与求得的幅值基本相等,从而论证了所求Zu的正确性。相比之下,与之间差异较大,说明若采用叠加原理方法来分析求得背景谐波正确性,则会误认为求得的Zu具有较大计算误差。The ICA algorithm is used to calculate the harmonic impedance on both sides of the PCC point, and the obtained background harmonic current and the separated user-side harmonic currents As shown in Figure 6(a). It can be seen that the measured and seek There is a big difference between them. also, and The correlation coefficient between them is relatively small, only 0.33. This shows that |Z c | is not much larger than |Z u |. Based on the method obtained by the present invention, should match matches, while Mismatch. Figure 6(b) shows that the measured with the sought The amplitudes are basically equal, which proves the correctness of Zu. In contrast, and The difference between them is large, indicating that if the superposition principle method is used to analyze and obtain the correctness of the background harmonics, it will be mistaken for the obtained Zu to have a large calculation error.
Claims (3)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202111506290.3A CN114325107B (en) | 2021-12-10 | 2021-12-10 | A method for judging the accuracy of harmonic impedance calculation results |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202111506290.3A CN114325107B (en) | 2021-12-10 | 2021-12-10 | A method for judging the accuracy of harmonic impedance calculation results |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN114325107A true CN114325107A (en) | 2022-04-12 |
CN114325107B CN114325107B (en) | 2024-11-22 |
Family
ID=81049954
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202111506290.3A Active CN114325107B (en) | 2021-12-10 | 2021-12-10 | A method for judging the accuracy of harmonic impedance calculation results |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN114325107B (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN114660362A (en) * | 2022-05-19 | 2022-06-24 | 四川大学 | System side harmonic impedance estimation method and device based on mutual information data optimization |
Citations (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103675446A (en) * | 2013-12-23 | 2014-03-26 | 重庆大学 | Real-time accurate harmonic source positioning system and method |
CN105807136A (en) * | 2016-03-17 | 2016-07-27 | 国网上海市电力公司 | Harmonic emission level estimation method based on weighted support vector machine |
CN108535547A (en) * | 2018-04-19 | 2018-09-14 | 西南交通大学 | A kind of adaptive independent component analysis method of harmonic impedance estimation |
CN108680788A (en) * | 2018-05-29 | 2018-10-19 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | Harmonic voltage transmission level computational methods and device |
CN109061300A (en) * | 2018-09-19 | 2018-12-21 | 江苏中凌高科技股份有限公司 | A kind of characteristic harmonics source localization method of PCC point |
CN109283389A (en) * | 2018-09-27 | 2019-01-29 | 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 | A method and system for evaluating the harmonic emission level of a wind farm |
CN111650437A (en) * | 2020-06-30 | 2020-09-11 | 国网上海市电力公司 | A distributed photovoltaic and wind power grid-connected harmonic measurement system and method |
CN112446607A (en) * | 2020-11-24 | 2021-03-05 | 福州大学 | Node harmonic interference evaluation method for multi-harmonic-source power grid |
KR20210036188A (en) * | 2019-09-25 | 2021-04-02 | 한국전력공사 | Harmonic measuring device and control method thereof |
CN112858782A (en) * | 2021-01-07 | 2021-05-28 | 国网河南省电力公司电力科学研究院 | Harmonic responsibility quantification method and system under influence of multi-user interaction of power system |
CN113484690A (en) * | 2021-07-27 | 2021-10-08 | 杭州得诚电力科技股份有限公司 | Harmonic source positioning method, device, equipment and storage medium of power supply system |
CN113640584A (en) * | 2021-07-27 | 2021-11-12 | 上海电力大学 | A System Harmonic Impedance Estimation Method Based on Impedance Deviation Minimum Criterion |
-
2021
- 2021-12-10 CN CN202111506290.3A patent/CN114325107B/en active Active
Patent Citations (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103675446A (en) * | 2013-12-23 | 2014-03-26 | 重庆大学 | Real-time accurate harmonic source positioning system and method |
CN105807136A (en) * | 2016-03-17 | 2016-07-27 | 国网上海市电力公司 | Harmonic emission level estimation method based on weighted support vector machine |
CN108535547A (en) * | 2018-04-19 | 2018-09-14 | 西南交通大学 | A kind of adaptive independent component analysis method of harmonic impedance estimation |
CN108680788A (en) * | 2018-05-29 | 2018-10-19 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | Harmonic voltage transmission level computational methods and device |
CN109061300A (en) * | 2018-09-19 | 2018-12-21 | 江苏中凌高科技股份有限公司 | A kind of characteristic harmonics source localization method of PCC point |
CN109283389A (en) * | 2018-09-27 | 2019-01-29 | 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 | A method and system for evaluating the harmonic emission level of a wind farm |
KR20210036188A (en) * | 2019-09-25 | 2021-04-02 | 한국전력공사 | Harmonic measuring device and control method thereof |
CN111650437A (en) * | 2020-06-30 | 2020-09-11 | 国网上海市电力公司 | A distributed photovoltaic and wind power grid-connected harmonic measurement system and method |
CN112446607A (en) * | 2020-11-24 | 2021-03-05 | 福州大学 | Node harmonic interference evaluation method for multi-harmonic-source power grid |
CN112858782A (en) * | 2021-01-07 | 2021-05-28 | 国网河南省电力公司电力科学研究院 | Harmonic responsibility quantification method and system under influence of multi-user interaction of power system |
CN113484690A (en) * | 2021-07-27 | 2021-10-08 | 杭州得诚电力科技股份有限公司 | Harmonic source positioning method, device, equipment and storage medium of power supply system |
CN113640584A (en) * | 2021-07-27 | 2021-11-12 | 上海电力大学 | A System Harmonic Impedance Estimation Method Based on Impedance Deviation Minimum Criterion |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
缪耀珊: "交流电气化铁道牵引负荷的谐波评估", 电气化铁道, no. 4, 15 August 2008 (2008-08-15), pages 1 - 9 * |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN114660362A (en) * | 2022-05-19 | 2022-06-24 | 四川大学 | System side harmonic impedance estimation method and device based on mutual information data optimization |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN114325107B (en) | 2024-11-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN107576853B (en) | Distribution Network Harmonics impedance computation method based on canonical correlation analysis | |
CN102135569B (en) | Fluctuation quantity method-based user side harmonic emission level practicality estimation method | |
CN102749521B (en) | Method for computing harmonic impedance of power system | |
CN103064008B (en) | A kind of Nolinear analog circuit soft fault diagnostic method based on Hilbert-Huang transform | |
CN105158723B (en) | An error evaluation system and method for a digital electric energy metering system | |
CN103838959A (en) | Method for applying partial least squares regression to power distribution network harmonic source positioning and detecting | |
CN109406949B (en) | Power distribution network early fault detection method and device based on support vector machine | |
CN110618314B (en) | A Harmonic Responsibility Division Method for Power Distribution System Anti-short-circuit Fault Interference | |
CN108844612B (en) | Transformer internal fault identification method based on mathematical statistics probability model | |
CN109284933B (en) | Electronic transformer state evaluation system and method based on mathematical statistics | |
CN106932641A (en) | A kind of electric network failure diagnosis method based on improvement HHT conversion | |
CN113325357A (en) | Voltage transformer error evaluation method and system based on output time series difference | |
CN105572455A (en) | Harmonic voltage responsibility measuring method based on harmonic power monitoring | |
CN103872679A (en) | Identification method for power grid Thevenin equivalent model parameter under condition of weak signals | |
CN105842644B (en) | Device and method for online comparison and calibration of error characteristics of electronic transformers | |
CN105445618B (en) | A kind of low current neutral grounding system fault route selecting method and device | |
CN117748507A (en) | Distribution network harmonic access uncertainty assessment method based on Gaussian regression model | |
Wu et al. | Quantifying harmonic responsibilities based on kurtosis detection principle of amplitude fluctuations | |
CN114325107A (en) | A method for judging the accuracy of harmonic impedance calculation results | |
CN114325555B (en) | Metering equipment abnormality online monitoring model and error calculation method | |
CN106203889A (en) | Non-perfect losses of distribution network appraisal procedure based on least square fitting method under information | |
CN111999695B (en) | State evaluation and abnormity diagnosis method for metering device of transformer substation | |
Liu et al. | Identification of major power quality disturbance sources in regional grid based on monitoring data correlation analysis | |
CN115575880B (en) | Online detection method for metering error state of power transformer | |
CN105552887A (en) | Branch active power flow-based power network topology error identification method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |