CN114299765B - Out-of-operation item warning method and system for airplane - Google Patents
Out-of-operation item warning method and system for airplane Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN114299765B CN114299765B CN202111591704.7A CN202111591704A CN114299765B CN 114299765 B CN114299765 B CN 114299765B CN 202111591704 A CN202111591704 A CN 202111591704A CN 114299765 B CN114299765 B CN 114299765B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- list
- item
- working
- items
- aircraft
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Abstract
The invention discloses a non-working item warning method for an airplane, which comprises the following steps: receiving one or more alert messages triggered by an abnormal system state of the aircraft; generating a non-working item list based on the one or more alarm messages, wherein the non-working items in the non-working item list indicate airplane modules which cannot work normally; merging the repeated non-working items in the non-working item list; selecting a corresponding sorting rule based on the aircraft operating state to sort the non-operating items in the non-operating item list, wherein at least one non-operating item has different relative priorities in different aircraft operating states; displaying the sorted list of inactive items.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of avionics human-computer interface design, in particular to a non-working item warning method and system for an airplane.
Background
The design of the integrated warning system is always the research focus of each civil aircraft manufacturer. However, the highly complex internal logic and the complex data cross-linking relationship between the aircraft systems greatly increase the difficulty of design and verification. While the display and the alarm system are deeply integrated, the pilot is required to introduce intelligent design features for convenient handling.
In the design of the current mainstream model for the comprehensive alarm system, the non-operation item list is mainly divided according to the flight stage or different alarm messages. However, the above-described division and display method of the list of the non-working items has disadvantages.
In particular, for a list of non-working items divided according to flight phases, the classification definition is not clear. The inoperative items are displayed in two categories, the "all flight phase" and the "approach landing phase" as in the current art. In actual use, there may be ambiguity or uncertainty in classification, such as non-operational terms in some approach landing phases, which may also affect the flight performance or flight quality in other flight phases. The two categories cannot be logically mutually exclusive, thereby causing to some extent pilot misunderstanding or confusion.
And for the non-working item list divided according to different alarm messages, repeated display of non-working items can occur. When non-working items associated with the same alarm message are listed under the same title, duplication may occur in different lists if different alarm messages are associated with the same non-working items. When the number of alarm messages is large, the classification method may increase the workload of the pilot for obtaining the information of the non-operating items.
In response to the deficiencies of existing inactive item display designs, it is desirable to provide an improved inactive item alert method and system for an aircraft.
Disclosure of Invention
The following presents a simplified summary of one or more aspects in order to provide a basic understanding of such aspects. This summary is not an extensive overview of all contemplated aspects, and is intended to neither identify key or critical elements of all aspects nor delineate the scope of any or all aspects. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts of one or more aspects in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
The invention provides a non-working item warning method for an airplane, which comprises the following steps: receiving one or more alert messages triggered by an abnormal system state of the aircraft; generating a non-working item list based on the one or more alarm messages, wherein the non-working items in the non-working item list indicate airplane modules which cannot work normally; merging the repeated non-working items in the non-working item list; selecting a corresponding sorting rule based on the aircraft operating state to sort the non-operating items in the non-operating item list, wherein at least one non-operating item has different relative priorities in different aircraft operating states; displaying the sorted list of inactive items.
In some embodiments, the aircraft operating conditions include one or more of: system status, flight phase, performance requirements of the aircraft.
In some embodiments, displaying the ordered list of inactive items further comprises: displaying the sorted list of inactive items in a window within a primary field of view of the aircraft flight deck.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises: when the non-operating item in the non-operating item list is selected, an alarm message associated with the non-operating item is displayed in the window.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises: and when the alarm message or the airplane operation state changes, updating the non-working item list and displaying the updated non-working item list.
In some embodiments, updating the list of inoperative items further includes one or more of: when a new warning message is received, adding a new non-working item associated with the new warning message to a non-working item list; deleting an inoperative item from the list of inoperative items when all alert messages associated with the inoperative item in the list of inoperative items have been dismissed; and when a new alarm message is received or the operation state of the airplane is changed, merging and sequencing the non-working items in the non-working item list again.
The invention also provides a non-operational item warning system for an aircraft, comprising: a list generation unit configured to: receiving one or more alert messages triggered by an aircraft fault; generating a non-working item list based on the one or more alarm messages, wherein the non-working items in the non-working item list indicate airplane modules which cannot work normally; the sorting unit is used for combining repeated non-working items in the non-working item list and selecting a corresponding sorting rule based on the operation state of the airplane to sort the non-working items in the non-working item list, wherein at least one non-working item has different relative priorities in different airplane operation states; and a display unit which displays the sorted list of the inactive items.
In some embodiments, the aircraft operating conditions include one or more of: system state, flight phase, performance requirements of the aircraft.
In some embodiments, the display unit is further configured to: displaying the sorted list of inactive items in a window within a primary field of view of the aircraft cockpit.
In some embodiments, the display unit is further configured to: when an inoperative item in the inoperative item list is selected, an alert message associated with the inoperative item is displayed in the window.
In some embodiments, the system further comprises an update unit configured to: and when the alarm message or the airplane running state changes, updating the non-working item list and displaying the updated non-working item list.
In some embodiments, the update unit is further configured to: when a new warning message is received, adding a new non-working item associated with the new warning message to a non-working item list; when all alarm messages associated with a non-working item in the non-working item list are released, deleting the non-working item from the non-working item list; and when a new alarm message is received or the operation state of the airplane is changed, merging and sequencing the non-working items in the non-working item list again.
The present invention also provides a computer readable medium storing a computer program for an out-of-operation item alert for an aircraft, the computer program being executable by a processor to perform the aforementioned out-of-operation item alert method for an aircraft.
The invention provides a method and a system for comprehensively judging and displaying system non-working items or affected system functions in real time, integrating and sequencing according to specific priority, and according to internal parameters such as current aircraft system state, flight stage and performance requirements. The defects of the existing model for the display design of the non-working items can be partially solved.
Drawings
The features, nature, and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the detailed description set forth below when taken in conjunction with the drawings. In the drawings, like reference numerals are used to designate corresponding parts throughout the several views. It is noted that the drawings described are only schematic and are non-limiting. In the drawings, the size of some of the elements may be exaggerated and not drawn on scale for illustrative purposes.
FIG. 1 illustrates a flow chart of a dead item alert method for an aircraft of the present invention.
FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary flow diagram for updating a list of non-working items of the present invention.
FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary process of the invention for an out of operation item alert for an aircraft.
FIG. 4 shows an interactive view of the list of inactive items of the present invention.
FIG. 5 illustrates a block diagram of the dead item alert system for an aircraft of the present invention.
FIG. 6 illustrates a block diagram of a device including a non-operational item alert system for an aircraft of the present invention.
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention more apparent, the present invention is further described in detail with reference to the following embodiments and the accompanying drawings. In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the described exemplary embodiments. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art, that the described embodiments may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other example embodiments, well known structures have not been described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the concepts of the present disclosure. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the invention and are not intended to limit the invention. Meanwhile, the various aspects described in the embodiments may be arbitrarily combined without conflict.
In the existing non-working item display design, the classification definition of a non-working item list divided according to the flight phase is not clear, and classification ambiguity or uncertainty may exist in the actual use process, so that misunderstanding of a pilot is caused. And the non-working item list divided according to different alarm messages can be repeatedly displayed, so that the workload of acquiring the non-working item information by a pilot is increased.
The invention provides an improved out-of-operation item warning method and system for an airplane, which avoid the defects of the prior art, reduce the workload of a pilot and improve the flight safety.
FIG. 1 illustrates a flow chart of a dead item alert method 100 for an aircraft of the present invention.
The method 100 starts at step 105. At step 105, one or more alert messages triggered by an aircraft fault are received.
When the airplane is detected to be in an abnormal system state or an operating state, the airplane alarm system can send out an alarm. For example, an aircraft alert system may generate and provide alert messages to the crew.
At step 110, a list of non-operational items is generated based on the one or more alert messages, wherein non-operational items in the list of non-operational items indicate aircraft modules that are not operating properly.
Note that the abnormal operation here includes the abnormal operation caused by the failure of itself or the failure of another module. In addition, the airplane module which cannot normally operate may refer to that the function module is not available (for example, the envelope protection function does not work, the autopilot does not work, etc.), and may also refer to that a certain display function is not available (for example, all maps are not available, FMC performance information is not available, a heading cursor on a navigation page does not work, etc.), or hardware such as a control plane, a multifunctional spoiler does not work.
In some embodiments of the invention, different alert messages may be associated with the same non-operational item. For example, if different alert messages are triggered by a failure of the same aircraft module, the same non-operational item may be associated. Thus, there may be duplicate non-working items in the generated list of non-working items.
In step 115, the inactive items repeated in the list of inactive items are merged.
For the condition that the same non-working item is caused by a plurality of alarm messages, the repeated non-working items in the non-working item list can be integrated in real time, and the repeated non-working items are avoided.
Next, in step 120, a corresponding sorting rule is selected based on the aircraft operating state to sort the non-working items in the non-working item list, where at least one of the non-working items has a different relative priority in different aircraft operating states.
In an embodiment of the invention, the aircraft operating conditions include system conditions, flight phases, performance requirements, etc. of the aircraft.
Different aircraft operating conditions may affect the relative priority of non-operational items. In particular, the system state of the aircraft (the operational or fault state of an existing system) may affect the ordering of the inoperative items. Different flight phases place different emphasis on some functional modules, thereby also affecting the sequencing of non-operational items. Furthermore, certain operating procedures selected by the pilot (e.g., different approach landing procedures, different takeoff thrust, etc. settings) may have particular performance requirements for the corresponding functional module, thereby also causing changes in the sequencing.
In some embodiments, the inoperative item associated with a low hydraulic system pressure for normal retraction and extension of the landing gear has a relatively high priority if the current system state indicates that the landing gear emergency retraction system is not operating properly. Conversely, if the current system state indicates that the emergency landing gear system is working normally, the non-working item related to the low pressure of the hydraulic system for the normal retraction and extension of the landing gear has lower priority.
In some embodiments, if the current flight phase is a landing phase, the brake fault has a higher degree of impact on aircraft operation. In this case, the non-operational item related to the brake failure has a relatively high priority. Conversely, if the current flight phase is not the landing phase, the brake failure has a relatively low degree of impact on the operation of the aircraft. In this case, the non-operational item related to the brake failure has a relatively low priority
In some embodiments, the pilot selecting different operating programs may have particular performance requirements for the corresponding functional modules. For example, pilot selection of an instrument landing procedure may have higher performance requirements on the modules associated with the instrument landing procedure. If a module associated with the instrument landing system is not functioning properly and the pilot selects an instrument landing procedure, its non-functioning items have a relatively high priority. Conversely, if the pilot selects a VOR approach or other non-instrumented landing procedure, the non-operational item has a lower priority.
In some embodiments of the invention, a variety of sequencing rules may be defined for different aircraft operating conditions. For example, if the current flight phase is a landing phase, the sequencing rule may assign a relatively higher priority to non-operational items related to brake failure. Conversely, if the current flight phase is not a landing phase, the sequencing rule may assign a relatively lower priority to non-operational items related to brake failure.
Finally, at step 125, the sorted list of inactive items is displayed.
In the preferred embodiment, the ordered list of non-working items can be displayed in a window in the main view field range of the airplane pilot, so that the crew can conveniently look up in time, and the condition perception capability of the crew on the flight system is improved.
Preferably, the respective non-working items are displayed in a list form, and the highest-ranked non-working item is displayed uppermost in the list. In this way, the crew can be made more clear of system failure.
In some embodiments of the invention, the display area in the window may be configured to be interactive so that a particular inactive item may be selected (e.g., by cursor or touch). When a non-working item is selected, an alert message associated with the non-working item may be displayed in a window.
In an embodiment of the present invention, when an alert message or an aircraft operation state changes, the list of inactive items may be updated and the updated list of inactive items may be displayed. Details regarding updating the list of inactive items are further described in FIG. 2.
The method 100 avoids the occurrence of repeated non-operational items in the list of non-operational items displayed to the crew by merging the repeated non-operational items, thereby reducing the workload of the crew. Meanwhile, the non-working items are sequenced, so that the condition perception capability of the unit on the aircraft system is further improved, and the flight safety is improved.
FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary flow chart of a method 200 of updating a list of non-working items of the present invention.
And when the list of the non-working items is displayed in the window, if the alarm message or the aircraft running state changes, updating the list of the non-working items and displaying the updated list of the non-working items.
Specifically, in step 205, when a new alert message is received, a new non-working item associated with the new alert message is added to the non-working item list.
For example, if a new aircraft module fails, the aircraft alert system may generate a new alert message. At this time, a new non-working item associated with the new alert message may be generated. When the new non-working item is added to the non-working item list, the priority of the new non-working item can be determined and added to the proper position in the non-working item list according to the priority, so that the new non-working item list does not need to be reordered. Alternatively, the new non-working item may be added anywhere in the list of non-working items and the new list of non-working items may be reordered.
In some cases, the non-working items resulting from the new alert message may already be present in the list. At this point, the newly added non-working item is duplicated with the original non-working items in the list. In this case, the new list of non-operational items may be merged and sorted by the sorting unit, so that the newly added non-operational item is merged with the duplicate non-operational item in the original list. In other words, in some cases, the updated list of non-working items may be the same as the original list of non-working items.
At step 210, when all alert messages associated with an inoperative item in the list of inoperative items have been dismissed, the inoperative item is deleted from the list of inoperative items.
When all alarm messages associated with a non-working item have been released, the corresponding function module can be considered to have been cleared and to be able to work normally. At this time, the inactive item may be deleted from the inactive item list.
As an example, illustrated in connection with fig. 4 below, the non-working item "Autopilot inop" in fig. 4 is associated with two alert messages ("NAV alert SYS" and "FD FAULT"). Only if both alarm messages have been dismissed will the inoperative item "Autopilot inop" be deleted from the list. If only one of the alarm messages is dismissed, the inoperative item "automatic inop" remains in the list.
In step 215, when a new warning message is received or the aircraft operation state changes, the non-working items in the non-working item list are merged and sorted again.
For example, when the current flight phase of the aircraft changes, the priorities of some non-working items change, and the non-working items can be merged and sorted again according to the latest priorities.
Finally, at step 220, the updated list of inactive items is displayed. For example, the updated list of inactive items may be displayed in a window within the primary field of view.
It should be noted that the order of the above steps is exemplary. In various embodiments of the present invention, the steps described above may be performed in a different order or in parallel.
The method 200 enables the flight crew to know the latest aircraft fault condition in time by updating the list of non-operational items in real time, thereby further improving flight safety.
FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary process 300 for non-operational item alerting for an aircraft of the present invention.
As shown, first, the aircraft alert system provides an alert message indication to the crew based on the current abnormal system state or operational state of the aircraft. For example, the aircraft alert system may generate one or more alert messages, such as alert message 1, alert message 2, and alert message 3 in the figure. It should be noted that the three alert messages shown in the figures are merely exemplary. In different implementations, more or less than three alert messages may be generated.
The generated alert messages may then be collectively provided to an alert processor for processing. The alert processor may form a list of non-operational items in conjunction with real-time pilot operation in the procedure.
Meanwhile, the alarm processor receives the parameters of the running state of the airplane, namely the system state, the flight phase, the performance requirement and the like. And the alarm processor selects a corresponding sorting rule based on the aircraft running state through comprehensive analysis, wherein the sorting rule assigns a specific priority to each non-working item. And the alarm processor sorts the non-working items in the non-working item list by using the selected sorting rule, generates a sorted non-working item list and displays the sorted non-working item list to the unit for reference.
In a preferred implementation, the inactive items are displayed in the form of a list in a separate page or window within the main field of view. In addition, manual hide and recall functionality may be provided, as well as automatic pop-up functionality under particular scenarios or conditions (e.g., when an aircraft enters a landing stage).
If the display area is configured as an interactive window or page, the corresponding inoperative item can also be clicked to review the alarm message associated with the inoperative item.
As shown, if an alert message or an aircraft operating state changes, the alert processor will receive real-time information, update the list of inactive items and display the updated list of inactive items. Details regarding updating the list of inactive items are described above in FIG. 2 and are not described in detail herein.
It should be noted that the process 300 shown in fig. 3 is merely exemplary. In different implementations, the worker in the art may implement the non-operational item alert in different ways. For example, in the implementation of fig. 3, when an alert message or an aircraft operational state changes, the original list of non-working items is updated (e.g., new non-working items are added to the original list, non-working items are deleted from the original list). In the replacement implementation, when the alarm message or the aircraft operation state changes, a new non-working item list can be generated according to the latest alarm message and the aircraft operation state and the original non-working item list is covered, instead of updating the original non-working item list.
FIG. 4 illustrates an interaction diagram 400 of the list of inactive items of the present invention.
In the implementation of displaying the list of the non-working items in the interactive window or page, the non-working items can be interacted through other hardware or software interaction modes such as cursor controller or touch control.
As shown in fig. 4, an exemplary list of non-working items is listed on the left side of the page, including three non-working items: autopilot inop (Autopilot-on-the-fly), LNAV inop (lateral navigation-on-the-fly), VNAV inop (vertical navigation-on-the-fly).
When the non-working item in the non-working item list is selected, the warning message associated with the non-working item can be displayed in a page for the unit to refer.
As shown in fig. 4, when the "automatic loop" non-working item is selected, the associated alarm messages "NAV alarm SYS" and "FD FAULT" may be displayed in the blank area on the right side of the non-working item.
It should be noted that the layout of the interaction diagram 400 of the list of inactive items shown in FIG. 4 is exemplary only. In different implementations, different layouts may be used by those skilled in the art. For example, the non-workitems may be displayed centrally, on the right side of the page, and so on.
FIG. 5 illustrates a block diagram of a system 500 for non-operational item alerting of an aircraft of the present invention.
Referring to fig. 5, system 500 may include a list generation unit 502, a sorting unit 504, a display unit 506, and an update unit 508. Each of these units may be connected to or in communication with each other, directly or indirectly, over one or more buses 510.
In embodiments of the present invention, the list generation unit 502 may be configured to: receiving one or more alert messages; generating a list of non-working items based on the one or more alert messages, wherein non-working items in the list of non-working items indicate airplane modules that cannot work properly.
The sorting unit 504 may be configured to: and combining repeated non-working items in the non-working item list, and selecting a corresponding sorting rule based on the operation state of the airplane to sort the non-working items in the non-working item list, wherein at least one non-working item has different relative priorities in different airplane operation states.
In embodiments of the present invention, the aircraft operating conditions may include the system state, flight phase, performance requirements, etc. of the aircraft.
The display unit 506 may be configured to: displaying the sorted list of inactive items.
In some embodiments of the present invention, the display unit 506 may be further configured to: displaying the sorted list of inactive items in a window within a primary field of view of the aircraft cockpit.
In some embodiments of the present invention, the display unit 506 may be further configured to: when an inoperative item in the inoperative item list is selected, an alert message associated with the inoperative item is displayed in the window.
The update unit 508 may be configured to: and when the alarm message or the airplane operation state changes, updating the non-working item list and displaying the updated non-working item list.
In some embodiments of the invention, the update unit 508 may be further configured to: when a new alarm message is received, adding a new non-working item associated with the new alarm message to a non-working item list; deleting an inoperative item from the list of inoperative items when all alert messages associated with the inoperative item in the list of inoperative items have been dismissed; and when a new alarm message is received or the operation state of the airplane is changed, merging and sequencing the non-working items in the non-working item list again.
While specific elements of system 500 are shown in FIG. 5, it should be understood that these elements are exemplary only and not limiting. In different implementations, one or more of the units may be combined, divided, removed, or additional units may be added. For example, in some implementations, ordering unit 504 may be split into a merge subunit for merging duplicate non-working items and an ordering subunit for ordering the non-working items. In some implementations, the display unit 506 and the update unit 508 may be combined into a single unit.
FIG. 6 illustrates a block diagram of a device 600 including the dead item alert for an aircraft of the present invention.
The apparatus illustrates a general hardware environment in which the present invention may be applied in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
The processor 602 may be any type of processor and may include, but is not limited to, a general purpose processor and/or a special purpose processor (e.g., a special purpose processing chip), an intelligent hardware device (e.g., a general purpose processor, a DSP, a CPU, a microcontroller, an ASIC, an FPGA, a programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic components, discrete hardware components, or any combination thereof). In some cases, the processor 602 may be configured to operate the memory array using a memory controller. In other cases, a memory controller (not shown) may be integrated into processor 602. The processor 602 may be responsible for managing the bus and general processing, including the execution of software stored on the memory. The processor 602 may also be configured to perform various functions described herein related to out-of-flight alerts for an aircraft. For example, the processor 602 may be configured to: receiving one or more alert messages triggered by an aircraft fault; generating a non-working item list based on the one or more warning messages, wherein the non-working items in the non-working item list indicate airplane modules which cannot work normally; merging the repeated non-working items in the non-working item list; selecting a corresponding sorting rule based on the aircraft operating state to sort the non-operating items in the non-operating item list, wherein at least one non-operating item has different relative priorities in different aircraft operating states; and displaying the sorted list of inactive items.
The detailed description set forth above in connection with the appended drawings describes examples and is not intended to represent all examples that may be implemented or fall within the scope of the claims. The terms "example" and "exemplary" when used in this specification mean "serving as an example, instance, or illustration," and do not mean "superior or superior to other examples.
Reference throughout this specification to "one embodiment" or "an embodiment" means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, usage of such phrases may refer to more than just one embodiment. Furthermore, the described features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.
The previous description is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the various aspects described herein. Various modifications to these aspects will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other aspects. Thus, the claims are not intended to be limited to the aspects shown herein, but is to be accorded the full scope consistent with the language claims, wherein reference to an element in the singular is not intended to mean "one and only one" unless specifically so stated, but rather "one or more. The term "some" means one or more unless specifically stated otherwise. All structural and functional equivalents to the elements of the various aspects described throughout this disclosure that are known or later come to be known to those of ordinary skill in the art are expressly incorporated herein by reference and are intended to be encompassed by the claims.
It is also noted that the embodiments may be described as a process which is depicted as a flowchart, a flow diagram, a structure diagram, or a block diagram. Although a flowchart may describe the operations as a sequential process, many of the operations can be performed in parallel or concurrently. In addition, the order of the operations may be rearranged.
While various embodiments have been illustrated and described, it is to be understood that the embodiments are not limited to the precise configuration and components described above. Various modifications, substitutions, and improvements apparent to those skilled in the art may be made in the arrangement, operation, and details of the devices disclosed herein without departing from the scope of the claims.
Claims (11)
1. An inoperative item alerting method for an aircraft, comprising:
receiving one or more alert messages triggered by an abnormal system state of the aircraft;
generating a list of non-working items based on the one or more alert messages, wherein a non-working item in the list of non-working items indicates an aircraft module that cannot work normally;
merging repeated non-working items in the non-working item list;
selecting a corresponding sorting rule based on the aircraft operating state to sort the non-operating items in the non-operating item list, wherein at least one non-operating item has different relative priorities in different aircraft operating states;
displaying the sorted list of inactive items; and
updating the list of inactive items and displaying the updated list of inactive items when a warning message or an aircraft operation state changes, wherein updating the list of inactive items further comprises: deleting an inoperative item from the inoperative item list when all alert messages associated with an inoperative item in the inoperative item list have been dismissed.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the aircraft operating conditions include one or more of: system state, flight phase, performance requirements of the aircraft.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein displaying the ordered list of inactive items further comprises:
displaying the ordered list of inactive items in a window within a primary field of view of an aircraft cockpit.
4. The method of claim 3, further comprising:
when an inoperative item in the inoperative item list is selected, displaying an alarm message associated with the inoperative item in the window.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein updating the list of non-working items further comprises one or more of:
when a new warning message is received, adding a new non-working item associated with the new warning message to the non-working item list;
and when a new warning message is received or the operation state of the airplane is changed, merging and sequencing the non-working items in the non-working item list again.
6. An inoperative item alerting system for an aircraft, comprising:
a list generation unit configured to:
receiving one or more alert messages triggered by an aircraft fault;
generating a list of non-working items based on the one or more alert messages, wherein a non-working item in the list of non-working items indicates an aircraft module that cannot work normally;
the sorting unit is used for combining repeated non-working items in the non-working item list and selecting a corresponding sorting rule based on the operation state of the airplane to sort the non-working items in the non-working item list, wherein at least one non-working item has different relative priorities in different airplane operation states;
a display unit which displays the sorted list of the inactive items; and
an update unit configured to: updating the list of inactive items and displaying the updated list of inactive items when a warning message or an aircraft operation state changes, wherein updating the list of inactive items further comprises: deleting an inoperative item from the inoperative item list when all alert messages associated with an inoperative item in the inoperative item list have been dismissed.
7. The system of claim 6, wherein the aircraft operational status comprises one or more of: system state, flight phase, performance requirements of the aircraft.
8. The system of claim 6, wherein the display unit is further configured to:
displaying the ordered list of inactive items in a window within a primary field of view of an aircraft flight deck.
9. The system of claim 8, wherein the display unit is further configured to:
when an inoperative item in the inoperative item list is selected, displaying an alarm message associated with the inoperative item in the window.
10. The system of claim 6, wherein the update unit is further configured to:
when a new warning message is received, adding a new non-working item associated with the new warning message to the non-working item list;
and when a new warning message is received or the operation state of the airplane is changed, merging and sequencing the non-working items in the non-working item list again.
11. A computer-readable medium storing a computer program for out-of-work item alerting of an aircraft, the computer program being executable by a processor to perform the method of any one of claims 1-5.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111591704.7A CN114299765B (en) | 2021-12-23 | 2021-12-23 | Out-of-operation item warning method and system for airplane |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111591704.7A CN114299765B (en) | 2021-12-23 | 2021-12-23 | Out-of-operation item warning method and system for airplane |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN114299765A CN114299765A (en) | 2022-04-08 |
| CN114299765B true CN114299765B (en) | 2023-02-24 |
Family
ID=80970269
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111591704.7A Active CN114299765B (en) | 2021-12-23 | 2021-12-23 | Out-of-operation item warning method and system for airplane |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN114299765B (en) |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109191023A (en) * | 2018-11-07 | 2019-01-11 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | A kind of power grid warning information immediate processing method and device |
| CN111224988A (en) * | 2020-01-08 | 2020-06-02 | 国网陕西省电力公司信息通信公司 | Network security information filtering method |
| CN112344990A (en) * | 2020-10-21 | 2021-02-09 | 平安国际智慧城市科技股份有限公司 | Environmental anomaly monitoring method, device, equipment and storage medium |
| CN113326173A (en) * | 2021-08-04 | 2021-08-31 | 云智慧（北京）科技有限公司 | Method, device and equipment for processing alarm message |
| CN113448763A (en) * | 2021-07-16 | 2021-09-28 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | Dynamic expansion grouping alarm service method for full life cycle management |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20150228004A1 (en) * | 2014-02-07 | 2015-08-13 | Kristin Kaye Bednarek | Smart Device Apps and Incentives For Encouraging The Creation and Sharing Electronic Lists To Imrpove Targeted Marketing While Preserving User Anonymity |
| FR3026214B1 (en) * | 2014-09-22 | 2017-05-19 | Thales Sa | METHOD FOR MANAGING ALERTS |
| US10099801B2 (en) * | 2015-10-01 | 2018-10-16 | The Boeing Company | Consolidated flight deck task list based on alerting and checklist items |
-
2021
- 2021-12-23 CN CN202111591704.7A patent/CN114299765B/en active Active
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109191023A (en) * | 2018-11-07 | 2019-01-11 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | A kind of power grid warning information immediate processing method and device |
| CN111224988A (en) * | 2020-01-08 | 2020-06-02 | 国网陕西省电力公司信息通信公司 | Network security information filtering method |
| CN112344990A (en) * | 2020-10-21 | 2021-02-09 | 平安国际智慧城市科技股份有限公司 | Environmental anomaly monitoring method, device, equipment and storage medium |
| CN113448763A (en) * | 2021-07-16 | 2021-09-28 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | Dynamic expansion grouping alarm service method for full life cycle management |
| CN113326173A (en) * | 2021-08-04 | 2021-08-31 | 云智慧（北京）科技有限公司 | Method, device and equipment for processing alarm message |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN114299765A (en) | 2022-04-08 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US9846523B2 (en) | Adaptive interface system for confirming a status of a plurality of identified tasks | |
| US9171273B2 (en) | Integrated electronic checklist display system | |
| CN104298803B (en) | System and method for evaluating cumulative effects of failures | |
| US11535393B2 (en) | Methods and systems for automatic cross-checking of electronic checklists | |
| US9384529B2 (en) | Flight data display | |
| US11137873B1 (en) | Flight deck display management | |
| US20160357492A1 (en) | Display system and method for an aircraft | |
| US8462018B1 (en) | Systems and method for controlling the simultaneous display of multi-level classified information on the same surface of an aircraft display unit | |
| US8751512B2 (en) | Method and device for managing information in an aircraft | |
| US9114887B2 (en) | Methods and systems for displaying aircraft information | |
| EP2882647B1 (en) | Checklist display system, method and graphical display therefor | |
| US10093431B2 (en) | Aircraft instrumentation systems for displaying electronic circuit breaker information | |
| EP2860601A1 (en) | Failure Analysis System | |
| US10099801B2 (en) | Consolidated flight deck task list based on alerting and checklist items | |
| US20200192559A1 (en) | Displaying performance limitations in aircraft display | |
| US11305886B1 (en) | Graphical user interface in a computer system in an aircraft | |
| US8443368B2 (en) | User controlled reconfiguring and saving of a task context comprising a configuration of a set of tools used by the user | |
| US11734630B2 (en) | Methods and systems for electronic checklist data references | |
| US20130024053A1 (en) | Reconfiguration process of an aircraft environment surveillance device | |
| CN114299765B (en) | Out-of-operation item warning method and system for airplane | |
| US20140095012A1 (en) | Systems and methods for providing a vehicle checklist | |
| KR20150112561A (en) | Health monitoring apparatus and method in aeronautic system | |
| US20120004794A1 (en) | Device and Method for Task Management for Piloting an Aircraft | |
| EP4009154A1 (en) | Methods and systems for electronic checklist tags | |
| US9889946B2 (en) | Electronic checklists with dynamic visibility of annotations |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |