CN114202702B - Based on D-fGWinter wheat dynamic harvest index remote sensing estimation method obtained by parameter remote sensing - Google Patents
Based on D-fGWinter wheat dynamic harvest index remote sensing estimation method obtained by parameter remote sensing Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN114202702B CN114202702B CN202111188766.3A CN202111188766A CN114202702B CN 114202702 B CN114202702 B CN 114202702B CN 202111188766 A CN202111188766 A CN 202111188766A CN 114202702 B CN114202702 B CN 114202702B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- harvest index
- winter wheat
- remote sensing
- dynamic
- estimation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 171
- 241000209140 Triticum Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 129
- 235000021307 Triticum Nutrition 0.000 title claims abstract description 128
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 72
- 239000002028 Biomass Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 56
- 230000017260 vegetative to reproductive phase transition of meristem Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 37
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 235000013339 cereals Nutrition 0.000 claims description 38
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims description 34
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000005429 filling process Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 abstract description 15
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 abstract description 9
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 24
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 23
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 19
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 16
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000010200 validation analysis Methods 0.000 description 11
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 10
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 8
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 8
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000003973 irrigation Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000002262 irrigation Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 6
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000013179 statistical model Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000013480 data collection Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000004720 fertilization Effects 0.000 description 4
- 240000008042 Zea mays Species 0.000 description 3
- 235000002017 Zea mays subsp mays Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000003337 fertilizer Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000000618 nitrogen fertilizer Substances 0.000 description 3
- 235000005824 Zea mays ssp. parviglumis Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005094 computer simulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000005822 corn Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 230000006735 deficit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000005069 ears Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000009499 grossing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000008267 milk Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000007781 pre-processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002310 reflectometry Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000009331 sowing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 240000005979 Hordeum vulgare Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000007340 Hordeum vulgare Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241001420622 Meris Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000012952 Resampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 240000006394 Sorghum bicolor Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000011684 Sorghum saccharatum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000016383 Zea mays subsp huehuetenangensis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- YYRMJZQKEFZXMX-UHFFFAOYSA-N calcium;phosphoric acid Chemical compound [Ca+2].OP(O)(O)=O.OP(O)(O)=O YYRMJZQKEFZXMX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006353 environmental stress Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013401 experimental design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003621 irrigation water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000009973 maize Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000035800 maturation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000018343 nutrient deficiency Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- OTYBMLCTZGSZBG-UHFFFAOYSA-L potassium sulfate Chemical compound [K+].[K+].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O OTYBMLCTZGSZBG-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 229910052939 potassium sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000011151 potassium sulphates Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009919 sequestration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035882 stress Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002426 superphosphate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005303 weighing Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/17—Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
- G01N21/25—Colour; Spectral properties, i.e. comparison of effect of material on the light at two or more different wavelengths or wavelength bands
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/17—Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
- G01N2021/1793—Remote sensing
- G01N2021/1797—Remote sensing in landscape, e.g. crops
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Cultivation Of Plants (AREA)
Abstract
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明涉及的是一种基于冠层高光谱敏感波段D-fG参数遥感获取的冬小麦动态收获指数遥感估算方法。The invention relates to a remote sensing estimation method of winter wheat dynamic harvest index based on canopy hyperspectral sensitive band Df G parameter remote sensing acquisition.
背景技术Background technique
收获指数(Harvest Index,HI),又称经济系数,指作物收获时经济产量(籽粒、果实)与生物产量之比,该指数反映了同化产物在籽粒和营养器官之间的分配比例。对粮食作物(如小麦、玉米等)来说,收获指数即籽粒产量占地上生物学产量的百分比,其中地上生物学产量指的是地上总干物质量(Donald,1962;Donald and Hamblin,1976;潘晓华等,2007)。由于作物收获指数在作物产量模拟与估算(Fan et al.,2017;Hu et al., 2019;Lorenz et al.,2010)、作物品种选育(Hay,1995;Rivera-Amado et al.,2019)、作物生长栽培环境评价(Porker et al.,2020;Yang and Zhang,2010)、作物固碳能力评价(Chen etal.,2021;Unkovich et al.,2010)以及农业对气候变化响应等方面能够起到重要的指示作用,其概念一经提出,便成为国内外学者的研究热点(Walter et al.,2018;姬兴杰等,2010)。Harvest Index (HI), also known as economic coefficient, refers to the ratio of economic yield (grain, fruit) to biological yield when crops are harvested. The index reflects the distribution ratio of assimilation products between grains and vegetative organs. For food crops (such as wheat, corn, etc.), the harvest index is the percentage of grain yield in the above-ground biological yield, where the above-ground biological yield refers to the total dry matter mass above ground (Donald, 1962; Donald and Hamblin, 1976; Pan Xiaohua) et al., 2007). Since crop harvest index is widely used in crop yield simulation and estimation (Fan et al., 2017; Hu et al., 2019; Lorenz et al., 2010), crop variety selection (Hay, 1995; Rivera-Amado et al., 2019) ), crop growth and cultivation environment assessment (Porker et al., 2020; Yang and Zhang, 2010), crop carbon sequestration capacity assessment (Chen et al., 2021; Unkovich et al., 2010), and agricultural response to climate change, etc. It plays an important indicative role. Once its concept is proposed, it has become a research hotspot of scholars at home and abroad (Walter et al., 2018; Ji Xingjie et al., 2010).
目前,农作物收获指数估算主要从田间尺度和区域尺度2种情况进行了深入研究。基于田间尺度作物HI估算中,一些学者主要从农学和作物学角度开展作物收获指数的模拟估算以及环境胁迫因子(如高温、水分亏缺、土壤养分缺失或过量等)对作物收获指数形成的影响等方面进行深入研究(Fletcher and Jamieson,2009;Kemanian et al.,2007;Soltani et al.,2005)。如Fletcher和Jamieson(2009)开展了小麦收获指数随时间变化的动态模拟及其影响因素研究,研究结果表明小麦收获指数的变化速率与作物灌浆初期的作物地上生物量和灌浆过程中作物生长速率密切相关,且小麦收获指数随时间呈现曲线变化,这对开展冬小麦收获指数的动态模拟与估算具有重要指导作用。Kemanian等 (2007)以小麦、大麦和高粱为研究作物,根据作物HI与作物开花后干物质积累量占整个生长季总干物质量的比例(fG)呈线性或曲线关系,在田间尺度建立了fG与HI之间的统计模型,实现了田间尺度作物收获指数的准确模拟和估计。同时,Li等(2011) 在中国山东省禹城市基于不同氮水平下冬小麦田间控制实验,利用作物开花后的干物质积累量占整个生长季总干物质量的比例(fG)等实测数据开展了冬小麦HI估算方法研究,取得了较好的作物收获指数模拟结果。上述研究结果对利用fG参数进行作物收获指数估算具有重要的参考意义,但由于上述研究仅考虑了成熟期作物fG参数和成熟期作物收获指数,均未考虑fG参数和收获指数的动态变化对作物收获指数估算和模拟的精度影响,从而一定程度上影响了收获指数估算结果的稳定性和估算精度的进一步提高。此外,一些学者基于作物开花至成熟时段的蒸腾量占整个生育期总蒸腾量的比例开展了小麦 HI估算研究(Li et al.,2011;Richards andTownley-Smith,1987;Sadras and Connor,1991),研究中所提方法对水分亏缺条件下的冬小麦HI进行了有效的估算,但在水分充足而存在其它环境因子胁迫(如氮素胁迫)条件下,作物HI估算仍需要进一步深入研究。At present, the estimation of crop harvest index is mainly studied from the field scale and the regional scale. In the field-scale crop HI estimation, some scholars mainly carry out the simulation estimation of crop harvest index from the perspective of agronomy and crop science and the impact of environmental stress factors (such as high temperature, water deficit, soil nutrient deficiency or excess, etc.) on the formation of crop harvest index. and other aspects for in-depth research (Fletcher and Jamieson, 2009; Kemanian et al., 2007; Soltani et al., 2005). For example, Fletcher and Jamieson (2009) conducted a study on the dynamic simulation of wheat harvest index over time and its influencing factors. The results showed that the change rate of wheat harvest index was closely related to the aboveground biomass of crops in the early stage of grain filling and the growth rate of crops during grain filling. Correlation, and the wheat harvest index shows a curve change with time, which has an important guiding role in the dynamic simulation and estimation of winter wheat harvest index. Kemanian et al. (2007) used wheat, barley and sorghum as research crops. According to the linear or curvilinear relationship between crop HI and the ratio of dry matter accumulation after flowering to the total dry matter mass of the whole growing season (f G ), a field scale was established. The statistical model between f G and HI enables accurate simulation and estimation of crop harvest index at the field scale. Meanwhile, Li et al. (2011) conducted a field control experiment of winter wheat under different nitrogen levels in Yucheng City, Shandong Province, China, using the measured data such as the ratio of dry matter accumulation after flowering to the total dry matter mass of the whole growing season (f G ). The HI estimation method of winter wheat has been studied, and good crop harvest index simulation results have been obtained. The above research results have important reference significance for the estimation of crop harvest index using the fG parameter, but because the above research only considers the fG parameter and the harvest index of mature crops, and the dynamics of the fG parameter and the harvest index are not considered. Changes have an impact on the accuracy of crop harvest index estimation and simulation, thus affecting the stability of harvest index estimation results and the further improvement of estimation accuracy to a certain extent. In addition, some scholars have carried out research on wheat HI estimation based on the proportion of evapotranspiration from flowering to maturity to the total evapotranspiration in the whole growth period (Li et al., 2011; Richards and Townley-Smith, 1987; Sadras and Connor, 1991), The method proposed in this study can effectively estimate the HI of winter wheat under the condition of water deficit, but under the condition of sufficient water and other environmental factors (such as nitrogen stress), the estimation of crop HI still needs to be further studied.
基于区域尺度开展作物HI的估算中,传统方法采用以点代面法、空间插值法获取区域作物收获指数(任建强等.2010)。其中,以点代面法是将定点试验获得的多年收获指数均值作为区域收获指数;空间插值法是将实际调查多点作物收获指数进行空间内插得到当年收获指数区域空间分布。近些年来,随着遥感技术的快速发展,遥感技术凭借其覆盖范围大、快速和准确获取地表作物参数信息的优势,为准确获取区域作物收获指数空间信息提供了可靠的技术手段(Campoy et al.,2020;Walter et al.,2018)。其中,国内外学者基于遥感卫星获取的能够反映作物长势状况的时序植被遥感信息(如归一化植被指数和叶面积指数等)开展了一系列的作物收获指数估算研究(Li et al.,2011;Moriondo et al.,2007)。如Moriondo等人(2007)将冬小麦全生育期划分为发芽-开花和开花-成熟两个阶段,根据开花前后两个时段NDVI均值,构建模型1-NDVIpost/NDVIpre估算HI 的空间分布,该方法可通过遥感手段获取冬小麦生长季的NDVI数据,对利用遥感信息获取区域尺度HI具有重要借鉴意义。同时,该方法也被中国学者进一步应用,如Du 等(2009)利用MERIS NDVI时序数据在山东禹城开展了区域冬小麦收获指数的反演和验证,并将区域冬小麦收获指数成果应用于作物产量估算研究。任建强等(2010)以中国黄淮海平原地区冬小麦为研究对象,以小麦开花期-乳熟期NDVI累积值和返青-开花前NDVI累积值的比值来表征冬小麦收获指数,通过建立该比值与实测收获指数间统计模型较好地估算了区域尺度上冬小麦的收获指数。上述方法简单易行,所需遥感数据时间序列较短且较易获取,有利于方法的实际应用,但上述方法均只针对成熟期收获指数的估算,均未实现收获指数变化动态变化过程指标信息的获取,这还有待进一步加强研究。In the estimation of crop HI based on the regional scale, the traditional method adopts the point-to-surface method and the spatial interpolation method to obtain the regional crop harvest index (Ren Jianqiang et al. 2010). Among them, the point-to-surface method is to use the average value of the multi-year harvest index obtained by the fixed-point experiment as the regional harvest index; the spatial interpolation method is to spatially interpolate the actual survey multi-point crop harvest index to obtain the regional spatial distribution of the current year's harvest index. In recent years, with the rapid development of remote sensing technology, remote sensing technology has provided a reliable technical means for accurately obtaining the spatial information of regional crop harvest index by virtue of its advantages of large coverage, rapid and accurate acquisition of surface crop parameter information (Campoy et al. ., 2020; Walter et al., 2018). Among them, scholars at home and abroad have carried out a series of studies on the estimation of crop harvest index based on the time-series vegetation remote sensing information (such as normalized vegetation index and leaf area index, etc.) obtained by remote sensing satellites that can reflect the growth status of crops (Li et al., 2011). ; Moriondo et al., 2007). For example, Moriondo et al. (2007) divided the whole growth period of winter wheat into two stages: germination-blooming and flowering-maturity. According to the average NDVI value of the two periods before and after flowering, a model 1-NDVI post /NDVI pre was constructed to estimate the spatial distribution of HI. The method can obtain NDVI data of winter wheat growing season through remote sensing, which has important reference significance for using remote sensing information to obtain regional-scale HI. At the same time, this method has also been further applied by Chinese scholars. For example, Du et al. (2009) used MERIS NDVI time series data to invert and verify the regional winter wheat harvest index in Yucheng, Shandong, and applied the regional winter wheat harvest index to crop yield estimation. Research. Ren Jianqiang et al. (2010) took winter wheat in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain area of China as the research object, and used the ratio of the NDVI cumulative value at the flowering stage-milk maturity stage and the turning green-before-flowering NDVI cumulative value to characterize the winter wheat harvest index. By establishing the ratio and the measured harvest The inter-index statistical model estimated well the harvest index of winter wheat at the regional scale. The above methods are simple and easy to implement, and the required remote sensing data time series are short and easy to obtain, which is beneficial to the practical application of the method. However, the above methods are only aimed at estimating the harvest index at the mature stage, and none of them can realize the dynamic change process index information of the harvest index change. acquisition, which requires further research.
因此,现有技术存在缺陷,需要改进。Therefore, the prior art has shortcomings and needs to be improved.
发明内容SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
本发明所要解决的技术问题是针对现有技术的不足提供一种基于冠层高光谱敏感波段D-fG参数遥感获取的冬小麦动态收获指数遥感估算方法。The technical problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a remote sensing estimation method for the dynamic harvest index of winter wheat based on the canopy hyperspectral sensitive band Df G parameter remote sensing acquisition based on the shortcomings of the prior art.
本发明的技术方案如下:The technical scheme of the present invention is as follows:
一种基于D-fG参数遥感获取的冬小麦动态收获指数遥感估算方法,包括以下步骤:A remote sensing estimation method of winter wheat dynamic harvest index based on Df G parameter remote sensing acquisition, comprising the following steps:
A1、根据地面实测动态生物量数据,构建作物开花期-成熟期期间不同时期累积的地上生物量与对应时期地上生物量间比值动态参数D-fG;A1, according to the measured dynamic biomass data on the ground, construct the ratio dynamic parameter DfG between the aboveground biomass accumulated in different periods during the flowering period-mature period of the crop and the aboveground biomass in the corresponding period;
D-fG计算方法如下:Df G is calculated as follows:
式中,∑Wpost为冬小麦开花期-成熟期期间不同时期累积的地上生物量(kg/hm2);In the formula, ∑W post is the aboveground biomass (kg/hm 2 ) accumulated in different periods between the flowering period and the maturity period of winter wheat;
∑Wwhole为采样时期对应的全部地上生物量(kg/hm2);t为采样时间,Wt为t采样时间的干物质量的重量(kg/hm2),Wa为开花期干物质量的重量(kg/hm2),D-fG,t表示t采样时间的比值参数;∑W whole is the total aboveground biomass corresponding to the sampling period (kg/hm 2 ); t is the sampling time, W t is the weight of the dry matter mass at the t sampling time (kg/hm 2 ), and W a is the dry matter mass at the flowering stage. Weight (kg/hm 2 ), Df G, t represents the ratio parameter of t sampling time;
A2、基于地面作物冠层高光谱数据构建的任意两个冠层高光谱窄波段光谱指数NDSI,建立NDSI与冬小麦D-fG之间的线性模型;A2. Based on any two canopy hyperspectral narrow-band spectral indices NDSI constructed based on ground crop canopy hyperspectral data, a linear model between NDSI and winter wheat Df G was established;
A3、然后绘制并分析NDSI与冬小麦D-fG间的拟合精度R2二维图;A3. Then draw and analyze the two-dimensional graph of the fitting accuracy R 2 between NDSI and winter wheat Df G ;
A4、通过确定R2极大值区域和极大值区域重心,从而得到对冬小麦D-fG敏感的波段中心;A4. By determining the maximum value area of R 2 and the center of gravity of the maximum value area, the band center sensitive to Df G of winter wheat is obtained;
A5、确定D-fG估算最优波段组合;A5. Determine the optimal band combination for Df G estimation;
A6、基于NDSI和D-fG关系的D-fG遥感估算模型;A6. Df G remote sensing estimation model based on the relationship between NDSI and Df G ;
A7、D-fG的遥感估算;A7. Remote sensing estimation of Df G ;
A8、获得基于D-fG和D-HI关系的动态收获指数估算模型;A8. Obtain a dynamic harvest index estimation model based on the relationship between Df G and D-HI;
A9、D-HI的遥感估算。Remote sensing estimation of A9, D-HI.
所述的方法,所述步骤A4,根据R2极大值区域重心法获得敏感波段中心,从而确定D-fG估算的敏感波段,即在冠层高光谱每个波段对应的窄波段光谱指数NDSI和D-fG间相关性计算基础上,根据相关系数满足统计显著性要求的阈值确定极大值区域,在此基础上,计算相关系数极大值区域的重心,从而获得NDSI与D-fG参数相关性较大的光谱波段中心和波段组合;具体过程如下:In the described method, in step A4, the center of the sensitive band is obtained according to the method of the center of gravity of the maximum value region of R 2 , so as to determine the sensitive band estimated by Df G , that is, the narrow band spectral index NDSI and NDSI corresponding to each band of the canopy hyperspectral spectrum. On the basis of the calculation of the correlation between Df G , the maximum value area is determined according to the threshold value of the correlation coefficient satisfying the statistical significance requirement . Large spectral band center and band combination; the specific process is as follows:
首先,在绘制NDSI与冬小麦D-fG间拟合R2二维图的基础上,确定NDSI与冬小麦D-fG间相关性高的波段区域;其次,在该区域内寻找R2极大值点,并遍历该点8邻域内满足显著性条件的所有点,并将这些点的集合标记为R2极大值区域Ω;最后,计算R2极大值区域的重心,将其作为每个R2极大值区域的敏感波段中心;重心的计算公式(7)如下:First, on the basis of drawing a two-dimensional graph of fitting R 2 between NDSI and winter wheat Df G , the band area with high correlation between NDSI and winter wheat Df G was determined ; Traverse all the points that satisfy the significance condition in the neighborhood of this point 8, and mark the set of these points as the R 2 maximal value region Ω; finally, calculate the barycenter of the R 2 maximal value region as each R 2 pole The center of the sensitive band in the large value area; the calculation formula (7) of the center of gravity is as follows:
式中,f(u,v)为波段坐标为(u,v)的R2值,Ω为极大值区域,敏感波段中心坐标。In the formula, f(u, v) is the R 2 value with the band coordinates (u, v), Ω is the maximum value area, The coordinates of the center of the sensitive band.
所述的方法,所述步骤A4,对冬小麦D-fG敏感的6个敏感波段中心包括λ(443nm,506nm)、λ(442nm,635nm)、λ(732nm,834nm)、λ(787nm,804nm)、λ(810nm, 877nm)和λ(861nm,985nm)。In the method, in the step A4, the 6 sensitive band centers sensitive to winter wheat Df G include λ(443nm, 506nm), λ(442nm, 635nm), λ(732nm, 834nm), λ(787nm, 804nm), λ (810 nm, 877 nm) and λ (861 nm, 985 nm).
所述的方法,所述步骤A6,基于NDSI和D-fG关系的D-fG遥感估算模型为:Described method, described step A6, the Df G remote sensing estimation model based on NDSI and Df G relation is:
D-fG,t=m×NDSIi,j,t+n (5)Df G,t = m×NDSI i,j,t +n (5)
其中,i、j为分别为350nm~1000nm间高光谱波段,t为不同取样时间,m和n为拟合后得到线性方程中的拟合参数;根据该公式计算求出作物开花期至t时期累积地上生物量与t生育期地上生物量间比值参数D-fG,t。Among them, i and j are the hyperspectral bands between 350nm and 1000nm respectively, t is the different sampling time, m and n are the fitting parameters in the linear equation obtained after fitting; according to this formula, the crop flowering period to the t period can be calculated. The ratio parameter Df G,t between the accumulated above-ground biomass and the above-ground biomass in the t growth period.
所述的方法,所述步骤A8,获得基于D-fG和D-HI关系的动态收获指数估算模型为:Described method, described step A8, obtain the dynamic harvest index estimation model based on Df G and D-HI relation is:
D-HIt=HI0+s×D-fG,t (6)D-HI t =HI 0 +s×Df G,t (6)
其中,HI0为截距,即在作物开花期之后生物量不发生变化情况下动态收获指数的值,即当D-fG,t为0时,D-HI收获指数的值;s为D-HI与D-fG线性关系中的斜率常数。Among them, HI 0 is the intercept, that is, the value of the dynamic harvest index when the biomass does not change after the flowering period of the crop, that is, when Df G, t is 0, the value of the D-HI harvest index; s is the D-HI Slope constant in linear relationship with Df G.
所述的方法,所述步骤A8,根据开花期—成熟期期间不同采集时间的动态冬小麦地上生物量数据和灌浆过程中籽粒产量动态数据,计算冬小麦小区128个样本点的D-fG和动态收获指数D-HI,在此基础上,利用公式(6)对D-fG和动态收获指数D-HI间的相关性进行拟合,得到D-fG和动态收获指数D-HI间估算模型,具体如下:Described method, described step A8, according to the dynamic data of aboveground biomass data of winter wheat and the dynamic data of grain yield in the grain filling process of different collection times during the flowering period-maturity period, calculate the Df G and the dynamic harvest index of 128 sample points in the winter wheat plot. D-HI, on this basis, use formula (6) to fit the correlation between Df G and dynamic harvest index D-HI, and obtain an estimation model between Df G and dynamic harvest index D-HI, as follows:
D-HIt=0.1018+0.8093*D-fG,t D-HI t =0.1018+0.8093*Df G,t
一种基于冬小麦动态收获指数的冬小麦产量估算方法,所述冬小麦动态收获指数采用任一上述方法获得。A winter wheat yield estimation method based on a winter wheat dynamic harvest index, wherein the winter wheat dynamic harvest index is obtained by any of the above methods.
本发明方法具有以下有益效果:The inventive method has the following beneficial effects:
(1)由静态fG参数发展为动态fG参数(1) Development from static f G parameters to dynamic f G parameters
前人研究基于fG的作物收获指数估算研究只考虑作物开花期-成熟期累积地上生物量与成熟期地上生物量间比值,而该参数由于未考虑作物生长过程中籽粒产量动态变化,因此,该参数属于静态参数。考虑到已有基于静态fG(S-fG)的作物收获指数估算研究中,由于建模数据和验证数据时间年份较短,因此,可能导致收获指数估算模型会存在稳定性不高的问题,针对这一情况,本发明进一步将一般的静态参数S-fG,发展为考虑开花期-成熟期期间不同生育时期累积的地上生物量与对应时期地上生物量间比值的动态参数D-fG(Dynamic fG)。由于考虑了作物开花期-成熟期间动态D-fG,这在一定程度上可以考虑作物生长动态变化过程信息,且可以增加每年的建模样本数量,从而可以利用较短年份建模数据获得稳定性和精度水平均较高的作物收获指数估算模型和估算结果。The previous studies on the estimation of crop harvest index based on fG only considered the ratio between the cumulative aboveground biomass at the flowering stage and the mature stage of the crop and the aboveground biomass at the mature stage, and this parameter did not consider the dynamic change of grain yield during the crop growth process. Therefore, This parameter is a static parameter. Considering that in the existing research on crop harvest index estimation based on static f G (Sf G ), due to the short time period of modeling data and validation data, it may lead to the problem of low stability of the harvest index estimation model. In this case, the present invention further develops the general static parameter Sf G into a dynamic parameter Df G (Dynamic f G ) that considers the ratio between the above-ground biomass accumulated in different growth stages during the flowering period-maturity period and the above-ground biomass in the corresponding period . Since the dynamic Df G during the flowering period and maturity of the crop is considered, it can take into account the information of the dynamic change process of crop growth to a certain extent, and can increase the number of modeling samples per year, so that the modeling data of shorter years can be used to obtain stability and stability. Crop harvest index estimation model and estimation results with a high level of precision.
(2)提出了基于遥感技术获取fG参数信息的技术方法(2) A technical method to obtain fG parameter information based on remote sensing technology is proposed
一般获取fG的方式是在田间尺度通过地面人工观测作物地上生物量获得,本发明在将静态S-fG发展为动态D-fG基础上,通过冠层高光谱获得NDSI遥感信息,然后利用重心模型对D-fG遥感估算敏感波段进行筛选,实现了D-fG参数的遥感估算。本发明所提出的基于冠层光谱敏感波段中心构建NDSI的D-fG遥感估算技术方法可为无人机遥感和大范围内利用遥感卫星技术进行D-fG参数遥感获取奠定技术基础,也为田间尺度基于实测S-fG的作物收获指数估算方法升尺度应用提供了新的思路和技术方法。The general way to obtain fG is to manually observe the aboveground biomass of crops at the field scale. On the basis of developing static SfG into dynamic DfG , the present invention obtains NDSI remote sensing information through canopy hyperspectral, and then uses the center of gravity model to Df G remote sensing estimation sensitive bands are screened to realize remote sensing estimation of Df G parameters. The DfG remote sensing estimation technology method based on the canopy spectral sensitive band center to construct NDSI proposed by the present invention can lay a technical foundation for remote sensing of UAVs and remote sensing acquisition of DfG parameters using remote sensing satellite technology in a large range, and also provide a basis for field scale based remote sensing. The upscaling application of the crop harvest index estimation method of measured SfG provides new ideas and technical methods.
(3)提出了基于动态fG参数遥感获取的动态收获指数遥感估测技术方法(3) The remote sensing estimation technology method of dynamic harvest index based on dynamic f G parameter remote sensing acquisition is proposed.
针对已有传统的基于fG参数作物收获指数估算全部采用地面实测数据来实现,而无法利用遥感信息实现该方法升尺度区域应用,且已有利用遥感信息估算作物收获指数研究一般只进行农作物成熟期收获指数估算,而对作物收获指数动态变化过程考虑不足,一定程度上影响了作物收获指数估算精度的进一步提高,因此,在充分利用遥感数据获得动态fG参数遥感信息基础上,本发明提出了考虑灌浆期—成熟期不同时期作物生物量变化和籽粒形成过程的动态作物收获指数遥感估算方法,一定程度上提高了作物收获指数遥感估算模型的稳定性和精度,突破了传统的基于fG参数作物收获指数估算方法无法利用遥感信息进行升尺度应用的瓶颈,实现了基于动态fG参数遥感获取的动态收获指数遥感高精度估测。In view of the existing traditional crop harvest index estimation based on f G parameter, it is all realized by ground measured data, but cannot use remote sensing information to realize the upscaling regional application of this method, and the existing researches using remote sensing information to estimate crop harvest index generally only focus on crop maturity. However, the lack of consideration of the dynamic change process of the crop harvest index affects the further improvement of the estimation accuracy of the crop harvest index to a certain extent. This paper proposes a dynamic crop harvest index remote sensing estimation method that considers crop biomass changes and grain formation processes in different periods of grain filling and maturity, which improves the stability and accuracy of the crop harvest index remote sensing estimation model to a certain extent. The parametric crop harvest index estimation method cannot use the remote sensing information for the bottleneck of upscaling application, and realizes the high-precision remote sensing estimation of the dynamic harvest index based on the dynamic f G parameter remote sensing.
附图说明Description of drawings
图1为研究区位置及试验小区布设;Figure 1 shows the location of the research area and the layout of the test plot;
图2为试验小区不同生育期冬小麦冠层高光谱曲线;Fig. 2 is the hyperspectral curve of winter wheat canopy in different growth stages of the experimental plot;
图3为技术路线图;Figure 3 is a technical roadmap;
图4为基于NDSI估算作物D-fG的遥感敏感波段中心确定示意图;Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of the center determination of the remote sensing sensitive band for estimating crop Df G based on NDSI;
图5为S-fG和成熟期收获指数G-HI间的线性关系模型;Fig. 5 is the linear relationship model between Sf G and maturity harvest index G-HI;
图6为基于实测S-fG的成熟期作物收获指数估算精度验证;Fig. 6 is the verification of the estimation accuracy of crop harvest index at the mature stage based on the measured Sf G ;
图7为正常水平施肥和灌水处理(N2W2)冬小麦NDSI二维分布(2020年);a.开花期(5月10日),b.灌浆前期(5月18日),c.灌浆中期(5月24日),d.灌浆后期 (6月3日),e.成熟期(6月19日);Figure 7 shows the two-dimensional distribution of NDSI in winter wheat under normal horizontal fertilization and irrigation (N2W2) (2020); a. flowering stage (May 10), b. early grain filling (May 18), c. middle grain filling (5 24th of June), d. late stage of grain filling (3rd of June), e. of maturity (19th of June);
图8为NDSI与冬小麦D-fG间的拟合R2二维图;Figure 8 is a two -dimensional diagram of fitting R2 between NDSI and winter wheat DfG ;
图9为NDSI与冬小麦D-fG间的拟合R2二维等值线图;Fig. 9 is the fitting R 2 two-dimensional contour map between NDSI and winter wheat Df G ;
图10为基于敏感波段中心构建的NDSI与D-fG间模型构建;Figure 10 shows the construction of the model between NDSI and Df G based on the center of the sensitive band;
图11为基于敏感波段中心的D-fG估算结果验证;Figure 11 is the verification of the Df G estimation result based on the center of the sensitive band;
图12为基于D-fG遥感参数的D-HI估算模型建立;Figure 12 shows the establishment of a D-HI estimation model based on Df G remote sensing parameters;
图13为基于高光谱敏感波段D-fG参数的D-HI估算结果验证;Fig. 13 is the D-HI estimation result verification based on the hyperspectral sensitive band Df G parameter;
图14为基于高光谱敏感波段D-fG参数的成熟期D-HI估算结果验证;Fig. 14 is the verification of the mature stage D-HI estimation result based on the hyperspectral sensitive band Df G parameter;
图10、图11、图13、图14中各图对应的敏感波段中心:a(443nm,506nm)、b (442nm,635nm)、c(732nm,834nm)、d(787nm,804nm)、e(810nm,877nm)、f (861nm,985nm);Sensitive band centers corresponding to each of Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 13, Figure 14: a (443nm, 506nm), b (442nm, 635nm), c (732nm, 834nm), d (787nm, 804nm), e ( 810nm, 877nm), f (861nm, 985nm);
具体实施方式Detailed ways
以下结合具体实施例,对本发明进行详细说明。The present invention will be described in detail below with reference to specific embodiments.
1材料与方法1 Materials and methods
1.1研究区域与试验设计1.1 Study area and experimental design
本发明田间试验设在北京市顺义区农业环境综合试验示范基地(116°92′~116°94′E,40°05′~40°06′N)。该研究区属于暖温带半湿润大陆季风气候,年平均气温约11.5℃,年平均降水量约625mm,年日照约2750小时,无霜期195天左右。该研究区的主要种植制度为冬小麦-夏玉米一年两熟制。研究区位置图见图1。The field test of the present invention is set in the agricultural environment comprehensive test demonstration base in Shunyi District, Beijing (116°92'~116°94'E, 40°05'~40°06'N). The study area belongs to the warm temperate semi-humid continental monsoon climate, with an average annual temperature of about 11.5 °C, an average annual precipitation of about 625 mm, an annual sunshine of about 2750 hours, and a frost-free period of about 195 days. The main planting system in this study area is winter wheat-summer maize with two crops a year. The location map of the study area is shown in Figure 1.
为了获得具有不同长势和生长状态的冬小麦观测作物,考虑到研究区目前冬小麦长势和产量主要受施肥和灌溉影响,特别是氮素和土壤水分对冬小麦长势和产量具有重要控制作用,因此,本发明设计试验主要考虑氮肥和水分两种因素。冬小麦试验于2019 年10月至2020年6月。试验选用小麦品种为轮选987,底肥为过磷酸钙、硫酸钾(P2O5为135kg/hm2、K2O为90kg/hm2)。试验设置了4种供氮水平:N0(不施氮肥)、N1(施氮量160kg/hm2)、N2(施氮量为240kg/hm2)、N3(施氮量为320kg/hm2)。氮肥量分两次施用,即播种时底肥和返青期追肥各施用一半的肥量,追肥时间为冬小麦返青-拔节期。整个生育期灌溉水量处理分为四个水平:W0(0mm)、W1(100mm)、W2(150mm)、 W3(200mm)。其中,W2为整个生育期当地冬小麦正常灌水总量。冬小麦灌水共计4 次,灌水时间分别为冬前、返青期、拔节期、孕穗期,平均每个小区每次灌水0mm、25mm、 37.5mm和50mm。冬小麦试验其他栽培管理与当地传统冬小麦管理措施保持一致。在冬小麦全生育期共设置4个不同施氮量和4个不同水分处理,共16个处理,每个处理设置3个重复,共48个试验小区,每个小区面积为30m2(5m×6m)。本发明中,控制实验的播种时间为2019年10月9日,冬小麦抽穗-开花期为2020年5月上旬、灌浆- 乳熟期(2020年5月中旬至6月上旬)、成熟期(2020年6月中旬)。In order to obtain observation crops of winter wheat with different growth states and growth states, considering that the growth and yield of winter wheat in the study area are mainly affected by fertilization and irrigation, especially nitrogen and soil moisture have important controlling effects on the growth and yield of winter wheat, therefore, the present invention The design experiment mainly considered two factors, nitrogen fertilizer and water. Winter wheat trials were conducted from October 2019 to June 2020. The wheat variety used in the experiment was Lunxuan 987, and the base fertilizers were superphosphate and potassium sulfate (P 2 O 5 was 135kg/hm 2 , K 2 O was 90kg/hm 2 ). Four nitrogen supply levels were set in the experiment: N0 (no nitrogen fertilizer application), N1 (nitrogen application rate of 160kg/hm 2 ), N2 (nitrogen application rate of 240kg/hm 2 ), N3 (nitrogen application rate of 320kg/hm 2 ) . The amount of nitrogen fertilizer was applied twice, that is, half of the fertilizer amount was applied at the time of sowing as the base fertilizer and the top-dressing during the greening period, and the top-dressing time was the greening-jointing period of winter wheat. The irrigation water treatment in the whole growth period was divided into four levels: W0 (0mm), W1 (100mm), W2 (150mm), W3 (200mm). Among them, W2 is the total amount of normal irrigation of local winter wheat in the whole growth period. Winter wheat was irrigated for a total of 4 times. The irrigation time was before winter, greening period, jointing period and booting period. On average, each plot was irrigated 0 mm, 25 mm, 37.5 mm and 50 mm per time. Other cultivation and management of winter wheat trials are consistent with the local traditional winter wheat management measures. During the whole growth period of winter wheat, a total of 4 different nitrogen application rates and 4 different water treatments were set, with a total of 16 treatments, each treatment was set with 3 replicates, and a total of 48 experimental plots, each with an area of 30m 2 (5m × 6m). ). In the present invention, the sowing time of the control experiment is October 9, 2019, and the heading-flowering period of winter wheat is early May, 2020, grain filling-milk maturity (mid-May to early June, 2020), maturity (2020). mid-June).
1.2数据获取与处理1.2 Data acquisition and processing
地面数据采集主要包括各个小区内冬小麦地上鲜生物量、地上干生物量和冬小麦冠层高光谱数据等指标的观测,采集数据过程中,主要选择天气晴朗无云、太阳光强度稳定的日期开展地面数据采集工作。最终,本发明在2020年5月10日(开花期)、5 月18日(灌浆前期)、5月24日(灌浆中期)、6月3日(灌浆后期)和6月19日(成熟期)共开展5次地面数据采集工作。试验共48个小区,根据每个小区内共布设2个采样点,共进行5次样品采集,为了保证数据采集质量,每个小区内在开花期选择长势基本一致的10个小麦植株区域(约1行20cm),并系上标签作为记号,供小麦开花-成熟期期间的每个采样点进行冬小麦地上鲜生物量和冠层高光谱数据采集。为了准确获得每个小区的地上鲜生物量、地上干生物量数据和冠层光谱数据,分别将每个小区内2个样点获得的数据进行平均处理,从而提高参与建模和模型验证的地面观测数据质量。The ground data collection mainly includes the observation of the above-ground fresh biomass, above-ground dry biomass and winter wheat canopy hyperspectral data of winter wheat in each plot. Data collection work. Finally, the present invention was launched on May 10, 2020 (flowering stage), May 18 (pre-filling stage), May 24 (mid-filling stage), June 3 (late-filling stage) and June 19 (mature stage), 2020. ) carried out a total of 5 ground data collection work. There were 48 plots in the experiment. According to the arrangement of 2 sampling points in each plot, a total of 5 samples were collected. In order to ensure the quality of data collection, 10 wheat plant areas (about 1
(1)地上生物量的获取(1) Acquisition of aboveground biomass
每次地面观测时,在各个小区内标记点处分别取20cm行长的冬小麦地上部分为样本,然后将采集的冬小麦样本用自封袋封存并运回实验室进行分析。在实验室中,首先称量各取样点小麦的总鲜重并记录;其次,将各个取样点的茎叶穗分开,分别放进纸袋并称量茎叶穗的鲜重;第三,将分离的小麦茎叶穗放入烘箱105℃下杀青处理30min,再将样本在85℃条件烘干至恒重,记录各个小区观测样点茎叶穗的干重称量结果。最后,得到各个小区样点的干生物量重。During each ground observation, the aerial parts of winter wheat with a row length of 20 cm were taken as samples at the marked points in each plot, and then the collected winter wheat samples were sealed in ziplock bags and transported back to the laboratory for analysis. In the laboratory, the total fresh weight of wheat at each sampling point was first weighed and recorded; secondly, the stems, leaves and ears of each sampling point were separated, put into paper bags and the fresh weight of the stems, leaves and ears was weighed; third, the separated The wheat stems, leaves and spikes were placed in an oven at 105 °C for 30 min, and then the samples were dried at 85 °C to a constant weight, and the dry weight weighing results of stems, leaves and spikes at each plot observation point were recorded. Finally, the dry biomass weight of each plot point was obtained.
(2)动态收获指数的获取(2) Obtaining the Dynamic Harvest Index
在获得各个小区采样点20cm行长的冬小麦茎叶穗干重基础上,分别对各个采样点小麦穗进行脱粒处理,然后称取并记录各个样点的籽粒重量。最后,计算冬小麦籽粒灌浆过程中各个地面观测时间的冬小麦收获指数。由于籽粒灌浆过程中,作物收获指数逐步形成且随时间变化收获指数也呈现动态变化,因此,本发明将冬小麦籽粒灌浆过程中各个地面观测时间的冬小麦收获指数称为动态收获指数(Dynamic Harvest Index,D-HI)。On the basis of obtaining the dry weight of winter wheat stems, leaves and panicles of 20cm row length at each plot sampling point, the wheat panicles at each sampling point were threshed respectively, and then the grain weight of each sample point was weighed and recorded. Finally, the winter wheat harvest index was calculated at each ground observation time during the grain filling process of winter wheat. During the grain filling process, the crop harvest index is gradually formed and the harvest index also exhibits dynamic changes with time. Therefore, the present invention refers to the winter wheat harvest index at each ground observation time during the grain filling process of winter wheat as the Dynamic Harvest Index (Dynamic Harvest Index, D-HI).
式中,t为灌浆至成熟期期间的地面采样时间,Wz,t、WJ,t、WY,t、WS,t分别为灌浆至成熟期期间t采样时间冬小麦籽粒、茎、叶、穗的干重,D-HIt为灌浆至成熟期期间t采样时间的动态收获指数。In the formula, t is the ground sampling time from grain filling to maturity, W z,t , W J, t , W Y, t , W S, t are the t sampling time from grain filling to maturity of winter wheat grains, stems and leaves, respectively. , dry weight of ear, D-HI t is the dynamic harvest index of t sampling time from grain filling to maturity.
(3)冠层高光谱数据测量(3) Measurement of canopy hyperspectral data
冠层高光谱测量主要利用美国ASD Field Spec 4光谱辐射仪对48个小区内长势均匀区域进行地面光谱采集,该光谱仪测量范围为350-2500nm。其中,350-1000nm波长内采样间隔为1.4nm,1000nm-2500nm波长内采样间隔为2nm,重采样后数据间隔为 1nm。每次测量前用标准白板进行校正,测量时探头垂直向下,光谱装置探头视角为25°视角,探头距离作物冠层顶部高度约为0.5m。每个小区取2个采样点,每个样点最优时间间隔读取5个光谱数据,取其均值作为该小区的光谱反射率值,以降低噪声干扰和随机性。本发明中,作物冠层光谱采集在当地时间10:00—14:00且天气状况良好、阳光照射充足条件下进行。The canopy hyperspectral measurement mainly uses the American ASD Field Spec 4 spectroradiometer to collect the ground spectrum in the uniform growth area in the 48 cells. The measurement range of the spectrometer is 350-2500nm. Among them, the sampling interval in the wavelength of 350-1000nm is 1.4nm, the sampling interval in the wavelength of 1000nm-2500nm is 2nm, and the data interval after resampling is 1nm. A standard whiteboard is used for calibration before each measurement. The probe is vertically downward during measurement. The viewing angle of the probe of the spectroscopic device is 25°, and the height of the probe from the top of the crop canopy is about 0.5m. Two sampling points are taken for each cell, and five spectral data are read at the optimal time interval of each sampling point, and the average value is taken as the spectral reflectance value of the cell to reduce noise interference and randomness. In the present invention, the crop canopy spectrum collection is carried out under the conditions of local time 10:00-14:00, good weather conditions and sufficient sunlight.
冠层高光谱数据的预处理主要包括光谱平均及光谱平滑处理。其中,光谱数据均值处理利用ViewSpecPro软件,其平均值作为相应采样点的反射光谱值。光谱平滑处理主要利用ENVI软件中9点加权移动平均法对光谱反射率数据进行平滑去噪处理。最终,得到观测小区各个采样点冬小麦冠层高光谱反射率数据。48个试验小区的光谱经过平均和平滑后的不同生育期冬小麦冠层高光谱曲线如图2所示。The preprocessing of canopy hyperspectral data mainly includes spectral averaging and spectral smoothing. Among them, the average value of spectral data is processed by ViewSpecPro software, and the average value is taken as the reflectance spectral value of the corresponding sampling point. Spectral smoothing mainly uses the 9-point weighted moving average method in ENVI software to smooth and denoise the spectral reflectance data. Finally, the hyperspectral reflectance data of winter wheat canopy at each sampling point in the observation plot was obtained. Figure 2 shows the canopy hyperspectral curves of winter wheat at different growth stages after the spectra of the 48 experimental plots were averaged and smoothed.
1.3研究方法1.3 Research methods
1.3.1基本概念1.3.1 Basic Concepts
(1)动态收获指数(1) Dynamic Harvest Index
一般的收获指数(Harvest Index,HI)只考虑成熟期作物籽粒产量占地上部总干物质量的百分比(Donald and Hamblin 1976),该指数为作物收获指数的最大值,即最终收获指数。为了提高作物收获指数估算的精度,提高作物收获指数模型的稳定性,本发明除了考虑成熟期收获指数,还同时考虑了作物收获指数逐步形成和随时间变化的收获指数动态信息,本发明称为动态收获指数(Dynamic Harvest Index,D-HI)。为了区分所提的D-HI指标,本发明将一般的收获指数定义为G-HI(General Harvest Index)。对粮食作物(如小麦、玉米等)来说,动态收获指数即指从作物籽粒形成开始,在逐步灌浆到成熟过程中,逐步增加的作物籽粒产量占作物地上部干物质量百分比的动态变化过程,该指数在籽粒形成后随作物生长发育时间的逐渐增加而增加,直到达到收获指数最大值。The general harvest index (Harvest Index, HI) only considers the percentage of grain yield in the total shoot dry matter at the mature stage (Donald and Hamblin 1976), which is the maximum crop harvest index, that is, the final harvest index. In order to improve the estimation accuracy of the crop harvest index and improve the stability of the crop harvest index model, the present invention not only considers the harvest index at the maturity stage, but also considers the gradual formation of the crop harvest index and the dynamic information of the harvest index that changes with time. Dynamic Harvest Index (D-HI). In order to distinguish the proposed D-HI index, the present invention defines the general harvest index as G-HI (General Harvest Index). For food crops (such as wheat, corn, etc.), the dynamic harvest index refers to the dynamic change process of the gradually increasing crop grain yield as a percentage of the dry matter mass of the crop from the beginning of the formation of the crop grain and from the gradual grain filling to the mature process. The index increased with the gradual increase of crop growth and development time after grain formation until reaching the maximum harvest index.
(2)动态fG参数(2) Dynamic f G parameter
一般的作物开花期-成熟期累积地上生物量与成熟期地上生物量间比值参数fG为静态参数(Static fG,S-fG)且只应用于成熟期的fG计算,而缺少开花期-成熟期之间fG参数的动态过程研究,这导致利用较短年份试验获取的fG静态参数与作物收获指数间相关关系可能存在关系不稳定的现象,从而一定程度降低了作物收获指数的估算精度。为了提高作物收获指数估算模型的稳定性和估算精度,本发明在原来静态fG参数基础上,提出一个动态fG指标,即考虑开花期-成熟期期间不同时期累积的地上生物量与对应时期地上生物量间比值动态参数D-fG(Dynamic fG)。该指标D-fG计算方法如下:The general crop flowering stage-maturity ratio between the above-ground biomass and the mature above-ground biomass ratio parameter f G is a static parameter (Static f G , Sf G ) and is only used in the calculation of f G at the mature stage, and lacks the flowering stage- Research on the dynamic process of fG parameters between maturation periods, which leads to the unstable relationship between the fG static parameters obtained by the short-year experiment and the crop harvest index, which reduces the estimation of the crop harvest index to a certain extent. precision. In order to improve the stability and estimation accuracy of the crop harvest index estimation model, the present invention proposes a dynamic fG index based on the original static fG parameter, that is, considering the aboveground biomass accumulated in different periods during the flowering period and the mature period and the corresponding period Aboveground biomass ratio dynamic parameter Df G (Dynamic f G ). The calculation method of this indicator Df G is as follows:
式中,∑Wpost为冬小麦开花期-成熟期期间不同时期累积的地上生物量(kg/hm2);∑Wwhole为采样时期对应的全部地上生物量(kg/hm2);t为采样时间,Wt为t采样时间的干物质量的重量(kg/hm2),Wa为开花期干物质量的重量(kg/hm2),D-fG,t表示t采样时间的比值参数。In the formula, ∑W post is the aboveground biomass accumulated in different periods during the flowering period and mature period of winter wheat (kg/hm 2 ); ∑W whole is the total aboveground biomass corresponding to the sampling period (kg/hm 2 ); t is the sampling period Time, W t is the weight of dry matter mass at t sampling time (kg/hm 2 ), W a is the weight of dry matter mass at flowering stage (kg/hm 2 ), Df G,t is the ratio parameter of t sampling time.
(3)冠层高光谱窄波段光谱指数NDSI(3) Canopy Hyperspectral Narrow Band Spectral Index NDSI
大量农作物遥感监测研究表明,归一化植被指数(NDVI)与作物地上生物量和作物籽粒产量间存在较强的相关性(任建强等,2015;冯美臣等,2010),同时,近年来该指数在作物收获指数遥感估算中也得到了一定应用且获得了较好的研究结果,因此,本发明也使用最常用的归一化植被指数进行动态收获指数遥感估算研究。NDVI的计算公式为:A large number of crop remote sensing monitoring studies have shown that there is a strong correlation between the normalized vegetation index (NDVI) and crop aboveground biomass and crop grain yield (Ren Jianqiang et al., 2015; Feng Meichen et al., 2010). The crop harvest index remote sensing estimation has also been applied to a certain extent and obtained good research results. Therefore, the present invention also uses the most commonly used normalized vegetation index to carry out the dynamic harvest index remote sensing estimation research. The formula for calculating NDVI is:
NDVI=(ρnir-ρred)/(ρnir+ρred) (3)NDVI=(ρ nir -ρ red )/(ρ nir +ρ red ) (3)
式中,nir和red分别表示近红外和红光波段,ρnir和ρred分别表示近红外波段光谱反射率和红光波段光谱反射率。当近红外波段反射率和红光波段反射率不限制在电磁波谱的近红外区域和红光区域,而是针对高光谱任意两波段进行组合时,可以用高光谱窄波段光谱指数(normalized spectral index,NDSI)进行表示,具体如下:where nir and red represent the near-infrared and red bands, respectively, and ρ nir and ρ red represent the spectral reflectance in the near-infrared and red bands, respectively. When the near-infrared band reflectance and the red light band reflectivity are not limited to the near-infrared region and red light region of the electromagnetic spectrum, but are combined for any two bands of the hyperspectral spectrum, the normalized spectral index of the narrow band of the hyperspectral spectrum can be used. , NDSI) to represent, as follows:
NDSI=(ρi-ρj)/(ρi+ρj) (4)NDSI=(ρ i -ρ j )/(ρ i +ρ j ) (4)
式中,i、j分别为高光谱波段对应的波长、ρi和ρj分别为i、j波长所对应的光谱反射率。其中,NDSI值域范围为[-1,1]。为了便于研究作物冠层高光谱窄波段光谱指数与 fG的相关关系,考虑到作物冠层光谱在1350~1415nm和1800~1950nm受大气和水蒸气影响较大,且本发明主要针对可见光—近红外波段范围进行研究,因此,本发明在 350~1000nm的波段范围(含650个波段)进行D-fG估算的遥感敏感波段筛选及动态作物收获指数遥感估算。In the formula, i and j are the wavelengths corresponding to the hyperspectral bands, respectively, and ρ i and ρ j are the spectral reflectances corresponding to the i and j wavelengths, respectively. Among them, the NDSI value range is [-1,1]. In order to facilitate the study of the correlation between the crop canopy hyperspectral narrow-band spectral index and f G , considering that the crop canopy spectrum is greatly affected by the atmosphere and water vapor at 1350-1415 nm and 1800-1950 nm, and the present invention is mainly aimed at visible light-near Therefore, the present invention performs remote sensing sensitive band screening for Df G estimation and remote sensing estimation of dynamic crop harvest index in the 350-1000 nm band range (including 650 bands).
1.3.2总体技术路线1.3.2 Overall technical route
首先,根据地面实测生物量数据,构建作物开花期-成熟期累积地上生物量与成熟期地上生物量间比值参数为静态参数(S-fG)和开花期-成熟期期间不同时期累积的地上生物量与对应时期地上生物量间比值动态参数(D-fG)。然后,基于地面作物冠层高光谱数据构建的任意两个冠层高光谱窄波段光谱指数(NDSI),建立NDSI与冬小麦D-fG之间的线性模型;然后绘制并分析NDSI与冬小麦D-fG间的拟合精度R2二维图;在此基础上,通过确定R2极大值区域和极大值区域重心,从而得到对冬小麦fG敏感的波段中心;最后,构建动态收获指数D-HI和参数D-fG的最佳模型。其次,根据地面实测生物量数据,构建基于S-fG的收获指数估算模型。最后,利用预留的收获指数验证数据集进行验证,并对两种方法构建的作物收获指数估算模型进行精度对比分析。具体技术路线如图3。Firstly, according to the measured biomass data on the ground, the ratio parameters between the above-ground biomass accumulated during the flowering-maturity period and the above-ground biomass in the mature period were constructed as the static parameter (Sf G ) and the above-ground biomass accumulated in different periods during the flowering-maturity period. The dynamic parameter (Df G ) of the ratio of aboveground biomass to the corresponding period. Then, based on any two canopy hyperspectral narrowband spectral indices (NDSI) constructed from ground crop canopy hyperspectral data, a linear model between NDSI and winter wheat Df G was established; then the relationship between NDSI and winter wheat Df G was drawn and analyzed. Fitting precision R 2 two-dimensional map; on this basis, the band center sensitive to winter wheat f G was obtained by determining the R 2 maximum value area and the center of gravity of the maximum value area; finally, the dynamic harvest index D-HI and The best model for parameter Df G. Secondly, according to the measured biomass data on the ground, a harvest index estimation model based on SfG was constructed. Finally, the reserved harvest index validation data set is used for verification, and the accuracy of the crop harvest index estimation model constructed by the two methods is compared and analyzed. The specific technical route is shown in Figure 3.
1.3.3基于高光谱敏感波段D-fG参数获取的作物动态收获指数估算1.3.3 Estimation of crop dynamic harvest index based on hyperspectral sensitive band Df G parameters
1.3.3.1作物动态收获指数估算模型构建1.3.3.1 Construction of crop dynamic harvest index estimation model
本发明提出了基于D-fG遥感信息的动态收获指数D-HI遥感估算方法。把动态参数D-fG作为中间变量,首先确定NDSI与D-fG之间模型,根据其模型确定对冬小麦fG敏感的波段中心;然后确定D-fG和动态收获指数D-HI间统计关系模型;最后,根据筛选出的敏感波段中心,即可确定相对应的D-fG,进而估算作物收获指数,并进行精度验证。作物动态收获指数的计算方法如下:The invention proposes a dynamic harvest index D-HI remote sensing estimation method based on Df G remote sensing information. Taking the dynamic parameter Df G as the intermediate variable, firstly determine the model between NDSI and Df G , and then determine the band center sensitive to winter wheat f G according to its model; then determine the statistical relationship model between Df G and the dynamic harvest index D-HI; finally, According to the selected sensitive band center, the corresponding Df G can be determined, then the crop harvest index can be estimated, and the accuracy can be verified. The calculation method of the crop dynamic harvest index is as follows:
D-fG,t=m×NDSIi,j,t+n (5)Df G,t = m×NDSI i,j,t +n (5)
D-HIt=HI0+s×D-fG,t (6)D-HI t =HI 0 +s×Df G,t (6)
公式(5)主要用于NDSI与D-fG的模型构建。其中,i、j为分别为350nm~1000nm 间高光谱波段,t为不同取样时间,m和n为拟合后得到线性方程中的拟合参数。根据该公式计算求出作物开花期至t时期累积地上生物量与t生育期地上生物量间比值参数 D-fG,t。Equation (5) is mainly used for model building of NDSI and DfG . Among them, i and j are the hyperspectral bands between 350nm and 1000nm respectively, t is the different sampling time, m and n are the fitting parameters in the linear equation obtained after fitting. According to this formula, the ratio parameter Df G,t between the above-ground biomass accumulated from the flowering period to the t period and the above-ground biomass of the t growth period was calculated.
公式(6)主要用于D-fG与D-HI间模型构建。其中,HI0为截距,即在作物开花期之后生物量不发生变化情况下动态收获指数的值,即当D-fG,t为0时,D-HI收获指数的值;s为D-HI与D-fG线性关系中的斜率常数。根据该公式可计算求出处于t生育期时动态收获指数。Equation (6) is mainly used for model building between Df G and D-HI. Among them, HI 0 is the intercept, that is, the value of the dynamic harvest index when the biomass does not change after the flowering period of the crop, that is, when Df G, t is 0, the value of the D-HI harvest index; s is the D-HI Slope constant in linear relationship with Df G. According to this formula, the dynamic harvest index in the t growth period can be calculated.
1.3.3.2D-fG遥感估算的冠层高光谱敏感波段中心确定1.3.3.2 Determination of the center of the canopy hyperspectral sensitive band estimated by Df G remote sensing
本发明利用遥感技术获取作物开花期-成熟期期间不同时期累积的地上生物量与对应时期地上生物量间比值动态参数D-fG信息,从而利用实测的D-fG与作物动态收获指数间相关关系,实现基于D-fG遥感信息的作物收获指数准确估算。研究中,在获得冬小麦冠层高光谱和实测冬小麦D-fG参数基础上,开展基于高光谱遥感窄波段光谱指数 NDSI的冬小麦D-fG遥感估算研究。由于高光谱数据波段众多且波段间的相关性较高,导致光谱信息冗余度增加,为提高D-fG参数遥感估算模型的准确性,本发明需要利用窄波段光谱指数NDSI对D-fG参数敏感的波段中心和光谱波段进行筛选。The invention utilizes remote sensing technology to obtain information on the ratio dynamic parameter DfG between the aboveground biomass accumulated in different periods during the flowering period and the mature period of the crop and the aboveground biomass in the corresponding period, so as to utilize the correlation between the measured DfG and the crop dynamic harvest index to realize Accurate estimation of crop harvest index based on DfG remote sensing information. In the research, based on the obtained winter wheat canopy hyperspectral and the measured Df G parameters of winter wheat, the remote sensing estimation of winter wheat Df G based on the hyperspectral remote sensing narrow-band spectral index NDSI was carried out. Due to the large number of hyperspectral data bands and the high correlation between the bands, the redundancy of spectral information increases. In order to improve the accuracy of the Df G parameter remote sensing estimation model, the present invention needs to use the narrow band spectral index NDSI which is sensitive to the Df G parameter. Filter by band center and spectral band.
由于在NDSI与D-fG间的R2二维图中,R2极大值区域并不是均匀分布的,R2极大值点与R2极大值区域重心不一定完全重合,导致R2极大值点对应波段不一定与最优波段中心重合。因此,为保证利用所选波段中心构建的NDSI可以获得高精度D-fG估算结果,进而使得作物收获指数估算结果更具有稳定性,本发明根据R2极大值区域重心法获得敏感波段中心,从而确定D-fG估算的敏感波段,即在冠层高光谱每个波段对应的窄波段光谱指数NDSI和D-fG间相关性计算基础上,根据相关系数满足统计显著性要求的阈值确定极大值区域,在此基础上,计算相关系数极大值区域的重心,从而获得NDSI 与D-fG参数相关性较大的光谱波段中心和波段组合。具体过程如下:Since in the two-dimensional map of R 2 between NDSI and Df G , the maximum value region of R 2 is not uniformly distributed, the center of gravity of the maximum value point of R 2 and the maximum value region of R 2 may not completely coincide, resulting in the extreme value of R 2 The band corresponding to the large value point does not necessarily coincide with the center of the optimal band. Therefore, in order to ensure that the NDSI constructed by using the selected band center can obtain a high-precision Df G estimation result, thereby making the crop harvest index estimation result more stable, the present invention obtains the sensitive band center according to the R 2 maximum value area center of gravity method, thereby Determine the sensitive band for DfG estimation, that is, on the basis of the correlation calculation between the narrow-band spectral index NDSI and DfG corresponding to each band of the canopy hyperspectrum, determine the maximum value region according to the threshold that the correlation coefficient meets the requirements of statistical significance, On this basis, the center of gravity of the region with the maximum value of the correlation coefficient is calculated, so as to obtain the spectral band center and band combination with greater correlation between the NDSI and Df G parameters. The specific process is as follows:
首先,在绘制NDSI与冬小麦D-fG间拟合R2二维图的基础上,确定NDSI与冬小麦D-fG间相关性高的波段区域;其次,在该区域内寻找R2极大值点,并遍历该点8邻域内满足显著性条件的所有点,并将这些点的集合标记为R2极大值区域Ω;最后,计算R2极大值区域的重心,将其作为每个R2极大值区域的敏感波段中心。冬小麦D-fG敏感波段中心确定示意图如图4,重心的计算公式(7)如下:First, on the basis of drawing a two-dimensional graph of fitting R 2 between NDSI and winter wheat Df G , the band area with high correlation between NDSI and winter wheat Df G was determined ; Traverse all the points that satisfy the significance condition in the neighborhood of this point 8, and mark the set of these points as the R 2 maximal value region Ω; finally, calculate the barycenter of the R 2 maximal value region as each R 2 pole The center of the sensitive band in the area of large value. The schematic diagram of determining the center of the Df G sensitive band of winter wheat is shown in Figure 4. The calculation formula (7) of the center of gravity is as follows:
式中,f(u,v)为波段坐标为(u,v)的R2值,Ω为极大值区域,敏感波段中心坐标。In the formula, f(u, v) is the R 2 value with the band coordinates (u, v), Ω is the maximum value area, The coordinates of the center of the sensitive band.
1.3.4基于实测S-fG的成熟期作物收获指数(G-HI)估算1.3.4 Estimation of crop harvest index (G-HI) at maturity based on measured Sf G
为了与改进前作物收获指数估算精度进行对比,本发明利用Kemanian等人(2007)提出的作物开花至成熟时段的干物质累积量占整个生育期总累积量的比例系数(S-fG) 与成熟期收获指数(G-HI)线性关系模型进行基于实测S-fG的成熟期作物收获指数G-HI 估算,采用线性模型形式如下:In order to compare with the estimation accuracy of the crop harvest index before the improvement, the present invention uses the proportional coefficient (Sf G ) of the dry matter accumulation from flowering to maturity of crops proposed by Kemanian et al. Harvest index (G-HI) linear relationship model is used to estimate the harvest index G-HI of mature crops based on the measured Sf G. The linear model form is as follows:
G-HI=HI0+k×S-fG (8)G-HI=HI 0 +k×Sf G (8)
式中,G-HI为收获期的作物收获指数,HI0为线性关系中的截距;k为线性关系中的斜率;S-fG为作物开花-成熟时段内干物质累积量占整个生育期内总累积量的的比例。In the formula, G-HI is the crop harvest index at the harvest period, HI 0 is the intercept in the linear relationship; k is the slope in the linear relationship; Sf G is the dry matter accumulation during the flowering-maturity period of the crop in the entire growth period. proportion of the total cumulative amount.
1.3.5作物收获指数估算模型精度评价1.3.5 Accuracy Evaluation of Crop Harvest Index Estimation Model
为了评价作物收获指数估算过程中fG(包括S-fG和D-fG)估算精度和收获指数(包括G-HI和D-HI)估算精度,本发明选取决定系数(coefficient of determination,R2)、均方根误差(root mean square error,RMSE)、归一化均方根误差(normalized root meansquare error,NRMSE)和平均相对误差(mean relative error,MRE)进行收获指数估算模型精度的检验。其中,R2表示模拟值与实测值的拟合程度,取值范围为0~1。R2越高,越接近于1,说明模型的拟合效果越好,反之,R2越低,越接近于0,说明模型的拟合效果越差。RMSE表示模拟值与实测值的偏离程度,均方根误差值越大,表示模拟值与实测值偏离越大,即模拟效果越差;反之,均方根误差值越小,表示模拟效果越好。 NRMSE是指均方根误差与实测值平均值之比。MRE是指各相对误差绝对值之和的平均值,表示模拟值与实测值的平均偏离程度。当NRMSE和MRE<10%时,判断模拟结果精度为极好;当10%<NRMSE和MRE<20%时,判断模拟结果精度为良好;当 20%<NRMSE和MRE<30%时,判断模拟结果精度为一般;当NRMSE和MRE>30%时,判断模拟结果精度为较差,判断标准优先考虑NRMSE值的大小,具体公式如下:In order to evaluate the estimation accuracy of f G (including Sf G and Df G ) and the estimation accuracy of harvest index (including G-HI and D-HI) in the estimation process of crop harvest index, the present invention selects coefficient of determination (R 2 ), Root mean square error (RMSE), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) and mean relative error (MRE) were used to test the accuracy of the harvest index estimation model. Among them, R 2 represents the degree of fitting between the simulated value and the measured value, and the value ranges from 0 to 1. The higher the R 2 is, the closer it is to 1, the better the fitting effect of the model is. On the contrary, the lower the R 2 is, the closer it is to 0, the worse the fitting effect of the model is. RMSE indicates the degree of deviation between the simulated value and the measured value. The larger the root mean square error value, the greater the deviation between the simulated value and the actual measured value, that is, the worse the simulation effect; on the contrary, the smaller the root mean square error value, the better the simulation effect. . NRMSE refers to the ratio of the root mean square error to the mean of the measured values. MRE refers to the average value of the sum of the absolute values of the relative errors, indicating the average deviation of the simulated value from the measured value. When NRMSE and MRE<10%, the accuracy of simulation results is judged to be excellent; when 10%<NRMSE and MRE<20%, the accuracy of simulation results is judged to be good; when 20%<NRMSE and MRE<30%, it is judged that the simulation results are accurate The accuracy of the results is general; when NRMSE and MRE>30%, the accuracy of the simulation results is judged to be poor, and the judgment standard gives priority to the size of the NRMSE value. The specific formula is as follows:
式中,xi为fG(如S-fG和D-fG)或HI(如G-HI和D-HI)的实测值;yi为冬小麦 fG(如S-fG和D-fG)或HI(如G-HI和D-HI)的估测值;分别为xi,yi的均值,n 为样本数。In the formula, x i is the measured value of f G (such as Sf G and Df G ) or HI (such as G-HI and D-HI); y i is the winter wheat f G (such as Sf G and Df G ) or HI (such as G-HI and D-HI) estimates; are the mean of x i and y i respectively, and n is the number of samples.
2结果与分析2 Results and Analysis
2.1基于实测S-fG的成熟期作物收获指数(G-HI)估算2.1 Estimation of crop harvest index (G-HI) at maturity based on measured Sf G
研究中,根据6月19日冬小麦成熟期的地上生物量数据和小麦籽粒单位面积产量,计算获得各个小区成熟期冬小麦平均实测收获指数;然后,将2020年5月10日采集的冬小麦开花期地上生物量作为基准,计算获得冬小麦开花-成熟时段内干物质累积量占整个生育期内总累积量的的比例S-fG参数。在此基础上,根据公式(8)构建了冬小麦开花-成熟时段内干物质累积量占整个生育期内总累积量的的比例S-fG与成熟期收获指数构建模型。研究中,根据建模数据集与验证数据集比例为2:1的原则,随机将其中一个冬小麦田间控制实验重复处理组实测的S-fG和G-HI作为验证数据集(共16个数据样本),其余2个实验重复处理组实测的S-fG和G-HI作为建模数据集(共32个数据样本)。其中,由图5可知,S-fG和收获指数HI构建的线性模型决定系数为0.5058。通过预留的验证数据集进行验证得到RMSE为0.0603,NRMSE和MRE分别为11.78%、11.31%,如图6所示。In the study, based on the aboveground biomass data and wheat grain yield per unit area of winter wheat at the maturity stage on June 19, the average measured harvest index of winter wheat at the maturity stage of each plot was calculated; Using biomass as the benchmark, the Sf G parameter was calculated to obtain the ratio of dry matter accumulation in winter wheat to the total accumulation in the entire growth period during the flowering-maturity period. On this basis, according to formula (8), a model was constructed based on the proportion of dry matter accumulation in the flowering-maturity period of winter wheat to the total accumulation in the entire growth period, SfG , and the harvest index at maturity. In the study, according to the principle of 2:1 ratio between the modeling data set and the validation data set, the measured Sf G and G-HI of one of the winter wheat field control experiment repeated treatment groups were randomly used as the validation data set (16 data samples in total). , and the remaining 2 experiments were repeated with the measured Sf G and G-HI of the treatment group as the modeling data set (32 data samples in total). Among them, it can be seen from Figure 5 that the coefficient of determination of the linear model constructed by Sf G and harvest index HI is 0.5058. The RMSE is 0.0603, and the NRMSE and MRE are 11.78% and 11.31%, respectively, as shown in Figure 6.
2.2基于高光谱敏感波段D-fG参数获取的作物收获指数遥感估算2.2 Remote sensing estimation of crop harvest index based on hyperspectral sensitive band Df G parameters
2.2.1不同控制实验处理的冬小麦冠层高光谱NDSI计算结果2.2.1 Calculation results of hyperspectral NDSI of winter wheat canopy under different control experimental treatments
在对每次地面观测不同实验处理小区采集的作物冠层高光谱数据预处理基础上,根据公式(4)计算并绘制每次地面观测各个实验处理小区任意两波段组合的窄波段光谱指数(NDSI)。其中,在350~1000nm高光谱范围内任意两波段间组合及相关NDSI 值共有650×650个。本发明仅展示冬小麦控制实验中正常水平施肥和灌水处理(N2W2) 的5次地面观测数据计算获得的冠层高光谱NDSI结果。图7所示的5幅NDSI分布图是冬小麦控制实验中正常水平施肥和灌水处理(N2W2)冬小麦开花期、灌浆前期、灌浆后期、灌浆后期和成熟期等不同生育期NDSI计算结果。其中,横坐标(λ1)、纵坐标 (λ2)均为作物冠层高光谱波长,波长范围为350~1000nm,横、纵轴构成二维空间所对应的点为任意两波段λ1、λ2所对应的反射率计算的NDSI值。Based on the preprocessing of the crop canopy hyperspectral data collected from different experimental treatment plots for each ground observation, the narrow band spectral index (NDSI) of any combination of two bands in each experimental treatment plot for each ground observation is calculated and plotted according to formula (4). ). Among them, in the hyperspectral range of 350-1000nm, there are a total of 650×650 combinations between any two bands and related NDSI values. The present invention only shows the canopy hyperspectral NDSI results calculated from 5 ground observation data of normal level fertilization and irrigation treatment (N2W2) in the winter wheat control experiment. The five NDSI distribution maps shown in Fig. 7 are the NDSI calculation results of different growth stages of winter wheat during the normal level of fertilization and irrigation (N2W2) in the control experiment of winter wheat at flowering, pre-filling, late-filling, late-filling and mature stages. Among them, the abscissa (λ 1 ) and the ordinate (λ 2 ) are the hyperspectral wavelengths of the crop canopy, and the wavelength range is 350-1000 nm. The points corresponding to the two-dimensional space formed by the horizontal and vertical axes are any two bands λ 1 , The calculated NDSI value of the reflectivity corresponding to λ 2 .
2.2.2基于NDSI的D-fG估算冠层高光谱敏感波段中心确定2.2.2 NDSI-based Df G estimation canopy hyperspectral sensitive band center determination
(1)基于NDSI与D-fG的相关性的R2二维分布图(1) Two-dimensional distribution map of R 2 based on the correlation between NDSI and Df G
本发明首先计算获得5月18日、5月24日、6月3日、6月19日四次地面观测各个小区的NDSI和D-fG等数据指标,其中,D-fG的计算以5月10日作为开花期冬小麦地上生物量为基准。在此基础上,构建了NDSI和D-fG间的统计关系模型。其中,48 个小区共进行四次地面观测,最终累计获得192个小区地面观测数据样本,数据指标包括NDSI和D-fG。根据建模数据集与验证数据集比例为2:1的原则,随机将其中一个冬小麦田间控制实验重复处理组计算获得NDSI和D-fG作为验证数据集(共64个小区地面观测数据样本),其余2个实验重复处理组计算获得NDSI和D-fG作为建模数据集(共 128个小区地面数据样本)。The present invention first calculates and obtains data indicators such as NDSI and Df G of each cell on May 18, May 24, June 3, and June 19. The calculation of Df G is based on May 10. The aboveground biomass of winter wheat at flowering stage was used as the benchmark. On this basis, a statistical relationship model between NDSI and Df G was constructed. Among them, 48 sub-districts conducted four ground observations in total, and finally 192 sub-district ground observation data samples were accumulated, and the data indicators included NDSI and Df G . According to the principle that the ratio of modeling data set and verification data set is 2:1, one of the winter wheat field control experiments was randomly calculated to obtain NDSI and Df G as the verification data set (a total of 64 plots of ground observation data samples), and the rest Two experiments were repeated for processing groups to obtain NDSI and Df G as the modeling data set (a total of 128 cell ground data samples).
最终,利用Matlab软件获得了NDSI与D-fG的拟合精度R2二维图(如图8所示),其中,横坐标(λ1)、纵坐标(λ2)为350~1000nm波长范围间隔1nm的作物冠层高光谱波长,横、纵轴构成R2二维空间所对应的点共计650×650个,且每个R2二维空间点是对应两波段(λ1,λ2)组合所构建的NDSI值与实测D-fG间的拟合精度R2。其中,每个R2二维空间点是由128个小区一定波长的两波段组合构建的NDSI与对应小区D-fG构建线性模型的决定系数。由图8可知,拟合精度R2以(350,350)、(1000,1000) 两点间连线呈轴对称分布,从中可以得到NDSI对D-fG相关性较大的区域及相关波段信息。在(350,350)、(1000,1000)两点间对称轴上侧,从图8中虚线方框内深红色部分可以看出,NDSI与冬小麦D-fG间呈现高度相关的主要有两个区域,区域包括横轴 370~550nm和纵轴480~720nm、横轴750~970nm和纵轴770~1000nm范围的二维区域,其中,R2达到0.75以上,这为D-fG估算冠层高光谱敏感波段中心确定奠定了基础。Finally, using Matlab software, a two-dimensional graph of the fitting accuracy R 2 of NDSI and Df G was obtained (as shown in Figure 8), where the abscissa (λ 1 ) and the ordinate (λ 2 ) are the interval in the wavelength range of 350-1000 nm For the crop canopy hyperspectral wavelength of 1 nm, the horizontal and vertical axes form a total of 650×650 points corresponding to the two-dimensional space of R 2 , and each point in the two-dimensional space of R 2 corresponds to a combination of two bands (λ 1 , λ 2 ) The fitting accuracy R 2 between the constructed NDSI value and the measured Df G. Among them, each R 2 two-dimensional space point is the coefficient of determination of the linear model constructed by the NDSI constructed by the combination of two bands of a certain wavelength in 128 cells and the corresponding cell Df G. It can be seen from Figure 8 that the fitting accuracy R 2 is axisymmetrically distributed with the line connecting the two points (350, 350) and (1000, 1000), from which we can obtain the region and related band information where NDSI has a high correlation with Df G. On the upper side of the symmetry axis between the two points (350, 350) and (1000, 1000), it can be seen from the dark red part of the dotted box in Figure 8 that there are two main areas where NDSI and winter wheat Df G are highly correlated. , the region includes a two-dimensional region ranging from 370 to 550 nm on the horizontal axis and 480 to 720 nm on the vertical axis, 750 to 970 nm on the horizontal axis and 770 to 1000 nm on the vertical axis, where R 2 reaches more than 0.75, which is the DfG estimate of canopy hyperspectral sensitivity The determination of the band center has laid the foundation.
(2)D-fG估算冠层高光谱敏感波段中心确定(2) Df G estimation canopy hyperspectral sensitive band center determination
研究中,通过查找相关系数显著性检验表,当样本数量n=128时,在0.05显著性水平上,当R2>0.030时,NDSI与D-fG呈现显著相关关系;在0.01显著性水平上,当 R2>0.051时,NDSI与D-fG呈现极显著相关关系。为了保证敏感波段中心确定的精度和可靠性,因此,本发明选择了符合R2>0.051的R2二维区域进行研究,在图8中寻找 R2>0.051的极大值点,遍历该点8邻域内所有R2>0.051的点,将这些点的集合标记为极大值区域,并以R2=0.1为梯度显示R2的分布区域,为了更直观的显示敏感波段的分布范围,这里对R2≥0.6的结果进行显示,如图9所示。In the study, by looking up the correlation coefficient significance test table, when the sample size n=128, at the 0.05 significance level, when R 2 >0.030, NDSI and Df G showed a significant correlation; at the 0.01 significance level, When R 2 >0.051, NDSI and Df G showed a very significant correlation. In order to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the determination of the center of the sensitive band, the present invention selects a two-dimensional region of R 2 that conforms to R 2 >0.051 for research, finds the maximum value point of R 2 >0.051 in Figure 8, and traverses this point 8 All points with R 2 >0.051 in the neighborhood, mark the set of these points as the maximum value area, and display the distribution area of R 2 with R 2 =0.1 as the gradient. In order to more intuitively display the distribution range of sensitive bands, here The results for R 2 ≥ 0.6 are displayed, as shown in FIG. 9 .
为了提高所选高光谱敏感波段中心估算D-fG的精度,进而提高估算收获指数的准确性,本发明选择了R2>0.8的R2二维区域进行敏感波段中心的确定研究。ΩA~ΩF为满足R2>0.8的R2极大值区域,具体结果如下:ΩA范围在横轴400~500nm和纵轴 480~540nm之间;ΩB范围在横轴370~550nm和纵轴550~720nm之间;ΩC范围在横轴 720~750nm和纵轴720~980nm之间;ΩD范围在横轴770~810nm和纵轴790~820nm之间;ΩE范围在横轴770~870nm和纵轴830~930nm之间;ΩF范围在横轴750~970nm和纵轴950~1000nm之间。在确定NDSI与D-fG的敏感区域后,根据公式(7)计算得到每一个R2极大值区域的中心(λ1,λ2),其中,λ1为极大值区域中心横坐标,λ2极大值区域中心纵坐标。最终,得到ΩA~ΩF极大值区域重心分别为A(443nm,506nm)、B (442nm,635nm)、C(732nm,834nm)、D(787nm,804nm)、E(810nm,877nm) 和F(861nm,985nm)。In order to improve the accuracy of estimating Df G at the center of the selected hyperspectral sensitive band, and further improve the accuracy of estimating the harvest index, the present invention selects the R 2 two-dimensional region with R 2 >0.8 to determine the center of the sensitive band. Ω A to Ω F are the maximum value region of R 2 satisfying R 2 >0.8, and the specific results are as follows: Ω A ranges from 400 to 500 nm on the horizontal axis and 480 to 540 nm on the vertical axis; Ω B ranges from 370 to 550 nm on the horizontal axis and the vertical axis between 550 and 720 nm; the range of Ω C is between 720 and 750 nm on the horizontal axis and between 720 and 980 nm on the vertical axis; the range of Ω D is between 770 and 810 nm on the horizontal axis and between 790 and 820 nm on the vertical axis; The range of Ω F is between 750-970 nm on the horizontal axis and 950-1000 nm on the vertical axis. After determining the sensitive areas of NDSI and Df G , calculate the center (λ 1 , λ 2 ) of each R 2 maximum area according to formula (7), where λ 1 is the abscissa of the center of the maximum area, λ 2 The ordinate of the center of the maximum value area. Finally, the center of gravity of the maximal region of Ω A ~ Ω F is obtained as A (443nm, 506nm), B (442nm, 635nm), C (732nm, 834nm), D (787nm, 804nm), E (810nm, 877nm) and F (861 nm, 985 nm).
2.2.3基于冠层光谱敏感波段中心构建NDSI的D-fG遥感估算2.2.3 Df G remote sensing estimation of NDSI based on the canopy spectral sensitive band center
根据2.2.2筛选出的D-fG估算冠层高光谱敏感波段中心结果分别计算冠层高光谱窄波段光谱指数NDSI。其中,6个敏感波段中心结果包括λ(443nm,506nm)、λ(442nm,635nm)、λ(732nm,834nm)、λ(787nm,804nm)、λ(810nm,877nm)和λ(861nm, 985nm)。然后,根据公式(5)利用128个小区地面观测数据样本的NDSI数据与冬小麦D-fG构建线性模型,并用其余64个小区地面观测数据样本作为验证数据集进行精度验证。基于敏感波段中心构建的NDSI与D-fG间统计关系及D-fG估算精度具体结果如表 1、图10和图11所示。从表1中可以看出,筛选出的6个D-fG估算冠层高光谱敏感波段中心构建的NDSI拟合D-fG在P<0.01水平上均达到极显著水平,模型决定系数R2在 0.8138~0.8613之间。通过预留验证数据集对所建立的NDSI与D-fG间统计模型进行验证可知,筛选出的6个D-fG估算冠层高光谱敏感波段中心构建的NDSI和D-fG间统计模型均具有较好的D-fG估算效果,估算D-fG均达到了高精度水平。其中,RMSE在 0.0267~0.0411之间,NRMSE在9.27%~14.27%之间,MRE在8.81%~14.26%之间。其中,筛选出的敏感波段中心(732nm,834nm)构建的NDSI估测冬小麦D-fG精度最高,其决定系数R2达了0.9522,NRMSE和MRE和分别为9.27%、8.81%;其次,筛选出的敏感波段中心(443nm,506nm)构建的NDSI估测冬小麦D-fG精度达到较高水平,其决定系数R2为0.9347,NRMSE和MRE和分别为10.94%、9.86%;筛选出的敏感波段中心(861nm,985nm)构建的NDSI估测冬小麦D-fG精度相对较低,其决定系数R2为 0.8981,NRMSE和MRE和分别为14.27%、14.26%。The canopy hyperspectral narrow-band spectral index NDSI was calculated according to the Df G screened out in 2.2.2 to estimate the canopy hyperspectral sensitive band center. Among them, the center results of 6 sensitive bands include λ(443nm, 506nm), λ(442nm, 635nm), λ(732nm, 834nm), λ(787nm, 804nm), λ(810nm, 877nm) and λ(861nm, 985nm) . Then, according to formula (5), the NDSI data of 128 plots of ground observation data samples and the winter wheat Df G were used to build a linear model, and the remaining 64 plots of ground observation data samples were used as verification data sets for accuracy verification. The statistical relationship between NDSI and Df G constructed based on the center of the sensitive band and the specific results of Df G estimation accuracy are shown in Table 1, Figure 10 and Figure 11. It can be seen from Table 1 that the NDSI fitting Df G constructed by the selected 6 Df G estimated canopy hyperspectral sensitive band centers all reached a very significant level at the level of P < 0.01, and the model determination coefficient R 2 was between 0.8138 and 0.8138. between 0.8613. The established statistical model between NDSI and Df G is verified by the reserved validation data set, and it can be seen that the statistical models between NDSI and Df G constructed by the selected 6 Df G estimated canopy hyperspectral sensitive band centers have good performance. The Df G estimation effect and the estimated Df G have reached a high level of accuracy. Among them, the RMSE is between 0.0267 and 0.0411, the NRMSE is between 9.27% and 14.27%, and the MRE is between 8.81% and 14.26%. Among them, the NDSI constructed by the selected sensitive band centers (732nm, 834nm) has the highest accuracy in estimating the DfG of winter wheat, and its determination coefficient R 2 reaches 0.9522, and the sums of NRMSE and MRE are 9.27% and 8.81%, respectively; The NDSI constructed by the sensitive band center (443nm, 506nm ) has a high accuracy in estimating the DfG of winter wheat. , 985nm) constructed NDSI to estimate DfG of winter wheat with relatively low accuracy, its coefficient of determination R 2 was 0.8981, and the sum of NRMSE and MRE were 14.27% and 14.26%, respectively.
表1基于敏感波段中心构建的NDSI与D-fG间统计关系及D-fG估算精度Table 1 Statistical relationship between NDSI and Df G based on the center of sensitive band and Df G estimation accuracy
注:拟合方程中x为波段λ1,λ2构建的NDSI,y为拟合的冬小麦D-fG。N为样本数量。Note: In the fitting equation, x is the NDSI constructed by the bands λ 1 and λ 2 , and y is the fitted winter wheat Df G . N is the number of samples.
**表示在p<0.01水平下极显著相关。** indicates a very significant correlation at the p<0.01 level.
2.2.4基于高光谱敏感波段D-fG参数获取的D-HI遥感估算模型建立及验证2.2.4 Establishment and verification of the D-HI remote sensing estimation model based on the acquisition of Df G parameters in the hyperspectral sensitive band
基于NDSI与D-fG间的相关性,本发明利用冠层高光谱筛选出D-fG参数估算敏感波段中心;然后,利用敏感波段中心构建的NDSI指数,实现了准确的D-fG遥感估算。在此基础上,基于实测的D-fG和D-HI间统计关系模型,利用D-fG遥感参数信息实现动态收获指数D-HI的遥感估算。最终,利用预留的验证数据对D-HI遥感估算模型进行验证。Based on the correlation between NDSI and Df G , the present invention uses canopy hyperspectral to screen out Df G parameters to estimate the sensitive band center; then, the NDSI index constructed by the sensitive band center is used to realize accurate Df G remote sensing estimation. On this basis, based on the measured statistical relationship model between Df G and D-HI, the remote sensing estimation of dynamic harvest index D-HI is realized by using Df G remote sensing parameter information. Finally, the D-HI remote sensing estimation model is verified using the reserved verification data.
2.2.4.1基于D-fG遥感参数的D-HI估算模型建立2.2.4.1 Establishment of D-HI estimation model based on Df G remote sensing parameters
根据开花期—成熟期期间不同采集时间的动态冬小麦地上生物量数据和灌浆过程中籽粒产量动态数据,计算冬小麦小区128个样本点的D-fG和动态收获指数D-HI,在此基础上,利用公式(6)对D-fG和动态收获指数D-HI间的相关性进行拟合,得到D-fG和动态收获指数D-HI间估算模型,具体如下:According to the dynamic data of aboveground biomass of winter wheat and the dynamic data of grain yield during the period of flowering and maturity at different collection times, the Df G and dynamic harvest index D-HI of 128 sample points in the winter wheat plot were calculated. Formula (6) fits the correlation between Df G and dynamic harvest index D-HI, and obtains an estimation model between Df G and dynamic harvest index D-HI, as follows:
D-HIt=0.1018+0.8093*D-fG,t D-HI t =0.1018+0.8093*Df G,t
研究表明,本发明中实测冬小麦D-fG与作物动态收获指数之间呈现显著的线性关系,其中,动态D-fG和动态收获指数D-HI构建的线性模型决定系数达到为0.9679(图 12),这为开展基于动态D-fG的动态收获指数估算奠定了良好基础。The research shows that there is a significant linear relationship between the measured winter wheat Df G and the crop dynamic harvest index in the present invention, wherein the coefficient of determination of the linear model constructed by the dynamic Df G and the dynamic harvest index D-HI reaches 0.9679 (Fig. 12). It lays a good foundation for the estimation of dynamic harvest index based on dynamic Df G.
2.2.4.2基于D-fG遥感参数的D-HI估算模型验证2.2.4.2 Validation of D-HI estimation model based on Df G remote sensing parameters
在基于D-fG遥感参数的D-HI估算模型建立基础上,利用预留的64组验证数据中光谱信息计算出每个遥感敏感波段中心相应的NDSI。其中,每个波段中心可以获得64 个NDSI代入数据。在此基础上,将上述NDSI代入表1中对应NDSI与D-fG间统计模型中,从而获得每个敏感波段中心对应的64个D-fG遥感参数。然后,将上述D-fG遥感参数代入图12中基于D-fG参数的D-HI遥感估算模型,从而获得每个敏感波段中心的 64个D-HI估算结果,并进行D-HI的遥感估算结果精度验证。其中,利用预留的64个 D-HI数据分别对不同敏感波段条件下的D-HI的遥感估算结果进行精度评价。Based on the establishment of the D-HI estimation model based on the Df G remote sensing parameters, the NDSI corresponding to the center of each remote sensing sensitive band is calculated using the spectral information in the reserved 64 sets of verification data. Among them, each band center can obtain 64 NDSI substitution data. On this basis, the above NDSI is substituted into the statistical model between the corresponding NDSI and Df G in Table 1, so as to obtain 64 Df G remote sensing parameters corresponding to the center of each sensitive band. Then, the above Df G remote sensing parameters are substituted into the D-HI remote sensing estimation model based on the Df G parameters in Figure 12, so as to obtain 64 D-HI estimation results at the center of each sensitive band, and the accuracy of the D-HI remote sensing estimation results is carried out. verify. Among them, the reserved 64 D-HI data were used to evaluate the accuracy of the remote sensing estimation results of D-HI under different sensitive band conditions.
(1)冬小麦动态收获指数总体精度验证(1) Overall accuracy verification of winter wheat dynamic harvest index
本发明在λ(443nm,506nm)、λ(442nm,635nm)、λ(732nm,834nm)、λ(787nm, 804nm)、λ(810nm,877nm)和λ(861nm,985nm)等6个遥感敏感波段中心构建的 NDSI估算D-fG条件下,分别对每个冠层高光谱敏感波段中心进行D-fG参数遥感估算的动态作物收获指数结果进行精度验证。最终,开花期—成熟期不同采样时期冬小麦动态收获指数总体验证结果如图13和表2所示。从表2可以看出,6个遥感敏感波段中心构建的NDSI估算D-fG条件下,利用冠层高光谱获得的D-fG参数遥感信息可以实现动态作物收获指数的准确估计。从D-HI估算总体精度评价指标结果可知,在筛选出的6个冠层高光谱敏感波段中心条件下,基于高光谱敏感波段D-fG参数的D-HI估算结果验证均达到了高精度水平,其拟合精度R2在0.9169~0.9584之间,RMSE在0.0380~0.0507之间,NRMSE在10.83%~14.45%之间,MRE在9.62%~13.99%之间。其中,基于高光谱敏感波段中心λ(732nm,834nm)估算D-fG参数的D-HI估测结果精度最高,NRMSE 和MRE分别为10.83%、9.62%;其次,基于高光谱敏感波段中心λ(443nm,506nm) 估算D-fG参数的D-HI估测结果精度较高,NRMSE和MRE分别为11.60%、10.24%;基于高光谱敏感波段中心λ(861nm,985nm)估算D-fG参数的D-HI估测结果精度相对较低,NRMSE和MRE分别为14.45%、13.99%。The present invention is in 6 remote sensing sensitive bands such as λ(443nm, 506nm), λ(442nm, 635nm), λ(732nm, 834nm), λ(787nm, 804nm), λ(810nm, 877nm) and λ(861nm, 985nm). Under the condition of DfG estimated by NDSI constructed by the center, the accuracy of the dynamic crop harvest index results of remote sensing estimation of DfG parameters in each canopy hyperspectral sensitive band center was verified. Finally, the overall verification results of the dynamic harvest index of winter wheat at different sampling periods from flowering to maturity are shown in Figure 13 and Table 2. It can be seen from Table 2 that under the condition of DfG estimated by NDSI constructed by the 6 remote sensing sensitive band centers, the DfG parameter remote sensing information obtained by the canopy hyperspectral can realize the accurate estimation of the dynamic crop harvest index. From the results of the overall accuracy evaluation index of D-HI estimation, it can be seen that under the condition of the center of the selected 6 canopy hyperspectral sensitive bands, the D-HI estimation results based on the Df G parameter of the hyperspectral sensitive band have reached a high level of accuracy. The fitting accuracy R 2 is between 0.9169 and 0.9584, the RMSE is between 0.0380 and 0.0507, the NRMSE is between 10.83% and 14.45%, and the MRE is between 9.62% and 13.99%. Among them, the D-HI estimation result based on the hyperspectral sensitive band center λ(732nm, 834nm) estimated the Df G parameter with the highest accuracy, with NRMSE and MRE of 10.83% and 9.62%, respectively; secondly, based on the hyperspectral sensitive band center λ(443nm) , 506nm), the D-HI estimation results for estimating DfG parameters are highly accurate, with NRMSE and MRE of 11.60% and 10.24%, respectively; D-HI estimation of DfG parameters based on the center λ of the hyperspectral sensitive band (861nm, 985nm) The accuracy of the measurement results is relatively low, with NRMSE and MRE of 14.45% and 13.99%, respectively.
表2基于D-fG遥感参数的D-HI估算模型总体精度验证Table 2 Overall accuracy verification of D-HI estimation model based on Df G remote sensing parameters
(2)灌浆至成熟期不同生育时期冬小麦D-HI估算模型精度验证(2) Accuracy verification of the D-HI estimation model for winter wheat at different growth stages from grain filling to maturity
本发明在利用预留的64组验证数据分析开花期—成熟期不同采样时期冬小麦动态收获指数遥感估算总体精度外,还分别针对5月18日、5月24日、6月3日和6月19 日等不同采样日期对应的灌浆前期、灌浆中期、灌浆后期的D-HI估算模型结果分别进行精度评价,具体结果如表3—表6所示。其中,预留的64组数据中,每次采样日期对应的验证数据为16组。In addition to using the reserved 64 sets of verification data to analyze the overall accuracy of remote sensing estimation of the dynamic harvest index of winter wheat in different sampling periods between the flowering period and the maturity period, the present invention also targets the data on May 18, May 24, June 3, and June respectively. The D-HI estimation model results of the pre-grouting, mid-grouting, and post-grouting corresponding to different sampling dates such as the 19th were evaluated for accuracy. The specific results are shown in Tables 3-6. Among them, among the 64 sets of data reserved, there are 16 sets of verification data corresponding to each sampling date.
A.不同灌浆阶段冬小麦D-HI估算模型精度验证A. Verification of the accuracy of the D-HI estimation model for winter wheat at different grain filling stages
在冬小麦灌浆前期(表3),通过遥感估算收获指数与实测作物收获指数间拟合精度R2在0.3128~0.5819之间,RMSE在0.0273~0.0393之间,NRMSE在13.21%~19.04%之间,MRE在11.50%~17.94%之间。其中,基于高光谱敏感波段中心λ(732nm,834nm) 估算D-fG参数的灌浆前期D-HI估测结果精度最高,NRMSE和MRE分别为13.21%、 11.50%;其次,基于高光谱敏感波段中心λ(443nm,506nm)估算D-fG参数的D-HI 估测结果精度较高,NRMSE和MRE分别为13.82%、11.92%;基于高光谱敏感波段中心λ(861nm,985nm)估算D-fG参数的D-HI估测结果精度相对较低,NRMSE和MRE 分别为19.04%、17.94%。In the early stage of winter wheat filling (Table 3), the fitting accuracy between the harvest index estimated by remote sensing and the measured crop harvest index R 2 was between 0.3128 and 0.5819, the RMSE was between 0.0273 and 0.0393, and the NRMSE was between 13.21% and 19.04%. MRE was between 11.50% and 17.94%. Among them, the Df G parameter estimated based on the hyperspectral sensitive band center λ(732nm, 834nm) has the highest accuracy of D-HI estimation results in the pre-grouting period, with NRMSE and MRE of 13.21% and 11.50%, respectively; secondly, based on the hyperspectral sensitive band center λ (443nm, 506nm) The D-HI estimation results of Df G parameters are highly accurate, with NRMSE and MRE of 13.82% and 11.92%, respectively; D-HI estimation of Df G parameters based on the hyperspectral sensitive band center λ (861nm, 985nm) The accuracy of HI estimation results is relatively low, with NRMSE and MRE of 19.04% and 17.94%, respectively.
在冬小麦灌浆中期(表4),通过遥感估算收获指数与实测作物收获指数间拟合精度R2在0.3597~0.4391之间,RMSE在0.0321~0.0437之间,NRMSE在11.27%~15.36%之间,MRE在9.05%~13.18%之间。其中,基于高光谱敏感波段中心λ(732nm,834nm) 估算D-fG参数的灌浆前期D-HI估测结果精度最高,NRMSE和MRE分别为11.27%、 9.05%;其次,基于高光谱敏感波段中心λ(443nm,506nm)估算D-fG参数的D-HI估测结果精度较高,NRMSE和MRE分别为11.69%、9.17%;基于高光谱敏感波段中心λ (861nm,985nm)估算D-fG参数的D-HI估测结果精度相对较低,NRMSE和MRE分别为15.36%、13.18%。In the mid-filling stage of winter wheat (Table 4 ), the fitting accuracy R2 between the harvest index estimated by remote sensing and the measured crop harvest index was between 0.3597 and 0.4391, the RMSE was between 0.0321 and 0.0437, and the NRMSE was between 11.27% and 15.36%. MRE was between 9.05% and 13.18%. Among them, the Df G parameter estimated based on the hyperspectral sensitive band center λ(732nm, 834nm) has the highest accuracy in the pre-grouting D-HI estimation results, with NRMSE and MRE of 11.27% and 9.05%, respectively; secondly, based on the hyperspectral sensitive band center λ (443nm, 506nm) D-HI estimation results of Df G parameters are highly accurate, with NRMSE and MRE of 11.69% and 9.17%, respectively; D-HI estimation of Df G parameters based on the hyperspectral sensitive band center λ (861nm, 985nm) The accuracy of HI estimation results is relatively low, with NRMSE and MRE of 15.36% and 13.18%, respectively.
在冬小麦灌浆后期(表5),通过遥感估算收获指数与实测作物收获指数间拟合精度R2在0.4928~0.5964之间,RMSE在0.0396~0.0565之间,NRMSE在9.92%~14.16%之间,MRE在8.66%~13.40%之间。其中,基于高光谱敏感波段中心λ(732nm,834nm) 估算D-fG参数的灌浆前期D-HI估测结果精度最高,NRMSE和MRE分别为9.92%、 8.66%;其次,基于高光谱敏感波段中心λ(443nm,506nm)估算D-fG参数的D-HI估测结果精度较高,NRMSE和MRE分别为10.92%、9.95%;基于高光谱敏感波段中心λ (861nm,985nm)估算D-fG参数的D-HI估测结果精度相对较低,NRMSE和MRE分别为14.16%、13.40%。At the late grain filling stage of winter wheat (Table 5), the fitting accuracy R2 between the harvest index estimated by remote sensing and the measured crop harvest index was between 0.4928 and 0.5964 , the RMSE was between 0.0396 and 0.0565, and the NRMSE was between 9.92% and 14.16%. MRE was between 8.66% and 13.40%. Among them, the Df G parameter estimated based on the hyperspectral sensitive band center λ(732nm, 834nm) has the highest accuracy of D-HI estimation results in the early stage of grouting, with NRMSE and MRE of 9.92% and 8.66%, respectively; secondly, based on the hyperspectral sensitive band center λ (443nm, 506nm) D-HI estimation results of Df G parameters are highly accurate, with NRMSE and MRE of 10.92% and 9.95%, respectively; D-HI estimation of Df G parameters based on the hyperspectral sensitive band center λ (861nm, 985nm) The accuracy of HI estimation results is relatively low, with NRMSE and MRE of 14.16% and 13.40%, respectively.
B.成熟期冬小麦D-HI遥感估算模型精度验证与传统方法比较B. Comparison of accuracy of D-HI remote sensing estimation model for mature winter wheat with traditional methods
在冬小麦成熟期(表6和图14),通过遥感估算收获指数与实测作物收获指数间拟合精度R2在0.2724~0.6762之间,RMSE在0.0492~0.0601之间,NRMSE在9.62%~11.74%之间,MRE在9.27%~11.43%之间。其中,基于高光谱敏感波段中心λ(732nm,834nm) 估算D-fG参数的成熟期D-HI估测结果精度最高,NRMSE和MRE分别为9.62%、9.27%;其次,基于高光谱敏感波段中心λ(443nm,506nm)估算D-fG参数的D-HI估测结果精度较高,NRMSE和MRE分别为10.33%、9.92%;基于高光谱敏感波段中心λ(861nm, 985nm)估算D-fG参数的D-HI估测结果精度相对较低,NRMSE和MRE分别为11.74%、11.43%。通过与章节2.1部分传统基于实测S-fG的成熟期G-HI估算结果的对比看,本发明所提方法基于高光谱敏感波段中心λ(732nm,834nm)估算D-fG参数估测成熟期的收获指数精度比传统的实测S-fG的G-HI估算精度RMSE提高0.0111,NRMSE提高 2.16%,MRE提高2.04%,这说明了本发明利用遥感技术改进传统的实测S-fG的G-HI 估算方法的有效性。At the maturity stage of winter wheat (Table 6 and Figure 14), the fitting accuracy R2 between the harvest index estimated by remote sensing and the measured crop harvest index was between 0.2724 and 0.6762 , the RMSE was between 0.0492 and 0.0601, and the NRMSE was between 9.62% and 11.74%. The MRE was between 9.27% and 11.43%. Among them, the mature-stage D-HI estimation results based on the hyperspectral sensitive band center λ(732nm, 834nm ) have the highest accuracy, with NRMSE and MRE of 9.62% and 9.27%, respectively; secondly, based on the hyperspectral sensitive band center λ (443nm, 506nm) D-HI estimation results of Df G parameters are highly accurate, with NRMSE and MRE of 10.33% and 9.92%, respectively . The accuracy of HI estimation results is relatively low, with NRMSE and MRE of 11.74% and 11.43%, respectively. By comparing with the traditional G-HI estimation results of mature stage based on measured Sf G in section 2.1, the method proposed in the present invention estimates the harvest index of the mature stage based on the hyperspectral sensitive band center λ (732nm, 834nm) to estimate the Df G parameter Compared with the traditional G-HI estimation accuracy of measured Sf G , the accuracy is improved by 0.0111, the NRMSE is improved by 2.16%, and the MRE is improved by 2.04%, which shows the effectiveness of the present invention using remote sensing technology to improve the traditional G-HI estimation method of measured Sf G .
总体看,本发明所提基于高光谱敏感波段D-fG参数获取的D-HI遥感估算方法获取的不同灌浆阶段(灌浆前期、灌浆中期和灌浆后期)动态收获指数以及成熟期收获指数均达到了较高水平的精度结果,且不同生育时期获取的动态收获指数最高精度排序为灌浆前期<灌浆中期<灌浆后期<成熟期,以上精度评价结果充分说明了本发明所提 D-HI遥感估算方法的可行性,这对通过考虑作物动态生长信息准确获取动态收获指数信息及成熟期收获指数具有重要意义。此外,与常见的成熟期作物收获指数遥感估算结果相比(Moriondo etal.,2007;任建强等,2010;),本发明所提方法获得的成熟期收获指数估算结果与常见遥感估算方法间结果具有一致性,如从利用高光谱敏感波段中心估算D-fG参数的D-HI估测结果精度结果看,最高D-HI估算精度的敏感波段中心λ(732nm, 834nm)主要位于红光和近红外波段,而上述中心组成的NDSI与传统估算作物收获指数采用的NDVI波段组合基本相同,这证明了本发明所提基于高光谱敏感波段D-fG参数获取的D-HI遥感估算方法与以往利用NDVI进行作物收获指数估算具有一定的一致性。In general, the dynamic harvest index at different filling stages (pre-filling, mid-filling and late-filling stage) and the harvest index at maturity obtained by the D-HI remote sensing estimation method based on the hyperspectral sensitive band Df G parameter obtained by the present invention all reach relatively high levels. High-level accuracy results, and the highest accuracy of the dynamic harvest index obtained in different growth periods is in the early stage of grain filling < middle stage of grain filling < late stage of grain filling < mature stage. The above precision evaluation results fully demonstrate the feasibility of the D-HI remote sensing estimation method proposed in the present invention. It is of great significance to accurately obtain the dynamic harvest index information and the harvest index at maturity by considering the dynamic growth information of crops. In addition, compared with the common remote sensing estimation results of crop harvest index at the mature stage (Moriondo et al., 2007; Ren Jianqiang et al., 2010;), the estimation results of the harvest index at maturity obtained by the method of the present invention and the results of common remote sensing estimation methods have the same Consistent, for example, from the D-HI estimation accuracy of Df G parameter estimation using the hyperspectral sensitive band center, the sensitive band center λ (732nm, 834nm) with the highest D-HI estimation accuracy is mainly located in the red and near-infrared bands , and the NDSI composed of the above-mentioned centers is basically the same as the NDVI band combination used in the traditional estimation of crop harvest index, which proves that the D-HI remote sensing estimation method based on the hyperspectral sensitive band Df G parameter obtained by the present invention is different from the previous crop estimation method using NDVI. Harvest index estimates have some consistency.
表3基于D-fG遥感参数的D-HI估算模型灌浆前期收获指数精度验证(5月18日)Table 3 D-HI estimation model based on Df G remote sensing parameters for pre-filling harvest index accuracy verification (May 18)
注:N代表验证数据集中灌浆前期实测D-HI的样本数量。**表示在p<0.01水平下极显著相关,*表示在p<0.05 水平下显著相关。Note: N represents the number of samples of D-HI measured before grouting in the validation dataset. ** means extremely significant correlation at p<0.01 level, * means significant correlation at p<0.05 level.
表4基于D-fG遥感参数的D-HI估算模型灌浆中期收获指数精度验证(5月24日)Table 4 Accuracy verification of the harvest index in the mid-filling stage of the D-HI estimation model based on Df G remote sensing parameters (May 24)
注:N代表验证数据集中灌浆中期实测D-HI的样本数量。**表示在p<0.01水平下极显著相关,*表示在p<0.05 水平下显著相关。Note: N represents the number of samples of D-HI measured in the mid-filling stage in the validation dataset. ** means extremely significant correlation at p<0.01 level, * means significant correlation at p<0.05 level.
表5基于D-fG遥感参数的D-HI估算模型灌浆后期收获指数精度验证(6月3日)Table 5 Accuracy verification of harvest index in the later stage of grain filling based on D-HI estimation model based on Df G remote sensing parameters (June 3)
注:N代表验证数据集中灌浆后期实测D-HI的样本数量。**表示在p<0.01水平下极显著相关,*表示在p<0.05 水平下显著相关。Note: N represents the number of samples of D-HI measured at the later stage of grouting in the validation dataset. ** means extremely significant correlation at p<0.01 level, * means significant correlation at p<0.05 level.
表6基于D-fG遥感参数的D-HI估算模型成熟期收获指数精度验证(6月19日)Table 6 Accuracy verification of harvest index at maturity of D-HI estimation model based on Df G remote sensing parameters (June 19)
注:N代表验证数据集中成熟期实测D-HI的样本数量。**表示在p<0.01水平下极显著相关,*表示在p<0.05 水平下显著相关。Note: N represents the number of samples of D-HI measured at maturity in the validation dataset. ** means extremely significant correlation at p<0.01 level, * means significant correlation at p<0.05 level.
应当理解的是,对本领域普通技术人员来说,可以根据上述说明加以改进或变换,而所有这些改进和变换都应属于本发明所附权利要求的保护范围。It should be understood that, for those skilled in the art, improvements or changes can be made according to the above description, and all these improvements and changes should fall within the protection scope of the appended claims of the present invention.
Claims (7)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202111188766.3A CN114202702B (en) | 2021-10-12 | 2021-10-12 | Based on D-fGWinter wheat dynamic harvest index remote sensing estimation method obtained by parameter remote sensing |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202111188766.3A CN114202702B (en) | 2021-10-12 | 2021-10-12 | Based on D-fGWinter wheat dynamic harvest index remote sensing estimation method obtained by parameter remote sensing |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN114202702A CN114202702A (en) | 2022-03-18 |
CN114202702B true CN114202702B (en) | 2022-06-21 |
Family
ID=80646172
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202111188766.3A Active CN114202702B (en) | 2021-10-12 | 2021-10-12 | Based on D-fGWinter wheat dynamic harvest index remote sensing estimation method obtained by parameter remote sensing |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN114202702B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN119314043A (en) * | 2024-09-25 | 2025-01-14 | 南京农业大学 | A dynamic harvest index estimation method based on multi-temporal high-resolution remote sensing images and phenological information |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AU2013216654A1 (en) * | 2007-01-31 | 2013-09-05 | Basf Plant Science Gmbh | Plants having enhanced yield-related traits and/or increased abiotic stress resistance, and a method for making the same |
CN109063893A (en) * | 2018-06-25 | 2018-12-21 | 浙江大学 | A kind of rice yield estimating and measuring method of dynamic harvest index in conjunction with net primary productivity |
CN109197437A (en) * | 2018-11-05 | 2019-01-15 | 黑龙江八农垦大学 | A kind of liquid manure high efficiency regulatory method of cold ground Corn In Semiarid Area large-ridge double-row under-film drip irrigation |
CN109272161A (en) * | 2018-09-18 | 2019-01-25 | 三亚中科遥感研究所 | Rice yield estimation method based on dynamic HI |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN110082300B (en) * | 2019-05-20 | 2020-03-03 | 中国水利水电科学研究院 | A method for establishing a monitoring model for winter wheat canopy moisture content based on spectral parameters |
CN110751094B (en) * | 2019-10-21 | 2020-08-28 | 北京师范大学 | Crop yield estimation method based on GEE comprehensive remote sensing image and deep learning method |
-
2021
- 2021-10-12 CN CN202111188766.3A patent/CN114202702B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AU2013216654A1 (en) * | 2007-01-31 | 2013-09-05 | Basf Plant Science Gmbh | Plants having enhanced yield-related traits and/or increased abiotic stress resistance, and a method for making the same |
CN109063893A (en) * | 2018-06-25 | 2018-12-21 | 浙江大学 | A kind of rice yield estimating and measuring method of dynamic harvest index in conjunction with net primary productivity |
CN109272161A (en) * | 2018-09-18 | 2019-01-25 | 三亚中科遥感研究所 | Rice yield estimation method based on dynamic HI |
CN109197437A (en) * | 2018-11-05 | 2019-01-15 | 黑龙江八农垦大学 | A kind of liquid manure high efficiency regulatory method of cold ground Corn In Semiarid Area large-ridge double-row under-film drip irrigation |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
李方杰 等."NDVI时序相似性对冬小麦种植面积总量控制的制图精度影响".《农业工程学报》.2021,全文. * |
王飞龙."基于卫星和无人机多源数据的水稻遥感估产方法研究".《中国优秀博硕士学位论文全文数据库(硕士) 农业科技辑》.2021,全文. * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN114202702A (en) | 2022-03-18 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN109829234B (en) | A cross-scale and high-precision dynamic crop growth monitoring and yield estimation method based on high-resolution remote sensing data and crop models | |
CN110082300B (en) | A method for establishing a monitoring model for winter wheat canopy moisture content based on spectral parameters | |
Zheng et al. | Assessment of the effects of shelterbelts on crop yields at the regional scale in Northeast China | |
CN109187441B (en) | Method for constructing summer corn nitrogen content monitoring model based on canopy spectral information | |
Er-Raki et al. | Determination of crop evapotranspiration of table grapes in a semi-arid region of Northwest Mexico using multi-spectral vegetation index | |
CN113268923B (en) | A Method for Yield Estimation of Summer Maize Based on Simulated Multispectral | |
Suyker et al. | Gross primary production and ecosystem respiration of irrigated and rainfed maize–soybean cropping systems over 8 years | |
Zhang et al. | Evaluation of the APSIM-Wheat model in terms of different cultivars, management regimes and environmental conditions | |
CN111044516B (en) | A method for remote sensing estimation of chlorophyll content in rice | |
CN110909933B (en) | Agricultural drought rapid diagnosis and evaluation method coupling crop model and machine learning language | |
CN104408307B (en) | The quick monitoring method of wheat powdery mildew occurring degree and its construction method of monitoring model | |
Meng et al. | Corn yield forecasting in northeast china using remotely sensed spectral indices and crop phenology metrics | |
CN111241912A (en) | Multi-vegetation index rice yield estimation method based on machine learning algorithm | |
CN105445229B (en) | Wheat spring nitrogen fertilizer applying method based on nitrogen balance spectroscopic methodology and its construction method for chasing after nitrogen quantity model | |
Abedinpour | Evaluation of Growth-Stage-Specific Crop Coefficients of Maize Using Weighing Lysimeter. | |
Marek et al. | Simulating evapotranspiration and yield response of selected corn varieties under full and limited irrigation in the Texas High Plains using DSSAT-CERES-Maize | |
CN104361249B (en) | Crop drought based on crop growth model causes calamity intensity index computing method | |
CN112837169A (en) | A method for comprehensive monitoring, early warning and assessment of drought in gridded drought process | |
US20250131716A1 (en) | Rapid drought monitoring and identification method for winter wheat based on uav measurements of leaf area index | |
Liu et al. | Reponses and sensitivities of maize phenology to climate change from 1981 to 2009 in Henan Province, China | |
CN108802728A (en) | The crop irrigation guidance method of dual polarization synthetic aperture radar and crop modeling assimilation | |
CN104517030B (en) | A kind of artificial pasture grows Suitable Area extracting method | |
CN104851048A (en) | Method for determining spatial distribution of suitable transplanting period of flue-cured tobacco in complicated hilly area | |
Bai et al. | Simulating on the effects of irrigation on jujube tree growth, evapotranspiration and water use based on crop growth model | |
CN116502901A (en) | Farmland drought spatial distribution evaluation method based on optical remote sensing data |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |