CN114169663A - Electric energy meter assembly and disassembly business normative supervision method - Google Patents
Electric energy meter assembly and disassembly business normative supervision method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN114169663A CN114169663A CN202111111806.4A CN202111111806A CN114169663A CN 114169663 A CN114169663 A CN 114169663A CN 202111111806 A CN202111111806 A CN 202111111806A CN 114169663 A CN114169663 A CN 114169663A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- meter
- seal
- time
- work order
- judgment value
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 29
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 52
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 238000007789 sealing Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 238000013479 data entry Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000005856 abnormality Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001788 irregular Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010248 power generation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/06—Electricity, gas or water supply
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a method for standardly supervising the assembly and disassembly business of an electric energy meter, which comprises the following steps of S1, obtaining work order data and a white list; identifying and numbering a table-changing work order from the work order data; step S2, sequentially calling the meter changing work orders according to the numbering sequence, determining whether the meter changing work orders belong to a white list, and sequentially judging whether the called meter changing work orders meet the preset electric energy meter assembly and disassembly standard according to preset judgment rules when the meter changing work orders do not belong to the white list to obtain a standard judgment result; step S3, judging whether the serial number of the called list change work order reaches the maximum serial number, if not, adding one to the serial number of the called list change work order, recalling the list change work order and executing step S2; and if so, outputting an abnormal work order list and corresponding abnormal project data according to the standard judgment result. The method and the system analyze and check the electric energy meter assembly and disassembly business normative condition according to the work order data materials, so that the electric energy meter assembly and disassembly business normative management has intelligence, accuracy and practicability.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of electric energy meter supervision, in particular to a normative supervision method for electric energy meter assembly and disassembly services.
Background
The electric energy metering data is the basis for settlement of power generation enterprises, power supply enterprises and power consumption customers, relates to fair and fair settlement of electric charges and is the core benefit of the power supply enterprises, and the carrier for recording the electric energy metering data is the electric energy meter, and along with the continuous improvement of the living standard of people, the assembly and disassembly services of the electric energy meter are more and more frequent, so that the normative monitoring on the installation and replacement services of the electric energy meter becomes more and more important. In the process of attaching and detaching meters, which is more and more important by the power supply bureau, the operation specification is continuously improved, most meter assembling and detaching operations tend to be standard, but certain error business exists due to the inevitable repeated operation along with the increase of the assembling and detaching business volume of the electric energy meters, the current problem of the non-standard assembling and detaching of the electric energy meters mainly focuses on the abnormal problems that the meters and seals are not installed on the same day when being used, the system is not recorded in time after the meters and seals are assembled and disassembled, the paper material records of the assembling and detaching of the meters and the seals are not consistent with the system record content, the logic handling of the assembling and detaching business of the meters and the seals is abnormal, the key information records of the paper materials are incomplete, and the like.
In order to solve the problem of non-standard correlation of the electric energy meter assembly and disassembly services, the electric energy meter assembly and disassembly service standardization is reinforced and supervised based on an intelligent report system, the goal of meter assembly and disassembly service supervision service flow and supervision personnel minimization is taken as the goal, the electric energy meter assembly and disassembly supervision system is perfected, the electric energy meter assembly and disassembly inspection flow is optimized, the cost reduction and efficiency improvement consciousness of staff is enhanced, the non-standard electric energy meter assembly and disassembly service is found in time and the management and control are enhanced, and the electric energy meter assembly and disassembly service standardization and the accuracy of basic electric energy metering data are guaranteed. The problems that the inspection efficiency of the electric energy meter assembly and disassembly services is low, the inspection consumes more manpower resources, the problem discovery is not timely, the supervision effect is not obvious and the like caused by the increase of the service quantity are gradually solved, the normative consciousness and the participation consciousness of service personnel are comprehensively improved, and the execution of the service control target is implemented.
Therefore, in order to meet the development requirements of the intelligent power grid and meet the new requirements of power supply enterprises on digital power grid construction and modern power supply service embodying construction and business supervision, the normative of the assembly and disassembly business of the electric energy meter of the large-business power supply enterprise is systematically supervised and examined, and an automatic intelligent electric energy meter assembly and disassembly business normative supervision flow is required to be applied. The normative supervision of the electric energy meter assembly and disassembly services mainly depends on manpower to extract data from mass data and check related contents of the services step by step, so that a certain experience basis is needed, the control effect requirements are difficult to meet, and the method is not suitable for the control analysis application scene of a small number of service control personnel for mass services.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a method for supervising the assembling and disassembling business normative of an electric energy meter, which realizes the flow automation and high-efficiency management and control of the assembling and disassembling business normative management and control of the electric energy meter and enables electric power marketing business supervision personnel to have more intelligence, accuracy and practicability in the assembling and disassembling business normative monitoring and management of the electric energy meter.
On the one hand, the utility model provides a method for supervising the standardization of electric energy meter assembly and disassembly services, which comprises the following steps:
step S1, acquiring work order data and a white list of the table-changing work order; identifying and numbering a table changing work order from the work order data, and counting the maximum value of the number of the table changing work order;
step S2, sequentially calling the meter changing work orders according to the numbering sequence, determining whether the called meter changing work orders belong to a white list, and sequentially judging whether the called meter changing work orders meet the preset electric energy meter assembly and disassembly standard standards according to preset judgment rules when the called meter changing work orders do not belong to the white list to obtain a standard judgment result; wherein, the standard judgment result comprises standard or non-standard;
step S3, judging whether the serial number of the called list change work order reaches the maximum serial number, if not, adding one to the serial number of the called list change work order, recalling the list change work order and executing step S2; and if so, outputting an abnormal work order list and corresponding abnormal project data according to the standard judgment result.
Preferably, in step S1, the work order data specifically includes:
the system work order data comprises a business work order number, a business category, an electric energy meter asset number, meter mounting and dismounting identification information, meter mounting and dismounting code input identification, meter mounting and dismounting seal input identification, meter mounting and dismounting meter code data, meter seal asset number, meter seal position information, meter picking and ex-warehouse time, meter mounting and dismounting time, meter system input time, meter seal ex-warehouse time, meter seal mounting time, a work order handling unit name, a work order handling personnel name and an assistant personnel name;
the paper worksheet data comprises a material receiving sheet for measuring materials, an operation sheet for assembling and disassembling a measuring device, an on-site meter and a seal photo.
Preferably, in step S1, the identifying the form change work order from the work order data specifically includes:
calling whether the meter in the work order data is assembled and disassembled with identification information, and judging whether the called meter is assembled and disassembled with the identification information is yes;
when the called meter is judged to be assembled or disassembled, the work order is judged to be a meter-changing work order;
and when the called meter is not assembled or disassembled with the identification information, judging that the work order is not the meter changing work order.
Preferably, in step S2, the sequentially determining whether the called meter replacement work orders meet the preset electric energy meter assembly and disassembly specification standard according to the preset determination rule includes:
acquiring meter assembly and disassembly time of a meter changing work order, meter taking warehouse-out time and meter system recording time;
comparing the meter taking and delivery time with the meter assembling and disassembling time, and determining a first logic judgment value according to a comparison result; when the meter receiving and delivering time is longer than the meter assembling and disassembling time, a first logic judgment value is 1, and when the meter receiving and delivering time is not longer than the meter assembling and disassembling time, the first logic judgment value is 0;
comparing the meter mounting and dismounting time with the meter system recording time, and determining a second logic judgment value according to the comparison result; when the meter assembling and disassembling time is longer than the meter system recording time, a second logic judgment value is 1, and when the meter assembling and disassembling time is not longer than the meter system recording time, the second logic judgment value is 0;
when the first logic judgment value is 1, judging that the meter receiving logic is abnormal; when the second logic judgment value is 1, judging that the meter assembly and disassembly recording logic is abnormal; when the first logic judgment value or the second logic judgment value is 1, judging that the table changing work order is abnormal, and outputting a standard judgment result as non-standard; when the first logic judgment value and the second logic judgment value are 0, the table-changing work order is judged to be normal, and the output standard judgment result is standard.
Preferably, in step S2, the sequentially determining whether the called meter replacement work orders meet the preset electric energy meter assembly and disassembly specification standard according to the preset determination rule further includes:
acquiring a meter acceptance time limit requirement coefficient, a meter system input time limit requirement coefficient and a rest day setting value of a meter changing work order;
calculating a first time limit judgment value according to the following formula:
Tlz＝Ksx*(T1-T2-Txx)/24
wherein Tlz denotes a first time limit determination value; ksx represents the scale factor of the time limit of the meter, Ksx belongs to [0, 1 ]; t1 represents the meter mounting and dismounting time; t2 represents the time of meter getting out of warehouse; txx represents the rest day to be rejected set according to the holidays, and the unit is day; kx represents a day-of-rest discrimination coefficient, x belongs to [ T2, T1], and when the date x is the set holiday, Kx is 1; when the date x is the working day, Kx is 0;
calculating a second time limit judgment value according to the following formula:
Tll＝Ksxl*(T3-T1-Txx)/24
wherein Tll denotes a second time limit judgment value; ksxl represents a time limit requirement coefficient of the meter system, and Ksxl belongs to [0, 1 ]; t1 represents the meter mounting and dismounting time; t3 represents meter system entry time;
when the first time limit judgment value is larger than or equal to 1, judging that the meter assembly and disassembly acceptance does not meet the time limit requirement; when the second time limit judgment value is smaller than 1, judging that the entry of the meter system does not meet the time limit requirement; when the first time limit judgment value is more than or equal to 1 or the second time limit judgment value is less than 1, judging that the list changing work order is abnormal, and outputting a standard judgment result as non-standard; and when the first time limit judgment value is smaller than 1 or the second time limit judgment value is not smaller than 1, judging that the list changing work order is normal, and outputting a standard judgment result as a standard.
Preferably, in step S2, the sequentially determining whether the called meter replacement work orders meet the preset electric energy meter assembly and disassembly specification standard according to the preset determination rule includes:
acquiring a data entry identifier of meter mounting and dismounting meter code data of the meter changing work order and whether a meter mounting and dismounting seal is an entry identifier;
calculating a first key information missing judgment value according to the following formula:
Q＝P*K1+F*K2
wherein Q represents a first key information missing judgment value; p represents a data entry identifier of meter table code data, and when the entry identifier is yes, P is 1; when the entry identification is no, P is 0; f represents whether the meter seal is installed and disassembled and whether an identification is recorded, and if the recorded identification is yes, F is 1; when the entry identification is no, F is 0; k1 and K2 represent preset scaling factors;
when Q is (K1+ K2), it is determined that there is a meter-critical information entry loss, and when Q is K1, it is determined that the seal information is missing; when Q is K2, judging that the table data is missing; when Q is 0, judging that the sealing information and the table code data are both missing; and when Q is (K1+ K2), or Q is K1, or Q is K2, or Q is 0, judging that the list changing worksheet is abnormal, and outputting a standard judgment result to be out of specification.
Preferably, in step S2, the sequentially determining whether the called meter replacement work orders meet the preset electric energy meter assembly and disassembly specification standard according to the preset determination rule further includes:
when the input mark F of the meter seal assembly and disassembly is equal to 1, judging the seal time limit, and acquiring meter seal assembly and disassembly time, meter seal picking and delivery time and meter seal system input time of a meter change work order;
comparing the meter seal drawing time with meter seal mounting and dismounting time, and determining a third logic judgment value according to the comparison result; when the meter seal receiving and delivering time is not more than the meter seal mounting and dismounting time, the third logic judgment value is 0;
comparing the meter seal mounting and dismounting time with the meter seal system input time, and determining a fourth logic judgment value according to the comparison result; when the meter seal mounting and dismounting time is longer than the recording time of the meter seal system, the fourth logical judgment value is 1, and when the meter seal mounting and dismounting time is not longer than the recording time of the meter seal system, the fourth logical judgment value is 0;
when the third logic judgment value is 1, judging that the meter seal receiving logic is abnormal; when the fourth logic judgment value is 1, judging that the meter seal assembling, disassembling and recording logic is abnormal; when the third logical judgment value or the fourth logical judgment value is 1, judging that the table changing work order is abnormal, and outputting a standard judgment result as non-standard; and when the third logic judgment value and the fourth logic judgment value are 0, judging that the table changing work order is normal, and outputting a standard judgment result as a standard.
Preferably, in step S2, the sequentially determining whether the called meter replacement work orders meet the preset electric energy meter assembly and disassembly specification standard according to the preset determination rule further includes:
when the third logical judgment value or the fourth logical judgment value is 0, acquiring an additional seal time limit requirement coefficient, a meter seal receiving, assembling and disassembling time limit requirement coefficient and a meter seal system recording time limit requirement coefficient;
calculating a third time limit judgment value according to the following formula:
Tzfy＝Ksxf*(T4-T1-Txx)/24
wherein Tzfy represents a third time limit judgment value; ksxf represents a time limit requirement coefficient for adding seal, and Ksxf belongs to [0, 1 ]; t1 represents the meter mounting and dismounting time; t4 represents the meter seal mounting and dismounting time of the meter changing work order; txx represents the day of rest to be rejected set according to the holidays; kx represents a day-of-rest discrimination coefficient, x belongs to [ T1, T4], and when the date x is the set holiday, Kx is 1; when the date x is the working day, Kx is 0;
calculating a fourth time limit judgment value according to the following formula:
Tlzf＝Ksxf1*(T4-T5-Txx)/24
wherein, Tlzf represents a fourth time limit judgment value; ksxflz represents a time limit requirement coefficient for assembling and disassembling the seal of the meter, and Ksxflz belongs to [0, 1 ]; t4 represents the meter seal mounting and dismounting time of the meter changing work order; t5 represents the time of meter seal acceptance for delivery;
the fifth time limit judgment value is calculated according to the following formula:
Tfll＝Ksxl*(T6-T4-Txx)/24
the Ksxfll represents a recording time limit requirement coefficient of a meter seal system, and the Ksxfll belongs to [0, 1 ]; t4 meter seal mounting and dismounting time for changing the meter work order; t6 represents meter seal system entry time;
when the third time limit judgment value is larger than or equal to 1, judging that the meter in the work order is not timely provided with a seal; when the fourth time limit judgment value is larger than or equal to 1, judging that the assembly and disassembly acceptance of the seal in the work order does not meet the time limit requirement; when the third time limit judgment value is greater than or equal to 1 or the fourth time limit judgment value is greater than or equal to 1, judging that the table changing work order is abnormal, and outputting a standard judgment result as non-standard; and when the third time limit judgment value is smaller than 1 and the fourth time limit judgment value is smaller than 1, judging that the table changing work order is normal, and outputting a standard judgment result as a standard.
Preferably, in step S2, the sequentially determining whether the called meter replacement work orders meet the preset electric energy meter assembly and disassembly specification standard according to the preset determination rule further includes:
acquiring a data entry identifier of meter mounting and dismounting meter code data of the meter changing work order and whether a meter mounting and dismounting seal is an entry identifier;
calculating a second key information missing judgment value according to the following formula:
Q1＝P1*K3+F1*K4
wherein, P1 represents the data entry mark of meter code data of the mounting and dismounting meter; f1 represents whether the seal of the meter is recorded with a mark or not; k3 and K4 represent preset scaling factors; when Q1 is equal to (K3+ K4), judging that meter key information entry is absent; when Q1 is K3, it is determined that the seal information is missing; when Q1 is K4, it is determined that table data is missing; when Q1 is equal to 0, judging that the sealing information and the table code data are both missing; and when Q1 is equal to (K3+ K4) or Q1 is equal to K3 or Q1 is equal to K4 or Q1 is equal to 0, judging that the list changing worksheet is abnormal, and outputting a standard judgment result to be out of specification.
Preferably, in step S2, the sequentially determining whether the called meter replacement work orders meet the preset electric energy meter assembly and disassembly specification standard according to the preset determination rule further includes:
acquiring meter mounting and dismounting system input electric quantity information, paper form recorded electric quantity information, meter mounting and dismounting seal codes, paper form seal codes, meter mounting and dismounting seal position information and paper form seal position information of a meter mounting and dismounting system of a meter changing work order;
when the electric quantity information recorded in the meter mounting and dismounting system is the same as the electric quantity information recorded in the paper form, setting a first data consistency judgment variable to be 1, otherwise, setting the first data consistency judgment variable to be 0, and judging that the electric quantity information is recorded in an inconsistent manner;
when the identification judgment is carried out on the mounting and dismounting meter seal code and the paper form seal code, setting a second data consistency judgment variable to be 1, otherwise, setting the second data consistency judgment variable to be 0, and judging that the seal number information is recorded inconsistently;
when the identification judgment is carried out on the sealing position information of the meter mounting and dismounting meter and the sealing position information of the paper form are the same, setting a third data consistency judgment variable to be 1, otherwise, setting the first data consistency judgment variable to be 0, and judging that the sealing position information is recorded inconsistently;
and when the first data consistency judgment variable or the second data consistency judgment variable or the third data consistency judgment variable is 0, judging that the list changing work order is abnormal, and outputting a standard judgment result to be non-standard.
In summary, the embodiment of the invention has the following beneficial effects:
the electric energy meter assembly and disassembly service normative supervision method provided by the invention is combined with the actual management and control scene of an electric energy meter assembly and disassembly service field, the actual conditions of data materials and design values are automatically handled according to meter assembly and disassembly services, and the electric energy meter assembly and disassembly service normative conditions are intelligently analyzed and checked according to a model algorithm, so that the electric power marketing service supervision personnel have intelligence, accuracy and practicability in the electric energy meter assembly and disassembly service normative monitoring management.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and it is within the scope of the present invention for those skilled in the art to obtain other drawings based on the drawings without inventive exercise.
Fig. 1 is a main flow diagram of a method for normatively supervising an electric energy meter installation and removal service in an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a logic diagram of a normative supervision method for an electric energy meter installation and removal service in an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention more apparent, the present invention will be described in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Fig. 1 and fig. 2 are schematic diagrams illustrating an embodiment of a method for normative supervision of an electric energy meter installation and removal business provided by the present invention. In this embodiment, the method comprises the steps of:
step S1, acquiring work order data and a white list of the table-changing work order; identifying and numbering a table changing work order from the work order data, and counting the maximum value of the number of the table changing work order; it can be understood that, the number of the table-changing work orders in the system is input or read, and the serial number of the initial work order number is defined as 1, that is, the number of the first table-changing work order to be called is set as 1, and then the table-changing work order to be called is added with 1 on the basis, so as to determine the number of the work orders which are judged in the subsequent judgment process; the method mainly comprises the steps of obtaining a work order number, a service type, meter mounting and dismounting time, meter receiving and ex-warehouse time, meter system input time, a data input identifier of meter code data of a meter, electric quantity information input in a meter mounting and dismounting system, whether a meter seal is installed and dismounted, a meter seal code, meter seal mounting and dismounting position information, meter seal mounting and dismounting time, meter seal receiving and ex-warehouse time and meter seal system input time of a meter changing work order.
In the specific embodiment, in the judgment process of the irregular assembly and disassembly services of the electric energy meter, the judgment is mainly carried out according to two parts of system work order data and paper work order data. The work order data specifically includes:
the system work order data comprises a business work order number, a business category, an electric energy meter asset number, meter mounting and dismounting identification information, meter mounting and dismounting code input identification, meter mounting and dismounting seal input identification, meter mounting and dismounting meter code data, meter seal asset number, meter seal position information, meter picking and ex-warehouse time, meter mounting and dismounting time, meter system input time, meter seal ex-warehouse time, meter seal mounting time, a work order handling unit name, a work order handling personnel name and an assistant personnel name;
the paper worksheet data comprises a material receiving sheet for measuring materials, an operation sheet for assembling and disassembling a measuring device, an on-site meter, a seal photo and the like; and judging whether the meter is assembled or disassembled if the identification information is judged to be yes preliminarily, namely judging whether the work order is a meter changing work order, and judging whether the service is not standard when the work order is determined to be the meter changing work order.
Further, identifying the form change work order from the work order data specifically includes: calling whether the meter in the work order data is assembled and disassembled with identification information, and judging whether the called meter is assembled and disassembled with the identification information is yes; when the called meter is judged to be assembled or disassembled, the work order is judged to be a meter-changing work order; and when the called meter is not assembled or disassembled with the identification information, judging that the work order is not the meter changing work order.
Step S2, sequentially calling the meter changing work orders according to the numbering sequence, determining whether the called meter changing work orders belong to a white list, and sequentially judging whether the called meter changing work orders meet the preset electric energy meter assembly and disassembly standard standards according to preset judgment rules when the called meter changing work orders do not belong to the white list to obtain a standard judgment result; wherein, the standard judgment result comprises standard or non-standard; it can be understood that whether the meter changing work order belongs to a white list or not is determined, and when the meter changing work order belongs to the white list, the work order is considered to be in the operating specification, and whether the preset electric energy meter assembling and disassembling specification standard is met or not does not need to be judged; and when the work order does not belong to the white list, the work order operation is considered to be possibly out of specification, and whether the work order operation meets the preset electric energy meter assembly and disassembly specification standard needs to be judged.
In a specific embodiment, the sequentially judging whether the called meter-changing work order meets the preset electric energy meter assembly and disassembly standard according to the preset judgment rule includes:
judging whether meter assembly and disassembly service time logic is abnormal or not
Based on the meter mounting/dismounting time T1, the meter receiving/ex-warehouse time T2, and the meter system entry time T3, the logical judgments Klj1 and Klj2 (first logical judgment value, second logical judgment value), the logical abnormality judgment is as follows:
when T2> T1, the logic determines Klj1 to be 1, otherwise Klj1 to be 0;
when T1> T3, the logic determines Klj2 to be 1, otherwise Klj2 to be 0;
when Klj1 is 1, the meter apply logic is abnormal; when Klj2 is equal to 1, the meter mounting and dismounting logging logic is abnormal. On the premise of no abnormity of meter logic, the judgment of relevant time limit condition can be carried out,
specifically, meter mounting and dismounting time of a meter changing work order, meter taking out time and meter system recording time are obtained;
comparing the meter taking and delivery time with the meter assembling and disassembling time, and determining a first logic judgment value according to a comparison result; when the meter receiving and delivering time is longer than the meter assembling and disassembling time, a first logic judgment value is 1, and when the meter receiving and delivering time is not longer than the meter assembling and disassembling time, the first logic judgment value is 0;
comparing the meter mounting and dismounting time with the meter system recording time, and determining a second logic judgment value according to the comparison result; when the meter assembling and disassembling time is longer than the meter system recording time, a second logic judgment value is 1, and when the meter assembling and disassembling time is not longer than the meter system recording time, the second logic judgment value is 0;
when the first logic judgment value is 1, judging that the meter receiving logic is abnormal; when the second logic judgment value is 1, judging that the meter assembly and disassembly recording logic is abnormal; when the first logic judgment value or the second logic judgment value is 1, judging that the table changing work order is abnormal, and outputting a standard judgment result as non-standard; when the first logic judgment value and the second logic judgment value are 0, the table-changing work order is judged to be normal, and the output standard judgment result is standard.
Further, it is judged that the meter is not required to be assembled or disassembled within time limit
According to the meter mounting and dismounting time T1, the meter receiving delivery time T2, the time limit requirement coefficient Ksx, the rest day set value Txx and the time limit judgment Tlz (the unit is day), the time limit abnormity judgment is as follows:
Tlz＝Ksx*(T1-T2-Txx)/24
ksx-time limit proportionality coefficient of traffic class, Ksx ∈ [0, 1]]Ksx is typically set to 1, according to current industry model requirements. T1-time of latest assembly and disassembly in units of hours. T2-Table last time delivery time was received, unit to hour. Txx-the day of rest to be rejected, set in advance according to the holidays, in days. KXCoefficient of day of rest, x ∈ [ T2, T1]When the date x is the set holiday, Kx is 1; when the date x is the working day, Kx is 0. When the measurement result is as follows: tlz is more than or equal to 1, the meter in the work order is assembled and disassembled and the time limit requirement is not met.
Specifically, a meter acceptance time limit requirement coefficient, a meter system input time limit requirement coefficient and a rest day setting value of a meter changing work order are obtained;
calculating a first time limit judgment value according to the following formula:
Tlz＝Ksx*(T1-T2-Txx)/24
wherein Tlz denotes a first time limit determination value; ksx represents the scale factor of the time limit of the meter, Ksx belongs to [0, 1 ]; t1 represents the meter mounting and dismounting time; t2 represents the time of meter getting out of warehouse; txx represents the rest day to be rejected set according to the holidays, and the unit is day; kx represents a day-of-rest discrimination coefficient, x belongs to [ T2, T1], and when the date x is the set holiday, Kx is 1; when the date x is the working day, Kx is 0;
judging that the meter system entry does not meet the time limit requirement, and judging the abnormal time limit according to the meter assembly and disassembly time T1, the meter system entry time T3, the service class and time limit requirement coefficient Ksxl, the rest day set value Txx and the time limit judgment Tll as follows:
Tll＝Ksxl*(T3-T1-Txx)/24
ksxl-service class time limit proportionality coefficient, Ksxl is E [0, 1 ∈]According to the requirement of the current business model, Ksxl is generally set to 0.2 when the business type is batch business; ksxl is typically set to 1 when the traffic class is non-bulk traffic. T1-time of latest assembly and disassembly in units of hours. T3-the latest entry of system time in units of hours. Txx-the days of rest required to be rejected, set in advance according to the holidays. KXCoefficient of day of rest, x ∈ [ T1, T3]When the date x is the set holiday, Kx is 1; when the date x is the working day, Kx is 0. When the measurement result is as follows: tll > 1, the work order meter system entry does not meet the time limit requirement.
Specifically, the second time limit judgment value is calculated according to the following formula:
Tll＝Ksxl*(T3-T1-Txx)/24
wherein Tll denotes a second time limit judgment value; ksxl represents a time limit requirement coefficient of the meter system, and Ksxl belongs to [0, 1 ]; t1 represents the meter mounting and dismounting time; t3 represents meter system entry time;
when the first time limit judgment value is larger than or equal to 1, judging that the meter assembly and disassembly acceptance does not meet the time limit requirement; when the second time limit judgment value is smaller than 1, judging that the entry of the meter system does not meet the time limit requirement; when the first time limit judgment value is more than or equal to 1 or the second time limit judgment value is less than 1, judging that the list changing work order is abnormal, and outputting a standard judgment result as non-standard; and when the first time limit judgment value is smaller than 1 or the second time limit judgment value is not smaller than 1, judging that the list changing work order is normal, and outputting a standard judgment result as a standard.
Further, acquiring a data entry identifier of meter code data of the meter mounting and dismounting meter of the meter changing work order and an identifier of whether a meter seal is entered or not;
calculating a first key information missing judgment value according to the following formula:
Q＝P*K1+F*K2
wherein Q represents a first key information missing judgment value; p represents a data entry identifier of meter table code data, and when the entry identifier is yes, P is 1; when the entry identification is no, P is 0; f represents whether the meter seal is installed and disassembled and whether an identification is recorded, and if the recorded identification is yes, F is 1; when the entry identification is no, F is 0; k1 and K2 represent preset scaling factors;
when Q is (K1+ K2), it is determined that there is a meter-critical information entry loss, and when Q is K1, it is determined that the seal information is missing; when Q is K2, judging that the table data is missing; when Q is 0, judging that the sealing information and the table code data are both missing; and when Q is (K1+ K2), or Q is K1, or Q is K2, or Q is 0, judging that the list changing worksheet is abnormal, and outputting a standard judgment result to be out of specification.
Namely, judging the meter key information input missing, specifically judging according to the key data identification setting content, setting the conditions of installing and detaching a data input mark P of meter code data and installing and detaching a meter seal whether to input a mark F according to the current business model requirement, judging the key information missing Q, and judging the meter key information input missing condition as follows:
Q＝P*K1+F*K2
p is a data entry identifier of meter table code data, and when the entry identifier is yes, P is 1; when the entry identification is no, P is 0. F, judging whether the seal of the meter is recorded with an identification, and if so, setting F to be 1; when the entry identification is no, F is 0. K1, K2-proportionality coefficient, can set up freely. When Q is (K1+ K2), it is determined that there is a meter-critical information entry missing, and when Q is K1, seal information is missing; when Q is K2, the table data is missing; when Q is 0, both the seal information and the table data are missing.
When the identification F of the meter seal assembly and disassembly is recorded is equal to 1, judging the seal time limit, namely judging the logical abnormity of the meter seal assembly and disassembly service time; acquiring meter seal assembly and disassembly time of a meter changing work order, meter seal drawing time and meter seal system recording time;
comparing the meter seal drawing time with meter seal mounting and dismounting time, and determining a third logic judgment value according to the comparison result; when the meter seal receiving and delivering time is not more than the meter seal mounting and dismounting time, the third logic judgment value is 0;
comparing the meter seal mounting and dismounting time with the meter seal system input time, and determining a fourth logic judgment value according to the comparison result; when the meter seal mounting and dismounting time is longer than the recording time of the meter seal system, the fourth logical judgment value is 1, and when the meter seal mounting and dismounting time is not longer than the recording time of the meter seal system, the fourth logical judgment value is 0;
when the third logic judgment value is 1, judging that the meter seal receiving logic is abnormal; when the fourth logic judgment value is 1, judging that the meter seal assembling, disassembling and recording logic is abnormal; when the third logical judgment value or the fourth logical judgment value is 1, judging that the table changing work order is abnormal, and outputting a standard judgment result as non-standard; and when the third logic judgment value and the fourth logic judgment value are 0, judging that the table changing work order is normal, and outputting a standard judgment result as a standard.
That is, the logical abnormality judgment is as follows, based on the meter seal mounting/dismounting time T4, the meter seal receiving shipment time T5, and the meter seal system entry time T6 (third logical judgment value, fourth logical judgment value) Klj3 and Klj 4: when T5> T4, the logic determines Klj3 to be 1, otherwise Klj3 to be 0; when T4> T6, the logic determines Klj4 to be 1, otherwise Klj4 to be 0; when Klj3 is equal to 1, the meter seal receiving logic is abnormal; when Klj4 is equal to 1, the meter seal mounting and dismounting entry logic is abnormal.
Further, when the third logical judgment value or the fourth logical judgment value is 0, namely on the premise that the meter seal logic is not abnormal, the judgment of the relevant time limit condition can be carried out (the meter is not timely additionally provided with a seal, the meter seal is not required to be assembled and disassembled, and the meter seal system entry is not required to be limited), and an additionally-installed seal time limit requirement coefficient, a meter seal is required to be assembled and disassembled, and a meter seal system entry time limit requirement coefficient are obtained;
calculating a third time limit judgment value according to the following formula:
Tzfy＝Ksxf*(T4-T1-Txx)/24
wherein Tzfy represents a third time limit judgment value; ksxf represents a time limit requirement coefficient for adding seal, and Ksxf belongs to [0, 1 ]; t1 represents the meter mounting and dismounting time; t4 represents the meter seal mounting and dismounting time of the meter changing work order; txx represents the day of rest to be rejected set according to the holidays; kx represents a day-of-rest discrimination coefficient, x belongs to [ T1, T4], and when the date x is the set holiday, Kx is 1; when the date x is the working day, Kx is 0; ksxf is a service class time limit proportional coefficient, Ksxf belongs to [0, 1], and the Ksxf is generally set to be 1 according to the requirement of the current business model. T1-time of latest assembly and disassembly in units of hours. T4-assembly and disassembly time of work order seal, unit is accurate to hour. Txx-the days of rest required to be rejected, set in advance according to the holidays. KX — coefficient of day-to-rest determination, where x belongs to [ T1, T4], and when the date x is the set holiday, KX is 1; when the date x is the working day, Kx is 0. When the measurement result is as follows: when Tzfy is more than or equal to 1, the seal is not timely added to the work order center meter.
Calculating a fourth time limit judgment value according to the following formula:
Tlzf＝Ksxf1*(T4-T5-Txx)/24
wherein, Tlzf represents a fourth time limit judgment value; ksxflz represents a time limit requirement coefficient for assembling and disassembling the seal of the meter, and Ksxflz belongs to [0, 1 ]; t4 represents the meter seal mounting and dismounting time of the meter changing work order; t5 represents the time of meter seal acceptance for delivery; ksxflz-the service class time limit scaling factor, Ksxflz ∈ [0, 1], which is generally set to 1, depending on the current business model requirements. T4-meter seal mounting and dismounting time, unit is accurate to hour. T5-Table receives the time of delivery in units of hours. Txx-the day of rest to be rejected, set in advance according to the holidays, in days. Kx is a coefficient of day-to-rest determination, x belongs to [ T5, T4], and when the date x is the set holiday, Kx is 1; when the date x is the working day, Kx is 0. When the measurement result is as follows: when the Tlzf is more than or equal to 1, the assembly and disassembly acceptance of the seal in the work order does not meet the time limit requirement.
The fifth time limit judgment value is calculated according to the following formula:
Tfll＝Ksxl*(T6-T4-Txx)/24
the Ksxfll represents a recording time limit requirement coefficient of a meter seal system, and the Ksxfll belongs to [0, 1 ]; t4 meter seal mounting and dismounting time for changing the meter work order; t6 represents meter seal system entry time; ksxfll-service class time limit proportional coefficient, Ksxfll belongs to [0, 1], according to the requirement of the current business model, Ksxfll is generally set to be 0.2 when the service class is the batch service; ksxfll is typically set to 1 when the traffic class is non-bulk traffic. T4-meter seal mounting and dismounting time, unit is accurate to hour. T6-Meter seal entry System time, in units of hours. Txx-the days of rest required to be rejected, set in advance according to the holidays. Kx is a coefficient of day-to-rest determination, x belongs to [ T4, T6], and when the date x is the set holiday, Kx is 1; when the date x is the working day, Kx is 0. When the measurement result is as follows: when Tfll is more than 1, the recording of the meter system in the work order does not meet the time limit requirement.
When the third time limit judgment value is larger than or equal to 1, judging that the meter in the work order is not timely provided with a seal; when the fourth time limit judgment value is larger than or equal to 1, judging that the assembly and disassembly acceptance of the seal in the work order does not meet the time limit requirement; when the third time limit judgment value is greater than or equal to 1 or the fourth time limit judgment value is greater than or equal to 1, judging that the table changing work order is abnormal, and outputting a standard judgment result as non-standard; and when the third time limit judgment value is smaller than 1 and the fourth time limit judgment value is smaller than 1, judging that the table changing work order is normal, and outputting a standard judgment result as a standard.
The judgment corresponding to the paper work order mainly comprises the judgment of key information input loss of the paper work order meter, specifically, the judgment is carried out according to the identification setting content of key data, the conditions of setting a data input mark P1 for installing and detaching meter code data and whether an installing and detaching meter seal is input mark F1 are set according to the current business model requirement, the key information loss judgment Q1 judges the key information input loss conditions of the paper work order meter as follows:
Q1＝P1*K3+F1*K4
p1, recording identification of form paper worksheet form code data, wherein when the form code data filling content is identified through an image identification technology, P1 is 1; when no relevant data is identified, P1 is 0. F1, installing and removing the entry mark of the seal paper work order seal information of the meter, wherein when the seal information filling content is identified through the image identification technology, F1 is 1; when no relevant data is identified, F1 is 0. K3 and K4-scale factors, freely settable. When Q1 < (K3+ K4), judging that meter key information entry is missing; when Q1 ═ K3, the seal information is missing; when Q1 ═ K4, table data is missing; when Q1 is 0, both the seal information and the table code data are missing.
Specifically, acquiring a data entry identifier of meter mounting and dismounting meter code data of a meter changing work order, and whether a meter mounting and dismounting meter seal is an entry identifier;
calculating a second key information missing judgment value according to the following formula:
Q1＝P1*K3+F1*K4
wherein, P1 represents the data entry mark of meter code data of the mounting and dismounting meter; f1 represents whether the seal of the meter is recorded with a mark or not; k3, K4 represent preset proportionality coefficients; when Q1 is equal to (K3+ K4), judging that meter key information entry is absent; when Q1 is K3, it is determined that the seal information is missing; when Q1 is K4, it is determined that table data is missing; when Q1 is equal to 0, judging that the sealing information and the table code data are both missing; and when Q1 is equal to (K3+ K4) or Q1 is equal to K3 or Q1 is equal to K4 or Q1 is equal to 0, judging that the list changing worksheet is abnormal, and outputting a standard judgment result to be out of specification.
Furthermore, the method needs to judge that key information of the paper worksheet meter is inconsistent with system information entry, identify the set content according to key data, and set the electric quantity information S1, paper form recorded electric quantity information S2, meter mounting and dismounting seal code F1, paper form seal code F2, meter mounting and dismounting seal position information W1, paper form seal position information W2, and data consistency judgment variables Y1, Y2 and Y3 according to the current industry and model requirements. When the identification judgment S1 is S2, Y1 is 1, otherwise Y1 is 0, and the electric quantity information is recorded in an inconsistent manner; when the identification judgment F1 is F2, Y2 is 1, otherwise Y2 is 0, and the seal number information entries are inconsistent; when the recognition judgment W1 is W2, Y3 is 1, otherwise, Y1 is 0, the seal position information entries are inconsistent.
Specifically, acquiring meter mounting and dismounting system input electric quantity information, paper form recorded electric quantity information, meter mounting and dismounting seal codes, paper form seal codes, meter mounting and dismounting seal position information and paper form seal position information of a meter mounting and dismounting system of a meter changing work order;
when the electric quantity information recorded in the meter mounting and dismounting system is the same as the electric quantity information recorded in the paper form by identification and judgment, the first data consistency judgment variable is 1, otherwise, the first data consistency judgment variable is 0, and the electric quantity information is judged to be recorded inconsistently;
when the identification judgment is carried out on the mounting and dismounting meter seal code and the paper form seal code, setting a second data consistency judgment variable to be 1, otherwise, setting the second data consistency judgment variable to be 0, and judging that the seal number information is recorded inconsistently;
when the identification judgment is carried out on the sealing position information of the meter mounting and dismounting meter and the sealing position information of the paper form are the same, setting a third data consistency judgment variable to be 1, otherwise, setting the first data consistency judgment variable to be 0, and judging that the sealing position information is recorded inconsistently;
and when the first data consistency judgment variable or the second data consistency judgment variable or the third data consistency judgment variable is 0, judging that the list changing work order is abnormal, and outputting a standard judgment result to be non-standard.
Step S3, judging whether the serial number of the called list change work order reaches the maximum serial number, if not, adding one to the serial number of the called list change work order, recalling the list change work order and executing step S2; and if so, outputting an abnormal work order list and corresponding abnormal project data according to the standard judgment result. It can be understood that whether all the table-changing work orders are judged by numbering and calling the serial numbers of the work orders can be judged, if not, the steps are repeated until all the work orders are judged, and an abnormal work order list and corresponding abnormal items under the set data are integrated.
In summary, the embodiment of the invention has the following beneficial effects:
the electric energy meter assembly and disassembly service normative supervision method provided by the invention is combined with the actual management and control scene of an electric energy meter assembly and disassembly service field, the actual conditions of data materials and design values are automatically handled according to meter assembly and disassembly services, and the electric energy meter assembly and disassembly service normative conditions are intelligently analyzed and checked according to a model algorithm, so that the electric power marketing service supervision personnel have intelligence, accuracy and practicability in the electric energy meter assembly and disassembly service normative monitoring management.
The above disclosure is only for the purpose of illustrating the preferred embodiments of the present invention, and it is therefore to be understood that the invention is not limited by the scope of the appended claims.
Claims (10)
1. A method for standardly supervising the assembly and disassembly business of an electric energy meter is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step S1, acquiring work order data and a white list of the table-changing work order; identifying and numbering a table changing work order from the work order data, and counting the maximum value of the number of the table changing work order;
step S2, sequentially calling the meter changing work orders according to the numbering sequence, determining whether the called meter changing work orders belong to a white list, and sequentially judging whether the called meter changing work orders meet the preset electric energy meter assembly and disassembly standard standards according to preset judgment rules when the called meter changing work orders do not belong to the white list to obtain a standard judgment result; wherein, the standard judgment result comprises standard or non-standard;
step S3, judging whether the serial number of the called list change work order reaches the maximum serial number, if not, adding one to the serial number of the called list change work order, recalling the list change work order and executing step S2; and if so, outputting an abnormal work order list and corresponding abnormal project data according to the standard judgment result.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein in step S1, the work order data specifically includes:
the system work order data comprises a business work order number, a business category, an electric energy meter asset number, meter mounting and dismounting identification information, meter mounting and dismounting code input identification, meter mounting and dismounting seal input identification, meter mounting and dismounting meter code data, meter seal asset number, meter seal position information, meter picking and ex-warehouse time, meter mounting and dismounting time, meter system input time, meter seal ex-warehouse time, meter seal mounting time, a work order handling unit name, a work order handling personnel name and an assistant personnel name;
the paper worksheet data comprises a material receiving sheet for measuring materials, an operation sheet for assembling and disassembling a measuring device, an on-site meter and a seal photo.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein in step S1, said identifying a trade list from said work order data includes:
calling whether the meter in the work order data is assembled and disassembled with identification information, and judging whether the called meter is assembled and disassembled with the identification information is yes;
when the called meter is judged to be assembled or disassembled, the work order is judged to be a meter-changing work order;
and when the called meter is not assembled or disassembled with the identification information, judging that the work order is not the meter changing work order.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the step S2 of sequentially judging whether the called meter replacement work orders meet the preset electric energy meter assembly and disassembly specification standard according to the preset judgment rules comprises:
acquiring meter assembly and disassembly time of a meter changing work order, meter taking warehouse-out time and meter system recording time;
comparing the meter taking and delivery time with the meter assembling and disassembling time, and determining a first logic judgment value according to a comparison result; when the meter receiving and delivering time is longer than the meter assembling and disassembling time, a first logic judgment value is 1, and when the meter receiving and delivering time is not longer than the meter assembling and disassembling time, the first logic judgment value is 0;
comparing the meter mounting and dismounting time with the meter system recording time, and determining a second logic judgment value according to the comparison result; when the meter assembling and disassembling time is longer than the meter system recording time, a second logic judgment value is 1, and when the meter assembling and disassembling time is not longer than the meter system recording time, the second logic judgment value is 0;
when the first logic judgment value is 1, judging that the meter receiving logic is abnormal;
when the second logic judgment value is 1, judging that the meter assembly and disassembly recording logic is abnormal;
when the first logic judgment value or the second logic judgment value is 1, judging that the table changing work order is abnormal, and outputting a standard judgment result as non-standard;
when the first logic judgment value and the second logic judgment value are 0, the table-changing work order is judged to be normal, and the output standard judgment result is standard.
5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the step S2 of sequentially determining whether the called meter-changing worksheets meet the predetermined electric energy meter installation and removal specification standards according to the predetermined determination rules further comprises:
acquiring a meter acceptance time limit requirement coefficient, a meter system input time limit requirement coefficient and a rest day setting value of a meter changing work order;
calculating a first time limit judgment value according to the following formula:
Tlz＝Ksx*(T1-T2-Txx)/24
wherein Tlz denotes a first time limit determination value; ksx represents the scale factor of the time limit of the meter, Ksx belongs to [0, 1 ]; t1 represents the meter mounting and dismounting time; t2 represents the time of meter getting out of warehouse; txx represents the rest day to be rejected set according to the holidays, and the unit is day; kx represents a day-of-rest discrimination coefficient, x belongs to [ T2, T1], and when the date x is the set holiday, Kx is 1; when the date x is the working day, Kx is 0;
calculating a second time limit judgment value according to the following formula:
Tll＝Ksxl*(T3-T1-Txx)/24
wherein Tll denotes a second time limit judgment value; ksxl represents a time limit requirement coefficient of the meter system, and Ksxl belongs to [0, 1 ]; t1 represents the meter mounting and dismounting time; t3 represents meter system entry time;
when the first time limit judgment value is larger than or equal to 1, judging that the meter assembly and disassembly acceptance does not meet the time limit requirement; when the second time limit judgment value is smaller than 1, judging that the entry of the meter system does not meet the time limit requirement; when the first time limit judgment value is more than or equal to 1 or the second time limit judgment value is less than 1, judging that the list changing work order is abnormal, and outputting a standard judgment result as non-standard; and when the first time limit judgment value is smaller than 1 or the second time limit judgment value is not smaller than 1, judging that the list changing work order is normal, and outputting a standard judgment result as a standard.
6. The method according to claim 5, wherein the step S2 of sequentially judging whether the called meter replacement work orders meet the preset electric energy meter assembly and disassembly specification standard according to the preset judgment rules comprises:
acquiring a data entry identifier of meter mounting and dismounting meter code data of the meter changing work order and whether a meter mounting and dismounting seal is an entry identifier;
calculating a first key information missing judgment value according to the following formula:
Q＝P*K1+F*K2
wherein Q represents a first key information missing judgment value; p represents a data entry identifier of meter table code data, and when the entry identifier is yes, P is 1; when the entry identification is no, P is 0; f represents whether the meter seal is installed and disassembled and whether an identification is recorded, and if the recorded identification is yes, F is 1; when the entry identification is no, F is 0; k1 and K2 represent preset scaling factors;
when Q is (K1+ K2), it is determined that there is a meter-critical information entry loss, and when Q is K1, it is determined that the seal information is missing; when Q is K2, judging that the table data is missing; when Q is 0, judging that the sealing information and the table code data are both missing; and when Q is (K1+ K2), or Q is K1, or Q is K2, or Q is 0, judging that the list changing worksheet is abnormal, and outputting a standard judgment result to be out of specification.
7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the step S2 of sequentially determining whether the called meter replacement work orders meet the predetermined electric energy meter assembly and disassembly specification standard according to the predetermined determination rule further comprises:
when the input mark F of the meter seal assembly and disassembly is equal to 1, judging the seal time limit, and acquiring meter seal assembly and disassembly time, meter seal picking and delivery time and meter seal system input time of a meter change work order;
comparing the meter seal drawing time with meter seal mounting and dismounting time, and determining a third logic judgment value according to the comparison result; when the meter seal receiving and delivering time is not more than the meter seal mounting and dismounting time, the third logic judgment value is 0;
comparing the meter seal mounting and dismounting time with the meter seal system input time, and determining a fourth logic judgment value according to the comparison result; when the meter seal mounting and dismounting time is longer than the recording time of the meter seal system, the fourth logical judgment value is 1, and when the meter seal mounting and dismounting time is not longer than the recording time of the meter seal system, the fourth logical judgment value is 0;
when the third logic judgment value is 1, judging that the meter seal receiving logic is abnormal;
when the fourth logic judgment value is 1, judging that the meter seal assembling, disassembling and recording logic is abnormal;
when the third logical judgment value or the fourth logical judgment value is 1, judging that the table changing work order is abnormal, and outputting a standard judgment result as non-standard;
and when the third logic judgment value and the fourth logic judgment value are 0, judging that the table changing work order is normal, and outputting a standard judgment result as a standard.
8. The method according to claim 7, wherein the step S2 of sequentially determining whether the called meter replacement work orders meet the predetermined electric energy meter assembly and disassembly specification standard according to the predetermined determination rule further comprises:
when the third logical judgment value or the fourth logical judgment value is 0, acquiring an additional seal time limit requirement coefficient, a meter seal receiving, assembling and disassembling time limit requirement coefficient and a meter seal system recording time limit requirement coefficient;
calculating a third time limit judgment value according to the following formula:
Tzfy＝Ksxf*(T4-T1-Txx)/24
wherein Tzfy represents a third time limit judgment value; ksxf represents a time limit requirement coefficient for adding seal, and Ksxf belongs to [0, 1 ]; t1 represents the meter mounting and dismounting time; t4 represents the meter seal mounting and dismounting time of the meter changing work order; txx represents the day of rest to be rejected set according to the holidays; kx represents a day-of-rest discrimination coefficient, x belongs to [ T1, T4], and when the date x is the set holiday, Kx is 1; when the date x is the working day, Kx is 0;
calculating a fourth time limit judgment value according to the following formula:
Tlzf＝Ksxf1*(T4-T5-Txx)/24
wherein, Tlzf represents a fourth time limit judgment value; ksxflz represents a time limit requirement coefficient for assembling and disassembling the seal of the meter, and Ksxflz belongs to [0, 1 ]; t4 represents the meter seal mounting and dismounting time of the meter changing work order; t5 represents the time of meter seal acceptance for delivery;
the fifth time limit judgment value is calculated according to the following formula:
Tfll＝Ksxl*(T6-T4-Txx)/24
the Ksxfll represents a recording time limit requirement coefficient of a meter seal system, and the Ksxfll belongs to [0, 1 ]; t4 meter seal mounting and dismounting time for changing the meter work order; t6 represents meter seal system entry time;
when the third time limit judgment value is larger than or equal to 1, judging that the meter in the work order is not timely provided with a seal;
when the fourth time limit judgment value is larger than or equal to 1, judging that the assembly and disassembly acceptance of the seal in the work order does not meet the time limit requirement;
when the third time limit judgment value is greater than or equal to 1 or the fourth time limit judgment value is greater than or equal to 1, judging that the table changing work order is abnormal, and outputting a standard judgment result as non-standard;
and when the third time limit judgment value is smaller than 1 and the fourth time limit judgment value is smaller than 1, judging that the table changing work order is normal, and outputting a standard judgment result as a standard.
9. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step S2 of sequentially determining whether the called meter-changing work orders meet the predetermined electric energy meter assembly and disassembly specification standard according to the predetermined determination rule further comprises:
acquiring a data entry identifier of meter mounting and dismounting meter code data of the meter changing work order and whether a meter mounting and dismounting seal is an entry identifier;
calculating a second key information missing judgment value according to the following formula:
Q1＝P1*K3+F1*K4
wherein, P1 represents the data entry mark of meter code data of the mounting and dismounting meter; f1 represents whether the seal of the meter is recorded with a mark or not; k3 and K4 represent preset scaling factors;
when Q1 is equal to (K3+ K4), judging that meter key information entry is absent;
when Q1 is K3, it is determined that the seal information is missing;
when Q1 is K4, it is determined that table data is missing;
when Q1 is equal to 0, judging that the sealing information and the table code data are both missing;
and when Q1 is equal to (K3+ K4) or Q1 is equal to K3 or Q1 is equal to K4 or Q1 is equal to 0, judging that the list changing worksheet is abnormal, and outputting a standard judgment result to be out of specification.
10. The method according to claim 9, wherein the step S2 of sequentially determining whether the called meter replacement work orders meet the predetermined electric energy meter assembly and disassembly specification standard according to the predetermined determination rule further comprises:
acquiring meter mounting and dismounting system input electric quantity information, paper form recorded electric quantity information, meter mounting and dismounting seal codes, paper form seal codes, meter mounting and dismounting seal position information and paper form seal position information of a meter mounting and dismounting system of a meter changing work order;
when the electric quantity information recorded in the meter mounting and dismounting system is the same as the electric quantity information recorded in the paper form by identification and judgment, the first data consistency judgment variable is 1, otherwise, the first data consistency judgment variable is 0, and the electric quantity information is judged to be recorded inconsistently;
when the identification judgment is carried out on the mounting and dismounting meter seal code and the paper form seal code, setting a second data consistency judgment variable to be 1, otherwise, setting the second data consistency judgment variable to be 0, and judging that the seal number information is recorded inconsistently;
when the identification judgment is carried out on the sealing position information of the meter mounting and dismounting meter and the sealing position information of the paper form are the same, setting a third data consistency judgment variable to be 1, otherwise, setting the first data consistency judgment variable to be 0, and judging that the sealing position information is recorded inconsistently;
and when the first data consistency judgment variable or the second data consistency judgment variable or the third data consistency judgment variable is 0, judging that the list changing work order is abnormal, and outputting a standard judgment result to be non-standard.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111111806.4A CN114169663A (en) | 2021-09-23 | 2021-09-23 | Electric energy meter assembly and disassembly business normative supervision method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111111806.4A CN114169663A (en) | 2021-09-23 | 2021-09-23 | Electric energy meter assembly and disassembly business normative supervision method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN114169663A true CN114169663A (en) | 2022-03-11 |
Family
ID=80476763
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111111806.4A Pending CN114169663A (en) | 2021-09-23 | 2021-09-23 | Electric energy meter assembly and disassembly business normative supervision method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN114169663A (en) |
Citations (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2004213069A (en) * | 2002-12-26 | 2004-07-29 | Kyocera Mita Corp | Apparatus for issuing business form, and electronic business form system using the same |
| CN109242145A (en) * | 2018-08-01 | 2019-01-18 | 深圳供电局有限公司 | A kind of electric energy meter batch rotation field operation method, apparatus and system |
| CN109299919A (en) * | 2018-09-27 | 2019-02-01 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | A kind of industry expands method of auditing administration and system |
| CN110046722A (en) * | 2019-04-19 | 2019-07-23 | 深圳市万物云科技有限公司 | Community's equipment maintenance method and device and system and storage medium based on OCR technique |
| CN111177510A (en) * | 2019-12-18 | 2020-05-19 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | Method and device for capturing and diagnosing electric charge customer service work order based on process automation |
| CN111221289A (en) * | 2019-04-09 | 2020-06-02 | 国网福建省电力有限公司 | Ammeter data interaction system and method |
| CN111682440A (en) * | 2020-06-17 | 2020-09-18 | 贵州电网有限责任公司 | Digital substation inspection method |
| CN112598142A (en) * | 2020-12-16 | 2021-04-02 | 明阳智慧能源集团股份公司 | Wind turbine generator overhaul work quality examination assisting method and system |
| CN112817978A (en) * | 2021-01-29 | 2021-05-18 | 泽恩科技有限公司 | Intelligent form system based on business risk points |
| CN113298269A (en) * | 2020-12-25 | 2021-08-24 | 国网宁夏电力有限公司营销服务中心(国网宁夏电力有限公司计量中心) | One-key type electric energy meter assembling, disassembling and replacing method |
-
2021
- 2021-09-23 CN CN202111111806.4A patent/CN114169663A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2004213069A (en) * | 2002-12-26 | 2004-07-29 | Kyocera Mita Corp | Apparatus for issuing business form, and electronic business form system using the same |
| CN109242145A (en) * | 2018-08-01 | 2019-01-18 | 深圳供电局有限公司 | A kind of electric energy meter batch rotation field operation method, apparatus and system |
| CN109299919A (en) * | 2018-09-27 | 2019-02-01 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | A kind of industry expands method of auditing administration and system |
| CN111221289A (en) * | 2019-04-09 | 2020-06-02 | 国网福建省电力有限公司 | Ammeter data interaction system and method |
| CN110046722A (en) * | 2019-04-19 | 2019-07-23 | 深圳市万物云科技有限公司 | Community's equipment maintenance method and device and system and storage medium based on OCR technique |
| CN111177510A (en) * | 2019-12-18 | 2020-05-19 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | Method and device for capturing and diagnosing electric charge customer service work order based on process automation |
| CN111682440A (en) * | 2020-06-17 | 2020-09-18 | 贵州电网有限责任公司 | Digital substation inspection method |
| CN112598142A (en) * | 2020-12-16 | 2021-04-02 | 明阳智慧能源集团股份公司 | Wind turbine generator overhaul work quality examination assisting method and system |
| CN113298269A (en) * | 2020-12-25 | 2021-08-24 | 国网宁夏电力有限公司营销服务中心(国网宁夏电力有限公司计量中心) | One-key type electric energy meter assembling, disassembling and replacing method |
| CN112817978A (en) * | 2021-01-29 | 2021-05-18 | 泽恩科技有限公司 | Intelligent form system based on business risk points |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| 张先;: "浅谈用电信息采集系统中异常数据的分析及判断", 中国设备工程, no. 21, 10 November 2018 (2018-11-10) * |
| 邢尚文;侯琛;: "信息化计量下提升工单业务及时性的实践", 农村电工, no. 01, 6 January 2016 (2016-01-06) * |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US9273983B2 (en) | System and method of high volume import, validation and estimation of meter data | |
| CN112686493A (en) | Method for evaluating running state and replacing of intelligent electric meter in real time by relying on big data | |
| US6965833B2 (en) | System and method for providing environmental impact information, recording medium recording the information, and computer data signal | |
| CN111539604A (en) | Enterprise rework and production recovery index measuring and monitoring method based on electric power data | |
| US20060026209A1 (en) | System and method for processing control data | |
| CN111177510B (en) | Method and device for grabbing and diagnosing electric charge customer service worksheet based on flow automation | |
| CN109634944B (en) | Network loss data cleaning method based on multi-dimensional space-time analysis | |
| CN111650901A (en) | Intelligent unattended factory system for cement production line | |
| CN115841398B (en) | Water supply network leakage analysis method and system based on Internet of things | |
| CN116028887B (en) | Analysis method of continuous industrial production data | |
| CN112561289A (en) | Energy performance integrated verification method in energy management system authentication | |
| CN111898068A (en) | Anomaly detection method based on PERT algorithm and instrument usage analysis | |
| CN110633916A (en) | Energy efficiency control system for coal mine enterprise | |
| CN111612019A (en) | Method for identifying and analyzing fault abnormality of intelligent electric meter based on big data model | |
| CN113988711A (en) | Power consumption data-based monitoring method for stopping or limiting production of sewage disposal enterprises in control state | |
| CN111652570A (en) | Automatic auditing system and method | |
| CN115798155A (en) | Natural gas metering and analyzing system | |
| CN114169663A (en) | Electric energy meter assembly and disassembly business normative supervision method | |
| CN117057835A (en) | Auxiliary analysis method and system for power grid engineering cost | |
| CN113379336B (en) | Intelligent manufacturing execution process data processing system and method based on MES system | |
| CN115441590A (en) | Electric power acquisition energy management system and method | |
| CN115333232A (en) | Online monitoring method for abnormal starting and stopping state of transformer and related device | |
| CN115330404A (en) | System and method for electric power marketing inspection | |
| AU2010202088C1 (en) | System and method for identifying energy overconsumption | |
| CN114399192A (en) | Online inspection automation RPA system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |