CN114154901A - Water affair engineering early-stage achievement quality evaluation system based on mobile phone APP - Google Patents
Water affair engineering early-stage achievement quality evaluation system based on mobile phone APP Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN114154901A CN114154901A CN202111500784.0A CN202111500784A CN114154901A CN 114154901 A CN114154901 A CN 114154901A CN 202111500784 A CN202111500784 A CN 202111500784A CN 114154901 A CN114154901 A CN 114154901A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation
- stage
- project
- design
- information
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/06—Electricity, gas or water supply
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A20/00—Water conservation; Efficient water supply; Efficient water use
- Y02A20/152—Water filtration
Abstract
In the water business industry, early-stage result quality evaluation is a common business, and the invention discloses a water business engineering early-stage result quality evaluation system based on a mobile phone APP. Compared with the traditional off-line evaluation scoring, the development of the quality evaluation program can perform on-line scoring and consulting, and realize the evaluation by double-line synchronization. Meanwhile, the data of past evaluation projects can be stored, and one-key file management is easily realized. In China where the WeChat applet is applied and developed and used in a mature way, the WeChat applet has strong acceptance capacity and high utilization rate, can quickly and simply realize the skilled use of the application, and can be normalized in paperless office on the future, so that professional technicians are not restricted to paper and do double-line office any more, and the system is a necessary point of scientific and technological progress, therefore, the development of the early-stage achievement quality evaluation system of the water project based on the mobile phone APP on the basis of 'Shenzhen city water project early-stage work achievement quality evaluation index system and assessment scoring detailed rules' has a very wide application prospect.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of water affair engineering, in particular to a water affair engineering early-stage achievement quality evaluation system based on a mobile phone APP.
Background
In the industry, quality evaluation is common business development and quality evaluation small program development, and compared with the conventional paper evaluation program, the quality evaluation program can be used for on-line consulting and off-line evaluation, so that evaluation synchronously performed by two lines is realized. Meanwhile, the data of past evaluation projects can be stored, and one-key file management is easily realized. In China where the application of the WeChat applet is developed and used in a mature way, the WeChat applet has strong acceptance capacity and high utilization rate for the public, and the skilled application of the application can be quickly and simply realized.
At present, similar evaluation development small programs exist in the market, and a water affair project early-stage result quality evaluation system based on a mobile phone APP belongs to the initiative. In the future, paperless office work on line is necessarily normalized, so that professional technicians are not bound to paper any more, and double-line office work is a necessary point of technological progress. Therefore, the system for evaluating the quality of the early-stage achievement of the water project based on the mobile phone APP is developed on the basis of the index system and the assessment scoring detailed rule of the early-stage work achievement of the water project in Shenzhen city, and has a very broad application prospect.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to solve the technical problem, the invention provides a water affair early-stage result quality evaluation system based on a mobile phone APP, wherein the mobile phone APP is added with a result quality evaluation system
S1, establishing an evaluation method of the early-stage results of the water project;
s2, establishing an evaluation module;
s3, establishing an evaluation index;
s4, establishing a grading rule and a weight;
s5, assigning;
and S6, building an intelligent evaluation model.
Preferably: the evaluation method comprises the following requirements:
s11, the project bears the qualification requirement of unit survey design:
the investigation and design qualification of an achievement report compiling unit must meet the regulation of the engineering design qualification standard, the investigation and design achievement compiling unit must have corresponding investigation and design qualification at each design stage of the hydraulic engineering, and if the achievement report finished by the unit only having the engineering consultation qualification is judged to be not qualified;
s12, main survey designer qualification requirements:
each professional technical responsible person who undertakes the survey design work must have the state-specified practice qualification and be in the valid period;
s13, corresponding stage thematic report requirement:
checking whether a special subject and a special report which are compiled according to national documents, technical rules and the requirements of examination opinions in the previous stage and need to be simultaneously arranged for examination are finished in the corresponding stage, wherein the special report comprises an engineering geological survey report and an environmental impact evaluation report, a water and soil conservation scheme report and a immigration arrangement planning book in the feasibility research stage;
s14, achievement integrity requirement:
checking whether the content of the design result meets the content requirements of the compiling rules of the corresponding stage, including chapter content, necessary drawings and accessories; checking whether the project construction task, scale, range, scheme and investment have the non-conformity of insufficient planning basis, non-conformity with the project requirement and obvious design defect;
s15, the requirement of complex project conformity evaluation:
and (4) for projects with large scale and complex design conditions, carrying out conformity evaluation by combining pre-examination work in a hospital.
Preferably: the establishing and evaluating module is used for:
s21, technical assessment scope and organization:
when the technical evaluation object is evaluated, all the examination items meeting the application range in the monthly examination plan are examined, and the examination process is finished by the evaluation module;
s22, technical evaluation:
and the evaluation module is used for grading according to the established evaluation method aiming at the degree that the reconnaissance design result meets the compiling regulation and other related technical standards, and outputting a grading result and a technical evaluation table.
Preferably: the evaluation indexes comprise comprehensive description information of a water affair project recommendation stage, a feasibility study report stage and a preliminary design stage, hydrological information, engineering measurement information, engineering tasks and scale information, engineering arrangement and building information, electromechanical and metal structure information, construction organization design information, construction land acquisition and compensation information, environmental impact evaluation and soil and water conservation information, labor safety and sanitation and energy conservation evaluation information, engineering management and social stability risk analysis information, investment estimation and economic evaluation information and drawing information.
Preferably: the scoring rules and weights are:
s41, assigning scores according to corresponding quality standards, adopting different evaluation contents and evaluation requirements for reports in different design stages, wherein the different evaluation contents occupy different weights, and if the evaluation contents do not meet the conditions, the evaluation contents are unqualified;
s42, the evaluation module scores the results, briefly explains the quality of the results, mainly describes the quality defect, and provides a clear suggestion for whether to review and recheck, if the review is suggested, the result quality evaluation score is unqualified, and clearly modifies the project for the recheck project.
Preferably: the assignments are:
s51, evaluation standard: more than 80 points (including 80 points) of the score are qualified, 60-80 points (including 60 points) of the score are basically qualified, less than 60 points of the score are unqualified, and the evaluation module divides the review items into two grades of qualified and unqualified;
s52, calculating the project technical evaluation score according to the following formula:
technical assessment score ═ sigma score/sigma score × 100.
Preferably: the model building method comprises the following steps:
s61, quantitative analysis: using unified dimension, calculation formula and discrimination standard, and taking individual evaluation indexes with certain representativeness to carry out quantitative evaluation through the quantitative calculation reaction evaluation result;
s62, qualitative analysis: the evaluation module synthesizes the evaluation results of the two methods to carry out comprehensive analysis and comparison to obtain the final evaluation result.
Preferably: the expert scoring process comprises the following steps:
1. scanning by WeChat;
2. logging in the small program;
3. clicking the project to be evaluated;
4. grading;
5. submitting a score;
6. and finishing the evaluation.
The invention has the technical effects and advantages that:
1. the evaluation system develops a result quality evaluation program suitable for early-stage of the water affair engineering by utilizing the mobile phone APP technology according to related laws, rules and regulations, and promotes the application of an intelligent technology in the water affair engineering.
2. The evaluation system belongs to the initial development and application in the early-stage work review of the construction engineering, and provides a reference function for project review of other engineering;
3. the evaluation system adopts refined evaluation, so that the evaluation result is more objective and more reliable, and the problems of the evaluation object can be reflected in a targeted manner;
4. compared with the traditional mode that experts are issued with paper evaluation manuscripts in the past review meeting, the application of small programs obviously improves the working efficiency and promotes the scientific and environment-friendly concept of paperless office;
5. complicated manual calculation work is abandoned, and the computer checks the score in real time without waiting for time;
6. and intelligently analyzing the scores of the experts by adopting an intelligent AI algorithm technology for dividing key modules, and obtaining a final result by analyzing a background intelligent algorithm.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a technical route diagram of a water affairs project early-stage result quality evaluation system based on a mobile phone APP provided in an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 2 is an expert scoring flow chart of a water affair project early-stage result quality evaluation system based on a mobile phone APP provided by the embodiment of the application.
Detailed Description
The present invention will be described in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments. The embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description, and are not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
Referring to fig. 1, in the embodiment, a system for evaluating the quality of the early-stage result of the water conservancy project based on a mobile phone APP is provided, and S1 is added to the mobile phone APP to make an evaluation method of the early-stage result of the water conservancy project, where the evaluation method includes the following requirements:
s11, the project bears the qualification requirement of unit survey design:
the investigation and design qualification of an achievement report compiling unit must meet the regulation of the engineering design qualification standard, the investigation and design achievement compiling unit must have corresponding investigation and design qualification at each design stage of the hydraulic engineering, and if the achievement report finished by the unit only having the engineering consultation qualification is judged to be not qualified;
s12, main survey designer qualification requirements:
each professional technical responsible person who undertakes the survey design work must have the state-specified practice qualification and be in the valid period;
s13, corresponding stage thematic report requirement:
checking whether a special subject and a special report which are compiled according to national documents, technical rules and the requirements of examination opinions in the previous stage and need to be simultaneously arranged for examination are finished in the corresponding stage, wherein the special report comprises an engineering geological survey report and an environmental impact evaluation report, a water and soil conservation scheme report and a immigration arrangement planning book in the feasibility research stage;
s14, achievement integrity requirement:
checking whether the content of the design result meets the content requirements of the compiling rules of the corresponding stage, including chapter content, necessary drawings and accessories; checking whether the project construction task, scale, range, scheme and investment have the non-conformity of insufficient planning basis, non-conformity with the project requirement and obvious design defect;
s15, the requirement of complex project conformity evaluation:
and (4) for projects with large scale and complex design conditions, carrying out conformity evaluation by combining pre-examination work in a hospital.
S2, establishing an evaluation module:
s21, technical assessment scope and organization:
when the technical evaluation object is evaluated, all the examination items meeting the application range in the monthly examination plan are examined, and the examination process is finished by the evaluation module;
s22, technical evaluation:
the evaluation module is used for grading according to an established evaluation method aiming at the degree that the reconnaissance design result meets the compiling regulation and other related technical standards, and outputting a grading result and a technical evaluation table;
s3, establishing an evaluation index:
the method comprises the steps of comprehensively explaining information, hydrological information, engineering measurement information, engineering task and scale information, engineering arrangement and building information, electromechanical and metal structure information, construction organization design information, construction land acquisition and compensation information, environmental impact evaluation and water and soil conservation information, labor safety and sanitation and energy conservation evaluation information, engineering management and social stability risk analysis information, investment estimation and economic evaluation information and drawing information in a water engineering project recommendation stage, a feasibility study report stage and a primary design stage;
s4, establishing a scoring rule and a weight:
technical evaluation concrete requirements:
s41, assigning scores according to corresponding quality standards, adopting different evaluation contents and evaluation requirements for reports in different design stages, wherein the different evaluation contents occupy different weights, and if the evaluation contents do not meet the conditions, the evaluation contents are unqualified;
s42, the evaluation module scores the results, briefly explains the quality of the results, mainly describes the quality defect, and provides a clear suggestion for whether to review and recheck, if the review is suggested, the result quality evaluation score is unqualified, and clearly modifies the project for the review project;
s5, assignment:
s51, evaluation standard: more than 80 points (including 80 points) of the score are qualified, 60-80 points (including 60 points) of the score are basically qualified, less than 60 points of the score are unqualified, and the evaluation module divides the review items into two grades of qualified and unqualified;
s52, calculating the project technical evaluation score according to the following formula:
technical evaluation score ═ sigma score/sigma score × 100;
s6, building an intelligent evaluation model:
s61, quantitative analysis: using unified dimension, calculation formula and discrimination standard, and taking individual evaluation indexes with certain representativeness to carry out quantitative evaluation through the quantitative calculation reaction evaluation result;
s62, qualitative analysis: the evaluation module synthesizes the evaluation results of the two methods to carry out comprehensive analysis and comparison to obtain the final evaluation result.
The expert scoring process comprises the following steps:
1. scanning by WeChat;
2. logging in the small program;
3. clicking the project to be evaluated;
4. grading;
5. submitting a score;
6. and finishing the evaluation.
It is to be understood that the described embodiments are merely a few embodiments of the invention, and not all embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by one of ordinary skill in the art and related arts based on the embodiments of the present invention without any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention. Structures, devices, and methods of operation not specifically described or illustrated herein are generally practiced in the art without specific recitation or limitation.
Claims (8)
1. Water affair engineering early-stage achievement quality evaluation system based on mobile phone APP is characterized in that the system is added into the mobile phone APP
S1, establishing an evaluation method of the early-stage results of the water project;
s2, establishing an evaluation module;
s3, establishing an evaluation index;
s4, establishing a grading rule and a weight;
s5, assigning;
and S6, building an intelligent evaluation model.
2. The system for evaluating the quality of the early-stage results of the water project based on the mobile phone APP as claimed in claim 1, wherein the evaluation method comprises the following requirements:
s11, the project bears the qualification requirement of unit survey design:
the investigation and design qualification of an achievement report compiling unit must meet the regulation of the engineering design qualification standard, the investigation and design achievement compiling unit must have corresponding investigation and design qualification at each design stage of the hydraulic engineering, and if the achievement report finished by the unit only having the engineering consultation qualification is judged to be not qualified;
s12, main survey designer qualification requirements:
each professional technical responsible person who undertakes the survey design work must have the state-specified practice qualification and be in the valid period;
s13, corresponding stage thematic report requirement:
checking whether a special subject and a special report which are compiled according to national documents, technical rules and the requirements of examination opinions in the previous stage and need to be simultaneously arranged for examination are finished in the corresponding stage, wherein the special report comprises an engineering geological survey report and an environmental impact evaluation report, a water and soil conservation scheme report and a immigration arrangement planning book in the feasibility research stage;
s14, achievement integrity requirement:
checking whether the content of the design result meets the content requirements of the compiling rules of the corresponding stage, including chapter content, necessary drawings and accessories; checking whether the project construction task, scale, range, scheme and investment have the non-conformity of insufficient planning basis, non-conformity with the project requirement and obvious design defect;
s15, the requirement of complex project conformity evaluation:
and (4) for projects with large scale and complex design conditions, carrying out conformity evaluation by combining pre-examination work in a hospital.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the system for evaluating the quality of the early-stage results of the water project based on the mobile phone APP comprises:
s21, technical assessment scope and organization:
when the technical evaluation object is evaluated, all the examination items meeting the application range in the monthly examination plan are examined, and the examination process is finished by the evaluation module;
s22, technical evaluation:
and the evaluation module is used for grading according to the established evaluation method aiming at the degree that the reconnaissance design result meets the compiling regulation and other related technical standards, and outputting a grading result and a technical evaluation table.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein the evaluation indexes include comprehensive description information of a water conservancy project recommendation phase, a feasibility study report phase and a preliminary design phase, hydrological information, engineering measurement information, engineering tasks and scale information, engineering layout and building information, electromechanical and metal structure information, construction organization design information, construction land acquisition and compensation information, environmental impact evaluation and soil and water conservation information, labor safety and sanitation and energy conservation evaluation information, engineering management and social stability risk analysis information, investment estimation and economic evaluation information, and drawing information.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the scoring rules and weights are as follows:
s41, assigning scores according to corresponding quality standards, adopting different evaluation contents and evaluation requirements for reports in different design stages, wherein the different evaluation contents occupy different weights, and if the evaluation contents do not meet the conditions, the evaluation contents are unqualified;
s42, the evaluation module scores the results, briefly explains the quality of the results, mainly describes the quality defect, and provides a clear suggestion for whether to review and recheck, if the review is suggested, the result quality evaluation score is unqualified, and clearly modifies the project for the recheck project.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the valuations are:
s51, evaluation standard: more than 80 points (including 80 points) of the score are qualified, 60-80 points (including 60 points) of the score are basically qualified, less than 60 points of the score are unqualified, and the evaluation module divides the review items into two grades of qualified and unqualified;
s52, calculating the project technical evaluation score according to the following formula:
technical assessment score ═ sigma score/sigma score × 100.
7. The system for evaluating the quality of the early-stage results of the water project based on the mobile phone APP as claimed in claim 1, wherein the model building method comprises the following steps:
s61, quantitative analysis: using unified dimension, calculation formula and discrimination standard, and taking individual evaluation indexes with certain representativeness to carry out quantitative evaluation through the quantitative calculation reaction evaluation result;
s62, qualitative analysis: the evaluation module synthesizes the evaluation results of the two methods to carry out comprehensive analysis and comparison to obtain the final evaluation result.
8. The system for evaluating the quality of the early-stage results of the water conservancy project based on the mobile phone APP as claimed in claim 1, wherein the expert scoring process comprises the following steps:
1. scanning by WeChat;
2. logging in the small program;
3. clicking the project to be evaluated;
4. grading;
5. submitting a score;
6. and finishing the evaluation.
Priority Applications (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111500784.0A CN114154901A (en) | 2021-12-09 | 2021-12-09 | Water affair engineering early-stage achievement quality evaluation system based on mobile phone APP |
| PCT/CN2022/109560 WO2023103418A1 (en) | 2021-12-09 | 2022-08-02 | Mobile phone app-based evaluation system for quality of early achievement of water engineering project |
| ZA2023/01786A ZA202301786B (en) | 2021-12-09 | 2023-02-14 | Quality evaluation system for prophase achievements of water project based on mobile phone app |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111500784.0A CN114154901A (en) | 2021-12-09 | 2021-12-09 | Water affair engineering early-stage achievement quality evaluation system based on mobile phone APP |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN114154901A true CN114154901A (en) | 2022-03-08 |
Family
ID=80454236
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111500784.0A Pending CN114154901A (en) | 2021-12-09 | 2021-12-09 | Water affair engineering early-stage achievement quality evaluation system based on mobile phone APP |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN114154901A (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2023103418A1 (en) |
| ZA (1) | ZA202301786B (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2023103418A1 (en) * | 2021-12-09 | 2023-06-15 | 深圳市深水水务咨询有限公司 | Mobile phone app-based evaluation system for quality of early achievement of water engineering project |
Family Cites Families (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20150112770A1 (en) * | 2013-10-21 | 2015-04-23 | Mark Phillips | Method for evaluating and managing project performance using communication |
| CN111178705B (en) * | 2019-12-17 | 2023-04-07 | 腾讯云计算（北京）有限责任公司 | Item evaluation method, item evaluation device, item evaluation apparatus, and storage medium |
| CN114154901A (en) * | 2021-12-09 | 2022-03-08 | 深圳市深水水务咨询有限公司 | Water affair engineering early-stage achievement quality evaluation system based on mobile phone APP |
| CN114240231A (en) * | 2021-12-16 | 2022-03-25 | 深圳市方软信息产业有限公司 | Medical and American industry service quality evaluation method based on big data platform |
-
2021
- 2021-12-09 CN CN202111500784.0A patent/CN114154901A/en active Pending
-
2022
- 2022-08-02 WO PCT/CN2022/109560 patent/WO2023103418A1/en unknown
-
2023
- 2023-02-14 ZA ZA2023/01786A patent/ZA202301786B/en unknown
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2023103418A1 (en) * | 2021-12-09 | 2023-06-15 | 深圳市深水水务咨询有限公司 | Mobile phone app-based evaluation system for quality of early achievement of water engineering project |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| WO2023103418A1 (en) | 2023-06-15 |
| ZA202301786B (en) | 2023-09-27 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Wei et al. | What are the key barriers for the further development of shale gas in China? A grey-DEMATEL approach | |
| Hu et al. | Measuring efficiency, effectiveness and overall performance in the Chinese construction industry | |
| Challoumis-Κωνσταντίνος Χαλλουμής | The impact factor of costs to the tax system | |
| Dubrovskaya et al. | The impact of digitalization on the demand for labor in the context of working specialties: Spatial analysis | |
| CN114154901A (en) | Water affair engineering early-stage achievement quality evaluation system based on mobile phone APP | |
| Castiglione et al. | ICT as general purpose technologies: a micro-econometric investigation on Italian firms | |
| CN112419124B (en) | Method and device for quickly identifying low-efficiency industrial land and storage medium thereof | |
| Sun et al. | Big data revealed relationship between air pollution and manufacturing industry in China | |
| CN107093018A (en) | Communication engineering project information method for visualizing and device based on health model | |
| Kim et al. | Digital transformation landscape in Asia and the Pacific: aggravated digital divide and widening growth gap | |
| Babii et al. | Entrepreneurship model of professional development of actuaries in Canada | |
| Ngacho et al. | Critical success factors influencing the success of Constituency Development Fund construction projects in Kenya: a confirmatory factor analysis | |
| Hyk et al. | Sustainability Reporting Trends: A Systematic Literature Network Analysis | |
| Khanalizadeh et al. | Exploring the effects of hotel development, economic growth and exchange rate on tourism industry: Evidence for Iran | |
| Luchkina | Engineering and consulting services for project management in construction | |
| CN110232527A (en) | A kind of evaluation method of Highway Construction Project quality credit | |
| Nekhoda et al. | Corporate social policy-problems of institutionalization and experience of Russian oil and gas companies | |
| Du Plessis et al. | Scoping phase comparison of development opportunities by making use of publicly available sustainability information | |
| Dong | Application of Voice Database in Enterprise Human Resources Optimization Based on Improved Algorithm | |
| Abeng | Determinants of non debt government expenditure in Nigeria: 1970-2003. | |
| Vandesande et al. | Towards a sustainable development rationale for heritage management and research | |
| Mygatt | The uses of scoping: the Massachusetts experience | |
| Adegoke et al. | The Use of 80: 20 Pareto Rule: A Guide in Testing Accuracy of Cost Estimating of Residential Buildings in Nigeria | |
| Zheng et al. | Application of BIM in Bridge Engineering and Its Risk Analysis | |
| Walkowiak et al. | Specialisation in the Digital Factory: An Empirical Analysis of Digital Crowdwork |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |