CN114036736A - Cause and effect network learning method based on local granger cause and effect analysis - Google Patents
Cause and effect network learning method based on local granger cause and effect analysis Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN114036736A CN114036736A CN202111304900.1A CN202111304900A CN114036736A CN 114036736 A CN114036736 A CN 114036736A CN 202111304900 A CN202111304900 A CN 202111304900A CN 114036736 A CN114036736 A CN 114036736A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- variable
- variables
- cause
- causal
- analysis
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 38
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 16
- 238000012047 cause and effect analysis Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 13
- 230000001364 causal effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 76
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 41
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 238000007781 pre-processing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000001744 unit root test Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000007418 data mining Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000809 air pollutant Substances 0.000 description 3
- 231100001243 air pollutant Toxicity 0.000 description 3
- 238000003915 air pollution Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010187 selection method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003245 coal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002485 combustion reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010219 correlation analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003344 environmental pollutant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000719 pollutant Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010223 real-time analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/10—Complex mathematical operations
- G06F17/16—Matrix or vector computation, e.g. matrix-matrix or matrix-vector multiplication, matrix factorization
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/10—Complex mathematical operations
- G06F17/18—Complex mathematical operations for evaluating statistical data, e.g. average values, frequency distributions, probability functions, regression analysis
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
- Computational Mathematics (AREA)
- Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
- Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Algebra (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Computing Systems (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (AREA)
- Evolutionary Biology (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Probability & Statistics with Applications (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
Abstract
The invention belongs to the field of data mining, and provides a causal network learning method based on local Glanberg causal analysis. The method comprises the steps of preprocessing acquired data and completing missing data by adopting an average interpolation method. And then carrying out stability inspection and processing on the completed data so as to meet the assumption of establishing a model. And then, normalizing the data to eliminate the influence brought by different variable dimensions. And finally, establishing a cause and effect network learning algorithm based on local Glange cause and effect analysis, realizing the aim of accurately exploring the cause and effect relationship among the variables, and simultaneously displaying a dynamic cause and effect relationship curve among different variables so as to quantitatively and definitely analyze the cause and effect relationship among the variables among the systems.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of data mining, and relates to a cause and effect network learning method based on local Glange cause and effect analysis, aiming at researching the relation between variables in high-dimensional data in the fields of weather and the like.
Background
The multivariate time series is a group of discrete observation sets of a plurality of variables distributed according to time, and is widely applied to a plurality of fields such as finance, industry, traffic, meteorology and the like. For example, in the field of air pollution research, with the rapid development of our country industry and the increase of transportation means in recent years, the concentration of harmful substances generated by combustion of coal, oil and the like in the atmosphere is obviously increased, and phenomena such as air quality reduction and haze weather occur. Haze weather is an atmospheric pollution state, and is a general expression of exceeding the standard of various suspended particulate matters in the atmosphere, and especially PM2.5 (particulate matters with aerodynamic equivalent diameter less than or equal to 2.5 micrometers) is considered as the sourcer of the haze weather. Air pollutants such as PM2.5 cause poor atmospheric visibility, so that social problems such as traffic jam and the like are caused, and the air pollutants can be inhaled into human bodies to cause harm to human health. Therefore, modeling is carried out on air pollutants such as PM2.5, causal relations among Air Quality Indexes (AQI) are described, and possible phenomena in the next step are predicted according to the current and historical time states of all variables, so that theoretical support is provided for air pollution prevention and control. Therefore, the establishment of an effective multivariate causal analysis model has important practical significance.
The causal relationship analysis method explains the influence of the causal variable on the effect variable by researching the drive response relationship among all variables of the system, and can effectively infer the internal structure and the operation mechanism of the system, thereby overcoming the defect that the traditional correlation analysis method is difficult to process indirect relationship and asymmetric relationship. The granger causal analysis method is a common method to explore causal relationships between variables. It estimates the time dependence of variables in the model by means of a vector autoregressive model and is based on a predictable idea: for two time series X and Y, there is a Granger causal relationship of X → Y, so to speak, if the addition of time series X history information helps to reduce the prediction error of Y. The directed graph shown in fig. 1 is a granger causal graph, which can visually show the causal relationship existing between variables. Nodes represent variables and arrows represent causal relationships between two variables. For example, x3The cause of the grande causality of (A) is x5。
At present, the improved method based on the granger causal analysis has been widely applied to problems such as multivariable and nonlinearity. However, the above-mentioned improvement method only quantitatively considers the causal relationship between the variables, and neglects the dynamic characteristics between the variables. Stramaglia Sebastiano et al in the article "Stramaglia Sebastiano, Tomas Scagliarini, Yuri Antonacci, et al. local Granger Causality [ J ]. Physical Review E,2021,103 (2)" show that local Glanberg causal analysis can reveal transient states of information transfer between variables, which a quantitative value cannot. The method is more effective especially when the interaction between variables in a certain period of time is explored. In addition, the conventional method based on the granger causal analysis is modeled based on a vector autoregressive model, which results in poor performance when the data dimensions are too high. Runge Jakob et al, in the article "Runge Jakob, Sebastian Bathiany, Erik Bollt, et al. Inferring catalysis from Time Series in Earth System Sciences [ J ]. Nature Communications,2019,10(1):2553 + 2553.", analyzed the current situation of causal analysis methods and indicated that causal network learning methods are applicable to the causal relationship exploration of high dimensional data.
The invention provides a causal network learning method based on local Glange causal analysis, which aims at the problem of causal relationship analysis of a complex high-dimensional system and is used for modeling causal analysis among variables in the research fields of meteorological pollution and the like.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to solve the technical problems that the traditional Glan's cause and effect analysis method cannot be applied to a high-dimensional time sequence due to structural limitation, and cannot search real-time dynamics among variables in a process, an original Glan's cause and effect analysis model is expanded, a cause and effect network learning algorithm based on local Glan's cause and effect analysis is provided, and accurate cause and effect relation search of high-dimensional data and real-time display of information in the process are realized. The method aims to expand the application of the original method to high-dimensional display and display of more dynamic information.
The method provides a causal network learning method for researching the relationship between each variable and the main pollutant PM2.5 among systems in the face of complex systems such as AQI. The acquired data is preprocessed, and missing data is completed by adopting an average interpolation method. And then carrying out stability inspection and processing on the completed data so as to meet the assumption of establishing a model. And then, normalizing the data to eliminate the influence brought by different variable dimensions. And finally, establishing a causal network learning algorithm based on local Glange causal analysis, realizing the purpose of accurately exploring causal relationships among variables, and simultaneously displaying a dynamic causal relationship curve among different variables so as to quantitatively and definitely analyze the relation between each variable and PM2.5 among systems and realize the analysis of PM2.5 influence factors.
In order to achieve the purpose, the technical scheme adopted by the invention is as follows: a cause and effect network learning method based on local Glanberg cause and effect analysis comprises the following specific steps:
step 1: acquiring air quality index AQI and meteorological observation data; preprocessing multidimensional AQI and meteorological time sequence data, performing interpolation on missing samples by an average interpolation method, and analyzing outliers to obtain smooth time sequence data; performing stationarity test on the time sequence data by using a unit root test method, if a unit root exists in a test result, indicating that the data is not stable, performing stationarity processing by using a difference method, otherwise, if the unit root is not obtained, indicating that the data is stable, and not needing to perform stationarity processing; then, normalizing the time series data;
step 2: determining the maximum lag order tau of the time series data obtained by the processing of the step 1 through the Chichi information criterionmaxGenerating a historical variable matrix X-;
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,data representing the current time t, τmaxIs the maximum hysteresis order, d represents the number of variables, and n represents the number of samples;
and step 3: using PC algorithm, with each variablePerforming feature selection processing on the target to obtain each variableIs related to the feature subset ofWherein, variableFor the data collected at the time of t sampling, i is 1,2, …, d; each variableBy its associated feature subsetThe following formula (2) shows:
and 4, step 4: subset of relevant featuresSending the data as a condition set to a local Greenger causal analysis model to obtain a quantitative causal relationship value, specifically
Step 4.1: selecting a driving variableAnd target variableHistorical variable matrix X from time series by feature selection method-Respectively finding out the most relevant feature subsets:andwill change the variablesIs backward smoothed by one bit to obtain the corresponding feature subsetA subset of features of (a);
step 4.2: to drive variableAnd target variableThe related feature subset is used as a condition set and sent into a local Glanberg causal analysis model, and the formula (3) is as follows:
step 4.3: weighted summation to obtain driving variableFor target variableThe result of the causal analysis of (a);
and 5: averaging the results obtained by the local granger causal analysis to obtain quantitative causal relationship values among the variables, and drawing the results of the local granger causal analysis to obtain dynamic causal relationship curves among the variables;
step 6: obtaining the causal relationship between any variable and other variables, and selecting a driving variable as a related influence factor of a target variable according to the causal relationship result; and establishing a prediction model by using the echo state network for analysis to obtain a prediction analysis result of the target variable.
The local Glanker causal analysis model further explores dynamic characteristics among variables on the basis of a causal analysis result of the obtained quantitative value; the local granger causal analysis model is represented by formula (4):
Lgc(ut,wt,yt)=GC+γ(ut,wt,yt) (4)
wherein GC is standard glandor causal analysis; gamma (u)t,wt,yt) Is about ut,wt,ytThe function of (2) for revealing the dynamic characteristics between variables; u. oftRepresenting a set of conditional variables, wtRepresenting the driving variable, ytRepresenting a response variable; second order statistics using a unified procedure to represent GC and γ (u)t,wt,yt):
Where | represents the determinant of the matrix,is a historical state and a present state observation; andis a covariance matrix; gamma (u)t,wt,yt) Has an average value of 0, represents<Lgc(t)>=GC;<·>Representing a time series average.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the following obvious advantages:
the present invention is directed to quantitative and dynamic real-time analysis of causal analysis among high-dimensional data variables. Firstly, the original data of the method are expanded through the AIC criterion, and then a causal network learning algorithm is established based on a feature selection method, and the algorithm can be different from a general causal analysis method based on a vector autoregressive framework, so that causal analysis of high-dimensional data is realized. And then, sending the characteristic selection result into a local Glanberg causal analysis model to obtain a quantitative causal relationship value among variables. In addition, the local granger causal analysis method also obtains a dynamic response curve among variables, so that more information is provided for exploring the causal relationship among the variables. Namely, the method not only obtains quantitative causal relationship measurement aiming at high-dimensional data, but also can obtain dynamic causal relationship among variables.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a Glankey causal graph showing nodes representing vectors and arrows representing causal relationships that exist between the vectors;
FIG. 2 is a flow chart of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the dynamic relationship between a portion of the variables and the PM2.5 variable.
FIG. 4(a) is a graph comparing GC to PM2.5 target and predicted values;
FIG. 4(b) is a graph of the error of the prediction curve for GC versus PM 2.5;
FIG. 5(a) is a plot of PCMCI versus PM2.5 target and predicted values;
FIG. 5(b) is a plot of the error of the prediction curve for PCMCI versus PM 2.5;
FIG. 6(a) is a comparison graph of the target value and predicted value for PM2.5 according to the present invention;
FIG. 6(b) is a graph of the prediction curve error for PM2.5 according to the present invention.
Detailed Description
The present invention is further described in detail below with reference to specific examples and simulation diagrams.
The hardware equipment used by the invention comprises a PC machine.
Fig. 2 is a flow chart of a cause and effect network learning method based on local granger cause and effect analysis, which specifically includes the following steps:
step 1: acquiring 5088 groups of data which are totally 10-dimensional and are acquired once per hour from 1 month and 1 day of 2021 to 7 months and 31 days of 2021 in Shanghai Xuhui region, wherein the meaning numbers of all variables are shown in table 1, and then interpolating missing values and abnormal values of a multidimensional AQI and meteorological data set to analyze; carrying out stationarity test on the data by adopting a unit root test method, and carrying out primary difference stationarity processing on the data according to a test result; normalizing the time series data;
TABLE 1 Shanghai AQI and Meteorological data number correspondence table
Step 2: determining the maximum lag coefficient tau according to the Chi information criterionmaxAt 8, carrying out lag term expansion on the original data according to the formula (1) to obtain a historical variable matrix X-;
And step 3: calculating the most relevant feature subset for each variable by utilizing a PC feature selection method, taking a variable PM2.5 as an example, firstly obtaining the relevant feature subset from a history set, and obtaining the results of PM10(t-1), NO2(t-1), CO (t-1), PM10(t-2) and AQI (t-5);
and 4, step 4: and (3) sending the feature subset obtained in the step (5) as a condition to a local Greenwich causal analysis model, and carrying out causal relationship exploration on each variable in the historical variable matrix and a PM2.5 variable, wherein the causal relationship exploration specifically comprises the following steps:
step 4.1: take an example of exploring the relationship between PM10 and PM 2.5. First find the relevant subset of the driving variable PM10 and the response variable PM 2.5; according to a PC algorithm, obtaining a relevant subset containing n variables after n iterations to meet the conditions;
step 4.2: bringing the time series of the driving variables and the response variables and the time series of the corresponding relevant subsets into a local granger causal analysis model, and calculating a quantitative causal analysis result through a formula (3);
step 4.3: weighted summation to obtain driving variableFor target variableThe result of the causal analysis of (a);
and 5: steps 4.1 and 4.2 are repeated until each variable in the historical set of variables is calculated as described above for PM 2.5. Through the process, a cause and effect value matrix is obtained10 represents the number of variables, 8 represents the maximum lag coefficient, and then the weighted summation is carried out to obtain the causal analysis result among the variables;
the results of the causal analysis are shown in table 2: the larger the number in the table, the greater the causal relationship between the two variables. Because of the interplay between variables, there are no two variables that are absolutely independent. As can be seen from table 2, the variables in which shanghai xuhui has a causal relationship with PM2.5 are denoted by SO2, O3, air temperature, etc.;
TABLE 2 causal indices for PM2.5
GC | PCMCI | The method of the invention | |
PM2.5 | 0.13 | 0.37 | 0.10 |
PM10 | 0.02 | 0.39 | 0.07 |
SO2 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.59 |
NO2 | 0.03 | 0.33 | 0.03 |
O3 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 0.47 |
CO | 0.04 | 0.25 | 0.04 |
AQI | 0.06 | 0.20 | 0.02 |
Air temperature | 0.01 | 0.10 | 1.25 |
Dew point | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.06 |
Wind speed | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.01 |
Step 6: dynamic causal relationships between some variables and PM2.5 as shown in fig. 3 are obtained by plotting the output time series of the glange causal analysis, from which dynamic information on the time distribution between the variables is obtained. In addition, the time sequence results are averaged to obtain quantitative causal values among the variables, and quantitative indexes are provided for subsequent determination of causal relationships among the variables. Fig. 3 shows the dynamic curve of PM2.5 versus air temperature over time, from which the dynamic relationship between the two variables over time is seen. If a specific period of research needs to be carried out, more information needs to be obtained from the curve in detail; and obtaining the most relevant characteristic subset of the target variable according to the result of the causal analysis, and then establishing a prediction model by using an echo state network to test the result of the causal relationship. The reserve pool parameters of the echo state network are set as follows: reservoir dimension 100, sparsity 0.05, spectral radius 0.5, and connection input weight 0.05. A total of 10 independent experiments were performed, and the average of 10 experiments was taken as the final result to eliminate the effect of error. The prediction index has a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and a Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error (SMAPE). Both are defined as follows:
in the formula, xiAndrespectively representing the true value and the predicted value, and n representing the number of samples.
The predicted results are shown in fig. 4, 5 and 6. It can be seen from the figure that the subset of variables selected by the method of the present invention can reflect the true trend of the predicted PM2.5 result. The error of 10 independent replicates is shown in table 3. In continuing comparison with the standard granger causal analysis method (GC) and a two-stage causal network learning method (PCMCI), the root mean square error and the symmetric mean absolute percentage error obtained by the present invention both gave the best results, which further demonstrates the effectiveness of the present invention.
TABLE 3 prediction results of various methods
GC | PCMCI | The method of the invention | |
RMSE | 0.0189 | 0.0184 | 0.0183 |
SMAPE | 0.1132 | 0.1120 | 0.1018 |
The above examples are only for showing the embodiments of the present invention, and should not be understood as limiting the scope of the present invention, it should be noted that those skilled in the art can make corresponding modifications without departing from the concept of the present invention, and these are all within the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (2)
1. A cause and effect network learning method based on local Glanberg cause and effect analysis is characterized by comprising the following specific steps:
step 1: acquiring air quality index AQI and meteorological observation data; preprocessing the multidimensional AQI and the meteorological time sequence data; performing stationarity test on the time sequence data by adopting a unit root test method; then, normalizing the time series data;
step 2: determining the maximum lag order tau of the time series data obtained by the processing of the step 1 through the Chichi information criterionmaxGenerating a historical variable matrix X-;
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,data representing the current time t, τmaxIs the maximum hysteresis order, d represents the number of variables, and n represents the number of samples;
and step 3: using PC algorithm, with each variablePerforming feature selection processing on the target to obtain each variableIs related to the feature subset ofWherein, variableFor the data collected at the time of t sampling, i is 1,2, …, d; each variableBy its associated feature subsetThe following formula (2) shows:
and 4, step 4: subset of relevant featuresSending the data as a condition set to a local granger causal analysis model to obtain a quantitative causal relationship value, which specifically comprises the following steps:
step 4.1: selecting a driving variableAnd target variableHistorical variable matrix X from time series by feature selection method-Respectively finding out the most relevant feature subsets:andwill change the variablesIs backward smoothed by one bit to obtain the corresponding feature subsetA subset of features of (a);
step 4.2: to drive variableAnd target variableThe related feature subset is used as a condition set and sent into a local Glanberg causal analysis model, and the formula (3) is as follows:
step 4.3: weighted summation to obtain driving variableFor target variableThe result of the causal analysis of (a);
and 5: averaging the results obtained by the local granger causal analysis to obtain quantitative causal relationship values among the variables, and drawing the results of the local granger causal analysis to obtain dynamic causal relationship curves among the variables;
step 6: obtaining the causal relationship between any variable and other variables, and selecting a driving variable as a related influence factor of a target variable according to the causal relationship result; and establishing a prediction model by using the echo state network for analysis to obtain a prediction analysis result of the target variable.
2. The cause and effect network learning method based on the local granger cause and effect analysis as claimed in claim 1, wherein the local granger cause and effect analysis model further explores dynamic characteristics between variables on the basis of the cause and effect analysis result of the obtained quantitative value; the local granger causal analysis model is represented by formula (4):
Lgc(ut,wt,yt)=GC+γ(ut,wt,yt) (4)
wherein GC is standard glandor causal analysis; gamma (u)t,wt,yt) Is about ut,wt,ytThe function of (2) for revealing the dynamic characteristics between variables; u. oftRepresenting a set of conditional variables, wtRepresenting the driving variable, ytRepresenting a response variable; second order statistics using a unified procedure to represent GC and γ (u)t,wt,yt):
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202111304900.1A CN114036736B (en) | 2021-11-05 | 2021-11-05 | Causal network learning method based on local Granges causal analysis |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202111304900.1A CN114036736B (en) | 2021-11-05 | 2021-11-05 | Causal network learning method based on local Granges causal analysis |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN114036736A true CN114036736A (en) | 2022-02-11 |
CN114036736B CN114036736B (en) | 2024-05-07 |
Family
ID=80136338
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202111304900.1A Active CN114036736B (en) | 2021-11-05 | 2021-11-05 | Causal network learning method based on local Granges causal analysis |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN114036736B (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN114511087A (en) * | 2022-04-19 | 2022-05-17 | 四川国蓝中天环境科技集团有限公司 | Air quality space inference method and system based on double models |
CN115935283A (en) * | 2022-12-27 | 2023-04-07 | 南京信息工程大学 | Drought cause tracing method based on multivariate nonlinear causal analysis |
CN116030941A (en) * | 2023-03-30 | 2023-04-28 | 北京科技大学 | Alzheimer's disease diagnosis method based on edge-centric effect connection network |
CN116187443A (en) * | 2023-02-10 | 2023-05-30 | 中国科学院自动化研究所 | Causal strength detection method and detection device based on multidimensional symbol dynamics |
CN116187443B (en) * | 2023-02-10 | 2024-05-24 | 中国科学院自动化研究所 | Causal strength detection method and detection device based on multidimensional symbol dynamics |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR101382507B1 (en) * | 2012-10-19 | 2014-04-10 | 사단법인대기환경모델링센터 | Air quality forecast and management system |
CN109033178A (en) * | 2018-06-26 | 2018-12-18 | 北京工业大学 | A method of excavating Granger causality between visibility multidimensional space-time data |
CN111367959A (en) * | 2020-02-17 | 2020-07-03 | 大连理工大学 | Zero-time-lag nonlinear expansion Granger causal analysis method |
WO2020206466A1 (en) * | 2019-03-07 | 2020-10-08 | Wismuller Axel W E | Method and device for determining a measure of causal influence between components of complex systems |
CN112101480A (en) * | 2020-09-27 | 2020-12-18 | 西安交通大学 | Multivariate clustering and fused time sequence combined prediction method |
-
2021
- 2021-11-05 CN CN202111304900.1A patent/CN114036736B/en active Active
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR101382507B1 (en) * | 2012-10-19 | 2014-04-10 | 사단법인대기환경모델링센터 | Air quality forecast and management system |
CN109033178A (en) * | 2018-06-26 | 2018-12-18 | 北京工业大学 | A method of excavating Granger causality between visibility multidimensional space-time data |
WO2020206466A1 (en) * | 2019-03-07 | 2020-10-08 | Wismuller Axel W E | Method and device for determining a measure of causal influence between components of complex systems |
CN111367959A (en) * | 2020-02-17 | 2020-07-03 | 大连理工大学 | Zero-time-lag nonlinear expansion Granger causal analysis method |
CN112101480A (en) * | 2020-09-27 | 2020-12-18 | 西安交通大学 | Multivariate clustering and fused time sequence combined prediction method |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
蒋洪迅;田嘉;孙彩虹;: "面向PM_(2.5)预测的递归随机森林与多层神经网络集成模型", 系统工程, no. 05, 31 December 2020 (2020-12-31) * |
袁勤;蒋涛: "基于格兰杰因果方法的注意脑电网络分析", 生物医学工程学杂志, vol. 33, no. 1, 31 December 2016 (2016-12-31) * |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN114511087A (en) * | 2022-04-19 | 2022-05-17 | 四川国蓝中天环境科技集团有限公司 | Air quality space inference method and system based on double models |
CN114511087B (en) * | 2022-04-19 | 2022-07-01 | 四川国蓝中天环境科技集团有限公司 | Air quality space inference method and system based on double models |
CN115935283A (en) * | 2022-12-27 | 2023-04-07 | 南京信息工程大学 | Drought cause tracing method based on multivariate nonlinear causal analysis |
CN115935283B (en) * | 2022-12-27 | 2023-07-25 | 南京信息工程大学 | Drought cause tracing method based on multi-element nonlinear causal analysis |
CN116187443A (en) * | 2023-02-10 | 2023-05-30 | 中国科学院自动化研究所 | Causal strength detection method and detection device based on multidimensional symbol dynamics |
CN116187443B (en) * | 2023-02-10 | 2024-05-24 | 中国科学院自动化研究所 | Causal strength detection method and detection device based on multidimensional symbol dynamics |
CN116030941A (en) * | 2023-03-30 | 2023-04-28 | 北京科技大学 | Alzheimer's disease diagnosis method based on edge-centric effect connection network |
CN116030941B (en) * | 2023-03-30 | 2023-08-25 | 北京科技大学 | Alzheimer's disease diagnosis method based on edge-centric effect connection network |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN114036736B (en) | 2024-05-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN114036736A (en) | Cause and effect network learning method based on local granger cause and effect analysis | |
CN110674604B (en) | Transformer DGA data prediction method based on multi-dimensional time sequence frame convolution LSTM | |
CN112905560B (en) | Air pollution prediction method based on multi-source time-space big data deep fusion | |
US10830743B2 (en) | Determining the net emissions of air pollutants | |
CN111367959B (en) | Zero-time-lag nonlinear expansion Granger causal analysis method | |
CN111582551B (en) | Wind power plant short-term wind speed prediction method and system and electronic equipment | |
CN111814956B (en) | Multi-task learning air quality prediction method based on multi-dimensional secondary feature extraction | |
CN112101480A (en) | Multivariate clustering and fused time sequence combined prediction method | |
CN105574669B (en) | Power transmission and transformation equipment state abnormity detection method based on time-space joint data clustering analysis | |
CN104764868A (en) | Soil organic carbon predication method based on geographically weighted regression | |
CN114004163B (en) | PM2.5 inversion method based on MODIS and long-short-term memory network model | |
CN115269675A (en) | Time-space analysis method for atmospheric pollution in industrial park | |
Girimurugan et al. | Application of Deep Learning to the Prediction of Solar Irradiance through Missing Data | |
CN113361690A (en) | Water quality prediction model training method, water quality prediction device, water quality prediction equipment and medium | |
CN116029419A (en) | Deep learning-based long-term new energy daily average generation power prediction method and system | |
CN114217025B (en) | Analysis method for evaluating influence of meteorological data on air quality concentration prediction | |
CN117273152A (en) | Pollutant tracing method by constructing quantitative causal graph | |
Atasever et al. | A new approach to short-term wind speed prediction: the prophet model | |
Lemmetty et al. | Computation of maximum rate of water–sulphuric acid nucleation in diesel exhaust | |
CN116401962A (en) | Method for pushing optimal characteristic scheme of water quality model | |
CN117236485A (en) | Method for reducing and predicting power supply quantity errors of power grid based on CNN-BILSTM algorithm | |
CN116307068A (en) | Multi-city multi-atmosphere pollutant prediction method based on four-dimensional directed GCN-LSTM model | |
CN110766219A (en) | Haze prediction method based on BP neural network | |
CN115510763A (en) | Air pollutant concentration prediction method and system based on data-driven exploration | |
CN113933915A (en) | Short-term and forthcoming extrapolation forecasting method based on space-time disturbance information interaction integration nesting |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |