CN113839839A - Method and system for testing multi-thread concurrent communication - Google Patents
Method and system for testing multi-thread concurrent communication Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN113839839A CN113839839A CN202111235019.0A CN202111235019A CN113839839A CN 113839839 A CN113839839 A CN 113839839A CN 202111235019 A CN202111235019 A CN 202111235019A CN 113839839 A CN113839839 A CN 113839839A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- data
- real
- threads
- thread
- time
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
- H04L43/08—Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
- H04L43/50—Testing arrangements
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02D—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES [ICT], I.E. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AIMING AT THE REDUCTION OF THEIR OWN ENERGY USE
- Y02D10/00—Energy efficient computing, e.g. low power processors, power management or thermal management
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
Abstract
The invention belongs to the technical field of network communication testing, and particularly provides a method and a system for testing multithreading concurrent communication, wherein the method comprises the following steps: s1, simulating a plurality of threads, triggering a preset number of threads to send task requests to equipment, enabling the equipment to process tasks according to the task requests, and returning processed result data to the corresponding threads; and S2, acquiring real-time data from the server, and performing consistency check on the real-time data and result data returned by each thread. On one hand, the testing tool can carry out accuracy check on the data in real time; and on the other hand, a three-party contrast mode is adopted, and the test accuracy is improved through multi-direction contrast. In addition, a test tool is adopted to simulate multithreading, so that the concurrency speed can be accurately controlled, and data processing results can be uniformly collected.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of network communication testing, in particular to a method and a system for testing multithreading concurrent communication.
Background
The multithreading structure is a structure that a plurality of threads in a process execute a test task at the same time, and the multitask test task is completed mainly through switching among the threads. In the multithread structure, a test program is executed in one process, the process has a simple memory address, each process has one thread, namely a main thread, the main thread only has one control flow to control the execution of all the steps, and the process can create or delete other different threads to complete the multitask test task. An important feature of the multi-thread structure is that all threads exist in one process, which can better share the testing resources and communicate between the threads, and the overhead of switching between the multiple threads is much smaller than that of switching between the multiple processes, so the multi-thread structure is a more suitable multi-task testing structure. The test system can dynamically manage, plan and schedule the test tasks and the test resources according to the test resource model and the test task set model, and simultaneously complete the test of a plurality of test tasks or task combinations, thereby fully exerting the test capability of the system and improving the test throughput and the test efficiency.
Because many people control many computers, can't accurate control many computers's concurrency speed, if need simulate actual scene and trigger at random simultaneously, the processing result that equipment received data can't be set relatively. In addition, the real-time reported message has no means for checking the real-time property and accuracy.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to solve the technical problem that the real-time performance and the accuracy cannot be checked during the multi-thread test in the prior art.
The invention provides a method for testing multithreading concurrent communication, which comprises the following steps:
s1, simulating a plurality of threads, triggering a preset number of threads to send task requests to equipment, enabling the equipment to process tasks according to the task requests, and returning processed result data to the corresponding threads;
and S2, acquiring real-time data from the server, and performing consistency check on the real-time data and result data returned by each thread.
Preferably, the task requests sent by the threads in S1 are the same work task or different work tasks.
Preferably, the S2 is followed by S3:
and S3, the test tool randomly sends data to the server so that the server can forward the data to the equipment in real time to obtain a real-time feedback result, and the real-time feedback result is returned to obtain third-party comparison data.
Preferably, the S3 is followed by S4:
and S4, carrying out consistency check on the third party comparison data, the result data returned by each thread and the real-time data.
Preferably, the S2 specifically includes: and carrying timestamp information in the sent task request, and comparing the received message and returning the timestamp information to determine the real-time property.
Preferably, the consistency check specifically comprises:
storing the data of each source into each corresponding pre-distributed set;
the element differences between each two sets were aligned to determine identity.
Preferably, said aligning the element differences between each two sets to determine identity comprises:
searching the same elements in the first set as the second set, if the same elements are found, the check is passed, and if the same elements are found, different elements in the first set are left;
searching the same elements in the second set as the first set, and if the same elements are searched in the second set, checking to pass; if not, leaving different elements in the second set;
different elements in the two checks are checked out and listed as inconsistent parts.
The invention also provides a test system for multi-thread concurrent communication, which comprises:
the thread simulation module is used for simulating a plurality of threads and triggering a preset number of threads to send task requests to the equipment so that the equipment can process tasks according to the task requests and return processed result data to the corresponding threads;
and the data consistency checking module is used for acquiring real-time data from the server and checking the consistency of the real-time data and result data returned by each thread.
The present invention also provides an electronic device, comprising:
at least one processor;
at least one memory coupled to the at least one processor and storing instructions for execution by the at least one processor, which when executed by the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to perform steps of a method of testing for multi-threaded concurrent communications.
The present invention also provides a computer storage medium having stored thereon one or more instructions adapted to be loaded by a processor and to execute the steps of a method for testing of multithreaded concurrent communications.
Has the advantages that: the invention provides a method and a system for testing multithreading concurrent communication, wherein the method comprises the following steps: s1, simulating a plurality of threads, triggering a preset number of threads to send task requests to equipment, enabling the equipment to process tasks according to the task requests, and returning processed result data to the corresponding threads;
and S2, acquiring real-time data from the server, and performing consistency check on the real-time data and result data returned by each thread. On one hand, the testing tool can carry out accuracy check on the data in real time; and on the other hand, a three-party contrast mode is adopted, and the test accuracy is improved through multi-direction contrast. In addition, a test tool is adopted to simulate multithreading, so that the concurrency speed can be accurately controlled, and data processing results can be uniformly collected.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for testing multi-thread concurrent communication according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of a multi-thread concurrent communication testing system according to the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a functional block diagram of an electronic device according to the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a functional block diagram of a computer storage medium according to the present invention.
Detailed Description
The following detailed description of embodiments of the present invention is provided in connection with the accompanying drawings and examples. The following examples are intended to illustrate the invention but are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
As shown in fig. 1, an embodiment of the present invention provides a method for testing multi-thread concurrent communication, including the following steps:
s1, simulating a plurality of threads, triggering a preset number of threads to send task requests to equipment, enabling the equipment to process tasks according to the task requests, and returning processed result data to the corresponding threads;
and S2, acquiring real-time data from the server, and performing consistency check on the real-time data and result data returned by each thread.
The test tool of the scheme can carry out accuracy check on data in real time; and 1 test tool is adopted to simulate multithreading, so that the concurrency speed can be accurately controlled, and data processing results can be uniformly collected. By designing the multi-thread concurrent communication test method, the requirement of product characteristic test is met.
Preferably, the task requests sent by the threads in S1 are the same work task or different work tasks. The test tool simulates a plurality of threads, and each thread can be designed with different work tasks and can also be designed with the same work task. Different detection requirements are met, so that the detection angle is more and more perfect. The design can be carried out according to the requirements.
Preferably, the step S2 further includes the step S3: s3, the test tool randomly sends data to the server for the server to forward to the equipment in real time to obtain a real-time feedback result, and the server returns the real-time feedback result to the test tool to obtain third-party comparison data; s4 is also included after S3: and carrying out consistency check on the third party comparison data, the result data returned by each thread and the real-time data. The accuracy of the processing result of the equipment is checked simultaneously by comparing the data in three ways. And a three-party comparison mode is adopted, and the test accuracy is improved through multi-direction comparison.
The third party compares the data, the result data returned by each thread and the real-time data and checks the consistency of the data, which specifically comprises the following steps: on one hand, real-time data is obtained from a server, and consistency check is carried out on the real-time data and result data returned by each thread. On the other hand, the test tool randomly sends data to the server so that the server can forward the data to the equipment in real time to obtain a real-time feedback result, the server returns the real-time feedback result to the test tool so as to obtain third-party comparison data, and the third-party comparison data and the data subjected to the consistency check screening are subjected to consistency check respectively. Thereby realizing three-way comparison. The specific comparison is further illustrated below.
Preferably, the S2 specifically includes: and carrying timestamp information in the sent task request, and comparing the received message and returning the timestamp information to determine the real-time property. The task data sent to the device is large in quantity, and each thread sends the task data in parallel. The data amount of the processing result is also large, and the concurrence can cause the data processing to have randomness. Therefore, the data has the time attribute in a real-time comparison mode, and the randomness of the data is solved.
Preferably, the consistency check specifically includes:
storing the data of each source into each corresponding pre-distributed set;
the element differences between each two sets were aligned to determine identity.
The specific process is as follows:
step one, uniformly storing result data which are processed through task requests sent by threads into a first set;
secondly, storing the real-time data acquired by the server into a second set;
and thirdly, comparing the difference between the first set and the second set to obtain a consistency check result.
The consistency check here may be the consistency check in step S2 or the consistency check in step S4. The data is stored in the set, and then the chess-playing check is carried out, so that the data transmission of the threads is not influenced.
Preferably, said aligning the elemental differences between each two sets to determine identity specifically comprises:
searching the same elements in the first set as the second set, if the same elements are found, the check is passed, and if the same elements are found, different elements in the first set are left;
searching the same elements in the second set as the first set, and if the same elements are searched in the second set, checking to pass; if not, leaving different elements in the second set;
different elements in the two checks are checked out and listed as inconsistent parts.
And storing the third-party comparison data into a third set, comparing the consistent elements with the third set respectively if the first set and the second set are not different after the first set and the second set are compared, wherein the comparison mode is the same as the process in the third step, and the elements are the same, and the check is passed. The data elements of the first set and the second set are checked first, and the elements which fail are screened in pairs. Then, the two sets after screening are compared and checked with the third set in the same way. And deleting the unqualified products in pairs to obtain a consistency detection result.
Wherein, the step of respectively comparing and checking the two sets after screening with the third set in the same way specifically comprises the following steps: the two sets after screening are assumed to be a first screening set and a second screening set respectively. The screening process is the process of removing inconsistent elements in each set in S2, and is not described herein again. At this time, the first screening set and the second screening set are already consistent, and then only the third set and any one of the two screening sets need to be subjected to consistency check. The specific operation is as follows:
and searching the same elements in the third set as the first screening set, if the same elements are found in the third set, checking the elements to pass, and if the same elements are found in the third set, leaving different elements in the third set.
And (5) finding out different elements in the inspection, and classifying the elements as inconsistent parts, namely unqualified parts. And deleting the unqualified elements in pairs, namely uniformly deleting corresponding inconsistent elements in the first screening set, the second screening set and the third set. And finally obtaining a consistency detection result.
In a specific implementation scenario, a specific principle process of the test method for implementing the multi-thread concurrent communication is as follows:
1. the test tool simulates a plurality of threads, and each thread can be designed with different work tasks and can also be designed with the same work task.
2. The test tool triggers one or more threads to send task requests to the device.
3. The device will return processing result data to each thread.
4. And simultaneously, after the equipment processes a task, the equipment sends a feedback message to the service in real time.
5. The test tool obtains the real-time message through the simulation server.
6. And the test tool performs consistency check on the feedback data returned by each thread and the data obtained by the simulation server.
Meanwhile, the test tool sends data to the service irregularly, the data are forwarded to the equipment in real time by the service, the real-time feedback result of the equipment is obtained, and the data are returned to the test tool by the service, so that the comparison data of a third party are obtained.
7. And comparing the data with the third party, and checking the consistency of the data returned by each thread and the data obtained by the simulation server, so that the third party checks the accuracy of the data.
As shown in fig. 2, an embodiment of the present invention further provides a system for implementing a testing method for multithreaded concurrent communication, that is, a testing tool in an embodiment of the present invention, including:
the thread simulation module is used for simulating a plurality of threads and triggering a preset number of threads to send task requests to the equipment so that the equipment can process tasks according to the task requests and return processed result data to the corresponding threads;
and the data consistency checking module is used for acquiring real-time data from the server and checking the consistency of the real-time data and result data returned by each thread.
In one specific implementation scenario, as shown in fig. 3:
a thread simulation module in the test tool simulates a plurality of threads and sends a task request to the equipment by triggering one or more threads; after the equipment processes each task, the processed result data is returned to the corresponding thread, and the result data returned by each thread is returned. On the other hand, a data consistency check module in the test tool acquires real-time data from the server, wherein the real-time data is the real-time data of the equipment acquired by the server, and then consistency check is carried out on the real-time data and result data returned by each thread.
It should be noted that, in the foregoing embodiments, the descriptions of the respective embodiments have respective emphasis, and reference may be made to relevant descriptions of other embodiments for parts that are not described in detail in a certain embodiment.
Fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the invention. As shown in fig. 3, an embodiment of the present invention provides an electronic device, which includes at least one memory 1310, at least one processor 1320, and a computer program 1311 stored in the memory 1310 and executable on the processor 1320, where the processor 1320 executes the computer program 1311 to implement the following steps: s1, simulating a plurality of threads, triggering a preset number of threads to send task requests to equipment, enabling the equipment to process tasks according to the task requests, and returning processed result data to the corresponding threads;
and S2, acquiring real-time data from the server, and performing consistency check on the real-time data and result data returned by each thread.
Please refer to fig. 4, which is a schematic diagram of a computer storage medium according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in fig. 4, the present embodiment provides a computer-readable storage medium 1400, on which a computer program 1411 is stored, the computer program 1411 comprising one or more instructions that when executed by a processor implement the steps of: s1, simulating a plurality of threads, triggering a preset number of threads to send task requests to equipment, enabling the equipment to process tasks according to the task requests, and returning processed result data to the corresponding threads;
and S2, acquiring real-time data from the server, and performing consistency check on the real-time data and result data returned by each thread.
The beneficial effect of this scheme:
1. the testing tool can carry out accuracy check on the data in real time;
2. a three-way comparison mode is adopted, and the test accuracy is improved through multi-direction comparison;
3. and 1 test tool is adopted to simulate multithreading, so that the concurrency speed can be accurately controlled, and data processing results can be uniformly collected.
As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, embodiments of the present invention may be provided as a method, system, or computer program product. Accordingly, the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, the present invention may take the form of a computer program product embodied on one or more computer-usable storage media (including, but not limited to, disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, and the like) having computer-usable program code embodied therein.
The present invention is described with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each flow and/or block of the flow diagrams and/or block diagrams, and combinations of flows and/or blocks in the flow diagrams and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, embedded computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture including instruction means which implement the function specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide steps for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described, additional variations and modifications in those embodiments may occur to those skilled in the art once they learn of the basic inventive concepts. Therefore, it is intended that the appended claims be interpreted as including preferred embodiments and all such alterations and modifications as fall within the scope of the invention.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made in the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, if such modifications and variations of the present invention fall within the scope of the claims of the present invention and their equivalents, the present invention is also intended to include such modifications and variations.
Claims (10)
1. A method for testing multi-thread concurrent communication is characterized by comprising the following steps:
s1, simulating a plurality of threads, triggering a preset number of threads to send task requests to equipment, enabling the equipment to process tasks according to the task requests, and returning processed result data to the corresponding threads;
and S2, acquiring real-time data from the server, and performing consistency check on the real-time data and result data returned by each thread.
2. The method for testing multi-thread concurrent communication according to claim 1, wherein the task requests sent by the threads in S1 are the same work task or different work tasks.
3. The method for testing multi-threaded concurrent communication according to claim 1, wherein the step S2 is followed by the step S3:
and S3, the test tool randomly sends data to the server so that the server can forward the data to the equipment in real time to obtain a real-time feedback result, and the real-time feedback result is returned to obtain third-party comparison data.
4. The method for testing multi-threaded concurrent communication according to claim 3, wherein the step S3 is followed by the step S4:
and S4, carrying out consistency check on the third party comparison data, the result data returned by each thread and the real-time data.
5. The method for testing multi-threaded concurrent communication according to claim 1, wherein the S2 specifically includes: and carrying timestamp information in the sent task request, and comparing the received message and returning the timestamp information to determine the real-time property.
6. The method for testing multi-threaded concurrent communication according to claim 4, wherein the consistency check specifically comprises:
storing the data of each source into each corresponding pre-distributed set;
the element differences between each two sets were aligned to determine identity.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein comparing the elemental differences between each two sets to determine consistency comprises:
searching the same elements in the first set as the second set, if the same elements are found, the check is passed, and if the same elements are found, different elements in the first set are left;
searching the same elements in the second set as the first set, and if the same elements are searched in the second set, checking to pass; if not, leaving different elements in the second set;
different elements in the two checks are checked out and listed as inconsistent parts.
8. A system for testing multi-threaded concurrent communications, comprising:
the thread simulation module is used for simulating a plurality of threads and triggering a preset number of threads to send task requests to the equipment so that the equipment can process tasks according to the task requests and return processed result data to the corresponding threads;
and the data consistency checking module is used for acquiring real-time data from the server and checking the consistency of the real-time data and result data returned by each thread.
9. An electronic device, comprising:
at least one processor;
at least one memory coupled to the at least one processor and storing instructions for execution by the at least one processor, the instructions when executed by the at least one processor causing the apparatus to perform the steps of the method of any of claims 1 to 7.
10. A computer storage medium having stored thereon one or more instructions adapted to be loaded by a processor and to perform the method of any of claims 1-7.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111235019.0A CN113839839B (en) | 2021-10-22 | 2021-10-22 | Method and system for testing multi-thread concurrent communication |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111235019.0A CN113839839B (en) | 2021-10-22 | 2021-10-22 | Method and system for testing multi-thread concurrent communication |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN113839839A true CN113839839A (en) | 2021-12-24 |
| CN113839839B CN113839839B (en) | 2023-05-09 |
Family
ID=78966011
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111235019.0A Active CN113839839B (en) | 2021-10-22 | 2021-10-22 | Method and system for testing multi-thread concurrent communication |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN113839839B (en) |
Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6324492B1 (en) * | 1998-01-20 | 2001-11-27 | Microsoft Corporation | Server stress testing using multiple concurrent client simulation |
| US6754701B1 (en) * | 2000-05-05 | 2004-06-22 | Mercury Interactive Corporation | Use of a single thread to support multiple network connections for server load testing |
| CN108650150A (en) * | 2018-05-11 | 2018-10-12 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | A kind of data verification method and device |
| CN108875061A (en) * | 2018-06-29 | 2018-11-23 | 郑州云海信息技术有限公司 | A kind of conformance test method and relevant apparatus of distributed file system |
| CN109815114A (en) * | 2018-12-14 | 2019-05-28 | 深圳壹账通智能科技有限公司 | Test method, management server, test equipment, computer equipment and medium |
| CN109815113A (en) * | 2018-12-14 | 2019-05-28 | 深圳壹账通智能科技有限公司 | Test method and server based on Jmeter platform |
| CN111813519A (en) * | 2020-06-30 | 2020-10-23 | 积成电子股份有限公司 | IEC 61850 multi-client-oriented multi-task concurrent testing method and system |
-
2021
- 2021-10-22 CN CN202111235019.0A patent/CN113839839B/en active Active
Patent Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6324492B1 (en) * | 1998-01-20 | 2001-11-27 | Microsoft Corporation | Server stress testing using multiple concurrent client simulation |
| US6754701B1 (en) * | 2000-05-05 | 2004-06-22 | Mercury Interactive Corporation | Use of a single thread to support multiple network connections for server load testing |
| CN108650150A (en) * | 2018-05-11 | 2018-10-12 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | A kind of data verification method and device |
| CN108875061A (en) * | 2018-06-29 | 2018-11-23 | 郑州云海信息技术有限公司 | A kind of conformance test method and relevant apparatus of distributed file system |
| CN109815114A (en) * | 2018-12-14 | 2019-05-28 | 深圳壹账通智能科技有限公司 | Test method, management server, test equipment, computer equipment and medium |
| CN109815113A (en) * | 2018-12-14 | 2019-05-28 | 深圳壹账通智能科技有限公司 | Test method and server based on Jmeter platform |
| CN111813519A (en) * | 2020-06-30 | 2020-10-23 | 积成电子股份有限公司 | IEC 61850 multi-client-oriented multi-task concurrent testing method and system |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 李明等: "一种信令数据仿真测试仪的软件体系结构研究与设计", 《现代电信科技》 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN113839839B (en) | 2023-05-09 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Dai et al. | Bigdl: A distributed deep learning framework for big data | |
| US9823991B2 (en) | Concurrent workload simulation for application performance testing | |
| CN106776280B (en) | Configurable performance testing device | |
| Herodotou et al. | Mapreduce programming and cost-based optimization? crossing this chasm with starfish | |
| US8185352B2 (en) | Benchmarking correlated stream processing systems | |
| CN111104304A (en) | Multi-task scene performance testing method, storage medium, electronic device and system | |
| CN107391373B (en) | AutoIT-based automatic performance testing method | |
| CN110532021B (en) | Processing method of configuration file of distributed control system, client and service device | |
| CN104834599A (en) | WEB security detection method and device | |
| CN108829802B (en) | Associated log playback method and device | |
| Li et al. | Improving the shuffle of hadoop MapReduce | |
| US20200349063A1 (en) | Probabilistic software testing via dynamic graphs | |
| US11144693B1 (en) | Method and system for generating verification tests at runtime | |
| CN112559525B (en) | Data checking system, method, device and server | |
| CN113839839B (en) | Method and system for testing multi-thread concurrent communication | |
| CN109241039B (en) | Method, system, server and storage medium for realizing global unique parameterized file | |
| CN114444076A (en) | Stain analysis method and device | |
| CN103902903A (en) | Malicious code analyzing method and system based on dynamic sandbox environment | |
| CN116627609A (en) | Hive batch processing-based scheduling method and device | |
| CN111679924B (en) | Reliability simulation method and device for componentized software system and electronic equipment | |
| CN105183871A (en) | Data query method and device | |
| CN109800891A (en) | A kind of machine learning redundant data delet method and system | |
| CN112181825A (en) | Test case library construction method and device, electronic equipment and medium | |
| Pathania et al. | Role of test case prioritization based on regression testing using clustering | |
| CN108628750B (en) | Test code processing method and device |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |