CN113837542A - Research biological culture quality evaluation model - Google Patents
Research biological culture quality evaluation model Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN113837542A CN113837542A CN202110963627.7A CN202110963627A CN113837542A CN 113837542 A CN113837542 A CN 113837542A CN 202110963627 A CN202110963627 A CN 202110963627A CN 113837542 A CN113837542 A CN 113837542A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation model
- parts
- culture
- achievement
- research
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 33
- 238000013441 quality evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 27
- 238000013210 evaluation model Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012827 research and development Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000012854 evaluation process Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06395—Quality analysis or management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/20—Education
- G06Q50/205—Education administration or guidance
Abstract
The invention relates to the technical field of software, and discloses a research life culture quality evaluation model, which comprises a culture evaluation model and a employment evaluation model, wherein the culture evaluation model comprises four parts of theoretical basis, professional literacy, innovation capability and comprehensive capability; the theoretical foundation comprises two parts, namely subject participation and subject achievement, wherein the subject participation comprises a public course, a repair course and a front-edge lecture seat, and the subject achievement comprises a public course achievement, a repair course achievement and a front-edge lecture seat participation number; according to the method, a professional master research quality evaluation model is established, so that evaluation can be performed at any time according to a certain standard in the process of study of the students, the method is applied to a professional master research culture quality evaluation system, the evaluation result of the professional master research culture quality is obtained, problems are found in time in the evaluation process, and the reasons are analyzed and corrected.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of software, in particular to a research life culture quality evaluation model.
Background
Software is a set of computer data and instructions organized according to a specific sequence, generally, the software is divided into system software, application software and middleware between the system software and the application software, along with the development of intelligent education, the software is widely applied to modern education, in order to better evaluate a researcher, a large number of researcher evaluation model systems appear, but the existing large number of researcher evaluation model systems are still in a theoretical research stage, and the weight occupied by observation indexes related to a calculation method of an evaluation model is subjective assumption and has no objective basis.
Disclosure of Invention
Technical problem to be solved
Aiming at the defects of the prior art, the invention provides a research biological culture quality evaluation model, which solves the problems in the background technology.
(II) technical scheme
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention provides the following technical scheme: a research life culture quality evaluation model comprises a culture evaluation model and a employment evaluation model, wherein the culture evaluation model comprises four parts of theoretical basis, professional literacy, innovation capability and comprehensive capability;
the theoretical foundation comprises two parts, namely subject participation and subject achievement, wherein the subject participation comprises a public course, a repair course and a front-edge lecture seat, and the subject achievement comprises a public course achievement, a repair course achievement and a front-edge lecture seat participation number;
the professional literacy comprises two parts, namely a paper publishing condition and a academic paper condition, wherein the paper publishing condition comprises the number of published papers and the average influence factor of periodicals in which the papers are located, and the academic paper condition comprises novelty of paper titles, innovation on theory or method, achievement of paper completion and paper achievement;
the innovation capability comprises two parts, namely a scientific research project and an innovation competition, wherein the scientific research project comprises a project participation number, scientific research results and patent conditions, and the innovation competition comprises a competition participation number, a competition grade average influence factor and a competition winning grade;
the comprehensive capacity comprises four parts of learning exploration capacity, organization coordination capacity, prize obtaining condition and honor obtaining condition, wherein the learning exploration capacity comprises literature reading number, the organization coordination capacity comprises student cadre condition and collective activity participation condition, the prize obtaining condition comprises prize grade average influence factor and prize obtaining grade, and the honor obtaining condition comprises honor grade average influence factor and honor obtaining grade;
the employment evaluation model comprises four major parts, namely graduation heading, position property, income level and development prospect, wherein the graduation heading comprises four parts, namely employment, upgradeability, entrepreneurship and backyard, the employment comprises five hundred-strength world, five hundred-strength China and the like, the upgradeability comprises a first-level subject point and a second-level subject point, and the entrepreneurship comprises a medium-sized enterprise, a small-sized enterprise and a micro enterprise;
the position property comprises three parts of affairs, technology and academia, and the affairs, the technology and the academia comprise three parts of high relevance, medium relevance and low relevance;
the income level comprises two parts of regions and salary, the regions comprise first-line cities, second-line cities, third-line cities and the like, and the salary comprises more than ten thousand, five thousand to ten thousand and less than five thousand;
the development prospect comprises three parts of better development prospect, medium development prospect and smaller development prospect.
Preferably, the establishment method of the research biological culture quality evaluation model comprises the following steps:
s1, establishing a monitoring point system of a professional Master research and development culture evaluation model;
s2, establishing a monitoring point system of a professional Master research and employment evaluation model;
s3, collecting data required by the model and processing the data;
s4, compiling codes, establishing a model, importing collected and sorted data into the model by using mechanical learning, training the culture quality evaluation model by using employment scores as results, and obtaining the weight of each monitoring point of the culture quality evaluation model in the model, thereby obtaining a more accurate basis professional Master research and development culture quality evaluation system;
and S5, the obtained weight information is imported into an evaluation module, so that the students can be evaluated to obtain a series of evaluation results including comparison conditions with the age average value, total scores, comments and the like.
(III) advantageous effects
The invention provides a research biological culture quality evaluation model, which has the following beneficial effects:
according to the invention, by establishing the professional Master research quality evaluation model, the evaluation can be carried out at any time according to a certain standard in the study process of the students, and the professional Master research quality evaluation model is applied to the professional Master research culture quality evaluation system to obtain the evaluation result of the professional Master research culture quality, the problems are found in the evaluation process in time, the reasons are analyzed and corrected, on the other hand, during the evaluation, the problems existing in the culture target, course setting and culture process can be searched through feedback information to promote the correction of the problems, and in a word, the culture quality evaluation model is constructed, so that the study culture mode can be better perfected, the quality of the students is improved, and the quality of the students meets the requirements of the culture target.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a culture evaluation model according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a employment evaluation model in accordance with the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
As shown in fig. 1-2, the present invention provides a technical solution: a research life culture quality evaluation model comprises a culture evaluation model and a employment evaluation model, wherein the culture evaluation model comprises four parts of theoretical basis, professional literacy, innovation capability and comprehensive capability;
the theoretical foundation comprises two parts, namely subject participation and subject achievement, wherein the subject participation comprises a public course, a repair course and a front-edge lecture seat, and the subject achievement comprises a public course achievement, a repair course achievement and a front-edge lecture seat participation number;
the professional literacy comprises two parts, namely a paper publishing condition and a academic paper condition, wherein the paper publishing condition comprises the number of published papers and the average influence factor of periodicals in which the papers are located, and the academic paper condition comprises novelty of paper titles, innovation on theory or method, achievement of paper completion and paper achievement;
the innovation capability comprises two parts, namely a scientific research project and an innovation competition, wherein the scientific research project comprises a project participation number, scientific research results and patent conditions, and the innovation competition comprises a competition participation number, a competition grade average influence factor and a competition winning grade;
the comprehensive capacity comprises four parts of learning exploration capacity, organization coordination capacity, prize obtaining condition and honor obtaining condition, wherein the learning exploration capacity comprises literature reading number, the organization coordination capacity comprises student cadre condition and collective activity participation condition, the prize obtaining condition comprises prize grade average influence factor and prize obtaining grade, and the honor obtaining condition comprises honor grade average influence factor and honor obtaining grade;
the employment evaluation model comprises four major parts, namely graduation heading, position property, income level and development prospect, wherein the graduation heading comprises four parts, namely employment, upgradeability, entrepreneurship and backyard, the employment comprises five hundred-strength world, five hundred-strength China and the like, the upgradeability comprises a first-level subject point and a second-level subject point, and the entrepreneurship comprises a medium-sized enterprise, a small-sized enterprise and a micro enterprise;
the position property comprises three parts of affairs, technology and academia, and the affairs, the technology and the academia comprise three parts of high relevance, medium relevance and low relevance;
the income level comprises two parts of regions and salary, the regions comprise first-line cities, second-line cities, third-line cities and the like, and the salary comprises more than ten thousand, five thousand to ten thousand and less than five thousand;
the development prospect comprises three parts of better development prospect, medium development prospect and smaller development prospect.
A method for establishing a research biological culture quality evaluation model comprises the following steps:
s1, establishing a monitoring point system of a professional Master research culture evaluation model, as shown in figure 1;
s2, establishing a monitoring point system of a professional Master research and employment evaluation model, as shown in FIG. 2;
s3, collecting data required by the model and processing the data;
s4, compiling codes, establishing a model, importing collected and sorted data into the model by using mechanical learning, training the culture quality evaluation model by using employment scores as results, and obtaining the weight of each monitoring point of the culture quality evaluation model in the model, thereby obtaining a more accurate basis professional Master research and development culture quality evaluation system;
and S5, the obtained weight information is imported into an evaluation module, so that the students can be evaluated to obtain a series of evaluation results including comparison conditions with the age average value, total scores, comments and the like.
It is noted that, herein, relational terms such as first and second, and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. Also, the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.
Although embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes, modifications, substitutions and alterations can be made in these embodiments without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined in the appended claims and their equivalents.
Claims (2)
1. A research biological culture quality evaluation model is characterized in that: the method comprises a culture evaluation model and a employment evaluation model, wherein the culture evaluation model comprises four parts of theoretical basis, professional literacy, innovation capability and comprehensive capability;
the theoretical foundation comprises two parts, namely subject participation and subject achievement, wherein the subject participation comprises a public course, a repair course and a front-edge lecture seat, and the subject achievement comprises a public course achievement, a repair course achievement and a front-edge lecture seat participation number;
the professional literacy comprises two parts, namely a paper publishing condition and a academic paper condition, wherein the paper publishing condition comprises the number of published papers and the average influence factor of periodicals in which the papers are located, and the academic paper condition comprises novelty of paper titles, innovation on theory or method, achievement of paper completion and paper achievement;
the innovation capability comprises two parts, namely a scientific research project and an innovation competition, wherein the scientific research project comprises a project participation number, scientific research results and patent conditions, and the innovation competition comprises a competition participation number, a competition grade average influence factor and a competition winning grade;
the comprehensive capacity comprises four parts of learning exploration capacity, organization coordination capacity, prize obtaining condition and honor obtaining condition, wherein the learning exploration capacity comprises literature reading number, the organization coordination capacity comprises student cadre condition and collective activity participation condition, the prize obtaining condition comprises prize grade average influence factor and prize obtaining grade, and the honor obtaining condition comprises honor grade average influence factor and honor obtaining grade;
the employment evaluation model comprises four major parts, namely graduation heading, position property, income level and development prospect, wherein the graduation heading comprises four parts, namely employment, upgradeability, entrepreneurship and backyard, the employment comprises five hundred-strength world, five hundred-strength China and the like, the upgradeability comprises a first-level subject point and a second-level subject point, and the entrepreneurship comprises a medium-sized enterprise, a small-sized enterprise and a micro enterprise;
the position property comprises three parts of affairs, technology and academia, and the affairs, the technology and the academia comprise three parts of high relevance, medium relevance and low relevance;
the income level comprises two parts of regions and salary, the regions comprise first-line cities, second-line cities, third-line cities and the like, and the salary comprises more than ten thousand, five thousand to ten thousand and less than five thousand;
the development prospect comprises three parts of better development prospect, medium development prospect and smaller development prospect.
2. A method for establishing a research biological culture quality evaluation model is characterized by comprising the following steps: the method comprises the following steps:
s1, establishing a monitoring point system of a professional Master research and development culture evaluation model;
s2, establishing a monitoring point system of a professional Master research and employment evaluation model;
s3, collecting data required by the model and processing the data;
s4, compiling codes, establishing a model, importing collected and sorted data into the model by using mechanical learning, training the culture quality evaluation model by using employment scores as results, and obtaining the weight of each monitoring point of the culture quality evaluation model in the model, thereby obtaining a more accurate basis professional Master research and development culture quality evaluation system;
and S5, the obtained weight information is imported into an evaluation module, so that the students can be evaluated to obtain a series of evaluation results including comparison conditions with the age average value, total scores, comments and the like.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110963627.7A CN113837542A (en) | 2021-08-20 | 2021-08-20 | Research biological culture quality evaluation model |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110963627.7A CN113837542A (en) | 2021-08-20 | 2021-08-20 | Research biological culture quality evaluation model |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN113837542A true CN113837542A (en) | 2021-12-24 |
Family
ID=78961153
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110963627.7A Pending CN113837542A (en) | 2021-08-20 | 2021-08-20 | Research biological culture quality evaluation model |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN113837542A (en) |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US8465288B1 (en) * | 2007-02-28 | 2013-06-18 | Patrick G. Roers | Student profile grading system |
| CN104867074A (en) * | 2015-05-15 | 2015-08-26 | 东北大学 | Student comprehensive quality evaluation method based on genetic algorithm optimization BP neural network |
| CN111027868A (en) * | 2019-12-13 | 2020-04-17 | 电子科技大学 | Structural equation model-based academic dissertation quality influence factor evaluation method |
| CN112101786A (en) * | 2020-09-15 | 2020-12-18 | 广东工贸职业技术学院 | Student data analysis method and device based on big data and computer equipment |
| CN112700132A (en) * | 2020-12-30 | 2021-04-23 | 河北地质大学 | Interval model-based student education quality evaluation system and method |
-
2021
- 2021-08-20 CN CN202110963627.7A patent/CN113837542A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US8465288B1 (en) * | 2007-02-28 | 2013-06-18 | Patrick G. Roers | Student profile grading system |
| CN104867074A (en) * | 2015-05-15 | 2015-08-26 | 东北大学 | Student comprehensive quality evaluation method based on genetic algorithm optimization BP neural network |
| CN111027868A (en) * | 2019-12-13 | 2020-04-17 | 电子科技大学 | Structural equation model-based academic dissertation quality influence factor evaluation method |
| CN112101786A (en) * | 2020-09-15 | 2020-12-18 | 广东工贸职业技术学院 | Student data analysis method and device based on big data and computer equipment |
| CN112700132A (en) * | 2020-12-30 | 2021-04-23 | 河北地质大学 | Interval model-based student education quality evaluation system and method |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
| Title |
|---|
| 孟宪涛: "研究生综合素质与就业关系的统计分析", 沈阳师范大学学报(自然科学版), vol. 38, no. 01, pages 51 - 54 * |
| 金云志: "硕士研究生培养质量评价体系研究", 万方中国学位论文数据库, pages 47 - 52 * |
| 陈光亮: "机器学习在大学生培养质量评价中的应用研究", 万方中国学位论文数据库, pages 15 - 46 * |
| 魏博文 等: "基于内涵发展的水利专业研究生培养质量评价体系及提升策略", 高等建筑教育, vol. 29, no. 02, pages 81 - 88 * |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Abramitzky et al. | Automated linking of historical data | |
| Kogan | Evaluating Higher Education. Papers from the International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education, Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. | |
| CN107239529A (en) | A kind of public sentiment hot category classification method based on deep learning | |
| Sofyan | The development of sports management research in Indonesia in the early twenty-first century: A bibliometric analysis | |
| CN108717459B (en) | A kind of mobile application defect positioning method of user oriented comment information | |
| CN111401040A (en) | Keyword extraction method suitable for word text | |
| Hardoy et al. | Immigrant concentration and student outcomes in upper secondary schools: Norwegian evidence | |
| CN102298583B (en) | A kind of BBBS (Bulletin Board System)BS web page quality evaluation method and system | |
| CN114186983B (en) | Video interview multidimensional scoring method, system, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| Zhou et al. | Application analysis of data mining technology in ideological and political education management | |
| Piovani | Styles of academic production in the Argentine social sciences: heterogeneity and heterodoxy | |
| Wilke | The Hidden Professoriate. Credentialism, Professionalism, and the Tenure Crisis. Contributions in Sociology, Number 29. | |
| CN113837542A (en) | Research biological culture quality evaluation model | |
| Sjöblom | THE CUMULATION PROBLEM IN POLITICAL SCIENCE AN ESSAY ON RESEARCH STRATEGIES | |
| CN111104455A (en) | Multisource and multidimensional school teaching transverse information difference comparison analysis method | |
| Amaral et al. | Between institutional competition and the search for equality of opportunities: Access of mature students | |
| Guha | Tarak Chandra Das: a marginalised anthropologist | |
| CN115564606A (en) | Intelligent marking method suitable for judicial examination subjective questions | |
| Figueroa | W. Arthur Lewis's Socioeconomic Analysis and the Development of Industrialization Policy in Jamaica, 1945-1960 | |
| Guijt | A user’s note: wealth ranking by cards | |
| Bogue | The quest for numeracy: Data and methods in American political history | |
| Wang et al. | An Measurement Method of Ancient Poetry Difficulty for Adaptive Testing | |
| Guéville et al. | Crowd Post-Correction of HTR Output in a Pedagogical Context: The Case of the Paris Bible Project'Correct-a-thon' | |
| Mahroyan et al. | Systematic Review of Studies on Science and Technology in Iran | |
| Ghafournia et al. | Dynamic performance evaluation by balanced scorecard simulation for high education centers |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |