CN113612225A - Medium-voltage power supply reliability effect evaluation method - Google Patents

Medium-voltage power supply reliability effect evaluation method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN113612225A
CN113612225A CN202110909650.8A CN202110909650A CN113612225A CN 113612225 A CN113612225 A CN 113612225A CN 202110909650 A CN202110909650 A CN 202110909650A CN 113612225 A CN113612225 A CN 113612225A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
iat
main
voltage
curve
ibt
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202110909650.8A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
赵永生
谈军
郝雨
余小飞
宋光明
程辰
吕朋朋
罗学龙
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Beiming Software Co ltd
State Grid Anhui Electric Power Co Ltd
NARI Nanjing Control System Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Beiming Software Co ltd
State Grid Anhui Electric Power Co Ltd
NARI Nanjing Control System Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Beiming Software Co ltd, State Grid Anhui Electric Power Co Ltd, NARI Nanjing Control System Co Ltd filed Critical Beiming Software Co ltd
Priority to CN202110909650.8A priority Critical patent/CN113612225A/en
Publication of CN113612225A publication Critical patent/CN113612225A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J2203/00Indexing scheme relating to details of circuit arrangements for AC mains or AC distribution networks
    • H02J2203/20Simulating, e g planning, reliability check, modelling or computer assisted design [CAD]

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)

Abstract

The invention belongs to an evaluation method, and particularly relates to a method for evaluating reliability and effect of medium-voltage power supply. It includes: the method comprises the following steps: collecting data; step two: adjusting power grid parameters; step three: synthesizing voltage and current; step four: fitting a curve; step five: selecting a main curve; step six: normalizing the curve; step seven: merging the main parameter normalization curves; step eight: calculating a threshold range; step nine: and (6) evaluating. The invention has the following remarkable effects: according to the effect evaluation method, the medium-voltage reliability is evaluated in a reverse mode from the power utilization effect through evaluating the power utilization effect of each device in the power grid. In the method execution process, the main performance parameters of the electric equipment are selected, so that the evaluation result and the effect of the electric equipment are directly hooked, the evaluation result is reliable and accurate, the multi-dimensional evaluation is changed into simple numerical comparison by selecting the main curve, normalizing and combining the curves, and the evaluation result is simple and understandable.

Description

Medium-voltage power supply reliability effect evaluation method
Technical Field
The invention belongs to an evaluation method, and particularly relates to a method for evaluating reliability and effect of medium-voltage power supply.
Background
The power grid is an important form of energy supply in modern society, and many devices, whether industrial or civil, are highly dependent on the power supply of the power grid.
However, for systematic reasons, the effect of the power supply from the power grid cannot meet the requirements of all the electrical consumers. Firstly, in terms of power supply form, power supply of a power grid is an energy supply form of centralized power generation, then power transmission is carried out through the power grid, and power is used by an end user. In order to ensure the power supply efficiency, the power generation devices of the power grid are often arranged in a centralized manner, and use coal, water power, nuclear energy, wind energy, solar energy or other power generation modes. And on the basis of the consideration of efficiency, high-voltage or ultrahigh-voltage transmission is adopted in the transmission process according to the transmission power and different trans-regional distances. Therefore, before the end user uses electricity, the most originally generated electric energy is converted and processed for many times, and the generated electric pollution influences the electricity utilization effect of the end user. Secondly, in terms of the power consumption demand mode of the end user, the power consumption demands of different users are different, and the power consumption demands of different devices are also different, for example, the sensitivity of the motor to current and frequency is higher, the sensitivity of the lighting device to voltage is higher, and the sensitivity of the high-precision electronic device to voltage and frequency is higher.
The prior art only adds a voltage stabilizer in front of the electric equipment to deal with the condition of electric power pollution. However, this processing method cannot adjust the demand of the electric equipment in real time, and cannot allow the power generation and power management unit to grasp the direction of power adjustment in real time.
Therefore, a method for evaluating reliability effect of medium voltage power supply is needed.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention provides a method for evaluating reliability and effect of medium-voltage power supply aiming at the defects of the prior art.
The invention is realized by the following steps: 1. a method for evaluating reliability effect of medium voltage power supply is characterized by comprising the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps: data collection
Collecting data separately for each device in the grid and the grid;
step two: adjusting grid parameters
Respectively adjusting the grid voltage, the grid current and the grid frequency of a power grid to stop all electric equipment in the power grid from working, and simultaneously recording all relevant parameters;
step three: voltage current synthesis
Synthesizing the recorded voltage and current;
step four: fitting of curves
By a resultant voltage utSynthesized current ItGrid frequency ftMain performance parameter S of ith equipmentiat、Sibt、SictRespectively fitting to respectively obtain main performance parameter curves of the ith equipment;
step five: selecting a main curve
Obtaining derivatives of three curves of the same performance parameter of the same equipment, taking the absolute value of an extreme value, and selecting the curve corresponding to the maximum absolute value of the extreme value as a main curve;
step six: curve normalization
Performing curve normalization on the main curve corresponding to each performance parameter of each device;
step seven: merging the main parameter normalization curves;
step eight: calculating a threshold range;
step nine: and (6) evaluating.
2. The method of claim 1 for evaluating the reliability effect of a medium voltage power supply, wherein: the first step comprises the following steps of,
for the grid, the following parameters were collected: network voltage u1t、u2t、u3tGrid current I1t、I2t、I3tFrequency of the grid ftWherein u is1t、u2t、u3tThree voltages representing three-phase alternating current, I1t、I2t、I3tRepresenting three currents of three-phase alternating current, t being time, i.e. u1tRepresenting the voltage of the first phase at time t, u2tRepresenting the voltage of the second phase, u, at time t3tRepresents the voltage of the third phase at time t; i is1tRepresenting the current of the first phase at time t, I2tRepresenting the current of the second phase at time t, I3tRepresenting the current of the third phase at time t; f. oftRepresenting the frequency of the grid at time t,
for each device in the grid, the following parameters are collected: s1at、S1bt、S1ct、S2at、S2bt、S2ct、S3at、S3bt、S3ct、…Siat、Sibt、SictWherein i represents the serial number of the equipment, and if n electric equipment in the power grid are provided, the value range of i is [1, n],Siat、Sibt、SictRespectively representing the main performance index of the ith equipment at the time t, wherein SiatThe value of (A) must be significant, SibtAnd SictThe value of (a) is not necessarily significant, and when not significant, it is-1,
the main parameters of the equipment are the main parameters of the equipment during normal operation;
in the step, t is time, the interval between t and t +1 is 1 second, and when the value of t is less than or equal to 3000, sampling is continuously carried out; and when the value of t is more than 3000 and all the devices in the power grid continuously and normally work, executing the subsequent steps besides sampling in each cycle.
3. A method of assessing the reliability effectiveness of a medium voltage power supply as claimed in claim 2, characterized by: the third step includes the following steps,
the resultant voltage u is calculated by the following formulat
Figure BDA0003203247170000041
The resultant current I is calculated by the following formulat
Figure BDA0003203247170000042
4. A method of assessing the reliability effectiveness of a medium voltage power supply as claimed in claim 3, characterized by: the fifth step includes the following steps,
step five, different performance parameters are respectively carried out,
when the same value appears, the main curve is selected according to the priority of voltage > current > frequency.
5. The method of claim 4 for evaluating the reliability effect of a medium voltage power supply, wherein: the sixth step includes the following contents that,
let giat(x) Is the main parameter S of a device with sequence number iiatWherein x is one of voltage u, current I, and frequency f, the specific determination method is obtained according to the calculation of step five,
then the curve f is normalizediat(x) The calculation method of (2) is as follows:
Figure BDA0003203247170000043
where min { g }iat(x) Is giat(x) Max { g } ofiat(x) Is giat(x) The maximum value of (a) is,
similarly, the main parameter S of the device with serial number i can be obtainedibtNormalized curve f ofibt(x),
Similarly, a normalized curve of all the main parameters of all the devices can be obtained.
6. The method of claim 5 for evaluating the reliability effect of a medium voltage power supply, wherein: the seventh step includes the following steps,
solving a main parameter normalization curve merging function f of the equipment i by using the following formulait(x)
fit(x)=P1fiat(x)+P2fibt(x)+P3fict(x)
Wherein f isiat(x)、fibt(x) And fict(x) Is the main parameter normalization curve of the device i obtained by calculation in the sixth step, and certainly, if the device i has no corresponding main parameter, the corresponding item number is directly omitted,
P1、P2and P3Is a coefficient, and the three values can be determined by any one of the following methods:
the first method is as follows: external giving
If the staff member can determine the weight relationship of several main parameters, the weight proportion of three parameters can be directly and externally given,
if the staff can not determine the weight relation of several parameters, a fixed value can be directly used, and the typical value given in the application is P1:P2:P3=5:3:2
The second method comprises the following steps: determining a weight ratio based on the values of several primary parameters
When | max { (f)iat(x))″}|+|max{(fibt(x))″}|+|max{(fict(x) ")" | is not equal to 0, P is1、P2And P3Is calculated by the following formula
Figure BDA0003203247170000051
Figure BDA0003203247170000052
Figure BDA0003203247170000053
Wherein (f)iat(x) "represents a pair function fiat(x) Second derivative, max { (f)iat(x) -) "(denotes (f)iat(x) "of, | max { (f)iat(x) ")" | denotes max { (f)iat(x) Absolute value of ""), analogous to (f)ibt(x) "represents a pair function fibt(x) Second derivative, max { (f)ibt(x) -) "(denotes (f)ibt(x) "of, | max { (f)ibt(x) ")" | denotes max { (f)ibt(x) Absolute value of "); (f)ict(x) "represents a pair function fict(x) Second derivative, max { (f)ict(x) -) "(denotes (f)ict(x) "of, | max { (f)ict(x) ")" | denotes max { (f)ict(x) The absolute value of ")" (ii) the absolute value of,
if | max { (f)iat(x))″}|+|max{(fibt(x))″}|+|max{(fict(x) ")", | 0, then P1=P2=P3=1/3,
Of course if there are only two main parameters, then P1=P2=1/2,
If there is only one main parameter, then there is no need for the main parameter normalization curve merging through this step.
7. The method of claim 6 for evaluating the reliability effect of a medium voltage power supply, wherein: the step eight includes the following contents that,
normalizing curve merging function f to main parameters of equipment iit(x) And solving an upper limit and a lower limit, wherein the upper limit and the lower limit are boundary thresholds of the device i for the medium-voltage electric mass.
The method for evaluating the reliability effect of the medium voltage power supply comprises the following steps,
when a new voltage and current frequency in the power grid occurs at the next moment, calculating a main parameter normalization curve merging function f of each device by using the fitting formulait(x) And if the calculation results are all within the threshold range of the step eight, judging that the medium-voltage quality is qualified, and otherwise, judging that the medium-voltage quality is unqualified.
The invention has the following remarkable effects: according to the effect evaluation method, the medium-voltage reliability is evaluated in a reverse mode from the power utilization effect through evaluating the power utilization effect of each device in the power grid. In the method execution process, the main performance parameters of the electric equipment are selected, so that the evaluation result and the effect of the electric equipment are directly hooked, the evaluation result is reliable and accurate, the multi-dimensional evaluation is changed into simple numerical comparison by selecting the main curve, normalizing and combining the curves, and the evaluation result is simple and understandable.
Detailed Description
A method for evaluating reliability and effect of medium-voltage power supply comprises the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps: data collection
For the grid, the following parameters were collected: network voltage u1t、u2t、u3tGrid current I1t、I2t、I3tFrequency of the grid ftWherein u is1t、u2t、u3tThree voltages representing three-phase alternating current, I1t、I2t、I3tRepresenting three currents of three-phase alternating current, t being time, i.e. u1tRepresenting the voltage of the first phase at time t, u2tRepresenting the voltage of the second phase, u, at time t3tRepresents the voltage of the third phase at time t; i is1tRepresenting the current of the first phase at time t, I2tRepresenting the current of the second phase at time t, I3tRepresenting the current of the third phase at time t; f. oftRepresenting the frequency of the grid at time t.
For each device in the grid, the following parameters are collected: s1at、S1bt、S1ct、S2at、S2bt、S2ct、S3at、S3bt、S3ct、…Siat、Sibt、Sict. Wherein i represents the equipment serial number, if the number of the electric equipment in the power grid is n, the value range of i is [1, n]。Siat、Sibt、SictRespectively representing the main performance index of the ith equipment at the time t, wherein SiatThe value of (A) must be significant, SibtAnd SictThe value of (b) is not necessarily meaningful, and when not meaningful, it takes the value of-1.
The primary performance indicator is not necessarily a primary parameter of the device. The main parameters of the equipment are the main parameters of the equipment during normal operation, and generally comprise current, voltage, power and the like; the main performance index refers to the effect evaluation dimension of providing a certain function for the outside by taking the equipment as a whole. In different application scenarios, the main performance index of the equipment may be different, as long as the main performance index of the equipment is determined before the method is performed.
In order to achieve unified calculation and improve efficiency, at most three main performance indexes are given to each device, and of course, a person skilled in the art can set more performance index dimensions as required.
For example, the main function of an electric fan is to blow air, so that the main performance index is the rotating speed, and the S of the electric fan7atIt is the speed of the fan (assuming that the equipment number of the fan is 7), and generally the fan has no other main performance indexes, so S7btAnd S7ctAll values of (a) are-1; the main parameters of the electric fan can comprise rated voltage, rated current, rated power and the like, and the parameters are not parameters influencing the most main use function of the electric fan and are not main performance indexes.
If the main function of the electric lamp is illumination, and the main performance index is brightness, the S of the electric lamp is8atIt indicates the brightness of the lamp (assuming that the equipment number of the lamp is 8), and the parameters of the rated voltage, the rated current, the rated power and the like of the lamp are not the main performance indexes of the lamp.
Also, as still an electric lamp, in some special cases, in addition to the need for lighting, heat is released to the lampWith the limitation, then S of the lamp9atIndicates the brightness of the lamp, S9btShowing the heat emission of the lamp (assuming the device number of this lamp is 9), S9ctHas a value of-1.
The time t in this step is set arbitrarily according to the different precision of the equipment in the power grid, and the interval between t and t +1 is 1 second in general. When the value of t is less than or equal to 3000, continuously sampling; and when the value of t is more than 3000 and all the devices in the power grid continuously and normally work, executing the subsequent steps besides sampling in each cycle.
Step two: adjusting grid parameters
Regulating the network voltage u of a network in each case1t、u2t、u3tGrid current I1t、I2t、I3tFrequency of the grid ftAnd all the electric equipment in the power grid stops working.
The purpose of this step is to examine the main performance parameter conditions of the consumer in extreme conditions, as well as the corresponding grid parameters.
Because most of the electric equipment cannot bear electric energy exceeding rated voltage and rated current, when the voltage or the current reaches the rated voltage limit or the rated current limit (the upper limit and the lower limit are respectively carried out), the electric equipment is actively disconnected through the switch so as to protect the safety of the electric equipment. The main performance parameters of the device recorded at this time are used as valid data for subsequent calculations.
Step three: voltage current synthesis
The resultant voltage u is calculated by the following formulat
Figure BDA0003203247170000091
The resultant current I is calculated by the following formulat
Figure BDA0003203247170000092
Step four: fitting of curves
By a resultant voltage utSynthesized current ItGrid frequency ftMain performance parameter S of ith equipmentiat、Sibt、SictAnd respectively fitting to respectively obtain main performance parameter curves of the ith equipment.
The fitting in this step is performed on data whose main performance parameter is not-1, that is, the main performance parameter of the i-th device should have meaning.
For example, for the ith device, the device has two significant main performance parameters SiatAnd Sibt. According to the preceding step requirement, S of the deviceictThe value is always-1, so the subsequent calculation is only for SiatAnd SibtThe process is carried out. For the first performance parameter SiatRespectively with a combined voltage utSynthesized current ItGrid frequency ftFitting, three curves can be obtained: voltage performance curve Kiau(t), Current Performance Curve KiaI(t), frequency Performance Curve Kiaf(t) of (d). Similarly, a second performance parameter S can be obtainedibtThree curves of (a): voltage performance curve Kibu(t), Current Performance Curve KibI(t), frequency Performance Curve Kibf(t)。
Step five: selecting a main curve
And (3) solving derivatives of the three curves of the same performance parameter of the same equipment, taking the absolute value of the extreme value, and selecting the curve corresponding to the maximum absolute value of the extreme value as a main curve.
The above process is performed separately for different performance parameters.
When the same value appears, the main curve is selected according to the priority of voltage > current > frequency.
For example, for the ith device, the device has two significant main performance parameters SiatAnd SibtObtaining corresponding parameters S according to the step fouriatThree curve voltage performance curve Kiau(t), Current Performance Curve KiaI(t), frequency Performance Curve Kiaf(t) and correspondingParameter SibtThree curve voltage performance curve Kibu(t), Current Performance Curve KibI(t), frequency Performance Curve Kibf(t) of (d). Curve K versus voltage performance at this timeiau(t), Current Performance Curve KiaI(t), frequency Performance Curve Kiaf(t) respectively obtaining derivatives, respectively taking absolute values of extreme values, and comparing the three values, wherein the curve corresponding to the maximum value is taken as a parameter SiatThe main curve of (2). Similar vs. voltage performance curve Kibu(t), Current Performance Curve KibI(t) respectively obtaining derivatives, respectively taking absolute values of extreme values, and comparing the three values, wherein the curve corresponding to the maximum value is taken as a parameter SibtThe main curve of (2).
Step six: curve normalization
And carrying out curve normalization on the main curve corresponding to each performance parameter of each device. The method comprises the following steps:
let giat(x) Is the main parameter S of a device with sequence number iiatWherein x is one of voltage u, current I, and frequency f, the specific determination method is obtained according to the calculation of step five.
Then the curve f is normalizediat(x) The calculation method of (2) is as follows:
Figure BDA0003203247170000111
where min { g }iat(x) Is giat(x) Max { g } ofiat(x) Is giat(x) Is measured.
Similarly, the main parameter S of the device with serial number i can be obtainedibtNormalized curve f ofibt(x)。
Similarly, a normalized curve of all the main parameters of all the devices can be obtained.
Step seven: principal parameter normalization curve merging
Solving a main parameter normalization curve merging function f of the equipment i by using the following formulait(x)
fit(x)=P1fiat(x)+P2fibt(x)+P3fict(x)
Wherein f isiat(x)、fibt(x) And fict(x) The main parameter normalization curve of the device i is obtained by calculation in the sixth step, and if the device i does not have corresponding main parameters, the corresponding item number is directly omitted.
P1、P2And P3Is a coefficient, and the three values can be determined by any one of the following methods:
the first method is as follows: external giving
If the staff member can determine the weight relationship of several main parameters, the weight proportion of three parameters can be directly given externally.
If the staff can not determine the weight relation of several parameters, a fixed value can be directly used, and the typical value given in the application is P1:P2:P3=5:3:2
The second method comprises the following steps: determining a weight ratio based on the values of several primary parameters
When | max { (f)iat(x))″}|+|max{(fibt(x))″}|+|max{(fict(x) ")" | is not equal to 0, P is1、P2And P3Is calculated by the following formula
Figure BDA0003203247170000121
Figure BDA0003203247170000122
Figure BDA0003203247170000123
Wherein (f)iat(x) "represents a pair function fiat(x) Second derivative, max { (f)iat(x) -) "(denotes (f)iat(x) "of, | max { (f)iat(x) ")" | denotes max { (f)iat(x))Absolute value of "", like (f)ibt(x) "represents a pair function fibt(x) Second derivative, max { (f)ibt(x) -) "(denotes (f)ibt(x) "of, | max { (f)ibt(x) ")" | denotes max { (f)ibt(x) Absolute value of "); (f)ict(x) "represents a pair function fict(x) Second derivative, max { (f)ict(x) -) "(denotes (f)ict(x) "of, | max { (f)ict(x) ")" | denotes max { (f)ict(x) Absolute value of "").
If | max { (f)iat(x))″}|+|max{(fibt(x))″}|+|max{(fict(x) ")", | 0, then P1=P2=P3=1/3,
Of course if there are only two main parameters, then P1=P2=1/2,
If there is only one main parameter, then there is no need for the main parameter normalization curve merging through this step.
Step eight: threshold range is calculated
Normalizing curve merging function f to main parameters of equipment iit(x) And solving an upper limit and a lower limit, wherein the upper limit and the lower limit are boundary thresholds of the device i for the medium-voltage electric mass.
Step nine: evaluation of
When a new voltage and current frequency in the power grid occurs at the next moment, calculating a main parameter normalization curve merging function f of each device by using the fitting formulait(x) And if the calculation results are all within the threshold range of the step eight, judging that the medium-voltage quality is qualified, and otherwise, judging that the medium-voltage quality is unqualified.

Claims (8)

1. A method for evaluating reliability effect of medium voltage power supply is characterized by comprising the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps: data collection
Collecting data separately for each device in the grid and the grid;
step two: adjusting grid parameters
Respectively adjusting the grid voltage, the grid current and the grid frequency of a power grid to stop all electric equipment in the power grid from working, and simultaneously recording all relevant parameters;
step three: voltage current synthesis
Synthesizing the recorded voltage and current;
step four: fitting of curves
By a resultant voltage utSynthesized current ItGrid frequency ftMain performance parameter S of ith equipmentiat、Sibt、SictRespectively fitting to respectively obtain main performance parameter curves of the ith equipment;
step five: selecting a main curve
Obtaining derivatives of three curves of the same performance parameter of the same equipment, taking the absolute value of an extreme value, and selecting the curve corresponding to the maximum absolute value of the extreme value as a main curve;
step six: curve normalization
Performing curve normalization on the main curve corresponding to each performance parameter of each device;
step seven: merging the main parameter normalization curves;
step eight: calculating a threshold range;
step nine: and (6) evaluating.
2. The method of claim 1 for evaluating the reliability effect of a medium voltage power supply, wherein: the first step comprises the following steps of,
for the grid, the following parameters were collected: network voltage u1t、u2t、u3tGrid current I1t、I2t、I3tFrequency of the grid ftWherein u is1t、u2t、u3tThree voltages representing three-phase alternating current, I1t、I2t、I3tRepresenting three currents of three-phase alternating current, t being time, i.e. u1tRepresenting the voltage of the first phase at time t, u2tRepresenting the voltage of the second phase, u, at time t3tRepresents the voltage of the third phase at time t; i is1tRepresenting the current of the first phase at time t, I2tIndicates the second time of tCurrent of phase, I3tRepresenting the current of the third phase at time t; f. oftRepresenting the frequency of the grid at time t,
for each device in the grid, the following parameters are collected: s1at、S1bt、S1ct、S2at、S2bt、S2ct、S3at、S3bt、S3ct、…Siat、Sibt、SictWherein i represents the serial number of the equipment, and if n electric equipment in the power grid are provided, the value range of i is [1, n],Siat、Sibt、SictRespectively representing the main performance index of the ith equipment at the time t, wherein SiatThe value of (A) must be significant, SibtAnd SictThe value of (a) is not necessarily significant, and when not significant, it is-1,
the main parameters of the equipment are the main parameters of the equipment during normal operation;
in the step, t is time, the interval between t and t +1 is 1 second, and when the value of t is less than or equal to 3000, sampling is continuously carried out; and when the value of t is more than 3000 and all the devices in the power grid continuously and normally work, executing the subsequent steps besides sampling in each cycle.
3. A method of assessing the reliability effectiveness of a medium voltage power supply as claimed in claim 2, characterized by: the third step includes the following steps,
the resultant voltage u is calculated by the following formulat
Figure FDA0003203247160000021
The resultant current I is calculated by the following formulat
Figure FDA0003203247160000031
4. A method of assessing the reliability effectiveness of a medium voltage power supply as claimed in claim 3, characterized by: the fifth step includes the following steps,
step five, different performance parameters are respectively carried out,
when the same value appears, the main curve is selected according to the priority of voltage > current > frequency.
5. The method of claim 4 for evaluating the reliability effect of a medium voltage power supply, wherein: the sixth step includes the following contents that,
let giat(x) Is the main parameter S of a device with sequence number iiatWherein x is one of voltage u, current I, and frequency f, the specific determination method is obtained according to the calculation of step five,
then the curve f is normalizediat(x) The calculation method of (2) is as follows:
Figure FDA0003203247160000032
where min { g }iat(x) Is giat(x) Max { g } ofiat(x) Is giat(x) The maximum value of (a) is,
similarly, the main parameter S of the device with serial number i can be obtainedibtNormalized curve f ofibt(x),
Similarly, a normalized curve of all the main parameters of all the devices can be obtained.
6. The method of claim 5 for evaluating the reliability effect of a medium voltage power supply, wherein: the seventh step includes the following steps,
solving a main parameter normalization curve merging function f of the equipment i by using the following formulait(x)
fit(x)=P1fiat(x)+P2fibt(x)+P3fict(x)
Wherein f isiat(x)、fibt(x) And fict(x) Is the step ofSixthly, calculating a main parameter normalization curve of the equipment i, wherein if the equipment i does not have corresponding main parameters, the corresponding item number is directly omitted,
P1、P2and P3Is a coefficient, and the three values can be determined by any one of the following methods:
the first method is as follows: external giving
If the staff member can determine the weight relationship of several main parameters, the weight proportion of three parameters can be directly and externally given,
if the staff can not determine the weight relation of several parameters, a fixed value can be directly used, and the typical value given in the application is P1:P2:P3=5:3:2
The second method comprises the following steps: determining a weight ratio based on the values of several primary parameters
When | max { (f)iat(x))″}|+|max{(fibt(x))″}|+|max{(fict(x) ")" | is not equal to 0, P is1、P2And P3Is calculated by the following formula
Figure FDA0003203247160000041
Figure FDA0003203247160000042
Figure FDA0003203247160000043
Wherein (f)iat(x) "represents a pair function fiat(x) Second derivative, max { (f)iat(x) -) "(denotes (f)iat(x) "of, | max { (f)iat(x) ")" | denotes max { (f)iat(x) Absolute value of ""), analogous to (f)ibt(x) "represents a pair function fibt(x) Second derivative, max { (f)ibt(x) -) "(denotes (f)ibt(x) Maximum of) ")The value, | max { (f)ibt(x) ")" | denotes max { (f)ibt(x) Absolute value of "); (f)ict(x) "represents a pair function fict(x) Second derivative, max { (f)ict(x) -) "(denotes (f)ict(x) "of, | max { (f)ict(x) ")" | denotes max { (f)ict(x) The absolute value of ")" (ii) the absolute value of,
if | max { (f)iat(x))″}|+|max{(fibt(x))″}|+|max{(fict(x) ")", | 0, then P1=P2=P3=1/3,
Of course if there are only two main parameters, then P1=P2=1/2,
If there is only one main parameter, then there is no need for the main parameter normalization curve merging through this step.
7. The method of claim 6 for evaluating the reliability effect of a medium voltage power supply, wherein: the step eight includes the following contents that,
normalizing curve merging function f to main parameters of equipment iit(x) And solving an upper limit and a lower limit, wherein the upper limit and the lower limit are boundary thresholds of the device i for the medium-voltage electric mass.
8. The method of claim 7 for evaluating the reliability effect of a medium voltage power supply, wherein: the step nine includes the following contents that,
when a new voltage and current frequency in the power grid occurs at the next moment, calculating a main parameter normalization curve merging function f of each device by using the fitting formulait(x) And if the calculation results are all within the threshold range of the step eight, judging that the medium-voltage quality is qualified, and otherwise, judging that the medium-voltage quality is unqualified.
CN202110909650.8A 2021-08-09 2021-08-09 Medium-voltage power supply reliability effect evaluation method Pending CN113612225A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110909650.8A CN113612225A (en) 2021-08-09 2021-08-09 Medium-voltage power supply reliability effect evaluation method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110909650.8A CN113612225A (en) 2021-08-09 2021-08-09 Medium-voltage power supply reliability effect evaluation method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN113612225A true CN113612225A (en) 2021-11-05

Family

ID=78340038

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202110909650.8A Pending CN113612225A (en) 2021-08-09 2021-08-09 Medium-voltage power supply reliability effect evaluation method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN113612225A (en)

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106096799A (en) * 2016-07-11 2016-11-09 国网浙江省电力公司经济技术研究院 Minimum construction investment forecast system based on electric network performance index evaluation
US20190049497A1 (en) * 2016-04-08 2019-02-14 Abb Schweiz Ag Islanding detection in an electrical power grid
US20190222024A1 (en) * 2018-01-16 2019-07-18 Total Solar International Systems and methods for controlling and managing thermostatically controlled loads
CN111275240A (en) * 2019-12-27 2020-06-12 华北电力大学 Load prediction method based on multi-energy coupling scene
CN112116235A (en) * 2020-09-11 2020-12-22 国网山东省电力公司枣庄供电公司 Method for evaluating influence of voltage pulse in power grid
CN112613734A (en) * 2020-12-22 2021-04-06 国网新疆电力有限公司营销服务中心(资金集约中心、计量中心) Electric energy state evaluation index selection method

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20190049497A1 (en) * 2016-04-08 2019-02-14 Abb Schweiz Ag Islanding detection in an electrical power grid
CN106096799A (en) * 2016-07-11 2016-11-09 国网浙江省电力公司经济技术研究院 Minimum construction investment forecast system based on electric network performance index evaluation
US20190222024A1 (en) * 2018-01-16 2019-07-18 Total Solar International Systems and methods for controlling and managing thermostatically controlled loads
CN111275240A (en) * 2019-12-27 2020-06-12 华北电力大学 Load prediction method based on multi-energy coupling scene
CN112116235A (en) * 2020-09-11 2020-12-22 国网山东省电力公司枣庄供电公司 Method for evaluating influence of voltage pulse in power grid
CN112613734A (en) * 2020-12-22 2021-04-06 国网新疆电力有限公司营销服务中心(资金集约中心、计量中心) Electric energy state evaluation index selection method

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Larsson Flicker emission of wind turbines during continuous operation
CN116304778B (en) Maintenance data processing method for miniature circuit breaker
CN116345701B (en) Low-voltage reactive compensation intelligent monitoring control system
CN112557842B (en) XLPE cable aging state evaluation method based on dielectric constant evaluation factor
CN117648554B (en) Intelligent data acquisition method for photovoltaic multifunctional circuit breaker
CN106777512B (en) Transformer energy-saving loss-reducing adaptability evaluation method
CN116430269B (en) Health assessment and fault prediction management system and method for UPS (uninterrupted Power supply)
CN110780154B (en) Device and method for improving ground fault identification through fault duration transient characteristics
CN109765460B (en) Power distribution network fault line selection method based on self-adaptive scale Symlets wavelet
CN111257607A (en) Method for checking parallel resistance electricity stealing of single-phase electric energy meter
CN112946393B (en) Electric energy quality monitoring and analyzing system
CN113612225A (en) Medium-voltage power supply reliability effect evaluation method
CN117650621A (en) Method and system for monitoring network operation state of power system
CN110108983B (en) Intelligent cable state online measurement and control management method
CN115267408B (en) System and method for accurately positioning faults of power distribution switchgear based on artificial intelligence
CN113533895B (en) Abnormal electricity utilization judgment method and device based on three-phase three-wire circuit load curve
CN102856884B (en) Heat accumulation based frequency converter overload method
CN111598420B (en) Regional power quality assessment method considering sensitivity index of main equipment of user
CN110571790A (en) Method and system for online voltage stability early warning based on Thevenin equivalence
CN114626641A (en) Transformer power failure prediction system based on data processing
Guan et al. A novel method for estimating voltage flicker
CN113902219A (en) Analysis method of main transformer load influence factor analysis model
CN113406537A (en) Quantitative evaluation method for fault degree of power equipment
CN116106743B (en) Multi-load pulse power supply data acquisition and control system
CN117214592B (en) Fault monitoring management system and method for power transformer

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination