CN113516619B - Product surface flaw identification method based on image processing technology - Google Patents
Product surface flaw identification method based on image processing technology Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN113516619B CN113516619B CN202110386182.0A CN202110386182A CN113516619B CN 113516619 B CN113516619 B CN 113516619B CN 202110386182 A CN202110386182 A CN 202110386182A CN 113516619 B CN113516619 B CN 113516619B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- image
- product
- point
- defect
- pixel
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/0002—Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
- G06T7/0004—Industrial image inspection
- G06T7/0008—Industrial image inspection checking presence/absence
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T5/00—Image enhancement or restoration
- G06T5/70—Denoising; Smoothing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T5/00—Image enhancement or restoration
- G06T5/90—Dynamic range modification of images or parts thereof
- G06T5/92—Dynamic range modification of images or parts thereof based on global image properties
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/10—Segmentation; Edge detection
- G06T7/136—Segmentation; Edge detection involving thresholding
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/60—Analysis of geometric attributes
- G06T7/62—Analysis of geometric attributes of area, perimeter, diameter or volume
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/70—Determining position or orientation of objects or cameras
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
- Y02P90/30—Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- Image Analysis (AREA)
- Image Processing (AREA)
Abstract
本发明公开了一种基于图像处理技术的产品表面瑕疵识别方法,首先在产品流水线上设置产品检测点,利用高清摄像机对监测点处的产品进行拍摄,获得产品的图像;其次,基于得到的产品图像,对图片进行灰度操作得到灰度图像;再次次针对灰度图像利用瑕疵点识别算法计算并输出瑕疵点面积和图像上的中心点坐标;最后根据输出值触发激光打标机,对产品进行激光打标签,标识出不合格字样。本发明提出的基于计算机处理的瑕疵识别方法,能够很好的识别出产品表面瑕疵点,而对达到产品质量要求表面光滑的产品不生成误判现象。可以解决工业生产中检验汽车配件是否合格问题,提高工业生产效率,节约成本,并适于推广到工厂流水线产品检测上。
The invention discloses a method for identifying product surface defects based on image processing technology. First, a product detection point is set on the product assembly line, and a high-definition camera is used to shoot the product at the monitoring point to obtain an image of the product; secondly, based on the obtained product Image, the grayscale operation is performed on the image to obtain the grayscale image; the defect point recognition algorithm is used to calculate and output the area of the defect point and the coordinates of the center point on the image for the grayscale image again; finally, the laser marking machine is triggered according to the output value, and the product Laser labeling is carried out to mark the unqualified words. The defect identification method based on computer processing proposed by the invention can well identify product surface defect points, and does not generate misjudgment phenomenon for products meeting product quality requirements with smooth surfaces. It can solve the problem of checking whether auto parts are qualified in industrial production, improve industrial production efficiency, save costs, and is suitable for being extended to factory assembly line product testing.
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明涉及图像处理技术领域,尤其涉及一种基于图像处理技术的产品表面瑕疵识别方法。The invention relates to the technical field of image processing, in particular to a product surface defect recognition method based on image processing technology.
背景技术Background technique
在汽车配件生产过程中,多采用人肉眼识别汽车配件表面瑕疵。而依靠人工方法检测的误检率高,检测的准确率受工人主观判断和疲劳度影响,为提高检测的准确率,采用机器视觉替代传统人类视觉检测的方法,成为发展趋势。In the production process of auto parts, human eyes are often used to identify surface defects of auto parts. However, relying on manual methods has a high false detection rate, and the accuracy of detection is affected by the subjective judgment and fatigue of workers. In order to improve the accuracy of detection, it has become a development trend to use machine vision to replace traditional human vision detection methods.
在实际工作中,产品的瑕疵点属于图像的局部特征,图像局部特征值不随图片的旋转、平移、仿射等变化而变化。目前在局部特征检测方面主要的算法有AKAZE、KAZE、BRISK或SIFT等算法。都是二进制描述符算法,每种算法都有自己的优缺点。AKAZE和KAZE是非线性算法,在处理图片方面花费的时间比较长,不适合在工业流水线上采用。BRISK或SIFT算法是线性算法,处理速度较快,但从多次实验结果的图片上分析来看,容易把非瑕疵的部分作为特征识别出来,造成判断错误的概率增大。In actual work, the defect points of the product belong to the local features of the image, and the local feature values of the image do not change with the rotation, translation, affine, etc. of the picture. At present, the main algorithms in local feature detection include AKAZE, KAZE, BRISK or SIFT and other algorithms. Both are binary descriptor algorithms, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. AKAZE and KAZE are non-linear algorithms that take a long time to process images and are not suitable for use on industrial assembly lines. The BRISK or SIFT algorithm is a linear algorithm with a fast processing speed, but from the analysis of the pictures of the experimental results, it is easy to identify the non-defective part as a feature, resulting in an increased probability of misjudgment.
此外,产品表面的纹理是物品表面特有的特征,可以利用纹理研究图像的空间依赖关系,分析物体表面特征。目前,纹理检测算法有Tamura纹理分析法,Gabor小波的纹理特征提取法,LBP纹理统计特征提取等方法。在实验过程中,通过构建GABOR滤波器,对瑕疵产品表面图像进行多次实验进行验证,原始图片左图original经过GABOR滤波器处理后,得到gabor图片,从图片上看,产品纹理相似度极大,无法通过图像的纹理分析识别产品瑕疵。In addition, the texture of the product surface is a unique feature of the surface of the object. The texture can be used to study the spatial dependence of the image and analyze the surface characteristics of the object. At present, texture detection algorithms include Tamura texture analysis method, Gabor wavelet texture feature extraction method, LBP texture statistical feature extraction and other methods. In the course of the experiment, by constructing the GABOR filter, multiple experiments were carried out on the surface image of the defective product to verify. The left image of the original image was processed by the GABOR filter to obtain the gabor image. From the image, the texture similarity of the product is extremely high , product imperfections cannot be identified through texture analysis of images.
发明内容Contents of the invention
针对上述存在的问题,本发明提供一种基于图像处理技术的产品表面瑕疵识别方法,能够快速识别出产品表面瑕疵点,而对达到产品质量要求表面光滑的产品不生成误判现象。In view of the above existing problems, the present invention provides a product surface defect recognition method based on image processing technology, which can quickly identify product surface defects without causing misjudgment of products that meet product quality requirements and have a smooth surface.
实现本发明目的的技术解决方案为:The technical solution that realizes the object of the present invention is:
一种基于图像处理技术的产品表面瑕疵识别方法,其特征在于,包括以下步骤:A product surface defect recognition method based on image processing technology, characterized in that it comprises the following steps:
步骤1:在产品流水线上设置产品检测点,利用高清摄像机对监测点处的产品进行拍摄,获得产品的图像;Step 1: Set product inspection points on the product assembly line, use high-definition cameras to shoot products at the monitoring points, and obtain product images;
步骤2:基于得到的产品图像,对图片进行灰度操作得到灰度图像;Step 2: Based on the obtained product image, perform a grayscale operation on the image to obtain a grayscale image;
步骤3:针对灰度图像利用瑕疵点识别算法计算并输出瑕疵点面积和图像上的中心点坐标;Step 3: Calculate and output the area of the defect point and the coordinates of the center point on the image using the defect point recognition algorithm for the grayscale image;
步骤4:根据输出值触发激光打标机,对产品进行激光打标签,标识出不合格字样。Step 4: Trigger the laser marking machine according to the output value, carry out laser marking on the product, and mark the unqualified words.
进一步地,步骤3所述的瑕疵点识别算法的具体操作步骤包括:Further, the specific operation steps of the blemish point identification algorithm described in step 3 include:
步骤31:对输入的灰度图像进行归一量化处理;Step 31: Perform normalized quantization processing on the input grayscale image;
步骤32:设置高斯滤波器尺度大小,利用高斯滤波器进行高斯卷积操作,对归一量化处理后的图像进行降噪处理;Step 32: Set the scale of the Gaussian filter, use the Gaussian filter to perform a Gaussian convolution operation, and perform noise reduction processing on the normalized quantized image;
步骤33:对降噪后的不同尺度图像做二值化操作,像素大于设置的获取图像像素角点的阈值minThreshold时,获取图像像素角点,过滤掉图像中非瑕疵点的像素值;Step 33: Perform binarization operations on the images of different scales after noise reduction, and when the pixel is greater than the set threshold minThreshold for obtaining image pixel corners, obtain the image pixel corners, and filter out the pixel values of non-defective points in the image;
步骤34:对得到的多个处理后的二值化图片,利用OpenCV的库函数findContours()计算得到多个连通域,并计算每一个连通域的中心坐标和半径;Step 34: For the multiple processed binarized pictures obtained, use the library function findContours () of OpenCV to calculate multiple connected domains, and calculate the center coordinates and radius of each connected domain;
步骤35:根据步骤34得到的中心坐标和半径,若像素叠加或连接,则全部放在一起构成一个大的连通域,最终在像素级别上划分出多个连通区域;Step 35: According to the center coordinates and radius obtained in step 34, if the pixels are superimposed or connected, all of them are put together to form a large connected domain, and finally multiple connected regions are divided at the pixel level;
步骤36:判断两个连通区域边缘点之间的距离,判断是否这两个连通区域归为一个group,若是,则作为一个块,否则视为分离的连通区域;Step 36: Determine the distance between the edge points of two connected regions, and judge whether the two connected regions are classified into a group, and if so, they are regarded as a block, otherwise they are regarded as separate connected regions;
步骤37:计算所述每个块大小,对于值大于设置的阈值时,则将该块特征视为产品瑕疵点。Step 37: Calculate the size of each block, and if the value is greater than the set threshold, the feature of the block is regarded as a product defect point.
进一步地,所述高斯滤波器尺度值设置为5。Further, the Gaussian filter scale value is set to 5.
本方法与现有技术相比,具有以下有益效果:Compared with the prior art, this method has the following beneficial effects:
本发明提出的基于图像处理技术的产品表面瑕疵识别方法,通过本发明中提出的瑕疵点识别算法,能够很好地识别出瑕疵点个数,达到准确无误,解决工业生产中检验汽车配件是否合格问题,避免人工检测花费时间长,检错误率高,从而提高工业生产效率,节约成本,并适于推广到工厂流水线产品检测上。The product surface defect recognition method based on image processing technology proposed by the present invention, through the defect point recognition algorithm proposed in the present invention, can identify the number of defect points well, achieve accuracy, and solve the problem of checking whether auto parts are qualified in industrial production The problem is to avoid the long time spent on manual inspection and the high detection error rate, thereby improving industrial production efficiency and saving costs, and is suitable for promotion to factory assembly line product inspection.
附图说明Description of drawings
图1为本发明中瑕疵点识别算法处理流程示意图;Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of the processing flow of the defect point identification algorithm in the present invention;
图2为本发明中产品表面纹理处理效果;Fig. 2 is product surface texture treatment effect among the present invention;
图3为本发明中特征值检测算法实验结果比较图;Fig. 3 is a comparative figure of eigenvalue detection algorithm experimental results among the present invention;
图4(a)-(b)为本发明实施例中样品1处理后的效果图;Fig. 4 (a)-(b) is the effect figure after sample 1 processing in the embodiment of the present invention;
图5(a)-(b)为本发明实施例中样品2处理后的效果图。Figure 5(a)-(b) are the effect diagrams of sample 2 in the embodiment of the present invention after treatment.
具体实施方式Detailed ways
为了使本领域的普通技术人员能更好的理解本发明的技术方案,下面结合附图和实施例对本发明的技术方案做进一步的描述。In order to enable those skilled in the art to better understand the technical solution of the present invention, the technical solution of the present invention will be further described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and embodiments.
本发明提出的一种基于图像处理技术的产品表面瑕疵识别方法,其操作步骤包括:A product surface flaw recognition method based on image processing technology proposed by the present invention, its operation steps include:
一种基于图像处理技术的产品表面瑕疵识别方法,包括以下步骤:A product surface defect recognition method based on image processing technology, comprising the following steps:
步骤1:在产品流水线上设置产品检测点,根据流水线速度,设定相机采集样本间隔时间并利用高清摄像机对监测点处的产品进行拍摄,获得产品的图像;Step 1: Set product inspection points on the product assembly line, set the camera sampling interval time according to the assembly line speed, and use high-definition cameras to shoot products at the monitoring points to obtain product images;
步骤2:基于得到的产品图像,将其存入计算机中,并对图片进行灰度操作得到灰度图像;Step 2: Based on the obtained product image, store it in the computer, and perform a grayscale operation on the image to obtain a grayscale image;
步骤3:针对灰度图像利用瑕疵点识别算法计算并输出瑕疵点面积和图像上的中心点坐标;Step 3: Calculate and output the area of the defect point and the coordinates of the center point on the image using the defect point recognition algorithm for the grayscale image;
步骤4:根据输出值触发激光打标机,对产品进行激光打标签,标识出不合格字样。Step 4: Trigger the laser marking machine according to the output value, carry out laser marking on the product, and mark the unqualified words.
优选地,参考附图1可以看出,所述瑕疵点识别算法的操作步骤包括:Preferably, referring to accompanying drawing 1, it can be seen that the operation steps of the blemish point identification algorithm include:
步骤31:对输入的灰度图像进行归一量化处理,处理后的灰度图像特征具有对平移、旋转、缩放等仿射变换具有不变特性;Step 31: Perform normalization and quantization processing on the input grayscale image, and the features of the processed grayscale image are invariant to affine transformations such as translation, rotation, and scaling;
步骤32:设置高斯滤波器尺度大小,利用高斯滤波器进行高斯卷积操作,对归一量化处理后的图像进行降噪处理;Step 32: Set the scale of the Gaussian filter, use the Gaussian filter to perform a Gaussian convolution operation, and perform noise reduction processing on the normalized quantized image;
步骤33:对降噪后的不同尺度图像做多次二值化操作,当像素大于所设置的图像像素角点(特征值)的阈值minThreshold时,获取图像像素角点(特征值);Step 33: Perform multiple binarization operations on the images of different scales after noise reduction, and when the pixel is greater than the set threshold minThreshold of the image pixel corner (eigenvalue), obtain the image pixel corner (eigenvalue);
优选地,minThreshold的值设置为0.0001;Preferably, the value of minThreshold is set to 0.0001;
步骤34:对处理后的二值化图片,使用findContours函数方法生成多个连通域,并计算每一个连通域的中心;Step 34: For the processed binarized image, use the findContours function method to generate multiple connected domains, and calculate the center of each connected domain;
所述的findContours函数是用于识别目标的轮廓的函数方法,其是OpenCV的库函数,通过设置该库函数的参数,得到多个连通域;该findContours函数的原型为findContours(image,contours,hierarchy,mode,method,offset=Point()),本申请中各参数的输入为:Described findContours function is the function method that is used to identify the outline of target, and it is the library function of OpenCV, by setting the parameter of this library function, obtains a plurality of connected domains; The prototype of this findContours function is findContours(image, contours, hierarchy ,mode,method,offset=Point()), the input of each parameter in this application is:
image:输入的是处理过的二值化图像;image: The input is the processed binarized image;
contours:是Point点构成的点的集合的向量,每一组Point点集就是一个轮廓,有多少轮廓,向量contours就有多少元素;Contours: It is a vector of a set of points composed of Point points. Each set of Point points is a contour. As many contours as there are, there are as many elements in the vector contours;
hierarchy:向量的元素和轮廓向量contours内的元素是一一对应的,默认值-1;hierarchy: There is a one-to-one correspondence between the elements of the vector and the elements in the contour vector contours, the default value is -1;
mode:为轮廓的检索模式,其可选值为:CV_RETR_EXTERNAL、CV_RETR_LIST、CV_RETR_CCOMP、CV_RETR_TREE,本申请中该参数设置为CV_RETR_EXTERNAL;mode: is the retrieval mode of the outline, and its optional values are: CV_RETR_EXTERNAL, CV_RETR_LIST, CV_RETR_CCOMP, CV_RETR_TREE, and this parameter is set to CV_RETR_EXTERNAL in this application;
method:用于定义轮廓的近似方法,其可选取值为:CV_CHAIN_APPROX_NONE、CV_CHAIN_APPROX_SIMPLE、CV_CHAIN_APPROX_TC89_L1、CV_CHAIN_APPROX_TC89_KCOS,本申请中该参数设置为CV_CHAIN_APPROX_NONE;method: the approximation method used to define the profile, which can be selected as: CV_CHAIN_APPROX_NONE, CV_CHAIN_APPROX_SIMPLE, CV_CHAIN_APPROX_TC89_L1, CV_CHAIN_APPROX_TC89_KCOS, this parameter is set to CV_CHAIN_APPROX_NONE in this application;
point:所有的轮廓信息相对于原始图像对应点的偏移量,相当于在每一个检测出的轮廓点上加上该偏移量,并且Point还可以是负值;point: The offset of all contour information relative to the corresponding point of the original image, which is equivalent to adding the offset to each detected contour point, and Point can also be a negative value;
步骤35:步骤34中经过多次二值化操作后得到的二值化图像中,有值的则认为像素连通,可以构成一个像素连通区域,每个区域都有一个中心坐标和半径,根据该中心坐标和半径,若像素叠加或连接则全部放在一起构成一个大的连通区域,最终在像素级别上划分出多个连通区域;Step 35: Among the binarized images obtained after multiple binarization operations in step 34, those with values are considered to be connected pixels, which can form a connected region of pixels, each region has a center coordinate and radius, according to the Center coordinates and radius, if the pixels are superimposed or connected, they will all be put together to form a large connected area, and finally multiple connected areas will be divided at the pixel level;
经步骤35处理后,瑕疵点在像素级别上由多个连通像素构成;After being processed in step 35, the defect point is composed of a plurality of connected pixels at the pixel level;
步骤36:在图像坐标上,判断两个连通区域边缘点之间的距离,如果最近距离小于minDist(指识别出的瑕疵点轮廓上的最近距离),则认为其连续,由此判断这两个连通区域是否归为一个group,若是,则作为一个块,否则视为分离的连通区域;Step 36: On the image coordinates, judge the distance between the edge points of two connected regions. If the shortest distance is less than minDist (referring to the shortest distance on the contour of the identified defect point), it is considered continuous, and thus judge the two Whether the connected area is classified as a group, if so, it is regarded as a block, otherwise it is regarded as a separate connected area;
步骤37:计算所述每个块大小,对于值大于设置的阈值threshold时,则将该块特征视为产品瑕疵点,在本申请中阈值threshold的值为1280。Step 37: Calculate the size of each block. If the value is greater than the set threshold threshold, the block feature is regarded as a product defect point. In this application, the value of the threshold threshold is 1280.
实施例Example
1、实验环境1. Experimental environment
操作系统:WIN 10;开发平台:Python3.8+Opencv+Jupyternotebook;Operating system: WIN 10; development platform: Python3.8+Opencv+Jupyternotebook;
CPU:四核Core(TM)_i7、GeForce RTX2060SUPER。CPU: Quad-core Core(TM)_i7, GeForce RTX2060SUPER.
2、性能分析与对比效果2. Performance analysis and comparative effect
参照技术方案中的步骤1-4进行实验,通过结果比较该发明算法和局部特征识别算法、纹理提取算法。在提取瑕疵点特征方面,局部特征识别算法提取特征值过多,如表1所示,会把一些非产品瑕疵点也作为特征提取出。再结合参考附图3,图上的彩色小圈或者点就是识别出来的特征值,从图上可以看出,从当前一些主流的局部特征值提取算法的实验结果看,其提取瑕疵点特征方面,局部特征识别算法提取特征值过多,无法正确识别瑕疵点。由于产品上的瑕疵点纹理与背景纹理极相似,纹理算法提取瑕疵点特征十分困难,无法识别出产品瑕疵点,如图2所示。Conduct experiments with reference to steps 1-4 in the technical solution, and compare the inventive algorithm with the local feature recognition algorithm and texture extraction algorithm through the results. In terms of extracting defect point features, the local feature recognition algorithm extracts too many feature values. As shown in Table 1, some non-product defect points will also be extracted as features. Combined with reference to Figure 3, the small colored circles or points on the figure are the identified eigenvalues. It can be seen from the figure that from the experimental results of some current mainstream local eigenvalue extraction algorithms, the characteristics of the extracted defect points , the local feature recognition algorithm extracts too many feature values, and cannot correctly identify defect points. Because the texture of the defect point on the product is very similar to the background texture, it is very difficult for the texture algorithm to extract the feature of the defect point, and it is impossible to identify the defect point of the product, as shown in Figure 2.
表1:该发明算法与特征值算法提取特征点比较Table 1: Comparison of the inventive algorithm and the eigenvalue algorithm for extracting feature points
表1中的样本1是一张分辨率665×1037,24位真彩色,大小92.9K的摄像机采集图片,如附图4(a)所示。经过处理后,得到附图4(b)的效果,通过计算机程序标注,图片中红色圆圈为产品的瑕疵点。Sample 1 in Table 1 is a picture captured by a camera with a resolution of 665×1037, 24-bit true color, and a size of 92.9K, as shown in Figure 4(a). After processing, the effect of Figure 4(b) is obtained, marked by a computer program, and the red circle in the picture is the defect point of the product.
样本2是一张分辨率4032×3024,24位真彩色,大小1.16M的摄像机采集图片,如附图5(a)所示。经过该发明算法处理后,得到附图5(b)的效果。通过计算机程序标注,图片中红色圆圈为产品的瑕疵点。Sample 2 is a picture captured by a camera with a resolution of 4032×3024, 24-bit true color, and a size of 1.16M, as shown in Figure 5(a). After being processed by the inventive algorithm, the effect of Fig. 5(b) is obtained. Marked by computer program, the red circle in the picture is the defect point of the product.
本说明书中未作详细描述的内容属于本领域专业技术人员公知的现有技术。尽管参照前述实施例对本发明专利进行了详细的说明,对于本领域的技术人员来说,其依然可以对前述各实施例所记载的技术方案进行修改,或者对其中部分技术特征进行等同替换,凡在本发明的精神和原则之内,所作的任何修改、等同替换、改进等,均应包含在本发明的保护范围之内。The content not described in detail in this specification belongs to the prior art known to those skilled in the art. Although the patent of the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the aforementioned embodiments, those skilled in the art can still modify the technical solutions described in the aforementioned embodiments, or perform equivalent replacements for some of the technical features. Within the spirit and principles of the present invention, any modifications, equivalent replacements, improvements, etc., shall be included within the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (2)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202110386182.0A CN113516619B (en) | 2021-04-09 | 2021-04-09 | Product surface flaw identification method based on image processing technology |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202110386182.0A CN113516619B (en) | 2021-04-09 | 2021-04-09 | Product surface flaw identification method based on image processing technology |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN113516619A CN113516619A (en) | 2021-10-19 |
CN113516619B true CN113516619B (en) | 2023-03-17 |
Family
ID=78062565
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202110386182.0A Active CN113516619B (en) | 2021-04-09 | 2021-04-09 | Product surface flaw identification method based on image processing technology |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN113516619B (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN114119565A (en) * | 2021-11-30 | 2022-03-01 | 上海交通大学 | A method and device for judging the quality of recycled plastic variegated dots |
CN114486903B (en) * | 2021-12-06 | 2024-05-14 | 浙江大学台州研究院 | A grayscale adaptive coil detection system, device and algorithm |
CN114689591A (en) * | 2021-12-06 | 2022-07-01 | 浙江大学台州研究院 | Coiled material detection device, system and detection method based on line scanning camera |
CN116630325B (en) * | 2023-07-25 | 2023-10-13 | 苏州赫芯科技有限公司 | Method, equipment and storage medium for detecting UV glue based on circuit board |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104240252A (en) * | 2014-09-22 | 2014-12-24 | 电子科技大学 | Detecting Algorithm for cracks of surface of high-temperature billet of machine vision bar |
JP2019200775A (en) * | 2018-05-10 | 2019-11-21 | 国立大学法人岩手大学 | Surface defect inspection device and surface defect inspection method |
Family Cites Families (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP4562126B2 (en) * | 2004-09-29 | 2010-10-13 | 大日本スクリーン製造株式会社 | Defect detection apparatus and defect detection method |
JP5238465B2 (en) * | 2008-11-25 | 2013-07-17 | 株式会社東芝 | Pattern shape evaluation method and pattern shape evaluation apparatus using the same |
CN106683099A (en) * | 2016-11-17 | 2017-05-17 | 南京邮电大学 | Product surface defect detection method |
JP6658711B2 (en) * | 2017-10-25 | 2020-03-04 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | Surface defect detection method and surface defect detection device |
CN108154510A (en) * | 2018-01-17 | 2018-06-12 | 深圳市亿图视觉自动化技术有限公司 | Method for detecting surface defects of products, device and computer readable storage medium |
CN108596880A (en) * | 2018-04-08 | 2018-09-28 | 东南大学 | Weld defect feature extraction based on image procossing and welding quality analysis method |
CN108760747B (en) * | 2018-04-28 | 2019-12-10 | 浙江大学 | A visual inspection method for surface defects of 3D printing models |
CN109738450B (en) * | 2019-01-09 | 2021-06-29 | 合肥联宝信息技术有限公司 | Method and device for detecting notebook keyboard |
CN109949291A (en) * | 2019-03-19 | 2019-06-28 | 苏州润智和智能科技有限公司 | A kind of defect inspection method of Cast Aluminum Auto-parts Abroad radioscopic image |
CN110503633A (en) * | 2019-07-29 | 2019-11-26 | 西安理工大学 | A method for surface defect detection of applique ceramic discs based on image difference |
CN110473201A (en) * | 2019-09-10 | 2019-11-19 | 江南大学 | A kind of automatic testing method and device of disc surface defect |
CN110672620B (en) * | 2019-10-08 | 2022-08-26 | 英特尔产品(成都)有限公司 | Chip defect detection method and system |
CN111325728B (en) * | 2020-02-19 | 2023-05-30 | 南方科技大学 | Product defect detection method, device, equipment and storage medium |
-
2021
- 2021-04-09 CN CN202110386182.0A patent/CN113516619B/en active Active
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104240252A (en) * | 2014-09-22 | 2014-12-24 | 电子科技大学 | Detecting Algorithm for cracks of surface of high-temperature billet of machine vision bar |
JP2019200775A (en) * | 2018-05-10 | 2019-11-21 | 国立大学法人岩手大学 | Surface defect inspection device and surface defect inspection method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN113516619A (en) | 2021-10-19 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN113516619B (en) | Product surface flaw identification method based on image processing technology | |
CN111292305B (en) | An improved YOLO-V3 metal processing surface defect detection method | |
CN108562589B (en) | Method for detecting surface defects of magnetic circuit material | |
CN108074231B (en) | A method for surface defect detection of magnetic sheet based on convolutional neural network | |
WO2024002187A1 (en) | Defect detection method, defect detection device, and storage medium | |
CN111383209A (en) | An unsupervised flaw detection method based on fully convolutional autoencoder network | |
CN107093175B (en) | A kind of power battery welding quality detection method | |
CN108827969A (en) | Metal parts surface defects detection and recognition methods and device | |
CN111815555A (en) | Adversarial neural network combined with local binary image detection method and device for metal additive manufacturing | |
CN111652853A (en) | A detection method of magnetic particle flaw detection based on deep convolutional neural network | |
CN108257171A (en) | Car radar assembling aperture detection method based on light vision | |
CN116485764B (en) | Structural surface defect identification method, system, terminal and medium | |
Fernández-Isla et al. | Automated visual inspection of ship hull surfaces using the wavelet transform | |
CN115995056A (en) | A method for automatic identification of bridge defects based on deep learning | |
CN107016394B (en) | Cross fiber feature point matching method | |
CN108647706A (en) | Object recognition classification and defect detection method based on machine vision | |
CN111968082A (en) | Product packaging defect detection and identification method based on machine vision | |
CN111415339B (en) | Image defect detection method for complex texture industrial product | |
CN116978834A (en) | Intelligent monitoring and early warning system for wafer production | |
Sanghadiya et al. | Surface defect detection in a tile using digital image processing: Analysis and evaluation | |
CN117094975A (en) | Method and device for detecting surface defects of steel and electronic equipment | |
Ghosh et al. | Counterfeit IC detection by image texture analysis | |
CN116580006A (en) | Bottled product labeling quality detection method based on machine vision | |
CN114926635B (en) | Target segmentation method in multi-focus image combined with deep learning method | |
CN115393290A (en) | Edge defect detection method, device and equipment |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |