CN113515106A - Industrial process multi-dimensional fault-tolerant predictive control method - Google Patents
Industrial process multi-dimensional fault-tolerant predictive control method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN113515106A CN113515106A CN202110438773.8A CN202110438773A CN113515106A CN 113515106 A CN113515106 A CN 113515106A CN 202110438773 A CN202110438773 A CN 202110438773A CN 113515106 A CN113515106 A CN 113515106A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- batch
- time
- model
- prediction
- establishing
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 47
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 19
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 18
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims description 17
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000011217 control strategy Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000010339 dilation Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000012804 iterative process Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000003252 repetitive effect Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000010923 batch production Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000009776 industrial production Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002427 irreversible effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
- G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
- G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
- G05B23/0218—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults
- G05B23/0243—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults model based detection method, e.g. first-principles knowledge model
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/20—Pc systems
- G05B2219/24—Pc safety
- G05B2219/24065—Real time diagnostics
Abstract
The invention discloses a multidimensional fault-tolerant predictive control method for an industrial process, which comprises the following steps of 1, establishing an equivalent multi-time-lag novel error model aiming at an intermittent process with time lag; step 2, on the basis of the novel error model, establishing a 2D-Roesser state space model based on a multi-step prediction idea and giving performance index representation; step 3, establishing a closed-loop control system of the 2D-Roesser state space model, and establishing a sufficient condition that the system has invariant set characteristics; step 4, designing a prediction controller and selecting a performance index function which is resistant to external interference and has terminal constraint based on the prediction models in the steps 1 and 3 along the time and batch directions, and providing sufficient conditions that the terminal constraint set of the prediction model is an invariant set; and 5, constructing an optimization algorithm aiming at the selected performance index function to obtain expected control performance along the time and batch directions. The invention can well make up the defects of the traditional fault-tolerant control and has advantages in the aspects of controller design and calculation.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of control of industrial processes, in particular to a multidimensional fault-tolerant predictive control method for an industrial process.
Background
With the rapid development of science and technology, industrial production gradually presents the characteristics of small scale, multiple varieties, high added value and the like, and the intermittent process draws attention of people again. At present, batch production technology has been widely applied in various fields of manufacturing industry, pharmacy, metal synthesis and the like. As the operating processes and flows of industrial production become more and more complex, the probability of system failure increases. Meanwhile, a time lag phenomenon is ubiquitous in industrial processes. The existence of factors such as faults and time lag gradually becomes an obstacle to the stable and efficient operation of the intermittent process. Faults are classified as sensor faults, actuator faults, and other component faults of the system. Of all failures, actuator failures are most common in industrial production. The existence of actuator faults can reduce the operation precision of the system, damage the control performance of the system and even influence the production efficiency. The existence of the time lag can cause the response speed of the system to be delayed and the tracking performance to be deteriorated, and even influence the stability of the system. Therefore, under the dual effects of faults and time lag, an effective and feasible control method is found to ensure stable and efficient operation of the control process, and the method has important significance for industrial production.
In order to solve the problem of faults, the fault-tolerant control technology of the intermittent process is widely applied, but the current technical level mainly adopts one dimension, and the one-dimensional method only considers the influence of time and specific industrial production. In addition, in actual production, there are factors such as actuator failure, drift and system external interference, and the control performance of the system is greatly affected. The intermittent process has two-dimensional characteristics, and the fault of the current batch has high possibility to influence the next batch and even a plurality of future batches. Coupled with the existence of time lags during the batch process, it is clear that the difficulty of controller design is increased. It becomes necessary to find new optimal control methods for batch processes under the dual influence of faults and time lags.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a multidimensional fault-tolerant predictive control method for an industrial process, aiming at an intermittent process with multiple time lags, interference and actuator faults, the control law can be updated in real time, the tracking performance and the anti-interference performance of the control method in the batch process are improved, the control performance of the system is ensured to be optimal, and the efficient production is realized.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention provides the following technical scheme: a multi-dimensional fault-tolerant predictive control method for industrial process includes
and 5, constructing an optimization algorithm aiming at the selected performance index function to obtain expected control performance along the time and batch directions.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the beneficial effects that: by applying the concept of dimension expansion, a V function containing corresponding time lag is designed aiming at each time lag, so that the design can well make up the defects of the traditional fault-tolerant control, and the method has advantages in the aspects of design and calculation of the controller. Especially, the system has the characteristics of simple design, small calculated amount and the like for a small time lag system.
Aiming at the intermittent process with multiple time lags, interference and actuator faults, the invention combines the iterative learning control law, selects the Lyapunov-Razumikhin function (LRF), and provides the intermittent process 2D prediction fault-tolerant control method with time lags and disturbance by utilizing the model prediction fault-tolerant control method, so that the control law can be updated in real time, the tracking performance and the anti-interference performance of the control method in the batch process are improved, the control performance of the system is ensured to be optimal, and the efficient production is realized.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a graph of the performance of different R-traces under repeated disturbances in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a graph of the input trace of different batches under repeated perturbation according to the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a graph of the output traces of different batches under repeated perturbation in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 4 is a graph of the update law of different batches under repeated perturbation according to the present invention.
FIG. 5 is a graph of tracking error for different batches under repeated perturbations in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 6 is a graph of different R tracking performance under non-repetitive disturbances in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a graph of the input trace of different batches under the non-repetitive perturbation of the present invention.
FIG. 8 is a graph of the output traces of different batches under the non-repetitive disturbance of the present invention.
FIG. 9 is a graph of the update law trajectories for different batches under non-repetitive disturbance according to the present invention.
FIG. 10 is a plot of tracking error traces for different batches under non-repetitive perturbations in accordance with the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
The invention provides a technical scheme that: a multi-dimensional fault-tolerant predictive control method for industrial process includes
and 5, constructing an optimization algorithm aiming at the selected performance index function to obtain expected control performance along the time and batch directions.
1.1 construct the following model of an intermittent process with time lag
Wherein t and k represent the time of run and the batch, respectively; x (t + s, k) is belonged to Rn,y(t,k)∈Rl,uF(t,k)∈RmRespectively representing state variables with time lag, output variables and input variables of the system at the kth batch at the time t;representing an adaptive constant matrix x0,kDenotes the initial state of the k-th batch, dmRepresents a maximum value of the state skew; wherein I represents an adaptive identity matrix, and ω (t, k) represents an external unknown disturbance; considering a partial failure fault α, the system input signal is u (t, k), so this fault type can be expressed as follows:
uF(t,k)=αu(t,k) (2)
definition of
α=diag[α 1,α 2,...,α m] (6)
α=diag[a1,α2,...,αm] (7)
Thus, an intermittent process with time lag and actuator failure can be described as follows:
1.2 building an equivalent 2D closed-loop state space model
1.2.1 introduction of an iterative learning control strategy
Aiming at the intermittent process of the formula (1), an iterative learning control law can be designed by using an iterative learning control strategy:
wherein u (t, 0) represents the initial value of the iterative process, typically set to zero; r (t, k) is belonged to RmRepresenting an iterative learning updating law to be designed; obviously, the design of the iterative learning controller u (t, k) can be converted into the design of the update law r (t, k) so that the control output y (t, k) can track the upper reference output y as much as possibler(t);
1.2.2 defining tracking error variables
e(t,k)=y(t,k)-yr(t) (10)
Defining an error function along the batch direction
δf(t,k)=f(t,k)-f(t,k-1) (11)
Wherein, f can represent system state variable, output variable and external disturbance;
according to the formulae (9) to (11), can be obtained
1.2.3 extended equivalent 2D-Roesser model the following was obtained
2D closed-loop state space model based on 2D-Roesser model can be obtained
1.2.4 design update law as follows:
2.1 establishing 2D state space model based on 2D-Roesser model under prediction mode as follows
2.2 selecting MPC as the limited optimization performance index
Where l (t + i | t, k + j | k) and VT(x (t + N | t, k + N | k) is referred to as the phase cost and the terminal cost, respectively.
Wherein Q and R are weight matrices, and τ is a positive scalar;
2.3 optimization problem, which can be described in the form
Wherein the content of the first and second substances, is a terminal constraint set, interference and control input satisfied
Representing that the RPI set omega is used at any time of t and r is used as a corresponding updating law; let LRF:definition ofWhereinThe corresponding update law is
3.2 set Ωπ,tIs a set of RPIs, consider the system (16), for a given matrixIf a symmetric positive definite matrix existsThe matrix Y belongs to R(n+l)×(n+l),G∈R(n+l)×(n+l),Z∈R(n+l)×(n+l)Positive scalar quantitySo that the following matrix inequality is resolvable:
3.2.1 according to the dilation theory-GTX-1G≤X-GT-G, left multiplying (23) by diag { G-T,G-T...,G-TMultiplying the transpose of the I, I, I, I } right to obtain
3.2.2 formula (25) can be converted to the following form:
whereinUsing schur theorem on (26) and left-multiplying the resulting inequalityAnd right-multiplying its transpose, the following equation can be obtained:
3.3 proof for equation (24):
ThenBy applying the shur complement theorem, the control input constraint condition (24) can be obtained.
The specific method of the step 4 is
4.1 sufficient conditions for the prediction model to be a invariant set are given as follows
Terminal constraint set of any batch at time tTwo conditions should be met, first omegaπ,tIs a set of RPIs, followed by the presence of alpha1,α2∈κ∞And positive definite functionSo that
4.2 equation (30) can be obtained by solving eigenvalues of a positive definite matrix,
wherein λ ismin:=min{ρmin(P)},λmax:=min{ρmax(P)},ρmin(. and ρ)max(. cndot.) represents the minimum and maximum eigenvalues, respectively, and is thus certified;
4.3 the main work focuses on the demonstration of conditional equation (31), as follows:
considering the system (18), if (23), (24) hold, the following matrix inequality can be solved
Is a set RPI, whereinFor (32) left-multiplying diag { G-T G-T … G-TRight-hand multiplying the transpose to obtain a matrix inequality equivalent to
let X-1=ξ-1P, formula (33) can be written as
Apply schur complement theory to (34), then take the leftRight-multiplying by its transpose to obtain
Then the following equation holds
The concrete method of the step 5 is
5.1 terminal constraint set due to the aforementioned RPI PropertiesThe following conditions should be satisfied
τ can be optimized taking into account (32) the conditions of the terminal constraint set; taking the new variable η τ ξ, so η is minimized; then (32) can be written as
5.2 the terminal constraint set based on the prediction model is a sufficient condition of an invariant set, and the steps of designing an optimization control algorithm are as follows:
b: if t is 0, for any batch k, solve for
So that the (23), (24), (38), (39),the optimum lambda is obtained and is recorded as lambda*Continuing to step c;
otherwise t ≠ 0, for any batch k, using lambda*Instead of λ, thereby solving
So that (23), (24), (38), (39), continues to step c;
The invention is explained in more detail below with reference to the figures and examples:
the invention uses a nonlinear continuous stirred tank as a control object to carry out simulation, and comprises the following two differential equations
Wherein, CAIs the concentration of A during the irreversible reaction (A → B); t is the temperature of the reactor; t isjIs the temperature of the cooling stream. As the variable to be operated on,k0=2.53×1019(1/mol min),E/R=13,500(K),T(0)=25(℃),CA(0)=0.9(mol/L)。
for system discrimination, a 26 ℃ transfer test was performed with a sampling interval of 1. From this, a transfer model can be derived
Assuming the system is second order, a least squares method with a transfer input and a transfer response is used.
x1(t,k)=y(t,k),x2(t, k) — 0.0013y (t-1, k) +0.0425u (t-1, k). The transfer function can be converted into the following state space model:
after discretization, the time lag extension model corresponding to the state space model is as follows:
in this simulation example, the actuator fault we consider is a partial failure fault (α ═ 0.8). Through simulation experiments, the tracking performance, input, output, updating law and tracking error control effect of the system under the control method are obtained, and the effectiveness of the proposed two-dimensional iterative learning prediction fault-tolerant controller is verified.
In a practical industrial process, interference is inevitable. The invention respectively considers the robustness of repeated interference and non-repeated interference and carries out simulation.
Referring to FIGS. 1-5, the repetitive interference ω (t, k) e R2,ω(t,k)=cos(t)×[0.001 0.002]T. In this case, ω (t, k) depends only on t, i.e., ω (t, k) ═ ω (t).
Referring to fig. 6-10, simulation studies were conducted on the robustness of non-repetitive interference. Wherein the non-repetitive interference omega (t, k) epsilon R2,ω(t,k)=(0.4Δ1 0.4Δ2)T,Δ1∈[-1 1],Δ2∈[-1 1]ω (t, k) depends on t and k.
Claims (6)
1. A multi-dimensional fault-tolerant predictive control method for an industrial process is characterized by comprising the following steps: comprises that
Step 1, aiming at an intermittent process with time lag, establishing an equivalent multi-time-lag novel error model;
step 2, on the basis of the novel error model, establishing a 2D-Roesser state space model based on a multi-step prediction idea and giving performance index representation;
step 3, establishing a closed-loop control system of the 2D-Roesser state space model, and establishing a sufficient condition that the system has invariant set characteristics;
step 4, designing a prediction controller and selecting a performance index function which is resistant to external interference and has terminal constraint based on the prediction models in the steps 1 and 3 along the time and batch directions, and providing sufficient conditions that the terminal constraint set of the prediction model is an invariant set;
and 5, constructing an optimization algorithm aiming at the selected performance index function to obtain expected control performance along the time and batch directions.
2. The industrial process multi-dimensional fault-tolerant predictive control method of claim 1, further comprising: step 1 is concretely
1.1 construct the following model of an intermittent process with time lag
Wherein t and k represent the time of run and the batch, respectively; x (t + s, k) is belonged to Rn,y(t,k)∈Rl,uF(t,k)∈RmRespectively representing state variables with time lag, output variables and input variables of the system at the kth batch at the time t;representing an adaptive constant matrix x0,kDenotes the initial state of the k-th batch, dmRepresents a maximum value of the state skew; wherein I represents an adaptive identity matrix, and ω (t, k) represents an external unknown disturbance; considering a partial failure fault α, the system input signal is u (t, k), so this fault type can be expressed as follows:
uF(t,k)=αu(t,k) (2)
definition of
α=diag[α 1,α 2,...,α m] (6)
α=diag[α1,α2,...,αm] (7)
Thus, an intermittent process with time lag and actuator failure can be described as follows:
1.2 building an equivalent 2D closed-loop state space model
1.2.1 introduction of an iterative learning control strategy
Aiming at the intermittent process of the formula (1), an iterative learning control law can be designed by using an iterative learning control strategy:
wherein u (t, 0) represents the initial value of the iterative process, typically set to zero; r (t, k) is belonged to RmRepresenting an iterative learning updating law to be designed; obviously, the design of the iterative learning controller u (t, k) can be converted into the design of the update law r (t, k) so that the control output y (t, k) can track the upper reference output y as much as possibler(t);
1.2.2 defining tracking error variables
e(t,k)=y(t,k)-yr(t) (10)
Defining an error function along the batch direction
δf(t,k)=f(t,k)-f(t,k-1) (11)
Wherein, f can represent system state variable, output variable and external disturbance;
according to the formulae (9) to (11), can be obtained
Order to
1.2.3 extended equivalent 2D-Roesser model the following was obtained
2D closed-loop state space model based on 2D-Roesser model can be obtained
1.2.4 design update law as follows:
3. the industrial process multi-dimensional fault-tolerant predictive control method of claim 2, characterized in that: step 2 is concretely
2.1 establishing 2D state space model based on 2D-Roesser model under prediction mode as follows
2.2 selecting MPC as the limited optimization performance index
Where l (t + i | t, k + j | k) and VT(x (t + N | t, k + N | k) is called the phase cost and the terminal cost, respectively
Wherein Q and R are weight matrices, and τ is a positive scalar;
2.3 optimization problem, which can be described in the form
Wherein the content of the first and second substances, is a terminal constraint set, interference and control input satisfied
4. the method of claim 3, wherein: step 3 is specifically
Representing that the RPI set omega is used at any time of t and r is used as a corresponding updating law; let LRF:definition ofWhereinThe corresponding update law is
3.2 set Ωπ,tIs a set of RPIs, consider the system (16), for a given matrixIf a symmetric positive definite matrix existsThe matrix Y belongs to R(n+l)×(n+l),G∈R(n+l)×(n+l),Z∈R(n +l)×(n+l)Positive scalar quantitySo that the following matrix inequality is resolvable:
3.2.1 according to the dilation theory-GTX-1G≤X-GT-G, left multiplying (23) by diag { G-T,G-T,...,G-TMultiplying the transpose of the I, I, I, I } right to obtain
3.2.2 formula (25) can be converted to the following form:
whereinUsing schur theorem on (26) and left-multiplying the resulting inequalityAnd right-multiplying its transpose, the following equation can be obtained:
3.3 proof for equation (24):
5. The method of claim 4, wherein: the specific method of the step 4 is
4.1, giving sufficient conditions that the terminal constraint set of the prediction model is an invariant set, which are as follows:
terminal constraint set of any batch at time tTwo conditions should be met, first omegaπ,tIs a set of RPIs, followed by the presence of alpha1,α2∈κ∞And positive definite functionSo that
4.2 equation (30) can be obtained by solving eigenvalues of a positive definite matrix,
wherein λ ismin:=min{ρmin(P)},λmax:=min{ρmax(P)},ρmin(. and ρ)max(. cndot.) represents the minimum and maximum eigenvalues, respectively, and is thus certified;
4.3 the main work focuses on the demonstration of conditional equation (31), as follows:
considering the system (18), if (23), (24) hold, the following matrix inequality can be solved
Is a set RPI, whereinFor (32) left-multiplying diag { G-T G-T … G-TRight-hand multiplying the transpose to obtain a matrix inequality equivalent to
let X-1=ξ-1P, formula (33) can be written as
Apply schur complement theory to (34), then take the leftRight-multiplying by its transpose to obtain
Then the following equation holds
6. The industrial process multi-dimensional fault-tolerant predictive control method of claim 5, wherein: the concrete method of the step 5 is
5.1 terminal constraint set due to the aforementioned RPI PropertiesThe following conditions should be satisfied
The following optimization problem is considered,
τ can be optimized taking into account (32) the conditions of the terminal constraint set; taking the new variable η τ ξ, so η is minimized; then (32) can be written as
5.2 the terminal constraint set based on the prediction model is a sufficient condition of an invariant set, and the steps of designing an optimization control algorithm are as follows:
b: if t is 0, for any batch k, solve for
So that the (23), (24), (38), (39),the optimum lambda is obtained and is recorded as lambda*Continuing to step c;
otherwise t ≠ 0, for any batch k, using lambda*Instead of λ, thereby solving
So that (23), (24), (38), (39), continues to step c;
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202110438773.8A CN113515106A (en) | 2021-04-22 | 2021-04-22 | Industrial process multi-dimensional fault-tolerant predictive control method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202110438773.8A CN113515106A (en) | 2021-04-22 | 2021-04-22 | Industrial process multi-dimensional fault-tolerant predictive control method |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN113515106A true CN113515106A (en) | 2021-10-19 |
Family
ID=78061518
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202110438773.8A Pending CN113515106A (en) | 2021-04-22 | 2021-04-22 | Industrial process multi-dimensional fault-tolerant predictive control method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN113515106A (en) |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20150115860A1 (en) * | 2013-10-25 | 2015-04-30 | Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. | Motion-Control System for Performing Different Tasks |
KR20170039512A (en) * | 2015-10-01 | 2017-04-11 | 한밭대학교 산학협력단 | Control apparatus using direct discrete time design approach and method thereof |
WO2018215910A1 (en) * | 2017-05-22 | 2018-11-29 | Oara Cristian | Method for automated vehicle platooning |
CN109541940A (en) * | 2018-11-13 | 2019-03-29 | 海南师范大学 | Mix fault tolerant control method based on 2D model multistage batch process constrained predictive |
CN110412873A (en) * | 2019-07-25 | 2019-11-05 | 辽宁石油化工大学 | Time lag batch process 2D iterative learning forecast Control Algorithm based on end conswtraint |
CN110750049A (en) * | 2019-09-23 | 2020-02-04 | 海南师范大学 | Intermittent process 2D prediction fault-tolerant control method with time lag and disturbance |
CN111505937A (en) * | 2020-03-04 | 2020-08-07 | 海南师范大学 | Industrial process improved model prediction fault-tolerant control method under multiple modes |
-
2021
- 2021-04-22 CN CN202110438773.8A patent/CN113515106A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20150115860A1 (en) * | 2013-10-25 | 2015-04-30 | Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. | Motion-Control System for Performing Different Tasks |
KR20170039512A (en) * | 2015-10-01 | 2017-04-11 | 한밭대학교 산학협력단 | Control apparatus using direct discrete time design approach and method thereof |
WO2018215910A1 (en) * | 2017-05-22 | 2018-11-29 | Oara Cristian | Method for automated vehicle platooning |
CN109541940A (en) * | 2018-11-13 | 2019-03-29 | 海南师范大学 | Mix fault tolerant control method based on 2D model multistage batch process constrained predictive |
CN110412873A (en) * | 2019-07-25 | 2019-11-05 | 辽宁石油化工大学 | Time lag batch process 2D iterative learning forecast Control Algorithm based on end conswtraint |
CN110750049A (en) * | 2019-09-23 | 2020-02-04 | 海南师范大学 | Intermittent process 2D prediction fault-tolerant control method with time lag and disturbance |
CN111505937A (en) * | 2020-03-04 | 2020-08-07 | 海南师范大学 | Industrial process improved model prediction fault-tolerant control method under multiple modes |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
宋将: "带有状态时滞的间歇过程2D迭代学习预测容错控制", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库 信息科技辑》, no. 01, 15 January 2021 (2021-01-15), pages 140 - 66 * |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Sui et al. | Finite-time adaptive quantized control of stochastic nonlinear systems with input quantization: A broad learning system based identification method | |
Jiang et al. | A review of fuzzy logic and neural network based intelligent control design for discrete-time systems | |
Yi et al. | Event-triggered globalized dual heuristic programming and its application to networked control systems | |
CN110619389A (en) | Load prediction method and system of combined cooling heating and power system based on LSTM-RNN | |
Tavoosi et al. | A review on type-2 fuzzy neural networks for system identification | |
Yu et al. | Fuzzy iterative learning control-based design of fault tolerant guaranteed cost controller for nonlinear batch processes | |
Zhang et al. | Data‐driven design of two‐degree‐of‐freedom controllers using reinforcement learning techniques | |
Yang et al. | Global stabilization of discrete-time linear systems subject to input saturation and time delay | |
Luo et al. | Tuning PID control parameters on hydraulic servo control system based on differential evolution algorithm | |
Sun et al. | Process knowledge-based random forest regression for model predictive control on a nonlinear production process with multiple working conditions | |
CN110750049B (en) | Intermittent process 2D prediction fault-tolerant control method with time lag and disturbance | |
Nie et al. | Robust finite‐time control and estimation for uncertain time‐delayed switched systems by observer‐based sliding mode technique | |
Zhu et al. | Fuzzy adaptive control of delayed high order nonlinear systems | |
Wu et al. | New results on robust exponential stability for discrete recurrent neural networks with time-varying delays | |
CN113515106A (en) | Industrial process multi-dimensional fault-tolerant predictive control method | |
CN110412873A (en) | Time lag batch process 2D iterative learning forecast Control Algorithm based on end conswtraint | |
Jia et al. | Correlation analysis algorithm-based multiple-input single-output Wiener model with output noise | |
Liu et al. | Receding Horizon Actor–Critic Learning Control for Nonlinear Time-Delay Systems With Unknown Dynamics | |
Ma et al. | Event-based switching iterative learning model predictive control for batch processes with randomly varying trial lengths | |
Wang et al. | Generalized predictive control based on particle swarm optimization for linear/nonlinear process with constraints | |
Kim et al. | A model predictive functional control based on proportional-integral-derivative (PID) and proportional-integral-proportional-derivative (PIPD) using extended non-minimal state space: Application to a molten carbonate fuel cell process | |
Sun et al. | Robust reliable H∞ optimization control for uncertain discrete‐time Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy systems with time‐varying delay | |
Wang et al. | A nonlinear adaptive predictive control method based on WT-BiLSTM | |
Niu et al. | A two-time scale decentralized model predictive controller based on input and output model | |
Liu et al. | Extended dissipative fault-tolerant control for fuzzy Markov jump nonlinear systems with randomly occurring gain variations |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |