CN113470438B - Logic time sequence deduction simulation-based conflict-free flight trajectory generation method - Google Patents

Logic time sequence deduction simulation-based conflict-free flight trajectory generation method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN113470438B
CN113470438B CN202110732673.6A CN202110732673A CN113470438B CN 113470438 B CN113470438 B CN 113470438B CN 202110732673 A CN202110732673 A CN 202110732673A CN 113470438 B CN113470438 B CN 113470438B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
flight
index
conflict
route
sequence
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN202110732673.6A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN113470438A (en
Inventor
姚幸廷
付胜豪
董斌
谢晓妤
朱姚结
童明
丁辉
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
CETC 28 Research Institute
Original Assignee
CETC 28 Research Institute
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by CETC 28 Research Institute filed Critical CETC 28 Research Institute
Priority to CN202110732673.6A priority Critical patent/CN113470438B/en
Publication of CN113470438A publication Critical patent/CN113470438A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN113470438B publication Critical patent/CN113470438B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08GTRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G5/00Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
    • G08G5/003Flight plan management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/10Geometric CAD
    • G06F30/13Architectural design, e.g. computer-aided architectural design [CAAD] related to design of buildings, bridges, landscapes, production plants or roads
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/10Geometric CAD
    • G06F30/18Network design, e.g. design based on topological or interconnect aspects of utility systems, piping, heating ventilation air conditioning [HVAC] or cabling
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08GTRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G5/00Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
    • G08G5/003Flight plan management
    • G08G5/0039Modification of a flight plan
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2111/00Details relating to CAD techniques
    • G06F2111/02CAD in a network environment, e.g. collaborative CAD or distributed simulation

Abstract

The invention provides a conflict-free flight trajectory generation method based on logic time sequence deduction simulation, which comprises the following steps of: step1, generating an initial flight plan; step2, deduction prediction and conflict recognition are carried out based on the logic time sequence; and 3, generating a corrected conflict-free track based on conflict dynamic mediation control of a preset strategy. The invention generates a relatively real flight plan based on the airspace operation element model, and improves the conflict detection speed by using a space grid method.

Description

Logic time sequence deduction simulation-based conflict-free flight trajectory generation method
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technology of air traffic control systems, and particularly relates to a conflict-free flight trajectory generation method based on logic time sequence deduction simulation.
Background
The conflict-free track generation technology is an important component of system construction in the field of air traffic management, plays an important role, can assist a controller to carry out conflict deployment on a next-day flight plan to generate a conflict-free, safe and reliable deployment scheme, can simulate the operation condition of the plan through a conflict-free track generation process, assists the controller to deduce and make a decision on the operation situation, is a core operation concept of future aviation operation proposed by the international civil aviation organization on the basis of track operation, and is the basis of the operation concept, so that the conflict-free track generation technology has an extremely important significance on the research of the conflict-free track generation technology. The conventional conflict-free track generation is mostly based on the flight performance of aircrafts, the tracks of multiple aircrafts are presumed on different sections, and then conflict detection is carried out on a flight plan according to a safety interval.
Disclosure of Invention
The purpose of the invention is as follows: the invention starts from the actual application requirement, uses a quick conflict identification method and a flexible conflict mediation strategy to flexibly and quickly generate the conflict-free flight flow. In addition, in the flight flow generation process, the existing airspace resources and rules are fully considered, so that the generated flight flow is guaranteed to meet the objective operation rule, and reliable data support is provided for subsequent simulation deduction and planning verification.
The invention specifically provides a conflict-free flight trajectory generation method based on logic time sequence deduction simulation, which comprises the following steps: the method comprises the following steps:
step1, generating an initial flight plan;
step2, deduction prediction and conflict recognition are carried out based on the logic time sequence;
and 3, generating a modified conflict-free track based on conflict dynamic mediation control of a preset strategy.
The step1 comprises the following steps:
step1.1, performing networked modeling on airspace operation element information;
step1.2, generating flight flow flight routes according to flight take-off and landing relation distribution;
and step1.3, finishing the configuration of the initial flight planning height layer according to the flight direction of the flight flow airline.
In step1.1, the airspace operation element information networking modeling specifically comprises the following models:
an airport model which comprises an airport code and longitude and latitude and is used in a plan is generated according to the requirement;
the runway model comprises a runway code, an affiliated airport and a runway angle, the runway model used in the plan is generated according to the requirement, and the incidence relation between the runway model and the affiliated airport model is established;
the waypoint model comprises waypoint codes and longitude and latitude, and is used in the plan according to the requirement;
the high-altitude route model comprises high-altitude route codes and route point forming points, generates a high-altitude route model used in a plan according to requirements, and establishes an incidence relation with all the route point models forming the route;
the method comprises the following steps that an approach and departure route model comprises an approach and departure route code, a forming waypoint, an associated airport and an associated runway, the approach and departure route model used in a plan is generated according to requirements, and an association relation is established among all the waypoint models, the associated airport model and the associated runway model forming a route;
let the number of flights to be generated be numallInitializing the flight index findexIf f is 0index<numallRepeatedly executing the step1.2 to the step 1.3; otherwise, the initial flight plan generation is completed.
Step1.2 comprises:
step 1.2.1, acquiring a flight number, and assigning an ADEP (advanced airport) and an AARR (airport landing) for a flight corresponding to the flight number;
step 1.2.2, obtaining all runway sets RW associated with ADEP airport in the model established in step1.1dep={DRW1,DRW2,...DRWnRandomly selecting the DRW of the jth runwayjAs a take-off runway, j takes the value of 1-n, and n takes the value of a natural number;
step 1.2.3, obtaining and associating airport ADEP and runway DRWjAssociated off-site course set FLdep={DFL1,DFL2,...DFLm},DFLmRepresenting the mth off-site route, wherein m is a natural number;
step 1.2.4, traverse FLdepExtracting the ending route point of each off-site route to form an off-site route ending point set Pdep={DP1,DP2,...DPm},DPmRepresenting an ending waypoint of the mth off-site route;
step 1.2.5, obtaining all runways RW associated with AARR airport in model established in step1.1arr={ARW1,ARW2,...ARWpRandomly selecting the kth runway ARWkAs landing runways, the value of k is 1-p, and the value of p is a natural number;
step 1.2.6, get and machineCourt AARR and runway ARWkAssociated set of incoming routes FLarr={AFL1,AFL2,...AFLq},AFLqShow and runway ARWkThe q-th approach route is correlated;
step 1.2.7, traverse FLarrExtracting the starting route point of each route to form an approach route starting point set Parr={AP1,AP2,...APq};APqShow and runway ARWkStarting waypoints of the associated qth approach route;
step 1.2.8, adding PdepAnd ParrAll the elements in (1) are combined one by one to obtain a course starting end point set SPda={(DP1,AP1),(DP1,AP2),...(DPm,APq)};
Step 1.2.9, for SPdaEach group element (DP) ofa,APb) Respectively finding out DP in the model established in step1.1aAnd APbThe associated high altitude routes are compared to obtain the simultaneous association DPaAnd APbHigh altitude route set FLair={F1,F2,...FrAnd calculates FLairAll routes in DPaAnd APbSelecting the route with the minimum distance among the route distances dis between the two points, thereby expanding the SPdaObtaining SPda={(DP1,AP1,Fc,dis),(DP1,AP2,Fd,dis),...(DPm,APq,Fe,dis)},FrIndicating the r-th simultaneous association DPaAnd APbC, d and e are 1-r;
step 1.2.10, traverse SPdaObtaining a combination of start and end points (DP) of which dis is the smallest routef,APg,Fh,dis);
Step 1.2.11, combining to obtain a generated flight path, namely: take-off airport ADEP, take-off runway DRWjDFL of off-site routefHigh altitude route FhAFL of approach routegLanding runway ARWkLanding airport AARR;
and step 1.2.12, randomly generating the takeoff time of the flight in a specified time period, and generating all arrival time of the flight according to the generated flight route and the set flight speed.
Step1.3 comprises: and (3) judging the direction of the flight route generated in the step1.2, and randomly assigning a planned height layer of the flight route according to the rules of east, west and west.
The step2 comprises the following steps:
step 2.1, establishing a flight circulating logic prediction sequence: the predicted time tfo is set, and a sequence POS (POS) is established for each flight0,pos1,...postfo) In which posi={Xi,Yi,heighti,flagiRepresents the position information of the flight with the cycle number i, including the projection coordinate Xi,YiHeight of heightiAnd using a parameter flagiMarking the validity of each second of data in the sequence, and marking the data as invalid data when the deduction prediction time exceeds the flight operation time;
step 2.2, establishing a flight position dynamic distribution management mechanism based on the spatial grid;
step 2.3, logic timing advance and prediction
And 2.4, rapidly identifying the conflict based on the grids.
Step 2.2 comprises:
step 2.2.1, setting the size length of the space grid according to the size a b of the planned airspace and the distance limit;
step 2.2.2, starting from the upper left corner of the planned airspace, dividing the airspace into n × m square spatial grids, wherein the intermediate parameter n is a/length +1, and the intermediate parameter m is b/length + 1;
step 2.2.3, numbering the grids in sequence from left to right, top to bottom, Sarea=(Area0,Area1,Area2,...Arean*m),SareaIs a collection of all spatial grids, AreaiA grid with the number i;
step 2.2.4, build prediction time series AF ═ (flip) in all grids0,Flist1,...Flisttfo) Wherein FlistiRepresenting a flight number list existing in each space grid when the serial number is i, wherein the value of i is 1-tfo;
step 2.3 comprises:
step 2.3.1, initialize logic sequence tcurIf at time t ═ 0curWhen all flights finish flying, logic time sequence propulsion is finished, and conflict-free track generation is finished; otherwise, executing step 2.3.2;
step 2.3.2, use of xhcur=tcurCalculating to obtain the current sequence number xh by percent (tfo +1)curRepresents the current timing tcurA sequence number in a circular queue; and calculate xhlastxh cur1, if xh cur0, then xhlast=tfo,xhlastRepresenting the sequence number at the last time and after the tfo time sequence, go to step 2.3.3;
step 2.3.3, deleting flight cycle logic prediction sequence and spatial grid distribution sequence at sequence number xhlastStep 2.3.4 is performed;
step 2.3.4, traversing all flights in the flight circulating logic prediction sequence, moving the flights which have ended at the current moment out of the sequence, and distributing the sequence S in a space gridareaRemoving the flight which is finished at the current moment, and executing the step 2.3.5;
step 2.3.5, the number of flights in the flight cycle logic prediction sequence is numcurInitializing flight index flindex=0;
Step 2.3.6, if flindex<numcurStep 2.3.7 is executed; otherwise, go to step 2.3.13;
step 2.3.7, calculate tcur+ tfo time flight flindexIs updated to the flight flindexIn a cyclic logic prediction sequence POS
Figure BDA0003140359850000051
Finding t according to the projected coordinates of the flightcur+ tfo space grid Area where flight is locatedjUpdating the grid
Figure BDA0003140359850000052
Add the current flight number, go to step 2.3.8;
step 2.3.8, for AreajThe grid performs conflict recognition in step 2.4, and if no conflict exists, the fl is orderedindex=flindex+1, go to step 2.3.6; otherwise, go to step 2.3.9;
in step 2.3.9, the number of conflict mediation policies available in step3 is SL, and a policy index SL is initializedindexWhen 0, go to step 2.3.10;
step 2.3.10, if slindex< SL, go to step 11; otherwise, flindexFailure to reconcile, record fl in the logindexAnd is in FcurMiddle deletion flindexLet fl beindex=flindex+1, go to step 2.3.6;
step 2.3.11, use policy slindexFor flight flindexAdjusting the flight path to the adjusted flindexAt tcurTo tcurThe track between + tfo times is calculated and updated to flindexIn a cyclic logical prediction sequence of POS and spatial grid sequence SareaStep 2.3.12 is performed;
step 2.3.12, at SareaTo flindexPerforming conflict identification at each time sequence, and enabling sl to be in conflict if conflict existsindex=slindex+1, go to step 2.3.10, otherwise, record flindexAdjusted course line, command flindex=flindex+1, go to step 2.3.6;
step 2.3.13, traverse all flights, find out all the flights which just take off in the current time sequence, the number of the flights which just take off is numnewInitializing the index fnew of the takeoff flight at the current momentindexStep 2.3.14 is performed, 0;
step 2.3.14, if fnewindex<numnewThen go to step 2.3.15; otherwise, let tcur=tcur+1, go to step 2.3.1;
step 2.3.15, calculate from tcurTo tcur+ tfo time flight fnewindexUpdating the projection coordinates and the height information into a flight circulating logic prediction sequence and a spatial grid distribution sequence;
step 2.3.16, performing conflict identification on the updated spatial grid distribution sequence, and if no conflict exists, performing fnewindexAdding the flight to the flight cycle logic prediction sequence, let fnewindex=fnewindex+1, go to step 2.3.14; otherwise, go to step 2.3.17;
step 2.3.17, for fnewindexConflict mediation is carried out, and if all the regulation strategies cannot mediate conflict, fnew is carried outindexFlight uses a delay-after-takeoff strategy, and if conflict is successfully reconciled, fnew is usedindexAdding the flight to the flight cycle logic prediction sequence, let fnewindex=fnewindex+1, step 2.3.14 is performed.
Step 2.4 includes:
step 2.4.1, judging the number of the grid according to the projection coordinate of the current flight;
step 2.4.2, extracting flight numbers recorded in all grids within k x k range taking the grid as the center at the current moment;
step 2.4.3, respectively calculating the distance between the flight corresponding to the flight number obtained in the step 2.4.2 and the current flight;
step 2.4.4, if the distance between the flight X and the current flight is less than the conflict distance, calculating the height difference between the flight X and the current flight;
step 2.4.5, if the altitude difference is smaller than the conflict altitude difference, judging that the current flight has conflict; if all in-range flights do not have a conflict, then there is no conflict for the current flight.
The step3 comprises the following steps:
step 3.1, adjusting the strategy of the height layer at the current moment:
after a conflict is detected, adjusting the height layer of the conflict flight at the current moment, adjusting the heights of the flight paths after the conflict flight to be in the adjusted height layer, and moving up or down n height layers based on the current height layer during adjustment, wherein at most 2n height layer adjustment strategies are provided in total;
step 3.2, the current time speed adjustment strategy is as follows:
after the conflict is detected, adjusting the speed of the conflict flight at the current moment, and adjusting the speeds after the conflict flight to be the adjusted speeds; during adjustment, based on the current speed, increasing or decreasing (n x 10) m/s, and at most 2n speed adjustment strategies exist in total;
step 3.3, takeoff time delay strategy
When the flight which is just added has conflict and the conflict can not be regulated after all the height and speed regulation strategies are used, a delay-after-takeoff strategy is used, wherein the delay-after-takeoff strategy is to delay the planning time of the current flight by 1 second and delay the flight which is just added;
step 3.4, finishing flight track correction based on a conflict condition strategy:
if the height layer adjustment is carried out, the climbing rate is changed to be a set value (the set value is determined according to the machine type) at the current moment, the climbing rate is set to be 0 after the height layer is adjusted to the target height layer, and the planned heights after the adjustment are all adjusted to be the height of the target height layer;
if the speed adjustment is performed, the acceleration is changed to a set value (the set value is determined according to the model) at the current moment, the acceleration is set to 0 after the target speed is adjusted, and all the planned speeds after the adjustment are adjusted to the target speed.
The invention generates a relatively real flight plan based on the airspace operation element model, and improves the conflict detection speed by using a space grid method.
The invention has the following beneficial effects:
the invention models the real airport and the air route, can randomly generate simulation flights of the appointed take-off and landing airport in batch, and is used for planning flight plans, thereby reducing the dependency on real flight plan data;
according to the flight schedule, the invention can generate a conflict-free flight track by adjusting the height layer, the speed and the takeoff time in the flight process;
the invention uses logic time sequence deduction simulation to deduct the original flight plan splendid second by second aiming at the appointed predicted time, thereby improving the safety performance of the generated track in time.
The invention uses the space grid method to detect the conflict, ensures that the generated track does not conflict in the set safety distance, and improves the safety performance of the generated track in space.
Drawings
The foregoing and/or other advantages of the invention will become further apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Fig. 1 is a flight flow generation flowchart.
Fig. 2 is a logic timing deduction prediction flow chart.
FIG. 3 is a flow chart of spatial grid method collision recognition.
Fig. 4 is a diagram of fast collision determination based on a spatial grid.
FIG. 5 is a conflict dynamic mediation flow diagram.
Detailed Description
The invention provides a conflict-free flight trajectory generation method based on logic time sequence deduction simulation, which comprises the following steps.
Step 1: initial flight plan generation
To generate an initial flight plan, the structure modeling is firstly carried out on the operating elements in the airspace, and then the take-off airport ADEP, the landing airport AARR and the take-off time t of each flight are determineddepThree elements. And finishing the generation of flight routes of the flight flows according to the generated elements, and configuring the height layers according to rules. The flow of the initial flight flow generation is shown in fig. 1.
And performing the spatial domain operation element for structural modeling by executing Step1.1. The elements comprise an airport, a runway, waypoints, a high-altitude route and an approach and departure route, and the incidence relation among the models needs to be determined while the models are established.
And after the element model is built, starting to generate an initial flight plan. Let the number of flights to be generated be numallInitializing the flight index findexIf f is 0index<numallRepeating the steps of Step1.2 and Step1.3; otherwise, the initial flight plan generation is completed.
Step1.1 airspace operation element information networking modeling
In order to generate the flight routes combined with the existing airspace operation element resources and rules, the invention carries out networked modeling on the airspace operation elements contained in the flight plan. The airspace operation elements contained in the patent include the following:
the airport model comprises parameters such as airport codes, longitude and latitude and the like, and is used in a plan according to requirements;
the runway model comprises parameters such as runway codes, an affiliated airport, runway angles and the like, a runway model used in a plan is generated according to requirements, and an incidence relation between the runway model and the affiliated airport model is established;
the waypoint model comprises waypoint codes, longitude and latitude and other parameters, and is used in the plan according to the requirement;
the high-altitude route model comprises parameters such as high-altitude route codes and route point forming points, generates a high-altitude route model used in a plan according to requirements, and establishes an incidence relation with all route point models forming routes;
the approach and departure route model comprises an approach and departure route code, a forming waypoint, an associated airport, an associated runway and other parameters, generates an approach and departure route model used in a plan according to requirements, and establishes an association relation with all the waypoint models, the associated airport model and the associated runway model forming routes.
Step1.2 completes flight flow flight route generation according to flight take-off and landing relation distribution
Based on the networked model of the airspace operation elements, the method can generate flight routes according to the flight take-off and landing relations. The steps of generating flight routes according to the flight take-off and landing relations are as follows:
step 1.2.1, acquiring a flight number, and assigning an ADEP (advanced airport) and an AARR (airport landing) for the flight;
step 1.2.2, all runway RW related to ADEP airport is obtained in element network modeldep={DRW1,DRW2,...DRWnRandomly selecting one DRWjAs a take-off runway;
step 1.2.3, obtaining and associating airport ADEP and runway DRWjAssociated off-site course set FLdep={DFL1,DFL2,...DFLm};
Step 1.2.4, traverse FLdepExtracting the ending route point of each route to form an off-site route ending point set Pdep={DP1,DP2,...DPm};
Step 1.2.5, all runways RW associated with AARR airport are obtained in element network modelarr={ARW1,ARW2,...ARWpRandomly selecting one of the ARWskAs landing runways;
step 1.2.6, obtaining and associating airport AARR and runway ARWkAssociated set of incoming routes FLarr={AFL1,AFL2,...AFLq};
Step 1.2.7, traverse FLarrExtracting the starting route point of each route to form an approach route starting point set Parr={AP1,AP2,...APq};
Step 1.2.8, adding PdepAnd ParrAll the elements in (1) are combined one by one to obtain a course starting end point set SPda={(DP1,AP1),(DP1,AP2),...(DPm,APq)};
Step 1.2.9, for SPdaEach group element (DP) ofa,APb) Respectively finding out DP in element network modelaAnd APbThe associated high altitude routes are compared to obtain the simultaneous association DPaAnd APbHigh altitude flight line FLair={F1,F2,...FrAnd calculates FLairSelecting the route with the minimum distance among the route distances dis of all routes between the corresponding two points, thereby expanding the SPdaObtaining SPda={(DP1,AP1,Fc,dis),(DP1,AP2,Fd,dis),...(DPm,APq,Fe,dis)};
Step 1.2.10, traverse SPdaObtaining a combination of start and end points (DP) of which dis is the smallest routef,APg,Fh,dis);
Step 1.2.11, combining to obtain a generated flight path, namely: take-off airport ADEP, take-off runway DRWjDFL of off-site routefHigh altitude route FhAFL of approach routegLanding runway ARWkLanding airport AARR;
and step 1.2.12, randomly generating the takeoff time of the flight in a specified time period, and generating all arrival time of the flight according to the generated flight route and the set flight speed.
After generating the flight flow flight route based on the flight take-off and landing relationship, Step1.3 is also needed to complete the configuration of the altitude layer.
Step1.3 completes the configuration of the initial flight plan height layer according to the flight direction of the flight flow route
And judging the direction of the flight route generated in Step1.2, and randomly assigning a planned height layer of the route according to the rule of east, west and west. The specific height level allocation rules are shown in table 1.
TABLE 1
Direction Height
Eastward 14900
Facing west 14300
Eastward 13700
Facing west 13100
Eastward 12500
Facing west 12200
Eastward 11900
Facing west 11600
Eastward 11300
Facing west 11000
Eastward 10700
Facing west 10400
Eastward 10100
Facing west 9800
Eastward 9500
Facing west 9200
Eastward 8900
Facing west 8400
Eastward 8100
Facing west 7800
Step 2: deductive prediction and conflict identification based on logic time sequence
In Step1, a specified number of flights are generated according to the flight's take-off and landing relationship and altitude level rules, but there is no guarantee that there is no conflict between the flights. At Step2, using the logical sequences, a derived prediction is made for all flights generated and conflict identification is made for all flights in each sequence. The logic timing based deductive prediction flow is shown in fig. 2.
Step 2.1, establishing flight circulation logic prediction sequence
The predicted time tfo is set. Establishing a sequence POS (POS) for each flight0,pos1,...postfo). Wherein, posi={Xi,Yi,heighti,flagiAnd represents the position information of the flight with the cycle number i, including the projection coordinate XY and height. And flag is used to determine the number of seconds per second in the sequenceAnd marking according to the validity of the data, and when the time exceeds the flight operation time, marking as invalid data.
Step 2.2, establishing flight position dynamic distribution management mechanism based on space grid
The invention carries out conflict prediction aiming at the spatial relationship between flights and sets two standards of horizontal distance and vertical distance. Aiming at the horizontal distance, the method divides the whole airspace by using a space grid method, limits a judgment area and reduces the calculation amount. The dynamic distribution management steps of the flight positions of the spatial grid are as follows:
step 2.2.1, setting the size length of the space grid according to the size of the planned airspace and the distance limit;
step 2.2.2, starting from the upper left corner of the planned airspace, dividing the airspace into n x m spatial grids;
step 2.2.3, numbering the grids in sequence from left to right, top to bottom, Sarea=(Area0,Area1,Area2,...Arean*m);
Step 2.2.4, build prediction time series AF ═ (flip) in all grids0,Flist1,...Flisttfo) Wherein FlistiRepresenting a flight number list existing in the space grid when the serial number is i;
step 2.3 logical timing advance and prediction
In order to predict the generated initial flight plan, a logical time sequence is established in the patent, representing the real time, so as to predict the flight path. Initializing a logic sequence tcurThe overall logic sequence advancing strategy is as follows:
step 2.3.1, if tcurWhen all flights in the time sequence are finished, logic time sequence propulsion is finished, and conflict-free track generation is finished; otherwise, executing step 2.3.2;
step 2.3.2, use of xhcur=tcurCalculating to obtain the current sequence number xh by percent (tfo +1)curRepresents the current timing tcurSequence number in the circular queue. And calculate xhlast=xhcur-1 (if xh)cur0, then xhlastTfo) representing the sequence number at the previous time and after tfo. Step 2.3.3 is executed;
step 2.3.3, deleting flight cycle logic prediction sequence and spatial grid distribution sequence at sequence number xhlastStep 2.3.4 is performed;
step 2.3.4, traversing flight cycle logic prediction sequence FcurAll flights in the system move the flights which have ended at the current moment out of the sequence and distribute the sequence S in the space gridareaRemoving the flight and executing the step 2.3.5;
step 2.3.5, FcurNumber of flights in numcurInitializing flight index flindex=0;
Step 2.3.6, if flindex<numcurStep 2.3.7 is executed; otherwise, go to step 2.3.13;
step 2.3.7, calculate tcur+ tfo time flight flindexThe projection coordinate and the height information of the flight fl are updatedindexIn a cyclic logic prediction sequence POS
Figure BDA0003140359850000121
And finding the space grid Area where the flight is located at the moment according to the projection coordinates of the flightjUpdating the grid
Figure BDA0003140359850000122
Add the current flight number, go to step 2.3.8;
step 2.3.8, for AreajThe grid carries out conflict identification, and if no conflict exists, the fl is orderedindex=flindex+1, go to step 2.3.6; otherwise, go to step 2.3.9;
at step 2.3.9, available conflict mediation policies are SL, and a policy index SL is initializedindexWhen 0, go to step 2.3.10;
step 2.3.10, if slindex< SL, go to step 11; otherwise, flindexFailure to reconcile, record fl in the logindexAnd is in FcurMiddle deletion flindexLet fl beindex=flindex+1, go to step 2.3.6;
step 2.3.11, use policy slindexFor flight flindexAnd adjusting the flight path. For the adjusted flindexAt tcurTo tcurThe track between + tfo times is calculated and updated to flindexIn a cyclic logical prediction sequence of POS and spatial grid sequence SareaStep 2.3.12 is performed;
step 2.3.12, at SareaTo flindexPerforming conflict identification at each time sequence, and enabling sl to be in conflict if conflict existsindex=slindex+1, go to step 2.3.10, otherwise, record flindexAdjusted course line, command flindex=flindex+1, go to step 2.3.6;
step 2.3.13, traverse all flights, find out all the flights which just take off in the current time sequence, the number of the flights which just take off is numnewInitializing the departure flight index fnew at the current timeindexStep 2.3.14 is performed, 0;
step 2.3.14, if fnewindex<numnewThen go to step 2.3.15; otherwise, let tcur=tcur+1, go to step 2.3.1;
step 2.3.15, calculate from tcurTo tcur+ tfo time flight fnewindexUpdating the projection coordinates and the height information into a flight circulating logic prediction sequence and a grid distribution sequence;
step 2.3.16, performing conflict recognition on the updated sequence, and if no conflict exists, then fnew is usedindexAirline joining to FcurIn (1), let fnewindex=fnewindex+1, go to step 2.3.14; otherwise, go to step 2.3.17;
step 2.3.17, for fnewindexConflict mediation is carried out, if all the regulation strategies can not mediate the conflict, a take-off time delay strategy is used for the flight, and if the conflict is successfully mediated, fnew is usedindexAirline joining to FcurIn (1), let fnewindex=fnewindex+1, go to step 2.3.14;
step 2.4 mesh-based collision rapid identification
The invention uses the space grid to rapidly identify the flight conflict. The spatial grid method conflict identification process is shown in fig. 3, and the rapid conflict judgment based on the spatial grid is shown in fig. 4.
The method comprises the following specific steps:
step 2.4.1, judging the number of the grid according to the projection coordinate of the current flight;
step 2.4.2, extracting flight numbers recorded in all grids within a k x k (k value is determined by requirements) range taking the grid as a center at the current moment;
step 2.4.3, respectively calculating the distances between the flights and the current flight;
step 2.4.4, if the distance between a flight and the current flight is less than the conflict distance, calculating the height difference between the flight and the current flight;
step 2.4.5, if the altitude difference is smaller than the conflict altitude difference, judging that the current flight has conflict; if all in-range flights do not have a conflict, then there is no conflict for the current flight.
Step 3: conflict dynamic mediation control based on preset strategy to generate modified conflict-free track
The invention uses a plurality of fixed strategies to adjust the flight routes with conflicts, and the adjustment is repeated until a conflict-free track is generated. The conflict dynamic mediation process is shown in fig. 5.
Step 3.1 current-time height layer adjustment strategy
To reconcile conflicts over the predicted time, the present invention uses a current time-of-day height level adjustment strategy. And after the conflict is detected, adjusting the height level at the current moment, and adjusting the heights of the routes behind the flight to be in the adjusted height level. During adjustment, the height layers are moved upwards or downwards by n height layers based on the current height layer, and the total height layer adjustment strategies are 2n at most.
Step 3.2 current time speed adjustment strategy
To reconcile conflicts within the predicted time, the present invention uses a current time speed adjustment strategy. And after the conflict is detected, adjusting the speed at the current moment, and adjusting the speeds after the flight to be the adjusted speeds. When adjusting, based on the current speed, the speed is increased or decreased by (n x 10) m/s, and the total speed adjusting strategies are 2n at most.
Step 3.3 takeoff time delay strategy
The post-takeoff delay strategy is used when there is a conflict with the flight that just joined and the conflict cannot be reconciled after all altitude and speed adjustment strategies are used. The strategy is to delay the planning time of the current flight by 1 second and delay the flight for processing.
Step 3.4, finishing flight track correction based on conflict condition strategy
If the height layer adjustment is carried out, the climbing rate is changed at the current moment, the climbing rate is set to be 0 after the target height layer is adjusted, and the planned heights after the adjustment are all adjusted to be the height of the target height layer;
if the speed adjustment is carried out, the acceleration is changed at the current moment, the acceleration is set to be 0 after the target speed is adjusted, and the planned speeds after the adjustment are all adjusted to be the target speed.
The present invention is described in further detail below in connection with the operation data of the airway simulation. First, a networked model of airports, runways, waypoints, high-altitude routes, and routes to and from the field is generated using the real data. Using a flight flow generation method to randomly generate 1000 flights between 9:00 and 11:00, wherein the departure and landing airport and the departure time of each flight are randomly set, and the planned height is set according to a rule; setting a horizontal collision distance to be 20km, a vertical collision distance to be 300m, a spatial grid size to be 10km x 10km and prediction time to be 180 s; and after the conflict is detected, the used height layer adjusting strategy is to adjust 1-2 height layers up and down, and the used speed adjusting strategy is to increase and decrease by 10-20 m/s. The above parameters are used to generate a collision-free plan for the flight flow, and partial results are shown in table 2.
TABLE 2
Figure BDA0003140359850000141
Figure BDA0003140359850000151
The invention provides a conflict-free flight trajectory generation method based on logic time sequence deduction simulation, and a plurality of methods and ways for implementing the technical scheme are provided, the above description is only a preferred embodiment of the invention, and it should be noted that, for a person skilled in the art, a plurality of improvements and embellishments can be made without departing from the principle of the invention, and the improvements and embellishments should also be regarded as the protection scope of the invention. All the components not specified in this embodiment can be implemented by the prior art.

Claims (7)

1. A conflict-free flight trajectory generation method based on logic time sequence deduction simulation is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step1, generating an initial flight plan;
step2, deduction prediction and conflict recognition are carried out based on the logic time sequence;
step3, based on the conflict dynamic mediation control of the preset strategy, generating a modified conflict-free track;
the step1 comprises the following steps:
step1.1, performing networked modeling on airspace operation element information;
step1.2, generating flight flow flight routes according to flight take-off and landing relation distribution;
step1.3, finishing the configuration of an initial flight planning height layer according to the flight direction of a flight flow route;
in step1.1, the airspace operation element information networking modeling specifically comprises the following models:
an airport model which comprises an airport code and longitude and latitude and is used in a plan is generated according to the requirement;
the runway model comprises a runway code, an affiliated airport and a runway angle, the runway model used in the plan is generated according to the requirement, and the incidence relation between the runway model and the affiliated airport model is established;
the waypoint model comprises waypoint codes and longitude and latitude, and is used in the plan according to the requirement;
the high-altitude route model comprises high-altitude route codes and route point forming points, generates a high-altitude route model used in a plan according to requirements, and establishes an incidence relation with all the route point models forming the route;
the method comprises the following steps that an approach and departure route model comprises an approach and departure route code, a forming waypoint, an associated airport and an associated runway, the approach and departure route model used in a plan is generated according to requirements, and an association relation is established among all the waypoint models, the associated airport model and the associated runway model forming a route;
let the number of flights to be generated be numallInitializing the flight index findexIf f is 0index<numallRepeatedly executing the step1.2 to the step 1.3; otherwise, the generation of the initial flight plan is finished;
step1.2 comprises:
step 1.2.1, acquiring a flight number, and assigning an ADEP (advanced airport) and an AARR (airport landing) for a flight corresponding to the flight number;
step 1.2.2, obtaining all runway sets RW associated with ADEP airport in the model established in step1.1dep={DRW1,DRW2,...DRWnRandomly selecting the DRW of the jth runwayjAs a take-off runway, j takes the value of 1-n, and n takes the value of a natural number;
step 1.2.3, obtaining and associating airport ADEP and runway DRWjAssociated off-site course set FLdep={DFL1,DFL2,...DFLm},DFLmRepresenting the mth off-site route, wherein m is a natural number;
step 1.2.4, traverse FLdepExtracting the ending route point of each off-site route to form an off-site route ending point set Pdep={DP1,DP2,...DPm},DPmRepresenting an ending waypoint of the mth off-site route;
step 1.2.5, obtaining all runways RW associated with AARR airport in model established in step1.1arr={ARW1,ARW2,...ARWpRandomly selecting the kth runway ARWkAs landing runways, the value of k is 1-p, and the value of p is a natural number;
step 1.2.6, obtaining and associating airport AARR and runway ARWkAssociated set of incoming routes FLarr={AFL1,AFL2,...AFLq},AFLqShow and runway ARWkThe q-th approach route is correlated;
step 1.2.7, traverse FLarrExtracting the starting route point of each route to form an approach route starting point set Parr={AP1,AP2,...APq};APqShow and runway ARWkStarting waypoints of the associated qth approach route;
step 1.2.8, adding PdepAnd ParrAll the elements in (1) are combined one by one to obtain a course starting end point set SPda={(DP1,AP1),(DP1,AP2),...(DPm,APq)};
Step 1.2.9, for SPdaEach group element (DP) ofa,APb) Respectively finding out DP in the model established in step1.1aAnd APbThe associated high-altitude air routes are compared to obtain the simultaneous association DPaAnd APbHigh altitude route set FLair={F1,F2,...FrAnd calculates FLairAll routes in DPaAnd APbSelecting the route with the minimum distance among the route distances dis between the two points, thereby expanding the SPdaObtaining SPda={(DP1,AP1,Fc,dis),(DP1,AP2,Fd,dis),...(DPm,APq,Fe,dis)},FrIndicating the r-th simultaneous association DPaAnd APbC, d and e are 1-r;
step 1.2.10, traverse SPdaObtaining a combination of start and end points (DP) of which dis is the smallest routef,APg,Fh,dis);
Step 1.2.11, combining to obtain a generated flight path, namely: take-off airport ADEP, take-off runway DRWjDFL of off-site routefHigh altitude route FhAFL of approach routegLanding runway ARWkLanding airport AARR;
and step 1.2.12, randomly generating the takeoff time of the flight in a specified time period, and generating all arrival time of the flight according to the generated flight route and the set flight speed.
2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that step1.3 comprises: and (3) judging the direction of the flight route generated in the step1.2, and randomly assigning a planned height layer of the flight route according to the rules of east, west and west.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein step2 comprises:
step 2.1, establishing a flight circulating logic prediction sequence: the predicted time tfo is set, and a sequence POS (POS) is established for each flight0,pos1,...postfo) In which posi={Xi,Yi,heighti,flagiRepresents the position information of the flight with the cycle number i, including the projection coordinate Xi,YiHeight of heightiAnd using a parameter flagiMarking the validity of each second of data in the sequence, and marking the data as invalid data when the deduction prediction time exceeds the flight operation time;
step 2.2, establishing a flight position dynamic distribution management mechanism based on the spatial grid;
step 2.3, logic timing advance and prediction
And 2.4, rapidly identifying the conflict based on the grids.
4. A method according to claim 3, characterised in that step 2.2 comprises:
step 2.2.1, setting the size length of the space grid according to the size a b of the planned airspace and the distance limit;
step 2.2.2, starting from the upper left corner of the planned airspace, dividing the airspace into n × m square spatial grids, wherein the intermediate parameter n is a/length +1, and the intermediate parameter m is b/length + 1;
step 2.2.3, numbering the grids in sequence from left to right, top to bottom, Sarea=(Area0,Area1,Area2,...Arean*m),SareaIs a collection of all spatial grids, AreaiA grid with the number i;
step 2.2.4, build prediction time series AF ═ (flip) in all grids0,Flist1,...Flisttfo) Wherein FlistiRepresenting the flight number list existing in each space grid when the serial number is i, wherein the value of i is 1-tfo.
5. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that step 2.3 comprises:
step 2.3.1, initialize logic sequence tcurIf at time t ═ 0curWhen all flights finish flying, logic time sequence propulsion is finished, and conflict-free track generation is finished; otherwise, executing step 2.3.2;
step 2.3.2, use of xhcur=tcurCalculating to obtain the current sequence number xh by percent (tfo +1)curRepresents the current timing tcurA sequence number in a circular queue; and calculate xhlast=xhcur1, if xhcur0, then xhlast=tfo,xhlastRepresenting the sequence number at the last time and after the tfo time sequence, go to step 2.3.3;
step 2.3.3, deleting flight cycle logic prediction sequence and spatial grid distribution sequence at sequence number xhlastStep 2.3.4 is performed;
step 2.3.4, traversing all flights in the flight circulating logic prediction sequence, moving the flights which are finished at the current moment out of the sequence, and dividing the flights into grids in spaceCloth sequence SareaRemoving the flight which is finished at the current moment, and executing the step 2.3.5;
step 2.3.5, the number of flights in the flight cycle logic prediction sequence is numcurInitializing flight index flindex=0;
Step 2.3.6, if flindex<numcurStep 2.3.7 is executed; otherwise, go to step 2.3.13;
step 2.3.7, calculate tcur+ tfo time flight flindexIs updated to the flight flindexIn a cyclic logic prediction sequence POS
Figure FDA0003551126720000041
Finding t according to the projected coordinates of the flightcur+ tfo space grid Area where flight is locatedjUpdating the grid
Figure FDA0003551126720000042
Add the current flight number, go to step 2.3.8;
step 2.3.8, for AreajThe grid performs conflict recognition in step 2.4, and if no conflict exists, the fl is orderedindex=flindex+1, go to step 2.3.6; otherwise, go to step 2.3.9;
at step 2.3.9, available conflict mediation policies are SL, and a policy index SL is initializedindexWhen equal to 0, go to step 2.3.10;
step 2.3.10, if slindex< SL, go to step 11; otherwise, flindexFailure to reconcile, record fl in the logindexAnd is in FcurMiddle deletion flindexLet fl beindex=flindex+1, go to step 2.3.6;
step 2.3.11, use policy slindexFor flight flindexAdjusting the flight path to the adjusted flindexAt tcurTo tcurThe track between + tfo times is calculated and updated to flindexIn a cyclic logic prediction sequence ofAnd a spatial grid sequence SareaStep 2.3.12 is performed;
step 2.3.12, at SareaMiddle to flindexPerforming conflict identification at each time sequence, and enabling sl to be in conflict if conflict existsindex=slindex+1, go to step 2.3.10, otherwise, record flindexAdjusted course line, command flindex=flindex+1, go to step 2.3.6;
step 2.3.13, traverse all flights, find out all the flights which just take off in the current time sequence, the number of the flights which just take off is numnewInitializing the departure flight index fnew at the current timeindexStep 2.3.14 is performed, 0;
step 2.3.14, if fnewindex<numnewThen go to step 2.3.15; otherwise, let tcur=tcur+1, go to step 2.3.1;
step 2.3.15, calculate from tcurTo tcur+ tfo time flight fnewindexUpdating the projection coordinates and the height information into a flight circulating logic prediction sequence and a spatial grid distribution sequence;
step 2.3.16, performing conflict identification on the updated spatial grid distribution sequence, and if no conflict exists, performing fnewindexAdding the flight to the flight cycle logic prediction sequence, let fnewindex=fnewindex+1, go to step 2.3.14; otherwise, go to step 2.3.17;
step 2.3.17, for fnewindexConflict mediation is carried out, and if all the regulation strategies cannot mediate conflict, fnew is carried outindexFlight uses a delay-after-takeoff strategy, and if conflict is successfully reconciled, fnew is usedindexAdding the flight to the flight cycle logic prediction sequence, let fnewindex=fnewindex+1, step 2.3.14 is performed.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein step 2.4 comprises:
step 2.4.1, judging the number of the grid according to the projection coordinate of the current flight;
step 2.4.2, extracting flight numbers recorded in all grids within k x k range taking the grid as the center at the current moment;
step 2.4.3, respectively calculating the distance between the flight corresponding to the flight number obtained in the step 2.4.2 and the current flight;
step 2.4.4, if the distance between the flight X and the current flight is less than the conflict distance, calculating the height difference between the flight X and the current flight;
step 2.4.5, if the height difference is smaller than the conflict height difference, judging that the current flight has conflict; if all in-range flights do not have a conflict, then there is no conflict for the current flight.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein step3 comprises:
step 3.1, adjusting the strategy of the height layer at the current moment:
after a conflict is detected, adjusting the height layer of the conflict flight at the current moment, adjusting the heights of the flight paths after the conflict flight to be in the adjusted height layer, and moving up or down n height layers based on the current height layer during adjustment, wherein at most 2n height layer adjustment strategies are provided in total;
step 3.2, the current time speed adjustment strategy is as follows:
after the conflict is detected, adjusting the speed of the conflict flight at the current moment, and adjusting the speeds after the conflict flight to be the adjusted speeds; during adjustment, based on the current speed, increasing or decreasing (n x 10) m/s, and at most 2n speed adjustment strategies exist in total;
step 3.3, takeoff time delay strategy
When the flight which is just added has conflict and the conflict cannot be regulated after all height and speed regulation strategies are used, a delay-after-take strategy is used, wherein the delay-after-take strategy is to delay the planning time of the current flight by 1 second and delay the flight which is just added;
step 3.4, finishing flight track correction based on a conflict condition strategy:
if the height layer adjustment is carried out, the climbing rate is changed to be a set value at the current moment, the climbing rate is set to be 0 after the target height layer is adjusted, and the planned heights after the adjustment are all adjusted to be the height of the target height layer;
if the speed adjustment is carried out, the acceleration is changed to be a set value at the current moment, the acceleration is set to be 0 after the target speed is adjusted, and the planned speeds after the adjustment are all adjusted to be the target speed.
CN202110732673.6A 2021-06-30 2021-06-30 Logic time sequence deduction simulation-based conflict-free flight trajectory generation method Active CN113470438B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110732673.6A CN113470438B (en) 2021-06-30 2021-06-30 Logic time sequence deduction simulation-based conflict-free flight trajectory generation method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110732673.6A CN113470438B (en) 2021-06-30 2021-06-30 Logic time sequence deduction simulation-based conflict-free flight trajectory generation method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN113470438A CN113470438A (en) 2021-10-01
CN113470438B true CN113470438B (en) 2022-05-10

Family

ID=77874079

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202110732673.6A Active CN113470438B (en) 2021-06-30 2021-06-30 Logic time sequence deduction simulation-based conflict-free flight trajectory generation method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN113470438B (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115206135B (en) * 2022-06-16 2024-02-13 中国电子科技集团公司第二十八研究所 Aircraft instruction altitude planning method with uncertain climbing rate
CN116030664A (en) * 2023-03-28 2023-04-28 中科星图智慧科技有限公司 Low-altitude flight collision early warning method, device, equipment and medium based on grid

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA2768323A1 (en) * 2011-02-22 2012-08-22 General Electric Company Methods and systems for managing air traffic
EP2667363A1 (en) * 2012-05-25 2013-11-27 The Boeing Company Conflict detection and resolution using predicted aircraft trajectories
CN110502676A (en) * 2019-08-19 2019-11-26 中国电子科技集团公司第二十八研究所 Airdrome scene operation emulation mode and storage medium based on visualization tool modeling
CN111009154A (en) * 2019-10-18 2020-04-14 中国电子科技集团公司第二十八研究所 Terminal area airspace conflict detection and resolution algorithm based on flight flow pre-sequencing
CN111583724A (en) * 2020-05-08 2020-08-25 中国电子科技集团公司第二十八研究所 Pre-tactical phase interval management method for four-dimensional track operation
CN112365745A (en) * 2020-10-23 2021-02-12 中国电子科技集团公司第二十八研究所 Complex airport scene conflict detection and release method based on path dynamic grouping

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA2768323A1 (en) * 2011-02-22 2012-08-22 General Electric Company Methods and systems for managing air traffic
EP2667363A1 (en) * 2012-05-25 2013-11-27 The Boeing Company Conflict detection and resolution using predicted aircraft trajectories
CN110502676A (en) * 2019-08-19 2019-11-26 中国电子科技集团公司第二十八研究所 Airdrome scene operation emulation mode and storage medium based on visualization tool modeling
CN111009154A (en) * 2019-10-18 2020-04-14 中国电子科技集团公司第二十八研究所 Terminal area airspace conflict detection and resolution algorithm based on flight flow pre-sequencing
CN111583724A (en) * 2020-05-08 2020-08-25 中国电子科技集团公司第二十八研究所 Pre-tactical phase interval management method for four-dimensional track operation
CN112365745A (en) * 2020-10-23 2021-02-12 中国电子科技集团公司第二十八研究所 Complex airport scene conflict detection and release method based on path dynamic grouping

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN113470438A (en) 2021-10-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN113470438B (en) Logic time sequence deduction simulation-based conflict-free flight trajectory generation method
Bennell et al. Airport runway scheduling
Liang et al. Conflict-free arrival and departure trajectory planning for parallel runway with advanced point-merge system
Patrón et al. Vertical profile optimization for the Flight Management System CMA-9000 using the golden section search method
JP5473672B2 (en) Maximizing aircraft predictability with a continuous descent approach
CN111583724A (en) Pre-tactical phase interval management method for four-dimensional track operation
CN112927562B (en) Aircraft flight altitude profile calculation method based on specified altitude limit
CN111508280B (en) Mobile time slot aviation control method based on 4D track
CN108961843A (en) A kind of analogue system and method based on track running technology
CN102903263B (en) Method and device used for removing flight conflicts and based on packet mode
CN103578299B (en) A kind of method simulating aircraft process
CN114446094B (en) Space-time conversion method of flight sequencing information
CN111009154B (en) Terminal area airspace conflict detection and resolution algorithm based on flight flow pre-sequencing
CN110084414B (en) Empty pipe anti-collision method based on K-time control deep reinforcement learning
JP2020077387A (en) Optimization of vertical flight path
CN109788618A (en) Lamp light control method, device, system and the medium of vector aircraft ground taxi
CN116307542A (en) Port entering sequencing method based on multi-metering point constraint and electronic terminal
CN110648560A (en) FAB flow management method based on distributed decision model
Korn et al. 4D trajectory management in the extended TMA: coupling AMAN and 4D FMS for optimized approach trajectories
CN114664122A (en) Conflict minimization track planning method considering high-altitude wind uncertainty
CN111047914B (en) FMS track prediction method based on four-dimensional track operation
Çeçen et al. Conflict-free en-route operations with horizontal resolution manoeuvers using a heuristic algorithm
Dhief et al. Speed control strategies for e-aman using holding detection-delay prediction model
CN112669651A (en) Method for correcting and predicting over-point time based on EET value in flight dynamic information
CN110634332B (en) Airport airspace flow control method for small and medium-sized vertical take-off and landing unmanned aerial vehicle

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
CB02 Change of applicant information
CB02 Change of applicant information

Address after: 210000 No.1, Lingshan South Road, Qixia District, Nanjing City, Jiangsu Province

Applicant after: THE 28TH RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF CHINA ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY Group Corp.

Address before: Muxuyuan Street Baixia District of Nanjing city of Jiangsu Province, No. 1 210007

Applicant before: THE 28TH RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF CHINA ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY Group Corp.

GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant