CN113325119B - Pesticide residue sample pretreatment concentration method - Google Patents
Pesticide residue sample pretreatment concentration method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN113325119B CN113325119B CN202110653387.0A CN202110653387A CN113325119B CN 113325119 B CN113325119 B CN 113325119B CN 202110653387 A CN202110653387 A CN 202110653387A CN 113325119 B CN113325119 B CN 113325119B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- sample
- pesticide residue
- water
- acetonitrile
- volume ratio
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N30/00—Investigating or analysing materials by separation into components using adsorption, absorption or similar phenomena or using ion-exchange, e.g. chromatography or field flow fractionation
- G01N30/02—Column chromatography
- G01N30/04—Preparation or injection of sample to be analysed
- G01N30/06—Preparation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N30/00—Investigating or analysing materials by separation into components using adsorption, absorption or similar phenomena or using ion-exchange, e.g. chromatography or field flow fractionation
- G01N30/02—Column chromatography
- G01N30/04—Preparation or injection of sample to be analysed
- G01N30/06—Preparation
- G01N30/08—Preparation using an enricher
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N30/00—Investigating or analysing materials by separation into components using adsorption, absorption or similar phenomena or using ion-exchange, e.g. chromatography or field flow fractionation
- G01N30/02—Column chromatography
- G01N30/88—Integrated analysis systems specially adapted therefor, not covered by a single one of the groups G01N30/04 - G01N30/86
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Other Investigation Or Analysis Of Materials By Electrical Means (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a pretreatment concentration method of a pesticide residue sample, which belongs to the technical field of pesticide detection, and combines a QuEChERS method and a DLLME method to carry out pretreatment concentration on the pesticide residue sample.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of pesticide detection, in particular to a method for pre-treating and concentrating a pesticide residue sample.
Background
The pretreatment of the sample is the most important step in the analysis process of pesticide residues in vegetables and fruits, and the purpose of the pretreatment is not only to separate a target compound from a complex matrix, but also to reduce or eliminate the interference of other components through purification, and simultaneously to concentrate an analyte so as to realize accurate determination of trace residues. Reported sample pretreatment methods for treating vegetables and fruits with multiple pesticide residues comprise a traditional liquid-liquid extraction method (LLE) (rezaeeet al, 2006), a solid-phase extraction method (SPE) (Nagarajuetal, 2007) and the like, the treatment processes of the methods are long in time consumption, low in efficiency and high in labor intensity, a large amount of organic solvents which are toxic and harmful to human bodies and the environment are required to be used, the purification steps of the SPE are complicated, and the cost for purifying small columns is high. Therefore, the development of a new sample pretreatment technology which is time-saving, efficient, low in organic solvent consumption, cheap and environment-friendly has become one of the hotspots of analytical chemistry research. In recent years, various novel sample pretreatment technologies have been developed, such as solid-phase microextraction (SPME) (arturetal, 1990), liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) (Saraf raz-Yazdietal, 2010), etc., which have the greatest advantage of achieving micro-upgrading without using solvents or toxic solvents, and the microextraction technology has been used as an environment-friendly sample pretreatment technology, which meets the current requirements of green chemical development.
Compared with SPME, LPME has the advantages of low cost and high extraction efficiency, and has been widely applied to the fields of environment, food, spice, medicine, biological analysis and the like (Raynie, 2006). LPME can now be divided into, according to the mode of operation: single Droplet Microextraction (SDME), hollow fiber membrane-based liquid phase microextraction (HF-LPME), and dispersion liquid microextraction (DLLME), among others (wangtal, 2010). The method is based on a triple solvent system, an extractant and a dispersing agent are mixed and then are quickly injected into a water sample, an emulsion system (the extractant/the water sample/the dispersing agent) is formed by slight shaking, small particles of the extractant are uniformly dispersed in the water phase at the moment, the small particles of the extractant have a larger contact area with an object to be detected, the object to be detected can be quickly transferred from the water phase to an organic phase and reach two-phase balance, and finally, through centrifugation, tiny particles of the extractant are precipitated at the bottom of a centrifugal tube, and a certain amount of precipitated phase is absorbed and then is directly subjected to sample injection analysis. According to the type of the extracting agent and the different extraction modes, the commonly used dispersion liquid-liquid micro-extraction at the present stage comprises the following steps: conventional dispersion liquid-liquid microextraction, ionic liquid dispersion liquid-liquid microextraction, suspension solidification dispersion liquid-liquid microextraction, temperature control type dispersion liquid-liquid microextraction, ultrasonic emulsification type dispersion liquid-liquid microextraction and other modes. The micro-extraction of dispersion liquid integrates sampling, extraction and concentration, and has the advantages of simple and rapid operation, low cost, small using amount of organic solvent, environmental friendliness, short extraction time, high enrichment efficiency, flexible and various forms and the like, so that the micro-extraction of dispersion liquid becomes a popular sample pretreatment technology (rezaeeet al, 2010). However, the DLLME method has the main disadvantages that the analyzed sample is not purified, impurities of the concentrated organic solvent are also concentrated, particularly when trace components in a complex sample (such as soil) are analyzed, matrix interference is very obvious (Wuetal, 2009), instrument consumables are seriously lost after multiple sample injections, and the maintenance frequency is increased. The application of DLLME methods most focused on the determination of contaminants in simple samples, such as organic species in liquid sample water (khodadoustat et al, 2011) and red wine (carpineteriroetal, 2012) and metals in water (afzalilet al, 2011). The high degree of concentration of DLLME method makes it of great significance for the analysis of small, trace active or harmful components that are difficult to analyze by conventional pretreatment methods, and with the progress of research DLLME technology has now been applied to the analysis of trace components in complex matrix samples, such as the determination of targets in biofluid urine samples (sundeal, 2011), blood (Moinfaretal, 2009), olive oil (Daneshfaretal, 2009), fruit juice (boonhichian maetal, 2012), honey (Cheneta 1, 2009), apples (andrascikovaetatal, 2012), fish meat (Hu & Lieta1, 2009), bananas (Ravelo-Pere, ezeta1, 2009), tea leaves (Moinfareta 1, 2009), and soil (Hu & Fu, 2009). DLLME is also combined with other pretreatment methods, such as measurement of chlorophenols in water samples by DLLME combined with Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) (fattahjet, 2007), measurement of sulfonylurea herbicides in soil (Wuetal 4, 2009) by DLLME combined with Dispersed Solid Phase Extraction (DSPE), measurement of targets in complex matrix samples by DLLME combined with floating organic droplet solidification technology (SPO) (matsadiqet, 2011), DLLME combined with Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE) (Rezaeeeta 1, 2010), and the like. In 2007, zhao et al developed a new method for measuring 6 organophosphorus pesticide residues in solid samples of watermelon and cucumber by acetonitrile extraction, DLLME concentration and GC-ECD analysis for the first time. In 2013, andrascikova et al used QuEChERS-DLLME-GC-MS to determine 19 kinds of pesticide residues in oranges, acetonitrile extract was mixed with carbon tetrachloride during extraction, and injected into pure water for DLLME process, in which the acetonitrile extractant was used as a dispersant in the DLLME process, but both were not applied to the purification process due to the relative simplicity of the matrix.
In 2003, the detection technology of QuEChERS pesticide multi-residue is provided by Anastassiadas and Lehotay, and the method comprises the steps of directly adding a proper amount of dispersing purificant (comprising PSA, C18, GCB and the like) into a sample extracting solution to remove interferents in a matrix, and finally separating a target object from the sample matrix through centrifugation. Compared with SPE, quEChERS is a sample pretreatment technology with relatively small reagent dosage, simplicity, time saving, labor saving, low price, low cost and high efficiency, and the application of QuEChERS is extended to the analysis fields of pesticide and veterinary drug residues, food additives, food quality detection and the like (Norlictal, 2011). The main disadvantage of this method is that it does not have a concentration function, and for relatively low sensitivity instruments, it requires the addition of a concentration step in order to achieve sensitive measurement of trace residues. The methods reported at present for improving the sensitivity are as follows: the sample injection amount is increased, and an expensive large-volume sample injector is required to be configured in the process; the rotary evaporation process is time-consuming and has great pollution to the environment; the nitrogen purging concentration of the sample purification liquid can greatly reduce the recovery rate of compounds with low boiling points and strong volatility, and is time-consuming, and the concentration times of the three methods are low.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a novel sample pretreatment method integrating purification and efficient concentration, solves the problems of high organic solvent consumption, long time consumption, more matrix interference, complicated steps and the like of the conventional method, can quickly detect residual pesticides in a sample, and has the advantages of wide application range, higher accuracy, good sensitivity and excellent recovery rate.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention provides the following scheme:
the invention provides a pretreatment concentration method of a pesticide residue sample, which comprises the following steps: and (3) pretreating and concentrating the pesticide residue sample by combining the QuEChERS method and the DLLME method.
Further, the pretreatment concentration method of the pesticide residue sample comprises the following steps: mixing alkanol/alkanoic acid with N-propyl ethylenediamine and water, performing vortex centrifugation, and taking supernate for later use; mixing the pesticide residue sample and the supernatant, homogenizing, adding an extracting agent, performing vortex for 0.5-1.5min, performing ultrasonic treatment, adding a water removing agent, performing centrifugal treatment after vortex for 2-3min, and filtering the supernatant with a 0.22-micron microporous filter membrane to obtain a first sample; and adding acetonitrile and chloroform into the first sample, uniformly mixing to form a water/acetonitrile/chloroform emulsion system, centrifuging, and collecting a precipitate phase to obtain a pesticide residue sample pretreatment concentrated product. Wherein alkanol/alkanoic acid means alkanol and/or alkanoic acid.
Further, the alkanol is one of n-octanol, n-hexanol and n-decanol.
Further, the alkanoic acid is one of n-octanoic acid, n-hexanoic acid and n-decanoic acid.
Furthermore, in the mixed system of the alkanol/alkanoic acid, the N-propyl ethylene diamine and the water, the alkanol/alkanoic acid accounts for 5-10% by volume, and the N-propyl ethylene diamine accounts for 30-40% by volume.
Further, the water removing agent is MgSO 4 Sodium chloride can also be added as an auxiliary water removal agent, and the mass ratio of the sodium chloride to the auxiliary water removal agent is 2:1. the addition amount of the water removal agent is 0.5-2 wt% of the pesticide residue sample.
Further, the extractant is acetone, ethyl acetate, acetonitrile or acetonitrile containing 1% acetic acid, and the mass volume ratio of the homogenized sample to the extractant is (0.8-1.2) g:1mL.
Furthermore, the ultrasonic power is 400-600W, and the ultrasonic time is 5-10min.
The invention discloses the following technical effects:
the pretreatment concentration method not only obviously reduces the dosage of the organic solvent, is green and environment-friendly, but also shortens the extraction time, eliminates the interference of other impurities and matrixes in the sample, and the pretreated sample can be directly used for GC-TOF/MS analysis and measurement, thereby greatly improving the sensitivity of the sample, being capable of simultaneously detecting the residues of various pesticides, having the advantages of accuracy, rapidness, simplicity, convenience, effectiveness, stability, low cost, good repeatability, high recovery rate and the like, and being suitable for the trace measurement of the pesticide residue sample. Wherein the detection limit (LOD, S/N is more than or equal to 3) and the quantification limit (LOQ, S/N is more than or equal to 10) are respectively 0.1ng/g and 0.3ng/g, and the sensitivity is higher; the relative standard deviation of the precision in the day and the precision in the day is within 7 percent, and the average accuracy is between 92.75 percent and 115.13 percent; the average recovery rate is between 85.17 and 120.86 percent, and the relative standard deviation is within 6 percent.
Detailed Description
Reference will now be made in detail to various exemplary embodiments of the invention, the detailed description should not be construed as limiting the invention but as a more detailed description of certain aspects, features and embodiments of the invention.
It is to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. In addition, for numerical ranges in the present disclosure, it is understood that each intervening value, to the upper and lower limit of that range, is also specifically disclosed. Every smaller range between any stated value or intervening value in a stated range and any other stated or intervening value in that stated range is encompassed within the invention. The upper and lower limits of these smaller ranges may independently be included or excluded in the range.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Although only preferred methods and materials are described herein, any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present invention. All documents mentioned in this specification are incorporated by reference herein for the purpose of disclosing and describing the methods and/or materials associated with the documents. In case of conflict with any incorporated document, the present specification will control.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the specific embodiments of the present disclosure without departing from the scope or spirit of the disclosure. Other embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification. The description and examples are intended to be illustrative only.
As used herein, the terms "comprising," "including," "having," "containing," and the like are open-ended terms that mean including, but not limited to.
The GC-TOF/MS analysis method provided by the embodiment of the invention has the following chromatographic conditions: 6890GC (Agilent Technologies, palo Alto, calif., USA) and Combipal were used TM Automatic sample injector (A)
AnalyticsAG, usa), the system is configured with electronically controlled split-flow non-split-flow injection ports. The chromatographic conditions for the detection were: VF-5 column (30 m. Times.0.32 mm. Times.0.25 μm, agilent Corp.); carrier gas: helium (99.999% pure); constant flow mode, flow rate: 1.0mL/min; and (3) sample introduction mode: no-shunt sample introduction; sample introduction volume:1 mu L of the solution; non-shunting time: 1min; the injection port temperature is 250 ℃; column oven temperature program: the initial temperature is 70 deg.C (keeping for 2 min), the temperature is raised to 190 deg.C at 20 deg.C/min, and then raised to 290 deg.C at 5 deg.C/min (keeping for 5 min); the total running time is 33min; transmission line temperature: 270 ℃.
And mass spectrum part:
GCT-premier time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Waters, manchester, UK) equipped with MassLynx4.0 workstation and NIST5.0 mass spectrum database for data acquisition and analysis and GC-MS control. Mass spectrum parameters: ionization mode: electron impact ionization (EI); bombardment energy: 70eV; ion source temperature: 230 ℃; filament current: 200 muA; detector voltage 2800V; the quality scanning mode is full scanning; the scanning range m/z is 50-600; solvent delay time: and 5min.
Mass spectrometry requires tuning using ammonium Perfluorotrihydrocarbate (PFTBA) as an internal standard, typically using three fragment tuning instruments, consisting essentially of adjustments of 68.9951 and 218.9856 peak intensity ratios, adjustments of the 218.9856 and 501.9711 peak types, to achieve higher sensitivity and resolution (at least greater than 7000 FWHM) for the instrument, and then automatically setting parameters by instrument guidance, where 218.9856 acts as a lock ion to correct the exact mass number of analyte fragments during analysis.
Example 1
Mixing N-octanol, N-propylethylenediamine and water, then whirling for 1min, centrifuging at 8000rpm for 3min, wherein the volume ratio of the N-octanol to the N-propylethylenediamine to the water in a mixing system is 5%, the volume ratio of the N-propylethylenediamine is 35%, and taking supernatant for later use; mixing 15.0g of an apple sample with the supernatant, homogenizing, adding acetone, wherein the mass volume ratio of the homogenized sample to the acetone is 0.8g:1mL, vortex for 0.5min, ultrasonic treatment for 5min at 600w, and adding 0.5wt% of water removing agent MgSO 4 Centrifuging at 5000rpm for 2min after vortexing for 2min, and filtering the supernatant with 0.22 μm microporous membrane to obtain a first sample; adding 1mL of acetonitrile and 50 mu L of chloroform into the first sample, uniformly mixing to form a water/acetonitrile/chloroform emulsion system, centrifuging, collecting a precipitate phase to obtain a pesticide residue sample pretreatment concentrated product, and pretreating and concentrating the pesticide residue sampleThe product was transferred to a microtiter tube (200. Mu.L) and placed in an autosampler vial (2 mL) for GC-TOF/MS analytical determination.
Example 2
Mixing N-octanol/N-hexanoic acid (volume ratio is 1); mixing 15.0g of an apple sample with the supernatant, homogenizing, adding acetone, wherein the mass volume ratio of the homogenized sample to the acetone is 1.0g:1mL, vortexing for 0.5min, performing ultrasonic treatment at 600w for 5min, and adding 0.5wt% of water removing agent MgSO 4 Centrifuging at 5000rpm for 2min after vortexing for 2min, and filtering the supernatant with 0.22 μm microporous membrane to obtain a first sample; adding 1mL of acetonitrile and 50 μ L of chloroform into the first sample, uniformly mixing to form a water/acetonitrile/chloroform emulsion system, centrifuging, collecting a precipitate phase to obtain a pesticide residue sample pretreatment concentrated product, transferring the pesticide residue sample pretreatment concentrated product into a microscale sample injection tube (200 μ L), placing the microscale sample injection tube into an automatic sample injection vial (2 mL), and using the sample injection tube for GC-TOF/MS analysis and determination.
Example 3
Mixing N-hexanol/N-decanoic acid (volume ratio is 1; mixing 15.0g of apple sample with the supernatant, homogenizing, adding acetonitrile containing 1% acetic acid, wherein the mass volume ratio of the homogenized sample to the acetonitrile containing 1% acetic acid is 1.2g:1mL, vortexing for 0.5min, performing ultrasonic treatment at 600w for 5min, and adding 0.5wt% of water removing agent MgSO 4 Centrifuging at 5000rpm for 2min after vortexing for 2min, and filtering the supernatant with 0.22 μm microporous membrane to obtain a first sample; adding 1mL of acetonitrile and 50 mu L of chloroform into the first sample, uniformly mixing to form a water/acetonitrile/chloroform emulsion system, centrifuging, collecting a precipitate phase to obtain a pesticide residue sample pretreatment concentrated product, and transferring the pesticide residue sample pretreatment concentrated product to a micro-sample injection tube (200)μ L) were placed in an autosampler vial (2 mL) for GC-TOF/MS analytical determination.
Example 4
Mixing N-decanol/N-octanoic acid (volume ratio is 1; mixing 15.0g of an apple sample with the supernatant, homogenizing, adding acetonitrile, wherein the mass volume ratio of the homogenized sample to the acetonitrile is 1.0g:1mL, vortexing for 0.5min, performing ultrasonic treatment at 600w for 5min, and adding 0.5wt% of water removing agent MgSO 4 Centrifuging at 5000rpm for 2min after vortexing for 2min, and filtering the supernatant with 0.22 μm microporous membrane to obtain a first sample; adding 1mL of acetonitrile and 50 μ L of chloroform into the first sample, uniformly mixing to form a water/acetonitrile/chloroform emulsion system, centrifuging, collecting a precipitate phase to obtain a pesticide residue sample pretreatment concentrated product, transferring the pesticide residue sample pretreatment concentrated product into a microscale sample injection tube (200 μ L), placing the microscale sample injection tube into an automatic sample injection vial (2 mL), and using the sample injection tube for GC-TOF/MS analysis and determination.
Example 5
Mixing N-decanol/N-octanol (volume ratio is 1; mixing 15.0g of orange sample (with peel) with the supernatant, homogenizing, adding acetone, wherein the mass volume ratio of the homogenized sample to the acetone is 1.2g:1mL, vortex for 0.5min, ultrasonic processing for 5min at 600w, adding 1.5wt% of water removing agent MgSO 4 And NaCl (mass ratio 2; adding 1mL of acetonitrile and 50 mu L of chloroform into the first sample, uniformly mixing to form a water/acetonitrile/chloroform emulsion system, centrifuging, collecting a precipitate phase to obtain a pesticide residue sample pretreatment concentrated product, transferring the pesticide residue sample pretreatment concentrated product into a microscale sample injection tube (200 mu L), and placing the microscale sample injection tube into an autoinjection small bottle (2 mL)Used for GC-TOF/MS analysis determination.
Example 6
Mixing N-hexanoic acid, N-propyl ethylenediamine and water, then whirling for 1min, and centrifuging at 8000rpm for 3min, wherein N-octanol accounts for 5% by volume and N-propyl ethylenediamine accounts for 40% by volume in a mixing system of the N-hexanoic acid, the N-propyl ethylenediamine and the water, and taking supernatant for later use; mixing 15.0g of apple sample with the supernatant, homogenizing, adding ethyl acetate, and enabling the mass volume ratio of the homogenized sample to the ethyl acetate to be 1.2g:1mL, vortex for 0.5min, and after ultrasonic treatment for 5min at 600w, add 2wt% of water removing agent MgSO 4 Centrifuging at 5000rpm for 2min after vortexing for 2min, and filtering the supernatant with 0.22 μm microporous membrane to obtain a first sample; adding 1mL of acetonitrile and 50 mu L of chloroform into the first sample, uniformly mixing to form a water/acetonitrile/chloroform emulsion system, centrifuging, collecting a precipitate phase to obtain a pesticide residue sample pretreatment concentrated product, transferring the pesticide residue sample pretreatment concentrated product into a microscale sample injection tube (200 mu L), and placing the microscale sample injection tube into an automatic sample injection small bottle (2 mL) for GC-TOF/MS analysis and determination.
Example 7
Accurately weighing 15.0g of well homogenized apple into a 100mL centrifuge tube, adding 3.0g of sodium chloride, 1.5g of anhydrous sodium acetate and 15.0mL of 1% acetic acid acetonitrile solution, homogenizing at a high speed for 1min, then centrifuging at a high speed of 5000r/min for 2min, taking 2.0mL of supernatant, transferring the supernatant into a 5mL centrifuge tube filled with 100mg of PSA, 100mg of C18, 300mg of anhydrous magnesium sulfate and a proper amount of GCB (the dosage of GCB is determined according to the color depth of a sample extracting solution), uniformly mixing by vortex, centrifuging at a speed of 5000r/min for 2min, filtering the supernatant through a 0.22 mu m microporous filter membrane, and collecting in a small beaker (5 mL) for concentration by a dispersion liquid microextraction method; taking 1.0mL of acetonitrile supernatant (dispersant) into a 15mL of pointed-bottom centrifugal test tube with a plug, adding 50.0 μ L of chloroform (extractant), mixing uniformly, and quickly injecting 4mL of ultrapure water into the pointed-bottom centrifugal tube; slightly shaking for 1min to form a water/acetonitrile/chloroform emulsion system, wherein small chloroform particles are uniformly dispersed in a water phase along with acetonitrile for extraction balance; centrifuging at a certain temperature (about 20 ℃) for 3min at 5000rpm, and depositing chloroform dispersed in an aqueous phase to the bottom of a centrifugal tube; finally, the precipitated phase was transferred to a microtiter tube (200. Mu.L) and placed in an autosampler vial (2 mL) for GC-TOF/MS analysis.
Example 8
Mixing 15.0g of an apple sample with water, homogenizing, and adding acetone, wherein the mass volume ratio of the homogenized sample to the acetone is 1.0g:1mL, vortexing for 0.5min, performing ultrasonic treatment at 600w for 5min, and adding 0.5wt% of water removing agent MgSO 4 Centrifuging at 5000rpm for 2min after vortexing for 2min, and filtering the supernatant with 0.22 μm microporous membrane to obtain a first sample; adding 1mL of acetonitrile and 50 mu L of chloroform into the first sample, uniformly mixing to form a water/acetonitrile/chloroform emulsion system, centrifuging, collecting a precipitate phase to obtain a pesticide residue sample pretreatment concentrated product, transferring the pesticide residue sample pretreatment concentrated product into a microscale sample injection tube (200 mu L), and placing the microscale sample injection tube into an automatic sample injection small bottle (2 mL) for GC-TOF/MS analysis and determination.
The results of the test of example 2 are shown in Table 1. The results of examples 1 and 3 to 6 were similar to those of example 2, with example 7 having a linear correlation coefficient of 0.9981, LOD of 0.01. Mu.g/kg, LOQ of 0.03. Mu.g/kg, example 8 having a linear correlation coefficient of 0.9975, LOD of 0.1. Mu.g/kg, LOQ of 0.5. Mu.g/kg.
TABLE 1
As is clear from Table 1, the pretreatment concentration method of the present invention has high sensitivity.
The above-described embodiments are merely illustrative of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, and do not limit the scope of the present invention, and various modifications and improvements of the technical solutions of the present invention can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the present invention, and the technical solutions of the present invention are within the scope of the present invention defined by the claims.
Claims (1)
1. The method for detecting the pesticide residue sample is characterized by comprising the following steps of:
mixing N-caprylic alcohol/N-hexanoic acid, N-propyl ethylenediamine and water in a volume ratio of 1:1, then whirling the obtained mixture for lmin, centrifuging the obtained mixture at 8000rpm for 3min, wherein the volume ratio of the N-caprylic alcohol/N-hexanoic acid to the N-propyl ethylenediamine and water in a mixed system is 10%, the volume ratio of the N-propyl ethylenediamine is 35%, and taking supernatant for later use; mixing 15.0g of an apple sample with the supernatant, homogenizing, adding acetone, wherein the mass volume ratio of the homogenized sample to the acetone is 1.0g to 1mL, performing vortex treatment for 0.5min and 600w ultrasonic treatment for 5min, adding 0.5wt% of a water removing agent MgSO4, performing centrifugal treatment at 5000rpm for 2min after vortex treatment for 2min, and passing the supernatant through a 0.22-micron microporous filter membrane to obtain a first sample; adding 1mL of acetonitrile and 50 μ L of chloroform into the first sample, uniformly mixing to form a water/acetonitrile/chloroform emulsion system, centrifuging, collecting a precipitate phase to obtain a pesticide residue sample pretreatment concentrated product, transferring the pesticide residue sample pretreatment concentrated product to a micropipe tube of 200 μ L, placing the micropipe tube in an autoinjection vial of 2mL, and performing GC-TOF/MS analysis and determination under the conditions that:
VF-5 chromatographic column 30m × 0.32mm × 0.25 μm; carrier gas: the purity of helium is 99.999%; constant flow mode, flow rate: 1.0mL/min; and (3) sample introduction mode: no shunt sampling; sample introduction volume: 1 mu L of the solution; non-shunting time: 1min; the temperature of a sample inlet is 250 ℃; column oven temperature program: maintaining the initial temperature at 70 deg.C for 2min, heating to 190 deg.C at 20 deg.C/min, and heating to 290 deg.C at 5 deg.C/min for 5min; the total operation time is 33min; transmission line temperature: 270 ℃;
mass spectrum parameters: ionization mode: electron bombardment ionization EI; bombardment energy: 70eV; ion source temperature: 230 ℃; filament current: 200 muA; detector voltage 2800V; the quality scanning mode is full scanning; the scanning range m/z is 50-600; solvent delay time: 5min;
wherein the pesticide residue comprises: acetamiprid, carbofuran, phoxim, chlorpyrifos, high-efficiency chlorofluorocyanate, deltamethrin, pyridaben and abamectin.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110653387.0A CN113325119B (en) | 2021-06-11 | 2021-06-11 | Pesticide residue sample pretreatment concentration method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110653387.0A CN113325119B (en) | 2021-06-11 | 2021-06-11 | Pesticide residue sample pretreatment concentration method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN113325119A CN113325119A (en) | 2021-08-31 |
| CN113325119B true CN113325119B (en) | 2022-11-29 |
Family
ID=77420640
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110653387.0A Active CN113325119B (en) | 2021-06-11 | 2021-06-11 | Pesticide residue sample pretreatment concentration method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN113325119B (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113933443B (en) * | 2021-10-27 | 2024-05-03 | 上海市农产品质量安全中心 | In-situ rapid detection method for acetamiprid in vegetables or fruits |
| CN115684442B (en) * | 2022-10-13 | 2023-06-06 | 深圳职业技术学院 | Sample pretreatment method and detection method of phenol disinfection byproducts |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108344818A (en) * | 2018-02-26 | 2018-07-31 | 四川省农业科学院分析测试中心 | The remaining detection method of Multiple Pesticides in a kind of soil |
| CN109781883A (en) * | 2019-01-17 | 2019-05-21 | 江南大学 | A method of based on QuEChERS- dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction trace detection 5 hydroxymethyl furfural |
| CN110632226A (en) * | 2019-08-30 | 2019-12-31 | 浙江工业大学 | Method for determining triazole pesticide residues in vegetables based on microwave demulsification dispersion liquid microextraction and QuEChERS technology |
-
2021
- 2021-06-11 CN CN202110653387.0A patent/CN113325119B/en active Active
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN113325119A (en) | 2021-08-31 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Du et al. | Simultaneous determination of cypermethrin and permethrin in pear juice by ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with gas chromatography | |
| Farajzadeh et al. | Air-assisted liquid–liquid microextraction-gas chromatography-flame ionisation detection: A fast and simple method for the assessment of triazole pesticides residues in surface water, cucumber, tomato and grape juices samples | |
| CN113325119B (en) | Pesticide residue sample pretreatment concentration method | |
| Li et al. | Determination of trace Cd and Pb in environmental and biological samples by ETV-ICP-MS after single-drop microextraction | |
| Hauser et al. | Membrane-assisted solvent extraction of triazines and other semi-volatile contaminants directly coupled to large-volume injection–gas chromatography–mass spectrometric detection | |
| Farajzadeh et al. | Low temperature-induced homogeneous liquid–liquid extraction and ternary deep eutectic solvent-based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction followed by gas chromatography in the assessment of multiclass pesticide residues in cucumbers | |
| CN105334277B (en) | Quick pretreatment method and detection method for grape wine farming residual analysis | |
| CN102507798A (en) | Method for rapidly screening high throughputs of 36 artificial synthetic pigments in food | |
| Jia et al. | Multiresidue pesticide analysis in nutraceuticals from green tea extracts by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry | |
| CN112229929A (en) | Method for on-line GPC-GC-MS/MS non-target rapid screening of pesticide residues in tea | |
| CN117310032A (en) | Method for detecting content of illegally added medicines for tonifying kidney and strengthening yang in traditional Chinese medicine | |
| CN115184497A (en) | Method for measuring content of 2, 4-epibrassinolide in dendrobium officinale | |
| Du et al. | Determination of 43 pesticide residues in intact grape berries (Vitis vinifera L.) by using an ultrasound-assisted acetonitrile extraction method followed by LC–MS/MS | |
| Wang et al. | Determination of multiclass pesticide residues in apple juice by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry with large‐volume injection | |
| CN113155989A (en) | Rapid detection method for acrylamide content in tea | |
| Li et al. | Microwave-assisted extraction and ionic liquid-based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction followed by HPLC for the determination of trace components in a Langdu preparation | |
| CN114705785B (en) | Method for detecting chlorophthalic acid in vegetable oil | |
| Ramos et al. | Extraction of micropollutants from size-limited solid samples | |
| CN103149289B (en) | Method for determining residual amount of 2, 4-D in tobacco | |
| CN105651870B (en) | The remaining method of pesticide in a kind of gas chromatography-mass spectrum detection liquid beverage | |
| CN114088841A (en) | QuEChERS-UPLC-MS/MS method for analyzing pesticide residues in rosa roxburghii | |
| CN108982684B (en) | Method for detecting and identifying Gelidium amansii | |
| Wu et al. | Simultaneous determination of 27 pesticides in ginseng by UPLC/MS/MS and modified QuEChERS procedure | |
| Zichová et al. | Influence of relevant parameters on the extraction efficiency and the stability of the microdrop in the single drop microextraction | |
| Wang et al. | Sensitive determination of three aconitum alkaloids and their metabolites in human plasma by matrix solid‐phase dispersion with vortex‐assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and HPLC with diode array detection |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |