CN113283516A - Multi-sensor data fusion method based on reinforcement learning and D-S evidence theory - Google Patents
Multi-sensor data fusion method based on reinforcement learning and D-S evidence theory Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN113283516A CN113283516A CN202110605802.5A CN202110605802A CN113283516A CN 113283516 A CN113283516 A CN 113283516A CN 202110605802 A CN202110605802 A CN 202110605802A CN 113283516 A CN113283516 A CN 113283516A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- data
- sensor data
- fusion
- conflict
- state
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 230000002787 reinforcement Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 19
- 238000007500 overflow downdraw method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 9
- 230000004927 fusion Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 57
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 claims description 35
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims description 22
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012217 deletion Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000037430 deletion Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013526 transfer learning Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F18/00—Pattern recognition
- G06F18/20—Analysing
- G06F18/25—Fusion techniques
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N20/00—Machine learning
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Evolutionary Biology (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (AREA)
- Computing Systems (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Testing Or Calibration Of Command Recording Devices (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a multi-sensor data fusion method based on reinforcement learning and a D-S evidence theory, which comprises the following steps: step one, inputting data of multiple sensors; step two, constructing a Markov decision model; thirdly, the Q-learning algorithm realizes conflict data resolution; and step four, realizing multi-sensor data fusion by adopting a D-S evidence theory. The method based on the combination of reinforcement learning and D-S evidence theory is adopted to quickly and efficiently realize the multi-sensor data fusion, and the reinforcement learning is adopted to perform real-time online processing on conflict data and fault data in the multi-sensor to obtain effective multi-sensor data after conflict resolution, so that the problem of high data conflict is solved; and secondly, uncertain multi-source data can be fused well by adopting a D-S evidence theory fusion method, and the fusion performance is improved.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of multi-sensor data fusion, in particular to a method for realizing multi-sensor data fusion based on reinforcement learning and a D-S evidence theory, which realizes real-time online effective fusion of multi-sensor data.
Background
With the application of modern science and technology to industrial equipment, the equipment is complicated, and the complex operation condition of the equipment cannot be accurately reflected by single sensor information. And because the device is easily interfered by the environment, the obtained data may have fault data, and the accurate decision of the complex equipment cannot be realized. And the multi-sensor can simultaneously reflect different characteristics of the system, and the multi-source data fusion is favorable for improving the system performance, so that the credibility of the result is high.
The multi-sensor data fusion technology is an important data processing technology which makes full use of multi-sensor data in different time and space and analyzes, sorts and fuses the data to improve the system performance, and plays a key role in actual production and application.
Among the multi-sensor data fusion models and methods, the D-S evidence theory is one of the most effective methods that can process uncertain information. The evidence theory also provides a Dempster combination rule, and the evidence can be fused under the condition of no prior information. However, a counterintuitive judgment results when there is a high degree of conflict between the evidences. In addition, in practice, there may be temporal inconsistency in the data obtained by multiple sensors, so that the method cannot realize real-time fusion of online data. The reinforcement learning is realized in a trial and error mode, and autonomous real-time interaction with the external environment can be realized without system prior information. Therefore, the real-time online fusion of the multi-sensor data is realized by adopting a method combining reinforcement learning and a D-S evidence theory.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to realize real-time online data fusion of multiple sensors, the invention provides an intelligent multi-sensor data fusion method based on reinforcement learning and a D-S evidence theory, and solves the problems of conflicting evidence and online real-time fusion.
The technical scheme adopted by the invention for solving the technical problem comprises the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps: multi-sensor data input
The multi-sensor data obtained is represented as: { D1,D2,…,DiIn which D isiData representing the ith sensor, i sensors in total in the system. In addition, the data expression of the sensor is a Basic Probability Assignment function (BPA). If new sensor data is added in the measuring processWhen it is written into the data, it is represented as: { D1,D2,…,Di,DNew}。
Step two: markov decision model construction
When the multi-sensor data is subjected to self-adaptive conflict resolution by adopting reinforcement learning, a Markov Decision Process (MDP) model needs to be constructed. The MDP model comprises a system state, an action and a reward function, and specifically comprises the following steps:
(1) action set A: because the information quantity of the multisource sensors is different, the system should make different action selections under different sensor information, so that when high conflict information exists, conflict resolution is carried out on the high conflict information to ensure the accuracy and validity of a fusion result, and therefore an action set is defined as follows: a ═ a1,a2The system can take the actions of retention or deletion according to the actual situation;
(2) a state set S: when the fusion system takes a certain action under different sensor information at different moments, the state of the system is transferred, and a fusion result at the current moment is defined as the state of the system, namely:
wherein m istAnd mt+1Indicating a fusion result of taking different actions at the current moment, at+1Indicating the action currently being taken. The set of system states is represented as: s ═ S1,s2,…,st,…}。
(3) The reward function R: which represents the reward value or penalty value given by the system in a certain state s and a certain action a during the operation of the system.
In the multi-sensor data fusion algorithm, different actions are selected through the setting of the reward function value, and finally, a more accurate and effective fusion result is obtained under the condition of the same data. In reinforcement learning, the optimal action is obtained by maximizing the accumulated reward value, so that the reward function setting is important. In the invention, a reward function is set according to the quality of a fusion result in a certain state, and the Deng entropy evaluation is adoptedThe price fusion result quality and the Deng entropy are confidence measure modes among evidences. Deng entropy E (m) of different states of systemt) Is defined as:
wherein, Θ represents the recognition framework, a is a subset in the recognition framework, and the corresponding BPA at time t is mt(A) And | a | represents the potential of a.
The larger the value of the Dunnex is, the larger the information content contained in the BPA is, which indicates that the fusion result in the current state is better. When E (m)t+1)≥E(mt) Now, the new state s is explainedt+1Advantageously, a positive reward should be given at this time. Otherwise, the new state s is illustratedt+1Is negative, a penalty should be given at this time. The reward function at time t +1 is thus defined as:
step three: q-learning algorithm for realizing conflict data resolution
The purpose of realizing conflict resolution in multi-sensor data fusion is to find an optimal strategy pi: s → A, i.e. a ═ pi (S), so that the system makes the best strategy selection under the condition of conflict data, and the effective conflict resolution is realized. The strategy is selected by repeatedly exploring and trial-and-error by the environment and the intelligent agent, and finally the strategy of adding the immediate reward and the future reward value of the system under a certain strategy is obtained as the optimal strategy. The method specifically comprises the following steps: at time t, the multi-sensor data fusion system receives a certain state stAnd an instant prize RtDetermining the action currently to be performed (retaining or removing the current evidence) based on the reward value, and then the intelligent fusion system transitions to the next state st+1And generates a reward Rt+1. The process is realized by adopting a Q-learning algorithm.
The Q-learning algorithm achieves the best strategy by maximizing the cumulative discount reward value, the Q value function being at a certain valueState stAnd a certain action atThe following jackpot value is expressed as:
where γ represents a discount factor.
The method adopts an epsilon-greedy algorithm to select the optimal action (strategy), and is specifically represented as follows:
wherein, pi*(a | s) represents an optimal strategy; ε represents the probability of exploration.
And updating the Q value function by adopting the following formula:
wherein, alpha is (0, 1)]Indicates the learning rate, st+1Indicating the next state.
The multi-sensor data fusion system obtains the optimal action at each moment through repeated updating interaction with the environment, and finally eliminates high-conflict BPA to realize self-adaptive online data processing.
Step four: multi-sensor data fusion by evidence theory
After conflict resolution processing is carried out on sensor data, effective fusion of multi-source data is realized by adopting Dempster combination rules in evidence theory, and the method specifically comprises the following steps:
wherein,
the method has the advantages that the method combining the evidence theory and the reinforcement learning can efficiently and quickly realize the data fusion of the multiple sensors; according to the method, the conflict data and the fault data in the multi-sensor are processed on line in real time by adopting reinforcement learning, so that the effective multi-sensor data after conflict resolution is obtained, and the problem of high data conflict is solved; the D-S evidence theory fusion method adopted by the invention can well fuse uncertain multi-source data and improve the fusion performance.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a diagram of an overall model of an implementation of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is vehicle fault data;
FIG. 3 is a multi-sensor data fusion result.
Detailed Description
The invention is further illustrated with reference to the figures and examples. An example of a vehicle system fault diagnosis is given here, with experimental data from [1 ]]。[1]Shows that there are three types of faults in the vehicle system (here, F)1，F2And F3And is shown), low oil pressure, air leakage of the air intake system and blocking of the electromagnetic valve are respectively realized. Furthermore, it passes through five sensors C1,C2,C3,C4,C5And acquiring automobile fault data. The invention describes the implementation steps of the proposed method in connection with the vehicle system fault data.
The method comprises the following steps: multi-sensor data input
The multi-sensor data obtained from the automotive system is represented as: { D1,D2,D3,D4,D5Indicates that there are 5 sensors in the system. In the vehicle system fault data, C5The sensors are in a failure state, and the other sensors work normally. The specific data are shown in fig. 2. Wherein, m (F)1) Representative failure type is F1Confidence value of m (F)2) Representative failure type is F2Confidence value of m (F)3) Representative failure type is F3M (Θ) represents an indeterminate confidence value for the fault type, Θ ═ F1,F2,F3}. The purpose of the invention isAnd judging which type of fault occurs in the automobile system according to the multi-sensor data.
Step two: markov decision model construction
The method comprises the steps of conducting self-adaptive conflict resolution on automobile system data through reinforcement learning, and firstly conducting Markov Decision Process (MDP) model construction. The MDP model comprises a system state, an action and a reward function, and specifically comprises the following steps:
(1) action set A: because the information content of 5 sensors is different, the system should make different action selections under different sensor information, so that when high conflict information exists, conflict resolution is carried out on the high conflict information to ensure the accuracy and validity of a fusion result, and therefore the action set is as follows: a ═ a1,a2Retention, deletion.
(2) A state set S: when the fusion system takes a certain action, the state of the system is transferred, and the fusion result at the current moment is defined as the state of the system, namely:
wherein m istAnd mt+1Indicating a fusion result of taking different actions at the current moment, at+1Indicating the action currently being taken. The set of system states is represented as: s ═ S1,s2,…,st,…}。
(3) The reward function R: which represents the reward value or penalty value given by the system in a certain state s and a certain action a during the operation of the system. In the invention, a reward function is set according to the quality of the fusion result in a certain state, the quality of the fusion result is evaluated by adopting the Deng entropy which is a reliability measurement mode among evidences. Deng entropy E (m) of different states of systemt) Is defined as:
wherein, Θ represents the recognition framework, a is a subset in the recognition framework, and the corresponding BPA at time t is mt(A)，|A|The potential of A is shown.
The larger the value of the Dunnex is, the larger the information content contained in the BPA is, which indicates that the fusion result in the current state is better. When E (m)t+1)≥E(mt) Now, the new state s is explainedt+1Advantageously, a positive reward should be given at this time. Otherwise, the new state s is illustratedt+1Is negative, a penalty should be given at this time. The reward function at time t +1 is thus defined as:
step three: q-learning algorithm for realizing conflict data resolution
The purpose of realizing conflict resolution in multi-sensor data fusion is to find an optimal strategy pi: s → A, i.e. a ═ pi (S), so that the system makes the best strategy selection under the condition of conflict data, and the effective conflict resolution is realized. The strategy is selected by repeatedly exploring and trial-and-error by the environment and the intelligent agent, and finally the strategy of adding the immediate reward and the future reward value of the system under a certain strategy is obtained as the optimal strategy. The method specifically comprises the following steps: at time t, the multi-sensor data fusion system receives a certain state stAnd an instant prize RtDetermining the action currently to be performed (retaining or removing the current evidence) based on the reward value, and then the intelligent fusion system transitions to the next state st+1And generates a reward Rt+1. The process is realized by adopting a Q-learning algorithm.
The Q-learning algorithm achieves the best strategy by maximizing the cumulative discount reward value, with the Q-value function being at a certain state stAnd a certain action atThe following jackpot value is expressed as:
where γ represents a discount factor.
The method adopts an epsilon-greedy algorithm to select the optimal action (strategy), and is specifically represented as follows:
wherein, pi*(a | s) represents an optimal strategy; ε represents the probability of exploration.
And updating the Q value function by adopting the following formula:
wherein, alpha is (0, 1)]Indicates the learning rate, st+1Indicating the next state.
The multi-sensor data fusion system obtains the optimal action at each moment through repeated updating interaction with the environment, and finally eliminates high-conflict BPA to realize self-adaptive online data processing.
Step four: multi-sensor data fusion realized by adopting D-S evidence theory
After conflict resolution processing is carried out on sensor data, effective fusion of multi-source data is realized by adopting Dempster combination rules in evidence theory, and the method specifically comprises the following steps:
wherein,
finally, the multi-sensor data fusion method based on reinforcement learning and D-S evidence theory is adopted, simulation analysis is carried out according to the data in the figure 2, simulation comparison is carried out with the traditional Dempster combination rule and the Yager combination rule, and the fusion result is shown in figure 3. As can be seen from FIG. 3, the fusion method provided by the invention has relatively high fusion precision, and can realize efficient, accurate and intelligent fusion under multi-sensor data. The main reasons are: the reinforcement learning eliminates conflict data and fault data in the multi-sensor data, and avoids negative influence of the data on the fusion result. In addition, the method has the advantages that whether the data arrival time is consistent or not does not need to be considered, and the online fusion of the data can be effectively realized.
The foregoing shows and describes the general principles and broad features of the present invention and advantages thereof. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described above, which are described in the specification and illustrated only to illustrate the principle of the present invention, but that various changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention, which fall within the scope of the invention as claimed. The scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
Reference to the literature
[1]Yan X H,Zhu J H,Kuang M C,et al.Missile aerodynamic design using reinforcement learning and transfer learning.Sci China Inf Sci,2018,61:119204.
Claims (1)
1. A multi-sensor data fusion method based on reinforcement learning and D-S evidence theory is characterized by comprising the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps: multi-sensor data input
The multi-sensor data obtained is represented as: { D1,D2,…,DiIn which D isiData representing the ith sensor, and there are i sensors in the system. In addition, the data expression of the sensor is in the form of a Basic Probability Assignment function (BPA); if new sensor data is added during the measurement process, the new sensor data is written into the data, and the data is expressed as: { D1,D2,…,Di,DNew}；
Step two: markov decision model construction
When the reinforcement learning is adopted to perform self-adaptive conflict resolution on multi-sensor data, firstly, a Markov Decision Process (MDP) model is constructed, wherein the MDP model comprises a system state, an action and a reward function, and specifically comprises the following steps:
(1) movable partMaking a set A: define the action set as: a ═ a1,a2The system can take the actions of retention or deletion according to the actual situation;
(2) a state set S: the invention defines the fusion result of the current moment as the state of the system, namely:
wherein m istAnd mt+1Indicating a fusion result of taking different actions at the current moment, at+1Representing the currently taken action, the system state set is represented as: s ═ S1,s2,…,st,st+1,…}；
(3) The reward function R: the invention sets a reward function according to the quality of the fusion result in a certain state, adopts the Deng entropy to evaluate the quality of the fusion result, and adopts the Deng entropy E (m) of the system in different statest) Is defined as:
wherein, Θ represents the recognition framework, a is a subset in the recognition framework, and the corresponding BPA at time t is mt(A) And | a | represents the potential of a;
the larger the value of the Dune entropy is, the larger the information content contained in the BPA is, which indicates that the fusion result in the current state is better; when E (m)t+1)≥E(mt) Now, the new state s is explainedt+1Advantageously, a positive reward should be given; conversely, a penalty value should be given; the reward function at time t +1 is thus defined as:
step three: q-learning algorithm for realizing conflict data resolution
The Q-learning algorithm achieves the best strategy by maximizing the cumulative discount reward value, the Q value function being at a certain statestAnd a certain action atThe following jackpot value is expressed as:
wherein γ represents a discount factor;
the method adopts an epsilon-greedy algorithm to select the optimal action (strategy), and is specifically represented as follows:
wherein, pi*(a | s) represents an optimal strategy; epsilon represents the exploration probability;
and updating the Q value function by adopting the following formula:
wherein, alpha is (0, 1)]Indicates the learning rate, st+1Represents the next state;
the multi-sensor data fusion system obtains the optimal action at each moment through repeated updating interaction with the environment, and finally eliminates high-conflict BPA to realize self-adaptive online data processing;
step four: multi-sensor data fusion realized by adopting D-S evidence theory
After conflict resolution processing is carried out on sensor data, effective fusion of multi-source data is realized by adopting Dempster combination rules in evidence theory, and the method specifically comprises the following steps:
wherein,
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110605802.5A CN113283516B (en) | 2021-06-01 | 2021-06-01 | Multi-sensor data fusion method based on reinforcement learning and D-S evidence theory |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110605802.5A CN113283516B (en) | 2021-06-01 | 2021-06-01 | Multi-sensor data fusion method based on reinforcement learning and D-S evidence theory |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN113283516A true CN113283516A (en) | 2021-08-20 |
| CN113283516B CN113283516B (en) | 2023-02-28 |
Family
ID=77282908
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110605802.5A Active CN113283516B (en) | 2021-06-01 | 2021-06-01 | Multi-sensor data fusion method based on reinforcement learning and D-S evidence theory |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN113283516B (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN114997341A (en) * | 2022-08-01 | 2022-09-02 | 白杨时代(北京)科技有限公司 | Information fusion processing method and device |
Citations (18)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101996157A (en) * | 2010-10-23 | 2011-03-30 | 山东科技大学 | Multisource information fusion method in evidence high-conflict environment |
| CN103557884A (en) * | 2013-09-27 | 2014-02-05 | 杭州银江智慧城市技术集团有限公司 | Multi-sensor data fusion early warning method for monitoring electric transmission line tower |
| CN103942554A (en) * | 2014-05-07 | 2014-07-23 | 苏州搜客信息技术有限公司 | Image identifying method and device |
| CN104408324A (en) * | 2014-12-11 | 2015-03-11 | 云南师范大学 | D-S evidence theory based multi-sensor information fusion method |
| CN104598986A (en) * | 2014-12-12 | 2015-05-06 | 国家电网公司 | Big data based power load prediction method |
| CN104679991A (en) * | 2015-01-27 | 2015-06-03 | 吉林大学 | Ordered proposition-oriented novel method of information fusion |
| CN105516164A (en) * | 2015-12-22 | 2016-04-20 | 中国科学院长春光学精密机械与物理研究所 | P2P botnet detection method based on fractal and self-adaptation fusion |
| CN107967487A (en) * | 2017-11-27 | 2018-04-27 | 重庆邮电大学 | A kind of colliding data fusion method based on evidence distance and uncertainty |
| CN108804741A (en) * | 2018-04-04 | 2018-11-13 | 西北工业大学 | D-S evidence theory shell combination Algorithm of Firepower Allocation under efficiency maximal condition |
| CN109086470A (en) * | 2018-04-08 | 2018-12-25 | 北京建筑大学 | A kind of method for diagnosing faults based on fuzzy preference relation and D-S evidence theory |
| CN109532719A (en) * | 2018-11-23 | 2019-03-29 | 中汽研（天津）汽车工程研究院有限公司 | One kind being based on electric car combined of multi-sensor information |
| CN110188882A (en) * | 2018-12-28 | 2019-08-30 | 湖南大学 | A kind of high conflicting evidence fusion method based on fuzzy reasoning |
| CN110796194A (en) * | 2019-10-29 | 2020-02-14 | 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 | Target detection result fusion judgment method for multi-sensor information |
| CN111065089A (en) * | 2019-11-05 | 2020-04-24 | 东华大学 | Internet of vehicles bidirectional authentication method and device based on crowd sensing |
| CN111582399A (en) * | 2020-05-15 | 2020-08-25 | 吉林省森祥科技有限公司 | Multi-sensor information fusion method for sterilization robot |
| CN111931806A (en) * | 2020-06-23 | 2020-11-13 | 广州杰赛科技股份有限公司 | Equipment fault diagnosis method and device for multi-sensor data fusion |
| US20200394409A1 (en) * | 2019-01-03 | 2020-12-17 | Lucomm Technologies, Inc. | System for physical-virtual environment fusion |
| CN112435275A (en) * | 2020-12-07 | 2021-03-02 | 中国电子科技集团公司第二十研究所 | Unmanned aerial vehicle maneuvering target tracking method integrating Kalman filtering and DDQN algorithm |
-
2021
- 2021-06-01 CN CN202110605802.5A patent/CN113283516B/en active Active
Patent Citations (18)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101996157A (en) * | 2010-10-23 | 2011-03-30 | 山东科技大学 | Multisource information fusion method in evidence high-conflict environment |
| CN103557884A (en) * | 2013-09-27 | 2014-02-05 | 杭州银江智慧城市技术集团有限公司 | Multi-sensor data fusion early warning method for monitoring electric transmission line tower |
| CN103942554A (en) * | 2014-05-07 | 2014-07-23 | 苏州搜客信息技术有限公司 | Image identifying method and device |
| CN104408324A (en) * | 2014-12-11 | 2015-03-11 | 云南师范大学 | D-S evidence theory based multi-sensor information fusion method |
| CN104598986A (en) * | 2014-12-12 | 2015-05-06 | 国家电网公司 | Big data based power load prediction method |
| CN104679991A (en) * | 2015-01-27 | 2015-06-03 | 吉林大学 | Ordered proposition-oriented novel method of information fusion |
| CN105516164A (en) * | 2015-12-22 | 2016-04-20 | 中国科学院长春光学精密机械与物理研究所 | P2P botnet detection method based on fractal and self-adaptation fusion |
| CN107967487A (en) * | 2017-11-27 | 2018-04-27 | 重庆邮电大学 | A kind of colliding data fusion method based on evidence distance and uncertainty |
| CN108804741A (en) * | 2018-04-04 | 2018-11-13 | 西北工业大学 | D-S evidence theory shell combination Algorithm of Firepower Allocation under efficiency maximal condition |
| CN109086470A (en) * | 2018-04-08 | 2018-12-25 | 北京建筑大学 | A kind of method for diagnosing faults based on fuzzy preference relation and D-S evidence theory |
| CN109532719A (en) * | 2018-11-23 | 2019-03-29 | 中汽研（天津）汽车工程研究院有限公司 | One kind being based on electric car combined of multi-sensor information |
| CN110188882A (en) * | 2018-12-28 | 2019-08-30 | 湖南大学 | A kind of high conflicting evidence fusion method based on fuzzy reasoning |
| US20200394409A1 (en) * | 2019-01-03 | 2020-12-17 | Lucomm Technologies, Inc. | System for physical-virtual environment fusion |
| CN110796194A (en) * | 2019-10-29 | 2020-02-14 | 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 | Target detection result fusion judgment method for multi-sensor information |
| CN111065089A (en) * | 2019-11-05 | 2020-04-24 | 东华大学 | Internet of vehicles bidirectional authentication method and device based on crowd sensing |
| CN111582399A (en) * | 2020-05-15 | 2020-08-25 | 吉林省森祥科技有限公司 | Multi-sensor information fusion method for sterilization robot |
| CN111931806A (en) * | 2020-06-23 | 2020-11-13 | 广州杰赛科技股份有限公司 | Equipment fault diagnosis method and device for multi-sensor data fusion |
| CN112435275A (en) * | 2020-12-07 | 2021-03-02 | 中国电子科技集团公司第二十研究所 | Unmanned aerial vehicle maneuvering target tracking method integrating Kalman filtering and DDQN algorithm |
Non-Patent Citations (5)
| Title |
|---|
| FUYUAN XIAO: "Multi-sensor data fusion based on the belief divergence measure of evidences and the belief entropy", 《INFORMATION FUSION》 * |
| YONG-WEI LI等: "Application of multi-sensor information fusion technology in the power transformer fault diagnosis", 《2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS》 * |
| 冯凯等: "异构数据融合的CNC刀具磨损状态在线识别方法", 《现代制造工程》 * |
| 刘斌: "基于本体的多源信息融合空间目标识别方法研究", 《中国博士学位论文全文数据库 工程科技Ⅱ辑》 * |
| 车晓雅: "多源信息系统的信息融合及其数值特征", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库 信息科技辑》 * |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN114997341A (en) * | 2022-08-01 | 2022-09-02 | 白杨时代(北京)科技有限公司 | Information fusion processing method and device |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN113283516B (en) | 2023-02-28 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN113935406B (en) | Mechanical equipment unsupervised fault diagnosis method based on countermeasure flow model | |
| US11586913B2 (en) | Power equipment fault detecting and positioning method of artificial intelligence inference fusion | |
| CN110348752B (en) | Large industrial system structure safety assessment method considering environmental interference | |
| CN111562108A (en) | Rolling bearing intelligent fault diagnosis method based on CNN and FCMC | |
| CN112082639A (en) | Engine state diagnosis method and diagnosis modeling method thereof | |
| CN113310689A (en) | Aeroengine transmission system fault diagnosis method based on domain self-adaptive graph convolution network | |
| CN112329337B (en) | Method for estimating residual service life of aero-engine based on deep reinforcement learning | |
| CN116449717B (en) | Extruder reduction gearbox state monitoring system based on digital twin | |
| CN110778714A (en) | Fuel vehicle gear identification method and system | |
| CN113283516B (en) | Multi-sensor data fusion method based on reinforcement learning and D-S evidence theory | |
| CN115659782A (en) | Bridge damage identification method based on PGDNN under action of mobile vehicle load | |
| CN112985830A (en) | Abs result automatic judging algorithm | |
| Hamed et al. | Fuel consumption prediction model using machine learning | |
| CN116519021A (en) | Inertial navigation system fault diagnosis method, system and equipment | |
| CN117877256A (en) | Vehicle fault prediction method and system based on digital twin | |
| CN110320802B (en) | Complex system signal time sequence identification method based on data visualization | |
| CN112069621B (en) | Method for predicting residual service life of rolling bearing based on linear reliability index | |
| CN113858566A (en) | Injection molding machine energy consumption prediction method and system based on machine learning | |
| CN113723592A (en) | Fault diagnosis method based on wind power gear box monitoring system | |
| Sun | Sensor fusion for vehicle health monitoring and degradation detection | |
| CN110532698B (en) | Industrial equipment vibration characteristic value trend prediction method based on data model | |
| CN117829821B (en) | Cloud platform-based composite material equipment maintenance and management method | |
| CN115472040B (en) | Personalized anti-collision early warning method for networked vehicle based on collision probability field | |
| CN113988400B (en) | AQI index prediction method based on PEARSON-LSTM multi-step fusion network | |
| CN118585897A (en) | Real-time anomaly detection method for locomotive diesel engine sensor data based on proxy model |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |