CN113220570B - Method and device for realizing online environment test based on defect library - Google Patents
Method and device for realizing online environment test based on defect library Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN113220570B CN113220570B CN202110512149.8A CN202110512149A CN113220570B CN 113220570 B CN113220570 B CN 113220570B CN 202110512149 A CN202110512149 A CN 202110512149A CN 113220570 B CN113220570 B CN 113220570B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- test
- defect
- key
- defect library
- library
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 197
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 142
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 23
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 46
- 238000011990 functional testing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 abstract description 5
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 12
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000013522 software testing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004080 punching Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000013589 supplement Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001502 supplementing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005856 abnormality Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000006227 byproduct Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/3684—Test management for test design, e.g. generating new test cases
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/3688—Test management for test execution, e.g. scheduling of test suites
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
- Y02P90/30—Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing
Abstract
The invention discloses a method and a device for realizing online environment test based on a defect library, which are applied to software test, wherein the method comprises the following steps: constructing a defect library; the defect library is obtained by executing a functional test on the tested target software by running key test cases in a test environment and various production environments; traversing the defect library to verify defects in the repair defect library when other new production environments are deployed and proposed; the beneficial effects are as follows: when the production environment is more, the software defects can be timely and effectively eliminated, a large amount of manpower and material resources for testing are avoided, the testing time for deploying projects on the production environment line is saved, the defect reasons are accurately positioned, the defect repairing efficiency is improved, the acceptance of an on-line system is facilitated, and the product quality is finally improved.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of software testing, in particular to a method and a device for realizing online environment testing based on a defect library.
Background
Software testing is receiving increasing attention as an effective means of discovering software defects and ensuring the quality of software products.
In software products, the test environment has been tested to meet the on-line standard, but after entering the production environment, the functional abnormality occurs, and the acceptance is not passed. After the product is released, the production environments of the online products are more, the online products need to be tested one by one, and the same product possibly has the same or different defects in different production environments, and some of the defects appear in the test environments, and some of the defects are normal in the test environments and enter the production environments to be shown. Therefore, software defects are not removed timely and effectively, a large amount of manpower and material resources for testing are wasted, and the potential hidden danger cannot be estimated for losses caused by products and enterprises.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims at: the method and the device for realizing the online environment test based on the defect library are provided, so that the problems that the production environment is more, the test time is longer, and software defects cannot be removed timely and effectively are solved.
First aspect: a method for implementing online environment testing based on a defect library, which is applied to software testing, the method comprising:
constructing a defect library; the defect library is obtained by executing a functional test on the tested target software by running key test cases in a test environment and various production environments;
the defect library is traversed as other new production environments are deployed and proposed to verify repairing defects in the defect library.
As an alternative embodiment of the present application, the defect library is constructed by:
acquiring test information of tested target software; the test information comprises key test points of all modules in the target software;
acquiring and importing a key test case;
in a test environment, the key test case is operated, and the test is executed on the key test point until the test passes;
and in each production environment, respectively running the key test cases, executing test on the key test points, and recording all generated defects and reasons generated by marking after repairing the defects as the defect library.
As an optional implementation manner of the application, the test information is obtained by analyzing the test requirement of the target software; wherein, the target software is associated with a corresponding test requirement.
As an optional embodiment of the present application, the specific presentation of each defect in the defect library is: module-critical test point-critical defect-defect cause.
Second aspect: an apparatus for implementing an online environment test based on a defect library, applied to a software test, the apparatus comprising:
a construction unit for constructing a defect library;
a test unit for:
in the test environment and each production environment, operating the key test cases to perform functional test on the tested target software;
the defect library is traversed as other new production environments are deployed and proposed to verify repairing defects in the defect library.
As an alternative embodiment of the present application, the defect library is constructed by:
acquiring test information of tested target software; the test information comprises key test points of all modules in the target software;
acquiring and importing a key test case;
in a test environment, the key test case is operated, and the test is executed on the key test point until the test passes;
and in each production environment, respectively running the key test cases, executing test on the key test points, and recording all generated defects and reasons generated by marking after repairing the defects as the defect library.
As an optional embodiment of the present application, the specific presentation of each defect in the defect library is: module-critical test point-critical defect-defect cause.
As an alternative embodiment of the present application, the reasons for the marking include backbone problems, deployment problems, data and environmental problems.
By adopting the technical scheme, the method has the following advantages: according to the method and the device for realizing the online environment test based on the defect library, provided by the invention, by establishing the defect library, when the production environment is more, the software defects can be timely and effectively removed, a great amount of manpower and material resources for testing are avoided to be wasted, the test time for deploying projects on the production environment line is saved, the defect reasons are accurately positioned, the defect repairing efficiency is improved, the acceptance of an online system is facilitated, and the product quality is finally improved.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for implementing an on-line environmental test based on a defect library according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of an apparatus for implementing an on-line environment test based on a defect library according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
Specific embodiments of the invention will be described in detail below, it being noted that the embodiments described herein are for illustration only and are not intended to limit the invention. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that: no such specific details are necessary to practice the invention.
Throughout the specification, references to "one embodiment," "an embodiment," "one example," or "an example" mean: a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment or example is included within at least one embodiment of the invention. Thus, the appearances of the phrases "in one embodiment," "in an embodiment," "one example," or "an example" in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment or example. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable combination and/or sub-combination in one or more embodiments or examples. Moreover, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the illustrations provided herein are for illustrative purposes and that the illustrations are not necessarily drawn to scale.
The present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Referring to fig. 1, a method for implementing online environment test based on a defect library is applied to software test, and the method comprises the following steps:
s101, constructing a defect library; and the defect library is obtained by executing the functional test of the tested target software by the key test cases in the test environment and each production environment.
Specifically, the defect library is constructed by the following steps:
acquiring test information of tested target software; the test information comprises key test points of all modules in the target software;
the test information is obtained by analyzing the test requirement of the target software; wherein, the target software is associated with a corresponding test requirement;
acquiring and importing a key test case; when the method is applied, the number of the key test cases is a plurality of, and the key test cases are pre-written in a database or a storage system; it should be noted that the number of the substrates,
the key Test Case (Test Case) is to make a scientific organization induction on the behavior activity of the software Test, and aims to convert the behavior of the software Test into a manageable mode; meanwhile, the test case is one of methods for quantifying the test details, different types of software and different test cases;
the test case document consists of a brief introduction part and a test case part. The introduction section compiles test purposes, test scope, definition terms, reference documents, summaries, and the like. The test case section lists the test cases one by one. Each specific test case will include the following details: version number, module name, use case number, use case name, use case level, pre-knowledge condition, verification step, expected result (including judgment standard), test result, test time, tester, etc.
In a test environment, the key test case is operated, and the test is executed on the key test point until the test passes;
that is, after the development and the test of the target software are completed, the test environment executes the test, iterates for a plurality of times until the test passes, then the code is packed, and the product is released.
And in each production environment, respectively running the key test cases, executing test on the key test points, and recording all generated defects and reasons generated by marking after repairing the defects as the defect library.
That is, the product is deployed to a production environment, requiring testing to be performed. When a first on-line lifting and testing system executes a test, the test is executed according to the main key test points which are arranged before, the serious defects of the system are recorded, and the reasons (including trunk problems, deployment problems, data, environmental problems and the like) of the problems are marked after the problems are repaired; the specific representation of each defect in the defect library is as follows: module-critical test point-critical defect-defect cause.
Similarly, the submitting test is completed in the next production environment deployment, and the submitting test is executed in the mode of the last step, namely: the method comprises the steps of (1) manufacturing a test point and a corresponding defect library, and supplementing serious defects and defect generation reasons of the current production environment on the basis of the existing defect library; and so on, to perform accumulated replenishment.
S102, traversing the defect library when other new production environments are deployed and lifted so as to verify and repair defects in the defect library.
Specifically, the production environment of the newly deployed system is set up in the follow-up, the defect library which is newly supplemented is referred to, the defects in the defect library of the current system are checked, if the defects exist, the defects are set up, and the corresponding defect reasons are marked. In this way, first, the time for the tester to find the defect can be saved; secondly, the defect reason is accurately positioned, so that the time for developing and deploying personnel to repair the problem is saved; thirdly, the problem that a tester tests insufficient coverage in a test environment can be solved, and the test quality is improved by summarizing the disbelief.
Further, for better understanding of the present invention, a certain attendance system is taken as an example for explanation:
first, the key test points of each module are obtained, and specific information is shown in table 1 below.
TABLE 1 Key test point distribution Table
| Sequence number | Module | Test point |
| 1 | Login | Normal login: correct account number and cipher |
| 2 | Abnormal login | |
| 3 | Attendance checking inquiry | Retrieval |
| 4 | Card-punching attendance synchronization | |
| 5 | Invitation card | Submitting a leave |
| 6 | Examination and approval leave | |
| 7 | Leave information attendance synchronization | |
| 8 | Inquiring the leave record | |
| 9 | Retrieval |
Second, the product is deployed to a production environment, requiring testing to be performed. When the first on-line lifting and testing system executes the test, the test is executed according to the main test points which are arranged before, the serious defects of the system are recorded, and the reasons (including trunk problems, deployment problems, data, environmental problems and the like) of the problems are marked after the problems are repaired. The test point and the corresponding defect library can be displayed in an Excel mode, and are specifically displayed as follows: module-test point-severe defect-defect cause. Examples are table 2 below:
TABLE 2 test point + corresponding defect library record table
| Sequence number | Module | Test point | Defect id | Serious defects are generated | Cause of defect generation | Defect repairing personnel |
| 1 | Login | Normal login: correct account number and cipher | 1001 | Login failure | Data manipulation | Zhang San |
| 2 | Abnormal login | |||||
| 3 | Attendance checking inquiry | Retrieval | ||||
| 4 | Card-punching attendance synchronization | 1003 | Non-workday punch card information is not synchronized | Trunk missing measurement | Li Si | |
| 5 | Invitation card | Submitting a leave | 1004 | Failure to submit, failure of the approver to select | Deploying unconfigured corresponding parameters | Zhang San |
| 6 | Examination and approval leave | |||||
| 7 | Leave information attendance synchronization | 1006 | The birth and fault information is not synchronized | Trunk missing measurement | Li Si | |
| 1009 | Loss of false information is not synchronized | Trunk missing measurement | Li Si | |||
| 8 | Inquiring the leave record | |||||
| 9 | Retrieval |
Furthermore, other production environment deployment finishes the submitting test, and is executed according to the mode of the last step, namely: and (3) making a test point and a corresponding defect library, and supplementing serious defects and defect generation reasons of the current production environment on the basis of the existing Excel defect library.
Finally, the production environment of the newly deployed system is subsequently tested, the defect library corresponding to the latest supplement is firstly referred to, the defects in the defect library of the current system are checked, if the defects exist, the defects are proposed, and the corresponding defect reasons are marked.
Further, the test is made more targeted, and in another embodiment, based on the above scheme, the method further includes: and setting priorities for all modules in the target software, and then running key test cases in a test environment and all production environments and executing functional tests on the tested target software by combining the priorities. Therefore, from different deployment environments and different customer demands, the test is more targeted, and the satisfaction degree of customers is further improved.
According to the scheme, through the establishment of the defect library, when the production environment is more, the software defects can be timely and effectively eliminated, a large amount of manpower and material resources for testing are avoided, the testing time for deploying projects on the production environment line is saved, the defect reasons are accurately positioned, the defect repairing efficiency is improved, the on-line system inspection and acceptance are facilitated, and the product quality is finally improved.
Based on the same inventive concept, referring to fig. 2, an embodiment of the present invention further provides a device for implementing an online environment test based on a defect library, which is applied to a software test, and the device includes:
a construction unit for constructing a defect library; the defect library is constructed by the following steps:
acquiring test information of tested target software; the test information comprises key test points of all modules in the target software;
acquiring and importing a key test case;
in a test environment, the key test case is operated, and the test is executed on the key test point until the test passes;
and in each production environment, respectively running the key test cases, executing test on the key test points, and recording all generated defects and reasons generated by marking after repairing the defects as the defect library.
A test unit for:
in the test environment and each production environment, operating the key test cases to perform functional test on the tested target software;
after the target software is developed and tested, the test environment executes the test, iterates for a plurality of times until the test passes, then codes are packed, and the product is released;
the product is deployed to a production environment where testing needs to be performed. Firstly, executing according to the main key test points which are arranged before, recording the serious defects of the system, and marking the cause of the problem after the problem is repaired;
the reasons for the marking include backbone problems, deployment problems, data, and environmental problems;
the specific representation of each defect in the defect library is as follows: module-critical test point-critical defect-defect cause.
The defect library is traversed as other new production environments are deployed and proposed to verify repairing defects in the defect library.
Specifically, the production environment of the newly deployed system is tested, firstly, the defect library corresponding to the latest supplement is referred to, the defects in the defect library of the current system are checked, if the defects exist, the defects are proposed, and the corresponding defect reasons are marked. In this way, first, the time for the tester to find the defect can be saved; secondly, the defect reason is accurately positioned, so that the time for developing and deploying personnel to repair the problem is saved; thirdly, the problem that a tester tests insufficient coverage in a test environment can be solved, and the test quality is improved by summarizing the disbelief.
Further, on the basis of the scheme, different customer requirements and deployment environments are met; the device also comprises a setting module, wherein the setting module is used for setting priority for each module in the target software; therefore, in the test environment and each production environment, the key test cases are operated, and the functional test is executed on the tested target software by combining the priorities.
It should be noted that, specific steps of each module in the system refer to the text descriptions of the foregoing method embodiments, and are not repeated herein.
According to the scheme, when the production environment is more, the software defects can be timely and effectively eliminated, a large amount of manpower and material resources for testing are avoided, the testing time for deploying projects on a production environment line is saved, the defect reasons are accurately positioned, the defect repairing efficiency is improved, the acceptance of an on-line system is facilitated, and the product quality is finally improved.
Finally, it should be noted that: the above embodiments are only for illustrating the technical solution of the present invention, and not for limiting the same; those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that: the technical scheme described in the foregoing embodiments can be modified or some or all of the technical features thereof can be replaced by equivalents; such modifications and substitutions do not depart from the spirit of the invention, and are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims and description.
Claims (4)
1. A method for implementing online environment test based on a defect library, which is applied to software test, and is characterized in that the method comprises the following steps:
constructing a defect library; the defect library is obtained by executing a functional test on the tested target software by running key test cases in a test environment and various production environments;
traversing the defect library to verify defects in the repair defect library when other new production environments are deployed and proposed;
the defect library is constructed by the following steps:
acquiring test information of tested target software; the test information comprises key test points of all modules in the target software;
acquiring and importing a key test case;
in a test environment, the key test case is operated, and the test is executed on the key test point until the test passes;
in each production environment, respectively running the key test cases, executing test on the key test points, and recording all generated defects and reasons generated by marking after repairing the defects as the defect library;
when the method is applied, the number of the key test cases is a plurality of, and the key test cases are pre-written in a database;
the key test case is to make a scientific organization induction on the behavior activity of the software test, and the purpose is to convert the behavior of the software test into a manageable mode;
the specific representation of each defect in the defect library is as follows: module-critical test point-critical defect-defect cause.
2. The method for realizing online environment testing based on the defect library according to claim 1, wherein the testing information is obtained by analyzing the testing requirement of the target software; wherein, the target software is associated with a corresponding test requirement.
3. An apparatus for implementing an online environment test based on a defect library, applied to a software test, the apparatus comprising:
a construction unit for constructing a defect library;
a test unit for:
in the test environment and each production environment, operating the key test cases to perform functional test on the tested target software;
traversing the defect library to verify defects in the repair defect library when other new production environments are deployed and proposed;
the defect library is constructed by the following steps:
acquiring test information of tested target software; the test information comprises key test points of all modules in the target software;
acquiring and importing a key test case;
in a test environment, the key test case is operated, and the test is executed on the key test point until the test passes;
in each production environment, respectively running the key test cases, executing test on the key test points, and recording all generated defects and reasons generated by marking after repairing the defects as the defect library; when the method is applied, the number of the key test cases is a plurality of, and the key test cases are pre-written in a database;
the key test case is to make a scientific organization induction on the behavior activity of the software test, and the purpose is to convert the behavior of the software test into a manageable mode;
the specific representation of each defect in the defect library is as follows: module-critical test point-critical defect-defect cause.
4. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein the reasons for marking include trunk problems, deployment problems, data and environmental problems.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110512149.8A CN113220570B (en) | 2021-05-11 | 2021-05-11 | Method and device for realizing online environment test based on defect library |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110512149.8A CN113220570B (en) | 2021-05-11 | 2021-05-11 | Method and device for realizing online environment test based on defect library |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN113220570A CN113220570A (en) | 2021-08-06 |
| CN113220570B true CN113220570B (en) | 2024-03-19 |
Family
ID=77094722
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110512149.8A Active CN113220570B (en) | 2021-05-11 | 2021-05-11 | Method and device for realizing online environment test based on defect library |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN113220570B (en) |
Citations (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102650966A (en) * | 2011-02-24 | 2012-08-29 | 王轶辰 | Multiplexing-oriented embedded software testing method and system |
| CN107562627A (en) * | 2017-09-04 | 2018-01-09 | 郑州云海信息技术有限公司 | A kind of test result automatic creation system and method |
| US10063412B2 (en) * | 2013-04-19 | 2018-08-28 | Zte Corporation | Network device detecting method and apparatus, and cloud detection system |
| CN109446076A (en) * | 2018-10-15 | 2019-03-08 | 广东省科技基础条件平台中心 | Software project testing method, system, storage medium and terminal device |
| CN109886651A (en) * | 2019-02-20 | 2019-06-14 | 福建省农村信用社联合社 | A kind of in-house many test tubes reason method and system |
| CN109960647A (en) * | 2017-12-26 | 2019-07-02 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | A kind of method for testing software and device calculate equipment and storage medium |
| CN110245088A (en) * | 2019-06-21 | 2019-09-17 | 四川长虹电器股份有限公司 | A kind of defect automated verification system and verification method based on Jenkins |
| CN111324522A (en) * | 2018-12-13 | 2020-06-23 | 北京数聚鑫云信息技术有限公司 | Automatic test system and method |
| CN111444101A (en) * | 2020-03-27 | 2020-07-24 | 成都嗨学梅里教育科技有限公司 | Method and device for automatically creating product test defects |
| CN112650685A (en) * | 2020-12-29 | 2021-04-13 | 北京字节跳动网络技术有限公司 | Automatic testing method and device, electronic equipment and computer storage medium |
-
2021
- 2021-05-11 CN CN202110512149.8A patent/CN113220570B/en active Active
Patent Citations (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102650966A (en) * | 2011-02-24 | 2012-08-29 | 王轶辰 | Multiplexing-oriented embedded software testing method and system |
| US10063412B2 (en) * | 2013-04-19 | 2018-08-28 | Zte Corporation | Network device detecting method and apparatus, and cloud detection system |
| CN107562627A (en) * | 2017-09-04 | 2018-01-09 | 郑州云海信息技术有限公司 | A kind of test result automatic creation system and method |
| CN109960647A (en) * | 2017-12-26 | 2019-07-02 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | A kind of method for testing software and device calculate equipment and storage medium |
| CN109446076A (en) * | 2018-10-15 | 2019-03-08 | 广东省科技基础条件平台中心 | Software project testing method, system, storage medium and terminal device |
| CN111324522A (en) * | 2018-12-13 | 2020-06-23 | 北京数聚鑫云信息技术有限公司 | Automatic test system and method |
| CN109886651A (en) * | 2019-02-20 | 2019-06-14 | 福建省农村信用社联合社 | A kind of in-house many test tubes reason method and system |
| CN110245088A (en) * | 2019-06-21 | 2019-09-17 | 四川长虹电器股份有限公司 | A kind of defect automated verification system and verification method based on Jenkins |
| CN111444101A (en) * | 2020-03-27 | 2020-07-24 | 成都嗨学梅里教育科技有限公司 | Method and device for automatically creating product test defects |
| CN112650685A (en) * | 2020-12-29 | 2021-04-13 | 北京字节跳动网络技术有限公司 | Automatic testing method and device, electronic equipment and computer storage medium |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| In-field Functional Test of CAN Bus Controllers;Riccardo Cantoro等;《2020 IEEE 38th VLSI Test Symposium (VTS)》;20200604;1-6 * |
| 移动应用缺陷报告自动生成系统的设计与实现;李沛源;《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库 信息科技辑》;20190715;I138-437 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN113220570A (en) | 2021-08-06 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JPH04233660A (en) | Method for monitoring development of product | |
| Johansen et al. | A survey of empirics of strategies for software product line testing | |
| CN107193730A (en) | A kind of interface test method of automation | |
| CN107506294A (en) | Visualize automated testing method, device, storage medium and computer equipment | |
| CN112488652A (en) | Work order auditing method, system, terminal and storage medium | |
| CN113220570B (en) | Method and device for realizing online environment test based on defect library | |
| JP4646248B2 (en) | Program inspection item generation system and method, program test system and method, and program | |
| CN113779857A (en) | Method and system for intelligent fault diagnosis center of tested aging device | |
| CN113672501B (en) | Parking lot service testing method and device | |
| CN111652539B (en) | Abnormal event monitoring method, device and system | |
| Winkler et al. | Investigating the effect of expert ranking of use cases for design inspection | |
| CN108763063B (en) | Software defect detection method without defect labeling data | |
| Lübke et al. | Effectiveness of combinatorial test design with executable business processes | |
| CN109374038A (en) | A kind of changed test method of the nuclear safe level instrument control product based on application model machine | |
| CN117194267B (en) | Software quality rating system based on cloud platform | |
| CN111258916B (en) | Automatic test method, device, storage medium and equipment | |
| Vilela | An Empirical Evaluation about Using Models to Improve Preliminary Safety Analysis | |
| CN113934646B (en) | System and method for software testing | |
| WO2023125706A1 (en) | Test method and system for mileage order generation of battery swapping vehicle, device and medium | |
| CN117455545A (en) | E-commerce consumer loss probability prediction method, system and electronic equipment | |
| CN116841852A (en) | Code checking method, device, electronic equipment, medium and product | |
| Sidek et al. | The preferable test documentation using IEEE 829 | |
| TW586174B (en) | Petri-Net based simulation method for a probed equipment of an IC foundry | |
| CN112612702A (en) | Automatic testing method and device based on web | |
| Tracy et al. | Agilent 3070 Test Program Set (TPS) Development |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| CB02 | Change of applicant information |
Address after: 266000 Room 302, building 3, Office No. 77, Lingyan Road, Huangdao District, Qingdao, Shandong Province Applicant after: QINGDAO YISA DATA TECHNOLOGY Co.,Ltd. Address before: 266000 3rd floor, building 3, optical valley software park, 396 Emeishan Road, Huangdao District, Qingdao City, Shandong Province Applicant before: QINGDAO YISA DATA TECHNOLOGY Co.,Ltd. |
|
| CB02 | Change of applicant information | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |