CN113204192A - Tracking control method for preset performance of unmanned helicopter - Google Patents

Tracking control method for preset performance of unmanned helicopter Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN113204192A
CN113204192A CN202110480646.4A CN202110480646A CN113204192A CN 113204192 A CN113204192 A CN 113204192A CN 202110480646 A CN202110480646 A CN 202110480646A CN 113204192 A CN113204192 A CN 113204192A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
unmanned helicopter
actuator
uncertainty
fault
error
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202110480646.4A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
阎坤
陈超波
韩士成
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Xian Technological University
Original Assignee
Xian Technological University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Xian Technological University filed Critical Xian Technological University
Priority to CN202110480646.4A priority Critical patent/CN113204192A/en
Publication of CN113204192A publication Critical patent/CN113204192A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B13/00Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
    • G05B13/02Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
    • G05B13/04Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
    • G05B13/042Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Feedback Control In General (AREA)
  • Control Of Position, Course, Altitude, Or Attitude Of Moving Bodies (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for controlling the preset performance of an unmanned helicopter, which comprises the following steps: 1. introducing system uncertainty and actuator faults into a nonlinear system model of the unmanned helicopter, and simultaneously converting inequality constraints of tracking errors into equality problems by adopting an error conversion function method for processing; 2. transforming the model established by the step 1, and approximating the system uncertainty by adopting a neural network method; meanwhile, an auxiliary system is constructed to solve the problem of failure fault of the actuator, so that the fault tolerance of the system is improved; 3. by combining the technologies 1 and 2, the robust fault-tolerant controller of the unmanned helicopter is designed under the framework of a backstepping method, and the tracking error of the system can be ensured to be changed in a set range all the time under the condition that the unmanned helicopter system faces complex environments such as system uncertainty, actuator faults and the like. The robust safe flight control scheme of the invention ensures that the tracking error of the unmanned helicopter can be converged within a set range under multiple factors such as system uncertainty, actuator fault and the like.

Description

Tracking control method for preset performance of unmanned helicopter
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of robust control of aircrafts, and particularly relates to a tracking control method for preset performance of an unmanned helicopter.
Background
An unmanned helicopter is an aircraft that performs a given task autonomously without human operators, using onboard sensors and automatic control systems, or by sending remote control commands via a radio remote control device. Compared with a fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicle, the unmanned helicopter has the following characteristics: (l) The functions of fixed-point hovering, vertical take-off and landing, pivot turning, low altitude slow flight and the like can be completed; (2) the free flight can be realized in the severe environment in the field without a special airport and a runway. Due to the unique advantages, the unmanned helicopter lays a heavy military role and a wide civil prospect. In military operations, unmanned helicopters can carry various weapons such as small air-ground missiles and the like to attack targets on the ground, water surfaces and air. Meanwhile, the unmanned helicopter has great advantages in the aspect of carrier-based aircrafts compared with a fixed wing unmanned plane, and is very suitable for the actual needs of naval vessels because the unmanned helicopter can vertically take off and land in a small space. In modern operation, the unmanned helicopter can attack an enemy unmanned aerial vehicle flying close to the sea surface to capture the ultra-low-altitude airspace control right, and can also be matched with a naval vessel formation to land to execute a firepower support task. In the civil aspect, the unmanned helicopter can complete the work of topographic mapping, resource exploration, forest fire prevention, aerial photography, pesticide spraying and the like. When a serious natural disaster occurs, a rescue search task and the inspection of electric power, bridges and roads in a disaster area can be executed. Although the unmanned helicopter has such a huge application prospect and also obtains attention and research of numerous scientific organizations at home and abroad, due to the inherent characteristics of strong nonlinearity, complex dynamic characteristics, unstable open loop, underactuation and the like, the design of the unmanned helicopter control system still faces many practical problems to be explored and solved.
Firstly, the extensive military and civil values of unmanned helicopters determine that the unmanned helicopters often need to carry out various operations under different environments and different meteorological conditions, such as sea surfaces, urban areas, valleys and the like, so that the environment information for executing tasks is often not completely transparent. Meanwhile, the multivariable characteristics of the unmanned helicopter and the change of system parameters in the flight process can cause the existence of uncertainty problems such as modeling errors, and if the controller cannot timely cope with the problems, the performance of the control system can be reduced and even the control is out of control. Therefore, the analysis and the processing of the system uncertainty problems such as modeling errors and the like are important guarantees for the safe flight of the unmanned helicopter.
Secondly, the rotor structure makes the movable part in unmanned helicopter system obviously increase than the fixed wing aircraft, and this also leads to the probability that the system breaks down to be higher, for example the long-time high-speed rotation of rotor can cause the decline of control gain. In addition, the special military positioning of the unmanned helicopter requires that the unmanned helicopter often perform tasks in complex and variable environments, which puts higher requirements on the performance of the system, such as the requirement that the tracking error of the system is changed within a set range. In particular, for an unmanned helicopter system performing precise blows, the requirement of high precision performance is crucial to improving the task completion rate. However, most of the current researches on flight control of unmanned helicopters do not comprehensively analyze and consider the typical problems. Meanwhile, the coupling of uncertainty and other problems such as parameter change, modeling error and the like occurs, and a brand new challenge is brought to the design of the flight control system of the unmanned helicopter.
Based on the technical scheme, high-quality flight control research is carried out on the unmanned helicopter with important strategic position in military, various factors threatening the flight safety of the unmanned helicopter are comprehensively analyzed, and the research significance and the practical value are important for ensuring the survival capability and task completion of the unmanned helicopter in battlefield environment.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a control method for the preset performance of an unmanned helicopter, which ensures that the tracking error of the unmanned helicopter can be converged within a set range under multiple factors such as system uncertainty, actuator fault and the like.
In order to achieve the purpose, the technical scheme of the invention is as follows:
a control method for preset performance of an unmanned helicopter specifically comprises the following steps:
(1) firstly, introducing system uncertainty and actuator faults into a nonlinear system model of the unmanned helicopter, and simultaneously converting inequality constraints of tracking errors into equality problems by adopting an error conversion function method for processing;
(2) and (3) transforming the model established in the step (1), and approximating the system uncertainty by adopting a neural network method. Meanwhile, an auxiliary system is constructed to solve the problem of failure fault of the actuator, so that the fault tolerance of the system is improved;
(3) and (3) combining the technologies in the step (1) and the step (2), designing the robust fault-tolerant controller of the unmanned helicopter under the framework of a backstepping method, and ensuring that the tracking error of the system can be changed in a set range all the time under the condition that the unmanned helicopter system faces complex environments such as system uncertainty, actuator faults and the like.
Further, in step (1), the attitude height composite model representing the vertical take-off and landing movement of the unmanned helicopter can be described as follows:
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000021
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000022
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000023
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000024
wherein g represents gravitational acceleration, m and JfRespectively representing mass and moment of inertia, Z, of the unmanned helicoptergAnd wfRepresenting the altitude and velocity of the unmanned helicopter in the vertical direction, Λf=[φ,θ,ψ]TRepresenting the attitude angle vector (roll, pitch and yaw, respectively), omegaf=[p,q,r]TRepresenting the attitude angular rate vector, H, in a collective coordinate systemfRepresenting the attitude change matrix, TmrSum-sigmaf=[Σxfyfzf]TRespectively, the control force and the moment acting on the unmanned helicopter.
In step (1), the failure fault of the unmanned helicopter actuator can be modeled as
uf=ρfu
Wherein
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000031
Is the control input vector, p, to be designedf=diag{ρ1234},ρi(i 1.., 4) is the iththUnknown residual control efficiency of each actuator and satisfies 0 < rhoi≤1。
Definition of
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000032
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000033
And (3) combining the steps (1) to (3) and simultaneously considering the influence of system uncertainty, rewriting the altitude and attitude combined dynamic model of the unmanned helicopter into the following form:
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000034
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000035
y=Mf
wherein Δ F (N)f) Representing the total uncertainty of the system and y is the system output.
In step (1), the purpose of the preset performance is to guarantee the tracking error ey=y-ydTransient and steady state performance. If the tracking error eyThe preset performance can be guaranteed by varying all the time within the following preset ranges:
f1iχfi(t)<eyi<λf2iχfi(t),i=1,2,3,4
wherein ey=[ey1,ey2,ey3,ey4]T,λf1iAnd λf2iIs a parameter to be designed and satisfies lambdaf1i∈(0,1],λf2i∈(0,1]。χfiIs a performance function.
To accomplish control performance, the inequality constraint is transformed into an equality form using an error transfer function as follows:
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000036
wherein beta isfiIs a transition error variable, Q (-) is an increasing function and has the following properties:
i)Q(·):(-λf1if2i)→(-∞,∞),ii)
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000037
in step (1), an error transformation function β of the formfi(i-1, 2,3,4) to ensure eyiThe preset performance of (2):
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000038
for convenience, let αi=α(eyi(0)/χfi(0)). The error transfer function can then be rewritten as
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000041
For beta isiDerived with respect to time t
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000042
Wherein
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000043
Definition of betaf=[βf1f2f3f4]T,χf=diag{χf1f2f3f4H and Πf=diag{Πf1f2f3f4Is obtained by
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000044
Considering ey=y-ydAnd y ═ MfThe above equation can be further written as
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000045
Combining the converted error dynamic equation with the unmanned helicopter attitude height model to obtain:
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000046
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000047
in step (2), the composite unmanned helicopter dynamic model is rewritten into
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000048
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000049
Wherein If=diag{1,1,1,1},Uf1=GfUf
In step (2), in order to cope with actuator faults and compensate for their negative effects, an auxiliary system is constructed with the same dimensions as the system as follows:
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100000410
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100000411
wherein P isf1∈R4×4And Pf2∈R4×4For positively determined symmetrical matrices to be designed, ζf1∈R4And ζf2∈R4To assist the internal state of the system.
In step (2), the radial basis function neural network of the formf1f-If)Uf1The approximation is carried out and the result is obtained,
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100000412
wherein
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000051
For the matrix to be designed, W1 *The ideal weight matrix is represented by a matrix of weights,
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000052
to satisfy
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000053
And c is1A gaussian function of > 0 and a high frequency,
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000054
is an approximation error and satisfies
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000055
The control design is driven by a practical auxiliary system of the form:
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000056
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000057
wherein
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000058
Is W1 *An estimate of (d).
In step (3), an error variable is defined as
zf1=βff1
zf2=Nf-Nfdf2
Wherein N isdIs a virtual control law to be designed.
In step (3), a virtual control law N is designedfdIs composed of
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000059
Wherein
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100000510
Is a matrix of designs.
In step (2), Δ F (N) due to system uncertaintyf) Is unknown, and is approximated by constructing a radial basis function neural network of the form
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100000511
Wherein
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100000512
For a matrix to be designed, the matrix
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100000513
The ideal weight matrix is represented by a matrix of weights,
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100000514
is at c2When is greater than 0, satisfy
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100000515
The function of the gaussian function of (a) is,
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100000516
is at the same time
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100000517
When it is satisfied with
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100000518
The error is approximated by the neural network.
In step (3), the adaptive robust fault-tolerant controller is designed as
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100000519
Wherein
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100000520
For the matrix to be designed, the matrix is,
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100000521
represents W2An estimate of (d).
Because of Uf1=GfUfThen the actual control input is
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100000522
In step (3), design
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100000523
And
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100000524
is the parameter update law of
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100000525
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100000526
Wherein
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100000527
And
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100000528
is a constant to be designed.
Adopt the beneficial effect that above-mentioned technical scheme brought:
the invention adopts an error conversion method to process inequality constraints of output performance, and simultaneously approaches system uncertainty by combining a radial basis function neural network method. In addition, an auxiliary system is constructed to solve the problem of actuator failure, and the fault tolerance of the system is improved. Finally, the designed robust fault-tolerant control scheme based on the preset performance can enable the unmanned helicopter to safely and intelligently fly, and meanwhile, the output tracking error is always changed within the set range.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the system control of the present invention.
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention clearer, the present invention will be described in further detail with reference to embodiments, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
The vertical take-off and landing modality considered by the present invention is the typical motion of an unmanned helicopter as distinguished from a fixed wing aircraft. The unmanned helicopter belongs to a high-precision system, and as the structure and the task of the unmanned helicopter become more and more complex, the control performance requirement of the unmanned helicopter becomes stricter, so that the limit of the output performance considered by the invention is based on the actual engineering requirement.
The invention discloses a preset performance control method of an unmanned helicopter, which simultaneously considers system uncertainty and actuator faults. Firstly, introducing an error conversion function to release inequality constraint conditions of tracking errors; then, in order to improve the robustness of the system, a neural network method is adopted to approximate the uncertainty of the system; meanwhile, an auxiliary system is constructed to solve the problem of failure faults of the actuator; and finally, a robust fault-tolerant controller is designed by combining a preset performance method to ensure the safe flight of the unmanned helicopter, and the tracking error is always changed within a set range.
Referring to FIG. 1, the present invention will be described in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and detailed description.
1. System model and related lemmas and assumptions
The vertical take-off and landing movement is a typical characteristic of unmanned helicopters as distinguished from fixed-wing aircraft. As a representative motion mode of the unmanned helicopter, the motion equation can be described as follows:
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000061
wherein g represents gravitational acceleration, m and JfRespectively representing mass and moment of inertia, Z, of the unmanned helicoptergAnd wfRepresenting the altitude and velocity of the unmanned helicopter in the vertical direction, Λf=[φ,θ,ψ]TRepresenting the attitude angle vector (roll, pitch and yaw, respectively), omegaf=[p,q,r]TRepresenting the attitude angular rate vector, H, in a collective coordinate systemfRepresenting the attitude change matrix, TmrSum-sigmaf=[Σxfyfzf]TRespectively, the control force and the moment acting on the unmanned helicopter.
Actuator failure problems often occur in practice due to long-term operation of the actuator and mechanical wear. Actuator failure faults, common in unmanned helicopter systems, are considered herein and may be modeled as
uf=ρfu (2)
Wherein
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000071
Is the control input vector, p, to be designedf=diag{ρ1234},ρi(i 1.., 4) is the iththUnknown residual control efficiency of each actuator and satisfies 0 < rhoi≤1。
Definition of
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000072
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000073
And (3) combining the steps (1) to (3) and simultaneously considering the influence of system uncertainty, rewriting the altitude and attitude combined dynamic model of the unmanned helicopter into the following form:
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000074
wherein Δ F (N)f) Representing the total uncertainty of the system and y is the system output.
To facilitate robust fault tolerant control scheme design for unmanned helicopter systems, the following assumptions and reasoning are given to achieve the desired control objectives.
Assume that 1: desired track signal ydAnd its derivative are bounded. Furthermore, all of the closed loop systemsThe states are both measurable and usable.
Assume 2: the roll and pitch angles of the helicopter satisfy inequality constraints, i.e.
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000075
And
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000076
introduction 1: as a linear parameterized neural network, radial basis function neural networks are often used to approximate an arbitrary unknown continuous function v (Z), which can be expressed in terms of its form
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000077
Wherein Z ∈ RnAnd
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000078
respectively representing the estimated values of the input vector and the weight matrix of the neural network, gamma is the approximation error of the radial basis function neural network,
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000081
is a vector of the basis functions,
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000082
is usually selected as
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000083
Where i ═ i1, i2]TAnd ζiThe center and width of the gaussian function, respectively.
Based on the above analysis, the radial basis function neural network can approximate any smooth continuous function v (Z) on the tight set to
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000084
Wherein W*Is an ideal weight matrix, and W*Is to satisfy
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000085
The error of the approximation of (a) is,
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000086
next we give a definition of the preset properties. The purpose of the preset performance is to guarantee the tracking error ey=y-ydTransient and steady state performance. If the tracking error eyThe preset performance can be guaranteed by varying all the time within the following preset ranges:
f1iχfi(t)<eyi<λf2iχfi(t),i=1,2,3,4 (8)
wherein ey=[ey1,ey2,ey3,ey4]T,λf1iAnd λf2iIs a parameter to be designed and satisfies lambdaf1i∈(0,1],λf2i∈(0,1]。χfiIs a performance function expressed as
χfi(t)=(χfi0fi∞)exp(-δfit)+χfi∞,i=1,2,3,4 (9)
Wherein, deltafi> 0 and χfi0>χfi∞> 0 is a normal number. According to chifi(t) definition, it can be seen that ×,/fi(0)=χfi0
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000087
At the same time, let us know chifi(t) is a positive, smooth, bounded monotonically decreasing function.
To accomplish control performance, the inequality constraint is transformed into an equality form using an error transfer function as follows:
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000088
wherein beta isfiIs a transition error variable, Q (-) is an increasing function and has the following properties:
i)Q(·):(-λf1if2i)→(-∞,∞),ii)
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000089
2, leading: for error variable eyiAnd a conversion error variable betafiIf beta isfiAnd bounded, the preset performance (8) is satisfied for all t ≧ 0.
2. Safety flight control scheme design based on preset performance
2.1 error transfer function design
Taking into account the increasing nature of the smoothing function Q (-) an error transformation function β of the formfi(i-1, 2,3,4) to ensure eyiThe preset performance of (2):
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100000810
wherein α (e)yi(0)/χfi(0) Is satisfied with
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000091
For convenience, let αi=α(eyi(0)/χfi(0)). The error transfer function (11) can then be rewritten as
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000092
For beta isiDerived with respect to time t
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000093
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000094
Definition of betaf=[βf1f2f3f4]T,χf=diag{χf1f2f3f4H and Πf=diag{Πf1f2f3f4Is obtained by
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000095
Considering ey=y-ydAnd y ═ MfEquation (15) can be further written as
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000096
Combining the converted error dynamics equation (19) with the unmanned helicopter system (3) yields:
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000097
due to the variable χf,ΠfAnd eyAre known and can therefore be applied directly to control designs. And then, under the framework of backstepping control, a self-adaptive neural network fault-tolerant control scheme is designed for the converted system (17), the designed controller can ensure the safety and stability of the original unmanned helicopter system (3), and the output error is changed within a set range all the time.
2.2 virtual controller design
For the purpose of analysis, the composite unmanned helicopter dynamic model (17) is rewritten to
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000098
Wherein If=diag{1,1,1,1},Uf1=GfUf
To cope with actuator faults and compensate for their negative effects, an auxiliary system is constructed with the same dimensions as (18) as follows:
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000101
wherein P isf1∈R4×4And Pf2∈R4×4For positively determined symmetrical matrices to be designed, ζf1∈R4And ζf2∈R4To assist the internal state of the system.
Due to actuator failure factor ρfUnknown, hence the coupling term (p)f-If)Uf1It cannot be used directly. Thus, based on theorem 1, the radial basis function network takes the form off1f-If)Uf1Performing an approximation of the form:
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000102
wherein
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000103
For the matrix to be designed, W1 *The ideal weight matrix is represented by a matrix of weights,
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000104
to satisfy
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000105
And c is1A gaussian function of > 0 and a high frequency,
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000106
is an approximation error and satisfies
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000107
In combination with (19) - (20), a practical auxiliary system of the form:
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000108
wherein
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000109
Is W1 *An estimate of (d).
According to the proposed assistance system (21), an error variable is defined as
zf1=βff1 (22)
zf2=Nf-Nfdf2 (23)
Wherein N isdIs a virtual control law to be designed.
To zf1The derivation is carried out and the calls (18), (19) and (21) are obtained
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100001010
Design virtual control law NfdIs composed of
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100001011
Wherein
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100001012
Is a matrix of designs.
Substituting (25) into (24) to obtain
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100001013
2.3 robust fault tolerant flight control scheme design
Considering (18) and (23), z can be obtainedf2Is a derivative of
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000111
Due to system uncertainty Δ F (N)f) Is unknown, and the following form of radial basis function neural network is constructed and approximated by combining the theorem 1, and the following form of radial basis function neural network can be obtained
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000112
Wherein
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000113
For a matrix to be designed, the matrix
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000114
The ideal weight matrix is represented by a matrix of weights,
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000115
is at c2When is greater than 0, satisfy
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000116
The function of the gaussian function of (a) is,
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000117
is at the same time
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000118
When it is satisfied with
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000119
The error is approximated by the neural network.
Substituting (28) into (27) to obtain
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100001110
Wherein
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100001111
Representing the approximation error.
Designing an adaptive robust fault-tolerant controller as
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100001112
Wherein
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100001113
For the matrix to be designed, the matrix is,
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100001114
represents W2An estimate of (d).
Because of Uf1=GfUfThen the actual control input is
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100001115
Substituting equation (30) into (29) can result in
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100001116
Wherein
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100001117
Indicating the estimation error.
Choosing a Lyapunov function as:
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100001118
wherein
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100001119
And
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100001120
is a parameter to be designed.
Considering (21), (26) and (31), and taking the derivative of (33) to obtain
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000121
In combination with the Young's inequality, equation (34) may be further written as
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000122
Design of
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000123
And
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000124
is the parameter update law of
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000125
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000126
Wherein
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000127
And
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000128
is a constant to be designed.
Considering (36) and (37), the following inequality can be obtained:
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000129
substituting the inequality into (35) can obtain:
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100001210
the parameter to be designed satisfies Kf2≥IfAnd 2Pf2≥IfAt the same time have
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100001211
Figure RE-GDA00030983607100001212
2.4 stability analysis
The above analysis design process can be summarized as theorem 1 as follows:
theorem 1: the method comprises the step of considering a vertical take-off and landing mode system model of the unmanned helicopter, wherein the vertical take-off and landing mode system model simultaneously has system uncertainty and actuator faults. The error transfer function is chosen as (11), the auxiliary system is designed as (21), and the parameter adaptation law is chosen as (36) - (37). Under the action of the robust fault-tolerant controller (30), the overall closed-loop system signal is bounded. At the same time, the tracking error eyAlways varying within a preset performance range (8).
And (3) proving that: from equation (38), the adaptive control scheme (30) is designed to ensure the bounding of all closed loop system signals. Further, from (38) can be obtained
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000131
Considering the Lyapunov function VfCan be given by
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000132
This means that when t → ∞ the tracking error zf1Satisfy the requirement of
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000133
Also, we can get
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000134
Due to betaf1=zf1f1Thus obtaining
Figure RE-GDA0003098360710000135
From equation (41) and theorem 2, the tracking error e can be derivedyRemain within the preset performance (8).
The present invention has been described in terms of specific examples, which are provided to aid understanding of the invention and are not intended to be limiting. Any partial modification or replacement within the technical scope of the present disclosure by a person skilled in the art should be included in the scope of the present disclosure.

Claims (1)

1. A preset performance control method of an unmanned helicopter is characterized by comprising the following steps:
(1) introducing system uncertainty and actuator faults into a nonlinear system model of the unmanned helicopter, and simultaneously converting inequality constraints of tracking errors into equality problems by adopting an error conversion function method for processing;
(2) transforming the model established in the step (1), and approximating the system uncertainty by adopting a neural network method; meanwhile, an auxiliary system is constructed to solve the problem of failure fault of the actuator, so that the fault tolerance of the system is improved;
(3) and (3) combining the technologies in the step (1) and the step (2), designing the robust fault-tolerant controller of the unmanned helicopter under the framework of a backstepping method, and ensuring that the tracking error of the system can be changed in a set range all the time under the condition that the unmanned helicopter system faces complex environments such as system uncertainty, actuator faults and the like.
CN202110480646.4A 2021-04-30 2021-04-30 Tracking control method for preset performance of unmanned helicopter Pending CN113204192A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110480646.4A CN113204192A (en) 2021-04-30 2021-04-30 Tracking control method for preset performance of unmanned helicopter

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110480646.4A CN113204192A (en) 2021-04-30 2021-04-30 Tracking control method for preset performance of unmanned helicopter

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN113204192A true CN113204192A (en) 2021-08-03

Family

ID=77029628

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202110480646.4A Pending CN113204192A (en) 2021-04-30 2021-04-30 Tracking control method for preset performance of unmanned helicopter

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN113204192A (en)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109765918A (en) * 2019-02-22 2019-05-17 南京航空航天大学 A kind of unmanned helicopter robust adaptive compensating control method
CN109856972A (en) * 2019-02-21 2019-06-07 南京航空航天大学 A kind of unmanned helicopter robust Fault-Tolerant tracking and controlling method
CN109991991A (en) * 2019-02-26 2019-07-09 南京航空航天大学 A kind of unmanned helicopter robust Fault-Tolerant tracking

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109856972A (en) * 2019-02-21 2019-06-07 南京航空航天大学 A kind of unmanned helicopter robust Fault-Tolerant tracking and controlling method
CN109765918A (en) * 2019-02-22 2019-05-17 南京航空航天大学 A kind of unmanned helicopter robust adaptive compensating control method
CN109991991A (en) * 2019-02-26 2019-07-09 南京航空航天大学 A kind of unmanned helicopter robust Fault-Tolerant tracking

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
YAN KUN,ET AL.: "neural network-based adaptive fault tolerant tracking control for unmanned autonomous helicopters with prescribed performance", 《JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING》 *

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Zhong et al. Robust actuator fault detection and diagnosis for a quadrotor UAV with external disturbances
CN109856972B (en) Robust fault-tolerant tracking control method for unmanned helicopter
Zhen et al. Automatic carrier landing control for unmanned aerial vehicles based on preview control and particle filtering
CN109765918B (en) Robust adaptive compensation control method for unmanned helicopter
CN109976361B (en) Event-triggering-oriented four-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle attitude control method
Yan et al. Extended state observer‐based sliding mode fault‐tolerant control for unmanned autonomous helicopter with wind gusts
Xu et al. Information fusion estimation-based path following control of quadrotor UAVs subjected to Gaussian random disturbance
CN110794857A (en) Robust discrete fractional order control method of fixed wing unmanned aerial vehicle considering external wind interference
Hwang et al. Generalized and heterogeneous nonlinear dynamic multiagent systems using online RNN-based finite-time formation tracking control and application to transportation systems
CN110320927A (en) Flight control method and system of intelligent deformable aircraft
CN113204191A (en) Active disturbance rejection fault-tolerant control method for unmanned helicopter
CN107817818B (en) Finite time control method for flight path tracking of uncertain model airship
CN115431271A (en) Anti-interference pointing control method for tail end of aircraft mechanical arm
CN112068594A (en) JAYA algorithm optimization-based course control method for small unmanned helicopter
Timchenko et al. Optimization of processes of robust control of quadcopter for monitoring of sea waters
CN108459611B (en) Attitude tracking control method of near space vehicle
Shao et al. Robust discrete-time flight control of UAV with external disturbances
CN109857146B (en) Layered unmanned aerial vehicle tracking control method based on feedforward and weight distribution
Wan et al. Adaptive sliding mode tracking control for unmanned autonomous helicopters based on neural networks
CN113204192A (en) Tracking control method for preset performance of unmanned helicopter
CN114003052B (en) Fixed wing unmanned aerial vehicle longitudinal movement robust self-adaptive control method based on dynamic compensation system
Chen et al. Design, modeling and tuning of modified PID controller for autopilot in MAVs
Nikolos et al. Roll control of unmanned aerial vehicles using fuzzy logic
Shao et al. Trajectory planning and prescribed performance tracking control based on fractional-order observers for unmanned helicopters with unmeasurable states
Chen Study on Flight Attitude Control of Four-rotor UAV

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
WD01 Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication
WD01 Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication

Application publication date: 20210803