CN113190909A - Method, device and storage medium for determining position reasonability of target object - Google Patents
Method, device and storage medium for determining position reasonability of target object Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN113190909A CN113190909A CN202110559415.2A CN202110559415A CN113190909A CN 113190909 A CN113190909 A CN 113190909A CN 202110559415 A CN202110559415 A CN 202110559415A CN 113190909 A CN113190909 A CN 113190909A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- target object
- model
- determining
- reasonable
- object model
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/10—Geometric CAD
- G06F30/13—Architectural design, e.g. computer-aided architectural design [CAAD] related to design of buildings, bridges, landscapes, production plants or roads
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2111/00—Details relating to CAD techniques
- G06F2111/10—Numerical modelling
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
- Computational Mathematics (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a method, a device and a storage medium for determining the position reasonability of a target object, wherein the method for determining the position reasonability of the target object comprises the following steps: acquiring a fault-tolerant parameter m; adjusting a preset parameter n according to the fault tolerance parameter m to obtain a proportional parameter k; controlling the target object model to amplify the proportion corresponding to the proportion parameter k to obtain a reference model; it is determined whether the target object is reasonably located based at least on whether there is a common portion between the reference model and other object models within the target region. The method for determining the position reasonability of the target object solves the problem that the judgment precision of the position reasonability of the target object is low in the prior art.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of model analysis, in particular to a method and a device for determining the position reasonability of a target object and a storage medium.
Background
In the process of production and life, the position of an object needs to be planned and laid out frequently, so that the problem of inconvenience in use caused by unreasonable positions of the object is solved. In the related art, a scheme exists for judging whether the position of an article is reasonable or not by adopting the model of the article for collision detection, but the detection precision of the scheme is low, and misjudgment is easy to occur when the distance between the models is short, so that inconvenience is brought to the operation process.
By taking the home decoration design process as an example, the placing positions of various furniture are reasonably planned, so that the placing positions of the furniture are more scientific, and the convenience and the comfort of a user are improved. In the planning process, whether the furniture placing position is reasonable can be determined by adopting the collision detection on the furniture models, but when the furniture models are close to each other, the false alarm is easy to occur, so that the working personnel need to take time and labor to confirm, and inconvenience is brought to the operation process.
In view of the above problems, no effective solution has been proposed.
The above information disclosed in the background section is only for enhancement of understanding of the background of the technology described herein. The background art may therefore contain certain information that does not form the known prior art to those skilled in the art.
Disclosure of Invention
The embodiment of the invention provides a method, a device and a storage medium for determining the position reasonability of a target object, which are used for at least solving the problem of low judgment precision of the position reasonability of the target object in the prior art.
In order to achieve the above object, according to a first aspect of embodiments of the present invention, there is provided a method of determining the plausibility of a location of a target object, including: acquiring a fault-tolerant parameter m; adjusting a preset parameter n according to the fault tolerance parameter m to obtain a proportional parameter k; controlling the target object model to amplify the proportion corresponding to the proportion parameter k to obtain a reference model; it is determined whether the target object is reasonably located based at least on whether there is a common portion between the reference model and other object models within the target region.
Further, determining whether the location of the target object is reasonable based at least on whether there is a common portion between the reference model and other object models within the target region includes: in case there is a common part between the reference model and other object models within the target area, it is not reasonable to determine the position of the target object.
Further, according to the fault tolerance parameter m, adjusting a preset parameter n to obtain a proportional parameter k, including: and obtaining a proportional parameter k according to a formula k which is m + n, wherein the value range of the preset parameter n is 1.2-3, and the fault-tolerant parameter m is a positive value or a negative value.
Further, determining whether the location of the target object is reasonable based at least on whether there is a common portion between the reference model and other object models within the target region includes: and under the condition that the common part does not exist between the reference model and other object models in the target area, determining whether the position relation between the target object model and the other object models is reasonable or not according to the position relation between the target object model and the other object models.
Further, determining whether the position relationship between the target object model and the other object models is reasonable according to the position relationship between the target object model and the other object models includes: if a public part exists between the target object model and other object models, the position relation between the target object model and other object models is unreasonable; and if the common part does not exist between the target object model and other object models, determining that the position relation between the target object model and other object models is reasonable.
Further, determining whether the position relationship between the target object model and the other object models is reasonable according to the position relationship between the target object model and the other object models includes: determining a reference geometric model according to the target object model, wherein the reference geometric model surrounds the target object model; if a public part exists between the reference geometric body model and other object models, the position relation between the target object model and the other object models is unreasonable; and if the common part does not exist between the reference geometric body model and other object models, determining that the position relation between the target object model and other object models is reasonable.
Further, in the case that the position relationship between the target object model and the other object models is reasonable, determining whether the position of the target object is reasonable at least according to whether a common part exists between the reference model and the other object models in the target area includes: determining whether the position relation between the target object model and the house type model is reasonable or not according to the position relation between the target object model and the house type model; and determining that the position of the target object is reasonable under the condition that the position relation between the target object model and the house type model is reasonable.
Further, determining whether the position relationship between the target object model and the house type model is reasonable according to the position relationship between the target object model and the house type model comprises: if the minimum distance between the geometric center of the target object model and the inner surface of the house type model is smaller than a preset value, determining that the position relation between the target object model and the house type model is unreasonable; and if the minimum distance between the geometric center of the target object model and the inner surface of the house type model is larger than or equal to a preset value, determining that the position relationship between the target object model and the house type model is reasonable.
Further, determining whether the position relationship between the target object model and the house type model is reasonable according to the position relationship between the target object model and the house type model comprises: if a public part exists between the target object model and the house type model, determining that the position relation between the target object model and the house type model is unreasonable; and if the common part does not exist between the target object model and the house type model, determining that the position relation between the target object model and the house type model is reasonable.
According to a second aspect of the embodiments of the present invention, there is provided an apparatus for determining the reasonableness of a position of a target object, including: the acquisition unit is used for acquiring a fault-tolerant parameter m; the adjusting unit is used for adjusting a preset parameter n according to the fault-tolerant parameter m to obtain a proportional parameter k; the amplifying unit is used for controlling the target object model to amplify the proportion corresponding to the proportion parameter k to obtain a reference model; a first determining unit for determining whether the position of the target object is reasonable at least according to whether a common part exists between the reference model and other object models in the target area.
According to a third aspect of embodiments of the present invention, there is provided a non-volatile storage medium comprising a stored program, wherein a device in which the non-volatile storage medium is located is controlled to perform the above-described method of determining the location reasonableness of a target object when the program is running.
According to a fourth aspect of the embodiments of the present invention, there is provided a processor for executing a program, wherein the program executes the method for determining the position reasonableness of the target object.
According to a fifth aspect of the embodiments of the present invention, there is provided a terminal device, including a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, the processor implementing the above method for determining the position reasonableness of a target object when executing the computer program.
The method for determining the position reasonability of the target object by applying the technical scheme of the invention comprises the following steps: acquiring a fault-tolerant parameter m; adjusting a preset parameter n according to the fault tolerance parameter m to obtain a proportional parameter k; controlling the target object model to amplify the proportion corresponding to the proportion parameter k to obtain a reference model; it is determined whether the target object is reasonably located based at least on whether there is a common portion between the reference model and other object models within the target region. Therefore, the fault-tolerant rate in the implementation process of the method can be flexibly controlled by acquiring the fault-tolerant parameters and modifying the proportional parameters according to the fault-tolerant parameters, the problem of misjudgment when the target object is close to other objects can be effectively solved, and the judgment precision of the position reasonability of the target object is improved.
Drawings
The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this application, illustrate embodiment(s) of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the invention without limiting the invention. In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow chart diagram of an alternative embodiment of a method of determining the position reasonableness of a target object according to the present invention;
fig. 2 is a schematic view of an alternative embodiment of the apparatus for determining the rationality of the position of a target object according to the invention.
Detailed Description
It should be noted that the embodiments and features of the embodiments in the present application may be combined with each other without conflict. The present application will be described in detail below with reference to the embodiments with reference to the attached drawings.
In order to make the technical solutions of the present invention better understood, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
It should be noted that the terms "first," "second," and the like in the description and claims of the present invention and in the drawings described above are used for distinguishing between similar elements and not necessarily for describing a particular sequential or chronological order. It is to be understood that the data so used is interchangeable under appropriate circumstances such that the embodiments of the invention described herein are capable of operation in sequences other than those illustrated or described herein. Furthermore, the terms "comprises," "comprising," and "having," and any variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, system, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of steps or elements is not necessarily limited to those steps or elements expressly listed, but may include other steps or elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.
It will be understood that when an element such as a layer, film, region, or substrate is referred to as being "on" another element, it can be directly on the other element or intervening elements may also be present. Also, in the specification and claims, when an element is described as being "connected" to another element, the element may be "directly connected" to the other element or "connected" to the other element through a third element.
Fig. 1 is a method of determining the rationality of a target object location according to an embodiment of the invention, as shown in fig. 1, the method comprising the steps of:
step S102, obtaining a fault tolerance parameter m;
step S104, adjusting a preset parameter n according to the fault-tolerant parameter m to obtain a proportional parameter k;
s106, controlling the target object model to amplify the proportion corresponding to the proportion parameter k to obtain a reference model;
step S108, determining whether the position of the target object is reasonable according to at least whether a public part exists between the reference model and other object models in the target area.
The method for determining the position reasonability of the target object by adopting the technical scheme comprises the following steps: acquiring a fault-tolerant parameter m; adjusting a preset parameter n according to the fault tolerance parameter m to obtain a proportional parameter k; controlling the target object model to amplify the proportion corresponding to the proportion parameter k to obtain a reference model; it is determined whether the target object is reasonably located based at least on whether there is a common portion between the reference model and other object models within the target region. Therefore, the fault-tolerant rate in the implementation process of the method can be flexibly controlled by acquiring the fault-tolerant parameters and modifying the proportional parameters according to the fault-tolerant parameters, the problem of misjudgment when the target object is close to other objects can be effectively solved, and the judgment precision of the position reasonability of the target object is improved.
Moreover, according to the common part condition between the reference model and other object models in the target area, the judgment result can be conveniently classified.
In specific implementation, the target object can be arbitrarily selected according to detection requirements, and can be a single object (such as a cabinet), a combined body (such as a combination of a plurality of cabinets), or an assembly (such as a part of a structural member of a single cabinet). Of course, the above-mentioned cabinet is only an example, and other objects such as sofas, beds, tables and chairs, etc. can be used. The presence of a common part between two models in this context means that the parts of the two models that are in contact or overlap.
Determining whether the location of the target object is reasonable based at least on whether there is a common portion between the reference model and other object models within the target region, including: in case there is a common part between the reference model and other object models within the target area, it is not reasonable to determine the position of the target object.
In this embodiment, adjusting the preset parameter n according to the fault tolerance parameter m to obtain the proportional parameter k includes: and obtaining a proportional parameter k according to a formula k which is m + n, wherein the value range of the preset parameter n is 1.2-3, and the fault-tolerant parameter m is a positive value or a negative value.
Specifically, determining whether the position of the target object is reasonable at least according to whether a common part exists between the reference model and other object models in the target area comprises: and under the condition that the common part does not exist between the reference model and other object models in the target area, determining whether the position relation between the target object model and the other object models is reasonable or not according to the position relation between the target object model and the other object models.
The condition that the position of the target object is obviously unreasonable can be preliminarily eliminated by adopting the position relationship between the reference model and other object models in the target area, and whether the position relationship between the target object model and other object models is reasonable can be accurately determined directly through the position relationship between the target object model and other object models. Therefore, compared with a mode of directly judging by adopting the position relation between the target object model and other object models, on the basis of ensuring the judgment accuracy, the method can effectively save the calculated amount and is beneficial to improving the judgment speed.
In the process of determining whether the position relationship between the target object model and the other object models is reasonable or not according to the position relationship between the target object model and the other object models, various different implementation manners may exist.
In an optional implementation manner, determining whether the positional relationship between the target object model and the other object model is reasonable according to the positional relationship between the target object model and the other object model includes: if a public part exists between the target object model and other object models, the position relation between the target object model and other object models is unreasonable; and if the common part does not exist between the target object model and other object models, determining that the position relation between the target object model and other object models is reasonable.
In the process of determining whether the position relationship between the target object model and the other object models is reasonable according to the position relationship between the target object model and the other object models, when the structure of the target object model is simple, for example, the target object model is a hardware or other small part or a structure with a regular shape, the interference condition can be determined directly by determining whether a common part exists between the target object model and the other object models, so that fine detection is realized, and whether the position relationship between the target object model and the other object models is reasonable is accurately determined. In this embodiment, when the model to be detected needs to be finely detected, Mesh objects (Mesh, which is generally represented as a set of triangular patches) in the modeling of the model itself are selected for Mesh-based detection.
In another optional implementation manner, determining whether the positional relationship between the target object model and the other object model is reasonable according to the positional relationship between the target object model and the other object model includes: determining a reference geometric model according to the target object model, wherein the reference geometric model surrounds the target object model; if a public part exists between the reference geometric body model and other object models, the position relation between the target object model and the other object models is unreasonable; and if the common part does not exist between the reference geometric body model and other object models, determining that the position relation between the target object model and other object models is reasonable.
When the structure of the target object model is complex, a reference geometric model can be determined according to the target object model, the reference geometric model surrounds the target object model, and therefore the reference geometric model can be approximately used as the target object model, the target object model is simplified, interference between the target object model and other object models can be accurately obtained by judging the common part condition between the reference geometric model and the target object model, whether the position relation between the target object model and other object models is reasonable or not is determined, and the calculated amount can be effectively reduced. Moreover, it can be understood that, on the basis of ensuring the surrounding effect on the target object model, the smaller the size of the reference geometric model is, the better the size is, so that the reference geometric model can be closer to the target object model, and the method has a positive effect on improving the judgment precision.
In concrete implementation, the reference geometric model may be provided in various shapes, such as a rectangular parallelepiped shape, a cylindrical shape, a conical shape, and the like, according to actual circumstances, and it may also be an irregular geometric body composed of a plurality of regular geometric bodies, and as long as the structure thereof has fewer features than the target object model, the function of reducing the amount of computation can be realized. In this embodiment, for a more complex model such as a plate, an external bounding Box similar to Box of the parameterized model is selected for the detection based on the outer contour.
Specifically, in the case that the position relationship between the target object model and the other object models is reasonable, determining whether the position of the target object is reasonable at least according to whether a common part exists between the reference model and the other object models in the target area includes: determining whether the position relation between the target object model and the house type model is reasonable or not according to the position relation between the target object model and the house type model; and determining that the position of the target object is reasonable under the condition that the position relation between the target object model and the house type model is reasonable.
Therefore, after the two judging steps, only under the condition that the position relation between the target object model and other object models is determined to be reasonable, whether the position relation between the target object model and the house type model is reasonable or not can be further judged, so that the times of judging whether the position relation between the target object model and the house type model is reasonable or not are effectively reduced, and the reduction of the calculated amount is facilitated.
In the process of determining whether the position relationship between the target object model and the house type model is reasonable or not according to the position relationship between the target object model and the house type model, the method can be realized by adopting a plurality of modes:
in an optional implementation manner, determining whether the positional relationship between the target object model and the house type model is reasonable according to the positional relationship between the target object model and the house type model includes: if the minimum distance between the geometric center of the target object model and the inner surface of the house type model is smaller than a preset value, determining that the position relation between the target object model and the house type model is unreasonable; and if the minimum distance between the geometric center of the target object model and the inner surface of the house type model is larger than or equal to a preset value, determining that the position relationship between the target object model and the house type model is reasonable. Therefore, the minimum distance between the geometric center of the target object model and the inner surface of the house type model is used as a judgment condition, the judgment process can be effectively simplified, and the calculation amount of the judgment process is reduced.
Specifically, the inner surface of the house model may include: interior wall surfaces, ceilings, pillar surfaces, and the like.
In another optional implementation manner, determining whether the positional relationship between the target object model and the house type model is reasonable according to the positional relationship between the target object model and the house type model includes: if a public part exists between the target object model and the house type model, determining that the position relation between the target object model and the house type model is unreasonable; and if the common part does not exist between the target object model and the house type model, determining that the position relation between the target object model and the house type model is reasonable. Although this implementation is computationally expensive, it is more accurate than a method in which the minimum distance between the geometric center of the target object model and the inner surface of the house type model is used as the determination condition.
As shown in fig. 2, an embodiment of the present invention further provides an apparatus for determining the reasonableness of a target object position, including: the acquisition unit is used for acquiring a fault-tolerant parameter m; the adjusting unit is used for adjusting a preset parameter n according to the fault-tolerant parameter m to obtain a proportional parameter k; the amplifying unit is used for controlling the target object model to amplify the proportion corresponding to the proportion parameter k to obtain a reference model; a first determining unit for determining whether the position of the target object is reasonable at least according to whether a common part exists between the reference model and other object models in the target area.
The first determination unit is configured to determine that the position of the target object is not reasonable in a case where there is a common portion between the reference model and the other object models within the target area. The adjusting unit is used for obtaining a proportional parameter k according to a formula k which is m + n, wherein the value range of the preset parameter n is 1.2-3, and the fault-tolerant parameter m is a positive value or a negative value.
The first determination unit is further configured to determine whether the positional relationship between the target object model and the other object models is reasonable according to the positional relationship between the target object model and the other object models in a case where there is no common part between the reference model and the other object models in the target region.
The first determination unit is configured to: if a public part exists between the target object model and other object models, the position relation between the target object model and other object models is unreasonable; and if the common part does not exist between the target object model and other object models, determining that the position relation between the target object model and other object models is reasonable.
The first determination unit includes a first determination module, a second determination module, and a third determination module: the first determination module is used for determining a reference geometric model according to the target object model, and the reference geometric model surrounds the target object model; the second determination module is used for determining that the position relation between the target object model and other object models is unreasonable if a common part exists between the reference geometric body model and other object models; and the third determination module is used for determining that the position relation between the target object model and the other object models is reasonable if no public part exists between the reference geometric body model and the other object models.
The device for determining the position reasonability of the target object further comprises a second determining unit, wherein the second determining unit is used for determining whether the position relationship between the target object model and the house type model is reasonable or not according to the position relationship between the target object model and the house type model under the condition that the position relationship between the target object model and other object models is reasonable; and determining that the position of the target object is reasonable under the condition that the position relation between the target object model and the house type model is reasonable.
The second determination unit is configured to: if the minimum distance between the geometric center of the target object model and the inner surface of the house type model is smaller than a preset value, determining that the position relation between the target object model and the house type model is unreasonable; and if the minimum distance between the geometric center of the target object model and the inner surface of the house type model is larger than or equal to a preset value, determining that the position relationship between the target object model and the house type model is reasonable.
The second determination unit is configured to: if a public part exists between the target object model and the house type model, determining that the position relation between the target object model and the house type model is unreasonable; and if the common part does not exist between the target object model and the house type model, determining that the position relation between the target object model and the house type model is reasonable.
In addition, the embodiment of the invention also provides a nonvolatile storage medium, the nonvolatile storage medium comprises a stored program, and when the program runs, the device where the nonvolatile storage medium is located is controlled to execute the method for determining the position reasonableness of the target object.
The embodiment of the invention further provides a processor, which is used for running the program, wherein the program runs to execute the method for determining the position reasonableness of the target object.
Finally, an embodiment of the present invention further provides a terminal device, which includes a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, and when the processor executes the computer program, the method for determining the position reasonableness of the target object is implemented.
The above-mentioned serial numbers of the embodiments of the present invention are merely for description and do not represent the merits of the embodiments. Moreover, the steps illustrated in the flowcharts of the figures may be performed in a computer system such as a set of computer-executable instructions, and while a logical order is illustrated in the flowcharts, in some cases, the steps illustrated or described may be performed in an order different than here.
In the above embodiments of the present invention, the descriptions of the respective embodiments have respective emphasis, and for parts that are not described in detail in a certain embodiment, reference may be made to related descriptions of other embodiments.
In the embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed technology can be implemented in other ways. The above-described embodiments of the apparatus are merely illustrative, and for example, the division of the units may be a logical division, and in actual implementation, there may be another division, for example, multiple units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or not executed. In addition, the shown or discussed mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection may be an indirect coupling or communication connection through some interfaces, units or modules, and may be in an electrical or other form.
The units described as separate parts may or may not be physically separate, and parts displayed as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one place, or may be distributed on a plurality of units. Some or all of the units can be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of the embodiment.
In addition, functional units in the embodiments of the present invention may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist alone physically, or two or more units are integrated into one unit. The integrated unit can be realized in a form of hardware, and can also be realized in a form of a software functional unit.
The integrated unit, if implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as a stand-alone product, may be stored in a computer readable storage medium. Based on such understanding, the technical solution of the present invention may be embodied in the form of a software product, which is stored in a storage medium and includes instructions for causing a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device) to execute all or part of the steps of the method according to the embodiments of the present invention. And the aforementioned storage medium includes: a U-disk, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a removable hard disk, a magnetic or optical disk, and other various media capable of storing program codes.
The foregoing is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, and it should be noted that, for those skilled in the art, various modifications and decorations can be made without departing from the principle of the present invention, and these modifications and decorations should also be regarded as the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (13)
1. A method of determining the plausibility of a target object location, comprising:
acquiring a fault-tolerant parameter m;
adjusting a preset parameter n according to the fault-tolerant parameter m to obtain a proportional parameter k;
controlling the target object model to amplify the proportion corresponding to the proportion parameter k to obtain a reference model;
determining whether the position of the target object is reasonable based at least on whether a common part exists between the reference model and other object models in the target area.
2. A method of determining the plausibility of a target object's position according to claim 1, wherein determining whether the target object's position is plausible based at least on whether there is a common part between the reference model and other object models within the target area comprises:
determining the position of the target object is not reasonable in case there is a common part between the reference model and other object models within the target area.
3. The method for determining the position reasonableness of the target object according to claim 1, wherein the step of adjusting a preset parameter n according to the fault-tolerant parameter m to obtain a proportional parameter k comprises the following steps: and obtaining the proportional parameter k according to a formula k which is m + n, wherein the value range of the preset parameter n is 1.2-3, and the fault-tolerant parameter m is a positive value or a negative value.
4. A method of determining the plausibility of a target object's position according to claim 1, wherein determining whether the target object's position is plausible based at least on whether there is a common part between the reference model and other object models within the target area comprises:
and under the condition that no public part exists between the reference model and other object models in the target area, determining whether the position relation between the target object model and the other object models is reasonable or not according to the position relation between the target object model and the other object models.
5. A method of determining the positional reasonableness of a target object according to claim 4, wherein determining whether the positional relationship between the target object model and the other object model is reasonable from the positional relationship between the target object model and the other object model comprises:
if a public part exists between the target object model and the other object models, determining that the position relation between the target object model and the other object models is unreasonable;
and if the common part does not exist between the target object model and the other object models, determining that the position relation between the target object model and the other object models is reasonable.
6. A method of determining the positional reasonableness of a target object according to claim 4, wherein determining whether the positional relationship between the target object model and the other object model is reasonable from the positional relationship between the target object model and the other object model comprises:
determining a reference geometric model from the target object model, the reference geometric model encompassing the target object model;
if a common part exists between the reference geometric body model and the other object models, determining that the position relation between the target object model and the other object models is unreasonable;
and if no public part exists between the reference geometric body model and the other object models, determining that the position relation between the target object model and the other object models is reasonable.
7. A method for determining the plausibility of a location of a target object according to any one of claims 4 to 6, wherein, in the event that the positional relationship between the target object model and the other object models is reasonable, determining whether the location of the target object is reasonable at least in dependence on whether there is a common part between the reference model and the other object models within the target area comprises:
determining whether the position relation between the target object model and the house type model is reasonable or not according to the position relation between the target object model and the house type model;
and determining that the position of the target object is reasonable under the condition that the position relation between the target object model and the house type model is reasonable.
8. A method of determining a target object position rationality according to claim 7, characterised in that determining whether the positional relationship between the target object model and the house type model is rational based on the positional relationship between the target object model and the house type model comprises:
if the minimum distance between the geometric center of the target object model and the inner surface of the house type model is smaller than a preset value, determining that the position relation between the target object model and the house type model is unreasonable;
and if the minimum distance between the geometric center of the target object model and the inner surface of the house type model is larger than or equal to a preset value, determining that the position relationship between the target object model and the house type model is reasonable.
9. A method of determining a target object position rationality according to claim 7, characterised in that determining whether the positional relationship between the target object model and the house type model is rational based on the positional relationship between the target object model and the house type model comprises:
if a public part exists between the target object model and the house type model, determining that the position relation between the target object model and the house type model is unreasonable;
and if the common part does not exist between the target object model and the house type model, determining that the position relation between the target object model and the house type model is reasonable.
10. An apparatus for determining the plausibility of a target object location, comprising:
the acquisition unit is used for acquiring a fault-tolerant parameter m;
the adjusting unit is used for adjusting a preset parameter n according to the fault-tolerant parameter m to obtain a proportional parameter k;
the amplifying unit is used for controlling the target object model to amplify the proportion corresponding to the proportion parameter k to obtain a reference model;
a first determining unit, configured to determine whether the position of the target object is reasonable at least according to whether a common part exists between the reference model and other object models in the target area.
11. A non-volatile storage medium, comprising a stored program, wherein the program, when executed, controls a device on which the non-volatile storage medium is located to perform the method of determining the location plausibility of a target object according to any one of claims 1 to 9.
12. A processor for running a program, wherein the program when running performs the method of determining the positional plausibility of a target object of any one of claims 1 to 9.
13. A terminal device comprising a memory, a processor and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor when executing the computer program implements a method of determining the location plausibility of a target object according to any one of claims 1 to 9.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110559415.2A CN113190909B (en) | 2021-05-21 | 2021-05-21 | Method, device and storage medium for determining position reasonability of target object |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110559415.2A CN113190909B (en) | 2021-05-21 | 2021-05-21 | Method, device and storage medium for determining position reasonability of target object |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN113190909A true CN113190909A (en) | 2021-07-30 |
| CN113190909B CN113190909B (en) | 2023-02-24 |
Family
ID=76984825
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110559415.2A Active CN113190909B (en) | 2021-05-21 | 2021-05-21 | Method, device and storage medium for determining position reasonability of target object |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN113190909B (en) |
Citations (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2000331050A (en) * | 1999-05-19 | 2000-11-30 | Fujitsu Ltd | Method and device for object position discrimination and object form model generation, and storage medium |
| CN108434613A (en) * | 2018-03-06 | 2018-08-24 | 沈阳东软医疗系统有限公司 | A kind of collision checking method and device |
| CN109887001A (en) * | 2019-01-31 | 2019-06-14 | 中国科学院深圳先进技术研究院 | Method for tracking target, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN111090900A (en) * | 2019-11-22 | 2020-05-01 | 广东三维家信息科技有限公司 | Component matching method and system in home decoration design and electronic equipment |
| CN111597465A (en) * | 2020-04-28 | 2020-08-28 | 北京字节跳动网络技术有限公司 | Display method and device and electronic equipment |
| CN111640329A (en) * | 2020-05-28 | 2020-09-08 | 南京市德赛西威汽车电子有限公司 | Vehicle early warning method based on collision model |
| CN111950329A (en) * | 2019-05-16 | 2020-11-17 | 长沙智能驾驶研究院有限公司 | Target detection and model training method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN112221128A (en) * | 2020-11-12 | 2021-01-15 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | Map adjusting method and related device |
| CN112733224A (en) * | 2020-12-28 | 2021-04-30 | 中铁广州工程局集团有限公司 | Simulation pile sinking construction method for dense pile group |
-
2021
- 2021-05-21 CN CN202110559415.2A patent/CN113190909B/en active Active
Patent Citations (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2000331050A (en) * | 1999-05-19 | 2000-11-30 | Fujitsu Ltd | Method and device for object position discrimination and object form model generation, and storage medium |
| CN108434613A (en) * | 2018-03-06 | 2018-08-24 | 沈阳东软医疗系统有限公司 | A kind of collision checking method and device |
| CN109887001A (en) * | 2019-01-31 | 2019-06-14 | 中国科学院深圳先进技术研究院 | Method for tracking target, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN111950329A (en) * | 2019-05-16 | 2020-11-17 | 长沙智能驾驶研究院有限公司 | Target detection and model training method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN111090900A (en) * | 2019-11-22 | 2020-05-01 | 广东三维家信息科技有限公司 | Component matching method and system in home decoration design and electronic equipment |
| CN111597465A (en) * | 2020-04-28 | 2020-08-28 | 北京字节跳动网络技术有限公司 | Display method and device and electronic equipment |
| CN111640329A (en) * | 2020-05-28 | 2020-09-08 | 南京市德赛西威汽车电子有限公司 | Vehicle early warning method based on collision model |
| CN112221128A (en) * | 2020-11-12 | 2021-01-15 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | Map adjusting method and related device |
| CN112733224A (en) * | 2020-12-28 | 2021-04-30 | 中铁广州工程局集团有限公司 | Simulation pile sinking construction method for dense pile group |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
| Title |
|---|
| ZOCTOPUS_ZHANG: "使用Unity中的Box Collider组件完成游戏场景中的碰撞检测功能", 《HTTPS://WWW.CNBLOGS.COM/OCTOPTUSLIAN/P/8946347.HTML》 * |
| 刘米兰等: "基于案例库的室内区域自动布局方法", 《计算机辅助设计与图形学学报》 * |
| 百度经验: "PROE文件的比例缩放", 《HTTPS://JINGYAN.BAIDU.COM/ARTICLE/ED2A5D1F34F5D409F6BE1704.HTML》 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN113190909B (en) | 2023-02-24 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US20200125087A1 (en) | Virtual wall system for robot | |
| CN105866741A (en) | Home control device and home control method on basis of sound source localization | |
| CN104040820A (en) | System for building management of electricity via network control of point-of-use devices | |
| CN104950318A (en) | Power-saving method for GPS (global position system) positioning module and mobile device | |
| CN110287626A (en) | Automatically generate method, medium, equipment and the device of interior decoration design scheme | |
| CN109298270A (en) | Equipment fault detection method and system based on power consumption judgment | |
| CN103646348B (en) | Method for saving factory station wiring diagram panoramic inversion context | |
| CN107277657A (en) | A kind of earphone method for retrieving, device and earphone | |
| CN113190909B (en) | Method, device and storage medium for determining position reasonability of target object | |
| CN102023767B (en) | Improvement method for capacitive touch pad edge positioning | |
| CN110426130A (en) | Temperature probe and probe insert state detection method, cooking system | |
| US10235009B1 (en) | Product variable optimization for manufacture or supply of designed products | |
| CN109688218A (en) | Method, apparatus, electronic equipment and the computer readable storage medium of pushed information | |
| CN114115251A (en) | Control method and control device of intelligent cleaning equipment and intelligent system | |
| CN111366211A (en) | Method and device for processing remaining working time of target vehicle | |
| CN112667924A (en) | Robot map acquisition method and device, processor and electronic device | |
| CN109495531A (en) | Request processing method and device | |
| CN108564432A (en) | A kind of consumption demand management method, system and electronic equipment | |
| CN207397064U (en) | Box culvert synchronization jacking system | |
| CN110764462B (en) | PLC intelligent electric cabinet control method and device and PLC control server | |
| CN111159626B (en) | Method, device, equipment and storage medium for calculating magnetic field value of micro robot | |
| CN110315537A (en) | A kind of method, apparatus and robot controlling robot motion | |
| CN105721199A (en) | Real-time cloud service bottleneck detection method based on kernel density estimation and fuzzy inference system | |
| CN104777765B (en) | Intelligent management, equipment and intelligence system | |
| EP3830736A1 (en) | Anti-constraint configuration and enforcement for computer-aided design (cad) models |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |