Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a hydroelectric generating set power adjusting method, a control system and a hydroelectric generating set based on an S-curve algorithm, and solves the technical problems that the hydroelectric generating set has relatively large power oscillation and relatively unstable power when the traditional linear control algorithm is adopted to adjust the opening degree of a guide vane in the prior art. The technical effects that can be produced by the preferred technical scheme in the technical schemes provided by the invention are described in detail in the following.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention provides the following technical scheme:
the invention provides a hydroelectric generating set power adjusting method based on an S-curve algorithm, which comprises the following steps: the opening degree of the guide vane is adjusted to adjust the power of the hydroelectric generating set, and the power oscillation condition of the hydroelectric generating set is improved by controlling the movement speed change of the guide vane based on an S-shaped acceleration and deceleration speed curve analysis algorithm.
Further, when the opening degree of the guide vane is adjusted to adjust the power of the hydroelectric generating set, the speed change process of the guide vane comprises three stages which are a slow speed increasing stage, a speed stabilizing stage and a slow speed reducing stage in sequence; in the slow speed increasing section, the speed of the guide vane is gradually increased from the initial speed; in the slow deceleration section, the speed of the guide vane gradually decreases until the speed is the initial speed.
Further, setting the duration of the slow speed increasing section to be time T1, setting the duration of the speed stabilizing section to be time T2, and setting the duration of the slow speed decreasing section to be time T3, wherein the time T1 is the same as or different from the time T3; the time T3 is greater than the time T1 and the time T2.
Further, the ratio range of the time T1 is 15-30%; the proportion range of the time T2 is 50% -70%; the proportion range of the time T3 is 15-30%.
Further, in the speed stabilizing section, the speed of the guide vane is a certain value or the speed of the guide vane fluctuates within a certain range.
Further, the speed curve of the slow speed increasing section is S-shaped, and the acceleration in the slow speed increasing section is increased firstly and then reduced.
Further, the speed curve of the slow speed reduction section is in an S shape, and the acceleration in the slow speed increasing section is increased firstly and then reduced.
The control system comprises a control device and a driving structure, wherein the control device is connected with the driving structure, the driving structure is connected with the guide vane and drives the guide vane to act, and the control device can realize the control of speed change when the guide vane is opened and the control of speed change when the guide vane is closed based on an S-shaped acceleration and deceleration curve analysis algorithm.
Further, the control system further comprises a feedback signal structure, the feedback signal structure is connected with the control device, and the feedback signal structure is used for detecting the speed of the guide vane and feeding back a speed signal to the control device.
A hydroelectric generating set comprises the control system.
The invention provides a hydroelectric generating set power adjusting method based on an S-curve algorithm, which comprises the following steps: the opening degree of the guide vane is adjusted to adjust the power of the hydroelectric generating set, the water flow can be adjusted by adjusting the opening degree of the guide vane, and the condition of power oscillation of the hydroelectric generating set is improved by controlling the moving speed of the guide vane based on an S-shaped acceleration and deceleration speed curve analysis algorithm. When the opening of the guide vane is adjusted to adjust the power of the hydroelectric generating set, the speed change process of the guide vane comprises three stages which are a slow speed increasing section, a speed stabilizing section and a slow speed reducing section in sequence; in the slow speed increasing section, the speed of the guide vane is gradually increased from the initial speed; in the slow deceleration section, the speed of the guide vane is gradually reduced until the guide vane is the initial speed, and water hammer generated in the moment of action of the guide vane is effectively relieved due to the adoption of the control of buffering acceleration and deceleration, so that the power oscillation, fluctuation and counter regulation of the unit are effectively inhibited.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly described below, it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and for those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained according to the drawings without creative efforts.
Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of an opening degree adjustment mode and a power adjustment mode of a hydroelectric generating set in the prior art during load adjustment in a grid-connected state;
FIG. 2 illustrates a graph of power oscillations and fluctuations of a vane in accordance with a conventional control algorithm;
FIG. 3 illustrates a graph of reverse power regulation of a vane according to a conventional control algorithm;
FIG. 4 illustrates a graph of reverse power regulation of a vane according to a conventional control algorithm;
FIG. 5 is a graph of speed versus time for an adjusting guide vane based on an S-curve acceleration and deceleration algorithm provided by the present invention;
FIG. 6 is a graph of displacement versus time for an adjusting guide vane based on an S-curve acceleration and deceleration algorithm provided by the present invention;
FIG. 7 is a graph of parameter values and time obtained by adjusting guide vanes based on an S-curve acceleration and deceleration algorithm (5% power change adjustment test);
FIG. 8 is a graph of various parameter values versus time (5% power change adjustment test) obtained by adjusting guide vanes based on a conventional control algorithm provided by the present invention;
FIG. 9 is a graph of parameter values and time obtained by adjusting guide vanes based on an S-curve acceleration and deceleration algorithm (10% power change adjustment test);
FIG. 10 is a graph of various parameter values versus time (10% power change adjustment test) obtained by adjusting guide vanes based on a conventional control algorithm provided by the present invention;
FIG. 11 is a graph of parameter values and time (20% power change adjustment test) obtained by adjusting guide vanes based on an S-curve acceleration and deceleration algorithm provided by the present invention;
FIG. 12 is a graph of various parameter values versus time (20% power change adjustment test) derived from adjusting the vanes based on a conventional control algorithm as provided by the present invention;
FIG. 13 is a graph of parameter values and time (40% power change adjustment test) obtained by adjusting guide vanes based on an S-curve acceleration and deceleration algorithm provided by the present invention;
FIG. 14 is a graph of parameter values and time (40% power change adjustment test) obtained by adjusting guide vanes based on an S-curve acceleration and deceleration algorithm provided by the present invention;
FIG. 15 is a graph of various parameter values versus time (40% power change adjustment test) obtained by adjusting guide vanes based on a conventional control algorithm provided by the present invention;
FIG. 16 is a graph of various parameter values versus time (40% power change adjustment test) obtained by adjusting guide vanes based on a conventional control algorithm provided by the present invention;
FIG. 17 is a table of values of parameters of the hydroelectric generating set during the test;
FIG. 18 is a graph of power stability index;
FIG. 19 is a graph of power regulation dynamic response.
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention more apparent, the technical solutions of the present invention will be described in detail below. It is to be understood that the described embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention, and not restrictive of the full scope of the invention. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the examples given herein without any inventive step, are within the scope of the present invention.
The invention provides a hydroelectric generating set power adjusting method based on an S-curve algorithm, which comprises the following steps: the opening degree of the guide vane is adjusted to adjust the power of the hydroelectric generating set, the water flow can be adjusted by adjusting the opening degree of the guide vane, and the condition of power oscillation of the hydroelectric generating set is improved by controlling the moving speed of the guide vane based on an S-shaped acceleration and deceleration speed curve analysis algorithm. Specifically, when the opening of the guide vane is adjusted to adjust the power of the hydroelectric generating set, the speed change process of the guide vane comprises three stages which are a slow speed increasing stage, a speed stabilizing stage and a slow speed reducing stage in sequence; in the slow speed increasing section, the speed of the guide vane is gradually increased from the initial speed (the initial speed is usually zero); in the slow deceleration section, the speed of the guide vanes gradually decreases until it is the initial speed (the initial speed is typically zero). Due to the adoption of the control of buffering acceleration and deceleration, the water hammer generated in the moment of the action of the guide vane is effectively relieved, so that the power oscillation, fluctuation and counter regulation of the unit are effectively inhibited.
In the speed stabilizing section, the speed of the guide vane is a certain value or fluctuates within a certain range; the speed curve of the slow speed increasing section is in an S shape, and the acceleration in the slow speed increasing section is increased firstly and then reduced; the speed curve of the slow deceleration section is in an S shape, and the acceleration in the slow deceleration section is increased firstly and then reduced. When the opening of the guide vane is adjusted to adjust the power of the hydroelectric generating set, referring to fig. 5, a speed change curve of the guide vane based on an S-curve acceleration and deceleration algorithm is schematically shown, where AC is a slow acceleration section, CD is a speed stabilization section, and DB is a slow deceleration section. Referring to fig. 6, fig. 6 is a corresponding time-displacement diagram, in fig. 6, AC corresponds to the displacement of the slow speed increasing stage, CD corresponds to the displacement of the speed stabilizing stage, and DB corresponds to the displacement of the slow speed decreasing stage. ACDB may represent a gradual increase in the opening of the guide vanes, and EHIF may represent a gradual decrease in the opening of the guide vanes. For using a conventional linear control algorithm, see FIG. 6, governor controlThe guide vane moves at a constant speed (under the traditional control algorithm) according to the current position yAActing to a target position yBThe guide vane can generate larger impact at the moment of switching action to generate water hammer, thereby influencing the stability of the dynamic response of the unit power. Note that, in fig. 6, a line marked with ACDB and located relatively below is a displacement line of the guide vane based on the S-type acceleration/deceleration curve analysis algorithm, a line marked with EHIF and located relatively above is a displacement line of the guide vane based on the S-type acceleration/deceleration curve analysis algorithm, and in fig. 6, the other curve is a displacement line of the guide vane based on the conventional control algorithm.
Setting the time length occupied by the slow speed increasing section as time T1, setting the time length occupied by the speed stabilizing section as time T2, and setting the time length occupied by the slow speed reducing section as time T3, wherein the time T1 is the same as or different from the time T3; time T3 is greater than times T1 and T2. Preferably, the time T1 is in the range of 15% -30%; the proportion range of the time T2 is 50-70%; the proportion range of the time T3 is 15-30%. Referring to fig. 5, the AC block time ratio T1 may be set to about 20%, the CD block time ratio T2 may be set to about 60%, and the DB block time ratio T3 may be set to about 20%. Of course, the time ratio of the slow speed increasing stage, the speed stabilizing stage, and the slow speed decreasing stage is not limited to the above-described one, and the ratio can be set appropriately according to the actual situation.
A control system for realizing a hydroelectric generating set power regulation method based on an S-curve algorithm comprises a control device and a driving structure, wherein the control device is connected with the driving structure, the driving structure is connected with a guide vane and drives the guide vane to act, and the control device can realize control over the moving speed of the guide vane based on an S-shaped acceleration and deceleration speed curve analysis algorithm. Due to the adoption of the control of buffering acceleration and deceleration, the water hammer generated in the moment of the action of the guide vane is effectively relieved, so that the power oscillation, fluctuation and counter regulation of the unit are effectively inhibited. Preferably, the control system further comprises a feedback signal structure, the feedback signal structure is connected with the control device, and the feedback signal structure is used for detecting the speed of the guide vane and feeding the speed signal back to the control device.
The invention provides a hydroelectric generating set which comprises a control system provided by the invention. When the opening of the guide vane is adjusted to adjust the power of the hydropower, the water hammer generated in the moment of the action of the guide vane can be effectively relieved, so that the power oscillation, fluctuation and reverse adjustment of the unit are effectively inhibited.
Example (b):
the field test is carried out on one unit of the hydropower station, and the main parameters of the test unit are shown in figure 17. The test data is obtained from a data acquisition system of the unit speed regulator, and the data acquired in real time mainly comprises unit frequency, unit power, a set power given value and guide vane opening. On the basis of 50% of rated power of the unit, amplitude variation adjustment tests of 5%, 10%, 20% and 40% of power are carried out. The dynamic response process of power regulation based on the S-curve algorithm control strategy and the traditional linear control strategy is compared through the test.
The small-amplitude power adjustment test is carried out on the basis of 50% of rated power, and a 5% power change adjustment test is carried out. Under the condition of stable power regulation, the monitoring system directly issues a power regulation target value of 55% to the speed regulator to respectively carry out 50% -55% -50% power regulation tests, and the field test curves are shown in figures 7-8; FIG. 7 is a power regulation test curve under an S-curve control strategy; fig. 8 is a power regulation test curve under a linear control strategy. In fig. 7, when the time t is 14s, the ordinate corresponding to each curve from bottom to top is the frequency value, the power value, the set power value, and the guide vane opening in sequence; in fig. 8, when the time t is 12s, the ordinate corresponding to each curve from bottom to top is the frequency value, the power value, the set power value, and the guide vane opening degree in this order.
The small-amplitude power adjustment test is carried out on the basis of 50% of rated power, and a 10% power change adjustment test is carried out. Under the condition of stable power regulation, the monitoring system directly issues a power regulation target value of 60% to the speed regulator to respectively carry out 50% -60% -50% power regulation tests, and the field test curves are shown in figures 9-10; FIG. 9 is a power regulation test curve under the S-curve control strategy; fig. 10 is a power regulation test curve under a linear control strategy. In fig. 9, when the time t is 22s, the ordinate corresponding to each curve from bottom to top is the frequency value, the power value, the guide vane opening, and the set power value in turn; in fig. 10, when the time t is 20s, the ordinate corresponding to each curve from bottom to top is the frequency value, the power value, the guide vane opening, and the set power value in this order.
The small-amplitude power adjustment test is carried out on the basis of 50% of rated power, and a 20% power change adjustment test is carried out. Under the condition of stable power regulation, the monitoring system directly issues a power regulation target value of 70% to the speed regulator to respectively carry out 50% -70% -50% power regulation tests, and the field test curves are shown in figures 11-12; FIG. 11 is a power regulation test curve under the S-curve control strategy; fig. 12 is a power regulation test curve under a linear control strategy. In fig. 11, when the time t is 20s, the ordinate corresponding to each curve from bottom to top is the frequency value, the power value, the guide vane opening, and the set power value in turn; in fig. 12, when the time t is 20s, the ordinate corresponding to each curve from bottom to top is the frequency value, the power value, the guide vane opening, and the set power value in this order.
The small-amplitude power adjustment test is carried out on the basis of 50% of rated power, and a 40% power change adjustment test is carried out. Under the condition of stable power regulation, the monitoring system directly issues a power regulation target value of 90% to the speed regulator to respectively carry out 50% -90% -50% power regulation tests, and the field test curves are shown in figures 13-14; FIGS. 13 and 14 are power regulation test curves under the S-curve control strategy; fig. 14 and 15 are power regulation test curves under a linear control strategy. In fig. 13, when the time t is 70s, the ordinate corresponding to each curve from bottom to top is the frequency value, the power value, the guide vane opening, and the set power value in turn; in fig. 14, when the time t is 40s, the ordinate corresponding to each curve from bottom to top is the frequency value, the set power value, the power value, and the guide vane opening degree in this order. In fig. 15, when the time t is 34s, the ordinate corresponding to each curve from bottom to top is the frequency value, the power value, the guide vane opening, and the set power value in turn; in fig. 16, when the time t is 72s, the ordinate corresponding to each curve from bottom to top is the frequency value, the set power value, the guide vane opening, and the power value in this order.
At the power of 5%In the 10% small-amplitude change adjustment test, the power adjustment can finally reach a stable state under two different control strategies, and the S curve control strategy is compared with the power delta of the linear control strategyp、△PmaxSmaller, which indicates better stability; p of power under S curve control strategyfp、tfpVery small, it shows that it suppresses power back regulation better; t is tsThe dynamic response adjustment time is reflected, and the S curve control strategy also has good performance. And the comprehensive test condition shows that the adjusting quality of the S curve control strategy in the small-power adjusting process is excellent.
Power stability index deltapThe method is characterized in that the ratio of the peak-peak value of continuous fluctuation of the output power of a unit to the rated power Pr of the unit, namely the actual output power of the unit to a given value (target value) P, is realized when the unit is in a grid-connected running state and a hydro-power unit speed regulator is in a power control modesetThe maximum interval of the deviation relative values and the unit power fluctuation curve are shown in figure 18. The calculation formula is as follows, deltapIs a power stability index; delta PmaxThe maximum wave peak value of the output power of the unit in the continuous fluctuation period is MW; delta PminThe minimum trough value of the output power of the unit in the continuous fluctuation period is MW; pr is the rated power of the unit, and the unit is MW.
FIG. 19 is a power regulation dynamic response curve, p0The current value of the unit power is obtained; p is a radical of1The target value of the unit power is obtained; pr is the rated power of the unit; p is a radical offpThe reverse peak power of the unit; delta PmaxOvershoot for power regulation; ts is the adjustment time; t is tMTime to peak; t is t0.9Is the rise time; t is thxIs the lag time; t is tfpTo the time of reaching the inverted peak.
Overshoot Δ P of linear control strategy during 20% power regulationmax、pfpThe peak values of the inverse regulation are larger, which shows that the S curve control strategy can effectively restrain the power regulationThe power overshoot and the back regulation peak of the dynamic response process are regulated.
Fig. 13-16 are dynamic response curves of 40% power variation amplitude, and the stability and the regulation quality are better represented by the S-curve control strategy. But when care is needed, for the adjustment time tsThe linear control strategy is smaller, which shows that in order to achieve a better control effect, the linear control strategy adopts a faster guide vane action mode under a high-power change amplitude to achieve rapid power adjustment, however, the instability of the power in the adjustment process is increased by the mode.
The above description is only for the specific embodiments of the present invention, but the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto, and any person skilled in the art can easily conceive of the changes or substitutions within the technical scope of the present invention, and all the changes or substitutions should be covered within the scope of the present invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention shall be subject to the protection scope of the appended claims.