CN113128946A - Interactive control method and equipment for network court trial - Google Patents

Interactive control method and equipment for network court trial Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN113128946A
CN113128946A CN202110271402.5A CN202110271402A CN113128946A CN 113128946 A CN113128946 A CN 113128946A CN 202110271402 A CN202110271402 A CN 202110271402A CN 113128946 A CN113128946 A CN 113128946A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
client
case
party
information
target case
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202110271402.5A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
杨无鬼
马恒
李发健
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Guangzhou Radio and television Zhongda Digital Technology Co.,Ltd.
Original Assignee
Guangzhou Octopus Technology Co ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Guangzhou Octopus Technology Co ltd filed Critical Guangzhou Octopus Technology Co ltd
Priority to CN202110271402.5A priority Critical patent/CN113128946A/en
Publication of CN113128946A publication Critical patent/CN113128946A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation; Time management
    • G06Q10/109Time management, e.g. calendars, reminders, meetings or time accounting
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10Services
    • G06Q50/18Legal services

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Technology Law (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to an interactive control method and equipment for a network court trial, wherein the method comprises the following steps: receiving the family opening notification information of the target case; generating a problem list about a target case according to the case information and a preset problem list generating algorithm, and sending the problem list to a client of a party; when the current time reaches the court trial starting time, obtaining a quality certification opinion sent by a client of a party; receiving response information about a question list sent by a client of a party; judging whether to add a question according to the response information, if so, sending an added question list to the client of the party, and repeatedly executing the operation of receiving the response information and adding the question when the current time does not reach the court trial deadline; receiving a mediation intention sent by a client of a party; and when the current time reaches the court trial ending time, generating a court trial record. Compared with the prior art, the method and the system realize reasonable management and control of the network court trial and meet the legal requirements of legal procedures.

Description

Interactive control method and equipment for network court trial
Technical Field
The embodiment of the application relates to the technical field of computers, in particular to an interaction control method and equipment for a network court trial.
Background
The network court trial is a remote case trial mode by means of internet communication, has higher flexibility compared with off-line trial of division, and can effectively reduce time cost and economic cost.
Common web court approaches typically include both video and written court approaches. The video court trial mode is difficult to ensure the real-time video call quality, can affect the accurate transmission of information, and the video recording is not beneficial to the induction and the arrangement of subsequent cases. If the written court trial mode is only through modes like message boards, forums and the like, information interaction among all parties of the court trial is carried out, so that the interaction process cannot be reasonably controlled, the legal requirements of legal procedures are met, and the case auditing efficiency is low.
Disclosure of Invention
The embodiment of the application provides an interaction control method and equipment for a network court trial, which can effectively improve the efficiency of the network court trial and the flexibility of information interaction among parties of the court trial, and the technical scheme is as follows:
in a first aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides an interaction control method for a network court trial, where the method includes the steps of:
s1: receiving the family opening notification information of the target case; the court notification information comprises court trial starting time, court trial ending time and case information of the target case;
s2: generating a problem list about the target case according to the case information of the target case and a preset problem list generation algorithm, and sending the problem list of the target case to a client of a party;
s3: when the current time reaches the court trial starting time, obtaining a quality certification opinion sent by the client of the party; wherein, the quality evidence opinions are opinions published by the parties according to case evidence;
s4: receiving response information about the question list sent by the client side of the party;
s5: judging whether a question is added according to the response information, if so, sending a question list about the addition of the response information to the client of the party, and repeatedly executing the steps S4 to S5 when the current time does not reach the court trial deadline;
s6: receiving a mediation intention sent by the client of the party;
s7: and when the current time reaches the court trial deadline, generating a court trial record according to the case information, the question list, the reply information, the quality certification opinions and the mediation desire.
Optionally, the generating a problem list about the target case according to the case information of the target case and a preset problem list generating algorithm includes:
confirming a problem label related to the case information based on the case information of the target case;
generating a problem list about the target case according to the problem label and a preset management problem library; the preset management question bank comprises a plurality of questions and labels corresponding to the questions.
Optionally, the step of confirming the problem label related to the case information based on the case information of the target case includes the steps of:
extracting key words in case information of the target case;
generating and displaying an initial question tag comprising the key vocabulary;
and screening the initial problem tags and confirming the problem tags related to the case information.
Optionally, the generating a question list about the target case according to the question label and a preset management question library includes:
acquiring a plurality of problems corresponding to the problem labels in an examination question library according to the problem labels and a preset examination question library;
displaying the plurality of questions, receiving custom modification of the plurality of questions by an arbitrator, and generating a question list about the target case.
Optionally, before obtaining the quality certification opinion sent by the client of the party when the current time reaches the court trial start time, the method includes the steps of:
acquiring case evidence of the target case;
generating a quality certificate list of the target case according to the case evidence of the target case and a preset quality certificate list generation algorithm; wherein the quality certificate list comprises quality certificate problems related to the authenticity, relevance and legality of the case evidence;
and sending the certificate list to the client of the party.
Optionally, after generating a problem list about the target case according to the case information of the target case and a preset problem generation algorithm, the method includes the steps of:
acquiring the shortest reply deadline corresponding to the type of the target case in a preset network arbitration rule;
and sending the shortest reply time limit corresponding to the target case to the client of the party.
Optionally, after generating a problem list about the target case according to the case information of the target case and a preset problem generation algorithm, the method includes the steps of:
acquiring the shortest reply deadline corresponding to the type of the target case in a preset network arbitration rule;
obtaining an extended response time limit according to the number of the question lists of the target case, the shortest response time limit and a preset time limit extension algorithm;
and sending the extended reply time limit corresponding to the target case to the client of the party.
Optionally, the interaction control method for the network court trial further includes the steps of:
and when the current time reaches the prolonged response period, if the response information about the question list sent by the client of the party is not received, sending the absence information of the party to the client of the party.
Optionally, the interaction control method for the network court trial further includes the steps of:
and when the current time reaches the court trial deadline, if the problem list of the target case is not sent to the client of the party, sending the network court trial for terminating the target case, and sending the information of canceling the network court trial to the client of the party.
In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides an interaction control device for a network court trial, including: a processor, a memory and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that the steps of the method according to the first aspect are implemented when the processor executes the computer program.
The embodiment of the application is implemented by the following steps of S1: receiving the family opening notification information of the target case; the court notification information comprises court trial starting time, court trial ending time and case information of the target case; s2: generating a problem list about the target case according to the case information of the target case and a preset problem list generation algorithm, and sending the problem list of the target case to a client of a party; s3: when the current time reaches the court trial starting time, obtaining a quality certification opinion sent by the client of the party; wherein, the quality evidence opinions are opinions published by the parties according to case evidence; s4: receiving response information and mediation intention about the question list sent by the client side of the party; s5: judging whether mediation can be achieved or not according to the mediation willingness; if not, sending a question list about the addition of the reply information to the client of the party, and repeatedly executing the steps S4 to S5 when the current time does not reach the court trial deadline; if yes, go to step S6; s6: and when the current time reaches the court trial deadline, generating a court trial record according to the case information, the question list, the reply information and the quality certification opinions. The method not only realizes reasonable control of the network court trial process, but also enables the information interaction between all parties of the court trial to be more efficient and flexible, effectively improves the participation degree of all parties of the court trial, and meets the legal requirements of legal procedures.
For a better understanding and implementation, the technical solutions of the present application are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a schematic flowchart of an interaction control method for a network court trial according to an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 2 is a schematic flowchart of S2 in the interaction control method for a network court trial according to an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 3 is a schematic flowchart of an interaction control method for a network court trial according to another embodiment of the present application;
fig. 4 is a schematic structural diagram of an interactive control device for a network court trial according to an embodiment of the present application.
Detailed Description
Reference will now be made in detail to the exemplary embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. When the following description refers to the accompanying drawings, like numbers in different drawings represent the same or similar elements unless otherwise indicated. The embodiments described in the following exemplary embodiments do not represent all embodiments consistent with the present application. Rather, they are merely examples of apparatus and methods consistent with certain aspects of the present application, as detailed in the appended claims.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the application. As used in this application and the appended claims, the singular forms "a", "an", and "the" are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It should also be understood that the term "and/or" as used herein refers to and encompasses any and all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.
It is to be understood that although the terms first, second, third, etc. may be used herein to describe various information, such information should not be limited to these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one type of information from another. For example, first information may also be referred to as second information, and similarly, second information may also be referred to as first information, without departing from the scope of the present application. The word "if/if" as used herein may be interpreted as "at … …" or "when … …" or "in response to a determination", depending on the context.
The conventional examination of the offline arbitration case usually needs a principal, an arbitrator and a case-handling secretary to participate together, and correspondingly, the network trial architecture of the arbitration case needs to comprise a principal client, an arbitrator client and a case-handling secretary client, and the network trial of the arbitration case is completed through the interaction of the principal client, the arbitrator client and the case-handling secretary client. In the embodiment of the application, the arbitrator client is used as an execution device to execute the interactive control method of the network court trial, and the operations executed by the client of the party and the client of the secretary for case handling are supplemented.
Referring to fig. 1, a schematic flow chart of an interaction control method for a network court trial according to an embodiment of the present application is shown, where the method includes the following steps:
s1: receiving the family opening notification information of the target case; wherein, the court notification information comprises the court trial start time, the court trial ending time and the case information of the target case.
In an alternative embodiment, the execution subject of the interactive control method for the network court trial may be an arbitrator client, or may be a component in the arbitrator client, for example: a processor or controller, etc. In another alternative embodiment, the execution subject of the interaction control method of the network court trial may be a server, and the server establishes a data connection with the arbitrator client and performs data interaction with the arbitrator client.
In the embodiment of the application, the execution subject of the interactive control method of the network court trial is an arbitrator client. The arbitrator client is a client device and does not refer to the arbitrator itself, and the arbitrator client can receive click and touch operations of the arbitrator on the device and correspondingly execute corresponding instructions so as to respond to the operations of the arbitrator on the arbitrator client.
The arbitrator client receives a family notification of the target case.
The court notification information comprises the court trial start time, the court trial ending time and the case information of the target case.
In the embodiment of the application, the division notification of the target case is sent by a secretary handling client.
Specifically, the case-handling secretary, the arbitrator and the party agree with the court trial starting time of the target case, the case-handling secretary uploads the case information and the court trial starting time to a case-handling secretary client, the case-handling secretary client automatically calculates the court trial ending time according to the court trial starting time, and then sends the court trial starting time, the court trial ending time and the case information, namely the court notice information to the arbitrator client and the party client.
In an alternative embodiment, in addition to sending the court notification information to the arbitrator client and the party client, the court notification of the target case may be printed and sent to the court notification of the target case in various manners, such as e-mail, sms delivery, offline EMS delivery, direct delivery, announcement delivery, and the like.
S2: and generating a problem list related to the target case according to the case information of the target case and a preset problem list generating algorithm, and sending the problem list of the target case to the client of the party.
The arbitrator client generates a problem list related to the target case according to the case information of the target case and a preset problem list generation algorithm, and sends the problem list of the target case to the client of the party.
The preset problem list generation algorithm can be stored in the arbitrator client in advance or in the server, and when the preset problem list generation algorithm is stored in the server, the arbitrator client needs to download the problem list generation algorithm from the server to the local if the problem list generation algorithm needs to be called.
The preset problem list generation algorithm can analyze the key information in the case information and automatically generate the problem list of the target case based on the key information, so that the work of an arbitrator is reduced, and the court trial efficiency of the case network is improved.
In the embodiment of the present application, when the current time has reached the court trial deadline, if the arbitrator client has not yet sent the problem list of the target case to the party client, the network court trial for terminating the target case is sent, and the network court trial cancellation information is sent to the party client.
In an alternative embodiment, to make the problem list closer to the case information and minimize the work of the arbitrator, referring to fig. 2, step S2 includes steps S21-S22, which are as follows:
s21: and confirming the problem label related to the case information based on the case information of the target case.
The arbitrator client confirms the problem label related to the case information based on the case information of the target case.
Specifically, the arbitrator client may first extract key words in the case information of the target case. The key words may include high-frequency words in the case information, or words preset in the arbitrator client and existing in the case information.
Thereafter, the arbitrator client generates and displays an initial question label that includes the key vocabulary. A large number of problem labels are preset in the arbitrator client, and the initial problem labels are problem labels comprising key words.
And finally, screening the initial problem tags by the client of the arbitrator, and confirming the problem tags related to the case information. The screening operation is carried out by an arbitrator through operating an arbitrator client, the arbitrator client receives an operating instruction of the arbitrator, screening of initial problem tags is carried out, and the problem tags related to case information are confirmed.
In an alternative embodiment, the arbitrator may also add some question tags manually by operating the arbitrator client.
S22: generating a problem list about the target case according to the problem label and a preset management problem library; the preset management question bank comprises a plurality of questions and labels corresponding to the questions.
And the arbitrator client generates a problem list related to the target case according to the problem label and a preset management problem library.
The preset problem management database can be stored in the arbitrator client or in the server, and when the preset problem management database is stored in the server, the arbitrator client needs to download the preset problem management database to the local from the server if the preset problem management database needs to be called.
The preset management question bank comprises a plurality of questions and labels corresponding to the questions.
Specifically, in an optional embodiment, the arbitrator client obtains a plurality of questions corresponding to the question tags in the question management library according to the question tags and a preset question management library, then displays the plurality of questions, receives user-defined modification of the plurality of questions by the arbitrator, and generates a question list about the target case.
The custom modification refers to the modification of a plurality of questions by the arbitrator through operating the arbitrator client.
In the embodiment, the problem labels related to the case information are confirmed based on the case information of the target case, and the problem list about the target case is generated according to the problem labels and the preset trial problem library, so that manual operation of an arbitrator can be effectively reduced, and the network court trial efficiency is improved.
After the arbitration client sends the problem list of the target case to the principal client, the principal can check and reply by logging in the court trial page. The specific process is described in detail again in step S3.
In an optional embodiment, when sending the question list of the target case to the principal client, the arbitrator client may also send the response time limit of the question list together, so as to realize the management and control of the response time limit.
Specifically, the arbitrator client obtains the shortest response time limit corresponding to the type of the target case in the preset network arbitration rules, and sends the shortest response time limit corresponding to the target case to the client of the party.
The preset network arbitration rules include the shortest response time limit corresponding to different types of cases, so that the corresponding shortest response time limit can be obtained based on the type of the target case.
In another alternative embodiment, the difficulty level is different considering the same type of case, so that the response time limit needs to be controlled more specifically to enable the party to have enough time to respond and protect the rights and interests of the party.
Specifically, the arbitrator client first obtains the shortest response time limit corresponding to the type of the target case in a preset network arbitration rule; then, obtaining an extended response time limit according to the number of the question lists of the target case, the shortest response time limit and a preset time limit extension algorithm; and finally, sending the extended reply time limit corresponding to the target case to the client of the party.
The method can better set the response time limit for cases with different difficulty degrees, is more favorable for the parties to fully express opinions, ensures the rights of the parties to the greatest extent, automatically prolongs the response time limit, can also reduce the work of an arbitrator, and improves the court trial efficiency.
S3: when the current time reaches the court trial starting time, obtaining a quality certification opinion sent by the client of the party; wherein the quality evidence opinions are opinions issued by the parties according to case evidence.
The arbitrator client acquires the current time, and when the current time reaches the court trial starting time, the arbitrator can acquire the quality certification opinions sent by the party client through the arbitrator client, wherein the quality certification opinions are opinions published by the party according to case evidence.
In an alternative embodiment, before the arbitrator client obtains the proof of quality opinion sent by the party client, please refer to fig. 3, the method further includes steps S7-S9, which are as follows:
s7: and acquiring case evidence of the target case.
The arbitrator client obtains case evidence of the target case. Wherein the case evidence may provide evidence to the arbitration court for the person at that time.
S8: generating a quality certificate list of the target case according to the case evidence of the target case and a preset quality certificate list generation algorithm; wherein the quality certificate list comprises quality certificate problems related to the authenticity, relevance and legality of the case evidence.
And the arbitrator client generates a quality certificate list of the target case according to the case evidence of the target case and a preset quality certificate list generation algorithm.
The preset quality certificate list generation algorithm can be arranged in the arbitrator client and can also be arranged in the server, and when the preset quality certificate list generation algorithm is arranged in the server, the arbitrator client needs to download the preset quality certificate list generation algorithm from the server to the local if the client needs to call the preset quality certificate list generation algorithm.
The quality certificate list comprises quality certificate problems related to authenticity, relevance and legality of the case evidence.
S9: and sending the certificate list to the client of the party.
The arbitrator client sends the quality certificate list to the client of the party, and the party can check the quality certificate list through the client of the party.
Before the principal views the certificate or question list, the principal's client needs to perform the following operations, which are described in detail herein:
after receiving the family opening notification information of the target case, the client of the client acquires the family opening starting time of the target case in the family opening notification information. When the current time reaches the trial start time, the party can log in the web trial page by operating the client of the party, and the login verification can be real-name verification, face-brushing verification, mobile phone real-name verification and the like of APPs such as WeChat or Payment treasures and the like, which is not limited herein.
Then, the client side of the party judges whether the party is a page for logging in the network court trial for the first time, if so, the following information is displayed: 1. states the arbitration committee to accept the scheme according to the law, arbitrates the court composition and transacts the secretary. 2. Confirm the identity of the current operator 3. confirm that the party is not objected to his delivery address. 4. If the current operator confirms the self agent items and the agent authority for the agent. 5. Confirming that there is no objection to the principal in this case. 6. And confirming that all the legal document parties related to the present case have received the legal document. 7. The mode of accepting the network court trial is determined as the trial mode of the case. 8. The operator confirmation is clear, stating the operational instructions and precautions for the network court trial. 9. The party's right obligation is stated and the operator confirmation is clear. 10. Answer whether the waiver and secretary is required to apply for. 11. The arbitration jurisdiction is confirmed. And the principal feeds back the answer to the information through the principal client, the principal client verifies the answered information, and if the arbitration program is questioned, the relevant information of the network court trial of the suspended target case is sent out. And if the verification is passed, displaying an entity trial problem page.
It should be noted that the information displayed by the client of the above-mentioned party is only an example, and is not limiting.
If the client of the party judges that the party is not the page for logging in the network court trial for the first time, the page for the entity trial problem can be directly displayed.
After entering the entity review question page, the party may view the question list and the quality certificate list and answer to generate quality certificate opinions and response information about the question list, and then the party client sends the quality certificate opinions and the response information to the arbitrator client.
In addition, the two parties can also send debate information through the party client, the two parties develop discussions, and finally send mediation wishes to the arbitrator client through the party client.
S4: and receiving response information about the question list sent by the client side of the party.
The arbitrator client receives the reply information about the question list sent by the party client.
In an optional embodiment, when the current time reaches the extended reply period, if the reply information about the question list sent by the principal client is not received, the principal absence information is sent to the principal client.
S5: judging whether a question is added according to the response information, if so, sending a question list about the addition of the response information to the client of the party, and repeatedly executing the steps S4 to S5 when the current time does not reach the court trial deadline; .
The arbitrator client determines whether to add a question based on the response information. Specifically, after receiving the response information, the arbitrator client displays the response information in a web court trial page, and the arbitrator can check the response information through the arbitrator client to determine whether to add a question.
If so, the arbitrator client sends a question list about the reply information addition to the party client, and repeatedly executes the steps S4 to S5 when the current time does not reach the court trial deadline.
In an alternative embodiment, when the arbitrator client sends the question list about the reply information addition to the client of the party, the client of the party can also be informed by sending a short message or the like.
And the principal can check the additional question list through the principal client, and reply, discuss and express the mediation intention on the additional question list until the current time reaches the court trial deadline.
S6: and receiving the mediation intention sent by the client of the party.
Network court trial requires soliciting the adjustment willingness of the party. Thus, the arbitrator client is to receive the mediation intent sent by the party client.
Specifically, the principal may express a mediation wish on a network court trial page through the principal client. The client side of the party sends the mediation intention expressed by the party to the arbitrator client side, and the arbitrator client side receives the mediation intention sent by the client side of the party.
S7: and when the current time reaches the court trial deadline, generating a court trial record according to the case information, the question list, the reply information, the quality certification opinions and the mediation desire.
And the arbitrator client acquires the current time, stops auditing the target case when the current time reaches the court trial deadline, and generates a court trial record according to the case information, the question list, the reply information, the quality certification opinion and the mediation intention.
The embodiment of the application is implemented by the following steps of S1: receiving the family opening notification information of the target case; the court notification information comprises court trial starting time, court trial ending time and case information of the target case; s2: generating a problem list about the target case according to the case information of the target case and a preset problem list generation algorithm, and sending the problem list of the target case to a client of a party; s3: when the current time reaches the court trial starting time, obtaining a quality certification opinion sent by the client of the party; wherein, the quality evidence opinions are opinions published by the parties according to case evidence; s4: receiving response information and mediation intention about the question list sent by the client side of the party; s5: judging whether mediation can be achieved or not according to the mediation willingness; if not, sending a question list about the addition of the reply information to the client of the party, and repeatedly executing the steps S4 to S5 when the current time does not reach the court trial deadline; if yes, go to step S6; s6: and when the current time reaches the court trial deadline, generating a court trial record according to the case information, the question list, the reply information and the quality certification opinions. The method not only realizes reasonable control of the network court trial process, but also enables the information interaction between all parties of the court trial to be more efficient and flexible, effectively improves the participation degree of all parties of the court trial, and meets the legal requirements of legal procedures.
Referring to fig. 4, a schematic structural diagram of an interactive control device for a network court trial according to an embodiment of the present application is provided. As shown in fig. 4, the interactive control device 4 of the network court trial may include: a processor 40, a memory 40, and a computer program 42 stored in the memory 40 and executable on the processor 40, such as: an interactive control program of the network court trial; the processor 40, when executing the computer program 42, implements the steps in the above-described method embodiments, such as the steps S101 to S105 shown in fig. 1.
In an alternative embodiment, the interactive control device 4 of the network court trial is an arbitrator client.
The processor 40 may include one or more processing cores, among others. The processor 40 is connected to various parts of the interactive control device 4 of the network court trial by various interfaces and lines, executes various functions and processes data of the interactive control device 4 of the network court trial by executing or executing instructions, programs, code sets or instruction sets stored in the memory 41 and calling up data in the memory 41, and optionally, the processor 40 may be implemented in at least one hardware form of Digital Signal Processing (DSP), Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), Programmable Logic Array (PLA). The processor 40 may integrate one or more of a Central Processing Unit (CPU), a Graphics Processing Unit (GPU), a modem, and the like. Wherein, the CPU mainly processes an operating system, a user interface, an application program and the like; the GPU is used for rendering and drawing contents required to be displayed by the touch display screen; the modem is used to handle wireless communications. It is understood that the modem may not be integrated into the processor 40, but may be implemented by a single chip.
The Memory 41 may include a Random Access Memory (RAM) or a Read-Only Memory (Read-Only Memory). Optionally, the memory 41 includes a non-transitory computer-readable medium. The memory 41 may be used to store instructions, programs, code sets or instruction sets. The memory 41 may include a program storage area and a data storage area, wherein the program storage area may store instructions for implementing an operating system, instructions for at least one function (such as touch instructions, etc.), instructions for implementing the various method embodiments described above, and the like; the storage data area may store data and the like referred to in the above respective method embodiments. The memory 41 may alternatively be at least one memory device located remotely from the aforementioned processor 40.
In the above embodiments, the descriptions of the respective embodiments have respective emphasis, and reference may be made to the related descriptions of other embodiments for parts that are not described or illustrated in a certain embodiment.
The present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments, and various modifications and variations of the present invention are intended to be included within the scope of the claims and the equivalent technology of the present invention if they do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention.

Claims (10)

1. An interactive control method for a network court trial, the method comprising the steps of:
s1: receiving the family opening notification information of the target case; the court notification information comprises court trial starting time, court trial ending time and case information of the target case;
s2: generating a problem list about the target case according to the case information of the target case and a preset problem list generation algorithm, and sending the problem list of the target case to a client of a party;
s3: when the current time reaches the court trial starting time, obtaining a quality certification opinion sent by the client of the party; wherein, the quality evidence opinions are opinions published by the parties according to case evidence;
s4: receiving response information about the question list sent by the client side of the party;
s5: judging whether a question is added according to the response information, if so, sending a question list about the addition of the response information to the client of the party, and repeatedly executing the steps S4 to S5 when the current time does not reach the court trial deadline;
s6: receiving a mediation intention sent by the client of the party;
s7: and when the current time reaches the court trial deadline, generating a court trial record according to the case information, the question list, the reply information, the quality certification opinions and the mediation desire.
2. The interactive control method for network court hearing of claim 1, wherein the generating of the problem list about the target case according to the case information of the target case and a preset problem list generating algorithm comprises the steps of:
confirming a problem label related to the case information based on the case information of the target case;
generating a problem list about the target case according to the problem label and a preset management problem library; the preset management question bank comprises a plurality of questions and labels corresponding to the questions.
3. The interactive control method for network court trial as claimed in claim 2, wherein the step of confirming the problem label related to the case information based on the case information of the target case comprises the steps of:
extracting key words in case information of the target case;
generating and displaying an initial question tag comprising the key vocabulary;
and screening the initial problem tags and confirming the problem tags related to the case information.
4. The interactive control method for network court trial as claimed in claim 2, wherein the step of generating a question list about the target case according to the question tags and a preset trial question library comprises the steps of:
acquiring a plurality of problems corresponding to the problem labels in an examination question library according to the problem labels and a preset examination question library;
displaying the plurality of questions, receiving custom modification of the plurality of questions by an arbitrator, and generating a question list about the target case.
5. The interactive control method for the network court trial of claim 1, wherein before obtaining the proof-of-quality opinion sent by the client of the party when the current time reaches the court trial start time, the method comprises the following steps:
acquiring case evidence of the target case;
generating a quality certificate list of the target case according to the case evidence of the target case and a preset quality certificate list generation algorithm; wherein the quality certificate list comprises quality certificate problems related to the authenticity, relevance and legality of the case evidence;
and sending the certificate list to the client of the party.
6. The interactive control method for network court hearing of claim 1, wherein after generating the problem list about the target case according to the case information of the target case and a preset problem generation algorithm, the method comprises the steps of:
acquiring the shortest reply deadline corresponding to the type of the target case in a preset network arbitration rule;
and sending the shortest reply time limit corresponding to the target case to the client of the party.
7. The interactive control method for network court hearing of claim 1, wherein after generating the problem list about the target case according to the case information of the target case and a preset problem generation algorithm, the method comprises the steps of:
acquiring the shortest reply deadline corresponding to the type of the target case in a preset network arbitration rule;
obtaining an extended response time limit according to the number of the question lists of the target case, the shortest response time limit and a preset time limit extension algorithm;
and sending the extended reply time limit corresponding to the target case to the client of the party.
8. The interactive control method for network court hearing of claim 7, further comprising the steps of:
and when the current time reaches the prolonged response period, if the response information about the question list sent by the client of the party is not received, sending the absence information of the party to the client of the party.
9. The interactive control method for network court hearing of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:
and when the current time reaches the court trial deadline, if the problem list of the target case is not sent to the client of the party, sending the network court trial for terminating the target case, and sending the information of canceling the network court trial to the client of the party.
10. An interactive control device for a network court trial, comprising: processor, memory and computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that the steps of the method according to claims 1 to 9 are implemented when the processor executes the computer program.
CN202110271402.5A 2021-03-12 2021-03-12 Interactive control method and equipment for network court trial Pending CN113128946A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110271402.5A CN113128946A (en) 2021-03-12 2021-03-12 Interactive control method and equipment for network court trial

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110271402.5A CN113128946A (en) 2021-03-12 2021-03-12 Interactive control method and equipment for network court trial

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN113128946A true CN113128946A (en) 2021-07-16

Family

ID=76773082

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202110271402.5A Pending CN113128946A (en) 2021-03-12 2021-03-12 Interactive control method and equipment for network court trial

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN113128946A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113888112A (en) * 2021-09-07 2022-01-04 广州市劳动人事争议仲裁院 Internet asynchronous auditing system and method

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101826169A (en) * 2009-03-06 2010-09-08 新奥特硅谷视频技术有限责任公司 Digitized long-distance court hearing method
CN109741168A (en) * 2018-12-07 2019-05-10 上海指旺信息科技有限公司 Online arbitration information exchange method and system
CN110310216A (en) * 2019-05-17 2019-10-08 杭州亦笔科技有限公司 A kind of internet arbitral award system and management method
CN110866174A (en) * 2018-08-17 2020-03-06 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 Pushing method, device and system for court trial problems
CN111813947A (en) * 2019-04-09 2020-10-23 北京国双科技有限公司 Automatic generation method and device for court inquiry synopsis
CN112001708A (en) * 2020-09-03 2020-11-27 曹庆恒 Court time management system, use method thereof and computer-readable storage medium
CN112418801A (en) * 2020-11-25 2021-02-26 广州市奥威亚电子科技有限公司 Pre-court evidence exchange system and method

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101826169A (en) * 2009-03-06 2010-09-08 新奥特硅谷视频技术有限责任公司 Digitized long-distance court hearing method
CN110866174A (en) * 2018-08-17 2020-03-06 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 Pushing method, device and system for court trial problems
CN109741168A (en) * 2018-12-07 2019-05-10 上海指旺信息科技有限公司 Online arbitration information exchange method and system
CN111813947A (en) * 2019-04-09 2020-10-23 北京国双科技有限公司 Automatic generation method and device for court inquiry synopsis
CN110310216A (en) * 2019-05-17 2019-10-08 杭州亦笔科技有限公司 A kind of internet arbitral award system and management method
CN112001708A (en) * 2020-09-03 2020-11-27 曹庆恒 Court time management system, use method thereof and computer-readable storage medium
CN112418801A (en) * 2020-11-25 2021-02-26 广州市奥威亚电子科技有限公司 Pre-court evidence exchange system and method

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
刘鹏;: "水行政执法程序研究及司法衔接应用", 中国水利, no. 02, pages 68 - 71 *
杭州商报: "杭州互联网法院开启"人机对话"审理模式", pages 1, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://www.echinagov.com/news/208955.htm> *
郭玲;: "像"网购"一样打官司", 农民文摘, no. 12, pages 36 - 38 *
陈欧飞;: "网上法庭的建设与发展", 人民司法(应用), no. 13, pages 54 - 58 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113888112A (en) * 2021-09-07 2022-01-04 广州市劳动人事争议仲裁院 Internet asynchronous auditing system and method

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10009303B2 (en) Message push method and apparatus
CN103944872B (en) Method and apparatus for distributing content
CN112311841B (en) Information pushing method and device, electronic equipment and computer readable medium
CN110634220B (en) Information processing method and device
CN110601965B (en) Message distribution method, device and system and message gateway
US10986038B1 (en) Authorizations associated with externally shared communication resources
CN104394169B (en) Both sides send personal letter method and server using anonymous way
CN108924036A (en) Method and apparatus for distributing resource, getting resource
CN102484655A (en) Public bot management in private networks
CN110458507B (en) Authorization method and device for public number business hosting
CN113128946A (en) Interactive control method and equipment for network court trial
JP2019053623A (en) Shared account management program, shared account management method and shared account management device
CN111147348B (en) Instant message sending method, device and readable medium
CN108768823B (en) Method and equipment for processing message and displaying message
CN107888478B (en) Voice information forwarding method, device and storage medium in instant messaging process
CN112530067A (en) Visitor management method, related device, storage medium and system
KR20160039757A (en) Real time counselling Service System through mobile internet and Method of it
EP2913785A1 (en) Virtual queue management system
CN104394168A (en) Method and server for matching wishing information anonymously transmitted by single party
CN115018314A (en) Queuing information processing method, device, system and storage medium
CN110634478A (en) Method and apparatus for processing speech signal
WO2020200022A1 (en) Method and device for acquiring information of recipient
CN113420133A (en) Session processing method, device, equipment and storage medium
KR102461836B1 (en) Apparatus and method for connecting chatbot
CN113554795A (en) Intelligent queuing method, device and system for business handling hall

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
TA01 Transfer of patent application right
TA01 Transfer of patent application right

Effective date of registration: 20220106

Address after: 510630 / F, radio and television science and technology building, 163 xipingyun Road, Huangpu Avenue, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, Guangdong

Applicant after: Guangzhou Radio and television Zhongda Digital Technology Co.,Ltd.

Address before: 901, Radio & TV technology building, 163 xipingyun Road, Huangpu Avenue, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630

Applicant before: Guangzhou Octopus technology Co.,Ltd.