CN113128795A - Intellectual property project value evaluation method - Google Patents
Intellectual property project value evaluation method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN113128795A CN113128795A CN201911387237.9A CN201911387237A CN113128795A CN 113128795 A CN113128795 A CN 113128795A CN 201911387237 A CN201911387237 A CN 201911387237A CN 113128795 A CN113128795 A CN 113128795A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation
- intellectual property
- item
- value
- data
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 51
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 abstract description 3
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/18—Legal services
- G06Q50/184—Intellectual property management
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Technology Law (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses an intellectual property project value evaluation method, which comprises the following steps: sending an instruction for evaluating the value of an intellectual property project through a client; step two, receiving the intellectual property item value evaluation of the step one through an evaluation task receiving module; acquiring information of data of the intellectual property item corresponding to the intellectual property item value evaluation; acquiring and analyzing the information of the data of the intellectual property right through a parameter acquisition module of an evaluation task, and acquiring evaluation parameters of the items of the data of the intellectual property right; step five, matching corresponding evaluation rules according to the evaluation parameters in the step four; and step six, forming evaluation value parameters by the evaluation realization module according to the corresponding evaluation rules in the step five. When the intellectual property rights relate to the state of law and whether the right is ended due to deadline or other reasons, the invention avoids adopting the traditional manual operation mode under the line, thereby achieving the effects of reducing the workload and improving the efficiency and the use.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to an intellectual property project value evaluation method, and belongs to the technical field.
Background
In the international investment and financing world, the risk investment plays an increasingly important role in the conversion process of scientific and technological achievements. However, because of the high uncertainty, dynamics and complexity of the inauguration investment, there is a large investment risk, so it is very necessary to make a project investment value evaluation. In the prior art, intellectual property rights relate to the state of law and the state of use and whether rights are ended due to deadline or other reasons, and if manual operation under a traditional line is used, the workload is very huge, so that the efficiency is low in the situation.
In order to solve the technical problems, a new technical scheme is especially provided.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide an intellectual property project value evaluation method to solve the problems in the background technology.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention provides the following technical scheme: an intellectual property item value evaluation method is characterized by comprising the following steps: the method comprises the following steps:
sending an instruction for evaluating the value of an intellectual property project through a client;
step two, receiving the intellectual property item value evaluation of the step one through an evaluation task receiving module;
acquiring information of data of the intellectual property item corresponding to the intellectual property item value evaluation;
acquiring and analyzing the information of the data of the intellectual property right through a parameter acquisition module of an evaluation task, and acquiring evaluation parameters of the items of the data of the intellectual property right;
step five, matching corresponding evaluation rules according to the evaluation parameters in the step four;
and step six, forming evaluation value parameters by the evaluation realization module according to the corresponding evaluation rules in the step five.
Preferably, the information of the data of the intellectual property item includes, but is not limited to, a name of the item, an object of the item, inventor information of the item, and applicant information of the item.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the beneficial effects that: when the intellectual property rights relate to the state and the use state of laws and whether the right is ended due to deadline or other reasons, the manual operation mode under the traditional line is avoided, and the using effects of reducing the workload and improving the efficiency are achieved.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention are clearly and completely described below, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
The invention provides a technical scheme that: an intellectual property item value evaluation method is characterized by comprising the following steps: the method comprises the following steps:
sending an instruction for evaluating the value of an intellectual property project through a client;
step two, receiving the intellectual property item value evaluation of the step one through an evaluation task receiving module;
acquiring information of data of the intellectual property item corresponding to the intellectual property item value evaluation;
acquiring and analyzing the information of the data of the intellectual property right through a parameter acquisition module of an evaluation task, and acquiring evaluation parameters of the items of the data of the intellectual property right;
step five, matching corresponding evaluation rules according to the evaluation parameters in the step four;
and step six, forming evaluation value parameters by the evaluation realization module according to the corresponding evaluation rules in the step five.
Preferably, the information of the data of the intellectual property item includes, but is not limited to, a name of the item, an object of the item, inventor information of the item, and applicant information of the item.
In an extended embodiment of the present invention, the following 3 methods may also be employed:
first, dcf method
In the field of company financing, a dcf project investment value evaluation method has long been the dominant method for evaluating strategic investment. Although this method is now under increasing criticism, more than 80% of large companies still use the dcf method as a tool of choice for investment decision making, possibly because it is simple to use and intuitively attractive.
Two, dta method
The dta project investment value evaluation method is a method for simulating investment decision by introducing a series of continuous decisions and random events, and is characterized by considering camera decision and uncertainty. In short, the dta method gains flexibility by subdividing the decisions. The risk of investment decision is characterized by different probabilities of occurrence of random events. [1]
Method III, roa
The physical option is developed based on the financial option, and the physical option and the financial option are similar surprisingly. A financial option is a right to allow a holder to buy or sell a financial asset on or before an expiration date, while a physical option is an option to a physical investment, i.e., the right that an investor may take some action or not at some point in the future.
By adopting the mode, when the intellectual property rights relate to the state and the use state of laws and whether the right is ended due to deadline or other reasons, the manual operation mode under the traditional line is avoided, and the using effects of reducing the workload and improving the efficiency are achieved.
Although embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes, modifications, substitutions and alterations can be made in these embodiments without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined in the appended claims and their equivalents.
Claims (2)
1. An intellectual property item value evaluation method is characterized by comprising the following steps: the method comprises the following steps:
sending an instruction for evaluating the value of an intellectual property project through a client;
step two, receiving the intellectual property item value evaluation of the step one through an evaluation task receiving module;
acquiring information of data of the intellectual property item corresponding to the intellectual property item value evaluation;
acquiring and analyzing the information of the data of the intellectual property right through a parameter acquisition module of an evaluation task, and acquiring evaluation parameters of the items of the data of the intellectual property right;
step five, matching corresponding evaluation rules according to the evaluation parameters in the step four;
and step six, forming evaluation value parameters by the evaluation realization module according to the corresponding evaluation rules in the step five.
2. The intellectual property item value assessment method of claim 1, wherein: the information of the data of the intellectual property item includes, but is not limited to, a name of the item, an object of the item, inventor information of the item, and applicant information of the item.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911387237.9A CN113128795A (en) | 2019-12-30 | 2019-12-30 | Intellectual property project value evaluation method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911387237.9A CN113128795A (en) | 2019-12-30 | 2019-12-30 | Intellectual property project value evaluation method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN113128795A true CN113128795A (en) | 2021-07-16 |
Family
ID=76767247
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911387237.9A Pending CN113128795A (en) | 2019-12-30 | 2019-12-30 | Intellectual property project value evaluation method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN113128795A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN116186419A (en) * | 2023-04-27 | 2023-05-30 | 华智众创(北京)投资管理有限责任公司 | Data processing method and device, computing equipment and storage medium |
-
2019
- 2019-12-30 CN CN201911387237.9A patent/CN113128795A/en active Pending
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN116186419A (en) * | 2023-04-27 | 2023-05-30 | 华智众创(北京)投资管理有限责任公司 | Data processing method and device, computing equipment and storage medium |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | The research on setting a unified interval of carbon price benchmark in the national carbon trading market of China | |
| CN108230147A (en) | A kind of exchange settlement method, system and device for quantifying investment tactics | |
| CN113128795A (en) | Intellectual property project value evaluation method | |
| Zeng et al. | Can the Shanghai LNG Price Index indicate Chinese market? An econometric investigation using price discovery theory | |
| Xinyuan et al. | Influencing factors of Intelligent manufacturing: Empirical analysis based on SVR model | |
| Safarian | Host country policies towards inward foreign direct investment in the 1950s and 1990s | |
| Wang et al. | Momentum and contrarian profits corresponding to the coincident economic indicator on the Taiwan stock market | |
| US20200219215A1 (en) | Method and system for evaluating monetary value of patent, and application program | |
| Li | Time-varying informational efficiency in China's A-share and B-share markets | |
| CN106846149A (en) | A kind for the treatment of method and apparatus of business object | |
| Samani et al. | A data-driven study to discover, characterize, and classify convergence bidding strategies in California ISO energy market | |
| Barner et al. | The global hydrogen market 2050–A model-based comparison of pathways and policy constraints | |
| Yalcin et al. | Uncertain productivity growth and the choice between FDI and export | |
| Riehl et al. | Lessons learned in mandatory carbon market development | |
| CN108038784A (en) | A kind of simulated stock method of commerce and intelligent terminal | |
| McWaters et al. | India Can Drive Global Digital Standards | |
| Miłoś | Conditions and challenges for Polish-Chinese trade cooperation in high-tech goods | |
| Guanglu | Research on financial risk early warning of listed companies in Guangzhou based on z-score model | |
| Sen | Trade policy, equipment investment and growth in India | |
| Chun-ling et al. | The impact of separation of control and cash flow rights on diversification—Evidence from China | |
| Zhang et al. | Big Data Analysis of Financial Risk and Avoidance Strategy—Based on Futures Industry | |
| Meng | Measurement of Operating Efficiency of Property Insurance Companies in China | |
| Liu et al. | Relationships among US S&P500 Stock Index, its futures and NASDAQ index futures with volatility spillover and jump diffusion: Modeling and hedging performance | |
| CN118096331A (en) | Power transmission and transformation project bid-signing management analysis method based on full-element matching | |
| Tu et al. | Impacts of the US-China Trade Tension and RCEP on Vietnam-China Trade Balance |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication | ||
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20210716 |