CN113112152A - State-of-the-earth space planning current situation assessment method - Google Patents
State-of-the-earth space planning current situation assessment method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN113112152A CN113112152A CN202110391891.8A CN202110391891A CN113112152A CN 113112152 A CN113112152 A CN 113112152A CN 202110391891 A CN202110391891 A CN 202110391891A CN 113112152 A CN113112152 A CN 113112152A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation
- space planning
- state
- level
- evaluation index
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 23
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 161
- 238000011158 quantitative evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 238000007781 pre-processing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 claims description 17
- 230000004308 accommodation Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000004927 fusion Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000035764 nutrition Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000016709 nutrition Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004451 qualitative analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/10—Complex mathematical operations
- G06F17/18—Complex mathematical operations for evaluating statistical data, e.g. average values, frequency distributions, probability functions, regression analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/26—Government or public services
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
- Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
- Computational Mathematics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (AREA)
- Evolutionary Biology (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Probability & Statistics with Applications (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Algebra (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a state evaluation method for a state space planning, belonging to the related technical field of state space planning and comprising the following specific steps: constructing a territorial space planning evaluation index system; (2) performing qualitative evaluation; (3) collecting quantitative evaluation index data; (4) preprocessing quantitative evaluation data; (5) quantitative evaluation; (6) calculating an expected target; (7) comprehensively evaluating; according to the invention, a territorial space planning evaluation index system with three-level indexes is constructed, qualitative and quantitative evaluation is simultaneously carried out on the basis of the territorial space planning evaluation index system to obtain qualitative and quantitative evaluation results, then qualitative and quantitative expected target values are simultaneously calculated to obtain specific data of the qualitative and quantitative expected targets, and finally, the proximity degree of the territorial space planning evaluation index system is calculated by adopting a TOPSIS comprehensive evaluation method, so that the territorial space planning status can be intuitively evaluated comprehensively, and early warning and guidance can be further carried out on the territorial space planning.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field related to the territorial space planning, in particular to a territorial space planning current situation evaluation method.
Background
Through retrieval, the Chinese patent number CN112085396A discloses an algorithm model configuration method based on a state evaluation index of a state of a territorial space planning, and although the method can calculate the state evaluation index of the state of the territorial space planning, the state of the territorial space planning cannot be comprehensively evaluated; the territorial space planning is an arrangement made on space and time for territorial space development protection in a certain region, is a guide for national space development and a space blueprint for sustainable development, is a basic basis for various development protection construction activities, is mainly divided into five levels to correspond to space units with different scales, namely countries, provinces, cities, counties, towns and the like, and mainly comprises the aspects of planning, implementation, evaluation and early warning; among them, the evaluation takes a position as light as possible; at present, the state-of-the-earth space planning is mostly evaluated around the current situation of the first grade of the country or province and city, and the first grade of the country or province and city has a large evaluation range and a large number of evaluation indexes and reference parameters, so that the state-of-earth space planning is not suitable for the first grade of county and county evaluation; most of the existing evaluation methods are qualitative evaluation methods, and the evaluation result is one-sided; therefore, the invention of a state-of-the-earth space planning current situation evaluation method becomes particularly important;
most of the existing state evaluation methods for the state of the territorial space planning adopt a qualitative analysis method to evaluate the state of the territorial space planning; because the method is an analysis method for deducing the property and the development trend of the object according to the subjective judgment and analysis capability of the predictor, the result is more comprehensive and has poorer accuracy, and the method is not favorable for being used as the early warning and guidance basis of the territorial space planning, so that the method for evaluating the state situation of the territorial space planning is provided.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to solve the defects in the prior art and provides a method for evaluating the current situation of territorial space planning.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention adopts the following technical scheme:
a state soil space planning current situation assessment method comprises the following specific steps:
(1) constructing a territorial space planning evaluation index system: taking the county-country-level state-soil space planning current situation as an evaluation object, and making a state-soil space planning evaluation index system according to three major leads and six major dimensions, wherein the state-soil space planning evaluation index system comprises a first-level evaluation index, a second-level evaluation index and a third-level evaluation index;
(2) and (3) qualitative evaluation: designing a county-level state and country-level space planning current state survey questionnaire according to a state and country space planning evaluation index system, simultaneously endowing a fixed evaluation value range to each problem in the questionnaire, distributing the questionnaire to each layer for surveying to obtain each initial evaluation value, and then calculating each initial evaluation value through a weighted average algorithm to obtain a state and country space planning qualitative evaluation result;
(3) collecting quantitative evaluation index data: collecting three-level evaluation index data of each category of county and county levels according to a state and soil space planning evaluation index system;
(4) preprocessing quantitative evaluation data: cleaning, loading and format conversion are carried out on each category of three-level evaluation index data by utilizing GIS software to obtain unified each category of three-level evaluation index data;
(5) quantitative evaluation: according to the ecological priority concept, weights with different proportions are reasonably given to all three-level indexes, and meanwhile, unified all kinds of three-level evaluation index data are calculated according to all three-level indexes with different proportion weights, so that a quantitative evaluation result of the state-of-the-earth space planning current situation is obtained;
(6) the expected target calculation is as follows: calculating the sum of the highest evaluation values of each problem in the questionnaire to obtain a qualitative expected target, and calculating the expected value of three-level evaluation index data required in the territorial space planning to obtain a quantitative expected target;
(7) and (3) comprehensive evaluation: and finally, respectively calculating the proximity degree of the qualitative evaluation result and the qualitative expected target and the proximity degree of the quantitative evaluation result and the quantitative expected target by using a TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to each other) comprehensive evaluation method to obtain a state comprehensive evaluation result of the territorial space planning, and using the state comprehensive evaluation result as early warning and reference of a subsequent territorial planning scheme.
Further, the three major guides in the step (1) are target guide, problem guide and operation guide; the six dimensions include innovation, coordination, greenness, openness, sharing, and security.
Further, the first-level index is specifically six dimensions; the second-level indexes comprise scientific and technological input and output, scientific and technological talents, urban and rural fusion, land and sea planning, overground and underground, green production, green life, green ecology, network accessibility, external communication, living accommodation, nutrition accommodation and industry accommodation.
Further, the qualitative assessment comprises the following specific steps:
s1: designing a county-level state and country space planning current situation questionnaire according to a state and country space planning evaluation index system, and simultaneously endowing each question in the questionnaire with a fixed evaluation value range, wherein the evaluation value range is 1-10:
s2: distributing the questionnaire to each layer for investigation, recording and feedback to obtain each initial evaluation value;
s3: and carrying out weight distribution on each initial evaluation value by using a weighted average algorithm, and simultaneously calculating the result to obtain the state qualitative evaluation result of the territorial space planning.
Further, the weighted average algorithm has the following specific formula:
wherein:
n＝x1+x2+…+xk (2)
in the formula: x is each item of initial evaluation value, f is weight, and n is the sum of each item of initial evaluation value.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the beneficial effects that:
1. according to the method for evaluating the current situation of the territorial space planning, a territorial space planning evaluation index system is formulated according to three dimensions and six dimensions, and the territorial space planning evaluation index system comprises a primary evaluation index, a secondary evaluation index and a tertiary evaluation index, so that a foundation is laid for subsequent qualitative and quantitative evaluation; in addition, the invention adopts a questionnaire survey method as a quantitative evaluation means, and each question in the questionnaire is endowed with a fixed evaluation value range, so that qualitative questions are converted into mathematical questions, and the method is favorable for carrying out data qualitative evaluation on the current situation of homeland space planning;
2. according to the method for evaluating the state of the territorial space planning, the three-level evaluation index data of each category of county and county levels are collected, meanwhile, weights with different proportions are given according to the ecological priority concept in the territorial space planning, then quantitative calculation is carried out, and the accuracy of the quantitative evaluation result is favorably improved.
Drawings
The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention and not to limit the invention.
Fig. 1 is an overall flowchart of a state of territorial space planning status assessment method provided by the invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments.
In the description of the present invention, it is to be understood that the terms "upper", "lower", "front", "rear", "left", "right", "top", "bottom", "inner", "outer", and the like, indicate orientations or positional relationships based on the orientations or positional relationships shown in the drawings, are merely for convenience in describing the present invention and simplifying the description, and do not indicate or imply that the device or element being referred to must have a particular orientation, be constructed and operated in a particular orientation, and thus, should not be construed as limiting the present invention.
Referring to fig. 1, a state space planning status assessment method specifically includes the following steps:
(1) constructing a territorial space planning evaluation index system: taking the county-country-level state-soil space planning current situation as an evaluation object, and making a state-soil space planning evaluation index system according to three major leads and six major dimensions, wherein the state-soil space planning evaluation index system comprises a first-level evaluation index, a second-level evaluation index and a third-level evaluation index;
(2) and (3) qualitative evaluation: designing a county-level state and country-level space planning current state survey questionnaire according to a state and country space planning evaluation index system, simultaneously endowing a fixed evaluation value range to each problem in the questionnaire, distributing the questionnaire to each layer for surveying to obtain each initial evaluation value, and then calculating each initial evaluation value through a weighted average algorithm to obtain a state and country space planning qualitative evaluation result;
(3) collecting quantitative evaluation index data: collecting three-level evaluation index data of each category of county and county levels according to a state and soil space planning evaluation index system;
(4) preprocessing quantitative evaluation data: cleaning, loading and format conversion are carried out on each category of three-level evaluation index data by utilizing GIS software to obtain unified each category of three-level evaluation index data;
(5) quantitative evaluation: according to the ecological priority concept, weights with different proportions are reasonably given to all three-level indexes, and meanwhile, unified all kinds of three-level evaluation index data are calculated according to all three-level indexes with different proportion weights, so that a quantitative evaluation result of the state-of-the-earth space planning current situation is obtained;
(6) the expected target calculation is as follows: calculating the sum of the highest evaluation values of each problem in the questionnaire to obtain a qualitative expected target, and calculating the expected value of three-level evaluation index data required in the territorial space planning to obtain a quantitative expected target;
(7) and (3) comprehensive evaluation: and finally, respectively calculating the proximity degree of the qualitative evaluation result and the qualitative expected target and the proximity degree of the quantitative evaluation result and the quantitative expected target by using a TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to each other) comprehensive evaluation method to obtain a state comprehensive evaluation result of the territorial space planning, and using the state comprehensive evaluation result as early warning and reference of a subsequent territorial planning scheme.
The three major guides in the step (1) are target guide, problem guide and operation guide; the six dimensions include innovation, coordination, greenness, openness, sharing, and security.
The first-level index is specifically six dimensions; the second-level indexes comprise scientific and technological input and output, scientific and technological talents, urban and rural fusion, global planning of land and sea, overground and underground, green production, green life, green ecology, network accessibility, external communication, living accommodation, nourishment and industry accommodation.
The qualitative evaluation comprises the following specific steps:
s1: designing a county-level state and country space planning current situation questionnaire according to a state and country space planning evaluation index system, and simultaneously endowing each question in the questionnaire with a fixed evaluation value range, wherein the evaluation value range is 1-10:
s2: distributing the questionnaire to each layer for investigation, recording and feedback to obtain each initial evaluation value;
s3: and carrying out weight distribution on each initial evaluation value by using a weighted average algorithm, and simultaneously calculating the result to obtain the state qualitative evaluation result of the territorial space planning.
The weighted average algorithm has the following specific formula:
wherein:
n＝x1+x2+…+xk (2)
in the formula: x is each item of initial evaluation value, f is weight, and n is the sum of each item of initial evaluation value.
The working principle and the using process of the invention are as follows: when the method is used, firstly, an earth space planning evaluation index system needs to be constructed: taking the county-country-level state-soil space planning current situation as an evaluation object, and making a state-soil space planning evaluation index system according to three major leads and six major dimensions, wherein the state-soil space planning evaluation index system comprises a first-level evaluation index, a second-level evaluation index and a third-level evaluation index; then, qualitative evaluation: designing a county-level state and country-level space planning current state survey questionnaire according to a state and country space planning evaluation index system, simultaneously endowing a fixed evaluation value range to each problem in the questionnaire, distributing the questionnaire to each layer for surveying to obtain each initial evaluation value, and then calculating each initial evaluation value through a weighted average algorithm to obtain a state and country space planning qualitative evaluation result; then collecting quantitative evaluation index data: collecting three-level evaluation index data of each category of county and county levels according to a state and soil space planning evaluation index system; then quantitative evaluation data preprocessing: cleaning, loading and format conversion are carried out on each category of three-level evaluation index data by utilizing GIS software to obtain unified each category of three-level evaluation index data; then, quantitative evaluation: according to the ecological priority concept, weights with different proportions are reasonably given to all three-level indexes, and meanwhile, unified all kinds of three-level evaluation index data are calculated according to all three-level indexes with different proportion weights, so that a quantitative evaluation result of the state-of-the-earth space planning current situation is obtained; the desired target then calculates: calculating the sum of the highest evaluation values of each problem in the questionnaire to obtain a qualitative expected target, and calculating the expected value of three-level evaluation index data required in the territorial space planning to obtain a quantitative expected target; and finally, comprehensive evaluation: finally, respectively calculating the proximity degree of the qualitative evaluation result and the qualitative expected target and the proximity degree of the quantitative evaluation result and the quantitative expected target by using a TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to the qualitative expected target) to obtain a state comprehensive evaluation result of the territorial space planning, and using the state comprehensive evaluation result as early warning and reference of a subsequent territorial planning scheme; according to the invention, a territorial space planning evaluation index system with three-level indexes is constructed, qualitative and quantitative evaluation is simultaneously carried out on the basis of the territorial space planning evaluation index system to obtain qualitative and quantitative evaluation results, then qualitative and quantitative expected target values are simultaneously calculated to obtain specific data of the qualitative and quantitative expected targets, and finally, the proximity degree of the territorial space planning evaluation index system is calculated by adopting a TOPSIS comprehensive evaluation method, so that the territorial space planning status can be intuitively evaluated comprehensively, and early warning and guidance can be further carried out on the territorial space planning.
The above description is only for the preferred embodiment of the present invention, but the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto, and any person skilled in the art should be considered to be within the technical scope of the present invention, and the technical solutions and the inventive concepts thereof according to the present invention should be equivalent or changed within the scope of the present invention.
Claims (5)
1. A state space planning current situation assessment method is characterized by comprising the following specific steps:
(1) constructing a territorial space planning evaluation index system: taking the county-country-level state-soil space planning current situation as an evaluation object, and making a state-soil space planning evaluation index system according to three major leads and six major dimensions, wherein the state-soil space planning evaluation index system comprises a first-level evaluation index, a second-level evaluation index and a third-level evaluation index;
(2) and (3) qualitative evaluation: designing a county-level state and country-level space planning current state survey questionnaire according to a state and country space planning evaluation index system, simultaneously endowing a fixed evaluation value range to each problem in the questionnaire, distributing the questionnaire to each layer for surveying to obtain each initial evaluation value, and then calculating each initial evaluation value through a weighted average algorithm to obtain a state and country space planning qualitative evaluation result;
(3) collecting quantitative evaluation index data: collecting three-level evaluation index data of each category of county and county levels according to a state and soil space planning evaluation index system;
(4) preprocessing quantitative evaluation data: cleaning, loading and format conversion are carried out on each category of three-level evaluation index data by utilizing GIS software to obtain unified each category of three-level evaluation index data;
(5) quantitative evaluation: according to the ecological priority concept, weights with different proportions are reasonably given to all three-level indexes, and meanwhile, unified all kinds of three-level evaluation index data are calculated according to all three-level indexes with different proportion weights, so that a quantitative evaluation result of the state-of-the-earth space planning current situation is obtained;
(6) the expected target calculation is as follows: calculating the sum of the highest evaluation values of each problem in the questionnaire to obtain a qualitative expected target, and calculating the expected value of three-level evaluation index data required in the territorial space planning to obtain a quantitative expected target;
(7) and (3) comprehensive evaluation: and finally, respectively calculating the proximity degree of the qualitative evaluation result and the qualitative expected target and the proximity degree of the quantitative evaluation result and the quantitative expected target by using a TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to each other) comprehensive evaluation method to obtain a state comprehensive evaluation result of the territorial space planning, and using the state comprehensive evaluation result as early warning and reference of a subsequent territorial planning scheme.
2. A state space planning status quo evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that the three major guides of step (1) are specifically target guide, problem guide and operation guide; the six dimensions include innovation, coordination, greenness, openness, sharing, and security.
3. The state-of-the-earth space planning status quo evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that the primary index is specifically six dimensions; the second-level indexes comprise scientific and technological input and output, scientific and technological talents, urban and rural fusion, land and sea planning, overground and underground, green production, green life, green ecology, network accessibility, external communication, living accommodation, nutrition accommodation and industry accommodation.
4. The state-of-the-earth space planning status quo evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that the qualitative evaluation specifically comprises the following steps:
s1: designing a county-level state and country space planning current situation questionnaire according to a state and country space planning evaluation index system, and simultaneously endowing each question in the questionnaire with a fixed evaluation value range, wherein the evaluation value range is 1-10:
s2: distributing the questionnaire to each layer for investigation, recording and feedback to obtain each initial evaluation value;
s3: and carrying out weight distribution on each initial evaluation value by using a weighted average algorithm, and simultaneously calculating the result to obtain the state qualitative evaluation result of the territorial space planning.
5. A state-of-the-earth space planning status quo evaluation method according to claim 1,
the weighted average algorithm has the following specific formula:
wherein:
n＝x1+x2+…+xk (2)
in the formula: x is each item of initial evaluation value, f is weight, and n is the sum of each item of initial evaluation value.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110391891.8A CN113112152A (en) | 2021-04-13 | 2021-04-13 | State-of-the-earth space planning current situation assessment method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110391891.8A CN113112152A (en) | 2021-04-13 | 2021-04-13 | State-of-the-earth space planning current situation assessment method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN113112152A true CN113112152A (en) | 2021-07-13 |
Family
ID=76716108
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110391891.8A Pending CN113112152A (en) | 2021-04-13 | 2021-04-13 | State-of-the-earth space planning current situation assessment method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN113112152A (en) |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN115994685A (en) * | 2022-11-17 | 2023-04-21 | 新泰市国土空间规划服务中心(新泰市建筑设计院、新泰市水利设计院) | Method for evaluating current situation of homeland space planning |
| CN116090890A (en) * | 2023-01-09 | 2023-05-09 | 广东省城乡规划设计研究院有限责任公司 | Construction method of urban physical examination evaluation index calculation module for homeland space planning |
| CN117436708A (en) * | 2023-12-20 | 2024-01-23 | 临沂市规划建筑设计研究院集团有限公司 | Risk assessment method for territorial space planning |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR20090117534A (en) * | 2008-05-09 | 2009-11-12 | 재단법인서울대학교산학협력재단 | System for evaluating ecological construction value using a geographical information system and method using the same |
| CN110298553A (en) * | 2019-06-04 | 2019-10-01 | 广州市城市规划勘测设计研究院 | A kind of National land space planing method, system and equipment based on GIS |
| CN112085396A (en) * | 2020-09-14 | 2020-12-15 | 洛阳众智软件科技股份有限公司 | Algorithm model configuration method based on state-of-the-earth space planning current situation evaluation index |
-
2021
- 2021-04-13 CN CN202110391891.8A patent/CN113112152A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR20090117534A (en) * | 2008-05-09 | 2009-11-12 | 재단법인서울대학교산학협력재단 | System for evaluating ecological construction value using a geographical information system and method using the same |
| CN110298553A (en) * | 2019-06-04 | 2019-10-01 | 广州市城市规划勘测设计研究院 | A kind of National land space planing method, system and equipment based on GIS |
| CN112085396A (en) * | 2020-09-14 | 2020-12-15 | 洛阳众智软件科技股份有限公司 | Algorithm model configuration method based on state-of-the-earth space planning current situation evaluation index |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN115994685A (en) * | 2022-11-17 | 2023-04-21 | 新泰市国土空间规划服务中心(新泰市建筑设计院、新泰市水利设计院) | Method for evaluating current situation of homeland space planning |
| CN116090890A (en) * | 2023-01-09 | 2023-05-09 | 广东省城乡规划设计研究院有限责任公司 | Construction method of urban physical examination evaluation index calculation module for homeland space planning |
| CN117436708A (en) * | 2023-12-20 | 2024-01-23 | 临沂市规划建筑设计研究院集团有限公司 | Risk assessment method for territorial space planning |
| CN117436708B (en) * | 2023-12-20 | 2024-04-05 | 临沂市规划建筑设计研究院集团有限公司 | Risk assessment method for territorial space planning |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN111222661B (en) | Urban planning implementation effect analysis and evaluation method | |
| CN113112152A (en) | State-of-the-earth space planning current situation assessment method | |
| CN109102193A (en) | Geography designs ecological red line and delimit and management system and database, evaluation model | |
| CN101976248B (en) | Method for rapidly identifying environmental risk of power transmission and transformation project | |
| AU2021435561A1 (en) | Big data-based commercial space quality evaluation method and system, device, and medium | |
| CN109146204A (en) | A kind of wind power plant booster stations automatic addressing method of comprehensiveestimation | |
| Feng et al. | Incorporation of spatial heterogeneity-weighted neighborhood into cellular automata for dynamic urban growth simulation | |
| CN109658510B (en) | Substation site selection method, device and server | |
| CN102646164B (en) | A kind of land use change survey modeling method in conjunction with spatial filtering and system thereof | |
| CN111445116A (en) | Auxiliary compiling system for territorial space planning | |
| CN111882244A (en) | Construction method of multi-source homeland development risk assessment system based on hierarchical framework | |
| CN108830413A (en) | A kind of the visualization prediction technique and system of building energy consumption | |
| CN114819589A (en) | Urban space high-quality utilization determination method, system, computer equipment and terminal | |
| CN113902270A (en) | Method and system for safety rating of urban gas area | |
| CN112365391A (en) | Land diversity measurement method based on 'homeland survey' data | |
| CN108416524A (en) | Estate planning based on a figure general framework refines deciphering method | |
| CN113076336A (en) | GIS macro-micro decision support system for site selection of water plant in remote area | |
| Xing et al. | Sustainable development evaluation of urban traffic system | |
| CN108287974A (en) | Coupling evaluation method towards land use change survey Cellular Automata Simulation precision | |
| CN118094196A (en) | Land utilization planning method and planning system based on data analysis | |
| Cheng et al. | A study on site selection of pumped storage power plants based on C-OWA-AHP and VIKOR-GRA: a case study in China | |
| CN113361899A (en) | Farmland planning processing method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium | |
| CN118094304A (en) | City updating method and system based on city physical examination evaluation | |
| El Sayed | Land suitability analysis as multi criteria decision making to support the Egyptian urban development | |
| Wu et al. | An innovative method for offshore wind farm site selection based on the interval number with probability distribution |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20210713 |