CN113049799A - Pesticide utilization level measuring method and device, storage medium and terminal - Google Patents

Pesticide utilization level measuring method and device, storage medium and terminal Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN113049799A
CN113049799A CN202110256024.3A CN202110256024A CN113049799A CN 113049799 A CN113049799 A CN 113049799A CN 202110256024 A CN202110256024 A CN 202110256024A CN 113049799 A CN113049799 A CN 113049799A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
pesticide
evaluated
control
area
level
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN202110256024.3A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN113049799B (en
Inventor
宋卫国
董茂锋
李宝聚
石延霞
孙强
张其才
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Original Assignee
Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences filed Critical Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Priority to CN202110256024.3A priority Critical patent/CN113049799B/en
Publication of CN113049799A publication Critical patent/CN113049799A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN113049799B publication Critical patent/CN113049799B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/5005Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells
    • G01N33/5008Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells for testing or evaluating the effect of chemical or biological compounds, e.g. drugs, cosmetics
    • G01N33/5014Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells for testing or evaluating the effect of chemical or biological compounds, e.g. drugs, cosmetics for testing toxicity
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/5005Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells
    • G01N33/5091Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells for testing the pathological state of an organism

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
  • Hematology (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Tropical Medicine & Parasitology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
  • Catching Or Destruction (AREA)

Abstract

The invention provides a method for measuring the utilization level of pesticide, a measuring device, a storage medium and a terminal, wherein the evaluation method comprises the steps of measuring the control level L of the pesticide and/or the control level M of the effective ingredients of the pesticide; the pesticide control level
Figure DDA0002967200790000011
Level of control of active ingredients of pesticides

Description

Pesticide utilization level measuring method and device, storage medium and terminal
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of pesticides, in particular to a method, a device, a storage medium and a terminal for measuring pesticide utilization level.
Background
The pesticide is a chemical agent used for preventing and controlling plant diseases and insect pests and regulating plant growth in the agricultural field, and is widely applied to the aspects of agriculture, forestry and animal husbandry production, environmental and household sanitation pest and disease control and the like.
In order to improve the use level of pesticides, various methods are adopted in the prior art, such as preparation of pesticides, selection of a reasonable application method, grasping of a key time for timely application and the like, but the method is always a blank in the industry for how to evaluate the use level of pesticides.
Disclosure of Invention
In view of the above-described drawbacks of the prior art, an object of the present invention is to provide a method for measuring a usage level of an agricultural chemical, a measuring apparatus, a storage medium, and a terminal, which solve the problems in the prior art.
To achieve the above objects and other related objects, the present invention includes the following technical solutions.
The invention provides a method for measuring the utilization level of pesticide, which comprises measuring the control level L of the pesticide and/or the control level M of the effective component of the pesticide;
the pesticide control level
Figure BDA0002967200770000011
Level of control of active ingredients of pesticides
Figure BDA0002967200770000012
Wherein n is the total number of types of the control objects, and the control objects comprise diseases and insect pests;
Xithe weight of the ith kind of control object means the labor and material cost consumed by the ith kind of control objectThe ratio of the cost of human and material resources consumed by all the control objects is calculated, and the sum of the weights of all the control objects
Figure BDA0002967200770000013
Is 1;
Jithe control coefficient of the pesticide for the i-th control object,
Figure BDA0002967200770000014
gicontrol Effect of the i th control object, HiThe usage amount of the pesticide corresponding to the ith control object;
Kithe control coefficient of the effective components of the pesticide of the ith control object,
Figure BDA0002967200770000015
giis a controlling effect of the I th kind of controlling object, IiThe content of the effective components in the pesticide application amount corresponding to the ith control object.
In the above-described measurement method of the present application, the larger L and M are indicative of the utilization level of the agricultural chemical or the higher the utilization level.
The applicant of the invention provides a simple and universal method for measuring the utilization level of pesticides, and the control effect on a control object, the usage amount of pesticides corresponding to the control object and the content of active ingredients in the usage amount of the pesticides corresponding to the control object are combined to quickly and conveniently obtain the control level of the pesticides and the control level of the active ingredients of the pesticides, so that the control effects of two different control modes are compared according to the control level of the pesticides and the control level of the active ingredients of the pesticides.
The control effect of the control object of the i-th species according to the measurement method described above
Figure BDA0002967200770000021
Wherein CK0The number of live insects before drug application in the blank control area is counted in units of heads;
CK1,ithe number of live insects in a blank control area after the pesticide is applied to the ith control object is the unit of head;
PT0the number of live insects in the unit of head before pesticide application is carried out on the ith control object in the area to be evaluated;
PT1,ithe unit of the number of live insects in the area to be evaluated after the application of the pesticide to the ith control object is head.
According to the determination method, the determination method further comprises the step of determining the pesticide use amount Q of the area to be evaluated and/or the content P of the effective components in the total pesticide use amount of the area to be evaluated.
According to the determination method, in two different treatment modes, the smaller the pesticide usage amount and/or the content of the active ingredients in the pesticide usage amount is, the better the content is.
According to the determination method, the determination method further comprises the steps of determining the reduction rate S of the total pesticide consumption between the areas A and B to be evaluated and/or the reduction rate T of the content of the effective components in the total pesticide consumption;
reduction rate of pesticide usage amount
Figure BDA0002967200770000022
Wherein Q isAThe total amount of pesticide to be evaluated in the area A, i.e.
Figure BDA0002967200770000023
OBIs the total amount of pesticide in the area B to be evaluated, i.e.
Figure BDA0002967200770000024
HA,iThe usage amount of the pesticide corresponding to the ith control object in the area A to be evaluated; hB,iThe dosage of the pesticide corresponding to the ith control object in the area B to be evaluated;
reduction rate of content of active ingredient in amount of agricultural chemical used
Figure BDA0002967200770000025
Wherein, PAIs the content of the effective component in the total amount of the pesticide in the area A to be evaluated, namely
Figure BDA0002967200770000026
IA,iThe content of effective components in the pesticide usage amount corresponding to the ith kind of control object in the area A to be evaluated; pBIs the content of the effective component in the total pesticide consumption in the area B to be evaluated, i.e. the
Figure BDA0002967200770000031
IB,iThe content of the effective components in the pesticide usage amount corresponding to the ith kind of control object in the area B to be evaluated.
According to the above-described measurement method, the larger the reduction rates S and T, the smaller the amount of the agricultural chemical used in the area B to be evaluated.
The determination method also comprises the comparison of the pesticide utilization level between two areas to be evaluated under different treatment modes under the same control object, wherein n is 1,
Figure BDA0002967200770000032
at this time, the pesticide utilization levels of the same control object in two different treatment modes are compared through the control coefficient.
According to the determination method, for the areas A and B to be evaluated in two different treatment modes, the pesticide utilization level Y and the effective component utilization level Z in the pesticide are determined;
Figure BDA0002967200770000033
wherein L isBThe control level of the pesticide in the area B to be evaluated is obtained; l isAThe control level of the pesticide in the area A to be evaluated;
MBfor the control level of the pesticidal active ingredient in the area B to be evaluated, MAThe control level of the pesticide effective components in the area A to be evaluated is shown.
According to the above-described evaluation method, when the efficiency of application of the pesticide Y and the efficiency of application Z of the active ingredient in the pesticide exceed 100%, it is indicated that the efficiency of application of the pesticide in the B mode exceeds the efficiency of application in the a mode.
The invention also discloses a device for measuring the pesticide utilization level, which comprises a pesticide prevention and control level calculation module and/or a pesticide effective component prevention and control level calculation module;
the pesticide control level calculation module is used for calculating a pesticide control level L,
Figure BDA0002967200770000034
the pesticide effective component prevention and control level calculation module is used for calculating the pesticide effective component prevention and control level M, institute
Figure BDA0002967200770000035
Wherein n is the total number of types of the control objects, and the control objects comprise diseases and insect pests;
Xithe weight of the ith kind of control object is the ratio of the cost of manpower and material resources consumed by the ith kind of control object to the cost of manpower and material resources consumed by all control objects, and the sum of the weights of the various control objects
Figure BDA0002967200770000036
Is 1;
Jithe control coefficient of the pesticide for the i-th control object,
Figure BDA0002967200770000037
gicontrol Effect of the i th control object, HiThe usage amount of the pesticide corresponding to the ith control object;
Kithe control coefficient of the effective components of the pesticide of the ith control object,
Figure BDA0002967200770000041
giis a controlling effect of the I th kind of controlling object, IiThe content of the effective components in the pesticide application amount corresponding to the ith control object.
The measuring device also comprises a control effect calculation module of the ith kind of control object, and the control effect calculation module is used for calculating the control effect g of the ith kind of control objectiWherein, in the step (A),
Figure BDA0002967200770000042
wherein CK0The number of live insects before drug application in the blank control area is counted in units of heads;
CK1,ithe number of live insects in a blank control area after the pesticide is applied to the ith control object is the unit of head;
PT0the number of live insects in the unit of head before pesticide application is carried out on the ith control object in the area to be evaluated;
PT1,ithe unit of the number of live insects in the area to be evaluated after the application of the pesticide to the ith control object is head.
The device for determining the total pesticide consumption further comprises a total pesticide consumption counting module of the to-be-evaluated area and/or an effective component content counting module in the total pesticide consumption of the to-be-evaluated area, wherein the total pesticide consumption counting module of the to-be-evaluated area is used for calculating the pesticide consumption Q of the to-be-evaluated area, and the effective component content counting module in the total pesticide consumption of the to-be-evaluated area is used for calculating the effective component content in the total pesticide consumption of the to-be-evaluated area.
The device also comprises a reduction rate calculation module of the pesticide usage amount between the areas A and B to be evaluated and/or a reduction rate calculation module of the content of the effective components in the pesticide usage amount;
the reduction rate calculation module of the pesticide usage is electrically connected with the pesticide usage statistic module of the to-be-evaluated area and is used for calculating and displaying the reduction rate S of the pesticide usage between the to-be-evaluated areas A and B,
Figure BDA0002967200770000043
wherein Q isAThe total amount of pesticide to be evaluated in the area A, i.e.
Figure BDA0002967200770000044
QBIs the total amount of pesticide in the area B to be evaluated, i.e.
Figure BDA0002967200770000045
HA,iThe usage amount of the pesticide corresponding to the ith control object in the area A to be evaluated; hB,iFor the ith kind of control object pair in the area B to be evaluatedThe usage amount of the pesticide;
the reduction rate calculation module of the content of the effective components in the pesticide usage amount is used for calculating and displaying the reduction rate T of the content of the effective components in the pesticide usage amount between the areas A and B to be evaluated,
Figure BDA0002967200770000046
wherein, PAIs the content of the effective component in the total amount of the pesticide in the area A to be evaluated, namely
Figure BDA0002967200770000051
IA,iThe content of effective components in the pesticide usage amount corresponding to the ith kind of control object in the area A to be evaluated; pBIs the content of the effective component in the total pesticide consumption in the area B to be evaluated, i.e. the
Figure BDA0002967200770000052
IB,iThe content of the effective components in the pesticide usage amount corresponding to the ith kind of control object in the area B to be evaluated.
According to the measuring device, a pesticide utilization level calculating module and/or a pesticide effective component utilization level calculating module among areas to be evaluated in different treatment modes are/is used for calculating and displaying a pesticide utilization level Y,
Figure BDA0002967200770000053
wherein L isBThe control level of the pesticide in the area B to be evaluated is obtained; l isAThe control level of the pesticide in the area A to be evaluated;
the pesticide effective component utilization level calculating module is used for calculating the pesticide effective component utilization level Z,
Figure BDA0002967200770000054
wherein M isBFor the control level of the pesticidal active ingredient in the area B to be evaluated, MAThe control level of the pesticide effective components in the area A to be evaluated is shown;
wherein the treatment modes of the area A to be evaluated and the area B to be evaluated are different.
The invention also discloses a computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, which program, when being executed by a processor, carries out the determination method as described above.
The invention also discloses a terminal, comprising: a processor and a memory; optionally a communicator;
the memory is used for storing computer programs, the processor is used for executing the computer programs of the memory so as to enable the terminal to execute the measuring method, and the communicator is used for communicating with the outside.
The invention discloses a method, a device, a storage medium and a terminal for measuring pesticide utilization level, which are used for comprehensively evaluating the pesticide utilization level in the crop cultivation process by taking a prevention and control object as a main body and combining the weight of different prevention and control objects according to the proportion of pesticide usage and prevention and control effect around the crop planting characteristics and requirements.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic view showing the structure of an assay device according to the present application.
Detailed Description
The embodiments of the present invention are described below with reference to specific embodiments, and other advantages and effects of the present invention will be easily understood by those skilled in the art from the disclosure of the present specification. The invention is capable of other and different embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways, and its several details are capable of modification in various respects, all without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
It is to be understood that the processing equipment or apparatus not specifically identified in the following examples is conventional in the art.
Furthermore, it is to be understood that one or more method steps mentioned in the present invention does not exclude that other method steps may also be present before or after the combined steps or that other method steps may also be inserted between these explicitly mentioned steps, unless otherwise indicated. Moreover, unless otherwise indicated, the numbering of the various method steps is merely a convenient tool for identifying the various method steps, and is not intended to limit the order in which the method steps are arranged or the scope of the invention in which the invention may be practiced, and changes or modifications in the relative relationship may be made without substantially changing the technical content.
Example 1
The embodiment discloses a method for measuring the utilization level of pesticide, which comprises the steps of measuring the control level L of the pesticide and/or the control level M of the effective components of the pesticide;
the pesticide control level
Figure BDA0002967200770000061
Level of control of active ingredients of pesticides
Figure BDA0002967200770000062
Wherein n is the total number of types of the control objects, and the control objects comprise diseases and insect pests;
Xithe weight of the ith kind of control object is the ratio of the cost of manpower and material resources consumed by the ith kind of control object to the cost of manpower and material resources consumed by all control objects, and the sum of the weights of the various control objects
Figure BDA0002967200770000063
Is 1;
Jithe control coefficient of the pesticide for the i-th control object,
Figure BDA0002967200770000064
gicontrol Effect of the i th control object, HiThe usage amount of the pesticide corresponding to the ith control object;
Kithe control coefficient of the effective components of the pesticide of the ith control object,
Figure BDA0002967200770000065
giis a controlling effect of the I th kind of controlling object, IiThe content of the effective components in the pesticide application amount corresponding to the ith control object.
In the above measurement method, larger L and M indicate higher utilization level of agricultural chemicals.
The applicant of the invention provides a simple and universal method for measuring the utilization level of pesticides, and the control effect on a control object, the usage amount of pesticides corresponding to the control object and the content of active ingredients in the usage amount of the pesticides corresponding to the control object are combined to quickly and conveniently obtain the control level of the pesticides and the control level of the active ingredients of the pesticides, so that the control effects or the control levels of two different control modes are compared according to the control levels of the pesticides and the control levels of the active ingredients of the pesticides.
The control effect of the control object of the i-th species according to the measurement method described above
Figure BDA0002967200770000071
Wherein CK0The number of live insects before drug application in the blank control area is counted in units of heads;
CK1,ithe number of live insects in a blank control area after the pesticide is applied to the ith control object is the unit of head;
PT0the number of live insects in the unit of head before pesticide application is carried out on the ith control object in the area to be evaluated;
PT1,ithe unit of the number of live insects in the area to be evaluated after the application of the pesticide to the ith control object is head.
According to the determination method, the determination method further comprises the step of determining the pesticide usage amount Q of the area to be evaluated and/or the content P of the effective components in the pesticide usage amount of the area to be evaluated.
According to the determination method, in two different treatment modes, the smaller the pesticide usage amount and/or the content of the active ingredients in the pesticide usage amount is, the better the content is.
In a preferred embodiment, the determination method further comprises determining a reduction rate S of the total amount of the agricultural chemical and/or a reduction rate T of the content of the effective ingredient in the amount of the agricultural chemical used between the areas a and B to be evaluated;
reduction rate of pesticide usage amount
Figure BDA0002967200770000072
Wherein Q isAThe total amount of pesticide to be evaluated in the area A, i.e.
Figure BDA0002967200770000073
QBIs the total amount of pesticide in the area B to be evaluated, i.e.
Figure BDA0002967200770000074
HA,iThe usage amount of the pesticide corresponding to the ith control object in the area A to be evaluated; hB,iThe dosage of the pesticide corresponding to the ith control object in the area B to be evaluated;
reduction rate of content of active ingredient in amount of agricultural chemical used
Figure BDA0002967200770000075
Wherein, PAIs the content of the effective component in the total amount of the pesticide in the area A to be evaluated, namely
Figure BDA0002967200770000076
PBIs the content of the effective component in the total pesticide consumption in the area B to be evaluated, i.e. the
Figure BDA0002967200770000077
IA,iThe content of effective components in the pesticide usage amount corresponding to the ith kind of control object in the area A to be evaluated; i isB,iThe content of the effective components in the pesticide usage amount corresponding to the ith kind of control object in the area B to be evaluated.
According to the above-described measurement method, the larger the reduction rates S and T, the smaller the amount of the agricultural chemical used in the area B to be evaluated.
In a preferred embodiment, the determination method further comprises comparing the pesticide utilization levels between two areas under evaluation in different treatment modes in the same control subject, wherein n is 1,
Figure BDA0002967200770000078
at this time, the pesticide utilization levels of the same control object in two different treatment modes are compared through the control coefficient.
In a preferred embodiment, the method also comprises the steps of determining the pesticide utilization level Y and the utilization level Z of the effective ingredients in the pesticide for the areas A and B to be evaluated of two different treatment modes;
Figure BDA0002967200770000081
wherein L isBThe control level of the pesticide in the area B to be evaluated is obtained; l isAThe control level of the pesticide in the area A to be evaluated;
MBfor the control level of the pesticidal active ingredient in the area B to be evaluated, MAThe control level of the pesticide effective components in the area A to be evaluated is shown.
In a preferred embodiment, when the pesticide use efficiency Y and the effective component use efficiency Z in the pesticide exceed 100%, it indicates that the pesticide use efficiency of the B mode exceeds the use efficiency of the a mode.
Figure BDA0002967200770000082
A more specific implementation mode according to the above technical scheme is as follows, two treatment modes, a treatment mode a and a treatment mode B, are respectively provided, the specific treatment modes and the data obtained by the above measurement method are shown in the table for two control objects, namely aphids and downy mildew. As can be seen from the above table and the data on the measured effect, the pesticide utilization level in the treatment mode A is better than that in the treatment mode B
Example 2
The embodiment of the application also discloses a device for measuring the utilization level of the pesticide, which comprises a pesticide prevention and control level calculation module 1 and/or a pesticide effective component prevention and control level calculation module 2;
said agricultural chemicalThe pesticide prevention and treatment level calculation module 1 is used for calculating a pesticide prevention and treatment level L,
Figure BDA0002967200770000091
the pesticide effective component prevention and treatment level calculation module 2 is used for calculating the pesticide effective component prevention and treatment level M, institute
Figure BDA0002967200770000092
Wherein n is the total number of types of the control objects, and the control objects comprise diseases and insect pests;
Xithe weight of the ith kind of control object is the ratio of the cost of manpower and material resources consumed by the ith kind of control object to the cost of manpower and material resources consumed by all control objects, and the sum of the weights of the various control objects
Figure BDA0002967200770000093
Is 1;
Jithe control coefficient of the pesticide for the i-th control object,
Figure BDA0002967200770000094
gicontrol Effect of the i th control object, HiThe usage amount of the pesticide corresponding to the ith control object;
Kithe control coefficient of the effective components of the pesticide of the ith control object,
Figure BDA0002967200770000095
giis a controlling effect of the I th kind of controlling object, IiThe content of the effective components in the pesticide application amount corresponding to the ith control object.
In a specific embodiment, the control system further comprises an ith control object control effect calculation module 9 for calculating the control effect g of the ith control objectiWherein, in the step (A),
Figure BDA0002967200770000096
wherein CK0Is a blank pairThe number of live insects before pesticide application is carried out according to the area, and the unit is a head;
CK1,ithe number of live insects in a blank control area after the pesticide is applied to the ith control object is the unit of head;
PT0the number of live insects in the unit of head before pesticide application is carried out on the ith control object in the area to be evaluated;
PT1,ithe unit of the number of live insects in the area to be evaluated after the application of the pesticide to the ith control object is head.
In a specific embodiment, the method further comprises a total pesticide dosage statistic module 3 of the area to be evaluated and/or a content statistic module 4 of the effective components in the total pesticide dosage of the area to be evaluated, wherein the total pesticide dosage statistic module 3 of the area to be evaluated is used for calculating the pesticide dosage Q of the area to be evaluated, and the content statistic module 4 of the effective components in the total pesticide dosage of the area to be evaluated is used for calculating the content of the effective components in the total pesticide dosage of the area to be evaluated.
In a specific embodiment, the system further comprises a reduction rate calculation module 7 for the usage amount of the pesticide between the areas to be evaluated A and B and/or a reduction rate calculation module 8 for the content of the effective components in the usage amount of the pesticide;
the reduction rate calculation module 7 of the pesticide usage is electrically connected with the pesticide usage statistic module 3 of the to-be-evaluated area and is used for calculating and displaying the reduction rate S of the pesticide usage between the to-be-evaluated areas A and B,
Figure BDA0002967200770000101
wherein Q isAThe total amount of pesticide to be evaluated in the area A, i.e.
Figure BDA0002967200770000102
QBIs the total amount of pesticide in the area B to be evaluated, i.e.
Figure BDA0002967200770000103
HA,iThe usage amount of the pesticide corresponding to the ith control object in the area A to be evaluated; hB,iThe dosage of the pesticide corresponding to the ith control object in the area B to be evaluated;
the pesticide is effective in the use amountA reduction rate calculation module 8 for calculating and displaying the reduction rate T of the content of the effective components in the pesticide usage amount between the areas A and B to be evaluated,
Figure BDA0002967200770000104
wherein, PAIs the content of the effective component in the total amount of the pesticide in the area A to be evaluated, namely
Figure BDA0002967200770000105
IA,iThe content of effective components in the pesticide usage amount corresponding to the ith kind of control object in the area A to be evaluated; pBIs the content of the effective component in the total pesticide consumption in the area B to be evaluated, i.e. the
Figure BDA0002967200770000106
IB,iThe content of the effective components in the pesticide usage amount corresponding to the ith kind of control object in the area B to be evaluated.
In a specific embodiment, for the pesticide utilization level calculation module 5 and/or the pesticide effective component utilization level calculation module 6 between the areas to be evaluated of two different treatment modes, the pesticide utilization level calculation module 5 is used for calculating and displaying the pesticide utilization level Y,
Figure BDA0002967200770000107
wherein L isBThe control level of the pesticide in the area B to be evaluated is obtained; l isAThe control level of the pesticide in the area A to be evaluated;
the utilization level calculation module 6 of the effective components in the pesticide is used for calculating the utilization level Z of the effective components in the pesticide,
Figure BDA0002967200770000108
wherein M isBFor the control level of the pesticidal active ingredient in the area B to be evaluated, MAThe control level of the pesticide effective components in the area A to be evaluated is shown;
wherein the treatment modes of the area A to be evaluated and the area B to be evaluated are different.
The present embodiment also discloses a computer-readable storage medium on which a computer program is stored, which program, when being executed by a processor, realizes the measurement method as described above.
The embodiment further discloses a terminal, including: a processor and a memory; optionally a communicator;
the memory is used for storing computer programs, and the processor is used for executing the computer programs of the memory so as to enable the terminal to execute the measuring method.
The foregoing embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and utilities of the present invention and are not intended to limit the invention. Any person skilled in the art can modify or change the above-mentioned embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, it is intended that all equivalent modifications or changes which can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and technical spirit of the present invention be covered by the claims of the present invention.

Claims (10)

1. A method for measuring the utilization level of a pesticide is characterized by comprising the steps of measuring the control level L of the pesticide and/or the control level M of an effective component of the pesticide;
the pesticide control level
Figure FDA0002967200760000011
Level of control of active ingredients of pesticides
Figure FDA0002967200760000012
Wherein n is the total number of types of the control objects, and the control objects comprise diseases and insect pests;
Xithe weight of the ith kind of control object is the ratio of the cost of manpower and material resources consumed by the ith kind of control object to the cost of manpower and material resources consumed by all control objects, and the sum of the weights of the various control objects
Figure FDA0002967200760000013
Is 1;
Jithe control coefficient of the pesticide for the i-th control object,
Figure FDA0002967200760000014
gicontrol Effect of the i th control object, HiThe usage amount of the pesticide corresponding to the ith control object;
Kithe control coefficient of the effective components of the pesticide of the ith control object,
Figure FDA0002967200760000015
giis a controlling effect of the I th kind of controlling object, IiThe content of the effective components in the pesticide application amount corresponding to the ith control object.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the control effect of the i-th control object
Figure FDA0002967200760000016
Wherein CK0The number of live insects before drug application in the blank control area is counted in units of heads;
CK1,ithe number of live insects in a blank control area after the pesticide is applied to the ith control object is the unit of head;
PT0the number of live insects in the unit of head before pesticide application is carried out on the ith control object in the area to be evaluated;
PT1,ithe unit of the number of live insects in the area to be evaluated after the application of the pesticide to the ith control object is head.
3. The determination method according to claim 1, characterized by further comprising determining the total amount of pesticide Q in the area to be evaluated and/or the content P of active ingredients in the total amount of pesticide Q in the area to be evaluated;
and/or further comprises the comparison of the pesticide utilization levels between two areas to be evaluated under different treatment modes under the same control object, wherein n is 1,
Figure FDA0002967200760000017
and/or for the areas A and B to be evaluated in two different treatment modes, determining the pesticide utilization level Y and/or the effective component utilization level Z in the pesticide;
Figure FDA0002967200760000021
wherein L isBThe control level of the pesticide in the area B to be evaluated is obtained; l isAThe control level of the pesticide in the area A to be evaluated; mBFor the control level of the pesticidal active ingredient in the area B to be evaluated, MAThe control level of the pesticide effective components in the area A to be evaluated is shown.
4. The measurement method according to claim 3, further comprising measuring a reduction rate S of the total amount of agricultural chemicals between the areas A and B to be evaluated and/or a reduction rate T of the content of active ingredients in the total amount of agricultural chemicals;
reduction rate of pesticide usage amount
Figure FDA0002967200760000022
Wherein Q isAThe total amount of pesticide to be evaluated in the area A, i.e.
Figure FDA0002967200760000023
QBIs the total amount of pesticide in the area B to be evaluated, i.e.
Figure FDA0002967200760000024
HA,iThe usage amount of the pesticide corresponding to the ith control object in the area A to be evaluated; hB,iThe dosage of the pesticide corresponding to the ith control object in the area B to be evaluated;
reduction rate of content of active ingredient in amount of agricultural chemical used
Figure FDA0002967200760000025
Wherein, PAIs the content of the effective component in the total amount of the pesticide in the area A to be evaluated, namely
Figure FDA0002967200760000026
IA,iThe content of effective components in the pesticide usage amount corresponding to the ith kind of control object in the area A to be evaluated; pBIs the content of the effective component in the total pesticide consumption in the area B to be evaluated, i.e. the
Figure FDA0002967200760000027
IB,iThe content of the effective components in the pesticide usage amount corresponding to the ith kind of control object in the area B to be evaluated.
5. A device for measuring the utilization level of pesticide is characterized by comprising a pesticide prevention and treatment level calculation module and/or a pesticide effective component prevention and treatment level calculation module;
the pesticide control level extreme module is used for calculating a pesticide control level L,
Figure FDA0002967200760000028
the pesticide effective component prevention and control level calculation module is used for calculating the pesticide effective component prevention and control level M, institute
Figure FDA0002967200760000029
Wherein n is the total number of types of the control objects, and the control objects comprise diseases and insect pests;
Xithe weight of the ith kind of control object is the ratio of the cost of manpower and material resources consumed by the ith kind of control object to the cost of manpower and material resources consumed by all control objects, and the sum of the weights of the various control objects
Figure FDA00029672007600000210
Is 1;
Jicoefficient of pesticide control for i-th control object,
Figure FDA0002967200760000031
giControl Effect of the i th control object, HiThe usage amount of the pesticide corresponding to the ith control object;
Kithe control coefficient of the effective components of the pesticide of the ith control object,
Figure FDA0002967200760000032
giis a controlling effect of the I th kind of controlling object, IiThe content of the effective components in the pesticide application amount corresponding to the ith control object.
6. The measuring apparatus according to claim 5, further comprising an i-th control object control effect calculation module for calculating a control effect g of the i-th control objectiWherein, in the step (A),
Figure FDA0002967200760000033
wherein CK0The number of live insects before drug application in the blank control area is counted in units of heads;
CK1,ithe number of live insects in a blank control area after the pesticide is applied to the ith control object is the unit of head;
PT0the number of live insects in the unit of head before pesticide application is carried out on the ith control object in the area to be evaluated;
PT1,ithe unit of the number of live insects in the area to be evaluated after the application of the pesticide to the ith control object is head.
7. The device for measuring the pesticide total consumption according to claim 5, characterized by further comprising a statistical module of the total pesticide consumption of the area to be evaluated and/or a statistical module of the content of the effective components in the total pesticide consumption of the area to be evaluated, wherein the statistical module of the total pesticide consumption of the area to be evaluated is used for calculating the pesticide consumption Q of the area to be evaluated, and the statistical module of the content of the effective components in the total pesticide consumption of the area to be evaluated is used for calculating the content of the effective components in the total pesticide consumption of the area to be evaluated;
and/or further comprises a pesticide utilization level calculation module and/or an effective component utilization level calculation module in pesticides between areas to be evaluated in different treatment modes, wherein the pesticide utilization level calculation module is used for calculating a pesticide utilization level Y,
Figure FDA0002967200760000034
wherein L isBThe control level of the pesticide in the area B to be evaluated is obtained; l isAThe control level of the pesticide in the area A to be evaluated; the pesticide effective component utilization level calculating module is used for calculating the pesticide effective component utilization level Z,
Figure FDA0002967200760000035
wherein M isBFor the control level of the pesticidal active ingredient in the area B to be evaluated, MAThe control level of the pesticide effective components in the area A to be evaluated is shown; wherein the treatment modes of the area A to be evaluated and the area B to be evaluated are different.
8. The measuring apparatus according to claim 7, further comprising a reduction rate calculation module of the amount of agricultural chemical used between the areas a and B to be evaluated and/or a reduction rate calculation module of the content of active ingredients in the amount of agricultural chemical used;
the reduction rate calculation module of the pesticide usage is electrically connected with the pesticide usage statistic module of the to-be-evaluated area and is used for calculating and displaying the reduction rate S of the pesticide usage between the to-be-evaluated areas A and B,
Figure FDA0002967200760000041
wherein Q isAThe total amount of pesticide to be evaluated in the area A, i.e.
Figure FDA0002967200760000042
QBIs the total amount of pesticide in the area B to be evaluated, i.e.
Figure FDA0002967200760000043
HA,iTo be evaluatedThe pesticide usage amount corresponding to the ith control object in the valence area A; hB,iThe dosage of the pesticide corresponding to the ith control object in the area B to be evaluated;
the reduction rate calculation module of the content of the effective components in the pesticide usage amount is used for calculating and displaying the reduction rate T of the content of the effective components in the pesticide usage amount between the areas A and B to be evaluated,
Figure FDA0002967200760000044
wherein, PAIs the content of the effective component in the total amount of the pesticide in the area A to be evaluated, namely
Figure FDA0002967200760000045
IA,iThe content of effective components in the pesticide usage amount corresponding to the ith kind of control object in the area A to be evaluated; pBIs the content of the effective component in the total pesticide consumption in the area B to be evaluated, i.e. the
Figure FDA0002967200760000046
IB,iThe content of the effective components in the pesticide usage amount corresponding to the ith kind of control object in the area B to be evaluated.
9. A computer-readable storage medium on which a computer program is stored, the program, when executed by a processor, implementing the measurement method according to any one of claims 1 to 4.
10. A terminal, comprising: a processor and memory, optionally including a communicator;
the memory is used for storing a computer program, the processor is used for executing the computer program of the memory so as to enable the terminal to execute the measuring method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, and the communicator is used for communicating with the outside.
CN202110256024.3A 2021-03-09 2021-03-09 Pesticide utilization level measuring method, pesticide utilization level measuring device, storage medium and terminal Active CN113049799B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110256024.3A CN113049799B (en) 2021-03-09 2021-03-09 Pesticide utilization level measuring method, pesticide utilization level measuring device, storage medium and terminal

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110256024.3A CN113049799B (en) 2021-03-09 2021-03-09 Pesticide utilization level measuring method, pesticide utilization level measuring device, storage medium and terminal

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN113049799A true CN113049799A (en) 2021-06-29
CN113049799B CN113049799B (en) 2024-04-16

Family

ID=76510678

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202110256024.3A Active CN113049799B (en) 2021-03-09 2021-03-09 Pesticide utilization level measuring method, pesticide utilization level measuring device, storage medium and terminal

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN113049799B (en)

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5900944A (en) * 1997-03-03 1999-05-04 Day-Glo Color Corp. Method and device for the analysis of pesticides
EP1386538A1 (en) * 2001-04-13 2004-02-04 Think Chemical Co. Ltd. Method of determining the practically useful application dose of pesticide, method of developing pesticide and method of indicating the performance of pesticide
CN103149323A (en) * 2013-01-29 2013-06-12 江苏省农业科学院 Simple and easy device and method of judging combined-use effect of pesticides quickly
KR101829329B1 (en) * 2016-11-16 2018-02-20 주식회사비엠테크 Smart device for communicating and detecting pesticide residues
CN108038588A (en) * 2017-11-15 2018-05-15 成都东谷利农农业科技有限公司 Pesticide field efficacy medicine test management method and device
CN109819956A (en) * 2019-01-03 2019-05-31 固安京蓝云科技有限公司 A kind of pesticide spraying plant protection operation analysis model and analysis method
CN110046817A (en) * 2019-04-12 2019-07-23 山西省农业科学院植物保护研究所 The evaluation method of one planting fruit-trees pesticide efficacy
CN111308059A (en) * 2020-03-25 2020-06-19 河南省农业科学院植物保护研究所 Method for quantitatively evaluating functions and characteristics of pesticides

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5900944A (en) * 1997-03-03 1999-05-04 Day-Glo Color Corp. Method and device for the analysis of pesticides
EP1386538A1 (en) * 2001-04-13 2004-02-04 Think Chemical Co. Ltd. Method of determining the practically useful application dose of pesticide, method of developing pesticide and method of indicating the performance of pesticide
CN103149323A (en) * 2013-01-29 2013-06-12 江苏省农业科学院 Simple and easy device and method of judging combined-use effect of pesticides quickly
KR101829329B1 (en) * 2016-11-16 2018-02-20 주식회사비엠테크 Smart device for communicating and detecting pesticide residues
CN108038588A (en) * 2017-11-15 2018-05-15 成都东谷利农农业科技有限公司 Pesticide field efficacy medicine test management method and device
CN109819956A (en) * 2019-01-03 2019-05-31 固安京蓝云科技有限公司 A kind of pesticide spraying plant protection operation analysis model and analysis method
CN110046817A (en) * 2019-04-12 2019-07-23 山西省农业科学院植物保护研究所 The evaluation method of one planting fruit-trees pesticide efficacy
CN111308059A (en) * 2020-03-25 2020-06-19 河南省农业科学院植物保护研究所 Method for quantitatively evaluating functions and characteristics of pesticides

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
田家榛 等: "基于农药施用频率影响因素下的农户施药各环节权重对比分析", 《农药》, vol. 58, no. 7, 10 July 2019 (2019-07-10), pages 469 - 474 *
赵磊 等: "3中生物农药对西藏飞蝗的防治效果", 《植物保护》, vol. 41, no. 5, 29 September 2015 (2015-09-29), pages 229 - 232 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN113049799B (en) 2024-04-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11696578B2 (en) Control of harmful organisms on the basis of the prediction of infestation risks
Fernandez-Cornejo et al. Pesticide use in US agriculture: 21 selected crops, 1960-2008
Medrzycki et al. Standard methods for toxicology research in Apis mellifera
de Cock et al. Experts' subjective assessment of pesticide exposure in fruit growing
Arthur Dosage rate, temperature, and food source provisioning affect susceptibility of Tribolium castaneum and Tribolium confusum to chlorfenapyr
Ewald et al. Trends in pesticide use and efficacy during 26 years of changing agriculture in southern England
Benni et al. A generalised additive model to characterise dairy cows’ responses to heat stress
Sinha et al. Population dynamics of stored-product mites
WO2021239972A1 (en) A method for an "on-the-fly" treatment of an agricultural field using a soil sensor
Garg et al. Smart agriculture and nanotechnology: Technology, challenges, and new perspective
US20230337571A1 (en) Real-time fertilization and/or crop protection decision making based on soil-, crop, field- and weather-related data wherein the soil-related data are obtained by a soil sensor
Felix et al. Effects of experimental canopy manipulation on amphibian egg deposition
Carlson Risk reducing inputs related to agricultural pests
CN113049799A (en) Pesticide utilization level measuring method and device, storage medium and terminal
Faye et al. Interrelationships between herd management practices and udder health status using canonical correspondence analysis
Arthur et al. Evaluation of catmint oil and hydrogenated catmint oil as repellents for the flour beetles, Tribolium castaneum andTribolium confusum
Hill et al. Predation risk and habitat use in chacma baboons (Papio hamadryas ursinus)
Rao et al. Adoption, impact and discontinuance of integrated pest management technologies for pigeon pea in South India
Meikle et al. Evaluation of sequential sampling plans for the larger grain borer (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) and the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and of visual grain assessment in West Africa
Khodayari et al. Seasonal activity of Zetzellia mali (Stigmaeidae) and its preys Eotetranychus frosti (Tetranychidae) and Tydeus longisetosus (Tydeidae) in unsprayed apple orchards of Maragheh, northwestern of Iran
Hall et al. The Performance of Independent Pest Management Consultants: In San Joaquin Cotton and Citrus
op Akkerhuis et al. Water Depletion, an Important Cause of Mortality in Females of the SpiderOedothorax apicatusafter Treatment with Deltamethrin: A Simulation Study
Xu et al. Comparing the cost–benefit probability of management based on early‐stage and late‐stage economic thresholds with that of seed treatment of Aphis glycines
Maddy Pesticide usage in California and the United States
Harris et al. Pecan nut loss from pollination to harvest

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant