CN112964931A - Non-ideal multi-damping harmonic signal parameter measurement method based on double-channel undersampling - Google Patents
Non-ideal multi-damping harmonic signal parameter measurement method based on double-channel undersampling Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112964931A CN112964931A CN202110103500.8A CN202110103500A CN112964931A CN 112964931 A CN112964931 A CN 112964931A CN 202110103500 A CN202110103500 A CN 202110103500A CN 112964931 A CN112964931 A CN 112964931A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- sampling
- signal
- frequency
- channel
- parameter
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000013016 damping Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 27
- 238000000691 measurement method Methods 0.000 title claims description 8
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 106
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 41
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 claims description 17
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 101100328957 Caenorhabditis elegans clk-1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 102100040862 Dual specificity protein kinase CLK1 Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 102100040844 Dual specificity protein kinase CLK2 Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 101000749294 Homo sapiens Dual specificity protein kinase CLK1 Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 101000749291 Homo sapiens Dual specificity protein kinase CLK2 Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002595 magnetic resonance imaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R23/00—Arrangements for measuring frequencies; Arrangements for analysing frequency spectra
- G01R23/16—Spectrum analysis; Fourier analysis
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Apparatus (AREA)
Abstract
A non-ideal multi-damping harmonic signal parameter measuring method based on double-channel undersampling comprises two sampling channels, in order to prevent frequency mixing and image frequency blurring, the two sampling channels are connected through a feedback channel, signal parameters can be recovered from non-ideal K harmonic MEDS signals through only 4K samples, and the method is also suitable for K unknown conditions. Compared with the method in the prior art, the method has higher reconstruction precision and robustness to noise.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of signal processing, and particularly relates to a non-ideal multi-damping harmonic signal parameter measurement method based on dual-channel undersampling.
Background
Parameter estimation of multi-Damped harmonic signals (MEDS) is a problem that often occurs in the fields of magnetic resonance imaging, linear system recognition, speech analysis, and transient analysis. A related problem includes pole-zero modeling of empirically generated time series data, since the impulse response of a linear stable rational model is composed of exponentially damped sinusoids. A number of researchers have proposed methods for parameter estimation based on nyquist sampling theory. Fotinea et al propose a state space approach to spectral estimation that performs factor 2 decimation while utilizing all available data sets. Chen et al propose a subspace-based parameter estimator that is efficient and accurate in estimating the parameters of an exponentially decaying sinusoidal signal sum. However, according to the nyquist sampling theorem, the above system needs to satisfy the requirement that the sampling rate is twice the signal bandwidth. Therefore, for wideband signals, these systems face a common problem in that not only a high sampling rate but also a complicated process is required to complete parameter estimation.
The continuous-time med signal is generally composed of a linear combination of a plurality of damped complex exponential signals, but since the actual signal cannot be perfectly matched with such a signal, the present invention takes such a model matching error into account and reduces the influence of such an error through an optimization algorithm. Also, due to the periodicity of the trigonometric function, the under-nyquist sampling results in frequency aliasing and image frequency aliasing.
In recent years, parameter measurement methods based on sub-nyquist sampling have received increasing attention. However, when measuring parameters using the under-nyquist sampling method, a key problem to be solved is frequency aliasing. Scholars of r.venkataramani and a.bourdoux, et al, propose multi-rate asynchronous sub-nyquist sampling schemes to solve the frequency aliasing problem, which typically limit the number of frequency components, also depending on the number of channels. However, these methods often require random sampling, resulting in a complex hardware structure, which greatly reduces the practicality. Furthermore, the estimation accuracy depends on the spectral grid density, which is generally not high in view of computational complexity. In the p.pal and s.qin et al systems, a two-channel sampling scheme of a relatively prime undersampling rate is employed to estimate the line spectrum. Huang et al, however, show that frequency estimates sometimes cannot be uniquely determined. To solve this problem, s.huang et al propose a three-channel under-Nyquist scheme with pairwise co-prime undersampling rate to ensure that the frequency aliasing problem can be successfully solved. However, these methods require a large number of samples to determine the correct frequency, and these systems require that the number of frequencies be known and that they are not specifically designed for the MEDS signal. Therefore, the measurement problem of the MEDS signal parameters needs to be solved urgently.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to overcome the defects of the prior art, the invention provides a non-ideal multi-damping harmonic signal parameter measurement method based on double-channel undersampling, aiming at the problems of frequency aliasing and image frequency aliasing and parameter measurement caused by the undersampling of non-ideal MEDS signals, the method comprises two sampling channels which are respectively a main sampling channel and an auxiliary sampling channel, and a feedback channel is arranged between the two channels, and the feedback channel can avoid the occurrence of frequency aliasing and image frequency aliasing; then, an intelligent optimization method is also provided to solve the problems of signal nonideal and insufficient prior information.
The technical scheme adopted by the invention for solving the technical problems is as follows:
a non-ideal multi-damping harmonic signal parameter measurement method based on dual-channel undersampling comprises the following steps:
firstly, initializing to generate a non-ideal MEDS signal, wherein the signal has the following form:
wherein T is belonged to (0, T), ck(K-1, 2, … K) is the complex amplitude, sk=rk+j2πfkIs the complex frequency, K is 1,2, … K, rkIs the damping factor, fkThe method comprises the following steps that pole frequency is adopted, K is the number of unknown frequency components, sigma (t) is a model matching error signal, and the model matching error signal sigma (t) is introduced into a model because a real signal and an MEDS signal cannot be completely matched;
step two, controlling a signal control switch so as to shunt the MEDS signals, firstly, dialing the control switch to a branch where a main sampling channel is located through the control signal, at the moment, sampling the obtained shunt MEDS signals through the main sampling channel, then dialing the control switch to a branch where an auxiliary sampling channel is located through the control signal, and at the moment, sampling the obtained shunt MEDS signals through the auxiliary sampling channel;
step three, the control signal dials the switch to the branch where the main sampling channel is located, the main sampling channel samples the obtained shunt MEDS signal, the sampling clock CLK1 uniformly samples the shunt signal, and the sampling rate is fsThe sample values are represented as follows:
where K is the unknown number of components, ckWhich is indicative of the complex amplitude of the signal,sk=rk+j2πfkrepresenting complex frequency, rkRepresenting the damping factor, fkRepresenting the pole frequency, m ∈ Z+,σ[n]Represents the sample value after σ (t) is sampled by the clock CLK 1;
and step four, establishing an optimization model to reduce the influence of model matching errors. Since the number of components K is unknown and the model matching error sigma (t) ≠ 0, the optimal component K and the optimal parameter are found by minimizing the energy of sigma (t)
Step five, sampling value x [ n ]]Input to the optimal estimation algorithm of the number of amplitude and frequency components, thereby obtaining the optimal K andp (P ≦ K) represents a valid estimate of the threshold exceededThe number of (2);
step six, estimating the parameterInput to a feedback sample rate generator module to calculate the sample rate f 'of the secondary sample channel'sAnd f'sSatisfies the following formula:
wherein,a,b∈{0,1,…,K-1},m∈{-(2Q-2),-(2Q-3),…,2Q-2},fsis the sampling rate, 0 < fs<fmax,fmaxFor signal frequency upper limit, when the sampling value is interfered by noise, in order to improve the robustness of the method, the sampling rate f 'generated by the sampling rate generator module is fed back'sThe following equation needs to be satisfied:
wherein rem { (. 1) } represents a remainder of division of (-) by 1, and ε represents a threshold determined by noise intensity;
and step seven, the control signal dials the switch to the auxiliary sampling channel, and the auxiliary sampling channel samples the obtained shunt signal. The signal is uniformly sampled by a sampling clock CLK2 at a sampling rate of f'sThe sample values are represented as follows:
wherein, c'kIn order to be a complex amplitude of the signal,T′s=1/f′sto adoptSample period, σ]n′]=σ[n′T′s]For model matching the sampled values of the error signal, N 'is 0,1, …, N' -1, and then an optimal estimation algorithm of the number of amplitude and frequency components is run, the sampled values x 'N']By the algorithm, an estimated value is obtained
Step eight, estimating the parameterAndinput to a joint estimation parameter algorithm for complex frequency and complex amplitudeAndand (4) obtaining a joint estimation.
Further, the process of the step four is as follows:
step 4.1, the established optimization model is expressed as follows:
step 4.2, because the input non-ideal med signal x (t) is unknown, that is, the formula (4) cannot be solved, and the sampling value obtained in step (2) is used to replace x (t), then step (4) is converted into the following formula:
wherein,number of frequency components K and parameterAre unknown, then (5) is described by the following formula:
wherein,
(7) referred to as the optimization objective function.
Still further, the process of the fifth step is as follows:
step 5.1, initialization, first, obtaining the sampling value x [ n ] from the parameter measurement system](N-0, 1, …, N-1), setting the number of frequency components K' to 0, setting the optimum number of frequency components K to 0, and setting the estimation parameter PbestSetting the optimum value of equation (7) to fbest;
Step 5.2, updating the number K' +1 of the frequency components;
step 5.3, using the sampling value x [ n ]]And solving (2) by a spectrum estimation method to obtain the estimation parametersAs an initial bit for the next step;
step 5.4, the optimization problem of (6) is solved by the provided optimization algorithm, and P is setoptIs a global optimum position;
Step 5.6, the result is output, ifAnd (4) outputting the solution to be the optimal solution, otherwise, returning to the step 5.3 and repeating the steps.
The process of the step eight is as follows:
step 8.1, estimated normalized frequency due to the periodicity of the trigonometric functionAndby a parameter of 2 pi mkNamely:
further, the following formula is obtained:
wherein, the angle is the main value of the complex angle, and is more than or equal to 0 and less than 2 pi, mkE.g., Z, K e.g., {1,2, …, K }. Because of the fact thatfmaxFor the upper frequency limit of the MEDS signal, the following is obtained:
0≤mk≤(Q-1) (14)
step 8.2, according to (12), fromThe argument of (c) is obtained from a frequency parameter solution set F and expressed in the form:
wherein f issIs the sampling rate of the main sampling channel, the angle is the amplitude main value of the complex number, the angle is more than or equal to 0 and less than 2 pi, mp∈Z,-(Q-1)≤nk≤Q-1,nkE.g. Z, so the true frequencyMeanwhile, the estimated value of the obtained damping factor is as follows:
step 8.3, in the subsampling channel, according to (12), fromThe argument of (c) is obtained as a frequency parameter solution set F' and expressed in the form:
wherein, f'sIs the sampling rate of the secondary sampling channel, the angle is the amplitude primary value of a complex number, and is more than or equal to 0 and less than 2 pi, m'p′∈Z,-(Q′-1)≤n′k≤Q′-1,n′kE.g. Z, so the true frequencyMeanwhile, the estimated value of the obtained damping factor is as follows:
to this end, the frequency parameter is obtained as shown in the following formula:
and the damping factor parameter is as follows:
thereby obtaining a complex frequency skAs shown in the following formula:
step 8.4, once the frequency is foundWe can calculate the parametersAndfirst, by selectingAndto determine parametersAssume that the other elements areAndthen, the parametersAndrespectively from the setAndis obtained, therefore, parameter ckEstimated as:
the invention has the following beneficial effects: obtaining the parameter complex frequency s of the MEDS signal to be measured by using the optimal estimation algorithm and the combined estimation parameter algorithm of the amplitude and frequency component numberkAnd complex amplitude ckA value of (d); the method has high reconstruction precision and robustness to noise.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a system structure diagram of a non-ideal multi-damping harmonic signal parameter measurement method based on two-channel undersampling.
Fig. 2 is a flow chart of an optimal estimation algorithm for the number of amplitude and frequency components.
Fig. 3 is a result of parameter recovery when the frequency is not aliased.
Fig. 4 is a parameter recovery result at the time of frequency aliasing.
Figure 5 is a comparison of parameter recovery performance as signal-to-noise ratio increases.
Detailed Description
The invention is further described below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Referring to fig. 1 to 5, a method for measuring non-ideal multi-damping harmonic signal parameters based on dual-channel undersampling comprises the following steps:
firstly, initializing to generate a non-ideal MEDS signal, wherein the signal has the following form:
wherein T is belonged to (0, T), ck(K-1, 2, … K) is the complex amplitude, sk=rk+j2πfkIs the complex frequency, K is 1,2, … K, rkIs the damping factor, fkIs the pole frequency, K is the unknown number of frequency components, and σ (t) is the model match error signal. Since the true signal and the med signal cannot be completely matched, we introduce a model matching error signal σ (t) in the model;
step two, controlling a signal control switch so as to shunt the MEDS signals, firstly, dialing the control switch to a branch where a main sampling channel is located through the control signal, at the moment, sampling the obtained shunt MEDS signals through the main sampling channel, then dialing the control switch to a branch where an auxiliary sampling channel is located through the control signal, and at the moment, sampling the obtained shunt MEDS signals through the auxiliary sampling channel;
step three, the control signal dials the switch to the branch where the main sampling channel is located, the main sampling channel samples the obtained shunt MEDS signal, the sample clock CLK1 uniformly samples the shunt signal, and the sampling rate is fsThe sample values are represented as follows:
where K is the unknown number of components, ckWhich is indicative of the complex amplitude of the signal,sk=rk+j2πfkrepresenting complex frequency, rkRepresenting the damping factor, fkRepresenting the pole frequency, m ∈ Z+,σ[n]Represents the sample value after σ (t) is sampled by the clock CLK 1;
step four, establishing an optimization model, reducing the influence of model matching errors, and finding the optimal component K and the optimal parameter by minimizing the energy of sigma (t) because the component number K is unknown and the model matching error sigma (t) is not equal to 0The process is as follows:
step 4.1, the established optimization model is expressed as follows:
step 4.2, because the input non-ideal med signal x (t) is unknown, that is, the formula (4) cannot be solved, and the sampling value obtained in step (2) is used to replace x (t), then step (4) is converted into the following formula:
wherein,number of frequency components K and parameterAre unknown, then (5) is described by the following formula:
wherein,
(7) called the optimization objective function;
step five, sampling value x [ n ]]Input to the optimal estimation algorithm of the number of amplitude and frequency components, thereby obtaining the optimal K andp (P ≦ K) represents a valid estimate of the threshold exceededThe number of (2) is as follows:
step 5.1, initialization, first, the sampling values x [ n ] can be obtained from the parameter measurement system shown in FIG. 1](N-0, 1, …, N-1), setting the number of frequency components K' to 0, setting the optimum number of frequency components K to 0, and setting the estimation parameter PbestSetting the optimum value of equation (7) to fbest;
Step 5.2, updating the number K' +1 of the frequency components;
step 5.3, using the sampling value x [ n ]]And solving (2) by a spectrum estimation method to obtain the estimation parametersAs an initial bit for the next step;
step 5.4, the optimization problem of (6) is solved by the proposed optimization algorithm, and we assume PoptIs a global optimum position;
Step 5.6, the result is output, ifThe output is the optimal solution, otherwise, the step 5.3 is returned to, and the steps are repeated;
step (ii) ofSixthly, estimating the parametersInput to a feedback sample rate generator module that calculates the sample rate f 'of the secondary sampling channel'sAnd f'sSatisfies the following formula:
wherein,a,b∈{0,1,…,K-1},m∈{-(2Q-2),-(2Q-3),…,2Q-2},fsis the sampling rate, 0 < fs<fmax,fmaxFor the upper limit of signal frequency, when the sampling value is interfered by noise, in order to improve the robustness of the method, the sampling rate f 'generated by the sampling rate generator module is fed back'sThe following equation needs to be satisfied:
wherein rem { (. 1) } represents a remainder of division of (-) by 1, and ε represents a threshold determined by noise intensity;
step seven, the switch is set to be in a sub-sampling channel by the control signal, the sub-sampling channel samples the obtained shunt signal, the sampling clock CLK2 samples the shunt signal uniformly, and the sampling rate is f'sThe sample values are represented as follows:
wherein, c'kIn order to be a complex amplitude of the signal,T′s=1/f′sis the sampling period, σ [ n']=σ[n′T′s]For model matching the sampled values of the error signal, N 'is 0,1, …, N' -1, and then an optimal estimation algorithm of the number of amplitude and frequency components is run, the sampled values x 'N']Through the algorithm, an estimated value can be obtained
Step eight, estimating the parameterAndinput into the joint estimation parameter algorithm, the complex frequency and the complex amplitude can be usedAndand (4) obtaining a joint estimation. The algorithm process is as follows:
step 8.1, estimated normalized frequency due to the periodicity of the trigonometric functionAndby a parameter of 2 pi mkNamely:
further, the following formula is obtained:
wherein, the angle is the main value of the complex angle, and is more than or equal to 0 and less than 2 pi, mkE.g., Z, K e.g., {1,2, …, K }. Because of the fact thatfmaxFor the upper frequency limit of the MEDS signal, the following is obtained:
0≤mk≤(Q-1) (14)
step 8.2, according to (12), fromThe argument of (c) is obtained from a frequency parameter solution set F and expressed in the form:
wherein f issIs the sampling rate of the main sampling channel, the angle is the amplitude main value of the complex number, the angle is more than or equal to 0 and less than 2 pi, mp∈Z,-(Q-1)≤nk≤Q-1,nkE.g. Z, so the true frequencyMeanwhile, the estimated value of the obtained damping factor is as follows:
step 8.3, in the subsampling channel, according to (12), fromThe argument of (c) is obtained as a frequency parameter solution set F' and expressed in the form:
wherein, f'sIs the sampling rate of the secondary sampling channel, the angle is the amplitude primary value of a complex number, and is more than or equal to 0 and less than 2 pi, m'p′∈Z,-(Q′-1)≤n′k≤Q′-1,n′kE.g. Z, so the true frequencyMeanwhile, the estimated value of the obtained damping factor is as follows:
to this end, the frequency parameter is obtained as shown in the following formula:
and the damping factor parameter is as follows:
thereby obtaining a complex frequency skAs shown in the following formula:
step 8.4, once the frequency is foundCalculating parametersAndfirst, by selectingAndto determine parametersLet other elements beAndthen, the parametersAndrespectively from the setAndis obtained, therefore, parameter ckEstimated as:
example (c): in a first experiment, it was verified that the method of the present invention can reconstruct the original signal with a small number of sample values under a noise-free condition, and compare it with a clock-interleaved sampling system. In this experiment, the number of frequency components K is set to 5, and the frequency f is set tok=[0.4,3,5.2,6.8,9.1]KHz。The method of the invention can recover the parameters of the original signal by using 4K to 20 sampling values, and the clock staggered sampling system can also accurately recover the parameters of the original signal, and the recovery result is shown in figure 3.
To further verify the validity of the method of the invention, we set the frequency fk=[0.4,3,5.5,6.8,9.1]Due to the fact thatThis will cause aliasing at 3KHz and 5.5KHz, and as can be seen from fig. 4, the feedback sampling system provided by the present invention can accurately recover the parameters of the original signal, whereas the clock interleaving sampling system cannot accurately recover the parameters of the original signal.
In a second experiment, we compared the method of the present invention with several other methods in the presence of noise, including in particular, a clocked interleaved sampling system, a time delayed sampling system, and a three channel co-prime sampling system. In the experiment process, we set the number of frequency components K to 5, and the frequency fkRandomly distributing the signals on (0,10) KHz, and then adding Gaussian noise to the MEDS signals to be measured, wherein the signal-to-noise ratio SNR of the noise is defined as follows:
wherein, PsignalAnd PnoiseRespectively representing the power of the signal and the noise, and the SNR ranges from [ -20,50 [ -20 [)]dB, the number of samples Num obtained by all systems is 300. The experiment is carried out for 2000 times totally, the experimental result is shown in fig. 5, and it can be seen from fig. 5 that the performance difference between the clock staggered sampling system and the time delay sampling system is not large, when the SNR is less than or equal to 25dB, the performance of the method of the invention is similar to that of the three-channel co-prime sampling system, but with the increase of the SNR, the method of the invention has higher accuracy than that of other systems. Experimental results show that the method has better robustness.
The embodiments described in this specification are merely illustrative of implementations of the inventive concepts, which are intended for purposes of illustration only. The scope of the present invention should not be construed as being limited to the particular forms set forth in the examples, but rather as being defined by the claims and the equivalents thereof which can occur to those skilled in the art upon consideration of the present inventive concept.
Claims (4)
1. A non-ideal multi-damping harmonic signal parameter measurement method based on double-channel undersampling is characterized by comprising the following steps:
firstly, initializing to generate a non-ideal MEDS signal, wherein the signal has the following form:
wherein T is belonged to (0, T), ck(K-1, 2, … K) is the complex amplitude, sk=rk+j2πfkIs the complex frequency, K is 1,2, … K, rkIs the damping factor, fkThe method comprises the following steps that pole frequency is adopted, K is the number of unknown frequency components, sigma (t) is a model matching error signal, and the model matching error signal sigma (t) is introduced into a model because a real signal and an MEDS signal cannot be completely matched;
step two, controlling a signal control switch so as to shunt the MEDS signals, firstly, dialing the control switch to a branch where a main sampling channel is located through the control signal, at the moment, sampling the obtained shunt MEDS signals through the main sampling channel, then dialing the control switch to a branch where an auxiliary sampling channel is located through the control signal, and at the moment, sampling the obtained shunt MEDS signals through the auxiliary sampling channel;
step three, the control signal dials the switch to the branch where the main sampling channel is located, the main sampling channel samples the obtained shunt MEDS signal, the sampling clock CLK1 uniformly samples the shunt signal, and the sampling rate is fsThe sample values are represented as follows:
where K is the unknown number of components, ckWhich is indicative of the complex amplitude of the signal,sk=rk+j2πfkrepresenting complex frequency, rkRepresenting the damping factor, fkRepresenting the pole frequency, m ∈ Z+,σ[n]Represents the sample value after σ (t) is sampled by the clock CLK 1;
step four, establishing an optimization model, reducing the influence of model matching errors, and finding the optimal component K and the optimal parameter by minimizing the energy of sigma (t) because the component number K is unknown and the model matching error sigma (t) is not equal to 0
Step five, sampling value x [ n ]]Input to the optimal estimation algorithm of the number of amplitude and frequency components, thereby obtaining the optimal K andp (P ≦ K) represents a valid estimate of the threshold exceededThe number of (2);
step six, estimating the parameterInput to a feedback sample rate generator module to calculate the sample rate f 'of the secondary sample channel'sAnd f'sSatisfies the following formula:
wherein,a,b∈{0,1,…,K-1},m∈{-(2Q-2),-(2Q-3),…,2Q-2},fsis the sampling rate, 0 < fs<fmax,fmaxFor signal frequency upper limit, when the sampling value is interfered by noise, in order to improve the robustness of the method, the sampling rate f 'generated by the sampling rate generator module is fed back'sThe following equation needs to be satisfied:
wherein rem { (. 1) } represents a remainder of division of (-) by 1, and ε represents a threshold determined by noise intensity;
step seven, the switch is set to be in a sub-sampling channel by the control signal, the sub-sampling channel samples the obtained shunt signal, the sampling clock CLK2 samples the shunt signal uniformly, and the sampling rate is f'sThe sample values are represented as follows:
wherein, c'kIn order to be a complex amplitude of the signal,T′s=1/f′sis the sampling period, σ [ n']=σ[n′T′s]For model matching the sampled values of the error signal, N 'is 0,1, …, N' -1, and then an optimal estimation algorithm of the number of amplitude and frequency components is run, the sampled values x 'N']By the algorithm, an estimated value is obtained
2. The method for measuring the parameters of the non-ideal multi-damping harmonic signal based on the two-channel undersampling as claimed in claim 1, wherein the process of the fourth step is as follows:
step 4.1, the established optimization model is expressed as follows:
step 4.2, because the input non-ideal med signal x (t) is unknown, that is, the formula (4) cannot be solved, and the sampling value obtained in step (2) is used to replace x (t), then step (4) is converted into the following formula:
wherein,number of frequency components K and parameterAre unknown, then (5) is described by the following formula:
wherein,
(7) referred to as the optimization objective function.
3. The method for measuring the parameters of the non-ideal multi-damping harmonic signal based on the two-channel undersampling as claimed in claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the process of the step five is as follows:
step 5.1, initialization, first, obtaining the sampling value x [ n ] from the parameter measurement system](N-0, 1, …, N-1), setting the number of frequency components K' to 0, setting the optimum number of frequency components K to 0, and setting the estimation parameter PbestSetting the optimum value of equation (7) to fbest;
Step 5.2, updating the number K' +1 of the frequency components;
step 5.3, using the sampling value x [ n ]]And solving (2) by a spectrum estimation method to obtain the estimation parametersAs an initial bit for the next step;
step 5.4, the optimization problem of (6) is solved by the provided optimization algorithm, and P is setoptIs a global optimum position;
4. The method for measuring the parameters of the non-ideal multi-damping harmonic signal based on the two-channel undersampling as claimed in claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the procedure of the step eight is as follows:
step 8.1, estimated normalized frequency due to the periodicity of the trigonometric functionAndby a parameter of 2 pi mkNamely:
further, the following formula is obtained:
wherein, the angle is the main value of the complex angle, and is more than or equal to 0 and less than 2 pi, mkE.g., Z, K e {1,2, …, K }, sincefmaxFor the upper frequency limit of the MEDS signal, the following is obtained:
0≤mk≤(Q-1) (14)
step 8.2, according to (12), fromThe argument of (c) is obtained from a frequency parameter solution set F and expressed in the form:
wherein f issIs the sampling rate of the main sampling channel, the angle is the amplitude main value of the complex number, the angle is more than or equal to 0 and less than 2 pi, mp∈Z,-(Q-1)≤nk≤Q-1,nkE.g. Z, so the true frequencyMeanwhile, the estimated value of the obtained damping factor is as follows:
step 8.3, in the subsampling channel, according to (12), fromThe argument of (c) is obtained as a frequency parameter solution set F' and expressed in the form:
wherein f iss'is the sampling rate of the secondary sampling channel, and the angle is the amplitude primary value of a complex number, and is more than or equal to 0 and less than 2 pi, m'p′∈Z,-(Q′-1)≤n′k≤Q′-1,n′kE.g. Z, so the true frequencyMeanwhile, the estimated value of the obtained damping factor is as follows:
to this end, the frequency parameter is obtained as shown in the following formula:
and the damping factor parameter is as follows:
thereby obtaining a complex frequency skAs shown in the following formula:
step 8.4, once the frequency is foundCalculating parametersAndfirst, by selectingAndto determine parametersAssume that the other elements areAndthen, the parametersAndrespectively from the setAndis obtained, therefore, parameter ckEstimated as:
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202110103500.8A CN112964931B (en) | 2021-01-26 | 2021-01-26 | Non-ideal multi-damping harmonic signal parameter measurement method based on two-channel undersampling |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202110103500.8A CN112964931B (en) | 2021-01-26 | 2021-01-26 | Non-ideal multi-damping harmonic signal parameter measurement method based on two-channel undersampling |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN112964931A true CN112964931A (en) | 2021-06-15 |
CN112964931B CN112964931B (en) | 2022-07-15 |
Family
ID=76272648
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202110103500.8A Active CN112964931B (en) | 2021-01-26 | 2021-01-26 | Non-ideal multi-damping harmonic signal parameter measurement method based on two-channel undersampling |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN112964931B (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN115276799A (en) * | 2022-07-27 | 2022-11-01 | 西安理工大学 | Decision threshold self-adapting method for undersampling modulation and demodulation in optical imaging communication |
CN115436702A (en) * | 2022-09-02 | 2022-12-06 | 浙江工业大学 | Non-ideal multi-damping harmonic signal multi-channel undersampling method |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101713795A (en) * | 2009-09-09 | 2010-05-26 | 中国科学院国家授时中心 | Method of digitalized measuring frequency in restriction of sampling rate |
KR20150047109A (en) * | 2013-10-23 | 2015-05-04 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Magnetic resonance imaging apparatus and imaging method for magnetic resonance image thereof |
EP3301461A1 (en) * | 2016-09-28 | 2018-04-04 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for detection of harmonics of a univariate signal |
CN111224672A (en) * | 2020-01-16 | 2020-06-02 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | Multi-harmonic signal undersampling method based on multi-channel time delay |
-
2021
- 2021-01-26 CN CN202110103500.8A patent/CN112964931B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101713795A (en) * | 2009-09-09 | 2010-05-26 | 中国科学院国家授时中心 | Method of digitalized measuring frequency in restriction of sampling rate |
KR20150047109A (en) * | 2013-10-23 | 2015-05-04 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Magnetic resonance imaging apparatus and imaging method for magnetic resonance image thereof |
EP3301461A1 (en) * | 2016-09-28 | 2018-04-04 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for detection of harmonics of a univariate signal |
CN111224672A (en) * | 2020-01-16 | 2020-06-02 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | Multi-harmonic signal undersampling method based on multi-channel time delay |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
黄山等: "三通道欠采样频率估计", 《华中科技大学学报(自然科学版)》 * |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN115276799A (en) * | 2022-07-27 | 2022-11-01 | 西安理工大学 | Decision threshold self-adapting method for undersampling modulation and demodulation in optical imaging communication |
CN115436702A (en) * | 2022-09-02 | 2022-12-06 | 浙江工业大学 | Non-ideal multi-damping harmonic signal multi-channel undersampling method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN112964931B (en) | 2022-07-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN112964931B (en) | Non-ideal multi-damping harmonic signal parameter measurement method based on two-channel undersampling | |
CN107102255B (en) | Single ADC acquisition channel dynamic characteristic test method | |
CN111224672B (en) | Multi-channel delay-based multi-harmonic signal undersampling method | |
CN109407501B (en) | Time interval measuring method based on relevant signal processing | |
CN103941088A (en) | Method for quickly measuring frequency of electric power system based on three-phase signals | |
CN106546817B (en) | A kind of Frequency Estimation and energy state postulate with feedback function | |
Zou et al. | Blind timing skew estimation using source spectrum sparsity in time-interleaved ADCs | |
CN112162152B (en) | Sine wave coherent pulse train signal frequency estimation method based on phase straight line fitting | |
CN112859019A (en) | Intra-pulse modulation type parameter extraction system and using method | |
Fu et al. | Parameter Measurement of $ M $-Ary PSK Signals With Finite Rate of Innovation | |
Chen et al. | Robust precise time difference estimation based on digital zero-crossing detection algorithm | |
CN116522269B (en) | Fault diagnosis method based on Lp norm non-stationary signal sparse reconstruction | |
CN112595889B (en) | under-Nyquist sampling and parameter measuring method for non-ideal multi-exponential decay sinusoidal signal | |
Huang et al. | Sub-Nyquist sampling of multiple exponentially damped sinusoids with feedback structure | |
CN110808929A (en) | Real-complex conversion type signal-to-noise ratio estimation algorithm of subtraction strategy | |
CN107870338B (en) | A kind of satellite navigation carrier wave tracing method of low update frequency | |
Yun et al. | Sub-Nyquist sampling and measurement of MPSK signal based on parameter matching | |
CN112883787B (en) | Short sample low-frequency sinusoidal signal parameter estimation method based on spectrum matching | |
Kusuma et al. | On the accuracy and resolution of powersum-based sampling methods | |
CN112129983B (en) | Waveform recovery data processing method based on equivalent sampling at equal time intervals | |
CN103746699A (en) | Signal reconstruction method based on rotation matrix error estimation for alternative sampling system | |
Tamim et al. | Hilbert transform of FFT pruned cross correlation function for optimization in time delay estimation | |
CN107576842B (en) | Broadband synchronous sampling method | |
CN112953468A (en) | Multi-exponential decay sinusoidal signal feedback type under-sampling hardware implementation method | |
Wu et al. | A faster method for accurate spectral testing without requiring coherent sampling |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |