CN112947083B - Nonlinear model predictive control optimization method based on magnetic suspension control system - Google Patents

Nonlinear model predictive control optimization method based on magnetic suspension control system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN112947083B
CN112947083B CN202110181216.2A CN202110181216A CN112947083B CN 112947083 B CN112947083 B CN 112947083B CN 202110181216 A CN202110181216 A CN 202110181216A CN 112947083 B CN112947083 B CN 112947083B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
magnetic suspension
nonlinear
model
control
magnetic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
CN202110181216.2A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN112947083A (en
Inventor
许贤泽
张锴杨
徐逢秋
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Wuhan University WHU
Original Assignee
Wuhan University WHU
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Wuhan University WHU filed Critical Wuhan University WHU
Priority to CN202110181216.2A priority Critical patent/CN112947083B/en
Publication of CN112947083A publication Critical patent/CN112947083A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN112947083B publication Critical patent/CN112947083B/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B13/00Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
    • G05B13/02Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
    • G05B13/04Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
    • G05B13/042Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Control Of Position Or Direction (AREA)
  • Magnetic Bearings And Hydrostatic Bearings (AREA)

Abstract

The invention provides a nonlinear model predictive control optimization method based on a magnetic suspension control system. According to the model prediction control principle, a nonlinear motion model combined with a disturbance estimation value is taken as a prediction model, the motion range of a magnetic suspension workbench and the maximum output of a current power amplifier are taken as constraint conditions, the total cost of tracking errors and current loads in a prediction step length is taken as a target function, and the problem of multi-step rolling optimization control of the magnetic suspension workbench is established; finally, the optimization control problem is converted into a nonlinear Eulerian Langerian equation set, and an optimization control strategy is solved by using a parallelization Newton method capable of being rapidly executed on line to form closed-loop control; the method solves the problem of real-time application of nonlinear model predictive control on a high-frequency sampling magnetic suspension system, and has universality, higher accuracy and convergence rate; the control method provided by the invention improves the accuracy of the magnetic suspension workbench tracking the expected track and improves the dynamic characteristic of the system.

Description

Nonlinear model predictive control optimization method based on magnetic suspension control system
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of magnetic suspension workbench motion control, in particular to a nonlinear model predictive control optimization method based on a magnetic suspension control system.
Background
The magnetic suspension technology is an effective means for providing multi-degree-of-freedom motion in ultra-precision application in industries such as semiconductor processing, bioengineering, aerospace part manufacturing and the like, and because of the full suspension characteristic of no mechanical and electrical connection, the multi-degree-of-freedom magnetic suspension workbench needs to perform complex translation and rotation control on all six axes even if the multi-degree-of-freedom magnetic suspension workbench is simple in set point adjustment. In addition, the inherent characteristics of an actual system, such as nonlinear coupling effects between multiple degrees of freedom motions, modeling inaccuracies, unknown disturbances, etc., will significantly degrade the stage performance and present difficulties to the motion controller design compared to a nominal system. The model predictive control is a mainstream advanced control method developed in recent years, depends on the solution of an optimization control problem under economic excitation, and has the potential of being applied to a nonlinear multiple-input multiple-output magnetic levitation system under the condition of considering state constraint and control constraint.
The development and implementation of advanced control schemes such as fuzzy control, iterative learning control, neural network control, adaptive robust control and the like are of great significance for improving the positioning and track tracking performance of the multi-degree-of-freedom magnetic suspension workbench. These controllers calculate the dynamic forces or moments required for accurate motion of the system based on a decoupled linear model or a taylor-extended linearized model. However, when the drive currents are bounded, they cannot handle explicit nonlinear process constraints from force and torque to current, and thus cannot provide the desired control performance and dynamic response. Although the nonlinear model predictive control is successfully applied to the single-degree-of-freedom magnetic suspension system, the computational burden of exponential explosion makes the nonlinear model predictive control difficult to apply to the multi-degree-of-freedom magnetic suspension workbench, and real-time closed-loop control cannot be realized.
An integrator is a practical method for model predictive control to attenuate the effects of disturbances and uncertainties in industrial applications. However, due to the coupling of the integration behavior with other control performance (e.g., strict constraint satisfaction, transient response, and stability), it is difficult to select model predictive control parameters that achieve the desired control performance for a closed-loop system. Alternatively, the disturbance observer can be used as a feed forward compensation for the controller without sacrificing nominal performance to enhance robustness against disturbances and uncertainties. In general, a typical application of a disturbance observer in model predictive control is based on lumped disturbance estimation of a nominal system as a correction term to feed forward directly to a control input, and since the disturbance estimation is not included in a backward horizontal optimization process, these model predictive controllers are relatively difficult to obtain active control performance and always cause static errors.
The traditional nonlinear model predictive controller is difficult to ensure high-precision tracking when the magnetic suspension workbench has disturbance and uncertainty, and the optimization calculation under the fast sampling frequency is difficult to meet the real-time requirement. Therefore, the nonlinear model predictive control of the magnetic suspension workbench and the online optimization method thereof are needed.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to solve the above technical problems, the present invention aims to provide a nonlinear model predictive control optimization method based on a magnetic levitation control system, so as to solve the problem that the traditional nonlinear model predictive controller is difficult to realize closed-loop real-time and accurate track tracking control on a magnetic levitation table.
The technical scheme of the system is that the magnetic suspension control system comprises: the device comprises a magnetic suspension workbench, a laser sensor, an analog-to-digital converter, a microprocessor, a digital-to-analog converter and a current power amplifier; the magnetic suspension workbench consists of a stator and a rotor; the stator is composed of a plurality of track coils; the rotor consists of a plurality of groups of Halbach magnetic arrays and a back plate; the stator and the rotor are wirelessly connected;
the laser sensor, the analog-to-digital converter, the microprocessor and the digital-to-analog converter are sequentially connected in series;
the laser sensor is arranged at the periphery of a rotor of the magnetic suspension workbench and used for measuring six-degree-of-freedom motion information of the magnetic suspension workbench and transmitting the six-degree-of-freedom motion information to the analog-to-digital converter;
the analog-to-digital converter performs analog-to-digital conversion on the six-degree-of-freedom motion information of the magnetic suspension workbench to obtain a six-degree-of-freedom motion digital signal of the magnetic suspension workbench, and transmits the six-degree-of-freedom motion digital signal to the microprocessor;
the microprocessor obtains a current control rate through the nonlinear model predictive control optimization method according to the six-degree-of-freedom motion digital signal of the magnetic suspension workbench, and transmits the current control rate to the digital-to-analog converter;
the digital-to-analog converter performs digital-to-analog conversion on the current control rate to obtain an analog current control rate, and transmits the analog current control rate to the current power amplifier for power amplification to obtain a driving current;
the current power amplifier transmits driving current to the stator of the magnetic suspension workbench, and when a plurality of track coils in the stator of the magnetic suspension workbench are energized with current, magnetic fields around the Halbach magnetic array on the rotor generate magnetic force under the excitation of the current so as to drive the magnetic suspension workbench to move in six degrees of freedom, so that closed-loop control is formed.
The technical scheme of the method is a nonlinear model predictive control optimization method, which comprises the following steps:
step 1: constructing a six-degree-of-freedom motion coordinate system by a microprocessor;
step 2: the microprocessor establishes a six-degree-of-freedom magnetic model in a suspension state;
and step 3: equating uncertainty which is not considered in modeling and external disturbance to disturbance lumped on an independent coil, establishing a nonlinear motion model of the magnetic suspension workbench by combining the magnetic force model in the step 2, and designing the lumped disturbance of the nonlinear disturbance observer estimation system according to the model;
and 4, step 4: according to a model prediction control principle, a discrete nonlinear motion model combined with a disturbance estimation value is used as a prediction model, the motion range of the magnetic suspension workbench and the maximum output of a current power amplifier are used as constraint conditions, the tracking error in a prediction step length and the total cost of current load are used as objective functions, and the problem of nonlinear multistep rolling optimization control of the magnetic suspension workbench is established.
And 5: and (4) converting the nonlinear multistep rolling optimization control problem model of the magnetic suspension workbench in the step (4) into a nonlinear Euler Langerian equation set, solving an optimization control strategy by using a parallelization Newton method capable of being rapidly executed on line, and realizing closed-loop control of the system.
Preferably, the six-degree-of-freedom motion coordinate system in step 1 is as follows:
the center of the upper surface of the stator is taken as the origin of a fixed coordinate system(s)so, taking the center of the lower surface of the mover as the origin of the moving coordinate system { t }to, relative displacement amount P of the tablex、Py、PzAt the originto is characterized by a vector difference under a fixed coordinate system, and the relative rotation amounts alpha, beta and gamma are characterized by the rotation amounts of the movable coordinate axis relative to the fixed coordinate axis;
preferably, the six-degree-of-freedom magnetic force model in the suspension state in step 2 is:
combining the mechanical structure and the coordinate system definition of the magnetic suspension workbench in the step 1, according to a magnetic field calculation method based on harmonic analysis and a Lorenz integral rule, the force and the moment acting on the magnetic suspension workbench are as follows:
Figure BDA0002941498370000031
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0002941498370000032
Figure BDA0002941498370000033
wherein, BrIs the remanent magnetization of the permanent magnet, NcoilIs the number of turns of the track coil, wcAnd hcTrack width and height, respectively, of the track coilmAnd hmLength and height of the individual permanent magnets, K being the thrust coefficient determined by the system structure, λ 2 pi/lmIs the spatial harmonic number, L is the distance from the center of the single Halbach magnetic array to the center of the whole magnetic array, and u ═ i1,i2,i3,i4,i5,i6,i7,i8]TIs the control input of the system under the drive of 8 independent coils;
preferably, the step 3 is a model of nonlinear motion of the magnetic suspension workbench considering lumped current disturbance:
the influence caused by unmodeled dynamics of the system, inaccurate magnetization of the magnet, non-uniform winding of the coil and electromagnetic disturbance of the current amplifier is assumed to be in a lumped form equivalent to that of 8 coils
Figure BDA0002941498370000041
Giving out;
because of the complete suspension characteristic without mechanical connection, the magnetic force model is further expanded into a form of a nonlinear motion model:
Figure BDA0002941498370000042
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0002941498370000043
the position and the speed of the six degrees of freedom of the system form state variables, namely the six degrees of freedom motion information of the magnetic suspension workbench is obtained by the measurement of the laser sensor;
M=diag(m,m,m,Iα,Iβ,Iγ) Is a diagonal matrix formed by the rotor mass and the rotational inertia on 3 rotating shafts,
Figure BDA0002941498370000044
is the gravitational acceleration vector;
the nonlinear disturbance observer in the step 3 is as follows:
aiming at the nonlinear motion model, a disturbance observer in the following form is designed:
Figure BDA0002941498370000045
Figure BDA0002941498370000046
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0002941498370000047
is an estimate of the disturbance to the system,
Figure BDA0002941498370000048
is the internal state vector of the disturbance observer, h-r=hT·(h·hT)-1And
Figure BDA0002941498370000049
are respectively h and
Figure BDA00029414983700000410
right inverse of (d), gain of observer to ensure fast convergence of disturbance estimation deviation
Figure BDA00029414983700000411
A positive definite and symmetrical matrix should be selected;
preferably, the discrete nonlinear motion model combined with the disturbance estimation value in step 4 is taken as a prediction model:
to improve the accuracy of the predicted state, the nonlinear motion model and the estimated value of the disturbance described in step 3 are combined
Figure BDA0002941498370000051
To estimate the state of the system at a future time:
Figure BDA0002941498370000052
at system sampling time TsAnd a sampling time tk=kTsDiscretizing the state of the estimated system at the future time under the condition that k is {0,1, 2. }, and obtaining a prediction model of the system under N prediction steps as follows:
Figure BDA0002941498370000053
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0002941498370000054
is an inverse time function;
and 4, taking the motion range of the magnetic suspension workbench and the maximum output of the current power amplifier as constraint conditions:
considering that the motion range of the actuator and the maximum output of the current power amplifier are constrained as follows:
Figure BDA0002941498370000055
Figure BDA0002941498370000056
converting the constraints into mixed inequality constraints:
Figure BDA0002941498370000057
and 4, taking the total cost of the tracking error and the current load in the prediction step as an objective function:
with xrefConsidering the positively determined tracking error weight for the reference trajectory
Figure BDA0002941498370000058
And current load weight
Figure BDA0002941498370000059
Defining the objective function under N prediction steps as:
Figure BDA00029414983700000510
4, the nonlinear multi-step rolling optimization control problem of the magnetic suspension workbench is as follows:
according to a model prediction control principle, a prediction model, mixed inequality constraints and an objective function of a system under N prediction step lengths are considered, and a magnetic suspension workbench nonlinear multi-step rolling optimization control problem model to be solved is as follows:
Figure BDA0002941498370000061
Figure BDA0002941498370000062
Figure BDA0002941498370000063
Figure BDA0002941498370000064
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0002941498370000065
and
Figure BDA0002941498370000066
respectively is a state sequence and a control sequence under N prediction step lengths;
preferably, the non-linear euler langery equation set in step 5 is:
converting the mixed inequality constraint of step 4 into a logarithmic barrier function:
Figure BDA0002941498370000067
followed by the definition of a Lagrange multiplier sequence
Figure BDA0002941498370000068
And Hamiltonian function of the problem to be optimized:
Figure BDA0002941498370000069
optimal sequence of states according to the KKT condition
Figure BDA00029414983700000610
Control sequence
Figure BDA00029414983700000611
And lagrange multiplier sequence
Figure BDA00029414983700000612
The following non-linear euler langery equation set should be satisfied:
Figure BDA00029414983700000613
wherein the initial optimum state
Figure BDA00029414983700000614
And tail optimal Lagrange multiplier
Figure BDA00029414983700000615
Is a boundary condition of the system of equations.
Figure BDA00029414983700000616
And
Figure BDA00029414983700000617
are respectively H about
Figure BDA00029414983700000618
And
Figure BDA00029414983700000619
a gradient of (a);
consider integrationOptimizing variables
Figure BDA00029414983700000620
Correction matrix
Figure BDA00029414983700000621
In combination with
Figure BDA00029414983700000622
Referring to the left side of the equation of the nonlinear eulerian langery system of equations, the parallelized newton method described in step 5 can be performed quickly on-line.
The parallel Newton method capable of being rapidly executed on line in the step 5 mainly comprises the following steps:
step 5.1, preprocessing variables to be optimized according to boundary conditions;
step 5.2, introduction
Figure BDA00029414983700000623
Approximate estimate of (2)
Figure BDA00029414983700000624
Roughly updating the integration optimization variables by a gradient descent method in combination with the correction matrix theta;
step 5.3, due to the introduction of
Figure BDA0002941498370000071
Based on approximate deviation
Figure BDA0002941498370000072
Optimizing variables for integration in a backward manner
Figure BDA0002941498370000073
And (6) carrying out correction.
Step 5.4, due to the introduction of
Figure BDA0002941498370000074
Based on approximate deviation
Figure BDA0002941498370000075
Optimizing variables for integration in a forward manner
Figure BDA0002941498370000076
Carrying out correction;
step 5.5, calculating KKT residual epsilon under current iterationjIf the residual error is less than the preset termination residual error epsilon, exiting the while loop and outputting zj+1And thetajOtherwise, returning to the starting point of the cycle;
solving the nonlinear multistep rolling optimization control problem of the magnetic suspension workbench by using a parallelization Newton method capable of being rapidly executed on line at each sampling moment, and outputting an integrated optimization variable zj+1In (1)
Figure BDA0002941498370000077
Applied to a coil to drive the worktable to move, and updating the state variable x (t) through the six-freedom-degree motion information of the magnetic suspension worktable measured by the laser sensor at the next sampling momentk+1) Solving for an estimate of the disturbance
Figure BDA0002941498370000078
And let z1=zj+1,Θ0=ΘjAnd repeatedly calculating the optimized control rate to form a closed-loop system.
The invention has the following beneficial effects:
a simplified magnetic force model of the magnetic suspension workbench is established, and the model structure is refined, so that the online calculated amount can be reduced;
a disturbance observer is designed aiming at a nonlinear motion model of a magnetic suspension workbench disturbed by a system, and an estimated value of disturbance is combined into a prediction model so as to improve the disturbance resistance and tracking precision of a track tracker;
under the rapid sampling frequency, the provided parallel Newton method can calculate the nonlinear multistep rolling optimization control problem of the magnetic suspension workbench in real time on a processor with a parallel framework, has better universality, can be widely used for solving the optimization problem in a nonlinear model prediction controller, and is favorable for popularization and application.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, the drawings of the embodiments will be briefly described below.
FIG. 1: a flow chart provided for an embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 2: a top view of a magnetic levitation table is provided for one embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 3: a left view of a magnetic levitation table provided in an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 4: a magnetic levitation table back view is provided for one embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 5: the method of the present invention provided for one embodiment of the present invention is outlined in comparison with other methods.
FIG. 6: the invention provides a method and a trajectory tracking comparison chart for other methods.
FIG. 7: the invention provides a profile error comparison graph for the method provided by one embodiment of the invention and other methods.
FIG. 8: the proposed method of the present invention provides a comparison of the frequency response of one embodiment of the present invention with other methods.
Detailed Description
In order to facilitate the understanding and implementation of the present invention for those of ordinary skill in the art, the present invention is further described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and examples, it is to be understood that the embodiments described herein are merely illustrative and explanatory of the present invention and are not restrictive thereof.
The following describes an embodiment of the present invention with reference to fig. 1 to 8, specifically:
the technical scheme of the system in the embodiment of the invention is that the magnetic suspension control system comprises: the device comprises a magnetic suspension workbench, a laser sensor, an analog-to-digital converter, a microprocessor, a digital-to-analog converter and a current power amplifier; the magnetic suspension workbench consists of a stator and a rotor; the stator is composed of a plurality of track coils; the rotor consists of a plurality of groups of Halbach magnetic arrays and a back plate; the stator and the rotor are wirelessly connected;
the laser sensor, the analog-to-digital converter, the microprocessor and the digital-to-analog converter are sequentially connected in series;
the laser sensor is arranged at the periphery of a rotor of the magnetic suspension workbench and used for measuring six-degree-of-freedom motion information of the magnetic suspension workbench and transmitting the six-degree-of-freedom motion information to the analog-to-digital converter;
the analog-to-digital converter performs analog-to-digital conversion on the six-degree-of-freedom motion information of the magnetic suspension workbench to obtain a six-degree-of-freedom motion digital signal of the magnetic suspension workbench, and transmits the six-degree-of-freedom motion digital signal to the microprocessor;
the microprocessor obtains a current control rate through the nonlinear model predictive control optimization method according to the six-degree-of-freedom motion digital signal of the magnetic suspension workbench, and transmits the current control rate to the digital-to-analog converter;
the digital-to-analog converter performs digital-to-analog conversion on the current control rate to obtain an analog current control rate, and transmits the analog current control rate to the current power amplifier for power amplification to obtain a driving current;
the current power amplifier transmits driving current to the stator of the magnetic suspension workbench, and when a plurality of track coils in the stator of the magnetic suspension workbench are energized with current, magnetic fields around the Halbach magnetic array on the rotor generate magnetic force under the excitation of the current so as to drive the magnetic suspension workbench to move in six degrees of freedom, so that closed-loop control is formed.
The model of the laser sensor is ZX2-LD 50L;
the model of the analog-to-digital converter is PXIe-7856R;
the model of the microprocessor is PXIe-8880;
the model of the digital-to-analog converter is PXIe-7856R;
the model of the current power amplifier is PA 12A;
the magnetic suspension workbench consists of a stator and a rotor;
the stator is composed of 8 track coils;
the rotor consists of 4 groups of Halbach magnetic arrays and a back plate;
FIG. 1 is an overall process flow diagram of the present invention; the top view of the magnetic levitation table of fig. 2, the left view of the magnetic levitation table of fig. 3 and the back view of the magnetic levitation table of fig. 4 provide the mechanical structure of the magnetic levitation table and the related structural parameters, coordinate system definition. The magnetic suspension workbench comprises a Halbach magnetic array 1, track coils 2 and a back plate 3, a stator consists of 8 track coils, and a rotor consists of 4 groups of Halbach arrays and back plates.
Step 1, a microprocessor constructs a six-degree-of-freedom motion coordinate system;
the six-degree-of-freedom motion coordinate system in the step 1 is as follows:
the center of the upper surface of the stator is taken as the origin of a fixed coordinate system(s)so, taking the center of the lower surface of the mover as the origin of the moving coordinate system { t }to, relative displacement amount P of the tablex、Py、PzAt the originto is characterized by a vector difference under a fixed coordinate system, and the relative rotation amounts alpha, beta and gamma are characterized by the rotation amounts of the movable coordinate axis relative to the fixed coordinate axis;
step 2: on the basis of the mechanical structure and coordinate definition of the magnetic suspension workbench, a magnetic force model with six degrees of freedom in a suspension state is established;
step 2, the establishment of the six-degree-of-freedom magnetic force model in the suspension state is as follows:
combining the mechanical structure and the coordinate system definition of the magnetic suspension workbench in the step 1, according to a magnetic field calculation method based on harmonic analysis and a Lorenz integral rule, the force and the moment acting on the magnetic suspension workbench are as follows:
Figure BDA0002941498370000091
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0002941498370000101
Figure BDA0002941498370000102
in the above formulas (1) and (2), Br1.2T is the remanent magnetization of the permanent magnet, Ncoil300 is the number of turns of the track coil, wc10mm and hc10mm is the track width and height, respectively, of the track coil,/m40mm and hm10mm is the length and height of the individual permanent magnets, K is the thrust coefficient determined by the system structure, λ 2 pi/lmIs the space harmonic number, L is 80mm, is the distance from the center of a single Halbach magnetic array to the center of the whole magnetic array, and u is [ i ═1,i2,i3,i4,i5,i6,i7,i8]TIs the control input of the system under the drive of 8 independent coils;
and step 3: equating uncertainty which is not considered in modeling and external disturbance to disturbance lumped on an independent coil, establishing a nonlinear motion model of the magnetic suspension workbench by combining the magnetic force model in the step 2, and designing the lumped disturbance of the nonlinear disturbance observer estimation system according to the model;
the nonlinear motion model of the magnetic suspension workbench considering the lumped current disturbance in the step 3 is as follows:
the influence brought by unmodeled dynamics of a system, inaccurate magnetization of a magnet, uneven winding of a coil, electromagnetic disturbance of a current amplifier and the like is assumed to be equivalent to a lumped form on 8 coils
Figure BDA0002941498370000103
It is given. Because of the complete suspension characteristic without mechanical connection, the magnetic force model is further expanded into a form of a nonlinear motion model:
Figure BDA0002941498370000104
in the above-mentioned formula (3),
Figure BDA0002941498370000105
is a system sixThe position and the speed of the degree form a state variable, namely the six-degree-of-freedom motion information of the magnetic suspension workbench, and the state variable is obtained by measuring through the laser sensor;
m-diag (2.37,2.37,2.37,9376.16,9376.16,18665.97) is a diagonal matrix consisting of mover mass and moment of inertia on 3 rotational axes, and g-0, 0,9.8,0,0,0]TIs the gravitational acceleration vector.
The nonlinear disturbance observer in the step 3 is as follows:
for the nonlinear motion model (3), a disturbance observer of the form:
Figure BDA0002941498370000111
wherein
Figure BDA0002941498370000112
Is an estimate of the disturbance to the system,
Figure BDA0002941498370000113
is the internal state vector of the disturbance observer, h-r=hT·(h·hT)-1And
Figure BDA0002941498370000114
are respectively h and
Figure BDA0002941498370000115
right inverse of (c). In order to ensure fast convergence of the disturbance estimation deviation, the gain E of the observer is diag (100,100,100,100,100,100,100,100);
and 4, step 4: according to a model prediction control principle, a discrete nonlinear motion model combined with a disturbance estimation value is used as a prediction model, the motion range of a magnetic suspension workbench and the maximum output of a current power amplifier are used as constraint conditions, the total cost of tracking errors and current loads in a prediction step is used as a target function, and the nonlinear multistep rolling optimization control problem of the magnetic suspension workbench is established;
step 4, taking the discrete nonlinear motion model combined with the disturbance estimation value as a prediction model:
to improve the accuracy of the predicted state, a non-linear motion model (3) is combined with the estimated value of the disturbance
Figure BDA0002941498370000116
To estimate the state of the system at a future time:
Figure BDA0002941498370000117
at system sampling time Ts1ms and sampling time tk=kTsIn the following description, the formula (5) is discretized by the backward euler method, and the prediction model of the system under N-10 prediction steps is obtained as follows:
Figure BDA0002941498370000118
in the above-mentioned formula (6),
Figure BDA0002941498370000119
is an inverse time function;
and 4, taking the motion range of the magnetic suspension workbench and the maximum output of the current power amplifier as constraint conditions:
considering that the motion range of the actuator and the maximum output of the current power amplifier are constrained as follows:
Figure BDA00029414983700001110
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
xmin=-[10mm,10mm,5mm,10-2rad,10-2rad,10-2rad,500mm/s,500mm/s,50mm/s,10rad/s,10rad/s,10rad/s]T
xmax=[10mm,10mm,5mm,10-2rad,10-2rad,10-2rad,500mm/s,500mm/s,50mm/s,10rad/s,10rad/s,10rad/s]T
umin=-[3A,3A,3A,3A,3A,3A,3A,3A]T
umax=[3A,3A,3A,3A,3A,3A,3A,3A]T
converting the constraints into mixed inequality constraints:
Figure BDA0002941498370000121
and 4, taking the total cost of the tracking error and the current load in the prediction step as an objective function:
with xrefFor the reference trajectory, considering the positive tracking error weight Q ═ diag (100,100,100,10000,10000,10000,0.001,0.001,0.001,0.001,0.001,0.001, 0.001) and the current load weight R ═ diag (0.001,0.001,0.001,0.001,0.001,0.001,0.001,0.001), the objective function for N prediction steps is defined as:
Figure BDA0002941498370000122
4, the nonlinear multi-step rolling optimization control problem of the magnetic suspension workbench is as follows:
according to a model prediction control principle, a prediction model (6), a mixed inequality constraint (8) and an objective function (9) are considered, and the nonlinear multi-step rolling optimization control problem of the magnetic suspension workbench to be solved is as follows:
Figure BDA0002941498370000123
in the above-mentioned formula (10),
Figure BDA0002941498370000124
and
Figure BDA0002941498370000125
respectively is a state sequence and a control sequence under N prediction step lengths;
and 5: converting the nonlinear multistep rolling optimization control problem of the magnetic suspension workbench in the step 4 into a nonlinear Eulerian Langerian equation set, solving an optimization control strategy by using a parallelization Newton method capable of being rapidly executed on line, and realizing closed-loop control of the system;
the nonlinear Eulerian Langerian equation set in the step 5 is as follows:
in order to solve the nonlinear multistep rolling optimization control problem (10) of the magnetic suspension workbench, a mixed inequality constraint (8) is firstly converted into a logarithmic barrier function:
Figure BDA0002941498370000131
followed by the definition of a Lagrange multiplier sequence
Figure BDA0002941498370000132
And Hamiltonian function of the problem to be optimized:
Figure BDA0002941498370000133
optimal sequence of states according to the KKT condition
Figure BDA0002941498370000134
Control sequence
Figure BDA0002941498370000135
And lagrange multiplier sequence
Figure BDA0002941498370000136
The following non-linear euler langery equation set should be satisfied:
Figure BDA0002941498370000137
in the above formula (13), the initial optimum state
Figure BDA0002941498370000138
And tail optimal Lagrange multiplier
Figure BDA0002941498370000139
Is a boundary condition of the system of equations.
Figure BDA00029414983700001310
And
Figure BDA00029414983700001311
are respectively H about
Figure BDA00029414983700001312
And
Figure BDA00029414983700001313
of the gradient of (c).
Considering integrated optimization variables
Figure BDA00029414983700001314
Correction matrix
Figure BDA00029414983700001315
In combination with
Figure BDA00029414983700001316
Refers to the left side of the equation of the nonlinear eulerian langery system of equations;
the fast online executable parallelization newton method described in step 5 is shown in table 1:
TABLE 1 parallelized Newton method for fast online execution
Figure BDA0002941498370000141
Figure BDA0002941498370000151
In table 1, M ═ 4 indicates the maximum number of iterations allowed, and κ ═ 10-3,ε=10-5"j" refers to the jth iteration in the optimization processGeneration;
referring to table 1, the parallel newton method capable of being performed on-line quickly in the present invention mainly includes the following steps:
firstly, preprocessing variables to be optimized according to boundary conditions;
second step of introduction
Figure BDA0002941498370000152
Approximate estimate of (2)
Figure BDA0002941498370000153
Roughly updating the integration optimization variables by a gradient descent method in combination with the correction matrix theta;
third step, due to introduction of
Figure BDA0002941498370000154
Based on approximate deviation
Figure BDA0002941498370000155
Optimizing variables for integration in a backward manner
Figure BDA0002941498370000156
And (6) carrying out correction.
The fourth step, due to the introduction of
Figure BDA0002941498370000157
Based on approximate deviation
Figure BDA0002941498370000158
Optimizing variables for integration in a forward manner
Figure BDA0002941498370000159
Carrying out correction;
fifthly, calculating KKT residual error epsilon under current iterationjIf the residual error is less than the preset termination residual error epsilon, exiting the while loop and outputting zj+1And thetajOtherwise, returning to the starting point of the loop.
Using the table at each sampling instant1, solving the nonlinear multi-step rolling optimization control problem of the magnetic suspension workbench by the parallelization Newton method capable of being rapidly executed on line, and outputting an integrated optimization variable zj+1In (1)
Figure BDA00029414983700001510
Applied to a coil to drive the worktable to move, and updating the state variable x (t) through the six-freedom-degree motion information of the magnetic suspension worktable measured by the laser sensor at the next sampling momentk+1) Solving for an estimate of the disturbance
Figure BDA0002941498370000161
And let z1=zj+1,Θ0=ΘjAnd repeatedly calculating the optimized control rate to form a closed-loop system.
The control effect of the present invention will be described by performing a trajectory tracking experiment using the magnetic levitation table shown in fig. 4.
1. Contour tracing and trajectory tracking control experiment: in order to verify the effectiveness of the nonlinear model prediction trajectory tracker of the designed magnetic suspension workbench, xrefThe reference track is designed as a three-dimensional hexagonal profile:
Figure BDA0002941498370000162
fig. 5, fig. 6 and fig. 7 show the profile tracing comparison, the trajectory tracking comparison and the profile error comparison of the method proposed by the present invention and the PID control method, respectively. Looking at the local magnification curve plotted in fig. 6, this curve shows that the actual position of the proposed method of the invention is closer to the reference trajectory than to the PID. In contrast to a PID controller, overshoot in the regulation results in a larger tracking error when there is a larger change in the reference profile. In contrast, the method provided by the invention utilizes the prediction capability to advance the turning of the response curve, thereby realizing excellent track following capability. The profile error depicted in fig. 7 is defined as the shortest distance from the actual position to the reference profile, and the root mean square of the profile error of the proposed method and PID controller is 10.0um and 27.5um, respectively. It can be seen that the proposed non-linear model predictive trajectory tracker has better control performance.
2. Frequency characteristic test experiment: the magnetic suspension working table is tested under the method and the PID controller, the frequency range of 1-150Hz,sx、sy、sfrequency characteristic in the z-axis direction. As can be seen from the amplitude and phase information shown in fig. 8, the proposed method has better low frequency tracking characteristics (1-20Hz) than the PID controller. At the same time, the phase lag situation is mitigated by taking into account future reference trajectories in the objective function. In addition, the invention provides that a higher bandwidth can be provided for the system, but because the determining factors of the frequency characteristic are the mechanical structure and the maximum output of the current power amplifier, the improvement is limited. The comparison result further shows the effectiveness of the nonlinear model prediction trajectory tracker provided by the invention on improving the control and performance of the magnetic suspension workbench and the dynamic response.
Through comparison experiments, the magnetic suspension workbench trajectory tracking controller based on nonlinear model predictive control and the online optimization method thereof are proved to be suitable for motion control of the magnetic suspension workbench, and have real-time performance, universality and better tracking accuracy.
It should be understood that the above description of the preferred embodiments is given for clarity and not for any purpose of limitation, and that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims (1)

1. A nonlinear model predictive control optimization method based on a magnetic suspension control system is characterized by comprising the following steps:
the magnetic suspension control system comprises: the device comprises a magnetic suspension workbench, a laser sensor, an analog-to-digital converter, a microprocessor, a digital-to-analog converter and a current power amplifier; the magnetic suspension workbench consists of a stator and a rotor; the stator is composed of a plurality of track coils; the rotor consists of a plurality of groups of Halbach magnetic arrays and a back plate; the stator and the rotor are wirelessly connected;
the laser sensor, the analog-to-digital converter, the microprocessor and the digital-to-analog converter are sequentially connected in series;
the laser sensor is arranged at the periphery of a rotor of the magnetic suspension workbench and used for measuring six-degree-of-freedom motion information of the magnetic suspension workbench and transmitting the six-degree-of-freedom motion information to the analog-to-digital converter;
the analog-to-digital converter performs analog-to-digital conversion on the six-degree-of-freedom motion information of the magnetic suspension workbench to obtain a six-degree-of-freedom motion digital signal of the magnetic suspension workbench, and transmits the six-degree-of-freedom motion digital signal to the microprocessor;
the microprocessor obtains a current control rate through the nonlinear model predictive control optimization method according to the six-degree-of-freedom motion digital signal of the magnetic suspension workbench, and transmits the current control rate to the digital-to-analog converter;
the digital-to-analog converter performs digital-to-analog conversion on the current control rate to obtain an analog current control rate, and transmits the analog current control rate to the current power amplifier for power amplification to obtain a driving current;
the current power amplifier transmits driving current to a stator of the magnetic suspension workbench, and when a plurality of track coils in the stator of the magnetic suspension workbench are energized with current, magnetic fields around the Halbach magnetic array on the rotor generate magnetic force under the excitation of the current so as to drive the magnetic suspension workbench to move in six degrees of freedom, so that closed-loop control is formed;
step 1: constructing a six-degree-of-freedom motion coordinate system by a microprocessor;
step 2: the microprocessor establishes a six-degree-of-freedom magnetic model in a suspension state;
and step 3: equating uncertainty which is not considered in modeling and external disturbance to disturbance lumped on an independent coil, establishing a nonlinear motion model of the magnetic suspension workbench by combining the magnetic force model in the step 2, and designing the lumped disturbance of the nonlinear disturbance observer estimation system according to the model;
and 4, step 4: according to a model prediction control principle, a discrete nonlinear motion model combined with a disturbance estimation value is used as a prediction model, the motion range of a magnetic suspension workbench and the maximum output of a current power amplifier are used as constraint conditions, the total cost of tracking errors and current loads in a prediction step is used as a target function, and the nonlinear multistep rolling optimization control problem of the magnetic suspension workbench is established;
and 5: converting the nonlinear multistep rolling optimization control problem model of the magnetic suspension workbench in the step 4 into a nonlinear Euler Langerian equation set, solving an optimization control strategy by using a parallelization Newton method capable of being rapidly executed on line, and realizing closed-loop control of the system;
the six-degree-of-freedom motion coordinate system in the step 1 is as follows:
the center of the upper surface of the stator is taken as the origin of a fixed coordinate system(s)so, taking the center of the lower surface of the mover as the origin of the moving coordinate system { t }to, relative displacement amount P of the tablex、Py、PzAt the originto is characterized by a vector difference under a fixed coordinate system, and the relative rotation amounts alpha, beta and gamma are characterized by the rotation amounts of the movable coordinate axis relative to the fixed coordinate axis;
the magnetic force model with six degrees of freedom in the suspension state in the step 2 is as follows:
combining the mechanical structure and the coordinate system definition of the magnetic suspension workbench in the step 1, according to a magnetic field calculation method based on harmonic analysis and a Lorenz integral rule, the force and the moment acting on the magnetic suspension workbench are as follows:
Figure FDA0003472448550000021
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA0003472448550000022
Figure FDA0003472448550000023
wherein, BrIs the remanent magnetization of the permanent magnet, NcoilIs the number of turns of the track coil, wcAnd hcTrack width and height, respectively, of the track coilmAnd hmLength and height of the individual permanent magnets, K being the thrust coefficient determined by the system structure, λ 2 pi/lmIs the spatial harmonic number, L is the distance from the center of the single Halbach magnetic array to the center of the whole magnetic array, and u ═ i1,i2,i3,i4,i5,i6,i7,i8]TIs the control input of the system under the drive of 8 independent coils;
step 3, the magnetic suspension workbench nonlinear motion model considering the lumped current disturbance:
the influence caused by unmodeled dynamics of the system, inaccurate magnetization of the magnet, non-uniform winding of the coil and electromagnetic disturbance of the current amplifier is assumed to be in a lumped form equivalent to that of 8 coils
Figure FDA0003472448550000024
Giving out;
because of the complete suspension characteristic without mechanical connection, the magnetic force model is further expanded into a form of a nonlinear motion model:
Figure FDA0003472448550000031
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA0003472448550000032
the position and the speed of the six degrees of freedom of the system form state variables, namely the six degrees of freedom motion information of the magnetic suspension workbench is obtained by the measurement of the laser sensor;
M=diag(m,m,m,Iα,Iβ,Iγ) Is composed of rotor mass and 3 rotary inertiaThe diagonal matrix is formed by the diagonal matrix,
Figure FDA0003472448550000033
is the gravitational acceleration vector;
the nonlinear disturbance observer in the step 3 is as follows:
aiming at the nonlinear motion model, a disturbance observer in the following form is designed:
Figure FDA0003472448550000034
Figure FDA0003472448550000035
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA0003472448550000036
is an estimate of the disturbance to the system,
Figure FDA0003472448550000037
is the internal state vector of the disturbance observer, h-r=hT·(h·hT)-1And
Figure FDA0003472448550000038
are respectively h and
Figure FDA0003472448550000039
right inverse of (d), gain of observer to ensure fast convergence of disturbance estimation deviation
Figure FDA00034724485500000310
A positive definite and symmetrical matrix should be selected;
step 4, taking the discrete nonlinear motion model combined with the disturbance estimation value as a prediction model:
combining the nonlinear motion model and the estimated value of the disturbance described in step 3
Figure FDA00034724485500000311
To estimate the state of the system at a future time:
Figure FDA00034724485500000312
at system sampling time TsAnd a sampling time tk=kTsDiscretizing the state of the estimated system at the future time under the condition that k is {0,1, 2. }, and obtaining a prediction model of the system under N prediction steps as follows:
Figure FDA00034724485500000313
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA00034724485500000314
is an inverse time function;
and 4, taking the motion range of the magnetic suspension workbench and the maximum output of the current power amplifier as constraint conditions:
considering that the motion range of the actuator and the maximum output of the current power amplifier are constrained as follows:
Figure FDA0003472448550000041
Figure FDA0003472448550000042
converting the constraints into mixed inequality constraints:
Figure FDA0003472448550000043
and 4, taking the total cost of the tracking error and the current load in the prediction step as an objective function:
with xrefConsidering the positively determined tracking error weight for the reference trajectory
Figure FDA0003472448550000044
And current load weight
Figure FDA0003472448550000045
Defining the objective function under N prediction steps as:
Figure FDA0003472448550000046
4, the nonlinear multi-step rolling optimization control problem of the magnetic suspension workbench is as follows:
according to a model prediction control principle, a prediction model, mixed inequality constraints and an objective function of a system under N prediction step lengths are considered, and a magnetic suspension workbench nonlinear multi-step rolling optimization control problem model to be solved is as follows:
Figure FDA0003472448550000047
Figure FDA0003472448550000048
Figure FDA0003472448550000049
Figure FDA00034724485500000410
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA00034724485500000411
and
Figure FDA00034724485500000412
respectively is a state sequence and a control sequence under N prediction step lengths;
the nonlinear Eulerian Langerian equation set in the step 5 is as follows:
converting the mixed inequality constraint of step 4 into a logarithmic barrier function:
Figure FDA00034724485500000413
followed by the definition of a Lagrange multiplier sequence
Figure FDA00034724485500000414
And Hamiltonian function of the problem to be optimized:
Figure FDA0003472448550000051
optimal sequence of states according to the KKT condition
Figure FDA0003472448550000052
Control sequence
Figure FDA0003472448550000053
And lagrange multiplier sequence
Figure FDA0003472448550000054
The following non-linear euler langery equation set should be satisfied:
Figure FDA0003472448550000055
wherein the initial optimum state
Figure FDA0003472448550000056
And tail optimal Lagrange multiplier
Figure FDA0003472448550000057
Is a boundary condition of the equation set;
Figure FDA0003472448550000058
and
Figure FDA0003472448550000059
are respectively H about
Figure FDA00034724485500000510
And
Figure FDA00034724485500000511
a gradient of (a);
considering integrated optimization variables
Figure FDA00034724485500000512
Correction matrix
Figure FDA00034724485500000513
In combination with
Figure FDA00034724485500000514
Referring to the left side of the equation of the nonlinear Eulerian Langerian equation set, the parallelization Newton method which can be rapidly executed on line in the step 5;
the parallel Newton method capable of being rapidly executed on line in the step 5 mainly comprises the following steps:
step 5.1, preprocessing variables to be optimized according to boundary conditions;
step 5.2, introduction
Figure FDA00034724485500000515
Approximate estimate of (2)
Figure FDA00034724485500000516
Roughly updating the integration optimization variables by a gradient descent method in combination with the correction matrix theta;
step 5.3, due to the introduction of
Figure FDA00034724485500000517
Based on approximate deviation
Figure FDA00034724485500000518
Optimizing variables for integration in a backward manner
Figure FDA00034724485500000519
Carrying out correction;
step 5.4, due to the introduction of
Figure FDA00034724485500000520
Based on approximate deviation
Figure FDA00034724485500000521
Optimizing variables for integration in a forward manner
Figure FDA00034724485500000522
Carrying out correction;
step 5.5, calculating KKT residual epsilon under current iterationjIf the residual error is less than the preset termination residual error epsilon, exiting the while loop and outputting zj+1And thetajOtherwise, returning to the starting point of the cycle;
solving the nonlinear multistep rolling optimization control problem of the magnetic suspension workbench by using a parallelization Newton method capable of being rapidly executed on line at each sampling moment, and outputting an integrated optimization variable zj+1In (1)
Figure FDA00034724485500000523
Is applied to the coil to drive the stage to move, and is switched on at the next sampling timeUpdating state variable x (t) of six-freedom-degree motion information of the magnetic suspension workbench measured by the laser sensork+1) Solving for an estimate of the disturbance
Figure FDA0003472448550000061
And let z1=zj+1,Θ0=ΘjAnd repeatedly calculating the optimized control rate to form a closed-loop system.
CN202110181216.2A 2021-02-09 2021-02-09 Nonlinear model predictive control optimization method based on magnetic suspension control system Expired - Fee Related CN112947083B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110181216.2A CN112947083B (en) 2021-02-09 2021-02-09 Nonlinear model predictive control optimization method based on magnetic suspension control system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110181216.2A CN112947083B (en) 2021-02-09 2021-02-09 Nonlinear model predictive control optimization method based on magnetic suspension control system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN112947083A CN112947083A (en) 2021-06-11
CN112947083B true CN112947083B (en) 2022-03-04

Family

ID=76245113

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202110181216.2A Expired - Fee Related CN112947083B (en) 2021-02-09 2021-02-09 Nonlinear model predictive control optimization method based on magnetic suspension control system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN112947083B (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114859715B (en) * 2022-04-21 2024-04-26 武汉大学 Fractional order sliding mode motion control method of magnetic suspension turntable motion control system
CN116595368B (en) * 2023-05-16 2024-01-26 北京航空航天大学 Nonlinear modeling-based power amplifier harmonic prediction method

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5740033A (en) * 1992-10-13 1998-04-14 The Dow Chemical Company Model predictive controller
CN105762789A (en) * 2015-11-09 2016-07-13 湘潭大学 Three-phase current transformer model prediction control method free from voltage sensor
CN106682808A (en) * 2016-09-20 2017-05-17 北京恒泰实达科技股份有限公司 Online rolling optimization scheduling model
CN109541939A (en) * 2018-09-30 2019-03-29 浙江工业大学 The multiple dimensioned approximate explicit model forecast Control Algorithm of express elevator mechanical oscillation
CN109991850A (en) * 2019-04-15 2019-07-09 中南大学 A kind of magnetic suspension system forecast Control Algorithm and system
CN110137942A (en) * 2019-04-23 2019-08-16 河海大学 Multiple Time Scales flexible load rolling scheduling method and system based on Model Predictive Control
CN110401378A (en) * 2019-07-24 2019-11-01 曲阜师范大学 Magnetic suspension yaw motor control method based on Neural Network model predictive control
CN110794680A (en) * 2019-11-14 2020-02-14 浙江工业大学 Magnetic levitation ball system prediction tracking control method based on extended state observer

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2005135186A (en) * 2003-10-30 2005-05-26 Toshiba Corp Reference model follow-up type control system and its method
WO2016010601A2 (en) * 2014-04-23 2016-01-21 The Florida State University Research Foundation, Inc. Adaptive nonlinear model predictive control using a neural network and input sampling

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5740033A (en) * 1992-10-13 1998-04-14 The Dow Chemical Company Model predictive controller
CN105762789A (en) * 2015-11-09 2016-07-13 湘潭大学 Three-phase current transformer model prediction control method free from voltage sensor
CN106682808A (en) * 2016-09-20 2017-05-17 北京恒泰实达科技股份有限公司 Online rolling optimization scheduling model
CN109541939A (en) * 2018-09-30 2019-03-29 浙江工业大学 The multiple dimensioned approximate explicit model forecast Control Algorithm of express elevator mechanical oscillation
CN109991850A (en) * 2019-04-15 2019-07-09 中南大学 A kind of magnetic suspension system forecast Control Algorithm and system
CN110137942A (en) * 2019-04-23 2019-08-16 河海大学 Multiple Time Scales flexible load rolling scheduling method and system based on Model Predictive Control
CN110401378A (en) * 2019-07-24 2019-11-01 曲阜师范大学 Magnetic suspension yaw motor control method based on Neural Network model predictive control
CN110794680A (en) * 2019-11-14 2020-02-14 浙江工业大学 Magnetic levitation ball system prediction tracking control method based on extended state observer

Non-Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for a Maglev Vehicle regarding Magnetic Saturation and Guideway Irregularities;Patrick Schmid;Peter Eberhard;Florian Dignath;《IFAC-PapersOnLine》;20191220;全文 *
Observer-based fast nonlinear MPC for multi-DOF maglev positioning system: Theory and experiment;Kaiyang Zhang;Fengqiu Xu;Xianze Xu;《Control Engineering Practice》;20210816;全文 *
Thomas Bächle;Sebastian;Hentzelt;Knut;Graichen.Nonlinear model predictive control of a magnetic levitation system.《Control Engineering Practice》.2013, *
Zhixun Ma ; Yan Sun ; Yuanzhe Zhao ; Zhenbin Zhang ; Guobin Lin.Dichotomy Solution Based Model Predictive Control for Permanent Magnet Linear Synchronous Motors.《2019 22nd International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS)》.2019, *
基于洛伦茨执行器的多轴磁悬浮定位系统设计与研究;徐逢秋;《中国博士学位论文全文数据库·工程科技Ⅱ辑》;20180215;全文 *
基于磁悬浮轴承系统的振动主动控制研究;赵杰;《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库·工程科技Ⅱ辑》;20180115;全文 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN112947083A (en) 2021-06-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN112947083B (en) Nonlinear model predictive control optimization method based on magnetic suspension control system
CN109514602A (en) A kind of industrial robot torque compensation control method based on loaded self-adaptive identification
Grzesiak et al. PMSM servo‐drive control system with a state feedback and a load torque feedforward compensation
Dwivedi et al. Stabilization of unstable equilibrium point of rotary inverted pendulum using fractional controller
Xiao et al. A model reference adaptive PID control for electromagnetic actuated micro-positioning stage
Wen et al. The study of model predictive control algorithm based on the force/position control scheme of the 5-DOF redundant actuation parallel robot
CN106100469B (en) Implementation method based on adaptive motor servo system robust position controller
CN110597051A (en) Stewart stable platform control method based on RBF neural network
Qin et al. Dual-loop robust attitude control for an aerodynamic system with unknown dynamic model: Algorithm and experimental validation
Yang et al. Neural network dynamic surface position control of n‐joint robot driven by PMSM with unknown load observer
CN112859618B (en) Self-adaptive learning sliding mode control method for multi-degree-of-freedom magnetic suspension planar motor
Kumar et al. Novel m-PSO Optimized LQR Control Design for Flexible Link Manipulator: An Experimental Validation.
CN106066604B (en) Implementation method based on adaptive and expansion error symbol integral robust motor servo system positioner
Lei et al. Super-twisting disturbance-observer-based nonlinear control of the overhead crane system
CN113114128B (en) Piezoelectric feedforward compensation method based on generalized Bouc-Wen inverse model
Zhao et al. Research on modular permanent magnet bias magnetic bearing
Chen et al. Compensatory fuzzy neural network control with dynamic parameters estimation for linear voice coil actuator
Jin et al. High precision tracking control for linear servo system based on intelligent second-order complementary sliding mode
Wen et al. Continuous non‐singular terminal sliding‐mode control of permanent magnet spherical actuator for trajectory tracking based on a modified nonlinear disturbance observer
Fan et al. Iterative learning control for linear motor motion system
Liu-Henke et al. An intelligent control structure for highly dynamic driving of a spherical electrical drive
Hannouda et al. Control of acrobot using inverse linear quadratic method
Xu et al. Iterative neural network adaptive robust control of a maglev planar motor with uncertainty compensation ability
Huang et al. Sliding Mode Variable Structure-Based Chattering Avoidance Control for Mobile Wheeled Inverted Pendulums
Liu et al. Speed control based on ESO for the pitching axis of satellite cameras

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee

Granted publication date: 20220304

CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee