CN112927317A - Optical coherence tomography fast space self-adaptive deconvolution method - Google Patents
Optical coherence tomography fast space self-adaptive deconvolution method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112927317A CN112927317A CN202110181508.6A CN202110181508A CN112927317A CN 112927317 A CN112927317 A CN 112927317A CN 202110181508 A CN202110181508 A CN 202110181508A CN 112927317 A CN112927317 A CN 112927317A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- image
- deconvolution
- imaging depth
- oct
- regularization
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000012014 optical coherence tomography Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 61
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 59
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 49
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 18
- 238000013178 mathematical model Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims description 12
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000005315 distribution function Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 12
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 241000234282 Allium Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000002732 Allium cepa var. cepa Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013213 extrapolation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009499 grossing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003902 lesion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000007476 Maximum Likelihood Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002591 computed tomography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002059 diagnostic imaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002708 enhancing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005284 excitation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009545 invasion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002595 magnetic resonance imaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000704 physical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920013655 poly(bisphenol-A sulfone) Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229910052573 porcelain Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000001525 retina Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T11/00—2D [Two Dimensional] image generation
- G06T11/003—Reconstruction from projections, e.g. tomography
- G06T11/008—Specific post-processing after tomographic reconstruction, e.g. voxelisation, metal artifact correction
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T3/00—Geometric image transformation in the plane of the image
- G06T3/40—Scaling the whole image or part thereof
- G06T3/4053—Super resolution, i.e. output image resolution higher than sensor resolution
-
- G06T5/73—
Abstract
The invention provides a fast space self-adaptive deconvolution method for optical coherence tomography, which comprises the following steps: constructing a mathematical model for deconvolution of the OCT image, and discretizing the mathematical model to obtain the linear model; step two: constructing a least square form of a deconvolution optimization problem; obtaining initial estimation of imaging depth and a clear image by a Richardson-Lucy algorithm, and setting a maximum iteration time Tmax and an image residual error threshold tau; setting the estimated values of the imaging depth and the clear image as wt and It respectively in the iteration of the t step, and obtaining a solution for accelerating iterative optimization according to a Gauss-Newton iterative solution of the objective function; and (5) iterating the calculation until convergence.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of optical coherence tomography, and relates to a method for estimating a point spread function of an imaging system and enhancing the resolution of an optical coherence tomography image by using a deconvolution method.
Background
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is a new generation of biomedical imaging technology, which uses a michelson interferometer to detect an interference signal after interference between backscattered light in a biological tissue and reflected light from a reference arm, and then calculates a microscopic two-dimensional or three-dimensional structural image of the biological tissue from an interference pattern of the scattered light and the reference light. The imaging depth of the OCT can reach mm level, and the imaging resolution can reach mum level. Compared with the traditional medical imaging technologies which are commonly used clinically, such as X-ray computed tomography (X-CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Ultrasonic Imaging (UI) and the like, the OCT imaging uses light waves as an energy source for imaging, and has the advantages of non-invasion, non-contact, no damage, high spatial resolution, low cost and the like. The OCT imaging has many advantages, so the development is rapid, the application field is wide, and the application prospect is wide. In addition to the medical field, the method is also applied to the fields of shape detection of precision mechanical devices, quality detection of semiconductor devices, material surface damage detection, crack detection of substances such as porcelain stones and the like, plant leaf and seed form, micro-organism internal structure imaging of micron order and the like.
Spatial resolution enhancement of OCT images is one of the hot spots in OCT research. The enhancement method of the OCT image can be classified into a hardware-based method and a digital-based method. Among the mathematical-based image enhancement methods, the deconvolution method is most commonly used. Deconvolution is a method to reduce ambiguity, and commonly used deconvolution methods are wiener filtering, Richardson-Lucy iterative deconvolution, and least squares deconvolution. Wiener et al, also known as minimum mean square error filtering, published by massachusetts institute of technology (MIT Press) in 1964 in a book entitled "Extrapolation, interpolation, and smoothing and engineering applications of stationary time series" (Extrapolation, interpolation, and smoothing of stationary time series with engineering applications). The goal is to find an estimate of the non-contaminated image, minimize the mean square error between them, and sharpen the blurred image while removing noise. The Richardson-Lucy iterative deconvolution reconstruction algorithm is an iterative algorithm used for image restoration under the Poisson noise background and is based on the maximum likelihood solution of Poisson statistical data. It aims to maximize the likelihood of restoring an image by using an expectation maximization algorithm (EM). The algorithm requires a good estimate of the process of image degradation to achieve accurate recovery. Fish et al succeeded in blindly deconvolving OCT images using Richardson-Lucy algorithm, first applied to OCT imaging, in Journal of The American Society of Optics-Optical Image Science and Vision, Vol.12, pages 58-65, published by Journal of The Optical Society of America A-Optics, Science and Vision, and Blind deconvolution with Richardson-Lucy algorithm, by Richardson-Lucy algorithm, et al, 1995. Ralston et al, 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 14, 1254, 1264, published under the heading Deconvolution method for eliminating lateral blur in optical coherence tomography (Deconvolution method for estimation of transverse blur in optical coherence tomography) proposes a regularized inverse Deconvolution algorithm using a Gaussian beam Deconvolution algorithm that reduces the lateral blur of OCT images and increases the lateral resolution of OCT images.
Methods for deblurring an image can be further classified into non-blind deconvolution and blind deconvolution, depending on whether the Point Spread Function (PSF) is known or not. In 1978, Trussell and Hunt, an article entitled "method for restoring blocks of spatially blurred images" (Image restoration of space-variant blurry by section methods), published by IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech & Signal Processing, volume 26, page 608 and 609, first proposed a method for restoring blocks of images using wiener filtering algorithm, which is an important method for performing spatially varying PSF non-blind deconvolution. The method mainly comprises the steps of dividing an image into subblocks, considering that PSF of each subblock image is space-invariant, deconvoluting each subblock by using a wiener filtering algorithm, and finally splicing the restored subblock blocks together to reconstruct the whole clear image. Liu et al 2011, in the article entitled "Automatic estimation of deconvolution defocused optical coherence tomography image point spread function based on information entropy" (Automatic estimation of point-spread-function for deconvolution defocused optical coherence tomography image point spread function), published in pages 18135-18148, propose an information entropy-based PSF Automatic estimation method to deconvolve the defocused area of an OCT image. They performed non-blind deconvolution operations on out-of-focus images using a set of gaussian PSFs of different spot sizes using an richardson-lucy iterative deconvolution algorithm. Podolean et al, 2013, in Applied Optics 52, 5663-5670, published under the article entitled "optical coherence tomography Image quality improvement based on Richardson-outi deconvolution algorithm" (Image quality improvement in optical coherence tomography using Lucy-Richardson deconvolution algorithm), used a solid phantom to evaluate the average PSF of the imaging system and an iterative Richardson-outi iterative deconvolution algorithm to improve the Image quality. Mohammadreza et al, 2017, in the Society of Optical instruments Engineers (Conference Series), an article entitled "Optical coherence tomography spatial variant deconvolution method based on total variation" (A spatial-variant deconvolution method based on total variation) published by Society of Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE): Conference Series), propose a new OCT image spatial deconvolution method based on total variation. They use solid mimetics to estimate the point spread function of each subregion of the imaging system and then use the iterative deconvolution method of Richardson-Lucy, Hybr and gross variation to mitigate the blurring of spatial variation.
In addition, Wang et al, 2018, in the 40th International Annual institute of IEEE Medicine and biological Engineering (40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society), pages 1-4, an article entitled Super-Resolution in Optical Coherence Tomography (Super-Resolution in Optical Coherence Tomography), proposes a solution based on inverse problem solving, namely a deconvolution method and a cost function for Super-Resolution, wherein the deconvolution method can be implemented by solving a least squares method. They then minimize them using an alternate direction multiplier (ADMM) and a back-and-forth splitting (FBS) algorithm. In addition, the standard L1 regularization with soft threshold was also compared to TV regularization in the ADMM scheme.
However, there still exist many problems in the OCT image reconstruction of biological tissues at home and abroad at present: (1) OCT systems require a compromise between imaging depth and imaging resolution, limited by the physical properties of the excitation source itself. On the premise of ensuring higher imaging resolution, the imaging depth of OCT is usually less than 4mm and is influenced by sample tissues; (2) the PSF of a cross-sectional image obtained by an OCT system at an arbitrary depth is generally unknown, and the size thereof is affected by factors such as the imaging depth and the imaging position. The existing image reconstruction algorithm uses PSF with unchanged space, so that the accuracy of the reconstructed image is lower; (3) if the OCT image is large, the amount of calculation of the image deconvolution operation is large, the time consumption is long, and the requirement on the configuration performance of the computing device is high.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a quick space self-adaptive deconvolution method which can improve the resolution of a reconstructed image and increase the imaging depth. In order to eliminate the influence of prior information of imaging depth in a PSF model on the deconvolution effect of an OCT image, a mathematical model of the deconvolution problem of the OCT image is constructed based on a least square method, an alternative optimization image reconstruction algorithm for automatically estimating the imaging depth is introduced in the process of deconvolution reconstruction of the OCT image, an iterative solution of the constructed model is deduced by adopting an alternative optimization and Gaussian-Newton method, the imaging depth and a real image are estimated at the same time, and the rapid spatial adaptive deconvolution of the OCT image is realized. Aiming at the problems of large calculation amount and long time consumption of the algorithm, the invention provides a quick implementation method of blind area deconvolution based on convolution property and Fourier transform. The invention can improve the reconstruction quality of the OCT image in both simulation results and experimental results, and obviously improves the resolution of the OCT image. The technical scheme is as follows:
an optical coherence tomography fast space adaptive deconvolution method comprises the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps: constructing a mathematical model of the deconvolution of the OCT image:
o(x,y)=h(x,y,w)*ι(x,y)
where, is the convolution operator, o (x, y) is the observed OCT signal, ι (x, y) is the refractive index distribution function to be detected, (x, y) is the coordinates of the probe point, w is the depth of the probe point, and h (x, y, w) is the point spread function obtained based on the gaussian beam model:
discretizing the mathematical model to obtain the following linear model:
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,is the blurred image corresponding to the signal o (x, y),a clear image corresponding to the refractive index function iota (x, y),a linear matrix corresponding to the convolution kernel h (x, y, w) and the convolution operation,representing that both sides of the symbol have an equivalence relationship.
Step two: constructing a least squares version of the deconvolution optimization problem:
wherein | O | count the luminance2Representing the two-norm of the vector O,for a blurred image generated by discretization of the OCT signal,for dispersion of refractive index profile function to be detectedThe obtained clear image is changed into a clear image,for the convolution kernel matrix, w is the imaging depth,andregularization terms for I and w, respectively, and λ and μ are regularization parameters;
step three: and setting t to be 0, obtaining initial estimation w of imaging depth and clear image by Richardson-Lucy algorithmtAnd ItAnd setting the maximum iteration number TmaxAnd an image residual error threshold τ;
step four: setting the estimated values of the imaging depth and the clear image as w in the t-th iterationtAnd It(ii) a Fixed wtIn the second stepIs a constant, an estimate of I andand independently, the optimization problem in the step two is simplified into the following form:
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,when the imaging depth is wtThe convolution operator of the time-of-day,selecting a Tikhonnv regularization form as a regularization item of the image in the t-th iteration, and obtaining a solution for accelerating iterative optimization according to a Gauss-Newton iterative solution form, wherein the solution is as follows:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,represents the point spread function h (x, y,) The corresponding n x n discretized image,andrespectively representing Fourier change and inverse Fourier transform of the two-dimensional image;
step five: fixing It+1In the second stepIs a constant, an estimate of wAnd independently, the optimization problem in the step two is simplified into the following form:
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,using a Tikhronv regularization term, i.e.wpIs a priori value of imaging depth;
the objective function w can be obtained according to the form of Gauss-Newton iterative solutiontThe gaussian-newton iterative solution of (a) is:
of formula (II) to'tAnd O ″)tSatisfy the requirement of
Step six: repeating the fourth step and the fifth step until the image residual errorOr the number of iterations t>Tmax。
The method provided by the invention improves the OCT image quality, obviously improves the contrast and resolution of the image, has stronger expression capability on details and smaller boundary loss; in addition, the alternating optimization algorithm provided by the invention can accurately estimate the imaging depth, further improve the accuracy of image reconstruction and reduce errors caused by imaging depth estimation errors; the operation time of the program is reduced, and the operation amount is reduced.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a complete flow chart of the fast spatial adaptive deconvolution algorithm of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a three representative simulation models of the present invention and shows the final imaging results using the Richardson-Lucy deconvolution method and the method of the present invention, the test method proposed by the present invention using a TV regularization term;
FIG. 3 is a time-averaged value before and after acceleration of deconvolution reconstruction of a simulation model of the present invention, wherein AO represents an alternating optimization algorithm before acceleration and AAO represents an alternating optimization algorithm after acceleration;
FIG. 4 is a diagram of the relative error of the estimated imaging depth of the present invention;
FIG. 5 shows the three OCT image deconvolution experimental results of the present invention, and shows the final imaging results using the Richardson-Lucy deconvolution method and the method of the present invention, which uses the TV regularization term.
FIG. 6 is a time-averaged value before and after acceleration of deconvolution reconstruction of OCT images of the invention.
Detailed Description
The optical coherence tomography fast space adaptive deconvolution method is described with reference to the attached drawings and embodiments.
Constructing a mathematical model of the deconvolution of the OCT image:
o(x,y)=h(x,y,w)*ι(x,y)
where, is the convolution operator, o (x, y) is the observed OCT signal, ι (x, y) is the refractive index distribution function to be detected, (x, y) is the coordinates of the probe point, w is the depth of the probe point, and h (x, y, w) is the point spread function obtained based on the gaussian beam model:
discretizing the analytic model to obtain the following linear model:
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,is the blurred image corresponding to the signal o (x, y),a clear image corresponding to the refractive index function iota (x, y),is the convolution kernel h (x, y, w) and the linear matrix corresponding to the convolution operation.
Constructing a least squares version of the deconvolution problem:
wherein | O | count the luminance2Representing the two-norm of the vector O, is a blurred image generated by discretization of the OCT signal,for a clear image obtained by discretizing the refractive index distribution function to be detected,for the convolution kernel matrix, w is the imaging depth,andregularization terms for I and w, respectively, and λ and μ are regularization parameters.
And setting t to be 0, obtaining initial estimation w of imaging depth and clear image by Richardson-Lucy algorithmtAnd ItAnd setting the maximum iteration number TmaxAnd an image residual threshold τ.
Setting the estimated values of the imaging depth and the clear image as w in the t-th iterationtAnd It. Fixed wtIn the second stepIs a constant, an estimate of I andand independently, the optimization problem in the step two is simplified into the following form:
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,when the imaging depth is wtThe convolution operator of the time-of-day,and selecting a Tikhonnv regularization form as a regularization item of the image in the t-th iteration, and using a reconstruction result of a Richardson-Lucy iterative deconvolution method as an initial value of a reconstructed image.
Obtained from the form of Gauss-Newton iterative solution, the objective function ItThe gaussian-newton iterative solution of (a) is:
from Lesion 1 (as demonstrated in the last part of the detailed description), the real matrixI.e. presence matrixOrder:
then:
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,the Tikhronv regularization term is usually chosen, i.e.IpIs a prior value of the reconstructed image.
Let Ip=ItThen, the final iterative solution of the gaussian-newton iterative method is:
from Lesion 2 (as demonstrated in the last part of the detailed description), it can be seen that for the convolution kernel matrix HwThe inverse operation can be converted into a simple calculation in the frequency domain by means of fourier transformation and inverse fourier transformation, so that the latter half of the above formula can be simplified to obtain an accelerated solution of the iterative optimization:
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,is the image h (x, y,) The vector of (2).
Fixing It+1In the second stepIs a constant, an estimate of wAnd independently, the optimization problem in the step two is simplified into the following form:
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,the Tikhronv regularization term is usually chosen, i.e.wpIs a priori the imaging depth.
The objective function w can be obtained according to the form of Gauss-Newton iterative solutiontThe gaussian-newton iterative solution of (a) is:
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
step six: repeating the fourth step and the fifth step until the image residual errorOr the number of iterations t>Tmax。
Prove 1 known H ═ HTAnd then:
performing a two-dimensional fourier transform on the PSF can obtain a formula of the form:
then:
namely:
and because:
therefore, the method comprises the following steps:
the theory of leading 1 can be used for the evidence.
Prove 2 for a given PSF expressionThe regularization parameter λ and the low resolution image O, the target image I, may be given by the following formula:
(Hw+λE)-1I=O (4-8)
namely:
simultaneous fourier transformation of both sides of equation (4-43) yields:
by simple transformation it can be obtained:
and then carrying out inverse Fourier transform on the formula (4-45) to obtain an expression in the following form:
namely:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,is a vector of the point spread function h (x, y, w).
So 2 can be introduced to ensure this.
The listed results comprise a simulation part and an experiment part, wherein the simulation model comprises a simulation tube, a Siemens Star diagram and an onion skin structure simulation diagram; the experimental data are OCT experimental images of the biological microstructure of the object to be detected, including in-vitro OCT images of fresh onions, in-vivo OCT images of human retina and human fingertip.
Fig. 2 shows the deconvolution imaging results of the three simulation models, respectively. As can be seen from the simulation results, the definition of the reconstructed image obtained by the reconstruction method based on regularization is obviously increased; compared with the reconstruction result of the Richardson-Lucy deconvolution method, the intensity and the contrast of the deconvolution image obtained by the method are higher, the reconstructed image is clearer, edges are hardly damaged, and obviously, the reconstruction method based on the regularization method provided by the invention has better effect;
FIG. 3 is a time-use average value before and after acceleration of deconvolution reconstruction of the simulation model of the present invention, from which it can be known that the acceleration algorithm can increase the overall operation speed of the algorithm, and the program operation time after acceleration is about one tenth of that before acceleration;
FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the relative error of the imaging depth estimation according to the present invention, wherein the relative error of the imaging depth estimation is 10-8The method has the advantages that the method is within the order of magnitude range and is a reasonable error range, and the result proves that the method is accurate and credible in the estimation of the imaging depth, so that the reconstruction error caused by the error in the estimation of the imaging depth can be reduced;
FIG. 5 shows the deconvolution experiment results of three OCT images according to the present invention. The reconstruction method still has a good reconstruction effect on OCT experimental data, and the improvement of the image resolution is obvious as seen from the arrow direction of a local enlarged image, a finer structure can be displayed, the brightness and the contrast of the image are higher, and the reconstruction method based on the regularization method provided by the invention has a good deconvolution reconstruction effect obviously.
FIG. 6 is a time-averaged value before and after acceleration of OCT image deconvolution reconstruction, from which it can be seen that the overall operation speed of the algorithm can be increased by the acceleration algorithm, and the program operation time after acceleration is about one tenth of that before acceleration;
the present invention is not limited to the disclosure of the embodiment and the drawings. It is intended that all equivalents and modifications which come within the spirit of the disclosure be protected by the present invention.
Claims (1)
1. An optical coherence tomography fast space adaptive deconvolution method comprises the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps: constructing a mathematical model of the deconvolution of the OCT image:
o(x,y)=h(x,y,w)*ι(x,y)
where, is the convolution operator, o (x, y) is the observed OCT signal, ι (x, y) is the refractive index distribution function to be detected, (x, y) is the coordinates of the probe point, w is the depth of the probe point, and h (x, y, w) is the point spread function obtained based on the gaussian beam model:
discretizing the mathematical model to obtain the following linear model:
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,is the blurred image corresponding to the signal o (x, y),a clear image corresponding to the refractive index function iota (x, y),a linear matrix corresponding to the convolution kernel h (x, y, w) and the convolution operation,representing that both sides of the symbol have an equivalence relationship.
Step two: constructing a least squares version of the deconvolution optimization problem:
wherein | O | count the luminance2Representing the two-norm of the vector O,for a blurred image generated by discretization of the OCT signal,for a clear image obtained by discretizing the refractive index distribution function to be detected,for the convolution kernel matrix, w is the imaging depth,andregularization terms for I and w, respectively, and λ and μ are regularization parameters;
step three: and setting t to be 0, obtaining initial estimation w of imaging depth and clear image by Richardson-Lucy algorithmtAnd ItAnd setting the maximum iteration number TmaxAnd an image residual error threshold τ;
step four: setting the estimated values of the imaging depth and the clear image as w in the t-th iterationtAnd It(ii) a Fixed wtIn the second stepIs a constant, an estimate of I andand independently, the optimization problem in the step two is simplified into the following form:
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,when the imaging depth is wtThe convolution operator of the time-of-day,selecting a Tikhonnv regularization form as a regularization item of the image in the t-th iteration, and obtaining a solution for accelerating iterative optimization according to a Gauss-Newton iterative solution form, wherein the solution is as follows:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,representing point spread functionThe corresponding n x n discretized image,andrespectively representing Fourier change and inverse Fourier transform of the two-dimensional image;
step five: fixing It+1In the second stepIs a constant, an estimate of wAnd independently, the optimization problem in the step two is simplified into the following form:
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,using a Tikhronv regularization term, i.e.wpIs a priori value of imaging depth;
the objective function w can be obtained according to the form of Gauss-Newton iterative solutiontThe gaussian-newton iterative solution of (a) is:
of formula (II) to'tAnd O "tSatisfy the requirement of
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202110181508.6A CN112927317B (en) | 2021-02-08 | 2021-02-08 | Optical coherence tomography rapid space self-adaptive deconvolution method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202110181508.6A CN112927317B (en) | 2021-02-08 | 2021-02-08 | Optical coherence tomography rapid space self-adaptive deconvolution method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN112927317A true CN112927317A (en) | 2021-06-08 |
CN112927317B CN112927317B (en) | 2024-04-16 |
Family
ID=76171473
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202110181508.6A Active CN112927317B (en) | 2021-02-08 | 2021-02-08 | Optical coherence tomography rapid space self-adaptive deconvolution method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN112927317B (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN116843788A (en) * | 2023-08-31 | 2023-10-03 | 清华大学 | Limited angle tomography method and device |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2009095296A1 (en) * | 2008-01-29 | 2009-08-06 | Bergen Teknologioverforing As | Constrained iterative blind deconvolution |
CN103761712A (en) * | 2014-01-21 | 2014-04-30 | 太原理工大学 | Image blind convolution method based on adaptive optical system point spread function reconstruction |
US20140176937A1 (en) * | 2011-08-18 | 2014-06-26 | Tiegen Liu | Distributed disturbance sensing device and the related demodulation method based on polarization sensitive optical frequency domain reflectometry |
CN109919844A (en) * | 2019-02-28 | 2019-06-21 | 河南师范大学 | A kind of high-resolution electricity tomography distribution of conductivity method for reconstructing |
CN111476733A (en) * | 2020-04-07 | 2020-07-31 | 浙江大学 | Microscope image deconvolution acceleration algorithm based on unmatched operators |
-
2021
- 2021-02-08 CN CN202110181508.6A patent/CN112927317B/en active Active
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2009095296A1 (en) * | 2008-01-29 | 2009-08-06 | Bergen Teknologioverforing As | Constrained iterative blind deconvolution |
US20140176937A1 (en) * | 2011-08-18 | 2014-06-26 | Tiegen Liu | Distributed disturbance sensing device and the related demodulation method based on polarization sensitive optical frequency domain reflectometry |
CN103761712A (en) * | 2014-01-21 | 2014-04-30 | 太原理工大学 | Image blind convolution method based on adaptive optical system point spread function reconstruction |
CN109919844A (en) * | 2019-02-28 | 2019-06-21 | 河南师范大学 | A kind of high-resolution electricity tomography distribution of conductivity method for reconstructing |
CN111476733A (en) * | 2020-04-07 | 2020-07-31 | 浙江大学 | Microscope image deconvolution acceleration algorithm based on unmatched operators |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
张丽娟;杨进华;苏伟;姜成昊;王晓坤;谭芳: "基于改进的期望值最大化自适应光学图像多帧迭代去卷积算法", 兵工学报, vol. 35, no. 11, 31 December 2014 (2014-12-31) * |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN116843788A (en) * | 2023-08-31 | 2023-10-03 | 清华大学 | Limited angle tomography method and device |
CN116843788B (en) * | 2023-08-31 | 2023-11-28 | 清华大学 | Limited angle tomography method and device |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN112927317B (en) | 2024-04-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Dong et al. | Nonlocal total variation models for multiplicative noise removal using split Bregman iteration | |
Satish et al. | A Comprehensive Review of Blind Deconvolution Techniques for Image Deblurring. | |
KR20160029668A (en) | Method and apparatus for generating sharp image based on blurry image | |
EP1849310A2 (en) | Adaptive image de-noising by pixels relation maximization | |
Kanakaraj et al. | SAR image super resolution using importance sampling unscented Kalman filter | |
Al-Ameen et al. | Employing a suitable contrast enhancement technique as a pre-restoration adjustment phase for computed tomography medical images | |
CN112927317B (en) | Optical coherence tomography rapid space self-adaptive deconvolution method | |
Li et al. | PURE-LET deconvolution of 3D fluorescence microscopy images | |
Zhang et al. | Cartoon-texture composite regularization based non-blind deblurring method for partly-textured blurred images with Poisson noise | |
Jaware et al. | Performance investigations of filtering methods for T1 and T2 weighted infant brain MR images | |
Li et al. | Image denoising and contrast enhancement based on nonsubsampled contourlet transform | |
CN112927316B (en) | Optical coherence tomography space self-adaptive deconvolution method | |
Dong et al. | Spatially adaptive blind deconvolution methods for optical coherence tomography | |
Krylov et al. | A post-processing method for 3D fundus image enhancement | |
Kim et al. | Application of blind deconvolution based on the new weighted L1-norm regularization with alternating direction method of multipliers in light microscopy images | |
Pathak et al. | A technique to suppress speckle in ultrasound images using nonlocal mean and cellular automata | |
Agaian et al. | A novel technique to enhance low resolution ct and magnetic resonance images in cloud | |
Singh et al. | Multi-objective noise estimator for the applications of de-noising and segmentation of MRI data | |
Mohan et al. | Multi-Tier Kernel for Disease Prediction using Texture Analysis with MR Images | |
Dasgupta | Comparative analysis of non-blind deblurring methods for noisy blurred images | |
Nair et al. | A robust non local means maximum likelihood estimation method for Rician noise reduction in MR images | |
Dong et al. | Three-dimensional deconvolution of wide field microscopy with sparse priors: Application to zebrafish imagery | |
CN115423890B (en) | Tomographic image iterative reconstruction method | |
Francis et al. | Image reconstruction from undersampled confocal microscopy data using multiresolution based maximum entropy regularization | |
JP7378407B2 (en) | Method for estimating parameters of objects estimated in digital images and methods for removing objects from digital images |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |