CN112837499A - Early warning reporting method, device, equipment and readable storage medium - Google Patents
Early warning reporting method, device, equipment and readable storage medium Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112837499A CN112837499A CN202110062805.9A CN202110062805A CN112837499A CN 112837499 A CN112837499 A CN 112837499A CN 202110062805 A CN202110062805 A CN 202110062805A CN 112837499 A CN112837499 A CN 112837499A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- effective
- warnings
- early
- early warning
- reporting
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B19/00—Alarms responsive to two or more different undesired or abnormal conditions, e.g. burglary and fire, abnormal temperature and abnormal rate of flow
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G1/00—Traffic control systems for road vehicles
- G08G1/16—Anti-collision systems
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W4/00—Services specially adapted for wireless communication networks; Facilities therefor
- H04W4/30—Services specially adapted for particular environments, situations or purposes
- H04W4/40—Services specially adapted for particular environments, situations or purposes for vehicles, e.g. vehicle-to-pedestrians [V2P]
Abstract
The invention provides an early warning reporting method, an early warning reporting device, early warning reporting equipment and a readable storage medium. The method comprises the following steps: when at least two effective early warnings exist in the same time period, detecting whether N effective early warnings which can be combined exist in the at least two effective early warnings, wherein N is a positive integer greater than or equal to 2; and if N effective early warnings which can be combined exist, combining and reporting the N effective early warnings which can be combined. According to the invention, when a plurality of effective early warnings exist in the same time period, the combined effective early warnings are combined and reported, the occurrence of disordered or omitted reporting of the early warning information is avoided, the user is ensured to only receive reasonable and effective early warning information, the interference to the normal driving of the user is reduced, and the user experience is improved.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of vehicle networking, in particular to an early warning reporting method, device, equipment and a readable storage medium.
Background
As more and more vehicles with the V2X communication function are provided, more and more information interaction between vehicles and between Road Side Units (RSUs) is provided; the early warning information of the V2X is also more and more frequent, the existing processing scheme for the early warning information is based on event triggering, and the report of the early warning information of the V2X is not analyzed and judged in detail and is directly presented to the user. Under the condition that multiple kinds of early warning are triggered simultaneously, the problems of disordered reporting and omission of early warning information exist, and normal driving of a user is easily interfered.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention mainly aims to provide an early warning reporting method, an early warning reporting device, early warning reporting equipment and a readable storage medium, and aims to solve the technical problem that reporting of early warning information is disordered and omitted under the condition that multiple kinds of early warnings are simultaneously triggered in the prior art.
In a first aspect, the present invention provides an early warning reporting method, where the early warning reporting method includes:
when at least two effective early warnings exist in the same time period, detecting whether N effective early warnings which can be combined exist in the at least two effective early warnings, wherein N is a positive integer greater than or equal to 2;
and if N effective early warnings which can be combined exist, combining and reporting the N effective early warnings which can be combined.
Optionally, before the step when there are at least two valid warnings in the same time period, the method further includes:
and when the early warning is triggered, carrying out validity judgment on the early warning.
Optionally, the step of determining the effectiveness of the early warning includes:
determining confidence evaluation duration according to the early warning emergency level;
detecting whether the triggering times of the early warning in the confidence evaluation duration are larger than a preset threshold value or not;
and if so, determining the early warning as an effective early warning.
Optionally, after the step of detecting whether there are N valid warnings that can be combined in the at least two valid warnings, the method further includes:
if N effective early warnings which can be combined do not exist, two target effective early warnings are selected from the at least two effective early warnings based on the priority and/or the emergency level of each effective early warning;
determining one effective early warning with high priority and the other effective early warning with low priority from the two target effective early warnings;
and preferentially reporting the effective early warning, and delaying the reporting of the other effective early warning under the condition that the other effective early warning supports delayed reporting.
Optionally, the step of selecting two effective target warnings from the at least two effective warnings based on the priority and/or the emergency level of each effective warning includes:
arranging the effective early warnings according to the sequence of the priority from high to low, and selecting two effective early warnings arranged at a first position and a second position as two target effective early warnings;
or, arranging the effective early warnings according to the sequence of the emergency level from high to low, and selecting two effective early warnings arranged at the first position and the second position as two target effective early warnings;
or, performing weighted calculation on a first numerical value corresponding to the priority of each effective early warning and a second numerical value corresponding to the emergency level to obtain a weighted average value of each effective early warning, and selecting two effective early warnings with the largest weighted average value and the second largest weighted average value as two target effective early warnings.
Optionally, after the step of selecting two effective targets for early warning, the method further includes:
if the priorities of the two effective target early warnings are the same, determining one effective early warning with a high emergency level and the other effective early warning with a low emergency level from the two effective target early warnings;
and preferentially reporting the effective early warning, and delaying the reporting of the other effective early warning under the condition that the other effective early warning supports delayed reporting.
Optionally, after the step of selecting two effective targets for early warning, the method further includes:
if the priorities and the emergency levels of the two effective target early warnings are the same, and the two effective target early warnings comprise one effective target early warning supporting delayed reporting and the other effective target early warning not supporting delayed reporting, the other effective early warning is reported preferentially, and the effective early warning is reported in a delayed manner;
if the priorities and the emergency levels of the two effective target early warnings are the same, and the two effective target early warnings do not support delayed reporting, reporting the effective early warning of one target arranged in the front of an early warning priority list in the two effective target early warnings, not reporting the effective early warning of the other target arranged in the rear of the two effective target early warnings, and recording the reason why the two effective target early warnings are not reported;
if the priorities and the emergency levels of the two effective target early warnings are the same, and the two effective target early warnings support delayed reporting, one effective target early warning in the two effective target early warnings, which is arranged in the early warning delay list, is reported, and the other effective target early warning in the two effective target early warnings, which is arranged behind the early warning delay list, is delayed to report.
In a second aspect, the present invention further provides an early warning reporting apparatus, where the early warning reporting apparatus includes:
the detection module is used for detecting whether N effective early warnings which can be combined exist in the at least two effective early warnings when the at least two effective early warnings exist in the same time period, wherein N is a positive integer greater than or equal to 2;
and the merging reporting module is used for merging and reporting the N valid early warnings which can be merged if the N valid early warnings which can be merged exist.
In a third aspect, the present invention further provides an early warning reporting device, where the early warning reporting device includes a processor, a memory, and an early warning reporting program stored in the memory and executable by the processor, where the early warning reporting program is executed by the processor, and the steps of the early warning reporting method are implemented.
In a fourth aspect, the present invention further provides a readable storage medium, where an early warning reporting program is stored on the readable storage medium, and when the early warning reporting program is executed by a processor, the steps of the early warning reporting method are implemented.
In the invention, when at least two effective early warnings exist in the same time period, whether N effective early warnings which can be combined exist in the at least two effective early warnings is detected, wherein N is a positive integer which is more than or equal to 2; and if N effective early warnings which can be combined exist, combining and reporting the N effective early warnings which can be combined. According to the invention, when a plurality of effective early warnings exist in the same time period, the combined effective early warnings are combined and reported, the occurrence of disordered or omitted reporting of the early warning information is avoided, the user is ensured to only receive reasonable and effective early warning information, the interference to the normal driving of the user is reduced, and the user experience is improved.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of a hardware structure of an early warning reporting device according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 2 is a schematic flow chart of an embodiment of an early warning reporting method according to the present invention;
fig. 3 is a functional module diagram of an early warning reporting apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention.
The implementation, functional features and advantages of the objects of the present invention will be further explained with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Detailed Description
It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the invention and are not intended to limit the invention.
In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides an early warning reporting device.
Referring to fig. 1, fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of a hardware structure of an early warning reporting device according to an embodiment of the present invention. In this embodiment of the present invention, the warning reporting device may include a processor 1001 (e.g., a Central Processing Unit, CPU), a communication bus 1002, a user interface 1003, a network interface 1004, and a memory 1005. The communication bus 1002 is used for realizing connection communication among the components; the user interface 1003 may include a Display screen (Display), an input unit such as a Keyboard (Keyboard); the network interface 1004 may optionally include a standard wired interface, a WIreless interface (e.g., a WI-FI interface, WI-FI interface); the memory 1005 may be a Random Access Memory (RAM) or a non-volatile memory (non-volatile memory), such as a magnetic disk memory, and the memory 1005 may optionally be a storage device independent of the processor 1001. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the hardware configuration depicted in FIG. 1 is not intended to be limiting of the present invention, and may include more or less components than those shown, or some components in combination, or a different arrangement of components.
With continued reference to fig. 1, a memory 1005 of fig. 1, which is a computer storage medium, may include an operating system, a network communication module, a user interface module, and an early warning reporting program. The processor 1001 may call an early warning reporting program stored in the memory 1005, and execute the early warning reporting method provided by the embodiment of the present invention.
In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides an early warning reporting method.
Referring to fig. 2, fig. 2 is a flowchart illustrating an early warning reporting method according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in fig. 2, in an embodiment, the method for reporting an early warning includes:
step S10, when at least two effective early warnings exist in the same time period, detecting whether N effective early warnings which can be combined exist in the at least two effective early warnings, wherein N is a positive integer greater than or equal to 2;
in this embodiment, when there are at least two effective warnings in the same time period (for example, within 3 s), it is required to detect whether there are N effective warnings that can be combined in the at least two effective warnings, where N is a positive integer greater than or equal to 2. Specifically, whether N effective warnings that can be combined exist in at least two effective warnings is determined by querying a warning combination indicator table, for example, N is 2, and the warning combination indicator table is shown in table 1.
TABLE 1
It is easily understood that table 1 is only a schematic illustration of the early warning that can be incorporated, and can be adjusted as needed in practical applications.
Further, in an embodiment, before step S10, the method further includes:
and when the early warning is triggered, carrying out validity judgment on the early warning.
In this embodiment, whether to trigger the early warning is determined according to the sensor data and the related determination rule, which is the prior art and is not described herein again. When the early warning is triggered, the effectiveness of the early warning needs to be judged so as to avoid the situation of false alarm.
Further, in an embodiment, the step of determining the effectiveness of the warning includes:
determining confidence evaluation duration according to the early warning emergency level; detecting whether the triggering times of the early warning in the confidence evaluation duration are larger than a preset threshold value or not; and if so, determining the early warning as an effective early warning.
In this embodiment, when the early warning is triggered, the emergency level of the early warning is determined, specifically, the emergency level may be set to two types, which are high in emergency level and low in emergency level, for example, collision early warnings such as intersection collision early warning and forward collision early warning are classified as high in emergency level, and non-collision early warnings such as front congestion warning and speed limit early warning are classified as low in emergency level. Then, a confidence evaluation duration is determined according to the early warning emergency level. And then detecting whether the triggering times of the early warning in the confidence evaluation duration are greater than a preset threshold, wherein the preset threshold is set according to actual needs, for example, set to be 2. And if so, determining the early warning as an effective early warning. The confidence evaluation duration corresponding to the emergency level is preset, for example, the confidence evaluation duration corresponding to the emergency level is 0.5s, and the confidence evaluation duration corresponding to the emergency level is 3 s.
And step S20, if N combinable effective early warnings exist, combining and reporting the N combinable effective early warnings.
In this embodiment, if there are N effective early warnings that can be merged, the N effective early warnings that can be merged are merged and reported, so that the N effective early warnings are merged and displayed to the driver.
In this embodiment, when there are at least two effective warnings in the same time period, it is detected whether there are N effective warnings that can be combined in the at least two effective warnings, where N is a positive integer greater than or equal to 2; and if N effective early warnings which can be combined exist, combining and reporting the N effective early warnings which can be combined. Through the embodiment, when a plurality of effective early warnings exist in the same time period, the combined effective early warnings are combined and reported, the situation that the reporting of the early warning information is disordered or omitted is avoided, the situation that a user only receives reasonable and effective early warning information is guaranteed, the interference to normal driving of the user is reduced, and the user experience is improved.
Further, in an embodiment, after step S10, the method further includes:
step S30, if there are not N effective prewarning which can be combined, selecting two target effective prewarning from the at least two effective prewarning based on the priority and/or emergency level of each effective prewarning;
in this embodiment, if there are no N effective warnings that can be combined in the at least two effective warnings, two target effective warnings are selected from the at least two effective warnings with the priority and/or the emergency level as a selection condition. For example, two effective early warnings with the highest priority and the next highest priority are selected as two effective early warnings for the target, or two effective early warnings with the highest emergency level and the next highest emergency level are selected as two effective early warnings for the target.
Further, in an embodiment, the step of selecting two target effective warnings from the at least two effective warnings based on the priority and/or the urgency level of each effective warning includes:
step S301, arranging the effective early warnings according to the sequence of the priority from high to low, and selecting two effective early warnings arranged at a first position and a second position as two target effective early warnings;
in this embodiment, the order of the priority of each warning may be preset. As shown in table 2, table 2 is a table that ranks the priorities of the respective warnings from high to low.
| Serial number | Early warning |
| 1 | Forward collision warning |
| 2 | Intersection collision early warning |
| 3 | Left turn auxiliary early warning |
| 4 | Lane change warning |
| 5 | Reverse overtaking warning |
| 6 | Emergency braking warning |
| 7 | Early warning of vehicle out of control |
TABLE 2
It is easily understood that table 2 is only illustrative, and the priority order of the respective warnings can be adjusted according to actual needs. Taking table 2 as an example, if the current effective warning includes: and (3) crossroad collision early warning, left-turn auxiliary early warning and reverse overtaking early warning, according to the sequence shown in the table 2, the two selected effective target early warnings are crossroad collision early warning and left-turn auxiliary early warning.
Step S302, or arranging the effective early warnings according to the sequence of the emergency level from high to low, and selecting two effective early warnings arranged at the first position and the second position as two target effective early warnings;
in this embodiment, the order of the emergency levels of the respective warnings may be preset. Then, the current effective early warnings are arranged according to a set sequence, and two effective early warnings arranged at the first position and the second position are selected as two target effective early warnings.
Step S303, or performing weighted calculation on a first numerical value corresponding to the priority of each effective early warning and a second numerical value corresponding to the emergency level to obtain a weighted average value of each effective early warning, and selecting two effective early warnings with the largest weighted average value and the second largest weighted average value as two target effective early warnings.
In this embodiment, the following are preset: the numerical value corresponding to the high priority level is 1, the numerical value corresponding to the low priority level is 0.8, the numerical value corresponding to the low priority level is 0.5, the numerical value corresponding to the high emergency level is 1, the numerical value corresponding to the low emergency level is 0.5, the weight value corresponding to the high priority level is 0.6, and the weight value corresponding to the emergency level is 0.4. If the priority of a valid warning is high and the emergency level is high, the weighted average of the valid warnings is (1 × 0.6+1 × 0.4)/2 is 0.5. By analogy, a weighted average value of each effective early warning can be calculated, and then two effective early warnings with the largest weighted average value and the second largest weighted average value are selected as two effective target early warnings. It should be noted that, the priority and the weighted value corresponding to the emergency level are set according to the actual situation, and the numerical values corresponding to different priorities and different emergency levels are set according to the actual situation, which is not limited herein.
Step S40, determining one effective early warning with high priority and the other effective early warning with low priority from the two effective early warnings;
in this embodiment, after determining that two targets are effectively early-warned, priorities of the two targets are compared to determine one effective early warning with a high priority and the other effective early warning with a low priority.
Step S50, the effective warning is reported preferentially, and the other effective warning is reported in a delayed manner if the other effective warning supports delayed reporting.
In this embodiment, a valid early warning with a high priority is reported first, and the delayed reporting is performed when another valid early warning supports the delayed reporting. If the other effective early warning does not support delayed reporting, the other effective early warning does not report, and the reason for not reporting is recorded.
Further, in an embodiment, after step S30, the method further includes:
if the priorities of the two effective target early warnings are the same, determining one effective early warning with a high emergency level and the other effective early warning with a low emergency level from the two effective target early warnings; and preferentially reporting the effective early warning, and delaying the reporting of the other effective early warning under the condition that the other effective early warning supports delayed reporting.
In this embodiment, if the priorities of the two effective pre-warnings of the target are the same, the emergency levels of the two effective pre-warnings of the target are compared, and one effective pre-warning with a high emergency level and the other effective pre-warning with a low emergency level are determined. Then, a valid early warning with a high emergency level is reported preferentially, and the delayed report is reported under the condition that the other valid early warning supports the delayed report. If the other effective early warning does not support delayed reporting, the other effective early warning does not report, and the reason for not reporting is recorded.
Further, in an embodiment, after step S30, the method further includes:
if the priorities and the emergency levels of the two effective target early warnings are the same, and the two effective target early warnings comprise one effective target early warning supporting delayed reporting and the other effective target early warning not supporting delayed reporting, the other effective early warning is reported preferentially, and the effective early warning is reported in a delayed manner;
in this embodiment, if the priorities and the emergency levels of the two effective target warnings are the same, and one effective target warning supports delayed reporting and the other does not support delayed reporting, the effective target warning that does not support delayed reporting is preferentially reported, and the effective target warning that supports delayed reporting is reported when the delay time is up.
If the priorities and the emergency levels of the two effective target early warnings are the same, and the two effective target early warnings do not support delayed reporting, reporting the effective early warning of one target arranged in the front of an early warning priority list in the two effective target early warnings, not reporting the effective early warning of the other target arranged in the rear of the two effective target early warnings, and recording the reason why the two effective target early warnings are not reported;
in this embodiment, if the priorities and the emergency levels of the two effective target warnings are the same and neither of the two effective target warnings supports delayed reporting, a previous effective target warning is reported according to the sequence of the two effective target warnings in the warning priority list, and a next effective target warning is not reported, and the reason why the two effective target warnings are not reported is recorded. Even if the emergency levels of the two early warnings are the same, the two early warnings are not parallel in the early warning priority list, but have a front-back arrangement relation.
If the priorities and the emergency levels of the two effective target early warnings are the same, and the two effective target early warnings support delayed reporting, one effective target early warning in the two effective target early warnings, which is arranged in the early warning delay list, is reported, and the other effective target early warning in the two effective target early warnings, which is arranged behind the early warning delay list, is delayed to report.
In this embodiment, if the priorities and the emergency levels of the two effective target warnings are the same and the two effective target warnings support delayed reporting, a first effective target warning arranged in the front is reported preferentially according to the sequence of the two effective target warnings in the warning priority list, and another effective target warning arranged in the back is reported when the delay time is up.
In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present invention further provides an early warning reporting device.
Referring to fig. 3, fig. 3 is a functional module schematic diagram of an early warning reporting apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in fig. 3, in an embodiment, the early warning reporting apparatus includes:
the system comprises a detection module 10, a judgment module and a warning module, wherein the detection module is used for detecting whether N effective warnings which can be combined exist in at least two effective warnings in the same time period, and N is a positive integer greater than or equal to 2;
and a merging reporting module 20, configured to merge and report the N valid early warnings that can be merged if the N valid early warnings that can be merged exist.
Further, in an embodiment, the early warning reporting apparatus further includes an effectiveness determining module, configured to:
and when the early warning is triggered, carrying out validity judgment on the early warning.
Further, in an embodiment, the validity determination module is configured to:
determining confidence evaluation duration according to the early warning emergency level;
detecting whether the triggering times of the early warning in the confidence evaluation duration are larger than a preset threshold value or not;
and if so, determining the early warning as an effective early warning.
Further, in an embodiment, the early warning reporting apparatus further includes a non-merged reporting module, configured to:
if N effective early warnings which can be combined do not exist, two target effective early warnings are selected from the at least two effective early warnings based on the priority and/or the emergency level of each effective early warning;
determining one effective early warning with high priority and the other effective early warning with low priority from the two target effective early warnings;
and preferentially reporting the effective early warning, and delaying the reporting of the other effective early warning under the condition that the other effective early warning supports delayed reporting.
Further, in an embodiment, the non-merged reporting module is configured to:
arranging the effective early warnings according to the sequence of the priority from high to low, and selecting two effective early warnings arranged at a first position and a second position as two target effective early warnings;
or, arranging the effective early warnings according to the sequence of the emergency level from high to low, and selecting two effective early warnings arranged at the first position and the second position as two target effective early warnings;
or, performing weighted calculation on a first numerical value corresponding to the priority of each effective early warning and a second numerical value corresponding to the emergency level to obtain a weighted average value of each effective early warning, and selecting two effective early warnings with the largest weighted average value and the second largest weighted average value as two target effective early warnings.
Further, in an embodiment, the non-merged reporting module is configured to:
if the priorities of the two effective target early warnings are the same, determining one effective early warning with a high emergency level and the other effective early warning with a low emergency level from the two effective target early warnings;
and preferentially reporting the effective early warning, and delaying the reporting of the other effective early warning under the condition that the other effective early warning supports delayed reporting.
Further, in an embodiment, the non-merged reporting module is configured to:
if the priorities and the emergency levels of the two effective target early warnings are the same, and the two effective target early warnings comprise one effective target early warning supporting delayed reporting and the other effective target early warning not supporting delayed reporting, the other effective early warning is reported preferentially, and the effective early warning is reported in a delayed manner;
if the priorities and the emergency levels of the two effective target early warnings are the same, and the two effective target early warnings do not support delayed reporting, reporting the effective early warning of one target arranged in the front of an early warning priority list in the two effective target early warnings, not reporting the effective early warning of the other target arranged in the rear of the two effective target early warnings, and recording the reason why the two effective target early warnings are not reported;
if the priorities and the emergency levels of the two effective target early warnings are the same, and the two effective target early warnings support delayed reporting, one effective target early warning in the two effective target early warnings, which is arranged in the early warning delay list, is reported, and the other effective target early warning in the two effective target early warnings, which is arranged behind the early warning delay list, is delayed to report.
The function implementation of each module in the above-mentioned early warning reporting apparatus corresponds to each step in the above-mentioned early warning reporting method embodiment, and the function and implementation process thereof are not described in detail herein.
In a fourth aspect, the embodiment of the present invention further provides a readable storage medium.
The readable storage medium of the present invention stores an early warning reporting program, wherein when the early warning reporting program is executed by a processor, the steps of the early warning reporting method are implemented.
The method implemented when the early warning reporting program is executed may refer to each embodiment of the early warning reporting method of the present invention, and details are not described here.
It should be noted that, in this document, the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or system that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or system. Without further limitation, an element defined by the phrase "comprising an … …" does not exclude the presence of other like elements in a process, method, article, or system that comprises the element.
The above-mentioned serial numbers of the embodiments of the present invention are merely for description and do not represent the merits of the embodiments.
Through the above description of the embodiments, those skilled in the art will clearly understand that the method of the above embodiments can be implemented by software plus a necessary general hardware platform, and certainly can also be implemented by hardware, but in many cases, the former is a better implementation manner. Based on such understanding, the technical solution of the present invention may be embodied in the form of a software product, which is stored in a storage medium (e.g., ROM/RAM, magnetic disk, optical disk) as described above and includes instructions for causing a terminal device to execute the method according to the embodiments of the present invention.
The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, and not intended to limit the scope of the present invention, and all modifications of equivalent structures and equivalent processes, which are made by using the contents of the present specification and the accompanying drawings, or directly or indirectly applied to other related technical fields, are included in the scope of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. An early warning reporting method is characterized in that the early warning reporting method comprises the following steps:
when at least two effective early warnings exist in the same time period, detecting whether N effective early warnings which can be combined exist in the at least two effective early warnings, wherein N is a positive integer greater than or equal to 2;
and if N effective early warnings which can be combined exist, combining and reporting the N effective early warnings which can be combined.
2. The warning reporting method of claim 1, wherein before the step when there are at least two valid warnings in the same time period, further comprising:
and when the early warning is triggered, carrying out validity judgment on the early warning.
3. The warning reporting method of claim 2, wherein the step of determining the validity of the warning includes:
determining confidence evaluation duration according to the early warning emergency level;
detecting whether the triggering times of the early warning in the confidence evaluation duration are larger than a preset threshold value or not;
and if so, determining the early warning as an effective early warning.
4. The warning reporting method according to claim 3, wherein after the step of detecting whether there are N valid warnings that can be combined in the at least two valid warnings, the method further comprises:
if N effective early warnings which can be combined do not exist, two target effective early warnings are selected from the at least two effective early warnings based on the priority and/or the emergency level of each effective early warning;
determining one effective early warning with high priority and the other effective early warning with low priority from the two target effective early warnings;
and preferentially reporting the effective early warning, and delaying the reporting of the other effective early warning under the condition that the other effective early warning supports delayed reporting.
5. The warning reporting method of claim 4, wherein the step of selecting two effective warnings from the at least two effective warnings based on the priority and/or the urgency level of each effective warning comprises:
arranging the effective early warnings according to the sequence of the priority from high to low, and selecting two effective early warnings arranged at a first position and a second position as two target effective early warnings;
or, arranging the effective early warnings according to the sequence of the emergency level from high to low, and selecting two effective early warnings arranged at the first position and the second position as two target effective early warnings;
or, performing weighted calculation on a first numerical value corresponding to the priority of each effective early warning and a second numerical value corresponding to the emergency level to obtain a weighted average value of each effective early warning, and selecting two effective early warnings with the largest weighted average value and the second largest weighted average value as two target effective early warnings.
6. The warning reporting method of claim 4, wherein after the step of selecting two effective warnings, further comprising:
if the priorities of the two effective target early warnings are the same, determining one effective early warning with a high emergency level and the other effective early warning with a low emergency level from the two effective target early warnings;
and preferentially reporting the effective early warning, and delaying the reporting of the other effective early warning under the condition that the other effective early warning supports delayed reporting.
7. The warning reporting method of claim 6, wherein after the step of selecting two effective warnings, further comprising:
if the priorities and the emergency levels of the two effective target early warnings are the same, and the two effective target early warnings comprise one effective target early warning supporting delayed reporting and the other effective target early warning not supporting delayed reporting, the other effective early warning is reported preferentially, and the effective early warning is reported in a delayed manner;
if the priorities and the emergency levels of the two effective target early warnings are the same, and the two effective target early warnings do not support delayed reporting, reporting the effective early warning of one target arranged in the front of an early warning priority list in the two effective target early warnings, not reporting the effective early warning of the other target arranged in the rear of the two effective target early warnings, and recording the reason why the two effective target early warnings are not reported;
if the priorities and the emergency levels of the two effective target early warnings are the same, and the two effective target early warnings support delayed reporting, one effective target early warning in the two effective target early warnings, which is arranged in the early warning delay list, is reported, and the other effective target early warning in the two effective target early warnings, which is arranged behind the early warning delay list, is delayed to report.
8. An early warning reporting device, comprising:
the detection module is used for detecting whether N effective early warnings which can be combined exist in the at least two effective early warnings when the at least two effective early warnings exist in the same time period, wherein N is a positive integer greater than or equal to 2;
and the merging reporting module is used for merging and reporting the N valid early warnings which can be merged if the N valid early warnings which can be merged exist.
9. An early warning reporting device, comprising a processor, a memory, and an early warning reporting program stored in the memory and executable by the processor, wherein the early warning reporting program, when executed by the processor, implements the steps of the early warning reporting method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.
10. A readable storage medium, wherein an early warning reporting program is stored on the readable storage medium, and when the early warning reporting program is executed by a processor, the steps of the early warning reporting method according to any one of claims 1 to 7 are implemented.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110062805.9A CN112837499B (en) | 2021-01-18 | 2021-01-18 | Early warning reporting method, device, equipment and readable storage medium |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110062805.9A CN112837499B (en) | 2021-01-18 | 2021-01-18 | Early warning reporting method, device, equipment and readable storage medium |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN112837499A true CN112837499A (en) | 2021-05-25 |
| CN112837499B CN112837499B (en) | 2022-10-18 |
Family
ID=75928608
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110062805.9A Active CN112837499B (en) | 2021-01-18 | 2021-01-18 | Early warning reporting method, device, equipment and readable storage medium |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN112837499B (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113744565A (en) * | 2021-09-06 | 2021-12-03 | 北京百度网讯科技有限公司 | Collision early warning method and device, electronic equipment and automatic driving vehicle |
Citations (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6389332B1 (en) * | 1999-04-29 | 2002-05-14 | Daimlerchrysler Ag | Information system and process in a vehicle |
| JP2002367064A (en) * | 2001-06-11 | 2002-12-20 | Nec Eng Ltd | System for polling control in alarm monitoring |
| JP2004345495A (en) * | 2003-05-22 | 2004-12-09 | Toyota Motor Corp | Obstacle detection device for vehicle |
| JP2010179783A (en) * | 2009-02-05 | 2010-08-19 | Toyota Motor Corp | Vehicle information reporting device |
| US20110187488A1 (en) * | 2010-02-04 | 2011-08-04 | American Power Conversion Corporation | Alarm consolidation system and method |
| US20170064078A1 (en) * | 2015-09-01 | 2017-03-02 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Emergency Signal For M2M Devices |
| US20180182053A1 (en) * | 2016-12-27 | 2018-06-28 | Atos It Solutions And Services Iberia, S.L. | Security Process And Security Tower Controlling Coming Vehicles At Checkpoint |
| JP2018131202A (en) * | 2018-04-27 | 2018-08-23 | 株式会社デンソー | Halt-time vehicle control unit |
| CN109756867A (en) * | 2018-12-29 | 2019-05-14 | 广州中国科学院软件应用技术研究所 | A kind of bus or train route collaboration car-mounted terminal application system based on LTE-V |
| CN110533879A (en) * | 2019-09-04 | 2019-12-03 | 上海飞田通信股份有限公司 | Driver alert system |
| US10521682B1 (en) * | 2018-11-14 | 2019-12-31 | Hyundai Motor Company | Apparatus and method for controlling object detection |
| WO2020154599A1 (en) * | 2019-01-24 | 2020-07-30 | Mobileye Vision Technologies Ltd. | Clustering event information for vehicle navigation |
| CN112214974A (en) * | 2020-10-10 | 2021-01-12 | 卡斯柯信号有限公司 | Intelligent rail crossing oriented alarm information merging analysis processing method |
-
2021
- 2021-01-18 CN CN202110062805.9A patent/CN112837499B/en active Active
Patent Citations (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6389332B1 (en) * | 1999-04-29 | 2002-05-14 | Daimlerchrysler Ag | Information system and process in a vehicle |
| JP2002367064A (en) * | 2001-06-11 | 2002-12-20 | Nec Eng Ltd | System for polling control in alarm monitoring |
| JP2004345495A (en) * | 2003-05-22 | 2004-12-09 | Toyota Motor Corp | Obstacle detection device for vehicle |
| JP2010179783A (en) * | 2009-02-05 | 2010-08-19 | Toyota Motor Corp | Vehicle information reporting device |
| US20110187488A1 (en) * | 2010-02-04 | 2011-08-04 | American Power Conversion Corporation | Alarm consolidation system and method |
| US20170064078A1 (en) * | 2015-09-01 | 2017-03-02 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Emergency Signal For M2M Devices |
| US20180182053A1 (en) * | 2016-12-27 | 2018-06-28 | Atos It Solutions And Services Iberia, S.L. | Security Process And Security Tower Controlling Coming Vehicles At Checkpoint |
| JP2018131202A (en) * | 2018-04-27 | 2018-08-23 | 株式会社デンソー | Halt-time vehicle control unit |
| US10521682B1 (en) * | 2018-11-14 | 2019-12-31 | Hyundai Motor Company | Apparatus and method for controlling object detection |
| CN109756867A (en) * | 2018-12-29 | 2019-05-14 | 广州中国科学院软件应用技术研究所 | A kind of bus or train route collaboration car-mounted terminal application system based on LTE-V |
| WO2020154599A1 (en) * | 2019-01-24 | 2020-07-30 | Mobileye Vision Technologies Ltd. | Clustering event information for vehicle navigation |
| CN110533879A (en) * | 2019-09-04 | 2019-12-03 | 上海飞田通信股份有限公司 | Driver alert system |
| CN112214974A (en) * | 2020-10-10 | 2021-01-12 | 卡斯柯信号有限公司 | Intelligent rail crossing oriented alarm information merging analysis processing method |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113744565A (en) * | 2021-09-06 | 2021-12-03 | 北京百度网讯科技有限公司 | Collision early warning method and device, electronic equipment and automatic driving vehicle |
| CN113744565B (en) * | 2021-09-06 | 2023-03-10 | 北京百度网讯科技有限公司 | Collision early warning method and device, electronic equipment and automatic driving vehicle |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN112837499B (en) | 2022-10-18 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP4814928B2 (en) | Vehicle collision avoidance device | |
| US20160167579A1 (en) | Apparatus and method for avoiding collision | |
| JP6686868B2 (en) | Vehicle driver status determination device | |
| CN111191697B (en) | ADAS road test verification optimization method and device based on sensor fusion | |
| US10354456B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for determining toll gate section | |
| US7479892B2 (en) | Detection of unintended lane departures | |
| JP5633802B2 (en) | Driving assistance device | |
| CN112837499B (en) | Early warning reporting method, device, equipment and readable storage medium | |
| CN111645674B (en) | Vehicle control device | |
| CN110807951A (en) | Vehicle collision avoidance method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN112829676B (en) | Alarm display method and device based on transparent A column | |
| CN109747644A (en) | Vehicle tracking anti-collision early warning method, device, controller, system and vehicle | |
| JP5831351B2 (en) | Driving assistance device | |
| CN111038518B (en) | Driving control method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| JP2014085711A (en) | Braking control device, braking control method, program and medium | |
| CN111824171A (en) | Apparatus and method for providing user interface for queue driving in vehicle | |
| CN113436464B (en) | Vehicle danger early warning method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| EP3822931B1 (en) | A vehicle alert system for notifying a potentially dangerous driving situation to a driver | |
| CN110316189B (en) | Active safety control method and related device | |
| CN113500993A (en) | Anti-collision function parameter calibration method, vehicle and readable storage medium | |
| Geisler et al. | A study of crash rates for vehicles with advanced crash avoidance features | |
| CN114023092B (en) | Vehicle collision event determination method, system, device and readable storage medium | |
| EP4181101A1 (en) | Method, apparatus, storage medium, and vehicle for predicting traffic flow | |
| US20230408631A1 (en) | Radar interference mitigation | |
| JP7294194B2 (en) | Safe driving judgment device |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |