CN112836975A - Bid evaluation method, device, terminal device and computer readable storage medium - Google Patents

Bid evaluation method, device, terminal device and computer readable storage medium Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN112836975A
CN112836975A CN202110167405.4A CN202110167405A CN112836975A CN 112836975 A CN112836975 A CN 112836975A CN 202110167405 A CN202110167405 A CN 202110167405A CN 112836975 A CN112836975 A CN 112836975A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
score
information
bid
preset
price
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202110167405.4A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
张思秀
王欣
栾风翔
吴润乐
拜佩
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shandong Yingge Information Consulting Co ltd
Original Assignee
Shandong Yingge Information Consulting Co ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shandong Yingge Information Consulting Co ltd filed Critical Shandong Yingge Information Consulting Co ltd
Priority to CN202110167405.4A priority Critical patent/CN112836975A/en
Publication of CN112836975A publication Critical patent/CN112836975A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00—Commerce
    • G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601—Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
    • G06Q30/0611—Request for offers or quotes
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00—Commerce
    • G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/08—Auctions
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/08—Construction

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a bid evaluation method, which is applied to terminal equipment and comprises the following steps: acquiring construction group design information, project management organization information and effective bid quotations from effective bid files of effective bidders bidding on target projects; evaluating the construction group design information by using a first scoring standard to obtain a design score; evaluating the project management institution information by using a second scoring standard to obtain an institution score; evaluating the effective bid offer using a third scoring criterion to obtain an offer score; obtaining an assessment result based on the design score, the organization score, and the offer score; and determining a successful bidder among the effective bidders based on the evaluation result. The invention also discloses a bid evaluation device, terminal equipment and a computer readable storage medium. By utilizing the evaluation method, the technical effect of improving the accuracy of the evaluation result of the bidder is achieved.

Description

Bid evaluation method, device, terminal device and computer readable storage medium
Technical Field
The present invention relates to the field of building technologies, and in particular, to a bid evaluation method, apparatus, terminal device, and computer-readable storage medium.
Background
Bidding is a comprehensive economic responsibility form for promoting competition in the field of infrastructure. Generally, a plurality of construction units participate in engineering bidding, bidding units (construction units) choose the best choice, one construction unit with short construction period, low construction cost, high quality, good credit and the like is selected, and the construction units organize the construction.
In general, when bidding for a project, a construction unit needs to estimate a bid price of the construction unit in bidding to obtain an estimation result of the construction unit, and determine one construction unit among a plurality of construction units based on the estimation result, and perform organization construction of the project by the construction unit.
However, when the existing evaluation method is used to obtain the evaluation result, the accuracy of the evaluation result is low.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention mainly aims to provide a bid evaluation method, a bid evaluation device, a terminal device and a computer readable storage medium, and aims to solve the technical problem that when an evaluation result is obtained by using the existing evaluation method in the prior art, the accuracy of the evaluation result is low.
In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides a bid evaluation method applied to a terminal device, the method including the steps of:
acquiring construction group design information, project management organization information and effective bid quotations from effective bid files of effective bidders bidding on target projects;
evaluating the construction group design information by using a first scoring standard to obtain a design score;
evaluating the project management institution information by using a second scoring standard to obtain an institution score;
evaluating the effective bid offer using a third scoring criterion to obtain an offer score;
obtaining an assessment result based on the design score, the organization score, and the offer score;
and determining a successful bidder among the effective bidders based on the evaluation result.
Optionally, before the step of acquiring the construction group design information, the project management authority information, and the effective bid quotation from the effective bid document of the effective bidder bidding on the target project, the method further includes:
acquiring form information, qualification information, and responsiveness information in a bid file of a bidder bidding on the target item;
screening primary bidders with form information meeting first preset conditions from the bidders;
screening reselected bidders with qualification information meeting second preset conditions from the initial bidders;
and screening the effective bidders with responsiveness information meeting a third preset condition from the reselecting bidders.
Optionally, the step of screening the effective bidders having responsiveness information satisfying a third preset condition among the reselecting bidders includes:
screening bidders with responsiveness information meeting third preset condition results from the reselecting bidders;
determining a selected offer among the resulting bid offers of the resulting bidders using a preset bid control price;
obtaining an arithmetic average offer based on the selected offer;
obtaining a composite base price based on the arithmetic average quote;
obtaining a minimum limit price based on the composite standard base price and a preset proportional coefficient;
determining the valid bidders having an resulting bid offer not less than the minimum qualified price among the resulting bidders.
Optionally, the step of evaluating the construction group design information by using the first scoring criterion to obtain a design score includes:
obtaining evaluation information of each item in the construction group design information;
obtaining evaluation scores respectively corresponding to the evaluation information of each item in a first preset evaluation rule table;
obtaining the design score based on the evaluation score.
Optionally, the step of evaluating the project management authority information by using the second scoring criterion to obtain an authority score includes:
acquiring a first sub-organization score corresponding to the constructor job eligibility information in the project management organization information in a second preset score rule table;
acquiring a second sub-organization score corresponding to the qualification information of the technical responsible person in the project management organization information from the second preset scoring rule table;
acquiring a third sub-mechanism score corresponding to the construction times of the bidder in the project management mechanism information within a preset time from the second preset scoring rule table;
acquiring a fourth sub-organization score corresponding to a matching result in the second preset scoring rule table, wherein the matching result is a matching result of additional person description information and preset additional person description information in the project management organization information;
obtaining the institution score based on the first sub-institution score, the second sub-institution score, the third sub-institution score, and the fourth sub-institution score.
Optionally, the step of evaluating the effective bid price by using a third scoring criterion to obtain a price score includes:
when the effective bidding quotation is higher than the composite base price, obtaining a grading step score based on a preset price base score, a preset price total score and the preset proportion coefficient; obtaining the offer score based on the preset price base score, the grading step score, the effective bid offer and the composite bid base price; or the like, or, alternatively,
when the effective bidding quotation is lower than the composite base price, obtaining a deduction step score based on the preset price base score, the preset price total score and the preset proportion coefficient; obtaining the offer score based on the preset price base score, the preset total price score, the deduction step score, the effective bidding offer and the composite bid price; or the like, or, alternatively,
and when the effective bidding quotation is equal to the composite base bid price, determining the preset price base score as the quotation score.
Optionally, before the step of obtaining an evaluation result based on the design score, the organization score, and the offer score, the method further includes:
acquiring the design weight of the design score, the organization weight of the organization score and the quotation weight of the quotation score;
the step of obtaining an assessment result based on the design score, the organization score, and the offer score includes:
obtaining an evaluation result based on the design score, the organization score, the offer score, the design weight, the organization weight, and the offer weight.
In addition, in order to achieve the above object, the present invention further provides a bid evaluation apparatus applied to a terminal device, the apparatus including:
the system comprises an acquisition module, a display module and a display module, wherein the acquisition module is used for acquiring construction group design information, project management organization information and effective bid quotations in effective bid files of effective bidders bidding on target projects;
the first scoring module is used for evaluating the construction group design information by using a first scoring standard so as to obtain a design score;
the second scoring module is used for evaluating the project management organization information by using a second scoring standard so as to obtain an organization score;
a third scoring module for evaluating the effective bid price using a third scoring criterion to obtain a price score;
an obtaining module for obtaining an evaluation result based on the design score, the organization score, and the offer score;
and the determining module is used for determining the successful bidders from the effective bidders based on the evaluation result.
In addition, to achieve the above object, the present invention further provides a terminal device, including: a memory, a processor, and a bid evaluation program stored on the memory and run on the processor, the bid evaluation program when executed by the processor implementing the steps of the bid evaluation method of any of the above.
In addition, to achieve the above object, the present invention further provides a computer readable storage medium having a bid evaluation program stored thereon, which when executed by a processor implements the steps of the bid evaluation method according to any one of the above items.
The technical scheme of the invention provides a bid evaluation method, which is applied to terminal equipment and is used for acquiring construction group design information, project management organization information and effective bid quotation in an effective bid file of an effective bidder who bids a target project; evaluating the construction group design information by using a first scoring standard to obtain a design score; evaluating the project management institution information by using a second scoring standard to obtain an institution score; evaluating the effective bid offer using a third scoring criterion to obtain an offer score; obtaining an assessment result based on the design score, the organization score, and the offer score; and determining a successful bidder among the effective bidders based on the evaluation result.
In the existing evaluation method, when a bidder is evaluated, only the bid price of an effective bidder is evaluated, so that the accuracy of an obtained evaluation result is low, and the obtained bidder is not the optimal bidder; the construction group design information, the project management organization information and the effective bid quotation of the effective bidders are evaluated respectively to obtain corresponding scores, evaluation results are obtained based on the scores of the three dimensions, and the accuracy of the evaluation results is high, so that the obtained bidders are the optimal bidders. Therefore, the evaluation method of the invention achieves the technical effect of improving the accuracy of the evaluation result of the bidder.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly described below, it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and for those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained according to the structures shown in the drawings without creative efforts.
Fig. 1 is a schematic structural diagram of a terminal device in a hardware operating environment according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic flow chart diagram illustrating a first embodiment of a bid evaluation method of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing the construction of a first embodiment of the bid evaluation device of the present invention.
The implementation, functional features and advantages of the objects of the present invention will be further explained with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
Referring to fig. 1, fig. 1 is a schematic structural diagram of a terminal device in a hardware operating environment according to an embodiment of the present invention.
The terminal device may be a User Equipment (UE) such as a Mobile phone, a smart phone, a laptop, a digital broadcast receiver, a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), a tablet computer (PAD), a handheld device, a vehicle mounted device, a wearable device, a computing device or other processing device connected to a wireless modem, a Mobile Station (MS), etc. The terminal device may be referred to as a user terminal, a portable terminal, a desktop terminal, etc.
In general, a terminal device includes: at least one processor 301, a memory 302, and a bid evaluation program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, the bid evaluation program configured to implement the steps of the bid evaluation method as previously described.
The processor 301 may include one or more processing cores, such as a 4-core processor, an 8-core processor, and so on. The processor 301 may be implemented in at least one hardware form of a DSP (Digital Signal Processing), an FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array), and a PLA (Programmable Logic Array). The processor 301 may also include a main processor and a coprocessor, where the main processor is a processor for processing data in an awake state, and is also called a Central Processing Unit (CPU); a coprocessor is a low power processor for processing data in a standby state. In some embodiments, the processor 301 may be integrated with a GPU (Graphics Processing Unit), which is responsible for rendering and drawing the content required to be displayed on the display screen. Processor 301 may also include an AI (Artificial Intelligence) processor for processing pertinent bid evaluation method operations such that the bid evaluation method model may be trained autonomously for learning, improving efficiency and accuracy.
Memory 302 may include one or more computer-readable storage media, which may be non-transitory. Memory 302 may also include high speed random access memory, as well as non-volatile memory, such as one or more magnetic disk storage devices, flash memory storage devices. In some embodiments, a non-transitory computer readable storage medium in memory 302 is used to store at least one instruction for execution by processor 301 to implement the bid evaluation methods provided by method embodiments herein.
In some embodiments, the terminal may further include: a communication interface 303 and at least one peripheral device. The processor 301, the memory 302 and the communication interface 303 may be connected by a bus or signal lines. Various peripheral devices may be connected to communication interface 303 via a bus, signal line, or circuit board. Specifically, the peripheral device includes: at least one of radio frequency circuitry 304, a display screen 305, and a power source 306.
The communication interface 303 may be used to connect at least one peripheral device related to I/O (Input/Output) to the processor 301 and the memory 302. In some embodiments, processor 301, memory 302, and communication interface 303 are integrated on the same chip or circuit board; in some other embodiments, any one or two of the processor 301, the memory 302 and the communication interface 303 may be implemented on a single chip or circuit board, which is not limited in this embodiment.
The Radio Frequency circuit 304 is used for receiving and transmitting RF (Radio Frequency) signals, also called electromagnetic signals. The radio frequency circuitry 304 communicates with communication networks and other communication devices via electromagnetic signals. The rf circuit 304 converts an electrical signal into an electromagnetic signal to transmit, or converts a received electromagnetic signal into an electrical signal. Optionally, the radio frequency circuit 304 comprises: an antenna system, an RF transceiver, one or more amplifiers, a tuner, an oscillator, a digital signal processor, a codec chipset, a subscriber identity module card, and so forth. The radio frequency circuitry 304 may communicate with other terminals via at least one wireless communication protocol. The wireless communication protocols include, but are not limited to: metropolitan area networks, various generation mobile communication networks (2G, 3G, 4G, and 5G), Wireless local area networks, and/or WiFi (Wireless Fidelity) networks. In some embodiments, the rf circuit 304 may further include NFC (Near Field Communication) related circuits, which are not limited in this application.
The display screen 305 is used to display a UI (User Interface). The UI may include graphics, text, icons, video, and any combination thereof. When the display screen 305 is a touch display screen, the display screen 305 also has the ability to capture touch signals on or over the surface of the display screen 305. The touch signal may be input to the processor 301 as a control signal for processing. At this point, the display screen 305 may also be used to provide virtual buttons and/or a virtual keyboard, also referred to as soft buttons and/or a soft keyboard. In some embodiments, the display screen 305 may be one, the front panel of the electronic device; in other embodiments, the display screens 305 may be at least two, respectively disposed on different surfaces of the electronic device or in a folded design; in still other embodiments, the display screen 305 may be a flexible display screen disposed on a curved surface or a folded surface of the electronic device. Even further, the display screen 305 may be arranged in a non-rectangular irregular figure, i.e. a shaped screen. The Display screen 305 may be made of LCD (liquid crystal Display), OLED (Organic Light-Emitting Diode), and the like.
The power supply 306 is used to power various components in the electronic device. The power source 306 may be alternating current, direct current, disposable or rechargeable. When the power source 306 includes a rechargeable battery, the rechargeable battery may support wired or wireless charging. The rechargeable battery may also be used to support fast charge technology. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the configuration shown in fig. 1 does not constitute a limitation of the terminal device and may include more or fewer components than those shown, or some components may be combined, or a different arrangement of components.
Furthermore, an embodiment of the present invention further provides a computer-readable storage medium, on which a bid evaluation program is stored, which when executed by a processor implements the steps of the bid evaluation method as described above. Therefore, a detailed description thereof will be omitted. In addition, the beneficial effects of the same method are not described in detail. For technical details not disclosed in embodiments of the computer-readable storage medium referred to in the present application, reference is made to the description of embodiments of the method of the present application. It is determined that the program instructions may be deployed to be executed on one terminal device, or on multiple terminal devices located at one site, or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network, as examples.
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that all or part of the processes of the methods of the embodiments described above can be implemented by a computer program, which can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, and when executed, can include the processes of the embodiments of the methods described above. The computer-readable storage medium may be a magnetic disk, an optical disk, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a Random Access Memory (RAM), or the like.
Based on the hardware structure, the embodiment of the bid evaluation method of the invention is provided.
Referring to fig. 2, fig. 2 is a schematic flow chart of a first embodiment of the bid evaluation method of the present invention, the method is applied to a terminal device, and the method comprises the following steps:
step S11: construction group design information, project management agency information, and effective bid quotations are acquired in effective bid files of effective bidders bidding on target projects.
The main execution body of the present invention is a terminal device, the terminal device is installed with a bid evaluation program, and the terminal device implements the bid evaluation method of the present invention when executing the bid evaluation program. The target project is generally the project to be constructed, and the specific project type is not limiting. Bidders may be any entity that can bid; various information of a bidding unit (bidder) can be submitted in a bidding document mode, and the terminal equipment acquires construction group design information, project management organization information and effective bidding quotation from the effective bidding document of the effective bidder, wherein the effective bidding document is the effective bidding document.
Specifically, the construction group design information, the project management organization information, and the effective bid price may be acquired from the effective bid document by a character recognition technique or the like. The construction group design information may include at least 10 items, such as content integrity and compilation level, construction schemes and technical measures, quality management systems and measures, safety management systems and measures, environmental protection management systems and measures, project schedule and measures, resource allocation plans, construction machinery equipment investment, approach plans and assurance measures, construction floor layout, and post-construction repair measures.
The project authority information may include constructor job eligibility information, technical leader eligibility information, enterprise construction performance (number of constructions within a preset time), additional person description information, and the like, wherein the preset time may be the last three years.
Further, before step S11, it is necessary to screen its bidders (bidders not performing any screening) for valid bidders using the following method: acquiring form information, qualification information, and responsiveness information in a bid file of a bidder bidding on the target item; screening primary bidders with form information meeting first preset conditions from the bidders; screening reselected bidders with qualification information meeting second preset conditions from the initial bidders; and screening the effective bidders with responsiveness information meeting a third preset condition from the reselecting bidders.
The form information comprises a bidder (bidder and bidding unit) name, bidding letter signature and seal information, a bidding document format, whether the quotation is unique or not, whether the united body bidding is accepted or not and the like, wherein when the bidder name is consistent with a business license, a qualification certificate and a safe production license, the bidding letter signature and seal information is signed and sealed by a legal representative or a proxy agent thereof, the bidding document format is a preset bidding document format (a document format set by a user according to the requirement), the quotation is unique, and when the united body bidding is accepted, the form information meets a first preset condition; it can be understood that each item of information in the required form information satisfies the requirement, and the form information side may satisfy the first preset condition.
The qualification information comprises whether a business license is provided, whether a safety production license is provided, qualification grade, financial condition, performance of similar projects of the enterprise, honor of the enterprise, project manager information, technical responsible person information, assistant person information, whether the enterprise purchases insurance for the staff and the like; when the enterprise has a business license, has a safety production license, has the qualification grade of independent legal qualification which is established by legal registration in the national community and the state of China, has three levels of communication engineering construction general contract and the qualification above which is issued by the construction administration department, has no loss (no loss audit report is provided, namely no loss in the preset time, no loss audit report is provided, namely no loss occurs in the preset time) in the preset time (the above description is referred to, usually three years), has similar project performance of completing a fixed number (for example, 3) in the preset time and the joint price of the communication engineering reaches a fixed amount (for example, 1000 ten thousand yuan) and the similar project performance of the enterprise (the clear text performance standard is satisfied when the contract or the notice of the project is provided), has good social activity, no fake bidding activity and the like and is not related to the specified conditions of the enterprise (the conditions of executing the market prohibition and the like are satisfied (the conditions are based on the market prohibition) The Law of Law [2016]285 states that, with reference to the national credit information sharing platform and the 'Chinese credit' website or the inquiry information of each level of credit information sharing platform, project manager information is about the second level (including the second level) of communication engineering profession and the job-practicing qualification of registered constructors above, has an effective safe production assessment qualification certificate (the construction B certificate) and is not used for other construction projects, technical responsible person information is about the second level and above of communication engineering profession, auxiliary person information is about auxiliary persons (constructors, quality inspectors, security personnel, material staffs and the like) all have corresponding position certificates, and when an enterprise buys insurance for the employees, the qualification information meets the second preset condition; it is understood that each item of information in the required qualification information satisfies the requirement, and the qualification information side may satisfy the second preset condition.
The responsiveness information includes whether the bid content meets the content of a bid range (target item) required by the bid document, whether a construction period (construction period of the target item) meets the construction period required by the bid document, whether the project quality meets the requirement of the bid, whether a bid validity period meets the requirement of the bid, whether a bid guarantee meets the requirement of the bid, whether a right obligation meets contract terms, whether a priced project amount list is matched with the project list content, whether technical standards and requirements meet preset technical standards and requirements, whether a bid price exceeds a maximum control price, and the like; when the bidding content meets the content of the bidding range required by the bidding document, the construction period meets the construction period required by the bidding document, the engineering quality meets the requirement of bidding, the bidding validity period meets the requirement of bidding, the bidding security gold meets the requirement of bidding, the rights and meanings meet the contract terms, the priced engineering quantity list is matched with the content of the preset engineering list (related to subdirectory codes, subdirectory names, subdirectory characteristics, metering units and engineering quantities), whether the technical standard and the requirement meet the preset technical standard and the requirement or not and the bidding price does not exceed the highest control price, and the responsiveness information meets a third preset condition; it can be understood that each item of information in the responsiveness information is required to meet the requirement, and the responsiveness information party can meet the third preset condition.
It is understood that the valid bid document of the valid bidder is required to perform steps S11-S16, and if the bidder is a non-valid bidder, the bid document of the bidder is rejected.
Further, the step of screening the reselected bidders for the valid bidders whose responsiveness information satisfies a third preset condition includes: screening bidders with responsiveness information meeting third preset condition results from the reselecting bidders; determining a selected offer among the resulting bid offers of the resulting bidders using a preset bid control price; obtaining an arithmetic average offer based on the selected offer; obtaining a composite base price based on the arithmetic average quote; obtaining a minimum limit price based on the composite standard base price and a preset proportional coefficient; determining the valid bidders having an resulting bid offer not less than the minimum qualified price among the resulting bidders.
It will be appreciated that the composite bid base price is represented by C, and that the pre-set bid control price (usually the highest bid price, the user root)Based on demand and actual engineering settings) is represented by a, resulting bid offer BkIn satisfy Bk∈[0.9A，A]The resulting bid offer of (a) is referred to as "selected offer is Bi". In the presence of at least one BiThe arithmetic mean of the selected bids is said arithmetic mean bid B,
Figure BDA0002941385750000101
in the absence of BiWhen the arithmetic mean quote is B ═ 0.9A. At this time, a composite base price C ═ a × p + B × (1-p) can be calculated; wherein, the optional value of p is 0.4, 0.5 or 0.6, etc., and the construction unit (bidder) randomly draws and decides on site under the supervision of the supervisor.
When the result bid price is less than the minimum limit price (the minimum limit price is C · t, t is usually 94%), the corresponding result bidder cannot participate in the bid, that is, the corresponding result bidder has been screened out, the bid document of the screened out result bidder is rejected, and only the remaining result bidders (i.e., valid bidders) can participate in the bid.
Step S12: evaluating the construction set design information using a first scoring criterion to obtain a design score.
Specifically, step S12 includes: obtaining evaluation information of each item in the construction group design information;
obtaining evaluation scores respectively corresponding to the evaluation information of each item in a first preset evaluation rule table; obtaining the design score based on the evaluation score.
The construction group design information evaluation information may include content integrity and compilation level, construction scheme and technical measures, quality management systems and measures, safety management systems and measures, environmental protection management systems and measures, engineering progress plans and measures, resource allocation plans, construction machinery equipment investment, approach plans and warranty measures, construction plane layout, and evaluation information corresponding to at least 10 items such as a repair measure after completion of an engineering, one evaluation information corresponding to different scores in a first preset scoring rule table, the corresponding evaluation score of the item being obtained based on the specific evaluation information of the item, the sum of the evaluation scores of the items being the design score.
In specific application, the total score of the construction group design information and each item included in the construction group design information are determined, and the sub-total scores corresponding to each item included in the construction group design information are determined according to the weight of each item included in the construction group design information (the weight of each item is determined by a user according to requirements and actual conditions); and determining scores corresponding to different preset evaluation information respectively based on the sub-total scores corresponding to the items included in the construction group design information and the different preset evaluation information of the items included in the construction group design information, and obtaining the first preset scoring rule table based on the scores corresponding to the different preset evaluation information and the different preset evaluation information corresponding to the items included in the construction group design information.
For example, the total construction group design information is divided into 30 points, and the method is adopted to obtain a first preset scoring rule table; in the first preset scoring rule table, the sub-total score of the content integrity and the compilation level is 7, and the included preset evaluation information and score are as follows: generally-2 points, medium-5 points and complete-7 points; the sub-total score of the construction scheme and the technical measures is 7, and the included preset evaluation information and score are as follows: generally-2 minutes, medium-5 minutes and preferably-7 minutes; the sub-total score of the quality management system and measures is 3, and the included preset evaluation information and score are as follows: generally-1 point, medium-2 points and preferably-3 points; the sub-total score of the safety management system and measures is 2, and the included preset evaluation information and score are as follows: generally-1 point and preferably-2 points; the sub-total score of the environmental protection management system and measures is 2, and the included preset evaluation information and score are as follows: generally-1 point and preferably-2 points; the sub-total score of the project schedule plan and measures is 2, and the included preset evaluation information and score are as follows: generally-1 point and preferably-2 points; the sub-total of the resource allocation plan is divided into 2 points, and the preset evaluation information and the score are as follows: generally-1 point and preferably-2 points; the sub-total of the construction machinery equipment investment, the approach plan and the guarantee measures is 2 points, and the included preset evaluation information and the score are as follows: preferably-1 min; the total sub-score of the construction plane layout is 2, and the included preset evaluation information and score are as follows: generally-1 point and preferably-2 points; the total sub-score of the repair measures after completion of the project is 2, and the preset evaluation information and the score are as follows: generally-1 point and preferably-2 points. And when the evaluation information of one item is poor or poor, the evaluation score of the item is 0, otherwise, the preset evaluation information which is the same as the evaluation information is determined in the first preset evaluation rule table based on the evaluation information, and the score corresponding to the preset evaluation information is used as the evaluation score of the item.
The technical personnel can evaluate each item information in the construction group design information by using the evaluation standard to obtain the evaluation information of each item. The evaluation criteria for content integrity and organizational level were: whether the compilation content of the main and other technical and economic indexes is complete, scientific, reasonable and practical; the evaluation criteria of the construction scheme and the technical measures are as follows: understanding key and difficult points of engineering, accuracy of expression, whether a solution is scientific, systematic, safe, economic and operable, whether guarantee measures are sufficient, accuracy of construction key technology and process control, whether application is in place and whether explanation is clear; the evaluation criteria of the quality management system and measures are as follows: whether the project quality assurance measure plan is comprehensive and meticulous, combines the reality, the measure is concrete, the person is responsible, the committed project quality standard and the committed commitment of the default responsibility; the evaluation criteria of the safety management system and measures are as follows: whether the safety civilization construction guarantees a plan to be comprehensive, complete, whether key places, processes and control and safeguard measures are sufficient, the materialization degree of responsible persons, the acceptance of the standard of safety civilization construction and the acceptance of default responsibility; the evaluation standards of the environmental protection management system and measures are as follows: whether the method is comprehensive and meticulous, and the commitment of practice, specific measures, in-place responsibility and default responsibility is combined; the evaluation criteria of the project schedule and measures are as follows: whether the construction schedule planning is reasonable and feasible, whether the key line is clear, accurate and complete, whether the key node control measures are sufficient and have strong operability, whether the measures are reliable or not and the promise of default responsibility are ensured; the evaluation criteria of the resource allocation plan are as follows: whether the investment of labor force can meet the construction requirement, whether the investment plan is coordinated with the progress plan, whether the allocation plan is reasonable, and whether the measures are concrete or not are ensured; the evaluation criteria of construction machinery equipment investment, approach plan and guarantee measures are as follows: whether the measures are comprehensive and reasonable; the evaluation standard of the construction plane layout is as follows: whether the arrangement is comprehensive and reasonable; the evaluation standard of the repair reporting measures after completion of the project is as follows: whether the warranty measure plan after the construction completion is comprehensive and meticulous, and the project quality standard of the commitment and the commitment of the liability are combined with the reality, the concrete measures, the responsibility of the person and the commitment.
It can be understood that, the user sets the total score of different construction group design information and the sub-total score of each item in the construction group design information according to the requirement (the sub-total score of each item is determined by the weight of each item in the construction group design information and the total score of the construction group design information), and determines different preset evaluation information (for example, common, better, medium or worse words) and the corresponding score of the preset evaluation information to obtain the first preset evaluation rule table; evaluation information of each item in the construction group design information may be obtained according to the evaluation criteria described above, so as to obtain evaluation scores corresponding to the evaluation information of each item in the construction group design information in a first preset score rule table, respectively, and obtain the design score based on the evaluation scores.
It should be noted that, in the embodiment of the present invention, the weight, the scoring rule, and the evaluation criterion of the scoring item (each item included in the construction group design information) related to the first preset scoring rule table are obtained based on a large amount of objective experimental data, the experimental data is obtained from objective data of a large amount of completed construction items, and the experimental data truly reflects the influence of each item included in the construction group design information on the evaluation result of the bidder, so that the weight, the scoring rule, and the evaluation criterion of the scoring item related to the first preset scoring rule table conform to a natural rule.
Step S13: evaluating the project management agency information using a second scoring criterion to obtain an agency score.
Specifically, step S13 includes: acquiring a first sub-organization score corresponding to the constructor job eligibility information in the project management organization information in a second preset score rule table; acquiring a second sub-organization score corresponding to the qualification information of the technical responsible person in the project management organization information from the second preset scoring rule table; acquiring a third sub-mechanism score corresponding to the construction times of the bidder in the project management mechanism information within a preset time from the second preset scoring rule table; acquiring a fourth sub-organization score corresponding to a matching result in the second preset scoring rule table, wherein the matching result is a matching result of additional person description information and preset additional person description information in the project management organization information; obtaining the institution score based on the first sub-institution score, the second sub-institution score, the third sub-institution score, and the fourth sub-institution score.
In specific application, determining a total score of project management mechanism information and each project included by the project management mechanism information, and determining sub total scores corresponding to each project included by the project management mechanism information according to the weight of each project included by the project management mechanism information (the weight of each project is determined by a user according to requirements and actual conditions); and determining scores corresponding to different preset information respectively based on the sub-total scores corresponding to the items respectively included in the item management mechanism information and the preset information of the items included in the construction group design information, and obtaining the second preset scoring rule table based on the scores corresponding to the different preset information and the different preset information corresponding to the items included in the item management mechanism information.
Specifically, when the preset information and the score corresponding to the constructor qualification information in the project management organization information are: the constructor has second or more than second qualification-fixed score, and the constructor has second or less than second qualification-0 score; when the preset information and the score corresponding to the technical responsible person qualification information in the project management organization information are as follows: the qualification of the technical responsible person is the fixed point of the job title of middle grade and above, and the qualification of the technical responsible person is the 0 point of the lower grade; when the description information and the score of the construction times of the bidder in the preset time in the project management organization information are as follows: corresponding to the fixed point in one construction, accumulating the fixed points of multiple constructions, and not accumulating when the score of the project reaches the sub-total score; when the preset information and the score corresponding to the matching result (the matching result is the matching result of the additional person description information and the preset additional person description information) in the project management mechanism information are: match-fixed score, mismatch-0 score. Wherein, the preset additional person description information may be: the extra personnel comprise four members, namely a constructor, a quality inspector, a safety worker and a material worker, wherein the four members simultaneously have corresponding post certificates and purchase three risks (old care, industrial injury and medical treatment); it is understood that when there is a mismatch between the additional person description information and the preset additional person description information, the item does not obtain a score.
For example, the project management authority information is divided into 10 points in total, and the sub-total points of the items in the project management authority information are determined based on the weights of the items in the project management authority information and the total points of the project management authority information. The sub-total score corresponding to the qualification information of the constructor is 1 score, the sub-total score of the qualification information of the technical responsible person is 1 score, the sub-total score of the construction times in the preset time is 6 scores (each construction corresponds to 2 scores, 6 scores are taken for more than 3 times), and the sub-total score corresponding to the description information of the extra person is 2 scores. And aiming at any project, determining corresponding preset information in a second preset scoring rule table based on the information of the project, and determining the score corresponding to the preset information as the sub-organization score of the project.
It can be understood that, the user sets the total score of the project management organization information according to the requirement, and determines the weight of each project in the project management organization information to determine the sub total score of each project in the project management organization information; and obtaining a second preset scoring rule table by utilizing the sub total scores of all items in the project management mechanism information and the preset information of all items in the project management mechanism information, and adding the first sub mechanism score, the second sub mechanism score, the third sub mechanism score and the fourth sub mechanism score after obtaining the first sub mechanism score, the second sub mechanism score, the third sub mechanism score and the fourth sub mechanism score according to the mode to obtain the mechanism score.
It should be noted that, in the embodiment of the present invention, the weights and the scoring rules of the scoring items (items included in the item management information) related to the second preset scoring rule table are obtained based on a large amount of objective experimental data, the experimental data is obtained from objective data of a large amount of completed construction items, and the experimental data truly reflects the influence of each item included in the item management information on the evaluation result of the bidder, so that the weights and the scoring rules of the scoring items related to the second preset scoring rule table conform to natural rules.
Step S14: evaluating the effective bid offer using a third scoring criterion to obtain an offer score.
Specifically, step S14 includes: when the effective bidding quotation is higher than the composite base price, obtaining a grading step score based on a preset price base score, a preset price total score and the preset proportion coefficient; obtaining the offer score based on the preset price base score, the grading step score, the effective bid offer and the composite bid base price; or the like, or, alternatively,
when the effective bidding quotation is lower than the composite base price, obtaining a deduction step score based on the preset price base score, the preset price total score and the preset proportion coefficient; obtaining the offer score based on the preset price base score, the preset total price score, the deduction step score, the effective bidding offer and the composite bid price; or the like, or, alternatively,
and when the effective bidding quotation is equal to the composite base bid price, determining the preset price base score as the quotation score.
It will be appreciated that when the effective bid price is above the composite base price, a bonus step is obtained, which is every bonus step above 1% of the base price, the bonus step Q ═ M-H ÷ (1-t), the preset price total is M (here 60), the preset price base is H (usually 0.6M, here 36), and the above t ═ 94, M ═ 60, H ═ 36 are carried in, Q ═ 4. When the effective bid price is lower than the composite bid price, obtaining a deduction step, wherein the deduction step is 1% of the deduction steps corresponding to the bid price, and based on the values of M and H, the deduction step T is H/100- (90 × 0.6+100 × 0.4), and T is 6; it is understood that 100 and 90 in T ÷ [100- (90 × 0.6+100 × 0.4) ] are fixed, invariant, where 0.6 and 0.4 in the formula are both determined by the selectable value of p.
In addition, when the effective bid price is higher than the composite bid price, the bid score is obtained based on the preset price base score, the bonus step score, the effective bid price, and the composite bid price, that is, the bid score is calculated by the following formula:
Vi＝max[0,H-(Bk-C)÷C×100×T]
when the effective bid price is lower than the composite bid price, obtaining the bid score based on the preset price base score, the preset total price score, the deduction step score, the effective bid price and the composite bid price, that is, calculating the bid score by the following formula:
Vi＝min[M,H+(C-Bk)÷C×100×Q]
determining the preset price base score as the offer score, i.e., offer score V, when the effective bid offer is equal to the composite base pricei＝H。
It should be noted that the grading rules of the bid quotations are obtained based on a large amount of objective experimental data, the experimental data are obtained from a large amount of objective data of completed construction projects, and the experimental data truly reflect the influence of different bid quotations on the evaluation results of bidders, so that the grading rules of the bid quotations conform to natural rules.
In a specific application, if the missing quote occurs, the item specified in the engineering volume list is not quoted by the bidder, the bidder is considered to promise free to the bidder, or the cost is considered to be shared among the unit prices (prices) of other related sub-items in the engineering volume list, and the item is not included in the review of the quote.
In addition to the aforementioned determination of bid veto bids, a bid offer is subject to a significant deviation in that its bid document should also be veto (i.e., the valid bidder needs to be screened among the resultant bidders in conjunction with the information herein and the aforementioned resultant bid offer): the bid quotation document (except the bid letter) is not signed by the construction personnel or is not provided with the special industry seal; the project code, project name, project characteristic, measurement unit and project quantity of the project quantity list are inconsistent with the project quantity list provided by the tenderer, except for obvious printing or error; the signed open bid record table, the bid letter (capital amount) and the quotation summary table are inconsistent in quotation and belong to major deviation.
The bid offer is a subtle deviation of one of the following: arithmetic errors found in arithmetic double-checking; the bidders are not billed according to the amount of the fee stipulated in the engineering quantity list; the bidders are not billed according to the safe civilization construction cost given in the engineering quantity list; the temporary listed amount is not filled according to the amount listed in the bidding document; the temporary material estimation unit price is not added to the comprehensive unit price according to the temporary estimation unit price listed in the bidding document, and the temporary professional project estimation price is not filled according to the amount listed in the bidding document.
For bid quotes with slight deviations, the review board can decide whether to correct them. If the correction is adopted, the method comprises the following steps:
correcting the arithmetic error according to the following arithmetic correction principle:
when the product of the comprehensive unit price and the engineering quantity is inconsistent with the total price, taking the marked comprehensive unit price as the standard, and modifying the comprehensive unit price when the marked total price is the standard unless the non-quotation review group considers that the obvious decimal point error exists; when the sum of the single sum is inconsistent with the total sum, the corresponding total sum and the corresponding sum expressed by characters are modified based on the single sum; and when the comprehensive unit price of the bidding quotation table is inconsistent with the comprehensive unit price in the comprehensive unit price analysis table, correcting the comprehensive unit price in the analysis table based on the comprehensive unit price of the bidding quotation table, and correcting each price in the analysis table according to the percentage of the difference between the two comprehensive unit prices. And when the material unit price in the corrected analysis table is inconsistent with the material unit price in the main material table, correcting the material unit price in the main material price table by taking the material unit price in the corrected analysis table as a standard.
The bidder does not count the fee amount given in the engineering quantity list, counts the fee amount of the bidder again according to the fee amount given in the engineering quantity list given by the tenderer and corrects the bid price of the bidder correspondingly;
the bidder does not calculate the safe civilization construction cost according to the given safe civilization construction cost in the engineering quantity list, the safe civilization construction cost of the bidder is calculated again according to the given safe civilization construction cost in the engineering quantity list given by the bidder, and the bidding quotation of the bidder is corrected correspondingly;
the temporary listed amount is not filled according to the amount listed in the bidding document, and is corrected according to the amount listed in the bidding document and the bidding quotation is corrected correspondingly;
the temporary material estimation unit price is not added into the comprehensive unit price according to the temporary estimation unit price listed in the bidding document, and the comprehensive unit price and corresponding price closing and bidding quotation are corrected according to the temporary material estimation unit price listed in the bidding document;
and correcting the temporary professional project valuation according to the temporary professional project valuation amount listed in the bidding document and correspondingly correcting the bid quotation of the temporary professional project valuation amount not filled in according to the amount listed in the bidding document.
The bid evaluation group should obtain the bidder's consent and confirm in writing for the result of the bid correction as specified. The bidder does not accept the corrected result or the corrected bid offer is higher than the bid control price published at the time of bid presentation, and the bid should be discarded.
Step S15: obtaining an assessment result based on the design score, the organization score, and the offer score.
Specifically, before step S15, the method further includes: acquiring the design weight of the design score, the organization weight of the organization score and the quotation weight of the quotation score; accordingly, step S15 includes: obtaining an evaluation result based on the design score, the organization score, the offer score, the design weight, the organization weight, and the offer weight.
In the present application, when the total score of construction group design information, the total score of project management organization information, and the total score of bid quotation are the same, the design weight, the organization weight, and the quotation weight are generally 0.3, 0.1, and 0.6, respectively; for example, when the total score of the construction group design information, the total score of the project management organization information, and the total score of the bid offer are the same and are all 100 minutes, the total score of the construction group design information, the total score of the project management organization information, and the total score of the bid offer may be adjusted to 30, 10, and 60 scores, respectively, according to the design weight, the organization weight, and the offer weight, and the design score, the organization score, and the offer score may be obtained, respectively, and then the design score, the organization score, and the offer score may be added to obtain the evaluation result (in the form of score).
The design score, the organization score, and the offer score may be obtained according to the above method, respectively taking 100 points as total points, and then the evaluation result may be obtained based on the design score, the organization score, the offer score, the design weight, the organization weight, and the offer weight.
It should be noted that the evaluation dimensions (the construction group design information, the project management organization information, and the bid quotation) and the weights of the evaluation dimensions (the design weight, the organization weight, and the bid quotation weight) according to the embodiments of the present invention are obtained based on a large amount of objective experimental data, the experimental data is obtained from objective data of a large number of completed construction projects, and the experimental data truly reflects the influence of the evaluation dimensions on the evaluation result of the bidder, so that the evaluation dimensions and the weights of the evaluation dimensions according to the embodiments of the present invention are naturally regular.
Step S16: and determining a successful bidder among the effective bidders based on the evaluation result.
It is understood that the evaluation result is in the form of a score, and the effective bidder having the highest score among the effective bidders is determined as the successful bidder, i.e., the successful bidder.
The technical scheme of the invention provides a bid evaluation method, which is applied to terminal equipment and is used for acquiring construction group design information, project management organization information and effective bid quotation in an effective bid file of an effective bidder who bids a target project; evaluating the construction group design information by using a first scoring standard to obtain a design score; evaluating the project management institution information by using a second scoring standard to obtain an institution score; evaluating the effective bid offer using a third scoring criterion to obtain an offer score; obtaining an assessment result based on the design score, the organization score, and the offer score; and determining a successful bidder among the effective bidders based on the evaluation result.
In the existing evaluation method, when a bidder is evaluated, only the bid price of an effective bidder is evaluated, so that the accuracy of an obtained evaluation result is low, and the obtained bidder is not the optimal bidder; the construction group design information, the project management organization information and the effective bid quotation of the effective bidders are evaluated respectively to obtain corresponding scores, evaluation results are obtained based on the scores of the three dimensions, and the accuracy of the evaluation results is high, so that the obtained bidders are the optimal bidders. Therefore, the evaluation method of the invention achieves the technical effect of improving the accuracy of the evaluation result of the bidder.
Referring to fig. 3, fig. 3 is a block diagram showing a first embodiment of the bid evaluation apparatus according to the present invention, the apparatus being used for a terminal device, the apparatus including:
an obtaining module 10, configured to obtain construction group design information, project management organization information, and effective bid quotations in effective bid files of effective bidders bidding on a target project;
a first scoring module 20, configured to evaluate the construction group design information by using a first scoring criterion to obtain a design score;
a second scoring module 30, configured to evaluate the project management organization information by using a second scoring criterion to obtain an organization score;
a third scoring module 40 for evaluating the effective bid offer using a third scoring criterion to obtain an offer score;
an obtaining module 50, configured to obtain an evaluation result based on the design score, the organization score, and the offer score;
a determining module 60, configured to determine a winning bidder among the valid bidders based on the evaluation result.
The above description is only an alternative embodiment of the present invention, and not intended to limit the scope of the present invention, and all modifications and equivalents of the present invention, which are made by the contents of the present specification and the accompanying drawings, or directly/indirectly applied to other related technical fields, are included in the scope of the present invention.

Claims (10)

1. A bid evaluation method applied to a terminal device, the method comprising the steps of:
acquiring construction group design information, project management organization information and effective bid quotations from effective bid files of effective bidders bidding on target projects;
evaluating the construction group design information by using a first scoring standard to obtain a design score;
evaluating the project management institution information by using a second scoring standard to obtain an institution score;
evaluating the effective bid offer using a third scoring criterion to obtain an offer score;
obtaining an assessment result based on the design score, the organization score, and the offer score;
and determining a successful bidder among the effective bidders based on the evaluation result.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein prior to the step of obtaining construction group design information, project administrator information, and valid bid quotations in valid bid files of valid bidders bidding on the target project, the method further comprises:
acquiring form information, qualification information, and responsiveness information in a bid file of a bidder bidding on the target item;
screening primary bidders with form information meeting first preset conditions from the bidders;
screening reselected bidders with qualification information meeting second preset conditions from the initial bidders;
and screening the effective bidders with responsiveness information meeting a third preset condition from the reselecting bidders.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the step of screening the reselecting bidder for the valid bidder whose responsiveness information satisfies a third preset condition comprises:
screening bidders with responsiveness information meeting third preset condition results from the reselecting bidders;
determining a selected offer among the resulting bid offers of the resulting bidders using a preset bid control price;
obtaining an arithmetic average offer based on the selected offer;
obtaining a composite base price based on the arithmetic average quote;
obtaining a minimum limit price based on the composite standard base price and a preset proportional coefficient;
determining the valid bidders having an resulting bid offer not less than the minimum qualified price among the resulting bidders.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the step of evaluating the construction set design information using a first scoring criterion to obtain a design score comprises:
obtaining evaluation information of each item in the construction group design information;
obtaining evaluation scores respectively corresponding to the evaluation information of each item in a first preset evaluation rule table;
obtaining the design score based on the evaluation score.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the step of evaluating the project administrator information using a second scoring criteria to obtain an institution score comprises:
acquiring a first sub-organization score corresponding to the constructor job eligibility information in the project management organization information in a second preset score rule table;
acquiring a second sub-organization score corresponding to the qualification information of the technical responsible person in the project management organization information from the second preset scoring rule table;
acquiring a third sub-mechanism score corresponding to the construction times of the bidder in the project management mechanism information within a preset time from the second preset scoring rule table;
acquiring a fourth sub-organization score corresponding to a matching result in the second preset scoring rule table, wherein the matching result is a matching result of additional person description information and preset additional person description information in the project management organization information;
obtaining the institution score based on the first sub-institution score, the second sub-institution score, the third sub-institution score, and the fourth sub-institution score.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the step of evaluating the effective bid price using a third scoring criterion to obtain a price score comprises:
when the effective bidding quotation is higher than the composite base price, obtaining a grading step score based on a preset price base score, a preset price total score and the preset proportion coefficient; obtaining the offer score based on the preset price base score, the grading step score, the effective bid offer and the composite bid base price; or the like, or, alternatively,
when the effective bidding quotation is lower than the composite base price, obtaining a deduction step score based on the preset price base score, the preset price total score and the preset proportion coefficient; obtaining the offer score based on the preset price base score, the preset total price score, the deduction step score, the effective bidding offer and the composite bid price; or the like, or, alternatively,
and when the effective bidding quotation is equal to the composite base bid price, determining the preset price base score as the quotation score.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the step of obtaining an assessment result based on the design score, the organization score, and the offer score is preceded by the method further comprising:
acquiring the design weight of the design score, the organization weight of the organization score and the quotation weight of the quotation score;
the step of obtaining an assessment result based on the design score, the organization score, and the offer score includes:
obtaining an evaluation result based on the design score, the organization score, the offer score, the design weight, the organization weight, and the offer weight.
8. A bid evaluation apparatus applied to a terminal device, the apparatus comprising:
the system comprises an acquisition module, a display module and a display module, wherein the acquisition module is used for acquiring construction group design information, project management organization information and effective bid quotations in effective bid files of effective bidders bidding on target projects;
the first scoring module is used for evaluating the construction group design information by using a first scoring standard so as to obtain a design score;
the second scoring module is used for evaluating the project management organization information by using a second scoring standard so as to obtain an organization score;
a third scoring module for evaluating the effective bid price using a third scoring criterion to obtain a price score;
an obtaining module for obtaining an evaluation result based on the design score, the organization score, and the offer score;
and the determining module is used for determining the successful bidders from the effective bidders based on the evaluation result.
9. A terminal device, characterized in that the terminal device comprises: a memory, a processor, and a bid evaluation program stored on the memory and run on the processor, the bid evaluation program when executed by the processor implementing the steps of the bid evaluation method of any of claims 1-7.
10. A computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon a bid evaluation program which, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of a bid evaluation method as recited in any of claims 1-7.
CN202110167405.4A 2021-02-08 2021-02-08 Bid evaluation method, device, terminal device and computer readable storage medium Pending CN112836975A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110167405.4A CN112836975A (en) 2021-02-08 2021-02-08 Bid evaluation method, device, terminal device and computer readable storage medium

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110167405.4A CN112836975A (en) 2021-02-08 2021-02-08 Bid evaluation method, device, terminal device and computer readable storage medium

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN112836975A true CN112836975A (en) 2021-05-25

Family

ID=75932628

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202110167405.4A Pending CN112836975A (en) 2021-02-08 2021-02-08 Bid evaluation method, device, terminal device and computer readable storage medium

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN112836975A (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114820145A (en) * 2022-04-21 2022-07-29 珠海采筑电子商务有限公司 Bidding product quality detection and evaluation method, terminal and readable storage medium thereof
CN114862523A (en) * 2022-05-30 2022-08-05 重庆大学 Bidding method and system based on carbon emission
CN114936842A (en) * 2022-05-19 2022-08-23 常州机电职业技术学院 Engineering audit management integrated system and method thereof
CN117709780A (en) * 2023-12-11 2024-03-15 北京谦润和科技有限公司 High tension switchgear construction qualification's audit management system based on artificial intelligence

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114820145A (en) * 2022-04-21 2022-07-29 珠海采筑电子商务有限公司 Bidding product quality detection and evaluation method, terminal and readable storage medium thereof
CN114936842A (en) * 2022-05-19 2022-08-23 常州机电职业技术学院 Engineering audit management integrated system and method thereof
CN114936842B (en) * 2022-05-19 2023-01-24 常州机电职业技术学院 Engineering audit management integrated system and method thereof
CN114862523A (en) * 2022-05-30 2022-08-05 重庆大学 Bidding method and system based on carbon emission
CN114862523B (en) * 2022-05-30 2024-04-02 重庆大学 Bidding method and system based on carbon emission
CN117709780A (en) * 2023-12-11 2024-03-15 北京谦润和科技有限公司 High tension switchgear construction qualification's audit management system based on artificial intelligence
CN117709780B (en) * 2023-12-11 2024-06-18 北京谦润和科技有限公司 High tension switchgear construction qualification's audit management system based on artificial intelligence

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN112836975A (en) Bid evaluation method, device, terminal device and computer readable storage medium
Wang Evolution of public–private partnership models in American toll road development: Learning based on public institutions' risk management
Zhang Paving the way for public–private partnerships in infrastructure development
Aladağ et al. Role of financial risks in BOT megatransportation projects in developing countries
Siemiatycki What's the secret? Confidentiality in planning infrastructure using public/private partnerships
US11995594B2 (en) Managing technical process data
KR102222385B1 (en) Method and server for classifying standard job of company
CN113887971A (en) Personal credit investigation method and device based on big data for enterprise and electronic equipment
CN115812216A (en) Information processing method, program, and information processing device
US20140019286A1 (en) Systems, devices and methods for facilitating structured settlement transactions
CN114418666A (en) Block chain-based auxiliary electric power emergency material digital purchasing method and device
CN115577983B (en) Enterprise task matching method based on block chain, server and storage medium
CN115016837A (en) Middle station construction method and device, terminal equipment and storage medium
CN105469287A (en) Engineering bidding quotation electronic data introduction system and method
CN108921682A (en) A kind of processing method of value-added tax, device and system
Toan et al. Assessment of factors influencing on the success of public-private partnerships infrastructure projects in Vietnam
CN114647885A (en) Method and system for construction drawing design content display and application calculation
Pannell et al. Benefit-Cost Analysis Decision Criteria: Reconciling Conflicting Advice
CN112001791A (en) Renewable energy power consumption trading system and method
CN112581075A (en) Insurance letter processing method and device for security company
KR101796053B1 (en) Method and apparatus for managing fund based on community
Rahman et al. PPP procurement methods in Malaysian construction industry
Mugurura et al. The legal public–private partnership framework and policy implementation in Uganda
CN205003732U (en) Feedback device of website credit information
Kavishe et al. Empowering Public-Private Partnership in Major Infrastructure Systems

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20210525