CN112821390A - Medium-term unit combination-based power system long-term production simulation method - Google Patents

Medium-term unit combination-based power system long-term production simulation method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN112821390A
CN112821390A CN202110089709.3A CN202110089709A CN112821390A CN 112821390 A CN112821390 A CN 112821390A CN 202110089709 A CN202110089709 A CN 202110089709A CN 112821390 A CN112821390 A CN 112821390A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
unit
coal
reservoir
new energy
power
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN202110089709.3A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN112821390B (en
Inventor
李旭霞
王尧
尹鸿睿
王建学
胡迎迎
杨钤
梁燕
荆永明
刘红丽
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Xian Jiaotong University
Economic and Technological Research Institute of State Grid Shanxi Electric Power Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Xian Jiaotong University
Economic and Technological Research Institute of State Grid Shanxi Electric Power Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Xian Jiaotong University, Economic and Technological Research Institute of State Grid Shanxi Electric Power Co Ltd filed Critical Xian Jiaotong University
Priority to CN202110089709.3A priority Critical patent/CN112821390B/en
Publication of CN112821390A publication Critical patent/CN112821390A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN112821390B publication Critical patent/CN112821390B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
    • H02J3/008Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks involving trading of energy or energy transmission rights
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
    • H02J3/38Arrangements for parallely feeding a single network by two or more generators, converters or transformers
    • H02J3/46Controlling of the sharing of output between the generators, converters, or transformers
    • H02J3/466Scheduling the operation of the generators, e.g. connecting or disconnecting generators to meet a given demand
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J2203/00Indexing scheme relating to details of circuit arrangements for AC mains or AC distribution networks
    • H02J2203/20Simulating, e g planning, reliability check, modelling or computer assisted design [CAD]
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y04INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
    • Y04SSYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
    • Y04S10/00Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
    • Y04S10/50Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a long-term production simulation method of a power system based on a medium-term unit combination, which comprises the steps of constructing daily statistical information of a net load at a peak-valley moment according to acquired planning data and prediction data of the power system; constructing an objective function of a middle-stage unit combination model by taking the comprehensive operation cost formed by minimizing the operation cost of a coal-fired unit, the water abandoning cost of a reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating unit and the electricity abandoning cost of a new energy unit as optimization targets; constructing constraint conditions of the medium-term unit combination model; establishing a middle-period unit combination model; and solving the established middle-term unit combination model to obtain the installed capacity, the generated energy, the utilization hours and the system operation cost of each type of power supply, and completing the long-term production simulation calculation of the power system. The method has the advantages of rapidness, effectiveness and easiness in implementation, and can assist a planner in evaluating a power system planning scheme containing the traditional power supply new energy power generation.

Description

Medium-term unit combination-based power system long-term production simulation method
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of planning evaluation in an electric power system, and particularly relates to a long-term production simulation method of the electric power system based on medium-term unit combination.
Background
Currently, electric power systems in China are in a transition phase. On one hand, the power supply structure of the power system in China still mainly comprises a thermal power generating unit at the present stage, and the number of large-scale coal burner assembling machines and the scale of the installed capacity are huge; on the other hand, the development of clean renewable energy power generation resources is rapid, and the installed capacity of new energy power generation units represented by wind power and photovoltaic power generation is increased year by year. Production simulation is one of simulation means of the power system, and can carry out simulation on the operation of the power system under the specified boundary condition to obtain key economic and technical indexes. In the present context, it is crucial to study a fast, efficient, and easy-to-implement production simulation approach for simulating the actual power system operation or evaluating the power system planning scheme.
Production simulation on medium and long-term scales generally needs to consider operation constraints and network safety constraints of time sequence coupling such as unit start-stop, climbing and the like so as to ensure that a simulation result conforms to the operation characteristics of an actual power system. On one hand, the traditional unit combination model taking hours as granularity is a large-scale mixed integer optimization problem mathematically and contains a large amount of time sequence coupling linear constraints, so that the direct solution is difficult; on the other hand, the less flexible power supply represented by the coal-fired unit is generally not scheduled to be started, stopped or stopped frequently in actual operation. Therefore, the production simulation on the medium-long scale can coarsen the calculation granularity, the generation plan is arranged by taking the day as a unit, the statistics of the simulation result is not influenced, and the calculation difficulty and the calculation expense are reduced.
Disclosure of Invention
The technical problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a fast, effective and easy-to-implement method for simulating and calculating long-term production of an electric power system, under a given planning boundary, a medium-term unit combination reasonably allocates power generation resources to meet load requirements at various times by optimizing the operating states and output of various types of power supplies on a daily basis, and assists with the backup at the peak-valley time of a net load and the verification of network transmission capability to ensure the rationality of results.
The invention adopts the following technical scheme:
a long-term production simulation method of a power system based on medium-term unit combination comprises the following steps:
s1, acquiring planning data and prediction data of the power system;
s2, constructing daily statistical information of the peak-valley time of the net load according to the acquired planning data and prediction data of the power system; constructing an objective function of a middle-stage unit combination model by taking the comprehensive operation cost formed by minimizing the operation cost of a coal-fired unit, the water abandoning cost of a reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating unit and the electricity abandoning cost of a new energy unit as optimization targets; constructing a medium-term unit combination model constraint condition comprising power supply operation constraint, system operation constraint, verification constraint and other constraints; establishing a middle-period unit combination model;
and S3, solving the established middle-stage unit combination model to obtain the installed capacity, the generated energy, the utilization hours and the system operation cost of each type of power supply, completing the long-term production simulation calculation of the power system, and taking the result of the simulation calculation as a reference index of the economic and technical performance of the planning scheme.
Specifically, in step S1, the power system planning data includes power supply planning data, grid planning data, and other data; the power system prediction data comprise predicted values of load demand and new energy output under medium and long-term scales.
Further, the power planning data includes maximum/minimum technical output of the coal-fired unit
Figure BDA0002911956440000021
Upward slope climbing rate of coal-fired unit
Figure BDA0002911956440000022
Fuel consumption characteristic curve of coal-fired unit and maximum/minimum technical output of reservoir type hydroelectric unit
Figure BDA0002911956440000023
Maximum technical output of a new energy unit
Figure BDA0002911956440000024
The power grid planning data comprises network connection information and impedance parameters of each power transmission line and each transformer in the power grid, and the upper limit of the transmission capacity of each power transmission line and each transformer
Figure BDA0002911956440000025
The operation mode of the cross-region connecting line; other data, including geographical distribution information of the load, up/down load reserve level α of the systemULDL
The predicted values of the load demand and the new energy output under the medium and long term scale comprise all values in a medium and long term hourly demand prediction curve of all node loads
Figure BDA0002911956440000031
Values in the medium-and-long term hourly output prediction curves of the new energy units
Figure BDA0002911956440000032
Available generated energy prediction value in each scheduling period of reservoir type hydroelectric generating set
Figure BDA0002911956440000033
Specifically, in step S2, the step of constructing daily statistics of the peak-valley time of the payload specifically includes:
obtaining a full system net load hourly curve according to a load hourly demand prediction curve, a new energy hourly output prediction curve and a tie line hourly planned operating power, and then obtaining a full system net load hourly curve according to the load hourly demand prediction curve, the new energy hourly output prediction curve and the tie line hourly planned operating power
Figure BDA0002911956440000034
And carrying out statistics on the maximum value, the minimum value and the occurrence time of the net load day by day to obtain the day-by-day statistical information of the peak valley time of the net load.
Further, the full system net load hourly curve:
Figure BDA0002911956440000035
wherein NT is the number of hours involved in the production of the simulation timescale; omegaDNEGTLIs the set of load/new energy machine group/cross-region connecting line of the system;
Figure BDA0002911956440000036
the output or operating power is predicted hourly for the net load/raw load/new energy/tie line.
Specifically, in step S2, in the objective function of the medium-term unit combination model, the operation cost of the coal-fired unit, including the fuel cost, the start-up cost, and the shut-down cost, is:
Figure BDA0002911956440000037
wherein ND/NDT/NS/NSDThe number of days contained in a production simulation time scale/the number of hours contained in each day/the number of reservoir type hydropower dispatching cycles/the number of days contained in each dispatching cycle; omegaTGRNEGThe system is a set of a system coal-fired unit/a reservoir/a new energy unit;
Figure BDA0002911956440000038
reservoir capacity contained for reservoir jA set of hydroelectric generating sets;
Figure BDA0002911956440000039
the fuel cost/start-up cost/shut-down cost of the coal-fired unit i;
Figure BDA00029119564400000310
indicating variables for judging whether the coal-fired unit i is started or stopped on k days, wherein 0 represents that the starting/stopping operation is not carried out, and 1 represents that the starting/stopping operation is carried out;
Figure BDA0002911956440000041
predicting available power generation amount/actual power generation amount of the reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating set in a scheduling period;
Figure BDA0002911956440000042
predicted output/actual generated energy of the new energy unit; beta is aHNEThe unit electricity abandonment cost of the reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating set/new energy generating set is reduced.
Specifically, in step S2, the power supply operation constraints include a fuel cost linearization constraint, a power generation amount clamp constraint, an operation state logic constraint, a total start/shut-down constraint, a power generation amount clamp constraint of a reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating set, a power generation amount constraint in a reservoir dispatching cycle, a new power generation amount clamp constraint of a new power supply unit, and a daily power generation amount constraint of a coal-fired unit; the system operation constraint comprises a system daily electric quantity balance constraint and a daily average up/down load standby constraint; the check constraint comprises upper and lower limit constraints of power supply power at the peak-valley time of a net load day, power balance constraint of a system, upper/lower load standby constraint and network transmission capacity constraint; other constraints include the peak shaving capability of a conventional dispatchable crew.
Further, the fuel cost linearization constraint of the coal-fired unit is as follows:
Figure BDA0002911956440000043
the generated energy clamp constraint is as follows:
Figure BDA0002911956440000044
the operating state logic constraints are:
Figure BDA0002911956440000045
Figure BDA0002911956440000046
the total number of start-ups/shutdowns constraints are:
Figure BDA0002911956440000047
Figure BDA0002911956440000048
the generated energy of the reservoir-capacity hydroelectric generating set is clamped and restrained as follows:
Figure BDA0002911956440000051
the constraint of the electricity generation amount in the reservoir dispatching cycle is as follows:
Figure BDA0002911956440000052
the generated energy clamp constraint of the new energy unit is as follows:
Figure BDA0002911956440000053
the power generation amount in the day is restricted as follows:
Figure BDA0002911956440000054
wherein ND/NDT/NS/NSDThe number of days contained in a production simulation time scale/the number of hours contained in each day/the number of reservoir type hydropower dispatching cycles/the number of days contained in each dispatching cycle; m is the number of linear sections of the fuel consumption curve of the coal-fired unit; omegaTGHGRNEGThe system is a set of a system coal-fired unit/a reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating set/a reservoir/a new energy source unit;
Figure BDA0002911956440000055
indicating variables for indicating whether the coal-fired unit i runs/starts/stops on k days, wherein 0 represents that the coal-fired unit i is in a shutdown state or does not start or stop operation, and 1 represents that the coal-fired unit i is in a running state or starts or stops operation;
Figure BDA0002911956440000056
the actual generated energy of a coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating unit/new energy source unit i in k days;
Figure BDA0002911956440000057
predicting the available generated energy/the predicted output of the new energy unit for the reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating set in the scheduling period;
Figure BDA0002911956440000058
the minimum technical output of a coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating set i;
Figure BDA0002911956440000059
the maximum technical output of a coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating unit/new energy unit i; LKi,s/LBi,sThe slope/intercept parameter of the linear segmentation of the fuel consumption characteristic curve of the coal-fired unit is obtained; n is a radical ofD,max/NU,maxThe number of times of shutdown/startup of the coal-fired unit is the upper limit;
the daily electric quantity balance constraint of the system is as follows:
Figure BDA00029119564400000510
the daily average upper/lower load backup constraints are:
Figure BDA0002911956440000061
Figure BDA0002911956440000062
wherein ND/NDTNumber of days contained for production simulation timescale/number of hours contained per day; omegaTGHGNEGTLDThe system is a set of a system coal-fired unit/a reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating unit/a new energy source unit/a cross-region tie line/load;
Figure BDA0002911956440000063
the method comprises the following steps of (1) providing actual generated energy/exchange electric quantity/required electric quantity of a coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating unit/new energy unit/cross-region connecting line/load i in k days;
Figure BDA0002911956440000064
an indication variable for indicating whether the coal-fired unit i operates on k days, wherein 0 represents that the coal-fired unit i is in a shutdown state, and 1 represents that the coal-fired unit i is in an operating state;
Figure BDA0002911956440000065
the minimum technical output of a coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating set i;
Figure BDA0002911956440000066
the maximum technical output of the coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating set i is obtained; alpha is alphaULDLA level of upper/lower load back-up for the system;
the upper and lower limits of the power supply power at the time of the peak valley of the net load are constrained as follows:
Figure BDA0002911956440000067
Figure BDA0002911956440000068
Figure BDA0002911956440000069
Figure BDA00029119564400000610
Figure BDA00029119564400000611
Figure BDA00029119564400000612
the power balance constraint of the system is:
Figure BDA00029119564400000613
the up/down load standby constraints are:
Figure BDA00029119564400000614
Figure BDA0002911956440000071
the network transmission capability constraints are:
Figure BDA0002911956440000072
wherein ND is the number of days included in the production simulation time scale; omegaBTGHGNEGTLDThe system is a set of a system bus, a coal-fired unit, a reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating unit, a new energy unit, a cross-regional connecting line and a load;
Figure BDA0002911956440000073
is the collection of the power supply or equivalent power supply/load connected on the bus i;
Figure BDA0002911956440000074
the actual generated energy of a coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating unit/new energy source unit i in k days;
Figure BDA0002911956440000075
an indication variable for indicating whether the coal-fired unit i operates on k days, wherein 0 represents that the coal-fired unit i is in a shutdown state, and 1 represents that the coal-fired unit i is in an operating state;
Figure BDA0002911956440000076
replacing PL in the upper standard with VL to represent a physical value at a valley time for an actual output/exchange power/required power of a coal-fired unit/a reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating unit/a new energy source unit/a cross-regional connecting line/power supply or an equivalent power supply/load i at a peak time of k days;
Figure BDA0002911956440000077
the minimum technical output of a coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating set i;
Figure BDA0002911956440000078
the maximum technical output of the coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating set i is obtained; alpha is alphaULDLA level of upper/lower load back-up for the system; gl,iTransferring distribution factors for power generation from a line l to a bus i in the power transmission network;
Figure BDA0002911956440000079
the transmission capacity limit of the transmission line/transformer l;
the peak shaving capacity constraint of a conventional dispatchable unit is:
Figure BDA00029119564400000710
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA00029119564400000711
the number of days contained for the production simulation time scale/the number of hours contained for the kth day; omegaTGHGDThe system is a set of a system coal-fired unit/a reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating set/a load;
Figure BDA00029119564400000712
the actual generating capacity of the reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating set i in k days is obtained;
Figure BDA00029119564400000713
load demand at t hours for full system payload;
Figure BDA00029119564400000714
an indication variable for indicating whether the coal-fired unit i operates on k days, wherein 0 represents that the coal-fired unit i is in a shutdown state, and 1 represents that the coal-fired unit i is in an operating state;
Figure BDA00029119564400000715
the upward climbing rate of the coal-fired unit i;
Figure BDA00029119564400000716
the maximum technical output of the coal-fired unit i.
Specifically, in step S3, the installed capacities of the various types of power supplies include installed capacities of a coal-fired unit, a reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric unit, and a new energy unit; the power generation capacity of each type of power supply comprises the actual power generation capacity of a coal-fired unit, a reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating unit and a new energy unit; the utilization hours of each type of power supply comprise actual generated energy of a coal-fired unit, a reservoir type hydroelectric generating unit and a new energy unit; the system operation cost comprises the operation cost of a coal-fired unit, the storage capacity type water and electricity abandoning cost and the electricity abandoning cost of a new energy unit; and according to the indexes, checking the economic and technical indexes of the planning scheme by combining the simulated power generation plans of various types of power supplies formulated by production simulation.
Further, the installed capacity P of the new energy source unitG,CapComprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0002911956440000081
wherein omegaGIs a collection of power sources of a certain type;
Figure BDA0002911956440000082
the maximum technical output of a certain power supply i is provided;
actual generating capacity E of new energy unitG,GenComprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0002911956440000083
wherein omegaGIs a collection of power sources of a certain type;
Figure BDA0002911956440000084
the actual power generation amount of a certain power supply i on the kth day; ND is the number of days involved in producing the analog time scale;
average hours of utilization AUH of each type of power supplyGComprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0002911956440000085
wherein E isG,GenIs the power generation of a certain type of power supply; pG,CapInstalled capacity for a certain type of power source;
operating cost OC of coal-fired unitTComprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0002911956440000086
storage type water-electricity abandoned cost OCHComprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0002911956440000087
new energy unit abandons electric cost OCNEComprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0002911956440000091
wherein ND/NDT/NS/NSDThe number of days contained in a production simulation time scale/the number of hours contained in each day/the number of reservoir type hydropower dispatching cycles/the number of days contained in each dispatching cycle; omegaTGRNEGIs a set of a coal-fired unit/a reservoir/a new energy unit;
Figure BDA0002911956440000092
the method comprises the following steps of (1) collecting reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating sets contained in a reservoir j;
Figure BDA0002911956440000093
the fuel cost/start-up cost/shut-down cost of the coal-fired unit i;
Figure BDA0002911956440000094
indicating variables for judging whether the coal-fired unit i is started or stopped on k days, wherein 0 represents that the starting/stopping operation is not carried out, and 1 represents that the starting/stopping operation is carried out;
Figure BDA0002911956440000095
predicting available power generation amount/actual power generation amount of the reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating set in a scheduling period;
Figure BDA0002911956440000096
predicted output/actual generated energy of the new energy unit; beta is aHNEThe unit electricity abandonment cost of the reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating set/new energy generating set is reduced.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has at least the following beneficial effects:
the invention relates to a long-term production simulation method of an electric power system based on medium-term unit combination, which is characterized in that under the conditions of given power supply and power grid planning boundary, new energy output prediction and load level, a mixed integer mathematical optimization model based on medium-term unit combination is established by taking day as granularity, and the production simulation of a planning scheme is realized by optimizing the operation of various types of power supplies; on the basis of conventional constraints such as power supply operation constraint, system operation constraint and the like, the verification constraint of standby and network transmission capacity at the moment of net load peak valley and the peak regulation capacity constraint of a conventional schedulable unit (mainly a coal-fired unit and a reservoir type hydroelectric generating unit) are added to ensure the reasonability of results. The simulation result is subjected to statistics to generate key economic and technical indexes concerned by planning personnel, such as the number of hours of power utilization of various types and the system operation cost, so that the planning scheme is effectively evaluated; the long-term production simulation of the planning scheme of the power system is realized by establishing and solving a medium-term unit combination model of the power system. The simulation result can reflect the optimal operation condition of the power system planning scheme under the scheduling target of comprehensively considering the economical efficiency of the coal-fired unit and the utilization rate of the renewable energy sources, and helps the planning personnel to check the economical and technical indexes of the planning scheme on the planning level.
Further, before the step of establishing the middle-term unit combination model in the production simulation, the planning data and the prediction data of the power system need to be acquired to provide the necessary boundary conditions for the middle-term unit combination.
Furthermore, on the basis of conventional power supply operation constraint and system operation constraint, the medium-term unit combination model adds check constraint of standby and network transmission capacity at the moment of net load peak valley and peak regulation capacity constraint of conventional schedulable units (mainly a coal-fired unit and a reservoir-type hydroelectric generating unit), thereby ensuring the reasonability and validity of results to a certain extent.
Furthermore, on the basis of conventional power supply operation constraint and system operation constraint, the medium-term unit combination model adds check constraint of standby and network transmission capacity at the moment of net load peak valley and peak regulation capacity constraint of conventional schedulable units (mainly a coal-fired unit and a reservoir-type hydroelectric generating unit), thereby ensuring the reasonability and validity of results to a certain extent.
Furthermore, the middle-period unit combination model considers the operation characteristic of the daily scheduled start and stop of the coal-fired unit in the actual power system operation, by coarsening the calculated granularity, the control on the scale of the mixed integer optimization model is realized, the calculation overhead (including time overhead and storage overhead) is obviously reduced compared with the traditional unit combination method which takes the hour as the granularity to optimize the system operation, the rapidity advantage of the method is embodied, before a middle-period unit combination model is constructed, according to a prediction curve of load demand and a prediction curve of output of new energy (wind power/photovoltaic), and generating a net load curve of the whole system by a planned operation curve of the cross-regional connecting line, counting the peak-valley time of the net load of the whole system day by day, and providing time information of each check constraint in the medium-term unit combination model, namely, specifying when the check constraint should be added every day.
Furthermore, the middle-period unit combination model is easy to realize, is not only suitable for being independently used for long-term production simulation of an electric power system, but also suitable for being used as a front model of a production simulation method with more complex models and higher calculation overhead so as to achieve the effect of pre-solving, and takes the minimum comprehensive operation cost formed by the operation cost of a coal-fired unit, the water abandonment cost of a reservoir-type hydroelectric generating set and the electricity abandonment cost of a new energy source unit as the optimization target. The method comprises the steps that the operation cost of a coal-fired unit is set, and the operation cost of the coal-fired unit, including fuel cost, unit starting cost and unit stopping cost, is comprehensively considered; each coal-fired unit will show differences in the simulation of power generation planning based on the difference in economics.
Furthermore, the middle-period unit combination model is provided with operation constraints of various types of power supplies, and the purpose is as follows: and limiting the operation range of the unit to reflect the operation mode and the operation characteristics of the unit in actual operation, so that the production simulation result accords with the reality. The operation restriction of the coal-fired unit reflects the operation restriction of the coal-fired unit in the aspects of fuel operation cost, unit output, start-up/shut-down; the operation restriction of the reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating set reflects the operation restriction of the reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating set in the aspects of generating capacity and hydroelectric resources; the operating constraints of the new energy unit reflect the limitations of the new energy unit in terms of the generated energy and the wind/photovoltaic power generation resources.
Further, the mid-term unit combination model sets the check constraint of the peak-valley load time of the net load, including the power balance, the upper/lower load standby and the network transmission capacity constraint under the peak-valley time of the net load day by day, and the peak/valley time of the net load of each day is the time when the conventional unit bears the maximum peak load pressure, and can be regarded as the extreme operation scene of each day. The constraint that the operation requirements of the system in the aspects of power balance, load reserve and network transmission capacity are reflected is added aiming at the extreme operation scenes, so that the simulated power generation plan compiled by production simulation can better accord with the actual operation condition of the system, and the rationality of the production simulation result is ensured.
Further, the medium-term unit combination model is provided with other constraints, including peak shaving capacity constraints of conventional schedulable units (mainly a coal-fired unit and a reservoir-capacity hydroelectric unit), and considering that the coal-fired unit and the reservoir-capacity hydroelectric unit are used as main peak shaving power supplies, the peak shaving requirements in the system should be responded at all times. By adding the peak shaving capacity constraint, the simulated power generation plan compiled by the production simulation can better accord with the actual operation condition of the system, and the rationality of the production simulation result, particularly the simulated output and operation state result of the coal-fired unit is ensured.
Furthermore, indexes reflecting the installed capacity, the generated energy, the power utilization hours and the system operation cost of each type of power supply are set for assisting power system planners to visually know the production simulation result of the planning scheme, the installed capacity index of each type of unit directly depends on the design of the planning scheme, and the power supply structure information of the planning scheme on the planning level can be visually reflected; the indexes of the generated energy and the power utilization hours of each type of power supply are obtained by analyzing the production simulation result, and the generated energy and the average load information of each type of power supply can be intuitively reflected; the system operation cost indexes comprise the operation cost of a coal-fired unit, the electricity abandoning cost of a reservoir-type hydroelectric generating set and the electricity abandoning cost of a new energy unit (wind power/photovoltaic), the former can visually reflect the operation economy of a traditional unit using fossil energy by combining the generated energy and the utilization hours of the coal-fired unit, and the latter can visually reflect the utilization condition of the system on clean and renewable power generation resources.
In conclusion, the method has the advantages of rapidness, effectiveness and easiness in implementation, and can assist a planner in evaluating a power system planning scheme comprising a traditional type power supply (a coal-fired unit and a reservoir type hydroelectric unit) and a new energy power generation (a wind turbine unit and a photovoltaic unit).
The technical solution of the present invention is further described in detail by the accompanying drawings and embodiments.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are some, not all, embodiments of the present invention. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
It will be understood that the terms "comprises" and/or "comprising," when used in this specification and the appended claims, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
It is also to be understood that the terminology used in the description of the invention herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used in the specification of the present invention and the appended claims, the singular forms "a," "an," and "the" are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
It should be further understood that the term "and/or" as used in this specification and the appended claims refers to and includes any and all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.
The invention provides a long-term production simulation method of an electric power system based on medium-term unit combination, which is characterized in that under the conditions of given power supply and power grid planning boundary, new energy output prediction and load level, a mixed integer mathematical optimization model based on medium-term unit combination is established by taking day as granularity, the production simulation of a planning scheme is realized by optimizing the operation of various types of power supplies, and planning personnel are helped to check the economic and technical indexes of the planning scheme on the planning level. The middle-period unit combination model considers the operation characteristics of the coal-fired units starting and stopping according to the daily arrangement in the actual power system operation, and realizes the control of the scale of the mixed integer optimization model by coarsening the calculated granularity, so that the calculation overhead is obviously reduced. On the basis of the operation constraint of a power supply and a system, the verification constraint of standby and network transmission capacity at the moment of a net load peak valley and the peak-adjusting capacity constraint of a conventional schedulable unit are added, so that the reasonability and the effectiveness of the result are ensured. The model contained in the method is easy to realize, is not only suitable for being independently used for long-term production simulation of the power system, but also suitable for being used as a front-end model of a production simulation method with more complex models and more huge calculation cost, thereby playing a pre-solving effect and having stronger adaptability and practical value for power grid planning evaluation of a large-scale power system.
Referring to fig. 1, the present invention provides a long-term production simulation method for an electric power system based on a medium-term unit combination, which includes the following steps:
s1, acquiring required data from related departments;
the calculation model input data obtained from the relevant departments include the following data:
power system planning data: power supply planning data, including maximum/minimum technical output of coal-fired units
Figure BDA0002911956440000141
Figure BDA0002911956440000142
Upward slope climbing rate of coal-fired unit
Figure BDA0002911956440000143
Fuel consumption characteristic curve of coal-fired unit and maximum/minimum technical output of reservoir type hydroelectric unit
Figure BDA0002911956440000144
Maximum technical output of a new energy unit
Figure BDA0002911956440000145
The power grid planning data comprises network connection information and impedance parameters of each power transmission line and each transformer in the power grid, and the upper limit of the transmission capacity of each power transmission line and each transformer
Figure BDA0002911956440000146
The operation mode of the cross-region connecting line; other data, including geographical distribution information of the load, up/down load reserve level α of the systemULDL
Power system prediction data: load demand and new energy (wind power and photovoltaic unit) output prediction values under medium and long term scales comprise all values in medium and long term hourly demand prediction curves of all node loads
Figure BDA0002911956440000147
Values in the medium-and-long term hourly output prediction curves of the new energy units
Figure BDA0002911956440000148
Available generated energy prediction value in each scheduling period of reservoir type hydroelectric generating set
Figure BDA0002911956440000149
S2, establishing a middle-period unit combination model;
s201, constructing daily statistical information of the peak valley time of the net load;
firstly, obtaining a full system net load hourly curve according to a load hourly demand prediction curve, a new energy hourly output prediction curve and a tie line hourly planned operating power:
Figure BDA00029119564400001410
wherein NT is the number of hours involved in the production of the simulation timescale; omegaDNEGTLIs the set of load/new energy machine group/cross-region connecting line of the system;
Figure BDA00029119564400001411
predicting output or operating power hourly for the net load/original load/new energy/tie line;
then according to
Figure BDA00029119564400001412
And carrying out statistics on the maximum value, the minimum value and the occurrence time of the net load day by day to obtain the day-by-day statistical information of the peak valley time of the net load.
S202, constructing a target function of a medium-term unit combination model;
the method takes the comprehensive operation cost formed by the operation cost of a coal-fired unit, the water abandonment cost of a reservoir-type hydroelectric generating set and the electricity abandonment cost of a new energy unit as an optimization target. Wherein, the operation cost of the coal-fired unit comprises the fuel cost, the starting cost and the shutdown cost:
Figure BDA0002911956440000151
wherein ND/NDT/NS/NSDThe number of days contained in a production simulation time scale/the number of hours contained in each day/the number of reservoir type hydropower dispatching cycles/the number of days contained in each dispatching cycle; omegaTGRNEGThe system is a set of a system coal-fired unit/a reservoir/a new energy unit;
Figure BDA0002911956440000152
the method comprises the following steps of (1) collecting reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating sets contained in a reservoir j;
Figure BDA0002911956440000153
the fuel cost/start-up cost/shut-down cost of the coal-fired unit i;
Figure BDA0002911956440000154
indicating variables for judging whether the coal-fired unit i is started or stopped on k days, wherein 0 represents that the starting/stopping operation is not carried out, and 1 represents that the starting/stopping operation is carried out;
Figure BDA0002911956440000155
predicting available power generation amount/actual power generation amount of the reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating set in a scheduling period;
Figure BDA0002911956440000156
predicted output/actual generated energy of the new energy unit; beta is aHNEThe cost of electricity abandonment for a storage capacity type hydroelectric generating set/new energy generating set unit;
s203, constructing model constraint conditions including power supply operation constraint, system operation constraint, verification constraint and other constraints;
(1) power supply operating constraints comprising:
fuel cost linearization constraint of coal-fired unit (3):
Figure BDA0002911956440000157
electric energy generation amount clamp constraint (4):
Figure BDA0002911956440000158
running state logical constraints (5) - (6):
Figure BDA0002911956440000159
Figure BDA0002911956440000161
total number of start/stop constraints (7) - (8):
Figure BDA0002911956440000162
Figure BDA0002911956440000163
and (3) power generation capacity clamping constraint (9) of a reservoir type hydroelectric generating set:
Figure BDA0002911956440000164
and power generation amount constraint (10) in a reservoir dispatching cycle:
Figure BDA0002911956440000165
and (3) the generated energy clamping constraint of the new energy unit (11):
Figure BDA0002911956440000166
daily power generation amount constraint (12):
Figure BDA0002911956440000167
wherein ND/NDT/NS/NSDThe number of days contained in a production simulation time scale/the number of hours contained in each day/the number of reservoir type hydropower dispatching cycles/the number of days contained in each dispatching cycle; m is the number of linear sections of the fuel consumption curve of the coal-fired unit; omegaTGHGRNEGThe system is a set of a system coal-fired unit/a reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating set/a reservoir/a new energy source unit;
Figure BDA0002911956440000168
indicating variables for indicating whether the coal-fired unit i runs/starts/stops on k days, wherein 0 represents that the coal-fired unit i is in a shutdown state or does not start or stop operation, and 1 represents that the coal-fired unit i is in a running state or starts or stops operation;
Figure BDA0002911956440000169
the actual generated energy of a coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating unit/new energy source unit i in k days;
Figure BDA00029119564400001610
predicting the available generated energy/the predicted output of the new energy unit for the reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating set in the scheduling period;
Figure BDA00029119564400001611
the minimum technical output of a coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating set i;
Figure BDA00029119564400001612
the maximum technical output of a coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating unit/new energy unit i; LKi,s/LBi,sThe slope/intercept parameter of the linear segmentation of the fuel consumption characteristic curve of the coal-fired unit is obtained; n is a radical ofD,max/NU,maxThe number of times of shutdown/startup of the coal-fired unit is the upper limit;
(2) system operational constraints include:
system day electric quantity balance constraint (13)
Figure BDA0002911956440000171
Daily average upper/lower load backup constraints (14) to (15):
Figure BDA0002911956440000172
Figure BDA0002911956440000173
wherein ND/NDTNumber of days contained for production simulation timescale/number of hours contained per day; omegaTGHGNEGTLDThe system is a set of a system coal-fired unit/a reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating unit/a new energy source unit/a cross-region tie line/load;
Figure BDA0002911956440000174
the method comprises the following steps of (1) providing actual generated energy/exchange electric quantity/required electric quantity of a coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating unit/new energy unit/cross-region connecting line/load i in k days;
Figure BDA0002911956440000175
an indication variable for indicating whether the coal-fired unit i operates on k days, wherein 0 represents that the coal-fired unit i is in a shutdown state, and 1 represents that the coal-fired unit i is in an operating state;
Figure BDA0002911956440000176
the minimum technical output of a coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating set i;
Figure BDA0002911956440000177
the maximum technical output of the coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating set i is obtained; alpha is alphaULDLA level of upper/lower load back-up for the system;
(3) the net load peak-to-valley load moment check constraints include:
upper and lower power supply power limits at the peak-valley time of the net load (16) to (21):
Figure BDA0002911956440000178
Figure BDA0002911956440000179
Figure BDA00029119564400001710
Figure BDA0002911956440000181
Figure BDA0002911956440000182
Figure BDA0002911956440000183
power balance constraint of system (22):
Figure BDA0002911956440000184
upper/lower load backup constraints (23) to (24):
Figure BDA0002911956440000185
Figure BDA0002911956440000186
network transmission capability constraint (25):
Figure BDA0002911956440000187
wherein ND is the number of days included in the production simulation time scale; omegaBTGHGNEGTLDThe system is a set of a system bus, a coal-fired unit, a reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating unit, a new energy unit, a cross-regional connecting line and a load;
Figure BDA0002911956440000188
a power supply or an equivalent power supply (comprising a coal-fired unit, a reservoir type hydroelectric unit and a new energy unit) connected with the bus iAnd cross-regional tie)/load set;
Figure BDA0002911956440000189
the actual generated energy of a coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating unit/new energy source unit i in k days;
Figure BDA00029119564400001810
an indication variable for indicating whether the coal-fired unit i operates on k days, wherein 0 represents that the coal-fired unit i is in a shutdown state, and 1 represents that the coal-fired unit i is in an operating state;
Figure BDA00029119564400001811
the method is characterized by comprising the following steps of (1) actual output/exchange power/required power of a coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating unit/new energy unit/cross-regional connecting line/(any type) power supply or equivalent power supply/load i at the peak moment of k days. Note that replacing PL in the superscript with VL then represents the physical value at the valley time;
Figure BDA00029119564400001812
the minimum technical output of a coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating set i;
Figure BDA00029119564400001813
the maximum technical output of the coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating set i is obtained; alpha is alphaULDLA level of upper/lower load back-up for the system; gl,iThe method comprises the following steps of transferring distribution factors for power generation from a line l to a bus i in a power transmission network, and establishing a linear mapping relation between bus injection power and line direct current power flow;
Figure BDA0002911956440000191
the transmission capacity limit of the transmission line/transformer l;
it should be noted that the peak-to-valley load time validation constraints include, but are not limited to, the constraints listed in (16) - (25). The above-mentioned constraint represents only the check constraint at the peak time, and the check constraint at the valley time has the same mathematical form as that at the peak time, and can be obtained by replacing PL in the superscripts of the symbols in (16) to (22) and (25) with VL.
(4) Other constraints include:
peak shaving capacity constraint of conventional schedulable units (mainly coal-fired units and reservoir hydroelectric units) (26):
Figure BDA0002911956440000192
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0002911956440000193
the number of days contained for the production simulation time scale/the number of hours contained for the kth day; omegaTGHGDThe system is a set of a system coal-fired unit/a reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating set/a load;
Figure BDA0002911956440000194
the actual generating capacity of the reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating set i in k days is obtained;
Figure BDA0002911956440000195
load demand at t hours for full system payload;
Figure BDA0002911956440000196
an indication variable for indicating whether the coal-fired unit i operates on k days, wherein 0 represents that the coal-fired unit i is in a shutdown state, and 1 represents that the coal-fired unit i is in an operating state;
Figure BDA0002911956440000197
the upward climbing rate of the coal-fired unit i;
Figure BDA0002911956440000198
the maximum technical output of a coal-fired unit i is obtained;
the principle of the constraint lies in that the estimated available climbing capacity of the peak-shaving power supply mainly comprising a coal-fired unit and a reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric unit in t hours is forced to be larger than the fluctuation of a net load, so that the peak-shaving requirement of the system can be met. Wherein the total output of the coal fired unit is estimated using the net load value.
And S204, solving the medium-term unit combination model constructed in the steps S202 and S203.
S3, establishing statistical data including installed capacity, generated energy, utilization hours and system operation cost of each type of power supply, and completing analog calculation; and the analog values of the installed capacity, the generated energy, the utilization hours and the system operation cost of each type of power supply after analog calculation can be used as reference indexes of the economic and technical performance of the planning scheme. The daily generated energy and the start-stop plan of each type of power supply can also be used as a detail reference for evaluating the planning scheme, or a reference for compiling the power generation plan after the planning scheme passes through and is put into use.
(1) The installed capacity of each type of power supply comprises the installed capacity (27) of a coal-fired unit, a reservoir capacity type hydroelectric unit and a new energy unit:
Figure BDA0002911956440000201
wherein, PG,CapInstalled capacity for a certain type of power source; omegaGIs a collection of power sources of a certain type;
Figure BDA0002911956440000202
the maximum technical output of a certain power supply i is provided;
(2) the power generation capacity of each type of power supply comprises the actual power generation capacity (28) of a coal-fired unit, a reservoir capacity type hydroelectric unit and a new energy unit:
Figure BDA0002911956440000203
wherein E isG,GenIs the power generation of a certain type of power supply; omegaGIs a collection of power sources of a certain type;
Figure BDA0002911956440000204
the actual power generation amount of a certain power supply i on the kth day; ND is the number of days involved in producing the analog time scale;
(3) the utilization hours of various types of power supplies comprise the actual generated energy (29) of a coal-fired unit, a reservoir type hydroelectric unit and a new energy unit:
Figure BDA0002911956440000205
wherein AUHGIs the average number of hours of use of a certain type of power supply; eG,GenIs the power generation of a certain type of power supply; pG,CapInstalled capacity for a certain type of power source;
(4) system operating costs, including:
coal fired unit operating cost (30):
Figure BDA0002911956440000206
storage capacity type water and electricity abandon cost (31):
Figure BDA0002911956440000211
cost of electricity abandonment for new energy unit (32):
Figure BDA0002911956440000212
wherein ND/NDT/NS/NSDThe number of days contained in a production simulation time scale/the number of hours contained in each day/the number of reservoir type hydropower dispatching cycles/the number of days contained in each dispatching cycle; omegaTGRNEGIs a set of a coal-fired unit/a reservoir/a new energy unit;
Figure BDA0002911956440000213
the method comprises the following steps of (1) collecting reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating sets contained in a reservoir j;
Figure BDA0002911956440000214
the fuel cost/start-up cost/shut-down cost of the coal-fired unit i;
Figure BDA0002911956440000215
indicating variables for judging whether the coal-fired unit i is started or stopped on k days, wherein 0 represents that the starting/stopping operation is not carried out, and 1 represents that the starting/stopping operation is carried out;
Figure BDA0002911956440000216
predicting available power generation amount/actual power generation amount of the reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating set in a scheduling period;
Figure BDA0002911956440000217
predicted output/actual generated energy of the new energy unit; beta is aHNEThe cost of electricity abandonment for a storage capacity type hydroelectric generating set/new energy generating set unit;
by means of the indexes and in combination with the simulated power generation plans of various types of power supplies made by production simulation, planners can check the economic and technical indexes of the planning scheme.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a long-term production simulation system for an electric power system based on a medium-term unit combination is provided, where the system can be used to realize long-term production simulation of the electric power system based on the medium-term unit combination, and specifically, the long-term production simulation system for the electric power system based on the medium-term unit combination includes an acquisition module, a modeling module, and a calculation module.
The acquisition module acquires planning data and prediction data of the power system;
the modeling module is used for constructing daily statistical information of the peak valley time of the net load according to the acquired planning data and the prediction data of the power system; constructing an objective function of a middle-stage unit combination model by taking the comprehensive operation cost formed by minimizing the operation cost of a coal-fired unit, the water abandoning cost of a reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating unit and the electricity abandoning cost of a new energy unit as optimization targets; constructing a medium-term unit combination model constraint condition comprising power supply operation constraint, system operation constraint, verification constraint and other constraints; establishing a middle-period unit combination model;
and the calculation module is used for solving the established middle-stage unit combination model to obtain the installed capacity, the generated energy, the utilization hours and the system operation cost of each type of power supply, and completing the long-term production simulation calculation of the power system.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention, a terminal device is provided that includes a processor and a memory for storing a computer program comprising program instructions, the processor being configured to execute the program instructions stored by the computer storage medium. The Processor may be a Central Processing Unit (CPU), or may be other general purpose Processor, a Digital Signal Processor (DSP), an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), an off-the-shelf Programmable gate array (FPGA) or other Programmable logic device, a discrete gate or transistor logic device, a discrete hardware component, etc., which is a computing core and a control core of the terminal, and is adapted to implement one or more instructions, and is specifically adapted to load and execute one or more instructions to implement a corresponding method flow or a corresponding function; the processor provided by the embodiment of the invention can be used for the operation of the long-term production simulation calculation of the power system based on the medium-term unit combination, and comprises the following steps:
acquiring planning data and prediction data of the power system; constructing daily statistical information of the peak-valley time of the net load according to the acquired planning data and the prediction data of the power system; constructing an objective function of a middle-stage unit combination model by taking the comprehensive operation cost formed by minimizing the operation cost of a coal-fired unit, the water abandoning cost of a reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating unit and the electricity abandoning cost of a new energy unit as optimization targets; constructing a medium-term unit combination model constraint condition comprising power supply operation constraint, system operation constraint, verification constraint and other constraints; establishing a middle-period unit combination model; and solving the established middle-term unit combination model to obtain the installed capacity, the generated energy, the utilization hours and the system operation cost of each type of power supply, and completing the long-term production simulation calculation of the power system.
In still another embodiment of the present invention, the present invention further provides a storage medium, specifically a computer-readable storage medium (Memory), which is a Memory device in a terminal device and is used for storing programs and data. It is understood that the computer readable storage medium herein may include a built-in storage medium in the terminal device, and may also include an extended storage medium supported by the terminal device. The computer-readable storage medium provides a storage space storing an operating system of the terminal. Also, one or more instructions, which may be one or more computer programs (including program code), are stored in the memory space and are adapted to be loaded and executed by the processor. It should be noted that the computer-readable storage medium may be a high-speed RAM memory, or may be a non-volatile memory (non-volatile memory), such as at least one disk memory.
The processor can load and execute one or more instructions stored in the computer readable storage medium to realize the corresponding steps of the power system long-term production simulation calculation based on the medium-term unit combination in the embodiment; one or more instructions in the computer-readable storage medium are loaded by the processor and perform the steps of:
acquiring planning data and prediction data of the power system; constructing daily statistical information of the peak-valley time of the net load according to the acquired planning data and the prediction data of the power system; constructing an objective function of a middle-stage unit combination model by taking the comprehensive operation cost formed by minimizing the operation cost of a coal-fired unit, the water abandoning cost of a reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating unit and the electricity abandoning cost of a new energy unit as optimization targets; constructing a medium-term unit combination model constraint condition comprising power supply operation constraint, system operation constraint, verification constraint and other constraints; establishing a middle-period unit combination model; and solving the established middle-term unit combination model to obtain the installed capacity, the generated energy, the utilization hours and the system operation cost of each type of power supply, and completing the long-term production simulation calculation of the power system.
Example analysis
In order to verify the effectiveness of the method provided by the invention, a test system is adopted for analysis, the test system network frame comprises 44 buses (30 of the buses are load buses), 65 power transmission lines and 12 transformers, and a power supply comprises 32 coal-fired units, 3 reservoir-type hydroelectric generating units, 5 wind power plants and 4 photovoltaic power plants. Wherein the new energy stations are equivalent to new energy units to participate in calculation.
The calculation scale of the middle-period unit combination is set to be one calculation month (672h), and rolling calculation is carried out month by month until a production simulation result of 8736h is obtained. The computation time on an 8-core 16-thread processor is 5.59s, and the statistical index is as follows:
Figure BDA0002911956440000241
it can be seen that the operation speed of the production simulation is very fast; the method can quickly and effectively assist the power system planners to carry out economic and technical evaluation on the planning scheme.
In summary, the long-term production simulation method for the power system based on the medium-term unit combination can simulate the compilation of the long-term power generation plan of the power system by constructing and solving a medium-term unit combination optimization model with day as granularity on the basis of the given planning boundary and the given prediction information, so as to realize the rapid and effective production simulation of the power system planning scheme, thereby achieving the effect of assisting the power system planner to evaluate the economy and the technology of the planning scheme.
As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, embodiments of the present application may be provided as a method, system, or computer program product. Accordingly, the present application may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, the present application may take the form of a computer program product embodied on one or more computer-usable storage media (including, but not limited to, disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, and the like) having computer-usable program code embodied therein.
The present application is described with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of the application. It will be understood that each flow and/or block of the flow diagrams and/or block diagrams, and combinations of flows and/or blocks in the flow diagrams and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, embedded processor, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture including instruction means which implement the function specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide steps for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The above-mentioned contents are only for illustrating the technical idea of the present invention, and the protection scope of the present invention is not limited thereby, and any modification made on the basis of the technical idea of the present invention falls within the protection scope of the claims of the present invention.

Claims (10)

1. A long-term production simulation method of a power system based on medium-term unit combination is characterized by comprising the following steps:
s1, acquiring planning data and prediction data of the power system;
s2, constructing daily statistical information of the peak-valley time of the net load according to the acquired planning data and prediction data of the power system; constructing an objective function of a middle-stage unit combination model by taking the comprehensive operation cost formed by minimizing the operation cost of a coal-fired unit, the water abandoning cost of a reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating unit and the electricity abandoning cost of a new energy unit as optimization targets; constructing a medium-term unit combination model constraint condition comprising power supply operation constraint, system operation constraint, verification constraint and other constraints; establishing a middle-period unit combination model;
and S3, solving the established middle-stage unit combination model to obtain the installed capacity, the generated energy, the utilization hours and the system operation cost of each type of power supply, and completing the long-term production simulation calculation of the power system.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein in step S1, the power system planning data includes power supply planning data, grid planning data and other data; the power system prediction data comprise predicted values of load demand and new energy output under medium and long-term scales.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the power supply planning data comprises a maximum/minimum technical contribution P of the coal-fired uniti T,max/Pi T,minUpward slope climbing rate of coal-fired unit
Figure FDA0002911956430000011
Fuel consumption characteristic curve of coal-fired unit and maximum/minimum technical output P of reservoir type hydroelectric uniti H,max/Pi H,minMaximum technical output P of new energy uniti NE,max
The power grid planning data comprises network connection information and impedance parameters of each power transmission line and each transformer in the power grid, and the upper limit P of the transmission capacity of each power transmission line and each transformerl L,maxThe operation mode of the cross-region connecting line; other data, including geographical distribution information of the load, up/down load reserve level α of the systemULDL
The load demand and new energy output prediction value under the medium and long term scale comprises each nodeValues in medium and long term hourly demand prediction curves for loads
Figure FDA0002911956430000012
Values in the medium-and-long term hourly output prediction curves of the new energy units
Figure FDA0002911956430000021
Available generated energy prediction value in each scheduling period of reservoir type hydroelectric generating set
Figure FDA0002911956430000022
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein in step S2, the daily statistics of peak-to-valley times of payload are specifically constructed as follows:
obtaining a full-system net load hourly curve according to a load hourly demand prediction curve, a new energy hourly output prediction curve and a tie line hourly planned operating power, and then obtaining a total-system net load hourly curve according to Pt D,NetAnd carrying out statistics on the maximum value, the minimum value and the occurrence time of the net load day by day to obtain the day-by-day statistical information of the peak valley time of the net load.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the full system payload hourly curve:
Figure FDA0002911956430000023
wherein NT is the number of hours involved in the production of the simulation timescale; omegaDNEGTLIs the set of load/new energy machine group/cross-region connecting line of the system;
Figure FDA0002911956430000024
the output or operating power is predicted hourly for the net load/raw load/new energy/tie line.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein in step S2, in the objective function of the medium term unit combination model, the operating costs of the coal-fired unit, including fuel costs, start-up costs, and shut-down costs, are:
Figure FDA0002911956430000025
wherein ND/NDT/NS/NSDThe number of days contained in a production simulation time scale/the number of hours contained in each day/the number of reservoir type hydropower dispatching cycles/the number of days contained in each dispatching cycle; omegaTGRNEGThe system is a set of a system coal-fired unit/a reservoir/a new energy unit;
Figure FDA0002911956430000026
the method comprises the following steps of (1) collecting reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating sets contained in a reservoir j;
Figure FDA0002911956430000027
the fuel cost/start-up cost/shut-down cost of the coal-fired unit i;
Figure FDA0002911956430000028
indicating variables for judging whether the coal-fired unit i is started or stopped on k days, wherein 0 represents that the starting/stopping operation is not carried out, and 1 represents that the starting/stopping operation is carried out;
Figure FDA0002911956430000029
predicting available power generation amount/actual power generation amount of the reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating set in a scheduling period;
Figure FDA00029119564300000210
predicted output/actual generated energy of the new energy unit; beta is aHNEThe unit electricity abandonment cost of the reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating set/new energy generating set is reduced.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein in step S2, the power supply operation constraints include a coal-fired unit fuel cost linearization constraint, a power generation amount clamp constraint, an operation state logic constraint, a total start/stop constraint, a reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating amount clamp constraint, a reservoir scheduling period power generation amount constraint, a new energy unit power generation amount clamp constraint, and a daily power generation amount constraint; the system operation constraint comprises a system daily electric quantity balance constraint and a daily average up/down load standby constraint; the check constraint comprises upper and lower limit constraints of power supply power at the peak-valley time of a net load day, power balance constraint of a system, upper/lower load standby constraint and network transmission capacity constraint; other constraints include the peak shaving capability of a conventional dispatchable crew.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the fuel cost linearization constraint for the coal burning unit is:
Figure FDA0002911956430000031
the generated energy clamp constraint is as follows:
Figure FDA0002911956430000032
the operating state logic constraints are:
Figure FDA0002911956430000033
Figure FDA0002911956430000034
the total number of start-ups/shutdowns constraints are:
Figure FDA0002911956430000035
Figure FDA0002911956430000036
the generated energy of the reservoir-capacity hydroelectric generating set is clamped and restrained as follows:
Figure FDA0002911956430000037
the constraint of the electricity generation amount in the reservoir dispatching cycle is as follows:
Figure FDA0002911956430000041
the generated energy clamp constraint of the new energy unit is as follows:
Figure FDA0002911956430000042
the power generation amount in the day is restricted as follows:
Figure FDA0002911956430000043
wherein ND/NDT/NS/NSDThe number of days contained in a production simulation time scale/the number of hours contained in each day/the number of reservoir type hydropower dispatching cycles/the number of days contained in each dispatching cycle; m is the number of linear sections of the fuel consumption curve of the coal-fired unit; omegaTGHGRNEGThe system is a set of a system coal-fired unit/a reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating set/a reservoir/a new energy source unit;
Figure FDA0002911956430000044
an indication variable of whether the coal-fired unit i is operated/started/stopped on k days, 0 represents shutdown state/notStarting or stopping operation is carried out, wherein 1 represents that the system is in a running state or the starting or stopping operation is carried out;
Figure FDA0002911956430000045
the actual generated energy of a coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating unit/new energy source unit i in k days;
Figure FDA0002911956430000046
predicting the available generated energy/the predicted output of the new energy unit for the reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating set in the scheduling period; pi T,min/Pi H,minThe minimum technical output of a coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating set i; pi T,max/Pi H,max/Pi NE,maxThe maximum technical output of a coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating unit/new energy unit i; LKi,s/LBi,sThe slope/intercept parameter of the linear segmentation of the fuel consumption characteristic curve of the coal-fired unit is obtained; n is a radical ofD,max/NU,maxThe number of times of shutdown/startup of the coal-fired unit is the upper limit;
the daily electric quantity balance constraint of the system is as follows:
Figure FDA0002911956430000047
the daily average upper/lower load backup constraints are:
Figure FDA0002911956430000051
Figure FDA0002911956430000052
wherein ND/NDTNumber of days contained for production simulation timescale/number of hours contained per day; omegaTGHGNEGTLDFor system coal-fired units/storage type hydroelectric powerA set of units/new energy units/cross-regional links/loads;
Figure FDA0002911956430000053
the method comprises the following steps of (1) providing actual generated energy/exchange electric quantity/required electric quantity of a coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating unit/new energy unit/cross-region connecting line/load i in k days;
Figure FDA0002911956430000054
an indication variable for indicating whether the coal-fired unit i operates on k days, wherein 0 represents that the coal-fired unit i is in a shutdown state, and 1 represents that the coal-fired unit i is in an operating state; pi T,min/Pi H,minThe minimum technical output of a coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating set i; pi T,max/Pi H,maxThe maximum technical output of the coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating set i is obtained; alpha is alphaULDLA level of upper/lower load back-up for the system;
the upper and lower limits of the power supply power at the time of the peak valley of the net load are constrained as follows:
Figure FDA0002911956430000055
Figure FDA0002911956430000056
Figure FDA0002911956430000057
Figure FDA0002911956430000058
Figure FDA0002911956430000059
Figure FDA00029119564300000510
the power balance constraint of the system is:
Figure FDA00029119564300000511
the up/down load standby constraints are:
Figure FDA00029119564300000512
Figure FDA0002911956430000061
the network transmission capability constraints are:
Figure FDA0002911956430000062
wherein ND is the number of days included in the production simulation time scale; omegaBTGHGNEGTLDThe system is a set of a system bus, a coal-fired unit, a reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating unit, a new energy unit, a cross-regional connecting line and a load;
Figure FDA0002911956430000063
is the collection of the power supply or equivalent power supply/load connected on the bus i;
Figure FDA0002911956430000064
the actual generated energy of a coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating unit/new energy source unit i in k days;
Figure FDA0002911956430000065
an indication variable for indicating whether the coal-fired unit i operates on k days, wherein 0 represents that the coal-fired unit i is in a shutdown state, and 1 represents that the coal-fired unit i is in an operating state;
Figure FDA0002911956430000066
replacing PL in the upper standard with VL to represent a physical value at a valley time for an actual output/exchange power/required power of a coal-fired unit/a reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating unit/a new energy source unit/a cross-regional connecting line/power supply or an equivalent power supply/load i at a peak time of k days; pi T,min/Pi H,minThe minimum technical output of a coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating set i; pi T,max/Pi H,maxThe maximum technical output of the coal-fired unit/reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating set i is obtained; alpha is alphaULDLA level of upper/lower load back-up for the system; gl,iTransferring distribution factors for power generation from a line l to a bus i in the power transmission network; pl L,maxThe transmission capacity limit of the transmission line/transformer l;
the peak shaving capacity constraint of a conventional dispatchable unit is:
Figure FDA0002911956430000067
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA0002911956430000068
the number of days contained for the production simulation time scale/the number of hours contained for the kth day; omegaTGHGDThe system is a set of a system coal-fired unit/a reservoir-capacity type hydroelectric generating set/a load;
Figure FDA0002911956430000069
the actual generating capacity of the reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating set i in k days is obtained; pt D,NetLoad demand at t hours for full system payload;
Figure FDA00029119564300000610
an indication variable for indicating whether the coal-fired unit i operates on k days, wherein 0 represents that the coal-fired unit i is in a shutdown state, and 1 represents that the coal-fired unit i is in an operating state;
Figure FDA00029119564300000611
the upward climbing rate of the coal-fired unit i; pi T,maxThe maximum technical output of the coal-fired unit i.
9. The method according to claim 1, wherein in step S3, the installed capacities of the power sources of each type include installed capacities of a coal-fired unit, a reservoir-type hydro-power unit, and a new energy unit; the power generation capacity of each type of power supply comprises the actual power generation capacity of a coal-fired unit, a reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating unit and a new energy unit; the utilization hours of each type of power supply comprise actual generated energy of a coal-fired unit, a reservoir type hydroelectric generating unit and a new energy unit; the system operation cost comprises the operation cost of a coal-fired unit, the storage capacity type water and electricity abandoning cost and the electricity abandoning cost of a new energy unit; and according to the indexes, checking the economic and technical indexes of the planning scheme by combining the simulated power generation plans of various types of power supplies formulated by production simulation.
10. Method according to claim 9, characterized in that the installed capacity P of the new energy source unitG,CapComprises the following steps:
Figure FDA0002911956430000071
wherein omegaGIs a collection of power sources of a certain type; pi G,maxThe maximum technical output of a certain power supply i is provided;
actual generating capacity E of new energy unitG,GenComprises the following steps:
Figure FDA0002911956430000072
wherein omegaGFor a power supply of some typeA set of (a);
Figure FDA0002911956430000073
the actual power generation amount of a certain power supply i on the kth day; ND is the number of days involved in producing the analog time scale;
average hours of utilization AUH of each type of power supplyGComprises the following steps:
Figure FDA0002911956430000074
wherein E isG,GenIs the power generation of a certain type of power supply; pG,CapInstalled capacity for a certain type of power source;
operating cost OC of coal-fired unitTComprises the following steps:
Figure FDA0002911956430000075
storage type water-electricity abandoned cost OCHComprises the following steps:
Figure FDA0002911956430000081
new energy unit abandons electric cost OCNEComprises the following steps:
Figure FDA0002911956430000082
wherein ND/NDT/NS/NSDThe number of days contained in a production simulation time scale/the number of hours contained in each day/the number of reservoir type hydropower dispatching cycles/the number of days contained in each dispatching cycle; omegaTGRNEGIs a set of a coal-fired unit/a reservoir/a new energy unit;
Figure FDA0002911956430000083
reservoir capacity type hydroelectric machine contained in reservoir jA set of groups;
Figure FDA0002911956430000084
the fuel cost/start-up cost/shut-down cost of the coal-fired unit i;
Figure FDA0002911956430000085
indicating variables for judging whether the coal-fired unit i is started or stopped on k days, wherein 0 represents that the starting/stopping operation is not carried out, and 1 represents that the starting/stopping operation is carried out;
Figure FDA0002911956430000086
predicting available power generation amount/actual power generation amount of the reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating set in a scheduling period;
Figure FDA0002911956430000087
predicted output/actual generated energy of the new energy unit; beta is aHNEThe unit electricity abandonment cost of the reservoir capacity type hydroelectric generating set/new energy generating set is reduced.
CN202110089709.3A 2021-01-22 2021-01-22 Medium-term unit combination-based power system long-term production simulation method Active CN112821390B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110089709.3A CN112821390B (en) 2021-01-22 2021-01-22 Medium-term unit combination-based power system long-term production simulation method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110089709.3A CN112821390B (en) 2021-01-22 2021-01-22 Medium-term unit combination-based power system long-term production simulation method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN112821390A true CN112821390A (en) 2021-05-18
CN112821390B CN112821390B (en) 2022-12-27

Family

ID=75858870

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202110089709.3A Active CN112821390B (en) 2021-01-22 2021-01-22 Medium-term unit combination-based power system long-term production simulation method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN112821390B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113642792A (en) * 2021-08-12 2021-11-12 中国南方电网有限责任公司 Medium-and-long-term unit combination accurate modeling technical method comprehensively considering complex large power grid operation constraint conditions

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106257792A (en) * 2016-08-04 2016-12-28 国家电网公司 A kind of new forms of energy priority scheduling method based on two benches Unit Combination
CN109980698A (en) * 2019-03-04 2019-07-05 国电南瑞科技股份有限公司 Long period fine granularity Unit Combination calculation method and system
CN112186734A (en) * 2020-08-20 2021-01-05 西安交通大学 Medium-and-long-term operation simulation method for power system, storage medium and computing equipment

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106257792A (en) * 2016-08-04 2016-12-28 国家电网公司 A kind of new forms of energy priority scheduling method based on two benches Unit Combination
CN109980698A (en) * 2019-03-04 2019-07-05 国电南瑞科技股份有限公司 Long period fine granularity Unit Combination calculation method and system
CN112186734A (en) * 2020-08-20 2021-01-05 西安交通大学 Medium-and-long-term operation simulation method for power system, storage medium and computing equipment

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
元一平: "协同短期调度的新能源电力系统月度机组组合模型与快速求解方法", 《中国电机工程学报》 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113642792A (en) * 2021-08-12 2021-11-12 中国南方电网有限责任公司 Medium-and-long-term unit combination accurate modeling technical method comprehensively considering complex large power grid operation constraint conditions

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN112821390B (en) 2022-12-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Pavičević et al. The potential of sector coupling in future European energy systems: Soft linking between the Dispa-SET and JRC-EU-TIMES models
Kang et al. Carbon emission flow from generation to demand: A network-based model
Jacobs et al. SOCRATES: A system for scheduling hydroelectric generation under uncertainty
CN106485352A (en) A kind of multiclass power supply generation schedule combination decision-making method
Pillai et al. Comparative analysis of hourly and dynamic power balancing models for validating future energy scenarios
CN109767078B (en) Multi-type power supply maintenance arrangement method based on mixed integer programming
Koeppel Reliability considerations of future energy systems: multi-carrier systems and the effect of energy storage
CN110350518B (en) Power grid energy storage capacity demand assessment method and system for peak shaving
CN103855718A (en) Scheduling method for pumped storage power station to participate in electric power system with wind power
CN112186734B (en) Medium-and-long-term operation simulation method for power system, storage medium and computing equipment
Pruckner et al. A hybrid simulation model for large-scaled electricity generation systems
CN110752598B (en) Method and device for evaluating flexibility of multipoint distributed energy storage system
Huang et al. Validation of a Europe-wide electricity system model for techno-economic analysis
CN112821390B (en) Medium-term unit combination-based power system long-term production simulation method
CN116111597A (en) Method, system, memory and equipment for constructing tidal current section scene set of medium-long term scheduling plan
CN108847661B (en) Annual production simulation operation method and system for regional power system
CN108767855B (en) Random production simulation method for time sequence continuous hybrid power system
CN112510690B (en) Optimal scheduling method and system considering wind-fire-storage combination and demand response reward and punishment
CN110544033B (en) Wind power consumption assessment method for power system after flexibility transformation of thermal power plant
Attardo et al. Urban energy hubs economic optimization and environmental comparison in Italy and Vietnam
CN112994087B (en) Multi-source power system medium-term optimization scheduling method based on conditional risk constraint
Fu et al. Study on wind power consumption capacity of power grid considering risk and unit commitment
Pavičević et al. Modelling flexible power demand and supply in the EU power system: soft-linking between JRC-EU-TIMES and the open-source Dispa-SET model
Konishi et al. Optimal allocation of photovoltaic systems and energy storages in power systems considering power shortage and surplus
CN116799836A (en) New energy station configuration energy storage benefit evaluation method and system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant