CN112797856A - Method for rapidly evaluating position load of minimum risk bomb of transport aircraft - Google Patents
Method for rapidly evaluating position load of minimum risk bomb of transport aircraft Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112797856A CN112797856A CN202110131766.3A CN202110131766A CN112797856A CN 112797856 A CN112797856 A CN 112797856A CN 202110131766 A CN202110131766 A CN 202110131766A CN 112797856 A CN112797856 A CN 112797856A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- load
- equivalent
- mach
- overpressure
- explosive
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
- F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
- F42B35/00—Testing or checking of ammunition
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a method for quickly evaluating the position load of a minimum risk bomb of a transport plane, which comprises the following steps of firstly, placing a detonation center at a selected position; secondly, calculating pressure pulses acting on internal points of the fuselage; finally, the dynamic load is converted into an equivalent static load for predicting structural failure caused by explosion. According to the invention, the equivalent static pressure is obtained through calculation, the scale of structural damage caused by explosive explosion can be estimated through the value, and the estimated value is utilized to assist in evaluating whether the residual structure can continuously bear the flight load.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of rapid evaluation of minimum risk bombs, in particular to a rapid evaluation method for position loads of minimum risk bombs of a transportation type airplane.
Background
The federal aviation administration of the united states issued a FAR 25-127 amendment on 28/10/2008, requiring manufacturers to design a "minimum risk bomb location" on the aircraft for placement of discovered suspect devices. Through the comprehensive design of the structure and the system, the key structure and the system related to the safety of the airplane can be protected to the maximum extent once the key structure and the system are exploded, so that the safety level of the airplane is effectively improved.
The validity of the aircraft minimum risk bomb position (LRBL) does not need to be verified experimentally, i.e. the validity of the position does not need to be verified by exploding the aircraft with "real bombs". However, depending on the design, other experiments related to LRBL are required, so how to establish a method for quickly evaluating the location load of the minimum risk bomb is an effective means for supporting the LRBL design and compliance verification.
Disclosure of Invention
Aiming at the existing problems, the invention provides a method for quickly evaluating the position load of the minimum risk bomb of the transport aircraft.
The technical solution for realizing the purpose of the invention is as follows:
the method for rapidly evaluating the position load of the minimum risk bomb of the transport-type airplane is characterized by comprising the following steps of:
step 1: placing the detonation center at a selected position, recording coordinates of the position as (a, b, c), defining parameters of the airplane body, and initializing the parameters: radius R, length L, thickness t and explosive equivalent w;
step 2: based on the coordinates and initialization parameters of the calculated point in the fuselage, the relevant parameters of the shock wave acting on the point in the fuselage and the load holding time t are calculated0And the shock wave related parameters include: mach number M of incident wavexReflected overpressure prMach number M of Mach wavesMach overpressure pmsAnd maximum Mach angle of reflection betamax;
And step 3: by calculating the maximum overpressure pmaxThe dynamic coefficient y is used for converting the dynamic load generated by explosion into the equivalent static load under the equivalent quantity and predicting the structural damage caused by explosion;
and 4, step 4: according to the maximum overpressure p obtainedmaxAnd the dynamic coefficient y, calculating to obtain the equivalent static pressure based on the detonation distance and the explosive equivalent;
and 5: the stress condition of the aircraft structure after the bomb explosion can be solved according to the obtained equivalent static pressure, and then whether the residual strength of the aircraft structure can continuously bear the flight load or not is evaluated in an auxiliary mode.
Further, the incident wave Mach number M obtained in the step 2xReflection overpressure prMach number M of Mach wavesMach overpressure pmsAngle of maximum Mach reflection betamaxAnd time of load t0Respectively as follows:
wherein, according to the cube root law of proportionality: if two same explosive charges are provided, the geometrical shapes of the charges are similar to each other, the charges have different sizes, and when the charges are exploded in the same atmosphere, the charges are at the same proportional distanceSimilar shock waves are generated, D is a space distance, and w is the equivalent weight of the explosive;
Ms=Mx/sinβ (4),
wherein beta is the contained angle between the ray that sends out from the initiation point and the fuselage profile intersection point tangent line, b is the horizontal radial distance of explosive and equivalent static load point to:
β=90-arctan(R/b) (5),
further, the maximum overpressure p of step 3maxComprises the following steps:
further, modeling the aircraft structure as a one-dimensional system with the natural frequency as a characteristic, wherein the static load in step 3 is the static load which generates the same deformation as the dynamic explosion, and estimating the natural frequency T of the structure, wherein the estimation formula is as follows:
wherein f is the cycle frequency;
and:
wherein t is the skin thickness, C is the frequency constant, k is the material factor, and l is the distance between the reinforcement frames.
Further, step 4 calculates the equivalent static pressure P for each of the explosive distance and the explosive equivalentEThe formula of (1) is:
PE=pmaxy (12)。
compared with the prior art, the method has the following beneficial effects:
firstly, the damage range of the explosion shock wave obtained by calculation on the aircraft skin can meet the requirement of any precision;
secondly, the invention can quickly provide the equivalent static pressure calculated by each explosion distance and the explosive equivalent, estimate the structural damage scale caused by explosive explosion according to the obtained equivalent static pressure, and assist in evaluating whether the residual structure can continuously bear the flight load by using the estimated value.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a process flow diagram of an evaluation method of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a Mach number versus proportional distance fit curve in the present invention;
FIG. 3 is t0T and pE/pmaxThe graph of (a), namely a curve diagram of the kinetic coefficient y;
Detailed Description
In order to make those skilled in the art better understand the technical solution of the present invention, the following further describes the technical solution of the present invention with reference to the drawings and the embodiments.
Referring to the attached fig. 1, the method for rapidly evaluating the location load of the minimum risk bomb of the transport-type airplane, provided by the invention, comprises the following operation steps:
step 1: placing the detonation center at a selected position, recording coordinates of the position as (a, b, c), defining parameters of the airplane body, and initializing the parameters: radius R, length L, thickness t and explosive equivalent w;
step 2: based on the coordinates and initialization parameters of the calculated point in the fuselage, the relevant parameters of the shock wave acting on the point in the fuselage and the load holding time t are calculated0And the shock wave related parameters include: mach number M of incident wavexReflected overpressure prMach number M of Mach wavesMach overpressure pmsAnd maximum Mach angle of reflection betamax;
And step 3: by calculating the maximum overpressure pmaxThe dynamic coefficient y is used for converting the dynamic load generated by explosion into the equivalent static load under the equivalent quantity and predicting the structural damage caused by explosion;
wherein, the dynamic load refers to that the explosive load is in a change state (dynamic pressure), and the static load refers to a static load (static pressure); the maximum overpressure is the maximum value of dynamic pressure, and the power coefficient y is a parameter for converting the maximum value of dynamic pressure into static pressure;
and 4, step 4: according to the maximum overpressure p obtainedmaxAnd the dynamic coefficient y, calculating to obtain the equivalent static pressure based on the detonation distance and the explosive equivalent;
and 5: the stress condition of the aircraft structure after the bomb explosion can be solved according to the obtained equivalent static pressure, and then whether the rest structure of the aircraft structure can continuously bear the flight load or not is evaluated in an auxiliary mode.
The equivalent static pressure is acted on the airplane structure, so that the stress of the airplane structure after the bomb explodes can be solved, and the residual strength can be evaluated in an auxiliary manner;
preferably, in step 2, the proportional distance z of any position of the fuselage is solved, and an explicit Shocks in air annex table is fitted to obtain the proportional distance z and the mach number MxThe Mach number M of the incident wave is obtained by the piecewise function betweenxComprises the following steps:
wherein, according to Hopkinson's law of proportionality, also called cube-root's law of proportionality: if two same explosive charges are provided, the geometrical shapes of the charges are similar to each other, the charges have different sizes, and when the charges are exploded in the same atmosphere, the charges are at the same proportional distanceGenerating similar shock waves, wherein D is the space distance, and w is the equivalent weight of the explosive;
according to the obtained incident wave Mach number MxObtaining the overpressure at this point, the reflected overpressure prMach number M of Mach wavesMach overpressure pmsMaximum Mach reflectionAngle betamaxAnd time of load t0Respectively as follows:
Ms=Mx/sinβ (4),
wherein, beta is 90-arctan (R/b) which represents the included angle between a ray drawn from the initiation point and the tangent of the intersection point of the fuselage outline, and b is the horizontal radial distance between the explosive and the equivalent static load point;
preferably, in step 3, said maximum overpressure pmaxComprises the following steps:
at this time, a static load which is the same as the static load generated by the dynamic explosion in the process of generating deformation is determined, the natural frequency T of the structure must be estimated, and since the deformation of the structure under the dynamic load is related to the natural frequency of the structure (the ratio of the explosion action time to the natural frequency is linearly related to the ratio of the equivalent static load to the dynamic load), the natural frequency of the structure is considered when the dynamic load is equivalent to the static load, and the calculation formula is as follows:
wherein f is the cycle frequency;
and:
wherein t is the skin thickness, C is the frequency constant, k is the material factor, and l is the distance between the reinforcement frames.
According to the abscissa as t0T, s, ordinate pE/pmaxI.e. the curve of the kinetic coefficient y, the fitted piecewise function is:
in FIG. 3, t is0T and pE/pmaxThe abscissa of the graph of (a) is denoted as s, the ordinate is denoted as y, y is linearly related to x, the resulting curve is a curve of the kinetic coefficient y, so the value of s can be determined by a series of equations preceding equation (13), pmaxIt can also be found that P can be obtained according to the formula (13)E。
Further, an equivalent static pressure P can be calculated for each of the explosive distance and the explosive equivalentEComprises the following steps:
PE=pmaxy (12)。
examples
Assuming that the explosive equivalent is 80g, the skin thickness is 2mm, the distance l between the reinforcing frames is 300mm, and the explosion distance is the incident wave Mach number MxReflection overpressure prMach number M of Mach wavesMach overpressure pms,
Maximum Mach angle of reflection betamaxAnd time of load t0Respectively as follows:
Mx=20.6266-44.3921z+28.3631z2=3.4681;
inputting R and b values by a program according to the parameters of the airplane and the coordinate points for calculating the static load,
and calculating: β -90-arctan (R/b) -1.2558;
Ms=Mx/sinβ=Inf;
in this case, beta is not more than betamaxMaximum overpressure pmaxComprises the following steps:
pmax=pr=76.7230Psi;
at this time, the natural frequency T of the structure is:
s=t0/T=0.0641;
the kinetic coefficient y is obtained by equation (13):
y=0.02+s=0.0841;
converting the dynamic load into equivalent static load for predicting structural damage caused by explosion and equivalent static pressure PEComprises the following steps:
PE=pmaxy=6.4563Psi。
according to the obtained equivalent static pressure PEThe size of the structural damage caused by the explosive blast is estimated and this estimate is then used to assist in assessing whether the remaining structure can continue to withstand the flight loads.
Those not described in detail in this specification are within the skill of the art. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes in the embodiments and modifications of the invention can be made, and equivalents of some features of the invention can be substituted, and any changes, equivalents, improvements and the like, which fall within the spirit and principle of the invention, are intended to be included within the scope of the invention.
Claims (5)
1. The method for rapidly evaluating the position load of the minimum risk bomb of the transport-type airplane is characterized by comprising the following steps of:
step 1: placing the detonation center at a selected position, recording coordinates of the position as (a, b, c), defining parameters of the airplane body, and initializing the parameters: radius R, length L, thickness t and explosive equivalent w;
step 2: based on the coordinates and initialization parameters of the calculated point in the fuselage, the relevant parameters of the shock wave acting on the point in the fuselage and the load holding time t are calculated0And the shock wave related parameters include: mach number M of incident wavexReflected overpressure prMach number M of Mach wavesMach overpressure pmsAnd maximum Mach angle of reflection betamax;
And step 3: by calculating the maximum overpressure pmaxThe dynamic coefficient y is used for converting the dynamic load generated by explosion into the equivalent static load under the equivalent quantity and predicting the structural damage caused by explosion;
step (ii) of4: according to the maximum overpressure p obtainedmaxAnd the dynamic coefficient y, calculating to obtain the equivalent static pressure based on the detonation distance and the explosive equivalent;
and 5: the stress condition of the aircraft structure after the bomb explosion can be solved according to the obtained equivalent static pressure, and then whether the rest structure of the aircraft structure can continuously bear the flight load or not is evaluated in an auxiliary mode.
2. The method for rapidly estimating the location load of the minimum risk bomb of a transport-type aircraft according to claim 1, wherein the incident wave Mach number M obtained in step 2xReflection overpressure prMach number M of Mach wavesMach overpressure pmsAngle of maximum Mach reflection betamaxAnd time of load t0Respectively as follows:
wherein, according to the cube root law of proportionality: if two same explosive charges are provided, the geometrical shapes of the charges are similar to each other, the charges have different sizes, and when the charges are exploded in the same atmosphere, the charges are at the same proportional distanceSimilar shock waves are generated, D is a space distance, and w is the equivalent weight of the explosive;
Ms=Mx/sinβ (4),
wherein beta is the contained angle between the ray that sends out from the initiation point and the fuselage profile intersection point tangent line, b is the horizontal radial distance of explosive and equivalent static load point to:
β=90-arctan(R/b) (5),
4. the method for rapidly estimating the location load of the minimum risk bomb of transportation aircraft as claimed in claim 1, wherein the aircraft structure is modeled as a one-dimensional system characterized by natural frequency, the static load in step 3 is the static load which generates the same deformation as the dynamic explosion, the natural frequency T of the structure is estimated, and the estimation formula is as follows:
wherein f is the cycle frequency;
and:
wherein t is the skin thickness, C is the frequency constant, k is the material factor, and l is the distance between the reinforcement frames.
5. The method for rapidly estimating the position load of the minimum risk bomb of transport-type airplane according to claim 1, wherein the step 4 is to calculate the equivalent static pressure P for each detonation distance and explosive equivalentEThe formula of (1) is:
PE=pmaxy (12)。
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202110131766.3A CN112797856B (en) | 2021-01-30 | 2021-01-30 | Method for rapidly evaluating position load of minimum risk bomb of transport aircraft |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202110131766.3A CN112797856B (en) | 2021-01-30 | 2021-01-30 | Method for rapidly evaluating position load of minimum risk bomb of transport aircraft |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN112797856A true CN112797856A (en) | 2021-05-14 |
CN112797856B CN112797856B (en) | 2023-01-03 |
Family
ID=75813097
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202110131766.3A Active CN112797856B (en) | 2021-01-30 | 2021-01-30 | Method for rapidly evaluating position load of minimum risk bomb of transport aircraft |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN112797856B (en) |
Citations (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB719771A (en) * | 1950-01-18 | 1954-12-08 | British Electricity Authority | Improvements in or relating to tele-communication equipment |
US20030112107A1 (en) * | 2001-12-04 | 2003-06-19 | Nmr Holdings No. 2 Pty Ltd | Asymmetric tesseral shim coils for magnetic resonance |
US20040061895A1 (en) * | 2002-09-27 | 2004-04-01 | Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Image forming device and image forming method |
CN101151504A (en) * | 2005-04-08 | 2008-03-26 | 独立行政法人产业技术综合研究所 | Blasting treating method |
US20110168004A1 (en) * | 2009-10-20 | 2011-07-14 | Henegar Douglas W | System and method for mitigating and directing an explosion aboard an aircraft |
CN204713434U (en) * | 2015-04-02 | 2015-10-21 | 中国人民解放军空军勤务学院 | Aerial bomb ammunition carrier |
CN106197184A (en) * | 2016-08-01 | 2016-12-07 | 西北工业大学 | A kind of civil aircraft main cabin portable directional explosion-proof device |
RU2649999C1 (en) * | 2017-04-17 | 2018-04-06 | Российская Федерация, от имени которой выступает Государственная корпорация по атомной энергии "Росатом" (Госкорпорация "Росатом") | Method of estimation of fougasseness characteristics in air explosion of a moving test object (variants) |
CN109581381A (en) * | 2018-11-28 | 2019-04-05 | 中国民航大学 | Enhanced turbulent flow detection method based on the vertical load factor |
CN109780956A (en) * | 2019-03-06 | 2019-05-21 | 西安近代化学研究所 | A kind of cumulative pressure release civil aircraft main cabin directional explosion-proof device |
US20210016900A1 (en) * | 2018-03-29 | 2021-01-21 | Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency | Method of designing a shape of an airframe of a supersonic aircraft, production method of a supersonic aircraft, and supersonic aircraft |
-
2021
- 2021-01-30 CN CN202110131766.3A patent/CN112797856B/en active Active
Patent Citations (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB719771A (en) * | 1950-01-18 | 1954-12-08 | British Electricity Authority | Improvements in or relating to tele-communication equipment |
US20030112107A1 (en) * | 2001-12-04 | 2003-06-19 | Nmr Holdings No. 2 Pty Ltd | Asymmetric tesseral shim coils for magnetic resonance |
US20040061895A1 (en) * | 2002-09-27 | 2004-04-01 | Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Image forming device and image forming method |
CN101151504A (en) * | 2005-04-08 | 2008-03-26 | 独立行政法人产业技术综合研究所 | Blasting treating method |
US20110168004A1 (en) * | 2009-10-20 | 2011-07-14 | Henegar Douglas W | System and method for mitigating and directing an explosion aboard an aircraft |
CN204713434U (en) * | 2015-04-02 | 2015-10-21 | 中国人民解放军空军勤务学院 | Aerial bomb ammunition carrier |
CN106197184A (en) * | 2016-08-01 | 2016-12-07 | 西北工业大学 | A kind of civil aircraft main cabin portable directional explosion-proof device |
RU2649999C1 (en) * | 2017-04-17 | 2018-04-06 | Российская Федерация, от имени которой выступает Государственная корпорация по атомной энергии "Росатом" (Госкорпорация "Росатом") | Method of estimation of fougasseness characteristics in air explosion of a moving test object (variants) |
US20210016900A1 (en) * | 2018-03-29 | 2021-01-21 | Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency | Method of designing a shape of an airframe of a supersonic aircraft, production method of a supersonic aircraft, and supersonic aircraft |
CN109581381A (en) * | 2018-11-28 | 2019-04-05 | 中国民航大学 | Enhanced turbulent flow detection method based on the vertical load factor |
CN109780956A (en) * | 2019-03-06 | 2019-05-21 | 西安近代化学研究所 | A kind of cumulative pressure release civil aircraft main cabin directional explosion-proof device |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN112797856B (en) | 2023-01-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN104568613B (en) | A kind of vessel cabin detonation inside Structure Damage evaluation method based on equivalent scale model | |
Buzyurkin et al. | Determination and verification of Johnson–Cook model parameters at high-speed deformation of titanium alloys | |
Guzas et al. | Air blast load generation for simulating structural response | |
Schonberg et al. | Penetration and ricochet phenomena in oblique hypervelocity impact | |
Jenq et al. | Simulation of a rigid plate hit by a cylindrical hemi-spherical tip-ended soft impactor | |
Fu et al. | Scaling the response of armor steel subjected to blast loading | |
Hedayati et al. | Foam-core effect on the integrity of tailplane leading edge during bird-strike event | |
Wang et al. | Experimental and numerical study of tire debris impact on fuel tank cover based on coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian method | |
CN112797856B (en) | Method for rapidly evaluating position load of minimum risk bomb of transport aircraft | |
Zhang et al. | Study on ballistic penetration resistance of titanium alloy TC4, Part II: Numerical analysis | |
Yu et al. | Analytical determination of the critical impact location for wing leading edge under birdstrike | |
Izadifard et al. | Blastwave parameters assessment at different altitude using numerical simulation | |
Zhu et al. | Axial distribution of fragments from the dynamic explosion fragmentation of metal shells | |
Weber et al. | Numerical simulation of a 100-ton ANFO detonation | |
Konokman et al. | Computational and experimental study of high-speed impact of metallic Taylor cylinders | |
Zhang et al. | Application of numerical methods for crashworthiness investigation of a large aircraft wing impact with a tree | |
Barnat | Experimental and numerical study of influence of incidence angle of shock wave created by explosive charge on the steel plate | |
Warsiyanto | Dynamic response of the wing during UAV collision | |
Jha et al. | Bird strike damage and analysis of UAV’s airframe | |
Hou et al. | Dynamic response and damage of the fan blades during UAV ingestion into an aero-engine | |
Masi | Blast actions from high explosives. Studies on their simulation and effects | |
Guida et al. | Evaluation and validation of multi-physics FE methods to simulate bird strike on a wing leading edge | |
Wu et al. | Safety assessment of aircraft panel under the impact load by tire fragment based on thermal–mechanical effect | |
Grujicic et al. | Smart-fuze design and development based on computational analysis of warhead/urban-target interactions | |
Wang et al. | An integral numerical analysis of impact of a commercial aircraft on nuclear containment |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |