CN112731809B - State and fault estimation method for dead zone sandwich system - Google Patents

State and fault estimation method for dead zone sandwich system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN112731809B
CN112731809B CN202011520165.3A CN202011520165A CN112731809B CN 112731809 B CN112731809 B CN 112731809B CN 202011520165 A CN202011520165 A CN 202011520165A CN 112731809 B CN112731809 B CN 112731809B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
state
equation
dead zone
fault
formula
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN202011520165.3A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN112731809A (en
Inventor
周祖鹏
刘旭锋
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Guilin University of Electronic Technology
Original Assignee
Guilin University of Electronic Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Guilin University of Electronic Technology filed Critical Guilin University of Electronic Technology
Priority to CN202011520165.3A priority Critical patent/CN112731809B/en
Publication of CN112731809A publication Critical patent/CN112731809A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN112731809B publication Critical patent/CN112731809B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B13/00Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
    • G05B13/02Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
    • G05B13/04Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
    • G05B13/042Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Feedback Control In General (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a state and fault estimation method of a dead zone sandwich system, which aims at the problem that intermediate variables of a dead zone nonlinear non-smooth sandwich system cannot be measured. Firstly, a key separation principle and a switching function are utilized to construct a non-smooth state space equation capable of accurately describing a dead zone sandwich system. And secondly, constructing the SPIO which can be switched along with the change of the system working interval according to the non-smooth state space equation. And by analyzing the estimation error of the observer, the condition of observer convergence is given, and a mathematical proof is given to the observer convergence theorem. The method has the advantage that the switching function is introduced into the observer, and compared with the traditional proportional-integral observer, the observer adopting the method can estimate the state and the fault of the system more accurately and simultaneously.

Description

State and fault estimation method for dead zone sandwich system
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of nonlinear system state estimation, in particular to a state and fault estimation method of a dead zone sandwich system.
Background
There is a class of dead zone sandwich systems in the industry. The intermediate variables of the system cannot be measured or are very expensive to measure, but if the intermediate state cannot be obtained, most state feedback control methods cannot be performed, because the state values of the system must be accurately known in the state feedback control. The most effective method for obtaining the unknown state value is to design an observer and estimate the unknown state of the system by using input and output variables of the system.
Chinese patent CN105204332A discloses a state estimation method of a composite sandwich system with dead zones and hysteresis based on a non-smooth observer, and the method is used for estimating the state of the system under the condition that the sandwich system does not have faults. However, in an actual system, a fault is often unavoidable, and the state estimation of the system generates certain disturbance due to the existence of the fault, and even results in divergence of estimation errors, that is, the state of the system cannot be estimated. The invention also does not estimate system faults as the fault effects are ignored. So far, no patents and literature have been found for dead zone sandwich systems that estimate both state and fault.
The present invention proposes a new switching proportional-integral observer to accomplish this. Switching items which can be switched along with the working range of the system are introduced into the switching proportional-integral observer, and state and fault estimation errors are analyzed. And finally, giving the condition that the estimation error of the system state and the estimation error of the fault are bounded. The estimation effects of the switching proportional-integral observer and the conventional proportional-integral observer were compared by the embodiment. The result shows that the switching proportional-integral observer is superior to the traditional proportional-integral observer, and the method can be used for future system control and fault tolerance control.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to overcome the defects of the prior art and provide a state and fault estimation method of a dead zone sandwich system.
The technical scheme for realizing the purpose of the invention is as follows:
a state and fault estimation method of a dead zone sandwich system comprises the following steps:
1) The method comprises the following steps of constructing a non-smooth state space equation capable of accurately describing a gap sandwich system with faults by using a key item separation principle and a switching function, wherein the characteristic of the nonlinear characteristic of a dead zone is that the size of output is only related to the size of input at the current moment and is unrelated to the input and the output at the previous moment, and aiming at the dead zone sandwich system with actuator faults, the state space equation of the system is established, and the method specifically comprises the following steps:
1-1) establishing a state space equation of the linear subsystem: according to the linear system theory, the linear subsystem L 1 The state space equation of (a) is as follows:
Figure BDA0002849223780000021
according to the linear system theory, the linear subsystem L 2 The state space equation of (a) is as follows:
Figure BDA0002849223780000022
wherein
Figure BDA0002849223780000023
u∈R 1 ×1 ,y∈R 1×1 ,f∈R 1×1 ,u f ∈R 1×1 ,a f ∈R 1×1 ,b f ∈R 1×1 ,x 11 And x 12 Each represents L 1 First and second state variables, x 21 And x 22 Each represents L 2 The first and second state variables of (a),
Figure BDA0002849223780000024
are respectively L 1 、L 2 The state transition matrix of (a) is,
Figure BDA0002849223780000025
are respectively L 1 、L 2 The input matrix of (a) is selected,
Figure BDA0002849223780000026
are respectively L 1 、L 2 The output matrix of (a) is obtained,
Figure BDA0002849223780000027
for the failure matrix, u ∈ R 1×1 As input, y ∈ R 1×1 For output, f ∈ R 1×1 Is a failure of the system, a f As a factor of a failed link, b f Input coefficients for unknown fault links; u. of f ∈R 1×1 The input for the failed link is unknown; a is f And b f Obtained from a priori knowledge of system faults, known; suppose u f Is bounded, a f Is less than 1, i.e. | a f L < 1, so the fault system is stable according to the linear system stability condition, n i For the dimension of the i-th linear system, let
Figure BDA0002849223780000028
And is
Figure BDA0002849223780000029
1-2) establishing a state space equation of the dead zone subsystem: defining intermediate variables m (k), w 1 (k) Comprises the following steps:
m(k)=m 1 +(m 2 -m 1 )h(k)
w 1 (k)=m(k)(x(k)-D 1 h 1 (k)+D 2 h 2 (k))
wherein
Figure BDA00028492237800000210
In order to be a function of the switching,
obtaining the following according to the input-output relation of the dead zone:
v 2 (k)=w 1 (k)-h 3 (k)w 1 (k)=(1-h 3 (k))w 1 (k),
wherein
Figure BDA0002849223780000031
Also as a switching function, when h 3 (k) When =0, the system operates in the linear region, and v 2 (k)=w 1 (k) (ii) a When h is generated 3 (k) When =1, the system is operating in a dead zone, and v 2 (k)=w 1 (k)-w 1 (k) =0, the input/output characteristic according to the dead zone is obtained:
Figure BDA0002849223780000032
due to the fact that
Figure BDA0002849223780000033
Substituting the formula (2) into the formula (3) to obtain:
Figure BDA0002849223780000034
1-3) establishing an integral state space equation of the dead zone sandwich system: according to formula (1), formula (2), formula (4) and
Figure BDA0002849223780000035
the state space equation of the linear motor drive system is as follows:
Figure BDA0002849223780000036
wherein
Figure BDA0002849223780000037
Figure BDA0002849223780000038
According to the characteristics of the sandwich system, only the output y (k) of the system can be directly measured, so that
Figure BDA0002849223780000039
Wherein
Figure BDA00028492237800000310
0 is a zero matrix of the corresponding order
Figure BDA00028492237800000311
Equation (5) is written as follows:
Figure BDA00028492237800000312
wherein eta i Switching vectors introduced for considering the existence of dead zone non-linear characteristics of the system;
2) According to the non-smooth state space equation of the gap sandwich system with the fault, which is constructed in the step 1), when the system meets the existence condition of the observer, a switching proportional-integral observer capable of automatically switching along with the change of the working interval of the gap sandwich system with the fault is constructed, and the existence condition and the bounded theorem of the corresponding switching proportional-integral observer are given, which comprises the following steps:
2-1) aiming at the dead zone sandwich system, a switching proportional-integral observer capable of estimating the state and the fault of the system simultaneously is constructed, and the switching proportional-integral observer for constructing the dead zone sandwich system is specifically as follows:
according to the state space equation (6) of the dead zone sandwich system, the following switching proportional-integral observer is constructed:
Figure BDA0002849223780000041
wherein
Figure BDA0002849223780000042
For the proportional gain of the ith operating interval,
Figure BDA0002849223780000043
is the integral gain of the ith working interval;
Figure BDA0002849223780000044
x (k), y (k), f (k), eta, respectively i If j =1,2,3, i = j, then
Figure BDA0002849223780000045
According to formula (7) and formula (1) and
Figure BDA0002849223780000046
f (k), the following formula (8) and formula (9) are obtained:
Figure BDA0002849223780000047
f(k+1)=a f f(k)+b f u f (k) (9)
is defined by subtracting equation (9) from equation (8)
Figure BDA0002849223780000048
The following formula (10) is obtained:
Figure BDA0002849223780000049
equation (7) is subtracted from equation (6) to obtain the following expression for the estimation error:
e(k+1)=(A-K pj C)e(k)+De f (k)+Δη os +ΔA os x(k) (11)
wherein
Figure BDA0002849223780000051
ΔA os =A j -A i
The equations (10) and (11) are written together in a matrix form, that is, the matrix form of the state and fault estimation errors is as follows equation (12):
Figure BDA0002849223780000052
the formula (12) is simplified by
Figure BDA0002849223780000053
Equation (12) is written in the form of a rectangular multiplication, as shown in the following equation:
e t (k+1)=A ej e t (k)+Δ t (k) (13)
2-2) setting Δ t (k) And initial estimation error e t (1) The norm of (a) is bounded and all are less than phi d I.e. phi d (||Δ t (k)||≤φ d And e (1) is less than or equal to phi d ) When j =1,2,3, the appropriate K is selected pj And K ij So that A is ej Is within the unit circle, the norms of the state and fault estimation errors are bounded and both are less than
Figure BDA0002849223780000054
I.e. switching the convergence condition of the proportional-integral observer to A ej Is within the unit circle;
3) The convergence of the switching proportional-integral observer is proved: for any k, | | Δ t (k)||≤φ d And phi is d If the matrix norm is an upper bound constant, then norm operations are performed on two sides of the formula (13), and the following formula (14) is obtained by the trigonometric inequality theorem of the matrix norm:
Figure BDA0002849223780000055
wherein, | | A ej I is A ej Wherein j =1,2,3,
according to the theorem of the spectral radius of the matrix, for A ej ∈R n×n
Figure BDA0002849223780000056
There is always a norm | · | |, such that the following equation (15) holds:
||A ej ||≤ρ(A ej )+ε (15)
according to the above theorem, since the proper K is selected pj 、K ij So that the characteristic value is within the unit circle, i.e. the spectral norm ρ (A) of the matrix ej ) If the proper epsilon is selected, the epsilon is more than 0 and less than 1-rho (A) ej ) According to equation (15), there are:
||A ej ||<1 (16)
therefore, from equation (14) and equation (16), when k → ∞ is satisfied, norm | | | e of the state and fault estimation errors t (k) I) less than
Figure BDA0002849223780000061
4) Estimating the state and fault of the dead zone non-smooth sandwich system: the following formula (17) and formula (18) are obtained from formula (7):
Figure BDA0002849223780000062
Figure BDA0002849223780000063
is obtained by the formula (17) and the formula (18)
Figure BDA0002849223780000064
According to the formula (7) and the formula (19), the estimation of the state and the fault of the dead zone non-smooth sandwich system is carried out according to the following process:
4-1) initializing the estimated value of the state variable and the estimated value of the fault: order to
Figure BDA0002849223780000065
And calculate
Figure BDA0002849223780000066
Order to
Figure BDA0002849223780000067
4-2) let k =3;
4-3) judging whether k is less than or equal to N, and if k is less than or equal to N, executing the step 4-4); otherwise, ending the operation;
4-4) if
Figure BDA0002849223780000068
The following operations are performed:
Figure BDA0002849223780000069
Figure BDA00028492237800000610
Figure BDA00028492237800000611
if it is
Figure BDA00028492237800000612
The following operations are performed:
Figure BDA0002849223780000071
Figure BDA0002849223780000072
Figure BDA0002849223780000073
if it is
Figure BDA0002849223780000074
The following operations are performed:
Figure BDA0002849223780000075
Figure BDA0002849223780000076
Figure BDA0002849223780000077
4-5) adding 1 to the value of k, repeating steps 4-3).
In step 4), most of the actual systems are not first-order systems, but second-order systems or two subsystems L which can be simplified into second-order systems, if not smooth sandwich systems 1 、L 2 The system is a second-order system, the whole system is a fourth-order system and has 4 state variables, and z is a system with 4 states in each step of calculation, namely the 1 st state and the k th step in the k stepThe 2 nd state, the 3 rd state at the k-th step and the 4 th state at the k-th step, therefore, all the states are stored by the matrix x of N rows and 4 columns, and the 4 states at the k-th step are stored in the 1 to 4 columns of the k-th row of the matrix x and written as x (k, [ 1:4)]) Abbreviated as x (k,: in short).
In the step 4-4), the step of,
Figure BDA0002849223780000078
the operation carried out in three cases is A, eta, K pK i 4 different matrices.
Compared with the traditional proportional-integral observer estimation method, the method for estimating the state and the fault of the dead zone sandwich system can estimate the state and the fault of the dead zone sandwich system at the same time, and has the advantages of high estimation error convergence speed and high precision.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a dead band sandwich system with a fault;
FIG. 2 is a Simulink model diagram of a non-smooth sandwich system;
FIG. 3 is a schematic view of a linear motor drive system;
FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the effect of switching the PID observer on the estimation of the system state when the system has a step fault;
FIG. 5 is a diagram of the effect of a conventional proportional-integral observer on the estimation of the state of a system when the system has a step fault;
FIG. 6 is a comparison graph of state estimation errors of the two methods of switching the proportional-integral observer and the conventional proportional-integral observer when the system has step faults;
FIG. 7 is a comparison graph of two methods of switching the proportional-integral observer and the conventional proportional-integral observer to the fault estimation when the system has step fault;
FIG. 8 is a diagram showing the effect of switching the proportional-integral observer on the estimation of the system state when the system contains a sinusoidal signal with attenuated amplitude;
FIG. 9 is a diagram showing the effect of a conventional proportional-integral observer on the estimation of the state of a system when the system contains a sinusoidal signal with an attenuated amplitude;
FIG. 10 is a diagram showing the comparison of the system state estimation error by the two methods of switching the proportional-integral observer and the conventional proportional-integral observer when the system contains a sinusoidal signal with attenuated amplitude;
fig. 11 is a comparison diagram of system fault estimation by two methods of switching the proportional-integral observer and the conventional proportional-integral observer when the system contains sinusoidal signals with attenuated amplitudes.
Detailed Description
The invention will be further elucidated with reference to the drawings and examples, without however being limited thereto.
Example (b):
a state and fault estimation method of a dead zone sandwich system comprises the following steps:
1) The method comprises the following steps of constructing a non-smooth state space equation capable of accurately describing a gap sandwich system with faults by using a key item separation principle and a switching function, wherein the characteristic of the nonlinear characteristic of a dead zone is that the size of output is only related to the size of input at the current moment and is unrelated to the input and the output at the previous moment, and aiming at the dead zone sandwich system with actuator faults, the state space equation of the system is established, and the method specifically comprises the following steps:
as shown in FIG. 1, a dead-zone sandwich system is shown with actuator faults, where u (k) and y (k) are measurable input and output variables, respectively, and v (k) is a measurable variable 1 (k) And v 2 (k) Is an unmeasurable intermediate variable, L 1 Representing a pre-cursor linear subsystem, L 2 Representing a post-Rake linear subsystem, D 1 And D 2 Is the width of the dead zone, m 1 And m 2 Is the slope of the linear region, and f (k) represents the actuator failure of the system.
1-1) establishing a state space equation of the linear subsystem: according to the linear system theory, the linear subsystem L 1 The state space equation of (a) is as follows:
Figure BDA0002849223780000081
according to the linear system theory, the linear subsystem L 2 The state space equation of (a) is as follows:
Figure BDA0002849223780000082
wherein
Figure BDA0002849223780000083
u∈R 1 ×1 ,y∈R 1×1 ,f∈R 1×1 ,u f ∈R 1×1 ,a f ∈R 1×1 ,b f ∈R 1×1 ,x 11 And x 12 Each represents L 1 First and second state variables, x 21 And x 22 Each represents L 2 The first and second state variables of (a),
Figure BDA0002849223780000091
are respectively L 1 、L 2 The state transition matrix of (a) is,
Figure BDA0002849223780000092
are each L 1 、L 2 The input matrix of (a) is selected,
Figure BDA0002849223780000093
are respectively L 1 、L 2 The output matrix of (a) is obtained,
Figure BDA0002849223780000094
for the failure matrix, u ∈ R 1×1 As input, y ∈ R 1×1 For output, f ∈ R 1×1 Is a failure of the system, a f As a factor of a failed link, b f Input coefficients for unknown fault links; u. of f ∈R 1×1 The input for the failed link is unknown; a is f And b f Obtained from a priori knowledge of system faults, known; suppose u f Is bounded, a f Is less than 1, i.e. | a f L < 1, so the fault system is stable according to the linear system stability condition, n i Is the ith linear systemDimension of system, set
Figure BDA0002849223780000095
And is
Figure BDA0002849223780000096
1-2) establishing a state space equation of the dead zone subsystem: defining intermediate variables m (k), w 1 (k) Comprises the following steps:
m(k)=m 1 +(m 2 -m 1 )h(k)
w 1 (k)=m(k)(x(k)-D 1 h 1 (k)+D 2 h 2 (k))
wherein
Figure BDA0002849223780000097
In order to be a function of the switching,
obtaining the following according to the input-output relation of the dead zone:
v 2 (k)=w 1 (k)-h 3 (k)w 1 (k)=(1-h 3 (k))w 1 (k),
wherein
Figure BDA0002849223780000098
Also as a switching function, when h 3 (k) =0, the system operates in the linear region, and v 2 (k)=w 1 (k) (ii) a When h is generated 3 (k) When =1, the system is operating in a dead zone, and v 2 (k)=w 1 (k)-w 1 (k) =0, the input/output characteristic according to the dead zone is obtained:
Figure BDA0002849223780000099
due to the fact that
Figure BDA00028492237800000910
Substituting the formula (2) into the formula (3) to obtain:
Figure BDA00028492237800000911
1-3) establishing an integral state space equation of the dead zone sandwich system: according to formula (1), formula (2), formula (4) and
Figure BDA0002849223780000101
the state space equation of the linear motor drive system is as follows:
Figure BDA0002849223780000102
wherein
Figure BDA0002849223780000103
Figure BDA0002849223780000104
According to the characteristics of the sandwich system, only the output y (k) of the system can be directly measured, so that
Figure BDA0002849223780000105
Wherein
Figure BDA0002849223780000106
0 is a zero matrix of the corresponding order
Figure BDA0002849223780000107
Equation (5) is written as follows:
Figure BDA0002849223780000108
wherein eta i To account for the presence of dead band non-of the systemLinear characteristic induced switching vector;
2) According to the non-smooth state space equation of the gap sandwich system with the fault, which is constructed in the step 1), when the system meets the existence condition of the observer, a switching proportional-integral observer capable of automatically switching along with the change of the working interval of the gap sandwich system with the fault is constructed, and the existence condition and the bounded theorem of the corresponding switching proportional-integral observer are given, which comprises the following steps:
2-1) aiming at the dead zone sandwich system, a switching proportional-integral observer capable of estimating the state and the fault of the system simultaneously is constructed, and the switching proportional-integral observer for constructing the dead zone sandwich system is specifically as follows:
according to the state space equation (6) of the dead zone sandwich system, a switching proportional-integral observer is constructed as follows:
Figure BDA0002849223780000109
wherein
Figure BDA0002849223780000111
For the proportional gain of the i-th operating interval,
Figure BDA0002849223780000112
is the integral gain of the ith working interval;
Figure BDA0002849223780000113
x (k), y (k), f (k), eta, respectively i If j =1,2,3, i = j, then
Figure BDA0002849223780000114
According to formula (7) and formula (1) and
Figure BDA0002849223780000115
f (k), the following formula (8) and formula (9) are obtained:
Figure BDA0002849223780000116
f(k+1)=a f f(k)+b f u f (k) (9)
subtracting equation (9) from equation (8) defines
Figure BDA0002849223780000117
The following formula (10) is obtained:
Figure BDA0002849223780000118
equation (7) is subtracted from equation (6) to obtain the following expression for the estimation error:
e(k+1)=(A-K pj C)e(k)+De f (k)+Δη os +ΔA os x(k) (11)
wherein
Figure BDA0002849223780000119
ΔA os =A j -A i
The equations (10) and (11) are written together in a matrix form, that is, the matrix form of the state and fault estimation errors is as follows equation (12):
Figure BDA00028492237800001110
the formula (12) is simplified by
Figure BDA00028492237800001111
Equation (12) is written in the form of a rectangular multiplication, as shown in the following equation:
e t (k+1)=A ej e t (k)+Δ t (k) (13)
2-2) setting Δ t (k) And initial estimation errorsDifference e t (1) The norm of (a) is bounded and all are less than phi d I.e. phi d (||Δ t (k)||≤φ d And | | | e (1) | | is less than or equal to phi | d ) When j =1,2,3, the appropriate K is selected pj And K ij So that A is ej Is within the unit circle, the norms of the state and fault estimation errors are bounded and both are less than
Figure BDA0002849223780000121
I.e. switching the convergence condition of the proportional-integral observer to A ej Is within the unit circle;
3) The convergence of the switching proportional-integral observer is proved: for any k, | | Δ t (k)||≤φ d And phi is d If the matrix norm is an upper bound constant, then norm operations are performed on two sides of the formula (13), and the following formula (14) is obtained by the trigonometric inequality theorem of the matrix norm:
Figure BDA0002849223780000122
wherein, | | A e j | | | is A ej Wherein j =1,2,3,
according to the theorem of the spectral radius of the matrix, for A ej ∈R n×n
Figure BDA0002849223780000123
There is always a norm | · | |, such that the following equation (15) holds:
||A ej ||≤ρ(A ej )+ε (15)
according to the above theorem, since the proper K is selected pj 、K ij So that the characteristic value of is within the unit circle, i.e. the spectral norm ρ (A) of the matrix ej ) Less than 1, if an appropriate ε is selected to satisfy 0 < ε < 1- ρ (A) ej ) According to equation (15), there are:
||A ej ||<1 (16)
therefore, from equation (14) and equation (16), when k → ∞ the state and fault estimation is mistakenPoor norm e t (k) I) less than
Figure BDA0002849223780000124
As shown in fig. 2, the Simulink model of the non-smooth sandwich system mainly comprises an ideal input, a summation module, a controller, an L1 subsystem, a dead zone link, an L2 subsystem, a feedback gain and a connection line, and may further include fault signals, such as an L1 fault signal, an L2 fault signal and a dead zone increasing module.
4) Estimating the state and fault of the dead zone non-smooth sandwich system: the following formula (17) and formula (18) are obtained from formula (7):
Figure BDA0002849223780000131
Figure BDA0002849223780000132
is obtained by the formula (17) and the formula (18)
Figure BDA0002849223780000133
According to the formula (7) and the formula (19), the estimation of the state and the fault of the dead zone non-smooth sandwich system is carried out according to the following process:
4-1) initializing the estimated value of the state variable and the estimated value of the fault: order to
Figure BDA0002849223780000134
And calculate
Figure BDA0002849223780000135
Order to
Figure BDA0002849223780000136
4-2) let k =3;
4-3) judging whether k is less than or equal to N, and if k is less than or equal to N, executing the step 4-4); otherwise, ending the operation;
4-4) if
Figure BDA0002849223780000137
The following operations are performed:
Figure BDA0002849223780000138
Figure BDA0002849223780000139
Figure BDA00028492237800001310
if it is
Figure BDA00028492237800001311
The following operations are performed:
Figure BDA00028492237800001312
Figure BDA00028492237800001313
Figure BDA00028492237800001314
if it is
Figure BDA00028492237800001315
The following operations are performed:
Figure BDA00028492237800001316
Figure BDA00028492237800001317
Figure BDA00028492237800001318
4-5) adding 1 to the value of k, repeating steps 4-3).
In step 4), most of the actual systems are not first-order systems, but second-order systems or two subsystems L which can be simplified into second-order systems, if not smooth sandwich systems 1 、L 2 The system is a second-order system, the whole system is a fourth-order system, 4 state variables exist, z is the 4 states in each step of the system, namely the 1 st state in the k step, the 2 nd state in the k step, the 3 rd state in the k step and the 4 th state in the k step, therefore, a matrix x with N rows and 4 columns is used for storing all the states, the 4 states in the k step are stored in 1 to 4 columns of the k row of the matrix x, and x (k, [ 1:4) is written into]) Abbreviated as x (k,: in short).
In the step 4-4), the step of,
Figure BDA0002849223780000141
the operations carried out in the three cases are A, eta, K pK i 4 different matrices.
The method is used for estimating the state and the fault of the direct current motor driving simulation system, and compared with the state and fault estimation result of a traditional proportional-integral observer, and the method specifically comprises the following steps:
as shown in FIG. 3, the schematic diagram of the linear motor driving system, in which the control circuit includes circuit amplifiers and filters, etc., can be considered as a linear subsystem L 1 (ii) a The load can be regarded as a linear subsystem L 2 (ii) a The linear motor consists of a magnetic field winding, an armature winding, a bracket and the like, wherein coulomb friction exists; the linear motor is equivalent to a dead zone link and is represented by DZ; therefore, the whole linear motor driving system can be regarded as a dead zone sandwich system; the system is mainly used for a system requiring output of linear displacement and automatic control.
The simulation model of the linear motor driving system is as follows:
the input signal is u =20sin (0.8 t), the sampling time is 80s, the sampling period is 0.01s, and all the state and fault initial values are set to 0; then:
linear subsystem L 1
Figure BDA0002849223780000142
Linear subsystem L 2
Figure BDA0002849223780000143
Dead zone:
Figure BDA0002849223780000144
Figure BDA0002849223780000145
4 state variables x of linear motor drive system 11 、x 12 、x 21 、x 22 And the physical meanings represented by each are shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1 State variables of Linear Motor drive systems
Figure BDA0002849223780000151
Thus, with the state space equations and system parameters of the system, a corresponding matrix can be derived as follows.
Figure BDA0002849223780000152
Figure BDA0002849223780000153
C=[0 0 0 00]And D = [0.04107 00 ]] T
The traditional observer dead zone link is a linear link, a proportional link is adopted for replacing the linear link, and the switching of the system between the linear link and the dead zone is omitted. Therefore, the conventional proportional-integral observer does not include a switching term, and the specific expression is as follows:
Figure BDA0002849223780000154
wherein
Figure BDA0002849223780000155
Two types of faults are simulated respectively:
the first type of fault, which is assumed to have a step fault at 10, represents a sudden fault in practical applications, a f =0.85,b f =1, when t is more than or equal to 0 and less than or equal to 10 f (t) =0, i.e. the first 10 seconds are non-faulty; when 10<When t is less than or equal to 80, u f (t) is 0.2, the sampling frequency is 100Hz, and K is selected according to the convergence condition of the switching proportional-integral observer pj =[0.1,0.1,0.1,0.1] T And K ij =1, characteristic value of Ae when j =1,3, 0.4480,0.8075,0.7975+0.0406i,0.7975-0.0406i,0.9494] T (ii) a When j =2, the characteristic value of Ae is [0.4500,0.8000,0.9500,0.8000+0.0316i,0.8000-0.0316i]] T Within the unit circle, i.e. whether the system is operating in the linear region or the dead zone, the characteristic value of Ae is within the unit circle.
By comparing fig. 4 and 5, it can be clearly seen that the switching proportional-integral observer can estimate the state of the system more accurately than the conventional proportional-integral observer; the state estimation errors of the switching proportional-integral observer and the conventional observer are shown in fig. 6, the estimation error of the switching proportional-integral observer is smaller than that of the conventional proportional-integral observer from fig. 6, when a step fault occurs at 10s, the state estimation effects of the switching proportional-integral observer and the conventional observer are shown in fig. 4 and 5, the fault estimation effects of the switching proportional-integral observer and the conventional observer are shown in fig. 7, from fig. 7, the switching proportional-integral observer can accurately track the fault signal in time, but the conventional proportional-integral observer cannot track the fault signal at all; in summary, the switching proportional-integral observer has better performance than the conventional proportional-integral observer in terms of state estimation and fault estimation.
The second type of fault is assumed to be a sinusoidal signal with attenuated amplitude, representing a slowly varying fault in practical applications. The sampling frequency is also 100Hz, af =0.8 and bf =1, when 0 ≦ t ≦ 10, u f (t) =0, i.e. the first 10 seconds are not faulty; when 10<When t is less than or equal to 80, the fault is u f (t)=e (-(t-30)/10) sin (pi (t-10)/10 + 1) +4, selection Kpj = [0.0575, -0.0998, -0.0960,0.0201] T ,K ij =1; when j =1,3, the characteristic value of Ae is [0.4517,0.8930,0.7776+0.0235i,0.7776-0.0235i,0.8301] T (ii) a When j =2, the characteristic value of Ae is [0.4500,0.8000,0.8000,0.8905,0.7894] T All within the unit circle.
When the fault is a sinusoidal signal with attenuated amplitude, the state estimation effects of the switching proportional-integral observer and the conventional observer are as shown in fig. 8 and 9. From fig. 8-11, it can be seen that the switched proportional-integral observer is more accurate than the conventional observer model, and therefore, the switched proportional-integral observer is more effective than the conventional observer state estimation.

Claims (1)

1. A method for estimating the state and fault of a dead zone sandwich system is characterized by comprising the following steps:
1) The method comprises the following steps of constructing a non-smooth state space equation capable of accurately describing a gap sandwich system with faults by using a key item separation principle and a switching function, wherein the characteristic of the nonlinear characteristic of a dead zone is that the size of output is only related to the size of input at the current moment and is unrelated to the input and the output at the previous moment, and aiming at the dead zone sandwich system with actuator faults, the state space equation of the system is established, and the method specifically comprises the following steps:
1-1) establishing a state space equation of the linear subsystem: according to the linear system theory, the linear subsystem L 1 The state space equation of (a) is as follows:
Figure FDA0004028180280000011
according to the linear system theory, the linear subsystem L 2 The state space equation of (a) is as follows:
Figure FDA0004028180280000012
wherein
Figure FDA0004028180280000013
For the first linear subsystem L 1 The state variable of (a) is changed,
Figure FDA0004028180280000014
for the second linear subsystem L 2 The state variable of (a) is changed,
Figure FDA0004028180280000015
u∈R 1×1 ,y∈R 1×1 ,f∈R 1×1 ,u f ∈R 1×1 ,a f ∈R 1×1 ,b f ∈R 1×1
Figure FDA0004028180280000016
are respectively L 1 、L 2 The state transition matrix of (a) is,
Figure FDA0004028180280000017
are respectively L 1 、L 2 The input matrix of (a) is selected,
Figure FDA0004028180280000018
are respectively L 1 、L 2 The output matrix of (a) is obtained,
Figure FDA0004028180280000019
for the failure matrix, u ∈ R 1×1 As input, y ∈ R 1×1 For output, f ∈ R 1×1 Is a failure of the system, a f As a factor of a failed link, b f Input coefficients for unknown fault links; u. of f ∈R 1×1 The input for the failed link is unknown; a is f And b f Obtained from a priori knowledge of system faults, known; suppose u f Is bounded, a f Is less than 1, i.e. | a f L < 1, so the fault system is stable according to the linear system stability condition, n i For the dimension of the i-th linear system, let
Figure FDA00040281802800000110
And is
Figure FDA00040281802800000111
1-2) establishing a state space equation of the dead zone subsystem: defining intermediate variables m (k), w 1 (k) Comprises the following steps:
m(k)=m 1 +(m 2 -m 1 )h(k)
w 1 (k)=m(k)(v 1 (k)-D 1 h 1 (k)+D 2 h 2 (k))
wherein the parameter D 1 To a positive dead zone width, D 2 Is the negative dead zone width, m 1 Is a positive linear region slope, m 2 Is the slope of the negative linear region,
Figure FDA0004028180280000021
in order to be a function of the switching,
obtaining the following according to the input-output relation of the dead zone:
v 2 (k)=w 1 (k)-h 3 (k)w 1 (k)=(1-h 3 (k))w 1 (k),
wherein
Figure FDA0004028180280000022
Also as a switching function, when h 3 (k) When =0, the system operates in the linear region, and v 2 (k)=w 1 (k) (ii) a When h is generated 3 (k) When =1, the system is operating in a dead zone, and v 2 (k)=w 1 (k)-w 1 (k) =0, the input/output characteristic according to the dead zone is obtained:
Figure FDA0004028180280000023
due to the fact that
Figure FDA00040281802800000211
Substituting the formula (3) into the formula (2) to obtain:
Figure FDA0004028180280000024
wherein, the symbol "·" is a multiplication sign, and the function of the symbol "·" is multiplication operation;
1-3) establishing an integral state space equation of the dead zone sandwich system: according to formula (1), formula (2), formula (4) and
Figure FDA0004028180280000025
the state space equation of the linear motor drive system is as follows:
Figure FDA0004028180280000026
wherein
Figure FDA0004028180280000027
Figure FDA0004028180280000028
According to the characteristics of the sandwich system, only the output y (k) of the system can be directly measured, so that
Figure FDA0004028180280000029
Wherein
Figure DEST_PATH_FDA0003984151590000032
0 is a zero matrix of the corresponding order
Figure FDA0004028180280000031
Equation (5) is written as follows:
Figure FDA0004028180280000032
wherein eta i Switching vectors introduced for considering the existence of dead zone non-linear characteristics of the system;
2) According to the non-smooth state space equation of the gap sandwich system with the fault, which is constructed in the step 1), when the system meets the existence condition of the observer, a switching proportional-integral observer capable of automatically switching along with the change of the working interval of the gap sandwich system with the fault is constructed, and the existence condition and the bounded theorem of the corresponding switching proportional-integral observer are given, which comprises the following steps:
2-1) aiming at the dead zone sandwich system, a switching proportional-integral observer capable of estimating the state and the fault of the system simultaneously is constructed, and the switching proportional-integral observer for constructing the dead zone sandwich system is specifically as follows:
according to the state space equation (6) of the dead zone sandwich system, the following switching proportional-integral observer is constructed:
Figure FDA0004028180280000033
wherein
Figure FDA0004028180280000034
Proportional gain for the ith operating interval, K ij ∈R 1x1 Is the integral gain of the ith working interval;
Figure FDA0004028180280000035
x (k), y (k), f (k), eta, respectively i If j =1,2,3, i = j, then
Figure FDA0004028180280000036
v 1 (k) As input to the first linear subsystem, according to equation (7) and equation (1) and
Figure FDA0004028180280000037
f (k), the following formula (8) and formula (9) are obtained:
Figure FDA0004028180280000038
f(k+1)=a f f(k)+b f u f (k) (9)
wherein, K i In order to integrate the gain of the gain,
subtracting equation (9) from equation (8) defines
Figure FDA0004028180280000039
The following formula (10) is obtained:
Figure FDA0004028180280000041
equation (7) is subtracted from equation (6) to obtain the following expression for the estimation error:
e(k+1)=(A j -K pj C)e(k)+De f (k)+Δη os +ΔA os x(k) (11)
wherein
Figure FDA0004028180280000042
ΔA os =A j -A i
The equations (10) and (11) are written together in a matrix form, that is, the matrix form of the state and fault estimation errors is as follows in equation (12):
Figure FDA0004028180280000043
simplifying the formula (12) by
Figure FDA0004028180280000044
Equation (12) is written in the form of a rectangular multiplication, as shown in the following equation:
e t (k+1)=A ej e t (k)+Δ t (k) (13)
2-2) setting Δ t (k) Norm sum e of t (1) The norm of (a) is bounded upward, and the bounded upward of the norms of both (b) is smaller than phi d Expressed as | | Δ by mathematical expression t (k)||≤φ d ,||e t (1)||≤φ d Wherein e (1) is the initial estimation error, | | Δ t (k) | | is Δ t (k) Arbitrary norm, | | e t (1) | is e t (1) When j =1,2,3, if the appropriate K is selected pj And K ij So that A is ej Is within the unit circle, the norms of the state and fault estimation errors are bounded and both are less than
Figure FDA0004028180280000045
I.e. switching the convergence condition of the proportional-integral observer to A ej Characteristic value of (2) in unit circleInternal;
3) The convergence of the switching proportional-integral observer is proved: for any k, | | Δ t (k)||≤φ d And phi is d If the matrix norm is an upper bound constant, then norm operations are performed on two sides of the formula (13), and the following formula (14) is obtained by the trigonometric inequality theorem of the matrix norm:
Figure DEST_PATH_FDA0003984151590000051
wherein, | | A ej I is A ej Where j =1,2,3,
according to the theorem of the spectral radius of the matrix, for A ej ∈R n×n
Figure FDA0004028180280000052
There is always a norm | · | |, such that the following equation (15) holds:
||A ej ||≤ρ(A ej )+ε (15)
according to the above theorem, since a suitable K is selected pj 、K ij So that A is ej Is within the unit circle, i.e. the spectral norm ρ (a) of the matrix ej ) If the proper epsilon is selected, the epsilon is more than 0 and less than 1-rho (A) ej ) According to equation (15), there are:
||A ej ||<1 (16)
therefore, from equation (14) and equation (16), when k → ∞ the norm of the state and fault estimation errors | | | e t (k) Less than | |
Figure FDA0004028180280000053
4) Estimating the state and fault of the dead zone non-smooth sandwich system: the following formula (17) and formula (18) are obtained from formula (7):
Figure FDA0004028180280000054
Figure FDA0004028180280000055
is obtained by the formula (17) and the formula (18)
Figure FDA0004028180280000056
According to the formula (7) and the formula (19), the estimation of the state and the fault of the dead zone non-smooth sandwich system is carried out according to the following process:
4-1) initializing the estimated value of the state variable and the estimated value of the fault: order to
Figure FDA0004028180280000061
And calculate
Figure FDA0004028180280000062
Order to
Figure FDA0004028180280000063
4-2) let k =3;
4-3) judging whether k is less than or equal to N, and if k is less than or equal to N, executing the step 4-4); otherwise, ending the operation;
4-4) if
Figure FDA0004028180280000064
The following operations are performed:
Figure FDA0004028180280000065
Figure FDA0004028180280000066
Figure FDA0004028180280000067
if it is
Figure FDA0004028180280000068
The following operations are performed:
Figure FDA0004028180280000069
Figure FDA00040281802800000610
Figure FDA00040281802800000611
if it is
Figure FDA00040281802800000612
The following operations are performed:
Figure FDA00040281802800000613
Figure FDA00040281802800000614
Figure FDA00040281802800000615
wherein the parameters
Figure FDA00040281802800000616
Meaning the estimated values of all states in step k,
two subsystems L of a non-smooth sandwich system 1 、L 2 The system is a second-order system, the whole system is a fourth-order system and has 4 state variables, and in the process of solving the system differential equation by adopting an iterative method, 4 state quantities of the system are calculated in each step, namely the 1 st state of the k step, the 2 nd state of the k step, the 3 rd state of the k step and the 4 th state of the k step, so that all the states are stored by using a matrix x with N rows and 4 columns, and the 4 states of the k step are stored in 1 to 4 columns of the kth row of the matrix x and written into x (k, [ 1:4)]) Abbreviated as x (k,: in this case),
4-5) adding 1 to the value of k, repeating steps 4-3).
CN202011520165.3A 2020-12-21 2020-12-21 State and fault estimation method for dead zone sandwich system Active CN112731809B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202011520165.3A CN112731809B (en) 2020-12-21 2020-12-21 State and fault estimation method for dead zone sandwich system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202011520165.3A CN112731809B (en) 2020-12-21 2020-12-21 State and fault estimation method for dead zone sandwich system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN112731809A CN112731809A (en) 2021-04-30
CN112731809B true CN112731809B (en) 2023-02-28

Family

ID=75604069

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202011520165.3A Active CN112731809B (en) 2020-12-21 2020-12-21 State and fault estimation method for dead zone sandwich system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN112731809B (en)

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105204332B (en) * 2015-08-10 2017-08-29 桂林电子科技大学 Dead band and sluggish compound Sandwich system method for estimating state are contained based on Non-smooth surface observer
CN108279569B (en) * 2018-01-12 2020-08-21 桂林电子科技大学 State estimation method for hysteresis sandwich system with fault
CN108227679B (en) * 2018-01-12 2020-06-05 桂林电子科技大学 State estimation method of gap sandwich system with fault
CN110275435B (en) * 2019-05-24 2022-07-05 广东工业大学 Observer-based multi-single-arm manipulator output consistent adaptive command filtering control method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN112731809A (en) 2021-04-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Yang et al. Reduced-order sliding-mode-observer-based fault estimation for Markov jump systems
Na Adaptive prescribed performance control of nonlinear systems with unknown dead zone
Shi et al. Robust design of integrated feedback and iterative learning control of a batch process based on a 2D Roesser system
Forgione et al. dynoNet: A neural network architecture for learning dynamical systems
Abdul-Adheem et al. Improved sliding mode nonlinear extended state observer based active disturbance rejection control for uncertain systems with unknown total disturbance
Utkin et al. Sliding mode control
Sun et al. Adaptive control based on single neural network approximation for non-linear pure-feedback systems
CN108733031B (en) Network control system fault estimation method based on intermediate estimator
Ma et al. Decentralized adaptive NN output-feedback fault compensation control of nonlinear switched large-scale systems with actuator dead-zones
CN110579970B (en) Intermittent process terminal constraint prediction control method under 2D rolling optimization
Norrlöf Disturbance rejection using an ILC algorithm with iteration varying filters
CN112731809B (en) State and fault estimation method for dead zone sandwich system
Tahoun et al. A new unmatched-disturbances compensation and fault-tolerant control for partially known nonlinear singular systems
CN113325717B (en) Optimal fault-tolerant control method, system, processing equipment and storage medium based on interconnected large-scale system
Arwin et al. Extended three-stage recursive least squares identification algorithm for multiple-input single-output CARARMA systems
CN108279569B (en) State estimation method for hysteresis sandwich system with fault
Lima et al. Improving robustness and disturbance rejection performance with industrial MPC
Montanaro et al. Discrete-time integral MRAC with minimal controller synthesis and parameter projection
CN110187637A (en) Robot system control method in the case where control direction and desired trajectory are uncertain
Ichalal et al. Nonlinear observer based sensor fault tolerant control for nonlinear systems
Yu et al. Discussion about sliding mode algorithms, Zeno phenomena and observability
Rauh et al. Iterative Learning Approaches for Discrete-Time State and Disturbance Observer Design of Uncertain Linear Parameter-Varying Systems
Bekiroglu et al. Model reference adaptive approach to sliding mode control
Zhang et al. Robust adaptive neural control of SISO nonlinear systems with unknown dead-zone and completely unknown control gain
Jing On parameter separation of the Wiener system identification

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant