CN112730634A - Concrete defect detection method and system - Google Patents

Concrete defect detection method and system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN112730634A
CN112730634A CN202011592247.9A CN202011592247A CN112730634A CN 112730634 A CN112730634 A CN 112730634A CN 202011592247 A CN202011592247 A CN 202011592247A CN 112730634 A CN112730634 A CN 112730634A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
waveform
dissimilarity
coefficient
concrete
measured
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN202011592247.9A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN112730634B (en
Inventor
李乃平
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shaanxi Architecture Science Research Institute Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Shaanxi Architecture Science Research Institute Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shaanxi Architecture Science Research Institute Co Ltd filed Critical Shaanxi Architecture Science Research Institute Co Ltd
Priority to CN202011592247.9A priority Critical patent/CN112730634B/en
Publication of CN112730634A publication Critical patent/CN112730634A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN112730634B publication Critical patent/CN112730634B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N29/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
    • G01N29/44Processing the detected response signal, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor
    • G01N29/4409Processing the detected response signal, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor by comparison
    • G01N29/4427Processing the detected response signal, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor by comparison with stored values, e.g. threshold values
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N29/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
    • G01N29/44Processing the detected response signal, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor
    • G01N29/4445Classification of defects
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N29/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
    • G01N29/44Processing the detected response signal, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor
    • G01N29/4472Mathematical theories or simulation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N29/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
    • G01N29/44Processing the detected response signal, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor
    • G01N29/449Statistical methods not provided for in G01N29/4409, e.g. averaging, smoothing and interpolation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N29/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
    • G01N29/44Processing the detected response signal, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor
    • G01N29/48Processing the detected response signal, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor by amplitude comparison
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2291/00Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
    • G01N2291/02Indexing codes associated with the analysed material
    • G01N2291/023Solids
    • G01N2291/0232Glass, ceramics, concrete or stone
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2291/00Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
    • G01N2291/02Indexing codes associated with the analysed material
    • G01N2291/028Material parameters
    • G01N2291/0289Internal structure, e.g. defects, grain size, texture

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Algebra (AREA)
  • Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
  • Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
  • Probability & Statistics with Applications (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a concrete defect detection method and a system. The method comprises the following steps: acquiring ultrasonic waveforms of a plurality of measuring points of concrete to be measured in a set area under the same test condition to obtain ultrasonic waveforms to be measured of the plurality of measuring points; respectively sampling the reference ultrasonic waveform and the ultrasonic waveform to be measured to obtain a reference wave sampling data set and a wave to be measured sampling data set of a plurality of measuring points; calculating a waveform dissimilarity coefficient of each measuring point according to the reference wave sampling data set and the to-be-measured wave sampling data set; the waveform dissimilarity coefficient is a standardized Euclidean distance of the ultrasonic waveform to be measured relative to the reference ultrasonic waveform; and calculating the statistic of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients of all the measuring points, and determining the position of the defect of the concrete to be measured according to the statistic. The method can effectively judge the concrete defects and improve the accuracy and reliability of the concrete defect detection.

Description

Concrete defect detection method and system
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of defect detection, in particular to a method and a system for detecting concrete defects.
Background
The ultrasonic method for detecting concrete defects is to adopt an ultrasonic detector with a waveform display function to measure acoustic parameters such as the propagation speed (sound velocity) or sound time, head wave amplitude (wave amplitude), receiving signal main frequency (main frequency) and waveform of ultrasonic pulse waves in concrete, and judge the defect condition of the concrete according to the parameters and relative changes of the parameters.
In the technical regulation for detecting concrete defects by an ultrasonic method, acoustic parameters, such as sound velocity (or sound time), amplitude and main frequency are all measurable, and waveform parameters can be stored in a file format, but the shape change of the waveform parameters can only be visually observed at present, and no quantifiable index exists.
The selection of judgment parameters and the judgment method of abnormal values in the concrete defect detection by the ultrasonic method are very important. In the technical regulation for detecting concrete defects by an ultrasonic method, the sound velocity or sound phase in the existing judgment parameters is accurate but insensitive, so that the judgment is easy to miss; the main frequency is greatly influenced by sampling length, whether the waveform exceeds the screen during sampling and external interference factors, is very unstable and is not generally used as a judgment parameter; the amplitude is the most sensitive parameter for determining the defect among the above parameters, but the amplitude is influenced by the coupling condition to cause misdetermination.
In order to improve the accuracy and reliability of the ultrasonic method for detecting the concrete defects, it is necessary to quantify the waveform with a certain sampling length in the time domain to judge the concrete defects. Because the received waveform must be changed as long as the concrete is defective, but the measuring points are not influenced by the boundary condition of the member and the structural construction of the propagation path non-defective medium is basically consistent.
At present, in the field of detecting concrete defects by an ultrasonic method, a domestic scholars adopts a Pearson correlation coefficient to calculate a correlation coefficient of any waveform relative to a reference waveform, and the absolute value of the correlation coefficient is not more than 1 to measure the correlation degree between waveforms, which is called as a waveform distortion coefficient.
A large amount of engineering detection data analysis and verification prove that the coefficient is not very effective for judging the waveform similarity of the ultrasonic pulse waves similar to sine wave curves. Since the coefficients are between 0 and 1, and are similar or dissimilar in some detail, the threshold value of the outlier (threshold) is not well defined. It is understood that the method takes a complete waveform of 3-5 periods in a time domain, the amount of information extracted from the surface is large, but the method is likely to carry unfavorable information and obscure useful information, so that the calculated coefficient judgment defect is insensitive. According to a number of engineering tests, useful information sensitive to defects is often in the bow wave portion (within a complete waveform of a cycle). In conclusion, the accuracy and reliability of the existing ultrasonic method for detecting the concrete defects still need to be improved.
Disclosure of Invention
Therefore, there is a need for a method and a system for detecting concrete defects to effectively determine concrete defects and fill the gap that waveform parameters cannot be quantified and effectively determined for a long time, so as to improve the accuracy and reliability of concrete defect detection.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention provides the following scheme:
a method of detecting concrete defects, comprising:
acquiring ultrasonic waveforms of a plurality of measuring points of concrete to be measured in a set area under the same test condition to obtain ultrasonic waveforms to be measured of the plurality of measuring points;
respectively sampling the reference ultrasonic waveform and the ultrasonic waveform to be measured to obtain a reference wave sampling data set and a wave to be measured sampling data set of a plurality of measuring points; the reference ultrasonic waveform is a continuous and complete waveform starting from a head wave starting point in the ultrasonic waveform of the defect-free concrete;
calculating a waveform dissimilarity coefficient of each measuring point according to the reference wave sampling data set and the to-be-measured wave sampling data set; the waveform dissimilarity coefficient is a standardized Euclidean distance of the ultrasonic waveform to be measured relative to the reference ultrasonic waveform;
calculating statistics of waveform dissimilarity coefficients of all measuring points, and determining the defects of the concrete to be measured and positions of the defects according to the statistics; the statistics include mean, standard deviation, and outlier data cutoff for set confidence levels.
Optionally, the calculating a waveform dissimilarity coefficient of each measurement point from the reference wave sampling data set and the to-be-measured wave sampling data set specifically includes:
Figure BDA0002869537290000021
Figure BDA0002869537290000022
Figure BDA0002869537290000031
wherein, XiThe waveform dissimilarity coefficient of the ith measuring point is taken as a coefficient; siThe standard deviation of a sampling data set of the wave to be measured of the ith measuring point is obtained; s0Sampling a standard deviation of the data set for a reference wave; a isi,jJ is the jth acquired data in the to-be-detected wave sampling data set of the ith measuring point, wherein j is 1,2, 3. N is the total number of samples; a is0,jSampling jth acquired data in the data set for the reference wave;
Figure BDA0002869537290000032
the average value of N sampling data in a sampling data set of the wave to be measured of the ith measuring point is obtained;
Figure BDA0002869537290000033
the average value of the N sampled data in the set of reference wave sampled data is used.
Optionally, calculating a statistic of waveform dissimilarity coefficients of all the measuring points, and determining a position of the defect of the concrete to be measured according to the statistic, specifically including:
calculating the average value of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients in the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the current iteration times and the standard deviation of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients; the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the initial iteration times comprises waveform dissimilarity coefficients of all the measuring points;
determining an abnormal data critical value under the current iteration number according to the average value of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient and the standard deviation of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient;
judging whether a waveform dissimilarity coefficient which is larger than or equal to the abnormal data critical value exists in a waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the current iteration times;
if so, determining the measuring point corresponding to the abnormal waveform dissimilarity coefficient as the position of the defect of the concrete, removing the abnormal waveform dissimilarity coefficient from the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set, updating the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set and the iteration times, and then returning to the step of calculating the average value of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients and the standard deviation of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients in the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the current iteration times; the abnormal waveform dissimilarity coefficient is a waveform dissimilarity coefficient which is greater than or equal to the abnormal data critical value in the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the current iteration number.
Optionally, the determining an abnormal data critical value under the current iteration number according to the average value of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient and the standard deviation of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient specifically includes:
Figure BDA0002869537290000034
wherein, X0Is an abnormal data critical value;
Figure BDA0002869537290000035
the average value of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient is obtained; sxIs the standard deviation of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient; lambda [ alpha ]nAnd determining coefficients for abnormal values corresponding to a waveform dissimilarity coefficient set including n waveform dissimilarity coefficients.
Optionally, before the calculating statistics of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients of all the measuring points, and determining the defect of the concrete to be measured and the position of the defect from the statistics, the method further includes:
and screening the waveform dissimilarity coefficients of all the measuring points by adopting a centroid clustering method.
The invention also provides a concrete defect detection system, which comprises:
the waveform acquisition module is used for acquiring ultrasonic waveforms of a plurality of measuring points of the concrete to be measured in the set area under the same test condition to obtain ultrasonic waveforms to be measured of the plurality of measuring points;
the sampling module is used for respectively sampling the reference ultrasonic waveform and the ultrasonic waveform to be detected to obtain a reference wave sampling data set and a wave to be detected sampling data set of a plurality of measuring points; the reference ultrasonic waveform is a continuous and complete waveform starting from a head wave starting point in the ultrasonic waveform of the defect-free concrete;
the waveform dissimilarity coefficient calculation module is used for calculating the waveform dissimilarity coefficient of each measuring point according to the reference wave sampling data set and the to-be-measured wave sampling data set; the waveform dissimilarity coefficient is a standardized Euclidean distance of the ultrasonic waveform to be measured relative to the reference ultrasonic waveform;
the defect detection module is used for calculating the statistic of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients of all the measuring points and determining the defects of the concrete to be detected and the positions of the defects according to the statistic; the statistics include mean, standard deviation, and outlier data cutoff for set confidence levels.
Optionally, the waveform dissimilarity coefficient calculation module specifically includes:
Figure BDA0002869537290000041
Figure BDA0002869537290000042
Figure BDA0002869537290000043
wherein, XiThe waveform dissimilarity coefficient of the ith measuring point is taken as a coefficient; siThe standard deviation of a sampling data set of the wave to be measured of the ith measuring point is obtained; s0Sampling a standard deviation of the data set for a reference wave; a isi,jJ is the jth acquired data in the to-be-detected wave sampling data set of the ith measuring point, wherein j is 1,2, 3. N is the total number of samples; a is0,jSampling jth acquired data in the data set for the reference wave;
Figure BDA0002869537290000044
the average value of N sampling data in a sampling data set of the wave to be measured of the ith measuring point is obtained;
Figure BDA0002869537290000051
the average value of the N sampled data in the set of reference wave sampled data is used.
Optionally, the defect detection module specifically includes:
the statistic calculation unit is used for calculating the average value of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients in the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the current iteration number and the standard deviation of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients; the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the initial iteration times comprises waveform dissimilarity coefficients of all the measuring points;
the critical value calculating unit is used for determining an abnormal data critical value under the current iteration times according to the average value of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients and the standard deviation of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients;
the judging unit is used for judging whether a waveform dissimilarity coefficient which is larger than or equal to the abnormal data critical value exists in the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the current iteration times;
the defect position determining unit is used for determining a measuring point corresponding to the abnormal waveform dissimilarity coefficient as the position of the defect of the concrete if the abnormal waveform dissimilarity coefficient is detected, removing the abnormal waveform dissimilarity coefficient from the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set, updating the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set and the iteration times, and returning to the statistic calculating unit; the abnormal waveform dissimilarity coefficient is a waveform dissimilarity coefficient which is greater than or equal to the abnormal data critical value in the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the current iteration number.
Optionally, the critical value calculating unit specifically includes:
Figure BDA0002869537290000052
wherein, X0Is an abnormal data critical value;
Figure BDA0002869537290000053
the average value of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient is obtained; sxAre dissimilar in waveformThe standard deviation of the coefficients; lambda [ alpha ]nAnd determining coefficients for abnormal values corresponding to a waveform dissimilarity coefficient set including n waveform dissimilarity coefficients.
Optionally, the concrete defect detecting system further includes:
and the screening module is used for screening the waveform dissimilarity coefficients of all the measuring points by adopting a centroid clustering method.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the beneficial effects that:
the invention provides a concrete defect detection method and system, wherein a waveform dissimilarity coefficient is obtained by calculating a Standardized Euclidean Distance (Standardized Euclidean Distance) of an ultrasonic waveform to be detected relative to a reference ultrasonic waveform, and the waveform dissimilarity coefficient is used as a parameter for waveform quantization. By calculating waveform dissimilarity coefficient statistics (average value, standard deviation and abnormal data critical value of set confidence level), the concrete defect can be effectively judged, and the blank that the waveform parameters cannot be quantified and effectively judged for a long time is filled, so that the accuracy and reliability of concrete defect detection are improved.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings needed to be used in the embodiments will be briefly described below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious for those skilled in the art to obtain other drawings without inventive exercise.
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for detecting defects in concrete according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 2 is a schematic structural diagram of a concrete defect detection system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
In order to make the aforementioned objects, features and advantages of the present invention comprehensible, embodiments accompanied with figures are described in further detail below.
Based on the defects of the prior art, the present embodiment proposes a waveform dissimilarity coefficient, which substantially calculates the distance, similarity, or dissimilarity value (waveform dissimilarity coefficient) of the waveform (data) of each measurement point in the time domain with respect to the reference waveform (data) by using the normalized euclidean distance. The result of the normalized euclidean formula calculation is dimensionless. The waveform dissimilarity coefficient can be used as an important parameter for defect judgment through probability statistical analysis on the basis of considering sampling errors.
Compared with a reference waveform (normal waveform), the waveform dissimilarity coefficient is sensitive to sudden change, dislocation or displacement of waveform data in a time domain, and can reflect the change condition of the waveform to a greater extent. Through a large number of engineering detection analysis verifications over the years, the concrete defects can be effectively judged by adopting the waveform quantization parameter (called as a waveform dissimilarity coefficient), so that the missing judgment is radically reduced.
Waveform dissimilarity coefficient: the received waveforms of a plurality of measurement points with the same test condition in a certain region are relative to a reference waveform (1 continuous complete waveform is taken from a head wave starting jump point) in a time domain, and the value calculated by normalizing the Euclidean distance is called as a waveform dissimilarity coefficient. The larger the coefficient, the greater the dissimilarity with respect to the reference waveform, i.e., the smaller the degree of similarity.
Fig. 1 is a flowchart of a concrete defect detection method according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Referring to fig. 1, the method for detecting concrete defects of the embodiment includes:
step 101: and acquiring ultrasonic waveforms of a plurality of measuring points of the concrete to be measured in the set area under the same test condition to obtain the ultrasonic waveforms to be measured of the plurality of measuring points.
Step 102: respectively sampling the reference ultrasonic waveform and the ultrasonic waveform to be measured to obtain a reference wave sampling data set and a wave to be measured sampling data set of a plurality of measuring points; the reference ultrasonic waveform is a continuous and complete waveform starting from a head wave starting point in the ultrasonic waveform of the defect-free concrete.
Let W0Sampling a data set for a reference wave, W0={a0,1,a0,2,...,a0,NIn which a is0,1,a0,2,...,a0,NThe elements respectively represent the ordered data of N sampling points of the reference ultrasonic waveform in the time domain, a0,1And (3) data representing the head wave jump point, and then sequentially acquiring N pieces of ordered waveform data according to a fixed sampling interval.
Let WiIs a set of waveform data of the ith measuring point of a certain area. I.e. Wi={ai,1,ai,2,...,ai,NIt is related to W0Aggregate data correspondence, WiA in the seti,1,ai,2,...,ai,NThe elements respectively represent N orderly collected data of the ultrasonic waveform to be measured of the measuring point (i measuring point), ai,1And representing the data of the head wave jump point of the ultrasonic wave form to be measured of the measuring point.
Step 103: calculating a waveform dissimilarity coefficient of each measuring point according to the reference wave sampling data set and the to-be-measured wave sampling data set; the waveform dissimilarity coefficient is a standardized Euclidean distance between the ultrasonic waveform to be measured and the reference ultrasonic waveform.
The step 103 specifically includes:
Figure BDA0002869537290000071
Figure BDA0002869537290000072
Figure BDA0002869537290000073
wherein,XiIs the waveform dissimilarity coefficient, X, of the ith measurement pointiNot less than 0, is a dimensionless number; siThe standard deviation of a sampling data set of the wave to be measured of the ith measuring point is obtained; s0Sampling a standard deviation of the data set for a reference wave; a isi,jJ is the jth acquired data in the to-be-detected wave sampling data set of the ith measuring point, wherein j is 1,2, 3. N is the total number of samples; a is0,jSampling jth acquired data in the data set for the reference wave;
Figure BDA0002869537290000074
the average value of N sampling data in a sampling data set of the wave to be measured of the ith measuring point is obtained;
Figure BDA0002869537290000081
the average value of the N sampled data in the set of reference wave sampled data is used. The waveform dissimilarity coefficient (X) of the measured ultrasonic waveform of the ith measuring point in a certain area relative to the waveform of the reference ultrasonic waveformi) The essence is the distance or similarity between two sets of ordered data, which is a statistical data processing method.
N can be calculated according to the following formula:
Figure BDA0002869537290000082
wherein, L is the length (mu s) of a continuous complete waveform in one period starting from the head wave starting point in the ultrasonic waveform of the defect-free concrete, and Delta T is the sampling time interval (mu s).
The calculation of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient (Xi) of a plurality of measuring points in a certain area under the same test condition can be completed by adopting the existing software and self-developed programs.
Step 104: calculating statistics of waveform dissimilarity coefficients of all measuring points, and determining the defects of the concrete to be measured and positions of the defects according to the statistics; the statistics include mean, standard deviation, and outlier data cutoff for set confidence levels. The outlier threshold for the set confidence level may be an outlier threshold with a single side confidence level of 90%.
The step 104 specifically includes:
1) calculating the average value of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients in the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the current iteration times and the standard deviation of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients; the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the initial iteration number comprises waveform dissimilarity coefficients of all the measuring points.
Let XiAnd the waveform dissimilarity coefficients represent the ith measuring point of a certain area. X1,X2,...XnThe samples conform to a normal distribution, the mean value of the sample statistics (mean value of waveform dissimilarity coefficient)
Figure BDA0002869537290000083
And standard deviation (standard deviation of waveform dissimilarity coefficient) SxThe calculation is performed according to the following formula:
Figure BDA0002869537290000084
Figure BDA0002869537290000085
when the statistic is calculated according to the formula, the waveform dissimilarity coefficient is screened. If there are one or more significantly larger suspect data, the data pair sample standard deviation S should be deletedxThe influence of (c). When the data is empirical, normal data can be selected for calculation, and when the data cannot be determined, the original sample data can be divided into two types by adopting a statistical centroid clustering method, and waveform dissimilarity coefficients with smaller values are taken for calculation.
2) And determining an abnormal data critical value under the current iteration number according to the average value of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient and the standard deviation of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient. The method specifically comprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0002869537290000091
wherein, X0An abnormal data critical value (also called an abnormal value determination value);
Figure BDA0002869537290000092
the average value of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient is obtained; sxIs the standard deviation of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient; lambda [ alpha ]nAn abnormal value determination coefficient (single-side upper limit confidence interval abnormal value determination coefficient) corresponding to a waveform dissimilarity coefficient set including n waveform dissimilarity coefficients. Lambda [ alpha ]nThe values of (A) can be found in Table 1.
TABLE 1
Figure BDA0002869537290000093
Figure BDA0002869537290000101
3) And judging whether the waveform dissimilarity coefficient which is larger than or equal to the abnormal data critical value exists in the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the current iteration number.
If yes, determining a measuring point corresponding to the abnormal waveform dissimilarity coefficient as the position of the defect of the concrete, removing the abnormal waveform dissimilarity coefficient from the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set, updating the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set and the iteration times, and returning to the step 1). The abnormal waveform dissimilarity coefficient is a waveform dissimilarity coefficient which is greater than or equal to the abnormal data critical value in the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the current iteration number. I.e. first based on initial calculations
Figure BDA0002869537290000102
SxValue and lambdanCalculating X from the calculation formula of the critical value of the abnormal data0If some data is larger than X0Then these data are outliers. Then, after removing these outliers, the remaining data is recalculated
Figure BDA0002869537290000103
SxThen calculating X according to the constant data critical value calculation formula0Comparing and removing, and repeating until the residual data are less than X0Until now. Greater than X for the above removal by one or more times0The data of (1) is the abnormal value of the area. According to the parameters and the judgment method, if the waveforms of a certain measuring point are not similar to each other, the coefficient XiThe concrete is judged to be an abnormal value, namely the concrete at the position has defects.
The concrete defect detection method of the embodiment has the following advantages:
1. the waveform dissimilarity coefficient is used as an important parameter for waveform quantification, and the parameter is calculated and determined by statistical analysis to have an abnormal value critical value (a determination value) with 90% unilateral confidence level, so that the concrete defect can be effectively determined, and the blank that the waveform parameter cannot be quantified and effectively determined for a long time is filled.
2. The accuracy of concrete defect judgment can be improved by adopting the waveform dissimilarity coefficient.
3. By adopting the waveform dissimilarity coefficient, the problem that the amplitude parameter cannot be used as a supplementary parameter of the defect judgment parameter due to the fact that the consistency of the coupling condition cannot be guaranteed by human factors can be effectively solved. Because the numerator term and the denominator term in the waveform dissimilarity coefficient formula are waveform data and standard deviation, when the coupling is not good, the waveform shape does not change (namely, the waveform dissimilarity coefficient does not change), and the waveform amplitude is greatly reduced due to the coupling factor. The numerator and the denominator in the waveform dissimilarity coefficient calculation formula can effectively remove amplitude variation, and ensure that the waveform similarity coefficient is unchanged, thereby reducing misjudgment to a certain degree.
The invention also provides a concrete defect detection system, and fig. 2 is a schematic structural diagram of the concrete defect detection system provided by the embodiment of the invention.
Referring to fig. 2, the concrete defect detecting system of the present embodiment includes:
the waveform obtaining module 201 is configured to obtain ultrasonic waveforms of multiple measuring points of the concrete to be measured in the set area under the same test condition, so as to obtain ultrasonic waveforms of the multiple measuring points to be measured.
The sampling module 202 is configured to sample the reference ultrasonic waveform and the to-be-measured ultrasonic waveform respectively to obtain a reference wave sampling data set and a to-be-measured wave sampling data set of a plurality of measurement points; the reference ultrasonic waveform is a continuous and complete waveform starting from a head wave starting point in the ultrasonic waveform of the defect-free concrete.
The waveform dissimilarity coefficient calculation module 203 is configured to calculate a waveform dissimilarity coefficient of each measurement point from the reference wave sampling data set and the to-be-measured wave sampling data set; the waveform dissimilarity coefficient is a standardized Euclidean distance between the ultrasonic waveform to be measured and the reference ultrasonic waveform.
The defect detection module 204 is used for calculating statistics of waveform dissimilarity coefficients of all measuring points, and determining the defects of the concrete to be detected and positions of the defects according to the statistics; the statistics include mean, standard deviation, and outlier data cutoff for set confidence levels.
As an optional implementation manner, the waveform dissimilarity coefficient calculating module 203 specifically includes:
Figure BDA0002869537290000111
Figure BDA0002869537290000112
Figure BDA0002869537290000113
wherein, XiThe waveform dissimilarity coefficient of the ith measuring point is taken as a coefficient; siThe standard deviation of a sampling data set of the wave to be measured of the ith measuring point is obtained; s0Sampling a standard deviation of the data set for a reference wave; a isi,jJ is the jth acquired data in the to-be-detected wave sampling data set of the ith measuring point, wherein j is 1,2, 3. N is the total sampleCounting; a is0,jSampling jth acquired data in the data set for the reference wave;
Figure BDA0002869537290000114
the average value of N sampling data in a sampling data set of the wave to be measured of the ith measuring point is obtained;
Figure BDA0002869537290000115
the average value of the N sampled data in the set of reference wave sampled data is used.
As an optional implementation manner, the defect detecting module 204 specifically includes:
the statistic calculation unit is used for calculating the average value of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients in the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the current iteration number and the standard deviation of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients; the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the initial iteration number comprises waveform dissimilarity coefficients of all the measuring points.
And the critical value calculating unit is used for determining an abnormal data critical value under the current iteration number according to the average value of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient and the standard deviation of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient.
And the judging unit is used for judging whether the waveform dissimilarity coefficient which is greater than or equal to the abnormal data critical value exists in the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the current iteration number.
The defect position determining unit is used for determining a measuring point corresponding to the abnormal waveform dissimilarity coefficient as the position of the defect of the concrete if the abnormal waveform dissimilarity coefficient is detected, removing the abnormal waveform dissimilarity coefficient from the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set, updating the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set and the iteration times, and returning to the statistic calculating unit; the abnormal waveform dissimilarity coefficient is a waveform dissimilarity coefficient which is greater than or equal to the abnormal data critical value in the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the current iteration number.
As an optional implementation manner, the critical value calculating unit specifically includes:
Figure BDA0002869537290000121
wherein, X0Is an abnormal data critical value;
Figure BDA0002869537290000122
the average value of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient is obtained; sxIs the standard deviation of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient; lambda [ alpha ]nAnd determining coefficients for abnormal values corresponding to a waveform dissimilarity coefficient set including n waveform dissimilarity coefficients.
As an optional implementation, the concrete defect detecting system further includes: and the screening module is used for screening the waveform dissimilarity coefficients of all the measuring points by adopting a centroid clustering method.
A specific example is given below.
In this particular example, concrete defects of different sizes and properties (porosity, voids, acceptable small defects) were simulated in the laboratory at a test distance of 1200mm and a grout concrete design strength rating of C40.
The digital ultrasonic detector of Beijing Yutong is adopted, the emission voltage is 500V, the sampling interval is 0.40 mu s, and the instrument is qualified after being identified before detection. Before detection, the instrument is withered. And detecting that the coupling condition is normal and no coupling inconsistency exists.
The 45 groups of the current co-detection data represent 45 measuring points, each 3 points represent one part (15 parts in total), and the data of each measuring point are not influenced by the boundary condition of the component. Specific detection data processing and analysis determination are as follows.
(1) And acoustic parameter data (namely amplitude, sound time or sound velocity) of 45 measuring points acquired by the original specification are shown in a table 2.
TABLE 2
Figure BDA0002869537290000131
Figure BDA0002869537290000141
Figure BDA0002869537290000151
(2) Waveform data of 45 measuring points derived from a TXT text waveform data file stored by an instrument (a reference wave is a complete waveform of a period from a head wave starting point of a 1 st measuring point, and the number of sampling points is 49, specifically:
Figure BDA0002869537290000152
the sample points at the 1 st to 15 th stations are shown in Table 3-1, the sample points at the 16 th to 30 th stations are shown in Table 3-2, and the sample points at the 31 th to 45 th stations are shown in Table 3-3.
TABLE 3-1
Figure BDA0002869537290000153
Figure BDA0002869537290000161
Figure BDA0002869537290000171
TABLE 3-2
Figure BDA0002869537290000172
Figure BDA0002869537290000181
Figure BDA0002869537290000191
Tables 3 to 3
Figure BDA0002869537290000192
Figure BDA0002869537290000201
Figure BDA0002869537290000211
The calculated waveform dissimilarity coefficients are shown in tables 4-1, 4-2 and 4-3.
TABLE 4-1
Figure BDA0002869537290000212
Figure BDA0002869537290000221
Figure BDA0002869537290000231
Figure BDA0002869537290000241
Figure BDA0002869537290000251
TABLE 4-2
Figure BDA0002869537290000252
Figure BDA0002869537290000261
Figure BDA0002869537290000271
Figure BDA0002869537290000281
Figure BDA0002869537290000291
Tables 4 to 3
Figure BDA0002869537290000292
Figure BDA0002869537290000301
Figure BDA0002869537290000311
Figure BDA0002869537290000321
(3) And (3) judging abnormal values by adopting waveform dissimilarity coefficients, wave amplitudes and sound time (or sound velocity).
(a) Using waveform dissimilarity coefficients (X)i) The results of the abnormal values are shown in table 5.
TABLE 5
Figure BDA0002869537290000331
Figure BDA0002869537290000341
Figure BDA0002869537290000351
(b) Using sound time (t)i) The results of determining abnormal values by the parameters are shown in table 6.
TABLE 6
Figure BDA0002869537290000352
Figure BDA0002869537290000361
(c) Using amplitude (A)i) The results of determining abnormal values by the parameters are shown in table 7.
TABLE 7
Figure BDA0002869537290000371
Figure BDA0002869537290000381
(d) Using the speed of sound (v)i) The results of determining abnormal values by the parameters are shown in table 8.
TABLE 8
Figure BDA0002869537290000391
Figure BDA0002869537290000401
The embodiments in the present description are described in a progressive manner, each embodiment focuses on differences from other embodiments, and the same and similar parts among the embodiments are referred to each other. For the system disclosed by the embodiment, the description is relatively simple because the system corresponds to the method disclosed by the embodiment, and the relevant points can be referred to the method part for description.
The principles and embodiments of the present invention have been described herein using specific examples, which are provided only to help understand the method and the core concept of the present invention; meanwhile, for a person skilled in the art, according to the idea of the present invention, the specific embodiments and the application range may be changed. In view of the above, the present disclosure should not be construed as limiting the invention.

Claims (10)

1. A concrete defect detection method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
acquiring ultrasonic waveforms of a plurality of measuring points of concrete to be measured in a set area under the same test condition to obtain ultrasonic waveforms to be measured of the plurality of measuring points;
respectively sampling the reference ultrasonic waveform and the ultrasonic waveform to be measured to obtain a reference wave sampling data set and a wave to be measured sampling data set of a plurality of measuring points; the reference ultrasonic waveform is a continuous and complete waveform starting from a head wave starting point in the ultrasonic waveform of the defect-free concrete;
calculating a waveform dissimilarity coefficient of each measuring point according to the reference wave sampling data set and the to-be-measured wave sampling data set; the waveform dissimilarity coefficient is a standardized Euclidean distance of the ultrasonic waveform to be measured relative to the reference ultrasonic waveform;
calculating statistics of waveform dissimilarity coefficients of all measuring points, and determining the defects of the concrete to be measured and positions of the defects according to the statistics; the statistics include mean, standard deviation, and outlier data cutoff for set confidence levels.
2. The method for detecting the concrete defect according to claim 1, wherein the calculating the waveform dissimilarity coefficient of each measuring point by the reference wave sampling data set and the wave sampling data set to be measured specifically comprises:
Figure FDA0002869537280000011
Figure FDA0002869537280000012
Figure FDA0002869537280000013
wherein, XiThe waveform dissimilarity coefficient of the ith measuring point is taken as a coefficient; siThe standard deviation of a sampling data set of the wave to be measured of the ith measuring point is obtained; s0Sampling a standard deviation of the data set for a reference wave; a isi,jJ is the jth acquired data in the to-be-detected wave sampling data set of the ith measuring point, wherein j is 1,2, 3. N is the total number of samples; a is0,jSampling jth acquired data in the data set for the reference wave;
Figure FDA0002869537280000014
the average value of N sampling data in a sampling data set of the wave to be measured of the ith measuring point is obtained;
Figure FDA0002869537280000015
the average value of the N sampled data in the set of reference wave sampled data is used.
3. The method for detecting the concrete defect according to claim 1, wherein a statistic of waveform dissimilarity coefficients of all measuring points is calculated, and the position of the defect of the concrete to be detected is determined according to the statistic, which specifically comprises the following steps:
calculating the average value of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients in the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the current iteration times and the standard deviation of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients; the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the initial iteration times comprises waveform dissimilarity coefficients of all the measuring points;
determining an abnormal data critical value under the current iteration number according to the average value of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient and the standard deviation of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient;
judging whether a waveform dissimilarity coefficient which is larger than or equal to the abnormal data critical value exists in a waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the current iteration times;
if so, determining the measuring point corresponding to the abnormal waveform dissimilarity coefficient as the position of the defect of the concrete, removing the abnormal waveform dissimilarity coefficient from the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set, updating the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set and the iteration times, and then returning to the step of calculating the average value of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients and the standard deviation of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients in the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the current iteration times; the abnormal waveform dissimilarity coefficient is a waveform dissimilarity coefficient which is greater than or equal to the abnormal data critical value in the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the current iteration number.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the abnormal data critical value at the current iteration number is determined by the average value of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient and the standard deviation of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient, and specifically comprises:
Figure FDA0002869537280000021
wherein, X0Is an abnormal data critical value;
Figure FDA0002869537280000022
the average value of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient is obtained; sxIs the standard deviation of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient; lambda [ alpha ]nAnd determining coefficients for abnormal values corresponding to a waveform dissimilarity coefficient set including n waveform dissimilarity coefficients.
5. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein before calculating statistics of waveform dissimilarity coefficients of all the measuring points and determining the defect of the concrete to be measured and the position of the defect from the statistics, the method further comprises:
and screening the waveform dissimilarity coefficients of all the measuring points by adopting a centroid clustering method.
6. A concrete defect detection system, comprising:
the waveform acquisition module is used for acquiring ultrasonic waveforms of a plurality of measuring points of the concrete to be measured in the set area under the same test condition to obtain ultrasonic waveforms to be measured of the plurality of measuring points;
the sampling module is used for respectively sampling the reference ultrasonic waveform and the ultrasonic waveform to be detected to obtain a reference wave sampling data set and a wave to be detected sampling data set of a plurality of measuring points; the reference ultrasonic waveform is a continuous and complete waveform starting from a head wave starting point in the ultrasonic waveform of the defect-free concrete;
the waveform dissimilarity coefficient calculation module is used for calculating the waveform dissimilarity coefficient of each measuring point according to the reference wave sampling data set and the to-be-measured wave sampling data set; the waveform dissimilarity coefficient is a standardized Euclidean distance of the ultrasonic waveform to be measured relative to the reference ultrasonic waveform;
the defect detection module is used for calculating the statistic of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients of all the measuring points and determining the defects of the concrete to be detected and the positions of the defects according to the statistic; the statistics include mean, standard deviation, and outlier data cutoff for set confidence levels.
7. The concrete defect detecting system of claim 6, wherein the waveform dissimilarity coefficient calculating module is specifically:
Figure FDA0002869537280000031
Figure FDA0002869537280000032
Figure FDA0002869537280000033
wherein, XiThe waveform dissimilarity coefficient of the ith measuring point is taken as a coefficient; siThe standard deviation of a sampling data set of the wave to be measured of the ith measuring point is obtained; s0Sampling a standard deviation of the data set for a reference wave; a isi,jJ is the jth acquired data in the to-be-detected wave sampling data set of the ith measuring point, wherein j is 1,2, 3. N is the total number of samples; a is0,jSampling jth acquired data in the data set for the reference wave;
Figure FDA0002869537280000034
the average value of N sampling data in a sampling data set of the wave to be measured of the ith measuring point is obtained;
Figure FDA0002869537280000035
the average value of the N sampled data in the set of reference wave sampled data is used.
8. The concrete defect detecting system of claim 6, wherein the defect detecting module specifically comprises:
the statistic calculation unit is used for calculating the average value of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients in the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the current iteration number and the standard deviation of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients; the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the initial iteration times comprises waveform dissimilarity coefficients of all the measuring points;
the critical value calculating unit is used for determining an abnormal data critical value under the current iteration times according to the average value of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients and the standard deviation of the waveform dissimilarity coefficients;
the judging unit is used for judging whether a waveform dissimilarity coefficient which is larger than or equal to the abnormal data critical value exists in the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the current iteration times;
the defect position determining unit is used for determining a measuring point corresponding to the abnormal waveform dissimilarity coefficient as the position of the defect of the concrete if the abnormal waveform dissimilarity coefficient is detected, removing the abnormal waveform dissimilarity coefficient from the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set, updating the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set and the iteration times, and returning to the statistic calculating unit; the abnormal waveform dissimilarity coefficient is a waveform dissimilarity coefficient which is greater than or equal to the abnormal data critical value in the waveform dissimilarity coefficient set under the current iteration number.
9. The system of claim 8, wherein the threshold calculation unit is specifically:
Figure FDA0002869537280000041
wherein, X0Is an abnormal data critical value;
Figure FDA0002869537280000042
the average value of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient is obtained; sxIs the standard deviation of the waveform dissimilarity coefficient; lambda [ alpha ]nAnd determining coefficients for abnormal values corresponding to a waveform dissimilarity coefficient set including n waveform dissimilarity coefficients.
10. The concrete defect detection system of claim 6, further comprising:
and the screening module is used for screening the waveform dissimilarity coefficients of all the measuring points by adopting a centroid clustering method.
CN202011592247.9A 2020-12-29 2020-12-29 Concrete defect detection method and system Active CN112730634B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202011592247.9A CN112730634B (en) 2020-12-29 2020-12-29 Concrete defect detection method and system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202011592247.9A CN112730634B (en) 2020-12-29 2020-12-29 Concrete defect detection method and system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN112730634A true CN112730634A (en) 2021-04-30
CN112730634B CN112730634B (en) 2024-04-09

Family

ID=75607673

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202011592247.9A Active CN112730634B (en) 2020-12-29 2020-12-29 Concrete defect detection method and system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN112730634B (en)

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100319456A1 (en) * 2009-06-19 2010-12-23 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Methods and systems for detecting defects in welded structures
CN106124632A (en) * 2016-07-22 2016-11-16 山东大学 A kind of concrete density appraisal procedure based on ultrasound wave

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100319456A1 (en) * 2009-06-19 2010-12-23 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Methods and systems for detecting defects in welded structures
CN106124632A (en) * 2016-07-22 2016-11-16 山东大学 A kind of concrete density appraisal procedure based on ultrasound wave

Non-Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
余安;汤洪志;刘朋梅;张亮;周阳权;: "声波透射法和反射波法在混凝土灌注桩缺陷检测中的对比研究", 工程地球物理学报, no. 01, 30 January 2015 (2015-01-30) *
安笑笑;贺西平;卢康;: "基于加权欧氏距离的陶瓷器超声波辨识方法", 电子学报, no. 07, 15 July 2018 (2018-07-15) *
廖智;: "超声波法探测混凝土内部缺陷的原理及应用", 科学技术与工程, no. 13, 8 May 2011 (2011-05-08) *
张立新;李慧剑;高柏峰;朱天志;: "基于小波分析与神经网络的混凝土缺陷超声定量检测", 无损检测, no. 01, 10 January 2009 (2009-01-10) *
李乃平;姚选社;郭栋;: "超声波检测钢管芯框架柱混凝土质量", 工程质量, no. 01, 10 January 2013 (2013-01-10) *
田惠生, 曹秀国, 李延宁: "功率谱分析在混凝土质量超声检测中的应用研究", 西安交通大学学报, no. 12, 20 December 1997 (1997-12-20) *
黄靓;黄政宇;汪优;: "混凝土超声波层析成像的图像后处理方法", 计算机工程与应用, no. 26, 11 September 2008 (2008-09-11) *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN112730634B (en) 2024-04-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN113567604B (en) Detection and analysis method of chromatographic spectrogram and electronic equipment
TWI398645B (en) Methods of locally in-order strobing,methods of jitter measurement and automated test equipment systems
CN114878582B (en) Defect detection and analysis method and system for special steel
CN116242443B (en) Dynamic metering method of ultrasonic metering instrument
CN110455923B (en) Rapid evaluation method for anchor rod anchoring quality grade
CN115047065A (en) Method, device and equipment for correcting impact of knocking force in beating method
CN112730634A (en) Concrete defect detection method and system
CN117168337B (en) OFDR strain edge optimization method and measurement method
CN111881800A (en) Concrete filled steel tube void defect detection method based on AR model and self-service inspection
CN113158558A (en) High-speed railway roadbed continuous compaction analysis method, device and analyzer
CN109873822B (en) Device and method for detecting firewall rule change based on Beidou subnanosecond high-precision time service
CN110907984A (en) Method for detecting earthquake front infrared long-wave radiation abnormal information based on autoregressive moving average model
KR101754165B1 (en) System for detecting abnormal behavior and evaluating safety of structure for merging non-periodic acceleration data
CN107861033B (en) Calibration method and system for positioning error of oscillation wave partial discharge detection system
CN113723207B (en) Acoustic emission signal mutation detection method based on histogram distance
CN110455922B (en) K-nearest neighbor method-based anchor rod anchoring quality grade evaluation method
KR102036790B1 (en) Condition Assessment System and Method for Cables via Stepped-Frequency Waveform Reflectometry
CN116754655A (en) Welding arc stability assessment method, device, equipment and medium
CN113295765B (en) Method for detecting grouting defects of pore canal
CN113945637A (en) Metal surface crack nondestructive flaw detection method based on ultrasonic waves
CN106198745A (en) Based on reflected energy than the anchoring defect length recognition methods of parameter
CN118068309A (en) Ultrasonic radar ranging accuracy and stability testing method and system
CN110749650A (en) Anchor rod anchoring compactness grade evaluation method based on support vector machine
JP4173408B2 (en) Seismic motion identification method and apparatus therefor
CN113820646A (en) Electronic transformer checking method and system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant