CN112730078A - Fracture toughness analysis method for pressure-bearing main equipment of nuclear power plant and pressure-bearing equipment of chemical machinery - Google Patents

Fracture toughness analysis method for pressure-bearing main equipment of nuclear power plant and pressure-bearing equipment of chemical machinery Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN112730078A
CN112730078A CN202011530211.8A CN202011530211A CN112730078A CN 112730078 A CN112730078 A CN 112730078A CN 202011530211 A CN202011530211 A CN 202011530211A CN 112730078 A CN112730078 A CN 112730078A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
extracting
pressure
stress
steps
positions
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN202011530211.8A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN112730078B (en
Inventor
牟力波
刘艳鹏
邱砚明
徐树林
徐文吉
范业娇
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hadian Power Equipment National Engineering Research Center Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Hadian Power Equipment National Engineering Research Center Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hadian Power Equipment National Engineering Research Center Co Ltd filed Critical Hadian Power Equipment National Engineering Research Center Co Ltd
Priority to CN202011530211.8A priority Critical patent/CN112730078B/en
Publication of CN112730078A publication Critical patent/CN112730078A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN112730078B publication Critical patent/CN112730078B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N3/00Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
    • G01N3/08Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying steady tensile or compressive forces
    • G01N3/10Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying steady tensile or compressive forces generated by pneumatic or hydraulic pressure
    • G01N3/12Pressure testing
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • G06F30/23Design optimisation, verification or simulation using finite element methods [FEM] or finite difference methods [FDM]

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a fracture toughness analysis method for pressure-bearing main equipment of a nuclear power plant and pressure-bearing equipment of chemical machinery, in particular to a fracture toughness analysis method for pressure-bearing equipment, which belongs to the field of nuclear power and pressure-bearing of chemical machinery and aims to solve the problem that the conventional pressure container fracture prevention method has no clear judgment and calculation method; the method adopts a linear elastic fracture mechanics theory, namely an analysis method for correlating the numerical value and distribution of the stress field near the crack tip of the linear elastic body with the crack with the size of the crack which possibly causes non-ductile failure is the numerical relationship among the fracture toughness, the size of the crack defect and the stress level of the material during crack propagation; the invention can analyze and judge the load at every moment, improve the accuracy of calculation, develop corresponding calculation software and improve the economy and the calculation efficiency.

Description

Fracture toughness analysis method for pressure-bearing main equipment of nuclear power plant and pressure-bearing equipment of chemical machinery
Technical Field
The invention discloses a fracture toughness analysis method for pressure-bearing main equipment of a nuclear power plant and pressure-bearing equipment of chemical machinery, in particular relates to a fracture toughness analysis method for pressure-bearing equipment, and belongs to the field of nuclear power and pressure-bearing of chemical machinery.
Background
For the current method for preventing the pressure container from breaking, no clear judgment and calculation method exists, the method for preventing the low-temperature brittle failure from the aspects of material selection and low-temperature low-stress working condition in GB/T150 is generally adopted in China, and whether the possibility of breaking exists is not judged from the aspect of numerical simulation; in the foreign standards, the failure of the equipment is judged by simply judging whether the crack is expanded or not by providing an inspection result and a load value when a regular inspection is operated, and a suggested result is not considered and provided from a design source.
Based on a method combining theory with foreign standards and design experience, a set of conservative fracture prevention method is researched, and further, a reasonable structural wall thickness can be designed through calculation, so that the structural strength requirement is met, and the brittle fracture prevention can also be met.
The principle is adopted: the method is a linear elastic fracture mechanics theory, namely an analysis method for correlating the value and distribution of the stress field near the crack tip of the linear elastic body with the crack with the size of the crack which can cause non-ductile failure, and is a numerical relation among the fracture toughness, the size of a crack defect and the stress level of a material during crack propagation.
In general, a stress field in the vicinity of a crack can be classified into an open type, a slip type, and a tear type according to the state of deformation of the crack surface in accordance with the relationship between the position of the crack and the stress, and brittle fracture of a pressure vessel is mainly an open type, that is, an object of study of this patent.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to solve the problem that the existing pressure container fracture prevention method has no clear judgment and calculation method, the invention provides a fracture toughness analysis method for pressure-bearing main equipment of a nuclear power plant and pressure-bearing equipment of chemical machinery, which comprises the following specific steps:
extracting coordinate point data of the main wall thickness of a geometric model to be measured, and establishing a finite element model;
step two, extracting and analyzing the boundary mechanical transient load, and judging the boundary temperature transient load;
step three, integrating the data of the extraction analysis result in the step two;
step four, calculating a reference critical stress intensity factor K by adopting a theoretical formulaICAnd calculating a reference critical stress intensity factor KIR
Step five, respectively calculating the tensile stress intensity factors K of the primary film in the axial direction and the circumferential directionImAnd judging whether the structure is continuous or not;
step six, calculating a safety factor F according to working conditions, and firstly judging whether the result is less than KICThen, whether it is less than K is judgedIRIf so, the structural design wall thickness of the geometric model to be tested is proved to be reasonable;
and step seven, judging that the condition is not met according to the step six, modifying the parameters, returning to the step one, or calculating the allowable defect size, and summarizing the result to a risk assessment report for prompting related personnel to regularly check.
Further, in the first step, regarding the main wall thickness data of the geometric model to be measured, data are extracted under a thermal analysis extraction result path, and the specific steps are detailed as follows:
firstly, extracting a thermal analysis calculation result, if a linearization path is consistent with a global coordinate system, extracting under the global coordinate system, otherwise, rotating the coordinate;
and step two, extracting a structure analysis result, and judging whether the coordinate needs to be rotated or not in the same way as the steps one by one.
Further, defining the position width of the geometric model to be detected as T, and extracting data according to the following two conditions:
in the first case, for changing the rotation coordinate, under the new coordinate system:
(1) when T is more than or equal to 100mm and less than or equal to 300mm, the steps are as follows:
step a1, extracting temperature values at the internal and external T/4 positions;
step a2, extracting total stress component values of Z direction and Y direction at least at four pairs of thicknesses in the thickness range less than T/4;
step a3, extracting time values at internal and external T/4 positions;
step a4, linearizing the path width;
step a5, extracting axial and circumferential film stress and bending stress at the inner T/4 part and the outer T/4 part;
(2) when T is more than or equal to 25mm and less than 100mm, the steps a1-a5 are carried out, and T/4 is replaced by 25 mm;
in the second case, without changing the coordinate system:
(1) when T is more than or equal to 100mm and less than or equal to 300mm, the steps are as follows:
step b1, extracting temperature values at the internal and external T/4 positions;
step b2, extracting total stress component values of Z direction and Y direction at least at four pairs of thicknesses within the thickness range less than T/4;
b3, extracting time values at the internal and external T/4 positions;
step b4, linearizing the path width;
b5, extracting axial and circumferential film stress and bending stress at the inner T/4 part and the outer T/4 part;
(2) when T is more than or equal to 25mm and less than 100mm, the steps b1-b5 are carried out, and T/4 is replaced by 25 mm;
further, data are extracted under the thermal analysis extraction result path, wherein the specific operation steps of extracting the structure temperature result of the structure continuous area are as follows:
in the first case, with respect to changing the rotation coordinate, under the new coordinate system:
(1) when T is more than or equal to 100mm, the steps are as follows:
step c1, extracting Z-direction and Y-direction film stress values at the T/4 position of the inner and outer surfaces;
step c2, extracting time values at the internal and external T/4 positions;
step c3, linearizing the path width;
(2) when T is more than or equal to 25mm and less than 100mm, the steps are as follows:
d1, extracting stress values of the films in the Z direction and the Y direction at the positions of 25mm on the inner surface and the outer surface;
step d2, extracting time values at the positions of 25mm inside and outside;
step d3, linearizing the path width;
in the second case, without changing the coordinate system:
(1) when T is more than or equal to 100mm, the steps are as follows:
step e1, extracting Z-direction and Y-direction film stress values at the T/4 position of the inner and outer surfaces;
step e2, extracting time values at the internal and external T/4 positions;
step e3, linearizing the path width;
(2) when 63mm < T <100mm, then the steps are:
f1, extracting stress values of the films in the Z direction and the Y direction at the positions of 25mm on the inner surface and the outer surface;
step f2, extracting time values at the positions of 25mm inside and outside;
step f3, linearizing the path width;
further, data are extracted under the thermal analysis extraction result path, wherein the specific operation steps of extracting the temperature result of the structural discontinuous region are as follows:
(1) when T is more than or equal to 100mm, the steps are as follows:
step g1, extracting Z-direction and Y-direction film stress values at the T/4 position of the inner and outer surfaces;
step g2, extracting time values at the internal and external T/4 positions;
step g3, linearizing the path width;
(2) when 63mm < T <100mm, then the steps are:
h1, extracting stress values of the films in the Z direction and the Y direction at the positions of 25mm on the inner surface and the outer surface;
step h2, extracting time values at the positions of 25mm inside and outside;
step h3, linearizes the path width.
The invention has the beneficial effects that:
the method adopts a linear elastic fracture mechanics theory, namely an analysis method for correlating the numerical value and distribution of a stress field near the crack tip of the linear elastic body with the crack with the size of the crack which possibly causes non-ductile failure, and is a numerical relation among fracture toughness, crack defect size and stress level of the material during crack propagation;
firstly, a relatively conservative calculation structure is used for judging whether the structure has cracks or crack propagation under the combined action of an alternating temperature transient load and an alternating mechanical transient load;
secondly, designing a reasonable and economic structure size on the basis of market economic benefits and cost, and prejudging the position and the size of the position which are likely to have cracks to a user in advance to remind the user to carry out regular inspection;
thirdly, for high-pressure low-temperature important equipment, according to the safety level and the hazard degree, a reasonable structure and wall thickness are provided from the fracture toughness direction;
and fourthly, for low-pressure high-temperature equipment, the wall thickness of a local structure can be reduced under the condition of meeting the basic strength, so that secondary stress components are reduced, and the occurrence of fracture is prevented (the wall thickness is increased, and the probability of the occurrence of fracture is also improved).
And fifthly, the load at every moment can be analyzed and judged, the calculation accuracy is improved, corresponding calculation software is developed, and the economy and the calculation efficiency are improved.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow chart of a fracture toughness analysis method for a pressure-bearing main device of a nuclear power plant and a pressure-bearing device of chemical machinery;
FIG. 2 is a plot of hypothetical defect depth versus interface size;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a virtual defect in practical use;
wherein, part A is a defect in a YZ plane, the stress takes the X direction (circumferential defect), part B is a defect in an XY plane, and the stress takes the Z direction (axial defect);
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a thermal analysis extraction result path;
FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a temperature result extraction path for a structural discontinuity zone;
FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of a structure analysis result extraction path at a structure continuation;
FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of a structure analysis result extraction path of a structural discontinuity area;
FIG. 8 is a critical stress intensity factor limit graph;
FIG. 9 is a graph of the critical stress intensity factor KIC versus Kia;
FIG. 10 is an analysis chart of the solution algorithm of KIt.
Detailed Description
Embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings:
the specific implementation mode is as follows: according to the requirements of the virtual defects, for the section with the thickness of 100mm to 300mm, the depth (a) of the virtual defects is 1/4 of the section thickness, the length (2c) is 1.5 times of the section thickness, namely, the length-depth ratio is (2 c/a) ═ 6:1, and the defects are assumed to be arranged on the inner surface and the outer surface; for sections greater than 300mm thick, a hypothetical defect of 300mm thick section is employed; for sections less than 100mm thick, conservative readings assume a defect depth of 25 mm. The combined path P01 has a cross-sectional dimension of 80.4mm, less than 100mm, so an imaginary maximum defect depth is taken at 25mm from the inner and outer surfaces, i.e. surface cracking refers to a cross-sectional thickness of less than 0.7 times the crack depth (a); a deep-buried crack refers to a crack having a depth (2a) less than 0.7 times the cross-sectional thickness, otherwise a through-crack, where the cracks studied by specification are long surface cracks and the cracks studied by specification are elliptical flaky surface cracks, with an aspect ratio (2 c/a) of 6: 1.
1. Device fracture mechanics assessment data extraction
When fracture mechanics is evaluated, the extraction requirement of data is divided into two steps; firstly, extracting a thermal analysis calculation result, and firstly, if a linearization path is consistent with a global coordinate system, extracting under the global coordinate system, otherwise, rotating the coordinate is needed, as shown in a P02 path in FIG. 4, and the specific data is required as shown in the graph 1. The second step, extracting the structure analysis result, as in the first step, judging whether the coordinates need to be rotated, and then performing the data request in fig. 4.
2. Evaluating the required thermal analysis result data, and setting T (mm) as the width of the part to be detected;
for the structural continuous area, from the result of calculating the temperature distribution,
(1) when T is more than or equal to 100mm and less than or equal to 300mm, the steps are as follows:
step a1, extracting temperature values at the internal and external T/4 positions;
step a2, extracting total stress component values of Z direction and Y direction at least at four pairs of thicknesses in the thickness range less than T/4;
step a3, extracting time values at internal and external T/4 positions;
step a4, linearizing the path width;
step a5, extracting axial and circumferential film stress and bending stress at the inner T/4 part and the outer T/4 part;
(2) when T is more than or equal to 25mm and less than 100mm, the steps a1-a5 are carried out, and T/4 is replaced by 25 mm;
secondly, on the premise of not changing the coordinate system:
(1) when T is more than or equal to 100mm and less than or equal to 300mm, the steps are as follows:
step b1, extracting temperature values at the internal and external T/4 positions;
step b2, extracting total stress component values of Z direction and Y direction at least at four pairs of thicknesses within the thickness range less than T/4;
b3, extracting time values at the internal and external T/4 positions;
step b4, linearizing the path width;
b5, extracting axial and circumferential film stress and bending stress at the inner T/4 part and the outer T/4 part;
(2) when T is more than or equal to 25mm and less than 100mm, the steps b1-b5 are carried out, and T/4 is replaced by 25 mm;
the extraction in the thermal analysis results is shown in FIG. 4;
secondly, for the structural discontinuous area, from the result of calculating the temperature distribution,
(1) when T is more than or equal to 100mm, the steps are as follows:
step c1, extracting Z-direction and Y-direction film stress values at the T/4 position of the inner and outer surfaces;
step c2, extracting time values at the internal and external T/4 positions;
step c3, linearizing the path width;
(2) when T is more than or equal to 25mm and less than 100mm, the steps are as follows:
d1, extracting stress values of the films in the Z direction and the Y direction at the positions of 25mm on the inner surface and the outer surface;
step d2, extracting time values at the positions of 25mm inside and outside;
step d3, linearizing the path width;
FIG. 5 is extracted from the results of the thermal analysis;
3. structural analysis result data required for evaluation
Firstly, for the structural continuous region, from the result of calculating structural analysis,
one, regarding changing the rotation coordinate, under the new coordinate system:
(1) when T is more than or equal to 100mm, the steps are as follows:
step e1, extracting Z-direction and Y-direction film stress values at the T/4 position of the inner and outer surfaces;
step e2, extracting time values at the internal and external T/4 positions;
step e3, linearizing the path width;
(2) when T is more than or equal to 25mm and less than 100mm, the steps are as follows:
f1, extracting stress values of the films in the Z direction and the Y direction at the positions of 25mm on the inner surface and the outer surface;
step f2, extracting time values at the positions of 25mm inside and outside;
step f3, linearizing the path width;
secondly, on the premise of not changing the coordinate system:
(1) when T is more than or equal to 100mm, the steps are as follows:
step g1, extracting Z-direction and Y-direction film stress values at the T/4 position of the inner and outer surfaces;
step g2, extracting time values at the internal and external T/4 positions;
step g3, linearizing the path width;
(2) when 63mm < T <100mm, then the steps are:
h1, extracting stress values of the films in the Z direction and the Y direction at the positions of 25mm on the inner surface and the outer surface;
step h2, extracting time values at the positions of 25mm inside and outside;
step h3, linearizing the path width;
the extraction is shown in FIG. 6;
secondly, for the structural discontinuous area, from the result of calculating the structure,
on the premise of not changing the coordinate system:
(1) when T is more than or equal to 100mm, the steps are as follows:
step i1, extracting Z-direction and Y-direction film stress values at the T/4 position of the inner and outer surfaces;
step i2, extracting time values at internal and external T/4 positions;
step i3, linearizing the path width;
(2) when 63mm < T <100mm, then the steps are:
step j1, extracting Z-direction and Y-direction film stress values at 25mm positions of the inner and outer surfaces;
step j2, extracting time values at the positions of 25mm inside and outside;
step j3, linearizes the path width.
The extraction is shown in FIG. 7.
4.0 calculation of the Critical stress Strength factor: (
Figure BDA0002851946150000071
MPa as the unit of the formula
4.1 calculation formula:
Figure BDA0002851946150000072
t is the temperature at the defect, DEG C;
RTNDT: reference non-ductile transition temperature, deg.C;
KIc: plane strain fracture toughness by stress intensity factor KIMeasured material toughness, which will result in no ductile crack propagation;
Figure BDA0002851946150000073
KI: in linear elastomers, when the deformation separates the crack planes, the normal to the crack plane (type I) approachesA measure of the stress field strength of the ideal crack tip;
Figure BDA0002851946150000074
4.2 calculation formula:
Figure BDA0002851946150000075
Figure BDA0002851946150000076
t is the temperature at the defect, DEG C;
RTNDT: reference non-ductile transition temperature, deg.C;
KIa: crack arrest fracture toughness, stress intensity factor K to crack arrest of defectsIA critical value of (a), i.e., less than a value at which the crack does not propagate, and greater than or equal to a value at which the crack propagates;
Figure BDA0002851946150000077
KIc: crack fracture toughness, critical value for defect crack initiation, i.e. above which the crack completely initiates:
Figure BDA0002851946150000081
4.3 alternative calculation formula:
Figure BDA0002851946150000082
english system;
Figure BDA0002851946150000083
metric system;
t temperature at defect, F/° C;
RTNDT: reference non-ductile transition temperature, F/° C;
KIR: crack propagationSpreading resistance, take KIaAnd KICThe smaller value of (d);
Figure BDA0002851946150000084
5.0 method for solving the stress intensity factor of the primary film and the radial gradient in different areas:
5.1 areas away from the discontinuity:
for the evaluation of the structure continuous area, according to the thickness of the path and the assumed defect position, the axial direction and the annular direction are respectively evaluated, the stress is the stress vertical to the defect direction, namely the annular stress is extracted from the axial defect, the axial stress is extracted from the annular defect, and the annular direction and the axial direction at the moment are relative to a local coordinate system of the path instead of a modeling global coordinate system.
Evaluating the requirements according to the shell and the seal head area at the continuous position of the geometric shape; the sum of the following must be less than KIC
(1)2KIm1And for the primary film stress intensity factor,
Figure BDA0002851946150000085
given by;
(2)KIt(ii) a The radial temperature gradient stress intensity factor is determined,
Figure BDA0002851946150000086
the following formula is obtained;
for internal surface defects during cool down:
Figure BDA0002851946150000087
for external surface defects during temperature rise:
Figure BDA0002851946150000088
the coefficients C0, C1, C2, and C3 are determined as follows for the thermal stress distribution during the ramp up and ramp down at any given time:
σ(x)=C0+C1(x/a)+C2(x/a)2+C3(x/a)3
x: is a virtual variable representing the radial distance (0. ltoreq. x/a. ltoreq.1) from a suitable surface, such as an inner or outer wall, m
a: maximum crack depth, m
σ (x): when the axial defect (corresponding to a local coordinate system) is evaluated, at least 4 stress components are taken along the section, wherein the stress components include the inner surface and the outer surface and the inner thickness and the outer thickness of T/4, and the stress components are MPa
The calculation result satisfies 2KIm1+KIt<KICThe evaluation of a plurality of the samples is qualified,
5.2 housing region adjacent to the discontinuity
Assessment of the shell area adjacent to the geometric discontinuity requires areas of relatively complex stress distribution.
(a) For normal operating conditions, the sum of the following must be less than KIC
(1)2KIm1Primary film stress;
(2)2KIb1primary bending stress;
(3)KIm2secondary film stress;
(4)KIb2secondary bending stress;
namely: 2KIm1+2KIb1+KIm2+KIb2<KIC
(b) For the hydraulic test working condition, the sum of the following items is required to be less than KIC;
(1)1.5KIm1primary film stress;
(2)1.5KIb1primary bending stress;
(3)KIm2secondary film stress;
(4)KIb2secondary bending stress;
namely: 1.5KIm1+1.5KIb1+KIm2+KIb2<KIC
(c) For other working conditions, the working condition is a hypothetical working condition with low probability, and the sum of the following items is necessarily less than KIC during calculation;
(1)KIm1primary film stress;
(2)KIb1primary bending stress;
(3)KIm2secondary film stress;
(4)KIb2secondary bending stress;
namely: kIm1+KIb1+KIm2+KIb2<KIC
In the formula:
KIm1: primary film stress intensity factor, KIm1=Mm×σm
Figure BDA0002851946150000101
Mm: a correction factor;
σm(ii) a Primary film stress; MPa;
KIb1: primary bending stress intensity factor, KIb1=Mb×σb
Figure BDA0002851946150000102
Mb: correction factor, Mb=2×Mm/3;
σb: primary bending stress; MPa;
KIm2: secondary film stress intensity factor, KIm2=Mm×σM
Figure BDA0002851946150000103
σM: secondary film stress; MPa;
KIb2: secondary bending stress intensity factor, KIb2=Mb×σB
Figure BDA0002851946150000104
σB: secondary bending stress; MPa;
the second embodiment is as follows: according to the description of the calculation step of embodiment 4.2, the following alternative calculation method can be used for the calculation step:
Figure BDA0002851946150000105
english system;
Figure BDA0002851946150000106
metric system;
t temperature at defect, F/° C;
RTNDTreference non-ductile transition temperature, F/° C;
KIR: crack propagation resistance, take KIaAnd KICThe smaller value of (d);
Figure BDA0002851946150000107
the third concrete implementation mode: according to the description of the calculation step of the first embodiment 5.2, the following alternative calculation method can be used for the calculation step: :
the method is based on a strength factor generated by mechanical load, and for the tensile stress strength factor generated by the mechanical load, the method comprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0002851946150000108
bending stress intensity factor for mechanical load:
Figure BDA0002851946150000111
Mk: a film stress correction factor; mB: a bending stress correction coefficient; a: depth of defect; m; q: a plastic zone defect shape correction factor;
Figure BDA0002851946150000112
Figure BDA0002851946150000113
σm: primary film stress; mpa (Mpa)
σb: primary bending stress; mpa (Mpa)
The corrected total stress intensity factor after considering the thermal stress effect:
Figure BDA0002851946150000114
σM: secondary film stress; MPa of
σB: secondary bending stress; MPa of
F: the safety factor is 2.0 for operation; 1.0 for the others; take 1.5 for the hydrostatic test.
When the calculation is failed, the alpha value is calculated according to the deformation formula of the formula, namely KIa-KI, and the limit depth of the defect is calculated.
Figure BDA0002851946150000115
The defect length should be detectable by non-destructive inspection and within a controllable range.
While the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims; therefore, the protection scope of the present invention shall be subject to the protection scope of the claims.

Claims (5)

1. A fracture toughness analysis method for pressure-bearing main equipment of a nuclear power plant and pressure-bearing equipment of chemical machinery is characterized by comprising the following steps: the method comprises the following specific steps:
extracting coordinate point data of the main wall thickness of a geometric model to be measured, and establishing a finite element model;
step two, extracting and analyzing the boundary mechanical transient load, and judging the boundary temperature transient load;
step three, integrating the data of the extraction analysis result in the step two;
step four, calculating a reference critical stress intensity factor K by adopting a theoretical formulaICAnd calculating a reference critical stress intensity factor KIR
Step five, respectively calculating the tensile stress intensity factors K of the primary film in the axial direction and the circumferential directionImAnd judging whether the structure is continuous or not;
step six, calculating a safety factor F according to working conditions, and firstly judging whether the result is less than KICThen, whether it is less than K is judgedIRIf so, the structural design wall thickness of the geometric model to be tested is proved to be reasonable;
and step seven, judging that the condition is not met according to the step six, modifying the parameters, returning to the step one, or calculating the allowable defect size, and summarizing the result to a risk assessment report for prompting related personnel to regularly check.
2. The method for analyzing the fracture toughness of the pressure-bearing main equipment of the nuclear power plant and the pressure-bearing equipment of the chemical machinery according to claim 1, is characterized in that: in the first step, regarding the main wall thickness data of the geometric model to be measured, data are extracted under a thermal analysis extraction result path, and the specific steps are detailed as follows:
firstly, extracting a thermal analysis calculation result, if a linearization path is consistent with a global coordinate system, extracting under the global coordinate system, otherwise, rotating the coordinate;
and step two, extracting a structure analysis result, and judging whether the coordinate needs to be rotated or not in the same way as the steps one by one.
3. The method for analyzing the fracture toughness of the pressure-bearing main equipment of the nuclear power plant and the pressure-bearing equipment of the chemical machinery according to claim 2, is characterized in that: defining the position width of the geometric model to be detected as T, and extracting data according to the following two conditions:
in the first case, for changing the rotation coordinate, under the new coordinate system:
(1) when T is more than or equal to 100mm and less than or equal to 300mm, the steps are as follows:
step a1, extracting temperature values at the internal and external T/4 positions;
step a2, extracting total stress component values of Z direction and Y direction at least at four pairs of thicknesses in the thickness range less than T/4;
step a3, extracting time values at internal and external T/4 positions;
step a4, linearizing the path width;
step a5, extracting axial and circumferential film stress and bending stress at the inner T/4 part and the outer T/4 part;
(2) when T is more than or equal to 25mm and less than 100mm, the steps a1-a5 are carried out, and T/4 is replaced by 25 mm;
in the second case, without changing the coordinate system:
(1) when T is more than or equal to 100mm and less than or equal to 300mm, the steps are as follows:
step b1, extracting temperature values at the internal and external T/4 positions;
step b2, extracting total stress component values of Z direction and Y direction at least at four pairs of thicknesses within the thickness range less than T/4;
b3, extracting time values at the internal and external T/4 positions;
step b4, linearizing the path width;
b5, extracting axial and circumferential film stress and bending stress at the inner T/4 part and the outer T/4 part;
(2) when T <100mm is less than or equal to 25mm, the same procedure is followed as in steps b1-b5, replacing T/4 with 25 mm.
4. The method for analyzing the fracture toughness of the pressure-bearing main equipment of the nuclear power plant and the pressure-bearing equipment of the chemical machinery according to claim 2 or 3, is characterized in that: and extracting data under the thermal analysis extraction result path, wherein the specific operation steps of extracting the structure temperature result of the structure continuous area are as follows:
in the first case, with respect to changing the rotation coordinate, under the new coordinate system:
(1) when T is more than or equal to 100mm, the steps are as follows:
step c1, extracting Z-direction and Y-direction film stress values at the T/4 position of the inner and outer surfaces;
step c2, extracting time values at the internal and external T/4 positions;
step c3, linearizing the path width;
(2) when T is more than or equal to 25mm and less than 100mm, the steps are as follows:
d1, extracting stress values of the films in the Z direction and the Y direction at the positions of 25mm on the inner surface and the outer surface;
step d2, extracting time values at the positions of 25mm inside and outside;
step d3, linearizing the path width;
in the second case, without changing the coordinate system:
(1) when T is more than or equal to 100mm, the steps are as follows:
step e1, extracting Z-direction and Y-direction film stress values at the T/4 position of the inner and outer surfaces;
step e2, extracting time values at the internal and external T/4 positions;
step e3, linearizing the path width;
(2) when 63mm < T <100mm, then the steps are:
f1, extracting stress values of the films in the Z direction and the Y direction at the positions of 25mm on the inner surface and the outer surface;
step f2, extracting time values at the positions of 25mm inside and outside;
step f3, linearizes the path width.
5. The method for analyzing the fracture toughness of the pressure-bearing main equipment of the nuclear power plant and the pressure-bearing equipment of the chemical machinery according to claim 4, is characterized in that: and extracting data under the thermal analysis extraction result path, wherein the specific operation steps of extracting the temperature result of the structural discontinuous region are as follows:
(1) when T is more than or equal to 100mm, the steps are as follows:
step g1, extracting Z-direction and Y-direction film stress values at the T/4 position of the inner and outer surfaces;
step g2, extracting time values at the internal and external T/4 positions;
step g3, linearizing the path width;
(2) when 63mm < T <100mm, then the steps are:
h1, extracting stress values of the films in the Z direction and the Y direction at the positions of 25mm on the inner surface and the outer surface;
step h2, extracting time values at the positions of 25mm inside and outside;
step h3, linearizes the path width.
CN202011530211.8A 2020-12-22 2020-12-22 Nuclear power plant pressure-bearing main equipment and chemical mechanical pressure-bearing equipment fracture toughness analysis method Active CN112730078B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202011530211.8A CN112730078B (en) 2020-12-22 2020-12-22 Nuclear power plant pressure-bearing main equipment and chemical mechanical pressure-bearing equipment fracture toughness analysis method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202011530211.8A CN112730078B (en) 2020-12-22 2020-12-22 Nuclear power plant pressure-bearing main equipment and chemical mechanical pressure-bearing equipment fracture toughness analysis method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN112730078A true CN112730078A (en) 2021-04-30
CN112730078B CN112730078B (en) 2023-08-18

Family

ID=75605729

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202011530211.8A Active CN112730078B (en) 2020-12-22 2020-12-22 Nuclear power plant pressure-bearing main equipment and chemical mechanical pressure-bearing equipment fracture toughness analysis method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN112730078B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113324848A (en) * 2021-05-20 2021-08-31 山东大学 Low-temperature bending strain test method for asphalt mixture trabecula test piece

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103366841A (en) * 2013-08-06 2013-10-23 苏州热工研究院有限公司 Evaluation method for defects of CPR1000 unit reactor pressure vessel core cylindrical shell zones
CN107063838A (en) * 2017-03-30 2017-08-18 苏州热工研究院有限公司 RPV simplifies elastic-plastic-fracture analysis method under a kind of extreme accident conditions based on RCC M specifications
JP2018173356A (en) * 2017-03-31 2018-11-08 三菱重工業株式会社 Fracture toughness test method
CN108956930A (en) * 2018-06-29 2018-12-07 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 A kind of method and system of the safety for the determining GIL shell containing inner defect
CN111859616A (en) * 2020-06-12 2020-10-30 中国石油天然气集团有限公司 High-pressure natural gas pipeline fracture critical dimension and service life assessment method

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103366841A (en) * 2013-08-06 2013-10-23 苏州热工研究院有限公司 Evaluation method for defects of CPR1000 unit reactor pressure vessel core cylindrical shell zones
CN107063838A (en) * 2017-03-30 2017-08-18 苏州热工研究院有限公司 RPV simplifies elastic-plastic-fracture analysis method under a kind of extreme accident conditions based on RCC M specifications
JP2018173356A (en) * 2017-03-31 2018-11-08 三菱重工業株式会社 Fracture toughness test method
CN108956930A (en) * 2018-06-29 2018-12-07 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 A kind of method and system of the safety for the determining GIL shell containing inner defect
CN111859616A (en) * 2020-06-12 2020-10-30 中国石油天然气集团有限公司 High-pressure natural gas pipeline fracture critical dimension and service life assessment method

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
A . R . R O S E N F I E L D: "Suggested toughness/temperature relations for reactor pressure vessel steels", NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, pages 487 - 496 *
E. SMITH: "The criteria for the arrest of a crack in a pressure vessel", INT.J. PRES. VES. & PIPING, pages 55 - 60 *
张兴田;: "基于RSE-M规范核电厂反应堆压力容器堆焊层缺陷的断裂力学分析与评定", 机械工程材料, no. 12, pages 32 - 36 *
徐树林;牟力波;傅吉坤;: "断裂力学评价在锅炉及压力容器领域的应用分析", 锅炉制造, no. 05, pages 54 - 56 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113324848A (en) * 2021-05-20 2021-08-31 山东大学 Low-temperature bending strain test method for asphalt mixture trabecula test piece

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN112730078B (en) 2023-08-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN108710721B (en) Failure evaluation graph-based unexplosive leak-first analysis method
Muthanna et al. Assessment of corroded API 5L X52 pipe elbow using a modified failure assessment diagram
CN112730078A (en) Fracture toughness analysis method for pressure-bearing main equipment of nuclear power plant and pressure-bearing equipment of chemical machinery
Agu et al. Failure assessment of pressure vessels made of plain carbon steel by using modified inherent flaw model in DL based industry optimization intelligent processing
Pang et al. Assessment of three-dimensional multi-crack propagation for fatigue life prediction
Liaw et al. Estimating remaining life of elevated-temperature steam pipes—Part II. Fracture mechanics analyses
Zheng et al. Constraint characterization and fracture initiation analysis for semi-elliptical surface cracks in reactor pressure vessel
Wang et al. Numerical investigation of creep crack growth behavior of UNS N10003 alloy based on the creep damage model
Zheng et al. Application of unified constraint-dependent Master Curve in fracture assessment of cracked pressure vessels
Yu et al. A LCF life assessment method for steam turbine long blade based on Elastoplastic analysis and local strain approach
Kim et al. A new repair criterion for steam generator tubes with axial cracks based on probabilistic integrity assessment
Okoloekwe et al. Reliability-based assessment of safe excavation pressure for dented pipelines
Broussard III Standardized through-wall distributions of dissimilar metal weld residual stress
Majumdar et al. Structural integrity assessment of nuclear steam generator
Kamaya et al. Normalizing the influence of flaw length on failure pressure of straight pipe with wall-thinning
KR20110034986A (en) An eddy current examination method for the outside diameter axial cracks in steam generator tubes using motorized rotating pancake coil
Homiack Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Codes for Piping International Benchmark–Part 1: Deterministic Comparisons
Li et al. Research on remaining bearing capacity evaluation method for corroded pipelines with complex shaped defects
Holtam et al. Fracture Mechanics Analysis of Clad Subsea Equipment in Sour HPHT Conditions
Tang et al. Fatigue crack growth analysis of surge line under thermal stratification conditions
Brust et al. Modeling crack growth in weld residual stress fields using the finite element alternating method
Zheng et al. Assessment of Fracture Toughness Using Small Punch Tests of Prenotched Specimens
Wu et al. STUDY ON CONSTRAINT EFFECT AND CREEP CRACK INITIATION OF PLATE CONTAINING ELLIPTICAL EMBEDDED CRACKS.
Gosselin et al. Enhanced ASME section XI appendix L flaw tolerance procedure
Hasegawa et al. Assessment of fatigue crack growths for transformed surface flaws using FFS codes

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant