CN112712293A - Enterprise evaluation method based on B2B platform - Google Patents

Enterprise evaluation method based on B2B platform Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN112712293A
CN112712293A CN202110068311.1A CN202110068311A CN112712293A CN 112712293 A CN112712293 A CN 112712293A CN 202110068311 A CN202110068311 A CN 202110068311A CN 112712293 A CN112712293 A CN 112712293A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
score
enterprise
stability
business
transaction amount
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202110068311.1A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
郑鑫
霍胜军
徐楠楠
高睿
于洋
高经纬
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Qingdao Mengdou Network Technology Co ltd
Original Assignee
Qingdao Mengdou Network Technology Co ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Qingdao Mengdou Network Technology Co ltd filed Critical Qingdao Mengdou Network Technology Co ltd
Priority to CN202110068311.1A priority Critical patent/CN112712293A/en
Publication of CN112712293A publication Critical patent/CN112712293A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00—Commerce
    • G06Q30/018—Certifying business or products
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00—Commerce
    • G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0201—Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00—Commerce
    • G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601—Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
    • G06Q30/0605—Supply or demand aggregation

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

An enterprise evaluation method based on a B2B platform comprises the following steps: (1) setting a score calculation index and a data source of platform enterprise evaluation: the indexes for calculating the enterprise evaluation score comprise: the enterprise platform behavior data score, the enterprise comment data score and the third-party data score; (2) determining the proportion of the total score S and the three-part score in the total score, and calculating and expressing the score of the enterprise n as: sn＝Saction_n+Stalk_n+Sother_n，SnA supplier score or a buyer score representing a business n, scored according to business behavior data Saction_nAnd enterprise comment data score Stalk_nIs determined as a supplier score Sn_sOr buyer score Sn_p(ii) a (3) Respectively calculating to obtain platform behavior data score, enterprise comment data score and third party data score of the enterprise, and obtaining score S of the enterprise as a suppliern_sAnd the score S of the enterprise as a buyern_p. The method can simultaneously evaluate the suppliers and the purchasers, and can be referred by the user when selecting the suppliers and the purchasers.

Description

Enterprise evaluation method based on B2B platform
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of electronic commerce, in particular to an enterprise evaluation method based on a B2B platform.
Background
For an enterprise residing in the B2B platform, the platform data is used for providing an effective data report for the enterprise, and meanwhile, the enterprise is scored through the data, so that a better supplier or buyer is provided for a user. The client is controlled and qualified basis is provided through grading, and certain objective difference among enterprises can be provided for the user. At present, most transaction websites are in a B2C mode, and most transaction websites belong to a mode of paying first and receiving goods, so that the management and control on purchasing are low, and the management and control on suppliers are also in the aspects of quality, timely delivery, service attitude and the like. For the B2B model, the transaction model is oriented to enterprises and business-to-enterprise transaction models, so various problems such as payment and payment are present, and compared with the B2C model, the transaction amount and risk are large, so the evaluation is not only limited to suppliers, but also corresponding control should be made on buyers, and the risk of the suppliers is reduced.
Disclosure of Invention
The purpose of the invention is: aiming at the problems described in the background art, the invention provides an enterprise evaluation method based on a B2B platform, which is a method suitable for enterprise evaluation under a B2B mode (a specific score after platform enterprise evaluation is called as a lima bean index), and the functions to be realized are as follows:
(1) evaluating a supplier, calculating the index of the lima beans and providing better supplier resources for a buyer;
(2) evaluating the buyers, calculating the index of the lima beans and providing better resources of the buyers for the suppliers;
(3) through the index of the lemon beans, the development condition and the credit condition of an enterprise are reflected to a certain extent, and a certain basis is provided for the platform to provide discount such as price reduction and subsidy for the enterprise.
In order to solve the problems, the technical scheme adopted by the invention is as follows:
an enterprise evaluation method based on a B2B platform is characterized by comprising the following steps:
(1) setting a score calculation index and a data source of platform enterprise evaluation: the indexes for calculating the enterprise evaluation score comprise: the enterprise platform behavior data score, the enterprise comment data score and the third-party data score;
(2) determining the proportion of the total score S and the three-part score in the total score, and calculating and expressing the score of the enterprise n as:
Sn＝Saction_n+Stalk_n+Sother_n
Sn_s＝Saction_s_n+Stalk_s_n+Sother_n
Sn_p＝Saction_s_n+Stalk_p_n+Sother_n
wherein S isnA total score value representing a supplier score or a buyer score of the business n, the supplier score and the buyer score being the same, based on the business behavior data score Saction_nAnd enterprise comment data score Stalk_nIs determined as a supplier score Sn_sOr buyer score Sn_p，Saction_s_nRepresenting a specific score, S, of business n as a supplier on the platform behavior dataaction_p_nRepresenting the concrete score of the behavior data of the enterprise n as a buyer on the platform, Stalk_s_nA concrete score, S, representing the business evaluation data when the business n is a suppliertalk_p_nA concrete score, S, representing the business evaluation data of the business n as a buyerother_nA specific score representing third party data for business n;
(3) respectively calculating according to the enterprise platform behavior data, the enterprise comment data and the third-party dataObtaining platform behavior data scores, enterprise comment data scores and third-party data scores of the enterprises, and respectively calculating scores S of the enterprises serving as suppliersn_sAnd the score S of the enterprise as a buyern_p。
Further, the enterprise platform behavior data score, the enterprise criticizing data score and the third-party data score of step (1) are obtained according to the enterprise platform behavior data, the enterprise criticizing data and the third-party data respectively, wherein:
enterprise platform behavior data: is data relating to transactions between enterprises;
the enterprise comment data comprises: enterprise likes and dislikes, and related enterprise comments;
third party data: and information related to the reputation and the risk of the enterprise from the third-party data comprises judicial risk and business risk information.
Further, determining the proportion of the scores of the three parts in the total score in the step (2), and properly adjusting the proportion distribution according to the platform development condition and the data source condition; wherein:
platform behavior data scoring: saction＝S×RactionWherein R isactionThe proportion of the score of the enterprise platform behavior data to the total score is obtained;
the enterprise comment data score is as follows: stalk＝S×RtalkWherein R istalkThe ratio of the scores of the enterprise comment data to the total score is determined;
third party data score: sother＝S×RotherWherein R isotherThe proportion of the third-party data score to the total score of the enterprise;
when the total proportion of the three parts is adjusted, the following requirements are ensured: raction+Rtalk+Rother＝1。
Further, the specific item of the platform behavior data score of the enterprise n in the step (2) and the calculation method are as follows:
Saction_n＝Sinfo_n+Scount_n+Svalue_n+Sstability_n+Stime_n+Sperson_n
wherein S isinfo_nScore condition, S, representing the completeness of information for an enterprisecount_nScore status representing business transaction amount, Svalue_nScore status representing business transaction amount, Sstability_nScore status, S, representing stability of the Businesstime_nScore condition, S, representing timeliness of the enterpriseperson_nScore conditions representing relationships of the persons;
the current six parts occupy the proportion in the total platform behavior score as follows:
enterprise information integrity score: sinfo＝Saction×RinfoWherein R isinfoRequiring the proportion of the information perfection score to the total score of the platform behaviors;
enterprise transaction amount score: scount＝Saction×RcountWherein R iscountThe proportion of the transaction amount score to the total score of the platform behavior is defined;
enterprise transaction amount score: svalue＝Saction×RvalueWherein R isvalueThe proportion of the transaction value to the total value of the platform behavior is defined;
enterprise stability score: sstability＝Saction×RstabilityWherein R isstabilityThe stability score is the proportion of the total score of the platform behavior;
enterprise timeliness score: stime＝Saction×RtimeWherein R istimeThe proportion of the timeliness score to the total score of the platform behavior;
the relationship score of the interpersonal relationship: sperson＝Saction×RpersonWherein R ispersonThe relationship score of the relationship accounts for the total score of the platform behavior;
the proportion occupied by the six parts is dynamically adjusted according to different development stages of the platform in the actual application process, and when the proportion is adjusted, the following needs to be ensured: rinfo+Rcount+Rvalue+Rstability+Rtime+Rperson＝1。
Further, the method for calculating the score of the enterprise information perfection comprises the following steps:
1) total score of enterprise information perfection: sinfo＝Saction×RinfoAnd the enterprise information comprises an enterprise information mandatory item and an enterprise information optional item, then:
the mandatory item score of the enterprise information is as follows: smust-info＝Sinfo×Rmust-infoWherein R ismust-infoThe percentage of the necessary item score of the enterprise information in the total score of the integrity of the enterprise information is calculated;
the optional item scores for the business information are: snon-info＝Sinfo×Rnon-infoWherein R isnon-infoThe percentage of the necessary item score of the enterprise information in the total score of the integrity of the enterprise information is calculated;
wherein R ismust-infoAnd Rnon-infoSetting specific values, adjusting and modifying according to actual use conditions in the platform, and ensuring R in the adjusting processmust-info+Rnon-info＝1；
2) Enterprise information integrity score calculation
The information integrity of the enterprise n is divided into:
Sinfo_n＝Smust-info+Snon-info_n
wherein S isinfo_nRepresenting an information integrity score for business n; smust-infoThe system represents the necessary score of the enterprise information, and the information which must be filled in when the enterprise registers in the information, namely the partial score is the necessary score, namely the partial score of all registered enterprises is the same; snon-info_nThe system represents the unnecessary item score of the enterprise information, and the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002905009950000041
wherein, Ctotal-non-infoTotal number of items, C, representing optional items of enterprise informationnon-info_nIndicating the number of items filled by the enterprise n in the necessary items of enterprise informationWhether the standard of filling is filling or not can be independent of the quantity, namely, one item is filled in the honor information, namely, the filling of the item is completed.
Further, the method for calculating the score of the business transaction amount comprises the following steps:
1) total business transaction score: scount＝Saction×RcountWherein the definition of the transaction amount is: the order number of the deal is irrelevant to the product type and the number in the pre-order; the enterprise transaction amount comprises monthly transaction amount, quarterly transaction amount and annual transaction amount, and then:
the monthly transaction volume score was: scount-month＝Scount×RcmWherein R iscmThe ratio of the monthly transaction volume score to the total enterprise transaction volume score;
quarterly trading volume score: scount-quarter＝Scount×RcqWherein R iscqThe ratio of the quarterly transaction amount score to the total enterprise transaction amount score;
annual trading volume score: scount-year＝Scount×RcyWherein R iscyThe proportion of the annual transaction volume score in the total enterprise transaction volume score is shown;
when the enterprise is used as a supplier to be evaluated, the transaction amount specifically refers to the number of supply orders of the enterprise as the supplier to other enterprises; when the enterprise is used as a buyer to evaluate, the transaction amount specifically refers to the number of purchase orders of the enterprise as the buyer to other enterprises;
wherein R iscm,Rcq,RcySetting specific values, adjusting and modifying according to actual use conditions in the platform, and ensuring R in the adjusting processcm+Rcq+Rcy＝1；
2) Business transaction amount score calculation
The business transaction amount score for business n is:
Scount_n＝Scount-month_n+Scount-quarter_n+Scount-year_n
wherein S iscount_nRepresenting a transaction amount score for Business n，Scount-month_nRepresents the monthly transaction amount score, S, for business ncount-quarter_nRepresenting the quarterly trading volume score, S, for Business ncount-year_nRepresenting an annual trading volume score for business n; the specific calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002905009950000051
Figure BDA0002905009950000052
Figure BDA0002905009950000053
wherein, Ccount-month_nRepresents the monthly transaction amount, max (C), for business ncount-month) Represents the maximum monthly transaction volume across all enterprises, at Scount_month_nIn the calculation, if max (C)count-month)When the monthly transaction amount score of all enterprises is 0, the monthly transaction amount score is not obtained through calculation; ccount-quarter_nRepresents the quarterly transaction amount, max (C), for business ncount-quarter) Represents the maximum quarterly trading volume across all enterprises; at Scount_quarter_nIn the calculation, if max (C)count-quarter) When the value is 0, the quarterly transaction amount scores of all enterprises are 0, and the quarterly transaction amount scores are not required to be obtained through calculation; ccount-year_nRepresents the annual transaction amount, max (C), of business ncount-year) Represents the maximum value of the annual transaction volume in all enterprises; at Scount_year_nIn the calculation, if max (C)count-year) When the annual transaction amount score is 0, all the enterprises have an annual transaction amount score of 0, and the annual transaction amount score does not need to be obtained by calculation.
Further, the method for calculating the score of the enterprise transaction amount comprises the following steps:
1) total value of business transaction: svalue＝Saction×RvalueWherein the definition of the transaction amount is: total amount of all transactions over a period of time; the enterprise transaction amount comprises a monthly transaction amount,Quarterly transaction amount and annual transaction amount, then:
the monthly transaction amount score is: svalue-month＝Svalue×RvmWherein R isvmThe proportion of the monthly transaction amount score in the total enterprise transaction amount score;
quarterly trading value score: svalue-quarter＝Svalue×RvqWherein R isvqThe ratio of the quarterly transaction amount value to the total enterprise transaction amount value;
annual transaction score: svalue-year＝Svalue×RvyWherein R isvyThe ratio of the annual transaction amount score to the total transaction amount score of the enterprise;
when the enterprise is used as a supplier to be evaluated, the transaction amount specifically refers to the transaction income amount generated when the enterprise is used as the supplier to supply products to other enterprises; when the enterprise is used as a buyer to perform scoring, the transaction amount specifically refers to the transaction payment amount generated when the enterprise is used as the buyer to purchase products of other enterprises;
wherein R isvm,Rvq,RvySetting specific values, adjusting and modifying according to actual use conditions in the platform, and ensuring R in the adjusting processvm+Rvq+Rvy＝1；
2) Enterprise transaction amount score calculation
The business transaction amount score for business n is:
Svalue_n＝Svalue-month_n+Svalue-quarter_n+Svalue-year_n
wherein S isvalue_nRepresents the trade score of business n, Svalue-month_nRepresents the monthly transaction amount score, S, for business nvalue-quarter_nRepresents the quarterly transaction amount score, S, for business nvalue-year_nRepresenting an annual transaction amount score for business n; the specific calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002905009950000071
Figure BDA0002905009950000072
Figure BDA0002905009950000073
wherein, Cvalue-month_nDenotes the monthly transaction amount, max (C), for business nvalue-month) Represents the maximum value of the monthly transaction amount in all enterprises, at Svalue_month_nIn the calculation, if max (C)value-month) When the value is 0, the monthly transaction amount scores of all enterprises are 0, and the scores are not required to be obtained through calculation; cvalue-quarter_nRepresents the quarterly transaction amount, max (C), for business nvalue-quarter) Represents the maximum quarterly transaction amount among all enterprises; at Svalue_quarter_nIn the calculation, if max (C)value-quarter) When the value is 0, the quarterly transaction amount scores of all enterprises are 0, and the quarterly transaction amount scores are not required to be obtained through calculation; cvalue-year_nDenotes the annual transaction amount, max (C), of the corporation nvalue-year) Represents the maximum value of annual transaction amounts in all enterprises; at Svalue_year_nIn the calculation, if max (C)value-year) When the annual transaction amount score is 0, the annual transaction amount score of all the enterprises is 0, and the annual transaction amount score is not obtained by calculation.
Further, the method for calculating the relationship score of the interpersonal relationship of the enterprise comprises the following steps:
1) total score of interpersonal relationship: sperson＝Saction×RpersonThe relationship of the; wherein the relationship of the:
(1) the monthly relationship score is: sperson-month＝Sperson×RpmWherein R ispmThe ratio of the monthly relationship value to the total enterprise relationship value;
(2) quarterly interpersonal relationship score: sperson-quarter＝Sperson×RpqWherein R ispqThe quarterly relationship score is the ratio of the quarterly relationship score to the total enterprise relationship score;
(3) annual pulse relationship score: sperson-year＝Sperson×RpyWherein R ispyThe ratio of the annual context relationship value to the total enterprise context relationship value is shown;
when an enterprise is rated as a supplier, the relationship specifically refers to the number of the enterprises that the enterprise supplies to other enterprises as the supplier; when the enterprise is used as a buyer to be evaluated, the relationship of the interpersonal relationship specifically refers to the number of the enterprises which are purchased by the enterprise as the buyer to other enterprises;
wherein R ispm,Rpq,RpySetting specific values, adjusting and modifying according to actual use conditions in the platform, and ensuring R in the adjusting processpm+Rpq+Rpy＝1；
2) Enterprise relationship score calculation
The relationship of the enterprise n is divided into:
Sperson_n＝Sperson-month_n+Sperson-quarter_n+Sperson-year_n
wherein S isperson_nRepresenting a interpersonal relationship score, S, for a business nperson-month_nRepresenting a monthly interpersonal relationship score, S, for a business nperson-quarter_nRepresenting a quarterly interpersonal relationship score, S, for a business nperson-year_nRepresenting the annual context score for business n. The specific calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002905009950000081
Figure BDA0002905009950000082
Figure BDA0002905009950000083
wherein, Cperson-month_nDenotes the number of monthly relationship, max (C), for the enterprise nperson-month) Maximum value of the number of monthly relationship among all enterprises, at Sperson_month_nIn the calculation, if max (C)person-month) When the score is 0, the monthly-interpersonal relationship score of all enterprises is 0, and the score is not obtained through calculation; cperson-quarter_nRepresenting the number of quarterly connections, max (C), for business nperson-quarter) Representing the maximum value of the number of quarterly connections among all enterprises; at Sperson_quarter_nIn the calculation, if max (C)person-quarter) When the score is 0, the quarterly interpersonal relationship score of all enterprises is 0, and the score is obtained without calculation; cperson-year_nDenotes the annual interpersonal relationship number, max (C), of the enterprise nperson-year) The maximum value of the number of the annual connections in all enterprises is represented; at Sperson_year_nIn the calculation, if max (C)person-year) When the score is 0, the annual context relationship score of all the enterprises is 0, and the score is not obtained by calculation.
Further, the method for calculating the timeliness score of the enterprise comprises the following steps:
1) total timeliness score: stime＝Saction×RtimeThe timeliness is defined as whether the order which is traded with the enterprise is delivered within the set time or not, if so, the order is delivered in time, and if not, the order is not delivered in time; wherein timeliness includes monthly timeliness, quarterly timeliness, annual timeliness, then:
the monthly timeliness score was: stime-month＝Stime×RtmWherein R istmThe percentage of the monthly timeliness score in the total timeliness score of the enterprise;
quarterly timeliness score: stime-quarter＝Stime×RtqWherein R istqThe percentage of the quarterly timeliness score in the total timeliness score of the enterprise;
annual timeliness score: stime-year＝Stime×RtyWherein R istyThe percentage of the annual timeliness score in the total timeliness score of the enterprise;
when the enterprise is used as a supplier to be evaluated, the timeliness specifically refers to the delivery timeliness of the enterprise serving as the supplier to other enterprise supplied products; when the enterprise is used as a buyer to perform scoring, the timeliness specifically refers to the timeliness of the payment of the enterprise for purchasing products from other enterprises as the buyer;
wherein R istm,Rtq,RtySetting specific values, adjusting and modifying according to actual use conditions in the platform, and ensuring R in the adjusting processtm+Rtq+Rty＝1；
2) Enterprise timeliness score calculation
The enterprise timeliness score for enterprise n is:
Stime_n＝Stime-month_n+Stime-quarter_n+Stime-year_n
wherein S istime_nRepresenting the timeliness score, S, of Business ntime-month_nRepresents the monthly timeliness score, S, for Business ntime-quarter_nRepresenting the quarterly timeliness score, S, of Business ntime-year_nRepresenting a yearly timeliness score for business n; the specific calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002905009950000091
Figure BDA0002905009950000101
Figure BDA0002905009950000102
wherein, Ctime-month_nRepresenting the actual timely monthly delivery or payment amount, C, for the enterprise ntime-month_ynIndicating the amount of timely delivery or payment for the month of business n, at Stime_month_nIn the calculation, ifCtime-month_ynWhen the score is 0, the monthly timeliness score of the enterprise n is 0, and the score is not obtained through calculation; ctime-quarter_nRepresenting the actual amount of timely delivery or payment in the quarter of business n, Ctime-quarter_ynIndicating the amount of timely delivery or payment for business n quarterly, at Stime_quarter_nIn the calculation, if Ctime-quarter_ynWhen the value is equal to 0, the quarterly timeliness score of the enterprise n is 0, and the quarterly timeliness score is obtained without calculation; ctime_year_nRepresenting the actual amount of timely delivery or payment per year for business n, Ctime-year_ynIndicating the amount of timely delivery or payment for n years for the business, at Stime_year_nIn the calculation, if Ctime-year_ynWhen the annual timeliness score of the enterprise n is 0, the annual timeliness score is not obtained by calculation.
Further, the method for calculating the score of the enterprise stability comprises the following steps:
1) total stability score: sstability＝Saction×RstabilityThe stability comprises transaction amount stability, transaction amount stability and interpersonal relationship stability; the stability of the trading volume comprises the stability of monthly trading volume, the stability of quarterly trading volume and the stability of annual trading volume; the stability of the trade amount comprises the stability of the monthly trade amount, the stability of the quarterly trade amount and the stability of the annual trade amount; stability of relationship between the meridians, including stability of relationship between the monthly meridians, stability of relationship between the quarterly meridians, and stability of relationship between the annual meridians; then:
the transaction amount stability score is Sstability-C＝Sstability×RsCWherein R issCThe proportion of the transaction quantity stability score in the total stability score of the enterprise is shown;
the stability score of the transaction amount is Sstability-V＝Sstability×RsVWherein R issVThe proportion of the stability score of the transaction amount in the total stability score of the enterprise is shown;
the stability score of the interpersonal relationship is Sstability-P＝Sstability×RsPWherein R issPThe proportion of the human relationship stability score in the total stability score of the enterprise is shown;
when the enterprise is used as a supplier to be evaluated, the stability of the transaction amount in the stability refers to the number of supply orders of the enterprise as the supplier to other enterprises; transaction amount stability refers to the amount of transaction income generated when a business serves as a supplier to supply products to other businesses; relationship stability refers to the number of businesses that a business supplies as a provider to other businesses. When the enterprise is used as a buyer to evaluate, the stable transaction amount refers to the number of purchase orders of the enterprise as the buyer to other enterprises; the stability of the transaction amount refers to the transaction payment amount generated when the enterprise is used as a buyer to buy products from other enterprises; the relationship stability refers to the number of enterprises that an enterprise purchases from other enterprises as a buyer;
wherein R issC,RsV,RsPSetting specific values, adjusting and modifying according to actual use conditions in the platform, and ensuring R in the adjusting processsC+RsV+RsP＝1；
2) Enterprise stability score calculation
The enterprise stability of enterprise n is divided into:
Sstability_n＝Sstability-C_n+Sstability-V_n+Sstability-P_n
wherein S isstability_nRepresents the stability score, S, of Business nstability-C_nRepresents the transaction stability score, S, for business nstability-V_nRepresenting the trade stability score, S, for business nstability-P_nRepresenting a interpersonal relationship stability score for business n; sstability-C_n,Sstability-V_n,Sstability-P_nThe specific calculation method comprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0002905009950000111
Figure BDA0002905009950000112
Figure BDA0002905009950000113
wherein R isscm,Rscq,RscyRespectively representing the proportion of the stability of monthly transaction amount, the stability of quarterly transaction amount and the stability of annual transaction amount in the stability of transaction amount; rscm,Rscq,RscySetting specific values, adjusting and modifying according to actual use conditions in the platform, and ensuring R in the adjusting processscm+Rscq+Rscy＝1；
Rsvm,Rsvq,RsvyRespectively representing the proportion of the stability of the monthly transaction amount, the stability of the quarterly transaction amount and the stability of the annual transaction amount in the stability of the transaction amount; rsvm,Rsvq,RsvySetting specific values, adjusting and modifying according to actual use conditions in the platform, and ensuring R in the adjusting processsvm+Rsvq+Rsvy＝1；
Rspm,Rspq,RspyRespectively representing the proportion of the stability of the relationship among the moon and the arteries, the stability of the relationship among the quarterly and the annual arteries in the stability of the relationship among the arteries; rspm,Rspq,RspySetting specific values, adjusting and modifying according to actual use conditions in the platform, and ensuring R in the adjusting processspm+Rspq+Rspy＝1；
Ccm_nRepresenting the amount of business n current month, Ccm_last_nRepresenting the amount of transactions, C, for a month over business ncq_nRepresenting the business's n current quarter transaction amount, Ccq_last_nRepresenting the volume of transactions, C, for a quarter of business ncy_nRepresenting the current year's transaction amount, C, for the business ncy_last_nRepresenting the last year of the business's transaction volume;
Cvm_nrepresenting the amount of the business' n current month, Cvm_last_nRepresenting the amount of the business n's last month, Cvq_nRepresenting the trade amount of the enterprise n times, Cvq_last_nIndicating rabbetTrade amount of business n last quarter, Cvy_nRepresenting the current year of the business n, Cvy_last_nRepresenting the transaction amount of the enterprise in the last year;
Cpm_nrepresenting the number of relationships, C, in the month of the enterprise npm_last_nRepresenting the number of relationship of the business's n previous month, Cpq_nNumber of connections, C, representing n seasons of the enterprisepq_last_nRepresenting the number of connections, C, of a quarter of an enterprise npy_nRepresenting the number of relationships of the enterprise n in the year, Cpy_last_nRepresenting the relationship quantity of the relationship of;
the value calculation formula of the function F with respect to the argument x is:
Figure BDA0002905009950000121
i.e. during application, to
Figure BDA0002905009950000122
Is calculated as an example, if the denominator Ccm_last_nWhen the value is equal to 0, then
Figure BDA0002905009950000123
No calculation is required; if denominator Ccm_last_nWhen not equal to 0, when
Figure BDA0002905009950000124
When the temperature of the water is higher than the set temperature,
Figure BDA0002905009950000131
when in use
Figure BDA0002905009950000132
When the temperature of the water is higher than the set temperature,
Figure BDA0002905009950000133
further, the specific item of the enterprise comment data score and the calculation method are as follows:
1) total scores of the enterprise comments: stalk＝S×Rtalk
2) And (3) calculating the enterprise comment score:
Figure BDA0002905009950000134
using the above formula, when commenting on Enterprise n as a supplier, CnThe comment data of the buyer is shown when the enterprise n is used as a supplier; c represents the maximum value among all the supplier enterprise review data. When the enterprise n is commented as a buyer, CnThe comment data of the supplier is shown when the enterprise n is used as a buyer; c represents the maximum value in the comment data of all the purchasing merchants;
if max (c) ═ 0, then the n enterprise comment scores are all 0, and the comment score does not need to be calculated by the above formula;
wherein, with respect to C and CnIs calculated as follows:
C＝[C1,Cc,…,Cn]
CnpraisenStepping onn
Wherein C isnIndicating the difference between the approval and the treading of the nth enterprise. If there are elements less than 0 in C, then:
C＝[C1+|min(C)|,C2+|min(C)|,…,Cn+|min(C)|]
ensuring that all elements in C are greater than or equal to 0 by the formula; if there is no element smaller than 0 in C, then C does not need to be adjusted by the above formula.
Further, the third-party data score specific items and the calculation method are as follows:
the third-party data is sourced from API interfaces provided by other third-party data platforms; the acquired information includes but is not limited to judicial risks, operational risks and the like, and the acquired information is information having negative influence on the enterprise image and is used as a basis for the third-party data score;
1) total enterprise third party data score: sother＝S×Rother
2) Enterprise third-party data score calculation:
Figure BDA0002905009950000141
the value calculation formula of the function H with respect to the argument x is:
Figure BDA0002905009950000142
wherein d isnThe number of legal proceedings in the judicial risk of the enterprise n (here, legal proceedings refer to those being advertised) and the number of administrative penalties in the business risk, and δ represents the maximum upper limit for realizing the set legal proceedings and administrative penalties. I.e. when enterprise n is
Figure BDA0002905009950000143
When S is presentother_n0; when the enterprise n is
Figure BDA0002905009950000144
When the temperature of the water is higher than the set temperature,
Figure BDA0002905009950000145
the technical scheme provided by the embodiment of the invention has the beneficial effects that at least: the enterprise evaluation method based on the B2B platform has the beneficial effects that:
(1) the evaluation can be simultaneously carried out on the suppliers and the purchasers;
(2) the client can be objectively evaluated through quantitative indexes without the subjective consciousness of people;
(3) better resources of the buyer can be provided for the supplier and better resources of the supplier can be provided for the buyer through the lemon bean index;
(4) and optimizing a supplier resource library of the platform through the index of the lemon beans, and providing a certain basis for providing discount such as price reduction and subsidy for enterprises.
(5) In the process of calculating the lemon bean index, the generated enterprise data report can be a data report provided for an enterprise, the development condition and the stability condition of the enterprise are reflected to a certain extent, the aspect needing to be improved is found, and certain convenience is provided for the enterprise.
(6) The lemon bean index is published externally on the platform and can be referred by a user when selecting a supplier and a buyer. The user can also promote the index score of the own lima beans according to the index score of the own lima beans through the transaction condition or the data filling condition on the platform and the like. The buyer or the supplier with higher index of the lemon beans can obtain the qualification of advertising in the corresponding block of the platform.
Additional features and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objectives and other advantages of the invention will be realized and attained by the structure particularly pointed out in the written description and claims hereof as well as the appended drawings.
The technical solution of the present invention is further described in detail by the accompanying drawings and embodiments.
Drawings
The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention and not to limit the invention. In the drawings:
fig. 1 is a flowchart of an enterprise evaluation method based on a B2B platform disclosed in an embodiment of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENT (S) OF INVENTION
Exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure will be described in more detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. While exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure are shown in the drawings, it should be understood that the present disclosure may be embodied in various forms and should not be limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the disclosure to those skilled in the art.
The embodiment of the invention provides an enterprise evaluation method based on a B2B platform. And the specific score after the platform enterprise evaluates is called the lima bean index.
Primary index and data source for index calculation of lemon beans
The main indicators and data sources currently calculated for the index of lima beans mainly come from three aspects (without excluding the possibility of subsequent expansion):
1. platform behavior data: mainly the data of each item related to the transaction between enterprises.
2. The enterprise comment data comprises: mainly enterprise likes and dislikes, and related enterprise comments.
3. Third party data: and the information mainly comes from third-party data and relates to the reputation and risk of the enterprise, such as judicial risk, operational risk and the like.
Second, step decomposition
1. Determining a total score
The total score S is set, assuming S as 100. The later stage can adjust the size of the total score according to the density or the approaching situation of the score. For example, if the index scores of the lima beans of a company are too concentrated in a certain interval, the total score can be increased, the sparsity of the scores can be increased, and the understanding of the difference between companies or the positioning of the specific positions of the difference points is facilitated.
2. Determining a three-part score
Determining the three-part score, the proportion occupied in the total score, and the proportion distribution can be modified appropriately according to the platform development condition and the data source condition.
Platform behavior data scoring: saction＝S×RactionWherein R isactionTemporarily setting R for the proportion of the enterprise platform behavior score to the total scoreaction＝0.8。
The enterprise comment data score is as follows: stalk＝S×RtalkWherein R istalkTemporarily setting R for the proportion of the criticizing data score of the enterprise to the total scoretalk＝0.1。
Third party data score: sother＝S×RotherWherein R isotherFor the proportion of the enterprise third party data score to the total score, temporarily setting Rother＝0.1。
The total ratio of the three parts is adjustedIn time, it is necessary to ensure that: raction+Rtalk+Rother＝1
3. And (3) calculating specific scores of the enterprises:
the score for business n is calculated as:
Sn＝Saction_n+Stalk_n+Sother_n
Sn_s＝Saction_s_n+Stalk_s_n+Sother_n
Sn_p＝Saction_s_n+Stalk_p_n+Sother_n
wherein S isnA total score value representing a supplier score or a buyer score of the business n, the supplier score and the buyer score being the same, based on the business behavior data score Saction_nAnd enterprise comment data score Stalk_nIs determined as a supplier score Sn_sOr buyer score Sn_p，Saction_s_nRepresenting a specific score, S, of business n as a supplier on the platform behavior dataaction_p_nRepresenting the concrete score of the behavior data of the enterprise n as a buyer on the platform, Stalk_s_nA concrete score, S, representing the business evaluation data when the business n is a suppliertalk_p_nA concrete score, S, representing the business evaluation data of the business n as a buyerother_nA specific score representing third party data for business n;
wherein S isaction_n,Stalk_n,Sother_nThe specific calculation method of (2) is specifically shown in the following section.
3.1 platform behavior data score specific item and calculation method
The concrete calculation of the behavior data score of the enterprise n is as follows:
Saction_n＝Sinfo_n+Scount_n+Svalue_n+Sstability_n+Stime_n+Sperson_n
wherein S isinfo_nScore condition, S, representing the completeness of information for an enterprisecount_nScore status representing business transaction amount, Svalue_nScore status representing business transaction amount, Sstability_nScore status, S, representing stability of the Businesstime_nScore condition, S, representing timeliness of the enterpriseperson_nIndicating the scoring of the relationship of the interpersonal relationship. The method tentatively sets the platform behavior score to be composed of the six parts, but adjusts the components of the platform behavior score according to the accumulation condition of data at the later stage, and is not limited to the current six parts.
The current six parts occupy the proportion in the total platform behavior score as follows:
(1) enterprise information integrity score: sinfo＝Saction×RinfoWherein R isinfoFor which the ratio of the information integrity score to the total score of the platform behavior is required, R is tentatively assignedinfo＝0.05。
(2) Enterprise transaction amount score: scount＝Saction×RcountWherein R iscountFor the proportion of the transaction amount score to the total score of the platform behavior, temporarily setting Rcount＝0.20。
(3) Enterprise transaction amount score: svalue＝Saction×RvalueWherein R isvalueFor the proportion of the transaction value to the total value of the platform behavior, temporarily setting Rvalue＝0.30。
(4) Enterprise stability score: sstability＝Saction×RstabilityWherein R isstabilityFor the proportion of its stability score to the total score of the platform behavior, let R be tentatively assignedstability＝0.15。
(5) Enterprise timeliness score: stime＝Saction×RtimeWherein R istimeFor its timeliness score to account for the total score of the platform behavior, temporarily Rtime＝0.15。
(6) The relationship score of the interpersonal relationship: sperson＝Saction×RpersonWherein R ispersonFor the ratio of the relationship score of the interpersonal relationship to the total score of the platform behavior, temporarily setting Rperson＝0.15。
The proportion of the six parts can be determined according to the actual application processThe different development stages of platform carry out dynamic adjustment, when the adjustment, need guarantee: rinfo+Rcount+Rvalue+Rstability+Rtime+Rperson1. When the platform components are changed, it is necessary to ensure that the sum of the proportions of all the components is 1.
3.1.1 score calculation method of enterprise information perfection
1. Total score of information perfection: sinfo＝Saction×RinfoAnd the enterprise information comprises an enterprise information mandatory item and an enterprise information optional item, then:
(1) the mandatory item score of the enterprise information is as follows: smust-info＝Sinfo×Rmust-infoWherein R ismust-infoTemporarily setting R for the ratio of the necessary item value of the enterprise information to the total value of the integrity of the enterprise informationmust-info＝0.5。
(2) The optional item scores for the business information are: snon-info＝Sinfo×Rnon-infoWherein R isnon-infoTemporarily setting R for the ratio of the necessary item value of the enterprise information to the total value of the integrity of the enterprise informationnon-info＝0.5。
Wherein R ismust-infoAnd Rnon-infoThe setting of specific values can be adjusted and modified according to the actual use condition in the platform, and R needs to be ensured in the adjustment processmust-info+Rnon-info＝1。
2. Information integrity score calculation
The information integrity of the enterprise n is divided into:
Sinfo_n＝Smust-info+Snon-info_n
wherein S isinfo_nRepresenting an information integrity score for business n; smust-infoThe system represents the necessary score of the enterprise information, and the information which must be filled in when the enterprise registers in the information, namely the partial score is the necessary score, namely the partial score of all registered enterprises is the same; snon-info_nThe system represents the unnecessary item score of the enterprise information, and the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002905009950000181
wherein, Ctotal-non-infoTotal number of items, C, representing optional items of enterprise informationnon-info_nThe number of items filled in the necessary item of the enterprise information by the enterprise n is represented, and whether the standard of filling in the unnecessary item of the enterprise information is filling can be independent of the number, namely, one item is filled in the honor information, namely, the filling is completed.
3.1.2 method for calculating transaction amount score
1. Total business transaction score: scount＝Saction×RcountWherein the definition of the transaction amount is: the order number of the deal is irrelevant to the product type and the quantity in the pre-order. The enterprise transaction amount comprises monthly transaction amount, quarterly transaction amount and annual transaction amount, and then:
(1) the monthly transaction volume score was: scount-month＝Scount×RcmWherein R iscmFor the ratio of the monthly transaction amount score to the total enterprise transaction amount score, temporarily Rcm＝0.25。
(2) Quarterly trading volume score: scount-quarter＝Scount×RcqWherein R iscqFor the ratio of the quarterly trading volume score to the total enterprise trading volume score, tentative Rcq＝0.35。
(3) Annual trading volume score: scount-year＝Scount×RcyWherein R iscyTemporarily setting R as the ratio of annual transaction volume score to total enterprise transaction volume scorecy＝0.40。
When the enterprise is used as a supplier to be evaluated, the transaction amount specifically refers to the number of supply orders of the enterprise as the supplier to other enterprises; when the enterprise is used as a buyer to evaluate, the transaction amount specifically refers to the number of purchase orders of the enterprise as the buyer to other enterprises;
wherein R iscm,Rcq,RcyThe specific value can be set according to the actual use condition in the platformAdjusting and modifying, wherein R is required to be ensured in the adjusting processcm+Rcq+Rcy＝1。
2. Business transaction amount score calculation
The business transaction amount score for business n is:
Scount_n＝Scount-month_n+Scount-quarter_n+Scount-year_n
wherein S iscount_nRepresents the transaction amount score, S, for business ncount-month_nRepresents the monthly transaction amount score, S, for business ncount-quarter_nRepresenting the quarterly trading volume score, S, for Business ncount-year_nRepresenting the annual transaction amount score for business n. The specific calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002905009950000191
Figure BDA0002905009950000192
Figure BDA0002905009950000193
wherein, Ccount-month_nRepresents the monthly transaction amount, max (C), for business ncount-month) Represents the maximum monthly transaction volume across all enterprises, at Scount_month_nIn the calculation, if max (C)count-month) When the monthly transaction amount score of all enterprises is 0, the monthly transaction amount score is not obtained through calculation; ccount-quarter_nRepresents the quarterly transaction amount, max (C), for business ncount-quarter) Representing the maximum quarterly trading volume across all enterprises. At Scount_quarter_nIn the calculation, if max (C)count-quarter) When the value is 0, the quarterly transaction amount scores of all enterprises are 0, and the quarterly transaction amount scores are not required to be obtained through calculation; ccount-year_nRepresents the annual transaction amount, max (C), of business ncount-year) Representing the maximum annual volume of transactions in all enterprises. At Scount_year_nIn the calculation, if max (C)count-year) When the annual transaction amount score is 0, all the enterprises have an annual transaction amount score of 0, and the annual transaction amount score does not need to be obtained by calculation.
3.1.3 method for calculating score of transaction amount
1. Total value of business transaction: svalue＝Saction×RvalueWherein the definition of the transaction amount is: the total amount of all transactions over a period of time. The enterprise transaction amount comprises a monthly transaction amount, a quarterly transaction amount and an annual transaction amount, and then:
(1) the monthly transaction amount score is: svalue-month＝Svalue×RvmWherein R isvmFor the ratio of the monthly transaction amount score to the total enterprise transaction amount score, temporarily Rvm＝0.25。
(2) Quarterly trading value score: svalue-quarter＝Svalue×RvqWherein R isvqFor the ratio of the quarterly transaction amount score to the total enterprise transaction amount score, temporarily Rvq＝0.35。
(3) Annual transaction score: svalue-year＝Svalue×RvyWherein R isvyTemporarily setting R as the ratio of annual transaction amount score to total enterprise transaction amount scorevy＝0.40。
When the enterprise is used as a supplier to be evaluated, the transaction amount specifically refers to the transaction income amount generated when the enterprise is used as the supplier to supply products to other enterprises; when the enterprise is used as a buyer to perform scoring, the transaction amount specifically refers to the transaction payment amount generated when the enterprise is used as the buyer to purchase products of other enterprises;
wherein R isvm,Rvq,RvyThe setting of specific values can be adjusted and modified according to the actual use condition in the platform, and R needs to be ensured in the adjustment processvm+Rvq+Rvy＝1。
2. Enterprise transaction amount score calculation
The business transaction amount score for business n is:
Svalue_n＝Svalue-month_n+Svalue-quarter_n+Svalue-year_n
wherein S isvalue_nRepresents the trade score of business n, Svalue-month_nRepresents the monthly transaction amount score, S, for business nvalue-quarter_nRepresents the quarterly transaction amount score, S, for business nvalue-year_nRepresenting the annual transaction amount score for business n. The specific calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002905009950000201
Figure BDA0002905009950000202
Figure BDA0002905009950000211
wherein, Cvalue-month_nDenotes the monthly transaction amount, max (C), for business nvalue-month) Represents the maximum value of the monthly transaction amount in all enterprises, at Svalue_month_nIn the calculation, if max (C)value-month) When the value is 0, the monthly transaction amount scores of all enterprises are 0, and the scores are not required to be obtained through calculation; cvalue-quarter_nRepresents the quarterly transaction amount, max (C), for business nvalue-quarter) Representing the maximum quarterly transaction amount among all businesses. At Svalue_quarter_nIn the calculation, if max (C)value-quarter) When the value is 0, the quarterly transaction amount scores of all enterprises are 0, and the quarterly transaction amount scores are not required to be obtained through calculation; cvalue-year_nDenotes the annual transaction amount, max (C), of the corporation nvalue-year) Representing the maximum amount of annual transactions among all enterprises. At Svalue_year_nIn the calculation, if max (C)value-year) When the annual transaction amount score is 0, the annual transaction amount score of all the enterprises is 0, and the annual transaction amount score is not obtained by calculation.
3.1.4 calculation method of interpersonal relationship score
1. Total score of interpersonal relationship: sperson＝Saction×RpersonAnd the relationship of. Wherein the relationship of the:
(1) the monthly relationship score is: sperson-month＝Sperson×RpmWherein R ispmTemporarily setting R as the ratio of the monthly relationship score to the total enterprise relationship scorepm＝0.25。
(2) Quarterly interpersonal relationship score: sperson-quarter＝Sperson×RpqWherein R ispqTemporarily setting R as the ratio of quarterly relationship score to total enterprise relationship scorepq＝0.35。
(3) Annual pulse relationship score: sperson-year＝Sperson×RpyWherein R ispyTemporarily setting R as the ratio of the annual context relationship score to the total enterprise context relationship scorepy＝0.40。
When an enterprise is rated as a supplier, the relationship specifically refers to the number of the enterprises that the enterprise supplies to other enterprises as the supplier; when the enterprise is used as a buyer to be evaluated, the relationship of the interpersonal relationship specifically refers to the number of the enterprises which are purchased by the enterprise as the buyer to other enterprises;
wherein R ispm,Rpq,RpyThe setting of specific values can be adjusted and modified according to the actual use condition in the platform, and R needs to be ensured in the adjustment processpm+Rpq+Rpy＝1。
2. Enterprise relationship score calculation
The relationship of the enterprise n is divided into:
Sperson_n＝Sperson-month_n+Sperson-quarter_n+Sperson-year_n
wherein S isperson_nRepresenting a interpersonal relationship score, S, for a business nperson-month_nRepresenting a monthly interpersonal relationship score, S, for a business nperson-quarter_nRepresenting a business nQuarterly interpersonal relationship score, Sperson-year_nRepresenting the annual context score for business n. The specific calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002905009950000221
Figure BDA0002905009950000222
Figure BDA0002905009950000223
wherein, Cperson-month_nDenotes the number of monthly relationship, max (C), for the enterprise nperson-month) Maximum value of the number of monthly relationship among all enterprises, at Sperson_month_nIn the calculation, if max (C)person-month) When the score is 0, the monthly-interpersonal relationship score of all enterprises is 0, and the score is not obtained through calculation; cperson-quater _ n represents the number of quarterly connections for Business n, max (C)person-quarter) Representing the maximum number of quarterly connections across all enterprises. At Sperson_quarter_nIn the calculation, if max (C)person-quarter) When the score is 0, the quarterly interpersonal relationship score of all enterprises is 0, and the score is obtained without calculation; cperson-year_nDenotes the annual interpersonal relationship number, max (C), of the enterprise nperson-year) Representing the maximum number of annual connections in all enterprises. At Sperson_year_nIn the calculation, if max (C)person-year) When the score is 0, the annual context relationship score of all the enterprises is 0, and the score is not obtained by calculation.
3.1.5 timeliness score calculation method
1. Total timeliness score: stime＝Saction×RtimeAnd the timeliness is defined as whether the order transacted with the enterprise is delivered within the specified time or not, if so, the order is delivered in time, and if not, the order is not delivered in time.Wherein timeliness includes monthly timeliness, quarterly timeliness, annual timeliness, then:
(1) the monthly timeliness score was: stime-month＝Stime×RtmWherein R istmTemporarily setting R as the proportion of the monthly timeliness score to the total timeliness score of the enterprisetm＝0.40。
(2) Quarterly timeliness score: stime-quarter＝Stime×RtqWherein R istqTemporarily setting R as the ratio of the quarterly timeliness score to the total timeliness score of the enterprisetq＝0.35。
(3) Annual timeliness score: stime-year＝Stime×RtyWherein R istyTemporarily setting R for the proportion of the annual timeliness score to the total timeliness score of the enterprisety＝0.25。
When the enterprise is used as a supplier to be evaluated, the timeliness specifically refers to the delivery timeliness of the enterprise serving as the supplier to other enterprise supplied products; when the enterprise is used as a buyer to perform scoring, the timeliness specifically refers to the timeliness of the payment of the enterprise for purchasing products from other enterprises as the buyer;
wherein R istm,Rtq,RtyThe setting of specific values can be adjusted and modified according to the actual use condition in the platform, and R needs to be ensured in the adjustment processtm+Rtq+Rty＝1。
2. Enterprise timeliness score calculation
The enterprise timeliness score for enterprise n is:
Stime_n＝Stime-month_n+Stime-quarter_n+Stime-year_n
wherein S istime_nRepresenting the timeliness score, S, of Business ntime-month_nRepresents the monthly timeliness score, S, for Business ntime-quarter_nRepresenting the quarterly timeliness score, S, of Business ntime-year_nRepresenting the annual timeliness score for business n. The specific calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002905009950000231
Figure BDA0002905009950000232
Figure BDA0002905009950000233
wherein, Ctime-month_nRepresenting the actual timely monthly delivery or payment amount, C, for the enterprise ntime-month_ynIndicating the amount of timely delivery or payment for the month of business n, at Stime_month_nIn the calculation, if Ctime-month_ynWhen the score is 0, the monthly timeliness score of the enterprise n is 0, and the score is not obtained through calculation; ctime-quarter_nRepresenting the actual amount of timely delivery or payment in the quarter of business n, Ctime-quarter_ynIndicating the amount of timely delivery or payment for business n quarterly, at Stime_quarter_nIn the calculation, if Ctime-quarter_ynWhen the value is equal to 0, the quarterly timeliness score of the enterprise n is 0, and the quarterly timeliness score is obtained without calculation; ctime_year_nRepresenting the actual amount of timely delivery or payment per year for business n, Ctime-year_ynIndicating the amount of timely delivery or payment for n years for the business, at Stime_year_nIn the calculation, if Ctime-year_ynWhen the annual timeliness score of the enterprise n is 0, the annual timeliness score is not obtained by calculation.
3.1.6 stability score calculation method
1. Total stability score: sstability＝Saction×RstabilityAnd the stability comprises transaction amount stability, transaction amount stability and interpersonal relationship stability. The stability of the trading volume comprises the stability of monthly trading volume, the stability of quarterly trading volume and the stability of annual trading volume; the stability of the trade amount comprises the stability of the monthly trade amount, the stability of the quarterly trade amount and the stability of the annual trade amount; stability of relationship between meridians, including stability of relationship between monthly meridians, stability of relationship between quarterly meridians,Stability of relationship between the annual meridians. Then:
(1) the transaction amount stability score is Sstability-C＝Sstability×RsCWherein R issCTentatively setting the proportion of the transaction stability score to the total stability score of the enterprise
Figure BDA0002905009950000241
(2) The stability score of the transaction amount is Sstability-V＝Sstability×RsVWherein R issVTentatively setting the proportion of the stability score of the transaction amount in the total stability score of the enterprise
Figure BDA0002905009950000242
(3) The stability score of the interpersonal relationship is Sstability-P＝Sstability×RsPWherein R issPTentatively setting the proportion of the stability score of the interpersonal relationship in the total stability score of the enterprise
Figure BDA0002905009950000243
When the enterprise is used as a supplier to be evaluated, the stability of the transaction amount in the stability refers to the number of supply orders of the enterprise as the supplier to other enterprises; transaction amount stability refers to the amount of transaction income generated when a business serves as a supplier to supply products to other businesses; relationship stability refers to the number of businesses that a business supplies as a provider to other businesses. When the enterprise is used as a buyer to evaluate, the stable transaction amount refers to the number of purchase orders of the enterprise as the buyer to other enterprises; the stability of the transaction amount refers to the transaction payment amount generated when the enterprise is used as a buyer to buy products from other enterprises; the relationship stability refers to the number of enterprises that an enterprise purchases from other enterprises as a buyer;
wherein R issC,RsV,RsPThe setting of specific values can be adjusted and modified according to the actual use condition in the platform, and in the adjusting process, the specific values need to be guaranteedCertificate RsC+RsV+RsP＝1。
2. Enterprise stability score calculation
The enterprise stability of enterprise n is divided into:
Sstability_n＝Sstability-C_n+Sstability-V_n+Sstability-P_n
wherein S isstability_nRepresents the stability score, S, of Business nstability-C_nRepresents the transaction stability score, S, for business nstability-V_nRepresenting the trade stability score, S, for business nstability-P_nRepresenting the interpersonal relationship stability score for business n. Sstability-C_n,Sstability-V_n,Sstability-P_nThe specific calculation method comprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0002905009950000251
Figure BDA0002905009950000252
Figure BDA0002905009950000253
wherein R isscm,Rscq,RscyRespectively representing the proportion of the stability of monthly transaction amount, the stability of quarterly transaction amount and the stability of annual transaction amount in the stability of transaction amount, and setting Rscm＝0.25,Rscq＝0.35,Rscy＝0.40。Rscm,Rscq,RscyThe setting of specific values can be adjusted and modified according to the actual use condition in the platform, and R needs to be ensured in the adjustment processscm+Rscq+Rscy＝1。
Rsvm,Rsvq,RsvyRespectively representing the proportion of the stability of monthly transaction amount, the stability of quarterly transaction amount and the stability of annual transaction amount in the stability of transaction amount, and a tentative value Rsvm＝0.25,Rsvq＝0.35,Rsvy＝0.40。Rsvm,Rsvq,RsvyThe setting of specific values can be adjusted and modified according to the actual use condition in the platform, and R needs to be ensured in the adjustment processsvm+Rsvq+Rsvy＝1。
Rspm,Rspq,RspyRespectively representing the proportion of the stability of the relationship among the moon, the quarterly and the annual meridians in the stability of the transaction amount, and temporarily setting Rspm＝0.40,Rspq＝0.35,Rspy＝0.25。Rspm,Rspq,RspyThe setting of specific values can be adjusted and modified according to the actual use condition in the platform, and R needs to be ensured in the adjustment processspm+Rspq+Rspy＝1。
Ccm_nRepresenting the amount of business n current month, Ccm_last_nRepresenting the amount of transactions, C, for a month over business ncq_nRepresenting the business's n current quarter transaction amount, Ccq_last_nRepresenting the volume of transactions, C, for a quarter of business ncy_nRepresenting the current year's transaction amount, C, for the business ncy_last_nRepresenting the last year of the business's transaction volume.
Cvm_nRepresenting the amount of the business' n current month, Cvm_last_nRepresenting the amount of the business n's last month, Cvq_nRepresenting the trade amount of the enterprise n times, Cvq_last_nRepresenting the amount of the transaction, C, for the previous quarter of business nvy_nRepresenting the current year of the business n, Cvy_last_nRepresenting the last year of the business' transaction amount.
Cpm_nRepresenting the number of relationships, C, in the month of the enterprise npm_last_nRepresenting the number of relationship of the business's n previous month, Cpq_nNumber of connections, C, representing n seasons of the enterprisepq_last_nRepresenting the number of connections, C, of a quarter of an enterprise npy_nRepresenting the number of relationships of the enterprise n in the year, Cpy_last_nRepresenting the number of relationship of the enterprise to the relationship of the relationship.
The value calculation formula of the function F with respect to the argument x is:
Figure BDA0002905009950000261
i.e. during application, to
Figure BDA0002905009950000262
Is calculated as an example, if the denominator Ccm_last_nWhen the value is equal to 0, then
Figure BDA0002905009950000263
No calculation is required; if denominator Ccm_last_nWhen not equal to 0, when
Figure BDA0002905009950000264
When the temperature of the water is higher than the set temperature,
Figure BDA0002905009950000265
when in use
Figure BDA0002905009950000266
When the temperature of the water is higher than the set temperature,
Figure BDA0002905009950000267
3.2 Enterprise comment data score specific item and calculation method
(1) Total scores of the enterprise comments: stalk＝S×Rtalk
(2) And (3) calculating the enterprise comment score:
Figure BDA0002905009950000271
using the above formula, when commenting on Enterprise n as a supplier, CnThe comment data of the buyer is shown when the enterprise n is used as a supplier; c represents the maximum value among all the supplier enterprise review data. When the enterprise n is commented as a buyer, CnThe comment data of the supplier is shown when the enterprise n is used as a buyer; c represents the maximum value among all the purchase merchant enterprise review data.
If max (c) ═ 0, then n enterprise points are all 0, and it is not necessary to calculate points using the above formula.
Wherein, with respect to C and CnIs calculated as follows:
C＝[C1,Cc,…,Cn]
CnpraisenStepping onn
Wherein C isnIndicating the difference between the approval and the treading of the nth enterprise. If there are elements less than 0 in C:
C＝[C1+|min(C)|,C2+|min(C)|,…,Cn+|min(C)|]
ensuring that all elements in C are greater than or equal to 0 by the formula; if there is no element less than 0 in C, then C does not need to be adjusted by the above formula.
3.3 third-party data score specific item and calculation method
The third party data is derived from API interfaces provided by other third party data platforms. The acquired information includes but is not limited to judicial risks, operational risks and the like, and the acquired information is information having negative influence on the enterprise image and is used as a basis for third-party data scores.
(1) Total enterprise third party data score: sother＝S×Rother
(2) Enterprise third-party data score calculation:
Figure BDA0002905009950000272
the value calculation formula of the function H with respect to the argument x is:
Figure BDA0002905009950000273
wherein d isnShows the number of legal proceedings in the judicial risk of the enterprise n (the legal proceedings are reported legal proceedings), administrative penalties in the business risk, and delta shows the legal proceedings and executions for realizing the settingMaximum upper bound for administration penalty. I.e. when enterprise n is
Figure BDA0002905009950000281
When S is presentother_n0; when the enterprise n is
Figure BDA0002905009950000282
When the temperature of the water is higher than the set temperature,
Figure BDA0002905009950000283
it should be understood that the specific order or hierarchy of steps in the processes disclosed is an example of exemplary approaches. Based upon design preferences, it is understood that the specific order or hierarchy of steps in the processes may be rearranged without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. The accompanying method claims present elements of the various steps in a sample order, and are not intended to be limited to the specific order or hierarchy presented.
In the foregoing detailed description, various features are grouped together in a single embodiment for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments of the subject matter require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, invention lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby expressly incorporated into the detailed description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate preferred embodiment of the invention.
Those of skill would further appreciate that the various illustrative logical blocks, modules, circuits, and algorithm steps described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both. To clearly illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software, various illustrative components, blocks, modules, circuits, and steps have been described above generally in terms of their functionality. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the overall system. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present disclosure.
The steps of a method or algorithm described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be embodied directly in hardware, in a software module executed by a processor, or in a combination of the two. A software module may reside in RAM memory, flash memory, ROM memory, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory, registers, hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of storage medium known in the art. An exemplary storage medium is coupled to the processor such the processor can read information from, and write information to, the storage medium. Of course, the storage medium may also be integral to the processor. The processor and the storage medium may reside in an ASIC. The ASIC may reside in a user terminal. Of course, the processor and the storage medium may reside as discrete components in a user terminal.
For a software implementation, the techniques described herein may be implemented with modules (e.g., procedures, functions, and so on) that perform the functions described herein. The software codes may be stored in memory units and executed by processors. The memory unit may be implemented within the processor or external to the processor, in which case it can be communicatively coupled to the processor via various means as is known in the art.
What has been described above includes examples of one or more embodiments. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or methodologies for purposes of describing the aforementioned embodiments, but one of ordinary skill in the art may recognize that many further combinations and permutations of various embodiments are possible. Accordingly, the embodiments described herein are intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications and variations that fall within the scope of the appended claims. Furthermore, to the extent that the term "includes" is used in either the detailed description or the claims, such term is intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term "comprising" as "comprising" is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim. Furthermore, any use of the term "or" in the specification of the claims is intended to mean a "non-exclusive or".

Claims (10)

1. An enterprise evaluation method based on a B2B platform is characterized by comprising the following steps:
(1) setting a score calculation index and a data source of platform enterprise evaluation: the indexes for calculating the enterprise evaluation score comprise: the enterprise platform behavior data score, the enterprise comment data score and the third-party data score;
(2) determining the proportion of the total score S and the three-part score in the total score, and calculating and expressing the score of the enterprise n as:
Sn＝Saction_n+Stalk_n+Sother_n
Sn_s＝Saction_s_n+Stalk_s_n+Sother_n
Sn_p＝Saction_s_n+Stalk_p_n+Sother_n
wherein S isnA total score value representing a supplier score or a buyer score of the business n, the supplier score and the buyer score being the same, based on the business behavior data score Saction_nAnd enterprise comment data score Stalk_nIs determined as a supplier score Sn_sOr buyer score Sn_p，Saction_s_nRepresenting a specific score, S, of business n as a supplier on the platform behavior dataaction_p_nRepresenting the concrete score of the behavior data of the enterprise n as a buyer on the platform, Stalk_s_nA concrete score, S, representing the business evaluation data when the business n is a suppliertalk_p_nA concrete score, S, representing the business evaluation data of the business n as a buyerother_nA specific score representing third party data for business n;
(3) respectively calculating the platform behavior data score, the enterprise comment data score and the third-party data score of the enterprise according to the enterprise platform behavior data, the enterprise comment data and the third-party data, and respectively calculating the score S of the enterprise as a suppliern_sAnd the score S of the enterprise as a buyern_p。
2. The B2B platform-based enterprise evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein the enterprise platform behavior data score, the enterprise criticizing data score and the third party data score of step (1) are obtained according to the enterprise platform behavior data, the enterprise criticizing data and the third party data respectively, wherein:
enterprise platform behavior data: is data relating to transactions between enterprises;
the enterprise comment data comprises: enterprise likes and dislikes, and related enterprise comments;
third party data: and information related to the reputation and the risk of the enterprise from the third-party data comprises judicial risk and business risk information.
3. The enterprise evaluation method based on the B2B platform according to claim 1, wherein the proportion of the total score occupied by the three-part score determined in step (2) is distributed, and the proportion is adjusted appropriately according to the platform development condition and the data source condition; wherein:
platform behavior data scoring: saction＝S×RactionWherein R isactionThe proportion of the score of the enterprise platform behavior data to the total score is obtained;
the enterprise comment data score is as follows: stalk＝S×RtalkWherein R istalkThe ratio of the scores of the enterprise comment data to the total score is determined;
third party data score: sother＝S×RotherWherein R isotherThe proportion of the third-party data score to the total score of the enterprise;
when the total proportion of the three parts is adjusted, the following requirements are ensured: raction+Rtalk+Rother＝1。
4. The B2B platform-based enterprise evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein the platform behavior data score specific items and calculation method of enterprise n in step (2) are:
enterprises as suppliers are classified as:
Saction_s_n＝Sinfo_n+Scount_s_n+Svalue_s_n+Sstability_s_n+Stime_s_n+Sperson_s_n
the enterprise as a buyer is divided into:
Saction_p_n＝Sinfo_n+Scount_p_n+Svalue_p_n+Sstability_p_n+Stime_p_n+Sperson_p_n
wherein S isinfo_nScore condition, S, representing the completeness of information for an enterprisecount_s_nScore representing the amount of supply of a business as a supplier, Svalue_s_nScore representing the amount of income a business transacts as a supplier, Sstability_s_nRepresenting the stability score of a business as a supplier, Stime_s_nScore condition, S, indicating the timeliness of delivery of the business as a supplierperson_s_nA score representing a relationship of a business as a supplier to supply a product to other customers; scount_p_nIndicating the score of the purchase amount of the company as a buyer, Svalue_p_nIndicating the score of the transaction payment of the business as buyer, Sstability_p_nRepresenting the stability score of the business as a buyer, Stime_p_nScore condition, S, indicating the timeliness of the payment of the enterprise as a buyerperson_p_nAnd the score condition of the relationship of the client relationship of the enterprise as a buyer for purchasing the product from other clients is represented.
The current six parts occupy the proportion in the total platform behavior score as follows:
enterprise information integrity score: sinfo＝Saction×RinfoWherein R isinfoRequiring the proportion of the information perfection score to the total score of the platform behaviors;
enterprise transaction amount score: scount＝Saction×RcountWherein R iscountThe proportion of the transaction amount score to the total score of the platform behavior is defined;
enterprise transactionThe quota is as follows: svalue＝Saction×RvalueWherein R isvalueThe proportion of the transaction value to the total value of the platform behavior is defined;
enterprise stability score: sstability＝Saction×RstabilityWherein R isstabilityThe stability score is the proportion of the total score of the platform behavior;
enterprise timeliness score: stime＝Saction×RtimeWherein R istimeThe proportion of the timeliness score to the total score of the platform behavior;
the relationship score of the interpersonal relationship: sperson＝Saction×RpersonWherein R ispersonThe relationship score of the relationship accounts for the total score of the platform behavior;
the proportion occupied by the six parts is dynamically adjusted according to different development stages of the platform in the actual application process, and when the proportion is adjusted, the following needs to be ensured: rinfo+Rcount+Rvalue+Rstabilitv+Rtime+Rperson＝1。
5. The B2B platform-based enterprise evaluation method of claim 4, wherein the score of the enterprise information perfection is calculated by:
1) total score of enterprise information perfection: sinfo＝Saction×RinfoAnd the enterprise information comprises an enterprise information mandatory item and an enterprise information optional item, then:
the mandatory item score of the enterprise information is as follows: smust-info＝Sinfo×Rmust-infoWherein R ismust-infoThe percentage of the necessary item score of the enterprise information in the total score of the integrity of the enterprise information is calculated;
the optional item scores for the business information are: snon-info＝Sinfo×Rnon-infoWherein R isnon-infoThe percentage of the value of the unnecessary item of the enterprise information in the total value of the integrity of the enterprise information is calculated;
wherein R ismust-infoAnd Rnon-infoThe setting of the specific value is carried out,adjusting and modifying according to the actual use condition in the platform, wherein R needs to be ensured in the adjusting processmust-info+Rnon-info＝1；
2) Enterprise information integrity score calculation
The information integrity of the enterprise n is divided into:
Sinfo_n＝Smust-info+Snon-info_n
wherein S isinfo_nRepresenting an information integrity score for business n; smust-infoThe system represents the necessary score of the enterprise information, and the information which must be filled in when the enterprise registers in the information, namely the partial score is the necessary score, namely the partial score of all registered enterprises is the same; snon-info_nThe system represents the unnecessary item score of the enterprise information, and the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure FDA0002905009940000041
wherein, Ctotal-non-infoTotal number of items, C, representing optional items of enterprise informationnon-info_nThe number of items filled in the necessary item of the enterprise information by the enterprise n is represented, and whether the standard of filling in the unnecessary item of the enterprise information is filling can be independent of the number, namely, one item is filled in the honor information, namely, the filling is completed.
6. The business evaluation method based on the B2B platform of claim 4, wherein the score of the business transaction amount is calculated by:
1) total business transaction score: scount＝Saction×RcountWherein the definition of the transaction amount is: the order number of the deal is irrelevant to the product type and the number in the pre-order; the enterprise transaction amount comprises monthly transaction amount, quarterly transaction amount and annual transaction amount, and then:
the monthly transaction volume score was: scount-month＝Scount×RcmWherein R iscmThe ratio of the monthly transaction volume score to the total enterprise transaction volume score;
quarterly trading volume score: scount-quarter＝Scount×RcqWherein R iscqThe ratio of the quarterly transaction amount score to the total enterprise transaction amount score;
annual trading volume score: scount-year＝Scount×RcyWherein R iscyThe proportion of the annual transaction volume score in the total enterprise transaction volume score is shown;
when the enterprise is used as a supplier to be evaluated, the transaction amount specifically refers to the number of supply orders of the enterprise as the supplier to other enterprises; when the enterprise is used as a buyer to evaluate, the transaction amount specifically refers to the number of purchase orders of the enterprise as the buyer to other enterprises;
wherein R iscm，Rcq，RcySetting specific values, adjusting and modifying according to actual use conditions in the platform, and ensuring R in the adjusting processcm+Rcq+Rcy＝1；
2) Business transaction amount score calculation
The business transaction amount score for business n is:
Scount_n＝Scount-month_n+Scount-quarter_n+Scount-year_n
wherein S iscount_nRepresents the transaction amount score, S, for business ncount-month_nRepresents the monthly transaction amount score, S, for business ncount-quarter_nRepresenting the quarterly trading volume score, S, for Business ncount-year_nRepresenting an annual trading volume score for business n; the specific calculation formula is as follows:
Figure FDA0002905009940000051
Figure FDA0002905009940000052
Figure FDA0002905009940000053
wherein, Ccount-month_nRepresents the monthly transaction amount, max (C), for business ncount-month) Represents the maximum monthly transaction volume across all enterprises, at Scount_month_nIn the calculation, if max (C)count-month) When the monthly transaction amount score of all enterprises is 0, the monthly transaction amount score is not obtained through calculation; ccount-quarter_nRepresents the quarterly transaction amount, max (C), for business ncount-quarter) Represents the maximum quarterly trading volume across all enterprises; at Scount_quarter_nIn the calculation, if max (C)count-quarter) When the value is 0, the quarterly transaction amount scores of all enterprises are 0, and the quarterly transaction amount scores are not required to be obtained through calculation; ccount-year_nRepresents the annual transaction amount, max (C), of business ncount-year) Represents the maximum value of the annual transaction volume in all enterprises; at Scount_year_nIn the calculation, if max (C)count-year) When the annual transaction amount score is 0, all the enterprises have an annual transaction amount score of 0, and the annual transaction amount score does not need to be obtained by calculation.
7. The B2B platform-based enterprise evaluation method of claim 4, wherein the score of the enterprise transaction amount is calculated by:
1) total value of business transaction: svalue＝Saction×RvalueWherein the definition of the transaction amount is: total amount of all transactions over a period of time; the enterprise transaction amount comprises a monthly transaction amount, a quarterly transaction amount and an annual transaction amount, and then:
the monthly transaction amount score is: svalue-month＝Svalue×RvmWherein R isvmThe proportion of the monthly transaction amount score in the total enterprise transaction amount score;
quarterly trading value score: svalue-quarter＝Svalue×RvqWherein R isvqThe ratio of the quarterly transaction amount value to the total enterprise transaction amount value;
annual transaction score: svalue-year＝Svalue×RvyWherein R isvyThe ratio of the annual transaction amount score to the total transaction amount score of the enterprise;
when the enterprise is used as a supplier to be evaluated, the transaction amount specifically refers to the transaction income amount generated when the enterprise is used as the supplier to supply products to other enterprises; when the enterprise is used as a buyer to perform scoring, the transaction amount specifically refers to the transaction payment amount generated when the enterprise is used as the buyer to purchase products of other enterprises;
wherein R isvm，Rvq，RvySetting specific values, adjusting and modifying according to actual use conditions in the platform, and ensuring R in the adjusting processvm+Rvq+Rvy＝1；
2) Enterprise transaction amount score calculation
The business transaction amount score for business n is:
Svalue_n＝Svalue-month_n+Svalue-quarter_n+Svalue-year_n
wherein S isvalue_nRepresents the trade score of business n, Svalue-month_nRepresents the monthly transaction amount score, S, for business nvalue-quarter_nRepresents the quarterly transaction amount score, S, for business nvalue-year_nRepresenting an annual transaction amount score for business n; the specific calculation formula is as follows:
Figure FDA0002905009940000061
Figure FDA0002905009940000062
Figure FDA0002905009940000063
wherein, Cvalue-month_nDenotes the monthly transaction amount, max (C), for business nvalue-month) Representing monthly transaction amounts in all enterprisesMaximum value at Svalue_montn_nIn the calculation, if max (C)value-month) When the value is 0, the monthly transaction amount scores of all enterprises are 0, and the scores are not required to be obtained through calculation; cvalue-quarter_nRepresents the quarterly transaction amount, max (C), for business nvalue-quarter) Represents the maximum quarterly transaction amount among all enterprises; at Svalue_quarter_nIn the calculation, if max (C)value-quarter) When the value is 0, the quarterly transaction amount scores of all enterprises are 0, and the quarterly transaction amount scores are not required to be obtained through calculation; cvalue-year_nDenotes the annual transaction amount, max (C), of the corporation nvalue-year) Represents the maximum value of annual transaction amounts in all enterprises; at Svalue_year_nIn the calculation, if max (C)value-year) When the annual transaction amount score is 0, the annual transaction amount score of all the enterprises is 0, and the annual transaction amount score is not obtained by calculation.
8. The enterprise evaluation method based on the B2B platform of claim 4, wherein the enterprise relationship score is calculated by:
1) total score of interpersonal relationship: sperson＝Saction×RpersonThe relationship of the; wherein the relationship of the:
(1) the monthly relationship score is: sperson-month＝Sperson×RpmWherein R ispmThe ratio of the monthly relationship value to the total enterprise relationship value;
(2) quarterly interpersonal relationship score: sperson-quarter＝Sperson×RpqWherein R ispqThe quarterly relationship score is the ratio of the quarterly relationship score to the total enterprise relationship score;
(3) annual pulse relationship score: sperson-year＝Sperson×RpyWherein R ispyThe ratio of the annual context relationship value to the total enterprise context relationship value is shown;
when an enterprise is rated as a supplier, the relationship specifically refers to the number of the enterprises that the enterprise supplies to other enterprises as the supplier; when the enterprise is used as a buyer to be evaluated, the relationship of the interpersonal relationship specifically refers to the number of the enterprises which are purchased by the enterprise as the buyer to other enterprises;
wherein R ispm，Rpq，RpySetting specific values, adjusting and modifying according to actual use conditions in the platform, and ensuring R in the adjusting processpm+Rpq+Rpy＝1；
2) Enterprise relationship score calculation
The relationship of the enterprise n is divided into:
Sperson_n＝Sperson-montn_n+Sperson-quarter_n+Sperson-year_n
wherein S isperson_nRepresenting a interpersonal relationship score, S, for a business nperson-month_nRepresenting a monthly interpersonal relationship score, S, for a business nperson-quarter_nRepresenting a quarterly interpersonal relationship score, S, for a business nperson-year_nRepresenting the annual context score for business n. The specific calculation formula is as follows:
Figure FDA0002905009940000081
Figure FDA0002905009940000082
Figure FDA0002905009940000083
wherein, Cperson-montn_nDenotes the number of monthly relationship, max (C), for the enterprise nperson-month) Maximum value of the number of monthly relationship among all enterprises, at Sperson_month_nIn the calculation, if max (C)person-month) When the score is 0, the monthly relationship score of all the enterprises is 0,then it is not necessary to obtain through calculation; cperson-quarter_nRepresenting the number of quarterly connections, max (C), for business nperson-quarter) Representing the maximum value of the number of quarterly connections among all enterprises; at Sperson_quarter_nIn the calculation, if max (C)person-quarter) When the score is 0, the quarterly interpersonal relationship score of all enterprises is 0, and the score is obtained without calculation; cperson-year_nDenotes the annual interpersonal relationship number, max (C), of the enterprise nperson-year) The maximum value of the number of the annual connections in all enterprises is represented; at Sperson_year_nIn the calculation, if max (C)person-year) When the score is 0, the annual context relationship score of all the enterprises is 0, and the score is not obtained by calculation.
9. The B2B platform-based enterprise evaluation method of claim 4, wherein the enterprise timeliness score calculation method comprises:
1) total timeliness score: stime＝Saction×RtimeWherein, the definition of timeliness is whether the order of the transaction with the enterprise is delivered or paid within the set time, if the order is delivered or paid, the order is delivered or paid in time, if the order is not delivered or paid, the order is not delivered or paid in time; wherein timeliness includes monthly timeliness, quarterly timeliness, annual timeliness, then:
the monthly timeliness score was: stime-month＝Stime×RtmWherein R istmThe percentage of the monthly timeliness score in the total timeliness score of the enterprise;
quarterly timeliness score: stime-quarter＝Stime×RtqWherein R istqThe percentage of the quarterly timeliness score in the total timeliness score of the enterprise;
annual timeliness score: stime-year＝Stime×RtyWherein R istyThe percentage of the quarterly timeliness score in the total timeliness score of the enterprise;
when an enterprise is rated as a supplier, timeliness specifically refers to that the enterprise is rated as a supplier for other enterprisesThe delivery timeliness of the enterprise supply product; when the enterprise is used as a buyer to perform scoring, the timeliness specifically refers to the timeliness of the payment of the enterprise for purchasing products from other enterprises as the buyer; wherein R istm，Rtq，RtySetting specific values, adjusting and modifying according to actual use conditions in the platform, and ensuring R in the adjusting processtm+Rtq+Rty＝1；
2) Enterprise timeliness score calculation
The enterprise timeliness score for enterprise n is:
Stime_n＝Stime-month_n+Stime-quarter_n+Stime-year_n
wherein S istime_nRepresenting the timeliness score, S, of Business ntime-month_nRepresents the monthly timeliness score, S, for Business ntime-quarter_nRepresenting the quarterly timeliness score, S, of Business ntime-year_nRepresenting a yearly timeliness score for business n; the specific calculation formula is as follows:
Figure FDA0002905009940000091
Figure FDA0002905009940000092
Figure FDA0002905009940000093
wherein, Ctime-month_nRepresenting the actual timely monthly delivery or payment amount, C, for the enterprise ntime-month_ynIndicating the amount of timely delivery or payment for the month of business n, at Stime_month_nIn the calculation, if Ctime-month_ynWhen the score is 0, the monthly timeliness score of the enterprise n is 0, and the score is not obtained through calculation; ctime-quarter_nRepresenting the actual amount of timely delivery or payment in the quarter of business n, Ctime-quarter_ynIndicating the amount of timely delivery or payment for business n quarterly, at Stime_quarter_nIn the calculation, if Ctime-quarter_ynWhen the value is equal to 0, the quarterly timeliness score of the enterprise n is 0, and the quarterly timeliness score is obtained without calculation; ctime_year_nRepresenting the actual amount of timely delivery or payment per year for business n, Ctime-year_ynIndicating the amount of timely delivery or payment for n years for the business, at Stime_year_nIn the calculation, if Ctime-year_ynWhen the annual timeliness score of the enterprise n is 0, the annual timeliness score is not obtained by calculation.
10. The B2B platform-based enterprise evaluation method of claim 4, wherein the enterprise stability score is calculated by:
1) total stability score: sstability＝Saction×RstabilityThe stability comprises transaction amount stability, transaction amount stability and interpersonal relationship stability; the stability of the trading volume comprises the stability of monthly trading volume, the stability of quarterly trading volume and the stability of annual trading volume; the stability of the trade amount comprises the stability of the monthly trade amount, the stability of the quarterly trade amount and the stability of the annual trade amount; stability of relationship between the meridians, including stability of relationship between the monthly meridians, stability of relationship between the quarterly meridians, and stability of relationship between the annual meridians; then:
the trade volume stability score is: sstability-C＝Sstabilitv×RsCWherein R issCThe proportion of the transaction quantity stability score in the total stability score of the enterprise is shown;
the transaction stability score is: sstability-V＝Sstability×RsVWherein R issVThe proportion of the stability score of the transaction amount in the total stability score of the enterprise is shown;
the interpersonal stability score was: sstability-P＝Sstabilitv×RsPWherein R issPThe proportion of the human relationship stability score in the total stability score of the enterprise is shown;
when the enterprise is used as a supplier to be evaluated, the stability of the transaction amount in the stability refers to the number of supply orders of the enterprise as the supplier to other enterprises; transaction amount stability refers to the amount of transaction income generated when a business serves as a supplier to supply products to other businesses; the relationship stability refers to the number of enterprises that the enterprise supplies to other enterprises as a supplier; when the enterprise is used as a buyer to evaluate, the stable transaction amount refers to the number of purchase orders of the enterprise as the buyer to other enterprises; the stability of the transaction amount refers to the transaction payment amount generated when the enterprise is used as a buyer to buy products from other enterprises; the relationship stability refers to the number of enterprises that an enterprise purchases from other enterprises as a buyer;
wherein R issC，RsV，RsPSetting specific values, adjusting and modifying according to actual use conditions in the platform, and ensuring R in the adjusting processsC+RsV+RsP＝1；
2) Enterprise stability score calculation
The enterprise stability of enterprise n is divided into:
Sstability_n＝Sstability-C_n+Sstability-V_n+Sstability-P_n
wherein S isstability_nRepresents the stability score, S, of Business nstability-C_nRepresents the transaction stability score, S, for business nstability-V_nRepresenting the trade stability score, S, for business nstability-P_nRepresenting a interpersonal relationship stability score for business n; sstability-C_n，Sstability-V_n，Sstability-P_nThe specific calculation method comprises the following steps:
Figure FDA0002905009940000111
Figure FDA0002905009940000112
Figure FDA0002905009940000113
wherein R isscm，Rscq，RscyRespectively representing the proportion of the stability of monthly transaction amount, the stability of quarterly transaction amount and the stability of annual transaction amount in the stability of transaction amount; rscm，Rscq，RscySetting specific values, adjusting and modifying according to actual use conditions in the platform, and ensuring R in the adjusting processscm+Rscq+Rscy＝1；
Rsvm，Rsvq，RsvyRespectively representing the proportion of the stability of the monthly transaction amount, the stability of the quarterly transaction amount and the stability of the annual transaction amount in the stability of the transaction amount; rsvm，Rsvq，RsvySetting specific values, adjusting and modifying according to actual use conditions in the platform, and ensuring R in the adjusting processsvm+Rsvq+Rsvy＝1；
Rspm，Rspq，RspyRespectively representing the proportion of the stability of the relationship among the moon and the arteries, the stability of the relationship among the quarterly and the annual arteries in the stability of the relationship among the arteries; rspm，Rspq，RspySetting specific values, adjusting and modifying according to actual use conditions in the platform, and ensuring R in the adjusting processspm+Rspq+Rspy＝1；
Ccm_nRepresenting the amount of business n current month, Ccm_last_nRepresenting the amount of transactions, C, for a month over business ncq_nRepresenting the business's n current quarter transaction amount, Ccq_last_nRepresenting the volume of transactions, C, for a quarter of business ncy_nRepresenting the current year's transaction amount, C, for the business ncy_last_nRepresenting the last year of the business's transaction volume;
Cvm_nrepresenting the amount of the business' n current month, Cvm_last_nRepresenting the amount of the business n's last month, Cvq_nRepresenting the trade amount of the enterprise n times, Cvq_last_nRepresenting the quarter of enterprise nTransaction amount, Cvy_nRepresenting the current year of the business n, Cvy_last_nRepresenting the transaction amount of the enterprise in the last year;
Cpm_nrepresenting the number of relationships, C, in the month of the enterprise npm_last_nRepresenting the number of relationship of the business's n previous month, Cpq_nNumber of connections, C, representing n seasons of the enterprisepq_last_nRepresenting the number of connections, C, of a quarter of an enterprise npy_nRepresenting the number of relationships of the enterprise n in the year, Cpy_last_nRepresenting the relationship quantity of the relationship of;
the value calculation formula of the function F with respect to the argument x is:
Figure FDA0002905009940000121
i.e. during application, to
Figure FDA0002905009940000122
Is calculated as an example, if the denominator Ccm_last_nWhen the value is equal to 0, then
Figure FDA0002905009940000123
No calculation is required; if denominator Ccm_last_nWhen not equal to 0, when
Figure FDA0002905009940000124
When the temperature of the water is higher than the set temperature,
Figure FDA0002905009940000125
when in use
Figure FDA0002905009940000126
When the temperature of the water is higher than the set temperature,
Figure FDA0002905009940000127
CN202110068311.1A 2021-01-19 2021-01-19 Enterprise evaluation method based on B2B platform Pending CN112712293A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110068311.1A CN112712293A (en) 2021-01-19 2021-01-19 Enterprise evaluation method based on B2B platform

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110068311.1A CN112712293A (en) 2021-01-19 2021-01-19 Enterprise evaluation method based on B2B platform

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN112712293A true CN112712293A (en) 2021-04-27

Family

ID=75549333

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202110068311.1A Pending CN112712293A (en) 2021-01-19 2021-01-19 Enterprise evaluation method based on B2B platform

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN112712293A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115345585A (en) * 2022-08-16 2022-11-15 清华大学苏州汽车研究院（吴江） Supply chain intelligent management system for enterprise operation

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115345585A (en) * 2022-08-16 2022-11-15 清华大学苏州汽车研究院（吴江） Supply chain intelligent management system for enterprise operation

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Whaley Derivatives: markets, valuation, and risk management
Seasholes et al. Predictable behavior, profits, and attention
US7676409B1 (en) Method and system for emulating a private label over an open network
US20160078542A1 (en) Forum for Purchasing Crowd Funded Goods and Services Using Dividend Credits
US20020019804A1 (en) Method for providing financial and risk management
US8429068B1 (en) Data aggregation for transaction banking partnerships
US7853501B1 (en) Data processing systems and method for creating efficient floater classes
US20060155638A1 (en) System & method for the creation of a global secure computerized electronic market-making exchange for currency yields arbitrage
EA006783B1 (en) Automated method and exchange for facilitating settlement of transactions
US8001022B2 (en) Construct separation for resource amount determination
AU2009200961A1 (en) Method and system for conducting a commercial transaction between a buyer and a seller
US20120005036A1 (en) Loan-it-forward trade system and method
Yan et al. Supplier's capacity investment strategy with factoring finance
CN112712293A (en) Enterprise evaluation method based on B2B platform
Jurkatis et al. Relationship discounts in corporate bond trading
KR102028482B1 (en) Pre-settlement financial system and method for online commerce platform
JP5204143B2 (en) Transaction server, transaction program, and transaction support method
Zelinová et al. Proposal for the Measurement of Reinsurance Contracts under IFRS 17
Hanselman Best practices & strategic value of funds transfer pricing
Miller Mas consultant's role asset-based financing
US20040230462A1 (en) Method for determining fair market value of product lease equipment in a multi-price structure environment
US20230342856A1 (en) Self-quoting system for life contingent and guaranteed future payments
Franklin et al. Activity-based costing and managed asset programs in the banking industry
Advisors LLC
Yassine et al. THE ROLE OF ISLAMIC BANKING INNOVATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPLEX FINANCIAL CONTRACTS IN ALGERIA. Economics and Finance, Volume 12, Issue 2, 16-26

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20210427

RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication