CN112668078B - Method for identifying damage of rusted reinforced concrete beam after fire disaster - Google Patents
Method for identifying damage of rusted reinforced concrete beam after fire disaster Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112668078B CN112668078B CN202011547638.9A CN202011547638A CN112668078B CN 112668078 B CN112668078 B CN 112668078B CN 202011547638 A CN202011547638 A CN 202011547638A CN 112668078 B CN112668078 B CN 112668078B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- damage
- algorithm
- reinforced concrete
- fire
- value
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 40
- 239000011150 reinforced concrete Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 27
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 47
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 34
- 238000012706 support-vector machine Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 claims description 20
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 239000004567 concrete Substances 0.000 claims description 14
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 238000012502 risk assessment Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000002787 reinforcement Effects 0.000 description 10
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000005474 detonation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013401 experimental design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013528 artificial neural network Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011241 protective layer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
- Y02T90/00—Enabling technologies or technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
Landscapes
- Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
一种锈蚀钢筋混凝土梁火灾后损伤识别方法,涉及安全风险评估技术领域,该识别方法是依据粒子群优化支持向量机法和残差修正的组合算法进行损伤指标的识别,包括:步骤1、使用ABAQUS有限元分析软件,构建火灾后锈蚀钢筋混凝土梁损伤模型;步骤2、根据频率与振型计算构造组合参数A,并将构造组合参数A作为组合算法的输入参数;步骤3、选定间接损伤指标和直接损伤指标作为组合算法的输出参数;步骤4、选取径向基核函数作为核函数,将低维空间的原始数据映射到高维空间中;步骤5、选用均方误差和拟合优度衡量预测精度;步骤6、依据组合算法计算。本发明对损伤预测的算法优势明显,计算更加精准,耗时更短,结果可靠性更高。
A damage identification method for corroded reinforced concrete beams after fire, which relates to the technical field of safety risk assessment. The identification method is to identify damage indicators according to a combined algorithm of particle swarm optimization support vector machine method and residual error correction, including: step 1, using The ABAQUS finite element analysis software builds the damage model of the corroded reinforced concrete beam after the fire; step 2, calculates the structural combination parameter A according to the frequency and mode shape, and uses the structural combination parameter A as the input parameter of the combination algorithm; step 3, selects the indirect damage The index and the direct damage index are used as the output parameters of the combined algorithm; step 4, the radial basis kernel function is selected as the kernel function, and the original data of the low-dimensional space is mapped to the high-dimensional space; step 5, the mean square error and the best fit are selected. degree to measure the prediction accuracy; step 6, calculate according to the combination algorithm. The algorithm of the invention has obvious advantages for damage prediction, the calculation is more accurate, the time consumption is shorter, and the result reliability is higher.
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明涉及安全风险评估技术领域,具体涉及一种锈蚀钢筋混凝土梁火灾后损伤识别方法。The invention relates to the technical field of safety risk assessment, in particular to a damage identification method for corroded reinforced concrete beams after fire.
背景技术Background technique
火灾是导致结构损坏、倒塌以及造成人员伤亡的原因之一,更是造成直接和间接经济损失的主要原因。结构损伤识别和健康监测技术可以探测出结构损伤的存在、位置,并预测结构剩余寿命,同时也为火灾后结构的损伤评估及加固修复提供理论基础。因此,建立结构的损伤识别算法进而快速准确地识别出损伤的存在、位置及程度具有重大的工程意义。受火灾过程复杂、试验仪器昂贵、高温对设备的损坏效应等诸多条件的限制,目前对火灾后结构的振动特性试验进行的较少。Fire is one of the causes of structural damage, collapse and casualties, as well as the main cause of direct and indirect economic losses. Structural damage identification and health monitoring technology can detect the existence and location of structural damage, and predict the remaining life of the structure. Therefore, it is of great engineering significance to establish a damage identification algorithm for structures to quickly and accurately identify the existence, location and extent of damage. Restricted by the complicated fire process, the expensive test equipment, and the damage effect of high temperature on the equipment, few tests have been carried out on the vibration characteristics of structures after a fire.
传统的损伤检测方法往往过于依赖技术人员的经验,或者在检测过程中对结构造成不同程度的损伤。基于振动测试的损伤识别方法,大多以单一的频率作为输入指标,忽略了对损伤更为敏感的振型指标。基于支持向量机(Support Vector Machine,SVM)的损伤识别方法在惩罚参数c和核函数参数g的选取上存在一定困难,收敛效果不明显,容易出现维数灾难。基于粒子群优化支持向量机(PSO-SVM)的损伤识别算法,粒子群优化算法在参数寻优的过程中,当例子发现一个当前最优位置时,其他例子迅速靠拢,很容易陷入局部最优的情况,无法寻找到全局最优解。Traditional damage detection methods often rely too much on the experience of technicians, or cause different degrees of damage to the structure during the detection process. Most of the damage identification methods based on vibration test take a single frequency as the input index, ignoring the mode shape index which is more sensitive to damage. The damage identification method based on Support Vector Machine (SVM) has certain difficulties in the selection of the penalty parameter c and the kernel function parameter g, the convergence effect is not obvious, and the dimensional disaster is prone to occur. The damage identification algorithm based on particle swarm optimization support vector machine (PSO-SVM), in the process of parameter optimization of particle swarm optimization algorithm, when an example finds a current optimal position, other examples quickly move closer, and it is easy to fall into local optimum , the global optimal solution cannot be found.
目前,尤其是针对锈蚀钢筋混凝土梁的火灾损伤识别研究较少,且大多集中在常温下的损伤识别,其中,大部分基于SVM进行振动测量的损伤识别方法都没有很好的解决惩罚参数c和核函数参数g的选取问题,导致依靠经验选取参数时存在的误差大和寻优费时等弊端,而传统算法(SVM、BP神经网络等)在损伤识别应用的过程中,模型误差、测量误差及环境因素导致的数据误差会使其在预测精度和稳定性方面存在不足,容错性和鲁棒性并不理想。At present, there are few studies on fire damage identification of corroded reinforced concrete beams, and most of them focus on damage identification at room temperature. Most of the damage identification methods based on SVM for vibration measurement do not have a good solution to the penalty parameters c and The selection of the kernel function parameter g leads to the disadvantages of large errors and time-consuming optimization when selecting parameters based on experience. However, in the process of damage identification and application of traditional algorithms (SVM, BP neural network, etc.), the model error, measurement error and environment The data errors caused by factors will make it insufficient in prediction accuracy and stability, and the fault tolerance and robustness are not ideal.
发明内容SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
为解决现有技术的问题,本发明提供了一种锈蚀钢筋混凝土梁火灾后损伤识别方法,该方法在PSO-SVM算法的基础上叠加残差修正的组合算法,可以有效解决上述问题,且算法优势明显,计算更加精准,耗时更短,结果可靠性更高。In order to solve the problems of the prior art, the present invention provides a damage identification method for corroded reinforced concrete beams after fire. The method superimposes a combined algorithm of residual error correction on the basis of the PSO-SVM algorithm, which can effectively solve the above problems, and the algorithm The advantages are obvious, the calculation is more accurate, the time-consuming is shorter, and the result is more reliable.
为解决上述问题,本发明技术方案为:In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the technical scheme of the present invention is:
一种锈蚀钢筋混凝土梁火灾后损伤识别方法,该识别方法是依据粒子群优化支持向量机法和残差修正的组合算法进行损伤指标的识别,包括:步骤1、使用ABAQUS有限元分析软件,构建火灾后锈蚀钢筋混凝土梁损伤模型,选择Frequency分析步,使用Lanczos特征值求解器进行模态分析,进而获得火灾损伤后的模态参数;同时选择静力通用分析步,获得锈蚀钢筋混凝土梁火灾后的残余承载力,并进行残余刚度计算;步骤2、根据步骤1计算所得的频率与振型作为组合参数,计算构造组合参数A,并将构造组合参数A作为组合算法的输入参数;步骤3、选定间接损伤指标和直接损伤指标作为组合算法的输出参数;步骤4、在组合算法的SVM中,选取径向基核函数作为核函数,将低维空间的原始数据映射到高维空间中;步骤5、在组合算法中,选用均方误差和拟合优度为精度评价指标,用以衡量损伤指标的预测精度;步骤6、依据粒子群优化支持向量机法和残差修正的组合算法,对锈蚀钢筋混凝土火灾后的损伤指标进行计算。A damage identification method for corroded reinforced concrete beams after fire, the identification method is to identify damage indicators according to a combined algorithm of particle swarm optimization support vector machine method and residual error correction, including:
优选的,所述的步骤1中,是在建模基础上,基于温度场数值模拟结果,选取关于高温后混凝土和锈蚀钢筋的质量密度、弹性模量、泊松比的文献数值为参数,构建火灾后锈蚀钢筋混凝土梁损伤模型。Preferably, in the
优选的,所述的步骤1中,在钢筋单元和混凝土单元之间采用SPRING2弹簧单元粘结,钢筋单元节点与混凝土单元节点在水平方向上的弹簧单元刚度由能量等值法确定。Preferably, in the
优选的,所述的步骤2中,构造组合参数A的计算公式为:Preferably, in the
A={FR1,FR2,···,FRm;MO1,MO2,···,MOn}A={FR 1 ,FR 2 ,...,FR m ; MO 1 ,MO 2 ,...,MO n }
式中:where:
m:频率的阶数m: the order of the frequency
n:振型的阶数n: the order of the mode shape
FRi:结构的i阶频率FRi: the i-order frequency of the structure
为i阶模态下q个自由度的归一化振型向量,计算式为: is the normalized mode shape vector of q degrees of freedom in the i-order mode, and the calculation formula is:
i阶模态下第j个自由度的振型分量 The mode shape component of the jth degree of freedom in the i-order mode
构造组合参数A时,需遵循以下原则:When constructing the combination parameter A, the following principles should be followed:
m≤4,n≤4。m≤4, n≤4.
优选的,所述的步骤3中,间接损伤指标和直接损伤指标的计算公式分别为:Preferably, in the step 3, the calculation formulas of the indirect damage index and the direct damage index are respectively:
B={T,ηs}B={T,η s }
C={α,β}C={α,β}
式中,B为间接损伤指标,C为直接损伤指标,T为受火时间,ηs为锈蚀率,α为承载力折减系数,β为刚度折减系数。In the formula, B is the indirect damage index, C is the direct damage index, T is the fire exposure time, η s is the corrosion rate, α is the bearing capacity reduction coefficient, and β is the stiffness reduction coefficient.
优选的,所述的步骤5中,均方误差和拟合优度的计算公式分别为:Preferably, in the step 5, the calculation formulas of the mean square error and the goodness of fit are respectively:
式中,MSE为均方误差,R2为拟合优度,yi是实际值,为预测值,n为测试样本个数。where MSE is the mean square error, R 2 is the goodness of fit, y i is the actual value, is the predicted value, and n is the number of test samples.
优选的,所述的步骤6中,包括如下具体算法步骤:Preferably, the
(a)建立锈蚀梁结构模型,以前三阶频率振型为输入参数,直接损伤指标和间接损伤指标为输出参数,构造训练样本;(a) Establish a corroded beam structure model, the former third-order frequency mode shape is the input parameter, the direct damage index and the indirect damage index are the output parameters, and the training sample is constructed;
(b)初始化粒子群算法的参数:种群规模,迭代次数,惯性权重,学习因子和各粒子的位置和速度等,均随机进行取值;(b) Initialize the parameters of the particle swarm algorithm: population size, number of iterations, inertia weight, learning factor and the position and speed of each particle, all of which are randomly selected;
(c)计算各粒子的适应度值,适应度函数取均方误差;(c) Calculate the fitness value of each particle, and the fitness function takes the mean square error;
(d)根据初始粒子的适应度值更新粒子的个体极值Pbest和群体极值Gbest;(d) Update the individual extreme value Pbest and the group extreme value Gbest of the particle according to the fitness value of the initial particle;
(e)根据公式和更新粒子的速度和位置,式中,ω为惯性权重;d为搜索空间的维数,d=1,2,..,D;i=1,2,…,n;k为当前送代次数;Vid为粒子的速度;c1和c2为非负的常数,称为加速因子;r1和r2为分布于[0,1]之间的随机数;(e) According to the formula and Update the speed and position of the particle, where ω is the inertia weight; d is the dimension of the search space, d=1,2,..,D; i=1,2,...,n; k is the current number of generations ; Vid is the velocity of the particle; c1 and c2 are non-negative constants called acceleration factors; r1 and r2 are random numbers distributed between [0,1];
(f)根据新种群中粒子适应度值更新个体极值和群体极值;(f) Update the individual extreme value and the group extreme value according to the particle fitness value in the new population;
(g)判断是否满足最大迭代次数或最小误差精度,若满足,则停止迭代,输出最优参数;若不满足则转至步骤(c);(g) Judging whether the maximum number of iterations or the minimum error accuracy is satisfied, if satisfied, stop the iteration and output the optimal parameters; if not, go to step (c);
(h)将获得的最优参数应用到SVM,并使用训练集对SVM进行训练;(h) applying the obtained optimal parameters to the SVM, and using the training set to train the SVM;
(i)通过训练得到训练集的预测值,将预测值与实际值做差得到对应的残差;(i) Obtain the predicted value of the training set through training, and make the difference between the predicted value and the actual value to obtain the corresponding residual;
(j)再将训练集中相同的输入和残差进行训练,得到残差预测值;(j) Then train the same input and residual in the training set to obtain the residual predicted value;
(k)将残差预测值与初始算法的预测值求和得到组合预测值,再以训练集中对应的输入和组合预测值构建组合预测算法,构建组合预测模型;(k) summing the residual prediction value and the prediction value of the initial algorithm to obtain a combined prediction value, and then constructing a combined prediction algorithm and a combined prediction model with the corresponding input and combined prediction value in the training set;
(l)利用实测模态参数构造测试样本,代入组合预测模型进行验证;(1) Construct test samples using the measured modal parameters, and substitute them into the combined prediction model for verification;
(m)判断获得的输出预测值是否满足MSE≤0.05和R2≥0.95,若满足,则输出结果,若不满足,则重新完善模型,再次进行迭代寻优。(m) Judging whether the obtained output predicted value satisfies MSE≤0.05 and R 2 ≥0.95, if so, output the result, if not, re-improve the model, and perform iterative optimization again.
本发明一种锈蚀钢筋混凝土梁火灾后损伤识别方法具有如下有益效果:The post-fire damage identification method for corroded reinforced concrete beams of the present invention has the following beneficial effects:
1.本发明以对结构损伤敏感的频率和振型作为火灾后损伤识别的组合输入参数,有利于提高预测精度。1. In the present invention, the frequency and mode shape sensitive to structural damage are used as the combined input parameters for post-fire damage identification, which is beneficial to improve the prediction accuracy.
2.考虑到火灾后的损伤评估与加固修复,输出参数选用两组损伤指标,间接损伤指标为受火时间和锈蚀率,直接损伤指标为承载力折减系数和刚度折减系数,其中,间接损失指标对应火灾后的损伤评估,直接指标对应火灾后的加固修复。2. Considering the damage assessment and reinforcement and repair after the fire, two sets of damage indicators are selected for the output parameters. The indirect damage indicators are the fire exposure time and the corrosion rate, and the direct damage indicators are the bearing capacity reduction coefficient and stiffness reduction coefficient. Among them, the indirect damage index is The loss index corresponds to the damage assessment after the fire, and the direct index corresponds to the reinforcement and repair after the fire.
3.PSO-SVM与残差修正的损伤识别算法解决了SVM在使用过程中手动调正参数效率过低的问题,缓解了PSO-SVM在参数寻优过程中容易找到局部最优参数的问题。3. The damage identification algorithm of PSO-SVM and residual correction solves the problem that the efficiency of manual parameter adjustment of SVM is too low during the use process, and alleviates the problem that PSO-SVM is easy to find local optimal parameters in the process of parameter optimization.
4.PSO-SVM与残差修正的损伤识别算法具有较强的鲁棒性和容错性,提高了收敛速度,大大降低了靠经验调整参数的风险,并且具有较高的预测精度和稳定性。4. The damage identification algorithm of PSO-SVM and residual correction has strong robustness and fault tolerance, improves the convergence speed, greatly reduces the risk of adjusting parameters by experience, and has high prediction accuracy and stability.
附图说明Description of drawings
图1、本发明一种实施方式中弹簧单元刚度示意图;1, a schematic diagram of the stiffness of the spring unit in an embodiment of the present invention;
图2、本发明粒子群优化支持向量机法和残差修正的组合算法的流程框图;Fig. 2, the flow chart of the combined algorithm of particle swarm optimization support vector machine method and residual error correction of the present invention;
图3、实验例中梁配筋及热电偶布置图;Figure 3. The beam reinforcement and thermocouple layout in the experimental example;
具体实施方式Detailed ways
以下所述,是以阶梯递进的方式对本发明的实施方式详细说明,该说明仅为本发明的较佳实施例而已,并非用于限定本发明的保护范围,凡在本发明的精神和原则之内所作的任何修改、等同替换和改进等,均应包含在本发明的保护范围之内。The following describes the embodiments of the present invention in a step-by-step manner. This description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, and is not intended to limit the protection scope of the present invention. Anything within the spirit and principle of the present invention Any modifications, equivalent replacements and improvements made within the scope of the present invention should be included within the protection scope of the present invention.
本发明的描述中,需要说明的是,术语“上”“下”“左”“右”“顶”“底”“内”“外”等指示的方位或位置关系为基于附图所示的方位或位置关系,仅是为了描述本发明和简化描述,而不是指示或暗示所指的装置或元件必须具有特定的方位、以及特定的方位构造和操作,因此不能理解为对本发明的限制。In the description of the present invention, it should be noted that the orientation or positional relationship indicated by the terms "upper", "lower", "left", "right", "top", "bottom", "inside", "outside", etc. are based on those shown in the accompanying drawings. The orientation or positional relationship is only for describing the present invention and simplifying the description, rather than indicating or implying that the indicated device or element must have a specific orientation, as well as a specific orientation configuration and operation, and therefore should not be construed as a limitation of the present invention.
一种锈蚀钢筋混凝土梁火灾后损伤识别方法,该识别方法是依据粒子群优化支持向量机法和残差修正的组合算法进行损伤指标的识别,包括:步骤1、使用ABAQUS有限元分析软件,构建火灾后锈蚀钢筋混凝土梁损伤模型,选择Frequency分析步,使用Lanczos特征值求解器进行模态分析,进而获得火灾损伤后的模态参数;同时选择静力通用分析步,获得锈蚀钢筋混凝土梁火灾后的残余承载力,并进行残余刚度计算;步骤2、根据步骤1计算所得的频率与振型作为组合参数,计算构造组合参数A,并将构造组合参数A作为组合算法的输入参数;步骤3、选定间接损伤指标和直接损伤指标作为组合算法的输出参数;步骤4、在组合算法的SVM中,选取径向基核函数作为核函数,将低维空间的原始数据映射到高维空间中;步骤5、在组合算法中,选用均方误差和拟合优度为精度评价指标,用以衡量损伤指标的预测精度;步骤6、依据粒子群优化支持向量机法和残差修正的组合算法,对锈蚀钢筋混凝土火灾后的损伤指标进行计算;A damage identification method for corroded reinforced concrete beams after fire, the identification method is to identify damage indicators according to a combined algorithm of particle swarm optimization support vector machine method and residual error correction, including:
所述的步骤1中,是在建模基础上,基于温度场数值模拟结果,选取关于高温后混凝土和锈蚀钢筋的质量密度、弹性模量、泊松比的文献数值为参数,构建火灾后锈蚀钢筋混凝土梁损伤模型;如图1所示,根据发明人之前试验所获得的火灾后锈蚀钢筋与混凝土的粘结滑移本构关系(图1曲线,即图中ABCDGF的连线),使得SOABCD=SDEFG,其中,残余段F点滑移值取下降段CG延长线与滑移量坐标轴交点H的滑移值,线段ODE所对应的斜率即为通过能量等值法得到的弹簧单元刚度,钢筋单元节点与混凝土单元节点在垂直方向上的弹簧单元刚度取极大值;In the
所述的步骤1中,在钢筋单元和混凝土单元之间采用SPRING2弹簧单元粘结,钢筋单元节点与混凝土单元节点在水平方向上的弹簧单元刚度由能量等值法确定;In the
所述的步骤2中,构造组合参数A的计算公式为:In the described
A={FR1,FR2,···,FRm;MO1,MO2,···,MOn}A={FR 1 ,FR 2 ,...,FR m ; MO 1 ,MO 2 ,...,MO n }
式中:where:
m:频率的阶数m: the order of the frequency
n:振型的阶数n: the order of the mode shape
FRi:结构的i阶频率FRi: the i-order frequency of the structure
为i阶模态下q个自由度的归一化振型向量,计算式为: is the normalized mode shape vector of q degrees of freedom in the i-order mode, and the calculation formula is:
i阶模态下第j个自由度的振型分量 The mode shape component of the jth degree of freedom in the i-order mode
构造组合参数A时,考虑到实际工程,结构动力响应测试数据具有随机性强、幅值较小、容易被噪声污染的特点,需遵循以下原则:When constructing the combination parameter A, considering the actual engineering, the structural dynamic response test data has the characteristics of strong randomness, small amplitude, and easy to be polluted by noise. The following principles should be followed:
m≤4,n≤4;在此数值范围内,可保证测试结果有效;m≤4, n≤4; within this value range, the test result can be guaranteed to be valid;
所述的步骤3中,间接损伤指标和直接损伤指标的计算公式分别为:In the step 3, the calculation formulas of the indirect damage index and the direct damage index are respectively:
B={T,ηs}B={T,η s }
C={α,β}C={α,β}
式中,B为间接损伤指标,C为直接损伤指标,T为受火时间,ηs为锈蚀率,α为承载力折减系数,β为刚度折减系数;考虑到火灾损伤识别的目的是为火灾后结构的损伤评估及加固修复提供理论支撑,故在算法中选择以上间接损伤指标和直接损伤指标为输出参数;In the formula, B is the indirect damage index, C is the direct damage index, T is the fire exposure time, η s is the corrosion rate, α is the bearing capacity reduction coefficient, and β is the stiffness reduction coefficient; considering that the purpose of fire damage identification is To provide theoretical support for damage assessment and reinforcement and repair of structures after fire, the above indirect damage index and direct damage index are selected as output parameters in the algorithm;
所述的步骤5中,均方误差和拟合优度的计算公式分别为:In the step 5, the calculation formulas of the mean square error and the goodness of fit are respectively:
式中,MSE为均方误差,R2为拟合优度,yi是实际值,为预测值,n为测试样本个数;其中,MSE越趋近于0和R2越趋近于1代表算法的预测精度越高。where MSE is the mean square error, R 2 is the goodness of fit, y i is the actual value, is the predicted value, n is the number of test samples; among them, the closer MSE is to 0 and the closer R 2 is to 1, the higher the prediction accuracy of the algorithm is.
所述的步骤6中,包括如下具体算法步骤,详见图2所示:In the described
(a)建立锈蚀梁结构模型,以前三阶频率振型为输入参数,直接损伤指标和间接损伤指标为输出参数,构造训练样本。(a) Establish a corroded beam structure model, the former third-order frequency mode shape is the input parameter, the direct damage index and the indirect damage index are the output parameters, and the training sample is constructed.
(b)初始化粒子群算法的参数:种群规模,迭代次数,惯性权重,学习因子和各粒子的位置和速度等,均随机进行取值;(b) Initialize the parameters of the particle swarm algorithm: population size, number of iterations, inertia weight, learning factor and the position and speed of each particle, all of which are randomly selected;
(c)计算各粒子的适应度值,适应度函数取均方误差;(c) Calculate the fitness value of each particle, and the fitness function takes the mean square error;
(d)根据初始粒子的适应度值更新粒子的个体极值Pbest和群体极值Gbest;(d) Update the individual extreme value Pbest and the group extreme value Gbest of the particle according to the fitness value of the initial particle;
(e)根据公式和更新粒子的速度和位置,式中,ω为惯性权重;d为搜索空间的维数,d=1,2,..,D;i=1,2,…,n;k为当前送代次数;Vid为粒子的速度;c1和c2为非负的常数,称为加速因子;r1和r2为分布于[0,1]之间的随机数;(e) According to the formula and Update the speed and position of the particle, where ω is the inertia weight; d is the dimension of the search space, d=1,2,..,D; i=1,2,...,n; k is the current number of generations ; Vid is the velocity of the particle; c1 and c2 are non-negative constants called acceleration factors; r1 and r2 are random numbers distributed between [0,1];
(f)根据新种群中粒子适应度值更新个体极值和群体极值;(f) Update the individual extreme value and the group extreme value according to the particle fitness value in the new population;
(g)判断是否满足最大迭代次数或最小误差精度,若满足,则停止迭代,输出最优参数;若不满足则转至步骤(c);(g) Judging whether the maximum number of iterations or the minimum error accuracy is satisfied, if satisfied, stop the iteration and output the optimal parameters; if not, go to step (c);
(h)将获得的最优参数应用到SVM,并使用训练集对SVM进行训练;(h) applying the obtained optimal parameters to the SVM, and using the training set to train the SVM;
(i)通过训练得到训练集的预测值,将预测值与实际值做差得到对应的残差;(i) Obtain the predicted value of the training set through training, and make the difference between the predicted value and the actual value to obtain the corresponding residual;
(j)再将训练集中相同的输入和残差进行训练,得到残差预测值;(j) Then train the same input and residual in the training set to obtain the residual predicted value;
(k)将残差预测值与初始算法的预测值求和得到组合预测值,再以训练集中对应的输入和组合预测值构建组合预测算法,构建组合预测模型;(k) summing the residual prediction value and the prediction value of the initial algorithm to obtain a combined prediction value, and then constructing a combined prediction algorithm and a combined prediction model with the corresponding input and combined prediction value in the training set;
(l)利用实测模态参数构造测试样本,代入组合预测模型进行验证;(1) Construct test samples using the measured modal parameters, and substitute them into the combined prediction model for verification;
(m)判断获得的输出预测值是否满足MSE≤0.05和R2≥0.95,若满足,则输出结果,若不满足,则重新完善模型,再次进行迭代寻优。(m) Judging whether the obtained output predicted value satisfies MSE≤0.05 and R 2 ≥0.95, if so, output the result, if not, re-improve the model, and perform iterative optimization again.
试验例:Test example:
设计并制作缩尺的钢筋混凝土梁试件,混凝土梁长3m,其中有效长度为2.4m,截面宽度150mm,高度300mm,混凝土保护层厚度为20mm,采用C30商品混凝土浇筑试件,梁的受拉钢筋采用直径为16mm的HRB400钢筋,制作过程中受拉钢筋一端焊上导线并引出,用于通电加速锈蚀试验。架立筋采用直径为12mm的HRB400钢筋,箍筋采用直径为8mm的HPB300钢筋,间距100mm,详细的试验设计参数见表1,其中B1梁为对比梁,梁配筋及热电偶布置图见图3。Design and manufacture scaled reinforced concrete beam specimens. The concrete beam is 3m long, of which the effective length is 2.4m, the section width is 150mm, the height is 300mm, and the thickness of the concrete protective layer is 20mm. C30 commercial concrete is used to cast the specimen. The steel bar adopts HRB400 steel bar with a diameter of 16mm. During the production process, one end of the tension steel bar is welded with a wire and drawn out for accelerated corrosion test by electrification. The erecting bars use HRB400 steel bars with a diameter of 12 mm, and the stirrups use HPB300 steel bars with a diameter of 8 mm, with a spacing of 100 mm. The detailed experimental design parameters are shown in Table 1, of which the B1 beam is the comparison beam, and the beam reinforcement and thermocouple layout are shown in the figure. 3.
表1试验设计参数Table 1 Experimental design parameters
对火灾前、后锈蚀钢筋混凝土梁进行动力测试,模态测点选取为支座间六等分点,对火灾后锈蚀钢筋混凝土梁进行静力加载,加载点为支座间三等分点。The dynamic test was carried out on the corroded reinforced concrete beams before and after the fire, and the modal measurement points were selected as the six equal points between the supports.
火灾后损伤识别结果见表2和表3。The damage identification results after the fire are shown in Tables 2 and 3.
表2火灾后间接损伤指标识别结果Table 2 Identification results of indirect damage index after fire
声明:T为等效爆火时间,Tp为等效爆火时间预测值。等效爆火时间为与实际升温曲线下方面积相等的标准升温曲线所对应的时间。ηs为锈蚀率,ηs,p为锈蚀率预测值。yi是实际值,为预测值。Statement: T is the equivalent detonation time, and T p is the predicted value of the equivalent detonation time. The equivalent detonation time is the time corresponding to the standard heating curve with the same area under the actual heating curve. η s is the corrosion rate, and η s,p is the predicted value of the corrosion rate. y i is the actual value, is the predicted value.
表3火灾后直接损伤指标识别结果Table 3 Identification results of direct damage index after fire
Claims (6)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202011547638.9A CN112668078B (en) | 2020-12-24 | 2020-12-24 | Method for identifying damage of rusted reinforced concrete beam after fire disaster |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202011547638.9A CN112668078B (en) | 2020-12-24 | 2020-12-24 | Method for identifying damage of rusted reinforced concrete beam after fire disaster |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN112668078A CN112668078A (en) | 2021-04-16 |
CN112668078B true CN112668078B (en) | 2022-05-17 |
Family
ID=75408252
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202011547638.9A Active CN112668078B (en) | 2020-12-24 | 2020-12-24 | Method for identifying damage of rusted reinforced concrete beam after fire disaster |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN112668078B (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN113283144A (en) * | 2021-06-09 | 2021-08-20 | 青岛理工大学 | Method for correcting and identifying damage of corrosion beam model |
CN113762378A (en) * | 2021-09-06 | 2021-12-07 | 南京工业大学 | Rusted concrete column earthquake failure mode discrimination method based on decision tree algorithm |
CN115114844B (en) * | 2022-05-09 | 2023-09-19 | 东南大学 | A meta-learning prediction model for reinforced concrete bond-slip curves |
CN115100176B (en) * | 2022-07-14 | 2024-05-14 | 中国海洋大学 | Reinforced concrete column damage assessment method based on neural network |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2018072351A1 (en) * | 2016-10-20 | 2018-04-26 | 北京工业大学 | Method for optimizing support vector machine on basis of particle swarm optimization algorithm |
CN110263971A (en) * | 2019-05-14 | 2019-09-20 | 西安理工大学 | Super short-period wind power combination forecasting method based on support vector machines |
CN111598448A (en) * | 2020-05-15 | 2020-08-28 | 青岛理工大学 | A post-fire damage assessment method for concrete T-beams |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN109033730A (en) * | 2018-09-30 | 2018-12-18 | 北京工业大学 | A kind of tool wear prediction technique based on improved particle swarm optimization algorithm |
CN109635382A (en) * | 2018-11-28 | 2019-04-16 | 青岛理工大学 | Reinforced concrete simply supported beam fire damage identification method based on improved support vector machine |
CN111191191B (en) * | 2019-12-26 | 2022-07-12 | 南昌大学 | A method for constructing a combined model for accurately predicting the deformation effect of concrete dams |
CN111444629B (en) * | 2020-04-15 | 2023-07-18 | 中国二冶集团有限公司 | Reinforcing steel bar corrosion parameter prediction method based on support vector machine |
-
2020
- 2020-12-24 CN CN202011547638.9A patent/CN112668078B/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2018072351A1 (en) * | 2016-10-20 | 2018-04-26 | 北京工业大学 | Method for optimizing support vector machine on basis of particle swarm optimization algorithm |
CN110263971A (en) * | 2019-05-14 | 2019-09-20 | 西安理工大学 | Super short-period wind power combination forecasting method based on support vector machines |
CN111598448A (en) * | 2020-05-15 | 2020-08-28 | 青岛理工大学 | A post-fire damage assessment method for concrete T-beams |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN112668078A (en) | 2021-04-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN112668078B (en) | Method for identifying damage of rusted reinforced concrete beam after fire disaster | |
CN103246821B (en) | A kind of many stress small sample accelerated life test plan design optimization method based on emulation | |
CN105808884B (en) | A method for predicting upper and lower bounds of stress intensity factor for plane cracks with bounded uncertainty based on fractal theory | |
CN110017929B (en) | Simultaneous identification method of load and damage of ship collision bridge based on substructure sensitivity analysis | |
Ponsi et al. | A multi-objective optimization approach for FE model updating based on a selection criterion of the preferred Pareto-optimal solution | |
CN103884593B (en) | Construction damage positionings based on a small amount of static measurement data and degree recognition methods | |
CN101673316A (en) | Method for identifying supporting cables needing to adjust cable force based on hybrid monitoring | |
CN103106305A (en) | Space grid structure model step-by-step correction method based on actual measurement mode | |
CN109545290B (en) | Amorphous alloy free volume detection method based on Voronoi fractal technology | |
CN118657026B (en) | Digital twin system and construction method for offshore drilling rig derrick safety assessment | |
CN115577587A (en) | A method and system for monitoring the health status of historical buildings | |
CN113570165A (en) | Coal reservoir permeability intelligent prediction method based on particle swarm optimization | |
CN113139228A (en) | Monitoring point arrangement optimization method for large-span foundation pit complex support system structure | |
KR101655058B1 (en) | Modal participation based flexural stiffness estimation method for building structure, and structural health assessment method using of it | |
CN117787067A (en) | Method, system and equipment for measuring bearing capacity of tower type derrick | |
Zeng et al. | Constrained stochastic imperfection modal method for nonlinear buckling analysis of single-Layer reticulated shells | |
CN110222417B (en) | A method for testing and judging the stability of arch ribs of long-span concrete-filled steel tube arch bridges | |
CN116136941A (en) | A Safety Assessment Method for Reinforced Concrete Gravity Dam | |
Ghorbani et al. | Time‐varying reliability analysis based on hybrid Kalman filtering and probability density evolution | |
CN112818577B (en) | Method for identifying post-fire damage of laminated beam based on deep learning theory | |
CN110532607A (en) | The sensor placement method of hypersonic aircraft rudder face structure distribution load identification | |
CN103064999A (en) | Model correcting method for underground powerhouse structure of pumped storage power station | |
CN118551635A (en) | A numerical simulation method for failure law and mechanical characteristics of soil-rock mixture | |
CN109101759A (en) | A kind of parameter identification method based on forward and reverse response phase method | |
CN105404740A (en) | Corrected sensitivity structural damage recognition method based on joint index and finite information |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
TR01 | Transfer of patent right |
Effective date of registration: 20240726 Address after: Unit 617, 6th Floor, Building 3, Courtyard 1, Longfa Street, Daxing District, Beijing 100000 Patentee after: Beijing Zhiconcrete Xinghua Technology Co.,Ltd. Country or region after: China Address before: No. 11, Fushun Road, North District, Qingdao, Shandong Patentee before: Qingdao University of Technology Country or region before: China |
|
TR01 | Transfer of patent right |