CN112525939A - Open-air PXRF core testing method capable of keeping data accuracy - Google Patents
Open-air PXRF core testing method capable of keeping data accuracy Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112525939A CN112525939A CN202011454049.6A CN202011454049A CN112525939A CN 112525939 A CN112525939 A CN 112525939A CN 202011454049 A CN202011454049 A CN 202011454049A CN 112525939 A CN112525939 A CN 112525939A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- core
- test
- pxrf
- data
- taking
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N23/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00
- G01N23/22—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by measuring secondary emission from the material
- G01N23/223—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by measuring secondary emission from the material by irradiating the sample with X-rays or gamma-rays and by measuring X-ray fluorescence
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a field PXRF core test method for maintaining data accuracy, which is characterized in that weighted average statistical analysis is carried out on the core sample length of a research area, and the combined sample length of a core and the depth of each section of the core are determined; keeping the surface of the rock core dry and clean; setting a PXRF instrument as a geochemical test mode, wherein each point test time is 60 seconds; calibrating the PXRF instrument by taking a certain amount of core sample laboratory data in a research area as a standard to obtain a calibration coefficient of each element and ensure the accuracy of subsequent test data; the test is performed at multiple points within each combined sample length and then the average value is taken as the final test result. The invention tests the combination sample length in the research area at multiple points and then takes the average value as the final test result, which can greatly improve the precision of the test data, the obtained result can be comparable with the laboratory test data, the acquisition of the field large-scale core geochemical data is satisfied, and the regional prospecting survey and the resource reserve evaluation are promoted.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of acquisition and analysis of geochemical data of rocks, in particular to a field PXRF core testing method for keeping data accuracy.
Background
The extraction of the combination characteristics of the geochemical elements and the geochemical abnormal delineation have important significance for the prospecting of mines, and the rapid analysis of the element components and the content thereof in rock samples to judge the mineralization potential of a research area is a very key problem. The traditional laboratory physical and chemical analysis method is generally slow in speed and expensive, and a portable X-ray fluorescence analyzer (PXRF) can quickly, accurately and cheaply analyze target body elements, so that the method is widely applied to analysis of ores, soil, metals and the like. How to ensure the accuracy and effectiveness of field PXRF data acquisition will directly affect the analysis result.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to make up for the defects of the prior art, and provides a field PXRF core testing method for maintaining data accuracy.
The invention is realized by the following technical scheme:
a field PXRF core testing method for maintaining data accuracy specifically comprises the following steps:
(1) carrying out weighted average statistical analysis on the lengths of the core samples in the research area, and determining the combined sample length of the core and the depth of each section of the core;
(2) setting a PXRF instrument as a geochemical test mode, wherein the test time of each point is 60 seconds;
(3) since the data of the PXRF direct test is semi-quantitative data, before large-scale test, a PXRF instrument needs to be calibrated by taking a certain amount of core sample laboratory data (the number of standard samples is determined according to actual conditions) in a research area as a standard to obtain a calibration coefficient of each element;
(4) and testing at multiple points in the length of the core combined sample, and then taking the average value of the test points as the final test result. The surface of the core is kept dry and clean during the test.
The PXRF instrument calibration method specifically comprises the following steps: collecting a certain number of core samples (determined according to actual conditions) in a deposit of a research area as standard samples, wherein the standard samples need to belong to different strata and cover different lithologies in a core of a drilled hole, carrying out laboratory whole-rock main trace element test on the standard samples, then carrying out correlation scattering point projection on element data of a PXRF test standard sample and laboratory data, taking the laboratory data of each element as a longitudinal axis (y) and the PXRF data as a transverse axis (x), obtaining a variable equation of y relative to x, and taking the variable equation as a calibration equation to calibrate the test element value of each point of PXRF.
The depth of a test object of the multipoint test is M meters, the combined sample length is numbered according to every N meters (the combined sample length is different in different mining areas and needs to be determined according to the actual condition of a research area), M/N sections are counted, multiple points (determined according to the actual condition of the research area) are taken from each section of the core to perform PXRF test, the average value of the tested multiple points of each section is used as the content of each element of the core, and each point is tested for 60 seconds.
The invention has the advantages that: the invention tests at multiple points in a certain core length range-combined sample length (determined according to actual conditions) and then takes the average value as the final test result, thus greatly improving the precision of the test data, obtaining the result which can be comparable with the laboratory test data and meeting the requirement of the acquisition of the field large-scale core geochemical data.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a scattergram of Cu, S, Fe, W calibration correlations.
FIG. 2 is a graphical representation of correlation of PXRF data for Cu, S, Fe, W elements with laboratory data.
FIG. 3 is a graph of PXRF data of Cu, S, Fe, W elements and laboratory data trend.
Detailed Description
A field PXRF core testing method for maintaining data accuracy specifically comprises the following steps:
(1) carrying out weighted average statistical analysis on the length of the core sample of the mineral deposit in the research area, and determining the combined sample length of the core and the depth of each section of the core;
(2) setting a PXRF instrument as a geochemical test mode, wherein the test time of each point is 60 seconds;
(3) since the data of the PXRF direct test is semi-quantitative data, the PXRF instrument needs to be calibrated by taking a certain amount of core sample laboratory data in a deposit of a research area as a standard before a large-scale test, so that a calibration coefficient of each element is obtained;
(4) and testing at multiple points in the length of the core combined sample, and then taking the average value of the test points as the final test result. The surface of the core is kept dry and clean during the test.
The PXRF instrument calibration method specifically comprises the following steps: the significance of the averaging method for PXRF multi-point testing in the combined sample length in order to guarantee the data accuracy is shown by taking a core number ZK16+02 of a copper-sulfur-tungsten polymetallic ore bed of the buckwheat mountain in Anhui city as a test object. Nine rock core samples are collected in the buckwheat mountain ore deposit to serve as standard samples, the standard samples need to belong to different strata and cover different lithologies in the rock core of the drill hole, and the test standard samples mainly comprise quartz sandstone, skarn type altered ore body, marble and granite spangle. The method comprises the steps of carrying out laboratory full-rock main trace element testing on a standard sample, carrying out correlation scatter plot on element data of a PXRF testing standard sample and laboratory data, taking the laboratory data of each element as a longitudinal axis (y) and the PXRF data as a transverse axis (x), obtaining a variable equation of y relative to x, and taking the variable equation as a calibration equation to calibrate the testing element value of each point of the PXRF.
The test object of the multipoint test is a buckwheat mountain deposit ZK16+02 rock core, the test depth is 37 m-103 m, the test object is numbered according to the combined sample length of every 1.5m, 40 sections are counted, five points are taken from each section of the rock core for PXRF test, the average value of the five-point tested value of each section is used as the content of each element of the rock core, and each point is tested for 60 seconds.
Example (b): as the direct test value of the PXRF instrument is a semi-quantitative result, data calibration is needed, and the test area is a buckwheat hill copper sulfide deposit in Anhui Xuancheng. Nine rock core samples are collected in the buckwheat mountain ore deposit to serve as standard samples, the nine sample standard samples belong to different strata and cover different lithologies in the ore deposit to ensure the calibration precision, and the standard samples mainly comprise quartz sandstone, skarn type altered ore body, marble and granite spangle. The method comprises the steps of carrying out laboratory full-rock main trace element testing on a standard sample, carrying out correlation scatter plot on element data of a PXRF testing standard sample and laboratory data, taking the laboratory data of each element as a longitudinal axis (y) and the PXRF data as a transverse axis (x), obtaining a variable equation of y relative to x, and taking the variable equation as a calibration equation to calibrate the testing element value of the PXRF. The buckwheat mountain ore deposit belongs to a skarn type hydrothermal solution filling ore deposit, main minerals are chalcopyrite, pyrite and scheelite, and mineral forming elements are Cu, S, Fe and W, so the four elements are mainly calibrated. The calibration equations are respectively: cu: y is 1.4611 x-0.0089; s: 2.0323 x-0.6253; fe: y 0.9744x + 1.8436; w: y 0.4587x +0.0029.
A scatter plot of the Cu, S, Fe, W calibration correlation is shown in FIG. 1.
Results of the experiment
The core tested at this time is a buckwheat mountain copper sulfur deposit core ZK16+02, the test depth is 37 m-103 m, the combined sample length is 1.5m, each 1.5m is numbered as one section, and the total number is 40 sections, as shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1 ZK16+02 test core Numbers
And taking five points in each section of the combined sample long core for PXRF test, and taking the average value of each section of the five-point test as the element content of the section of the core. The core PXRF test values are plotted against the laboratory test data results, as shown in fig. 2 and 3.
As can be seen from fig. 2, the correlation between the five-point PXRF test average value of the four mineral forming elements of Cu, S, Fe and W in each combined sample length of the buckwheat hill copper sulfide deposit ZK16+02 core and laboratory data is good, the two results show obvious positive correlation, the correlation coefficient is above 0.9, and fig. 3 shows that the two test results have consistent variation trends and can reflect the peak value variation of the elements.
Conclusion
The PXRF field core multipoint test averaging technical method can greatly improve the accuracy of test data, meet the requirement of collecting field large-scale core geochemical data and promote regional prospecting exploration.
Claims (3)
1. A field PXRF core test method for maintaining data accuracy is characterized by comprising the following steps: the method specifically comprises the following steps:
(1) carrying out weighted average statistical analysis on the lengths of the core samples in the research area, and determining the combined sample length of the core and the depth of each section of the core;
(2) setting a PXRF instrument as a geochemical test mode, wherein the test time of each point is 60 seconds;
(3) calibrating a PXRF instrument by taking a certain amount of core sample laboratory data in a research area as a standard to obtain a calibration coefficient of each element;
(4) and testing at multiple points in the length of the core combined sample, and then taking the average value of the test points as the final test result.
2. The field PXRF core testing method for maintaining data accuracy as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: the PXRF instrument calibration method specifically comprises the following steps: collecting a certain number of rock core samples in a research area as standard samples, wherein the standard samples need to belong to different strata and cover different lithologies in the rock core of the borehole, carrying out laboratory whole-rock main trace element test on the standard samples, then carrying out correlation scattering point projection on element data of PXRF test standard samples and laboratory data, taking the laboratory data of each element as a longitudinal axis (y) and the PXRF data as a transverse axis (x), obtaining a variable equation of y relative to x, and calibrating the test element value of each point of PXRF by taking the variable equation as a calibration equation.
3. The field PXRF core testing method for maintaining data accuracy as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: selecting a core with the depth of a research area of M meters as a test object, taking every N meters as a core combined sample length, numbering the core depth in the M meters according to the unit of every N meters, counting M/N sections, taking multiple points in each section of core to perform PXRF test, and taking the average value of the multiple points in each section of core after the multiple points are tested as the content of each element of the section of core.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202011454049.6A CN112525939A (en) | 2020-12-10 | 2020-12-10 | Open-air PXRF core testing method capable of keeping data accuracy |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202011454049.6A CN112525939A (en) | 2020-12-10 | 2020-12-10 | Open-air PXRF core testing method capable of keeping data accuracy |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN112525939A true CN112525939A (en) | 2021-03-19 |
Family
ID=74998858
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202011454049.6A Pending CN112525939A (en) | 2020-12-10 | 2020-12-10 | Open-air PXRF core testing method capable of keeping data accuracy |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN112525939A (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN116678908A (en) * | 2023-08-03 | 2023-09-01 | 自然资源实物地质资料中心 | Quality control method and device for core element test by pXRF |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN201335816Y (en) * | 2009-01-14 | 2009-10-28 | 布莱格科技(北京)有限公司 | X-ray energy spectrum core scanner |
CN106885815A (en) * | 2017-03-22 | 2017-06-23 | 中国石油大学(华东) | A kind of method that depositional environment is differentiated based on element XRF methods in sandstone |
CN108535303A (en) * | 2018-05-28 | 2018-09-14 | 中石化石油工程技术服务有限公司 | A kind of XRF instruments of detection core sample element |
CN109490266A (en) * | 2018-11-15 | 2019-03-19 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司江汉油田分公司勘探开发研究院 | A kind of rock sample sampling without damage method |
CN110161067A (en) * | 2019-06-11 | 2019-08-23 | 中国地质大学(北京) | A kind of concentrate tenor measuring method based on Portable X RF |
US20190351804A1 (en) * | 2016-09-09 | 2019-11-21 | Bly Ip Inc. | Systems and methods for analyzing core using x-ray fluorescence |
CN111458363A (en) * | 2020-04-21 | 2020-07-28 | 中国地质大学(武汉) | Method for rapidly delineating titanium deposit based on handheld X-ray fluorescence analyzer |
-
2020
- 2020-12-10 CN CN202011454049.6A patent/CN112525939A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN201335816Y (en) * | 2009-01-14 | 2009-10-28 | 布莱格科技(北京)有限公司 | X-ray energy spectrum core scanner |
US20190351804A1 (en) * | 2016-09-09 | 2019-11-21 | Bly Ip Inc. | Systems and methods for analyzing core using x-ray fluorescence |
CN106885815A (en) * | 2017-03-22 | 2017-06-23 | 中国石油大学(华东) | A kind of method that depositional environment is differentiated based on element XRF methods in sandstone |
CN108535303A (en) * | 2018-05-28 | 2018-09-14 | 中石化石油工程技术服务有限公司 | A kind of XRF instruments of detection core sample element |
CN109490266A (en) * | 2018-11-15 | 2019-03-19 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司江汉油田分公司勘探开发研究院 | A kind of rock sample sampling without damage method |
CN110161067A (en) * | 2019-06-11 | 2019-08-23 | 中国地质大学(北京) | A kind of concentrate tenor measuring method based on Portable X RF |
CN111458363A (en) * | 2020-04-21 | 2020-07-28 | 中国地质大学(武汉) | Method for rapidly delineating titanium deposit based on handheld X-ray fluorescence analyzer |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
张学华 等: "手持式 X 射线荧光光谱仪在富钴结壳资源勘查中的应用", 《岩矿测试》 * |
张广玉 等: "手持式 X 射线荧光光谱多点测试技术在地质岩心和岩石标本预研究中的应用", 《岩矿测试》 * |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN116678908A (en) * | 2023-08-03 | 2023-09-01 | 自然资源实物地质资料中心 | Quality control method and device for core element test by pXRF |
CN116678908B (en) * | 2023-08-03 | 2023-10-27 | 自然资源实物地质资料中心 | Quality control method and device for core element test by pXRF |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN104612675B (en) | A kind of carbonate formation Lithology while drilling method for quickly identifying | |
Clift et al. | Evolving east Asian river systems reconstructed by trace element and Pb and Nd isotope variations in modern and ancient Red River‐Song Hong sediments | |
EP3809133B1 (en) | A method for characterizing underground metallic mineral deposits based on rock coatings and fracture fills | |
Alizai et al. | Pb isotopic variability in the modern-Pleistocene Indus River system measured by ion microprobe in detrital K-feldspar grains | |
CN101354362A (en) | Method for analyzing x-ray fluorescence shale content in petroleum well drilling | |
CN111058837A (en) | Shale oil lithology evaluation method based on multiple stepwise regression | |
Parbhakar-Fox et al. | Cost-effective means for identifying acid rock drainage risks—integration of the geochemistry-mineralogy-texture approach and geometallurgical techniques | |
CN115078520A (en) | Mineral geochemistry-based porphyry system mineralization evaluation method | |
CN112525939A (en) | Open-air PXRF core testing method capable of keeping data accuracy | |
CN112946780B (en) | Method and device for determining running and sliding fracture activity period | |
Martin et al. | Developing a quantitative mudrock calibration for a handheld energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometer | |
CN115586155B (en) | Rapid delineating vein-like gold ore deposit ore body and method for obtaining indication mark index thereof | |
CN109490974B (en) | Uranium ore geological map filling working method for improving uranium multi-metal comprehensive exploration efficiency | |
CN107339076B (en) | Grooving sampling method for underground tunnel record | |
CN114993759A (en) | Rock powder sampling method for radioactive mineral exploration | |
CN110454155B (en) | Method for determining age of quaternary stratum by using susceptibility logging method | |
CN110685676B (en) | Method for quantitatively identifying high-quality shale sections | |
Wust et al. | From X-Ray fluorescence (XRF) to mechanical profiling for better well completion. Valuable analytics for the exploration toolbox! | |
Toconasa et al. | A comparison between conventional blast hole sampling and diamond core drilling for copper grade at the Antapaccay mine | |
CN110632665B (en) | Sand body configuration quantitative analysis method | |
CN113534284A (en) | Method for estimating development characteristics of sand oxidation zone by using water quality parameters | |
CN110728074A (en) | Method for continuously explaining lithology of mixed-volume fine-grained rock and modeling method of model thereof | |
Fallon et al. | Towards grade estimation via automated interpretation of geophysical boreholelogs | |
Besplug et al. | Determination of reservoir properties from XRF elemental data in the Montney Formation | |
Niemeläinen et al. | Comparison of traditional and novel on-line blast hole sampling in ore grade control |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20210319 |