CN112431588A - Side drilling well selection optimization method - Google Patents

Side drilling well selection optimization method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN112431588A
CN112431588A CN202011103266.0A CN202011103266A CN112431588A CN 112431588 A CN112431588 A CN 112431588A CN 202011103266 A CN202011103266 A CN 202011103266A CN 112431588 A CN112431588 A CN 112431588A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
well
coefficient
oil
score
residual
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN202011103266.0A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN112431588B (en
Inventor
王晶
张原立
万晓龙
李文青
李宇征
张皎生
王萍
曹军
欧泉旺
谭习群
宋磊
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Petrochina Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Petrochina Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Petrochina Co Ltd filed Critical Petrochina Co Ltd
Priority to CN202011103266.0A priority Critical patent/CN112431588B/en
Publication of CN112431588A publication Critical patent/CN112431588A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN112431588B publication Critical patent/CN112431588B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B49/00—Testing the nature of borehole walls; Formation testing; Methods or apparatus for obtaining samples of soil or well fluids, specially adapted to earth drilling or wells
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/30—Specific pattern of wells, e.g. optimizing the spacing of wells
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A10/00—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE at coastal zones; at river basins
    • Y02A10/40—Controlling or monitoring, e.g. of flood or hurricane; Forecasting, e.g. risk assessment or mapping

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Pipeline Systems (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)

Abstract

The invention provides a sidetracking well selection optimization method which comprises the steps of collecting parameters influencing sidetracking effects, assigning values to the parameters according to mine field practices and oil reservoir practices, determining weights of the parameters by using a grey correlation method, calculating decision coefficients of target wells and grading the decision coefficients of the target wells. The main factors influencing the sidetracking effect are obtained by applying a cluster analysis method and combining oil field development horizontal grading and three-stacking system oil reservoir development practices: at present, the saturation of residual oil, the single well control reserve of an adjacent well, the accumulated oil production of the adjacent well, the development degree of a crack, the perforation thickness of the adjacent well, the oil layer thickness of the adjacent well, the distance from a waterline, the comprehensive water content of the adjacent well and the original oil saturation. The method innovatively provides quantitative evaluation for selecting the sidetracking well and optimizes selection of the sidetracking well. The method is suitable for selection of side drilling wells of three-stacked system water injection exploitation oil reservoirs with length of 4+5, length of 6 and length of 8.

Description

Side drilling well selection optimization method
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of oilfield development, and particularly relates to a sidetracking well selection optimization method which is used for rapidly screening sidetracking wells by using dynamic and static data.
Background
In the low-permeability oil-gas field, because the abundance of the stratum is low and the effective connectivity of pores is poor, a plurality of enriched oil-gas areas cannot be effectively communicated with oil-gas wells, so that a plurality of resources are retained in the stratum, and a plurality of production wells are forcedly closed due to water rising or are subjected to underground casing breakage, casing deformation and falling, so that the production wells cannot normally produce, and a plurality of resources cannot be excavated.
The sidetracking can solve the problems, can achieve the aim of excavating residual oil, can effectively utilize an original shaft and a well field, avoids an accident section and a water outlet layer, and is used for drilling an oil-gas enrichment area in a geological guiding manner, can flexibly adjust the well type into a straight well, a directional well, a horizontal well and the like, can relate to the oil-gas accumulation area in a large area, and has the characteristics of short drilling period, low cost, short investment recovery period, quick oil well recovery, large sweep range, small formation damage and the like.
The traditional well selection method is that an oil field engineer selects a well according to experience and related dynamic and static data, and has the main defects of large workload, strong subjectivity and difficult popularization and application.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a side drilling well selection optimization method, which overcomes the technical problems in the prior art.
Therefore, the technical scheme provided by the invention is as follows:
a side-drilling well selection method comprises the following steps:
step 1) collecting residual oil distribution map of oil deposit of target well, and controlling recoverable reserve of adjacent well by single wellN djr Cumulative oil production of adjacent wellQ 0 Degree of crack developmentFPerforation thickness of adjacent wellH s Oil layer thickness of adjacent wellHDistance from waterlineL s Comprehensive water content of adjacent wellF w Original oil saturationS oi Obtaining residual oil saturation through residual oil distribution diagram of oil reservoirS 0 ；
Step 2) controlling recoverable reserves according to adjacent wells and single wellN djr And cumulative oil production of adjacent wellsQ 0 Obtaining the coefficient of residual recoverable reserveD；
Step 3) according to the thickness of an oil layer of an adjacent wellHAnd perforation thickness of adjacent wellH s Obtaining the residual perforation thickness coefficient of the oil layerB；
Step 4) respectively comparing the residual recoverable reserve coefficientDAnd residual perforation thickness coefficient of oil layerBGrading and assigning;
step 5) separately adjusting the residual oil saturationS 0 Degree of crack developmentFDistance from waterlineL s Comprehensive water content of adjacent wellF w And original oil saturationS oi Grading and assigning;
step 6) determining the residual recoverable reserve coefficient respectivelyDResidual perforation thickness coefficient of oil layerBResidual oil saturationS 0 Degree of crack developmentFDistance from waterlineL s Comprehensive water content of adjacent wellF w And original oil saturationS oi Weight coefficient of seven parametersP i ，iThe number is a parameter number, and the value is 1-7;
step 7) seven itemsThe products of the scores of the parameters and the respective weights are added to obtain a decision coefficientJCoefficient of decisionJThe value range is 0-1;
step 8) when decision coefficientJNot less than 0.7, which is class I; j is more than or equal to 0.4 and less than 0.7, and is type II; j is less than 0.4, and is III;
step 9) the types I and II are suitable for sidetracking; class iii is not suitable for sidetracking.
Coefficient of remaining recoverable reserve in step 2)DControlling recoverable reserves for adjacent wells for a single wellN djr And cumulative oil production of adjacent wellsQ 0 The difference value of the two is compared with the ratio of the recoverable reserves of the adjacent well single well,D=（N djr - Q 0 ）/N djr 。
thickness coefficient of residual perforation of oil layer in step 3)BIs the thickness of the oil reservoir of the adjacent wellHAnd perforation thickness of adjacent wellH s Difference of (D) and thickness of oil layer of adjacent wellHThe ratio of (a) to (b),B=（H-H s ）/ H。
coefficient of remaining recoverable reserve in step 4)DAnd residual perforation thickness coefficient of oil layerBThe grading standard is as follows:
when in useD<0.3 hour, score
Figure 100002_DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
1Is 0; 0.3-0.3 ≤D<0.5, score value
Figure 657826DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
1Is 0.5;Dwhen the value is more than or equal to 0.5, the score is
Figure 309387DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
1Is 1;
when in useB<0.4 hour, score
Figure 354703DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
2Is 0; 0.4-0.4 ≤B<0.6, score value
Figure 812229DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
2Is 0.6;Bwhen the value is more than or equal to 0.6, the score is
Figure 361022DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
Is 1.
Residual oil saturation in step 5)S 0 And degree of crack developmentFThe grading standard is as follows:
when in use
Figure 100002_DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
<At 30%, score
Figure 449064DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
3Is 0; 30 percent of<
Figure 778414DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
<50% score value
Figure 711735DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
3Is 0.5;
Figure 380614DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
>at 50%, score
Figure 701874DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
3Is 1;
degree of crack developmentFScore of (1)
Figure 190624DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
4Comprises the following steps: when the crack develops
Figure 193215DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
1, when the crack is more developed
Figure 280382DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
0.5, when cracks do not develop
Figure 444647DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
Is 0.
Distance from waterline in step 5)L s Comprehensive water content of adjacent wellF w And original oil saturationS oi The grading standard is as follows:
when 100 <L s Time, score value
Figure 686273DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
5Is 0; 100 is less than or equal toL s <150, score value
Figure 100002_DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
Is 0.5;L s when it is 100, score
Figure 289292DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
Is 1;
when in use
Figure 667184DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
≥60%，
Figure 330247DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
6Is 0, 40 percent or less
Figure 793589DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
＜60%，
Figure 137983DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
6Is 0.3 percent and less than or equal to 20 percent
Figure 698277DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
＜40%，
Figure 204345DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
6The content of the organic acid is 0.5,F w ＜20%，
Figure 420562DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
6is 1;
when in use
Figure 100002_DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
<At 30%, score
Figure 863920DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
7Is 0; 30 percent of<S oi <50% score value
Figure 216404DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
Is 0.5;S oi >at 50%, score
Figure 893373DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
Is 1.
Coefficient of remaining recoverable reserve in step 6)DResidual perforation thickness coefficient of oil layerBResidual oil saturationS 0 Degree of crack developmentFDistance from waterlineL s Comprehensive water content of adjacent wellF w And original oil saturationS oi The weight coefficients of (a) are 0.13, 0.12, 0.15, 0.14, 0.15, 0.16, 0.15, respectively.
Coefficient of decisionJCalculated as follows:
J=S1×P 1 + S2×P 2 + S3×P 3 + S4×P 4 + S5×P 5 + S6×P 6 + S7×P 7
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
Figure 393624DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
1coefficient of remaining recoverable reserveDThe score of (a) is calculated,P 1 coefficient of remaining recoverable reserveDThe weight coefficient of (a);
Figure 79820DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
2is residual perforation thickness coefficient of oil layerBThe score of (a) is calculated,P 2 residual perforation thickness system for oil layerNumber ofBThe weight coefficient of (a);
Figure 286811DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
3is degree of remaining oil saturationS 0 The score of (a) is calculated,P 3 is degree of remaining oil saturationS 0 The weight coefficient of (a);
Figure 462577DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
4degree of development of cracksFThe score of (a) is calculated,P 4 degree of development of cracksFThe weight coefficient of (a);
Figure 387808DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
5is distance from waterlineL s The score of (a) is calculated,P 5 is distance from waterlineL s The weight coefficient of (a);
Figure 612116DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
6for synthesizing water for adjacent wellF w The score of (a) is calculated,P 6 for synthesizing water for adjacent wellF w The weight coefficient of (a);
Figure 1509DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
7is original oil saturationS oi The score of (a) is calculated,P 7 is original oil saturationS oi The weight coefficient of (2).
The invention has the beneficial effects that:
the sidetracking well selection optimization method provided by the invention obtains main factors influencing the sidetracking effect by applying a cluster analysis method and combining oil field development horizontal grading and three-stacked system oil reservoir development practices: at present, the saturation of residual oil, the single well control reserve of an adjacent well, the accumulated oil production of the adjacent well, the development degree of a crack, the perforation thickness of the adjacent well, the oil layer thickness of the adjacent well, the distance from a waterline, the comprehensive water content of the adjacent well and the original oil saturation. And then according to the mine field practice and the oil reservoir practice, assigning values to the parameters, determining the weight of each parameter by using a gray correlation method, calculating the decision coefficient of the target well, grading the decision coefficient of the target well, establishing a standardized and quantified selection standard of the sidetracking well, optimizing the selection of the sidetracking well, and having strong operability and higher calculation result and field cognition so as to provide support for later-stage oil field stable production work.
The following will be described in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a graph of the production dynamics of well A in the examples.
Detailed Description
The following description of the embodiments of the present invention is provided for illustrative purposes, and other advantages and effects of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the present disclosure.
The exemplary embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, however, the present invention may be embodied in many different forms and is not limited to the embodiments described herein, which are provided for complete and complete disclosure of the present invention and to fully convey the scope of the present invention to those skilled in the art. The terminology used in the exemplary embodiments illustrated in the accompanying drawings is not intended to be limiting of the invention.
Unless otherwise defined, terms (including technical and scientific terms) used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Further, it will be understood that terms, such as those defined in commonly used dictionaries, should be interpreted as having a meaning that is consistent with their meaning in the context of the relevant art and will not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense.
Example 1:
the embodiment provides a side drilling well selection method, which comprises the following steps:
step 1) collecting residual oil distribution map of oil deposit of target well, and controlling recoverable reserve of adjacent well by single wellN djr Cumulative oil production of adjacent wellQ 0 Degree of crack developmentFPerforation thickness of adjacent wellH s Oil layer thickness of adjacent wellHDistance from waterlineL s Comprehensive water content of adjacent wellF w Original oil saturationS oi Obtaining residual oil saturation through residual oil distribution diagram of oil reservoirS 0 ；
Step 2) controlling recoverable reserves according to adjacent wells and single wellN djr And cumulative oil production of adjacent wellsQ 0 Obtaining the coefficient of residual recoverable reserveD；
Step 3) according to the thickness of an oil layer of an adjacent wellHAnd perforation thickness of adjacent wellH s Obtaining the residual perforation thickness coefficient of the oil layerB；
Step 4) respectively comparing the residual recoverable reserve coefficientDAnd residual perforation thickness coefficient of oil layerBGrading and assigning;
step 5) separately adjusting the residual oil saturationS 0 Degree of crack developmentFDistance from waterlineL s Comprehensive water content of adjacent wellF w And original oil saturationS oi Grading and assigning;
step 6) determining the residual recoverable reserve coefficient respectivelyDResidual perforation thickness coefficient of oil layerBResidual oil saturationS 0 Degree of crack developmentFDistance from waterlineL s Comprehensive water content of adjacent wellF w And original oil saturationS oi Weight coefficient of seven parametersP i ，iThe number is a parameter number, and the value is 1-7;
step 7) adding the products of the scores of the seven parameters and the respective weights to obtain a decision coefficientJCoefficient of decisionJThe value range is 0-1;
step 8) when decision coefficientJNot less than 0.7, which is class I; j is more than or equal to 0.4 and less than 0.7, and is type II; j is less than 0.4, and is III;
step 9) the types I and II are suitable for sidetracking; class iii is not suitable for sidetracking.
The method obtains parameters influencing the sidetracking effect by using a cluster analysis method, obtains the weight of each parameter by using a grey correlation method, establishes a standardized and quantified sidetracking well selection standard, optimizes sidetracking well selection, and has strong operability.
Example 2:
on the basis of the embodiment 1, the embodiment provides a preferable method for selecting a well by sidetracking, and the coefficient of the residual recoverable reserves in the step 2)DControlling recoverable reserves for adjacent wells for a single wellN djr And cumulative oil production of adjacent wellsQ 0 The difference value of the two is compared with the ratio of the recoverable reserves of the adjacent well single well,D=（N djr - Q 0 ）/N djr 。
thickness coefficient of residual perforation of oil layer in step 3)BIs the thickness of the oil reservoir of the adjacent wellHAnd perforation thickness of adjacent wellH s Difference of (D) and thickness of oil layer of adjacent wellHThe ratio of (a) to (b),B=（H-H s ）/ H。
example 3:
on the basis of the embodiment 1 or 2, the embodiment provides a preferable method for selecting the well by sidetracking, and the coefficient of the residual recoverable reserve in the step 4)DAnd residual perforation thickness coefficient of oil layerBThe grading standard is as follows:
when in useD<0.3 hour, score
Figure 285860DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
1Is 0; 0.3-0.3 ≤D<0.5, score value
Figure 432807DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
1Is 0.5;Dwhen the value is more than or equal to 0.5, the score is
Figure 24588DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
1Is 1;
when in useB<0.4 hour, score
Figure 206170DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
2Is 0; 0.4-0.4 ≤B<0.6, score value
Figure 661423DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
2Is 0.6;Bwhen the value is more than or equal to 0.6, the score is
Figure 561246DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
Is 1.
Example 4:
on the basis of the embodiment 1, the embodiment provides a preferable method for sidetracking well selection, and the residual oil saturation in the step 5) isS 0 And degree of crack developmentFThe grading standard is as follows:
when in use
Figure 189673DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
<At 30%, score
Figure 225762DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
3Is 0; 30 percent of<
Figure 851915DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
<50% score value
Figure 35772DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
3Is 0.5;
Figure 405574DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
>at 50%, score
Figure 561748DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
3Is 1;
degree of crack developmentFScore of (1)
Figure 358803DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
4Comprises the following steps: when the crack develops
Figure 29956DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
1, when the crack is more developed
Figure 937869DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
0.5, when cracks do not develop
Figure 948550DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
Is 0.
And grading the crack development degree F by utilizing the logging data, the dynamic monitoring data and the production data and comprehensively considering natural microcracks, dynamic cracks and the like.
Example 5:
on the basis of the embodiment 1, the embodiment provides a preferable method for selecting the well by sidetracking, and the distance from the waterline in the step 5) isL s Comprehensive water content of adjacent wellF w And original oil saturationS oi The grading standard is as follows:
when 100 <L s Time, score value
Figure 477358DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
5Is 0; 100 is less than or equal toL s <150, score value
Figure 573490DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
Is 0.5;L s when it is 100, score
Figure 285094DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
Is 1;
when in use
Figure 415862DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
≥60%，
Figure 617036DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
6Is 0, 40 percent or less
Figure 934885DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
＜60%，
Figure 450180DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
6Is 0.3 percent and less than or equal to 20 percent
Figure 497770DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
＜40%，
Figure 807529DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
6The content of the organic acid is 0.5,F w ＜20%，
Figure 612674DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
6is 1;
when in use
Figure 666080DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
<At 30%, score
Figure 568177DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
7Is 0; 30 percent of<S oi <50% score value
Figure 48837DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
Is 0.5;S oi >at 50%, score
Figure 606857DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
Is 1.
Wherein, the distance from the waterlineL s Reflecting the risk of sidetracking implementation. Combined with mine practice, for distance from waterlineL s Grading and assigning.
Comprehensive water content of adjacent wellF w Reflecting the risk of sidetracking implementation, is inversely related to sidetracking matching. Grading method for water content of oil field based on water injection development, and combining with mine field practice to synthesize water contentF w Grading and assigning.
Example 6:
on the basis of the embodiment 1, the embodiment provides a preferable method for selecting a well by sidetracking, and the coefficient of the residual recoverable reserve in the step 6)DResidual perforation thickness coefficient of oil layerBResidual oil saturationS 0 Degree of crack developmentFDistance from waterlineL s Comprehensive water content of adjacent wellF w And original oil saturationS oi The weight coefficients of (a) are 0.13, 0.12, 0.15, 0.14, 0.15, 0.16, 0.15, respectively.
Coefficient of decisionJCalculated as follows:
J=S1×P 1 + S2×P 2 + S3×P 3 + S4×P 4 + S5×P 5 + S6×P 6 + S7×P 7
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
Figure 762157DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
1coefficient of remaining recoverable reserveDThe score of (a) is calculated,P 1 coefficient of remaining recoverable reserveDThe weight coefficient of (a);
Figure 722023DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
2is residual perforation thickness coefficient of oil layerBThe score of (a) is calculated,P 2 is residual perforation thickness coefficient of oil layerBThe weight coefficient of (a);
Figure 373584DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
3is degree of remaining oil saturationS 0 The score of (a) is calculated,P 3 is degree of remaining oil saturationS 0 The weight coefficient of (a);
Figure 215638DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
4degree of development of cracksFThe score of (a) is calculated,P 4 degree of development of cracksFThe weight coefficient of (a);
Figure 610848DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
5is distance from waterlineL s The score of (a) is calculated,P 5 is distance from waterlineL s The weight coefficient of (a);
Figure 425220DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
6for synthesizing water for adjacent wellF w The score of (a) is calculated,P 6 for synthesizing water for adjacent wellF w The weight coefficient of (a);
Figure 309999DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
7is original oil saturationS oi The score of (a) is calculated,P 7 is original oil saturationS oi The weight coefficient of (2).
Determining the weight coefficient of the 7 parameters by using a gray correlation methodP 1 - P 7 . The sum of the products of the above 7 parameter scores and the respective weights is the final decision coefficientJ。
Coefficient of decisionJThe value is in the range of 0 to 1,Jnot less than 0.7, which is class I; 0.4-0.4 ≤JLess than 0.7, is type II;Jless than 0.4, is of type III,Jthe higher the value, the better the sidetracking effect of the target well is;Jvalues below 0.4 are not recommended for sidetracking.
Example 7:
based on example 1, this example takes a certain waterflood reservoir a well as an example, and further details the method.
Selecting a certain water injection oil reservoir A well, and calculating a decision coefficient of a target well according to the method, wherein the method comprises the following steps:
step 1) collecting the residual oil distribution map of the oil reservoir where the target well is located to obtain the current oil saturationS 0 Controlling recoverable reserves for 50% of adjacent wellsN djr The cumulative oil production of an adjacent well is 42000tQ 0 10000t, degree of crack developmentF isRelatively developed crack and perforation thickness of adjacent wellH s 4m, the thickness of an oil layer of an adjacent wellHIs 11.5m away from the waterlineL s The water content of 135m and an adjacent well is comprehensively increasedF w 50% of original oil saturationS oi 70 percent;
step 2) calculating the residual recoverable storageCoefficient of measureD: adjacent well single well control recoverable reserveN djr And cumulative oil production of adjacent wellsQ 0 Controlling recoverable reserves by dividing difference by adjacent wellN dj ；
Step 3) calculating the residual perforation thickness coefficient of the oil layerB: thickness of oil layer of adjacent wellHThickness of perforation of adjacent wellH s Is divided by the thickness of the adjacent well reservoirH；
Step 4) respectively comparing the residual recoverable reserve coefficientDAnd residual perforation thickness coefficient of oil layerBGrading and assigning points;
S1=1，S2=1；
step 5) separately adjusting the residual oil saturationS 0 Degree of crack developmentFDistance from waterlineL s Comprehensive water content of adjacent wellF w And original oil saturationS oi Grading and assigning;
S3=1；S4=0.5；S5=0.5；S6=0.3；S7=1；
step 6) determining the residual recoverable reserve coefficient respectivelyDResidual perforation thickness coefficient of oil layerBResidual oil saturationS 0 Degree of crack developmentFDistance from waterlineL s Comprehensive water content of adjacent wellF w And original oil saturationS oi The weight coefficients of the seven parameters are determined,P 1 the content of the organic acid was 0.13,P 2 the content of the organic acid was 0.12,P 3 the content of the organic acid is 0.15,P 4 is a content of at least 0.14,P 5 the content of the organic acid is 0.15,P 6 the content of the carbon dioxide is 0.16,P 7 is 0.15;
step 7) calculating a target well decision coefficientJ=0.743：
And 8) the target oil reservoir is of type I, and the predicted sidetracking effect is good.
And (3) field implementation:
a well starts sidetracking in 2019 and 4 months, daily produced liquid is 3.2t at the initial stage of production, daily produced oil is 2.77t, and comprehensive water content is 13.4%; at present, the daily liquid yield is 1.68t, the daily oil yield is 1.52t, the comprehensive water content is 9.5 percent, and the current cumulative oil yield is 782 t. The current production is stable (see figure 1), and the sidetracking effect is good. Consistent with the predicted results.
The method is suitable for selection of side drilling wells of three-stacked system water injection exploitation oil reservoirs with length of 4+5, length of 6 and length of 8.
The above examples are merely illustrative of the present invention and should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention, which is intended to be covered by the claims and any design similar or equivalent to the scope of the invention.

Claims (8)

1. A side-drilling well selection method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step 1) collecting residual oil distribution map of oil deposit of target well, and controlling recoverable reserve of adjacent well by single wellN djr Cumulative oil production of adjacent wellQ 0 Degree of crack developmentFPerforation thickness of adjacent wellH s Oil layer thickness of adjacent wellHDistance from waterlineL s Comprehensive water content of adjacent wellF w Original oil saturationS oi Obtaining residual oil saturation through residual oil distribution diagram of oil reservoirS 0 ；
Step 2) controlling recoverable reserves according to adjacent wells and single wellN djr And cumulative oil production of adjacent wellsQ 0 Obtaining the coefficient of residual recoverable reserveD；
Step 3) according to the thickness of an oil layer of an adjacent wellHAnd perforation thickness of adjacent wellH s Obtaining the residual perforation thickness coefficient of the oil layerB；
Step 4) respectively comparing the residual recoverable reserve coefficientDAnd residual perforation thickness coefficient of oil layerBGrading and assigning;
step 5) separately adjusting the residual oil saturationS 0 Degree of crack developmentFDistance from waterlineL s Comprehensive water content of adjacent wellF w And original oil saturationS oi Performing classification endowmentDividing;
step 6) determining the residual recoverable reserve coefficient respectivelyDResidual perforation thickness coefficient of oil layerBResidual oil saturationS 0 Degree of crack developmentFDistance from waterlineL s Comprehensive water content of adjacent wellF w And original oil saturationS oi Weight coefficient of seven parametersP i ，iThe number is a parameter number, and the value is 1-7;
step 7) adding the products of the scores of the seven parameters and the respective weights to obtain a decision coefficientJCoefficient of decisionJThe value range is 0-1;
step 8) when decision coefficientJNot less than 0.7, which is class I; j is more than or equal to 0.4 and less than 0.7, and is type II; j is less than 0.4, and is III;
step 9) the types I and II are suitable for sidetracking; class iii is not suitable for sidetracking.
2. The sidetracking well selection method according to claim 1, characterized in that: coefficient of remaining recoverable reserve in step 2)DControlling recoverable reserves for adjacent wells for a single wellN djr And cumulative oil production of adjacent wellsQ 0 The difference value of the two is compared with the ratio of the recoverable reserves of the adjacent well single well,D=（N djr - Q 0 ）/N djr 。
3. the sidetracking well selection method according to claim 1, characterized in that: thickness coefficient of residual perforation of oil layer in step 3)BIs the thickness of the oil reservoir of the adjacent wellHAnd perforation thickness of adjacent wellH s Difference of (D) and thickness of oil layer of adjacent wellHThe ratio of (a) to (b),B=（H-H s ）/H。
4. the sidetracking well selection method according to claim 1, characterized in that: coefficient of remaining recoverable reserve in step 4)DAnd residual perforation thickness coefficient of oil layerBThe grading standard is as follows:
when in useD<0.3 hour, score
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
1Is 0; 0.3-0.3 ≤D<0.5, score value
Figure 206793DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
1Is 0.5;Dwhen the value is more than or equal to 0.5, the score is
Figure 533869DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
1Is 1;
when in useB<0.4 hour, score
Figure 880537DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
2Is 0; 0.4-0.4 ≤B<0.6, score value
Figure 293063DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
2Is 0.6;Bwhen the value is more than or equal to 0.6, the score is
Figure 55483DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
Is 1.
5. The sidetracking well selection method according to claim 1, characterized in that: residual oil saturation in step 5)S 0 And degree of crack developmentFThe grading standard is as follows:
when in use
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
<At 30%, score
Figure 299383DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
3Is 0; 30 percent of<
Figure 754635DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
<50% score value
Figure 654458DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
3Is 0.5;
Figure 781420DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
>at 50%, score
Figure 817509DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
3Is 1;
degree of crack developmentFScore of (1)
Figure 443663DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
4Comprises the following steps: when the crack develops
Figure 893099DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
1, when the crack is more developed
Figure 997321DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
0.5, when cracks do not develop
Figure 153496DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
Is 0.
6. The sidetracking well selection method according to claim 1, characterized in that: distance from waterline in step 5)L s Comprehensive water content of adjacent wellF w And original oil saturationS oi The grading standard is as follows:
when 100 <L s Time, score value
Figure 950550DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
5Is 0; 100 is less than or equal toL s <150, score value
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
Is 0.5;L s is 100 hoursScore value
Figure 621703DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
Is 1;
when in use
Figure 795196DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
≥60%，
Figure 868194DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
6Is 0, 40 percent or less
Figure 836150DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
＜60%，
Figure 932282DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
6Is 0.3 percent and less than or equal to 20 percent
Figure 942088DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
＜40%，
Figure 72855DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
6The content of the organic acid is 0.5,F w ＜20%，
Figure 211713DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
6is 1;
when in use
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
<At 30%, score
Figure 857458DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
7Is 0; 30 percent of<S oi <50% score value
Figure 107173DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
Is 0.5;S oi >at 50%, score
Figure 92447DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
Is 1.
7. The sidetracking well selection method according to claim 1, characterized in that: coefficient of remaining recoverable reserve in step 6)DResidual perforation thickness coefficient of oil layerBResidual oil saturationS 0 Degree of crack developmentFDistance from waterlineL s Comprehensive water content of adjacent wellF w And original oil saturationS oi The weight coefficients of (a) are 0.13, 0.12, 0.15, 0.14, 0.15, 0.16, 0.15, respectively.
8. The sidetracking well selection optimization method according to claim 1, wherein the decision coefficientJCalculated as follows:
J=S1×P 1 + S2×P 2 + S3×P 3 + S4×P 4 + S5×P 5 + S6×P 6 + S7×P 7
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
Figure 464522DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
1coefficient of remaining recoverable reserveDThe score of (a) is calculated,P 1 coefficient of remaining recoverable reserveDThe weight coefficient of (a);
Figure 535247DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
2is residual perforation thickness coefficient of oil layerBThe score of (a) is calculated,P 2 is residual perforation thickness coefficient of oil layerBThe weight coefficient of (a);
Figure 588653DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
3is degree of remaining oil saturationS 0 The score of (a) is calculated,P 3 is degree of remaining oil saturationS 0 The weight coefficient of (a);
Figure 428433DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
4degree of development of cracksFThe score of (a) is calculated,P 4 degree of development of cracksFThe weight coefficient of (a);
Figure 971410DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
5is distance from waterlineL s The score of (a) is calculated,P 5 is distance from waterlineL s The weight coefficient of (a);
Figure 263851DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
6for synthesizing water for adjacent wellF w The score of (a) is calculated,P 6 for synthesizing water for adjacent wellF w The weight coefficient of (a);
Figure 120949DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
7is original oil saturationS oi The score of (a) is calculated,P 7 is original oil saturationS oi The weight coefficient of (2).
CN202011103266.0A 2020-10-15 2020-10-15 Sidetracking well selection optimization method Active CN112431588B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202011103266.0A CN112431588B (en) 2020-10-15 2020-10-15 Sidetracking well selection optimization method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202011103266.0A CN112431588B (en) 2020-10-15 2020-10-15 Sidetracking well selection optimization method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN112431588A true CN112431588A (en) 2021-03-02
CN112431588B CN112431588B (en) 2023-07-25

Family

ID=74694656

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202011103266.0A Active CN112431588B (en) 2020-10-15 2020-10-15 Sidetracking well selection optimization method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN112431588B (en)

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102322249A (en) * 2011-08-25 2012-01-18 孙洪军 Method for improving oil reservoir recovery efficiency of interlayer developed deep-layer heavy oil
US20120109603A1 (en) * 2009-06-22 2012-05-03 Ning Li Quantitative calculation method for oil (gas) saturation of fractured reservoir
CN106837297A (en) * 2016-12-22 2017-06-13 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 A kind of method for recognizing inter well connectivity and profit dynamic prediction
US20170314377A1 (en) * 2016-04-29 2017-11-02 Petrochina Company Limited Method for Enhancing Oil Recovery in Huff-Puff Oil Production of Tight Oil from a Fractured Horizontal Well
CN108691537A (en) * 2018-04-18 2018-10-23 中国石油大港油田勘探开发研究院 A kind of reservoir geology reserve forecasting method
CN110005388A (en) * 2019-02-11 2019-07-12 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 A kind of 3 cun of half Slim Hole fracturing yield increasing method of extra-low permeability oil reservoirs
US10689954B1 (en) * 2019-04-24 2020-06-23 Dagang Oil Field Company Of Cnpc Research method of trajectory design and on-site tracking and adjustment of shale oil horizontal well

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120109603A1 (en) * 2009-06-22 2012-05-03 Ning Li Quantitative calculation method for oil (gas) saturation of fractured reservoir
CN102322249A (en) * 2011-08-25 2012-01-18 孙洪军 Method for improving oil reservoir recovery efficiency of interlayer developed deep-layer heavy oil
US20170314377A1 (en) * 2016-04-29 2017-11-02 Petrochina Company Limited Method for Enhancing Oil Recovery in Huff-Puff Oil Production of Tight Oil from a Fractured Horizontal Well
CN106837297A (en) * 2016-12-22 2017-06-13 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 A kind of method for recognizing inter well connectivity and profit dynamic prediction
CN108691537A (en) * 2018-04-18 2018-10-23 中国石油大港油田勘探开发研究院 A kind of reservoir geology reserve forecasting method
CN110005388A (en) * 2019-02-11 2019-07-12 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 A kind of 3 cun of half Slim Hole fracturing yield increasing method of extra-low permeability oil reservoirs
US10689954B1 (en) * 2019-04-24 2020-06-23 Dagang Oil Field Company Of Cnpc Research method of trajectory design and on-site tracking and adjustment of shale oil horizontal well

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN112431588B (en) 2023-07-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN110222477B (en) Perforation parameter optimization method for maintaining balanced expansion of staged fracturing fracture of horizontal well
CN103003522B (en) Improve the method for the output in ripe gas field or oil field
Yakupov et al. Optimization of reserve production from water oil zones of D3ps horizon of Shkapovsky oil field by means of horizontal wells
CN101617101B (en) Automated field development planning of well and drainage locations
CN107944599B (en) Method for predicting yield of oil-gas horizontal well
Hefner III The United States of gas: Why the shale revolution could have happened only in America
CN105545265B (en) Large-area compact gas reservoir exploitation method
CN110439519A (en) A kind of fracturing process and system based on the design of limit current limliting
CN111456709A (en) Horizontal well multistage fracturing and staged clustering method based on logging curve
CN114186440B (en) Geological-engineering double-track shale compressibility comprehensive evaluation method
CN110991933A (en) Mountain shale gas resource evaluation method and system
CN112211626B (en) Optimization method for productivity well testing test type of heterogeneous gas reservoir gas well
CN112431588A (en) Side drilling well selection optimization method
CN110714755A (en) Method for rapidly predicting secondary enrichment speed of residual oil in water-drive reservoir
CN106845685B (en) Parameter optimization method for reducing horizontal well oil testing fracturing operation cost
CN114462690A (en) Deep shale gas fracturing effect prediction method based on mutation theory
Elyasi Developing an evaluation model for economic feasibility analysis of using mechanical boring machines (TBM vs Roadheader) in one of the largest coal reserves in Iran
Trentham et al. A “Cookbook” Approach to Exploring for, and Evaluating, Residual Oil Zones in the San Andres Formation of the Permian Basin
CN113052374A (en) Data-driven intelligent prediction method for casing loss depth of oil well
Smith et al. Mine production scheduling for optimization of plant recovery in surface phosphate operations
CN111101930A (en) Method for evaluating single-well exploitation yield-increasing potential in gas reservoir development mode
Erlong Selection of target wells and layers for fracturing with fuzzy mathematics method
Willigers et al. Maximizing the value of unconventional reservoirs by choosing the optimal appraisal strategy
CN117823126A (en) Characterization and diving method for residual oil of massive bottom water reservoir
RU2527957C1 (en) Development method for four production facilities of multilayer oil deposit

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant